19960192 Ver 1_Complete File_19960221

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 AJ •
'?r
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ED F= H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 12, 1996
MEMO
To: John Parker, DCM
From: Tohn Dotney,"D'E'[
Re: Water Quality comments
Bridge replacement on SR 1326 o er Broad Creek project
Beaufort County
DEM # 960192
DEM has no objections to this project which plans to replace Bridge # 105 over Broad
Creek on SR 1326 with another bridge. The bridge should be constructed such that weep
holes do not discharge directly into Broad Creek.
Please call me at 733-1786 if you have any questions.
cc: Washington DEM Regional Office
Central Files
960192.dcm
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: On SR 1326 at Bridge #105 across Broad Creek, Beaufort
County
Photo Index - 1989: No photo 1984: No photo
State Plane. Coordinates - X: 200,200 Y: 650,100 Bunyon LL
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 11 January 1996
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 24 January 1996
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public highway
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Highground ±300 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±300 sq. ft. or 0.006 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C-SWP-NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing bridge with a new 135'
long by 28' wide bridge.
r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge #105 over Broad Creek
Beaufort County
Environmental setting
The project that is being proposed at this time is the replacement of NC DOT Bridge
#105 on SR 1326 across Broad Creek in Beaufort County. The section of SR 1326 on which
the bridge is located is a rural unpaved road. Broad Creek at this location has been channelized.
The existing bridge has a length of 138' and a width of 20'. Navigation clearance beneath the
existing bridge is 6 foot 6 inches above the NWL. Other than an existing spoil berm which
extends along the eastern side of the creek, areas which border the creek are vegetated with
wetland vegetation consisting predominately by red maples, myrtles and some pines.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge along the existing alignment.
The new bridge will be 135' long and will have a width of 28'. Navigation clearance beneath
the bridge will not change and will remain at 6 foot 6 inches. Very little shoulder modifications
will be required, only a slight amount of upland excavation will be required.
Environmental impact
The project as proposed should have a minimal environmental impact. No wetland
vegetation, nor public trust areas, will be excavated and/or filled.
David L. Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 6 February 1996
« .
y}y ?. STA Te
?6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TI?ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS . GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
January 22, 1995
Mr. David Gossett
Division of Coastal Management
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 1507
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Mr. Gossett:
Subject: Beaufort County, Replacement of Bridge Nos. 38 on SR 1924 over South Creek
and 105 on SR 1326 over Broad Creek, State Project No. 5.1551.
Enclosed is a copy of the CAMA permit application, drawings and a copy of the fee check
for the above referenced projects. The proposed action will include the demolition and
replacement of bridge Nos. 38 over South Creek and 105 over Broad Creek. The bridges will be
replaced along existing alignment and will not require temporary detours.
The work at bridge number 38 across South Creek will require the relocation of the
roadside ditch. The fill in surface waters will be 0.008 acres and the excavation in wetlands will be
0.008 acres. No impacts to surface waters or wetlands are anticipated for the bridge (#105)
across Broad Creek.
The NCDOT is requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) permit. By copy of this letter we are requesting the review and
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Environmental Management
and a Section 404 permit form the US Army Corps of Engineers. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please do not hesitate to call Scott P. Gottfried at 919-733-7844, Ext. 307.
Sincer y,
F anklin Vick, P.E., Manager
HFV/sg Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Jimmy Lee, PE, Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. Don Morton, PE, Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, PE, Structure Design
Mr. Rick Shirley, PE, Division 2 Engineer
9
' FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Washington
a. Landowner:
Street address or secondary road number
SR 1326
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Address P. O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name N. C. Dept. of Transportation
Address P. O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek sound, bay) Broad Creek
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replacement of existing bridge with new
bridge
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax [phone]
C. Project name (if any) Beaufort County,
Replace Bridge No. 105
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
Will the project be for public, private or
commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
Public Transportation.
Upgrading of SR 1326. Existing bridge in
poor condition Replace bridge along
existing alignment Construction will
utilize typical roadway construction
equipment and methods.
a. County Beaufort
Revised 03/95
' FORM DCM-MP-1
M. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A N
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW effluent, "wash down", and.residential
or NWL Natural ground elev. 98.5 (assumed) datum discharges.) Surface runoff along project
Natural ground elev. +5.0 (U. S. G. S. Quad)
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sandy loam/ Organic muck
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e. Vegetation on tract Various upland N/A
vegetation
f . Man-made features now on tract
Wooden bridge
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (consult the local land use In addition to the completed application form, the
plan) following items must be submitted:
Conservation X Transitional/Urban
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not zoned
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? Yes No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable.)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
* A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? _ Yes X No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, ifavoilable)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
'FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See Sheet 3 of 3
Address
Phone
Name _
Address
Phone
Name _
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of, 19 9l .
Print Name H. Franklin Vick P.E.
Signature
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
1
b. Number of culverts proposed
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated .
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL X Yes No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated Total +/-10'
(2) Width of area to be excavated Total +/-30'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/-45 c.v. for bridge abutments
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the Upland area to be provided by contractor.
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
N/A
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes No N/A
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
Public X Private
1. BRIDGES
h.
a.
b
c.
Type of bridge (construction material)
Reinforced concrete

(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
g. Length of proposed bridge 135'
Water body to be crossed by bridge if yes, explain
Broad Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 4.0(+/-)
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 138'
(2) Width of existing bridge 20'
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 6.6'
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All of existing bridge
will be removed allowing for new bridge_
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
6.6'
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain
Width of proposed bridge 28'
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
N/A
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
in. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No N/A
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No N/A
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No N/A
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: No
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Z
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? By stringent erosion
control - NCDOT Standards
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Typical bridge construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT - Replace Bridge No. 105 in Beaufort County
Applicant or Project Nam
ignature
Date
Revised 03/95

? '• try , ? 1!)S\' ?':'-' -
•. 1 v 171 ? P3 N
V`Oe ! j 0 1
Id ferC
\..
rn7 r7L1 17.t2
\' 1
Us7
17 lut `• p I
s w A
.10
/J ? 3.l2
.g IA
C v 111
r lw * 2 .? t) 13? W.
?? x 171q
l is
r a? ?1 Wwr.w' '`.. ?• 'r° ra IJ)! r3a) '' IM:
i e C7' r u \y
`, uat` R.1d T: `• .) -2 to 1 u L 1722 y 1s j . 1]9) 1
49)
e 1 i .3 1.191
ANT, ..? ? ? ??; \ 1
,,r. z is X71 1243 1w_ a r.9,2 1M?
4 ;.,?? v ?J !)ii ? Y
I ift
9 2
WASHI T '.-' q° i 77
POP. Al- t't
7.'. s2 ,• ?a• s. .. 7.e
.. .-? 171E •`~`• 1604 Uet .
11 17 J .. -•?r...
1.? \ 1 j j ' ? .tea Ga. a?.y v
2.a
11l2 .1m y. au
.1 y^ti? r
rr7n} WASHIN 0 - a 1 n .T .?
PARK \\ ' . Zio^
?? ? ro?.srd? Lila O? l...enr
IIN r17. ? . \\ ?. B ? 1]!7 y
2.6 MA
17) .
•'y
.1.? 1 °cQ? yr ` _ ` 1 \\\ ? n ?u j 1D1
1113
J. 2., Tr wh
QUA 1;4L
Y in r_ti . n \` \ ` SCALE
33 1122 0 1 2 3
'O .• ? 'J24 • •K 1 \ `? ? rat:
?Jlll \ \ / .` ld
vt
5 64
IO Woodard A I ,leasant Crove 6 Columbra+
Ha sell 9 es fairer Scupperrrorl` 3 \ 1)
cerrtte • ll 1 iS I,??,",?V _Q''? W ley r
12 1 ( old Pornr • I'? Q %`?j 32 . oper Ges.+e.,
-1 11 ^ 't I ; Ererelt? 4 •••. illiamStol Darden Plymoutk Cherr , 94
IQ
t3+ 6.h0 amesrrll , 5 * Fr n Robersonville ?-?,. 5 WASHINGTON 0 ?°""'•' "?• '" ` °
umele / ..q.nq,.? . Landt t
Bemel 1 •? M- A R T sr ,r
99 11 '}
d - ' BEar Crass Phelps Loke •
1
13 30 g 16 Nrnson 32 I$ T Y R E L
7I . g na 1 I•
1 Stokes ` 11
I l \ y :1 _ - _ _ _ \ _ l'u polr:ke _ um Neck r
15 Pike Ras - '
1
\
13 ?J Wst 1 p? ' . ' Lake
/a Z; 1 9 Pa<tolua Old Ford DAG 'n
`? I$ _ xu. .a9
A Art 5 w r 161 6 lelt rnet c w gd \ p s ,B Scale of Mites -
Gre nriil + tt n 20 - l! * I 2y Acre Terra
a rm son 00, Ir2$b10 0 32 Cera ) (J? 7Leechr 3B
1 sland 166 0 20 20 30 40 48
P I T 3 Yealeswlle O
r 6 unr a 9 i"" Scale of Kilometers
n / wmlerwlle H Choeowrmly 1 '0 l _..?..?.-
tree 81ack lack /.e, R Mn
M V W.. ?I.N 92
t All = 6 P sr Pf ,• Balk 2 wrna'
Ayden it Shelmerd`nt N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS.
,TI V 1 1 1. 9.yrle..? '1{,ns rl DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Ca'KO • Wrlmar pa^e rntr? , ' BEAUFORT COUNTY BR.# 105
Crlrran Pamlico Br
9 !310 111•\x$Cross ? Bonne( T ON SR-1326 OVER BROAD
CREEK. PROP. 3 @ 45 SPAN
xs • SS 3 Soul .
Vaneeb«a 1 \ Ed.ard Gees . 1
is For ``n"e" . 1. SHEET OF - 3 FEB.95

1
i
4- 50

'?t• ?7?'GRRvaI
o-
v? FNP
r'•
flp t 89po,
End 4+ ? (,
-c- L i
- - - - S ?, - - - - - S R-132C ro s?-X328
I Qj
r )o-
4
2 JFJ ac ? O
O 6r:d Je

i
` I" '---5o Z., IO 11 5 1 2
Ayc• QA1LY FLOW =;t5c',F5. STA• /o t7/f 90°S1,eC-V1
/VO FILL IN WAT•EZS 3 d 95. o' PXF ST9, Cok ED 5LA/3
/Vo F/LL IN 1NFTkRNA$ cp(:)W/1/ C- 9R1>F E2, 1d3.1
4 _ //O
!? &-Row or Ert:st,"
PR o p An P?epv5tl &e.* f'
GRgoi ZX1,CrlMG
a•D?
-?- CL.LT Qv I t oo Q
N.G.7 SIP J a° t °Oa CR.1Z
' N.G.
,
i 6,6 1 1. R R p
I
' " I NvJL . EL. 5f.g
ai i 1 o
1 •I To
rlsNG 1 I ?PRO?. J?aT?'= G R t? O- ? R rise-0
p=RS p)EtS IAgI,;,,Fx!si A16-
t4AlpF /EF? Z,'wcC,
/ imv V{ la«d EXCa?aT:en I
/?eNoT?S Pfa poSeJ ar,d f_
,OENoTF-S:X)si/NG B?tOG? - - - -- -
S CALF', J''-50' A/0Rz/O?vERi .
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY BR.# 105
ON SR-1326 OVER BROAD
CREEK. PROP. 3 @ 45'SPAN
SHEET a OF-- FEB.95

O COY ELLSWORTH WOOLARD
RT.#5 BOX 384
WASHINGTON,N.C. 27889
BO COY ELLSWORTH WOOLARD
RT.#5 BOX 384
WASHINGTON,N.C. 2 7 8 8 9
CO LESLIE E. WOOLARD JR.
& CORY WOOLARD
P.O. BOX 36220
RALEIGH, N.C. 27685
OD MITCHEL L. CANADY
& MERTON CANANDY
RT.# 5 BOX 307 M
WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889