20191637 Ver 2_401 Application_20200707

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20191637 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
What amout is owed?*
r Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office *
Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Tullamore Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Josh Swindell
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
7/7/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Beaver Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-V; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.764043
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.868958
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
U
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F- Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
J Dallas Herndon Heirs
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 08-E; Page: 3122
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
1010 N Salem Street
Address tine 2
city
Apex
Postal / Zip 0ode
27502
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Charles and Annette Herndon
State / Rwince / Ifgion
NC
(buntry
United States
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 6437; Page: 156
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
531 Country Club Road
Address tine 2
Cty
State/ Province/ legion
Mount Olive
NC
Fbstal / Zip Code
Country
28365
United States
2e. Telephone Number:
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Charleston Village Homeowners Association
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 8767; Page: 2027
2c. Responsible party
2d.Address
Street Address
315 S. Salem Street
Address tine 2
City
State / Province / legion
Apex
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27502
United States
2e. Telephone Number:
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
Josh@EnvisionHon)es.com
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Josh Swindell
3b. Business Name:
Envision Homes
3c.Address
Street Address
4441 Six Forks Road, Suite 106-117
Address tine 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27609
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Scott Mitchell
4b. Business Name:
Mitchell Environmental, PA
4c.Address
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
United States
3e. Fax Number

Street Address
1501 Lakestone Village Lane, Suite 205
Address tine 2
City
Fuquay-Varina
Postal / Zip Code
27526
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Holt Road agent authorization signed.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropriate)
Tullamore
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Apex
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0733839147;0733835369;0733828561
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1745 Holt Road
Address Line 2
City
Apex
Postal / Zip Code
27502
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Beaver Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300020609
4. Project Description and History
State / Rovince / Rtion
NC
Country
United States
4e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
13.11
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
United States
62.98KB
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The existing conditions on the site consists of open field and wooded areas. The general land use in the vicinity is mostly residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Holt Road Assemblage USGS.pdf 336.11KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey Map.pdf 1.17MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.9731
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
201

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to develop the property into a residential subdivision.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Equipment to be used is that typical of subdivision and roadway installation including excavators, bull dozers, dump trucks, etc.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
2020-05-15 Tullamore CD's 2nd Submittal.pdf 43.05MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
Corps AID number unknown
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Mitchell Environmental, PA
Other:
r Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Corps: October 1, 2018
DWR: December 2, 2019 (DWR Project # 20191637)
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
1745HoltRoad_Apex_WakeCo_Stream Appeal 120919.pdf 2.97MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
W Buffers
U
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
1 Road and Lot Fill P Headwater Forest A Yes Both 0.036
(acres)
F-]
Road Fill
P
__]
Headwater Forest
A
No
Both
0.086
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.122
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.122

❑ 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Rip Rap Dissipator Permanent Rip Rap Fill A Perennial Both ]4Av;Jneerfeet)]
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
10
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
10
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Checkall that apply.
C Neuse
r Tar -Pamlico
C Catawba
r Randleman
r- Goose Creek
r Jordan Lake
V Other Cape Fear
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Grading/Stornmater
P
A
No
1,135
2,777
Sewer Crossing
P
A
No
3,395
1,607
Pine Tree Removal
T
A
No
0
435
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 435.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 4,530.00 4,384.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 4,530.00 4,819.00
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
C-04 DEMOLITION PLAN.PDF 2.86MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation u
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The road length was shortened from original design to minimize fill and grading. Lot lines were adjusted to minimize impacts as well, including the
reduction of total proposed lots.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt and tree protection fencing will be installed to ensure construction and impacts remain inside approved areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?

17 Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Attach Receipt and/or letter
3c. Comments
SOA will be provided as soon as received from mitigation bank.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
9 Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
17 Phase II W NSW r USMP V Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Apex
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?"
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?"
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This development is not likely to spur cumulative impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS iPaC
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Tullamore.pdf 4.93MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
HPOWEB 2.0
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HPOWEB 2.0 - Tullamore.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Wake County iMaps
Miscellaneous
Comments
780.7KB
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.

Signature
® By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Scott Mitchell
Signature
SCOTT,MI I—Oi%LL
Date
7/7/2020

Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Applicant
(When Applicant has property/properties under contract
to purchase from duly authorized owner of record)
NCDENR — Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the applicant, hereby designate and authorize representatives of Mitchell Environmental, P.A., to act on my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in
support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the day of w't 20-ft--.
(number) (M nth) (Year)
I, the undersigned applicant, with written authorization from a duly authorized owner of record of the
property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: --TZA10.goc-P— Location: \-ALAS t>° �1 . + '� r'v�)17S) `
Property Applicant's Name (Print): 7p.", cc . *4. r Akk-
Property Applicant's Signature: JJJ_
Property Applicant's Mailing Address: '-I y q I s"K For FS to(," it 1 _
Property Applicant's Telephone: �-, �� S Fax No.
Property Applicant's Email Address: oS:—QyQxtV�S�o�-��0/1lq!L-,AC_ C-avv,
1501 Lakestone Village Lane, Suite 205
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
919-669-0329

2 ti

LL

OV9 91 T a1e�S
;aawl 000 5 0 0001 000 Z 000 E 0001, 000 5
u7 Z �--
e
a l i W I (J
O7 U
(95' ways suiof) �
LO
Ln
Uj
rALd
m �
m
w q N U Lu
cvLJ •ill, a :` m _ - � �1 � - 1 _- Z�_ �_ _ � _1: / _
c� f
w
LO
�c
s w m a
Ile
uj
Lli
"L, •ems-'=— \cl'`�
L)
LU
_-
`. ULU
La
.00
12
£
J
ni
N U u
U - t
Lu -
. U.
X.
c x1 l
fj
V
Z.
LE
Y
N
d'
Q U°
J m I
in
U — _
(pq ways 'sasul suioo W N
U v mN m
U � 2

W xW xW x W x W x Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx Wx W
18" PINE24" PINE20" PINE20" PINE18" PINE18" PINE18" GUM20" PINE24" PINE18" GUM28" PINE30" GUM18" OAK18" PINE22" MAPLE18" GUM18" MAPLE20" GUM18" PINE18" PINE22" PINE20" PINE26" PINE30" POPLAR22" PINE22" POPLAR24" PINE18" MAPLE30" POPLAR20" MAPLE22" POPLAR18" MAPLE20" POPLAR28" POPLAR22" POPLAR18" MAPLE20" PINE18" POPLAR22" POPLAR18" POPLAR22" POPLAR24" MAPLE22" PINE18" POPLAR18" MAPLE22" POPLAR18" PINE36" OAK18" POPLAR22" PINE20" POPLAR18" GUM18" OAK26" PINE22" PINE18" PINE22" PINE24" PINE18" PINE20" GUM18" GUM30" OAK18" POPLAR28" MAPLE22" PINE20" PINE18" PINE26" POPLAR22" PINE24" PINE22" PINE18" PINE20" POPLAR22" GUM24" POPLAR20" MAPLE20" POPLAR18" PINE18" POPLAR-X324" PINE18" PINE20" GUM24" PINE18" GUMBA
T
T
E
R
Y

W
A
G
N
E
R

D
R
I
V
E
BATTLEWOOD ROADTEMPLETON GAP DRIVEHOLT ROADCOUNTRY HEARTS LANEWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLD WTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLDWTLD374
375
37
5
37
6
3
7
7
3
7
8
380
380
3
8
3
38
5
385385
3863
8
8
38
9
3
9
0
39
0
390390391391392392
393393393394395 39
5
395395395 3953953963
9
6
3
9
7 3973983983993993994
0
0
400400 400400400400401401
401402402 40340
3
40340440
4
404405405405 405405405405405405406406407408409410410410410411412 413 414415
415415416417418419420
420420 421422 423425425425430430430430430431431431432432433433433434435435
WTLDWTLDWTLDWTLD
W
T
L
D
WTLD
W
T
L
D
WTLDHENRY SCHWETZKEROBERT E. RODGERSD.B. 5036, PG. 001PIN 733.04-82-7342JENNIFER MURRYD.B. 6814, PG. 487PIN 733.04-82-5379BRIAN FOXD.B. 6136, PG. 821PIN 733.04-82-5496WILLIAM FERRELLD.B. 1835, PG. 495PIN 733.04-82-5593SUSAN P. CARRD.B. 0615, PG. 323PIN 733.04-82-5691RODGER D.STROTHERD.B. 8417, PG. 783PIN 733.04-82-6608ERIC A. DEANSD.B. 4593, PG. 593PIN 733.04-82-6705MARK LESAINTD.B. 7329, PG. 632PIN 733.04-82-6821TOVE REALESTATE, LLCD.B. 0741, PG. 221PIN 733.04-82-6940ZACHARY J. HESSD.B. 7490, PG. 426PIN 733.04-82-6977WALTER BROWND.B. 5222, PG. 036PIN 733.04-83-6065BROOKS M. DEPROD.B. 7714, PG. 938PIN 733.04-83-6122CAREY E. HORRELLD.B. 6874, PG. 372PIN 733.04-83-5167PATRICK D. WARREND.B. 8302, PG. 899PIN 733.04-83-5214WILLIAM J. ANGRILLAD.B. 7629, PG. 333PIN 733.04-83-4341SAEED TAROKHD.B. 6125, PG. 599PIN 733.04-93-1553JEFFREY P. TAFTD.B. 0210, PG. 946PIN 733.04-93-1426SHAUN LIVERNOISD.B. 6407, PG. 144PIN 733.04-93-1338JOHN PAYNED.B. 6429, PG. 562PIN 733.04-93-1247FRANK D. TARANTINOD.B. 6305, PG. 856PIN 733.04-93-1230BROOKE J. TRUED.B. 7431, PG. 110PIN 733.04-93-1143PHILLIP S. HARRISD.B. 7056, PG. 291PIN 733.04-93-1046PETER J. BIERFELDTD.B. 2882, PG. 547PIN 733.04-93-1050ROY R. NILESD.B. 7100, PG. 789PIN 733.04-92-1943DAVID A. FRONINGD.B. 1279, PG. 478PIN 733.04-92-1834SHAILESH SHAHD.B. 9468, PG. 184PIN 733.04-92-1738THOMAS HULLD.B. 8797, PG. 051PIN 733.04-92-1740PATRICK T. FIELDINGD.B. 3306, PG. 381PIN 733.04-92-1674PATRICK M. WADED.B. 4682, PG. 690PIN 733.04-82-8342CHARLESTON VILLAGE HOAD.B. 8169, PG. 416PIN 733.04-92-1475EX. CBRIM: 426.79INV IN (N): 423.24INV IN (W): 419.49INV OUT: 419.24EX. CBRIM: 426.84INV OUT: 424.2515" RCP15" RCP15" RCPEX. CBRIM: 427.11INV OUT: 424.58EX. CBRIM: 427.16INV IN: 423.34INV OUT: 420.43INV: 431.74INV: 431.0912" CMPINV: 428.69INV: 428.2315" RCPOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEINV: 426.43INV: 425.1315" RCPTP TP TPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTP
TPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTP TPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTP TPTPTPTPTP TPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTP TP TP TP TP TP TP
TP
T
P
TP
TPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TPTPTPTPTPT
PTPTPTPTPTPPERMANENT WETLANDIMPACT AREA = 0.036 AC(1,575 SF)EXISTING CONCRETETO BE REMOVEDEXISTING STRUCTURETO BE REMOVEDEXISTING STRUCTURETO BE REMOVEDJURISDICTIONALWETLANDSREMOVE TREE,TYP.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCETOTAL CRZ AREA = 2,463 SFIMPACTED CRZ AREA = 280 SFPERCENT IMPACTED = 11%NO TREE PROTECTION FENCEDUE TO EXISTING BREACHEDPOND DAMPERMANENT WETLANDIMPACT AREA = 0.086 AC(3,750 SF)TOTAL CRZ AREA = 1,810 SFIMPACTED CRZ AREA = 860 SFPERCENT IMPACTED = 48%REMOVE EXISTING CURB &GUTTERBUFFER ZONE 3IMPACTSAREA = 11,807 SFBUFFER ZONE 2IMPACTSAREA = 2,777 SFBUFFER ZONE 2IMPACTSAREA =1,056 SFBUFFER ZONE 2IMPACTSAREA = 561 SFBUFFER ZONE 1IMPACTSAREA = 4,530 SFBUFFER ZONE 1IMPACTSAREA = 3,395 SFTEMP. BUFFERZONE 1 IMPACTSAREA =435 SFSTREAMIMPACTS = 10 LFTPUTILITY DEMOLITIONTREE REMOVALTREE PROTECTION FENCEBUILDING REMOVALCONCRETE REMOVALWETLAND IMPACTSZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACTSZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTSZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTSC-04ENGINEERINGCurry205 S. Fuquay AvenueFuquay-Varina, NC 27526(919) 552-0849(919) 552-2043CURRY ENGINEERSNORTH CAROL
I
NA EST.10NC LIC. NO. P-0799TFZ:\PROJECTS FOLDER-ZEBULON\2019\2019-027 TULLAMORE SUBDIVISION - APEX\PLANS\CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS\SHEET FILES\C-04 DEMOLITION PLAN.DWGPLOTTED: 5/28/2020 2:42 PM PROFESSIONAL'S SEALDATE:FILE NO.HORZ. SCALE:ORIG. SHEET SIZE:REVISIONS 24 x 36STATUSCONSULTANTCLIENTCONSTRUCTION DRAWINGSTULLAMORE SUBDIVISIONMARCH 6, 20202019-027FOR REVIEW ONLYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONYTTE SEAL36823NANNGIDREWEEEPS.R SARTHPRONOFESCROLINAIONAL
JS Development, LLC4441 Six Forks Road, Suite 106-117Raleigh, NC 27609919.389.7595 (m)Contact: Josh [e-mail] signatures affixed below certify that this sheet has been reviewed and approved solely per thecertifications signed on the cover sheet of these construction plans.__________________________________PW - TransportationDate__________________________________Building InspectionsDate__________________________________WR - Utility EngineeringDate__________________________________ElectricDate__________________________________WR - S&EDate__________________________________WR - StormwaterDate__________________________________PlanningDate__________________________________Planning - TransportationDate__________________________________FireDate__________________________________Parks, Recreation & Cultural Res.DatePRELIMINARYDO NOT USE FORCONSTRUCTIONAMAY 15, 2020TOA COMMENTSDEMOLITION PLAN1" = 50'N50'100'SCALE IN FEET25'50'SCALE: 1 IN = 50 FTSCALE IN FEETHORIZONTAL0LEGEND:GENERAL NOTES:1.A COPY OF THE DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH HAZARDCONTROL UNTIL AN ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT FROM A NORTH CAROLINAACCREDITED ASBESTOS INSPECTOR MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION FOR THEDEMOLITION PERMIT WHICH MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION.2.NO EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ON THE SITE OR DISTURBANCE IS PERMITTED UNTIL ALL THETREE PROTECTION AND SILT FENCING HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND APPROVED.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER IN THE EVENT THAT UNANTICIPATEDHAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALLREQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL OFHAZARDOUS MATERIALS. A COPY OF THE DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION FROM THE NORTHCAROLINA HEALTH HAZARD CONTROL UNIT AN ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT FROM ANORTH CAROLINA ACCREDITED ASBESTOS INSPECTOR MUST ACCOMPANY THEAPPLICATION FOR THE DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICH MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THESTART OF DEMOLITION.8.DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES AND/OR UTILITIES BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONSSURVEY. IF FIELD CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN THATREQUIRES ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNERAND/OR THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE AND/ORUTILITY. SUBSURFACE UTILITIES AND FEATURES DENOTED ON THIS PLAN SHOULD BECONSIDERED APPROXIMATE IN NATURE AND HAVE BEEN LOCATED TO THE EXTENTPOSSIBLE VIA LEVEL "C" SUE METHODS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORSUBSURFACE UTILITY EXPLORATION, INCLUDING UTILITY "POTHOLING" OR BY THEEXCAVATION OF TEST PITS AS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE UTILITY LOCATION,DEPTHS, AND MATERIALS.9.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BEGIN ANY DEMOLITION WORK PRIOR TO APPROVAL ANDISSUANCE OF LAND DISTURBANCE AND DEMOLITION PERMITS ISSUED BY THE TOWN OFAPEX.10.DO NOT INTERRUPT EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES FOR FACILITIES OCCUPIED BY THEOWNER OR OTHERS EXCEPT WHEN PERMITTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ANDTHEN ONLY AFTER ARRANGING TO PROVIDE ACCEPTABLE TEMPORARY UTILITY SERVICES.A.NOTIFY OWNER NOT LESS THAN 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROPOSED UTILITYSERVICE INTERRUPTIONS.B.DO NOT PROCEED WITH UTILITY INTERRUPTIONS WITHOUT RECEIVING WRITTENPERMISSION FROM THE OWNER.11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO EXISTING TOWN OF APEX ORNCDOT INFRASTRUCTURE, PRIVATE UTILITY, COMPANY INFRASTRUCTURE, OR ADJACENTPROPERTY OWNERS PROPERTY.12.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A TRAFFICCONTROL PLAN PER NCDOT AND MUTCD STANDARDS.13.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SECURITY OF HIS/HER EQUIPMENT ANDMATERIALS STORED ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.14.ANY PAVEMENT CUT SHALL BE DONE AS A FULL DEPTH SAW CUT WITH LINES STRAIGHTAND NEAT.15.REMOVE ALL EXISTING ON-SITE TRASH AND DEBRIS. TRASH SHALL BE REMOVED ANDDISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY HAZARDOUSMATERIALS (ASBESTOS, LEAD PAINT, ETC.) ARE ENCOUNTERED.16.REMOVE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, AND OTHER CONCRETE SECTIONS BY SAWCUTTING THE NEAREST CONTROL JOINT AWAY FROM THE AREA DESIGNATED TO BEREMOVED ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN.17.NOTIFY AND COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED RELOCATION AND/OR REMOVAL OF EXISTINGUNDERGROUND UTILITIES, POLES, METERS, OR OTHER ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCESWITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY PROVIDER (I.E. POWER, TELEPHONE, CABLE, ANDNATURAL GAS/PROPANE) PRIOR TO THE START OF SELECTIVE DEMOLITION WORK.18.ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN A LAWFUL MANNER.19.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CLEAN WORK SITE, FREE OF DEBRIS, TRASH, OR OTHERCONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. AREAS SUBJECT TO SITE CONSTRUCTION ADJACENT TO THEPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE LEFT "BROOM CLEAN" ATTHE END OF EACH WORK DAY.20.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TEMPORARY UTILITIES NEEDED DURINGCONSTRUCTION.21.STRUCTURES BEING REMOVED IN, OR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO, THE RESOURCECONSERVATION AREA (RCA) AND/OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED BYHAND. NO HEAVY MACHINERY SHALL BE USED DURING DEMOLITION. INSTALL TREEPROTECTION FENCE IN INITIAL PHASE SUCH THAT EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/ORGRAVEL MAY BE REMOVED HOWEVER AFTER REMOVAL, TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALLBE INSTALLED IN LOCATION AS SHOWN.22.A COPY OF THE DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION FROM THE NC HEALTH HAZARD CONTROL UNITAND AN ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT FROM A NC ACCREDITED ASBESTOS INSPECTORMUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION FOR THE DEMOLITION PERMIT WHICH MUST BEOBTAINED PRIOR TO START OF THE DEMOLITION.23.NO MACHINERY OF ANY KIND IS ALLOWED BEHIND THE TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TPF).ANY ITEMS SHOWN BEHIND TPF THAT MUST BE REMOVED (EX. ELECTRIC POLES, ELECTRICLINES, SMALL BUILDINGS, TRASH, ETC.) SHALL BE REMOVED BY HAND OR USINGMACHINES STATIONED OUTSIDE THE TPF.24.REFER TO C-01 FOR APPLICABLE TOWN OF APEX NOTES.STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATIONS CONDUCTED BY MITCHELL ENVIRONMENTALIN AUGUST 2019. USACE & TOWN OF APEX CONCURRENCE OF ENVIRONMENTALFEATURES SEPTEMBER 27, 2019. TOWN OF APEX PROJECT ID NUMBER FORBUFFER CALL IS "APEX 18-008".ENVIRONMENTAL DELINEATION NOTES:ADHERE TO WAKE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WASTEWATER SYSTEM ABANDONMENT PROCEDURES TO ABANDON A WASTEWATERSYSTEM LOCATION. FOLLOW THESE STEPS:1.APPLY FOR AN ABANDONMENT PERMIT. A SITE VISIT WILL BE MADE AND PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED.2.HAVE AN APPROVED HAULER PUMP THE LIQUID, SLUDGE, AND SCUM FROM ALL THE TANKS IN THE SYSTEM.3.THE TANK(S) SHOULD BE ABANDONED BY A CERTIFIED SEPTIC INSTALLER, LICENSED PLUMBER, LICENSED PUBLIC UTILITIES CONTRACTOR,OR THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THE TANK(S) IS/ARE LOCATED. THREE WAYS TO ABANDON THE TANKS ARE LISTED BELOW:A.REMOVE THE TANKSB.FILL IN THE TANK IN ONE OF TWO WAYS:·FILL IN ENTIRE TANK WITH CONCRETE. MUST CAP OFF INLET AND OUTLET PIPE PENETRATIONS FIRST.·CAP OFF INLET AND OUTLET PIPE PENETRATIONS WITH CONCRETE, FILL IN ENTIRE TANK WITH SAND OR PEA GRAVEL, ANDTHEN CAP OFF BOTH INLET AND OUTLET ACCESS OPENINGS WITH CONCRETE.C.CRUSH TANK IN PLACE. BREAK UP BOTTOM OF TANK SO WATER DOES NOT POND ON TOP. FILL IN AREA WITH SAND OR PEA GRAVEL.PACK MATERIAL TO ENSURE SETTLING COMPLETE.4.BACKFILL THE EXCAVATION WITH CLEAN CLAY MATERIAL TO NATURAL GRADE AND ESTABLISH A VEGETATIVE COVER.5.DISCONNECT POWER AT THE SOURCE TO ALL ELECTRICAL CONTROLS AND REMOVE ALL CONTROLS AND PANELS.6.REMOVE ALL PARTS OF THE DRAINFIELD ON THE GROUND SURFACE (SUCH AS VALVES, VALVE BOXES AND RISERS), BACKFILL THE AREATO A NATURAL GRADE AND ESTABLISH A VEGETATIVE COVER.7.COAT ALL SURFACE AREAS EXPOSED TO EFFLUENT WITH HYDRATED LIME AND ESTABLISH A VEGETATIVE COVER.8.RECOMMEND TO WAIT AT LEAST 18 MONTHS BEFORE USING THE DISPOSAL AREA FOR GARDENING OR CONSTRUCTION.SEPTIC TANK ABANDONMENT NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITFROM WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (WCDES)PRIOR TO ABANDONING WELL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WCDES 24 HOURSNOTICE & OBTAIN PERMIT PRIOR TO ABANDONMENT.2.ALL WATER SUPPLY WELLS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY ABANDONED PER NORTHCAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISIONOF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. ABANDONMENT OF WELLS SHALL ADHERE TOTITLE 15A NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, CHAPTER 2C, SECTION.0113. TO OBTAIN A COMPLETE COPY OF THESE RULES:http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac.asp OR CONTACT THE DIVISION OF WATERRESOURCES AT DENR AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION 1636 MAIL SERVICECENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636 PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone].WELLS MUST BE ABANDONED BY A CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR.4.THE WELL CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A RECORD OF ABANDONMENT (NCDENRFORM GW-30) TO THE DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTERCOMPLETION OF WELL ABANDONMENT.WELL ABANDONMENT NOTES:AAA
r. ■ O
H P01► Find address/historic resource
A
■■•■■
•r
r
a
n
2.0 Coiksultants'
4 n
ssrkro d
FN
Cir
4
-' t3
—
P a
u D
Q�t`a�3
a
pfr 541
DrLeSti�
cre�+t is
�7r
r'f
Q
C as11 e Ha �
- I
r 15
4 [}
p
❑k Or
White
F■
C3
Cir
_leek Dr
to
Oak Park
Tutuphvr"
r C►eek Rd
U i 1
LeweY Dr a
z
0��lla9
e�
i 4 i ��
ti
Ln
Ook Ot
`ic
G
-
1
'-Duck
I
;Noads
v an eY
m
E
Ln a O
Wake
13ur�y`f
�a�'epr RoK
- - - I White��
�graltr't� n
J
f
h 4
C
7
—
U
2
w
way
Hasbrouck DY
Holt Rd
_ _ -
e �desf D,
Kati 0 r'
�Hoitridge
WAKE
a
fop
Hill H�
r�11-
a
Calletfe 5tx
_
C�
t3
ti
Kirkstan�
�rll
C �4pT
a
�� •
� s 0c3 L n
SOY- �
�' ay Cn
a
I
I
3
� � I �
I
'
Row�c
'p•
n�a�l ker St
� - -
afd Jenks
Rd'
❑
�Q
96,
Dr rr,FC ��-
r -+
78.866142 35.760446Degrees Cri
�:-
rtsi N -
Qecs�`°ncj�`�``�
0.2mi
<

IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
PaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
fi [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F

Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
�o�
FOB

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific an
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. _
3. Log in (if directed to do so}: ,k
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species' and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS

Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fvvs.gov/ecplspecies/5217
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed Threatened
STATUS
Endangers \0
V>�#6
Critical habitats �
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection ActZ.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/

con servation-measures. php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below. .•��
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..........................._.......-.............-....... .......-
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
... .........................--............................... ..........
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
------ ------------- -------- ----------------------
PROJECTAREA SOMETIME WITHIN
.-.-..---- --- ------ -- .. ....
THE TIMEFRAME SPEC.-.I.F-I.E..-.D.,
..........................--....... ...... -
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
........................ -.-... ..------
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
_.................................-............................................................-...
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
'00, -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THAT -THE BIRD DOES -NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PR0]ECTAREA,)
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.

Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hyiocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
Probability of Presence Summary
4tx
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.

Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. \ ,
probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
{This is not a Bird of
Conservation
Concern [BCC} in this
------------ ----
area, abut warrants
.............................................
attention because of
the E le Act or for
•atential
susceptibilities in
offshore areas from
certain types of
development or
activities.]
• ......
Blue -winged
Warbler
BCC BCR (This is a
Bird of Conservation
I......... ....
Concern [BCC} only in
particular Bird
Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the
........................
continental USA)
........................................
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
JAN _L, MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG� q-P OCT NOV DEC
IIII IIII Ilia 1111 IIII i�[T F i7 rI IIII IIII IIII lilt
♦ram
CPI
I I I A { f f+++ +$+I ff+-J— ++++ +.++ +++�

Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.....................................
I I I I 1 1 1 1 I l l, f i l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1* 1+1+
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ +111 1 I I I I I E I I I I 1 I' ++1$ 110+ ++++ ++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
.......................................
of Conservation
......................................
Concern (BCC]
throughout its range
in the continental 0
USA and Alaska.]
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen_ science_ datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 1 Okm grid celI(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKIN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,, banding, and citizen
science datasets .

Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or Iongline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapp_Jing of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look

carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE N❑ FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject t❑ regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER POND
Palustrine
RIVERINE

Riverine
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidaI zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions Ir �-
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction aver wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.