19951127 Ver 1_Complete File_19951020

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A LT X. ? FA
E:) F= F4
No-i-ember 17, 1995
Robson County
DENT Project # 951127
Stave Project # 8.1461701
TIP # U-2416
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Franklin Vick
Planning and Environmental Branch
NC DOT FIL
Post Office Box 25201 COP y
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.97 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
improving roadway conditions along NC 73-711 from the NC 72/NC 711 iatersection to West Fifth Street, as
you described in your application dated 6 October 1995. After reviewing Sour application, we have decided that
this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 2671 aid 2733. These certifications allow
you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 26 and 18 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you descrked in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. An in-water construction moratorium
from March 15 through June 15 is in effect due to the presence of anadronous fish. Design Standards in
Sensitive Watersheds in the Sedimentation Control Guidelines shall be imp"emented for this project. In addition,
you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding
unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincere ,
0 on Howard, Jr. R .E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Stephanie Briggs; NC DOT 951127.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyc'ed/ 10% post-consumer paper
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE
TEL:[phone] Nov 17'95 9:02 No.003 P.02
0 Nom Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27644-11W 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwoad, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba Mcgee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coo
Habitat Conservation Program - Gm(
DATi:: October 24, 1995 J
EUDJEC=Ti 1kI0rtt< Carolina Dopnst nont of Trnnoportatiot% (kTrnnT)17t" inII of Aln
Signifloant Impact (FONSI) for NC 72-711 Improvements, from west of SR 1539
to West Fifth Strcct (NC 72) in Lumberton, Robeson County, North Carolina.
Tt P No. U-2416, SCH Project No. 96-0241.
Staff biologists of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject FONSI and
are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess project
impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions
of the National Fmvironmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332 (2) (c)) and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
NC:D(Yl' proposes to improve NC'/2-'/ E 1 in 1,unik?erton to a five to six-lane facility from west of
McNeill Bridge Road (SR 1539) to West Fifth Street east of 1-95. The bridge carrying NC 72-711 over
the Lumber River will also he replaced as part of this project. Impacts to wetlands have been reduced
from 1 acre indicated in the Environmental Assessment to 0.98 acres. All wetland impacts will occur to
the swamp forests in the Lumber River iloodplain.
We feel that the environmental commitments included in the FONSI are adequate to protect the
fishory resources in the Lumber River. Howcvor, wo continue to support an in-water work moratoriums
from March 15 to June 15. We will concur with FONSI for this project but will request that the in-water
work moratorium be a cunclition of futy required permits.
'thank you for the opportunity to comment on this FONSI. If we, can be of any further assistance
please call me at [phone].
cc: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh

401 ISSUED

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
October 6, 1995
Regulatory Branch
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Dear Sir:
q5))2?
GARLAND B. GARRETr J R.
SECRETARY
Y
F cCT20I005
SUBJECT: Robeson County, NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive) from West of SR 1539
to West Fifth Street (NC 72), Lumberton, State Project No. 8.1461701,
T.I.P. No. U-2416.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to improve
NC 72-711 in Lumberton to a five- to six-lane facility to improve traffic flow and to
enhance safety in the vicinity of the NC 72-711/1-95 interchange. The project will include
replacing the bridge over the Lumber River, replacing the existing bridge over I-95,
widening the I-95 ramps, and realigning, or terminating, service roads in three of the four
quadrants of the NC 72--711/I-95 interchange. The project begins at the NC 72/NC 711
intersection west of I-95 and ends at NC 72 (West Fifth Street) east of I-95.
The potential environmental impacts of this project were evaluated in
Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
documents which were approved by the Federal Highway Administration on November 4,
1994 and August 31, 1995, respectively. The EA document discusses the two design
alternatives which were considered for this project. The proposed alternative was selected
because it would better serve the purpose and need of the project and avoid several design
problems.
The NCDOT has attempted to avoid and minimize wetland impacts during the
design of the project. Encroachment into jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters as a
result of project construction is unavoidable in order to achieve the purpose and need of
this project. Impacts on wetlands will be minimized through best management practices
0
during project construction. The Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan established by
the Division of Highways in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of
Environment Health, and Natural Resources will be followed during construction to
minimize turbidity levels. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds in the Sedimentation
Control Guidelines (Title 15A 4B. 0024) will be implemented due to the proximity of High
Quality Waters.
The bridge has also been designed such'that deck runoff will not drain directly into
the Lumber River. Vegetation will be established along the new and existing bridge
approaches to minimize impacts to the Lumber River and associated wetlands. No
clearing of off-road sites for construction storage and staging areas will be allowed.
The NCDOT has also committed to consider a moratorium on in-water
construction in the Lumber River from March 15 through June 15 due to the presence of
anadromous fish. In compliance with the FONSI for this project, the NCDOT is providing
a copy of this information to the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission for their review and
comment.
As outlined in the EA, the project has a minimal impact on wetlands. The EA
identified a total impact of 1.0 acres of wetlands that would be filled by the project. In
fact, a total of 0.97 acres will be filled. These impacts will occur at four sites, which are
illustrated in the attached drawings.
Sites 1 and 2 occur at the end abutments of the new bridge over the Lumber River
and involve impacts to a bottomland hardwood community adjacent to the river. This
community is characterized by a natural hydrologic regime of alternating annual wet and
dry periods. Trees are buttressed and some are fluted in response to anaerobic conditions
caused by periodic inundations. Root systems are shallow and frequently visible at the
surface.
Black gum (Nyssa s lv vatica var. biflora), laurel oak ( uercus laurifolia), willow
oak ( uercus hp ellos), and river birch (Betula nigra) are common canopy species. Bald
cypress (Taxodium distichum) is scattered infrequently throughout the community. Past
logging activities, as evidenced by stumps, indicates bald cypress was once a major canopy
component. Red maple (Acer rubrum), wax myrtle (M_yrica cerifera), blueberry
(Vaccinium corymbosom), Virginia tea (Itea vir_ginica), and green ash (Fraxinus
caroliniana), make up the understory. Typical herbaceous species are false nettle
(Boehmeria cylindrica), cane (Anandinaria gigantea), poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), and royal fern (Osmunda re alis).
The project will impact a total of 0.85 acres of this community, including both
Sites 1 and 2. This is consistent with the 0.9 acres predicted by the EA and FONSI
documents. As discussed in those documents, it is anticipated that the new bridge can be
authorized by a Bridge General Permit No. 31.
Site 3 consists of impacts to a disturbed wetland at the base of an existing roadway
fill slope. The impacted area consists of a dense thicket of briars such as blackberry
(Rubus spp.) and greenbriar (Smilax spp.). This site will require the placement of 24 cubic
yards of fill in 0.05 acres of wetlands. Consequently, it ' nticipated that this project can
be authorized by Nationwide Permit [33 CFR 330.5(a 18] or minor discharges.
Site 4 consists of a man-made ditch between Hester Drive (SR 1592) and West
Fifth Street (NC 72). This impact is caused by the extension of Dunn Street (SR 2522).
The ditch will be eliminated and replaced by a pipe, resulting in 0.07 acres of wetland fill.
This impact w cussed in the EA and FONSI for the project. Since this impact occurs
above head . ers, it ' anticipated that it can be authorized by Nationwide Permit [33
CFR 330.5( 261.
Since all sections of this project can be authorized under Nationwide or General
Permits, a completed pre-discharge notification form is enclosed. Please review the
project for authorization under Section 404. If you have any questions or need any
additional information, please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin at [phone], Extension
315.
Sincerel
H' Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
GEC/plr
Attachments
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, NCEHNR, DEM
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. N. L. Graf, FHWA, attn: Mr. Roy Shelton
Mr. Kelly Barger, PE, Program Development Branch
Mr. Don Morton, State Highway Engineer - Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, PE, State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. W. F. Rosser, PE, Division 6 Engineer
DEM ID:
ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit ft
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR..iOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT. N.C. Department of Transportation - Division of Highdays
1. Owners Name: Planning and Environmental Branch Attention: Mr. H. Franklin Vick
2. Owners Address: P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N : 27611
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): (Work): [phone]
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Robeson
Nearest Town or City:
Lumberton, NC
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NC 72/NC 711
6. Name of Closest Stream/River:
7. River Basin:
Lumber River
Lumber River
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS H? YES t)q
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [
NO[]
NO ?J
If yes, explain.
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
Approximately 1.45 acres within project right of way.
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: 0.97 acres
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: 0.97 acres
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): See cover letter and
plan sheets.
13. Purpose of proposed work. Public roadway improvemBnts.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that thisba?tivitY must t exarried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts . o prac ica e a terns ive.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES rX] NTO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which maybe affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES *X ] NO[
]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property.
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy.
E. What is land use of surrounding property?
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? _
A2
Owner's Signature Date
a n ...• w n. . w....nP n....j • ..?.? ?> r
• n w w w v w ?r _
;dl 371
_ ) Rfslr
1
R•C Sonn ? r S!,•nnen ) ? ,,
1y 1 I T
- ? ! ! ) r Rf rl
?1 V
v
BEGIN PROJECT
1T
? ry
-32
1711 0
711
13
c:
K:
J0.br? cYr. 1 593
5).
ISa9 95? F?J
2.49-9
301 , Lumb-orton
FL MUniclpal
:509 Airport
-? i -
w,
. ?) ? R.fTprl ? 10
? ? 501 s )t to
' \ 1 '"" IrMa 371
1 1
w`tils 1;
ON
?eRreo
f ?,U
rl L
1: ton
>.na 7 1 1'
R ew,
s r n E
Mt
O' N
t l e?,
Ilfnl
frt lrrnp,{ w '• 1
rat till 1 ?w P ,
off
1 r
E drylt
B lf/N
rn.ll
aF
v
c?!!RO
•1 p
IY?_ is
- 1588 J
59
72
END PROJECT
a
:501
:•^.::::
y
s a

'NUK-I'H CAROLINA DEPAJ TM> 117 0
TRANS PORTATJO N
DIVISION OF f-11G'-TWAYS
N ENVCitON?,,i;Nl'i.l,
'L,kNWCrNG AND
NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 72/NC 711 INTERSECTION
To wEST FIFTH S7- '-
LUMBERTON RnpESv,
' 0'1 i
TIP PP,OJECT U-2416
------------

TEMPTLT ON I
Hols"Ri MILLS
)9 /
:0
AL Aiafl E,ND

592
END PRO.JEL
I
I
i
i
i

r
\ NORrr{ CAROLINA L
\ TRANSPORTATION
DT:RSION OF HUGKWA,
\ PLANNING A*?D cNv[RON&frN
\ BRANCH
\ UM F S OF
i00 - YEAR FLOOD
\ yaERTON
U-2416
FIG. ? i

0-4
3NIl HOPM

'
? Q I n
I TWO

?
I ea f I \
\
-
\ a w \

{d to ? pia

? ? IIA I I??

? \
II
• Q I I '

w Il II I°- ° \
- I II Jr a ° \
I ?1== \
II
\
w I \
II i i p p
' _
I III aZi
N g II a
i ow II o fJ
N
# I I?©
I ? ?
1
W cc
\ I © V
•
4 ?

I I GPI II ? ? d

w l al 6 a
w
{ a I I II ? © _
(w { Q? I II oF?/
{ ?I i oII m Q ?
la?l I silo ? ?
z
O
H
? I~ 1F?/ ? W
O
a. x z r-,
°i O
z ? o ? oz x

o
o z H

o
o H U
z z w
a
w x w
o
A a
U s3*
z v

0
CO
.-r
I(
a
U

o?
\ i
N \
r
3
Q J W
< I
r W l\\
© K
a i
ai
N
za
o_
N Q
m
Q
? e

IN
1-
J i
I ?
3M1 H?1dW
.l,
i_
N
? r
J
0
r _
_ J
w ?a
3
L I W W
3<
t3
0
u ?` O
N J[ m?'
4
Q
y,, O
'd
O

cr)

U
z ? o ?z x
x

° z ?' w
H ° H
) v
zz o
a CO
w
?
a

NI

Q O .
U a c? wi
z wl

a
O
it
W
C!?
T?
c?
O
U)
c
z
4 W
O ?
.a
7 ? x
x
x
4 w -r
0 o z
A o 0
, '
?i
i
---....---

ID
w^
jam
f
1
? l I }
?
//
Y O
Q l l
I
II
/? W
? 1 + W

W

X . " ..
1 ?
1
?o w

t? x z T c?
z W.
'
o el ? c=, ? ? v ?
,
f ,
11 ?? o z w ?. w
1111 „I+I o ? ? zz w

\1 F
co
° o
ce
1\
1 11 ` '`I I ?Z. a
W
> w
a
a
m
1 4
?m ?? ? \1 \I I I I? v ? `? w
11 11 I I z CIO
IDA
11 1\ I I 1 I II 1 II 1/ ??
11 \\ \y r 1 I I rl i /i
YY
. `? I I 11, I I II 1 1 +1 ? Q
o/ \ I I 5' HN ? I I 11 Ill I rll r l +II o
? I I II II Illl /1
=+ II I1 III IIt I I +i
I z
= 11 I II
1
?I i it iill irl IIII ?I H
Npp05 a I I ri ?? ? 11 Ili I I o
i ? ? I l + II ? rtl Ijl jj + z ? x
a/ 1 ? II rl I l11 I I j `' `' "
+ II 111 111 + .? x
a ? II Ilt 111 11 W w?
a/ + 1I
l / II I rll J z
i II . ? III I I ! w w ?
fl 'fJn'fl'nQ'?`a I I + A p
_ I ?l II I rll I l
. -? ` _ - - - _ lUM8ER70N CgY l9AITS ._.- ? 11 rl I III
--__ j
i II t1l Ill II II
1 b j It . II 11
I+ II !I ,Ill ,I fi j
? rr IIIII? ?l li
\ I
\\ '\ t t ? I rl l u
al \ \1 \
1 ( /IIVI
l
©I ? I
}Il ll I I ? Ir I ,ail
'
? tl l
t
I 11 Ir
Il I ? + l
l o
c ? I 1 II 1 I I ffi III ?I! m J 11 ?`

_
`
??\ ?
? I 1.11 Ir Il
11
11 illlr Ij
I
1 I it ?

? ? W l? l l l l Ir 1

?? \? ? ?
?
?
?
zl
I-1 r I11
1 Il
1!1 I
1
I
?? ? ° ? o o I I 11 I I
II

wi
°= m
? WW I I I lII
11 I I
ILL
t I 11
I
rl 11
'
- I i
I

i
i

dl ? `P V

101,
r
Z

w U tz?

I Q tZu,

c, '5

0
7 co

Na
;
o . 4
I

I

?

o ri)

C-) z

=

o
?

C?J _
I
I
7 M
CID
I
?I
m,
1
I W? ( Y4-
!
4 1 I i zQ 4 ? e« • ?: I- ?osG I
it I ? o ?•-------' ?, '!? ? i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, "'A
Health and Natural Resources 4
Division of Environmental Management 'N
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E H N
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM November 8, 1995
To: Melba McGee
From: Eric Galamb
Subject: FONSI for NC 72-711 in Lumberton
Robeson County
State Project DOT No. 8.1461701, TIP #U-2416
EHNR # 96-0241, DEM # 11077
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact of waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that 0.98 acres of waters including wetlands will be
impacted.
All of our concerns expressed from the review of the EA have been satisfied in the
FONSI. DEM is in receipt of the 401 Certification application. DEM will initiate the
application review.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of a FONSI by DEM would not preclude the denial
of a 401 Certification upon application if wetland impacts have not been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Ed Lewis, DOT
Wilmington COE
Monica Swihart
nc72-71 1.fon
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive)
From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72)
Lumberton, Robeson County
Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1)'
State Project No. 8.1461701
T.I.P. No. U-2416
Administrative Action
Finding of No Significant Impact
and
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Submitted pursuant to 42 U. S. C. 4332(2)(C)
and
49 U.S.C. 303
Date ?r H. Franklin Vick, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
-9S C WoZe-c?
Date Nicholas L. Graf
1 Division Administrator, FHWA
NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive)
From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72)
Lumberton, Robeson County
Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1)
State Project No. 8.1461701
T.I.P. No. U-2416
Finding of No Significant Impact
and
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
August, 1995

Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
M:7. AUJ-P
Ed F. Lewis
Project Planning Engineer
. W son Stroud
P sect Planning Unit Head-
Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
???•???N C AROI't '
is 1wk.
SEAL
6916 '
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Summary of Special Project Commitments .................. iii
A. Lumber River State Park .............................. iii
B. Permits Required ..................................... iii
C. Water Quality ........................................ iv
I. Type of Action .............................. ............. 1
II. Project Status and Schedule ......... .................. 1
III. Description of Proposed Action .......................... 2
IV. Recommended Improvements ................................ 2
A. NC 72-711 and West Fifth Street Improvements ....... 2
B. NC 72-711/Interstate 95 Interchange
Modifications ................................. 3
C. Service Road Realignment ........................... 3
D. Dunn Road Extension ................................ 4
E. Structures ......................................... 4
1. Bridge over Interstate 95 ..................... 4
2. Lumber River Bridge ........................... 4
F. Design Speed ...................................... 4
G. Access Control ..................................... 4
H. Intersection Treatment ............................. 5
I. Right of Way ....................................... 5
V. Revisions to the Environmental Assessment ............... 5
A. Cox Road (SR 1588) Realignment ..................... 5
B. Southbound Interstate 95 Ramps ..................... 5
C. Wetland Impacts .................................... 5
D. Architectural/Historical Resources ................. 6
E. U. S. Coast Guard Permit ............................ 6
VI. Wetlands Finding ........................................ 6
A. Study Area Waters of the United States ............. 7
B. Permits ........................................... 7
C. Mitigation ......................................... 8
1. Avoidance ..................................... 8
2. Minimization ...... ......................... 8
3. Compensatory Mitigation ....................... 8
D. Only Practicable Alternative Wetland Finding........ 9
VII. Protected Species .. ................................... 9
VIII. Circulation of Environmental Assessment ................. 11
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
IX. Public Hearing .......................................... 17
A. Cox Road Access .................. .... ....... 18
B. Impacts to Business at West Fifth Street/West
Drive Intersection ............................ 18
X. Basis for Finding of No Significant Impact .............. 19
FIGURES
Figure F-1' - Vicinity Map
Figure F-2 - Aerial Mosaic Showing the Proposed Improvements
Figure F-3 - Access to Cox Road
APPENDIX
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to
the Lumber River State Park.... ....... . FA-1
Written Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment ......... FA-12
Public Hearing News Release ....................................... FA-31
Public Hearing Handout ............................................ FA-32

ii
NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive)
From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72)
Lumberton, Robeson County
Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1)
State Project No. 8.1461701
T.I.P. No. U-2416
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
SUMMARY OF SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS
A. LUMBER RIVER STATE PARK
The following measures will be taken to mitigate impacts to the
Lumber River State Park:
1. Before construction begins, the Division Engineer will insure that
signs advising boaters of construction activities at the Lumber River
bridge are placed at the boat access area off Kenric Road (SR 1539)
immediately south of the Lumber River bridge and on the upstream and
downstream sides of the bridge.
2. The Lumber River channel will be kept open to boating traffic during
construction. Efforts to maintain as wide a channel opening as
possible during construction shall be made.
3. The number of piers in the river will be minimized as much as
possible. Fifty feet between piers (existing spacing) is the minimum
acceptable spacing. The North Carolina Division of Parks and
Recreation has requested that no piers be placed in the river
channel, but has indicated that if needed, one row of piers can be
placed in the middle of the channel.
4. If pier footings that are placed in the channel come to within three
feet of the water's surface, fins will be installed to indicate the
presence of the footings to protect boats and the footings.
The impacts of and mitigation for replacement of the Lumber River
bridge are detailed in the Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation found in
the Appendix, pages FA-1 through FA-11.
B. PERMITS REQUIRED
A 401 Water Quality Certification administered through the N. C.
Department of Environment,-Health, and Natural Resources will be required.
This certification is issued for any activity that may result in a
discharge into waters for which a federal permit is required.
Approximately 1.0 acre of wetlands will be filled as a result of the
project. A Bridge General Permit (31) is anticipated for impacts to
Waters of the United States resulting from new bridge construction over
i i i
the Lumber River as well as from the proposed widening of NC 72-711. A
nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (26) is likely to be applicable for all
impacts to Waters of the United States resulting from the proposed
extension of Dunn Road.
The need for a U.S. Coast Guard permit was investigated for this
project. Based on that investigation, and in accordance with "Subpart H -
Navigational Clearance for Bridges" (23 CFR 650.805), the Federal Highway
Administration has determined that a U.S. Coast Guard permit will not be
required to replace the bridge over the Lumber River (see Appendix page
FA-18).
C. WATER QUALITY
Impacts on wetlands will be minimized through best management
practices during project construction. The Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan established by the Division of Highways in cooperation with
the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources will be followed during construction to minimize turbidity
levels. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds in the Sedimentation
Control Guidelines (Title 15A 4B. 0024) will be implemented due to the
proximity of High Quality Waters.
Bridge deck runoff shal not drain directly into the Lumber River.
Vegetation will be established along the new and existing bridge
approaches to minimize impacts to the Lumber River and associated
wetlands. No clearing of off-road sites for construction storage and
staging areas shall be allowed.
Due to the presence of anadromous fish in the Lumber River, NCDOT
will consider a moratorium on in-water construction in the Lumber River
from March 15 through June 15. NCDOT will consult with fisheries
biologists of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission during the
permitting phase of the project concerning this moratorium.

41

iv I
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Prepared by the
Planning and Environmental Branch
of the
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
in consultation with the
Federal Highway Administration
I. Type of Action
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Action, Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined that this project will not have any
significant impact on the human or natural environment. This Finding of No
Significant Impact is based on the Environmental Assessment, which was
independently evaluated and determined to adequately and accurately
discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project.
Copies of the Environmental Assessment are on file in the library of the
Planning and Environmental Branch of the NCDOT. The Environmental
Assessment provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that
an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The FHWA takes full
responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the Environmental
Assessment.
The following persons can be contacted for additional information
concerning this proposal and statement:
Mr. Nicholas-L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
Suite 410, 310 New Bern Ave.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone [phone]
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone [phone]
II. PROJECT STATUS AND SCHEDULE
The project is included in the 1996-2002 NCDOT Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP schedule shows right of way
acquisition to begin in fiscal year 1996 and construction in fiscal year
1997. The TIP funding for the project is $7,143,000, which includes
$6,425,000 for construction and $718,000 for right of way. The estimated
2
cost of the project is $7,218,000, which includes $6,700,000 for
construction and $518,000 for right of way. This estimated cost does
include the recommended Cox Road realignment (see Section V.A. and Figure
F-2, Sheet 2). The Environmental Assessment was approved on November 4,
1994, and a Public Hearing.was held on March 30, 1995.
III. Description of Proposed Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to improve
NC 72-711 in Lumberton to a five-to six-lane facility to improve traffic
flow and to enhance safety in the vicinity of the NC 72-711/Interstate 95
interchange. Replacing the bridge over the Lumber River, replacing the
existing bridge over Interstate 95, and realigning, or terminating,
service roads in three of the four quadrants of the NC 72-711/Interstate
95 interchange are also to be included in the project. The Interstate 95
exit ramps will be widened to 36 feet, and the southbound Interstate 95
ramps will be relocated on a new alignment closer to Interstate 95 to
allow Cox Road (SR 1588) to tie directly into NC 72-711. The project
begins at the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of Interstate 95 and ends
just north of the NC 72-711/NC 72 (West Fifth Street) intersection east of
Interstate 95 (see Figures F-1 and F-2).
IV. Recommended Improvements
A. NC 72-711 and West Fifth Street Improvements
It is recommended NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive) be widened to a
five-to six-lane facility from just east of the NC 72/NC 711 intersection
west of Interstate 95 to just west of the NC 72-711/NC 72 (West Fifth
Street) intersection east of Interstate 95 (0.7 mile). A five-lane
shoulder facility with a 60-foot pavement plus 10-foot paved shoulders
(2-foot full depth) is recommended along NC 72-711 from the NC 72-NC
711/SR 1539 intersection to the southbound Interstate 95 ramp terminal.
(The taper for this proposed widening will start at the NC 72/NC 711
intersection and will end at the NC 12-711/SR 1539 intersection, where the
full five-lane cross section will begin.) A six-lane shoulder facility
with a 72-foot pavement and 10-foot paved shoulders (2-foot paved full
depth) is recommended from the southbound Interstate 95 ramp terminal to
the northbound Interstate 95 ramp terminal. This six-lane cross section
will provide single left turn lanes and additional vehicle storage
capacity between the interchange ramp terminals. A six-lane curb and
gutter facility (76 feet face to face) with six-foot berms will begin at
the northbound Interstate 95 ramp terminal and continue to West Drive,
where it will begin to taper down to tie into the existing four-lane curb
and gutter facility (48 feet face to face) on West Fifth Street
approximately 350 feet south of Dunn Road. The recommended six-lane
facility will provide more desirable capacity at the NC 72-711/West Fifth
Street intersection.
3
It is recommended NC 72-711 be widened to the north side of the
existing road along the entire length of the project. Since the Lumber
River channel is approximately 150 feet narrower on the north (upstream)
side of the bridge, north-side widening will minimize the required bridge
length and project costs.. The proposed widening and grade changes will
require reconstructing the northbound and southbound ramp terminals of the
NC 72-711/Interstate 95 interchange.
In conjunction with the proposed NC 72-711 improvements, it is
recommended West Fifth Street (SR 2499) south of NC 72-711 be widened
symmetrically to a five-lane curb and gutter facility (64 feet face to
face) in order to supply the required turning movement capacity at the NC
72-711/West Fifth Street intersection. This proposed five-lane cross
section will taper down to tie into the existing West Fifth Street cross
section (40-foot face to face curb and gutter facility) approximately 400
feet south of the proposed NC 72-711/ West Fifth Street intersection.
The proposed improvements described above are shown in Figure F-2.
6. NC _72-711/Interstate 95 Interchange Modifications
The service roads in the northwest, northeast, and southeast
quadrants of the NC 72-711/Interstate 95 interchange will have their
access to the ramps terminated. Cox Road (SR 1588) will be extended to tie
directly into NC 72-711 just west of the existing Interstate 95 southbound
ramp terminal. To provide more desirable spacing along NC 72-711 between
Cox Road and the southbound Interstate 95 ramp terminal, the southbound
ramps will be relocated to approximately 200 feet east of their present
locations. The two Interstate 95 exit ramps will be widened to 36 feet to
provide three approach lanes at their intersections with NC 72-711. The
Interstate 95 entrance ramps will not be widened. These improvements are
shown in Figure F-2.
C. Service Road Realignment
Two-way ramps currently exist in the northeast, southeast, and
northwest quadrants of the NC 72-711/Interstate 95 interchange. These
ramps are intersected by three service roads, SR 1592 (Hester Drive), SR
1593 (Jonathan Street), and SR 1588 (Cox Road), respectively. It is
recommended that the existing service road connections with the
interchange ramps be removed. This will eliminate the two-way operation
of the ramps and lessen driver confusion and the likelihood of accidents,
thereby improving safety.
SR 1592 (Hester Drive) is to be terminated approximately 650 feet
north of its present tie-in with the northbound on-ramp of Interstate 95.
An access road will be constructed to connect West Fifth Street and SR
1592 across from Dunn Road. SR 1593 (Jonathan Street) is to be realigned
to link with Cottonwood Street to tie into SR 2499 at the existing
Cottonwood Street/SR 2499 intersection. SR 1588 (Cox Road) is to be
extended to tie directly into NC 72-711. These proposed improvements are
shown in Figure F-2.
4
D. Dunn Road Extension
As noted previously, it is also recommended that Dunn Road be
extended from West Fifth Street to Hester Drive (SR 1592) by constructing
a 40-foot wide (face-to-face) curb and gutter facility. This facility
will provide access between West Fifth Street and Hester Drive. The
access between Hester Drive and NC 72-711 via the Interstate 95 northbound
entrance ramp is to be removed under the proposed improvements.
E. Structures
1. Bridge over Interstate 95
The existing bridge carrying NC 72-711 over Interstate 95
(bridge number 25) is to be removed and replaced with a new bridge to
accommodate the proposed widening of NC 72-711 to the north. A clear
roadway width of 92 feet is to be provided on the new bridge to
accommodate the proposed six-lane cross section to be constructed
between the Interstate 95 ramp terminals, including 10-foot shoulders
on each side. The new bridge is to provide a vertical clearance of
17 feet over Interstate 95.
The new bridge will be approximately 238 feet in length to
accommodate possible future widening of Interstate 95 to six lanes.
The 1996-2002 NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program does not
include a project to construct additional lanes along Interstate 95
in the vicinity of the project.
2. Lumber River Bridge
Bridge number 43 carrying NC 72-711 over the Lumber River is to
be replaced to accommodate the proposed five-lane cross section at
that location. A clear roadway width of 80 feet, including 10-foot
shoulders on each side, is to be provided on the bridge. North-side
widening of NC 72-711 in the vicinity of the bridge is recommended
due to the narrower channel width of the Lumber River on the north
(upstream) side of the highway. The Programmatic Section 4(f)
Evaluation located in the Appendix details the special measures to be
taken during the design and construction of the proposed Lumber River
Bridge due to the presence of the Lumber River State Park.
F. Design Speed
The recommended design speed along NC 72-711 is 50 mph.
G. Access Control
Additional control of access will be acquired along the north side of
NC 72-711 from the northbound Interstate 95 ramp terminal to just south of
West Drive. Control of access will also be acquired along the north and
south sides of NC 72-711 from the southbound ramp terminal to the Lumber
River Bridge. No control of access is proposed elsewhere along NC 72-711
due to the need to provide access to adjacent properties. Full control of
access is to be maintained along Interstate 95 (mainline and ramps).
Control of access will be reestablished by fencing where secondary road
ramp accesses were. The limits of proposed access control are shown in
Figure F-2.
H. Intersection Treatment
As noted previously under item IV.C., the service roads in the
northeast, southeast, and northwest quadrants of the NC 72-711/Interstate
95 interchange are to be revised to eliminate the service road connections
with the interchange ramps.' The existing NC 72-711/West Fifth Street
intersection will be modified to become a more standard T-type
intersection: West Fifth Street will be slightly realigned at this
location to provide an improved connection to NC 72-711 (see Figure F-2).
No changes to the NC 72-711 intersection are proposed, and no other
intersection revisions are recommended.
I. Right of Way
Approximately 1.76 acres of additional right of way will be required
to accommodate the proposed improvements to NC 72-711 and West Fifth
Street and the proposed Dunn Road extension to SR 1592. The proposed
extension of Cox Road to NC 72-711 will take place within existing right
of way.
V. Revisions to the Environmental Assessment
The following are revisions to the Environmental Assessment:
A. Cox Road (SR 1588) Realignment
As a result of concerns raised by local citizens at the public
hearing (see Section IX., Public Hearing) held on March 30, 1995, it was
decided to provide direct access to NC 72-711 from Cox Road (SR 1588).
Under the original design described in the Environmental Assessment (see
Section II.C., Service Road Realignment, on page 11), Cox Road would have
no access to NC 72-711 or the Interstate 95 southbound exit ramp. See
Section IV.C., Service Road Realignment, of this document for additional
discussion of this topic.
B. Southbound Interstate 95 RaMDS
Due to the proposed extension of Cox Road (SR 1588) to NC 72-711, the
southbound Interstate 95 ramps are proposed to be relocated to the east to
intersect with NC 72-711 approximately 200 feet east of their present
locations.
C. Wetland Impacts
Based on the proposed design modifications that call for the
realignment of Cox Road and the southbound Interstate 95 ramps, the amount
of wetlands impacted has decreased from 1.0 acre (0.4 hectare) to
0.98 acre (0.39 hectare). This includes 0.9 acre (0.36 ha) along
NC 72-711 and 0.08 acre (0.03 ha) along the Dunn Street Extension.
6
D. Architectural/Historical Resources
Section IV.A.5.a. on page 18 of Environmental Assessment noted that
there were no properties over fifty years of age in the area of potential
effect (APE). However, there are two structures over fifty years of age
within the APE, but they have been determined to be not eligible for
listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Therefore, no
properties in the APE are eligible for the National Register. The State
Historic Preservation Officer has concurred with this finding (see
Appendix, page FA-27).
Since there are no properties listed in or are eligible for the
National Register in the APE, no further compliance within Section 106 is
required.
E. U. S. Coast Guard Permit
The need for a U.S. Coast Guard permit was investigated for this
project. In this area the Lumber River (1) is not used or is not
susceptible to be used in its natural condition or by reasonable
improvement as a means to transport interstate or foreign commerce and (2)
is not tidal. Based on that investigation and in accordance with "Subpart
H-Navigational Clearance for Bridges" (23 CFR 650.805), the Federal
Highway Administration has determined that a U.S. Coast Guard permit will
not be required to replace the bridge over the Lumber River (see Appendix
page FA-18).
VI. Wetlands Finding
.The Lumber River is the only water resource located in the project
study area. The Division of Environmental Management (DEM) assigns
streams a Best Usage Classification. The Lumber River's classification has
not changed since the completion of the Environmental Assessment. The
river is classified as Water Supplies (WS-IV) High Quality Water (HQW)
Swamp Water (Sw). WS-IV are waters protected as water supplies, which are
generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds and are also
suitable for all Class C uses; Class C refers to waters suitable for
aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary
recreation, and agriculture.
Surface waters and wetlands fall under th
of the United States," as defined in Section
Register (CFR) Part 328.3. Wetlands, defined
areas that are inundated or saturated by surf
frequency and duration sufficient to suppov
circumstances do support, a prevalence of vege
life in saturated conditions. Any action that
these areas falls under the jurisdiction of
Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean
1344).
e broad category of "Waters
33 of the Code of Federal
n 33 CFR 328.3, are those
ace or ground water at a
-t, and under normal
tation typically adapted to
proposes to place fill into
the U.S. Army Corps of
Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C.
A. Study Area Waters of the United States
Impacts to surface waters will result from the new bridge
construction across the Lumber River, and impacts to jurisdictional
wetlands will occur along the Lumber River floodplain and along the
proposed Dunn Road extension. The site located along the Lumber River
includes a cypress/gum swamp with hydrophytic vegetation of bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum), black gum (Nyssa s ly vatica), and royal fern (Osmunda
rem). Other wetland indicators for this site are buttressed stems,
high water marks, drainage patterns, and sediment within the wetland. The
soil indicator is 10YR 2/1 (black). The proposed widening of NC 72-711
will impact 0.36 ha (0.90 ac) of wetlands. The proposed extension of Dunn
Road will impact 0.03 ha (0.08 ac) of wetlands.
B. Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters are
anticipated. In accordance with provisions of section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required from the COE for the
discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States."
A Bridge General Permit (31) is anticipated for impacts to Waters of
the United States resulting from. new bridge construction over the Lumber
River, as well as from the proposed widening of NC 72-711. This permit
authorizes the placement of fill material associated with the
construction, repair or replacement of bridges spanning navigable waters
and Waters of*the United States.
A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (26) is likely to be applicable
for all impacts to Waters of the United States resulting from the
extension of Dunn Road. This permit authorizes discharges of dredged or
fill material into headwaters and isolated jurisdictional wetlands
provided the following conditions are met:
(1) the discharge does not cause the loss of more than 4.0 hectares (10.0
acres) of Waters of the United States;
(2) the permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would
cause the loss of Waters of the United States greater than 0.4
hectare (1.0 acre) in accordance with the "Notification" general
conditions (for discharges in special aquatic sites, including
jurisdictional wetlands, the notification must also include a
delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including
jurisdictional wetlands), and;
(3) the discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of -a single and complete project.
In addition, this project will also require a 401 Water Quality
General Certification from the DEM prior to the issuance of a Nationwide
Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that the state issue
or deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed
activity that may result in a discharge to Waters of the United States.
Final decisions concerning applicable permits for the subject project rest
with the COE.
8
C. Mitigation
The COE has adopted through the. Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net
loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to
restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of
Waters of the United States, specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland
impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts (to
wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three
aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered sequentially.
1. Avoidance
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable
possibilities of averting impacts to Waters of the United States.
According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining
"appropriate and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such
measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts
and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology, and logistics in
light of overall project purposes. Encroachment into jurisdictional
wetlands and surface waters as a result of project construction is
unavoidable in order to achieve the purpose and need of this project.
2. Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable
steps to reduce the adverse impacts to Waters of the United States.
Implementation of these steps will be required through project
modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically focuses on
decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of
median widths, ROW widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder widths. Other
practical mechanisms to minimize impacts to Waters of the United States
crossed by the proposed project include: strict enforcement of
sedimentation control Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the protection
of surface waters during the entire life of the project; reduction of
clearing and grubbing activity; reduction/ elimination of direct discharge
into streams; reduction of runoff velocity; re-establishment of vegetation
on exposed areas, with judicious pesticide and herbicide usage;
minimization of "in-stream" activity; and litter/debris control.
Impacts to surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands can be
minimized by utilizing the some of the previously mentioned methods.
Vegetation will be established along the new and existing bridge
approaches in order to minimize impacts to the Lumber River and associated
wetlands.
3. Compensatory Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated
impacts to Waters of the United States have been avoided and minimized to
the maximum extent possible. It is recognized that "no net loss of
9
wetlands" functions and values may not be achieved in each and every
permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is
required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all
appropriate and practicable minimization has been required. Compensatory
actions often include restoration, creation, and enhancement of Waters of
the United States. Such actions should be undertaken in areas adjacent to
or contiguous to the discharge site.
Authorizations under Nationwide Permits usually do not require
compensatory mitigation according to the 1989 MOA between the EPA and the
COE. Impacts sanctioned under General Permits usually do not require
compensatory mitigation. Final decisions concerning compensatory
mitigation rest with the COE.
D. Only Practicable Alternative Wetland Findin
Executive Order 11990 established a national policy to avoid, to the
extent possible, adverse impacts on wetlands and to avoid direct or
indirect support of new construction wetlands wherever there is a
practicable alternative.
The majority of impacts to "Waters of the United States" will be in
the form of surface water impacts at the Lumber River. Approximately 0.9
acre (0.36 ha) of wetlands will be impacted at the Lumber River and 0.08
acre (0.03 ha) at the Dunn Street Extension. With the exception of not
building the project, there are no feasible means of avoiding this wetland
taking. NCDOT will minimize impacts on wetlands through the use of best
management practices.
It has been determined there is no practicable alternative to the
proposed construction in wetlands and that the proposed action includes
all practicable measures to minimize harm to wetlands which may result
from such use.
VII. Protected Species
As of 28 March 1995, the Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists the
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus
michauxii) as federally Endangered species for Robeson County. This
c asst ication denotes that species is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range. A brief description of these
species characteristics and habitat follows.
Picoides borealis (red-cockaded woodpecker) E
The adult red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) has a plumage that is
entirely black and white except for small red streaks on the sides of the
nape in the male. The back of the RCW is black and white with horizontal
stripes. The breast and underside of this woodpecker are white with
streaked flanks. The RCW has a large white cheek patch surrounded by the
black cap, nape, and throat.
10
The RCW uses open old growth stands of southern pines, particularly
longleaf pine ( j s palustris), for foraging and nesting habitat. A
forested stand must contain at least 50% pine, lack a thick understory,
and be contiguous with other stands to be appropriate habitat for the RCW.
These birds nest exclusively in trees that are >60 years old and are
contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range
of the RCW is up to 200.0 ha (500.0 ac). This acreage must be contiguous
with suitable nesting sites. i
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees and usually
in trees that are infected with the fungus that causes red-heart disease.
Cavities are located in colonies from 3.6-30.3 m (12.0-100.0 ft) above the
ground and average 9.1-15.7 m (30.0-50.0 ft) high. They'can be identified
by a large encrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree. The RCW
lays its eggs in April, May, and June; the eggs hatch approximately 38
days later.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
No habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker exists in the project
study area. It was noted during a site visit by an NCDOT biologist on
June 1, 1995 that pines are found within the study area. These trees,
however, are sporadically scattered in a community primarily composed of
hardwoods. No impact to the red-cockaded woodpecker will result from
project construction.
Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac) E
Michaux's sumac is a densely pubescent rhizomatous shrub. The bases
of the leaves are rounded and their edges are simply or doubly serrate.
The flowers of Michaux's sumac are greenish to white in color. Fruits,
which develop from August to September on female plants, are a red densely
short-pubescent drupe.
This plant occurs in rocky or sandy open woods. Michaux's sumac is
dependent on some sort of disturbance to maintain the openness of its
habitat. It usually grows in association with basic soils and occurs on
sand or sandy loams. Michaux's sumac grows only in open habitat where it
can get full sunlight. Michaux's sumac does not compete well with other
species, such as Japanese honeysuckle, with which it is often associated.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Plant-by-plant surveys for Michaux's sumac were conducted by NCDOT
biologists on June 1, 1995. Irregularly maintained road shoulders were
surveyed for this Endangered species. No populations of Michaux's sumac
occur in the study area. -No impact to Michaux's sumac will result from
project construction.
Since completion of the Environmental Assessment, the USFWS has
delisted the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) as a
federally protected species. The American alligator was classified as
Threatened due to Similarity in Appearance. No new species have been
added to Robeson County by the USFWS.
11
VIII. Circulation of Environmental Assessment
The approved Environmental Assessment was circulated to the following
federal, state, and local agencies:
*U.S. Department of Defense-Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
*U.S. Department of the Interior-Fish and Wildlife Service
*Federal Emergency Management Agency
Environmental Protection Agency-Environmental Review'Branch
U. S. Geological Survey
*North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources-Division of Archives
and History
North Carolina Department of Administration-State Clearinghouse
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources:
*Wildlife Resources Commission
*Division of Environmental Management
Natural Heritage Program
*Division of Land Resources
*Division of Environmental Health
*Fayetteville Regional Office
Robeson County Commissioners
City of Lumberton:
Mayor
Planning Department
*Municipal Airport
Lumber River Council of Governments
Written comments were received from the agencies denoted with an
asterisk. Copies of these comments received are included in the Appendix
of this report (see pages FA-12 through FA-30). The following is a
summary of the comments which require responses:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
1. Comment: The proposed project is located within the jurisdiction of
the City of Lumberton, which participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program. From a review of the February 1989 Robeson
County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas Flood Insurance Rate
Map, the roadway crosses Lumber River, a detail study stream with
100-year flood elevations determined and a floodway defined.' A
12
certification will be required indicating that the new bridge will
cause no rise in the 100-year natural water surface elevation. We
also suggest coordinating with the city for compliance with their
flood plain ordinance.
Response: A complete hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the
project has been performed and no increase in flood stages will occur
at the Lumber River.
2. Comment: Based on information provided in the Environmental
Assessment and the Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for impacts
to the Lumber River State Park, we concur that the wetland impacts
may be authorized under General Permit (CESAW-CO82=N-000-0031) to
place fill material associated with the construction, repair or
replacement of bridges spanning navigable waters and waters of the
United States. Furthermore, a review of our headwaters maps indicates
the impacts to the natural drainage ditch to be crossed by the
proposed Dunn Road extension may be authorized by Nationwide Permit
26 for work above the headwaters. Approximately 1.0 acre of wetland
will be filled as a result of this project, but specific acreage must
be provided and the wetlands delineated and field approved by this
office prior to submitting your application for a Department of the
Army Section 404 permit. If you have any questions please contact
Mr. Taylor.
Response: Required Department of the Army permit authorization,
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended,
will be obtained during the development of the project design plans.
Also, as noted previously in this report, it is now anticipated
approximately 0.98 acre of wetlands will be filled as a result of
this project.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service
1. Comment: Section III of the Environmental Assessment (pp. 14-15)
presents an adequate discussion of the alternatives for this project.
Alternatives are limited in projects which upgrade existing
facilities. The Service believes that the consideration of various
alternatives and the selection process for the preferred alternative
were satisfactory.
Response: None required.
2. Comment: The Environmental Assessment states (p. 33) that no stream
rechannel ization is "anticipated." The Service believes that any
stream modifications can adversely impact fish and wildlife habitat.
The Service recommends that the NCDOT make every effort to avoid
stream modifications.
Response: No stream modifications are proposed for this project.
13
3. Comment: The Service supports the measures listed in the
Environmental Assessment (pp.-34-36) to minimize construction
impacts. Furthermore, we support the use of Design Standards in
Sensitive Watersheds which the Environmental Assessment states
(p. 25) will be employed in this project. The Service would add that
there be no clearing of off road construction facilities such as
machinery parking areas and material storage sites.
Response: Comments noted. No clearing of off-road sites for
construction storage and staging areas shall be allowed along the
project.
4. Comment: Despite the use of Best Management Practices, the in-water
work required for constructing the bridge over the Lumber River could
have adverse impacts on fish population in the project area.
Therefore, the Service recommends that the NCDOT consult with
fisheries biologists of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission regarding the implementation of a construction moratorium
during critical times for local fish populations.
Response: A moratorium on in-water construction activities in the
Lumber River from March 15 to June 15 will be considered during the
permitting phase of the project in consultation with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission.
5. Comment: The Environmental Assessment states (p. 23) that the
proposed project will impact approximately 1.0 acre of wetlands.
These losses would occur in both bottomland hardwood forest (0.9
acre) along the Lumber River and scrub-shrub wetlands (0.1 acre)
along the proposed Dunn Road Extension. The Service considers
bottomland hardwoods to be especially valuable and under pressure
from development. The Service supports the proposal by the NCDOT to
minimize adverse impacts on these wetlands by using best management
practices during construction.
Response: Comment noted.
6. Comment: The Environmental Assessment states (p. 23) that wetland
impacts may be covered by either General or Nationwide permits which
would be issued by the Regulatory Branch, U. S. Army of Corps of
Engineers. Projects covered by these permits do not require
compensatory mitigation for wetland losses. However, the Service
recommends that the NCDOT explore opportunities for the replacement
of bottomland hardwoods along the Lumber River. This effort could
involve restoration or enhancement of wetlands adjacent to the Lumber
River State Park.
Response: During the design and permit phase of the project, NCDOT
will implement the step down process of avoidance, minimization and
mitigation of wetland impacts as outlined under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1344).
7. Comment: Because the proposed replacement of the Lumber River Bridge
will require the placement of piers in the Lumber River which, at the
project site, is part of the North Carolina Natural and Scenic River
14
System, Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of
1966 requires that an evaluation be made to determine that all
feasible and prudent alternatives to such use are considered and that
all possible efforts to minimize adverse impacts to publicly owned
land are incorporated.in project plans. The Environmental Assessment
(pp. 18-19 and A-4 to A-14) addresses these issues. The Service is
pleased that the NCDOT has coordinated this project with the North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Based on information contained in the Environmental Assessment, the
Service considers the requirements of Section 4(f) to be fulfilled.
Response: Comment noted.
8. Comment: The Environmental Assessment states (pp. 21-22) that two
Federally-endangered species are known to occur in Robeson County.
These species are the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii).
The Environmental Assessment states the generally accepted
description of habitat used by the red-cockaded woodpecker, and
proceeds immediately to the statement that "Suitable habitat of this
type does not exist in the project area." Similarly, the
Environmental Assessment gives a brief, general description of the
habitat occupied by Michaux's sumac and states that "This habitat
does not exist in the project area". In the recent past, the Service
has requested that the NCDOT provide the Service with a brief outline
of the procedures or methods used to arrive at their conclusions
regarding potential impact to Federally-listed species. On
December 13, 1994, Service biologists met with Mr. Randy Turner of
NCDOT and Mr. Roy Shelton of the Federal Highway Administration to
discuss this issue. At that meeting, an agreement was reached to
include a brief outline of the methodology which the NCDOT used in
evaluating potential impacts to Federally-listed species in project
Environmental Assessment's. While the present Environmental
Assessment is dated October, 1994, the Service must still conclude
that the data presented are not adequate for us to assess the
potential impacts on these two species.
Furthermore, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 requires
that action agencies make a clear and specific statement regarding
likely impacts to Federally-listed species. The Environmental
Assessment for the proposed project makes no such statement.
Based on a lack of information regarding the evaluation of potential
impacts to Federally-listed species, the Service finds that the
requirements of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act have not been
fulfilled. The Service encourages the NCDOT to provide the
additional information to support your stated determination
statements on impacts to Federally-listed species.
Response: Reference Section
methods used by NCDOT staff
regarding potential impact
VII. of this report for procedures and
biologist to arrive at their conclusion
to Federally-listed species.
15
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Comment: Robeson County, North Carolina is participating in the
Regular Phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The
Lumber River has 100-year floodplain and regulatory floodways
delineated; therefore, any encroachment into the floodways must be in
compliance with the NFIP regulations. The-agency in charge must.
ensure compliance with the floodplain management measures as enacted
by the State of North Carolina. In this regard, it is imperative
that the agency coordinate closely with the appropriate staff in the
Floodplain Management Section of the Division of Emergency
Management.
Response: During the design and permit phases of the project, NCDOT
staff will coordinate with the appropriate staff in the Floodplain
Management Section.
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History
Comment: While we believe the Environmental Assessment adequately
addresses our concerns for historic architectural resources, the
Architectural /Historical Resources Section (page 18) should be
corrected. As stated in our letter dated November 14, 1994, there
are two structures over fifty years of age within the area of
potential effect. We concurred that these two structures are not
historic.
Response: As SHPO noted, there are two structures in the area of
potential effect over fifty years of age. However, these structures
are not historic and not eligible for listing in the National
Register of Historic Places. See Section V.D. of this report for
further discussion of architectural/historic resources.
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources:
Wildlife Resources Commission
Comment: We feel that the subject document adequately addresses our
concerns regarding fish and wildlife in the project area. At this
time, we will concur with the Environmental Assessment and anticipate
concurrence with the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). We
request that NCDOT continue to look for opportunities to minimize
wetland impacts and require contractors to strictly adhere to Best
Management Practices. Sedimentation and erosion control measures for
High Quality Waters (HQW) should be in place prior to the initiation
of construction and should be maintained throughout the life of the
project. We also request that no in-water construction take place in
the Lumber River from March 15 to June 15. This is to minimize the
negative impacts from sedimentation and turbidity on the spawning
activity of freshwater fish species (primarily sunfish and largemouth
bass).
16
Response: NCDOT will incorporate the use of Best Management Practices
during the construction of this project. The Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan established by the Division of Highways in
cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources will be followed during construction to
minimize turbidity levels. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds
in the Sedimentation Control Guidelines (Title 15A 4B 0024 wi e
implemented due to the proximity of High Quality Waters. Due to the
presence of anadromous fish in the Lumber River, NCDOT will consider
a moratorium on in-water construction in the Lumber River from
March 15 through June ,15. NCDOT will consult with fisheries
biologists of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission during
the permitting phase of the project concerning this moratorium.
Division of Environmental Management
1. Comment: DEM requests that hazardous spill catch basins be installed
at all water supply stream crossings. The BMP for protection of
surface waters requires DOT to install hazardous spill catch basins
in water supply critical areas. Other stream crossings may be outside
of the critical area but DEM still believes that hazardous spill
catch basins at these locations will provide extra protection at
minimal cost. Bridge deck runoff should not drain directly into the
bodies of water. All stream relocations should adhere to DOT's
Stream Relocation/Channelization guidelines. DEM requests that DOT
utilize HQW soil and erosion control measures to protect the water
supply.
Response: Hazardous spill catch basins at the crossing of the Lumber
River, as described in Section II.C. of the Best Management Practices
(1991), are not required. There are no stream relocations
anticipated for this project. Bridge deck runoff shall not drain
directly into the Lumber River.
2. Comment: The bridge over the Lumber River will be relocated to the
north side. This provides DOT with an opportunity to revegetate the
wetlands that were impacted with the original bridge.
Response: The bridge over the Lumber River will be replaced in its
existing location with additional widening to the north due to
NC 72-711 being widened to the north. Therefore, there will be no
opportunity to revegetate the wetlands that were impacted with the
original bridge.
Division of Land Resources
1. Comment: This project will impact five geodetic survey markers. N.C.
Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior to construction.
Response: Before commencing construction, NCDOT will notify the
NCDEHNR, Division of Land Resources.
17
2. Comment: The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this
project should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under
the erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways
from the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Response: The North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission has
approved the program of erosion and sedimentation control associated
with highway construction used by the NCDOT. The erosion control
plan for this project will be prepared under this program.
Division of Environmental Health, Public Water Supply Section
Comment: Public transportation (busing) and other measures (staggered
work, car pooling, van pooling) should be incorporated into the
planning process for improving NC 72-711 to maximize the life of the
improvement. By minimizing the number of single occupied vehicles
(and associated congestion), the need for another major road
improvement in 10-20 years is reduced.
Response: The functional advantage of mass transit is to efficiently
move large numbers of people usually along fixed routes on fixed
schedules. In order to be cost effective, the mass transit system
must move people within or between areas having high population
densities. The low density nature of the project study area is not
supportive for this type of transportation whi.ch is reflected by the
lack of any local bus system.
City of Lumberton - Lumberton Municipal Airport
1. Comment: The principal instrument approach to the primary runway
(5/23) is south to nort t ere ore, most instrument approaches do
not occur over the NC 72-711 interchange area. However, some
instrument approaches are flown to runway 13, in the vicinity of the
proposed interchange and some visual approach aircraft traffic
patterns for runway 5 and 13 do fly over the existing and proposed
interchange. No adverse affect is expected from any proposed
alternative.
Response: Comment noted.
2. Comment: There is a project currently in progress, with federal and
state funds, to purchase additional clear zone land in the runway 5
approach area, to the southwest of the airport. No adverse affect is
expected from any proposed alternative.
Response: Comment noted.
IX. Public Hearing
Following circulation of the Environmental Assessment, an open forum
public hearing was held for this project as well as two other NCDOT
projects in Lumberton, I-2305B and U-2415. The hearing took place at the
18
Gilbert Carroll Middle School on March 30, 1995 (see the Appendix, Page
FA-31 through FA-40 for copies of the public hearing notice and the
handout given to hearing attendees). Over 60 citizens and over 10 NCDOT
personnel Attended the public hearing. The questions and concerns dealt
with individual property concerns, proposed typical cross sections, road
closures, alignments, required right of way, and the project schedule. The
majority of the questions and concerns were adequately addressed at the
hearing. There were two principal questions which required additional
investigation in order to be adequately addressed. The first question
dealt with the Cox Road (SR 1588) access to NC 72-711 via the southbound
Interstate 95 exit ramp being removed, and the second question dealt with
impacts to a business located at the corner of West Fifth Street and West
Drive. These issues are addressed below.
A. Cox Road Access
Several residents and business owners located along Cox Road
(SR 1588) were opposed to NCDOT's proposal to close the Cox Road
connection to the southbound Interstate 95 exit ramp. This closure would
eliminate direct access between Cox Road and NC 72-711, which is presently
provided at the existing Interstate 95 southbound ramp terminal. If this
access were removed, the only access to properties along Cox Road would be
by way of West Fifth Street (NC 72) and V.F.W. Road (see Figure F-3). The
V.F.W. Road/Hackett Street intersection located north of the Seaboard
Coastline Railroad is poorly aligned, with inadequate lateral sight
distance due to the presence of a building built very close to the edge of
pavement. Traffic would have to cross the at-grade railroad crossing in
order to reach Cox Road from V.F.W. Road. The V.F.W. Road/West Fifth
Street intersection is also poorly aligned. Large trucks would have
difficulty in making the required turns in order to get to Cox Road from
Interstate 95 and NC 72-711. Finally, V.F.W. Road is privately owned, in
addition to being in poor condition and substandard in design.
Improvements to V.F.W. Road would be required to provide suitable access
to Cox Road from West Fifth Street.
Due to the anticipated expense of the above improvements to V.F.W.
Road, relocating the Interstate 95 southbound exit and entrance ramps to
access NC 72-711 approximately 200 feet east of their present intersection
with NC 72-711 was investigated. This would allow Cox Road to be extended
to tie directly into NC 72-711. Adequate spacing between the southbound
Interstate 95 ramp terminal and the intersection of the Cox Road Extension
and NC 72-711 will be provided by this design.
It is recommended to extend Cox Road to tie directly into NC 72-711
as described above. This will cost the least of the other options and
will have the least impacts. Also, traffic operations into the Cox Road
area will be better served.-
B. Impacts to Business at West Fifth Street/West Drive Intersection
The owner of a business located on the corner of West Fifth Street
and West Drive was concerned that the proposed design would eliminate 4
parking spaces near the front of his store. This would take him below the
19
required number of spaces according to City of Lumberton's ordinance.
Also, the owner was concerned that no two-way, left-turn centerlane is
proposed in front of his business on West Fifth Street.
During the design phase, the curb radius at the northeast corner of
the West Fifth Street and West Drive intersection will be re-designed in
order to limit the number of parking spaces affected.
Widening West Fifth Street to a five-lane facility with a center
left-turn lane is beyond the scope of the subject project. However, the
tapers for the dual left turn lanes on southbound West Fifth Street at the
SR 2499 intersection extend to north of West Drive and will allow a
storage area for southbound West Fifth Street motorists desiring to turn
left into businesses in this area.
X. Basis for Finding of No Significant Impact
Based upon environmental studies and comments received from Federal,
State, and local agencies, it has been concluded that the proposed action
will have no significant adverse affect upon the quality of the
environment. The following is the basis for this conclusion:
a) While the project has received moderate input from the public,
it is not considered controversial on environmental grounds.
b) No significant adverse impacts on natural, ecological, cultural,
or scenic resources of national, state, or local significance
are expected.
c) Impacts to the Lumber River State Park, a Section 4(f) resource,
have been considered, and the project includes measures to
minimize harm to this resource.
d) The project is anticipated to displace only one business.
Adequate replacement business sites are expected to be
available.
e) No significant detrimental impact on air quality, water quality,
or by increased noise levels is anticipated in the project area.
f) The project is consistent with local plans and will not divide
or disrupt a community.
g) There are no feasible means of avoiding the loss of
approximately 0.98 acre of wetlands expected to result from the
project. Impacts- on wetlands will minimized through the use of
Best Management Practices (1991).
h) No listed threatened or endangered species was found to occur in
the vicinity of the project.
In view of the above, it has been determined that a Finding of No
Significant Impact is applicable to the project.
EFL/tp

72
` BEGIN PROJECT
: 1548 ,2
0
711
?ep`? vc 1593
, J S
95 F?
1589• r
2499 Lumberton
301
Municipal
Airport
2509
u•
?i

1642

6
U

59 72
U j A END PROJECT
2501 ` -.. _... -_.....
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 721NC 711 INTERSECTION
TO WEST FIFTH STREET
LUMBERTON, ROBESON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-2416
FIG. F-1 1
T ?
i
w. ? ? y 0+
Yeti ': `4 3`K ? y?
s q,- . L _
tk . .
C-1-
L'UAWBER

Rv4/?,0qo
POORLY
ALIGNED
INTERSECTION
154 I /
1535
EXISTING AT-GRADE 0
/
RR CROSSING /
1567
:. 1591
$ION
L' PROPOSED ACCESS PROPOSED IN THE 1617
EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT /
# 1535 OF COX ROAD TO BE ELIMINATED /
W LUMBERT01 ?
=Q
72 RAPT. CH.
O?
ti ?° h ,, •c
.1 ? 1592
S Ci?? I 1588 r 13URKE ST.
I ??O
MARSNALI S N4T?Oh = ty`2'
1612 .
.i • , _ .. ARNOL ST.
•••• ? 4?f.
!'539 tn
1592 72
1,1W. LUMBERTON
1619 ?SCH.
1597 s?`' °P I
2499 2501
?- 1
W. PARK ASSEMBLY J N
OF GOD CH. /
loo,
SOUTHBOUND I-95 ?.
RAMP RELOCATION
i
i
i
. r'

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
??Nj DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
ACCESS TO COX ROAD
LUMBERTON, ROBESON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-2416
SCALE: 1' = 1000' FIG.F-3
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
FOR IMPACTS TO THE LUMBER RIVER STATE PARK
FA-1
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL FOR
FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS WITH MINOR INVOLVEMENT WITH
PUBLIC PARKS, RECREATION LANDS, AND WILDLIFE AND WATERFOWL
REFUGES
F. A. Project M-7763(1)
State Project 8.1461701
T. I. P. No. U-2416
Description: NC 72-711 (COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE) FROM WEST OF
SR 1539 TO WEST FIFTH STREET (NC 72)
'Yes No
1. Is the proposed project designed to
improve the operational characteristics,
safety, and/or physical condition of
existing highway facilities on ? a
essentially the same location?
2. Is the project on new location?
3. Is the Section 4(f) land a publicly
owned public park, recreation land, or
wildlife and waterfowl refuge located
adjacent to the existing highway?
4. Does the amount and location of the land
to be used impair the use of the
remaining Section 4(f) land, in whole or
in part, for its intended purpose?
(See chart below)

v/ F-1
[-] V/
Total size of section 4(f) site Maximum to be acquired
less than 10 acres ................10 percent of site
10 acres-100 acres ................ 1 acre
greater than 100 acres ............ 1 percent of site

5. Do the proximity impacts of the project
(e.g., noise, air and water pollution,
wildlife and habitat effects, aesthetic
values) on the remaining Section 4(f) a
land impair the use of such land for its
intended purpose?
V
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-2
2
Yes No
6. Do the officials having jurisdiction
over the Section 4(f) land agree, in
writing, with the assessment of the
impacts of the proposed project on, and
the proposed mitigation for, the Section ? ?
4(f) lands? (see Attachment A-1).
7. Does the project use land from a site
purchased or improved with funds under
the Land and Water Conservation Act
(Section 6(f)), the Federal Aid in Fish
Restoration Act (Dingell-Johnson Act),
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Act
(Pittman-Robertson Act), or similar
laws, or are the lands otherwise ?
encumbered with a Federal interest
(e.g., former Federal surplus property)?
8. If the project involves lands described
in Item 7 above, does the appropriate a /
Federal Agency object to the land
conversion or transfer?
9. Does the project require preparation of
JL_
an EIS?
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE AND PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and
found not to be feasible and prudent:
Yes No
1. Do-nothing. v1 F-1
Does the "do nothing" alternative:
?
(a) correct capacity deficiencies?
"
(b) correct existing safety hazards?
F-1
or (c) correct deteriorated conditions?
t
and (d) create costs, unusual problems, or ? F
-1
impacts of extraordinary measure?
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-3
3
Yes No
2. Improvement of the highway without using / ?
the adiacent public park, recreational V/
land, or wildlife waterfowl refuge.
(a) Have minor alignment shifts,
changes in standards, use of ?
retaining walls, etc., or traffic ?
management measures been evaluated?
(b) The items in 2(a) would result in
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) substantial adverse community
impact
or (ii) substantial increased costs
or (iii) unique engineering,
transportation, maintenance,
or safety problems
or (iv) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or (v) a project which does not meet
the need
and (vi) impacts, costs, or problems
which are of extraordinary
magnitude
3. Build an improved facility on new
location without using the public park, ? ?
recreational land, or wildlife and
waterfowl refuge. (This would be a
localized "run around.")
(a) An alternate on new location would
result in: (circle, as appropriate)
(i) a project which does not solve
the existing problems
or (ii) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or a substantial increase in
project cost or engineering
difficulties
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-4
4
and (iv) such impacts,
difficulties
or unique or
magnitude
costs, or
of truly unusual
extraordinary
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-5
5
. 1.
2.
3.
MINIMIZATION OF HARM
The project includes all possible
planning to minimize harm.
Measures to minimize harm include the
following: (circle those which are
appropriate)
a. Replacement of lands used with lands
of reasonably equivalent usefulness
and location and of at least
comparable value.
b. Replacement of facilities impacted
by the project including sidewalks,
paths, benches, lights, trees, and
other facilities.
O Restoration and landscaping of
disturbed areas.
d. Incorporation of design features and
G habitat features, where necessary,
to reduce or minimize impacts to the
Section 4(f) property.
O Payment of t
the land and
improvements
Section 4(f)
market value
improvements
he fair market value of
improvements taken or
to the remaining
site equal to the fair
of the land and
taken.
Yes No

O Additional or alternative mitigation
measures as determined necessary
based on consultation with the
officials having jurisdiction over
the parkland, recreation area, or
wildlife on waterfowl refuge (see Item 3 below).
A discussion of specific mitigation measures is provided as
follows:
1. Before construction begins, the Division Engineer will
insure that "Bridge Construction Ahead" signs are placed
at the boat access area off McNeill Bridge Road (SR 1539)
immediately south of the Lumber River bridge and on the
upstream and downstream sides of the bridge.
2. The Lumber River channel will be kept open to boating
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-6
6
traffic during construction. Efforts to maintain as wide
a channel opening as possible during construction shall
be made.
3. The number of piers in the channel will be minimized as
much as possible. Fifty feet between piers (existing
spacing) is the minimum acceptable spacing. If needed,
one pier can be placed in the middle of the river
channel.
4. If pier footing(s) which are placed in the channel come
to within three feet of the water's surface, fins will be
installed to indicate the presence of the footing(s) in order to
protect boats and the footing(s).
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following
(attach correspondence):
a. Officials having jurisdiction over
the Sect'i on 4(f) ' Land
b. Local/State/Federal Agencies
C. US Coast Guard
(for bridge requiring bridge permits)
d. DOI, if Section 6(f) lands are
involved
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f)
evaluation approved on December 23, 1986.
All required alternatives have been evaluated, and the findings
made are clearly applicable to this project. There are no
feasible or prudent alternatives which avoid use of the Section
4(f) land.
The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and
there are assurances that the measures to minimize harm will be
incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed.
Approved:
1031-7¢
Date )W Manager, Planning & Environmental Branch
NCDOT
i/ ¢
Date Division Administrator, FHWA
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-7
7
Proiect Description
The proposed improvements call for widening NC 72-711 in the
vicinity of I-95 (see Figure 1). The bridges over the Lumber
River and I-95 southwest of Lumberton will be replaced and
• widened.
The Lumber River State Park was established by the North
Carolina General Assembly in 1989, but no land was acquired until
the summer of 1991 during a special session of the General
Assembly. In the vicinity of the this project, the park limits
are the mean high water level of the Lumber River. Since the
bridge replacement and widening will cause the placement of piers
into the Lumber River, a Section 4(f) statement is required.
The project consists of replacing and widening the Lumber
River bridge. The existing 28-foot (clear roadway width) bridge
will be replaced with a bridge 80 feet in width to accomodate the
widening of NC 72-711 (see Figure 2).
NCDOT coordinated the Lumber River bridge replacement with
the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation to determine
measures to minimize harm and specific mitigation. A letter from
Parks and Recreation stating they have no objections to the
proposed project is attached (see Attachment A-1).
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
FA-8
• P rl
71
t
• • da
Re:
- Snu
.
nn
Red S
"
p
as
i .
•s
Renn
1
Wakulla tih
V
r
aaton l
i

Z
IS
Ima
? 5; Bwt
1I?
1

ID R c?-O 1 .su 15 E It '/ .0.. N.
/ t Pt '0610 o+w.....? 1 f
?b f Raemon I IO 41
14 i Lurilhrtnl
` \ 1 Pva A11tmMm •3Gt it •s j Stu
•? , mj Plant c
•l•••• 1 •'f" .Id ? t ? LE
elan f 1f 41 t 17 { ?'
i
t
I Fairmont
O ' rottOIr t~ Pro
N \ ' Ortu
o?? 4 1
Boardman
1 e .stul
? •?MUrf tta ?•,'
16,42
72 Lin F-fs S 15 QA?
Ar^ BEGIN PROJECT
15,48 1 _32 588
........:...
71I °
! -:71588
M13E t5 b
59
17
`::..::. 9 FEU } ? ...
1593
Jae ':::y
5A END PROJECT
2499 2500 ::....::•.
95
1589 c:::::' r ' i : •::.
2
2a99 "' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
301 Lumberton =r"' TRANSPORTATION
• FL E' Municipal DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
^''r==" '?
Airport .. PLANNING AND ENVIRONM1:,,\M-AI,
?:::::G•:•: .
2509 BRANCH
NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 72/NC 711
INTERSECITON TO SR 2499
LUMBERTON, ROBESON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-2416
ti
FIGURE I
FA-9

0
.g
w
0)
p
H
M?
LL
C7 w
z >
H H
z m
w
p tr
H W
w D
p J
H
to w
Q
?- J
m Qa
ow
zir

Q
0

I
Z
d'

N w
4J •
fl '
11. ?
?'?•,n4'1'q n
Q7 n
0'
V

I?
I~
4
d
d
4
4
f3
a
a
a'
4

N
\
W
N
0 LL

•

-
a ?
E5 CY)
n N
\
W Q
zu)
C
" v
7 \
M
\\ F'xa
UEQIGz ,
I
N
t
/ 4n \` aoz w~?
?x
U jZ
z ? lil
U)
H ~? 0

/ J _

© 4'/i?3,a4? ?
4'hfl'14b4r? -?
1-9
?

4 ?

b
4
a
C)

u.
4
r
t
1.
8
fJ
lbo
41
I I ? ?
?+ 4
Q?
l7i ? b
I I i) Q \
_a
I I S/a 2 1 6 p
?a
(I uR
Q ?„ g
II ? ? 75?Q
a
5
- a
o A
II a a\ ?
I) o a\ ?
II 4
b 4
/ ED 4 4
ED
/ \ED a
I I/
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Parks & Recreation
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Dr. Philip K. McKnelly, Director
April 19, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ed Lewis, Project Planning Engineer
Environmental and Planning Branch
Department of Transportation
FROM: Philip K. McKnelly.?'-;
Ink,
?EHNR
SUBJECT: Improvements to NC 72/711 from NC 72/NC 711 Intersection West of I-95
to SR 2499 East of I-95: TIP No. U-2416, State Project No. 8.1461701
The Division of Parks and Recreation has reviewed NCDOT's 4(f) evaluation regarding
the improvements to NC 72/711 from the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to SR
2499 east of I-95. We agree with your assessment that the impacts do not constitute an
impairment of the land or the Lumber River. The Division has no objections to the
project as planned provided that the mitigation measures in the minimization of harm
section of the evaluation are followed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you should have any
question, or need additional information, please call Sue Regier, Head of our Resources
Management Program.
4
PKM/SR/gsr
cc: Sue Regier, Head of Resource Management
Scott Daughtry, South District Superintendent
. 1.7
James Sessoms, Superintendent, Lumber River State Park
- S/17
ATTACHMENT A-1
P.O. Box 27687, Rdeigh, North Cc rolina 2761 1-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]C85 FA-11
W REPLY REFER TO
I
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1690
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
February 24, 1995
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
J
MAR 0 1 1995
Z ,.
F' O
This is in response to your letter of January 9, 1995, requesting our comments
on the "Federal Environmental Assessment for NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive), From
West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72), Lumberton, Robeson County, F. A.
Project No. M-7763(1), State Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416" (Regulatory
Branch Action I.D. No. 199501472).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources,
which include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' projects. The
proposed roadway improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood
control or navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of
further assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Wilbert V. Paynes
Acting Chief, Planning Division
Enclosure
FA-12
February 23, 1995
Page 1 of 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
"Federal Environmental Assessment for NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive); From West of
SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72), Lumberton, Robeson County, F. A. Project No.
M-7763(1), State Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416" (Regulatory Branch Action
I.D. No. 199501472)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC - Bobby L. Willis, Plan Formulation and Flood Plain
Services Branch, at [phone]
The proposed project is located within the jurisdiction of the city of Lumberton,
which participates in the National Flood Insurance Program. From a review of the
February 1989 Robeson County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas Flood
Insurance Rate Map, the roadway crosses Lumber River, a detail study stream with
100-year flood elevations determined and a floodway defined. A certification will be
required indicating that the new bridge. will cause no rise in the 100-year natural water
surface elevation. We also suggest coordinating with the city for compliance with their
flood plain ordinance.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - Mike Taylor, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Branch at [phone]
Based on the information provided in the Environmental Assessment and the
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to the Lumber River State Park, we
concur that the wetland impacts may be authorized under General Permit (CESAW-
C082-N-000-0031) to place fill material associated with the construction, repair or
replacement of bridges spanning navigable waters and waters of the United States.
Futhermore, a review of our headwaters maps indicates the impacts to the natual
drainage ditch to be crossed by the proposed Dunn Road extension may be authorized
by Nationwide Permit 26 for work above the headwaters. Approximately 1.0 acre of
wetland will be filled as a result of this project, but specific acreage must be provided
and the wetlands delineated and field approved by this office prior to submitting your
application for a Department of the Army Section 404 permit. If you have any questions
please contact Mr. Taylor.

FA-13
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ecological SerNices
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
February 22, 1995
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
N. C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Dear Mr. Vick:
TAKES
PRIDE IN
AMERICA®
® s
MAR 0 2 1995
2 J
DIVISIGN OF QQ
HIGHWAYS vd
FNS/RONNtE?P
Thank you for your letter of January 9, 1995 providing the U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with a copy of the Administrative Action Environmental
Assessment (EA) for improvements to NC 72-711 and the Programmatic Section 4(f)
Evaluation for Impacts to the Lumber River State Park, Robeson County, North
Carolina (T.I.P. No. U-2416). This report is provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 661-
667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The EA assesses the proposal by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) to widen NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive) to a five- to six-lane facility
from just east of the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to West Fifth Street
(NC 72) east of I-95 in Lumberton. The project would also include replacing the
bridge over the Lumber River, replacing the existing bridge over I-95, widening
existing ramps at the I-95 interchange, and realigning or terminating service
=loads in three of the four quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange. The
length of the project would be approximately 0.7 miles.
SPECIFIC CODSIENTS
Analysis of Alternatives
Section III of the EA (pp. 14-15) presents an adequate discussion of the
alternatives considered for this project. n iternati ves are 15_mito _d in pr _ojo
_ctG
which upgrade existing facilities. The Service believes that the consideration
of various alternatives and the selection process for the preferred alternative
were satisfactory.
Construction Techniques
The EA states (p. 33) that no stream rechannel ization is "anticipated." The
Service believes that any stream modifications can adversely impact fish and
wildlife habitat. The Service recommends that the NCDOT make every effort to
avoid stream modifications.
The Service sua_rorts the measures listed in the EA (pp. 34-36) to minimize
construction impacts. Furthermore, we support the use of Design Standards in
Sensitive Watersheds which the EA states (p. 25) will be employed in this
project. The Service would add that. there be no clearing for off road
construction facilities such as machinery parking area and material storage
sites.
FA-14
General-Fish and Wildlife Resources
•
Despite the use of best management practices, the in-water work required for
constructing the bridge over the Lumber River could have adverse impacts on fish
population in the project area. Therefore, the Service recommends that the NCDOT
consult with fisheries biologists of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
commission regarding the implementation of a construction moratorium during
critical times for local fish populations.
Wetlands
The EA states (p. 23) that the proposed project will impact approximately 1.0
acre of wetlands. These losses would occur in both bottomland hardwood forest
(0.9 acre) along the Lumber River and scrub-shrub wetlands (0.1 acre) along the
proposed Dunn Road extension. The Service considers bottomland hardwoods to be
especially valuable and under pressure from development. The Service supports
the proposal by the NCDOT to minimize adverse impacts on these wetlands by using
best management practices during construction.
Mitiaation
The EA states (p. 23) that wetland impacts may be covered by either General or
Nationwide permits which would be issued by the Regulatory-Branch/ U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers. Projects covered by these permits do not require
compensatory mitigation for wetland losses. However, the Service recommends that
the NCDOT explore opportunities for the replacement of bottomland hardwoods along
the Lumber River. This effort could involve restoration or enhancement of
wetlands adjacent to the Lumber River State Park.
Section 4(f) Evaluation
Because the proposed replacement of the Lumber River Bridge will require the
placement of biers in the Lumber River which, at the project site, is part of the
North Carolina Natural and Scenic River System, Section 4(f) of the U. S.
Department of Transportation Act of 1966 requires that an evaluation be made to
determine that all feasible and prudent alternatives- to such use are considered
and that all possible efforts to minimize adverse impacts to publicly owned land
are incorporated in project plans. The EA (pp. 18-19 and A-4 to A-14) addresses
these issues. The Service is pleased that the NCDOT has coordinated this project
with the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Based on information contained in the EA, the Service considers the requirements
of Section 4(f) to be fulfilled.
Federallv-listed species.
The EA states (pp. 21-22) that two Federally-endangered species are known to.
occur in Robeson County. These species are the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis) and Michaux's sumac (Rnus michauxii).
The EA states the generally accepted description of habitat used by the red-
cockaded woodpecker, and proceeds immediately to the statement that "Suitable
habitat of this type does not exist in the project area." Similarly, the EA
gives a brief,. general description of the habitat occupied by Michaux's sumac and
states that "This habitat does not exist in the project area. In the recent
past, the Service has requested that the NCDOT provide the Service with a brief
outline of the procedures or methods used to arrive at their conclusions
regarding potential impact to Federally-listed species. On December 13, 1994,
Service biologists met with Mr. Randy Turner of NCDOT and Mr. Roy Shelton of the
Federal High:aay Administration to discuss this issue. At that meeting, an
agreement was reached to include a brief outline of the methodology which the
NCDOT used in evaluating potential impacts to Federally-listed species in project
EAs. While the present EA is dated October, 1994, the Service must still
conclude that the data presented are not adequate for us to assess the potential
impacts on these two species.
FA-15
Furthermore, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 requires that action
agencies make a clear and specific statement regarding likely impacts to
Federally-listed species. The EA for the proposed project makes no such
statement.
Based on a lack of information regarding the evaluation of potential impacts to
Federally-listed species, g;he Service finds that the requirements of Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act have not been fulfilled. The Service encourages
the NCDOT to provide the additional information to support your. stated
determination statements on impacts to Federally-listed species.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please
continue to advise us of the progress of this project,-including your official
determination of the impacts of this project. If "our office can supply any
additional information or clarification, please contact Howard Hall, the
biologist reviewing this project, at (919)-856-4520, ext 27.
Sincerely yours,,
L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor
FA-16
''1 r

Federal Emergency Management Agency
n, Region IV
o a r 1371 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
February 6, 1995
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
E1
FEB 10 1995
1r%- DIVISION OF,
HIGHWAYS
Re: Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Robeson County, North Carolina
West of S.R. 1539 to West Fifth Street Improvements
Dear Mr. Vick:
This is in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement we
received January 13, 1995, for the above-referenced project.
Robeson County, North Carolina is participating in the Regular
Phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The Lumber
River has 100-year floodplain and regulatory floodways delineated;
therefore, any encroachment into the floodways must be in
compliance with the NFIP regulations.
The. agency in charge must ensure compliance with the floodplain
management measures as enacted by the State of North Carolina. In
this regard, it is imperative that the agency coordinate closely
with the appropriate staff in the Floodplain Management Section of
the Division of Emergency Management.
If we can be of further assistance,. please contact Ms. Bel Marquez
at [phone].
incerely,
Robert E. McBeth, Chief
Hazard Identification and
Risk Assessment Branch
Mitigation Division

FA-17
OF ra
a ?
o
I Atli CA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
REGION FOUR
310 New Bem Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
February 1, 1995
In Reply Refer To.

HO-NC
Mr. H. F. Vick, P.E.
Manager of Planning and
Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Mr. :Vick:
Subject: Federal-aid Project M-7763 1 , State No. U-2416, NC-72&711, from west of SR-1539 to West 1Fifth
Street,, Lumberton, Robeson County
-Ref: United States Coast Guard Bridge Permit
We have reviewed the subject project to determine if a United
States Coast (USCG) permit is required for replacing the bridge
over the Lumber River.
Based on data included in your December 23, 1994 letter and in
accordance with "Subpart H - Navigational Clearance for Bridges"
(23 CFR 650.805), the Federal Highway Administration has determined
that a USCG permit is not required to replace the bridge over the
river.
A verbal determination was given Mr. Ed F. Lewis, Project Engineer,
on January 12, 1995. If you have any questions, please contact
Wady Williams at 856-4350.
Sincerely yours,
For Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator
FA-18

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
January 31, 1995 G E f y
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch zFEB p 2 1995
Division of Highways 2
Department of Transportation ZC D1VISICN OF Q?'?
?JC'VZJ ? IGHwgYS
FROM: David Brook
Deputy Sate Historic Preservation Officer ??ROfVMEP
SUBJECT: Improvements to NC 72-711 from west of SR 1539
to west of 5th Street, Lumberton, Robeson County,
U-2416, M-77631, 8.1461701, CH 95-E-4220-0495
We have received the Environmental Assessment (EA) concerning the above
project from the State Clearinghouse and would like to comment.
While we believe the EA adequately addresses our concerns for historic
architectural resources, the Architectural/Historical Resources Section (page 18)
Should be corrected. As stated in our letter of November 14, 1994, there are two
structures over fifty years of age within the area of potential effect. We concurred
that these two structures are not historic.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions.
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: State Clearinghouse
B. Church
FA-19
169 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27C-Ji-2,'!,'?',
q
td?.Sa
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
FM208- DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIQ
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 603-8003 L
02-28-95 (dam g
Z *49 0 .
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS G) 4/V/
MAILED TO FROM
N-C DEPT* OF TRANSPORTATION MRS- CHRYS BAGGET? NTN-a?
WHIT WEBS DIRECTOR
PROGRAM DEV- BRANCH N C STATE-CLEARINGHOUSE
TRANSPORTATION BLDG-/INTER-OFF
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ENV. ASSSESS- - OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OF TO NC 72-711
(COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE) FROM WEST OF SR 1539 TO WEST OF FIFTH STREET
IN LUMBERTCN (TIP #U-2416)
SAI NO 95E00000495 PROGRAM TITLE - ENV- ASSESS-
THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS- AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SUBMITTED ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
( X) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHCULL YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONSt
PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE [phone].
C-C- REGION N
.
t u . 1 .1995
i1----------------l-???V1
L
FA-20
NCWRC.HCP.FALLS LAKE TEL:91 -'1d-ytiJy rcu 1V tiJ 1V•1V ivu.Vvµ r.u.
N_ orth Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission.
NZ -
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
'TO: Melba Mcgee
. Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project C dinator
Habitat Conservation Progra?
DATE: February 10, 1995
SUBJ1?CT. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCD01) Environmental
Assessment (EA) for NC72-711 Improvements, from west of SR 1539 to West
Fifth Street (NC 72) in Lumberton, Robeson County, North Carolina. TIP No. iJ-
2416, SCH Project No. 95-0495.
Staff biologists of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject EA
and are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess
project impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with
certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332 (2) (c)) and the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
NCDOT proposes to improve NC 72-711 in Lumberton to a five to six-lane facility from
west of Mcneill Bridge Road (SR 1539) to West Fifth Street east of I-95. The bridge carrying
NC 72-711 over the Lumber River will also be replaced as part of this project. Impacts to
wildlife habitat include approximately 1.9 acres of forested land of which 1 acre is jurisdictional
wetlands.
We feel that the subject docunrenl adequately addresses our concerns regarding fish anti
wildlife resources in the Project area. At this time, we will concur with the EA and anticipate
concurrence with the upcoming Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
We request that NCDOT continue to look for opportunities to minimize wetland impacts
and require contractors to strictly adhere to Best Management Practices. Sedimentation and
erosion control measures for High Quality Waters (HQW) should be in place prior to the
initiation of construction and should be maintained throughout the life of the project. We also,
FA-21
wi..w??,h?.,r,rrtLL? Lhii\C ICL•71J-JGO-70J7 •.•"• +V_ JV 1V,-av ..v.VV? .V1
Memorandum 2 February 10, 1995
1
request that no in-water construction take place in the Lumber River from March 15 to June 15.
This is to minimize the negative impacts from sedimentation and turbidity on the spawning
activity of freshwater fish species (primarily sunfish and largemouth bass).
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any further
assistance please call me at [phone].
cc: Keith Ashley, District 4 Fisheries Biologist
Thomas Padgett, District 4 Wildlife Biologist
Randy Wilson, NG/ES Program Manager
David Dell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
2

FA-22

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment.
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management

James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard; Jr.; P.E:; Director-
February 21, 1995 .
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dom
Monica Swihart'I`?
From: Eric Galamb L'
Subject: EA for NC 72-711 In Lumberton
Robeson, County
State Project DOT No. 8.1461701, TIP #U-2416
EHNR # 95-0495, DEM # 10842
a'
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Environmental
Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
activities which impact of waters of the state Including wetlands. The document states that
1.0 acres of waters including wetlands will be impacted.
The Lumber River is classified WS-IV Sw HQW (page 24). DEM requests that hazardous spill
catch basins be installed at all water supply stream crossings. The BMP for the protection of
surface waters requires DOT to install hazardous spill, catch basins in water supply critical
areas. Other stream crossings may be outside of the critical area but OEM still believes that
hazardous spill catch basins at these locations will provide extra protection at minimal cost
Bridge deck runoff should not drain directly into the bodies of water. All stream relocations
should adhere to DOT's Stream Relocation/ Channelization guidelines. OEM requests that
DOT utilize HQW soil and erosion control measures to protect the water supply.
The bridge over the Lumber River will be relocated to the north side. This provides DOT with
an opportunity to revegetate the wetlands that were impacted with the original bridge.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of an EA by DEM would not preclude the denial of a 401
Certification upon application if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Gaiamb (733-1786) in
DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch. '
cc: Ed Lewis, DOT
Wilmir=on COE
nc72-71 1.ea
P.O. Box 29.&,5, Raleigh, North Ccrollno 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equd opportunity Affirmctive Ac!icn Employer 50% recvdad/ 10% post-ccnsaner paper
FA-23
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Division of Land Resources
James G:?1rlartin, Govemor PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS
vyllu& W. %_ Obey, Jr., Secretary
-Project Number: -If--
Project Name:
Countv- ?O?C-j Oy

rtes
a' ` - Cad

Geodetic Survev
L/ This project will impact geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic
Survey should be'contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
.Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at [phone].
lp"XI, Z!, -7 IZ414-
Reviewer Date
Erosion and Sedimentation.Control
• No comment

This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (F.QW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
clarth Carolina Sedimentation Control Cammissicn.
Other ( ccsc;,ents attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at [phone].
Reviewer Date
P.O. °c;::7uo7 ' Rule!gh. N.C. 27611-7687 e Telerhonc [phone]
FA-24
Stale of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
Public Water Supply Section
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
- ...... Jonathan B. Howes,-Secretary =

Clearinghouse Project No. 95-0495
Robeson County
January 27, 1995
T'
Public transportation (busing) and other measures (staggered work, car pooling, van pooling) should be
incorporated into the planning process for improving NC72-711 to maximize the life of the improvement. By
minimizing the number of single occupied vehicles (and associated congestion), the need for another major road
improvement-in 10-20 years is reduced.
i?
/XZ
YJ
Paul B. Clark
Environmental Engineer
Water Quality Compliance Branch
Public Water Supply Section
Division of Environmental Health
Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources
r
FA-25
P.O. Box 29536, Rcieigh, North Carolina 27626-0536 Telephone [phone] FAX 919-71x3242
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50A recycled/ 1 Cr% post-consumer pc-par

- 4 'g• !''sZueM
'I"Ct":..?11.1 YhC pE PrC?CC.C
r • ., 1

Ut
U
The applicinc should be. aclvisecl' cilac plans :.nd specificac:ons for aiY ?vacer sysce
im[ proveZ?encs must be :p?::•ovcd by the L:-qislon of Ll:%1tronnlc:1M[ Healthh, prior ca?he•zvra
Jf a CO Licr cc ot'the Imci-acIOL1 of CJ11SC1•UC1_oI1* (..s requ::cd by 15A_ NCAC 1St; .0300 ec. sec
For informaeien, connate ehe Public W-Acc_- Suoply Se_eioli, (919) 733-246C).
This project will be classified :u a nor.-com"muniCy ouc :e wace: suopl?/ and must comply w
scace and federal cirinl:inb rilCer i??On1COt'1t1_ CGQuIrG:?1GF:cS. For n10Cc Mformacioll the zQplic'
should concac: Ehe Public wacer Juaply (91-:
1
t this project is ConSc!•ucceC as orco_ osed= jc will rccci-rlme _d closure of fecc'of zdjzc:
.Ii
7:aCcrs co the h:^resc oC stcllEL or i^forr_:zclort rcgarCir.; . he.shell:ish s:nIc3Cion prc:
l..1, the -oolicanc should corlc:c= r=1e Shellfish S..r_ic.ni?n Brut'- ac (919) •726-6527.
The svoil alspes:Iarea(s} proposed for this :)rojecc imv: product. :. rnoscuizo brceaing-grebl;
ror inr ion conccrn=na :AQropnice inosquico con.rol mczSLrCS.3 the aoolicz^_C•shc
_Tormz_t
,? ,,
conr-zec the 1 uouc.H':eslch P•'csc Ma nallcme^c.Sec_'On 7:z: 1 19 716-5970.
?----Z lbe zppilcznc Should be- aCvtSCC CZ 2C O:' Ct=rOliclO:? rJr eUio:e:
?---?, SCrLiC_'.ICGS, 2P_ GiG:1S:YG :'. Coi:Cl'Oi =rOC, r:.^__ ?il?'• be- C1C=.'•S::'_r' = Ci?C: i0 przYC:r
i171°DCZCiCi: Of C C'ad'.^.CS Ci. Ql:.: t ll: ::'?. I ht c) cm. In- CGdc E -CO
1.. I
ct_ae_C or c.. Put _eclCt_
conCZCC t__e tccal heaC i le.:.
733-64-07.
--? Tie zopl'clac should be advised co c-ncacc -cne focal hciim deoa.?rzer.C re Inc,
acat 1 rc'vuirc.:.Cr.CS ^r : ^C'C :=:, !t'_5=3:.;f!nrc,`2? i„tll!C?= Li CI V:: a _ i ??.: a`• iv:. .
? :L ?rtnr`rntl -- rrlr- C1 r1 : iitC! nC ,r•r n-•SICe R/ sc_ C.1SCICS:! mct(1=)dS, COVICAC,
a,- i. _Lr^12C:Ca ? -`'.
r--? The applLCanc should hr. the ic'czi 'Icaicn C1C.: :i:lll_:1 Cclglr6m+ me Sa..
t- laullt I%-S rcqul:L6 fell. cnls 1:1-o1(n:_
?" it ..:1.`:C1l1LJ' c;.;::L''-. ll::':.. '?:t. ;?:_ .'l`t:..... :1:....;? Cif; C:v11S1.!'•,:.::...tl. ,: ....... ?:? C?1.: '.V ^, i:\
1 - l'C.!O(_1'.:l]111I..-:`.•?; :. )U?)!:.:C,__. _t' .. .. .It,'. ?. t..a .. ??h. C':.. .-. _. ..?: !?'.:!:. a_ ?•?? ::?: .:
al
t) t.lC:t, :?_.. ?.:??.:'" i?• `I'1:' _ ..rt?l:l?,'i: ?i.
Section/I3rlnelI. - Dzce
State of North- Carolina Reviewing Office:
Department of Environment;. Health, and Natural: Rdsourr -
Project Number. Due Date:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL. REVIEW-- PROJECT COMMENTS'
9? = oyes •= ?o-- s?_ :- -
{
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR" permit(s) andlor approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law. .
-aa:--. ,.n H,n --areP Af thB forrn_
Questions regarding these permits snouts uc auuicaac.} ?.....? •._y•-••_. _...__ --._.-_- - -- __
reiative to these plans and permits are available from the same
lines
id
d
Normal Process
.
e
gu
All applications, information an
' Regional Off Ice. Time
(statutory time
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS limit)
` .. PERMITS
t Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
Q Permit to construct 5 operate wastewater treatmen
3 sewer
ions
t construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application

ens
,
facilities, sewer system ex
technical conference usual -
(90 days)
systems not discharging into state surface waters.
NPDES • permit to discharge into surface water andlor Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site insoection. 90.120 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to
NIA
f
aters
i construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPOES. Reply )
(
.
ace w
nto state sur
discharging time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPOES
permit-whichever is later.
30 clays
Water Use Permit Pre-aoplication technical conference usually necessary (NIA)
7 days
Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued
prior to the installation of a well. (t5 days}
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
On-site inspection. Preaoplication conference usual. Filling
owner
Dredge and Fill Permit .
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 (jays(
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
60 days
Permit to construct b operate Air Pollution Abatement
r 15A NCAC 21H
S NIA (90 days).
L? .
ources as pe
facilities andlor Emission
Any open burning associated with subject prooosal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 20.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
60 days
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A
C NCAC 20.0525 wnicn requires notification and removal NIA
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group
(90 days)
919-733-0820,
C Comolex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 20.0800.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be property addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion b sedimentatior
0 {
20 da
s
4 control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with prober Regional Office (land Quality Sec:.) at least 3 y
(30 davsi
days before oeginnmo activity. A fee of S30 for the first acte and 520.00 for eadn additional acre or Dart must accompany the plan
-

C 7
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance:
(30 days)
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR_ Bond amount
i varies with type mine and numoer of acres of affected land. Any area 30 days
G Mining Permit mined greater Inan one acre must be permited. The aporoonate bond (60 daysi
must be received before the permit can be issued.
C North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit
a d 1 day
(NIA)
ays
exceeds
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit • 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required -if more t day
(NIA)
rj
Counties in coastal N.C. with organic sods
than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections
"
should be requested at least ten nays before actual burn is planned.
90.120 days

r? NIA (NIA)
L Oil Refining Facilities
If permit required. application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must nife N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days
inspect construction. certify construction is according to EHNR aoprov
Dam Safety Permit ed plans. May also require oermit under mosquito control program. And 160 days)
a AOd permit from Corps of Engineers. An Inspection of site is neces-
sary to verily Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of 2200.00 must ac•
FA-2?
company the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total orctec: cost will be required upon completion
...o.
Normal P.-- as
C
C
C
C
C
C

PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)

Permit to drill
l File surety bond of $5,000 with EHNR running to State of N.C. 10 days
exp
oratory oil or gas well conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon (NIA)
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations.

opnys+cal Exploration Permit - ._... "
77-7

Application tiled with ?HNR at least.10 nays prior ioissue_of e
permit

-- - ..
10daYs
Application by letter. No standard application form. (NIA)
State Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include 15.20 days
J descriptions & drawings of structure & proof of ownership (N/A)
of riparian property.
401 Water Quality Certification
NIA 60 days
(130 days)

CAMA Permit for MAJOR development
$250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)

CAMA Permit for MINOR development
550.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
1 Abandonment of any wells. it required, must be ih accordance with Title 15A. Subchapter 2C.0100.
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
1 Compliance with 15A NCAC 21-1.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. 45 days
(N/A)
Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority):
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
59 Woodfin. Place
- Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone] [phone]
' ? Mooresville Regional Office i
? R
l
h R

919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950 g
a
e
egional Office
3800 Garrett Drive
Suite 101
Mooresville, NC 28115 ,
Raletgh, NC 27609
[phone] [phone]
? Washington Regional Office ? Wil
i
t
R

1424 Carolina Avenue m
ng
on
egional Office
127 Cardinal Onve Extension
Washington, NC 27889
(919) US-6481 Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
? Winston-Salem Relioral O"ice
8025 North Po.r:t l?ivd. FA-28
Suite 1C0

THIS PAGE
INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK
FA-29

. 1U1\iBERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Lumberton/Robeson County Airport Commission
Airport Blvd. Ir F I j1?
Lumberton, North Carolina 28358 O
X
February 20, 1995
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E. Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
NC Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
-t1
S
\Z?
\c
FEB 2.2 1995
D1V1S1CK4 pr
,HIGHWAYS
RE: Environmental Assessment
NC 72-711 (County Club Drive)
From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72)
Lumberton, Robeson County
F.A.'Project'No. 11-7763(1)
State Project No. 8.1461701
T. I. P. No. U-2416;
Dear Mr. Vick:
The following comments are in reference to Table of Contents
I.I. Nearby Airports starting on page 8.
1. First paragraph. Third sentence. The principal instrument
approach to the primary runway (5/23) is south to nortl;
therefore, most instrument approaches do 'not occur over the
NC 72-711/I-95 interchange area. However some instrument
approaches are flown to runway 13,,in the vicinity of the
proposal interchange and some visual approach aircraft
traffic patterns for runway 5 and 13 do 'ly over the existing
and proposed interchange. No adverse affect is expected from
any proposed alternative.
2. Second paragraph. Second sentence. There is a project
currently in progress, with federal and state funds, to
purchase additional clear zone land in the runway 5 approach
area, to the South:iest of the airport. No adverse affect is
expected from'any proposed alternati??e.
Should you have any questions please contact me at the above
address or cal-1 910-'734--6480.`'-
Sincerely,,
Larry Scantlin
Airport flanager
LUS/b s•
FA-30
NOTICE OF AN OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC HEARING
FOR PROPOSED 1HPR.OVEIMENTS
TO THREE I-95 INTERCHANGES IN LUMBERTON:
US 301 - SR 1997
NC 211 (ROBERTS ROAD)
NC 72/NC 711 (COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE)
Project 8.1461401 - I-2305B Pobeson County
8.1461601 U-2415
8.1461701 U-2416
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold
the above open house public hearing on Thursday,
March 30, 1995 between the hours of -4:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. in
the Gilbert Carroll Middle School Cafeteria located at
300 Bailey Road in -Lumberton. Interested individuals may
attend this hearing at their convenience between the above
stated hours. Division of Highways personnel will be available
to provide information, answer questions, and take comments
regarding these projects,
The following I-95 interchange improvements are proposed:
U3 301/SR 1997 - Widen Southbound Lumber River. Bridge; Relocate
Service Road Connectors to US 301 Thereby
Eliminating Two-Way Ramps; Improve Northbound
and Southbound Ramps.
NC 211 - Widen NC 211 to a Multi-Lane Roadway from
McMillan Avenue to Lackey Street; Replace and
Widen Bridge Over 1-95; Add Loops in NW and SE
Quadrants; Realign Service Roads.
NC 72/110.711 - Widen NC 72/11C 711 to a Multi-Lane Roadway
from the NC 72/NC 711 Intersection to NC 72
(West 5th Street) ; Replace Lumber River
Bridge; Replace Bridge Over I-95; Realign
Service Roads.
Additional right of way and the relocation of two businesses -
one at NC 211 and one at NC 72/NC 711 - will be required for
these projects.
Maps setting forth the location and design and copies of
:.'Lie Environmental Documents are available for public review in
r th_ North' Carolina Department of Transportation'.s District •
Office located on NC 711 - apprc:,i;aalely ene mile. __-= NC 72 -
in Lumberton. _
NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for
disabled persons who wish to participate in the hearing. To
receive special services or additional project information,
please call M L. L. Hendricks. P. O. Box 25201,
Raleigh, ITC 27611 o= telephone [phone].
FA-31
k-`

I-95
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
NC 7? ? N-C 711
.:.,(COUN,TRY CLUB DRIVE)
Tai WEST FIFTH STREET (NC 72)
PROJECT O. 8.1461701
TIP NO. U-2416
ROBESO COUNTY

CONIBNED PUBLIC HE 1ING
NIAFICH 303 19SO'
s: :s+i.?+?.?Y?i`?.?.`''.u ?1.2srr;:.ti?:ia:i ?.:ai'xtJt?'?_?',?.=, y ?:?c,;,;'-'i:•,'•? r'f':+'-.,_,_.+`..;,;?;ssaa.. ?`!?'"•?` ?„et+t, -?'•:+?}?u'„'= .??.a=.:?c:?..:il+cu??t`?' Yi"ti3
FA-32 L

'lip
s i >.
s ?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR. R. SAMUEL HUNT I I I
GovERNoR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201 SECRETARY
MARCH '30, 1995
DEAR CITIZEN:
THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THE OPEN-FORUM PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
PROPOSED I-95 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS (NC 72-NC 711 - COUNTRY
CLUB DRIVE). CONTAINED IN THIS HANDOUT PACKAGE IS INFORMATION
ABOUT THE PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT, THE DESIGN, AND RIGHT OF WAY
PROCEDURES. YOU ARE INVITED TO READ THE HATERIAL'TO BECOME
ACQUAINTED WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
A MAID OF THE 'PROJECT AND SEVERAL SETS OF.PLANS ARE AVAILABLE
FOR YOUR REVIEW, REPRESENTATIVES OF ' THE DEPARTME24T OF
TRANSPORTATION ARE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS THE PROJECT A?TD ANSWER
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DESIGN. REPRESENTATIVES OV THE RIGHT OF
WAY AIM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE BRANCH ARE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS
TEESE AREAS A,NM TO ADDRESS YOUR QUESTIONS.
THE PURPOSE OP THE PUBLIC HEARING IS TO SOLICIT YOUR THOUGHTS
ON THE PROPOSED PROJECT. YOU MAY PROVIDE THEM BY USING THE
C01,24ENT SHEET IN YOUR HANDOUT OR RECORDING THEM ON THE TAPE
RECORDER AVAILABLE FOR THAT PURPOSE. WRITTEN C01ILMENTS HAY BE
DEPOSITED IN THE DESIGNATED BOX OR MAILED DURING THE NEXT
10 DAYS TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED. ALL COMMEIITS WILL BECOME PART
OF THE PUBLIC RECORD.
AGAIN, I WA111T TO THI-NX YOU FOR ATTENDING THE PUBLIC HEARING 'AND
FOR GIVING US YOUR CO.leiENTS. A DECISION ON THE PROPOSED
PROJECT WILL BE MADE IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
YOURS TRULY,
L. L. HE='RI C'XS
PUBLIC HEARING OFFICER

FA-33 ?rte
PURPOSE OF PROJECT
The proposed I-95 improvements to the NC 72/NC 711 (Country Club
Drive) Interchange will result in more efficient vehicle operation
and reduced travel times, resulting. -in road user cost savings.
Traffic safety will. be enhanced... ..Access.. to homes, businesses, and
public facilities in the project area will be improved.
PURPOSE OF PUBLIC.MEETING
Tonight's meeting is one step in the Department of Transportation's
procedure for making.you, the public, a part of the planning process.
The Department of Transportation Is soliciting your views on the
proposed I-95 improvements to the NC 72/NC 711 (Country Club Drive)
Interchange.
YOUR PARTICIPATION
Several representatives of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation are present at this meeting. Any of these people will
be happy to talk with you,' explain the design to you, and answer your
questions. Now that the opportunity is here, you are encouraged to
participate by voicing your comments to Department of Transportation
representatives at this meeting, by writing them on the comment sheet
and leaving it with one of the representatives, or by mailing them in
during the 10 days following the Public Hearing.
Those wishing to submit written material may send it to:
Ift
Mr. L. L. Hendricks
NCDOT - DOH
Citizens Participation Unit
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Telephone - [phone]
FAX - (919).250-4208
nEAT IS DOWE VITH TEE TWF R TAT ON.
All input received through the public involvement process will be
made available. for review and consideration by the Administrative and
Engineering staffs of the Division of'Highways. The Engineering
staff will review and consider all comments on an individual basis to
determine those that can be effectively incorporated into the final
design. t
FA-3.4
`\t
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The North Carolina Department of Transportation and the Federal
Highway Administration propose to improve the NC 72/NC 711 (Country
Club Drive) Interchange. NC 72/NC 711 (Country.Club Drive) will. be
widened to a - five and six lane, facility.- from just. east of the
'NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to.West Fifth Street (NC 72)
east of I-95 in Lumberton. Bridges over I-95 and the Lumber River
will be replaced. The service roads in•the northeast, southeast, and
northwest quadrants of the interchange will be revised to eliminate
the service road connections with the existing ramps. Dunn Road will
be-extended from West Fifth Street to Hester Road. Approximately
400' of West Fifth Street (from the NC 72-NC 711/West Fifth Street
Intersection) will be widened to a five-lane roadway with curb and
gutters to supply the required turning movement capacity.
MOTE: Bridges will be phase constructed and traffic will be
maintained during construction.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Langth 0.770 Miles

Right of Way Variable
Relocatees Residences - 0
Businesses - 1
Estimated Cost Right of Way $ 518,000
Construction 6,300,000
----------
Total -
$ -
6,818,000
TaniatiJe Schedule Right of Way - July, 199 5
Construction - March, 1997

-70 l?rr?r t rn ?a.
FA-35

A.

r
r
z
0
V
LU
V)
V
ra-

4
0
0
0
co
O
N
n
?r
ct
W
00
W
Q 7
a=
a
J
W
H
oW
W°
o >_
FA-36
J
Z
a_
ztn
oc?
V f,?
C
0
:D cr
00
M z
W V
W ?..-
Z?
d
t? z
M
?-- LU
$ H
'F-
V
cr-
a.
LU

co
N
N
ip

N

5
Oj
z
0
O_
U
O
4
U ?
CL

FA-37
J
W
4
J
Q
Z
2i
w
..
Z U
O w 3
O
u
CD
CC t }
W
.w
0
O F-
0 J
Z
m
C?
:D W
U
w M
2
J
Lf)
0
a---Z
Z)
0
co
Er
O
z

`?" ` ? Ion ?
_. '•? 371 ! ?
_ SA.$ f 1 .\
S 1 Rf...Hl
I 1 gfWti• ,? Sl.nl fW
• f rb1 ' IS ?
• S1 ^ oll. ' ems. t
/ •\
• ? R E I O N
•••••• ? 7 R.wnet / w tl
/s u
501 `+ Lurz)Bead
•'• I ?t.. ?tt•. n• 301
•.••.•• - • , ) Rate 16
O •.•• ••• v.0 1 roct e
v •
72
F
'•' / ! 35
1?Oq
6EGIN PROJECT,
1S't9r .32 ``1 ?O Isae
............
711
17 sv I
t:: u
' 'c8r 4'.
END PROJECT,
tSao •c: •?X'=y'•??: y
?, 2a?7 f:c ' Lim: erar. =ate= ?` NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
MDEPARTMENT
O?'
TRANSPORTATION
.? '.^....:: • :::: _^ _ DIYI510N OF HTGgC: A.15
^rpc PLP.ITYTi1GANDEi7VIHON:iiI:+^IT.?I.
V+ 230?
NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 72 NC 711 INTERSECTION
TO WEST FI=TH STR ET
LUMSFRTON, ROGESCiq COU;47-
TIP PROJECT U-241 G
FIG.
FA-39 '

4
COMMENT sFIE-rT
I-95 Improvements
NC 72-NC 711 (Country Club Drive) Interchange
March 30, 1995
U-2416 Robeson County Project 8.1461701
NAME:
ADDRESS:
COHME,'JTS AND/OR QUESTIONS:
I
Comments may be mailed to:
L. L. Hendricks, Public Hearing Officer
N. C. Department cf Transportation - Division or Highwavs
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FA-40
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources / AT.IWA •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ? E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A, Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 7, 1995
MEMO
To: Ed Lewis
NC DOT
Through: John Dorn
From: Eric GalambA
Subject: Revised Comments on the EA for NC 72-711
Robeson County
TIP # U-2416
DOT informed DEM that the stream classification for the Lumber River was incorrect
in the EA. The correct class is C Sw and HQW. Since it is not a water supply stream, DEM
does not require hazardous spill catch basins. However, DEM reaffirms the request that the
bridge deck runoff not drain directly into the Lumber River.. This request is to protect
contaminants from entering the body of water and thus protect the HQW classification. If the
deck runoff is dropped onto the stream banks, pollutant removal is possible. All other
comments from our February 21, 1995 remain valid and unchanged.
NC 72-71Lmem
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

)eve nok
LAWO

:SINS W Woo
taOd3a ONV 3IVOII83AN1 ? NO117y 3IVlndoaadv 3Hvl
munivNOls ? 3an1VN'IS AW.aoa iiiaae aavaaad ?.
S1N3WWO:3 anoA nod - a3MSNV ?38V31a'
NOI1vWtlOd N4=aflOA and .51NI"Inosy 3W 338 ONY 310N ?.
'IYAOaddV anoA and - 0 - SlIV130 3aOW N11M Naf113a ' O -
Mnb3a aROA aid 0 3W OI Nidn mi ONV ZION ?
N011YSa3ANOD..uno aid ? 3113 ONV 31ON
NOLLOV

90-18 •WOOM'Ho roN d3a woad
?
!WOOa ao 'ON •d3a ?
J of
dl-1S IVJ.1[WSNVUI
x0isdsH0dSM HI 30 ` xHwsxVaHa 'a W
aoa SCA7F
a,w
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
January 9, 1995
Mr. Eric Galamb
DEHNR - Div. of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1148
Dear Mr. Galamb:
R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
RECEIVED
,3aN 1 t 1995'
ENyIRON g%%-HC1ENCES
SUBJECT: Federal Environmental Assessment for NC 72-711 (Country Club
Drive), From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72),
Lumberton, Robeson County, F. A. Project No. M-7763(1), State
Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416
Attached is a copy of the Environmental Assessment and the Natural
Systems Technical Reports for the subject proposed highway improvement. It
is anticipated this project will be processed with a "Finding of No
Significant Impact"; however, should comments received on the Environmental
Assessment or at the public hearing demonstrate a need for preparing a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement you will be contacted as part of our scoping
process.
Copies of this Assessment are being submitted to the State
Clearinghouse, areawide planning agencies, and the counties, towns, and
cities involved.
Permit review agencies should note it is anticipated Federal Permits
will be required as discussed in the report.
Any comment you have concerning the Environmental Assessment should be
forwarded to:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Division of Highways
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Your comments should be received by February 27, 1995. If no comments
are received by that date we will assume you have none. If you desire a copy
of the "Finding of No Significant Impact," please so indicate.
Sincerely
9?--
?;,, H.
Franklin Vic E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/plr
I
ti
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
November 27, 1990
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
MEMORANDUM TO: Lubin Prevatt, Unit Head
Rural Project Unit
FROM: Janet L. Shipley, Environmental Specialist
Environmental Unit
SUBJECT: Biological report for NC 72-711, from west of
SR 1539 to SR 2501, Lumberton, Robeson county.
TIP# U-2416
The following report is prepared from a field survey
conducted by Environmental Unit Staff on September 6, 1990.
This federally funded project is classified as an
Environmental Assessment (EA).
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
t
Widening, Improvement and Bridge Replacement
of NC 72-711 in Robeson County
TIP ## U-2416
State Project NO. 8.1461701
NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
U-2416
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
JANET L. SHIPLEY
NOVEMBER 1990
J
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction .........................................1
1.1 Project Description .............................1
1.2 Purpose ........................................1
1.3 Study Area .....................................1
1.4 Methodology ....................................1
2.0 Natural Resources ....................................2
2.1 Plant Communities ..........................2
2.11 Uplands ...............................2
2.12 Wetlands ..............................2
2.2 Wildlife ...................................3
2.3 Soils ......................................4
2.4 Water Resources ............................5
3.0 Special Topics ........................................5
3.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands ..........................5
3.12 Permit Requirements ........................5
3.13 Mitigation .................................6
3.2 Protected Species ...............................6
3.21 Federally-listed species ...................6
3.22 State-listed Species .......................7
3.3 Natural and Scenic Rivers .........................7
4.0 References ............................................7
Appendix Exhibit- Agency scoping letters
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project description
The Transportation Improvement Program calls for
widening NC 72-711 to a five-lane curb and gutter facility
(six lanes between the western I-95 ramp and SR 2499) from
the NC 72-711 intersection west of I-95 to SR 2501. The
existing bridge over I-95 is to be replaced, and the existing
bridge over the Lumber River is to be widened to five lanes.
It is proposed that NC 72-711 be realigned from just west of
I-95 to east of SR 2499 to conform with the Lumberton
Thoroughfare Plan. The existing access roads (SR 1588, SR
1592 and SR 1593) are to be realigned to eliminate the
interchange ramp/access road intersections.
This project is being planned as a state Environmental
Assessment (EA).
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this technical report is to describe the
natural systems found within the project area and to document
probable impacts to these systems.
1.3 Study Area
Robeson County is on the Coastal Plain in the
southeastern part of North Carolina (Fig. 1) and is the
second largest county in the state. Lumberton, the county
seat, is on the banks of the Lumber River and is a major
tobacco market center. The soils are nearly level, making
Robeson County mainly a farming county, with tobacco being
the number one cash crop.
1.4 Methodology
This 0.8 mile study area was surveyed October 12, 1990
to identify vegetative communities and wildlife species
contained therein. Vegetative communities and wildlife were
inventoried and mapped during cruise surveys, and
characterized by ground truthing at specified sample points
within each community. Wetland communities were identified,
using methods in the "Federal Manual for Identifying and
Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands".
In-house preparatory work was done prior to my field
visit. The Robeson County Soil Survey, the hydric soils list
for Robeson County and the USGS Northwest and Southwest
Lumberton quadrangle maps were studied to identify potential
wetland sites.

72 BEGIN PROJECT 1e42
.:;•' :.:,.:? '?S 1575 ?`?? 4•

I5a7 ?49 .

:•
::::
..: 1537
1 S48 'gyp
p
?
14
_ XX
30
v9
I`
0000
?o
t= `,i7
J 1593
00 In.
S°
2499
1589 95 F?J
E'? i s
2499
301 Lumberton
Municipal
2509 ?•: ^ y ' Airport_
J
O
1588
'10
592
.10 72
1 A Ae ..
2so1 ?--- END PROJECT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTME14T of
TRANSPORTATION
i1QN
DIVISION OF MI-GNwATS
'tw PLANNING AND RESEARCH SRANCH
I
LUMBERTON
NC 72-711/1-95 INTERCHANGE
ROBESON COUNTY
U-2416
12/89 0 mile 1/4 FIG. 1
2
2.0 Natural Resources
'F
2.1 Plant Communities
Five vegetative communities were identified in the study
area. Wetland communities include bottomland hardwood
forests and wet shrub-scrub assemblage. Man-dominated areas,
mixed-herbaceous assemblage and mixed pine-hardwood forest
were identified as upland communities.
2.11 Uplands
Man-dominated Areas
Commercial development, roads, maintained road-side
shoulders and interchange areas, dominate the study area.
These are areas with a suppressed level of vegetative growth,
due to mowing, spraying, clearing or other man initiated
activities. Turf and landscaped areas make up the dominant
vegetative component and are planted in ornamentals and grass
(Festuca sp.).
Mixed Herbaceous Assemblage
Abandoned fields allowed to revegetate naturally, show
early stages of succession characterized by plants that have
short life cycles, reproduce annually by seeds and produce an
abundance of seeds. Common plant species occurring within
these areas are dog-fennel (Eupatorium capillifoium),
goldenrod (Solidago altissima), broomsedge (Andropogon
virginicus), lespedeza (Lespedeza virginica) and aster (Aster
spp.).
Mixed Pine-Hardwood Forest
Lumber River bottomland hardwood forest grades upslope
into a mixed pine-hardwood forest. This community represents
an intermediate successional stage between pine forest and
hardwood forest. It is found in situations where a hardwood
forest has suffered a disturbance such as fire or selective
cutting. This community has been previously logged.
Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), interspersed with willow oak
(Ouercus phellos) comprises the canopy. Many red maple (Acer
rubrum) saplings and thickets of wax myrtle (Mvrica cerifera)
make up the understory. Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
and cane (Arundinaria gigantea) dominate the herbaceous
layer.
2.12 Wetlands
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
This community is characterized by a natural hydrologic
regime of alternating annual wet and dry periods. Trees are
3
buttressed and some are fluted in response to anaerobic
conditions caused by periodic inundations. Root systems are
shallow and frequently visible at the surface. Within the
project area, bottomland hardwood forests are associated with
the Lumber River.
Black gum ( ssa svlvatica var. biflora), laurel oak
(Ouercus laurifolia), willow oak and river birch (Betula
i ra) are common canopy species. Bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum) is scattered infrequently throughout. Past
logging activities, as evidenced by stumps, indicates that it
was once a major canopy component. Red maple, wax myrtle,
blueberry (Vaccinium corvmbosom), Virginia tea (Itea
virainica) and green ash (Fraxinus caroliniana) make up the
understory.
Typical herbaceous species are false nettle (Boehmeria
cvlindrica), cane, poison ivy, and royal fern (Osmunda
reaalis).
Wet Shrub-Scrub Assemblage
A powerline clearing adjacent to the Lumber River,
exists in what was once bottomland hardwood forest. As a
result of clearing activities, a diverse shrub-scrub
assemblage of wetland species has developed. Black willow,
sweet-gum (Liauidambar stvraciflua), red maple and river
birch grow in association with a proliferation of vines, such
as trumpet vine (Camusis radicans), grape (V'tis
rotundifolia) and green-briers (Smilax spp.). Few herbaceous
species are present, probably due to woody plant competition.
Goldenrods are the most notable herbaceous species present.
Future widening and construction on new location will
eliminate strips of mixed pine-hardwood forest, wet shrub-
scrub, mixed herbaceous and maintained habitats. This will
result in direct loss of plant and animal species from
clearing operations, destruction of foraging and protective
habitat, soil compaction, and soil erosion. Filling and
sedimentation of wetlands may alter drainage or hydrologic
continuity.
2.2 Wildlife
Wildlife species are associated with given types of
plant communities which, in turn produce a wide variety of
food, cover and protection.
Upland, woodland animals in areas of hardwoods and
conifers are gray fox (Urocvon cinereoaraenteus), white-
tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), gray squirrel (Sciurus
ni er), woodpeckers (Picoides and Melanerues spp.) and a
variety of songbirds.
4
Openland wildlife associated with overgrown vegetation
(shrub-scrub and mixed herbaceous) are mourning dove (Zenaida
macroura), quail (Co inus virainianus), red fox (Vulpes
ulv ) and eastern cottontail (Svlvilaaus floridanus).
Bottomland hardwood forests in association with the
Lumber River, provide refuge for the raccoon (Procyon lotor),
beaver (Castor canadensis), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus),
mink (Mustela vison) and a variety of reptiles and
amphibians.
Urban areas provide shelter for opportunistic animal
species, such as the Norway rat (Rattus norveaicus), white-
footed mouse (Peromvscus leucopus leucopus) and house mouse
(Mus musculus). These rodents are common prey for red-tail
hawks (Buteo -iamaicensis). Other bird species typical in
urban settings are the American robin ( dus miaratorius)
mockingbird ( imus polvalottos), rock dove (Columba ivia)
and the European starling (Sturnus vulaaris).
Impacts due to the proposed widening will be reflected
in the creation of new habitat and in the alteration and
elimination of previously existing habitat. Subterranean,
burrowing and slow moving organisms will be eliminated.
Larger, faster animals will simply be displaced.
2.3 Soils
The following native soil series are located within the
project area: Johnston soils, Johns sandy loam, Lakeland
sand, Lumbee sandy loam and loamy Udorthents.
The most prevalent hydric soil and soil type in the
project area is Johnston soil which underlies the floodplain
of the Lumber River. The surface layer is mucky loam, loam
or sandy loam, which is nearly level and poorly drained.
Small areas of the hydric soil, Lumbee sandy loam, exists, as
does Johns sandy loam, which has hydric inclusions of Lumbee
sandy loam.
Upland soils in the project area are comprised of
loamy Udorthents and Lakeland sand. Loamy Udorthents are
soils of variable characteristics that have been altered by
man to the extent that the relief and soil profile cannot be
recognized. These soils underlie the developed (urbanized)
areas. Lakeland sand is an excessively drained soil on the
highest parts of the landscape.
5
ya-
r
M
XV
ryJ? ?t
50
Table 1. Summary of Hydric and Nonhydric Soil Series
SOIL SERIES
Johnston soil
Lumbee sandy loam
Johns sandy loam
Lakeland sand
Udorthents, loamy
2.4 Water Resources
CLASSIFICATION
Hydric
Hydric
Non-hydric
Non-hydric
Non-hydric
HYDRIC INCLUSION
Lumbee sandy loam
The Lumber River is the only major crossing in the
project area. It has a "best usage" classification of Ws III
Sw HQW. WSIII indicates a water supply segment in developed
or urbanized areas with no categorical restrictions on
watershed development or discharges. Sw indicates that it is
swamp waters with characteristics different from other
waterbodies, such as low velocity, low ph, low dissolved
oxygen and a high organic content. High Quality Waters (HQW)
are waters rated as excellent based on biological and
physical/chemical characteristics.
Dredging, filling, pile-driving operations, slope
stabilization and land clearing are construction activities,
resulting in the direct loss of benthic organisms due to
increase in silt loads. The removal of benthic organisms
reduces the potential food supply for fish, which may affect
fish populations.
Siltation has many adverse impacts on fish and benthos:
decreases the depth of light penetration, inhibiting pIant_
and algal growth, which is a food source, clogs the
filtration apparatus of filter-feeding benthos and the gills
of fish, buries benthic organisms on the bottom, cutting them
off from a food source, adversely effects preferred benthic
substrate, and spoils downstream spawning beds for fish.
3.0 Special Topics
3.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands
Asymmetrical widening to the north side of 72-711 up to
the I-95 interchange and the new location of an access road
will occur in a defined floodplain system. Wetlands impacted
will approximate 1.4 acres.
3.12 Permit Requirements
It is anticipated that the proposed action will require
a Nationwid Permit for wetland takings above headwaters (33
CFR 330.5) .

6
3.12 Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not likely to be required
under a Nationwide Permit.
Erosion and sedimentation control measures should be
strictly enforced to hold turbidity levels within limits.
3.2 Protected Species
3.21 Federally-Listed Species
Plants and animals with federal protection statuses of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Scoping comments received from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service indicate that the red-cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis) and Michaux' poison-sumac (Rhus
michauxii), both with an Endangered status, occur in Robeson
County, as do several Status Review species. N.C Natural
Heritage Program files indicate that the American alligator
(Alligator mississiuAiensis), a Threatened due to Similarity
in Appearance species, has been sitecT wttfitri several m31es of
the project area.
Red-cockaded Woodpecker (E)
Suitable habitat consists of pine or pine-hardwood mix
(50 percent or more pine) stands, 30 years of age or older.
No suitable habitat of this type exists in the project area.
Michaux' Poison-Sumac (E)
This species occurs in rocky or sandy, open woods. This
habitat does not exist in the project area.
American Alligator (T S/A)
The American alligator inhabits fresh water swamps,
marshes, abandoned rice fields, ponds, lakes, and backwaters
of large rivers. Saddletree .Swamp_and it's tributary Five
Mile Branch provide suitable habitat for this species.
Anticipated impacts to these systems are likely to be
negligible, since road widening will occur on previously
placed fill material. No sightings of the American alligator
occurred on the day of my investigation.
The following status Review (SR) species are not legally
protected under the Endangered Species Act and are not
subject to any of it's provisions until they are formally
proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. They are

7
reported in Table 2. in the event that this will occur.
Table 2. STATUS REVIEW SPECIES
Common Name Scientific Name
Sarvis holly Ilex amelanchier
Wireleaf dropseed Snorobulus teretifolius
Bog spicebush Lindera subcoriacea
Torrey's muhly Muhlenberaia torrevanna
Awned meadow-beauty Rhexia aristosa
3.22 State-Listed Species
Nothing, in addition to the American alligator, is
reported in the NHP files.
3.3 Natural and Scenic Rivers
The project will cross the Lumber River, a component of
the N.C. Natural and Scenic Rivers System (Natural and Scenic
Rivers Act of 1971). The section of the river which NC 72-
711 crosses, has been classified as a recreational segment.
It offers outstanding recreation and scenic values that are
largely free of impoundments.
4.0 References
4.0 REFERENCES
American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Checklist af North
American Birds. (6th ed.) Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence,
Kansas. 877p.
Ehrlich, P.E., D.S. Dobkin and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birders
Handbook. A Field Guide to the Natural HIstorv of North
American Birds. Simon and Schuster, N.Y., N.Y. 785 p.
Depoe, C.E., J.B. Funderburg, and T.L. Quay. 1961. The
reptiles and amphibians of North Carolina: a preliminary
check-list and bibliography. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.
77:125-136
Federal Interagency committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989.
Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional
Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Cooperative Technical Publication. 76 pp.
Godfrey, R.K., J.W. Wooten. 1981. Aquatic and Wetland Plants
of Southeastern United States. Dicotyledons. The University
of Georgia Press, Athens. 933p.
Lee, D.S., Funderburg, J.B. Jr., and M.K. Clark. 1982. A
Distributional Survey of North American Mammals. North
Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, N.C. 70 p.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey and J.R. Harrison 111.
1980. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia.
The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. 264p.
North Carolina Wildlife Resourses Commission. 1974. North
Carolina mammalian species with keys to the orders and
families. N.C. Wildl. Resour. Comm.,Raleigh.
NCDEHNR-DER. 1990. Classifications and water quality
standards assigned to the waters of the Lumber River basin.
Division of Environmental Management, Raleigh, N.C. 34p.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell, and R.P. Teulings 1980. Birds of
the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
Hill. 408 p.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and G.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the
Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. 1183 p.
Scott, S.L. (ed.). 1987, Field Guide to the Birds of North
America. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C. 464
Smith, R.R., J.B. Funderburg and T.L. Quay. 1960. A
checklist of North Carolina mammals. N.C. Wildl. Resour.
i ?
0
a
i
z
o°O
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AM WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office ' ?. Now
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 e Mm,-
May 23, 1990
Mr. L. J. Ward, Manager
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
N.C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
r. •
•
Subject: Scoping Comments for the Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711,
from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501 near Lumberton in Robeson
County; TIP No. R 84BC. f
Dear Mr. Ward: U
This responds to your letter of May 2, 1990, requesting comments on the
proposed project. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) -is particularly concerned about
potential impacts the proposed action may have on endangered/threatened-and
on the Lumber River and adjacent wetlands. The project should be desiMed
to avoid impacts to these resources.
The attached page identifies the Federally-listed endangered (E) and/or
threatened (T) and/or species proposed for,..listing as endangered (PE) or
threatened (PT) which may oocur in the proposed project corridor. If the
proposed project will be removing pines greater than or equal to 30 years of
age in pine or pine/hardwood habitat, all pine stems greater than or equal
to 60 years of age occurring within a 1/2 mile radius surveys of project
related clearing should be surveyed for should be active red-cockaded
woodpecker cavities. If red-cockaded woodpeckers are observed within the
project area or active cavity trees found, the project has the potential to
adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker, and you should contact this
office for further information.
The Service's review of any environmental document would be greatly
facilitated if it contained the following information:
1) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within existing
and required additional right-of-way and any areas, such as borrow
areas, which may be affected directly or indirectly by the proposed
improvements.

r

2) Acreage of branches, creeks, streams, 'rivers or wetlands to be
filled. Wetlands affected by the proposed project should be mapped
in accordance with the Federal .Manual for Identifying and

Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
3) Linear feet of any water courses relocated.
4) Acreage of upland habitats, by cover type, which would be.,
eliminated.
5) Techniques which will be employed for designing and constructing
any relocated stream channels or for creating replacement wetlands.
6) Mitigation measures which will be employed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce or compensate for habitat value losses associated with any
of the proposed improvements.
J
v
2
A
O
O
7) Assessments of the expected secondary and cumulative impacts of the
proposed project on fish and wildlife resources.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments to you and encourage
your consideration of them. Please continue to advise us of the progress of
this project. '
Sincerely yours
L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor

Attachments

REVISED SEPTEMBER 11, 1989
Robeson County
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) - E
Michaux' poison-sumac (Rhus'michauxii) - E
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for
listing as endangered or threatened, are under status review by the
Service. "Status Review" (SR) species are not legally protected under the
Act, and -are not subject' to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. We
are providing the below list of status review species which may occur
within the project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification:
These species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be
protected under the Act. In the meantime, we would appreciate anything you
might do for them.
Sarvis holly (Ilex amelanchier) - SR ,
Wireleaf dropseed (Sporobolus.teretifolius) - SR
Bog spicebush (Lindera subcoriacea) - SR
Torrey's muhly (Muhlenbergia torreyanna) - SR
Awned meadow-beauty (Rhexia aristosa) - SR
n
J
a
2
n
O
O
ti

0
z
0
0
/? • DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
_ P.O. BOX 1890
i. WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
J
June 20, 1990 4.? C r
IN REPLY REFER TO
Planning Division -V *N.2 2 1990
r?,a
HI 'H OF
S Q.
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager ? RFSEARtiN©?
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Post-Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
We have reviewed your letter of May 2, 1990, requesting information for
the "Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711, from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501,
Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1), State Project
No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-24160 and offer the following comments.
The proposed project crosses a defined flood plain; therefore, any
adverse effects on flood stages should be defined and mitigated during,
project design.
Department of the Army permit authorization; pursuant to Section 404 of-
the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge
of excavated or fill material in waters of the United States or any adjagent,,
and/or isolated wetlands in conjunction with the proposed action, ineli
;ding
borrow areas and disposal of construction debris. Specific permit requirements
will depend on design of the project, extent of fill work within streams and
wetland areas (dimensions, fill amounts, etc.), construction methods, and other
factors. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands should first be
avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensation or mitigation for
unavoidable impacts. When final plans are completed, including the extent and
location of development within waters of the United States and wetlands, our
Regulatory Branch would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for a
project-specific determination of Department of the Army permit requirements.
Should you have any questions, please contact Hr. Hugh Heine, Regulatory Branch,
at [phone].
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project.
further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact
Sincerely,
If we can be of
us.
®z!.19 ©'
Lawrence W. Saunders
Chief, Planning Division
1007N A 0*.)
?` fC
..nO
V :r
Griffiths Forestry Center
2411 Garner Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
May 15, 1990
I '404:1161T X 41 IOU
TO: Melba-McGee
Environmental Assessment Unit
FROM: Don H. Robbins
Staff Forester p? t?
SUBJECT: EA of the Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711 near Lumberton in
Robeson County, North Carolina
PROJECT #90-0894 ,
DUE DATE 6-1-90
To better determine the impact, if any, to forestry in the area of the
proposed project, the Environmental Assessment should contain the following
information concerning the proposed alternative routes for the possible
right-of-way purchases for the project:
1. The number of total woodland acres that would be taken out of timber
production as a result of new right-of-way purchases.
2. The acres breakdown of this woodland concerning present conditions
such as clear-cut areas, young growing timber, and fully stocked
stands of very productive timber within the new right-of-way
purchases for disturbed and undisturbed portions.
3. The site indexes of the forest soils that would be involved within
the proposed right-of-way, so as to be able to determine the
productivity of these forest soils in the area.
4. The number of woodland acres that would affect any watersheds in the
area, if the woodland was removed.
10UJr4 A.1U:1
Melba McGee
PROJECT #90-0894
Page 2
5. If woodland is involved, it is hoped that the timber could be
merchandised and sold to lessen the need for piling and burning of
debris during right-of-way construction.
Provisions should be indicated in the EA that the contractor will
make all efforts to salvage any merchantable timber to permit
construction, once the contractor takes charge of the right-of-way.
6. The provisions that the contractor will take during the construction
phase to prevent erosion, sedimentation and construction damage to
the remaining standing trees outside of the right-of-way boundary
and construction limits.
We would hope that a route could be chosen, that would have the least
impact to forest and related resources in that area.
DHR:la
cc: Fred White
File
21314/S
::?? ? • ''Sir
im! 1990
??..

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commissio` Lev
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Assessment
Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
FROM: W. Don Baker, Program Manager l(ifi
Division of Boating and Inland Fisheries
DATE: May 15, 1990
SUBJECT: Environmental Impact of the Proposed Improvement
of NC 72-711, from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501,
Lumberton, Robeson County. (90-0894)
These comments are provided in response to your request
of May 2, 1990, for information for input relating to fish
and wildlife concerns for the proposed subject project.
Wildlife Resources Commission review of the environmental
document would be greatly facilitated if it contained:
1. A description of fishery and wildlife resources,
including habitats, existing within, or impacted
by the project.
2. The quantity of wetlands, streams, lakes, ponds
and other fish or wildlife habitats to be graded,
filled or otherwise disturbed.
3. Stream relocations, crossings or other proposed
construction activity that may impact them.
4. Acreage of upland habitat impacted by cover type.
5. Mitigation measures proposed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce, or compensate for fish and wildlife
habitat losses.
Thank you for the opportunity for input during the
pre-planning stage for this project. We will be happy to
assist in any manner feasible during all phases of the
project.
WDB/lp
100014 AdOZO
. CSU?Z v?
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 7, 1990
MEMORANDUM
JUI!11990
<- Rif i-''•?L?
SECREx:12 ?,OFFICE
f ° DO-A
TO : Melba McGee
FROM: John Sutherlan
SUBJECT: 90-0894, Improving NC 72-711 in Robeson County
We have the following comments on the above project:
John N. Morris
Director
1. At stream and wetland crossings, utilize bridges whenever
possible to minimize habitat losses and floodplain
encroachment.
2. Minimize the loss of timber and prime farmland.
3. Provide vegetation buffers when highway passes close to
residential areas.
4. Mitigate the loss of wetlands and forests.
5. Minimize the use of curb and gutter; maximize the use of
porous pavement and grass swales.
6. Involve local landowners in gathering data on impacts; be
flexible on location of alternatives - adjust them to meet
local concerns.
7. Where the proposed highway crosses a navigible river, e.g.
Lumber River, work with local governments to provide public
boat access if such access is needed.
1'.O I'? i? ?7LK' , V.116141 N01111 C arolina 2701 7n>:- (r•6 . h„nr '.)19.71 ?.gl.k
d? si?1TFo
auw
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO:
From:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
/,eC?m?Izr X990
J
Lubin Unit Hear.'
Rural Project Unit
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
Janet L. `ipley, Environmental Biologist. SAS
Environmena-
Subject: Updated permit and mitigation information
for NC 72-711, from west of SR 1539 to SR
2501, Lumberton, Robeson L:ounty.
Tip# U-2416
Wilson Stroud and I met with Dennis Fipiiin, December
1990 to discuss mitigation and permit changes for U-2416.
Asymmetrical widening to the north side of N:-, 72-711 up to
the I-95 interchange and the new location of an access road
will involve the Lumber River and associated. wetlands.
Approximately 1.4 acres will be impacted. It is anticipated
that an individual permit will be required, since the flow
rate of the Lumber River is greater than 5 cfs.
There are no opportunities for on-site mitigation, so it
is recommended debiting the company swamp on an acre for acre
basis and to follow stringent "best management practices".
cc: V. Charles Bruton
Dennis Pipkin
Randy Turner
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
`?' .,. AA7Fo
y r=?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF RANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HuNT. JR SAM HuNT
GOVERNOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECRETARY
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
18 February 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Wilson Stroud, Unit Head
Project Planning Unit
FROM: Phillip Todd, Environmental Biologist X "
Environmental Unit
SUBJECT: Reevaluation of Environmental Input for
U-2416, proposed widening of NC 72-711
(Country Club Drive) from NC 72/NC 711
Intersection west of I-95 to SR 2501 east of
I-95, Robeson County; TIP No. U-2416;
State Project No. 8.1461701;
Federal Aid No. M-7763(1).
REFERENCE: Natural Resources Technical Report by Janet
Shipley, dated 27 November 1990.
ATTENTION: Ed Lewis, Project Manager
As you requested, I have reviewed the environmental
information presented for the Environmental Assessment of
U-2416. Since the completion of the reference Natural
Resources Technical Report, some information has been
updated.
The water usage classification of the Lumber River has
been changed from WS-III Sw HQW to WS-IV Sw HQW. WS-IV
waters are streams protected as water supplies which are
generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds and
are suitable for all Class C uses. Class C waters are those
waters which have water qualtiy uses suitable for aquatic
life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary
recreation and agriculture. Sw is a supplemental water
classification in which waters have low velocities and other
natural characteristics which are different from adjacent
streams. HQW indicates High Quality Waters which are rated
as excellent based on biological and physical/chemical
characteristics.
As of 20 December 1993, the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) lists only the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus sumac) as federally
protected (Endangered) species for Robeson County.

2
Endangered species are those threatened with extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of their range. The
American alligator has been delisted by FWS from its
Threatened status although the allligator is listed as
Threatened for North Carolina by the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NHP). Organisms which are listed as
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by
the N.C. NHP list of Rare Plant and Animal species are
afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species
Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation
Act of 1979. Brief discussions of the red-cockaded
woodpecker and Michaux's sumac characteristics and habitat
are provided since they were not previously descibed in
detail in the referenced Natural Resources Technical Report.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) E
The adult red-cockaded woodpecker
that is entirely black and white excep
on the sides of the nape in the male.
black and white with horizontal stripe
underside of this woodpecker are white
The RCW has a large white cheek patch
cap, nape, and throat.
(RCW) has a plumage
t for small red streaks
The back of the RCW is
s. The breast and
.with streaked flanks.
surrounded by the black
The RCW uses open old growth stands of southern pines,
particularly longleaf pine (Pinus Palustris), for foraging
and nesting habitat. A forested stand must contain at least
50% pine, lack a thick understory, and be contiguous with
other stands to be appropriate habitat for the RCW. These
birds nest exclusively in trees that are >60 years old and
are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age.
The foraging range of the RCW is up to 200 hectares (500
acres). This acreage must be contiguous with suitable
nesting sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees
and usually in trees that are infected with the fungus that
causes red-heart disease. Cavities are located in-co-lonies
from 3.6-30.3 m (12-100 ft) above the ground and average
9.1-15.7 m (30-50 ft) high. They can be identified by a
large incrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree.
The large incrustation of sap is believed to be used as a
defense by the RCW against possible predators. A clan of
woodpeckers usually consists of one breeding pair and the
offspring from previous years. The RCW lays its eggs in
April, May, and June and hatch 38 days later. Clutch size
ranges in number from 3-5 eggs. All members of the clan
share in raising the young. Red-cockaded woodpeckers feed
mainly on insects but may feed on seasonal wild fruits.
3
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
No habitat for the red-cockaded
project study area. No impact to the
will occur from project construction.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus sumac)
woodpecker exists in the
red-codkaded woodpecker
Michaux's sumac is a densely pubescent rhizomatous shrub
that grows 0.2 to 1.0 meters in height. The narrowly winged
or wingless rachis supports 9 to 13 sessile, oblong to
oblong-lanceolate leaflets that are each 4 to 9 cm long, 2 to
5 cm wide, acute and acuminate. The bases of the leaves are
rounded and their edges are simply or doubly serrate. It
bears small flowers in a terminal, erect, dense cluster. The
flowers of Michaux's sumac are greenish to white in color.
Fruits, which develop from August to September on female
plants, are a red densely short-pubescent drupe, 5 to 6 mm
across.
This plant occurs in rocky or sandy open woods.
Michaux's sumac is dependent on some sort of disturbance to
maintain the openness of its habitat. It usually grows in
association with basic soils and occurs on sand or sandy
loams. Michaux's sumac grows only in open habitat where it
can get full sunlight. Michaux's sumac does not compete well
with other species, such as Japanese honeysuckle, with which
it is often associated.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
No habitat for Michaux's sumac exists in the project
study area. No impact to Michaux's sumac will occur from
project construction.
c: V. Charles Bruton,
M. Randall Turner,
File: U-2416
Ph. D.
Environmental Supervisor
? ?/1T(o
y? .r ate,
au..,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF 1PvANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. )p
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
June 15, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO:
ATTENTION:
FROM:
Wilson Stroud, Unit Head
Project Planning Unit
Ed.. Levu le 41 Man4ager
Project Planning Unit
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
Janet L. Shipley, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Design Changes for U-2416,
Proposed Widening of NC 72-711; Robeson
County; State Project NO. 8.1461701; Federal
Aid NO. M-7763(1).
REFERENCE: (1) Natural Resource Technical Report, completed
by Janet L. Shipley, November 27, 1990
(2) Reevaluation of Reference 1, completed by
Phillip Todd, February 18, 1994
The following natural resources reevaluation has been
prepared following a field survey conducted by Environmental
Unit Staff on June 7, 1994. The intent is to reevaluate the
project based on design changes discussed under Project
Description, and to provide updated information on biotic
community impacts, jurisdictional wetland impacts, permits
and mitigation. Other natural resource topics are adequately
addressed in referenced technical reports.
cc: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D
M. Randall Turner, Environmental Supervisor
File: U-2416
rH
Natural Resource Reevaluation for proposed widening
of NC 72/NC 71.E
from SR 1539 through Fifth Street
Lumberton, Robeson County
TIP NO. U-2416
State Project NO. 8.1461701
Federal Aid NO. M-7763(1)
NATURAL RESOURCE REEVALUATION
U-2416

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
Janet L. Shipley
June 1994
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Subject project calls for the proposed north-side
widening of NC 72-711 from just west of SR 1539 to Fifth
Street in Lumberton. At the Fifth and Dunn Street
intersection, a service road on new location 99.1 m (325 ft)
is proposed. Access to NC 72 from existing service roads has
been terminated. Proposed right-of-way width is 27.7 m (90
ft).
Biotic Community Impacts
Table 1 summarizes potential losses from proposed
project construction. Calculations are based on right-of-way
limits of 27.7 m (90 ft).
Table 1. ANTICIPATED BIOTIC COMMUNITY IMPACTS
COMMUNITY
Maintained Community
Mixed Pine Hardwood
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
IMPACTS
Hectares (Acres)
1.1 (2.8)
0.4 (0.9)
0.4 (0.9)
TOTAL 1.84 (4.6)
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US
Surface waters and associated wetlands fall under the
broad category of "Waters of the United states" as defined in
33 CFR 328.3. The US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) takes
jurisdiction over the discharge of dredged or fill material
into these waters of the U.S. as authorized by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act.
Jurisdictional wetlands will receive impacts from
project construction. The floodplain associated with the
Lumber River is categorized as palustrine, forested,
deciduous communities (PF06), and a drainage ditch is
classified as palustrine, emergent, persistent (PEM1), as
defined by Cowardin et al. (1979). Wetland communities were
identified in the project corridor on the basis of low soil
chroma values, hydrophytic vegetation and the presence of
hydrology or hydrological indicators. A summary of wetland
impacts associated with each site is provided in table 2
below.
Table 2 Summary of Wetland Impacts, ha (ac)
Site Wetland Classification Anticipated Impacts
1 PEM1 <0.1 (<0.1)
2 PF06 0.4 (0.9)
--------------
Total Impacts <0.5 (<1.0)
*Palustrine, Emergent, Persistent
**Palustrine, Forested, Deciduous,
PERMITS
In accordance with provisions of section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344), a'permit will be required
from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material
into "Waters of the United States".
It is anticipated that widening over the Lumber River
and associated floodplain will require a Section 404
Individual Permit. Because the project crosses a segment.of
the Lumber River that is state designated as Natural and
Scenic, the normally applicable Bridge General permit will
not apply.
Based upon site location and estimated acreage involved,
it is anticipated that impacts to the naturalized drainage
ditch will be authorized by Nationwide Permit [33 CFR 330.5
(a) (26)]. This permit generally authorizes discharges of
dredge or fill material in wetlands located above the
headwaters (flow less than 1.5 cubic m (5 cubic ft) per
second) of non-tidal rivers, streams and their lakes and
impoundments including adjacent wetlands.
A 401 Individual Water Quality Certification
administered through the N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources will be required. This
certificate is issued for-any activity which may result in a
discharge into waters for which a federal permit is required.
MITIGATION
By a memorandum of agreement dated February 6, 1990, The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Corps of Engineers
(COE) require that a strict mitigation sequence; avoidance,
minimization, and compensatory mitigation be followed for all
individual permits as described in (40 CFR (230) (A-f)),
commonly known as 404 (b) (1) Guidelines for Specification of
Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill material.

JAMES B. HUNT. JR.
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRAtNSPORTATION
MEMORANDUM TO:
June 16, 1994
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O.150X25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
Wilson Stroud, Unit Head
Project Planning Unit
ATTENTION: Ed Lewis, Pro<
Project Planning Unit
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
FROM: Janet L. Shipley, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit
ye r=".
o.+
SUBJECT: Addendum to Mitigation Section of Natural
Resource Evaluation of Design Changes for U-
2416, Proposed Widening of NC 72-711; County;
State Project NO. 8.1461701; Federal
Aid NO. M-7763(1).
Please incorporate the following information in the
Mitigation section of subject Project.
Compensatory mitigation is required for actions covered
by Individual Section 404 permits. On-site mitigation
opportunities should be considered first as should
opportunities within the same watershed outside of the
immediate project area. A third option is to mitigate
immediate acreage by debiting the North Carolina Department
of Transportation Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, as outlined
in an agreement between.the USFWS, North Carolina Nature
Conservancy, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and
NCDOT.
cc: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D
M. Randall Turner, Environmental Supervisor

1
y° r=aa
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
)AMEs B. HUNT. jR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
August 12, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO : -:Wilson: Stroud,' ;Znit: Head
Project Planning Unit
ATTENTION: Ed Lewis, Project Manager
Project Planning Unit
?S
8/Jz
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
FROM: Janet L. Shipley, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit"
SUBJECT: to Evaluation of Design changes for
U- 6 roposed Widening of NC 72-711;
Robeson County; State Project NO. 8.1461701;
Federal Aid NO. M-7763(1).
REFERENCE: (1) Natural Resource Technical Report, by Janet
L. Shipley, June 15, 1994
Please incorporate the following updated permit and
mitigation information in referenced report. .
PERMITS
In accordance with provisions of section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344), a permit will be required
from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material
into "Waters of the United States".
It is anticipated that widening over t Lumber River,
and associated floodplain will require General P mit
(CESAW-C082-N-000-0031). This permit aut orizes the
placement of fill material associated with the construction,
repair or replacement of bridges spanning navigable waters
and waters of the United States. However, final judgement
concerning specific permit jurisdiction is reserved by the
COE.
Based upon site location and estimated acrpaag involved,
it is anticipated that impacts to th aturalized d ainag
i will be authorized by a ionwide P it [33 CFR 330.
(atc(26)]. This permit genera y authorizes discharges of
dredge or fill material in wetlands located above the
headw_ aters (flow less than 1.5 cubic_m (5 cubic ft) per
_eccnd) oZ non-t=da1 rivers, strears and their lanes and
T uG,
7*

t
impoundments including adjacent wetlands.
A 401 Individual Water Quality Certification
administered through the N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources will be required. This
certificate is issued for any activity which may result in a
discharge into waters for which a federal permit is required.
MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation is not required where Nationwide
permits or General Permits are authorized, according to the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Corps of Engineers (COE).
Final discretionary authority in these matters rests with the
COE.
cc: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D
M. Randall Turner, Environmental Supervisor
File: U-2416
r! „4n
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
August 22, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Wilson Stroud, Unit Head,
Project Planning Unit
ATTENTION: E-d,• ?ewi s , "l -Project Manager
Project Planning Unit
FROM: Janet L. Shipley, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Addendum to Evaluation of Design Changes for
U-2416, Proposed Widening of NC 72-211;
Robeson County; State Project NO. 8.1461701;
Federal Aid NO. M-7763(1).
Please incorporate the following updated permit and
mitigation information in Reevaluation of Proposed Widening
of NC 72-211, dated June 15, 1994.
PERMITS
In accordance with provisions of section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344), a permit will be required
from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material
into "Waters of the United States".
It is anticipated that widening over the Lumber River,
and associated floodplain will either require a General
Permit (CESAW-CO82-N-000-0031) or a Section 404 Individual
Permit. A General Permit authorizes the placement of fill
material associated with the construction, repair or
replacement of bridges spanning navigable waters and waters
of the United States. However, this general permit will not
be applicable to proposed construction when the Wilmington
District Engineer determines, after any necessary
investigations, that the proposed activity would adversely
affect areas which possess historic, cultural, scenic,
conservation, or recreational values. Application of this
exemption applies to wild, scenic, and recreational rivers
established by State and -Local entities. If iL. Ls determined

by the COE that the proposed activity will adversely affect
that segment of the Lumber River that is state designated as
Natural and Scenic, the normally applicable Bridge General
permit will not apply. It is then anticipated that widening
over the Lumber River and associated floodplain will require
a Section 404 Individual Permit.
Based upon site location and estimated acreage involved,
it is anticipated that impacts to the naturalized drainage
ditch will be authorized by Nationwide Permit [33 CFR 330.5
(a) (26)]. This permit generally authorizes discharges of
dredge or fill material in wetlands located above the
headwaters (flow less than 1.5 cubic m (5 cubic ft) per
second) of non-tidal rivers, streams and their lakes and
impoundments including adjacent wetlands.
A 401 Individual Water Quality Certification
administered through the N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources will be required. This
certificate is issued for any activity which may result in a
discharge into waters for which a federal permit is required.
MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation is not required where Nationwide
permits or General Permits are authorized, according to the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Corps of Engineers (COE).
Compensatory mitigation is required for actions covered
by Individual Section 404 permits. On-site mitigation
opportunities should be considered first as should
opportunities within the same watershed outside of the
immediate project area. A third option is to mitigate
immediate acreage by debiting the North Carolina Department
of Transportation Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, as outlined
in an agreement between the USFWS, North Carolina Nature
Conservancy, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and
NCDOT. Final discretionary authority in these matters rests
with the COE.
cc: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D
M. Randall Turner, Environmental Supervisor
File: U-2416 16
K
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Environmental Management
00% OOW*ft 00&
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N 11
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
February 21, 1995
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorn
Monica Swihart
From: Eric Galamba
Subject: EA for NC 72-711 in Lumberton
Robeson County
State Project DOT No. 8.1461701, TIP #U-2416
EHNR # 95-0495, DEM # 10842
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Environmental
Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
activities which impact of waters of the state including wetlands. The document states that
1.0 acres of waters including wetlands will be impacted.
The Lumber River is classified WS-IV Sw HQW (page 24). DEM requests that hazardous spill
catch basins be installed at all water supply stream crossings. The BMP for the protection of
surface waters requires DOT to install hazardous spill catch basins in water supply critical
areas. Other stream crossings may be outside of the critical area but DEM still believes that
hazardous spill catch basins at these locations will provide extra protection at minimal cost.
Bridge deck runoff should not drain directly into the bodies of water. All stream relocations
should adhere to DOT's Stream Relocation/ Channelization guidelines. DEM requests that
DOT utilize HQW soil and erosion control measures to protect the water supply.
The bridge over the Lumber River will be relocated to the north side. This provides DOT with
an opportunity to revegetate the wetlands that were impacted with the original bridge.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of an EA by DEM would not preclude the denial of a 401
Certification upon application if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-1786) in
DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Ed Lewis, DOT
Wilmington COE
nc72-71 1.ea
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources 1C1/!j El ?`cc Project located in 7th floor library
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs CB hh?
Project Review Form
Project Number: County: Date: Rq z CjF Date Response Due (firm deadline):
*72
\Il?14 lA?:a Js i IAA1.YllN
This project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville ? All R/O Areas Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries
Fayetteville q?J Air
ly Coastal Management xWater Planning
/` Water ? Water Resources Environmental Health
? Mooresville roundwater V Wildlife ? Solid Waste Management
? Raleigh Land Quality Engineer ] Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
hi
t
? W ? Recreational Consultant Land Resources ? David Foster
on
ng
as ? Coastal Management Consultant Parks and Recreation ? Other (specify)
? Wilmington ?Others Environmental Management
? Winston-Salem PWS Monica Swihart
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager
? No objection to project as proposed
? No Comment
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Approve
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked)
? Recommended for further development with recommendations for
strengthening (comments attached) -
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attachedlauthority(ies) cited)
In-House Reviewer complete individual response.
? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
? Applicant has been contacted
?Applicant has not been contacted
? Project. Controversial (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement not needed
? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
NEPA and SEPA
? Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO:
Melba McGee Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
PS-104
!?! JC','HCP , FRLLO LR E TEL : 919-52?:-,= 839 Feb 21 '95 11 :22 No . 00 r P .01
s
.€ b a

ICj•PC, HCP , FALLS LAKE TEL : 919-52? -9539 Feb 21'95 11:23 No. 007 P.03
Memoranduu m 2 February 10, 1995

NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive)
From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72)
Lumberton, Robeson County
F. A. Project No. M-7763(1)
State Project No. 8.1461701
T.I.P. No. U-2416
Administrative Action
Environmental Assessment
and
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
for Impacts to the Lumber River State Park
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Submitted pursuant to 42 U. S. C. 4332(2)(C)
s
Date ?r H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
1/44-)?e
of Graf
4iicvisi Administrator, FHWA
NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive)
From West of SR 1539 to West Fifth Street (NC 72)
Lumberton, Robeson County
F. A. Project No. M-7763(1)
State Project No. 8.1461701
T.I.P. No. U-2416
Environmental Assessment
and
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
for Impacts to the Lumber River State Park
October, 1994
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
45ce -4. d&?
Ed F. Lewis
Project Planning Engineer
' W son Stroud
P ect Planning Unit Head
?/• U /O-3/-9¢
Lubin Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
,``e?11111!!l/Pd?,
CARO'111
?,? rteeo.oeoP Oj
a
z SEAL =
6916
??:G?•''fi'.>GINEE?,•' ???,44
V. P
-let %
issilit"wo
Summary
Environmental Assessment
and Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
Prepared by the
Planning and Environmental Branch
of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation
in consultation with the
Federal Highway Administration

1. Type of Action
This is a Federal Highway Administration Action, Environmental
Assessment.
2. Additional Information
The following persons can be contacted for additional information
concerning this proposal and statement:
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
Suite 400, 310 New Bern Ave
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone [phone]
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone [phone]
3. Summary of Special Project Commitments
a. The following measures will be taken to mitigate impacts to the
Lumber River State Park:
1. Before construction begins, the Division Engineer will
insure that signs advising boaters of construction
activities at the bridge are placed at the boat access area
off McNeill Bridge Road (SR 1539) immediately south of the
Lumber River bridge and on the upstream and downstream
sides of the bridge.
2. The Lumber River channel will be kept open to boating
traffic during construction. Efforts to maintain as wide a
channel opening as possible during construction shall be
made.
i
3. The number of piers in the river will be minimized as much
as possible. Fifty feet between piers (existing spacing)
is the minimum acceptable spacing. The North Carolina
Division of Parks and Recreation has requested that no
piers be placed in the river channel, but has indicated
that if needed, one row of piers can be placed in the
middle of the channel.
4. If pier footings which are placed in the channel come to
within three feet of the water's surface, fins will be
installed to indicate the presence of the footings in order
to protect boats and the footings.
The impacts and mitigation for replacement of the Lumber River
bridge are detailed in the Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
found in the Appendix, pages A-4 through A-13.
b. Approximately 1.0 acre of wetlands will be filled as a result of
the project. A nationwide permit and a general permit will be
required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to address the
impacts to the wetlands. However, final discretionary authority
rests with the Corps.
C. Since the Lumber River is classified as a "High Quality Water"
Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds in the Sedimentation
Control Guidelines (Title 15A 4B. 0024) will be implemented.
d. Since the project occurs in the vicinity of the Lumberton
Municipal Airport, the Federal Aviation Administration will be
given the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental
Assessment.
e. There are three active sites along the project with underground
storage tank (UST) involvement. According to a preliminary site
assessment (PSA), there has been a release of petroleum
hydrocarbons from one of these sites. The DEM-Groundwater
Office in Fayetteville has been forwarded a copy of the PSA
report. It has been requested that DEM keep NCDOT informed of
any remedial activities that will be required of the property
owner. Before the property is acquired, DEM shall be contacted
to determine if this site has been properly remediated according
to DEM regulations.
4. Actions Required by Other Agencies
In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C, 1344)9 it is anticipated that two permits (a Nationwide permit
and a General Permit) will be required from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers for the proposed highway widening near the Lumber River (see
Section II.L.). A 401 Water Quality Certification will be required from
the Division of Environmental Management, N. C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources.
ii
5. Description of Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to improve
NC 72-711 in Lumberton to a five- to six-lane facility to improve traffic
flow and to enhance safety in the vicinity of the NC 72-711/I-95
interchange. Replacing the bridge over the Lumber River, replacing the
existing bridge over I-95, and realigning, or terminating, service roads
in three of the four quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange are also
to be included in the project. The I-95 ramps will be widened. The
project begins at the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 and ends at
NC 72 (West Fifth Street) east of I-95.
6. Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts
The proposed improvements will allow more efficient vehicle operation
and reduced travel times, resulting in road user cost savings. Traffic
safety will be enhanced. Access to homes, businesses, and public
facilities in the project area will be improved.
Approximately 1.76 acres of additional right of way will be required.
No homes will be relocated as a result of the project. It is anticipated
that one business, a gas station-convenience store, may be relocated as a
result of the project. Approximately 1.0 acres of wetlands will be
affected by the project. No farmland, as defined by the Farmland
Protection Policy Act, will be affected. The project crosses the Lumber
River, which has been designated as a state park.
7. Alternatives Considered
a. Recommended improvement - Widen NC 72-711 to a five-to six-lane
facility from west of McNeill Bridge Road (SR 1539) to West
Fifth Street east of Interstate 95, replace the existing bridge
carrying NC 72-711 over the Lumber River, replace the NC 72-711
bridge over I-95, and eliminate the service road/ interchange
ramp tie-ins.
b. NC 72-711 realignment - Widen NC 72-711 to a five- to six-lane
facility from just east of the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of
Interstate 95 to Starlite Drive (SR 2501). A realignment of
NC 72-711 would start at the Cox Road (SR 1588) intersection
west of I-95 and break to the south, crossing Interstate 95 with
a new bridge, intersect SR 2499, and tie into Starlite Drive.
The service road/interchange ramp tie-ins would be eliminated.
This alternative would be in conformance with the Lumberton
Thoroughfare Plan by providing a southern loop around Lumberton
via NC 72-711 and Starlite Drive; however, it would not serve
the majority of traffic wanting access to Lumberton via West
Fifth Street. In addition, there were several grade tie-in
concerns as well as some storage problems evident. Therefore,
this alternative is not recommended.
iii
C. Postponement of proposed action - The existing facility is
already operating at an undesirable level-of-service, especially
during peak traffic periods. Postponement of the project would
result in a continuing deterioration of traffic conditions in
the future as traffic demand increases. Therefore, this
alternative is not recommended.
d. Do nothing" alternative - Although this alternative would avoid
the limited adverse environmental impacts that are anticipated
to result from the project, there would be no positive effect on
the traffic capacity of the highway or improvements in traffic
safety. For these reasons, this alternative is not recommended.
e. Alternate modes of transportation - No alternate mode of
transportation is considered to be a practical alternative.
Highway transportation is the dominant mode of transportation in
the project area, and the project involves widening an existing
highway.
8. Federal, State, and Local Agencies Contacted at the Beginning of
this Studv
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Emergency Management Administration
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
U. S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service
U. S. Department of the Army - Wilmington District Corps
of Engineers
U. S. Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service
U. S. Geological Survey
N. C. Department of Administration - State Clearinghouse
N. C. Department of Cultural Resources - Division of Archives and
History
N. C. Department of Human Resources - Division of Health Services
N. C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources-
Environmental Assessment Section
N. C. Department of Public Instruction - Division of School Planning
Lumber River Council of Governments
Robeson County Commissioners
Mayor of Lumberton
Lumberton Municipal Airport
9. Basis for Environmental Assessment
On the basis of planning and environmental studies, it is anticipated
this project will not have a significant detrimental effect on the quality
of the human environment. The proposed project will cause no significant
changes in route classification and land use and is not controversial in
nature. The project has been reviewed by federal, state, and local
agencies, and no objections have been raised. No major objections to the
project were voiced at the public meeting held November 15, 1990 in
Lumberton. For these reasons, it is concluded that an Environmental
Assessment is applicable to the project.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT .............................
A. General Description of Project ....................... 1
B. Project Status and Historical Resume ................. 1
C. Existing Conditions ........................... 1
.......
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied ............... 1
2. Route Classification ............................ 1
3. Existing Cross Section .......................... 2
4. Existing Right of Way ........................... 2
5. Speed Limits .................................. 2
6. Access Control .................................. 2
7. Bridges .........................................
8. Traffic Data .. ........ ... ...... 3
3
.............
9. Horizontal and Vertical Curvature ............... 3
10. Intersecting Roads ............................. 3
11. Service Roads ... ....................... 4
12. Degree of Roadside Interference ................. 4
13. Railroad Crossings .............................. 4
14. School Bus Data ................................ 4
15. Existing Sidewalk ............................... 4
D. Capacity Analysis .................................... 4
E. Constrained Traffic .................................. 6
F. Accident Analysis .................................... 7
G. Project Terminals .................................... 8
H. Thoroughfare Plan .................................... 8
I. Nearby Airports ...................................... 8
J. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community ......... 9
II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ..................................... 9
A. NC 72-711 and West Fifth Street Widening
and Realignment ........ ................ 9
B. NC 72-711/I-95 Interchange Modifications ............. 10
C. Service Road Realignment ............................. 10
D. Dunn Road Extension .................................. 11
E. Structures ........................................... 11
1. Bridge over I-95 ............................... 11
2. Lumber River Bridge ............................. 11
F. Design Speed ......................................... 12
G. Access Control ...... ............................... 12
H. Intersection Treatment ............................... 12
I. Right of Way . ... ........................... 12
J. Degree of Utility Conflicts .......................... 12
K. Anticipated Design Exceptions ........................ 12
L. Special Permits Required ............................. 13
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
M. Changes in the State Highway System .................. 13
N. Multiple Use of Space ................................ 13
0. Bikeways ................................... 13
P. Sidewalk ......................................... 13
Q. Cost Estimates ....................................... 14
R. Other Proposed Highway Improvements
in the area ..................................... 14
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................... 14
A. Recommended Improvements ............................. 14
B. Starlite Drive Connection .......................... 15
C. Postponement of Proposed Action ...................... 15
D. "Do Nothing" Alternative ..... 15
E. Alternate Modes of Transportation .................... 15
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............... 16
A. Social Effects ....................................... 16
1. Land Use ........................................ 16
a. Existing Land Use .......................... 16
b. Existing Zoning ............................ 16
C. Proposed Land Use .. ................... 16
d. Project Compatibility with
Local Plans ........................... 17
2. Neighborhood Characteristics .................... 17
3. Relocatees ...................................... 17
4. Public Facilities ............................... 17
5. Historic and Cultural Resources ................. 17
a. Architectural/Historical Resources ......... 18
b. Archaeological Resources ................... 18
B. Section 4(f) Properties .............................. 18
C. Economic Effects ................................. 19
D. Environmental Effects ................................ 19
1. Biological Resources ............................ 19
a. Plant Life ................................. 19
b. Wildlife ................................... 21
C. Federally-Listed Species ................... 21
vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
2. Soils ......................................... 22
3. Wetlands .. . ........................... 23
4. Flood Hazard Evaluation ......................... 24
5. Water Quality ................................... 24
6. Farmland ........................................ 25
7. Highway Traffic Noise/Construction
Noise Analysis ............................. 25
8. Air Quality Analysis ............................ 30
9. Stream Modification ............................. 33
10. Hazardous Materials ............................. 33
11. Geotechnical Impacts ............................ 34
12. Construction Impacts ............................ 34
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION ................................. 36
A. Comments Received .................................... 36
B. Public Meeting ....................................... 36
C. Public Hearing ....................................... 37
TABLES
Table 1 - Bridge Data ..... . ..... .................. 3
Table 2 - Intersection Capacity Analysis ................. 6
Table 3 - Accident Rates ................................. 7
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
w

Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Photos of Existing Conditions
Figure 3 - Projected Traffic Volumes
Figure 4 - Lumberton Thoroughfare Plan (Part)
Figure 5 - Aerial Mosaic Showing the Proposed
Improvements
Figure 6 - Schematic Drawing of Intersection Layouts
Figure 7 - 100-Year Floodplain Limits
Figure 8 - Proposed Improvements near the Lumber
River
Figure 9 - Typical Section 1
Figure 10- Typical Section 2
APPENDIX
Relocation Report and NCDOT Relocation Information ....... A-1
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to
the Lumber River State Park ......................... A-4
Table N1 - Typical Noise Levels ......................... A-15
Table N2 - Noise Abatement Criteria ................. A-17
Figure N1 - Ambient Noise Measurement Sites .............. A-17
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Table N3 - Ambient Noise Levels ......................... A-18
Table N4 - Leq Traffic Noise Exposures .................. A-19
Table N5 - Noise Abatement Criteria Summary ............. A-20
Table N6 - Traffic. Noise Level Increase Summary ......... A-20
Tables Al through A4 - Air Quality Analysis Tables........ A-21
Comments Received from Review Agencies ................... A-25
Public Meeting News Release .......................... A-47
Public Meeting Newspaper Articles ........................ A-48
Public Meeting Handout ................................... A-52
viii
Prepared by
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
in consultation with the
Federal Highway Administration
I. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A. General Description of Project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to widen
NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive) to a five- to six- lane facility from just
east of the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to West Fifth Street
(NC 72) west of I-95 in Lumberton (see Figure 1). The NC 72-711/I-95
interchange is also to be upgraded, and the bridges over I-95 and the
Lumber River will be replaced. The project is located in Robeson County.
B. Project Status and Historical Resume
The 1995-2001 NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) calls
for improving NC 72-711 by constructing a multilane facility (part on new
location), revising the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange, and replacing a
structure. Right of way acquisition and construction are scheduled to
begin in fiscal years 1995 and 1996, respectively. The TIP includes a
total funding of $6,918,000 for the project, including $518,000 for right
of way and $6,400,000 for construction. The total estimated cost of the
recommended improvements is $6,718,000, including $518,000 for right of
way and $6,2000,000 for construction. This cost is less than the TIP
funding by $200,000.
The segment of existing NC 72-711 from the NC 72/NC 711 intersection
to SR 1539, originally constructed in 1946, was widened to a three- to
four-lane facility in 1988. That project included upgrading and adding
signals to the NC 72/NC 711 intersection. The segment of existing
NC 72-711 between SR 1539 and West Fifth Street was constructed in 1956
when I-95 was constructed.
C. Existing Conditions
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied
The length of the studied section of NC 72-711 (from the
NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to the NC 72-711/West Fifth
Street intersection east of I-95) is approximately 0.7 mile.
2. Route Classification
NC 72-711 is classified as a Urban Principal Arterial east of
I-95 and a rural major collector west of I-95 under the National
Highway System. NC 72-711 is a federal-aid urban route.
2
3. Existing Cross Section
West of the NC 72 intersection, NC 711 is a three-lane, 36-foot
roadway with 7-foot grassed shoulders. This width includes an
exclusive left turn lane onto westbound NC 72 and one through lane in
each direction. Immediately east of the NC 711/NC 72 intersection,
NC 72-711 is a four-lane, 48-foot roadway with 8-foot grassed
shoulders. This width includes one through lane in each direction, a
right hand turn lane for westbound NC 72-711 traffic wanting to turn
onto NC 72, and a dedicated left turn lane for the Robeson County
Inspection Department. The pavement width narrows to 36 feet (three
lanes) between the NC 72/NC 711 intersection and the NC 72-711/SR
1539 intersection. The pavement width further narrows to 24 feet
(two lanes) between SR 1539 and the Lumber River, and this width is
carried across the Lumber River bridge. From east of the Lumber
River to West Fifth Street NC 72-711 consists of a three-lane,
36-foot pavement. This three-lane section allows for left-turn lanes
at the ramp terminals of the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange. The
NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersection is channelized to allow for
a free-flowing right-hand turn from southbound West Fifth Street onto
westbound NC 72-711 (see Figure 5).
Photographs of existing conditions along the, project are shown
in Figure 2.
4. Existing Right of Way
Generally, the existing right of way width is 100 feet along
NC 72-711. The existing right of way width flares out in the
vicinity of the intersecting ramps and roads. West Fifth Street
south of NC 72-711 has an existing right of way width of 90 feet, and
West Fifth Street north of NC 72-711 has an existing right of way
width of 60 feet.
5. Speed Limits
The posted speed limit along NC 72-711 is 45 mph west of I-95
and 35 mph east of I-95. The posted speed limit along West Fifth
Street within the Lumberton city limits is 35 mph.
6. Access Control
Access. to NC 72-711 is fully controlled only in the immediate
vicinity of I-95.
3
7. Bridges
The Lumber River and I-95 bridges are described below in
Table 1:
w
Table 1
Bridge Data
Clear Actual

Date Roadway Bridge Sufficiency Remaining
Bridge Built Width Length Rating Life
Lumber River (#43) 1955 28' 300' 59.9 18 yr.
1-95 (#25) * 1955 40' 200' 57.9 5 yr.
* Note: Bridge number 25 provides a minimum vertical clearance of 16
feet, 3 inches over I-95 and a total horizontal clearance
(between piers) of 35 feet, 4 inches along I-95 in each
direction.
8. Traffic Data
Projected traffic volumes along NC 72-711 for the year 1996
range from 23,000 vehicles per day (vpd) just west of I-95 to
24,000 vpd east of SR 2499. Projected traffic volumes for the year
2016 range from 50,100 vpd to 51,000 vpd at the above locations.
Approximately 7 percent of these volumes (4 percent duals and 3
percent TTST) will be truck traffic. Projected 2016 traffic volumes
along the service roads in three of the four quadrants of the
NC 72-711 interchange range from 400 vpd (SR 1593) to 800 vpd
(SR 1588 and SR 1592). Projected traffic volumes, major turning
movements, truck data, and design hour data are shown in Figure 3.
9. Horizontal and Vertical Curvature
The studied segment of NC 72-711 has good horizontal and
vertical alignment. A 6-degree curve exists at the west end of the
project near the NC 72/NC 711 intersection.
V

10. Intersecting Roads
A diamond-type interchange is provided at the NC 72-711/I-95
junction. All other intersections are at-grade.
The NC 72-711/SR 1539 intersection is stop sign-controlled. All
other intersections along NC 72-711 are signal-controlled. All
service road intersections with the I-95 ramps are stop sign-or yield
sign-controlled.
4
The NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersection is channelized to
allow for smoother traffic operations, and it is signalized. The
NC 72-711/southbound I-95 ramp intersection and the NC 72-711/
northbound I-95 ramp intersection are channelized to allow for free
flowing right turns onto NC 72-711 (see.Figure 5).
11. Service Roads
Service roads intersect the I-95 interchange ramps in the
northeast, southeast, and northwest quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95
interchange. Two-way traffic operation exists along a portion of
these ramps, resulting in driver confusion, possible conflicts
between ramp and service road vehicles, and potential wrong-way
movements on the ramps. The SR 1588 and SR 1593 connections in the
northwest and southeast quadrants, respectively, are the most
hazardous, since they make it possible for vehicles to enter I-95 in
the wrong direction. No service road exists in the southwest
quadrant of the interchange.
12. Degree of Roadside Interference
Roadside interference exists only near the NC 72/NC 711 and
NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersections.
13. Railroad Crossings
No railroads cross the project.
14. School Bus Data
Approximately fifteen school buses travel the studied section
of NC 72-711 two times a day.
15. Sidewalk
There is no sidewalk within the project limits.
D. Capacity Analysis
Mainline capacity analyses were not performed for the existing two-to
four-lane highway and the proposed five-to six-lane facility. Arterial ,
level of service is defined in terms of average travel speed of all
tFro-Jgh-vehies on the arterial. It is strongly influenced by the number
of signals per mile and the average intersection delay per vehicle. Delay
is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost
travel time. Arterial capacity is generally dominated by the capacity of
intersections. Along the studied section of NC 72-711, there are 5
intersections within a distance of 0.7 mile, four of which are signalized.
The capacity and level of service of NC 72-711 are determined by the
capacity and level of service of the five intersections.
5

9
Level of service "A" describes operations with very low delay, i.e.,
less than 5 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is
extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most
vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to
low delay. Level of service "B" describes operations with delay in the
range of 5 to 15 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good
progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS
"A", causing higher delay. Level of service "C" describes operations with
delay in the range of 15 to 25 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays
may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual
cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles
stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through
the intersection without stopping. Level of service "D" describes
operations with delay in the range of 25 to 40 seconds per vehicle. At
level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer
delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long
cycle lengths, or high volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios. Many vehicles
stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual
cycle failures are noticeable. Level of service "E" describes operations
with delay in the range of 40 to 60 seconds per vehicle. This is
considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values
generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c
ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Level of
service "F" describes operations with delay in excess of 60 seconds per
vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This
condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates
exceed capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios
below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long
cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delays.
Intersection capacity analyses were performed for the following
intersections due to heavy projected traffic volumes and turning movements
at these locations: (1) the NC 72/NC 711 intersection, (2) the
NC 72-111/SR 1539 intersection, (3) the NC 72-711/Southbound I-95 ramp
terminal intersection, (4) the NC 72-711/Northbound I-95 ramp terminal
intersection, and (5) the NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersection. These
analyses were performed for both the existing and proposed intersections
for years 1996 and 2016. The results of these analyses are shown below in
Table 2:
Analyzing the results shown in Table 2, the section of NC 72-711 in
the immediate vicinity of I-95 ramp terminals is currently operating at
LOS D to E. This surpasses the level of acceptable delay. Without the
recommended improvements, LOS E to F conditions are expected before the
year 2000. Even with the proposed improvements, LOS F conditions are
expected along most of the project by the year 2000.
6
Table 2
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Calculated Levels-of-Service
Existing Proposed
Facility Facility
Intersection 1996 2016 1996 2016
NC 72/NC 711 D F D+ F*+
NC 72-711/SR 1539 C E C+ E+
NC 72-111/Southbound I-95 ramp terminal E F C F*
NC 72-711/Northbound I-95 ramp terminal D F C F*
NC 72-711/West Fifth Street C F C F*
Notes: * LOS F reached in year 2000
+ No improvements are recommended at this location
E. Constrained Traffic
The capacity analysis described above is based upon the projected
traffic volumes presented in Figure 3. Those volumes reflect the number
of vehicles that would travel NC 72-711 if there were no capacity
deficiencies on the roads feeding traffic into NC 72-711 (NC 72 and NC 711
at the west end of the project and West Fifth Street at the east end).
NC 72 and NC 711 to the west of the project presently are three-lane
roadways in rural settings. It appears these roads could be widened to
multilane facilities in order to increase capacity without causing
substantial environmental impacts; however, improvements to these roads
are not presently identified in the NCDOT Transportation Improvement
Program. To the north of the project, West Fifth Street is a four-lane
curb and gutter roadway already operating near capacity. This roadway is
located in an urban setting, with businesses and residences lining both
sides of the corridor. It appears that if West Fifth Street were widened
to a five- or seven-lane facility in order to carry the projected traffic
volumes, substantial relocation of homes and businesses would result.
This widening of West Fifth Street is not presently identified in the
NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program, and it is unlikely that such
widening will occur.
In conclusion, West Fifth Street will not have sufficient capacity to
carry the amount of traffic projected in the year 2016 (52,200 vpd). As a
result, the volumes projected on NC 72-711 in the year 2016 (52,600 vpd)
are higher than the volumes that will actually occur. Based upon these
considerations, constructing sufficient through and turn lanes along
NC 72-711 and all the roads that intersect it so as to provide a more
desirable level of service in the design year is not considered prudent or
w
R

7
probable. The recommended improvements (see Section II) provide capacity
and safety improvements, while at the same time minimizing environmental
impacts.
The proposed improvements to US 74 west of Lumberton currently
programmed in the TIP (Project R-513) will improve access to I-95 from the
west. It is anticipated this project will take some of the traffic off of
NC 72-711 west of Lumberton. Right of way acquisition for Project R-513
" is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1998, and construction is scheduled
to begin in fiscal year 2001.
F. Accident Analysis
A comparison of accident rates along NC 72-711 and the statewide
rates for both urban and rural two-lane "NC" routes is shown in Table 3.
The statewide rates for three-lane routes were not selected for comparison
with reported NC 72-711 accidents because the reported mileage inventory
for "three-lane NC routes" are limited as such to make average statewide
accident rates statistically insignificant. In addition, even though the
majority of the existing NC 72-711 facility consists of three lanes, left
turns occur only at the intersections, so the facility operates more like
a two-lane road. Therefore, NC 72-711 accident rates were analyzed in
relation to statewide average rates for two-lane roads. The rates shown
for NC 72-711 were obtained from studies conducted from January 1, 1989 to
December 31, 1992. The statewide rates were obtained from studies
conducted from 1990 through 1992.
Table 3
Accident Rates
(per 100 million vehicle miles)
Average Statewide Rate for
Rate along all two-lane "NC" Routes
Accident Type NC 72-711 Urban Rural

All accidents 844.9 264.2 202.6
Fatal 0.0 1.1 2.5
Non-fatal 410.4 107.4 94.5.
Nighttime 144.8 49.8 63.2
Wet conditions 144.8 66.5 52.0
The rates for all but fatal accidents along NC 72-711 were
substantially higher than the corresponding statewide rates for urban and
rural two-lane "NC" routes.
Fifty-three percent of the 140 accidents recorded along the project
involved rear-end collisions. Twelve percent involved vehicles making
left- or right-hand turns. Twenty-two percent involved angle collisions.
8
Fifty-four percent of the recorded accidents occurred on NC 72-711 at
the I-95 interchange ramp terminals. Thirty-one percent occurred near the
NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersection. Thirteen percent occurred at
the NC 72/NC 711 intersection.
G. Project Terminals
West of the NC 72-711 intersection both NC 72 and NC 711 consist of a
three-lane, 42-foot pavement with 7-foot grassed shoulders. North of the
project, West Fifth Street is a 44-foot face-to-face travelway consisting
of four lanes with curb and gutter. South of the project, West Fifth
Street is a 41-foot face-to-face travelway consisting of three lanes with
curb and gutter. West Fifth Street becomes a two-lane facility with
grassed shoulders south of the SR 2501 (Starlite Drive) intersection.
H. Thoroughfare Plan
NC 72-711 is identified as a major thoroughfare on the Lumberton
Thoroughfare Plan. This plan was adopted by the City of Lumberton and the
North Carolina Board of Transportation in 1978. The thoroughfare plan
proposes realignment of NC 72-711 to link with SR 2501 (Starlite Drive) to
provide part of a future circumferential route around the south side of
Lumberton (see Figure 4).
Traffic pattern investigations and origin and destination studies
were performed as part of the planning for the subject project. It was
determined that even if NC 72-711 were realigned to tie into SR 2501
(Starlite Drive), as proposed in the thoroughfare plan, the vast majority
of motorists along NC 72-711 would choose to go north along West Fifth
Street into Lumberton rather than continuing on SR 2501 south of
Lumberton. These traffic patterns would be better served by maintaining
the existing through movement from NC 72-711 onto West Fifth Street, as
recommended (see Section II). The proposed improvements at the NC 72-711/
West Fifth Street intersection and the proposed intersection layout are
shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.
A modification to the current Lumberton Thoroughfare Plan to reflect
the changing traffic patterns evident on the southwest side of Lumberton
is under investigation. It is anticipated the modified thoroughfare plan
will not include the Starlite Drive (SR 2501)/NC 72-711 connection as
proposed in the approved Thoroughfare Plan (1978). In addition, a b
proposed loop road intersecting I-95 south of the subject project will
take-some traffic away from the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange. The modified
Lumberton Thoroughfare Plan is expected to be presented to Lumberton
officials for their approval later this year.
I. Nearby Airports
The Lumberton Municipal Airport is located just south of SR 2501 near
the east end of the project. The northern end of the principal runway is
situated approximately 1000 feet from SR 2501. The principal approach to
that runway is south to north; therefore, most approaches do not occur
over the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange area.
9
The proposed airport plan includes acquiring additional property at
the south end of the principal runway for a future 1000-foot extension of
the runway (the principal runway is shown in Figure 4). There are no
immediate plans to acquire the needed property. No extension of the
runway at the north end (toward SR 2501) is proposed. An instrument
landing system (ILS) is currently being installed, and airport authorities
expect it to be fully operational before the year is out. The glide path
window at the north end of the runway extends across SR 2501 east of the
" project. The proposed improvements to NC 72-711 will not affect the glide
path window (see letter from Lumberton Municipal Airport in the Appendix,
page A-46).
The proposed realignment of NC 72-711 has been coordinated with the
Lumberton Municipal Airport, and no major impact on the runway glide path
is anticipated. The proposed improvements to NC 72-711 will be no closer
to the airport than the existing road, and the proposed NC 72-711/West
Fifth Street intersection is to be at-grade at approximately the same
elevation as the existing intersection. The proposed NC 72-711 bridge
over I-95 is to be constructed approximately 5 feet higher than the
existing bridge, and the Lumber River bridge is to be constructed
approximately 4 feet higher than the existing bridge. A copy of this
approved Environmental Assessment will be forwarded to the Federal
Aviation Administration for their review and comment.
J. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community
The proposed improvements will allow more efficient vehicle operation
,and reduced travel times for motorists, resulting in road user cost
savings. Traffic safety will be improved by providing additional through
and turn lanes along NC 72-711 and by eliminating the existing two-way
ramp operation in three of the four quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95
interchange. Access to homes, businesses, and public facilities near the
project will be improved.
II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. NC 72-711 and West Fifth Street Widening and Realignment
It is recommended NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive) be widened to a
five- to six-lane facility from just east of the NC 72/NC 711 intersection
west of I-95 to West Fifth Street east of I-95 (0.7 mile). A five-lane
shoulder facility with a 60-foot pavement plus 10-foot paved shoulders
(2-foot full depth) is recommended along NC 72-711 from the NC 72-
NC 711/SR 1539 intersection to the southbound I-95 ramp terminal. (The
taper for this proposed widening will start at the NC 72/NC 711 inter-
section and will end at the NC 72-711/SR 1539 intersection, where the full
five-lane cross section will begin. A left turn lane will be provided for
westbound NC 72-711 traffic wanting access to SR 1539.) A six-lane
shoulder facility with a 72-foot pavement and 10-foot paved shoulders
(2-foot paved full depth) is recommended from the southbound I-95 ramp
terminal to the northbound I-95 ramp terminal. This six-lane cross
section will provide double left turn lanes and additional vehicle storage
capacity between the interchange ramp terminals and more desirable capa-
city at the NC 72-711/West Fifth Street' intersection. A six-lane curb and
10
gutter facility (76 feet face to face) with six-foot berms will begin at
the northbound I-95 ramp terminal and continue to West Drive, where it
will begin to taper down to tie into the existing four-lane curb and
gutter facility (48 feet face to face) on West Fifth Street just south of
Dunn Road.
It is recommended NC 72-711 be widened to the north side of the
existing road along the entire length of the project. Since the Lumber
River channel is approximately 150 feet narrower on the north (upstream)
side of the bridge, north-side widening will minimize the required bridge
length. The proposed widening and grade changes will require
reconstructing the northbound and southbound ramp terminals of the
NC 72-711/I-95 interchange.
In conjunction with the proposed NC 72-711 improvements, it is
recommended West Fifth Street (SR 2499) south of NC 72-711 be widened to a
five-lane curb and gutter facility (64 feet face to face) in order to
supply the required turning movement capacity at the NC 72-711/West Fifth
Street intersection. This proposed five-lane cross section will taper
down to tie into the existing West Fifth Street cross section
approximately 400 feet south of the proposed NC 72-711/West Fifth Street
intersection.
The proposed improvements described above are shown in Figure 5.
Proposed intersection layouts are shown in Figure 6.
B. NC 72-711/I-95 Interchange Modifications
Since the widening of NC 72-711 is to the north, this widening will
require reconstructing the northbound and southbound ramp terminals of the
NC 72-711/I-95 interchange as shown in Figure 5. As noted below, all
service roads will have their access to the ramps terminated (see
Figure 5).
Finally, the two I-95 exit ramps will be widened to 36 feet to
provide three approach lanes at their respective intersections with
NC 72-711. Double lefts will be provided at the I-95 exit ramp terminals
(see Figure 6). The two I-95 entrance ramps will be widened to provide
lanes for the double lefts off of NC 72-711.
C. Service Road Realignment

Two-way ramps currently exist in the northeast, southeast, and
northwest quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange. These ramps are
intersected by three service roads, SR 1592 (Hester Drive), SR 1593
(Jonathan Street), and SR 1588 (Cox Road), respectively. It is '
recommended that the existing service road connections with the
interchange ramps be removed. This will eliminate the two-way operation
of the ramps and lessen driver confusion and the likelihood of accidents,
thereby improving safety.
SR 1592 (Hester Drive) is to be terminated approximately 650 feet
north of its present tie-in with the northbound on-ramp of Interstate 95.
An access road will be constructed to connect West Fifth Street and
SR 1592 across from Dunn Road. SR 1593 (Jonathan Street) is to be
realigned to link with Cottonwood Street to tie into SR 2499 at the
11
existing Cottonwood Street/SR 2499 intersection. SR 1588 (Cox Road) is to
be terminated and will not have access to NC 72-711. These proposed
improvements are shown in Figure 5.
D. Dunn Road Extension
It is also recommended to extend Dunn Road (SR 2522) from West Fifth
Street to Hester Road (SR 1592) by constructing a 40-foot wide curb and
.gutter facility within a 60-foot right-of-way. This facility will provide
access between West Fifth Street and Hester Road. The access between
Hester Road and NC 72-711 via the I-95 northbound entrance ramp is to be
removed under the proposed improvements.
4
E. Structures
The I-95 Bridge (No. 25) and the Lumber River Bridge (No. 43) are
proposed to be replaced rather than widened. The grade along NC 72-711
will be raised to accommodate the 25-year flood along the Lumber River.
Based on economic analyses performed by the Structure Design Unit, it
costs the same to replace versus to widen the Lumber River Bridge, so it
will be replaced. Also, under TIP Project I-23058, I-95 will be milled
and resurfaced to a net depth increase of 6 inches. The vertical
clearance under the I-95 bridge is 16 feet-three inches. The resulting
vertical clearance under the I-95 bridge would be 15 feet-9 inches which
is 3 inches below the minimum vertical clearance for interstate routes of
16 feet. In addition, the longer bridge spans would require deeper
girders which would also reduce the vertical clearance.
1. Bridge over I-95
The existing bridge carrying NC 72-711 over I-95 (bridge number
25) is to be removed and replaced with a new bridge to accommodate
the proposed widening of NC 72-711 to the north. A clear roadway
width of 92 feet is to be provided on the new bridge to accommodate
the proposed six-lane cross section to be constructed between the
I-95 ramp terminals, including 10-foot shoulders on each side. The
new bridge is to provide a vertical clearance of 17 feet over I-95.
The new bridge will be approximately 262 feet in length to
accommodate possible future widening of I-95 to eight lanes with a
22-foot median and 12-foot paved outside shoulders. The 1995-2001
NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program does not include a project
to construct additional lanes along I-95 in the vicinity of the
project.
2. Lumber River Bridge
Bridge number 43 carrying NC 72-711 over the Lumber River (see
Figure 8) is to be replaced to accommodate the proposed five-lane
cross section at that location. A clear roadway width of 80 feet,
including 10-foot shoulders on each side, is to be provided on the
bridge. North-side widening is recommended due to the narrower
channel width of the Lumber River on the north (upstream) side of the
12
highway. The Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation located in the
Appendix (see pages A-4 through A-14) details the special measures to
be taken during the design and construction of the proposed Lumber
River Bridge due to the presence of the Lumber River State Park.
F. Design Speed
The recommended design speed along NC 72-711 is 50 mph.
G. Access Control
Additional control of access will be acquired along the north side of
NC 72-711 from the northbound I-95 ramp terminal to just south of West
Drive. Control of access will also be acquired along the north and south
sides of NC 72-711 from the southbound ramp terminal to the Lumber River
Bridge. No control of access is proposed elsewhere along NC 72-711 due to
the need to provide access to adjacent properties. Full control of access
is to be maintained along I-95 (mainline and ramps). The limits of
proposed access control are shown in Figure 5.
H. Intersection Treatment
As noted above under item II.C., the service roads in the northeast,
southeast, and northwest quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange are
to be revised to eliminate the service road connections with the
interchange ramps. The existing NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersection
will be modified to become a more standard T-type intersection. West
Fifth Street will be slightly realigned near the eastern project terminal
to "tee" into NC 72-711 (see Figure 5). No changes to the NC 72-711
intersection are proposed, and no other intersection revisions are
recommended.
I. Right of Way
Approximately 1.76 acres of additional right of way will be required
to accommodate the proposed improvements to NC 72-711 and West Fifth
Street and the proposed Dunn Road extension to SR 1592.
J. Degree of Utility Conflicts
The overall degree of utility conflict of this project is expected to
be high. Utilities which will be impacted by the project will be
relocated prior to construction. During construction, care will be taken
to prevent damage to utilities along the project. The contractor will
prepare a work schedule which will minimize impacts on water and other.
utility services.
K. Anticipated Design Exceptions
0,
No design exceptions are expected at this time.
13
L. Special Permits Required
In accordance with the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S. C 1344), a permit will be required from the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (COE) for the discharge of dredged or fill material into
"Waters of the United States". Based upon site location and estimated
acreage involved of the wetlands (a natural drainage ditch) located along
the proposed Dunn Road extension, the wetland impacts will be authorized
by Nationwide Permit [33 CFR 330.5(a) (26)].
It is anticipated that widening over the Lumber River and associated
floodplain will either require a General Permit (CESAW-C082-N-000-0031) or
a Section 404 Individual Permit. Final determination of the permits
required rests with the COE.
A 401 Water Quality Certification will be required from the Division
of Environmental Management, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources.
M. Changes in the State Highway System
No changes in the state highway system are anticipated.
N. Multiple Use of Space
There are no plans to utilize the right of way for any other purposes
except public utilities, which will be allowed use of the right of way
within certain limitations.
0. Bikeways
The need for special accommodations for bicycles along the project
has not been identified.
P. Sidewalk
No sidewalk is proposed as part of the subject project.
The City of Lumberton requested sidewalk be provided along one side
of the bridge carrying NC 72-711 over I-95 to improve pedestrian access
across the interstate (see Appendix, Page A-44). As part of the proposed
typical section, 10-foot paved shoulders will be provided along the
project in the vicinity of I-95. This includes 10-foot shoulders on the
bridge over I-95. When contacted, city officials agreed that the 10-foot
paved shoulder would adequately serve pedestrian traffic across I-95.
14
Q. Cost Estimates
Right of Way Construction Total
Roadway improvements $ 518,000 $ 3,380,000 $ 3,898,000
(excluding the Lumber
River and I-95 bridges)
Lumber River and I-95 N/A $ 2,820,000 $ 2,820,000
bridges
Total $ 518,000 $ 6,2009000 $ 6,718,000
R. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Area
The 1995-2001 NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) calls
for upgrading I-95 from NC 72-711 interchange to the US 301 interchange in
Lumberton (5.36 miles) under TIP Project I-2305B. That project is to
include resurfacing I-95, right of way fence repair and replacement,
drainage improvements, guardrail improvements, pavement rutting repair,
concrete median barrier installation, and the lengthening and widening of
acceleration and deceleration lanes. Construction is scheduled to begin
in fiscal year 1996.
TIP project U-2415 calls for widening NC 211 to a multilane facility
from. Rowland Avenue to west of SR 1586. The project also calls for
revising the NC 211/I-95 interchange, replacing the bridge over I-95, and
installing a new signal system. Right of way is scheduled for fiscal year
1996, and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1996.
It is anticipated TIP projects U-2415, I-2305B, and U-2416 will be
let together under one construction contract to minimize impacts to
motorists.
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Recommended Improvements
The recommended improvement is comprised of the following:
1. Widening NC 72-711 to a five- to six-lane facility from east of
the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to West Fifth Street
east of I-95 .
2. Replacing the existing bridge carrying NC 72-711 over the Lumber
River (bridge number 43) with a five-lane structure.
3. Replacing the existing bridge carrying NC 72-711 over I-95
(bridge number 25) with a six-lane structure at the same
location and providing adequate horizontal clearance under the
new bridge for possible future widening of I-95 to eight lanes.

i
a
15
4. Removing service road ramp connections in the northeast,
southeast, and northwest quadrants of the NC 72-711/I-95
interchange (SR 1592, SR 1593, and SR 1588, respectively).
5. Extending Dunn Road from West Fifth Street to Hester Road
(SR 1592) by constructing a three-lane, 40-foot wide (face to
face) curb and gutter facility. This facility will provide
access between West Fifth Street and Hester Road.
B. Starlite Drive Connection
Another alternative considered calls for relocating NC 72-711 to the
• south over Interstate 95 and tying it into Starlite Drive (SR 2501). This
alternative reflects what is recommended in the Lumberton Thoroughfare
Plan (see Section I.H. of this report and Figure 4). However, traffic
studies indicated this design would not adequately serve the heavy traffic
movement on West Fifth Street going into Lumberton. These studies also
indicated relatively few motorists would travel Starlite Drive around the
south side of Lumberton, even if this alternative were constructed. For
these reasons, this alternative is not recommended.
C. Postponement of Proposed Action
The existing facility is already operating at an undesirable
level-of-service, especially during peak traffic periods. Postponement of
the project would result in a continuing deterioration of traffic
conditions in the future as traffic demand increases. Therefore, this
alternative is not recommended.
D. "Do Nothina" Alternative
Although this alternative would avoid the limited adverse
environmental impacts that are anticipated to result from the project,
there would be no positive effect on the traffic capacity of the highway
or improvements in traffic safety. For these reasons, this alternative is
not recommended.
E. Alternate Modes of Transportation
No alternate mode of transportation is considered to be a practical
alternative. Highway transportation is the dominant mode of
transportation in the project area, and the project involves widening an
existing highway.
4
16
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A.
Social Effects
1. Land Use
a. Existing Land Use
The western quadrants of the NC 72-711 interchange are
largely undeveloped and dominated by wetlands. A exception is a
service station located on SR 1588 in the northwest quadrant.
Institutional development exists near the NC 72/NC 711
intersection near the western project terminal.
The eastern quadrants of the interchange are. largely
developed. The northeast quadrant includes retail stores and
fast food restaurants. The southeast quadrant includes a motel,
fast food restaurants, and retail stores. Vacant wooded land
and farmland exist along Starlite Drive (SR 2501) near the
eastern project terminal.
b. Existing Zoning
The project lies within the jurisdiction of the City of
Lumberton. The City enforces a Land Use Ordinance, which was
adopted in 1985 and last updated in 1990. The Ordinance serves
as both the zoning ordinance and the long-range planning tool
for the City.
The southwest quadrant of the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange is
zoned B-4 Commercial District. This is a general business
district which permits the widest range of commercial land uses.
The northwest quadrant is zoned M-2 Manufacturing District.
The M-2 District permits the heaviest industrial uses permitted
by the City. A small B-5 Commercial District which accommodates
the service station is also located in this quadrant.
The eastern quadrants are zoned B-5 Commercial District.
This district permits traveler-oriented commercial
establishments.
Land on the north side of NC 72-711 west of I-95 is zoned
M-1 Manufacturing District. Zoning districts on the south side
of NC 72-711 west of I-95 include small residential districts
and B-4 Commercial Districts.
C. Proposed Land Use

As noted above under Item "b", the City's Land Use
Ordinance serves as the long-range planning tool.
17
d. Project Compatibility with Local Plans
Although the proposed project may adversely affect some
individual businesses and undeveloped properties in the project
vicinity, it is anticipated the project will not have a
detrimental effect on the existing land use, in general.
Development may be encouraged by improved accessibility.
2. Neighborhood Characteristics
The site of the proposed action is characterized by
institutional development, commercial development, and undeveloped
lands. Institutional development is found near the western end of
the project and includes the Robeson County Department of Social
Services, Bryan Learning Center, Robeson County Board of Education
facilities, the Robeson County Planetarium, the North Carolina Cancer
Institute, U. S. Department of Agriculture facilities, and a Robeson
County Inspection Department office. No development exists within
the low-lying areas bordering the project between SR 1539 and I-95.
Commercial development exists near the eastern quadrants of the
NC 72-711/I-95 interchange and consists of service stations, fast
food restaurants, motels, and small retail stores.
The proposed project will not split any neighborhoods or
communities. It is anticipated community cohesion will not be
disrupted as a result of the project.
3. Relocatees
It is anticipated that one business, a gas station-convenience
store, may be relocated as a result of the project. No residences,
farms, or non-profit organizations will be relocated as a result of
the project. See Appendix pages A-1 through A-3 to reference the
relocation report and information regarding the NCDOT Relocation
Assistance Program.
4. Public Facilities
Directly southwest of the I-95/NC 72-711 interchange is a boat
ramp for access to the Lumber River. This access is located off of
McNeill Bridge Road (SR 1539). Additional discussion of this
facility is presented below in Section IV.B.. Other public
facilities in the project area are described in Section IV.A.2..
5. Historic and Cultural Resources
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented
by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section
106 requires that if a federally-funded, licensed, or permitted
project has an effect on a property listed on or eligible for listing
on the National Register of Historic Places, the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation be given an opportunity to comment.
18
a. Architectural/Historical Resources
The area of potential effect (APE) was surveyed in the
field by Division of Highways staff. No properties over fifty
years old were found; therefore, no properties in the APE are
eligible for the National Register. The State Historic
Preservation Officer has concurred with this finding (see
Appendix, page A-31).
Since there are no properties listed in or are eligible for
the National Register in the APE, no further compliance within
Section 106 is required.
b. Archaeological Resources
Based upon an archaeological survey conducted by the
Division of Highways, it has been concluded the proposed project
will not impact any archaeological sites that are on or eligible
for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The
State Historic Preservation Officer of the N. C. Department of
Cultural Resources concurred with this finding (see page A-32 in
the Appendix).
Since there are no properties listed in or are eligible for
the National Register in the APE, no further compliance within
Section 106 is required.
B. Section 4(f) Properties
The project crosses the Lumber River, a component of the North
Carolina Natural and Scenic Rivers System established by the Natural and
Scenic Rivers Act of 1971. The Lumber River State Park was established by
the North Carolina General Assembly in 1989, but no land was acquired
until the summer of 1991 during a special session of the General Assembly.
In the vicinity of the this project, the park limits are the mean high
water level of the Lumber River. The section of the river which the
project crosses has been classified as a recreational segment (see Figure
8). It offers outstanding recreation and scenic values that are largely
free of impoundments. A public boating access point is located
approximately 500 feet upstream of the NC 72-711 crossing of the Lumber
River. This access point is reached via SR 1539 (see Figure 5).
Proposed improvements in the vicinity of the Lumber River call for
widening NC 72-711 to a five-lane section and replacing the existing
bridge over the river (see Figure 8). Since the bridge replacement will
require the placement of piers into the Lumber River, a Programmatic
Section 4(f) Evaluation is required. The Programmatic Section 4(f)
Evaluation included in the Appendix of this report (see pages A-4 through
A-14) includes discussion of impacts of the project on the Lumber River
and proposed mitigation measures to minimize these impacts.
t
r

19
NCDOT has coordinated plans to replace the Lumber River bridge with
the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation to discuss measures to
minimize harm to the park. A letter from the Division of Parks and
Recreation stating they have no objections to the proposed project is
attached to the Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation (see page A-14).
C. Economic Effects
` The estimated labor force of Robeson County in January, 1994 was
52,630 persons. Out of that labor force, approximately 48,900 persons
were employed, resulting in an unemployment rate of 7.1 percent.
It is anticipated the proposed improvements to NC 72-711 and the
NC 72-711/I-95 interchange will have a positive economic impact in that
overall access to the businesses in the vicinity of the interchange will
be improved.
D. Environmental Effects
1. Biological Resources
a. Plant Life
Five vegetative communities were identified in the project
study area. These communities include two wetland communities
(bottomland hardwood forests and wet shrub-scrub assemblage) and
three upland communities (man-dominated areas, mixed-herbaceous
assemblage, and mixed pine-hardwood forest).
Man-Dominated Areas
Commercial development, roads, maintained roadside
shoulders, and interchange areas dominate the study area. These
areas have a suppressed level of vegetative growth due to
mowing, spraying, clearing, or other man-initiated activities.
Turf and landscaped areas make up the dominant vegetative
component and are planted in ornamentals and grass (Festuca
sp.). Approximately 6.1 acres of this community will be lost as
a result of the project.
01
Mixed Herbaceous Assemblage
Abandoned fields allowed to revegetate naturally show early
stages of succession characterized by plants that have short
life cycles, reproduce annually by seeds, and produce an
14 abundance of seeds. Common plant species occurring within these
areas along the project are dog-fennel (Eupatorium
caP_illifoium), goldenrod (Solidago altissima), broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus), lespedeza (Lespedeza virginica), and
aster (Aster spp.). Approximately 2.8 acres of this community
will be lost as a result of the project.
20
Mixed Pine-Hardwood Forest
Lumber River bottomland forests adjoin a mixed
pine-hardwood forest. The mixed pine-hardwood forest community
represents an intermediate successional stage between pine
forest and hardwood forest. This community is normally found
where a hardwood forest has suffered a disturbance such as fire
or selective cutting. The mixed pine-hardwood community
adjoining the project was previously logged. The canopy
comprises loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) interspersed with willow
oak ( uercus ph_ellos). Many red maple (Ater rubrum) saplings
and thickets of wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) make up the
understory. Poison ivy (Toxicondendron radicans) and cane '
(Arundinaria gigantea) dominate the herbaceous layer.
Approximately 0.9 acre of this community will be lost as a
result of the project.
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
This community is characterized by a natural hydrologic
regime of alternating annual wet and dry periods. Trees are
buttressed and some are fluted in response to anaerobic
conditions caused by periodic inundations. Root systems are
shallow and frequently visible at the surface. These bottomland
hardwood forests are associated with the Lumber River.
Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora), laurel oak
( uercus laurifolia), willow oak, and river birch (Betula nigra)
are common canopy species. Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) is
scattered infrequently throughout the community. Past logging
activities, as evidenced by stumps, indicates bald cypress was
once a major canopy component. Red maple, wax myrtle, blueberry
(Vaccinium cor mbosom), Virginia tea (Itea Virginica), and green
ash (Fraxinus taro iniana) make up the understory. Typical
herbaceous species are false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica),
cane, poison ivy, and royal fern (Osmunda re alis).
Approximately 0.9 acre of this community will be lost as a
result of the project.
Wet Shrub-Scrub Assemblage
A power line clearing adjacent to the Lumber River exists
in what was once bottomland hardwood forest. As a result of
clearing activities, a diverse shrub-scrub assemblage of wetland
species has developed. Black willow, sweet gum (Liquidambar
st raciflua), red maple, and river birch grow in association Pk
with a proliferation of vines such as trumpet vine (Cam psis
radicans), grape (Vitis rotundifolia), and green-briers (Smilax
spp.). Few herbaceous species are present, probably due to
woody plant competition. Goldenrods are the most notable
herbaceous species present. Approximately 0.1 acre° of this
community will be lost as a result of the project.
21
General
r

The proposed widening and realignment of NC 72-711 will
eliminate strips of mixed pine-hardwood forest, wet shrub-scrub,
mixed herbaceous, and maintained habitats. This will result in
direct loss of plant and animal species from clearing
operations, destruction of foraging and protective habitat, soil
compaction, and soil erosion. Filling and sedimentation of
wetlands may alter drainage or hydrologic communities.
b. Wildlife
Wildlife species -are associated with given types of plant
communities, which provide a wide variety of food, cover, and
protection.
Upland woodlands animals that inhabit areas of hardwoods
and conifers in the project vicinity are gray fox (Urocyon
cinereoargenteus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus),
gray squirrel (Sciurus niger), woodpeckers (Picoides and
Melanerpes spp.), and a variety of songbirds.
Open land wildlife associated with overgrown vegetation
(shrub-scrub and mixed herbaceous) in the project area are
mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), quail (Colinus virginianus),
red fox (Vulpes fulva), and eastern cottontail ( Sylvilagu
floridanus).
Bottomland hardwood forests in association with the Lumber
River provide refuge for the raccoon (Procyon lotor), beaver
(Castor canadensis), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), mink (Mustela
vison), and a variety of reptiles and amphibians.
Urban areas provide shelter for opportunistic animal
species such as the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), white-footed
mouse (Perom_yscus leucopus ), and house mouse (Mus musculus).
These rodents are common prey for red-tail hawks (Buteo
jamaicensis). Other bird species typical in urban settings are
the American robin (Turdus migratorius), mockingbird (Mimum
of lottos), rock dove (Columba livia), and the European
starling (Sturnus vulgaris).
Existing wildlife habitat will be altered or eliminated as
a result of the project. Subterranean, burrowing, and
slow-moving organisms will be eliminated. Larger, faster
animals will simply.be displaced..
C. Federally-Listed Species
Plants and animals with federal protection statuses of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE), and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973.
22
Comments received from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
in May of 1990 indicate the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis) and Michaux's poison-sumac (Rhus michauxii), both with
an Endangered status, occur in Robeson County, as do several
Status Review species. This information is current. Files of
the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program indicate the
American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), a Threatened
due to Similarity in Appearance species, has been sited within
several miles of the project area.
Suitable habitat for the Red-cockaded Woodpecker consists
of pine or mixed pine/hardwood (at least 50 percent pine) stands
thirty years of age or older. Suitable habitat of this type
does not exist in the project area. Michaux' Poison-Sumac
occurs in rocky or sandy open woods. This habitat does not
exist in the project area. The American alligator inhabits
fresh water swamps, marshes, abandoned rice fields, ponds,
lakes, and backwaters of large rivers. The Lumber River and its
associated floodplain area provides suitable habitat for this
species; however, impacts to this system are likely to be
negligible. There were no sightings of the American alligator
during the ecological survey of the project.
The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided a list of
"Status Review" (SR) species which may occur in the project
area:
Sarvis Holly (Ilex amelanchier)
Wireleaf dropseee (Sporobolus teretifolius)
Bog spicebush (Lindera subcoriacea)
Torrey's muhly (Muhlenbergia torreyanna)
Awned meadow-beauty (Rhexia aristosa)
These species are not legally protected under the
Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any provisions of
the Act until the species are formally proposed or listed as
Threatened or Endangered.
2. Soils
The following native soil series are located within the project
area: Johnston soils, Johns sandy loam, Lakeland sand, Lumbee sandy
loam, and loamy Udorthents. These soils are described below:
Soil Series
Johnston soil
Lumbee sandy loam
Johns sandy loam
Lakeland sand
Udorthents (loamy)
Classification
Hydric
Hydric
Non-Hydric
Non-Hydric
Non-Hydric
A
0.

_Hydric Inclusion ON,
Lumbee sandy loam
23
The most prevalent soil type in the project area is Johnston
soil, which underlies the floodplain of the Lumber River. The
surface layer is mucky loam, loam, or sandy loam, which is nearly
level and poorly drained. Small areas of Lumbee sandy loam exist, as
does Johns sandy loam, which has hydric inclusions of Lumbee sandy
loam.
Upland soils in the project area comprise loamy Udorthents and
Lakeland sand. Loamy Udorthents are soils of variable
characteristics that have been altered by man to the extent the
relief and soil profile cannot be recognized. These soils underlie
the developed (urbanized) areas. Lakeland sand is an excessively
drained soil on the highest parts of the landscape.
3. Wetlands
The proposed widening of NC 72-711 to five lanes west of I-95
will occur in a defined floodplain system associated with the Lumber
River. Approximately 1.0 acre of wetlands will be filled as a result
of the project. This includes 0.9 acre of bottomland hardwood forest
in the vicinity of the Lumber River Bridge and 0.1 acre of wet
shrub/scrub assemblage in the vicinity of the proposed Dunn Road
(SR 2522) extension.
In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C 1344), a permit will be required from the Corps of
Engineers (COE) for the discharge of dredged or fill material into
"Waters of the United States". It is anticipated that widening over
the Lumber River and its associated floodplain will require a General
Permit (CESAW-C082-N-000-0031). This permit authorizes the placement
of fill material associated with the construction, repair or
replacement of bridges spanning navigable waters and waters of the
United States. However, final judgement concerning specific permit
jurisdiction is reserved by the COE. Based upon site location and
estimated acreage involved, it is anticipated that impacts to the
naturalized drainage ditch to be crossed by the proposed Dunn Road
extension will be authorized by Nationwide Permit [33 CFR 330.5 (a)
(26)]. This permit generally authorizes discharges of dredge or fill
material in wetlands located above the headwaters [flow less than 1.5
cubic m (5 cubic ft) per second] of non-tidal rivers, streams and
their lakes and impoundments including adjacent wetlands. In
addition, a 401 Water Quality Certification administered through the
N. C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources will
be required. This certification is issued for any activity which may
result in a discharge into waters for which a federal permit is
required.
Compensatory mitigation is not required required where
Nationwide Permits or General Permits are authorized, according to
the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Corps of Engineers (COE). Final
discretionary authority in these matters rests with the COE.
24
Impacts on wetlands will be minimized through the use of best
management practices during project construction. The Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan established by the Division of Highways in
cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources will be followed during construction to
minimize turbidity levels. See also Item 5. Water Quality for
further information.
4. Flood Hazard Evaluation
Robeson County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Regular Program. A detailed flood study of the Lumber River was
completed in 1989. The approximate limits of the 100-year floodpl.ain '
of the Lumber River in the vicinity of the project are shown in
Figure 7.
The floodplain areas in the vicinity of the project are wooded
with some commercial development. The proposed bridge and roadway
improvements will not have a significant effect (as defined by 23 CFR
650.101(q)) upon the Lumber River or its associated floodplain. The
proposed improvements will encroach on and disturb approximately 0.9
acre of wetlands in the Lumber River floodplain area. The terrain in
the project area is relatively flat with poor drainage
characteristics. Ground water levels and existing drainage patterns
will not be significantly affected by the project. Siltation of
adjacent areas will be minimized through the use and maintenance of
standard erosion control devices.
5. Water Quality
The Lumber River is the only major water crossing of the
project. It has a "best usage" classification of WS IV Sw HQW. WS
IV waters are streams protected as water supplies which are generally
in moderately to highly developed watersheds and are suitable for all
Class C uses. Class C waters are those waters which have water
quality uses suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival,
fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. Sw
indicates swamp waters with characteristics different from other
water bodies such as low velocity, low ph, low dissolved oxygen, and
a high organic content. HQW (High Quality Waters) are waters rated
as excellent based on biological and physical/chemical
characteristics.
Dredging, filling, pile-driving operations, slope stabilization,
and land clearing are construction activities than result in the
direct loss of benthic organisms due to increase in silt loads. The
removal of benthic organisms reduces the potential food supply for
fish, which may affect fish populations.
Siltation has many adverse impacts on fish and benthos:
decreasing the depth of light penetration; inhibiting plant and algal
growth, which are food sources; clogging the filtration apparatus of
filter-feeding benthos and the gills of fish; burying benthic
organisms on the bottom, thereby cutting them off from a food source;
adversely affecting preferred benthic substrate; and spoiling
25
downstream spawning beds for fish. Since the Lumber River is
classified as an HQW, the proposed project is located in a "High
Quality Water Zone". A High Quality Water Zone is defined as areas
that are within 1 mile and drain into an HQW. Construction that
impacts a High Water Quality Zone is required to follow Design
Standards in Sensitive Watersheds in the Sedimentation Control
Guidelines (Title 15A 4B. 0024).
` 6. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires that all federal
agencies and their representatives consider the impact of
construction projects on prime, important, and unique farmland soils
in the project area. The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) of the
U. S. Department of Agriculture was contacted to determine whether
such soils occur in the project area. The SCS indicated no farmland,
as defined by the Farmland Protection Policy Act, will be affected
(see page A-26 in the Appendix).
7. Highway Traffic Noise/Construction Noise Analysis
This analysis was performed to determine the effect of the
proposed project on noise levels in the immediate project area. This
investigation includes an inventory of existing noise sensitive land
uses and a field survey of ambient (existing) noise levels in the
study area. It also includes a comparison of the predicted noise
levels and the ambient noise levels to determine if traffic noise
impacts can be expected resulting from the proposed project. Traffic
noise impacts are determined from the current procedures for the
abatement of highway traffic noise and construction noise, appearing
as Part 772 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If
traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of
alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the
noise impacts must be considered.
Noise is basically defined as unwanted sound. It is emitted
from many sources including airplanes, factories, railroads, power
generation plants, and highway vehicles. Highway noise, or traffic
noise, is usually a composite of noises from engine exhaust, drive
train, and tire-roadway interaction.
' The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound
pressure. Since the range of sound pressure varies greatly, a
logarithmic scale is used to relate sound pressures to some common
reference level, usually the decibel (dB). Sound pressures described
in decibels are called sound pressure levels and are often defined in
terms of frequency weighted scales (A, B, C, or D).
The weighted-A scale is used almost exclusively in vehicle noise
measurements because it places most emphasis on the frequency range
to which the human ear is most sensitive (1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound
levels measured using A-weighting are often expressed as dBA.
Throughout this report, references will be made to dBA, which means
an A-weighted decibel level. Several examples of noise pressure
levels in dBA are listed in Table N1 (see page A-15).
26
Review of Table N1 indicates that most individuals in urbanized
areas are exposed to fairly high noise levels from many sources as
they go about their daily activities. The degree of disturbance or
annoyance of unwanted sound depends essentially on three things:
1) the amount and nature of the intruding noise,
2) the relationship between the background noise and the
intruding noise, and
3) the type of activity occurring where the noise is heard.
In considering the first of these three factors, it is important
to note that individuals have different hearing sensitivity to noise.
Loud noises bother some more than others, and some individuals become
aroused to anger if an unwanted noise persists. The time patterns of
noise also enter into an individual's judgement of whether or not a
noise is objectionable. For example, noises occurring during
sleeping hours are usually considered to be much more objectionable
than the same noises in the daytime.
With regard to the second factor, individuals tend to judge the
annoyance of an unwanted noise in terms of its relationship to noise
from other sources (background noise). The blowing of a car horn at
night when background noise levels are approximately 45 dBA would
generally be much more objectionable than the blowing of a car horn
in the afternoon when background noises might be 55 dBA.
The third factor is related to the interference of noise with
activities of individuals. In a 60 dBA environment, normal
conversation would be possible while sleep might be difficult. Work
activities requiring high levels of concentration may be interrupted
by loud noises, while activities requiring manual effort may not be
interrupted to the same degree.
Over a period of time, individuals tend to accept the noises
which intrude into their lives, particularly if the noises occur at
predicted intervals and are expected. Attempts have been made to
regulate many of these types of noises including airplane noises,
factory noise, railroad noise, and highway traffic noise. In
relation to highway traffic noise, methods of analysis and control
have developed rapidly over the past few years.
In order to determine whether highway noise levels are or are
not compatible with various land uses, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) has developed noise abatement criteria and
procedures to be used in the planning and design of highways. These
abatement criteria and procedures are set forth in the aforementioned
Federal reference (Title 23 CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise
abatement criteria for various land uses is presented in Table N2
(see page A-16). The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is the level of
constant sound which in a given situation and time period, has the
same energy as does time varying sound. In other words, the
fluctuating sound levels of traffic noise are represented in terms of
a steady noise level with the same energy content.
27
Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the
project to determine the existing background noise levels. The
purpose of this noise level information was to quantify the existing
acoustic environment and to provide a base for assessing the impact
of noise level increases occurring at receptors along the project.
The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the
most current traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate
existing noise levels for comparison with the noise levels actually
measured. The calculated existing noise levels were determined to be
in the range of 0.1 to 4.2 dBA of the noise levels actually measured.
Differences in dBA levels can be attributed to "bunching" of
vehicles, changing in the traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds
versus the computer's "evenly-spaced" vehicles and single vehicular
speed. The ambient noise measurement sites and the corresponding
existing Leq noise levels are presented in Figure N1 and Table N3,
respectively (see pages A-17 and A-18).
The prediction of highway traffic noise is a complicated
procedure. In general, the traffic situation is composed of a large
number of variables which describe different cars driving at
different speeds through a continual changing highway configuration
and surrounding terrain. Obviously, to assess the problem, certain
assumptions and simplifications must be made.
The procedure used to predict future noise levels in this study
was the Noise Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and
OPTIMA (revised March, 1983). The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction)
procedure is based upon the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction
Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). The BCR traffic noise prediction model uses
the number and type of vehicles on the planned roadway, their speeds,
the physical characteristics of the road (curves, hills, depressed,
elevated, etc.), receptor location and height, and, if applicable,
barrier type, barrier ground elevation, and barrier top elevation.
In this regard, it is to be noted that only preliminary
alignment was available for use in this noise analysis. The proposed
project is to improve the existing roadway to a five- to six-lane
facility. The proposed roadway was modeled assuming no special noise
abatement measures would be incorporated. Only those existing
natural or man-made barriers were considered. The roadway sections
and proposed intersections were assumed to be flat and at-grade.
Thus, this analysis represents "worst-case" topographic conditions.
The noise predictions made in this report are highway-related noise
predictions for the traffic conditions during the year being
analyzed.
Peak hour design and Level-of-Service (LOS) C volumes were
compared, and the volumes resulting in the noisiest conditions were
used with proposed posted speed limits. Thus, during all other time
periods, the noise levels will be no greater than those indicated in
this report.
28
The STAMINA 2.0 computer model was utilized to enable the
determination of the number of land uses (by type) which, during the
peak hour in the design year 2016, would be exposed to noise levels
approaching or exceeding the FHWA noise abatement criteria and those
land uses predicted to expect a substantial noise increase. The
basic approach was to select a receptor location such as 25, 50, 100,
200, 400, 800, and 1600 feet from the center of the near traffic lane
(adaptable to both sides of the roadway). The location of this
receptor was determined by the projected traffic volume along the
proposed project. The result of this procedure was a grid of
receptor points along the project. Using this grid, noise levels
were calculated for each identified receptor.
The Leq traffic noise exposures associated with this project are
listed in Table N4 (see page A-19). Information included in these
tables consist of listings of all receptors in close proximity to the
project, their ambient and predicted noise levels, and the estimated
noise level increase for each.
Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise
levels either: [a] approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement
criteria (with "approach" meaning within 1 dBA of the Table N2
value), or [b] substantially exceed the existing noise levels. The
NCDOT definition of substantial increase is shown in the lower
portion of Table N2. Consideration for noise abatement measures must
be given to receptors which fall in either category.
The maximum number of receptors in each activity category that
are predicted to become impacted by future traffic noise is shown in
Table N5 (see page A-20) according to the proposed typical section.
These are noted in terms of those receptors expected to experience
traffic noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA NAC or by
a substantial increase in exterior noise levels. No receptors are
expected to experience a substantial increase in their exterior noise
levels. Other information included in Table N5 is the maximum extent
of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours. This information can
assist local authorities in exercising land use control over the
remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within local
jurisdiction. For example, with the proper information on noise
levels, the local authorities. can prevent further development of
incompatible activities and land uses with the predicted noise levels
of an adjacent highway.
Table N6 (see page A-20) indicates the exterior traffic noise
level increases for the identified receptors adjacent to the roadway
section. Predicted noise level increases for this project range from
+1 to +9 dBA. Increases in exterior traffic noise levels of this
magnitude are common on widening projects due to the traffic noise
associated with the existing facility being brought closer to the
receptors by way of adding lanes to the outside. When real-life
noises are heard, it is possible to barely detect level changes of
2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change is more readily noticeable. A 10 dBA change
is judged by most people as a doubling or a halving of the loudness
of the sound.
29
Highway alignment. selection involves the horizontal or vertical
orientation of the proposed improvements in such a way as to minimize
impacts and costs. The selection of alternative alignments for noise
abatement purposes must consider the balance between noise impacts
and other engineering and environmental parameters. For noise
abatement, horizontal alignment selection is primarily a matter of
siting the roadway at a sufficient distance from noise sensitive
areas. Changing the highway alignment is not a viable alternative
for noise abatement.
Traffic system management measures which limit vehicle type,
speed, volume and time of operations are often effective noise
abatement measures. For this project, traffic management measures
are not considered appropriate for noise abatement due to their
effect on the capacity and level-of-service on the proposed roadway.
Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels can
often be applied with a measurable degree of success by the
application of solid mass, attenuable measures to effectively
defract, absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise emissions. Solid
mass, attenuable measures may include earthberms or artificial
abatement walls. However, these mitigating measures may not be
feasible or reasonable in all cases, particularly for receptors with
frontage along primary or secondary roads which cross the proposed
project. Reduction of traffic noise from the proposed roadway may not
necessarily lower the noise levels at these receptors to within the
recommended noise abatement criteria and/or below a substantial noise
level increase.

The project will maintain control of access only in the
immediate vicinity of I-95, meaning most commercial establishments
and residences will have direct driveway connections to the proposed
roadway, and all intersections will adjoin the project at grade.
For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it
must be high enough and long enough to shield the receptor from
significant sections of the highway. Access openings in the barrier
severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then
becomes economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small
noise reduction. Safety at access openings (driveways, crossing
streets, etc.) due to restricted sight distance is also a concern.
Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction, a barrier's length
would normally be eight (8) times the distance from the barrier to
the receptor. For example, a receptor located 50 feet from the
barrier would normally require a barrier 400 feet long. An access
opening of 40 feet (10 percent of the area) would limit its noise
reduction to approximately 4 dBA (FUNDAMENTAL AND ABATEMENT OF
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE, Report No. FHWA-HHI-HEV-73-7976-1, USDOT,
chapter 5, section 3.2, page 5-27).
Businesses, churches, and other related establishments located
along a particular highway normally require accessibility and high
visibility. Solid mass, attenuable measures for traffic noise
abatement would tend to disallow these two qualities and, thus, would
not be acceptable abatement measures in their case.
30
Based on the above factors, no physical abatement measures are
feasible, and none are recommended for this project.
The traffic noise impacts for the "do-nothing" alternative were
also considered. If the traffic currently using the network of roads
in the project area should double and no improvements are made to
NC 72-711, the future traffic noise levels would only increase
approximately 3 dBA above existing noise levels. This small increase r
would be barely noticeable to the people working and living in the
area.
The major construction elements of this project are expected to
be earth removal, hauling, grading, and paving. General construction
noise impacts, such as temporary speech interference for passersbys
and those individuals living or working near the project, can be
expected, particularly from paving operations and from the earth
moving equipment during grading operations. Overall, considering the
relatively short-term nature of construction noise and the limitation
of construction to daytime hours, these impacts are not expected to
be substantial. The transmission loss characteristics of nearby
natural elements and man-made structures are believed to be
sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive construction noise.
Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is
not feasible or reasonable, and no noise abatement measures are
proposed. This evaluation completes the highway traffic noise
requirements of Title 23 CFR, Part 772, and unless a major project
change develops, no additional reports are required for this project.
.8. Air Quality Analysis
Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from
industrial and internal combustion engines are the most prevalent
sources. Other origins of common outdoor air pollution are solid
waste disposal and any form of fire. The impact resulting from
highway construction ranges from intensifying existing air pollution
problems to improving the ambient air conditions. The traffic is the
center of concern when determining the impact of a new highway
facility or the improvement of an old highway facility. Motor
vehicles emit carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), hydrocarbons
(HC), particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (SO ), and lead (Pb) (listed 41.
in order of decreasing emission rate). Autoiiiobiles are considered to
be the major source of CO in the project area. For this reason, most
of the analysis presented is concerned with determining expected
carbon monoxide levels in the vicinity of the project due to traffic
flow."
In order to determine the ambient CO concentration for the
receptor closest to the highway project, two concentration components
must be used: local and background. The local concentration is
defined as the CO emissions from cars operating on highways in the
near vicinity (i.e., distances within 100 meters) of the receptor
location. The background concentration is defined by the North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources as
31
"the concentration of a pollutant at a point that is the result of
emissions outside the local vicinity; that is, the concentration at
the upwind edge of the local sources. In this study, the local
concentration was determined by the NCDOT Traffic Noise/Air Quality
Staff using line source computer modeling and the background
concentration was obtained from the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources. Once the two
concentration components were resolved, they were added together to
" determine the ambient CO concentration for the receptor in question
and to compare to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen
41. oxides. Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are
carried into the atmosphere where they react with sunlight to form
ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Area-wide automotive emissions of HC and
NO are expected to decrease in the future due to the continued
installation and maintenance of pollution control devices on new
cars. Hence, the ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide levels in the
atmosphere should continue to decrease as a result of the
improvements on automobile emissions.
The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide
require several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of
ozone generally occur 10 to 20 kilometers downwind of the source of
hydrocarbon emissions. Urban areas as a whole are regarded as
sources of hydrocarbons, not individual streets and highways. The
emissions of all sources in an urban area mix together in the
atmosphere, and in the presence of sunlight, the mixture reacts to
form ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and other photochemical oxidants. The
best example of this type of air pollution is the smog which forms in
Los Angeles, California.
Automobiles are not regarded as significant sources of
particulate matter and sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources
account for less than 7 percent of particulate matter emissions and
less than 2 percent of sulfur dioxide emissions. Particulate matter
and sulfur dioxide emissions are predominantly the result of
non-highway sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, and agricultural).
Because emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from
automobiles are very low, there is no reason to suspect that traffic
on the project will cause air quality standards for particulate
matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded.
Automobiles without catalytic converters can burn regular
gasoline. The burning of regular gasoline emits lead because regular
• gasoline contains tetraethyl lead which is added by refineries to
increase the octane rating of the fuel. Newer cars with catalytic
converters burn unleaded gasoline, thereby eliminating lead
emissions. Also, the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has required the reduction in the lead content of leaded
gasolines. The overall average lead content of gasoline in 1974 was
2 grams per gallon. By 1989, this composite average had dropped to
0.01 grams per gallon. In the future, lead emissions are expected to
decrease as more cars use unleaded fuels and as the lead content of
32
leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 make
the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead additives
unlawful after December 31, 1996. Because of these reasons, it is
not expected that traffic on the proposed project will cause the
NAAQS for lead to be exceeded.
A microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine
future CO concentrations resulting from the proposed highway
improvements. "CAL3QHC - A Modeling Methodology For Predicting
Pollutant Concentrations Near Roadway Intersections" was used to
predict the CO concentration at the nearest sensitive receptor to the
project.
Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO
concentrations consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions
with predicted traffic volumes, vehicle emission factors, and
worst-case meteorological parameters. The traffic volumes are based
on the annual average daily traffic projections. The traffic volume
used for the CAL3QHC model was the highest volume within any
alternative. Carbon monoxide vehicle emission factors were
calculated for the year 1996 and the design year 2016 using the EPA
publication "Mobile Source Emission Factors" and the MOBILESA mobile
source emissions computer model.
The background CO concentration for the project area was
estimated to be 1.9 parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the
Air Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources indicated
that an ambient CO concentration of 1.9 ppm is suitable for most
suburban/rural areas.
The worst-case air quality receptor was determined to be
receptor #12 for both the build scenario and the no-build scenario.
The "build" and "no-build" one-hour CO concentrations for the nearest
sensitive receptor for the years of 1996 and 2016 are shown in the
following table.
One Hour CO Concentrations (PPM)
Year Build No-Build
1996 4.4 4.3
2016 7.3 17.4
Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations for the Build
Alternative with the NAAQS (maximum permitted for 1-hour averaging
period = 35 ppm; 8-hour averaging period = 9 ppm) indicates no
violation of these standards. Since the results of the worst-case
1-hour CO analysis for the Build Alternative is less than 9 ppm, it
can be concluded that the 8-hour CO level does not exceed the

33

standard. In addition, the CO concentration is significantly less
under the "Build Alternative" versus the "No-Build Alternative" in
the design year. See Tables Al, A2, A3 and A4 in the Appendix (pages
A-21 through A-24) for input data and output.
The project is located within the jurisdiction for air quality
of the Fayetteville Regional Office of the N.C. Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. The ambient air quality
for Robeson County has been determined to be in compliance with the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards. This project is not
anticipated to create any adverse effect on the air quality of this
attainment area.
During construction of the proposed project, all materials
resulting from clearing and grubbing, demolition or other operations
will be removed from the project, burned or otherwise disposed of by
the contractor. Any burning will be done in accordance with
applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of the North
Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
Care will be taken to insure that burning will be done at the
greatest practical distance from dwellings and not when atmospheric
conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning
will only be utilized under constant surveillance. Also during
construction, measures will be taken to reduce the dust generated by
construction when the control of dust is necessary for the protection
and comfort of motorists or area residents. This evaluation
completes the assessment requirements for air quality of the NEPA
process and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
9. Stream Modification
No stream rechannelization is anticipated. If stream
rechannelization is required, it will be coordinated with appropriate
natural resource agencies in compliance with the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 USC et seq.).
10. Hazardous Materials
A reconnaissance survey identified three active sites (gas
stations) within the project corridor with the potential for
underground storage tank involvement. These sites collectively have
thirteen underground storage tanks. A subsequent records search of
the files of the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources (DEHNR), Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) (Groundwater Section) was conducted to determine the status of
these tanks. The tanks were installed between May, 1981 and March,
1987.
A detailed preliminary site assessment (PSA) was performed at
one of the three active sites due to the location of the existing
underground storage tanks (UST's) with regard to the proposed
right-of-way. According to the PSA, there has been a release of
34
petroleum hydrocarbons from the UST's and fuel dispensers located on
the subject property. The concentration of hydrocarbons in the soil
exceeds DEM action levels, and the close proximity of the UST's to
the groundwater table indicates probable groundwater contamination.
The files of the Division of Solid Waste Management (DEHNR) were
also consulted to determine whether any unregulated dumps or other
potentially contaminated properties are within the project corridor.
Based on this.investigation, no involvement with hazardous materials
(other than the underground tanks noted above) is anticipated. The
DEM - Groundwater Office in Fayetteville has been forwarded a copy of
the PSA Report. It has been requested that DEM keep NCDOT informed
of any remedial activities that will be required of the property
owner. Before the property is acquired, DEM shall be contacted to
determine if this site has been properly remediated according to DEM
regulations.
11. Geotechnical Impacts
No significant adverse effects on the geological regime of the
project corridor is anticipated. The proposed project is located on
a stream terrace of the Central Coastal Plain region. Elevations
within the project corridor vary from 120 to 125 feet above mean sea
level.
The project area consists of fossiliferous clay and fine-grained
sediments of the Pliocene Yorktown Formation and shelly sands of the
Tertiary Duplin Formation. Exposures of the Black Creek Formation
could be encountered near the Lumber River crossing. Soils within
the project corridor are classified as A-2, A-3, A-49 A-5, and A-6
within the AASHTO system. These soils are poorly drained to
well-drained within a low shrink-swell potential. A seasonally high
water table of less than 5 feet below the land surface is anticipated
for some soils within the project area.
Borrow potential is anticipated to be favorable, as several
borrow pits are located adjacent to the existing corridor.
12. Construction Impacts
To minimize potential adverse effects caused by construction, 14
the following measures, along with those already mentioned, will be
enforced during the construction phase:
a. Waste and debris will be disposed of in areas outside of
the right of way and provided by the contractor, unless
otherwise required by plans or Special Provision by the
Engineer. Disposal of waste and debris in active public
waste or disposal areas will not be permitted without prior
approval by the Engineer. Such approval will not be
permitted when, in the opinion of the Engineer, it will
result in excessive siltation or pollution.
35
b. Borrow pits and all ditches will be drained insofar as
possible to alleviate breeding areas for mosquitos.
C. An extensive rodent control program will be established if
structures are to be removed or demolished.
d. Care will be taken not to block existing drainage ditches.
` e. Several water lines are located in the vicinity of the
proposed project. The contractor will prepare a work
schedule which minimizes possible damage to or rupture of
the water lines and interruption of water service. The
contractor will consult appropriate water system officials
in preparing this schedule.
f. During construction of the proposed project, all materials
resulting from clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other
operations will be removed from the project, burned, or
otherwise disposed of by the Contractor. Any burning will
be done in accordance with applicable local laws and
ordinances and regulations of North Carolina State
Implementation Plan for Air Quality. Care will be taken to
insure burning will be done at the greatest distance
practicable from dwellings and not when atmospheric
conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public.
Burning will be performed under constant surveillance.
g. An erosion control schedule will be devised by the
contractor before work is started. The schedule will show
the time relationship between phases of the work which must
be coordinated to reduce erosion and shall describe
construction practices and temporary erosion control
measures which will be used to minimize erosion. In
conjunction with the erosion control schedule, the
Contractor will be required to follow those provisions of
the plans and specifications which pertain to erosion and
siltation. These contract provisions are in accordance
with the strict erosion control measures as outlined in the
Department of Transportation's FHPM 6-7-3-1. Temporary
erosion control measures such as the use of berms, dikes,
dams, silt basins,, etc. will be used as needed.
h. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for
use on this project, the Contractor shall obtain a
certification from the State Department of Cultural
Resources certifying that the removal of material from the
borrow source will have no effect on any known district,
site, building, structure, or object that is included, or
eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic
Places. A copy of this certification shall be furnished to
the Engineer prior to performing any work on the proposed
borrow source.
36
i. Traffic service in the immediate project area may be
subjected to brief disruption during construction of the
project. Every effort will be made to insure that the
transportation needs of the public will be met both during
and after construction.
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Comments Received
The project has been coordinated with appropriate federal, state, and
local agencies. Comments were received from the following agencies:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
U. S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service
U. S. Department of the Army - Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
U. S. Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service
N. C. Department of Administration - State Clearinghouse
N. C. Department of Cultural Resources - State Historic Preservation
Officer
N. C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources -
Planning and Assessment Division, Division of Environmental
Health, Division of Forest Resources, Division of Land
Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, Division of Water
Resources, Wildlife Resources Commission
N. C. Department of Public Instruction
Mayor of Lumberton
Lumberton Area Chamber of Commerce
Lumberton Municipal Airport
Copies of the comments received are included in the Appendix (see
pages A-25 through A-46).
B. Public Meeting
The Division of Highways held an informal, one-to-one public meeting
on the project (and on T.I.P. Project U-2415, proposed improvements to
NC 211 at I-95 in Lumberton) November 15, 1990 at the Robeson County
Public Library in Lumberton. Representatives of the Fayetteville Division
Office and the Planning and Environmental Branch were present to explain
the project, receive comments, and answer questions. Approximately
twenty-five persons attended the meeting. Copies of the news release
advertising the meeting and newspaper articles published before and after
the meeting are included in the Appendix (see pages A-47 through A-51).
An aerial photograph showing the proposed improvements to NC 72-711
and the NC 72-711/I-95 interchange was displayed at the meeting. A
handout containing general project information, a vicinity map, and a
comment sheet was made available to each participant (see pages A-52
through A-56 in the Appendix). Each participant was given the opportunity
to review the aerial photograph and ask questions or comment on the
project.

37
The proposed design at the time of the workshop showed the widening
and partial realignment of NC 72-711 to a five-to six-lane facility from
the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of Interstate 95 to Starlite Drive
(SR 2501). The realignment of NC 72-711 would start at the Cox Road
(SR 1588) intersection and break to the south, crossing Interstate 95 with
a new bridge, intersect SR 2499, and tie into Starlite Drive. Eliminating
the service road/interchange ramp tie-ins was also indicated on the aerial
photograph. This alternative is discussed in more detail in Sections I.H.
and III.B. of this report.
The majority of those present at the meeting felt the proposed
improvements are needed and supported the project. The owner of a business
?? located on West Fifth Street just north of the NC 72-711/West Fifth Street
intersection voiced opposition to the proposed realignment of NC 72-711 to
tie into Starlite Drive and questioned the need for the project. He stated
realigning NC 72-711 to the south of the existing highway will hurt his
business due to less direct access and reduced visibility from 1-95. In
addition, the owner of undeveloped business property on West Fifth Street
farther north of the NC 72-711/West Fifth Street intersection expressed
concern the project will adversely affect the sale value of his property
due to less direct access from I-95. Another attendee suggested NC 72-711
be widened to a four-lane rather than a five-lane undivided section at the
Lumber River to reduce project costs and minimize wetland takings.
Based on subsequent studies, the original proposal to realign
NC 72-711 in order to tie that facility into Starlite Drive was dismissed
in favor of the recommended improvements (see Section II and Section
III.). The proposed five lane cross section is needed at the Lumber River
bridge to allow for a left-turn lane at SR 1539.
C. Public Hearing
A public hearing will be held following circulation of this report to
provide more detailed information on the project to local citizens and to
receive additional comments on the project.
EFL/pl r
e
or
i
Or
•
C
m
N
r
-i O
=O
m 7C
;z 7Z
n C)
? 2-7-
N) m
1 C/7
v ---i
? D
\ r
H O
0 Z
n
Z
z
m N
z
Z
O D
m
r
C- O
C O
N 7?1
Z
m
L/) M
-i D
N
O -i
TI
D
-Tl r
rnz
z
C./) C)
a
m N
m
&Awft
? ,
r -
C)
O

e ? „ns
~r°
m 2?,k+

V)m ?

O

L/) O 77,
? Z
O ?
N
-PA V)
c9 ;)o ,

-TI CD

rn ?

_ Ln

t/) D
A

t
r

m --q

C
m
r-
--q O
=O
m 7C
P-
zz
n C.7
? m
N D
\ V)
Z -i
n
D
?r
?--O
1? Z
F--1
ZZ
rn
? v
Cn N
M i
? v
O
Z D
-I
r -
C)
O
m 7Z
-i Z
O
n m
D
r -I
m
D
r r
c0
3 Z
co C)
m
? z
n
C N
m i
M
W
cr-
CD
LL
12
W
z
S
z
U >.
LL z
W O
F- U
J z
O
h W
N W N m
'Q
z W O
W
N
N 2
\ D
cfl J
rn
T
l11
4
F-
Cf)
W
NIZ
d ?N
N?
dlt0
N
LOICI)
Lo C,
r
CIA
cc
N
Mt co
N to
M N
Inl? MIM
O 1
N .-
fD N 'n
M
I^?? `?( ?(I IMINAl
N co `t0
MI^ NIN .y .- U7
WI CO OIM
N co
? N
MI r I ? ? ?I N
11 \ d
N1 in
MOlr
r r
fD .- I T OI N
U) (O
dl M N t0
N d _ dl M
u ( C21 N
Nla ^l^ Ol^ d -
?I or'
la i d
O M
. M tp
d N
d,° I NIL
_.al
? N
T-
V-
04
N
U
z
O M
O, M
O M
m r)

U
z
d o ? ? rl o
inl N 1f7 N

r
Old N.
00 f0
M
-I
36
N
mco
?- Cl)
°°1 N
N
IN
15?'g
S?
0
LEGEND
MAJOR

0
PROJECT U-2416
1547 GREEENV L E MISSION LIMITS
D
1> PT. CH.
2
1535
NC 711 RI ?'FR /
1588
1539
J 15 92 ?G 12
os? . I 161
1589
159.7
499 ` 250 J aq H?°°E ° ?l
W. PARK ISSEMBLY
v OF GOD C-.
O

s

EXISTING PROPOSED
UMBE.
THOROUGHFARES
FREEWAYS
OTHER
MINOR THOROUGHFARES
95
i
I
i
TEMPTATION
?
00 MRY M!
OOSE LLS?
HAVEN 2509
LMA CM. /
TExTuRED
FIBERS
LUMBERTON
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

>9
PRINCIPAL
RUNWAY
( N
\ O

?D
O
11111
¦ E N E ¦
-m
PNN? ?
5 '
G
/
/
I
\, 'O C
d -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 72/NC 711 INTERSECTION
TO WEST FIFTH STREET
LUMBERTON, ROBESON COUNTY
U-2416
LUMBERTON THOROUGHFARE PLAN (PART)
0 feet 1000
3/91 3 I FIG.4
iii ??» , •?

/ y
/ J=2
/
/ N
/ h
,\ y
r?l
i Is
rBS \ \ ? ? ?
\
ebyO1 \\ ? •\\\
\
1 :1
1 1
Ah 1
11
r-?
Z:z
1 j;?ltrt
l ,ll
1,1

it
I I
I I
Illl
I
I
II
III I
.III I
III I
III I
?`\ III I
'? tl1
I
l " I
I'
l
I
I I
I I
I-j
II
? W
3

? I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I >
I
i I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
jl I
II I
II I
II I
I I
l
I I I
l
II I
II I
it I
Ii I
ill
II I
II I
,I I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I 1
I1
11
1
l Bl

is
r ?

w
Y w
.? z z
O ;?
$??? z U
moo=

s?xpp ? gmz
H
U?pZU ? oo
`?W=

HIN
?j

n

J,UMBER

BEGIN PROJECT

i
1619 END PROJECT
A
h5

1
TEMPTATION 1
HOISERY MILLS-0
et.
1597 1
SEH
es? °? °a
T L
2499 2501°°? ?.*l
O•D H ?
gS
pNH?` yt • `
W.PARK ASSEMBLY
OF GOD CH.
000/
/
/
l
D'
`2509
:XTURED
!BERS
NICIPAL AIRF

LEGEND
LIMITS OF 100 -
YEAR FLOOD

6

11 1 I?? „2501 ?.
1

? cn
r°
j
? 4J?/I I I
i I
iF \ F:7 $ t? II
?? II
?? II
Q ?
0

?,•.??, aP 4
'?uti7r r " 41fl rr pal, ,?r r ~
ID /
W bd *d b Z -+?_? r--+-+-
V x
0
m cn
cm
0?
M ?-+
:0 C7
m
.x? z
H H
!tl 6)
X.
W
H
d
m

3111
y 0
x?zoIn n, "V
C V ?-? J 4a p H ?-? 711V
-n
14 r"r' 1-3-3 r I L1 \ 4
v0

N
w
a
-' f
10 o F ,
F.
GMug

I
-
r ,.

?
I
?,
i ,
I
I
`
I
{
I?l
l?
I
l

c
}-
tt
1 ?
a

)I r1;). ?i I
?
_

•
° .
? '
?
fig. , .
. , {?} `
E
! ?

•' E,3 ,r
p
?, q?4

a

T
Z
O
U
/W
V
Q
U_

F-
a:
O
OD
J
Q
Q Z
ow
o

O W J
Q O W

L
C
G
Q

Z LC)
00)
F-

W
U)
oC O
LLJ co
}
N J
W OO
C Z
WO
~
Z
Q J
JZ

?
CO
Oa:
F-
w
? F-
F-
U
w
O
M
CL
w
o Wo H
ao W
z

CO)
0)
W
C'3
LL
i

N
z
O
U
Cw
a
U

0
O
O
N
O
00
6D
ib
N
N
n
OD
v
N
BD
Q
J
W
Q
ac
1-
z
O
U
w
Cl)
w
rz
D
0
0
z
a
cri
cr
U
Z
J
Cfl
O
F-
d'
a
z
2
cr
w
F-
U
O
m
H
a
w
O
Q
z
2
w
F-
a.
LO
0
z
O
m
I-
cr
O
z
0
T
w
/D
0
LL
L ©C A T I ON REPORT North Carolina Department of Transportation
X E.I.S. __CORRIDOR _____DESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PROJECT: 8.1461701 COUNTY: Robeson _ Alternate 1 of 1_ Alternate
I.D. NO.: -2416 F.A. PROJECT: -M-7763(1)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: NC 72-711--from West of SR 153 to R 2501, Lumberton
ES TIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
lsplacee
Owners
Tenants
Total Minor-
sties
0-15M
15-25M
25-35M.
35-50M
50 UP
Individuals
Families 0 0 0 0
Businesses 0 1 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLINGS AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Ren t
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M $ 0-150 0-20M $ 0-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTI ONS 20-40M 150-250 20-40M 150-250
YES NO EXPLAIN ALL "YES" ANSWERS 40-70M 250-400 40-70M 250-400
X 1. Will special relocation 70-100 400-600 1 170-100 400-600

X services be necessary
2. Will schools or churches be
f
100 UP
I
600 UP
100 UP
600 UP

X a
fected by displacement
3. Will business services still
b
TOTAL -- :d

X e available after project
4. Will any business be dis-
REMARKS (Respond by Number)
placed. If so, indicate size
type, estimated number of 3. There are numerous competing gas station-

X employees, minorities, etc.
5. Will relocation cause a convenience stores in the immediate area of the
subject business.
h
ousing shortage
X 6. Source for available hous-
i
l 4. The appraiser will need to determine the highest

X ng (
ist)
7. Will additional housing and best use for the property before we can
decide if this Shell gas station-convenience store

X programs be needed
8. Should Last Resort Housing
b will be offered a total business relocation or
only the reimbursement to move 3 gas pumps in an
e considered easement area. Upon initial site inspection,
X 9. Are there large, disabled,
l there appears to be room to rearrange the pump
e
derly, etc. families
A island, relocate parking area, and continue in
NSWER THESE ALSO FORDESIGN operation. Probably 4-6 employees

NA
10. Will public housing be .

"
NA needed for project
11. Is public housing avail-
bl 14. Replacement sites are available from time to time
in the City of Lumberton area.

NA a
e
12. Is it felt there will be ad-
equate DSS housing available
d
i
Np,G?
,??TaY B f pl tAGH

NA ur
ng relocation period
13. Will there be a problem of
housing within financial
199??
Fig

means
X 14. Are suitable business sites
il
bl
l
ava
a
e (
ist source)
15. Number months estimated to -,
complete RELOCATION 6-8
A-A
Relocation-Agent - Date -
Form 15.4 Revised 5/90
A-1
Approved Date
Original & 1 Copy: State Relocation Agent
2 Copy: Area Relocation File
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS
It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable
replacement housing will be available prior to construction of
federally assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina
Board of Transportation has the following three programs to
minimize the cost of relocation:
* Relocation Assistance,
* Relocation Moving Payments, and
* Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement.
With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT
staff will be available to assist displacees with information such
as availability and prices of homes, apartments', or businesses for
sale or rent, and financing or other housing programs. The
Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for
payment of actual moving expenses encountered in relocation.
Where displacement will force an owner or tenant to purchase or
rent property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing
arrangement (in case of ownership), the Relocation Replacement
Housing Payments or Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to
$22,500 to owners who are eligible and qualify, and up to $5,250
to tenants who are eligible and qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be
conducted in accordance with the Federal Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
(Public Law 91-646), and the North Carolina Relocation Assistance
Act (GS-133-5 through 133-17). The program is designed to provide
assistance to displaced persons in relocating to a replacement
site in which to live or do business. At least one relocation
officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced
families, individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations, and
farm operations for relocation assistance advisory services
without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
The NCDOT will so schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to
displacement, for negotiations and possession of replacement
housing which meets decent, safe, and sanitary standards. The
displacees are given at least a 90-day written notice after NCDOT
purchases the property. Relocation of displaced persons will be
offered in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public
utilities and commercial facilities.
Rent and sale prices of replacement housing offered will be
within the financial means of the families and individuals
displaced, and be reasonably accessible to their places of
employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of
displaced businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm
operations in searching for and--moving to r-eplacement property.
A-2
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be
displaced will receive an explanation regarding all available
options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing, (2) rental
of replacement housing, either private or public, or (3) moving
existing owner-occupant housing to another site (if possible).
The relocation officer will also supply information concerning
other state or federal programs offering assistance to displaced
persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in
order to minimize hardships to displaced persons in adjusting to a
new location.
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate
the displacee for the costs of moving personal property from
homes, businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations
acquired for a highway project. Under the Replacement Program for
Owners, NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental purchase
payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees,
surveys, appraisals, and other closing costs. If applicable, the
NCDOT will pay for any increased interest expenses for replacement
dwellings. Reimbursement to owner-occupants for replacement
housing payments, increased interest payments, and incidental
purchase expenses may not exceed $22,500 combined total.
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not
to exceed $5,250, to rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down
payment, including incidental expenses, on the purchase of a
replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the
state determines is required .
It is a policy of the state that no person will be displaced
by the NCDOT's federally-assisted construction projects unless and
until comparable or adequate replacement housing has been offered
or provided for each displacee within a reasonable period of time
prior to displacement. No relocation payment received will be
considered as income for the purposes of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954 or for the purposes of determining eligibility or the
extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the
Social Security Act or any other federal law.
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable
replacement. housing is not available or when it is unavailable
within the displacee's financial means, and the replacement
payment exceeds the federal and state legal limitation. The
purpose of the program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of
implementation by the state so that decent, safe, and sanitary
replacement housing can be provided. It is not felt that this
program will be necessary on the project, since there appear to be
adequate opportunities for relocation within the area.
A-3
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
FOR IMPACTS TO THE LUMBER RIVER STATE PARK

A-4
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL FOR
FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS WITH MINOR INVOLVEMENT WITH
PUBLIC PARKS, RECREATION LANDS, AND WILDLIFE AND WATERFOWL
REFUGES
F. A. Project M-7763(1)
State Project 8.1461701
T. I. P. No. U-2416
Description: NC 72-711 (COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE) FROM WEST OF
SR 1539 TO WEST FIFTH STREET (NC 72)
'Yes No
1. Is the proposed project designed to
improve the operational characteristics,
safety, and/or physical condition of
existing highway facilities on F
??!!
essentially the same location?
2. Is the project on new location? F-1 Y
3. Is the Section 4(f) land a publicly
owned public park, recreation land, or ?
wildlife and waterfowl refuge located
adjacent to the existing highway?
4. Does the amount and location of the land
to be used impair the use of the
remaining Section 4(f) land, in whole or
in part, for its intended purpose? ?
(See chart below)
'# Total size of section 4(f) site Maximum to be acquired
less than 10 acres ................10 percent of site
10 acres-100 acres ................ 1 acre
greater than 100 acres .............. 1 percent of site
5. Do the proximity impacts of the project
(e.g., noise, air and water pollution,
wildlife and habitat effects, aesthetic
values) on the remaining Section 4(f)
land impair the use of such land for its F
intended purpose?
A-5
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
2
Yes No
K

14
6. Do the officials having jurisdiction
over the Section 4(f) land agree, in
writing, with the assessment of the
impacts of the proposed project on, and
the proposed mitigation for, the Section
4(f) lands? (see Attachment A-1).
7. Does the project use land from a site
purchased or improved with funds under
the Land and Water Conservation Act
(Section 6(f)), the Federal Aid in Fish
Restoration Act (Dingell-Johnson Act),
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Act
(Pittman-Robertson Act), or similar
laws, or are the lands otherwise
encumbered with a Federal interest
(e.g., former Federal surplus property)?
8. If the project involves lands described
in Item 7 above, does the appropriate /
Federal Agency object to the land F V/
conversion or transfer?
9. Does the project require preparation of
an EIS?
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE AND PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and
found not to be feasible and prudent:
Yes No
1. Do-nothing. _/_ F-1
Does the "do nothing" alternative: -
F
1
/
V
(a) correct capacity deficiencies?

(b) correct existing safety hazards?

or (c) correct-deteriorated conditions?
and (d) create costs, unusual problems, or
impacts of extraordinary measure?
A-6
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
3
Yes No
2. Improvement of the highway without using ?
the adiacent public park, recreational
land, or wildlife waterfowl refuge.
(a) Have minor alignment shifts,
changes in standards, use of
retaining walls, etc., or traffic
management measures been evaluated?
(b) The items in 2(a) would result in
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) substantial adverse community
impact
or (ii) substantial increased costs
or (iii) unique engineering,
transportation, maintenance,
or safety problems
or (iv) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or (v) a project which does not meet
the need
and (vi) impacts, costs, or problems
which are of extraordinary
magnitude
3. Build an improved facility on new
location without using the public park,
recreational land, or wildlife and
waterfowl refuge. (This would be a
localized "run around.")
(a) An alternate on new location would
result in: (circle, as appropriate)
(i) a project which does not solve
the existing problems
or (ii) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or a substantial increase in
project cost or engineering
difficulties
A-7
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
4

and (iv) such impacts,
difficulties
or unique or
magnitude
costs, or
of truly unusual
extraordinary
A-8
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
5
MINIMIZATION OF HARM
1. The project includes all possible
planning to minimize harm.
2. Measures to minimize harm include the
following: (circle those which are
appropriate)
a. Replacement of lands used with lands
of reasonably equivalent usefulness
* and location and of at least
comparable value.
b. Replacement of facilities impacted
by the project including sidewalks,
paths, benches, lights, trees, and
other facilities.
O Restoration and landscaping of
disturbed areas.
d. Incorporation of design features and
G habitat features, where necessary,
to reduce or minimize impacts to the
Section 4(f) property.
O Payment of t
the land and
improvements
Section 4(f)
market value
improvements
he fair market value of
improvements taken or
to the remaining
site equal to the fair
of the land and
taken.
Yes No
F-1
O Additional or alternative mitigation
measures as determined necessary
based on consultation with the
officials having jurisdiction over
the parkland, recreation area, or
wildlife on waterfowl refuge (see Item 3 below).

3. A discussion of specific mitigation measures is provided as
follows:
1. Before construction begins, the Division Engineer will
insure that "Bridge Construction Ahead" signs are placed
at the boat access area off McNeill Bridge Road (SR 1539)
immediately south of the Lumber River bridge and on the
upstream and downstream sides of the bridge.
2. The Lumber River channel will be kept open to boating
A-9
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
6
traffic during construction. Efforts to maintain as wide
a channel opening as possible during construction shall
be made.
3. The number of piers in the channel will be minimized as
much as possible. Fifty feet between piers (existing
spacing) is the minimum acceptable spacing. If needed,
one pier can be placed in the middle of the river
s channel.
4. If pier footing(s) which are placed in the channel come
to within three feet of the water's surface, fins will be
installed to indicate the presence of the footing(s) in order to
` protect boats and the footing(s).
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following
(attach correspondence):
a. Officials having jurisdiction over
the Section 4(f) Land /
b. Local/State/Federal Agencies V
C. US Coast Guard
(for bridge requiring bridge permits)
d. DOI, if Section 6(f) lands are
involved
a
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f)
evaluation approved on December 23, 1986.
All required alternatives have been evaluated, and the findings
made are clearly applicable to this project. There are no
feasible or prudent alternatives which avoid use of the Section
4(f) land.
The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and
there are assurances that the measures to minimize harm will be
incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed.
Approved:
t 10 31= 1¢ r. ?.
Date 4?W-tManager, Planning & Environmental Branch
NCDOT
11
Date _Division Administrator, FHWA
A-10
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
7
Proiect Description
The proposed improvements call for widening NC 72-711 in the
vicinity of I-95 (see Figure 1). The bridges over the Lumber
River and I-95 southwest of Lumberton will be replaced and
widened.
The Lumber River State Park was established by the North
Carolina General Assembly in 1989, but no land was acquired until
the summer of 1991 during a special session of the General
Assembly. In the vicinity of the this project, the park limits
are the mean high water level of the Lumber River. Since the
bridge replacement and widening will cause the placement of piers
* into the Lumber River, a Section 4(f) statement is required.
The project consists of replacing and widening the Lumber
River bridge. The existing 28-foot (clear roadway width) bridge
will be replaced with a bridge 80 feet in width to accomodate the
widening of NC 72-711 (see Figure 2).
NCDOT coordinated the Lumber River bridge replacement with
the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation to determine
measures to minimize harm and specific mitigation. A letter from
Parks and Recreation stating they have no objections to the
proposed project is attached (see Attachment A-1).
W
,r
A-11
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information
prior to approval. Consult Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
10

w
tir
Tir\
0 N.
41 ??
.••••"•
dg
Red Sormss lyt.
i 1
e
•• •• .r ? • 5 u 11
/ 3 ? Pe roke ie.er•.? 2
,
/S ) Rnemon 2 10 7410
•••• ` 501 1
•••
•'•• j Purw fl** 301
4 03
u 41 , 74
••••. 1 1? n ld
•
\} V 1
O Fnumon,
N '••. ? roc,awll
•••• ? Orr
0
••? ••• \l,j/ 1 s eon
• `T Borne
-- Msrretts .ri
BEGIN PROJECT
1548
: .32
711
15
i 6
711
gER
Of c•:•s 1593
2499
95 Fr
1589
301
'k \ 2509
2499

1642
'44/Z,QO
4p
14
2501 ' 00
. • P
,er )1
y Re'.
Sninnon
Renn rt
ld _,
b
72 >
END PROJECT
..... .
Lumberton •'- NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT O

Municipal
... TRANSPORTATION
DIVIS
ION OF HIGHWAYS
Airport
PLANNING AND EN'V IRONMI:NI A1,
:. BRANCH
TV
NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 72/NC 711
INTERSECITON TO SR 2499
4 '= LUMBERTON, ROBESON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-2416
FIGURE 1
A-12
/ 0 (I
E t!' \ Q p ? II
\I ? ?i `?' ? II
q II
';1 ? i3 =
r' (I
?' IE IE \ ? ?
\ IE
{?, IE
-,? IE
n \
I
N
w
2! P
fE51p , iy?
t7d b d ?
'? _
ou o
_ ")69N Sao
??zro
zto
M

i
a
N
V?
'nF
V'I,I ?i/1( ?:/I,, 4/1/1 ???
0
N
0
A
N
G,I
`I

,?
i ? +? : ? I j t cog

(

. ? V
?
?
tii'j?;r4
511

,: fV

0
df• •il'
u x
> ?
m (A
H
rq
cm
m?
?a
m
x z
<z
rn m
X
d
cu
x
d
m
m
0. 0-
s-,

,% R wov,
1, 1,
4N
??6
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources / • a
0
Division of Parks & Recreation 40
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor ? ? H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Dr. Philip K. McKnelly, Director
0
April 19, 1994
MEMORANDUM

TO: Ed Lewis, Project Planning Engineer
Environmental and Planning Branch
Department of Transportation
FROM: Philip K. McKnellxia,/
SUBJECT: Improvements to NC 72/711 from NC 72/NC 711 Intersection West of I-95
to SR 2499 East of I-95: TIP No. U-2416, State Project No. 8.1461701
The Division of Parks and Recreation has reviewed NCDOT's 4(f) evaluation regarding
the improvements to NC 72/711 from the NC 72/NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to SR
2499 east of I-95. We agree with your assessment that the impacts do not constitute an
impairment of the land or the Lumber River. The Division has no objections to the
project as planned provided that the mitigation measures in the minimization of harm
section of the evaluation are followed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you should have any
question, or need additional information, please call Sue Regier, Head of our Resources
Management Program.
4
PKM/SR/gsr
cc: Sue Regier, Head of Resource Management
Scott Daughtry, South District Superintendent
James Sessoms, Superintendent, Lumber River State Park
S/17
Attachment A-1
A-14
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina .27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Acticn Emolover 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer pacer
TABLE N1
BEARING: SOUNDS BOMBARDING US DAILY
r
W

140 Shotgun blast, jet 100 ft away at takeoff PAIN
Motor test chamber HUMAN EAR PAIN THRESHOLD

130
Firecrackers
120 Severe thunder, pneumatic jackhammer
Hockey crowd
Amplified rock music UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD

110
Textile loom
100 Subway train, elevated train, farm.tractor
Power lawn mower, newspaper press
Heavy city traffic, noisy factory LOUD

90
D Diesel truck 40 mph 50 ft. away
E 80 Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal
C Average factory, vacuum cleaner
I Passenger car 50 mph 50 ft. away MODERATELY LOUD

B 70
E Quiet typewriter
L 60 Singing birds, window air-conditioner
S Quiet automobile
Normal conversation, average office QUIET

50
Household refrigerator
Quiet office VERY QUIET

40
Average home
30 Dripping faucet
Whisper 5 feet away
20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves
AVERAGE PERSON'S THRESHOLD OF HEARING
Whisper JUST AUDIBLE

10
0 THRESHOLD FOR ACUTE HEARING
Sources: World Book, Rand McNally Atlas of the Human Body,
Encyclopedia Americana, "Industrial Noise and Hearing
Conversation" by J. B. Olishifski and E. R. Harford
(Researched by N. Jane Hunt and published in the Chicago
Tribune in an illustrated graphic by Tom Heinz.)
R-15
TABLE N2
NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
K
Activity '
Category Leq(h) Description of Activity Category
A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of. extraordinary significance and serve an important public
+ (Exterior) need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to
serve its intended purpose.
B 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels,
(Exterior) hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals.
C 72 Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above.
(Exterior)
D -- Undeveloped lands
E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and
(Interior) auditoriums.
Source: Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772, U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration
DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
Existing Noise Level
in Leq(h) increase in dBA from Existing Noise
Levels to Future Noise Levels
< 50 > 15
>50 >10
Source: North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Guidelines.
i
t
}
A-16
P,
a?
RIVER
E
n? BEGIN PROJECT
1!•t
72
?f V yT•O.0 .l ?I= ]Ol
q
rrn
MM
fNl ? 'a •
r'? END PROJECT ,
s... 4 3
Ill 2 i
r.
fl _
lumb.ne. N
A vniipal
";.p-t y
?y
r -^l
A,
FIGURE NJ
AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENT SITES
NC 72-711 From West of SR 1539 to
Fifth Street in Lumberton, Robeson County,
Project # 8.1461701, TIP # U-2416
A-17
IF
i
w
TABLE N3
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
MOM
NC 72-711 From West of SR 1539 to
Fifth Street in Lumberton, Robeson County,
Project N 8.1461701, TIP # U-2416
SITE LOCATION
NOISE
LEVEL
DESCRIPTION (dBA)
1. NC-72-711 at the Intersection of Grassy 67
SR 1539 (kenric Road)
2. SR 2499 (W. 5-th St.), 0.1 mile North Grassy 65
of SR 1501 (Starlite Drive)
3. I-95, 0.13 mile south of NC-72-711 Grassy 74
4. NC-72-711, From SR 2499 (W. 5-th ST.) Grassy 70
to End of Project
Note:
The ambient noise level sites were measured at 50 feet from the center
of the nearest lane of traffic.
A-18
TABLE N4
Leq TRAFFIC NOISE EXPOSURES
NC 72-711 From West of SR 1539 to
Fifth Street in Lumberton,.Robeson County,
Project i 8.1461701, TIP 9 U-2416
i
AMBIENT NEAREST
RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY
ID ? LAND USE CATEGORY
vss.a==:=v:.....vas NAME DISTANCE(ft)
==sv==..:..auaaa LEVEL
___° NAME DISTANCE(ft)
=avs.vvv:.=:?
Beginning of Project to 1-95
1 Business C NC 72-711 205 L 57/<40 NC 72-711 188 L
2 Business C " 145 L 60/00 " 132 L'
3 Business C " 455 L 57/47 " 440 L
1-95 to SR 2499 (west Fifth Street)
4 Business C SR 2499 130 L 59/49 NC 72-711 150 R
5 Business C " 75 R 63/43 " 250 R
SR 2499 (West Fifth Street) to End of Project
6 Business C NC 72-711 78 R 68/58 NC 72-711 160 R
7 Business C " 102 R 66/41 " 128 R
8 Business C " 72 R 68/43 " 72 R
9 Business C " 125 L 65/40 " 70 L
10 Business C " 160 L 63/53 " 150 L
it Business C " 158 L 64/00 " 158 L
12 Residence B " 52 R 70 " 52 R
13 Business C " 52 R 70/60 " 52 R
14 Business C " 70 R 69/59 " 70 R
15 Business C " 65 R 69/59 " 65 R
16 Residence B " 92 L 67 " 92 L
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
-L- -Y- MAXIMUM
1/1
NOISE
LEVEL
INCREASE
a
66/41 + 9/1
69/44 + 9/4
--------------------- N/A--------------
--=------------------N/A--------------
60.8 66.5 67/47 + 4/4
---------------------N/A--------------
- 67/42 + 1/1
- - 72/47 + 4/4
72.2 63.7 72/47 + 7/7
65.9 65.5 * 68/58 + 5/5
65.4 66.4 68/43 + 4/3
- - * 74 + 4
--------------------- N/A--------------
--------------------- N/A--------------
--------------------- N/A--------------
70.1 66.0 It 71 + 4
NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L-=> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y-=> Noise level from other contributing roadways.
Category E noise levels shown as exterior/ interior (58/48). * _> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
A-19
TABLE N5
FBWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY
r
i. Description
Beginning of Project to I-95
I-95 to SR 2499 (West Fifth Street)
SR 2499 (W Fifth St.) to End of Project
NC 72-711 From West of SR 1539 to
Fifth Street in Lumberton, Robeson County,
Project # 8.1461701, TIP # U-2416
Maximum Predicted Contour
Leq Noise Levels Distances
dBA (Maximum)
50, 100• 200, 72 dBA 67 dBA
74 70 65 98, 1721
71 67 62 72' 134'
72 68 62 74' 135'
TOTALS
Approximate Number of Impacted
Receptors According to
Title 23 CFR Part 772
A B C D E
0 " 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 2 1 0 0
0 2 1 0 0
NOTES - 1. 501, 1001, and 200' distances are measured from center of nearest travel lane.
2. 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of proposed roadway.

Section
TABLE N6
TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE SUMMARY
NC 72-711 From West of SR 1539 to
Fifth Street in Lumberton, Robeson County_
Project # 8.1461701, TIP # U-2416
RECEPTOR EX=aOR NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Substantial Impacts Due
Noise Level to Both
<=0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >- 25 Increases(1) Criteria(2)
Beginning of Project to I-95 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
1-95 to SR 2499 (W. 5-th St.) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SR 2499 (W. 5-th St.) to End 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
(1) As defined by only a substantial Increase (See bottom of Table N2).
(2) As defined by both criteria in Table N2.
A-20
TABLE Al
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION
r JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County
DATE: 06/02/1994 TIME: 10:03:56.59
RUN: BUILD, 5 Lanes, YEAR 1996, 42-MPH
PAGE 1
SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES -
iw -------------------- -----------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO - 108. CM
U - 1.0 WS CLAS = 5 (E) ATIM = 60. MINUTES M IXH 400. M 'AMR - 1.9 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION
* LINK COORDINATES (M) *
LENGTH BRG TYPE
VPH EF
H W WC QUEUE
* XI Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
-------------------- - ---*---------------- ------------------------ *-- ------------------- -----------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 11.0 -804.7 11.0 804.7 * 1609. 360. AG 1420. 18.9 .0 13.4
2. Near Lane Link * .0 804.7 .0 -804.7 * 1609. 180. AG 1420. 18.9 .0 13.4
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
* COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z
------------------------ *-------------------------------------*
1. R12, 52' R CL (Res) * -10.4 .0 1.8 *
JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
.. ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 4.4
DEGR. * 8
RUN: BUILD, 5 Lanes, YEAR 1996, 42-MPH

A-21
TABLE A2
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION PAGE 2
W JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County
DATE: 06/02/1994 TIME: 10:00:38.75
RUN: BUILD, 5 Lanes, YEAR 2016, 29-MPH
SITE 8 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES _
it --------------------------- ----
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S zD = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS 5 (E) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 400. M AMB = 1.9:PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION *
LINK COORDINATES (M) *
LENGTH BRG TYPE
VPH EF
H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ *---------------------------------------- *°------------------- -----------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 11.0 -804.7 11.0 804.7 * 1609. 360. AG 3135. 18.8 .0 13.4
2. Near Lane Link * .0 804.7 .0 -804.7 * 1609. 180. AG 3135. 18.8 .0 13.4
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
*
COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z
------------------------- *-- -----------------------------------*
1. R12, 52' R CL (Res) * -10.4 .0 1.8
JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County
MODEL RESULTS
RUN: BUILD, 5 Lanes, YEAR 2016, 29-MPH
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
s
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
r ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 7.3
DEGR. * 7
A-22
TABLE A3
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION PAGE 3
JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County RUN: NO-BUILD, 5 In, YEAR 1996, 41-MPH
DATE: 06/02/1994 TIME:-11:20:47.97
SITE S METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES _
Ire -------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U - 1.0 M/S CLAS 5 (E) ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH = 400. M AMB = 1.9 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) *
LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF
H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------- ---- *---------------------------------------- :----------------------------------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 7.3 -804.7 7.3 804.7 * 1609. 360. AG 1420. 19.2 .0 13.4
2. Near Lane Link * .0 804.7 .0 -804.7 * 1609. 180. AG 1420. 19.2 .0 13.4
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
-
------------
-----
* COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z
------------------------- *-------------------------------------*
1. R12, 52' R CL (Res) * -12.2 .0 1.8
JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County RUN: NO-BUILD, 5 Ln, YEAR 1996, 41-MPH
MODEL RESULTS
------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
e
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 4.3
DEGR. * 6

A-23
TABLE A4
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION PAGE 4
JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County RUN: NO-BUILD, 5 Ln, YEAR 2015, 7-MPH
DATE: 06/02/1994 TIM: 11:21:21.92
SITE 6 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES _
-------------------------------
VS m .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO - 108. CM
U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 5 (E) ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH = 400. M AMB 1.9.PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) *
LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF
H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 YI X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ *---------------------------------------- *°------------------------------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 7.3 -804.7 7.3 804.7 * 1609. 360. AG 3135. 56.4 .0 13.4
2. Near Lane Link * .0 804.7 .0 -804.7 * 1609. 180. AG 3135. 56.4 .0 13.4
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
* COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z
------------------------- *-------------------------------------*
1. R12, 52' R CL (Res) * -12.2 .0 1.8
JOB: U-2416: NC 72-711, Robeson County RUN: NO-BUILD, 5 In, YEAR 2016, 7-MPH
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.

WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
f ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 17.4
DEGR. * 8
A-24
`"'' 6 `990 z??
Z'
? I
V+ oc e
t r ^'

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
ATLANTA REGIONAL OFFICE
730 PEACHTREE STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30308
December 18, 1990
Mr. L. J. Ward, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Research Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Ward:
This acknowledges receipt of your letter dated December 7,
1990, soliciting comments on the proposed improvement of NC 72-711,
from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501, Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal
Aid Project No. M-7763(1), State Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P.
No. U-2416. It appears that the proposed relocation will not
impact any of the hydroelectric developments under the jurisdiction
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Therefore, we have no
comment.
truly yours,
,VVM Robert W. Crisp, P.E.
Director
N
A-25
United States
Department of
Agriculture

So'i
Conservation 4405 Bland Road, Suite 205
Service Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone: [phone]
May 22, 1990
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager, Planning and Research Branch
Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
`, ?Qr2s
im
9?_ rs
Re: Proposed Improvement of NC 211, from Rowland Avenue to'west of
Cross Road, Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project No.
M-7761(2), State Project No. 8.1461601, T.I.P. No. U-2415
Fq?u 6?:
L
i
Proposed Improvement of NC-72-711,. from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501,
Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1), State
Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416
Extension of Project Limits, NC 14 from US 29 Business in Reidsville
to NC 700/770 in Eden; Rockingham County; State Project No. 6.511014;
T.I.P. No. R-2401
Dear Mr. Ward:
This is in response to your request for Important Farmland Information for
the above projects. The first two projects-U-2415 and U-2416 will not
affect any farmland as defined by the Farmland Protection Policy Act.
The third project R-2401 was addressed in our March 6, 1990, response to
you. Please let us know if you did not receive this information. It not,
we will try again to provide the data.

Z The Sod Conservation Service A-26
is an agency of the
Department of Agriculture
:OOON AdOJ
cc: Edward L. Holland
David R. Hopkins
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 284021890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Planning Division
June 20, 1990
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Post._OffLee -Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
Q F.
A &-N,2 2 1990
2 DIV/SIO;? ??
?.? ?-IICHVVA CAF U
S
RFS'-ARGYi?'?'
We have reviewed your letter of May 2,1990, requesting information for
the "Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711, from west-of SR 1539 to SR 25019
Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1), State Project
No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416" and offer the following comments.
The proposed project crosses a defined flood plain; therefore, any
adverse effects on flood stages should be defined and mitigated during
project design.
r

Department of the Army permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge
of excavated or fill material in waters of the United States or any adjacent
and/or isolated wetlands in conjunction with the proposed action, including
borrow areas and disposal of construction debris. Specific permit requirements
will depend on design of the project, extent of fill work within streams and
wetland areas (dimensions, fill amounts, etc.), construction methods, and other
factors. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands should first be
avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensation or mitigation for
unavoidable impacts. When final plans are completed, including the extent and
location of development within waters of the United States and wetlands, our
Regulatory Branch would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for a
project-specific determination of Department of the Army permit requirements.
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Hugh Heine, Regulatory'Branch,
at [phone].
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of
further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Lawrence W. Saunders
Chief, Planning Division
A-27
ENT Os

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
May 23, 1990

Mr. L. J. Ward, Manager
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
N.C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Subject: Scoping Comments for the Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711,
from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501 near Lumberton in Robeson
County; TIP No. R-84BC.
Dear Mr. Ward:
This responds to your letter of May 2, 1990, requesting comments on the
proposed project. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is particularly concerned about
potential impacts the proposed action may have on endangered/threatened and
on the Lumber River and adjacent wetlands. The project should be designed
to avoid impacts to these resources.
The attached page identifies the Federally-listed endangered (E) and/or
threatened (T) and/or species proposed for listing as endangered (PE) or
threatened (PT) which may occur in the proposed project corridor. If the
proposed project will be removing pines greater than or equal to 30 years of
age in pine or pine/hardwood habitat, all pine stems greater than or equal
to 60 years of age occurring within a 1/2 mile radius surveys of project
related clearing should be surveyed for should be active red-cockaded
woodpecker cavities. If red-cockaded woodpeckers are observed within the
91 project area or active cavity trees found, the project has the potential to
adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker, and you should contact this
office for further information.
The Service's review of any environmental document would be greatly
facilitated if it contained the following information:
1) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within existing
and required additional right-of-way and any areas, such as borrow
areas, which may be affected directly or indirectly by the proposed
improvements.
A-28
2) Acreage of branches, creeks, streams, rivers or wetlands to be
filled. Wetlands affected by the proposed project should be mapped
in accordance with the Federal Manual for Identifying and
' Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
3) Linear feet of any water courses relocated.
4) Acreage of upland habitats, by cover type, which would be
eliminated.
5) Techniques which will be employed for designing -and constructing
any relocated stream channels or for creating replacement wetlands.
6) Mitigation measures which will be employed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce or compensate for habitat value losses associated with any
of the proposed improvements.
7) Assessments of the expected secondary and cumulative impacts of the
proposed project on fish and wildlife resources.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments to you and encourage
your consideration of them. Please continue to advise us of the progress of
this project.
Sincerely yours
U C
L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor
Attachments
a

A-29
-f REVISED SEPTEMBER 11, 1989
Robeson County
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) - E
Michaux' poison-sumac (Rhus michauxii) - E
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for
listing as endangered or threatened, are under status review by the
Service. "Status Review" (SR) species are not legally protected under the
Act, and -are not subject' to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. We
are providing the below list of status review species which may occur
within the project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification.
These species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be
protected under the Act. In the meantime, we would appreciate anything you
might do for them.
Sarvis holly (Ilex amelanchier) - SR
Wireleaf dropseed (Sporobolus teretifoli us) - SR
Bog spicebush (Lindera subcoriacea) - SR
Torrey's muhly ' (Muhlenbergia torreyanna) - SR
Awned meadow-beauty (Rhexia aristosa) - SR

A-30
R 12:,
North Carolina Department of Cultural
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
} November 14, 1994
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Addendum to Historic Architectural Resources
Report, NC 72-711 from west of SR 1589 to West
Fifth Street, Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal
Aid Project M-7763(1), State Project 8.1461701,
TIP U-2416, ER 95-7675
Dear Mr. Graf:
Di
C4, S__
NOV 17 1994
DlVISIC,q CF
1 „
Thank you for your letter of October 7, 1994, concerning the above project.
We have reviewed the addendum and concur that the two fifty-year-old buildlings
in the area of potential effect for the Dunn Street extension, a residence and store,
are not historic.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
-' . DB:slw - :..
cc: ?H. F. Vick
B. Church
A-31
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ??
o,.. STATE,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
November 14, 1990
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 26806
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Re: Section 106 Consultation
NC 72-711 Improvements west of SR 1539 to
SR 2501, U-2416, Lumberton, Robeson County
CH 90-E-4220-0894, ER 91-7420
Dear Mr. Graf:
Thank you for your letter of October 17, 1990, transmitting the archaeological
survey report by Thomas Padgett concerning the above project.
During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project
area. Mr. Padgett has recommended that no further archaeological investigation
be conducted in connection with this project. We concur with this
recommendation since this project will not involve significant archaeological
resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
' concerning the above comment;-please contact Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
T. Padgett
PCC' lw
A-32
109 East ones Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
• NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
FM20'8 05/25/90 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27611
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS 40'??a ?9ov
O?
NG ptVt HWAYS
MAILED TO FROM ?•,?? rttG ON
* & T
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MRS. CHRYS BAGGETT RES
L.J. WARD DIRECTOR
DIV. OF HIGHWAYS N C STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
HIGHWAY BLDG-/INTER-OFFICE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPING FOR COMMENTS 43N IMPACT OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OF
NC 72-711, FROM WEST OF SR 1539 TO SR 25019 IN LUMBERTON, NC
SA I NO 90E422008194 PROGRAM TITLE - SCOPING
THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS SEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SUBMITTED t ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
i X) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE t919J 733-0499.
T C.C. '.REGION N

A-33
a ` 57wti o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
r

James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
MEMO-\DUM
Douglas G. Lewis
Director
Planning and Assessment
P,
10
t.
-90
w ; z
• .T
TO : Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee
Project Review Coordinator
RE: 90-0894 - NC-72-711 Near Lumberton
in Robeson County
DATE: June 12, 1990
The Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
has reviewed the proposed scoping notice. The attached list and
description of information is necessary for a thorough review.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
V

MM: bb
Attachment
A-34
P.U. Box 27087, Raleigh. Niorch Carolina 27611-7h87 Telephone [phone]
1:
W
v
Y

Griffiths Forestry Center
2411 Garner Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
May 15, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee.
Environmental Assessment Unit
FROM: Don H. Robbins ,/
Staff Forester C7 /,
SUBJECT: EA of the Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711 near Lumberton in
Robeson County, North Carolina U _ Z ¢/0j
PROJECT #90-0894
DUE DATE 6-1-90
To better determine the impact, if any, to forestry in the area of the
proposed project, the' Environmental Assessment should contain the following
information concerning the proposed alternative routes for the possible
right-of-way purchases for the project:
1. The number of total woodland acres that would be taken out of timber
production as a result of new right-of-way purchases.
2. The acres breakdown of this woodland concerning present conditions
such as clear-cut areas, young growing timber, and fully stocked
stands of very productive timber within .'the new right-of-way
purchases for disturbed and undisturbed portions.
3. The site indexes of the forest soils that would be involved within
the proposed right-of-way, so as to be able to determine the
productivity of these forest soils in the area.
4. The number of woodland acres that would affect any watersheds in the
area, if the woodland was removed.
A-35
Melba McGee
PROJECT #90-0894
Page 2
: 5. If woodland is involved, it is hoped that the timber could be
merchandised and sold to lessen the need for piling and burning of
debris during right-of-way construction.
Provisions should be indicated in the FA that the contractor will
make all efforts to salvage any merchantable timber to permit
construction, once the contractor takes charge of the right-of-way.
6.' The provisions that the contractor will take during the construction
phase to prevent erosion, sedimentation and construction damage to
the remaining standing trees outside of the right-of-way boundary
and construction limits.
We would hope that a route could be chosen, that would have the least
impact to forest and related resources in that area.
DHR: la
cc: Fred White
File
r
A-36
1
0 North 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Assessment
Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
FROM: W. Don Baker, Program Manager zf/?
Division of Boating and Inland Fisheries
DATE: May 15, 1990
SUBJECT: Environmental Impact of the Proposed Improvement
of NC 72-711, from west of SR 1539 to SR 2501,
Lumberton, Robeson County. (90-0894) U - 24- /6
These comments are provided in response to your request
of May 2, 1990, for information for input relating to fish
and wildlife concerns for the proposed subject project.
Wildlife Resources Commission review of the environmental
document would be greatly facilitated if it contained:
1. A description of fishery and wildlife resources,
including habitats, existing within, or impacted
by .the project.
2. The quantity of wetlands, streams, lakes, ponds
and other fish or wildlife habitats to be graded,
filled or otherwise disturbed.
3. Stream relocations, crossings or other proposed
' construction activity that may impact them.
4. Acreage of upland habitat impacted by cover type.
5. Mitigation measures proposed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce, or compensate for fish and wildlife
habitat losses.
Thank you for the opportunity for input during the
pre-planning stage for this project. We will be happy to
assist in any manner feasible during all phases of the
project.
WDB/lp
A-37
O ?. STATF o
•? GIMM ?•
IF
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
- 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 7, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
115 111171
11 1
1 JUN ?990
N
E C* ,
SECRCD!?-,-.?- O
v i ICC,
Melba McGee
John Sutherlan
90-0894, Improving NC 72-711 in Robeson County
We have the following comments on the above project:
John N. Morris
Director
V - 2-r /1
1. At stream and wetland crossings, utilize bridges whenever
possible to minimize habitat losses and floodplain
encroachment.
2. Minimize the loss of timber and prime farmland.
3. Provide vegetation buffers when highway passes close to
residential areas.
4. Mitigate the loss of wetlands and forests.
5. Minimize the use of curb and gutter; maximize the use of
y porous pavement and grass swales.
6. Involve local landowners in gathering data on impacts; be
flexible on location of alternatives - adjust them to meet
local concerns.
41 7. Where the proposed highway crosses a navigible river, e.g.
Lumber River, work with local governments to provide public
boat access if such access is needed.
A-38
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.7687 Telephone 919,733-4064
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
June 6, 1990

MEMORANDUM:
TO: Melba McGee
FROM: Carol Tingley V;1--

SUBJECT: 90-0894 DOT Improvements NC 72-711 ()-Z4 16

The Division of Parks and Recreation has reviewed the proposal to
improve-NC 72-711 in Robeson County. The project will cross the
Lumber River, a component of the N. C. Natural and Scenic Rivers
System. The section of the river which NC 72-711 crosses has
been classified as a recreational segment. Care should be taken
in design and construction to minimize environmental impacts to
the river.
We are very interested in working with DOT in the design of
appropriate public access sites. along the Lumber River where
bridge replacement and other transportation improvements take
place. Heavy traffic volume along this stretch of NC 72-711 and
nearby noise from I-95 make this location less desirable as a
location for public access to the river..
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project.
CT/sk
cc:Kim Huband
3155
r

A-39

7
aw ?? o
d a..y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Stephen G. Conrad
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
MEMORANDUM , r
Date: May 14, 1990
To: Melba McGee
From: Randy Cotten` `
Thru: Gary Thompson
Subject: Robeson County, Lumberton, N.C., Proposed
Improvement of NC 72-711, from West of SR 1539
to SR 2501, Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1),
State Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416
We have reviewed the above referenced project and find
that 8-geodetic survey markers will be impacted.
The N.C. Geodetic Survey should be contacted at P.O.
Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611, [phone] prior to
construction. Intentional destruction of a geodetic
monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
V
GWT/ajs ,
cc: Joe Creech, NCDOT
A-40
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
County NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

1*
f
Inter-Agency Project Review Response
t rvv% w...t1 . C, S 31 .
Project Name Me- 2 --71 4s S °?- 2S'o ((„h„t,.??.) Type of Project
Several water lines are located in the path of and adjacent to the
proposed project. Due to a possible rupture during construction, the
contractor should contact the appropriate water system officials to
specify a work schedule.
This project will be classified as a. non-community" public water
supply and must comply with state and federal -drinking water moni-
? toring requirements. For more information the applicant should con-
tact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
If this project is.constructed as proposed, we will recommend closure
of feet of adjacent waters to the harvest of shellfish. For
F1 informationregarding the shellfish sanitation program, the applicant
should contact the Shellfish Sanitation Branch at [phone].
The spoil disposal area(s) proposed for this project may produce a
F-1 mosquito breeding problem. For information concerning appropriate
mosquito control measures, the applicant should contact the Public
Health Pest Management Section at [phone].
The applicant should be advised that prior to the removal. or demo-
lition of dilapidated structures, an extensive rodent control program
may be necessary in order to prevent the migration of the rodents to
? adjacent areas. For information concerning rodent control, contact
the local health department or the Public Health Pest Management
Section, [phone].
The applicant should be advised to contact the local health depart-
ment regarding their requirements for septic tank installations (as
? required under 10 NCAC 10A .1900 et. seq.). For information con-
cerning septic tank and other on-site waste disposal methods, contact
the On-Site Sewage Branch at [phone].
The applicant should be advised to contact the
F-1 County Health Department regarding the sanitary facilities required
for this project.
Reviewer
DEW 3198 (Revised 2/90)
Division of Environmental Health
Review 2/91
Branch/Unit Date
A-41
Project Number
,.- STA7E o
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
116 West Edenton Street - Education Building
Raleigh, NC 27603-1712
y% &
yam:- Cam,
Bob Etheridge
Superintendent
it
f.
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager of Planning and Research
NC Division of Highways
Highway Building
FROM: Charles H. We
Assistant Sta perintendent for Auxiliary Services
NC Departmen ublic Instruction
217 W. Jones t., Ed. Annex I
May 30, 1990.
RE: Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711, from West of SR 1539 to SR 2501,
Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1), State
Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416
Please find attached communication from William R. Johnson, Superintendent of
Public Schools of Robeson County, relative to subject project.
mrl
Attachment
A-42
an equal opportunity/affrnuitive action employer
Donald A. Bonner
Associate
Superintendent
Personnel Services
J. C. Humphrey
Associate
,r Superintendent
Business And
Administrative
Services
x
Public Schools of Robeson County
Post Office Drawer 2909
Lumberton, North Carolina 28359
[phone]
William R. Johnson, Superintendent

John C. Ray
Associate
Superintendent
Program Services
Ruth D. Woods
Associate
Superintendent
Compensatory
Education Services

May 25 , 1990
Mr. Charles H. Weaver
Assistant State Superintendent
Auxiliary Services
N. C. Dept. of Public Instruction
116 West Edenton Street
Education Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-1712
lco
• 1F
Re: Proposed Improvement of NC 72-711, from West of SR 1539 to
SR 2501, Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project
No. M-7763(1), State Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P.
No. U-2416
Dear Mr. Weaver:
The road improvement project is adjacent to our office complex and we
can personally attest to the cooperation, delays, -and even confusion in this
area. This project, as proposed, should certainly rate a high priority.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
William R. Johnson
Superintendent
WRJ: rgb

A-43
In guest of Excellence
a
Clt? o ZUM&TtOn
POST OFFICE BOX 1996
1'um9atton, cJVo aAZ ea fina
213359.1388 ,
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager of Planning and Research
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
May 25, 1990
MUNICIPAL BUILDING
301 EAST STH STREET

' 2 9 1990
r
D1VISlON OF VZ
HIGH
yyAYS OPP?
-. RF5'EARGN
RE: Proposed Improvement of NC72-711, from west of SR 1539 SR 2501,
Lumberton, Robeson County, Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1),
State Project No. 8.1461701, T.I.P. No. U-2416
Dear Mr. Ward:
Thank you for giving me an opportunity to respond to the aforereferenced
project. Please be advised that the Lumberton City Council has
unanimously approved this highway project as one of its major priorities
for highway improvements within the Lumberton area. It is respectfully
requested that this project be authorized to proceed at- the earliest
possible date in order to provide much needed relief in this very
busy corridor.
It is further requested that at least one side of the bridge be built
to provide for a sidewalk. This is needed in order to ensure the
safety of pedestrians.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter, and we look forward
to its timely completion.
Since ly,
David F. Weinstein
Mayor
ljs
- cc: Lumberton City Council
A-44
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
LUMBERTON AREA
Jr,0/6^ N 49F
w% 9
•F -
OF C
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ot
W
November 15, 1990
Mr. D. R. Dupree
Acting Division Engineer
N. C. Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Dupree:

On behalf of the Lumberton Area Chamber of Commerce, I want
to thank the North Carolina Department of Transportation for
holding a public meeting to receive input from concerned
citizens of Robeson County on the Proposed Upgrading of NC 211
and NC 72-711, project numbers 8.1461601 and 8.1461701.
The Lumberton Area Chamber of Commerce respectfully requests
that DOT remain on a timely completion of these projects.
Sincerely,
John C. Nicholson
President
is
~ cc: Mr. L. Jack Ward
Manager/Planning & Environmental Branch
NCDOT
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
A-45
• 800 N. Chestnut Street P. O. Box 1008, Lumberton, North Carolina 28359-1008 Telephone [phone] •
LUMBERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Lumberton/Robeson County Airport Commission
Airport Blvd.
Lumberton, North Carolina 28358

July 15, 1994
NC Dept. of Transportation
Ed Lewis
Planning & Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
RE: Lumberton, Improvements To NC,72-711, Federal Project
M-7763(1), State Project 8.1461701, TIP Project U-2416
My investigation of the subject project finds no significant
negative impact on Lumberton Municipal Airport operations.
The primary concern is height obstruction in violation of FAA
Regulation, Part 77 (Objects Affecting navigable Airspace).
The highest elevation of 153.5763 mean sea level, including
railings, for the proposed overpass does not violate FAR Part
77. The restrictions of FAR Part 77 are also a part of
Lumberton City Ordinance.
One other concern to airport activity is light glare during
night operations. Because of the distance away from the
airport, and the existing and planned overpass is not
directly in line with any runway approach, no light glare
hazard is envisioned.
Should you have any questions please call.
Sincerely,
.. ??llle.Scantlin Larry • Airport Manager
LWS/bs
A-46
James G. Martin, Governor '° :%la,
Thomas J. Harrelson, Secretary
;:?''.r. : ,r s
75i
North Carolina
ient of Trans
Release: Immediate
Date: October 29, 1990
Contact: Bill Jones, [phone] - Distribution: 78
Release No: 423
PUBLIC MEETING SET FOR PROPOSED UPGRADING OF NC-211 and NC 72-711
RALEIGH -- The N.C. Department of Transportation will hold "a
public meeting Thursday, November 15 on a proposal to upgrade NC-211
and NC-72-711 in the vicinity of I-95 at Lumberton in Robeson County.
The meeting will be open from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. on Thursday,
November 15 at the Osterneck Auditorium of the Robeson County Public
Library, located at 101 N. Chestnut Street in Lumberton.
The proposed improvements to NC-211 (Roberts Avenue) consist of
widening that facility to a five- to six-lane curb and gutter section
from Kings Cross Road across I-95 to link with the existing five-lane
section east of I-95. Replacement of the bridge carrying NC-211 over
I-95 and improvements to the NC-211/I-95 interchange are also included
in the project.
The proposed improvements to NC-72-711 (Country Club Drive)
consist of widening that facility to a five- to six-lane curb and
gutter section from the NC-72/NC-711 intersection west of I-95 to SR
2501 (Starlite Drive) east of I-95. It is anticipated NC-72-711. will
be realigned to the south of the existing highway from just west,_of
the NC-72-711/I-95 interchange to SR 2501 to conform with the
Lumberton Thoroughfare Plan: Replacement of the bridge carrying
NC-72-711 over I-95 and rehabilitation of the bridge over the Lumber
River are also included in the project.
The projects are scheduled in the Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP), NCDOT's planning document for highway projects. Right
of way acquisition and construction for both projects are scheduled
for Fiscal Years 1993 and 1995, respectively.
The public is invited to attend the informal meeting, ask
questions, make comments or recommendations, and submit material about
the proposed projects. NCDOT officials are asking interested citizens
.to meet with them on a one-to-one basis. This will give the
department a better opportunity to understand citizens' attitudes
about the proposed projects.
Other written material may be submitted to L. Jack Ward, Manager
Hof Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT, P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh,
NC 27611.
**DOT**
A-47
Public Affairs Division NC DOTLINE Joanne V. Latham
P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, N. C. 27611 1-800-526-2368
Director of Public Affairs
[phone] Media Information Updates
FAX: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity: Affirmative Acrion Employer
THE ROBESONIAN, Lumberton, N.C., Wednesday, November 14,1990
f

DOT public hearing set to
discuss highway projects
DOT
SCOTT WITTEN
Staff writer
The N.C. Department of
Transportation (DOT) will hold a
public hearing Thursday on two
proposals to upgrade roads and
bridges in Lumberton.
The meeting will be open from 4.7
p.m. in the Osterneck Auditorium of
the Robeson County Library.
Lumberton City Manager Ray
Griffin Jr. said DOT officials are
seeking public input on the proposed
improvements to Roberts Avenue
and N.C. 72.711 in the vicinity of In.
terstate 95.
The proposed improvements to
Roberts Avenue call for the road to
be widened to a five-to-six lane curb
Continued from page 1 A
Drive. Jones said it is anticipated
that the road will be realigned to the
south of the existing highway, just
west of the N.C.-72/711 overpass to
State Road 2501 to conform to
Lumberton's Thoroughfare Plan.
DOT is also expected to replace
the overpass and rehabilitate the
Lumber River Bridge. The project,
expected to begin in 1995, will cost
an estimated $6.3 million.
According to Griffin, the project
allows resident to talk "one-on-one"
with DOT officials.
"The meeting will explain to the
public just what the project consists
of," Griffin said. "It will let
residents near the proposed project
know what will happen and how it
will affect them."
Griffin called the exsisting roads
insufficient for the amount of traffic
utilizing the roads.
"There are serious deficiences on
both roads that need to be address.
ed," he said. "It would be a mistake
and gutter section from Kings Cross
Road across I-95 to link with the ex.
isting five lane section east of 1.95,
according to Bill Jones, a DOT
spokesperson. The N.C. 211/I-95 in.
terchange are also included in the
project. -_ -
Griffin said the Roberts Avenue
project is expected to cost an
estimated $3.2 million. Construction
on the project is expected to begin in
1993.
The proposed project for N.C..
72/711 is expected to widen the road
to a five-to-six lane curb and gutter
section from the N.C. 72-711 in.
tersection west of I-95 to Starlight
Please sen00T, page 7A
if people and businesses stayed
away and did not get themselves on
record."
According to Jones, the public
may ask questions, make comments
and submit material about the pro.
posed projects. Other written mate.
rial may be submitted to. L. Jack
Ward. Manager of Planning and
Enviromental Branch, NCDOT,
P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh, N.C. 27611.
Betty West, associate executive
director of the Lumberton Chamber
of Commerce, said the local
business community has pushed for
the projects for several years.
"We've been very interested in the
improvements," Ms. West said.
"Those roads are extremely confus.
ing, expecially to tourists. They get
in there and they are unsure where
to go. I don't know what the accident
rate is, but it must be high."
. She said the chamber held a jun.
eheon with DOT officials in October
to discuss the project.
Chamber members and members
of the Lumberton City Council have
requested that DOT keep the pro.
jects on schedule.
Both projects have been repeated.
ly pushed back during the 198o's
because of funding problems or
other projects taking precedence.
- "We're just asking that they stay
timely on completing these pro.
jects," she said. "I feel Lumberton
should be treated fairly and get its
fair share of help from the Depart.
ment of Transportation. All we're
asking is to be treated fairly.
Councilman Wyatt Johnson said
city officials are- optimistic about
the projects "staying on track."
"I think the DOT is going to stay
on schedule," Johnson said. "This is
the farthest they gone. We're now on
the TIP (Transportation Improve.
ment Project) plan and we weren't
before. So it looks good."
The TIP is the department's plan.
ning document for highway pro.
jects.
A-48
Cn
m
CD
ci
G?
m
.n
E
CD
O
Z
co
V
LL
c
co
c
O
N
L
O
Q?
L
I-

WAMW

c
a?
c
0
O
u cis ° A Q
s? .a ea
m
7 p ..Ni V a p? A d
uy
a. A A 'a ? .rq N .
At
.bco O
a O A A a Mq
>, a
41
u ,a H e p
•9 a
m
4y? °'« a M
m
° .? ? w A D V m
N y 'y V „y ^ d
O A a q N N 0.
' DO D.oQ Q aCVyC1 4
..?"+r O.°. a7+? Z J
I P.. A C.? b 0. ?.+ A d a
N N a
9
as
?c?a„cA..3EA"-? y3d?o
p=E
?S.0 A.. O ca
A ? w a y Rt y ?" •!! N
a
to 2a -a
w
?E" d o cc
oL?.q a
F r. u o :, u 3 Z vc
a a a t+o a
cis
u
a C N C Q .-? p. C m O M C
CU 'a 0 OF a.° o q cis.4
Z a ca E w A N
m
N
ca > C II a UO.E
owe a o ° A A-
&. C
0 to v u o '.»
O .,
,,,,, 5 L .a .. N a N a
d .?.+ CO ?°• car G OL
N ? T. V E , o
N C N
r N= t C"
cga, E?
aaai?,ooq?a. E
,p u r ce
.?+ A aw0.. a cc
°. a m°'" v
.us ul N'C ... a. G?•G •0 O
Cr L. Cc E a
Aumniaaca..c.°.a
a...A.. y V .... q. a N C to
y cc E?
4 Q =U ? a
.°. A a>,E a, act= A E
.C a -4 3 N.? V V St.- i. > v
o C fl a g i' ?o ' a+ o a s v G c s a` , a
-A N 4
2
W
O
V
h
D O r: ? ? y? r
?3 oui>? d?aq+ 'Q
crA..G_ X06 boo a
ba 41 4, -
In "=is-z 4u
G p 'a O A O, a
G6 = (D
a go
40
E y?« N AA"- 43
mE. do `c 3 ? u c
w IN a a w ??
4 p w
a o A ? O y a O r "" O w
qr a+>?' ??U aU q w
-a ta.0 E ?t o a.
doC3 S0
Ow?,3u?eo
a a a, •S w N .,,.
p a N o
Yi A 7 y .? O q y G. O
4m ca C3
Yl A O
a G yG a a•S A a
o ?+ a .a F. ? 1..
,?A• V p o? C6 p R .? w OCo Oo
3 r ".a `CJ°' v r U. a& u W&I
.C A
?' p a •o a :: F
oc
m
ca
a
a
4D
?I
Piz
A-49
r ^ 1. N A A A a i.. O A '..0. q a
a 44 A W N N e.o p ?^ a Q a {?' A? a a
r N W U N a a p~j a O a°. y W ?: a
GA r+
A fJ a C V G - O V C ,?: N
ah 'a
lu co IA
5 wA. A« wisra. as Eaw wap4Ga
cc .0 S=
ul 1.6 go
it u
7 a A N .-c N a .p W y.._ A bo a s A %)4 -4
aui a°u« 0 9 •°- aA?xp E.q9 cc
y y .E V O g A q..,
4M I..
O a?i > ?cs,E '"'y a. au+ `° ° '-' UCCA a dr ? E o 0
a. > - R D'a
Q .p a .3 ° a ct y y W
A O .4 = to fO v R« 44
.a a oo C
? a w sm - a oo.o oo q 0!5
W on. u 11.0 ;6
O {.
,° A h 9 a ??...a+ W a NO 4 &4., m ,p E `?' G C O 'C V
a?i•v ayVism u a a a`_?? ayQ a
a ua Zish•a c>auo>o •o°.c«°-'.?8?a?- WFu°?ticzi
ay,> 'EAi°'?=••aacn>?^c A°a`? v°A o.?=% b?Eo
41 lu
os a ?, "' a 7 p?f? a A O co W u a cc WI, U a?
?e no A o 2' a..
r a a>,r a 4E
? a q
?d ul y C d«?? > a a? m sn no C
w o a~+ao o?.?i? o o ptjp, acF a 72 y w a au+ ue?'
3;.6,x:...- a« ?rg.a•?_c°.,q,«
.ta'3 qA« qU caa,i a.,; R?.^ *c a . S ??°+ a a.
A .? a ca 0 ? 4m w y° .OiO ., 3
A7A, '• > N In Q-jo a+a+.=r,'_ o a r+ cu-R? > o.G
go I.. Us 0
60 9 40
di Cj
go 4, oh
CJ = wi -2
ar A a« a u a >' N aH N y?,a? r a OO W,? E d E a
:.G lrN N N. O+v '" ti O a .E a4i Tf G cv
r•a ?? am: ?.ow. Gs!? ?..a'Fj p?bc ?.
.°w U
a
a a c -- p, c° U o U a 7 .E ` .E E :: 4..p, • , iri p,
a o no?ow a_y d
°' > ?
yao,°?a.Eoooor?aNrj°a° h3c-??c~, v?iO
d E a 4 .? N o~ Q A C O W ?+ Q'v ?.. • 7i V> "A
, : cu L= 41
A cn .n a O a N 0.?,,. CZ in.E
E « ?- ti a a N .r ?•' a •1.
> of -+ a a? op a 3 a ~ tI 4 w M A
ca.«,.?5 S a aai« oE'a y o?Ga °J + `4 ?? a° c.
0. a m: a s
? r aF'« o«? N CIA,p ul???? ppU Apc wa
?•O? .?.'Sh ?•r7.V .J-. QE •°.. O?D.j3. ci V Zj a
lo..
INK
0
L
ea
a
Mg. v
? wz
a?
MEOW*
. Q
i
4)
..Q
E
.J
L
O
U.
cz
n?
W
^L
_•
TLn
V '
O
• a?
Ln
•
A-50
g d . d d C s. C >? N •p eo C1 61 d ? : _
d..i _
N
R
•
p
.
V
y
?,,,? O
. ... G R.: y.L
.. d. O ?
O
.".
co cc p r ....
E
-m-

co
1..
r w C..S R{ d ..Ci
cu
d N ?•, y:. WX
O ca •„ ?,,, d d CC d
o?+ ?o I.Mii- ..»
Lit
n
E
> C7
x.v
w
0 u a,
cC
> .,
- •o o .
N d Q r. O rwil .,.,....
c 4). Z
m R w ?.r
O
oooooNipq?°-ojvann,p?ew'3? o?In?
G
Op a/ R N r7 Cl Q y U ee O
N
es- V V W
p
W
. 'WU
y L? ?+ ' y 6h
?C4O
d
y -. O.
..: p
Hti Z•.
d
cis
'?
V O
p
E--
•
p
•
C 7 l
..
R .r d O E. >
g cc Q AM- lti L4 ? _
.. i
i
•
. CC+ Y . .:.?
p ..pC. R L-2 .
cc
^?
u ... ?_ ._.?..,
++ al g ? .
dl
I+
G
Ord ~ ?• ..Q.?
G'N. VV11 t?i r >+?..+ ,
0p'ccjy' O?
gN v
di -d 'w C.6.escts
Sy O.a

cis
'fl O- G O O
0 w 0
0 an
.
o cc -c-2 -w
g N a o.?.,4 > as
.0 0.
la
N 7'O f4
Gi
~ a •?
yy ?+
.y?
G .
W?+aiai?.g•w y y Co N?
Qdy.?.
41 0
a
E•
.? d
.
a >.. > a? x
>,? rs ca s p cS ?• E
ca y E-? 5 a ?a ar E. xt e z E v°> y. .
101,

ea?i n From Page 1B
that Using* service roads at the
interchange.
Mr. Smith said he crosses Rob-
erts Avenue in the affected area
five times a day. He said he uses the
N.C. 72-711 exit area three to four
times a week.
"And they're both disasters," he
said. "Traffic will back up to
Shoney's in the afternoon when
everybody is going home."
Mr. Evely also welcomed news
of improvements to the N.C. 211
exit. Dairy Queen sits in a corner
near the exit ramp 'and the
highway. Mr. Evely owns the busi-
ness but leases the building, where
the state has proposed building an
access road to Lackey Street.
"I thought that was a good idea
from the beginning ... I thought it
would help business," he said.
Although Mr. Evely said he was
"shocked," he appeared calm,
"I've got a couple of years to
look around and see what I want to
do," he said. "If that's how it is,
that's how it is. I'll just have to look
around ... I don't want to take Dairy
Queen out of Lumberton"
Under the plan, the state is
scheduled to begin buying
right-of-way in 1993 and construc-
tion is scheduled to begin in 1995.
Lubin Prevatt, head of rural project
planning for the department, said
construction should take about two
years.
At the N.C. 72-711 exit, the state
has proposed a $6.3 million project
that includes widening the highway
from five- to six-lanes from the
N.C. 72-711 intersection hest of I-95
to Starlite Drive east of the in-
terstate.
The state plans to realign N.C.
72-711 south of the existing highway
from the west ramp of the current
interchange to Starlite Drive. The
proposed realignment would con-
form with the city's thoroughfare
plan, which eventually calls for an
outer loop around Lumberton.
The bridge carrying N.C. 72-711
across the interstate would be
replaced, and the state plans to
upgrade a separate bridge over the
Lumber River. The state also plans
to separate interstate traffic from
the service road traffic in the area.
"Our main concern is getting
ramp traffic and service road
traffic away from each other," Eric
Midkiff, a highway planning
engineer, said.
The changes wo ld improve
traffic and reduce the number of
accidents, be said. Between
.January 1986 and April 1990, the
N.C. 211 area had almost four times
more accidents than the state
average for urban state roads,
according to state officials.- The
N.C. 72-711 area had almost twice
as many as the state average,
accoiding to officials.
The department said the pro-
posals are not concrete and could
change depending on recommenda-
tions or other factors.
A-51
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch

NC 72-711
FROM THE NC 72/NC 711
INTERSECTION WEST OF I-95
TO SR 2501 EAST OF 1-95

LUMBERTON
TIP NO. U-2416
NOVEMBER 75, 1990
Public Meetin
A-52
PUBLIC MEETING
NC 72-711, from the NC 72/NC 711 intersection
west of I-95 to SR 2501
east of I-95, Lumberton, Robeson County
Federal Aid Project No. M-7763(1)
State Project No. 8.1461701
TIP No. U-2416
^1
November 15, 1990
PUBLIC MEETING
This meeting is being held to present proposed improvements to
NC 72-711 in the vicinity of I-95 in Lumberton. Comments and suggestions
concerning the proposed highway improvements are appreciated and will be
considered during the project study.
The Division of Highways realizes individuals living close to a
proposed project want to be informed of the possible effects of the
project on their homes and businesses. However, exact information is
not available at this stage of the planning process. Additional planning
studies and design work will be performed before the actual alignment and
right of way limits are established. More detailed information will be
available at the public hearing to be held at a later date.
Written comments or requests for additional information should be
addressed to:
Mr. L. J. Ward, P. E.
Manager of Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed improvements to NC 72-711 (Country Club Drive) consist
of widening that facility to a five- to six-lane section from the NC 72/
NC 711 intersection west of I-95 to SR 2501 (Starlite Drive) east of
-I-95. It is anticipated NC 72-711 will be realigned to the south of the
s existing highway from the west ramp terminal of the NC 72-711/I-95 inter-
change to SR 2501 to conform with the Lumberton Thoroughfare Plan.
Replacing the bridge carrying NC 72-711 over I-95 and rehabilitating the
bridge over the Lumber River will be included in the project.
CURRENT SCHEDULE
Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 1993,
and construction is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 1995. These
schedules are-subject-to the availability of sufficient highway funds.
A-53

V1
EXISTING FACILITY
Length:
Roadway width:
Shoulder width:
Right of way width:
Terrain: '
Access control:
Speed limit:
Traffic volumes:
Truck traffic:
Bridges:
Bridge
No.
25
43
ESTIMATED COSTS
0.8 mile
24 to 36 feet
8 feet
approximately 100 feet
flat
partial
35 to 45 mph
1990: 14,600 to 16,400 vehicles.per day
2010: 26,300 to 29,600 vehicles per day
(projected)
five percent of the above traffic volumes
Clear Siiffi- Estimated
Roadway ciency Remaining
Description Built Width Rating Life
over 1-95 1955 40' 81.6 25 yr.
over Lumber
River 1955 28' 66.8 23 yr.
Right of way $1,750,000
Construction 4,550,000
Total Estimated Cost $6,300,000
SEM/rm
A-54

i
•'1a ~ 1537 •?O
1.548 O ?O 1.588 14
711
•?6 1539 1588
N 711
-4
164.2
<r'? 72 BEGIN PROJECT
Fem.;: ;:-;:•;:t 1535 \?? R
40
1517
> O

17 1592
72

' r O6
4
1593 x•1
::''•

S
2499 .2501 -'4-- END PROJECT
95 F?v ...
1589 COTTONWOOD STREET

FP NORTH CAROLINA DEPORTMENT OF
2499
301
Lumberton s TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 'OF HIGHWAYS

c
? r? •.
Municipol PLANNING AND RESEARCH BRANCH
?
, Airport
2509
f.. LUMBERTON
?
.::
0
..... NC 72-711/I-95 INTERCHANGE
ROBESON COUNTY
? .. 41-2416 -

'8' 12/$9 0 mile 1/4 FIG. 1

A-55
PUBLIC MEETING - LUMBERTON
November 15, 1990
COMMENT SHEET
PROPOSED-IMPROVEMENTS TO NC 72-711 FROM WEST OF SR 1589 to SR 2501,
LUMBERTON, ROBESON COUNTY, TIP NO. U-2416
NAME:
ADDRESS:
COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS:
STATEMENTS RELATIVE TO THE PROPOSED NC 72-711 IMPROVEMENT MAY ALSO BE MAILED TO:
MR. L. J. WARD, P. E., MANAGER OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH, N. C.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, P. 0. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N. C. 27611
A-56