HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200865 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20200630NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 30, 2020
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: 252-247-3330 (Courier 04-16-33)
gregq.bodnar(cDncdenr.gov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
Project Location: Tar/ Pamlico River Basin, Hyde County
Proposed Project: To create a 42-acre oyster sanctuary
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director, Division of Coastal
Management
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Grep_p Bodnar at the address above by July 21, 2020. If you have any questions
regarding the proposed project, contact Shane Staples (252)948-3950 when appropriate, in-depth comments
with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
PRINT NAME
AGENCY
SIGNATURE
DATE
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave. Morehead City, NC 28557 (252) 808-2808
ROY COOPER
Govenmr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sutoelm'y
BRAXTON DAVIS
Uire<hu', Ul rv.vinn uj('nasial
kfun,genrenr
June 30, 2020
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: 252-247-3330 (Courier 04-1 B-33)
rg�.bodnaKa ncdenr oov
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
Project Location: Tar/ Pamlico River Basin, Hyde County
Proposed Project: To create a 42-acre oyster sanctuary
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by July 21, 2020. If you have any questions
regarding the proposed project, contact Shane Staples (252)948-3950 when appropriate, in-depth comments
with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached'*
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
PRINT
AGENCY
SIGNATURE
DATE
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
State of Nonh Carolina I Emironmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Aee. Morehead City, NC 28557 (252) 808.2808
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Hyde County, Pamlico Sound, Approximately 3 nautical miles South of Long
Point along the edge of Gull Shoal
Boundary Locations (State Plane) —
N W — N: 610985 E: 2901323
NE — N: 610985 E: 2903628
SE— N:607927 E:2903628
S W — N: 607927 E: 2901323
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA and D/F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit— N/A
Was Applicant Present — N/A
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete - 28 May 2020
6. SITE DESCRIPTION: Office - Washington
(A) Local Land Use Plan — Hyde County
Land Classification from LUP—N/A
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, PTA
(D) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public/Government
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — N/A
Planned — N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — N/A
Planned — Artificial Reef
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
f252,00ft2
(c) Other
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 252,000 ftz (5.5 acres)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA-HQW, NSW
Open: Yes
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The NCDMS proposes to create a 42-acre oyster sanctuary as mitigation for habitat
sites 10-acres and 32 acres respectively. The 60 reef structures will consist oimpacts associated with the USACE expansion of Wanchese Harbor. The sactuary will consist of two sub-
f granite rip -rap placed on soft
bottom of the Pamlico Sound and each will be 150' long x 28' wide and 5' high.
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Pamlico Sound Oyster Mitigation Site
Hyde County
Project Setting
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services has been allotted fund by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers to design and build an artificial oyster sanctuary in the Pamlico Sound.
The sanctuary will serve as mitigation for the habitat impacts associated with the deepening of
Wanchese Harbor as part of the Shallowbag Bay navigation project.
The 42-acre mitigation site is located in the open waters of the Pamlico Sound
approximately 3 miles south of Long Point in Hyde County on Gull Shoal. The 42-acre site is
divided into two sub -sites 10 acres and 32 acres respectively separated by approximately 500
feet. The water depths in the location of the artificial reefs structures range from 12 to 15 deep
and the bottom composition is comprised of sand and other soft sediment.
The waters of the Pamlico Sound at the project site are classified SA-HQW by the
Environmental Management Commission. The Marine Fisheries Commission classifies the area
as a Secondary Nursery Area and the area is open to the harvest of shellfish.
Proiect Description
The NCDMS proposes to create a 42-acre oyster sanctuary in the Pamlico Sound
approximately 3 miles south of Long Point. The project will consist of two main areas along Gull
Shoal 10-acres and 32-acres respectively. The artificial reef design will consist of 60 individual
structures constructed of class A and class 1 granite rip rap. Each structure will be 150' long x
28' wide and have a trapezoidal cross-section with a maximum height of 5 feet. All structures
follow design criteria used by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries for artificial reef/oyster
sanctuaries with methodology approved by multiply state and federal agencies as laid out in the
provided Environmental Assessment. Materials for the artificial reef will be staged at 114 Hill
Street in Engelhard, NC on a parcel that is owned by the Wanchese Seafood Industrial Park.
Anticipated Impacts
The project as proposed would create a new oyster sanctuary encompassing 42-acres of
Pamlico Sound bottom of which 252,OOOft2 (5.5-acres) are proposed to be filled with granite rip -
rap. The project would result conversion of soft bottom habitat to hard bottom habitat and
localized temporary turbidity during construction. The project, if successful should result in
additional shellfish habitat and hard bottom habitat for finfrsh in the Pamlico Sound.
4700 Falls of Neuse, Suite 300
MIARaleigh, NC 27609
m o f f a t t & N c h o l (919) 781-4626: (919) 781-4869
w .moffatnichol.com
March 26, 2020
Mr. Shane Staples
Division of Coastal Management
NC Department of Environmental Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
(252) 948-3851
shatie.staples@ncdent.gov
Subject: NC Division of Mitigation Services Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Project
Dear Mr. Staples:
The Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has been allotted funds from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
design and build an artificial oyster reef sanctuary in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina. The reef sanctuary is
intended to satisfy mitigation requirements for habitat impacts associated with the deepening of Wanchese
Harbor, a component of the Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay navigation project. The proposed project will provide
42 acres of oyster habitat in the vicinity of Gull Shoal.
DMS has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) to provide information in support of an application for
a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Permit from the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM).
The EA is included as an attachment to the application. Further details on the project are available in the
attached application and accompanying documentation.
If you have any questions on this project, please call us at 919-781-4626, or email me at
Tkennedy@moffattnichol.com.
Sincerely,
Moffatt & Nichol
9'--?z5-
J Todd Kennedy, PH, QEP
Project Manager
Enclosures
RECEIVED
MAY 2 S 2020
DCM-WARO
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION
Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
Mailing Address: 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652
Phone Number: 919-707-8319
Email Address: lin.xu(aD-ncdenr.gov
I certify that I have authorized Moffatt & Nichol
Agent / Contractor
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA permits
necessary for the following proposed development: NC DMS Pamlico
Sound Oyster Reef in Hyde County.
l furthermore certify that / am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to
Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application.
Signature
�t � )(l-
�s Print or Type Name
/j / -/- RECEIVED
Date
MAY 2 8 2020
This certification is valid through /-�? / 3% 1 -2 D-" 6 DCM_WARO
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
Project Purpose, Need, and Scope
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has been allotted funds by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) to design and build an artificial oyster sanctuary in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina.
The sanctuary is intended to satisfy mitigation requirements for habitat impacts associated with the
deepening of Wanchese Harbor, a component of the Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, North Carolina navigation
project. It will provide 17 hectares (42 acres) of oyster habitat.
The project consists of creating a new, subtidal oyster sanctuary located in the open waters of the Pamlico
Sound approximately 4.8 kilometers (3 miles) due south of Long Point in Hyde County (Figure 1). The
location is near a significant shoal formation called Gull Shoal. One new sanctuary site is proposed with
two subareas: one that is approximately 4 hectares (10 acres) in size and the other totaling 13 hectares (32
acres). The two subareas are separated by approximately 152.4 meters (500 feet). The permitting area for
the project surrounds the two subareas and is approximately 65 hectares (161.8 acres) in size.
Figure 1. Location map for Pamlico Sound Oyster Reef
The design calls for 60 individual reef structures that are trapezoidal in shape with dimensions of 45.7
meters by 8.5 meters (150 feet by 28 feet) and totaling 2.23 hectares (5.5 acres) of footprint. Each structure
includes a 0.3-meter (I -foot) bedding stone layer of NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Class A
rip rap (granite) placed on the sound floor to minimize settlement. Layered on top of the bedding stone is
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 2020
DCM-WARO
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
1.2 meters (4 feet) of NCDOT Class 1 rip rap or a maximum height of 1.5 meters (5 feet). Individual
structures are separated by 23 meters (75 feet). See design plans for additional details (Attachment A).
Currently there are soft bottom sediments at the site. This habitat will be replaced by 2.23 hectares (5.5
acres) of oyster reef based on reef structure footprint. There are no hard bottom, submerged aquatic
vegetation (SAV), oyster reef, primary nursery areas (PNAs), wetlands, or other benthic habitat at the site.
The primary purpose and need of the project (i.e., the Preferred Alternative) is to construct a 17-hectare
(42-acre) artificial oyster sanctuary to serve as Estuarine Subtidal-Mollusk habitat mitigation for wetland
impacts stemming from the dredging of Wanchese Harbor. In addition, the project will address oyster
population decline and the lack of oyster larval supply in the Pamlico Sound, while also providing long-
term environmental benefit and ecosystem services. An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared to
support the evaluation of alternatives and analysis of potential impacts. The document is provided as an
attachment to the permit application (Attachment B).
In addition to the primary purpose of the project, the sanctuary helps to address the overall need to restore
oyster populations in the Pamlico Sound. Oyster populations have declined in North Carolina waters as a
result of overharvest, habitat destruction, disease, and pollution (DMF, 2001; Denton et al., 2010).
Restoration of eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, is needed in the Pamlico Sound to address this decline
given the important role of oysters for healthy estuarine ecosystem function. Some of the most important
ecosystem services include enhancing estuarine biodiversity, increasing production of fish and
invertebrates, improving water quality by filtering sediment and microalgae, and stimulating denitrification
(Dame et al., 1984; Lenihan & Peterson, 1998; Nelson et al., 2004; Newell et al., 2002; Peterson et al.,
2003; Powers et al., 2009). Oyster reefs also benefit recreational and commercial fisheries (i.e., finfish
species) and other marine species by providing habitat, refuge, and feeding opportunities (DMF, 2015).
The Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) and their partners have been developing oyster sanctuaries across
the Pamlico Sound to promote high density broodstock that provide oyster larval production and
distribution among the larger ecosystem as part of the Oyster Sanctuary Program (DMF, 2015). To date,
DMF and their partners has been involved in the development of more than 15 oyster sanctuaries, some
under development, across the Pamlico Sound region. Larval availability has been traditionally lower in the
western Pamlico Sound. DMF's long-term plan is to develop additional reef sites that would contribute to
the macro -scale larval supply in the region.
Construction Methodology
Reef Construction
Artificial oyster reef structures will be deployed using barges at least 200 feet by 50 feet. Rock material
will be placed in the water directly offthe barge with a bobcat or front-end loader in the locations designated
in the engineering plans. Excavators and long reach equipment will be available in the working area to
reposition any rock material that is misaligned.
Stockpile Site
Several potential stockpile sites were investigated in Hyde County. The focus of the search was to find state
or county -owned land that had at least 0.5 acres available and access to a navigable waterway. Out of four
potential sites investigated, the Engelhard site is being carried forward for permitting. See Figure below.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 S 2020
0CM-WAR®
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
Figure 2. Stockpile site map
The Wanchese Seafood Industrial Park's address is 114 Hill Street in Engelhard. In total the property is
about 3.2 hectares (8 acres) in size, a half -acre section in the southwest corner of the property has been
identified as a suitable stockpile site. There is a paved road that goes down the middle of the property
which would allow for easy access to the site from land. The half -acre stockpile area has been placed well
outside of the 75-foot zone bordering the estuarine open water Area of Environmental Concern (AEC). Half
of the property has a building on it, which is being leased to a tenant. Use of this site should not interrupt
the daily operations for the tenant on the other side of the property. The property is situated off Far Creek
which is a United States Army Corps of Engineers maintained harbor. This suggests the site would provide
sufficient navigation depth for a barge. The widest part of Far Creek harbor is about 76 meters (250 feet),
which would not allow for a 61-meter (200-foot) long barge to turn around. The site presents waterfront
access issues with the presence of four abandoned trawlers lining the waterfront of the property. The
trawlers are made of wood and steel and are about 24 meters (80 feet) long. The waterfront of the property
is also lined with an old pier/boardwalk and pilings which would likely need to be removed by the
contractor. A letter of consent for use of the property is attached (Attachment Q.
Reef construction materials will be brought to the site in metal bins and will not be piled loosely in the
stockpile area. The metal bins will be lifted either with a crane or bobcat for placement on the barge.
RECEIVE®
MAY 2 S 2020
CCM-WARO
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
Environmental Concerns
Water Quality
The placement of stone at the reef site will result in minor turbidity increases during construction. However,
this will remain localized and temporary. The proposed action will not contribute to point or non -point
sources of pollutants and will not have long-term adverse impacts on water quality. Establishment of oysters
on these constructed reefs will have positive benefits to water quality and no long-term, adverse impacts
are expected.
SAV
DMF defines SAV as rooted plants that remain submerged during all tidal fluctuations. North Carolina has
eight plant species that can be found in SAV beds. In North Carolina, SAV is usually found in waters that
are less than 2 meters (6 or 7 feet) deep due to turbidity and sunlight penetration. A review of available
SAV data from the Albemarle -Pamlico National Estuary Partnership (APNEP) at its online mapping tool
(hnp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/apnep/sav-map) indicates that the closest SAV to the project area is
approximately 6.4 kilometers (4 miles) away within Wysocking Bay.
In addition to a review of APNEP data, diver surveys were conducted by the University of North Carolina
at Wilmington (UNCW) Center for Marine Science (CMS) on March 8, 2019 and April 25, 2019. Divers
swam a total of 16 transects, all 164 feet (50 meters) long, in two different target subareas to determine
bottom habitat composition. They made note of the bottom habitat every 5 meters (about 16 feet). The
divers did not locate any SAV beds within the project area, and therefore the preferred alternative is not
expected to have any impacts on SAV habitat.
Essential Fish Habitat and Manaeed Soecies
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) types located within the project area include Aquatic Bed (Tidal Freshwater)
and Estuarine Water Column/Creeks. Aquatic bed habitats in the project area include the soft bottom
substrate of the Pamlico Sound. This habitat type is comprised of sand as well as inorganic muds, organic
muds, and peat. Nutrients for this habitat type are typically provided by riverine sources and transported
via wind tides in addition to lunar tidal exchange. The abundance of benthic macroalgae in this habitat
supports a high diversity of invertebrates that are an important fishery food source. Although SAV are not
present within the project area, this habitat can typically support SAV populations. The estuarine water
column extends from the estuarine bottom to the surface waters and is characterized by the oligohaline
(estuarine) waters present in Pamlico Sound with seasonally variable salinity levels. Distinct zones within
the water column can be defined by parameters such as salinity, temperature, and DO. Water column
zonation continually fluctuates and is a function of tidal dynamics, season, nutrient levels, and ocean
proximity. Fish and shellfish often exploit distinct resources within the water column based on species -
specific diet, behavior, and morphology.
The Preferred Alternative would likely result in primarily short-term, localized, and temporary adverse
effects to EFH and managed species, but project design, implementation, and construction measures under
consideration would keep these impacts to a minimum, as well as reduce the possibility of any permanent,
long-term impacts. Short-term impacts would include increased turbidity, siltation, and noise from
construction activities. Most managed species found in this area though are highly mobile and would be
able to escape construction disturbance and eventually return to the area post -construction. Aquatic
substrate impacted by siltation should recover after construction, and turbidity would be limited to the
immediate construction area. The project will convert soft bottom habitat to oyster reef habitat. Over time
this will result in increased species diversity for fish. RECEIVED
MAY 2 S 2020
DCM-WARO
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
NOAA/NMFS has jurisdiction over seven protected marine species that maybe found in the Pamlico Sound
and adjacent waters. These species include Atlantic sturgeon, shortnose sturgeon, Kemp's ridley sea turtle,
green turtle, leatherback turtle, loggerhead turtle, and hawksbill turtle. All seven of these species have
potential habitat within the project area for the Preferred Alternative.
There are no anticipated impacts from the Preferred Alternative on NOAA/NMFS managed species.
Moffatt & Nichol will ensure that conservation measures follow the recently approved DMF programmatic
consultation for statewide reef development (NOAA, 2019), thus there will be no adverse impacts
anticipated for NOAA/NMFS managed species. The spacing between the reef structures will allow for
adequate movement for NOAA/NMFS managed species, and any impacts resulting from construction
would likely be temporary. In addition, because this project takes place completely in -water, no USFWS-
listed species will be impacted.
Wetlands
There will be no anticipated impacts to CAMA-managed coastal wetlands at the Engelhard stockpile site,
as the work will occur entirely within upland areas. Coastal wetland absence at the site was confirmed with
GIS data as well as personal communication with Division of Coastal Management staff on December 9,
2019. The stockpile area at the Engelhard stockpile site will be placed well outside of the 75-foot boundary
from the estuarine waters AEC.
State Historic Preservation Office SHPO)
Pursuant to Section 106 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance
with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
conducted a review of the proposed project and is not aware of any historic resources which would be
affected by the proposed project; therefore, the proposed project to construct an oyster reef will not
adversely impact any cultural or historic resources. A non-SHPO resource sunken vessel is located within
the reef layout area in Pamlico Sound and will need to be removed prior to reef construction. No dredging
or alterations to the substrate will occur as a result of removing the vessel.
Cumulative Impacts
Cumulative impacts will be positive since this project contributes to part of the proposed larval highway
ton increase oyster productivity throughout the Pamlico Sound in keeping with DMF goals. The reef is
expected to promote ecosystem services such as improving water quality, providing habitat for other aquatic
species, and improving opportunities for recreational fishing.
SEPA
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) applies for any project that meets all three of the following
criteria, an environmental document must be prepared:
1. An expenditure of $10 million in funds provided by the state of North Carolina for a single project
or action or related group of projects or action
Or
2. Land -disturbing activity of equal to or greater than 10 acres of public lands resulting in substantial,
permanent changes in the natural cover or topography of those lands (or waters)
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 2020
DCM-WARO
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
3. An action by a state agency, and
Has a potential detrimental environmental effect upon natural resources, public health and safety, natural
beauty, or historical or cultural elements, of the state's common inheritance.
This project is not subject to SEPA (personal communication, Lyn Hardison, 5/31/2019)
Conservation Measures
In developing the Pamlico Oyster Reef, DMS will implement the following conservation measures which
are based on measures developed by DMF, NOAA, and USACE as part of the programmatic consultation
for DMF's artificial reef program (NOAA, 2019)).
The Permittee shall follow the NMFS Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions, dated
March 23, 2006, and will apply these measures to further reduce interaction risk and require all construction
workers to watch for all ESA -listed species. Operation of any mechanical construction equipment will cease
immediately if a protected species is seen within a 50-foot radius of the equipment. Deployment activities
will cease immediately if Endangered Species Act (ESA) -listed species are sighted within 50 feet of the
construction area and will not recommence until the protected species observer reports that the ESA -listed
species has left the area under its own volition.
DMS in consultation with DMF, DCM, USACE and other state and federal agencies has selected granite
rip rap (Class 1 and Class A) as the construction material. These materials meet the following guidelines:
• DMF Guidelines and Specifications for Acceptable Reef Materials, which were created using
guidance from internal studies.
• Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC)/Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission
(GSMFC) Guidelines for Marine Artificial Reef Materials.
• USEPA National Guidance: Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Preparing Vessels Intended to
Create Artificial Reefs.
• NOAA/NMFS National Artificial Reef Plan and artificial reef guidance.
In addition, DMS will adhere to the following permit conditions set forth in in the Corps' Regional General
Permit 198500194 and Programmatic General Permit 1980002911, the DMF Special Conditions, as
amended by NMFS's recommended project design criteria's (PDCs) as follows:
1. Any deployment of reef materials must comply with:
a. Maximum speed for all vessels involved in placing the reef material is 10 knots.
b. Deployments will be conducted during daylight hours when lighting, weather, and sea
conditions allow for visual monitoring of the project area.
c. Deployment: Deployment activities will not commence until the project supervisor reports
that no sea turtles, marine mammals (North Atlantic right whales have additional
restrictions listed below), or other ESA -listed species have been sighted within 91.4 meters
(300 feet) of the active deployment site (i.e., barge carrying material or moored vessel to
be scuttled) for at least 60 minutes. Deployment activities will cease immediately if sea
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 2020
DCM-WAR®
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
turtles, marine mammals, or other ESA -listed species are sighted within 91.4 meters (300
feet) of the active deployment site. Deployment activities will not recommence until the
project supervisor reports that no sea turtles, marine mammals, or other ESA -listed species
have been sighted for at least 60 minutes. DMF and its designees are also required to
participate in the Right Whale Early Warning System to protect North Atlantic right
whales. If a right whale or any other species of whale is reported within the area, then the
contractor will be required to follow the enclosed NMFS's Southeast Region Vessel Strike
Avoidance Measures and Reporting for Mariners (revised February 2008) (Appendix B),
except where specific measures below are in conflict, in which case the measures in this
Opinion govern (e.g., a speed restriction to a maximum of 10 knots (kt) at all times in right
whale calving areas [i.e., federally -protected areas off the southeastern U.S. coast
designated and implemented for the protection of right whales and their calves during their
calvingimigration season] for vessels 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length or greater). By law,
vessels shall maintain a 457.2-meter (500-yard) buffer between the vessel and any North
Atlantic right whale [as required by federal regulation 50 CFR 224.103 (c)].
2. Vessel Movement: If a sea turtle, giant manta ray, oceanic whitetip shark, or marine mammal is
seen within 91.4 meters (300 feet) of the vessel, all appropriate precautions shall be implemented
to avoid a collision (for North Atlantic right whale regulations require maintaining a distance of
457.2 meters or 1500 feet). These precautions shall include cessation of any vessel movement when
closer than 15.24 meters (50 feet) of a sea turtle, giant manta ray, oceanic whitetip shark, or marine
mammal (excluding at times when movement is required for safe navigation [e.g., transiting
inlets]). Operation may not resume until the protected species has departed the immediate area of
its own volition.
a. All vessels:
i. Marine mammals (i.e., dolphins, whales [other than North Atlantic right whales],
and porpoises) and sea turtles: Maintain a minimum distance of 91.4 meters (300
feet).
ii. North Atlantic right whale: Maintain a minimum 457.2-meter (1,500-foot)
distance (500 yards).
iii. Vessels 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length or longer must comply with the Right
Whale Ship Strike Reduction Rule (50 CFR 224.105) which includes reducing
speeds to 10 knots or less in Seasonal Management Areas
(http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/shipstrike/).
iv. Mariners shall check various communication media for general information
regarding avoiding ship strikes and specific information regarding right whale
sightings in the area. These include NOAA weather radio, USCG NAVTEX
broadcasts, and Notices to Mariners.
v. Reduce speed to 10 knots or less when mother/calf pairs or groups of marine
mammals are observed, when safety permits.
3. Reef structures shall be sited and installed in accordance with the permitted boundaries and site
clearances. New reef sections are limited to 1 reef section measuring %4- by '/4-nmi area (40 ac) in
size with a distance of 152.4 meters (500 feet) between each section. Offshore reefs shall maintain
RECEIVE®
MAY 2 8 2020
CCM-WARD
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
a minimum vertical clearance of twice the height of the structure from the top of the deployed
material relative to the mean low water (MLW) at all times.
4. Reef structures shall not be placed on natural hard -bottom habitat. No artificial reef materials shall
be deployed until a benthic assessment of the bottom conditions has been accomplished by diver
(Note, that this has been accomplished through surveys by Geodynamics and UNCW), submersible
video camera, or sidescan sonar. The inspection of the deployment area may occur at the time of
deployment but no more than I year prior to deployment. The permittee shall maintain a
deployment buffer of at least 60.96 meters (200 feet) from any submerged aquatic resources,
including seagrasses, macroalgae, hard or soft coral (including coral reefs), sponges, oysters, or
hard bottom when placed in areas of sand. If materials are off-loaded from a barge or placed in
areas that may generate turbidity (e.g., areas with fines or muck), a 152.4-meter (500-foot) buffer
is required.
5. Materials should be of sufficient size and relative' density to not move from the reef site post -
deployment and be clean and free from asphalt, creosote, petroleum, other hydrocarbons and toxic
residues, loose free-floating material or other deleterious substances.
6. The use of explosives to deploy materials is not authorized.
7. Reef materials shall be selected to ensure that ESA -listed species do not become entrapped in reef
structures, or entangled in debris (e.g., abandoned fishing tackle, nets, and lines) that may
accumulate on artificial reefs:
a. Materials used for artificial reef building shall conform to the recommendations in the
National Artificial Reef Plan (as Amended): Guidelines for Marine Artificial Reef
Materials, Second Edition (ASMFC and GSMFC 2004). Except that derelict automobiles
shall not be used and derelict vessels and military surplus shall have openings on all
exposed sides adequate to prevent entrapment of ESA -listed species. Openings will be
sufficient of sufficient size and quantity to allow for several points of egress for sea turtle
species that may enter the structure.
b. Military surplus and vessel structures such as ladders, rails, booms, antennas, etc. will be
removed to reduce the potential accumulation of abandoned fishing tackle and lines. For
all secondary -use, recycled concrete and similar materials, all steel reinforcement rods
(rebar) must be cut at the base of the concrete so that no metal protrudes from the concrete's
surface.
8. During regularly scheduled reef assessments, staff will make reasonable attempts to clean reef
materials of debris, without compromising the safety of the crew and divers. For example,
precluding conditions might involve low visibility or high current, which may present diver safety
issues and increase the potential of divers being entangled or snagged. The Permittee will send
confirmation of cleanup to NMFS's Southeast Regional Office (takereport.nmfsser@noaa.gov),
including dates of cleanup efforts and results of the clean-up.
9. All material placed to construct reefs (specifically designed reef modules) will be selected and
placed to avoid the movement of reef materials due to sea conditions or currents. The Permittee
(i.e., DMS) will be responsible for any materials which are moved by sea conditions or which break
loose from reefs, and the Permittee will be responsible for any damage caused by such materials.
No individual artificial reef component (i.e., prefabricated module, concrete piece, etc.) will weigh
less than 500 pounds, with the exception of materials deployed directly by authorized county or
RECEIVED
8
MAY 2 8 ZOZO
DCM-WARO
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
state programs in low -energy environments (e.g., Reef Ball "Bay Ball" or "Mini -Bay Ball" in
shallow estuaries or bays). The permittee shall not deploy artificial reef materials until an
assessment of the bottom conditions has been accomplished by diver, submersible video camera,
or sidescan sonar. (Note, that this has been accomplished through surveys by Geodynamics and
UNCW). The inspection of the deployment area may occur at the time of deployment but no more
than 1 year prior to deployment. No artificial reef material will be deployed in any nearshore area
335.3 meters (1,100 feet) of any identified sea turtle nesting beach that predominantly consists of
sandy benthic habitat. No emergent artificial reef material will be authorized in identified
loggerhead sea turtle nearshore reproductive critical habitat areas. Any artificial reef material
deployed within these critical habitat areas and within 335.3 meters (1,100 feet) of the beach at
MLW) must provide at least 1.2 meters (4 feet) of surface clearance at MLW, a maximum reef
section length of 15.24 meters (50 feet), and the project must include gaps free of any material at a
1:1 ratio (e.g., for every 7.6 meters/25 feet of contiguous artificial reef material, a 7.6-meter/25-
foot gap clear of any material must be created).
10. All materials used for construction of reefs shall be consistent with the National Artificial Reef
Plan and will be clean and free of petroleum and other hydrocarbons (oil, grease, asphalt and
creosote), toxic residues (mercury, cadmium and lead) and loose, free floating material and other
deleterious substances and/or in compliance with criteria established by the USEPA. The use of
tires, Fish Aggregating Devices (FADS), post -use sanitary sewer materials, automobiles and other
civilian vehicles, white goods (refrigerators, washers, etc.) boat molds, floatables, loose organic
material and general demolition debris, other than clean concrete units to form reefs, are not
authorized.
11. The placement of material within any jurisdictional wetland, SAV bed, coral reefs, oyster reefs,
mussel beds, scallop beds, clam beds or live bottoms (areas supporting the growth of sponges, sea
fans, soft coral and other sessile macro invertebrates generally associated with rock outcrops) is not
authorized.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 2020
DCM-WARO
DMS Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
CAMA Permit Narrative
References
Dame, R.F., R.G. Zingmark, E. Haski. 1984. Oyster reefs as processors of estuarine materials. J Exp Mar
Biol Ecol 83:239-247.
Deaton, A.S., W.S. Chappell, K. Hart, J. O'Neal, and B. Boutin. 2010. North Carolina Coastal Habitat
Protection Plan. North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR). Division of
Marine Fisheries (DMF). 639 pp.
Lenihan, H.S., and C.H. Peterson. 1998. How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances
impacts of bottom water hypoxia on oyster reefs. Ecological Applications 8:128-140.
North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF). 2001. North Carolina oyster fishery management plan.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR).
North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF). 2015. Environmental Assessment for Little Creek
Oyster Sanctuary. Prepared for US Army Corps of Engineers.
Nelson K.A., L.A. Leonard, M.H. Posey, T.D. Alphin. M.A. Mallin. 2004. Using transplanted oyster beds
to improve water quality in small tidal creeks: a pilot study. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 298:347-368.
Newell R.I.E., J.C. Cornwell, M.S. Owens. 2002. Influence of simulated bivalve biodeposition and
microphytobenthos on sediment nitrogen dynamics: a laboratory study. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1367-1379.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2019. North Carolina Division of Marine
Fisheries Artificial Reef Program. Action ID SAW-2018-01538. Consultation Number SER-2019-19783,
SERO-2019-00225. Approved October 2019.
Peterson, C.H., J.H. Grabowski, and S.P. Powers. 2003. Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting
from restoring oyster reef habitat: Quantitative valuation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 264:249-264.
Powers, S.P., P. Peterson, J.H. Grabowski., and H.S. Lenihan. 2009. Success of constructed oyster reefs in
no -harvest sanctuaries: implications for restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 389, 159-170.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 2020
10 DCM-WAR®
ON Mr-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Nc Division Of Mitigation Services
Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary
Mitigation Site
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Lin
Xu
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional pages) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
276991652
USA
919.707 -
8319 ext.
Street Address (if different from above)
city
State
ZIP
217 West Jones Street., Suite 3000A
Raleigh
NC
27603-
Email
lin.xu@ncdenr.gov
2. Agent/ContractorInformation
Business Name
Moffatt & Nichol
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Todd
Kennedy
Agentl Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Robert
Neal
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
4700 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 300
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27609
919 - 781 - 4626 ext.
919 - 781 - 4626 w.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 781 4869
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back> RECEIVEn
MAY 2 S 20rd
DCM-WARO
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
Stale Rd. #
Hyde
N/A
N/A
Subdivision Name
city
State
Zip
N/A
N/A
NC
N/A - N/A
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - N/A . N/A ext. N/A
NIA, N/A, N/A, N/A, N/A
a. In which NC river basin Is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Tar -Pamlico
Pamlico Sound
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
J. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Pamlico Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
I. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ONO
work falls within.
NIA
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (R.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
NIA
7.0480e+6 (permit area)
c. Size of Individual lot(s)
J. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
N/A ❑NHW or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
N/A
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
N/A
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacen to the proposed project site.
N/A
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No NNA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes NNo
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ❑No NNA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ONO NNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
t V CU
<Form continues on next page>
MAY 2 8 2020
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? []Yes ®No
(Iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
The stockpile site is covered under stormwater permit SW7110805 and has 48.661 square feet of impervious area available to
develop within the current stormwater permit. A minor moditfication form and site mapping are included to update the
stormwater permit on development (temporary) activities for the stockpile area.
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®PubliclGovemment
❑PrivatelCommunity
b. Give a brief descripllon of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The primary purpose and need of the project is to construct a 42-acre arlifical oyster sanctuary to serve as Estuarine
Sublidal-Mollusk habitat mitigation for wetland impacts stemming from the dredging of Wanchese harbor. In addition, the
project will address oyster population decline and the lack of oyster larval supply in the Pamlico Sound, while also providing
long-term environmental benefits and ecosystem services.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
There will be one site with two subareas to maximize the chances for success of the artificial oyster sanctuary. The tiered
system includes a 10-acre, shallower reef subarea to be constructed adjacent to a deeper, 32-acre reef subarea to provide
habitat variability that could enhance oyster survival and productivity as well as increase larval recruitment and contributions
to the "larval superhighway" planned by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries. Reef structures will be deployed using barges at
least 200 feet by 50 feet. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction
Conditions, DMF Guidelines, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFCpGulf States Marine Fisheries
Commision (GSMFC) Guidelines for Marine Artifical Reef Materials, USEPA National Guidance: Best Management Practices
(BMPs) for Preparing Vessels Intended to Create Artifical Reefs, NOAA/NMFS National Artifical Reef Plan/Guidance, and
USACE General Permit 198500194 and Programmatic General Permit 1980002911 permit conditions will be adhered to
during all construction activities.There will be a need for an upland stockpile to be a temporary holding location for
construction materials and barge loading. A non-SHPO resource derelict vessel is located at the stockpile site and will need
to be removed prior to construction. No dredging or alterations to the substrate will occur as a result of removing the vessel.
d. List all development activities you propose.
This project involves the creation of 42 acres of oyster sanctuary habitat in the Pamlico Sound to be used for mitigation.
Habitat structures are 60 individual reef structures constructed with granite rip rap.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? NA
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 5.5 acres ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project
encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area []Yes [2
that the public has established
use of?
�VED
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
N/A tory 9 �al�
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
I. Will wastewater or stormwaler be discharged into a wetland? []Yes ❑No ®NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? []Yes []No ®NA
J. Is there any mitigaton proposed? []Yes []No RNA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
Form continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following Items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is suffkiently detalled to gulde agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with slate application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Williams Seafood, Inc. Phone No. N/A
Address PO BOX 454, Engelhard, NC 27824
Name Gibbs Development Properties Phone No. N/A
Address PO BOX 39, Engelhard, NC 27824
Name Dudley Scott Williams Phone No. N/A
Address 3100 Hodges Road, Scranton, NC 27875
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, pennittee, and Issuing dates.
Slate Stormwater Permit SW7110805 N/A
N/A NIA
h. Signed consultant or agent authorizatlon form. If applicable.
I. Welland delineation, If necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project Involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge. ���+CC CC 1t��
Date _03-28-2020 Print Name J Todd Kennedy, Agent on Beh2IfHL4CIEiv�VED
Mitigation Services
Signature
MAY 2 8 2020
� / ��
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 5 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information
Major Development Permit
RECEIVED
MAY 2 S 2020
DCM-WARO
Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
Length
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9000
Width
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Avg. Existing
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Depth
Final Project
Depth
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
cubic yards.
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlandstmarsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area.
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
III) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
III) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
b. Type of material to
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
®This section not applicable
of disposal area.
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
[]Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes []No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
MAY 2 8 2020
DCM-WAR®
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®This section not applicable
(if development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Lannth-
UBulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:.__
c. Average distance walerward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill_ Riprap_
Breakwater/Sill_ Other_
1. Source of fill material.
Width: _
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
I. (1) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes []No ❑NA
(11) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
Information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES El This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes LINO ❑NA b. (1) WIII fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
(11) Amount of material to be placed in the water 51,769 tons other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
(Ili) Dimensions of FlII area 5.5 Acres number of square feet affected.
❑CW
(iv) Purpose of fill ❑SAV _ ❑sB
❑WL ®None
For the purpose of creating 60 individual reef structures
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas: within the overall 42 acre oyster sanctuary site.
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
controlled?
An upland stockpile site has been selected in Engelhard on site
Covered by an existing stormwater permit. When stone material
Is being placed in the water at the sound site, steps will be
taken to minimize turbidity and siltation, but some minor turbidity
is expected to occur and will be temporary and localized.
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d.
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(li) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
Navigation Impacts will be negligible and will include navigational
aids required by the U.S. Coast Guard and shown on permit
drawings.
What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragllne,
backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Reef structures will be deployed using barges at least 200 feet by
50 feel. Rock material will be placed in the water directly off of
the barge with a bobcat or front end loader in the locations
designated in the engineering plans.Excavators and long reach
equipment will be available in the working area to reposition
any rock material that is misaligned.
(i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? []Yes ❑No RNA
(it) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
REC
02-25-2020 Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigat' Rfe2 8 2020
Date
Project Name
D WARO
J Todd Kennedy, Agent on Behalf of NC Division of Mitigation
Services
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
RECEIVED
MAY 2 8 2020
DCM-WARD
Form DCM MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. (i) Is the docking facility/marine:
❑Commercial ❑Public/Government ❑Private/Community
c. (1) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
(it) Number _
(Ili) Length
(iv) Width
(v) Floating []Yes ❑No
®This section not applicable
b. (1) Will the facility be open to the general public?
[]Yes ❑No
d. (1) Are Finger Piers included? ❑Yes []NO
If yes:
(ii) Number _
(Ili) Length
(iv) Width _
(v)Floating []Yes ❑No
e. (I) Are Platforms included? []Yes []No I. (i) Are Boatlifts included? ❑Yes []No
If yes: If yes:
(ii) Number (it) Number _
(ill) Length _ (ill) Length
IN) Width _ (iv) Width
(v) Floating ❑Yes []NO
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
❑ Full service, Including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
(it) Number of slips existing maintenance service
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
❑ Dockage ("wet slips') only, number of slips:
❑ Dry storage; number of boats: _
❑ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
❑ Other, please describe:
i. Check the proposed type of siting:
❑ Land cut and access channel
[]Open water; dredging for basin and/or channel
[]Open water; no dredging required
[]Other; please describe:
k. Typical boat length: _
m. (!)Will the facility have tie pilings?
[]Yes ❑No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
I. (1) Will the facility be open to the gene'FalEC
public IVE®
❑Yes ❑No
MAY 2 8 ZOZO
DCM-WARO
Z DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA OPERATIONS
®This section not applicable
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed project.
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons; Number: _; Location:
❑ Showers
❑ Boatholding lank pumpoub Give type and location:
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
e. (1) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge'signs proposed.
(it) Give the location and number of "Pumpout Available' signs proposed.
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing Industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be disposed of?
h. Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed.
I. Give the location of fuel -handling facilities, and describe the safely measures planned to protect area water quality.
j. What will be the marina policy on overnight and live -aboard dockage?
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin Hushing?
I. If this project is an expansion of an existing marina, what types of services are currently provided?
RECEIVED
an. Is the marina/docking facilityMAY
proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
❑Yes ❑No
2 S 2020
DCIVI-VYARO
n. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
❑Yes ONO
0. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
❑CW -_ ❑SAV __ ❑SB _
OWL _ ❑None
P. Is the proposed marina/doddng facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ❑Yes []No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease.
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts)
®This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑Public/Government ❑Private/Community
(it) Number _
(Ili) Length
(iv) Width _
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from ddpline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheetpfle, etc. Ifa rock groin, use MP-2, Excavation and Fill.)
a• (i) Num®This section not applicable
ber
(li) Length
(Ili) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.)
®This section not applicable
a. Length b. Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW. NWL or wetlands
6. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS
a. Is the structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑PubliclGovernmenl [)Private/Community
a Distance to be placed beyond shoreline _
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing _
7. GENERAL
®This section not applicable
b. Number
d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(RECEIVED
MAY 2 S 2020
0CM-WARD
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
Approximately 3.3 miles from shore
Approximately 3.4 miles
Note; For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
of vessel.
C. Width of water body
23 miles (measured inshore of the Oyster reef to Hatteras)
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
®Yes LINO ❑NA
(it) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
Navigation impacts will be negligible and will include
navigational aids required by the U.S. Coast Guard and
shown on permit drawings.
& OTHER
a. Give complete description;
03/26/2020
Date
Pamlico Sound Oyster Sanctuary Mitigation Site
Project Name
J Todd Kennedy, Agent on Behalf of NC Division of Mitigation
Services
App" n, to
Appll nt Signature
d. Water depth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWL
5 to 16 feet
®This section not applicable
RECEIVED
MAY 2 S 2020
DCM-WARD
ws-a� ., r..
'�3dH8 tl3AdJ Awx� osee=tl a.w
MI%Itltl]NItlON'.VMII'O]30 �M�xn avo-nmu mir I V11r,w �� �
J33tl tl31LDYHM106 dJI1X01
ALL
p
f pig
.6q
00 �
pxm m�
rU n
iuo $
�w 2
Q • H� LLa
Oo
LL
�s
w _ w
W J
�yy o
W Q g6
O OC > N Q
O y
z
Z Z �Ae W g
O�ss °
cf) Z
UO
c W
a
m u
m a
aro.rz ai aro .s..�-oaw wa•r wn ossa ru a w
uo.ml:l.e .
® ONYaL0N1tlN33 3Y b[VD56 a
N30
I.,,, 0I036 n<ww •11 ��
•�f10W0NWON'.UNM n3�0U1 umu mr 1V1,,,W
a ao axnoe oa a �,
x
8
zp
Pg ;3
a
we
OOh nF
s
LLJ
`S
Q
q � p
a F a
Q
�W
® o
o a
o w cq<� U a
S§p)
Nff
U
�a0861uz 6g
sz d$
aim 12 € k
�as `s gs f2 g §s a y g z g u $
m $iN a� Fad=
a6 c � a �1 � g _€
G@ ins �� Mtl3 o<gg
� gda3 F �s : eb' F`so�
Sn�E�w msaM °5 dis€E� G
"2
m
`m=� 4� M �
5�esi uas � a €j�
P%. 12y€
q_
6�€ SF b=�4 b Fa Ia.II W
g `s kcg Q3 s� x� a �_ � a$ p g
�a � �a=g< <� g gcs a H �z ER a�< ? aig
ai g
g ssa§� a3�Wk o ®� -� s € i rr � As>`r� t'i afl
�o Y�F 8- H 4& s: D ¢ d a3 a p
Ill a . i�a a € �g g ua §� I la s s M z 11Z ul
N M i ui tl d N M N M i M
U 0
r----------------------------------------------------------
0
.�:4.'0R%%FY93IX.^.XSY88SA
f`AX%2aaF<X7
d�R�S9�'X64'g9c%ffPgc
SSRG:A:9&:MSp
i$x7ESMN'a��es@
SA6RF68XF.�A:YYS.9X9d
y?"a
."ale
Mqr
CY
R93qq
a;X3
3
�Y�aa8
Him
6 a
a9s9$%$5'56208�®ImgSn
Y�pa
R7�i6���y3:as9a$"^$®�ia±�aa'g9g9m
38g"sg,
g$ggg^'^YiR"^y
�y'pM%8F'RX.;R
g�k�-
.ws"^�aIXzna=""qya"9RE'7c
dtlYNXR
Si
A%R;4,MRXR33XR�AYM
6MMGa%C
886XX8:99S
PSa^,8^Gq
MMR
Sib:
9f999A�8�999
Y
.$aA:�a"X.ffg6g$^$�,�gKRB�gGg
'"535:•IXAY3,$CXFX:RA.^.Y6IX
m"�RRgXg
R:36&A6Rx�YMYFiq:
'g:g9��gkg
xyygg
IX5"d
�dg�'a
d:OFAa
��:^SAX"a
YYSd
SA��6�a"atlgX
IX'AAMYo".SAY®47�8
®y,y
$�a�
"
S�SSSRR:CFSp,.e„^.pXYgq:AAYm
MM8:
S:
%SY:AM9
F.^�ASAYGYXS
g 5s o
\oast, a, ox�iooe ...w... xouaw A� U g
rxmwaxtxox noo w.sx mm.0 vu, 1x11r, d
e xmuo axnoaoonxroe T,y,.
Z�
� Ww
6 O— m5
i Y g
Q R 380 9Yg
zs
tW mW mWal
iW
20
_ W s— f � OJ"Rb I
g l
I.
SBoR An
Qo
O
N
.� ,GO
WNN
t A�
m U m <