20200859 Ver 1_Yadkin_USFWS_20200505_Full_Submittal_20200629

hdrinc.com
440 S Church Street, Suites 900 & 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202-2075
[phone]

May 5, 2019

Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801

Subject: Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
Stanly and Union Counties, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Hamstead:
HDR, on behalf of our clients Union County Public Works (Union County) and the Town of
Norwood (Norwood), requests review and comment on potential impacts to threatened and
endangered species and migratory bird species that may result from construction activities
associated with the Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project (Project) located in Stanly and
Union Counties, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2).
Project Description
Union County and Norwood propose to install approximately 39.8 miles of water pipeline, as
well as a water treatment plant. The Project will supply Union County with drinking water to
meet rising demands, and will provide Norwood with the ability to upgrade their water supply
system. The Project will extend from an area near Lake Tillery in the Town of Norwood in
Stanly County toward Monroe in Union County and will be installed using an open-cut
trenching method across all stream and wetland features. Impacts associated with construction
activities will be temporary in nature and all contours will be returned to pre-construction levels.
Stream and wetland crossings will be performed in the dry and surrounding construction areas
will be stabilized via sediment and erosion control devices.
The proposed Project will require a Clean Water Act Section 404 Nationwide Permit 12 from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Charlotte Regulatory Field Office for unavoidable
impacts to jurisdictional surface waters.
Description of Study Area
The Study Area consists of approximately 1,106.36 acres of land including forested and
herbaceous land, single family residences, agricultural fields, planted pines, and roadside
rights-of-way, (Site Photographs). Land use in the vicinity of the proposed Project consists of
residential, industrial, commercial, agriculture, and undeveloped forested lands.
Desktop Review
HDR conducted a desktop review of protected species likely to occur on in the vicinity of the
Project site. Species addressed include those listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
or those with critical habitat designated under the ESA.
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 2

HDR consulted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) Information for Planning and
Consultation (IPaC) database, which summarizes species and trust resources under the
USFWS’s jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the Study Area (see
attached IPaC Resources List). The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data
Explorer database was also queried for a list of federally protected species with potential to
occur within in the proximity to the Project site (see attached NCNHP Project Report NCNHDE-
10390). Lastly, updated species lists for Stanly and Union Counties were obtained from the
USFWS’s website https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_counties.html (species lists
were updated on June 27 2018). Table 1 presents a summary of species that are federally
protected on all resource lists in Stanly and Union counties.

Table 1. Federally Protected Species for Stanly and Union Counties, North Carolina
County Common
Name
Scientific
Name
Federal
Status1
Record
Status Habitat Description
Habitat
Present in
Study Area
Vertebrate
Stanly Bald eagle Haliaeetus
leucocephalus BGEPA Current
Nests at tops of large, mature
trees near large rivers, lakes,
and marshes containing small
animals, fish, and carrion.
Yes
Stanly
Northern
long-eared
bat
Myotis
septentrionalis T Probable/
Potential
Hibernates in caves and mines
during winter; roosts under
bark, in cavities or crevices in
trees and snags during
summer.
No -
hibernacula;
Yes -
roosting
trees
Invertebrate
Union Carolina
heelsplitter
Lasmigona
decorata E Current
Cool, clean, well-oxygenated
water with stable, silt-free
stream bottoms.
No
Plants
Union Michaux’s
sumac Rhus michauxii E Historic
Sandy or rocky, open, upland
woods on acidic or
circumneutral, well-drained
sandy or loamy soils; sandy or
submesic loamy swales and
depressions in the Sandhills
region; disturbed areas such as
maintained roadsides and utility
rights-of-way.
Yes
Stanly/
Union
Schweinitz’s
sunflower
Helianthus
schweinitzii E Current
Areas with poor soils in forest
openings, grasslands, or
disturbed areas such as
roadsides and utility rights-of-
way.
Yes
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 3

1 BGEPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
E = Endangered. A taxon “in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
T = Threatened. A taxon “likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.”
2 Current = the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Probable/Potential = the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
Historic = the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
The NCNHP Data Explorer query revealed that one occurrence of a federally protected
species (Schweinitz’s Sunflower EO ID 13021) has been documented within a one-mile radius
of the Study Area, but records indicate that occurrence has been destroyed. The query also
revealed two natural areas and one managed area within the Study Area, as well as five
natural areas and two managed areas within one mile of the Study Area.
The IPaC database indicated that no critical habitat for the species listed in Table 1 was
identified within the Study Area. Migratory bird presence was also included in the query. The
query results revealed eastern whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferous), Kentucky warbler
(Oporornis formosus), prairie warbler (Dendroica discolor), prothonotary warbler (Protonotaria
citrea), red-headed woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus), rusty blackbird (Euphagus
carolinus), and wood thrush (hylocichla mustelina) as Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC).
BCCs may breed in the Project Area within the specified timelines listed in the IPaC resource
list. Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was returned in the query due to their protection
under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and is not a BCC. IPaC also showed that no
National Wildlife Refuge lands or fish hatcheries are located in the Study Area.
Field Reconnaissance Results
HDR biologists conducted on-site surveys within the Study Area on August 8th and September
19th, 2018, and September 24th, 2019 to verify the presence or absence of potential habitat and
possible individual of federally protected species listed above in Table 1. A summary of habitat
descriptions and the presence/absence of habitat within the Study Area for federally protected
species is provided below.
Vertebrates
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) [Federally Protected under BGEPA]
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: October 1 – May 15
Habitat Description: Bald eagles occur throughout much of the continental U.S. and Canada.
The species frequently builds their nests in live pines or cypress trees near large bodies of
open water and may congregate around fish processing plants, dumps, and below dams where
fish congregate. Nests typically measure 6 to 8 feet deep and 6 feet in diameter, and are cone
shaped. Bald eagles are opportunistic feeders and consume a variety of prey, which may be
self-caught, scavenged, or robbed from other bird species. The threat to this species is
attributed to disturbance and destruction of foraging and nesting habitat by urban and
residential development (USFWS 1978).
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 4

No individuals of bald eagles or nest were observed; therefore, no impacts to this species are
anticipated.
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) [Federally Threatened]
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: May 15 – August 15 (summer); January 15 –
February 15 (winter)
Habitat Description: The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is found across much of the eastern
and north-central U.S. and all Canadian provinces from the Atlantic coast to the southern
Northwest Territories and eastern British Columbia. The species’ range includes 37 states.
White-nose syndrome, a fungal disease known to affect bats, is currently the predominant
threat to this species. The NLEB has two distinct seasonal habitats. Winter habitats include
caves and mines, and summer habitats consist of roosting singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or crevices of both live and dead trees. On rare occurrences this bat has also
been found roosting in man-made structures such as barns or sheds. The NLEB emerges at
dusk to fly through the understory of forested hillsides and ridges feeding on moths, flies,
leafhoppers, caddisflies, and beetles, which they catch while in flight using echolocation. The
bat also feeds by gleaning motionless insects from vegetation and water surfaces (USFWS
2015).
Mature trees (greater than 12 inches in diameter) that exhibit exfoliating bark (i.e., hickories
and oaks) and dead tree snags were observed within the forested portions of the Study Area
and may serve as potential roosting habitat; however, the site was reviewed in accordance
with the NLEB Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES)
between the USACE, Wilmington District, and the Asheville and Raleigh U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Offices, and it was determined that the Project is located outside of the
designated areas and/or 12-digit federally designated hydrologic unit code (HUC) watersheds.
As such, activities associated with construction within the Project limits do not require
prohibited incidental take and the proposed Project meets the criteria for the 4(d) rule; any
associated take is exempted/excepted. As established in the NLEB SLOPES, this Project does
not require prohibited intentional take of the NLEB and it meets the criteria for the 4(d) rule.
Additionally, according to the NCNHP Data Explorer report, no known habitat including
hibernacula and/or maternity roost trees has been documented within or in close proximity to
the Study Area.
Invertebrates
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) [Federally Endangered]
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: Year-round; March 1 – September (optimal)
Habitat Description: The Carolina heelsplitter requires cool, clean, well-oxygenated water. It
prefers stable, silt-free stream bottoms and generally occurs where the stream banks are well-
vegetated with trees and shrubs. Historically, the Carolina heelsplitter was found in several
locations in North and South Carolina. Known populations for the Carolina heelsplitter in Union
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 5

County occur only in the Goose Creek and Duck Creek watersheds within the Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin (USFWS 2011).
According the NCNHP Data Explorer report, there are no known populations of the Carolina
heelsplitter within the Study Area. A known location of designated critical habitat, outside of the
Study Area, was observed to reference the preferred habitat conditions prior to conducting
reconnaissance surveys. In general, on-site streams are moderately degraded and exhibit
erosion, incision, and high sediment levels which are limiting habitat factors for this species. No
mussels of any species were observed and no suitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter is
present within the Study Area. No impacts to this species are anticipated.
Vascular Plants
Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii) [Federally Endangered]
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: May – October
Habitat Description: Michaux’s sumac is endemic to the inner Coastal Plain and lower
Piedmont regions, and grows in sandy or rocky, open, upland woods on acidic or
circumneutral, well-drained sands or sandy loam soils with low cation exchange capacities.
The species is also found on sandy or submesic loamy swales and depressions in the
Sandhills region as well as in openings along the rim of Carolina bays; maintained railroad,
roadside, power line, and utility rights-of-way; areas where forest canopies have been opened
up by blow downs and/or storm damage; small wildlife food plots; abandoned building sites;
under sparse to moderately dense pine or pine/hardwood canopies; and in and along edges of
other artificially maintained clearings undergoing natural succession. In the central Piedmont, it
occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. The plant is shade intolerant and, therefore,
grows best where disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, and periodic fire) maintains its
open habitat (USFWS 1989).
Michaux’s sumac’s preferred habitat and soil types were present in localized areas along
roadside and utility right or ways and edges of the upland hardwood forests throughout the
Study Area. No individuals were observed. Therefore, no impacts to this species are
anticipated.
Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) [Federally Endangered]
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August – October
Habitat Description: Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to the Piedmont of North and South
Carolina. The few sites where this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural
vegetation are in xeric hardpan forests. The species is also found along roadside rights-of-way,
maintained power lines and other utility rights-of-way, edges of thickets and old pastures,
clearings and edges of upland oak-pine-hickory woods, Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and
other sunny or semi-sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, blow
downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open or partially open areas for sunlight. The species
is intolerant of full shade and excessive competition from other vegetation. Schweinitz’s
sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston,
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 6

Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion, among
others (Figure 3A - 3N). It generally grows in shallow sandy soils with high gravel content,
shallow, poor, clayey hardpans, or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived from mafic
rocks (USFWS 1991).
Schweinitz’s sunflower’s preferred habitat and soil types were present in localized areas along
roadside and utility rights-of-way and edges of the upland hardwood forests throughout the
Study Area. A nearby reference population of Schweinitz’s sunflower was visited prior to the
field investigation to familiarize HDR biologists with the species. No individuals were observed
in the Study Area during field investigations. Therefore, no impacts to this species are
anticipated.
Effect Determination
Based on the desktop review of the USFWS county lists, IPaC database, the NCNHP Data
Explorer Report, and the subsequent field survey for the presence or absence of potential
habitat, Project-related activities will have no effect on the bald eagle, Carolina heelsplitter,
Michaux’s sumac, or Schweinitz’s sunflower. The Project may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect, the NLEB but meets the criteria for the 4(d) rule and any associated take is
exempted/excepted.
We respectfully request that you review the Study Area and the attached information to
determine if there may be any adverse impacts to federally protected species or migratory bird
species. If you have any questions or require additional information after your review of the
enclosed materials, please contact me at [phone] or [e-mail].
Respectfully,

Tony Nardo
Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Site Photographs
Figure 1A – 1E. Project Location
Figure 2A – 2G. USGS Topographic Quad maps
Figure 3A – 3N. Soils Map
USFWS IPaC Resources List
NCNHP Project Report NCNHDE-10390
cc: John Shutak, PE – Union County Public Works
Tracy Randazzo, PMP – HDR
Tyler Leben, PE – HDR
Eric Mularski, PWS – HDR
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 7

References
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of Concern
by County for North Carolina. Updated June 27, 2018.
(https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_counties.html)
_____. 2015. Threatened Species Status for the Northern Long-eared Bat with 4(d) Rule. April
2015. (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-04-02/pdf/2015-07069.pdf)
_____. 2011. Fact Sheet for Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). December 2011.
(https://www.fws.gov/asheville/pdfs/CarolinaHeelsplitter_factsheet.pdf)
_____. 1991. Schweinitz’s Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) Determined to be Endangered. May
1991. (https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1852.pdf)
_____. 1989. Determination of Endangered Status for Michaux’s Sumac (Rhus michauxii).
September 1989. (https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1601.pdf)
_____. 1978. Determination of Certain Bald Eagle Populations as Endangered or Threatened. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, W ashington, D.C.
(https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr183.pdf )

Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 8

Photograph 1 – View of Schweinitz’s Sunflower reference population (taken Septmeber 9, 2019)

Photograph 2 – View of Schweinitz’s Sunflower reference population (taken Septmeber 9, 2019)
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 9

Photograph 3 – View of Study Area, (Facing Southeast)

Photograph 4 – View of Study Area, (Facing Northwest)
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 10

Photograph 5 – View of Study Area (Facing Southeast)

Photograph 6 – View of Study Area (Facing Southeast)
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 11

Photograph 7 – View of Study Area (Facing Southeast)

Photograph 8 – View of Study Area (Facing Northeast)
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 12

Photograph 9 – View of Study Area (Facing Northwest)

Photograph 10 – View of Study Area (Facing South)
Yadkin Regional Water Supply Project
May 5, 2019
Page 13

Photograph 11 – View of Study Area (Facing South)

Photograph 12 – View of Study Area (Facing East)

UNION CO UNTY
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\01A_YADKIN_VICINITY.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10 /2019
FIGURE 1A
PROJECT V ICINITY(CLIENT LOGO)
0 0.5Miles
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Union
Stanly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: Esri, Op enStreetM ap contrib uto rs, and the GIS User Co mmu nity
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
NC
Stud yArea
Map Ind ex
A
Stanly, Union, and Anson Counties
Location Map
Nam e:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80.4 40563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\01B_YADKIN_VICINITY.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10 /2019
FIGURE 1B
PROJECT V ICINITY(CLIENT LOGO)
0 0.5Miles
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Union
Stanly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: Esri, Op enStreetM ap contrib uto rs, and the GIS User Co mmu nity
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
NC
Stud yArea
Map Ind ex
B
Stanly, Union, and Anson Counties
Location Map
Nam e:Yad kin Regional Water Sup pl y P roj ectApplicant:Union County Public Wor ks a nd the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties No rth Ca rolinaDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,10 6.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80.4 40563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
STANLY COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\01C_YADKIN_VICINITY.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10 /2019
FIGURE 1C
PROJECT V ICINITY(CLIENT LOGO)
0 0.5Miles
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Union
Stanly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: Esri, Op enStreetM ap contrib uto rs, and the GIS User Co mmu nity
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
NC
Stud yArea
Map Ind ex
C
Stanly, Union, and Anson Counties
Location Map
Nam e:Yad kin Regional Water Sup pl y P roj ectApplicant:Union County Public Wor ks a nd the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties No rth Ca rolinaDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80.4 40563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
ANSON COUNTY
UNION COUNTY
UNION CO UNTY
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\01D_YADKIN_VICINITY.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10 /2019
FIGURE 1D
PROJECT V ICINITY(CLIENT LOGO)
0 0.5Miles
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Union
Stanly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: Esri, Op enStreetM ap contrib uto rs, and the GIS User Co mmu nity
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
NC
Stud yArea
Map Ind ex
D
Stanly, Union, and Anson Counties
Location Map
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
ANSO N COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
MONTGO MERY COUNTY
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\01E_YADKIN_VICINITY.M XD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 1E
PROJECT V ICINITY(CLIENT LOGO)
0 0.5Miles
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Union
Stanly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: Esri, Op enStreetM ap contrib uto rs, and the GIS User Co mmu nity
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
NC
Stud yArea
Map Ind ex E
Stanly, Union, and Anson Counties
Location Map
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
BAKER SQUADRANGLE WATSONQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02A_YADKIN_TOPOGRAPHIC.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 2A
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
A
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
WATSONQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02B_YADKIN_TOPOGRAPHIC.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 2B
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
B
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
WATSONQUADRANGLE OLIVE BRANCHQUADRANGLE
STANFIELDQUADRANGLE OA KBOROQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02C_YADKIN_TOPOGRAPHIC.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 2C
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
C
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
OAKBOROQUADRANGLESTANFIELDQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02D_YADKIN_TOPOGRAPHIC.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 2D
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
D
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
OAKBOROQUADRANGLE
STANFIELDQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02E_YADKIN_TOPOGRAPHIC.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/1 0/2019
FIGURE 2E
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
E
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
AQUADALEQUADRANGLEOAKBOROQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02F_YADKIN_TOPOGRAPHI C.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 2F
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
F
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
AQUADALEQUADRANGLE MOUNT GILEAD W ESTQUADRANGLE
ALBEMARLEQUADRANGLE MORROW MOUNTAINQUADRANGLE
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\02G_YA DKIN_TOPOGRAPHIC.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9 /10/2019
FIGURE 2G
USG S 24K TOPOGRAPHIC Q UADRANG LE(CLIENT LOGO)
0 2,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USA Topo Maps GIS Service - Copyr ight:© 2 013 Nationa l Geo gra phic Soc ie ty, i-cub ed
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
USG S Topo gra phicQuadrangle
G
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
CmB
CmB
TbB2
TbB2
BdB2
TbB2
BdB2
ChA BdB2
ScA
TaB
BdB2
TbB2
TbB2
TbB2
MhA
BdB2
BdB2
ScA
BdB2
CmB
BaB
TbB2
BaB
CmBScA
CmB
BaB
BdB2
TaB
TaB
CmB
BaB
BdC2
BdB2
CmB
TaB
ChA
TbB2
BuB
BdB2
GoC
TbB2
ScA
BaB
TbB2
W
GoC
TbB2
TaB
TbB2
TaB
GsB
TbB2
TaB
BaB
GoC
GsB
WyB
CmB
BdB2
MhA
BaB
TaB
MhA
W BaB
W
BaB
BaB
TbB2
TbB2
GoC
CmB
W
MhA
TbB2
W
TaB
W
GsB
ChA
BdC2
ChA
GoC
WCmB
W
W
GsB
ScA
W
W
BdC2 W CmB BdC2
CmBChA
BdC2
CmB
TaB
TaB
BdB2
W
BdC2
CmB
CmB
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03A_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3A
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
A
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesMhA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam s andy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesTbB2–Siloam s andy loam, 10 to 45 perc ent slopesW–WaterWyB–Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
CmB
TaB
TbB2
CmB
TaB
ChA
TbB2
ChA
ScA
CmB
TbB2
TaB
BdB2
BdB2
TbB2
BdB2
TbB2
BdB2
BaB
TbB2
TaB
TbB2
TaB
TaB
ScA
TaB
BdC2
CmB
TbB2
TaB
TaB
TaB
TaB
ScA
TbB2
TaB
BdB2
TbB2
BdB2
TaB
BdB2
BdB2
BdB2
TbB2
TaB
MhA
BdC2
BaC
BdB2
GsC
BdB2
TaB
TaB
TbB2
TbB2
BdB2
BaB
W
BdB2
TbB2
BdC2
BaB
TbB2
TaB
TaB
BdB2
TaB
BdB2
TaB
BdC2
BdC2
BaB
TbB2
TbB2
TbB2
BdB2
CmB
TbB2
BaB
BdB2
W
TaB
TaB
BaB
BdC2
W
CmB
BdB2
BaB
TaB
BdB2
TbB2
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
W
Ba B
TaB
TaB
MhA
BaB
BaB
TaB
MhA
TaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
W
GoC
GoC
BdB2
BaB
W
BdB2
BdB2
BdC2
ScA
BaCBaC
WyB
W
W
MhA
BdC2
CmB
W
W
BaB
W
TbB2 TbB2 TaB
W
TbB2
TaB
TaB
TaC
CmB
TbB2
BdB2
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03B_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3B
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
B
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesMhA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam s andy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesTbB2–Siloam s andy loam, 10 to 45 perc ent slopesW–WaterWyB–Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
W
ScA
BdB2
BaB
TbB2
BdB2
TbB2
BdC2
BdB2
TbB2
TbB2
BaB
BaB
BdB2
ChA
ChA
BaB
CmB
TbB2
BdB2
BdB2BdB2
BaB
TbB2
GoE
TbB2
BdB2
W
BdB2
GoE
BdB2
BaC
BdC2
GoE
GsC
BdB2
BaC
TbB2
BdC2
TbB2
GsC
BaBGsB
CmB
BaB
GsE
BdB2
BdC2
GoE
TbB2
GoE
BdC2
TaB
BaB
BdC2
BaC
BdB2
TaB
BaC
BaB
ChA
BaB
GsC
GsE
BdB2
BaB
GoE
GoE
GsE
ChA
Bd B2
CmB
BaC
BdB2
GsE
BdC2
GoE
BdC2
ChA
BdC2
BuB
GsB
GsC
ChA
DAM
BdB2
BaC
BdC2
GsE
BdC2
BdC2
BuB
BdC2
BdB2
GoE
GsC
BdB2
W
W
W
ChA
GsC
CmB
CmB
BdC2
ChA
ChA
CmB
WBdC2
GsC
CmB
GoC
ChA
CmB
CmB
CmB
ChA
BdC2
GsC
GsE
Bd B2
W
GoE
W
ChA
BdB2
BdC2
CmBTbB2BdB2
BdC2
W
BdC2
BdC2BdC2
BdB2
BdB2
BaB
TaB
BdC2
ChA
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03C_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3C
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
C
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesMhA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam s andy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesTbB2–Siloam s andy loam, 10 to 45 perc ent slopesW–WaterWyB–Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
BaB
BaB
BdB2
BdC2
TaB
BdB2
BdB2
GsB
BaC
BaB
BdB2
CmB
GsC
BdB2
BaC
BdB2
BdB2
GsC
GoE
GsE
BaB
BdB2
BdB2
BdB2
GsC
TbB2
TbB2
CmB
BaB
ChA
GsCCmB
GsC
BdB2
GsC
GoE
CmB
GsE
TbB2
ChA
BaB
ChA
BaB
BaC
BaC
GsC
GsB
BdB2
BdB2
GsB
GsB
GsC
BdB2
BdC2
BaC
BdC2
BdB2
TbB2
GsC
ChA
TbB2
GsC
GsB
BaB
TbB2
BdB2
BaC
GoC
BaC
BaB
GsE
ChA
GsE
BdC2
BaB
ChA
GsC
GsC
TbB2
CmB
BaB
TbB2
BaB
ChA
BdC2
TbB2
BaB
CmB
BaB
TbB2
GsB
CmB
W
GsC
W
W
BdC2
GsE
CmB
GsE
ChA
BdC2
GsC
GoE
ChA
GsE
GsC
GsC
ChA
TbB2
BdB2
BaC
BdC2
ChA
BaC
GsB
W
ChA
BaC
BaBTaBBdB2
Bd B2
BaC
TbB2
BaC GsC
GsC
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03D_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3D
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
D
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy c lay loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent s lopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent s lopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest s andy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesMhA–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam sandy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesTbB2–Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 45 percent slopesW–WaterWyB–Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
CmB
BaB
BaB
BdB2
TbC2
GsC
BaB
GsBBaB
PaE2
BaB
BaC
TbB2
BaB
BaB
BdB2
TaB
GoE
ChA
TbB2
BaC
TaB
WyC
GoC
BaB
MhA
CeB2
TaC
CmB
BdC2
ChA
BaB
BaB
GsC
BdB2
BdB2
WyB
BdB2
MhA
BdB2
TaC
BdB2
BaB
TaD
BaC
TaB
W
TaC
BdB2
GsC
BaB
GoE
PaE2
TaB
ChA
BaC
BaB
BaB
GsC
BaB
GsE
GsB
BdB2
GsC
GsC
WyB
BaC
MhA
BdB2
BaB
BaB
BdB2
TaB
CmB
GsB
BaB
TaB
BaB
GoE
GsB
GsC
TbB2
GoC
BaB
WyB
BaB
TaB
BdC2
GoC
W
GoC
BaB
BaB
GsC
MhA
BdB2 W
BaB
GsB
BdB2
GsC
W
GsB
GsBBaB
BaC
CmB
BaC
BaC
BaC
MhA
BdB2
MhA
BdC2
GsB
GoE
BdB2
BdC2
BaB
ChA
CmB
W
CmB
BdB2
BdB2BaC
BdC2
BdB2
BdC2
W
GsC
GoE
BdC2
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03E_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3E
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
E
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy c lay loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent s lopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent s lopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest s andy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesMhA–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam sandy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesTbB2–Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 45 percent slopesW–WaterWyB–Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
CmB
CmB BdB2
BaB
CmB
GsC
TaB
GsB
GsB
BdB2
BaB
BaB
GsC
TaC
MhA
GsE
TaB
BaC
ChA
TbB2
TbB2
TbB2
BdB2
BaC
BaB
TaB
BaB
GsB
GsE
GsB
BaB BaB
TaB
TaB
CmB
BaB
GoC
BaB
BaB
GsC
GsCBaB
BaB
BaB
TbC2
WyB
GsB
GsC
BdB2
BdB2
BaC
BaB
TaC
MhA
GsB
BaB
BdB2
GsB
BdB2
GsB
BdB2
BaB GsB
GsB
TbB2
GsB
GsB
CmB
BuB
BaB
BdB2
BaB
MhA
BaB
TaC
TaB
BdB2
BaB
BdB2
TaB
BaB
BaB
W
GsB
BdB2
BdB2
Bd B2
MhA
BaB
TbB2
BdB2
GsB
BaB
BdB2
BdB2
BaB
BdB2
MhA
MhA
BdC2
CmB
GsB
BdB2
TbB2 W
TbB2
TbB2
GsB
GsB
BdC2
GsE
GsB
BaB
W
TaB
BdB2
W
BdB2
Bd B2
ChA
GsC
MhA
GsC
GoC
WyC
BdB2
W
GsC
ChA
GsE
W
BdC2
BdB2
W
Bd B2
GsB
BaC
CmB
GsC BdC2GsC
BaB
W
GsCGoE
GsB
GoE
ChA
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03F_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/201 9
FIGURE 3F
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
F
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesMhA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam s andy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesTbB2–Siloam s andy loam, 10 to 45 perc ent slopesW–WaterWyB–Wynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
CmB
BaB
BaB
GsB
BaB
BdC2
BaB
GsC
GsB
BaB
GsB
BaB
GoC
GsC
MhA
BaB
BdB2
BaB
BaCBaB
BdB2
BuB
GsB
CmB
MhA
BaC
GoC
GsC
GsB
GsC
GsC
BdB2
TaB
BaC
BdB2
GsB
BaC
BaCBaB
BaB
BaB
GsB
BaB
GoC
GsC
GsB
CmB
GsE
BaB
BdB2
BaB
BdB2
GsE
GsB
GsC
GsB
BaB
BaB
BaC
GsB
GsB
BdB2
CmB
BaB
BaB
BdB2
GsB
GoC
BaB
MhA
GsBGsB
BaB
GsE
BdB2
GsB
MhA
BaB
BaB
GsB
BaB
BdB2
W
CmB
GsB
BaBW
GsC
BdB2
BaB
W
W
GsB
ChA
BaC
BaC
GsC
CmB
CmB
GsC
BaB
BdB2BdB2
GsE GsE
BaC
GsB
W
GsE
GsC
W
BaB
GsE
BaB
GsB
CmB
BaB
GsB
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03G_YA DKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/1 0/2019
FIGURE 3G
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
G
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes , frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes , frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine s andy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine s andy loam, 15 to 45 perc ent slopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex , 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex , 15 to 25 percent slopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex , 8 to 15 percent slopes , moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex , 15 to 25 percent slopes , moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie s andy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesGsC–Poplar Forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes , moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesMhA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 8 to 15 perc ent s lopesScA–Rhodhiss sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent s lopesTaB–Siloam s andy loam, 4 to 10 perc ent s lopesTbB2–Siloam s andy loam, 10 to 45 perc ent s lopesW–W aterWyB–W ynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
UNION CO UNTY
STANLY COUN TY
GsC
GsB
BaB
GsB
GsC
GsE
GsB
BaB
BaB
BaC
GsE
GsC
GsC
GoE
GsB
BaB
GsC
GsC
GsC
GsE
BdB2
GsE
GsB
GoC
GsC
BaB
BaB
GoE
BaB
BdB2
BaB
GsB
GsC
ChA
BaC
GsB
GoE
GsB
GsB
GsC
TaB
GoE
GsB
GoC
ChA
GsE
CmB
BaB
GoE
GsC
BdB2
BdB2
BaB
GoE
GsC
GsC
GsC
GsE
BaB
GsC
GsC
BdB2
GsE
BdB2
GsE
W
ChA
ChA
GsC
GsC
BdC2
GsE
CmB
CmB
GsC
GsC
CmB
CmB
GsB
BaC
BaB
W
GsC CmB
W
BdB2
W
GsC
CmB
GsB
GsC
GsE
GsE
GsE
BaB
ChA
GsB
GsC
GoC
BaB
GoF
GoF
GoF
BaD
BaD
GoF
GoF
GoF
BaB
GoC
OaA
GoF
BaD BaD
MhBGoC
BaB
BaD
CoA
CoA
OaA
GoF
GoCGoC
BaB
BaDBaB
OaA
GoC BaB
GoF
BaF
BaD
W
BaD
OaA
BaD
BaD
BaB
GoF
GoF
BaF
BaD
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoC
W
CoA
BaD
OaA
CoA
GoCBaB
BaD
BaD
MhB
BaD
BaB
BaD
GoCGoC
BaD
GoC
GoF
CoA
MhBGoC
CoA
OaA
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03H_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3H
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION AND STANLY COUNTIES NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
H
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedBaC–Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes , frequently floodedBdB2–Dan River loam, 0 to 2 perc ent slopes, frequently floodedBdC2–Devotion fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesBuB–Devotion fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesChA–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmB–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesGoC–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedGoE–Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsB–Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesGsC–Poplar Forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedGsE–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesMhA–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesScA–Rhodhis s sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesTaB–Siloam sandy loam, 4 to 10 perc ent slopesTbB2–Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 45 percent slopesW–W aterWyB–W ynott gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopes
On-Site Soils (UNION COUNTY)
BaB –Badin c hannery s ilt loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesBaD–Badin c hannery s ilt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesBaF–Badin c hannery s ilt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesBbB–Badin-Urban land complex , 2 to 8 perc ent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land complex , 8 to 25 percent s lopesCoA–Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedEcB–Enon c obbly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesEcD–Enon c obbly loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopesEnC–Enon very c obbly loam, 4 to 15 perc ent slopes , very stonyGmC–Georgeville s ilt loam, 4 to 15 percent s lopes, ex t remely boulderyGmF–Georgeville s ilt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes, ex tremely boulderyGoC–Golds ton very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent s lopesGoF–Golds ton very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesHeD–Hiwas see gravelly loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopesKkB–Kirksey s ilt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesLgB–Lloy d gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesMhB–Mis enheimer c hannery silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesOaA–Oak boro silt loam, 0 to 2 perc ent slopes , frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesTbD–Tarrus channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus channery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes , moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus-Urban land complex , 2 to 8 perc ent slopesW–W ater
On-Site Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
UNION CO UNTY
MhB
GoC
GoC
GoC
GoF
GoC
GoF
GoC
GoC BaD
BaB
GoF
BaB
GoC
OaA
GoF
KkB
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaB
BaD
KkB
KkB
MhB
BaB
GoC
BaB
BaB
BaB
GoF
MhB
GoF GoC
GoC
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaD
GoF
BaB
BaD
GoF
MhB
BaF
BaD
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaB
GoF
MhB
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaD
BaB
GoC
KkB
GoF
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaF
MhB
BaB
GoC
GoF
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaD
KkB
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaB
KkB
KkB
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaD
W
BaD
BaB
GoF
BaB
BaB
W
GoF
BaB
MhB GoC
KkB
BaF
BaDGoC
BaD
OaA
BaB
BaF
BaF
BaD
BaD
BaB
MhB
W
W
BaD
GoC
KkB
BaD
BaD
BaB
GoC
BaB
GoC
MhB
BaB
W
GoC
BaB
GoC
BaB
KkB
BaB
W
BaB
Ba B
MhB
GoF
GoC
BaB
KkB BaB
Ba B
GoC
KkB
GoF
KkB
GoC
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03I_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2 019
FIGURE 3I
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF STAN LY COU NTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
I
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Badin c hannery s ilt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesBaD–Badin c hannery s ilt loam, 8 to 15 perc ent s lopesBaF–Badin c hannery s ilt loam, 15 to 45 perc ent s lopesBbB–Badin-Urban land complex , 2 to 8 percent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land complex , 8 to 25 percent slopesCoA–Congaree fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 perc ent s lopes, frequently floodedEcB–Enon cobbly loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesEcD–Enon cobbly loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopesEnC–Enon very cobbly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very s tonyGmC–Georgeville silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes , extremely boulderyGmF–Georgeville silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes , extremely boulderyGoC–Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopesGoF–Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesHeD–Hiwassee gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesKkB–Kirks ey s ilt loam, 0 t o 6 percent slopesLgB–Lloyd gravelly loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesMhB–Misenheimer channery silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesOaA–Oakboro silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesTbD–Tarrus c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus c hannery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus c hannery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus-Urban land complex , 2 to 8 percent slopesW–W ater
On-Site Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
MhBKkB
GoC
MhB
BaB
GoC
BaB
KkB
GoC
MhB
GoC
KkB
GoC
Ur
KkB
BaB
GoF
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoF
GoCOaA
GoC
BaB
GoC
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaB
GoF
GoC
GoC
BbB
BaB
MhB
KkB
BaD
BaD
GoC
BbB
BaB
GoC
KkB
BaB
GoC
GoC
GoC
BbB
KkB
MhB
BaD
GoC
GoC
BbB
MhB BaB
TdB
BaD
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
MhB
BaB
MhB
BaB
GoC
BaB
GoC
BaB BaB
BaB
BaB GoC
GoC
BaB
BaD
GoC
GoC
GoF
GoC
GoCBaD
BaB
GoC
GoF
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
KkB
BbB
BaB
BaD
GoC
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoC
GoC
BaB
GoC
GoC
GoC
MhB
W
BaB
BaD
GoF
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaD
OaA
OaA
BaD
GoF
BaD
GoF
BaD
GoC
GoC
KkB
KkB
GoF GoC
BaD
KkB
KkB
OaA
BaD
GoF
GoC
GoF
W
GoC
KkB
BaF
Ba B
W
BaB
BaB
KkB
KkB
BaD
KkB
KkB
GoF
GoCKkB
GoC
BaD
W
KkB
KkB
GoC
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03J_YADKIN_SOI LS.MXD - USER : EKOCH - D ATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3J
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF STAN LY COU NTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
J
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Badin c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesBaD–Badin c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesBaF–Badin c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesBbB–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 8 to 25 perc ent slopesCoA–Congaree fine s andy loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes, frequently floodedEcB–Enon c obbly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesEcD–Enon c obbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEnC–Enon very cobbly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyGmC–Georgeville s ilt loam, 4 to 15 perc ent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGmF–Georgeville s ilt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGoC–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent s lopesGoF–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesHeD–Hiwassee gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesKkB–Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6 percent s lopesLgB–Lloy d gravelly loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesMhB–Mis enheimer channery silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesOaA–Oak boro silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes , frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus c hannery s ilt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesTbD–Tarrus c hannery s ilt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus c hannery s ilty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus c hannery s ilty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes , moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 percent slopesW–W ater
On-Si te Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
ANSO N COUNTY
GoE
BgD
W ShA
BgB
BgC
BgDGoE
GoC
GoF
GoC
GoC
BaB
Ud
GoC
Pt
GoFGoF
GoC
GoF
GoF
W
GoF
BaD
OaA
BaB
GoF
BaD BaB
OaA
GoC
GoC
KkB
BaB
GmC
W
BaB
BaB
KkB
GoF
GmF
Ba B
CoA
GoF
OaA
BaB
GoF
GoC
GoF
BaB
GoC
KkB
OaA
BaD
BaB
GoF
GoF
Ba B
GoF
BaD
GoC
GoC
GoC
BaB GoC
BaB
GoF
GoC
BaD
GoF
MhB
Ud
GoF
GoC
BaB
HeB
BaD
BaD
BaD
BaB
KkB
BaB
BaD
BaB EnC
BaB
BaB
BaD
GoF
GoC
W
BaD
BaD
W
GoC
BaB
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaB
BaB
GoC
BaD
GoF GoC
GoC
OaA
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaD
MhB
BaB
BaD
DAM
BaD
BaD
BaD
BaD
Ud
TbB
BaD
BaB
CoA
GoC
BaB
GoF
OaA
GoC
W
BaD
W
MhB
BaD
BaB
W
W
OaA
BaDBaB
GoC
W
GoC
GoC
GoC
GoF
GoF
W
GoCBaD
GoC
GoC
OaA
MhB
BaDBaD
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03K_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3K
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF STAN LY COU NTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7), Stanly Coun ty,NC (201 7), and An son Cou nty, NC (2 017)
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
K
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Badin c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesBaD–Badin c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesBaF–Badin c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesBbB–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 8 to 25 perc ent slopesCoA–Congaree fine s andy loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes, frequently floodedEcB–Enon c obbly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesEcD–Enon c obbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEnC–Enon very cobbly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyGmC–Georgeville s ilt loam, 4 to 15 perc ent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGmF–Georgeville s ilt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGoC–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent s lopesGoF–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesHeD–Hiwassee gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesKkB–Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6 percent s lopesLgB–Lloy d gravelly loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesMhB–Mis enheimer channery silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesOaA–Oak boro silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes , frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus c hannery s ilt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesTbD–Tarrus c hannery s ilt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus c hannery s ilty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus c hannery s ilty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes , moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 percent slopesW–W ater
On-Si te Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
KkB
MhB
GoC
TbB
GoC
GoC
GoF
BbB
GoF
TbB
TbB
BaD
KkB
GoC
KkB
GoC
GmC
GoC
GoC
TbB
TbD
TbB
GoF
MhB
GmF
TbB
GmC
GoC
MhB
TbB
GmC
GoF
BaB
BaB
BaB
BaB
OaA
TaF
BaB
BaB
GoCTbB
MhB
BaB
BaB
TbB
BaB
MhB
GoC
GoF
BaB
KkB
TbD
KkB
BaD
KkB
OaA
TbB
GoF
BaB
GoF
BaB
BaB
BaD
GoC
TbD
TbD
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaD
GmF
GoF
BaB
GoC
TbD
BaB
GoC
GoC
GmF
GoF
GoC
GoC
BaB
TbD
BaB
KkB
BaD
GoC
MhB
BaB
BaB
BaB
GmC
GmF
TbB
GoC
BaB
MhB
GoF
EnC
TbD
MhB
GmC
GoC
BaB
GoC
BaB
GoC
MhBMhB
TbD
Ud
TbB
BaD
TbB
BaB
BaB
GoC
GoC
BaB
W
BaD
BaD
BaD
GoF
MhB
GoC
MhB
MhB
BaB
TbB
GoC
BaB
BaD
BaB
BaB
GoC BaB
GoC
GoF
BaD
MhB
GoC
BaD
BaD
BaD
W
OaA
BaB
BaD
GoC
KkBTbD
BaB
BaB
BaB
KkB
MhBBaB
GoF
GoC
MhB
MhB
TbD
BaB
KkB
BaB
W
BaB
BaB W
BaD
MhB
W
W
TbD
BaB
GoC
W
BaB
OaA
Ba B
GoF
W
GoC
W
BaD
GoF
GoC
OaA
W
BaB
BaB
MhB
BaB
GmF
GoC
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03L_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/201 9
FIGURE 3L
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF STAN LY COU NTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
L
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Badin c hannery silt loam, 2 t o 8 perc ent slopesBaD–Badin c hannery silt loam, 8 t o 15 perc ent slopesBaF–Badin c hannery silt loam, 15 t o 45 perc ent slopesBbB–Badin-Urban land c omplex , 2 to 8 percent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land c omplex , 8 to 25 percent slopesCoA–Congaree fine s andy loam, 0 t o 2 perc ent slopes , frequently floodedEcB–Enon cobbly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesEcD–Enon cobbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEnC–Enon very cobbly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes , very stonyGmC–Georgeville silt loam, 4 t o 15 perc ent slopes , extremely boulderyGmF–Georgeville silt loam, 15 t o 45 perc ent slopes , extremely boulderyGoC–Goldston very c hannery silt loam, 4 to 15 perc ent s lopesGoF–Goldston very c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 perc ent slopesHeD–Hiwass ee gravelly loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopesKkB–Kirk s ey silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesLgB–Lloy d gravelly loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesMhB–Misenheimer c hannery silt loam, 0 t o 4 perc ent slopesOaA–Oak boro silt loam, 0 to 2 perc ent slopes , frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus channery s ilt loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesTbD–Tarrus channery s ilt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus channery s ilty c lay loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus channery s ilty c lay loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopes, moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesW–W at er
On-Site Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
BaD
GoC
GoC MhB
OaA
OaA
TdB
BbB
Ud
GoF
EcB
GoC
Ud
BaB
EcB
BaD
GoF
EcB
BaD
OaA
EcB
BaB
EcD
BaB
TbB
EcB
BaB
BbB
BaB
EcD
TdB
TcB2
EnC
MhB
TcB2
EcD
BbB
TbB
BbD
GoC
GoC
BaD
GoF
GoF
BaB
BaD
KkB
MhB
TcB2
BaD
BbB
BaD
BbB
GoC
EcD
GoC
GoF
GoF
EcB
BaB
BaB
GoF
Ur
TcD2
EcB
EnE
BaD
TcB2
MhB
KkB
BbD
EcD
GoFBaB
TcB2
BaB
BaB
GoF
GmF
BaD
TdB
BaD
BaB
BbD
TbB
EnC BaB
GoF
EnC
BaF
TbB
BaD
TbB
EcD
BaB
EnC
GoF
BaD
BaF
BaB
BaB
GoC
GmC
TbB
TcB2EcB
BaD
KkB
GoC
BaB
MhB
BaD
GoC
BaB
W
BaD
EnE
TbD
BaD
TbB
TbB
GoC
EcB
EcB
GoF
TcB2
BaB
TbB
TbB
TbB
BaB
TbB
GmC
EcBMhB
EcD
EnE
BaD
BbD
EcB
MhB
EcB
GoF
BaB
BaB
BaB BaD
TcB2
BaF
GoF
BbD
MhB
EcD
KkB
BaD
BbD
BaB
W
BbD
BaB
TbB
EcB
EcB
EcD
BaB
W
GoC
TbB
BaB
GoC
GoC
GoF
BaD
TcB2
GoC
BaB
W
BaB
GoC
W
BaD
KkB
EnC
BaB
EcD
KkB
BaB
GoF
TcB2
TbB
EcD
BaB
TdB
LgB
GoF
GoF
EnE
BaB
TcB2
BaDKkB
EcB
TbB
GoF
BaB
BaB
MhB
BaB
GoF
BaD
BaD
BaD
GoF
BaB
BaB
MhB
BaB
MhB
GoC W
GoF
BbD
W
BaB
GoC
Ba B
GoF
GoC
GoF
TbB
EnC EnC
BbD
EcBMhB
BbD
TbD
GoC
GoC EcB
BaF
GoC
EcB
BaB GmC
BaB
GoF
BbB
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03M _YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3M
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF STAN LY COU NTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
M
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Badin c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesBaD–Badin c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesBaF–Badin c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesBbB–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 8 to 25 perc ent slopesCoA–Congaree fine s andy loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes, frequently floodedEcB–Enon c obbly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesEcD–Enon c obbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEnC–Enon very cobbly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyGmC–Georgeville s ilt loam, 4 to 15 perc ent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGmF–Georgeville s ilt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGoC–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent s lopesGoF–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesHeD–Hiwassee gravelly loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopesKkB–Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6 percent s lopesLgB–Lloy d gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesMhB–Mis enheimer channery silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesOaA–Oak boro s ilt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes , frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesTbD–Tarrus c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus c hannery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus c hannery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes , moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 percent slopesW–W ater
On-Site Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
STANLY COUN TY
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
W
TdB
BaD
BaD
BaD
BbD
BbB
GoF
TcB2
BaD
BbD
BbD
BaD
EnC
EcB
EnC
BbB
EnC
BaD
OaA
HeD
EcD
UrBbD
Bb B
TcB2
BaD
TcB2
BaD TbB
Ur
TcB2
TdB
TcB2
EnE
TcD2
BbB
BbD
TcB2
BbD
BaF
BbD
GeB
EnE
EnE
OaA
BaD
TcB2
BaD
BaB
TcB2
TdB
EcD
TdB
BbB EcD
TcB2
BaD
TdB
TdB
EnC
EnE
EcB
BaF
BbD
Ud
TcB2
BaD
BaD
BbB
W
TcB2
TdB
TcB2
GoF
W
TcB2
KkB
TcB2
BaB
BaD
EcB
TdB
BbB
W
GoF
GoF
BaD
BaD
TdB
BaD
BaF
KkB
GoF
BbD
EcD
TcB2
TcD2
BaF
BbD
GmC
TcB2
W
TcB2
GoF
BaB
BbD
BbD
OaA
KkB
GoF
GoF
TbB
BaD
EnC
EcD
BbD
BaB
BaD
GoC
W
BaB
BaB
TbB
BaDBaD
TdB
W
GmC
W
BaB GoF
TcD2
TdB
GmC
W
TcD2
PATH: \\CLTSMAIN\GIS_DATA\GIS\PROJECTS\3096_UNIONCO\10051744 _YRWSP_PROGRAM_MANAGEM ENT\7.2_WORK_IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCS\MXD\PJD\03N_YADKIN_SOILS.MXD - USER: EKOCH - DATE: 9/10/2019
FIGURE 3N
NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF STAN LY COU NTY NC(CLIENT LOGO)
0 1,000Feet
O
PR ELIMINA RY JURISDICTIONAL DETERM INATIO N
Union
St anly
Anson
Cabarrus
DATA SOUR CE: USDA NRCS S oil Survey o fUnion Coun ty, NC (201 7) an d Sta nly County,NC (201 7).
LEGEND
Study Ar ea
So il Map Units
Hydric Rat ing
Hydric (1 - 32%)
N
YADKIN REGIONAL WAT ER S UPPLY PROJECT
Map Ind ex
BaB –Badin c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent s lopesBaD–Badin c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesBaF–Badin c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesBbB–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesBbD–Badin-Urban land c omplex, 8 to 25 perc ent slopesCoA–Congaree fine s andy loam, 0 to 2 percent s lopes, frequently floodedEcB–Enon c obbly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesEcD–Enon c obbly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesEnC–Enon very cobbly loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyGmC–Georgeville s ilt loam, 4 to 15 perc ent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGmF–Georgeville s ilt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopes, ex tremely boulderyGoC–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent s lopesGoF–Golds ton very c hannery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent s lopesHeD–Hiwassee gravelly loam, 8 to 15 perc ent slopesKkB–Kirksey silt loam, 0 to 6 percent s lopesLgB–Lloy d gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent s lopesMhB–Mis enheimer channery silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesOaA–Oak boro s ilt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes , frequently floodedTbB–Tarrus c hannery silt loam, 2 to 8 perc ent slopesTbD–Tarrus c hannery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent s lopesTcB2–Tarrus c hannery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedTcD2–Tarrus c hannery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes , moderately erodedTdB–Tarrus-Urban land c omplex, 2 to 8 percent slopesW–W ater
On-Site Soils (STANLY COUNTY)
Name:Yadkin Regional Water Suppl y Proj ectApplicant:Union County Public Works and the Townof NorwoodLocation:Stanly and Union Counties North Caroli naDate:09/06/2019Study Area:1,106.36 acresCenter Coordinates:-80 .440563°, 35.066787°
IPaC: Explore Location Page 1 of 11
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -
specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed
activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
offices) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Stanly and Union counties, North Carolina
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]t�
1B [phone]t�
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

lPaC: Explore Location Page 2 of 11
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the
species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam
upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact
the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site
conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project
area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific
information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of
such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal
agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be
obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see
directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, lease return to the IPaC website and
request an official species list by doing the followin
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT,
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed Species
'- and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA Fisherlesz).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list.
Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

INC: Explore Location
Page 3 of 11
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the
critical habitat.
htt s://ecas.fw5. ov/ec /s ecies/3534
Flowering Plants
NAM E
M' h ' S Rh h
Threatened
STATUS
Endangered
0
STATUS
is aux s umac us mic auxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217 !�p
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzil Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws,g vo /ecp species/3a49
i
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
k--%%
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act?.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

INC: Explore Location Page 4 of 11
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratocybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of
Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more
about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, seethe FAQ below. This
is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be
found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted
birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mal2ping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are
available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information
about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report,
can be found below.
.1 . N %00�
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IFA BREEDING
.....................................................................................
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD
..........................................................................................
❑N YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
.....................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
........................................................................
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
.............................................................
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A
VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE
....................................................................................
DATES INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD
....................................................................................
BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE
............................................................................
RANGE. `BREEDS ELSEWHERE"
...................................................................................
INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES
.........................................................................................
NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR
............................................................................
PROJECT AREA.)
..........................................
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or
activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

INC: Explore Location Page 5 of 11
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC} throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska. A r�
1
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus�Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska. �
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina I Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities
to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this
report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used
to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week
where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

lPaC: Explore Location
Page 6 of 11
example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of
them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is
calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week
of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1) N % V
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid celI(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is
expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse Cursor aver the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPEC ES �O
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
(This is not a Bird of
Conservation Concern
..............................................
(BCC) in this area, but
............................................
warrants attention
......................................
because ofthe Eagle
..........................................
Act or for potential
.......................................
susceptibilities in
...................................
offshore areas from
.........................................
certain types of
................................
development or
..............................
activities.)
.....................
]AN
probability of presence breeding season survey effort — no data
FEB REAR APR MAY IUV JUL AUG SEP OC- VOv DEC
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

lPaC: Explore Location
Page 7 of I I
Eastern Whip -poor- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----
will
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
.C.o.n.s.e.rva.ti�n..E.�.n.ce.r.n.
.. . .. . .. ..... ..
(BCC) throughout its
range in the
.........................
continental USA and
Alaska.)
................
Kentucky Warbler 4- — -4 -4-- 1 I 1 j5___ —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
.... ............. ...........................
—
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the
continental USA and
Ala
Prairie Warbler —+++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
{rhis
is a
Bird of
Co ... ....... ti concern
{BCC] throughout its ,
range in t ' he
cantlnen[
l USA and
Alaska,)
Prothonotary 4 F 1 4 j I 11 1 1 P I + + -I- — 4-
Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
.. ..... ... (This 1.s.a..Bird of
Conservation .--.6-ncern
range -i-n-the
.
pand -nen - tal U -SA-.-....-
Alaska...
and
. ............. 0
r I
Red-headed +411 A I k tj- I I I I
woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This -is"a BIr'd_ of . ............
.................................
Conservation Concern
(B_cc) throughout its
range in the
continental USA and
. .... ............. .............
Alaska)
. .... ......
Rusty Blackbird 1 +4-+4- 4- +4-4-1- +4-4--4- 4-+4-- 4-1-
BCC Rangewide {CON]
V—
(This Is a Bird of
..... ...... .. ..........
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
..........................................
ran g�aj * n ­ the * ' '
contin
USA and
Alaska.)
................
Wood Thrush + -4- 4-+ +4- ++++ . . . . +++-4- + + +
BCC Rangewide (CON) 'III lip' "I'
Bird(This is a of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the
continental USA and
Alaska.)
................
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

INC: Explore Location
Page 8 of 11
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in
the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding
their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be
breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be
advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present
on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCCI and other species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
AL �N . The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey: banding._and citizen_science_datas-ets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 1 Okm grid cell(s) which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location?,�
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn
more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of
Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you
are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of ornithology NeotropicaI Birds guide. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area,
there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the
bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

lPaC: Explore Location
Page 9 of 11
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid
and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more
information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and
requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird
species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also
offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including
migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information, For additional information on marine bird
tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin0,�4
g.
What if I have m on eagles list?
g Y
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur.
oe
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
�ON\
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern.
To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project
area, please see the FAQ' What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cells) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey
effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of
concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which
means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in
knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project
activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about
conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your
migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
11.I�e77�1e7�►[�1e7�1�LeliA�1�DL����1:IG�[�Z���I[�7��
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

lPaC: Explore Location
Page 10 of 11
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District,
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our
NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the..acXuaI extent of
wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAN❑
PF01A
PSS1A
PF01C
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
LAKE
L1 UBHh
RIVERINE
R2UBH
R4SBC
R5U8H
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use
of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the
amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata
should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the
actual conditions on site.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

IPaC: Explore Location Page 11 of 11
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery
as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic
vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some
deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas shoufid seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and prop rietaryjurisdictions that may affect such
activities.
�o�
Foy
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/5JNGKKLDDNGZRLAUGPIPPX3AVU/resources 10/2/2019

NCNHDE-10390
October 4, 2019
Johanna Velasquez
HDR Inc
440 S. Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: Yadkin_YRWSP; 10051744
Dear Johanna Velasquez:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Yadkin_YRWSP
Project No. 10051744
October 4, 2019
NCNHDE-10390
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Freshwater
Bivalve
19715 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2002-05-21 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S3
Natural
Community
30090 Dry-Mesic
Oak--Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
---2011-04-26 B 2-High ------G4G5 S4
Natural
Community
3144 Dry Basic
Oak--Hickory Forest
---2010 B 2-High ------G2G3 S2S3
Natural
Community
30092 Mesic Mixed Hardwood
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
---2011-04-26 B 2-High ------G3G4 S4
Natural
Community
31133 Piedmont Alluvial
Forest
---2011-04-26 BC 2-High ------G4 S4
Natural
Community
31139 Piedmont Levee Forest
(Typic Subtype)
---2011-04-26 C 2-High ------G3G4 S3S4
Vascular Plant 13737 Baptisia alba Thick-pod White Wild
Indigo
2007-05-01 BC 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S2
Vascular Plant 17248 Boechera
missouriensis
Missouri Rockcress 1956-04-07 H 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G5 S1S2
Vascular Plant 2635 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1992-10-02 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 10422 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1991-07-26 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 166 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1989-09-13 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 12775 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1991-07-26 C 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Page 2 of 8
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Vascular Plant 10423 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 2007-09-13 C 2-High ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 28570 Primula meadia Shooting-star 1975-04-13 H 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S2S3
Vascular Plant 10837 Symphyotrichum
concinnum
Narrow-leaved Smooth
Aster
1956-09-24 F 3-Medium ---Threatened G5T4 S2
Vascular Plant 9741 Symphyotrichum
concinnum
Narrow-leaved Smooth
Aster
1987-09-22 F 3-Medium ---Threatened G5T4 S2
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Long Creek Slate Slopes R3 (High)C4 (Moderate)
New Salem Branch R5 (General)C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
*NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on October 4, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q3 Jul 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 8
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Yadkin_YRWSP
Project No. 10051744
October 4, 2019
NCNHDE-10390
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Amphibian 11637 Ambystoma
talpoideum
Mole Salamander 2002-01-31 E 4-Low ---Special
Concern
G5 S2S3
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
26059 Gomphurus septima Septima's Clubtail 2008-05-13 BC 5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G2 S3
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
31241 Gomphurus septima Septima's Clubtail 1989-04-28 E 4-Low ---Significantly
Rare
G2 S3
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33735 Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S2?
Freshwater
Bivalve
19715 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2002-05-21 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
19515 Toxolasma pullus Savannah Lilliput 2009-05-13 E 3-Medium ---Endangered G2 S2
Freshwater
Bivalve
29558 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell 2009-05-13 E 3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G4 S4
Freshwater
Bivalve
16905 Villosa vaughaniana Carolina Creekshell 2016-06-01 E 3-Medium ---Endangered G2G3 S3
Freshwater Fish 9284 Moxostoma robustum Robust Redhorse 1992?X 3-Medium ---Endangered G1 S1
Natural
Community
30090 Dry-Mesic
Oak--Hickory Forest
(Piedmont Subtype)
---2011-04-26 B 2-High ------G4G5 S4
Natural
Community
3144 Dry Basic
Oak--Hickory Forest
---2010 B 2-High ------G2G3 S2S3
Natural
Community
30091 Dry Oak--Hickory
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
---2015 B 2-High ------G4G5 S4
Natural
Community
30092 Mesic Mixed Hardwood
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
---2011-04-26 B 2-High ------G3G4 S4
Natural
Community
31133 Piedmont Alluvial
Forest
---2011-04-26 BC 2-High ------G4 S4
Page 4 of 8
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Natural
Community
31134 Piedmont Alluvial
Forest
---2011-06-08 C 2-High ------G4 S4
Natural
Community
27166 Piedmont Basic Glade
(Typic Subtype)
---2008-09-04 B 2-High ------G2 S2
Natural
Community
27144 Piedmont Cliff (Basic
Subtype)
---2008-10-14 B 2-High ------G2?S1
Natural
Community
31139 Piedmont Levee Forest
(Typic Subtype)
---2011-04-26 C 2-High ------G3G4 S3S4
Vascular Plant 13737 Baptisia alba Thick-pod White Wild
Indigo
2007-05-01 BC 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S2
Vascular Plant 29697 Baptisia alba Thick-pod White Wild
Indigo
2011-06-08 C 2-High ---Threatened G5 S2
Vascular Plant 26251 Baptisia alba Thick-pod White Wild
Indigo
2008-06-03 C 2-High ---Threatened G5 S2
Vascular Plant 17248 Boechera
missouriensis
Missouri Rockcress 1956-04-07 H 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G5 S1S2
Vascular Plant 26192 Boechera
missouriensis
Missouri Rockcress 2008-05-12 BC 2-High ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G5 S1S2
Vascular Plant 26193 Boechera
missouriensis
Missouri Rockcress 2008-05-13 BC 2-High ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G5 S1S2
Vascular Plant 3305 Eurybia mirabilis Piedmont Aster 2011-06-08 A 3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
Throughout
G3 S3
Vascular Plant 23358 Eurybia mirabilis Piedmont Aster 2008-04-22 B 2-High ---Significantly
Rare
Throughout
G3 S3
Vascular Plant 26189 Eurybia mirabilis Piedmont Aster 2008-05-13 B 2-High ---Significantly
Rare
Throughout
G3 S3
Vascular Plant 12805 Eurybia mirabilis Piedmont Aster 2008-09-04 B 2-High ---Significantly
Rare
Throughout
G3 S3
Page 5 of 8
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Vascular Plant 26188 Eurybia mirabilis Piedmont Aster 2008-05-12 B 2-High ---Significantly
Rare
Throughout
G3 S3
Vascular Plant 2635 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1992-10-02 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 10422 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1991-07-26 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 11742 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1992-10-02 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 166 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1989-09-13 F 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 12775 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 1991-07-26 C 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 10423 Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower 2007-09-13 C 2-High ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S3
Vascular Plant 13021 Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's Sunflower 1957-09 X 3-Medium Endangered Endangered G3 S3
Vascular Plant 23351 Paspalum dissectum Mudbank Crown Grass 1957-09-17 H 3-Medium ---Endangered G4?S2
Vascular Plant 28570 Primula meadia Shooting-star 1975-04-13 H 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S2S3
Vascular Plant 29698 Primula meadia Shooting-star 2011-06-08 C 2-High ---Threatened G5 S2S3
Vascular Plant 10837 Symphyotrichum
concinnum
Narrow-leaved Smooth
Aster
1956-09-24 F 3-Medium ---Threatened G5T4 S2
Vascular Plant 9741 Symphyotrichum
concinnum
Narrow-leaved Smooth
Aster
1987-09-22 F 3-Medium ---Threatened G5T4 S2
Vascular Plant 26289 Tradescantia virginiana Virginia Spiderwort 2008-04-22 C 2-High ---Threatened G5 S2S3
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Long Creek Slate Slopes R3 (High)C4 (Moderate)
YAD/Crooked Creek Aquatic Habitat R3 (High)C4 (Moderate)
New Salem Branch R5 (General)C5 (General)
Page 6 of 8
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Polk Mountain R3 (High)C4 (Moderate)
Baucom Bluff R4 (Moderate)C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Three Rivers Land Trust Easement Land Trust for Central North Carolina Private
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on October 4, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q3 Jul 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 7 of 8
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 8 of 8