310384_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200618

W Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q/Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
5' 30 pv"
Date of Visit: �$- Arrival Time: I� Departure Time County: LI TJ Region: W 1 O
6-2f-2o 3 a 1La
Farm Name: "® ML%1EA P CflfiM5 NC Owner Email:
Owner Name: k6c kyi-s� CMK NaaPp-R-tIES LLB- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �"fm 000RE Title:
Onsite Representative: G (LEER. Moo,2-C Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: W AI>G W Al2-12 Certification Number: qq9 yq_.
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 310-+$ J500
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Pnultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[+ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[]No ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
YNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
✓ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
r a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I— 3 — 5
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): , 5 H , S
Observed Freeboard (in): R 9 2>0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [:]Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect d application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. O Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): e)&p
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Ed -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[2 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - -3%4 jDate of Inspection: I `A0 v
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [�J/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E;4
❑ Yes [A
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
EVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E O
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
F3vS1�ln� to `f}•e +oe o�the dike Walk, Ioj's o!� do' �et,neI� wor-/-z- orr -fh;s When bVid,00S
Jos ne e d S �a {�e lone oh o, r e s�' o an I -I F'°rt , O Se 4ofs o; I -F0 help ;,,1:4,1 ec�v�r
-. ova i/'ie 1 0.C. 360 m;nLJ;eS is f-0 long anal Ms" 1+.,'t �� �8��5('
�ull fas�r 1� a� /r�'Y9al �.c.,
WI,;u, e��ds tk i��ro11;� loar�`�*.� �Q of
W�
S e n ure f k, W IA cogs all Qvv,� P i v+q o�o.%e s,
newt 1S �ce►ved C1. �e tl,¢ WA aF �-1�aoae an
SAy"` le"--1- s ,
�A a��v� `e.: ri Wee is ly &IGC'k 1,i ve C Gr at S�
IDS
�001710s Ong
Reviewer/Inspector Name: So N jJ RAQRy Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: '':�aaC9
Page 3 of 3 21412015