20120064 Ver 1_Meeting Minutes_Site Visit_June 16 2020_20200618

Strickland, Bev
From: Wiesner, Paul
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 3:42 PM
To: Davis, Erin B
Cc: Kim Browning; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Allen, Melonie; Tsomides
Harry; Phillips, Kelly D
Subject: Meeting Minutes -Crooked Creek #2- Credit Release Site Visit -June 16, 2020_DMS#
94687 SAW# 2011-02201 DWR# 20120064
Attachments: Crooked Cr II_94687_IRT Site Visit Memo -June 2020.pdf
Erin,
The meeting minutes from the June 16, 2020 IRT credit release site visit at the Crooked Creek #2 site are attached.
Please let us know if you have any questions, comments or concerns.
Harry,
Please include the final meeting minutes in the 2020 MY5 report for reference.
Thanks
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
828-273-1673 Mobile
Pau l.wiesnera-ncdenr.gov
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville, N.C. 28801
D- E Q:�`
Nle�
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
6/18/2020
PROJECT SITE MEETING MINUTES
Crooked Creek II Stream and Wetland Restoration Site, Union County
Meeting Date: 6/16/2020
DMS Project ID 94687
USACE ACTION ID: SAW 2011-02201
DWR # 12-0064
In attendance:
Erin Davis (NCDWR), Paul Wiesner (NCDMS), Harry Tsomides (NCDMS), Kelly Phillips (NCDMS)
Meeting Summary
This Design -Bid -Build project is currently in Monitoring Year 5 (2020). The field meeting was held
in order to discuss project history and current conditions as they relate to project performance
and success, identify any apparent concerns heading into the remainder of the monitoring phase,
and evaluate the MY04 (2019) credit release as proposed in the ledger presented to the IRT on
April 20, 2020. Site conditions were rainy and cool (60 degrees).
Previous monitoring events of note:
April 2017 - IRT Credit Release Site Visit (MY2)
January 2018 - Supplemental planting (prior to MY3 growing season)
February 2018 - Wetland creation zone head cut repair (handwork, straw wattles, juncus plugs
and live stakes)
October 2018 - Invasive vegetation treatment (last of a multi -treatment contract)
March 2020 - GWG 11 installation along right floodplain of UT1
Field review and items discussed
• The group met at the project entrance along NC Hwy 218, and briefly discussed the
project status and recent history. The MY4 (2019) credit release ledger was discussed and
DMS noted that they are requesting to "catch up" with the approved mitigation plan
release schedule following credit holdbacks in recent years, based on general trending
towards success with stream flow in UT1 and wetland gauge results. DMS noted that, if
the current proposed release were approved, the remaining unreleased credits for the
NORTH CRROLI D�� -0
Department W Emtronmenhl4ueM1Y�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

project would be 15% of the stream and 30% of the wetland total available credits.
Relevant project monitoring events were discussed (see above), and DWR noted their
support for the addition of GWG 11, which was recently added to provide additional data
for the wetland restoration zone along the right floodplain of UT1.
• The group walked to the upstream section of UT1, and observed flow in the stream
channel, and a well -vegetated buffer; the group walked downstream along UT1 and noted
a lack of base flow along much of UT1, but a well-defined channel with a coarse substrate
mixture. Some evidence of overbank flow (wrack and debris) were present. Recent
continuous flow data were discussed from 2018 (103 days of consecutive flow), 2019 (116
days) and 2020 (83 days, as of March 25, 2020).
• Alongside the right floodplain of UT1, the recently installed ground water gauge (GWG
#11) was found and soils examined; while there were clearly some hydric characteristics
within the soil profiles (0" to 12") taken by DWR and DMS near GWG 11, soils were noted
as probably not fully developed wetland soils yet. At GWG 4 farther downstream along
UT1 (also on the right floodplain), the soils looked similar to those observed at GWG 11.
• The group continued downstream along UT1 to the confluence of Crooked Creek. While
much of UT1 lacked base flow during this visit, flow had been observed on prior visits in
March 2020 by DMS and the monitoring firm Wildlands (separately), and channel features
were generally evident. There were no sections of channel 'choked' with sediments or
wetland herbaceous vegetation (e.g., Juncus spp.). All log structures and constructed
riffles observed appeared intact and functioning.
• DMS noted that there are Goose Creek watershed enhancement and restoration buffer
assets associated with the project (70,936 sq. ft.). DWR noted that buffer credit close out
typically occurs following MY5 and would likely be evaluated for buffer credit closure
sometime in 2021 by the DWR buffer coordinator (Katie Merritt). DMS noted that there
is one vegetation plot in each mitigation area type (restoration and enhancement). All 12
vegetation plots across the site are on track to meet success criteria.
• The group walked downstream along Crooked Creek (enhancement II). Areas of prior
invasive floodplain vegetation treatment were noted. In general, there were no major
issues noted and the Crooked Creek floodplain appeared to be almost entirely clear of
invasive vegetation. There was also no evidence of livestock. Just downstream of the
confluence of UT1 with Crooked Creek, the large debris jam (with downed trees
accumulating in one meander bend) was found and discussed, and while the historic
channel diversion had formed a large oxbow, it appeared that some of the downed trees
which had been spanning the channel on prior visits had been cleared out by more recent
storm events. There were still multiple downed trees and large woody debris
accumulated along both sides of the channel at this location.
NORTH CRHOLI D�� -01
Department W Emlmnmenhl4uelHy�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

• A wooden deer stand was observed within the left floodplain of Crooked Creek. DMS has
been aware of the deer stand as it has existed since project inception. It is unknown
whether the deer stand is currently being used, or who may be using it, since this project
is within State-owned property. DMS will try to obtain more information on how this deer
stand might or might not be in use.
• UT2 (enhancement II) was observed flowing into Crooked Creek. The group walked the
length of UT2 up to the fence line and edge of the project area, and adjacent cattle
pasture, where it flows through a concrete pipe into the project area. Flow was evident
along the entire length of UT2. The group then continued to walk towards the
downstream limits of the project along Crooked Creek.
• An area of historic encroachment was inspected, where ATVs had been getting into and
disturbing the left floodplain of Crooked Creek towards the downstream end of the
project. The landowner has been contacted several times about this, additional posting
was installed in 2018, and the activity seems to have ceased, as tall herbaceous vegetation
was seen growing in the entry path from the adjacent mowed/maintained backyard.
However, there appeared to be a swath of maintained/mowed lawn 10-15 feet into the
project area along most of the expansive backyard. DMS will contact this landowner again
and attempt to have this activity stopped. While this section is more than 50 feet away
from the creek, it appears to be an encroachment that need not and should not be
happening.
• The group walked back along the pasture fence line towards the project area wetlands.
To this point, very few invasives had been noted; only very scattered individuals. However,
the monitoring firm's 2020 spring assessment had mapped several areas of invasives.
Using this map as a guide, the group headed for veg plot 10 to evaluate the area for
invasives, as the monitoring map was showing the plot surrounded by Chinese lantern
and morning glory. In general, while the group could not validate the mapped results here,
there seem to be some scattered areas across the site that, when added up, may warrant
another treatment. DMS plans to conduct a further detailed site invasives evaluation
within the next few weeks and engage a contractor to treat the remaining invasives. The
trees in veg plot 10 appeared to be healthy and thriving.
• The group then walked back towards Crooked Creek to observe the wetland head cut that
was reported in MY2 (2017), and addressed in early 2018 with some hand work
stabilization, wattle installation, and live staking. While the condition here has improved
dramatically since treatment, the head cut persists. It is unclear if the head cut is active,
and if so, what is the rate of retreat. A small amount of flow was observed flowing through
the head cut and continuing downgradient. DMS plans to keep a close eye on this and
evaluate options if necessary.
• Walking back towards the parking area through the center of the wetlands, many of the
supplemental plantings from 2018 were evident as healthy trees, albeit shorter than most
NORTH CRHOLI D�� -01
Department W Emlmnmenhl4uelHy�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

of the originally planted trees. DWR noted that some of the trees in this area appeared to
be a few years 'behind' the others. DMS noted this was one of the areas that was indeed
supplemental planted in 2018, prior to the MY3 growing season.
• The meeting concluded with discussion of site conditions and credit releases moving
forward. It was noted that the project is on a 5-year stream / 7-year wetland release
schedule. While the site is trending towards success, there were concerns in earlier
monitoring years about stream flow and wetland gauge attainment. While DWR indicated
their inclination to recommend release of crediting as proposed in the MY4 (2019) ledger,
they expressed concern about the remaining 15% of stream credits and indicated it was
very likely to be held back in 2021 in favor of gathering more stream data and monitoring
the site as a whole (both stream and wetlands) through seven years. DWR recommended
that DMS continue to monitor both stream and wetlands through MY7 (2022), with the
remaining stream credit likely to be held back until project close out, and wetland credits
being released on the current schedule as deemed appropriate. DMS will plan to move
forward with this monitoring approach unless instructed otherwise by the IRT.
Meeting notes compiled by.
Harry Tsomides, Project Manager
Division of Mitigation Services
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Tel. [phone]
[e-mail]
NORTH CAROLI D E R-
Depart-M at Birtro fal OLPMRY
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Strickland, Bev
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Kim, Erin and Todd;
Wiesner, Paul
Wednesday, June 10, 2020 11:05 AM
Kim Browning; Davis, Erin B; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Allen, Melonie; Phillips, Kelly D; Tsomides, Harry
IRT Credit Release Site Visit - Tuesday June 16th @ 11:00am- Crooked Creek #2 -
SAW# 2011-02201 DWR# 20120064 DMS#94687
Georef Map -Crooked Cr_94687_2020.pdf, Crooked Cr_94687_MY5 SAR_2020.pdf
Follow up
Completed
We will plan to meet you at the Crooked Creek #2 DMS site next Tuesday June 16t" at 11:OOam.
Meeting location coordinates are:
35.138707,-80.523737
We also wanted to pass along the site's most recent MY5 (2020) Site Assessment Memo for your review. This memo
provides the most recent info on the project site.
I am also including a georeferenced map from the memo for your use during the site visit.
Please let us know if you have questions before the site visit.
Thanks
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
828-273-1673 Mobile
Pau l.wiesnera-ncdenr.gov
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville, N.C. 28801
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

w
WILDLANDS rk"
FNCINkkkiNU
0 130 260 520 Feet
I i I i I
Crooked Creek #2 Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Crooked Creek #2 Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94687
Site Assessment Report- 2020
Union County, NC

to
, rtgz�
W1LDLANDS
I : : (. : P 1 [ . .
April 16, 2020
Mr. Harry Tsomides
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Site Assessment Report — MY5
Crooked Creek #2 Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 94687
DEQ Contract Number 6617
Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin — CU# 03040105; Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Tsomides,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) conducted the Monitoring Year 5 (MY5) site assessment on
Crooked Creek #2 Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Project between March 25, 2020 through March
27, 2020. The purpose of the site assessment was to evaluate the general project conditions, monitoring
features, and to perform any necessary maintenance on the monitoring features and instrumentation.
The locations of the areas of concern (AOCs) were recorded on a GPS with sub -meter accuracy. All AOCs
documented in this letter will continue to be monitored and reported in detail with the year-end report.
General site photographs documenting the condition of the site and a Current Condition Plan View
(CCPV) Map are included in this report. This letter details findings from the site assessment below.
General Project Conditions
Wetlands
The target performance criterion for wetland hydrology is a free groundwater surface within 12 inches
of the ground surface for 17 consecutive days. The growing season began March 23rd and the gages
were downloaded March 251". While it is too early in the growing season to assess the performance
criterion, all previously installed gages show a free groundwater surface above the criteria level. In
addition, a new groundwater gage was installed in Wetland Restoration Zone A on the right side of UT1.
This groundwater gage was installed to gather additional groundwater level data to support wetland
project goals and mitigation success attainment for regulatory closeout. Wildlands installed the gage in a
representative location, which was determined by conducting a site reconnaissance and soil sampling.
Wetland gage data will continue to be downloaded and the results for the entire growing season will be
included in the MY5 annual monitoring report.
In February of 2018, maintenance was performed on the north side of Wetland Enhancement Zone B to
stabilize a head cut. Upon inspection during the MY5 site visit, this repair appears stable, not actively
eroding, and continuing to fill in with vegetation. This area will continue to be monitored throughout the
year for any changes in stability. One new area of concern was noted during the MY5 site assessment:
beaver activity. Fresh beaver chews on trees were observed within wetland creation zone B near UT2.
However, no beaver dam or individual species were located during the site visit.

Vegetation
Two small, new patches of Japanese Honeysuckle were observed during the MY5 site walk, as shown
below in the CCPV map and photographs. Additionally, as previously reported, a colony of cattails
(Typha latifolia) is still thriving and encroaching Vegetation Plot 5 and looks to be expanding slightly in
the wettest portion of Wetland Restoration Zone A. In total, 1.08 acres of invasive species were
documented within the easement area during the MY5 site assessment; approximately 39% is Japanese
Honeysuckle, 27% is Chinese lantern/morning glory, 21% is Chinese privet/ Bradford pear, 9% is Johnson
grass, and 4% is cattails. Additional preventative invasive treatment may be warranted to control the
spreading of these invasive species.
Areas of Chinese privet treated in MY4 throughout the site appear to be effective, particularly along the
riparian areas of Crooked Creek near the southeast portion of the easement. Although the treatment
throughout the site appears to be effective, Wildlands will continue to monitor these areas throughout
the growing season. Current AOCs are depicted on the attached CCPV map.
Streams
As of March 25, 2020, the stream flow gage on UT1 indicates there have been 83 days of consecutive
flow in 2020. However, instream vegetation still persists, growing in the channels and trapping fine
sediments. In addition, baseflow was documented in all channels during the MY5 site visit.
Along Crooked Creek's main channel, multiple large tree debris jams were observed. The site
experienced high flows on March 24th for approximately three days, with water levels receding by March
27th This event resulted in flooding within a majority of the lower portion of the site and backing up
water into UT1 (non -project) and the overflow connector, UT1, the intermittent channel surrounding
GWG 10, and UT2.
Easement
During the MY5 site walk, there were no indicators of easement encroachments. The driving path
previously documented from MY3 and MY4 was not present. Wildlands will continue to monitor the site
for issues within the easement.
Conclusion
This site assessment indicates that, although there are a few minor problem areas indicated in the
vegetation and stream components of this project, the site appears stable and all monitoring features
are well marked and functioning. Wildlands will re-evaluate all areas of concern noted in this site
assessment during the annual monitoring activities and provide a summary in the annual monitoring
report.
Feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Kirsten Y. Gimbert
Project Manager

Site Photographs

Head cut before repair (2/15/2018) 1 Head cut after repair (4/2/2018) 1
Head cut (4/5/2019) 1 Head cut (3/25/2020) 1
UT1 bankfull and wrack lines (3/25/2020) 1 UT2 wrack lines (3/25/2020)

Crooked creek confluence overflow channel (3/25/2020) 1 Crooked creek confluence overflow channel (3/27/2020)
Crooked Creek debris jam (3/27/2020) 1 UT1 dense vegetation in channel (3/25/2020) 1
Japanese Honeysuckle AOC (3/25/2020) 1 New GWG in Wetland Restoration Zone A (3/27/2020)

1
4-7 .gyp -
16* - a
�,,'
r.
° 1 c

w
WILDLANDS rk"
FNCINkkkiNU
0 130 260 520 Feet
I i I i I
Crooked Creek #2 Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Crooked Creek #2 Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94687
Site Assessment Report- 2020
Union County, NC

Strickland, Bev
From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 11:05 AM
To: Davis, Erin B
Cc: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Subject: [External] RE: Crooked Creek 2 - Credit Release Site Visit
• ' External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Wow, thanks Erin!
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr, Ste. 105 1 Wake Forest, NC 27587 1 919.554.4884 x60
BUILDING STRONG
From: Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 10:36 AM
To: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY
CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Crooked Creek 2 - Credit Release Site Visit
Kim/Todd,
Yesterday I met with DMS (Paul, Harry and Kelly) at Crooked Creek 2 for the MY4 credit release site visit (in the rain).
Based on the monitoring report review, we had concerns about in -stream vegetation in UT1, wetland gauge 4 not
meeting the hydroperiod threshold, site invasive coverage and debris jams on Crooked Creek.
UT1 (Restoration) — Flow was observed at the top of the reach and near the confluence of Crooked Creek. However, the
middle section was dry. The majority of the reach was shaded, primarily by willows. Herbaceous vegetation was noted in
clusters along UT1 (multiple species). In a few of the riffles, fibrous roots were abundant across the channel bed. While
the presence of in -stream vegetation is still a concern, UT1 has strong channel features and no signs of vegetation
inhibiting flow or trapping sediment was observed. Riffles and pool features appeared stable. Log sills and vanes did
show signs of rot, including mushroom growth.
Wetland Areas — Overall the vegetation density, diversity and vigor look good. We checked soils near the new gauge
west of UT1, gauge 4 and gauge 5. All soil pulls showed substantial redox. The matrix color seemed a little bright but not
uncharacteristic for chewacla. Saturation was variable; some pockets of standing water present. I am very glad that the
new gauge was installed since the gauge 4 location wasn't representative of the overall wetland restoration area. Gauge
4 is located in a green ash/maple stand with sparse herbaceous coverage (drainage patterns were observed).
Crooked Creek (Ell) — Significant large wood debris was observed along stream banks and within the floodplain, but was
not inhibiting flow. There were sections of cut bank slope. Overall, for a large watershed system the stream appeared
fairly stable with a well -vegetated floodplain. We walked the buffer where dense privet stands had been treated and
noted just a few resprouts.

Encroachments — We walked the buffer section that ATVs had trespassed in. Some track depressions remained in the
saturated floodplain but the area was covered with vegetation. DIMS installed two additional signs at the encroachment
access point to discourage reentry. Unfortunately, we observed a new encroachment of mowing around several
easement signs approximately 3-5 feet into the site. Additionally, the landowner is over -spraying into the easement 3-5
feet when maintaining the cattle section fence line. DMS will be following up with the landowner to resolve these
encroachment issues.
Headcut Area — Wildlands had completed a headcut repair and reported it as stable. However, it's stability is
questionable. The area is approximately 1-2 feet deep and wide, exposed soil, with a concentrated flow path. It's
difficult to judge whether the headcut has moved upslope. I don't think it warrants a major repair effort (heavy
equipment will disturb more than help), but I would recommend seeding, matting and live staking it; plus marking it to
monitor any mitigation upslope.
Supplemental Planting — We walked areas that had been supplemental planted in Jan. 2018. Density appeared sufficient
and stems showed good vigor.
Invasives — Privet and honeysuckle were observed, although not at a highly concerning density. Treatment is still
recommended. We didn't see the morning glory or Chinese lantern that Wildlands had mapped, so DMS is following up
with them.
Credit Release — Based on reported flow data and wetland field observations, DWR supports releasing MY4 credit and
credit withheld in MY3. There are sufficient wetland credits remaining (MY5-MY7) in the event that gauge 4 data does
not improve, though field observations were encouraging. The final credit release for SMUs is proposed for MY5.
However, DWR recommends delaying closeout of stream credits until MY7 in order to continue to track UT1 conditions
(veg, flow, stability). This request was discussed with DMS, who shared that Wildlands is contracted to monitor stream
and wetland areas through MY7.
DMS will be providing meeting minutes.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Many thanks,
Erin B. Davis, PWS
Stream & Wetland Mitigation Specialist
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-817-0360 cell
erin.davisa-ncdenr.gov

Strickland, Bev
From: Wiesner, Paul
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 11:14 AM
To: Davis, Erin B
Cc: Tsomides, Harry; Phillips, Kelly D
Subject: RE: Meeting Minutes -Crooked Creek #2- Credit Release Site Visit June 16, 2020
DMS# 94687 SAW# 2011-02201 DWR# 20120064
Thanks Erin. We will attach your email to the meeting notes for reference and will include everything on the MY5
report.
Have a good weekend
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
828-273-1673 Mobile
Paul.wiesnera-ncdenr.gov
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville, N.C. 28801
��D-E
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Davis, Erin B
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 11:06 AM
To: Wiesner, Paul <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kim Browning <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>; Allen, Melonie <[e-mail]>; Tsomides, Harry
<[e-mail]>; Phillips, Kelly D <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Meeting Minutes_Crooked Creek #2- Credit Release Site Visit -June 16, 2020_DMS# 94687_SAW# 2011-
02201_DWR# 20120064
Hi Paul,
The meeting minutes look good. I just have a few additional comments:
• 1 agree with your UT1 comments, but we did also observe scattered wetland herbaceous veg within the channel
and fibrous roots across some of the riffles, as well as some signs of rot on the log sills (although no instability).
• Regarding the headcut, I agree that it should be monitored for mitigation upslope and would recommend that
additional vegetated stabilization measures be considered.

I also noted the veg die -off we saw from the herbicide treatment along the cattle fence approximately 3-5 feet
into the easement. I understand that the landowner needs to maintain the fence line, but would ask that more
care be given to target the treatment on the fence itself and limit drift into the easement.
Many thanks. Have a nice weekend!
Erin
From: Wiesner, Paul
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 3:42 PM
To: Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kim Browning <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>; Allen, Melonie <[e-mail]>; Tsomides, Harry
<[e-mail]>; Phillips, Kelly D <[e-mail]>
Subject: Meeting Minutes_ Crooked Creek #2- Credit Release Site Visit —June 16, 2020_DMS# 94687_SAW# 2011-
02201_DWR# 20120064
Erin,
The meeting minutes from the June 16, 2020 IRT credit release site visit at the Crooked Creek #2 site are attached.
Please let us know if you have any questions, comments or concerns.
Harry,
Please include the final meeting minutes in the 2020 MY5 report for reference.
Thanks
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
828-273-1673 Mobile
Pau l.wiesnera-ncdenr.gov
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville, N.C. 28801
F � f
Owlny r4MwnV 9� S��
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.