20200826 Ver 1_401 Application_20200623

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#*
20200826
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Stephanie Goss: eads\szgoss
Select Reviewing Office:* Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:* 401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No
How much is r $240.00
owed?* r $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* r New Project r New Project Existing ID
r Pre -Application Submittal r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments r Stream or Buffer Appeal
r For the Record Only (Courtesy
Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Brandon Fulton
who is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Blue Jay
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Durham
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Oick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Project Blue Jay - PCN_NWP
4.8MB
18_SAW 2020_00232.pdf
Only pdf or krm files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
PCN; request for verification of use of NWP 18 for temporary impacts associated with electrical utility.
Allowable buffer impacts.
Sign and Submit
R By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:

• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
�� �2CYIYcF'lA�l �r�d��
Submittal Date: 6/23/2020
Is filled in adorratically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1.Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type:Private Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6.Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7.Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8.Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9.Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10.Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11.Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
12.Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit # 39
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
1818
SAW-2020-00232

June 22, 2020

Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35

Reference: Pre-Construction Notification Application
Request for Nationwide Permit 18 (Minor Discharge) & Water Quality
Certification No. 4139
Project Blue Jay (SAW-2020-00232)
5 Moore Drive
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 10155

Dear Mr. Hopper,

On behalf of Parmer RTP, LLC and ARCO Design/Build, please find the attached Request for
Pre-Construction Notification for the approximate 300 acre Project Blue Jay site located at 5
Moore Drive in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. The purpose of the project is to
connect an existing electric substation to a proposed commercial development that will contain
research and logistics services for a pharmaceutical company.

The subject site is located west of Moore Drive in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina.
According to the Durham County Online GIS website, the site is identified as portions of Durham
County Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs) 0739-74-19-8533, 0739-85-90-8453, 0739-86-65-
3511.SRV, 0739-02-77-4055, 0739-02-98-2166, 0739-86-65-3511.RTP, and 0749-06-62-8419.
The site consists of approximately 250 acres and is owned by Parmer RTP, LLC.

ECS conducted a site visit with Mr. Chris Hopper and Ms. Samantha Dailey, with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) on February 4, 2020. The USACE concurred with the
approximate boundaries of the waters as shown on the enclosed delineation maps in the
appendices. At the time of issuance of this permit application, ECS has not received a
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) letter from the USACE.

Project Description

The proposed commercial facility will be a 100+ acre research and development site for a
pharmaceutical company. Due to the size and nature of the development, new electrical conduit
is needed to supply the buildings future use. The only connection point (within reason) to the
existing electrical substation crosses over Tributary 2 and Northeast Creek. Since stream
crossings are required, the proposed crossing locations were chosen to minimize impacts. The
crossing occurs as close to perpendicular as reasonably possible. In addition, the location was
identified to be where the floodplains were at the minimum width.

2
The project facility will be constructed via standard construction procedure. The electric line
extension will be constructed by open trenching. The stream will be dewatered and routed
around the construction area via a pump and filter bag configuration. The site falls within the
Jordan Lake Watershed and is zoned SRP and located within the Suburban Development Tier;
therefore, minimal buffer impacts will be required. The 5 Moore Drive 300 acre commercial
project will maintain independent utility, and will be permitted through the City of Durham.

Impacts & Mitigation
The development plan proposes ~40 feet of temporary impacts to jurisdictional streams, and
approximately 4,043 square feet of buffer impact. Buffer impacts are in accordance with the
Jordan Buffer Rules Table of Uses allowable activities, and are 20 feet in width per crossing.
Limited maintenance of the corridor will be required. Temporary stream impacts include work
area, coffer dam and pump around, and open cutting. No permanent stream or wetland impacts
are proposed. Minimal clearing will take place, and the utility corridor will be allowed to return to
original conditions subsequent to installation. Due to the minimal temporary impact to streams,
and minimal impact to riparian buffers, no mitigation is proposed.

Avoidance and minimization of waters was performed to the greatest extent possible with
respect to the waters on-site, and the necessary path of the electrical line to connect to the
proposed facility.

3
Closing

ECS respectfully requests the verification of the use of NWP 18 to authorize ~40 feet of
temporary impacts to jurisdictional streams, and approximately 4,043 square feet of buffer
impact. The attached permit application, project information, and associated attachments
provide details pertaining to the proposed project impacts.

ECS looks forward to your attention to this request. Please contact Jonathan Grubb at (919)
414-0214/[e-mail] or Brandon Fulton at [phone]/
[e-mail] with questions or if additional information is required.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Grubb W. Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Staff Project Manager Environmental Principal
[e-mail] [e-mail]
919-414-0214 704.409.7744

Attachments: Preliminary ORM Form
Signed Owner Agent Authorization
Pre-Construction Notification Application
Appendices
Impact Exhibits
SAW Concurrence Email
Verified Waters Map
Durham County Parcel Info

SHPO GIS Results
NHP Response Letter
ECS SOUTHEAST, LL P `Setting the Sfwdard for arvrce"
�. Geatechnical • Construction Matedais • Envi!rwmantal • Facilities MGR&OO&WEnpmoinOF+rvF.,9?d
W iLtr kf&a C*409MS Frm C-406
PC Rap stared Enpreerny Few 3299
Agent Authorization
PropertyfSlte: lPAX"0 — itrr
Address of Site: 5 tie
'vtlhwt
Parcel Identification Number(PIN): TZ1507,0 1 27-102 01q 4 1Lrb5 ti 8l IS 974.0
Owner Information:
Name: A0L#M0- 1 -T P , I.t. r—
Address: kl'7 5 I jX(--S"Z&r- r
y q ov
Los i e-e4-ts . CA 100Z5
Telephone N umber l 0- Lt'-q --79 C
Fax Number:
Email Address: hoir Q. lC+t~C4,7- [ R.✓ - . COAN
Property Owner Certlflcatioon:
i, the undersigned, a duly a3uftrized owner of record of the p rope rtylproperties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington district, U-S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources �NCD R) to enter upun the property
herein described for the purpose of conducting do -site investigations and issuing a
determination asswlated with Waters of the U.S, subject to FedersUState jurisdiction under
Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act andlor Section 10 of tha Rivers and Harbors Act of
IMP- I also authorize ECS to act in-�j behalf � n. a pr�cessing of this request and to furnish
supplemental information In support this req rp t, yhclucling stmarrifwetlonrd matters in
caordinetion vuith the USACE ar, offye' ' CDVVR d erillcation and permit application:
y
PrapCrty�uuner Sigr►riure: '
Date:
\ (D I ot k'�
ECS Capital Swices. RLLG • RCS Florida. LLC • ECS Md,Atlantic, LLc • ECS muwest, LLC • Eta S4utheW LLP • EGS Tam, LLP
www.ecstimlted,com

Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Pe rmit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?

For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:

Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. Yes No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Blue Jay
Durham
Durham
Parmer RTP, LLC
Dean Change, ESQ
11755 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California, 90025
310-429-7585
18

Page 2 of 10
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Jon Zuk
ARCO Design/Build
200 North Warner Road, Suite 430
King of Prussia, PA 19409
610-952-7247
[e-mail]
Brandon Fulton, LSS, PWS
Engineering Consulting Services Southeast, LLC
1812 Center Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28217
707-525-5152
[e-mail]
Developer
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude:
1c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.

Please see Appendices
-78.869901
~300
Northeast Creek
WS-V-NSW
Cape Fear
The PSA consists of primarily heavily wooded land, but also has a large cleared area that has been graded. The wooded land
consists of mature and immature pine and hardwood species, ranging from approximately 10 to 50 years old. Dense to moderately
dense understory vegetation is located throughout the wooded land.
~27.63
See Appendices
See Appendices
ECS Southeast, LLP
February 4, 2020
SAW-2020-00232 - see email concurrence in attachments
35.936397
~8500
SAW-2020-00232
Jonathan Grubb
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams – tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction

3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:

Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
0
Excavation Northeast Creek PER Corps 6 20
UT to Northeast Creek 4 20
40
see appendices for description of temporary impacts.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
T
T
-
-
-
-
Excavation
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
INT
-
-
-
-
Corps
-
-
-
-

Page 5 of 10
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.

Type of impact
4d.

Waterbody
type
4e.

Area of impact (acres)
O1
O2
O3
O4
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:

5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:

Choose one Choose
Stormwater
Northeast Creek No 1214 809
UT to Northeast Creek 1212 808
2426 1617
Perpendicular crossing, 20 feet utility corridor, for underground electrical utility
-
-
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose
Choose
Choose
Choose one
P
P
-
-
-
-
No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
)
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:

4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

Please see Appendices
Please see Appendices
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one

Page 7 of 10
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate th e
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)

Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:

Page 8 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.

Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:

2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:

2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No

Being Permitting through City of Durham (Phase 2)
~10.5
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.

City of Durham municipal wastewater.

Page 10 of 10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:

8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)

Date

Raleigh
Site recon, NCNHP. Letters send to Raleigh USFWS for concurrence. See appendices for Biological Conclusions.
NOAA EFH Finder
NC SHPO GIS. Request for concurrence sent to NCSHPO June 11, 2020.
FEMA Flood Firms
Brandon Fulton 6-22-2020

Appendices:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History

1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or Parcel ID): 225020, 225021, 225017, 16353, 156981,
156979, 156982, 156983, 225023, 156980

3d. Explain the purpose of the project:

The proposed commercial facility will be a 100+ acre research and development site for a
pharmaceutical company. Due to the size and nature of the development, new electrical conduit
is needed to supply the buildings future use. The only connection point (within reason) to the
existing electrical substation crosses over Tributary 2 and Northeast Creek. Since stream
crossings are required, the proposed crossing locations were chosen to minimize impacts. The
crossing occurs as close to perpendicular as reasonably possible. In addition, the location was
identified to be where the floodplains were at the minimum width.

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:

The project facility will be constructed via standard construction procedure. The electric line
extension will be installed by open trenching, and is approximately 4 feet in width. The streams
will be dewatered and routed around the construction area via a pump and filter bag
configuration. The site falls within the Jordan Lake Watershed and is zoned SRP and located
within the Suburban Development Tier; therefore, minimal buffer impacts will be required. The 5
Moore Drive 300 acre commercial project will maintain independent utility, and will be permitted
through the City of Durham.

Standard construction equipment used in the construction of sanitary sewer lines will be utilized.
Proper erosion and sedimentation control measures would be employed throughout the project.
Typical materials and machinery will be used on-site during the construction process.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
designing project:

The development plan proposes ~40 feet of temporary impacts to jurisdictional streams, and
approximately 4,043 square feet of buffer impact. Buffer impacts are in accordance with the
Jordan Buffer Rules Table of Uses allowable activities, and are 20 feet in width per crossing.
Limited maintenance of the corridor will be required. Temporary stream impacts include work
area, coffer dam and pump around, and open cutting. No permanent stream or wetland impacts
are proposed. Minimal clearing will take place, and the utility corridor will be allowed to return to
original conditions subsequent to installation. Due to the minimal temporary impact to streams,
and minimal impact to riparian buffers, no mitigation is proposed.

Avoidance and minimization of waters was performed to the greatest extent possible with
respect to the waters on-site, and the necessary path of the electrical line to connect to the
proposed facility.

2

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques:

Disturbance of the wetland shall be minimized to the extent practicable in order to construct the
electrical line. The construction techniques shall be conducted in accordance with NCDENR
standards. Temporary and additional erosion control measures shall be maintained throughout
the construction process. Silt fencing will be placed at the bottom of the slopes to deter
sediment and erosion control during roadway development activities. Temporary erosion,
sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and maintained during the entire
construction duration and until final stabilization is established.

F. Supplementary Information

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)

ECS performed and assessment for Endangered Species and Critical Habitat. The PSA
consists of primarily heavily wooded land, but also has a large cleared area that is being
graded. The wooded land consists of mature and immature pine and hardwood species, ranging
from approximately 10 to 100 years old. Open understory to moderately dense vegetation is
located throughout the wooded land. The site reconnaissance was performed on May 27th,
2020. A letter was sent to the USFWS Asheville Office on June 11 to obtain concurrence of our
findings.

Common Name Scientific name Federal Status Record Status
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA Current
Invertebrate
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon E Current
Vascular Plant
Michaux’s sumac Rhus michauxii E Current
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata E Current
E = Endangered
T(S/A) = Threatened due to similarity of appearance

Species/Habitat Description
Vertebrate:
Bald Eagle Survey Window: Year-round
Description: Distinguished by a white head and white tail feathers, bald eagles are powerful,
brown birds that may weigh 14 pounds and have a wingspan of 8 feet. Male eagles are smaller,

3
weighing as much as 10 pounds and have a wingspan of 6 feet. Sometimes confused with
Golden Eagles, Bald Eagles are mostly dark brown until they are four to five years old and
acquire their characteristic coloring.

Habitat: Bald Eagles live near rivers, lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple
food. Bald Eagles will also feed on waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small animals
and carrion. Bald Eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites. Their
habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter, the
birds congregate near open water in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.

Conclusion: The PSA consists of primarily heavily wooded land, but also has a large cleared
area that has been graded. Large bodies of water and a steady food support are not present
within the PSA. Based on the site reconnaissance and observations, suitable habitat for the
Bald Eagle is not present within the PSA or in the surrounding area. No individuals, or nests
were observed during the site reconnaissance. Due to being a fair distance away from a large
enough body of water, ECS has concluded that the developments will have no effect on the
Bald Eagle.

Invertebrate:

Dwarf Wedgemussel Survey Window: Year Round

Description: The dwarf wedgemussel is a small bivalve, rarely exceeding 45 mm in length.
Clean young shells are usually greenish-brown with green rays. As the animal ages, the shell
color becomes obscured by diatoms or mineral deposits and appears black or brown. The shell
is thin but does thicken somewhat with age, especially toward the anterior end. The anterior end
is rounded while the posterior end is angular forming a point near the posterio-ventral margin.
The ventral margin is only slightly curved. The nacre is bluish-white, appearing whiter in the
thicker anterior end. The most distinctive shell character of the dwarf wedgemussel is the
arrangement of the lateral teeth. There are two lateral teeth in the right valve and one in the left
valve. The typical arrangement for most freshwater mussel species consists of two lateral teeth
in the left valve and one in the right valve.

Habitat: The dwarf wedgemussel appears to be a generalist in terms of its preference for
stream size, substrate and flow conditions – it inhabits small streams less than five meters wide
to large rivers more than 100 meters wide; it is found in a variety of substrate types including
clay, sand, gravel and pebble, and sometimes in silt depositional areas near banks; and it
usually inhabits hydrologically stable areas, including very shallow water along streambanks
and under root mats, but it has also been found at depths of 25 feet in the Connecticut River.
Dwarf wedgemussels are often patchily distributed in rivers.

Conclusion: The PSA consists of primarily heavily wooded land, but also has a large cleared
area that has been graded. The wooded land consists of mature and immature pine and
hardwood species, ranging from approximately 10 to 50 years old. Dense to moderately dense
understory vegetation is located throughout the wooded land. Multiple streams transect the site
containing all types of substrate. Based on the habitat within the PSA, it was concluded that

4
habitat is present for the dwarf wedgemussel within the streams; however the streams are not to
be impacted other than temporarily for an underground utility feed crossing. No mussels of any
genus were observed during the site reconnaissance. The project will not have permanent
impacts to streams or wetlands, and stormwater management/sediment erosion control plan will
adhere to Water Supply Water and Nutrient Sensitive Water Phase II requirements. ECS
concluded that the project will not affect the mussel.

Vascular Plants:

Michaux’s Sumac Survey window: May through October
Description: Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 -
3 feet (ft) (30.5 – 91 centimeters, cm) in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated,
oblong to lanceolate, acuminate leaflets. Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent
observations have revealed plants with both male and female flowers on one plant. The flowers
are small, borne in a terminal, erect, dense cluster, and colored greenish yellow to white.
Flowering usually occurs from June to July; while the fruit, a red drupe, is produced through the
months of August to October.

Habitat: Michaux's sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils.
Apparently, this plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an
open area. Several populations in North Carolina are on highway rights-of way, roadsides, or on
the edges of artificially maintained clearings. Two other populations are in areas with periodic
fires, and two populations exist on sites undergoing natural succession. One population is
situated in a natural opening on the rim of a Carolina bay.

Conclusion: The PSA consists of primarily heavily wooded land, but also has a large cleared
area that has been graded. The wooded land consists of mature and immature pine and
hardwood species, ranging from approximately 10 to 50 years old. Dense to moderately dense
understory vegetation is located throughout the wooded land. Carolina Bays and areas with
periodic fires are not located on site. Based on the habitat within the PSA, it was concluded that
minimal potential habitat is present for Michaux’s sumac around the edge of the woods. A
targeted survey was performed, and no individuals were observed during the site
reconnaissance. Since the existing woodland will not be impacted, and the remainder of the site
contains cleared or dense vegetation, ECS concluded that the project will not affect the plant.

Smooth Coneflower Survey Window: Late May through October

Description: Smooth coneflower is a perennial herb in the Aster family (Asteraceae) that
grows up to 3.3 feet (ft) (1 meter; m) tall from a vertical root stock. The large elliptical to broadly
lanceolate basal leaves may reach 8 inches (in) (20 centimeters; cm) in length and 3.0 in (7.5
cm) in width and taper into long petioles toward the base. They are smooth to slightly rough in
texture. The stems are smooth, with few leaves.

Habitat: Smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line rights-of-way, usually on magnesium and calcium
rich soils associated with amphibolite, dolomite or limestone (in Virginia), gabbro (in North
Carolina and Virginia), diabase (in North Carolina and South Carolina), and marble (in South
Carolina and Georgia). Smooth coneflower occurs in plant communities that have been
described as xeric hardpan forests, diabase glades or dolomite woodlands. Optimal sites are
characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer. Natural fires,

5
as well as large herbivores, historically influenced the vegetation in this species' range. Many of
the herbs associated with Smooth coneflower are also sun-loving species that depend on
periodic disturbances to reduce the shade and competition of woody plants.

Conclusion: The PSA consists of primarily heavily wooded land, but also has a large cleared
area that has been graded. The wooded land consists of mature and immature pine and
hardwood species, ranging from approximately 10 to 50 years old. Dense to moderately dense
understory vegetation is located throughout the wooded land. Carolina Bays and areas with
periodic fires are not located on site. Based on the habitat within the PSA, it was concluded
minimal potential habitat is present for Smooth Coneflower on roadsides and around the edge of
the woods. A targeted survey was performed and no individuals were observed during the site
reconnaissance. Since the existing woodland will not be impacted, and the remainder of the site
contains cleared or dense vegetation, ECS concluded that the project will not affect the plant.
OWNER
PARMER RTP, LLC
11755 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 1400
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
DEAN CHANG, ESQ
FOR
PROJECT BLUE JAY
PARMER RTP, LLC
STREAM AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT DRAWINGS
CONTACT INFORMATION
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
OVERALL SITE PLAN - PROPOSED CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN I
SITE PLAN II
H:\2019\NCR192094\DRAWINGS\EXHIBITS\WETLAND IMPACT\NCR192094 SDP - WETLAND----->LAYOUT: COVER SHEETSTREAM AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT DRAWINGS
BLUE JAY
DURHAM, NC 27709
5-26-2020 | ME | NCR192094
COVER SHEET
REFERENCES
¨BOUNDARY &
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY:
BOHLER NC, PLLC
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
PHONE: [phone]
DATED: 2/7/2020
SURVEY JOB #NSR192094
ELEVATIONS: NAVD 1998
¨GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
REPORT:
S&ME, INC.
3201 SPRING FOREST ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27616
DATED: 11/08/19
¨WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT:
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
MOORE DRIVE
DURHAM, NC 27703
DATED: 09/30/2019
CONTACTS
¨DURHAM CITY/COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
101 CITY HALL PLAZA
DURHAM, NC 27701
PHONE: [phone]
THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENTS ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AS PART OF
THESE PLANS, HOWEVER, BOHLER ENGINEERING DOES NOT CERTIFY THE ACCURACY OF
THE WORK REFERENCED OR DERIVED FROM THESE DOCUMENTS, BY OTHERS.
PLAN REFERENCES AND CONTACTS
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
DEVELOPER
ARCO DESIGN/BUILD
200 N. WARNER ROAD, SUITE 430
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19409
CONTACT: JON ZUK
EMAIL: [e-mail]
PHONE: (610) 952 - 7427
1"=500'
0 500125250500H:\2019\NCR192094\DRAWINGS\EXHIBITS\WETLAND IMPACT\NCR192094 DMP - WETLAND----->LAYOUT: EXIST. CONDITIONSSTREAM AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT DRAWINGS
BLUE JAY
DURHAM, NC 27709
5-26-2020 | ME | NCR192094
OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN W E
SNAD83 NAD83NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
EX. REGULATORY FLOODWAY
EX. 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
EX. 10' NO-BUILD SETBACK
EX. FLOODPLAIN
EX. WETLAND
EX. 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND
EX. WETLANDS
EXISTING WETLANDS
ACREAGE
WETLAND #1
WETLAND #2
WETLAND #3
WETLAND #5
WETLAND #7
± 3.38
± 10.56
± 12.64
± 0.94
± 0.11
EX. STREAM
EXISTING STREAMS
LINEAR FEET
± 1,400
± 4,800
± 1,300
± 1,000
UNT #1 TO NORTH EAST
TRIBUTARY CREEK #2
UNT #2 TO NORTH EAST
TRIBUTARY CREEK #2
NORTH EAST CREEK
TRIBUTATRY #2
NORTH EAST CREEK
FFF FF FFFGF
F
F FWWWW W
EEM
EM
EM
EM
EM
EM
EEEEEMGG
G
G
G
EEM
EM
F
F FF
FJBJBJBJBJBJBJB
JB
JB JBJB
JB
JB
JB
JB
JB
JB JBJB
JB
JB
JB JBJBJBJBTT
T
JB JBJB
JB
JB
JB JBJB
JB
JB
JB
JB
1"=500'
0 500125250500H:\2019\NCR192094\DRAWINGS\EXHIBITS\WETLAND IMPACT\NCR192094 SPP - WETLAND----->LAYOUT: OVERAL SITE PLAN - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSTREAM AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT DRAWINGS
BLUE JAY
DURHAM, NC 27709
5-26-2020 | ME | NCR192094
OVERAL SITE PLAN - PROPOSED CONDITIONS W E
SNAD83 NAD83STREAM AND BUFFER IMPACTS
IMPACT
NUMBER IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
(SF)(AC)(SF)(AC)
1 UTILITY
EXTENTION 1,212 0.0282
TOTAL 2,426 0.055 1,617 0.037
1,214 0.028
STREAM IMPACT
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
(SF)(AC)(SF)(AC)
0 436 0.005
808 0.018
809 0.018
95 0.002
121 0.003
0
0
0
0
0
IMPACT 2
IMPACT 1
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
(LF)(LF)(LF)(LF)
0
0
0
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
EX. REGULATORY FLOODWAY
EX. 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
EX. 10' NO-BUILD SETBACK
EX. FLOODPLAIN
EX. WETLAND
EX. 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODN86°47'03"W 660.00'
N88°54'47"W 610.01'
F
EEEEEEEEEEPROP.
C
O
N
D
UI
T
C
O
N
N
E
C
TI
O
N
TO F
U
T
U
R
E
E
L
E
C.
LI
N
E
EXTE
N
SI
O
N
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
S
1"=40'
0 40102040H:\2019\NCR192094\DRAWINGS\EXHIBITS\WETLAND IMPACT\NCR192094 SPP - WETLAND----->LAYOUT: SITE PLAN ISTREAM AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT DRAWINGS
BLUE JAY
DURHAM, NC 27709
5-26-2020 | ME | NCR192094
SITE PLAN I W E
SNAD83 NAD8320' IMPACT ZONE 2
30' IMPACT ZONE 1
IMPACT 1
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
20'107.
2
420'30'6.
0
7
EX. REGULATORY FLOODWAY
EX. 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
EX. 10' NO-BUILD SETBACK
EX. FLOODPLAIN
EX. WETLAND
EX. 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND
S50°00'15"E 785.07'
1"=40'
0 40102040H:\2019\NCR192094\DRAWINGS\EXHIBITS\WETLAND IMPACT\NCR192094 SPP - WETLAND----->LAYOUT: SITE PLAN IISTREAM AND RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT DRAWINGS
BLUE JAY
DURHAM, NC 27709
5-26-2020 | ME | NCR192094
SITE PLAN II W E
SNAD83 NAD83IMPACT 2
20' IMPACT ZONE 2
30' IMPACT ZONE 1
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
20'106.13'20'30'EX. REGULATORY FLOODWAY
EX. 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
EX. 10' NO-BUILD SETBACK
EX. FLOODPLAIN
EX. WETLAND
EX. 25' WETLAND BUFFER
EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND
4.75
1
Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
From:Jonathan Dale Grubb
Sent:Friday, June 19, 2020 12:07 PM
To:Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Subject:FW: SAW-2020-00232 / Parmer RTP, LLC Campus / Research Triangle Park / Durham
County NC
Concurrence Email

-----------------------------
Jonathan Dale Grubb
ECS Southeast, LLP T: 910.686.9114 D: 919.861.9859 C: 919.414.0214

Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient.

-----------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Dale Grubb
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 12:54 PM
To: 'Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)'
Subject: RE: SAW-2020-00232 / Parmer RTP, LLC Campus / Research Triangle Park / Durham County NC

Chris,

Thank you very much for your quick response. I will be sure to relay the message about using existing crossings.

Thanks,
Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 12:30 PM
To: Jonathan Dale Grubb
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SAW-2020-00232 / Parmer RTP, LLC Campus / Research Triangle Park / Durham County NC

Thank you, Jonathan:

The updated map for the above referenced site reflects the delineations reviewed and verified during our site visit
earlier today, 02/04/2020. Please note the feature shown as 'Potential Stream 12' includes a break at the culverted road
bed we used to access this area. If unavoidable impacts to this feature require permitting in the future, the use of a pre-
existing crossing may aid in demonstrating avoidance and minimization. Revise this if you would like to, otherwise I will
use this map when processing any PJD and/or permit application/request for this site.

2
The resources as shown may be relied upon for avoidance and minimization planning as preliminary layouts are
developed. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Chris

Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35

We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and
complete the survey.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Dale Grubb <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 11:55 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2020-00232 / Parmer RTP, LLC Campus / Research Triangle Park / Durham County
NC

Good Morning Chris,

I hope you’ve had a good week. I apologize for the delay in JD updates as we have been under a cyber-attack for three
weeks, and are finally back up and moving forward. Please see the attached updated map and table. Can you concur
with this map so that Arco can proceed with overlaying their plans to make sure all waters are being avoided? I
appreciate your timely response as I apologize for this inconvenience to everyone. If something doesn’t look right to
your memory, please let me know ASAP so I can get it fixed. Have a great weekend!

Best,
Jonathan

-----------------------------
Jonathan Dale Grubb
ECS Southeast, LLP T: 910.686.9114 D: 919.861.9859 C: 919.414.0214

Confidential/proprietary message/attachments. Delete message/attachments if not intended recipient.

-----------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 10:40 AM
To: Jonathan Dale Grubb; [e-mail]
3
Cc: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: SAW-2020-00232 / Parmer RTP, LLC Campus / Research Triangle Park / Durham County NC

Gentlemen:
Thank you both for your time yesterday. I've attached a copy of my site notes for your review. Please advise if I
overlooked or misrepresented anything. Areas shown are estimates and subject to change based on survey/GPS data.

We've assigned this a new Action ID Number: SAW-2020-00232. Based on our conversation yesterday we understand
the initial project area will avoid all aquatic resources and not require Clean Water Act Section 404 permitting. Please
note that due to the history of projects and past approvals on this site, it is possible any new impact would be
considered cumulative with those already approved and constructed.

We neglected to discuss it onsite yesterday, but there were potential eagles sited on the southern tract. Please make
sure to secure USFWS's concurrence if impacts requiring our approval are necessary. We will also need to ensure that
historic resources (I believe it was mentioned another consultant had addressed this) and ESA species identified by
USFWS are addressed prior to pursuing future approvals.

Please let me know if there are questions. We look forward to receiving the revised PJD application.

Regards,

Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35

=======================================================
This message has been analyzed by Deep Discovery Email Inspector.

=======================================================
This message has been analyzed by Deep Discovery Email Inspector.

=======================================================
This message has been analyzed by Deep Discovery Email Inspector.

FIGURE 6
ECS Project No.
Title:
Client:
Approved By:Date:
Drawn By:WBFJDG
02/28/2020WBF
49:1015 5/1 0603
Project:
Checked By:
Potential Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Map
³Legend
Project Stu dy Area
Po ten tia l Stream
Po nds
Po ten tia l Wetla nd
0 1,5 00 3,0 00750Feet
1. JURISDICTIONAL WATERSOF THE US WERE DELINEATED BY ECS ON SEPTEMBER 16-17 AND OCTOBER 7, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ONTHIS MAP WEREVERIFIEDBY THE USACE ONFEBRUARY 4,2020
PARMER INN OVATIONCENTERS
MOORE DRIVE &EAST CORNWALLISROADDURHAM COU NTYNORTH CAROLINA
Potential Wetland 3Approx. 12.64 Acres
Potential Wetland 1Approx. 3.38 Acres
Potential Wetland 2Approx. 10.56 Acres
Potential Wetland 6 Approx. 0.086Acre
Potential Stream 1Approx. 4,761Linear Feet
Potential Stream 2Approx. 988Linear Feet
Potential Stream 3Approx. 120Linear Feet
Potential Stream 4Approx. 2,039Linear Feet
Potential Stream 5Approx. 160Linear Feet
Potential Stream 6Approx. 746Linear Feet
Potential Stream 7Approx. 210Linear Feet
Potential Stream 8Approx. 1,149Linear Feet
Potential Stream 9Approx. 515Linear Feet
Pond 1Approx. 3.14Acres
Pond 2Approx 1.75Acres
Potential Stream 10Approx. 351Linear Feet
Potential Stream 11Approx. 1,130Linear Feet
Potential Wetland 4Approx. 1.94Acres
Potential Wetland 5Approx. 0.94Acre
Potential Stream 12Approx. 1,132Linear Feet
Added segment of stream 6Approx. 53Linear FeetPotential Wetland 7 Approx. .048Acre
Potential Wetland 7Approx. 0.11Acre
r { l •L
L •. I
i I
IR-I El o I
YRONI DIM null
POLY,LM null
STI-M A I H.I I a I
OLD ID SAN-
c szixvI null
1 l' 1--,LkA: null
01VAD I Air N. r •1 IA'.%x 1 r;li
0W-k iFU mil -
M A [ 7�
SpL,MmDh mull
splia"JFw IlulJ
LXNa J'U .1,6
LANM£ DBC v.,L('Ahll I.N4J-L: %I k1?4-L
K CLk nill
�;m C4aIE L 14x ti
EXEMPT_{CGDi null
3m M I �;LLL`M I I
TW,AL --U-U
DIED BOOK Im1914f,
D£ED NAIE IHNHW.4
Q1r_{T (�QF4 IMHI t ,n
M-ti T-PAC1 INW[l k
r).AT SOLD _r.l.,W61
°�uj7 _Pfucx I HHIfp"HI
STIMD M IhHMI
,SLBD-RF N. A-'w1-i-gULh3,VISIL7hf
OWNER ;FAS,EL P kF�l.

dL
...... . ......
J
?A�CEL- ED
;Z7
MONT PW
PMY.ALCFZ
$ UA CAL F. t
CILD - m
.EMT
0 W.0 FvZ
invM]TV
Qi%—$ TA
MUIPA
aE SaT 00 DE
spii fw)ik
LA 5 D L'i I Mc
MER CL-kss
;N- nz COD!
'EMST Canx
BLDG-IALLE
TOT -AA- VAIV
DEm - fiQoK
FLAT PA G1
DATY�Soo
P,.Uzvma
&MD-M
fif.
rLuli
I Al 0
f. J 1 -111 4j[ IN.
md4
nijl.'
k-4251%,
RULM L R ALL V L L-L
11111
loh
A I
I I :x- %16 1 1AD-Li 4 I k 141W
mull
Will
L , Q%-A%1r.,F-LL4'
(A
I I I Hrn
I ti rk V. Fi RAG.
KLdj
k'fA.XA
XV

j
Fad
r.
�I
z
t
rJ �: �.r•. �' J
M 4
•� �• :6 •�
X T r.
.. - L 1- _ � X y = L- - - � a.l .T � tl = C -. / - � _ 1 - rt � _ - _ ~I - }' • � .r -I
�Qr �RI W yF34� y W �� kS
I I � F.1 �y -rI r+� ' F�e.ri 8 r p 0 -0 � I I {:
1 �I�IaI. I I a P4 W I I I�}I I I' I ICI �I �I �I I I I
Gips Is. 0:aS EOGOOOOOOO403a`r�'F•1 fi Nr-I W MP.17rG a�] i i00QM

eu
AN
�
�
�
7
:
�
7
�
a
\
»
]
�
j
3 �
�
� {
-
i
7
FL
k
)) / j
E
w
N.���'$\kN
@@-.2 Aga N
. i iiIir
Id
Q �i-i 'w•'.'§�� � k��§QQH. w
@�
q3��r�- ��U�d
�■ �oQ§\QQoo�ogmm�N��Q�aaQ■ QQ

� r+ti. ,. r' •.yam
• �Ir
�1
1
J
� rl
T Y.
.i
All
� r
' J
:6
7�1 •.r .lam J�' w
ju
r {JI eI I I'J I I iri I I I �IS ,
1 L-I �y 7
NJ
L} �y yy I I % �y �1 1" I i �1 LMJ. W `1
�LIg4 I�afi�i. ti}+r bq�� Y�rl 1"�0 0I7.IPLIi�a+i�����

NCHPO HPOWEB
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,
NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri
(Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Local districts & boundaries
Local individual resources & centerpoints
Local Landmark
Local Landmark, Gone
Local HD Center Point
Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints
Surveyed Only
Surveyed in NRHD
Surveyed Only, Gone
Surveyed in NRHD, Gone
Blockface- Multiple properties
Blockface in NRHD
Surveyed Area, No designation
Surveyed Area in NHRD
DOE districts & boundaries
Determined Eligible Boundary
Both DOE and Study List Boundary
DOE individual resources & centerpoints
Determined Eligible
DOE, Gone
SL and DOE
SL and DOE, Gone
DOEHD Center Point
SLDOEHD Center Point
SL districts & boundaries
Study List Boundary
Both SL and Determined Eligible Boundary
SL individual resources & centerpoints
SL Individual Entry
SL and DOE entry
Study List Entry, Gone
SL and DOE, Gone
SLHD Center Point
SLDOEHD Center Point
NR districts & boundaries
National Register Boundary
6/19/2020, 1:45:12 PM
0 0.65 1.30.33 mi
0 1 20.5 km
1:36,112
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
Town of Cary, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS |
NCNHDE-12326
June 19, 2020
Jonathan Grubb
ECS Southeast LLP
7614 Netherlands Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Commercial Development Building ; 49:10155-D
Dear Jonathan Grubb:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Commercial Development Building
Project No. 49:10155-D
June 19, 2020
NCNHDE-12326
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Durham - Bethesda Park City of Durham Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on June 19, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3