400144_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qua!

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

N
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400144 Facility Status: Active
permit: AWS400144
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/23/2017 Entry Time: 03:00 pm Exit Time: 3:40 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Danny L Miller
Phone:
252-747-5789
Mailing Address:
1211 Corbett Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
1211 Corbett Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 28' 03" Longitude:
77" 44' 41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Retards and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller
Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller
Phone
On -site representative Danny Miller
Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: 2013
11-30-16 = .84
4-28-17 = 1.21
7-01-16 = 1.17
IRR records are complete & balanced out
Reviewed: rainfallffreeboard; crop yield; sludge survey 2016 T=25, LTZ=5.7'
page: 1

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/23/17 1npsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW; 518,400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
LARGER
36.00
Lagoon
SMALL
05106/%
19m
36.00
page: 2

l Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/23/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M13
❑
3 Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5 Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6 Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11 Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number.
Inspection Date: 08/23/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400144
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Conn. wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] []
[]
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 00
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/23/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
E3
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

f'
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil
and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number:
400144
Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400144
Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/08/2016 Entry Time: 03:00 pm
Exit Time: 3:35 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Danny L Miller
Phone:
252-747-5789
Mailing Address:
1211 Corbett Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
1211 Corbett Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
Compliant El
Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 28' 03" Longitude:
77° 44' 41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi on left
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: due 2017
7-1-16 = 1.17
3-9-16 = .76
12-30-15 = I.05
6-30-15 = 68
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
reviewed. rainfall/freeboard. calibration due 2016; sludge survey due 2016.
fb range: 19.5" 1-23-15 to 45" on M-16
page: 1

Permit: AWS400144 Owner- Facility - Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 I 3.800
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total 5SLW: 518.400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
LARGER
2700
Lagoon
SMALL
05/06!96
1900
27 00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number:
400144
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastaf Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Cam. Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
[i
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner -Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

• Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400144 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400144
Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of visit: 08/19/2015 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 9:40 am Incident #
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller
Phone:
252-747-5789
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35' 28' 03" Longitude:
77" 44' 41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller
Operator Certification Number:
18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller
Phone
On -site representative Danny Miller
Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspectors):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis soil tested: 112013
6-30-15 = .68
3-26-15 = 1.14
8-14-14 = 1.00
5-9-14 = 1.22
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
LTZ ST
Reviewed: rainfall/freeboard: sludge survey Large=7.2 2.3
calibration 1112014 small=6.8 2.79
Remember to do a sludge survey before Dec.31,2015
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inspection Type Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine - Feeder tc Finish 3,840 3,80D
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518.400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
LARGER
32.00
Lagoon
SMALL
05106l96
19.00
32.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny l-Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 1npsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
[]
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
MEI
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
a ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑M
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet statics)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10 Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ [] ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number,
400144
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne,
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cverseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] ■ ❑
[(
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

I
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
400144 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
0811412014 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Farm Name:
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Owner:
Danny L Miller
Mailing Address:
1211 Cornett Town Rd
Active Permit: AWS400144
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Greene Region:
Exit Time: 9:30 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Snow Hill NC 28580
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-5789
Physical Address: 1211 Cornett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: NCompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35` 28' 03" Longitude: 77' 44' 41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other Issues
E Waste Application
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number. 18510
Secondary OIC(s).
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 1124/13
Waste Analysis:
5-9-14= 1.22 crop - SB
7-25-14= -98
3-18-14= 1.10
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed crop yield, freeboard, rainfall(-14"), stocking.
Remember to do a sludge survey before December 31st.
page: 1

t
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08/14/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,900
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LARGER
Lagoon SMALL 05/06/96 19.00
page: 2

Permit:
AWS400144
Owner -Facility:
Danny l- Miller
Facility Number:
400144
Inspection Date:
08/14/14
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
00
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
MEI
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner- Facility : Danny L Miller Facility Number:
400144
Inspection Date: 08/14/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ONE][]
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

II
I
Permit:
AWS400144
Owner - Facility :
Danny L Miller
Facility Number:
400144
Inspection Date:
08/14/14
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Feld
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4 0144 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/29/2013 Entry Time: 1U0 AM Exit Time: 10:55 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mur h -Brawn LL
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'03" Longitude: 77°44'41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-25-13 = .98
3-18-13 = 1.10
6-20-12 = 1.34
soil tested: 1-24-13
Date:
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, & stocking are recoreded. Sludge survey done 1012012 and due in
2013. Caliberation due in 2014.
Looks Good.
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 0812912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 31840 2,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
LARGER
21.00
ILagoon
SMALL
05/06/96
19.00
21.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08129/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.ed iarge trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
11000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ [1
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Facility Number. 400144
inspection bate: 0812912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total Phosphorus?
Cl
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Conn. Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and DOcurnentS
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the Facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS4001" Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection date: 08/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDFS only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
EOD
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Cl
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Facility Number:
4001"
Inspection Date: 0812912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e.,
discharge, ❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 40 144 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: psi 012Q1Entry Time: 10:30 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: jenny Miller Swing Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 ett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Latitude: 35°28'03" _ Longitude: 77''41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on leis.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Danny Miller
Title
Phone:
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: 2010
6-20-12 = 1.34
2-12-12 = 1.10
1-27-11 = 1.57
Phone
1RR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded. Remember to do a sludge survey & get soil
samples pulled before the end of 2012!
Calibration done in 2011 SS due in 2012.
Page: 1

J
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 0812012012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
IL agoon
LARGER
25.00
agoon
SMALL
05106/96
19.00
25.00
Page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400144 Owner • Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 08120/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Stale other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
U
■
U
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility; Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 0812012012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
OND
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number. 400144
Inspection Date: 08/2012012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
In
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23_ If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24_ Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
01111
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ Cl
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ D 0
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection Date: 0812012012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30_ Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with ors -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34_ Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? n ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

41
E Division of Water Quality
r-1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400144 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoWtine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/23/2011 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 09:4Q AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner. dgrgv L Miller Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 CQ[benjQwn Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphv-Brgwn LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°28'03" _ _ Longitude: 77°44'4 "
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi, on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-20-11 = 1.6
6-15-11 = 1.6
4-6-11 = 1.1
soil tested: Jan. 2010
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall & freeboard are recorded.
Sludge survey & caliberation are due in 2011
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 0612312011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 1,500
Total Design Capacity: 3,640
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
goon LARGER
ILagoon SMALL 05/06/96 19.00 34.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Fatuity: Danny ! Miller
Inspection Date: 0812312011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
400144
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
b_ Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
D
■
0
D
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc_)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or M ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

1
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection Date: 0812312011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
000
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facitity: [Danny t Miller Facility Number; 400144
Inspection Date: 08/23/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ fl ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■ Q ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 0812312011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
f1FE...r Iran......
Facility Number : 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report n ■ ❑ n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? n ■ n 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
Cl
Page: 6

10
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400144 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: QM ne Region: �,(1 yaghi0gion
Date of Visit: 11/05/2010 Entry Time:09-00 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Faun Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Diinny L Miller
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'03" Longitude: 77°44'41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
a Discharges 8 Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
J1 Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18510
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested 2010
8-6-10 = 1.5
4-6-10 = 1 A
1-20-10 = 1.0
IRR records are complete and balanced out. SS Due 2010 Remember to do one before end of year_ Calib. 2011
Freeboard range:
3120/10 = 19 19" to 42 42" on g125110
Looks Good.
Page: 1

Permit: AVVS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 11/0512010 Inspection Type: Compiiance Inspection Beason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
R Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 1.400
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518.400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
LARGER
29.00
agoon
SMALL
05/06/96
19.00
28-00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 1110512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8, Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner -Facility. Danny L Miller
Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 1110512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Q
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
COm, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
Crop Type 3
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑■Q❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ID 11
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records _and _Documents _ Q ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection Date: 11/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21 Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24 Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 11/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer]]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

't!
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400144 Facility Status: Active_ Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/03/2009 Entry Time:08:10 AM Exit Time: Incident ##:
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller Phone: [phone] ^�
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: �5*2§'Q3" Longitude: 77°44'41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-18-09 2.1
4-8-09 .68
2-2-09 2A
soil tested Jan 07 none in 2008 Please pull Soil sample ASAP
Page: 1

■ e 6
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 09/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number; 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder is Finish 3,840 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518.400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon
LARGER
42.00
agoon
SMALL
05/06196
19.00
48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
❑ n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Q
■
Q ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
n
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc )?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑ n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (trot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 09103/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
In
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

I
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stacking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility flail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
n
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ I_i Q
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Canny L Miller
Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ n
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
110011
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

lb
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400144 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10121l2008 Entry Time:10 50 AM Exit Time: incident #:
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 25580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow H11 NC 28580
Facility Status: n Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3_,'28'03" _ Longitude: 77°44'41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis
9-19-08 = 2.1
1-31-08 = 2.2
soil test 1-8-07
don't forget to take the sludge survey in 2008
Looks good!
Phone:
Date:
Page. 1

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection Date: 1012112008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 1,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
LARGER
25,00
agoon
SMALL
05/06196
1900,
28.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 10/2112008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ONOO
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11 Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page:3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner -Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 10/21/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com,
Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes. check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Facility Number:
400144
Inspection Date: 101211200E Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

n
Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 10/21/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31 Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
n■nn
n■nn
Page 6

0 Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 40C144 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Ins ection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/21 /2007 Entry Time:08:40 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: n Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'03" Longitude: 77°44'41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left.
Question Areas:
jj Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment jj Waste Application
W Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18510
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-12-07 = .85
5-1-07 = 2.0
7-13-07 = 2.2
soil test Jan. 8, 2007
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
LARGER
41.00
agoon
SMALL
05/06/96
19.00
38.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
C1
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
❑
D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
Q
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
Q
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
❑
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
I]
0
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
110
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
171
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
Q
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400144 Owner -Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205? rl
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift? r l
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0
■
0
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
O
■
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
IN
n
Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number: 4001"
Inspection Date: 09121/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
fl
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Cl
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
rl
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility tail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
■
n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Q
■
Cl
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Y..
Aln
Ale
MP
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ fl ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ I]
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
D■00
D■DD
D■DD
Page: 6

N Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400144 Facility Status: Active Permit: N A240144 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/17/2006 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Danny L Miller Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211 Corbett Town Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'03" Longitude: 77'44'41"
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment jj Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Danny L Miller Operator Certification Number: 18510
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Danny Miller Phone:
On -site representative Danny Miller Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil Sample: 1112/05
Waste analyses:lbsN11000gal
3-6-06 = 1.5
9-26-05 = 1.5
5-26-05 = 3.6
1-21-05 = 2.6
Looks good!
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection Date: 03117/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3.840 3,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon LARGER 25.D
agoon SMALL 25.01
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller Facility Number : 400144
Inspection Date: 03/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n ■ n n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ■ n n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
f_I
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,e.1 large trees, severe
❑
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
rl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
f-i
■
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
1]
EDD
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground? fl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 03/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
In
Total P205?
[1
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ !�
16. Did the facility Fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? D ■
n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
18 Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ n
Records and documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
W UP?
f_'1
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Facility Number: 400144
Inspection Date: 03/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ 0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ 0
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ D
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air I_I ■ ❑ Q
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240144 Owner - Facility: Danny L Miller
Inspection Date: 03/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400144
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■LPL,
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

Division of Water.Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation .;
O Other Agency _ - .: • - � ' - -
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 144 Date of Visit: 3-25-2004 Time: "..25
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
N Permitted 0 Certified Q Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.............
Farm Name: A,�11u1J.�l�111R�.S13'Lti xitlt.......................................................... ...... County: Gumag ............................................... WARQ.......
Owner Name: 1,?, ARY..................................... 1!'t kr.......................................................... Phone No:(21521147:17.8.9.........................................................
Mailing Address: lDl.S11CGtl..P.}YA1.��fl....................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:
Onsite Representative: D}ajaxty.Mllcr................................................
8z1oW..bi1l.NC....................................................... 28.589 .............
. Phone No:
... Integrator:l'r.�lmxuttl.Iaatdaa tl.k a�rin.Qf.l`iQ�tlt...........
Certified Operator: D?ajajay. �................................ Tdillcr ................................................ Operator Certification Number:h3S.1U.............................
Location of harm:
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mi. on left. A*
0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 28 4 �. 3�It Longitude 77 • 44 41 µ
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
❑Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3840
2397
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 2
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 518,400
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑Yes ER No
Structure 6
rX//'
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (incites): 26 27
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: 40--144 1Date of Inspection 3-25-20D4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes OR No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes ®No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Soybeans Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Odor Issues
17.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
K
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: � - 31-
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-144 Date of Inspection 3-25-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ONO
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Cl Yes N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewtinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPi)ES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
N Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Annual Certification Form
0
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

i Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Natural Resources Conservation Service
Q Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 144 Date: 1018/03 Time: 1100 Time On Farm: F 70 WARO
Farm Name Danny Miller Swine Farm County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 1211 Corbett Town Road Snow Hill NC 28580
Onsite
Representative Danny Miller Integrator Premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated: — —
❑ Operating below threshold I
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
3840
3840
O Routine
Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerlintegrator
Q Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2.
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2.
Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes
® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3.
Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes
®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4.
Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes
® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5.
Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes
®no
and/or public health?
6.
Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes
® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier small large
Level (Inches) 38 38
CROP TYPES 1corn Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA AyB ExA WaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 144 Date:
1018/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8.
Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9.
Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10.
Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
El
❑ 11.
Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12.
Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need in
❑
❑
El 13.
Waste structure needs maintenance
(list comment section)
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14.
Over application >= 10% & 10 Ibs.
30. 21i.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15.
Over application < 10% or < 10 Ibs.
re -certification
❑ 16.
Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
❑ 17.
Deficient irrigation records
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 18.
Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organ izelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19.
Late/missing lagoon Ievel records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21.
Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22
Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24.
Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Requlatoi-V Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred
to DVVQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred
to NCDA pate.
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
❑
❑
El Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operatin improvements
g ' p rovements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3.
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54, Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 144 Date: 1 1018/03
COMMENTS:
'Waste analysis dated 8I6l03 nitrogen is 1.7 Ibs11000 gallons
4/21/03 nitrogen is 1.0 Ibs11000 gallons
3119/03 nitrogen is 2.9 Ibs/1000 gallons
7118/02 nitrogen is 2.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
*Be sure to initial IRR1 every 120 minutes when irrigation system is running.
'IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
'Veg. well established on lagoon dike walls.
'Mr. Miller states that soil test dated 02/05/01 is for 2002 crop year. Private lab Waters Lab did not put correct date.
Lab did not test for Cu and 2n. These test need to be conducted yearly. lime was applied 2002 crop year. Remember to
take soil test for 2003 crop year.
*COC dated April 9, 2003 and on site.
Need documentation from Carl Dunn DSWC, PE on approval in 10" pvc pipe tying lagoon together.
'Lagoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
*Rain stop switch installed on pump.
*"Need to return stop irrigation pump form to DWQ.
55. Discussed NPDES and transferring information to new forms.
*Need to initial lagoon and rainfall form.
'Need to transfer stocking # to new forms.
*Make records available for 5 years.
*Calibrate reel and complete sludge survey.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/13/02 Entered By: Imartin McLawhorn
AL
3 03/10/03

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 2l19/2002 Time: 11:30 am
p of Operational p Below Threshold
0 Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: Danny Miller Swine Farm County: Grt~ene............................................... .W..ARO.......
Owner Name: Danny Miller Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1211..Ctzr.Izest.lawn..Road................................................................ Snow.Hill_. ................................................ 2858Q--...........
Facility Contact: ........................................
Onsite Representative: Danny.N[Wer.
Certified Operator: Dan y...L.................
Location of Farm:
Title: ...........................
Phone No: . ...............
............ .......... .... I ................. .. Integrator: Premi u ion.Stauda r.(LEarm s .of.North...........
Miller ................................................. Operator Certification Number: 18510........
a e 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi.. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about mi. on lett.
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude �• --y °° Longitude • �� w r f
Swine
Capacity Population Poultry
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
❑ Boars
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
0 Datry
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Layer
p Non -Layer
i] Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 518,400
Number of Lagoons JE3 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ agoon rea 13 spray fleld Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps p No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes []No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 17 Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ...........jied............... ....... _wgeth.er........ ...................... ..............
Freeboard(inches): ............... .3.1........ ........ ... ............h................ ...................................

acihtr Number: 40_144 Date of Inspection
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, :severe erosion, 13 Yes ONO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? © Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures Iack adequate, gaugedmarkers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload p Yes ® No
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ONO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 13 Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 13 Yes N No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? p Yes ONO
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
13Yes
ONO
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
13 Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
© Yes
ONO
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
ONO
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
H No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
ONO
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
10 o violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no turther correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to questi€tn #) .,,Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. ..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): p Field Copy p Final Notes
Records available for review.
Waste analysis: 8/30/01 = 1.5 lbs.
Soil analysis - up through 2001 available. Lime has been applied. Suggest, as by DSWC, to obtain copy of time
receipt. Soil analysis dated 2/5/01 _
Lagoons are tied together by underground pipe (which was installed last year). The work supervised by NRCS._
Need to obtain a written description and certification from the county office for your records. Contact Don Smith
for assistance. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

r ,
05103101 contifrued
Facility Nurn4er. 40_144 Date of Inspection
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below © Yes 13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29_ Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 13 Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 13 Yes il No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as.requiared.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.

.•.. 99 .17
-'i-i
i I
4202
SL Job"
1202 f
}.o .�.
20 ry ,..p'' — •}fr -,
Cem.ram~
/r
Iti
3fc .... ` � wow' -.♦ ,r '"' �'" f: •/ r F }.. !rI - `
Carr,
_ Peanut Crossidadi
a
-. Cem - - 13
Cam:
de.,iialtraCh Cem. f
rww
Cem 13
.:A I G I� USi•� --
t.
' -- -
Mech
Name: SNOW HILL Location: 035' 27' 48.0° N 077' 44' 49.3" W
Date: 10/30/102 Caption: Danny Miller Farm
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet

05103101 Continue
f Facility Number. 40-144 Date of Inspection 719f2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
❑ Yes
N No
seepage_ etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenancefimprovement?
❑ Yes
N No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged mailers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste A lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans. Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Recorth & Document%
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Pewit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMr ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answerss and/or any recommendations or any Other comments.
IUse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ! Field Copy L1 Final Notes
*Soil test dated 8/23/0 D. Lime was applied. Suggest keeping lime receipts.
*WUP has coastal field changed to row crops -(Wheat, soybeans)
*Waste analysis dated 2/21/01. Nitrogen is 2.31bs/1000 gallons
5/21/01 nitrogen is 2.1 Ibs/1000 gallons_
*Remember to take soil test for this year and follow lime requirements_
*Discussed IRR2/waste analysis schedule.
*Lagoon levels being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Records are well organized_ T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

i O Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4U lqq Date of Visit: 7/9R001 Time: 1130
- - -- — t0 Not O rational 0 Below Threshold
N Permitted 9 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date La- A Operated or Above Threshold: .......... _..._...
Farm Name: Dxn U.Muter..Sw. kc.EAl=...�. ................................................................ County: .G.Knivto............................................... WARCL......
Owner Name: DAM ........................ _ MitOttir..._.... .................... _...... ............... ... Phone No: 2S2:T4.7.:57A2............... ................................. .........
Mailing Address: ]Rt.4.Boa 2'1................................. .... .. ..W ....__ ....` S IRWI 7111..HC........................................._....._..... 285.$Q.............
Facility Contact:........................................,.,....................... .. ... Title:Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: I1 "My. Mil . Integrator: ..............................
Certified Certified Operator: 11mmy.................................... AjUkr................ .................... ............ Operator Certification Number: IM19.............. ..,...........
Location of Farm:
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mL Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 mL on left.
AL
qr
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• ��..
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponniation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3840
3840
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I I I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 518,400
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Diwhatges & Stmirn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field. ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observe, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (lireeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Ideutiiier: .............large ..... —.__ ._.____ ,saw ----
Freeboard(inches): 2 ............... 24............................................................ _..._............ ..._....._..._
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure G

L v '
05103101 Cowed
Facilitv Number: 40-144 Date of Inspection 7/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29_ is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i_e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
J

o�o� WArF9QG thdiael F. Easley
Governor
�] Wftarn G. Ross, Jr. 5ecsvtary
] Deparhnent of 1 nwonment and Natural Resocaroes
Q -C Kerr T. Stevens
Division of water Quality
Dates April 16, 2001
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office_ Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections,
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAVam;
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2IL0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operatcr; (4) the required records are being, kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Asa reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
The maximum waste level in lagoons/stora¢e ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CA WMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis_
cp The following records are required. off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soE analysis and land irrieation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/mana-ger in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three vears.
w Land application rates shall be in accordance with. the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving Cron or result in runoff during anv riven application.
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
Can e another vmemW channel, an earth ditch, stabuluzation struetztre, or other suitable Outlets.
T Itissu"ested-notarequiremen to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plant can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001 _
Thank you for your zssistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any question& please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist
Cc: ✓RraRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27a89 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

s
• Dh ision of Water Quality
0 Dh ision of Soil and Water Consen ation
Q other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Omer ❑ Denied Access
Facilitti Number l0 l l l i Date of Visit: 3-13-3t101 Time: 3:Uti pm
t
- i
---- Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered
Farm Name: D&lEl i.M Uer.5.Aj .FaIDut...
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Count-:.Sxrgim ......................................
Oti,ner Name: Daps y.................................... Millcr .............. .... ........................... Phone No: 252-7.4.7-S789........... ........................................
Mailing Addresx: 8t.4.Box2.7.9.................. -................ -..... .... ..................... Snom:Biii.AC.................................... 2858.0.............
Facility Contact: ._._.... __...
Onshe Representative- Raw-Millcl:
Certified Operator. Tammy......
Title: Phone No:..... _ �........
I ntev, rator: Psxiutu m.Standud .......... ..
.--..--.... MiEl r......... _ _...... Operator Certification Number. 18510..............
Location of Farm:
Take 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mi- Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about I mi. on left.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse L:�tixu�lr • �� Dongitude �� 4 i .•
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I® Feeder to Finish
3840
3840
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
I❑ Boars
Desig t Current
Design Current
Poultr7-
Ca achy Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Laver
❑ Dairn-
J❑ Non -Laver
J❑ Nan -Dais-
j
❑ Other
II
Total Design Capacity
i
3.840
Total SSLW-*
518,400
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray- Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation? � Yes Z.-No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If di5:,har2c i�z obs--n-ed. %va, tho coni-e ance man-made" ;J Yes ❑ No
b- I f discharge is ob,en ed- did it rea: h Wa%:r of the Scat:," (If yes, uotif- DWQ) �-` Yes `: No
c- If diseharge is obs n-e.d. wbat is the estimated float in aal/miu?
d. Does di -char je bi7aass a lagoon system? (lf v"- nodh- DWQ) J Yes 3 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes JK No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes 7, No

01/U1/01
Facility Number. 40— t4
Date of Inspection 3-13 20(il
Continued
r
Waste Collection &• Treatment
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure , Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure i Structure 6
Identifier:Freeboard (inches):
- zS............................. .?................. ...... ..._...... ..... ......... ................................... ...... ......... .................... .................. —..............
3. Are there am immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion_
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
it mediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mamtenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management ;ystem other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markines?
Wastc Application
10. Are there any buffers that need mainteuance rnprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corte Soybeans_ Wheat
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility- lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facilitN need a wettable acre determination`'
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receh ing crop need improvement?
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
17. Are rock outcrops present"
19. Is fliere a ,A-ater supply Nvell within 230 feet of the spratf fold boundan ?
C On -site ❑ Utl=site
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes Z No
Yes IK- No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes g No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes
Z- No
Yes
No
Yet,
L \o
i .inkn(m.n ❑ ye.,
❑ :�io
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readi1v available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps_ etc.)
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard waste analysis & soil sample reports)
22_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
24. Fail to noti:R- regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge_ freeboard problems. over application)
25. Did Re6ewer/lnsspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A4lrMP?
Odor l«ues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge ai/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes 9, No
❑ Yes Z No
[:]Yes Z� No
Yes No
Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Yes 19, No
29. Are there anv dead animals not disposed of properly- within 24 hours?
J Yes [K, No

01/01/01
l Facility Number: 40-144 Date Elf inspection 3-13-2(lill
30. Is there am' etidence of -wind drift during land application? (i.e_ residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt_
roads. building structure, and/or public properly)
3 L Is the land application sprat system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Continued
Printed im. 3/302QD1
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Z No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any 17ES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of fardity to better explain situations. -{use additional pages as neeessaryj:
El Copy ❑Final Notes
Waste analysis 2/26/01 2.3 ]bs./10U0 gals. 7/7/2000 4.6 lbs./l i)00 gals.
Soil analysis 8/23/00
irrigation records complete wilb a nitrogen balance and no overapplication noted.
Freeboard level records maintained per General Permit requirements.
moortant Reminder*" Please be advised that all records of the CAMTW are required by the General Permit to be legible and in
orderly fashion. The records of the CAWMP must also be maintained for a minimum of three years in chronological form. You are
ther ad-Osed to review the records of your CAWMP to ensure that you are not in violation of your General Permit by meeting the
iditions listed above.
Reviewer/luspector Name Daphn B. Cullom
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: 3 - _ p R

0 Dhision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Consery atiort
I Q Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaivation
:
Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Fa ility Number ��0 J � ^ �1 � j Date of Visit: S/22�200o Time: 1t100 Printed on: 3i$t2001
3— — 1Vot O rational
Q Q Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: l��l .�lr :ip►e.F p�.....:.......... ............ CountF: Grftne............................... ................ W.AR.Q.......
Owner Name:RAW ..................................... ].!'�i� ir.:..............:................... ..... al-.1.42M.89 ........................
..... .... .............. Phone No: al
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress:&.4.$:R%.12`a.................................................................................... .... Sno]tk:M. C..-....-_.....-.......-..........
OnsiteRepresentative: Dattut.-N11kx.................................... .::.............. ........... ..-........... Integrator Uroliaa.Eat7w........
Certified Operator: DmwyJL ............................... Miller...-.:.........
Location of Farm:
28580 .............
Operator Certification Number:.l$510 .............................
rake 13 N from Snow Hill about 3 mL. Turn right on SR 1202. Farm is about 1 tmi, on left. #
w
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude * 1 4, Longitude 0 * =• •4
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3840
38 40
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-Dain-
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 518,400
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lug©on rea ❑ 5pra.y Field Area
Holding Ponds f Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge oriuinwed at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. It'discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b- It• discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notiN DW Q) ❑Yes ❑ No
c- if discharge is obsencd- N)hat is the estimated flow in cal/min?
Ll. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysiern? (If yes. not&, DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes X No
Waste Collection & Treatmem
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
titru�;ture I Structure 2 wtructure I Structure l Structure 5 Structure
Identifier ..-.....-.--Lar4c............ ............ small.-.-........
1eeboard (inches) ................ 30............... ................ U..................

5100
Facility Numher: 40-144 Date of Inspection 8f22/2000 Printed or.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion.
seepage. etc_)
6_ Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notif • DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid Ievel
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued on back
3/8/2001
❑ Yes ® No
Yes ® No
N Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving. crop need improvement?
16_ Is there a Iack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23 _ Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You wail receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer`.fo question #): Explain any YES answers andfor any':re'egmmendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as. necessary):
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
*Waste analysis dated 7/7/00. Nitrogen is C6 Ibs/I000 gallons_ This analysis appears to be extremeb high as compared to previous
Samples. May want to take another sample immediately and adjust MR-2 PAN balances for the dates that this waste sample covers.
*`Waste plan dated March 15 2000 and based on wetted acres.
Irrigation system is hose traveler-
UM-2 calculated by pulls.
Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
. Need tonwwbqKm inner walls to allow for row and visual inspections.
�I
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Rev-iewerllnspector Signature: Date: 1 5100
Facility Number: 40-144 1).at,t c,f Inspection 8/22/2000 Painted on: 3/8/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation`.'
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly ti%-ithin 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt ❑ Yes ® No
roads. building s-tructure. and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon`? ❑Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts_ missing or
or broken fan blade(s). inoperable shutters. etc.) ❑ Yes ER No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Field #1 coastal bermada hay has weeds. Field was sprayed four weeks ago with 2-4-D. Some Iargc weeds seem to be shading
19. There is not a waste sample to cover irrigation events on Coastal bermuda hay for months of May and June_
19. Soil test for 1999 not in record book. .
J

0 Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
'IF Q Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 144
e Permitted S Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Date of Visit 1 5/10/20 00 Printed on: 5/18/2000
Q !at O erational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
Farm Name: ....................... County: Grerup ............................................... V�.t�R�?........
............................................... .
Owner Name: I<?,&l?. y..................................... Millgjr.......................................................... Phone No: 919-I47-S7V.............................................. .............
FacilityContact: .............Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 1 1.1. axk�et!t. iaxr�n.ltQa............................................................... S QW Lill..NC....................................................... 285.8.0.............
Onsite Representative: Da,Amy..5filk.r....................
Integrator: Carolina- Farms ...................
Certified Operator:Rapjiy..L................................ jyidIcr................................................. Operator Certification Number:1$5,XQ
Location of Farm:
.....................................................................................................----............................................,...................----.---------.........,.....................................................----.......
Take.)f .�i.�rlaan.S.t1a .. ilA.akosxt.3.�mi....Turn.r.' ht..Qm. >�.1 A ,.F��r�l..i�. baltt..1.alai...alx.lefk........................................................... ............
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� Longitude C�• �� ��
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponnlation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3840
3801
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I L IE]Non-Dairyl_
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 518,400
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lancx,n :area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ([f yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 3 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier ..(Lg,)LQ5.1018A....(SmuLQ.51.01SB.................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 21 30

Continued on back
facility Number: 40-144 Date of Inspection S/lt}/20t}0 Printed on: 5/18/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Com, Wheat, Soybeans Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fait to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ No -violations or deficiencies•were noted duriing•this visit: You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IS No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #). Explain any Vft answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary);
12./13. Planning to add Coastal Bermuda back to waste utilization plan and will graze with sheep.
Contact Technical Specialist for assistance.
19. Last soil analysis in records from 2/98. Contact SW District or NCCES for a copy of 1999 soil
analysis.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
I'IF
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall

Reviewerllnspector Sign atu re: Date:
Facility Number: 40-144 Date of Inspection 5/10/2000 Printed on: 5/18/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J

Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
D Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
E Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
© Other Agency.- Operation Review
10 Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review ® Other �
Facility Number 40 l44 Date of Inspection 1219199
Time of Inspection 12:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted D Certified ® Conditionally Certified E3 Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ,CIA[IJ.�l�]iIGJC.TY]UII�..h3XJR1.................... .. County: Gxemac ............................................... WARQ.......
Owner Name: PARny...................................... miller ........... Phone No: 911:141-.570 ..........................................................
FacilityContact : .......................................... ...............................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: t. . t!]t� 4.......................................................................................... Sl O.W.11ilk.M...........................................--........ ��S�Q....,.........
Onsite Representative: ? 1aA1X.lYaiIltKC........................................... . Integrator: C;A 0.limaYorals...........................
Certified Operator:D#njaY..Ia................................ Mi[Iet:.......... ........... ........................... Operator Certification Number.185..0............. ................
Location of Farm:
,..........................................................................
Latitude ' L 6& Longitude ' 41
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3840
3810
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Resign Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver I I JE1Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 518,400
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1111 Lagoon area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge ori;inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (1f yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches.): ............... 25................ ................ 2..................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back
Printed on 12116199

Printed on 12/16/99
Facility Dumber: 40-144 I date of Inspection iE2/9/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Wheat, Soybeans Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
e) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records _&_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
earresnnndenee. ahnnt this visit.
111111�ilom
❑ Yes N No
11111�':.4m
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilih7 to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
=acility is having plan modified to allow for more winter application on additional wheat. Plan will probably exclude any
Dermuda and go to all row crops. Farm has wheat in plan now for winter application.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date:

13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
IN Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
JIM Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of_DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number rf Date of Inspection
-- Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
I$ Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered 113\;ot O erational Date Last Operated .
Farm Name: j i,l►t SL•' -� County'..................��2..2........ ......... .......................................................... '
OwnerName: ................................................... .............................................................. . ........ Phone No: ...... ... .........
............................................
FacilityContact: .................... Title: .................................................... ............ Phone No: ........................... ........................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ................. �.���...................tA,.IIe�..................................... Integrator:............." .........F`,.'.;.' ............................
�1:I�ri
Certified Operator:.. ..............................`' !.`...._.............. ... Operator Certification Number:......,..,,...............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0• ° Longitude • F 64
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pnpulaton
❑ Wean to Feeder
ig.Feeder to Finish
'3 $10
3 $ f
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
,Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2fNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was die conveyance than -made`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [Z No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ff No
Structure l Structure ? Structure 3 Stnicture 4 StrkjcturC 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches); *5 25.................................................................I...................... I.............. ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes Z No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Numbcr: yQ — I yy ]late of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes [A No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? El Yes No
Waste Annlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
El No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding El PAN
❑ Yes
No
12.
Crop type (.?-n
13.
Do the receiving crops: differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑Yes
No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
O No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes.
❑ No
c) This facility is pended fora wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15_
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes.
EJ No
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
El No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis. & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21 _
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes.
P No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23_
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�j No
�4.*14aiidris:or deride.ncies •were noted• dt*ftig fbis:visit; • "4 :witl•Ir&6VOy rio: irurther
corres aric enee aN ' f this visit.......:.:.:. :
Comments (refer to giiestion #): Explaia`any YES ansst is aud/ot any recoiumendations of any dither comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additlional pages as necessary).
FaC i 17
i 5 `4o �j 0W `3ar I %if) -( �vri;,Pr -e Lewiw.,
�.` �C.4-1 fp�� r-�+c,.Y. 11�.. 1.✓'i li ��o7��J 'y eX�1��� C�..y l'.Qf►nw.� atr� �c7 �a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: �. �- c 9
3/23/99

■ Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
0 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
C3 Other Agency - Operation Review
14P Routine O Cornplaint 0 FoIlo►i'-up of DWQ Inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 40 144 Date of Inspection 4/6194
Time of Inspection 1025 124 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Permitted 0 Certified ■ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 1E3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: DA110J:.i.1' .11mr-s:1.Iltt.k.81Ea1L .............................. .... County:(;X.Crjap ............................................... W
. � ARQ._.....
Owner Name: DaAny...................................... millcr.......... ................................................ Phone No: 25.2-7.4I.:S.7.89............... ...............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: l<it.4.B.QX2.71.................................... .... S.Upm—id.Ill..l.!1C................. ........... .......... ..... 21584..............
Onsite Representative:,Q&gtgy,J0jCr.................... .... Integrator:CAKf)jjU&jF ...................
................................
Certified Operator:JD.Uny..la.................... 5SIler.
Location of Farm:
........... Operator Certification Number:1.85.X0....... .................
Latitude 0 • Longitude a
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Poaulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
3840
3732
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder,
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer FEEI
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,840
Total SSLW 1 518,400
A6
Number of Lagoons 2 j ❑ Suhsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway N Yes '❑ No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Large Small
Freeboard (inches):...............29. 1.7 .........................
29 ............... ............................................................................................................................ .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 5/9/2000

Printed on 5/9/2000
Facility Number: 40-144 I Date of Inspection 416/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes M No
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes M No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes M No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes M No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
M No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes M No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes M No
No violations or deficiencies'were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question f: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situation& (use additional pages as necessary):
*Recommend signing up for Neuse Rule options by 8/1/99 with Greene Soil and Water.
*Given Int. Reg. card.
*Waste sample dated 12/29/98 with nitrogen 4.7 lbs/1000 gallons - need to sample again for March application.
*Soil test dated 2/23/98,
*Keeping weekly lagoon levels as required_
4. Mr. Miller has ability to lower lagoon #2 by pumping to lagoon#1 but is waiting for weather to break to start irrigating
onto Coastal Bermuda. He is planning to have transfer pipe installed between structures this summer. Lagoon#2 is one third
he size of lagoon# 1. High level in lagoon#2 does not pose a problem at this time.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252194"481 Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

rrjuteu on oivizuuu
Facility Number: 40-144 Date of Inspection 4/b/99
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
In the future, need to notify DWQ of high lagoon levels.
7. Bare areas on lagoon#2 - north wall still eroding. Has seeded area once - continue efforts to establish vegetation.
14b. Operation has map with pulls, separate lane dimension sheet with plan amended to wettable acre and on a per -pull basis.
Plan was also revised to include third party land with corn -wheat -bean rotation. Small grain overseed on Coastal was removed
from plan.
15. Has burned Coastal fields for weed control.
*Started this cropping cycle to keep 1RR2 by pulls.
J
Printed on 51912000

[Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
Routine 0 Com taint 0 Folloix-ue of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Q
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified 13 Applied for Permit Permitted 0 Not:O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.....c ,�.nr .................I�E ..`.....�......'A�-uv�....... C.ounty:...
Owner Name:...,.... �4Y4 ..................I . A. .. Phone No: �.� .. `7.... `... 7 ......,..............
Facility Contact: .......... ........................ ...................... ......... ............ Title: Phone No:........................ ��
IGt SS9-
MailingAddress:. .:. ....ti.... ................................................... ......................
Ons.ite Representative :................::...........................................:............ Integrator:.... S A. i.!! ....-..... ............
Certified Operators... :7.t�t... ..:IJ�.4 ................... k ............................... Operator Certification Number:... �.65.!Q................
Location of Farm:
.......... .................... . ......... . ---- -- -- . ---- --- ...........- . ... ........
Latitude 0 6 46 Longitude • 6 46
Swine
Eurrent
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
ceder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ID Lagoon Area 10 Spray Fielcl Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b- If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7- Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
D1�0
❑ Yes
0401
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
E► No
❑ Yes
(2"No
0 Yes
[j 40
❑ Yes
B"NNo
0 Yes
Ed <0
Continued on back

101
Facility, Numher: 46 — k Q
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes €1-'
Structures (Lairoons.11olding Ponds Flush Pits. etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes fl]
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 0
Identifier: ....I.. I. .........:� .Z
Freeboardtft):........... L.C1.............................11'................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
M<o
1 1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`?
❑, Yes
[Xo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
tom' T e5
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
011<10
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
_�
2 �o
(If in excess of'P, or runoffentering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
Wi
`Mf
15. Crop type ....... .J�,.1�.4,'..........................................................................................._.1........_.. ......_
.1
16. Do the receiving crops differ with -those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Gj`(es
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application.,
❑ YesE;[,�o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
LAo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Eal<o
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
I,Ko
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
t 21<0
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
0<0
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only --//
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes 0d 0
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? I4es ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? Ol es ❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
66, 411IS0, ,5 �q4� cis) C
�t � V lL7 Usk-SU l J� l I I C% 1 l L1� T,,G✓t 0. l�� r1� _ ���' . �C
tlU t' Tic, 1rti c� �d� �� i ► �. c n to `irk -Q- Gt C�'�c�c .7/25/97
5 - tr
Reviewer/Inspector Nametoy V1
Reviewer/Inspector signature: 1'1� Date: u - 793 et 7

Facility Number: —' t I el I Date of Inspection
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
BIZ ---,Re
(3 o—lt_ a -Uff S 6 v�,— 4 LV a-� "tU VQ l/2LA� 4-114�
CAos%C_„L_ ,
re me VIV-fl f I�
7/25/97

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p
p Division of Water Quality
rcouttne 0 c-ompiamt 0 roiio-v-up of "wt1 inspection 0 t,o
Facility Number
p Registered N Certified p Applied for Permit N Permitted
Farm Name: Damay. lfiller.Swine.Farm................................
Owner Name: Danny .....................................
er Agency
-up of ll�,wl_ rev[eiv 0 titner
Date or Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not 0perattona Date Last Operated:
County: Greene WARO
Phone No: 91Q-.7.41-57.89..........................
Facility Contact: Daniay.Mfiller..................................................Title: owner................................................... Phone No: 9191559 .38.1.7jxnaldle�....
MailingAddress: lti:.4.Box.279.......................................................................................... Saow.Hill...N.0 ....................................................... 2858.0 .............
Onsite Representative: Danzy..1.!'liller............................................................................. Integrator: Carolina.Farms.....................................................
Certified Operator: Danny.1 ............................... mfflcr ................................................ Operator Certification Number: JR510 .............................
Location of Farm:
,.a e. - . -. ream. naw. a oat. ..mL, .urjn r1 x-An. arm.t a OUP. ..Jill .pn, a 1,. ........................ A
Latitude �• �� �� Longitude • �=
L_
Swine Capacity Population Poultry „ Capacity Papu[afian Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Weanto Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
❑ Layer p any
❑ Non -Layer I JE3 on- airy
pOther
Total, Design Capacity 3,84
Total SSLW ,
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding:PoAds 0
❑
❑
Lagoon Area ❑ pray is Area
❑
o
iqutWaste
Management
ystei
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
Discharge ori�yinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify D)NdQ)
0 Yes
N No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Qf yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require
❑ Yes
®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
® No
7/25/97

Facility um er: 40—t44
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,111olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ..............big.............. ............ sm.o.......... ...................................... .................. ...........
Freeboard (ft): 2.2 1.9
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure I
15. Crop type Coastal.Bjrnuida.(]asy.)..............Sma11.Cuain.O.uerseed..................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R..:o.vio tions.or i-cren.cies:werqoi gt rsv e.note . tsit... You. will receive nofurther...
e�`�eSpo� e e dt t iS . . ......... ..... ..... .
..........................................................
Use drawrngs o faeillty #o better".exP latrt;sit�uations add itr nat pages ss nice'.
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Structure 6
...........................
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ll No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
* No subsurface drain tile on site according to Mr. Miller .,
* Lagoons operate separately
12. Continue efforts to establish vegetation on bare spots on smaller lagoon
2. Need to rework IRR2 forms on a per field basis and need to balance nitrogen for Coastal Bermuda crop (1997). Also need to
secure copy of completed certification signed by a designated technical specialist (Greene District).
* Not required at.time of certification but will need for General Permit: odor control, insect control and mortality checklists
* Need to pull soil samples for 1947
* Will be working with the Greene Conservation District to revise waste utilization plan to include third party land (Bobby Jones) -
ill also include notarized agreement 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name _Pat Hooper :'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

WA n d
State of North Carolina
Department of Environments`
and Natural Resources
-
Division of Water Quality �-
Washington Regional Office o
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor �t RFLR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary N F,µ`"�'
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 23, 1997
Mr. Danny Miller
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Rt. 4, Box 279
Snow Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Facility No(s). 40-144
Greene County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On October 16, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept, (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 1I
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
David Moore, Carolina Farms
WaRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
■ Division of Water Quality
outine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p ko11ow-_u_p`=WC review p ter
Date of IE1spection
Facility, Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted in Not 0perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: D nny.Mi. kxSw1ae-Farm.................. ......... -.......................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Elarmy.................................... MjUr........ .................................................. Phone No: 9.19,-.7.47-,5.789 ..................................................
Facility Contact: ........... ........ .......................................................... -Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: RtABox.27.9.......................................................................................... Snow.Hill..NC........................................... ............ 285811-............
Onsite Representative: Danny..X[Wer.............................................................................. Integrator:C.arolina.Farms.....................................................
Certified Operator: Dagn A. .............................. Miller................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1M1Q.............................
Location of Farm:
a e. ram, now. a oui..mr..- nrn.rl nn arm.ts ouf. .mL.on a t...............................
Latitude Longitude
Swine Capacity Population
to ee er
ee er to tntsarrow
Fcan
to can
arrow to Fee er
13 arrow to Finish
13 Gilts
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer I Ip airy
113 Non -Lay r 1 1 113 Non -Dairy
p other
Total Design Capacity 3,N40
Total SSLW ,
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds F___21____j p Subsurface rains resent p agoon rea JE3 Spray Field Are,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 17 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a la-oon system? (If yes, nutily DWQ) p Yes p No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ig No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

acifity Number: 40_ 144
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes ® No
Structures (Laizoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
{ 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 2.6 ft. 3 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes
® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
......................... ...... .... ................. I...
p Yes
®No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
15. Crop type .........................Rye................................GAastal.Reravada.Grass...... ..............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onh
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R .. wvao tlons.or erencies-were.note uring t cs y!s1t:. ou willreceive nor further .
cer>~eS�i©Ade>ae� about this Yis� .......... .... :::::...:.:.. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
Yes ®No
13 Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
I] Yes ® No
p Yes ❑ No
Gomments (refer to question tt): Explain any Yl5 answers antvor any recommennatlons or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
;oil Analyst' --robe collected Fall 1997
4Il componeo .' of the certified animal waste manage., gent plan are complete.
[rrigatioa 1b*"B R4 is complete; However the 1RR 2 form needs to be completed to show the nitrogenbalance for each receiving
the following items are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general permit, therefore these items
oust be implemented
;Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign'debris including, but not limited to tires, bottles, plastic products, light bulbs, YU&7
I Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne & Cullum I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. ��� �� 3 �'� �,� Date: L -j _ cl -7

aeffity Number: 40_144 Date of Inspection
-
es or any other solids waste = AL
isclraiging'wsstea mto agoon onld'beedendedbenem-the su li" ofWe lagoon to avoid releasing gases from
"S
;3he lagoon -areas should be kept mowed or otherwisecontrolled and accessible. , High grass doesoy all o -to conduct a
ifiorough�mspecaon�i` for seepage,
quid'aritmal wasterom#3��oonhal[ be conduc`as close #ohc.'ti�e of agic asractieal and at
rvrihnmdaysbefore`arafter) ohe date of appticatiorl. 'lh�s analysis sliall'include the folio iamcters: Nitrogen,
a aniod&Vrequired annually. .
e following records are required: lagoon level data, off --site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste and soil analysis and
i rigationrecords.- ibesie records should be maintainedby the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
imum of three years.
WOW
,.RZ
_ _ ag..v-- d-{y�e���..StS- ...a+cw.aaw.sewa�o�t6- � .. �" �-==�•i'�`r.-�' ==� "'+`-hr?,ra"•"rL""�. ,., _�.i- � ... ._
71