20200797 Ver 1_401 Application_20200616

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200797
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Gold Dredge Stream Relocation
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jeff Harbour
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
6/16/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Fishing Creek
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
WS-V; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.1932
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Nash
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.0087
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes f No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
R Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Timothy Fisher
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
1760 First Street Ext.
Address Line 2
city
Nashville
Postal / Zip Code
27856
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rovince / I-gion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r- Yes r No
r Yes r No
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)

4a. Name:
Jeff Harbour
4b. Business Name:
Terracon
4c.Address
Street Address
2401 Brentwood Road
Address Line 2
Suite 107
CRY
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zip Code
27604
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Auth.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Nashville
2. Project Identification
Slate / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
289900203678
7.1
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Taylors Store Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Rovince / Region
Castalia
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Fishing Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-V: NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201020200
4. Project Description and History
81.94KB
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The property is the current location of Mr. Fisher's gold prospecting operation. Fie has discovered the Gold Dredge buried in what was historically a shallow, man-made water body that
allowed the dredge to float and operate. The water body has long disappeared and what remains now includes a perennial stream and a wetland slough that appears to be the result of
some beaver activity. An approximately, 50-ft portion of the stream was excavated without 404 approval when the dredge was discovered. The approximate center line of the stream
crossed the bow of the buried dredge. This can be seen in the uploaded plans. The stream was also diverted around the dredge site in an attempt to eliminate the water as much as
possible. Both the initial excavation and the diversion were unauthorized and Mr. Fisher was not aware that his actions required Section 404/401 approval.
Land use in this area is rural with pine plantation and agriculture being the primary land cover classes.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*

r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS map.pdf
185.03KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
SOILS. pdf 28.01 KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.5
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
900
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to reroute the stream back into a natural landscape position that also provides adequate workspace for the proposed partial excavation of the gold
dredge. The gold dredge has been assigned a Archaeological Site number by NCSHPO. It is the intent of Mr. Fisher to eventually open the site to the public once a partial excavation
has been initiated. The proposed project will also potentially have a 20-foot wide access across the perennial stream that would allow pedestrian and equipment ingress and egress for
the gold dredge site.
The eAsting channel, including the 50-foot section that was excavated by Mr. Fisher, encompasses 429 linear feet. The relocated channel, will encompass 493 linear feet; providing an
additional 64 linear feet of aquatic resource. Natural channel design will be used construct the new channel and it is intended to provide better overall function than the currently
degraded channel that now exists. The old channel will not be filled. Twenty (20) feet of the new channel will be piped to allowfor an access point to the site.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project involves the relocation of a stream segment that was disturbed during unauthorized excavation activities associated with the discovered gold dredge. This proposed
relocation will place the stream segment in a more natural landscape position and move it and it's associated buffers away from the gold dredge site so that the owner can partially
excavate the site. The stream relocation will be designed using natural stream channel design methods. A 20-foot wide culvert will also be installed to provide access to the site across
the stream.
Typical equipment may include a small excavator, back -hoe, and equipment to haul away the excess material
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Tim Fishers Gold Dredge - Stream Relocation Plans 5-12-20.pdf 3.39MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jeff Harbour
Agency/Consultant Company: Terracon
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries W Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts

F 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * r7l;
StreamType * 3f. Type of �ff��rhImpact Jurisdiction* gth*
S1
culvert
Permanent
Culvert
lJT Fishin Creek
9
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
20
(linearfeet)
g2
gold dredge excavation
Temporary
Excavation
LIT Fishing Creek
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
50
(linearfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
20
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
70
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
50
3j. Comments:
The 50-ft impact resulted from unauthorized excavation; however the aquatic resource was not lost as a result of the excavation. The proposed
channel relocation will result in a net gain of overall channel length.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Qeckall that apply.
r" Neuse Tar -Pamlico
C Catawba r Randleman
C Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
5b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
=xempt P UT to Fishing Creek No 1,265 6,528
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 1,265.00
6,528.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 1,265.00
6,528.00
61. Comments:
The project has been assigned a State Archaeological Site Number (Site 31 NS206). Therefore, the proposed work is Exempt from the riparian buffer
rules per the table of uses. The relocated stream will result in a net gain of 7233 sf of Zone 2 and 4840 sf of Zone 1
Supporting Documentation
Tim Fishers Gold Dredge 6-9-20.pdf 3.4MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The applicant sought out environmental consulting experience as a result of a NOV for the unauthorized excavation at the dredge site. We have
worked with the applicant and COE/DWR to identify unique solutions to allowfor the partial excavation of the state -recognized archaeological site. The
proposed stream relocation should allow the permittee to excavate the site without damaging nearby aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Stringent ESC measures will be employed during construction and during the excavation. Excavated material will be moved to an upland location
identified by the engineer and stockpiled with protective measures put in place to prevent erosion.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:

Project incurs 20 If of permanent stream loss by a culvert crossing. The relocation will result in anew gain of 64 linear feet of stream channel
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormvrater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information u
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15ANCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
The applicant initiated some of the site excavation without proper 404/401 authorization resulting in approbmately 50 feet of stream impact. The
stream is not considered a loss but was extensively vddened and deepened from the excavation activities.. Mr Rick Trone of NCDWR has visited the
site several times and the applicant is working with Mr. Trone and the USACE to obtain this all necessary approvals via this current PCN submittal. The
site has been designated an archaeological site by NCSHPO and any potential buffer impacts are Exempt
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Nothing that the applicant is proposing can be reasonable expected to result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
(- Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?

r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
FWS IPaCs report indicates no critical habitats in the study area. Terracon biologists conducted a species habitat assessment and found no suitable
habitat capable of supporting the listed species. NCNHP indicates that there are known occurrences of protected species within one mile, in Fishing
Creek. The study area itself, however, does not provide suitable habitats or critical habitat for any of the listed species. The onsite streams do not
provide the necessary habitat components for the listed species. The streams have also experienced degradation as a result of historical use of the
property for gold dredging activities.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaCs report.pdf 5.47MB
NHP project _report_gold_dredge_nhp_25248_25248.pdf 1.84MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes
r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
EFH mapper by NOAA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes
r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
The gold dredge site has been assigned a State Archaeological Site Number (31 NS206) and a North Carolina Archaeological Site Form is on file at
the SHPO. Terri Russ, an Registered Professional Archaeologist with ESI, is also providing consultation to Mr. Fisher during this process and assisted
in obtaining the official site number.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
r Yes
r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Floodmaps
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
June32020 photos.pdf 422.46KB
Signature
17 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jeff Harbour
u
Signature

c17e9r-m1-?-
Date
6/16/2020

1
%ri m4
a
3
fb
t
3
�
�
i
z
°1
t
3

ACME Mapper 2.2 - 23.8 km N of Nashville NC
https://mapper.acme.com/
i
in
_ 1 f
r _
It A
1 _
147
I'L l
r Y 1 JF •�`-F�+rt
_ am f, r
y 11 _ i too m -
000 ft Leaflet Tiles © Esri — Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, iPC, USGS, and the GIS User Community
1
- - - L-
1 of 1 6/11/2020, 1:07 PM

NASH COUNTY GOLD DREDGE
cry �i-
� a `
'.VYA
Gee w+. Dredge Site
Gp ,
cmc yMh �f 4nf
4c$ tih r
G coc
fir
� h
GcES �
F;
Q�eE
W t.
Cleo Ges GeC
Gec f
Goc
�e
ri

TIM FISHER'S GOLD DREDGE -STREAM RELOCATION
NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
INDEX
COVER
COVER SHEET
CE-01
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CE-02
SITE PLAN
CE-03
STREAM PROFILE
CE-04
EROSION CONTROL
CE-05
EROSION CONTROL
NOTES AND DETAILS
CE-06
PLANTING PLAN
CE-07
IMPACT MAP
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
General Notes
1. TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA PERFORMED BY PIEDMONT SURVEYS, INC.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES OF FIRMS HAVING FACILITIES ON OR ADJACENT TO THE SITE
BEFORE DISTURBING, ALTERING, REMOVING, RELOCATING, ADJUSTING OR CONNECTING TO SAID FACILITIES. THE OWNER SHALL PAY ALL COSTS
IN CONNECTION WITH ALTERATION OF OR RELOCATION OF ANY EXISTING FACILITIES.
3. ALL EXCAVATION IS UNCLASSIFIED AND SHALL INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED.
4. ALL STREAM BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE NATURAL CLEAN COBBLE/GRAVEL MIX FREE OF CLAY, SILT, ROOTS, CLUMPS, ETC..
5. UNUSABLE EXCAVATED MATERIALS AND ALL WASTE RESULTING FROM CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE BY THE
CONTRACTOR IN AN APPROVED SOLID WASTE LANDFILL.
6. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED. CONTACT THE NC ONE CALL CENTER AT LEAST 72
HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING ® 811. TRUE LINE SURVEYING HAS ONLY LOCATED THE UTILITIES THAT ARE ABOVE GROUND AT THE TIME OF
FIELD SURVEY. UNDERGROUND LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE OR AS REPORTED BY VARIOUS RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. THE
SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES SUCH AS UTILITIES, TANKS AND PIPES ARE LOCATED HEREON.
7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH 4" MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL, FREE OF ROOT MATTER
AND ROCKS AND GRASSED.
Surveying:
PIEDMONT
PIEDMONT
SURVEYS, INC.
License No: C-07 _
Civil Engineering=
SURVEYS, INC.
Charles M. Davis, Jr.
Professional Land Surveyor
105 CHURCH STREET — P.O. BOX 562
LOUISBURG, NC 27549 [phone]
FAX [phone]
ENGINEERING =Enhhh,
801 EAST WASHINGTON STREET P.O. BOX 1108
NASHVILLE, N.C. 27856 PHONE: [phone]
[e-mail] WWW.STOCKSENGINEERING.COM
00LO
Orn
�;_0
xl
O
m L0
o^
N
LO
N
W
Z
O
n
Z
W~
w
w
WV)
Z
u,
OLQ
Z_00
r,
—
Z N
= U
Z
z
�
�W
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
OQ
00 Z
O
U
C�
z
w
w
Z
Z
w
U)
Y
U
O
H
BLN=C-1874
O
v �
O
J Z
W J
� O
v
W
0 0
a z
W -
a �
z
a �
J O
o v
0
0 _
b� L�2_
W z
0
-
R04
SEAL
19843
�'°v ..�' FN� I NEE-E�.•',�� �:
AEL
5/12/2020
COVER SHEET
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2016-040
HORZ. SCALE: I NONE
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water". John 7:38
VERT. SCALE: I NONE
COVER

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
SYMBOL LEGEND
Q
Existing Iron Pipe(EIP)
p
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
®
50 Penny Nail
O
Existing Axle
®
Power Pole
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
-E-
Electric Lines
(�
Center Line
R/W Right of Way
®
Man Hole
♦
Existing Planted Stone
�
tJ
1
1
1
1
t
t
t
t
1
t
1
t
1
7
1
� �
1
� �
1
uo-,
1
t
t
�
t
'
1
.4
Sop
0\P
9g 40
U�
t
j 00
1 E\
1
U�
i5 a
1 /
i 0
N a?
28.31 EMN
4 /
o
i
�
'
G+
1
0
� t
00
1
ZD
1
O 1
Z
30
EMN 6 .00,
Q
2
0 9g
LL'f M
1
c
,
1
O
New Iron Pipe(NIP)
0
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
0
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
Existing Rebar
Computed Point(CP)
CC
Control Corner
0
Light Pole
0
Grid Monument
F�
Property Line
®
R/W Monument
T"
Telephone Lines
U
Utility Lines
3° 1b54„
PSQr°\t/.
oKe
\�e
r
rn
v '
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
4
4
/
E\P
g4 Oj
g4
So9 9 07'
271.69'
378.9g
W
:k P
�t
1
Of E\P
109 94 54'
1\
/100
ten
�A������
m,.rrr
tee -►id
i
Vv/
Linnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
Charles Lee Harris
D.B. 2229, Pg. 650
M.B. 29, Pg. 157
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 4g,
N , g 05 48
"E
�I
I /
lopOj
gg 15 E\
�\ I
/ I
/ I
I �
w I
r ' I
N /
I "0.
1
0\vertne\
�
R11,
I
Choy
'
/ 9
4
�< r
/ r
' z
E1P 2
� ZoP Otq.7
ti
Jo
o
M �
v.
Boa
soh
9�
4V
NN /
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
*NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
0 0 /
z �
8,
I
�I a$
I
I
/ Ot E\P
1/P lop g866
31.65'- _ ,
`The Gold Dredge Site has been assigned a State
Archaeological Site Number (Designated as Site
JlNS206) and a NC Archaeological Site Form is
`on file with the State Historic Preservation Office.
Work Area
— ♦ nth / I v�
I �p N
0 m rn
`89
�90 �
N
J
f ^ Ot E\P
T oP 114 66,
E\
94
— 5
97969
98
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00LO
orn
�00
xI
O
00 L0
O^
N
N
w
z
O
o_
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z
z
Z
z
w
y
Y
0
O
H
W
w3::
W�
z00
o LQ
•
CD r-
z N
= U
Z
zV)w
�
J
Wa'
(n
w=
z
00000
BLN=C-1874
CA O
ES S ON'
SEAL
19843
411�HAEL S�
' 5 12 2020
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-01

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
TOP OF STREAMBi
0 BANKFULL STAGE
10'-15' LONG 0 BASEFLOW
>10" DIAMETER
PL)
NOTES'
FOOTER LOG
>12" DIAMETER
1. SHARPEN THE END OF THE LOG WITH A CHAINSAW
INSTALLED BELOW
BEFORE 'DRIVING" IT INTO THE BANK.
STREAM BED.
2. ORIENT ROOT WADS UPSREAM SO THAT THE STREAM
FLOW MEETS THE ROOT WAD AT A 90—DEGREE ANGLE,
DEFLECTING THE WATER AWAY FROM THE BANK.
J. A BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
SIDE OF THE ROOT WAD IF A EDDY IS ED BY
THE ROOT WAD. HE BOULDERBACK SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY
4 x3'x2'.
ROOT WAD
TRENCHING METHOD:
NOT TO SCALE
1. IF THE ROOT WAD CANNOT BE DRIVEN INTO THE BANK
OR THE BANK NEEDS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED. THE
TRENCHING METHOD SHOULD BE USED. THIS METHOD
REQUIRES THAT A TRENCH BE EXCAVATED FOR THE
LOG PORTION OF THE ROOT WAD.
2. A FOOTER LOG SHOULD BE INSTALLED UNDERNEATH
THE ROOT WAD IN A TRENCH EXCAVATED PARALLEL TO
THE BANK AND WELL BELOW THE STREAMBED.
J. ONE—THIRD OF THE ROOT WAD SHOULD REMAIN BELOW
NORMAL BASE FLOW CONDITIONS
ROOT WADS
(NUMBER & SIZE TO BE
DETERMINED IN THE FIELD)
PLANTS/TRANSPLANTS
/ Q
Q.
U \
a
RIFEC
j S/ i
Q� / EROSION CONTROL — \ T,1PIG/
/ MATTING ON BANKS
R
0
TYPICAL ROOT �.
�
tl
1
1
1
1
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
�
t
lop
a99.40
U�
t
ro
j
1 E\
i5 a
o
i $
1
E\. 43'
o N
1.
N a?�/2"
1
101
0
-o o
E\P
28.31 EMN
4 /
i
�
'
G+
1
0
00
1
ZD
o
Z I ;
'
30
�
EMN 6 .00,
Q
1 E2\Po
0 9g
LL'f M
1
1
TER LOG
' DIAMETER
'ALLED BELOW
EAM BED.
Unnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
5
I /
o /
lop SS 15 E\
$D
I
I
/ � d
l �
Charles Lee Harris 1
D.B. 2229, Pg. 650
M.B. 29, Pg. 157 \ o
A I ^Q0
J �
P
p O
or /
\ \il
1 1 z
S 12p14g / / Ot �\P'
52•g3 g9 I / 1EP �o\P SS 66
31 F� c
N 85°0217
Ot
1oP S919 E\P
E\ . ' \
I
/
Chorne _ — ., WORK AREA
WAD PLACEMENT0*0
o
NOT TO SCALE a
b
STRUCTURE NOTES. //°
1. GENERALLY ✓—HOOK VANES ROOT WADS
CROSS VANES AND MATTING WILL BE .. /
INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION AND z
SEQUENCE AS SHOWN.
2 BOULDER CLUSTERS SHOULD BE ADDED
DOWNSTREAM OF J—HOOK VANES.
3. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR CHANGES
TO STRUCTURE LOCATIONS MAY BE MADE
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
N 3° I-E(54„
PSQra\t.
o*e
\Ae
r
rn
0/„EIP
271.69'
378.99
W
E2
\P
P
& Brake i
Gr e\ �' e `xt \
— �
Of
109 g4.54
E\
1
�• • / ,
.a /
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
CW
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
/—� *NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
CL
I
0
2
to
00
000
'
I STOCKPILE
ARFA
,1
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
SYMBOL LEGEND
p Existing Iron Pipe(EIP) O New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
®
Existing Rebar
Existing Axle
Computed Point(CP)
0
Power Pole
CC
Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
®
Light Pole
-E'
Electric Lines
0
Grid Monument
(L
Center Line
Property Line
R/W
Right of Way
®
R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T-
Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
U
Utility Lines
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE OF EVENTS.•
CONSTRUCTION WILL BE OBSERVED BY STOCKS ENGINEERING PERSONNEL.
CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE.
1. MOBILIZE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO THE SITE.
2. SET UP STAGING AREAS, CONSTRUCT ENTRANCES AND SAFETY FENCES.
J. INSTALL COFFER DAMS AND PUMP TO ALLOW WORK IN THE DRY ® STA 2+00.
4. CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP NEAR STATION 3+75.
5. CLEAR, GRUB AND EXCAVATE BETWEEN STATIONS 2+25 AND 3+50.
RESTRICT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC TO EXCAVATION LIMITS AND CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS ROADS. CONSTRUCT IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND INSTALL ROOT WADS.
APPLY TEMPORARY SEED AND INSTALL EROSION MATTING ON CHANNEL BANKS;
SEED THE FLOODPLAIN.
6. ONCE BANKS HAVE BEEN MATTED AND ALL STRUCTURES COMPLETE, TURN
WATER INTO NEW CHANNEL.
7. REMOVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS.
8. APPLY MULCH AND PERMANENT SEEDING; PLANT RIPARIAN VEGETATION AT
THE APPROPRIATE TIME OF YEAR.
9. DEMOBILIZE EQUIPMENT FROM THE SITE.
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
�+reiinriiec ic�cun
C90.Rf'1�.4NE
ifOOTK'.40
2'
TYPICAL RIFFLE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
0
15'
TYPICAL POOL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00(D
orn
-00
xI
O rn
00 L0
O^
N
N
O
1
U
U
z_
w
w
z_
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
O
W`,�
w�
W�
V)
z
z00
O L0
•
r-
r
�
Z N
= U
z
�z
_'
J
Wa'
(o
w
Cn
00Z
BLN=C-1874
CA O
SEAL
19843
�'CHAEL 5��/•�`•
' 5 12 2020
SITE PLAN
REVISIONS
FILE NO.
2020-023
HORZ. SCALE:
1"=50'
VERT. SCALE:
NONE
CE-02

SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
110
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
110
105
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
105
100
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
100
95
95
90
90
85
0
36 " HDPE
1,75%. BURY
12 BELOW BED
Q
EXISTING
—028
85
80
I
LOG CROSS
VANE (TYP)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
80
75
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
75
70
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70
9+00 10+00 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 22+00
00LD
Orn
�;0-
xl
O
m L0
o^
. cV
n Lo
N
W
Z
O
n
Z
W~
w
w
WV)
Z
Z u,
OLQ
r,
Z CV
V= U
< Z
z
�W
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
OQ
00 Z
O
U
C�
Z_
Fy
W
W
Z_
0
Z
LJ
U)
Y
U
O
H
BLN=C-1874
O
v �
O
J Z
W J
� O
v
V O
J O
o v
0
W Z
N
00-0
ol��%'.
SEAL
19843
5/12/2020
STREAM
PROFILE
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-In
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. John 7:38

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
SYMBOL LEGEND
0 Existing Iron Pipe(EIP) 0 New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
0
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
0
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
®
Existing Rebar
O
Existing Axle
Computed Point(CP)
®
Power Pole
CC
Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
0
Light Pole
-E-
Electric Lines
0
Grid Monument
(�
Center Line
F�
Property Line
R/W Right of Way
®
R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T-
Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
U
Utility Lines
�
tl
�
1
�
1
1
�
t
�
�
1
�
1
�
1
S t
EMN ;
uo
t
t
�
t
.4
lop
o99.40
U�
t
j 00
tJ E\
1
U
a
1 /
i $
I
E\. 43'
N a?
�o o
ESP
28.31 EMN
i
�
G+
1
0
00
/a'P�
1
ZD
1
O ,
30
EMN 6 .00,
Q
2
0 9g
LL'f M
1
1
N 30I-E(54„
PSQra\t.
o*e
\�e
r
rn
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
/
4
4
4
g4 7 loP Of 07
g4.
E\,' _ .
271.69'
378.9g
W
P
& Brake
Gr e1 �' e S\P
loP 01g4.54
C94 J//
lop $g 15
E\
Charles Lee Harri.
D.B. 2229, Pg. 6°
M.B. 29, Pg. 15
i
Linnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
N 85°02' 17"E
loP O$g 119 1EP
E\
10,
00
/ory
v
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
*NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
! "i V -
mg qlhj,
Of E\P
l09 1�466
E\
o=0s_
94
9796—,�
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
0
STOCKPILE
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 4g,
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
.p� M.B. 39, Pg. 86
MOS/OAILEGEND
co�sr��cr�ory
far�acf
■--�■ siLrff�cf
.S/LTFENCEOUTLEr
� rE/I'POr9.4i�1'.SED//I9EiVTri�.4P
NOTES:
1. TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROWDED
BY PIEDMONT SURVEYS, INC.
2. ALL STRUCTURES ARE APPROXIMA TE AND SHALL
BE FIELD PLACED BY ENGINEER.
J. BANKS SHALL BE MA TIED AND LIVE STAKED PER
DETAILS.
4. BANK MA TTING SHALL BE NAG C700 BN OR EGUAL.
5. BANK SEEDING SHALL BE A PERMANENT WETLAND
SEED MIX AT A RA TE OF 25 LBS/ACRE.
6. ALL STREAM BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE NATURAL
CLEAN COBBLE/SAND MIX.
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00LO
orn
�00
xI
O
M L0
O^
N
N
w
z
O
w
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z_
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
0
W`,�
w�
W�
z(0
O LQ
•
CD r-
z N
= U
Z
z
�
�w
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
OQ
00 z
BLN=C-1874
CA 04''%.
9<
SEAL
19843
I N0�`����:
411OHAEL S�
' 5 12 2020
EROSION
CONTROL
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-04

SILFFFACE
NOT TO SCALE
oio�oi FI..�eiei'.►� �.
oi�.��oi����ioi�'�eioi .i��oi jai• .-. -
i�ei���oi�o� ��oi�o��o%!��ei�.►i`��.•. -
��i�.��!ei 40, i, A �oi�o%��oi�o%1�Q•i�o�ei�oi�oi,�!o%��oi�oi,:�
:!o�oi�.��oi�.��oi�ei�.��oi�e.,.;��ei�'�ei�oi��oi�oi`•�.� .
'►�oi�.��oi�oi���oi'ffi$ �oi�.��oi���i�i�o%��oi�o���i�.��o%��oi�oi�:��e�=
i�.1�oi�oi1.��oi�.��oi�ei`��ei�'0"
��oi���i��%���i%� e�i�`����oi�e:, �!►�ei����i��i���i�ei�oi����.►i�o%��oJ i•
�►i�oi���oi�ei���ei�oi�.��oi�oi`��ei��,!°io%!��oi����.►i�oi�o%��oi�o%��oi��'
��j�0IO1 ��OI�.OIL.��OI�.OI�.��OI�.OI�.��OI�.��OI •'I ���OI�.OIL.��OI�.OI�.��O��.OI�.��OI�.OI�.����
-s!L.i��1►��p���I0I�0I���0I�0I���0`���pj�OI���1 i��Na�I�OI�N•;I�OI�Nt,��0Is�0I���0I� ►� .� ty..�A1ii�•!����ij���I.����I ��•I �pvw+j�Ol�,� j�•,I�•I���•,j�•I��-,��-I� I
BACKFILL MIN. 8" FILTER I
THICK LAYER OF
GRAVEL.
14"
Lr,
T
-,�IIII„
Do
V-TRENCH
POST
���
FILTER FABRIC
EXTENSION OF FABRIC
AND WIRE INTO TRENCH
=III—��+ .II • • I I I
III- ':•: • - m
�I 2
1/3
1/3
1/3
BANKFULL
BANKFULL
BANKFULL
WIDTH
WIDTH
WIDTH
BURY END OF LOG VANES
AND HEADER LOG INTO
6
A
CHANNEL BED. SECURE
20' TO
LOGS TOGETHER EITHER
30'
BY CABLING OR PINNING
O
WITH REBAR.
o
O� °
o
o
Y
NOTCH
z
°
m
m
HEADER
LOG
LOG FLOW
VANE
1
iPOOL j
POOL EXCAVATED PER
DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
BOULDER DIMENSIONS (FT)
STATION I HEIGHT I LENGTH I WIDTH
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF STANDARD OR EXTRA STRENGTH
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24
INCHES ABOVE GROUND SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF
WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE).
J. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE
LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY,
SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 FEET
MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST.
4. SUPPORT STANDARD FILTER FABRIC BY WIRE MESH FASTENED SECURELY TO
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS. EXTEND THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT TO THE
BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. FASTEN THE WIRE REINFORCEMENT, THEN FABRIC ON
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE FENCE POST. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD
HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
5. WHEN A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IS USED, SPACE POSTS A MAXIMUM OF
8 FEET APART SUPPORT POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES.
6. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT
REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE. SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC
DIRECTLY TO POSTS. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50
POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
7. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP
ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER.
8. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE
TRENCH.
9. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND
COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE
PERFORMANCE.
10. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
MAINTENANCE:
WIRE INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL.
MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT
FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT
PROMPTLY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE
FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING
THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA
HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
CONS TRUC PON SPECS:
1. CLEAR & GRUB THE AREA AROUND THE SILT FENCE
OUTLET AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF DEBRIS.
2. PLACE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AS SHOWN
PER THE DETAIL.
J. PROPERLY OVERLAP STONE BEYOND EDGES OF SILT
FENCE OPENING.
MAIN TENANCE:
INSPECT OUTLETS WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT
IMMEDIA TEL Y REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE FL 0 W AREA
AND REPAIR AS NEEDED. CAREFULLY CHECK OUTLETS
FOR EROSION AND REPAIR IMMEDIA TEL Y. ENSURE THERE
IS NO SCOURING APPARENT DOWNSTREAM OF OUTLET
IMMEDIA TEL Y STABILIZE ANY AREAS THAT NEED REPAIR.
FLOW
BACKFILL, TYP.
LOG VANE, TYP J (/pou"
NAIL FILTER FABRIC #57 STONE, TYP. 2' MIN.
TO BACK OF LOG VANE,
SEE PROJECT SPECIAL
PROVISIONS EXCAVATED TRENCH
FOR LOG VANE
k57 STONE CONSTRUCTION
/-- FILTER FABRIC
-LOG
�A VANE
KEY IN VANE TO BANK -
MINIMUM OF AT AN
ELEVATION EQUAL TO
BANKFULL OR SLIGHTLY
LOWER
PLAN VIEW
2' MIN.
EXCAVATED POOL
HEADER LOG, TYP.
FILTER FABRIC, TYP.
SECTION A -A
BANKFULL TIE VANE ARM INTO ---\
1/2 BANKFULL ELEVATION
FLOW r
BED-
BACKFILL, TYP
#57 STONE, TYP:
LOG CROSS VANE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
4% TO 10'o
, SLOPE
SECURE LOGS TOGETHER,
i/ SEE PROJECT SPECIAL
PROVISIONS
ROOTWAD
FILTER FABRIC, TYP.
SECTION 6-13
NOTES:
1. DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE
VANE ARM TIES INTO BANKFULL.
2. DO NOT EXCAVATE POOL TOO CLOSE TO FOOTER BOULDERS.
3. CLASS "A" STONE CAN BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS
BETWEEN HEADERS AND FOOTERS.
4. COMPACT BACKFILL TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
5. POOL DEPTH SHOULD BE 2 TO 3 TIMES BANKFULL DEPTH.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1. CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE
MATERIAL AND PROPERLY GRADE IT.
2. PLACE THE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND
SMOOTH IT.
J. PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR OTHER SUITABLE OUTLET.
4. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRICS BECAUSE THEY IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS
SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE.
MAINTENANCE:
MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOPORESSING WITH 2-INCH STONE. AFTER EACH
RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY.
IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC
ROADWAYS.
FL1O W
1
CONSTRUCTION AREA
UPSTREAM
Y / \ `L
Q: / STILLING BASIN \I Q
Ca ` (2 FT. MAX. DEPTH) Ca
Q.
w / w
EXISTING CHANNEL DOWNSTREAM
PLAN VIEW
1' 5'
IMBW�4
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
ASS B RIP RAP
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
NOT TO SCALE
LJ
co co
Orn
�FO
xl
O rn
m `O
O N
N
w
z
O
O
U
CD
z
Of
w
z
Z C,
z
w
U)
Y
U
O
W
w�
WF
z z co
OLQ
F-00
z N
= U
V
�z
z F-w
J
W w>
S Q
00 z
BLN-C-1874
Z
0
V
Ct
C* -9
Q
Q
W
y �
pLoa
CZ Z
W
O
ac
V cz,
O v
C7 =
y y
C A R0�
ESSipN'yy
Q� SEAL l =
19843 =
FNG I
/gMAEL
5/15/2620
D
EROSION
DETAILS
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE:
NONE
VERT. SCALE:
NONE
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water". John 7:38
CE-05

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
PLACE MATTING IN 6 INCH DEEP TRENCH,
STAPLE, BACKFILL AND COMPACT.
TOP OF STREAMBANK NOTES:
1. BANKS SHOULD BE SEEDED PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT OF MATTING.
2. PLACE MATTING ACCORDING TO
MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
J. MATTING STAPLES SHOULD BE PLACED
IN A DIAMOND SHAPE PATTERN.
WATER SURFACE
MATTING TO .BE
EXTENDED • TO
TOE OF' $'LOPE
CROSS—SECTION VIEW
)P OF STREAMBANK
TAPLES
MATTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOT TO SCALE
K
1
1
1
1
1
t
t
t
t
1
t
1
t
1
7
1
� �
1
S t
EMN ;
uo ;
t
t
t
t
.4
lop
a99.40
U�
t
ro
j
E\
1
l
U
1t
r
C
a o-
1 /
1
4»
z o
t,
1
- 43'
101
1
N
3' 1 5
o N
m
0
E
28.31 EMN
/
P
0o
�
oKe
1
00 tt
1
/ O� I
r
\ °'
�t
ZD
1
V
O 1
z
1
UP
30'
Ep 6 .00
2
1 E\PC
t
�
tO '
N 10
10
Go
NO TES.
1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND
INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. DO NOT INSTALL STAKES THAT HAVE
BEEN SPLIT.
J. STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH
BUDS POINTING UPWARDS
TOP OF STREAMBANK
4, STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED
PERPENDICULAR TO BANK.
5. STAKES SHOULD BE 1/2 TO 2 INCHES
IN DIAMETER AND 2 TT0 3 FEET LONG.
—2'-3'
6. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEA WNG
B TWEEN
115 OF STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
SETAKES
17 WATER SURFACE
SQUARE CUT TOP
LIV E CUTTING
�, ••
MATTING TO .BE
'
MIN. 112" DIA.
2'-3' LENGTH
EXTENDED • TO , . • ' '
TOE OF_'$LOPE
BUDS FACING UPWARDS
CROSS—SECTION
VIEW
ANGLE CUT
30-45 DEGREES
LIVE STAKE
DETAIL
~TOP OF STREAMBANK
PLANT STAKES
I I I I I I I WITHIN UPPER
112 OF BANK
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
_MATTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
LIVE STAKING SPECIFICATION
NOT TO SCALE
271.69'
W 378.99
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
4
4
4_
Of r" '
lop g4.54
E\
Charles Lee Harn
D.B. 2229, Pg. 6°
M.B. 29, Pg. 15
_innie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
v
— — IDY \
N 85'02' 17"E
lop 00 1EP
0\haed
rne\ _
3
/ E1P 2 ti
/ lop_ Ot4.7
/ 6
I Cb /
J
/ o0
,moo
O
O'.O� 0
�
C�
U
/ bo!
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
*NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
0{ E\P —.1
lop 8g 15
31.65'
2 ROWS OF
LIVE STAKES
00
I W W (PER DETAIL)
or
W W W (QTY.660)
m
\
rz
rz
_o
a
I
z
1 /2' lop O
6 v
v
00
0 0�
en
Of E\P '
lop 1�466
E\
— 95' 94
96
9 8 97 2 ROWS OF
LIVE STAKES
(PER DETAIL)
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
BARE ROOT
PLANTING
(8' 0. C.)
(QTY. 250)
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 4g,
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
0, NoK�_`
SYMBOL
LEGEND
0
Existing Iron Pipe(EIP)
0 New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑ New RR Spike(NRS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
O New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
® Existing Rebar
O
Existing Axle
Computed Point(CP)
®
Power Pole
CC Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
(D Light Pole
-E-
Electric Lines
0 Grid Monument
q
Center Line
F� Property Line
R/W
Right of Way
® R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T- Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
U Utility Lines
BUFFER TREES SPECIES WFOOT x 8—FOOT SPACING)
SPECIES
COMMON NAME
QUANTITY
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
50
Cercis canadensis
Eastern redbud
50
Carnus amomum
Silky dogwood
50
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
50
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
50
RANDOMLY PLACE AND MIX TREES AND SHRUBS ® 80. C.
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00LO
orn
�00
xl
O
M L0
O
N
LO
w
z
O
w
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z_
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
O
WLd
W�
z00
o L0
•
CD r
z N
= U
Z
z
� _
i
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
oQ
00 z
BLN=C-1874
*,`,�N CA I/0�''
`� per. ofESS/O`-
SEAL
19843
41ONAEL 5N�•�`•
' 5 12 2020
PLANTING
PLAN
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-06

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
U
Z
O
r
0
�
tJ
1
1
t
t
t
t
t
S t
EMN ;
co
t
t
�
t
lop
a99.40
jC�
1 EI
1
U
a
I
1 /
i $
I
o N
N a?
1
1/21
101
�,�(}
r 1/2" Et
�o o
E\P
28.31 EMN
C
4 . � A /
i
i
'
G+
1
0
00
r CP
1
ZD
1
O ,
30
,
EMN 6 .00,
Q
1 2 E\Po
LL'f M
1
1
3° 1 54„
271.69'
/7378.99
W
lop 8g 15
E\
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
4
4
lop 9 \P
4.O
P
& Broke
Gr
109 g4.54
EI
1
CW
/
I
I
Charles Lee Harris I 1
D.B. 2229, Pg. 0 I F11 1
M.B. 29, P9 157u
r /
II �U0/
^ /
J
EXISTING CHANNEL /
Linnie E. Hargrove ±429 LF /
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801 I
I
1
12p1�48 /
S 52 g3' g9
I
N 8 5° 0 2' 17' I
loP OB9719 1EP \
EI
/b
' z
E1P 2
/ loP 94.1
I ry.
J
/
o
U
��O
/OrL w /
0
9�
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
/—� *NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
/ Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
31.65'-
Of E\P
l09 1�466
E\
9
96s54
j 97
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
PROPOSED CHANNEL
f493 LF
LIMI TS OF
DISTURBANCE
STOCKPILE
ARFA
o,
N
�89
�90 —1
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
SYMBOL LEGEND
p
Existing Iron Pipe(EIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
0
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
®
50 Penny Nail
O
Existing Axle
0
Power Pole
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
-E'
Electric Lines
�L
Center Line
R/W
Right of Way
®
Man Hole
♦
Existing Planted Stone
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, P9. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 49'
E
O
New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
0
Existing Rebar
0
Computed Point(CP)
CC
Control Corner
®
Light Pole
0
Grid Monument
Property Line
®
R/W Monument
T-
Telephone Lines
Utility Lines
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
TE�POR.4Rl'BUFFEA//I/P.4CTS'
OLDIOMEZBUFFERRE/l90l�ED /322v5F
OLDIOME/BUFFEAAE/190YE0 /2,9aSF
NEfYIONE2BUFFEB20,�77SF
MEfYIOME/BUFFER /7,783SF
PEAA/.4MEMTBUFFER//I'P.4CTs
IOME2BUFFEA//I9P.4CT6,5285F
IOME/BUFFEA/AM4CT 4MYSF
PEA/I/.4NE MT44WAffiff 1090,4CTS
&94014MMf��fMNTN= 429LF
MEWO10.4MME1,ZZ007W �93LF
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00(D
Orn
-00
xI
O rn
00 L0
O^
N
N
w
z
O
w
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
O
H
W`1�
w�
W�
zCo
O�
•
�
Z N
= U
z
�Z
_'
J
W
(n
a'
w=
Cn
z
00
BLN=C-1874
O
v �
O
J Z
Lij J
O
„j v
T
N
Z
L00
6 %
J �
o v
0
Z
0
00-0
ofESS/O... /'L'�:
SEAL
19843
�'CHAEL S�
' 5 12 2020
IMPACT MAP
REVISIONS
FILE NO.
2020-023
HORZ. SCALE:
1"=50'
VERT. SCALE:
NONE
CIE -0l

TIM FISHER'S GOLD DREDGE -STREAM RELOCATION
NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
INDEX
COVER
COVER SHEET
CE-01
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CE-02
SITE PLAN
CE-03
STREAM PROFILE
CE-04
EROSION CONTROL
CE-05
EROSION CONTROL
NOTES AND DETAILS
CE-06
PLANTING PLAN
CE-07
IMPACT MAP
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
General Notes
1. TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA PERFORMED BY PIEDMONT SURVEYS, INC.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES OF FIRMS HAVING FACILITIES ON OR ADJACENT TO THE SITE
BEFORE DISTURBING, ALTERING, REMOVING, RELOCATING, ADJUSTING OR CONNECTING TO SAID FACILITIES. THE OWNER SHALL PAY ALL COSTS
IN CONNECTION WITH ALTERATION OF OR RELOCATION OF ANY EXISTING FACILITIES.
3. ALL EXCAVATION IS UNCLASSIFIED AND SHALL INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED.
4. ALL STREAM BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE NATURAL CLEAN COBBLE/GRAVEL MIX FREE OF CLAY, SILT, ROOTS, CLUMPS, ETC..
5. UNUSABLE EXCAVATED MATERIALS AND ALL WASTE RESULTING FROM CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE BY THE
CONTRACTOR IN AN APPROVED SOLID WASTE LANDFILL.
6. LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED. CONTACT THE NC ONE CALL CENTER AT LEAST 72
HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING ® 811. TRUE LINE SURVEYING HAS ONLY LOCATED THE UTILITIES THAT ARE ABOVE GROUND AT THE TIME OF
FIELD SURVEY. UNDERGROUND LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE OR AS REPORTED BY VARIOUS RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. THE
SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES SUCH AS UTILITIES, TANKS AND PIPES ARE LOCATED HEREON.
7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH 4" MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL, FREE OF ROOT MATTER
AND ROCKS AND GRASSED.
Surveying:
PIEDMONT
PIEDMONT
SURVEYS, INC.
License No: C-07 _
Civil Engineering=
SURVEYS, INC.
Charles M. Davis, Jr.
Professional Land Surveyor
105 CHURCH STREET — P.O. BOX 562
LOUISBURG, NC 27549 [phone]
FAX [phone]
ENGINEERING =Enhhh,
801 EAST WASHINGTON STREET P.O. BOX 1108
NASHVILLE, N.C. 27856 PHONE: [phone]
[e-mail] WWW.STOCKSENGINEERING.COM
00LO
Orn
�;_0
xl
O
m L0
o^
N
LO
N
W
Z
O
n
Z
W~
w
w
WV)
Z
u,
OLQ
Z_00
r,
—
Z N
= U
Z
z
�
�W
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
OQ
00 Z
O
U
C�
z
w
w
Z
Z
w
U)
Y
U
O
H
BLN=C-1874
O
v �
O
J Z
W J
� O
v
W
0 0
a z
W -
a �
z
a �
J O
o v
0
0 _
b� L�2_
W z
0
-
R04
SEAL
19843
�'°v ..�' FN� I NEE-E�.•',�� �:
AEL
5/12/2020
COVER SHEET
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2016-040
HORZ. SCALE: I NONE
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water". John 7:38
VERT. SCALE: I NONE
COVER

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
SYMBOL LEGEND
Q
Existing Iron Pipe(EIP)
p
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
®
50 Penny Nail
O
Existing Axle
®
Power Pole
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
-E-
Electric Lines
(�
Center Line
R/W Right of Way
®
Man Hole
♦
Existing Planted Stone
K
1
1
1
1
1
t
t
t
t
t
1
t
1
7
1
t
1
S t
EMN ;
Qo
t
t
�
t
Sop
o99.40
U�
t
00
j
1 E\
1
U
i5 a
1 /
i 0
N a?
1/21
�o
E\P
28.31 EMN
4 /
o
i
�
'
G+
1
0
� t
00
1
ZD
1
O ,
30
EMN 6 .00,
Q
2
0 89
LL'f M
1
c
,
1
O
New Iron Pipe(NIP)
0
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
0
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
Existing Rebar
Computed Point(CP)
CC
Control Corner
0
Light Pole
0
Grid Monument
F�
Property Line
®
R/W Monument
T"
Telephone Lines
U
Utility Lines
3' 1b54„
PSQra\t/.
oke
\�e
r
rn
V /
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
4
4
4,
g4 7 SoP Of 407
g.
E\;� _.
271.69'
378.99
W
P
& Broke i �
Gr e\ � eS\P
SoP 01g4.54
E\
1
i
Vv/
CW
Linnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
'4g
i�
Ot E\P;
1oP $g,79
E1
Charles Lee Harris
D.B. 2229, Pg. 650
M.B. 29, Pg. 157
e /
°✓O�(0 05
0
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
*NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
` 31.65 co
The Gold Dredge Site has been assigned a State
Archaeological Site Number (Designated as Site
`31NS206) and a NC Archaeological Site Form is
on we with the State Historic Preservahon Office. /
W
W etW°��s °jo
jWork Area
oth W W �
N /
W rld9e 0 �m \(\/
9 l V
94 9
995
691 0
N
J
IJi I 0{ E1P
E\
98 —
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00LO
orn
�00
xI
O
00
O^
N
N
w
z
O
o_
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z
z
Z
z
w
y
Y
0
O
H
W
w3::
W�
z00
o LQ
•
CD r-
z N
= U
Z
zV)w
�
J
Wa'
(n
w=
z
00000
BLN=C-1874
`�N. c,N CA 04''�''.
pR ES S /0".
SEAL
19843
4fYCHAEL c)
' 5 12 2020
EX/STING
CONDITIONS
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-01

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
T
U
Z
0
N
0
TOP OF STREAMBi
0 BANKFULL STAGE
10'-15' LONG 0 BASEFLOW
>10" DIAMETER
PL)
NOTES•
FOOTER LOG
>12" DIAMETER
1. SHARPEN THE END OF THE LOG WITH A CHAINSAW
INSTALLED BELOW
BEFORE 'DRIVING" IT INTO THE BANK.
STREAM BED.
2. ORIENT ROOT WADS UPSREAM SO THAT THE STREAM
FLOW MEETS THE ROOT WAD AT A 90—DEGREE ANGLE,
DEFLECTING THE WATER AWAY FROM THE BANK.
J. A BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM
CROSS—SECTION VIEW
SIDE OF THE ROOT WAD IF A BACK EDDY IS
THE ROOT WAD. HE BOULDER SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY
4 x3'x2'.
ROOT WAD
TRENCHING METHOD:
NOT TO SCALE
1. IF THE ROOT WAD CANNOT BE DRIVEN INTO THE BANK
OR THE BANK NEEDS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED. THE
TRENCHING METHOD SHOULD BE USED. THIS METHOD
REQUIRES THAT A TRENCH BE EXCAVATED FOR THE
LOG PORTION OF THE ROOT WAD.
2. A FOOTER LOG SHOULD BE INSTALLED UNDERNEATH
THE ROOT WAD IN A TRENCH EXCAVATED PARALLEL TO
THE BANK AND WELL BELOW THE STREAMBED.
J. ONE—THIRD OF THE ROOT WAD SHOULD REMAIN BELOW
NORMAL BASE FLOW CONDITIONS
ROOT WADS
(NUMBER & SIZE TO BE
DETERMINED IN THE FIELD)
PLANTS/TRANSPLANTS
/ Q
TER LOG
DIAMETER
rALLED BELOW
EAM BED.
Linnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
J — —
U \
a
A� RIFj S/ i
EROSION CONTROL — \ T,1PIG/
/ MATTING ON BANKS
R
0
TYPICAL ROOT �.
/ \ J
WAD PLACEMENT \ o,
NOT TO SCALE a
\ J
U
STRUCTURE NOTES
Of
lop Sg 15
E\
leb
/ COCO
Charles Lee Harris
D.B. 2229, Pg. 650
M.B. 29, Pg. 157 \
w�
r/
J �
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
5
\ / / or
1 1 z
S 12p14g / / Of\P'
52•g3 g9 I / 1EP �o\P SS 66
31 F�
N 85*02
Of EfP 1/2 \ co
a \
loP Sg.19 E\P ' \ W
E\ ' v
1. GENERALLY ✓—HOOK VANES ROOT WADS
CROSS VANES AND MATTING WILL BE .. / / W
INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION AND / + V�
SEQUENCE AS SHOWN.
2. BOULDER CLUSTERS SHOULD BE ADDED /
DOWNSTREAM OF J—HOOK VANES.
/ � Of E1P 2 �'
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
J. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR CHANGES
TO STRUCTURE LOCATIONS MAY BE MADE
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
�
tl
1
1
1
1
t
t
t
t
t
uo•
1
t
t
�
t
lop
Ogg 0
V j
t j I
1 E\
a o-
I o
,
z o
t, E\. 43'
1 101
1
N
3' 54
o N
m
1/
1 /2" EI
P1
E 28.31 EMN
4 C
/
P SQra\\
0
1
oee
G '4 pr
1
0
r
q
X
0 1
\
�'
o �
�
30'
Ep 6 .00
2
1 E\P�
t
�
N M
1
271.69'
/7378.99
W
4
4
/
lop Of O\P
g4.
E2
\P
P
& Brake i —
Gr e\ �'� eSt�
— F0
Of �"
loP g4.54
E\
1
C �6
0
/ I �s�
eked � 4„
Q1harnef _ / WORK AREA 6'
0*0
l— ss -
O 96
97
98
,� g9
109 f
110
Qo�r �0o G�PO��\ 11 lop 0f�4 66'
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
/—� *NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
CL
I
0
2
,1
000
I '
STOCKPILE
ARFA
l \
`89
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
SYMBOL LEGEND
p Existing Iron Pipe(EIP) O New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
®
Existing Rebar
Existing Axle
Computed Point(CP)
0
Power Pole
CC
Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
®
Light Pole
-E'
Electric Lines
0
Grid Monument
(L
Center Line
Property Line
R/W
Right of Way
®
R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T-
Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
U
Utility Lines
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE OF EVENTS.•
CONSTRUCTION WILL BE OBSERVED BY STOCKS ENGINEERING PERSONNEL.
CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE.
1. MOBILIZE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO THE SITE.
2. SET UP STAGING AREAS, CONSTRUCT ENTRANCES AND SAFETY FENCES.
J. INSTALL COFFER DAMS AND PUMP TO ALLOW WORK IN THE DRY ® STA 2+00.
4. CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP NEAR STATION 3+75.
5. CLEAR, GRUB AND EXCAVATE BETWEEN STATIONS 2+25 AND 3+50.
RESTRICT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC TO EXCAVATION LIMITS AND CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS ROADS. CONSTRUCT IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND INSTALL ROOT WADS.
APPLY TEMPORARY SEED AND INSTALL EROSION MATTING ON CHANNEL BANKS;
SEED THE FLOODPLAIN.
6. ONCE BANKS HAVE BEEN MATTED AND ALL STRUCTURES COMPLETE, TURN
WATER INTO NEW CHANNEL.
7. REMOVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS.
8. APPLY MULCH AND PERMANENT SEEDING; PLANT RIPARIAN VEGETATION AT
THE APPROPRIATE TIME OF YEAR.
9. DEMOBILIZE EQUIPMENT FROM THE SITE.
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
•p) M.B. 39, Pg. 86
nrniinriinc i cisciin
C90.Rf'Z4NE
ifOOTK'.40
2'
TYPICAL RIFFLE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
0
15'
TYPICAL POOL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00(D
Orn
-00
xI
O CA
00 L0
O^
N
N
w
z
O
w
O
1
U
CD
z_
w
w
z
C,
Z
z
w
Cn
U
0
W`,�
w�
W�
z00
O L0
•
r
�
Z N
= U
z
�z
_i
J
Wa'
(n
w=
S<
00 z
BLN=C-1874
N CA O
ofESS/O...
SEAL
19843
FNG I NE������:
, /CHAEL S11
� �,.�`•
' 5 12 2020
SITE PLAN
REVISIONS
FILE NO.
2020-023
HORZ. SCALE:
1"=50'
VERT. SCALE:
NONE
CE-02

SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
110
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
110
105
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
105
100
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
100
95
95
90
90
85
0
36 " HDPE
1,75%. BURY
12 BELOW BED
Q
EXISTING
—028
85
80
I
LOG CROSS
VANE (TYP)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
80
75
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
75
70
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70
9+00 10+00 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 22+00
00LD
Orn
�;0-
xl
O
m L0
o^
. cV
n Lo
N
W
Z
O
n
Z
W~
w
w
WV)
Z
Z u,
OLQ
r,
Z CV
V= U
< Z
z
�W
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
OQ
00 Z
O
U
C�
Z_
Fy
W
W
Z_
0
Z
LJ
U)
Y
U
O
H
BLN=C-1874
O
v �
O
J Z
W J
� O
v
V O
J O
o v
0
W Z
N
00-0
ol��%'.
SEAL
19843
5/12/2020
STREAM
PROFILE
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-In
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water. John 7:38

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
SYMBOL LEGEND
p Existing Iron Pipe(EIP) O New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
®
Existing Rebar
O
Existing Axle
Computed Point(CP)
®
Power Pole
CC
Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
0
Light Pole
-E-
Electric Lines
0
Grid Monument
(�
Center Line
F�
Property Line
R/W Right of Way
®
R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T"
Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
Utility Lines
�
tJ
�
1
�
1
1
�
t
�
�
1
�
1
�
1
S t
EMN ;
Qo ;
t
t
t
�
t
lop
a99.40
U�
t
00
1 E\
1
j
l
U
1t
r
a o-
1
z o
t,
1
E\. 43'
101
1
N
54
3' 1
o N
) m
1 /
/2" 0SQra\\
P1
E
28.31 EMN
4
/
P
0
oKe
8r��e
00 tt
1
/ O� 1
r
\ °'
�t
ZD
1
V
O 1
1
30'
Ep 6 .00
1 E2\Po
t
�
N M
1
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
/
4
Z4-
51
4
g4 7 lop Of 07
g4.
271.69'
378.99
W
P
& Brake
Gr
Of
lop g4.54
E\
Linnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
Charles Lee Harri.
D.B. 2229, Pg. 6°
M.B. 29, Pg. 15
S 152 g3 8 Sg\
N 85°02' 17"E
lop O$g \9 1EP
W d
e
0\ve� e\
v Charn _ —
W 0lIw �W
o"' ^ 1/101
00
lop 8g 15
E\
i
v
ds
LL�� g0
3 000
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
*NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
94
9796—,�
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
STOCKPILE
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 49'
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
.p� M.B. 39, Pg. 86
MRS/O AffiND
co�ST,96cTMOrr
far�acf
■--�■ S/LTFENCE
S/LTFENCEOUTLFT
-7 TE/I'POr9.4i�1'SED//I9EiVTTi�.4P
NOTES:
1. TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROWDED
BY PIEDMONT SURVEYS, INC.
2. ALL STRUCTURES ARE APPROXIMA TE AND SHALL
BE FIELD PLACED BY ENGINEER.
J. BANKS SHALL BE MA TIED AND LIVE STAKED PER
DETAILS.
4. BANK MA TTING SHALL BE NAG C700 BN OR EGUAL.
5. BANK SEEDING SHALL BE A PERMANENT WETLAND
SEED MIX A T A RA TE OF 25 LBS/ACRE.
6. ALL STREAM BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE NATURAL
CLEAN COBBLE/SAND MIX.
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00(D
Orn
-00
xI
O rn
M L0
O^
N
N
w
z
O
w
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z_
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
0
W`,�
w�
W�
z00
O LQ
•
�
Z N
= U
Z
z
�
�w
J
Wa'
(n
w=
�V)
OQ
00 z
BLN=C-1874
CA O
f 1-:SS/0".
SEAL
19843
AEL S�
94
' 5 12 2020
EROSION
CONTROL
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-04

SILFFFACE
NOT TO SCALE
oio�oi FI..�eiei'.►� �.
oi�.��oi����ioi�'�eioi .i��oi jai• .-. -
i�ei���oi�o� ��oi�o��o%!��ei�.►i`��.•. -
��i�.��!ei 40, i, A �oi�o%��oi�o%1�Q•i�o�ei�oi�oi,�!o%��oi�oi,:�
:!o�oi�.��oi�.��oi�ei�.��oi�e.,.;��ei�'�ei�oi��oi�oi`•�.� .
'►�oi�.��oi�oi���oi'ffi$ �oi�.��oi���i�i�o%��oi�o���i�.��o%��oi�oi�:��e�=
i�.1�oi�oi1.��oi�.��oi�ei`��ei�'0"
��oi���i��%���i%� e�i�`����oi�e:, �!►�ei����i��i���i�ei�oi����.►i�o%��oJ i•
�►i�oi���oi�ei���ei�oi�.��oi�oi`��ei��,!°io%!��oi����.►i�oi�o%��oi�o%��oi��'
��j�0IO1 ��OI�.OIL.��OI�.OI�.��OI�.OI�.��OI�.��OI •'I ���OI�.OIL.��OI�.OI�.��O��.OI�.��OI�.OI�.����
-s!L.i��1►��p���I0I�0I���0I�0I���0`���pj�OI���1 i��Na�I�OI�N•;I�OI�Nt,��0Is�0I���0I� ►� .� ty..�A1ii�•!����ij���I.����I ��•I �pvw+j�Ol�,� j�•,I�•I���•,j�•I��-,��-I� I
BACKFILL MIN. 8" FILTER I
THICK LAYER OF
GRAVEL.
14"
Lr,
T
-,�IIII„
Do
V-TRENCH
POST
���
FILTER FABRIC
EXTENSION OF FABRIC
AND WIRE INTO TRENCH
=III—��+ .II • • I I I
III- ':•: • - m
�I 2
1/3
1/3
1/3
BANKFULL
BANKFULL
BANKFULL
WIDTH
WIDTH
WIDTH
BURY END OF LOG VANES
AND HEADER LOG INTO
6
A
CHANNEL BED. SECURE
20' TO
LOGS TOGETHER EITHER
30'
BY CABLING OR PINNING
O
WITH REBAR.
o
O� °
o
o
Y
NOTCH
z
°
m
m
HEADER
LOG
LOG FLOW
VANE
1
iPOOL j
POOL EXCAVATED PER
DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
BOULDER DIMENSIONS (FT)
STATION I HEIGHT I LENGTH I WIDTH
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF STANDARD OR EXTRA STRENGTH
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24
INCHES ABOVE GROUND SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF
WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE).
J. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE
LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY,
SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 FEET
MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST.
4. SUPPORT STANDARD FILTER FABRIC BY WIRE MESH FASTENED SECURELY TO
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS. EXTEND THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT TO THE
BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. FASTEN THE WIRE REINFORCEMENT, THEN FABRIC ON
THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE FENCE POST. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD
HAVE MINIMUM 50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
5. WHEN A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IS USED, SPACE POSTS A MAXIMUM OF
8 FEET APART SUPPORT POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES.
6. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET POST SPACING DOES NOT
REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE. SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC
DIRECTLY TO POSTS. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM 50
POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
7. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP
ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER.
8. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE
TRENCH.
9. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND
COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION OF THE BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE
PERFORMANCE.
10. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
MAINTENANCE:
WIRE INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL.
MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT
FENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT
PROMPTLY. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE
FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING
THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA
HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
CONS TRUC PON SPECS:
1. CLEAR & GRUB THE AREA AROUND THE SILT FENCE
OUTLET AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF DEBRIS.
2. PLACE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AS SHOWN
PER THE DETAIL.
J. PROPERLY OVERLAP STONE BEYOND EDGES OF SILT
FENCE OPENING.
MAIN TENANCE:
INSPECT OUTLETS WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT
IMMEDIA TEL Y REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE FL 0 W AREA
AND REPAIR AS NEEDED. CAREFULLY CHECK OUTLETS
FOR EROSION AND REPAIR IMMEDIA TEL Y. ENSURE THERE
IS NO SCOURING APPARENT DOWNSTREAM OF OUTLET
IMMEDIA TEL Y STABILIZE ANY AREAS THAT NEED REPAIR.
FLOW
BACKFILL, TYP.
LOG VANE, TYP J (/pou"
NAIL FILTER FABRIC #57 STONE, TYP. 2' MIN.
TO BACK OF LOG VANE,
SEE PROJECT SPECIAL
PROVISIONS EXCAVATED TRENCH
FOR LOG VANE
k57 STONE CONSTRUCTION
/-- FILTER FABRIC
-LOG
�A VANE
KEY IN VANE TO BANK -
MINIMUM OF AT AN
ELEVATION EQUAL TO
BANKFULL OR SLIGHTLY
LOWER
PLAN VIEW
2' MIN.
EXCAVATED POOL
HEADER LOG, TYP.
FILTER FABRIC, TYP.
SECTION A -A
BANKFULL TIE VANE ARM INTO ---\
1/2 BANKFULL ELEVATION
FLOW r
BED-
BACKFILL, TYP
#57 STONE, TYP:
LOG CROSS VANE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
4% TO 10'o
, SLOPE
SECURE LOGS TOGETHER,
i/ SEE PROJECT SPECIAL
PROVISIONS
ROOTWAD
FILTER FABRIC, TYP.
SECTION 6-13
NOTES:
1. DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE
VANE ARM TIES INTO BANKFULL.
2. DO NOT EXCAVATE POOL TOO CLOSE TO FOOTER BOULDERS.
3. CLASS "A" STONE CAN BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS
BETWEEN HEADERS AND FOOTERS.
4. COMPACT BACKFILL TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
5. POOL DEPTH SHOULD BE 2 TO 3 TIMES BANKFULL DEPTH.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1. CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE
MATERIAL AND PROPERLY GRADE IT.
2. PLACE THE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND
SMOOTH IT.
J. PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR OTHER SUITABLE OUTLET.
4. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRICS BECAUSE THEY IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS
SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE.
MAINTENANCE:
MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOPORESSING WITH 2-INCH STONE. AFTER EACH
RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY.
IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC
ROADWAYS.
FL1O W
1
CONSTRUCTION AREA
UPSTREAM
Y / \ `L
Q: / STILLING BASIN \I Q
Ca ` (2 FT. MAX. DEPTH) Ca
Q.
w / w
EXISTING CHANNEL DOWNSTREAM
PLAN VIEW
1' 5'
IMBW�4
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
ASS B RIP RAP
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
NOT TO SCALE
LJ
co co
Orn
�FO
xl
O rn
m `O
O N
N
w
z
O
O
U
CD
z
Of
w
z
Z C,
z
w
U)
Y
U
O
W
w�
WF
z z co
OLQ
F-00
z N
= U
V
�z
z F-w
J
W w>
S Q
00 z
BLN-C-1874
Z
0
V
Ct
C* -9
Q
Q
W
y �
pLoa
CZ Z
W
O
ac
V cz,
O v
C7 =
y y
C A R0�
ESSipN'yy
Q� SEAL l =
19843 =
FNG I
/gMAEL
5/15/2620
D
EROSION
DETAILS
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE:
NONE
VERT. SCALE:
NONE
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water". John 7:38
CE-05

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
PLACE MATTING IN 6 INCH DEEP TRENCH,
STAPLE, BACKFILL AND COMPACT.
TOP OF STREAMBANK NOTES:
1. BANKS SHOULD BE SEEDED PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT OF MATTING.
2. PLACE MATTING ACCORDING TO
MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
J. MATTING STAPLES SHOULD BE PLACED
IN A DIAMOND SHAPE PATTERN.
WATER SURFACE
MATTING TO .BE
EXTENDED • TO
TOE OF' $'LOPE
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
—TRENCH
I I I I I I —TOP OF STREAMBANK
STAPLES
—MATTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOT TO SCALE
�
tl
1
�
1
�
�
1
1
�
t
�
t
�
�
1
t
1
t
1
t
1
7
1
� �
1
� �
1
S t
EMN ;
uo ;
t
t
t
t
.4
lop
O99.40
U�
t
00
E\
1
j
a o-
1
4»
z o
t,
1
E\. 43'
101
1
N
3' 1 5
o N
m
1/
�,�(}
/2" EI
P1
E
28.31 EMN
/
P
0
i2
1
°ke
G '4e pr
1
0
00 tt
1
/ °P I
r
\ °'
�t
ZD
1
\
V
O 1
z
1
UP
30
EMN 6 .00
Q
2
t
�
N M
1
NO TES.
1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND
INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. DO NOT INSTALL STAKES THAT HAVE
BEEN SPLIT.
J. STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH
BUDS POINTING UPWARDS
TOP OF STREAMBANK
4, STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED
PERPENDICULAR TO BANK.
5. STAKES SHOULD BE 1/2 TO 2 INCHES
IN DIAMETER AND 2 TT0 3 FEET LONG.
—2'-3'
6. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEA WNG
B TWEEN
115 OF STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
SETAKES
17 WATER SURFACE
SQUARE CUT TOP
LIV E CUTTING
�, ••
MATTING TO .BE
'
MIN. 112" DIA.
2'-3' LENGTH
EXTENDED • TO , . • ' '
TOE OF_'$LOPE
BUDS FACING UPWARDS
CROSS-SECTION
VIEW
ANGLE CUT
30-45 DEGREES
LIVE STAKE
DETAIL
~TOP OF STREAMBANK
PLANT STAKES
I I I I
WITHIN UPPER
I I I
112 OF BANK
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
—MA TTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
LIVE STAKING SPECIFICATION
NOT TO SCALE
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
4
4
4_
g4 7 1oP Of 4.07
g
ke P
BrO
Ot
1
271.69' Of E\P
/ , 1oP g4.54
W 378.99 E\.
i
94
Vila
lop 8g 15
E\
Charles Lee Harn
D.B. 2229, Pg. 6°
M.B. 29, Pg. 15
_innie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
v
N 85.02' 17"E
109 O$g 1\9 1 EP
g0
W d
0\ve�ee\
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
*NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
31.65'
2 ROWS OF
LIVE STAKES
00
I W W (PER DETAIL)
or
W W W (QTY.660)
\
\
rz
rz
_o
a
I
z
1 /2' lop 0
6 v
v
w w w
W
9
W
�
rn
�jS
C°
•
�a � W
p f
0
o �F �� W
05
en r:8
e 0
v
Of E\P lup 1�466'
E\
94
9695�
98 97 2 ROWS OF
LIVE STAKES
(PER DETAIL)
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
BARE ROOT
PLANTING
(8' 0. C.)
(QTY. 250)
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 4g,
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
0, NoK�_`
SYMBOL
LEGEND
0
Existing Iron Pipe(EIP)
0 New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑ New RR Spike(NRS)
p
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
0 New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
® Existing Rebar
O
Existing Axle
Computed Point(CP)
®
Power Pole
CC Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
(D Light Pole
-E-
Electric Lines
0 Grid Monument
q
Center Line
F� Property Line
R/W
Right of Way
® R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T- Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
U Utility Lines
BUFFER TREES SPECIES WFOOT x 8-FOOT SPACING)
SPECIES
COMMON NAME
QUANTITY
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
50
Cercis canadensis
Eastern redbud
50
Carnus amomum
Silky dogwood
50
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
50
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
50
RANDOMLY PLACE AND MIX TREES AND SHRUBS ® 80. C.
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00m
orn
�00
xl
O
M L0
O
N
LO
w
z
O
w
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z_
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
O
WLd
WV
z00
o L0
•
CD r
z N
= U
Z
z
�
_
i
J
Wa'
()
w=
�V)
oQ
00 z
BLN=C-1874
*,`,�N CAR��04''
`S` P. . of ES S ON'
SEAL
19843
ChAEL S�
' 5 12 2020
PLANTING
PLAN
REVISIONS
FILE NO. 2020-023
HORZ. SCALE: 1"=50'
VERT. SCALE: NONE
CE-06

BEFORE YOU DIG,
CALL
0
0
O
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
T
U
Z
O
r
0
�
tJ
1
1
�
t
t
t
t
t
S t
EMN ;
c9
t
t
�
t
lop
a99.40
V j
t
� j
1 E\
1
U S
i5 a
1 /
i $
1
o N
N a?
11
/2
�o o
E\P
28.31 EMN
4 C
i
�
G+
1
0
3:
00
r CP
1
ZD
1
O ,
30
,
EMN 6 .00,
Q
1 2 E\Po
o eg
LL'f M
1
1
N 30I-E(54„
PSQra\t.
o*e
\�e
r
rn
271.69'
/7378.99
W
Timothy Ross Fisher
D.B. 2900, Pg. 682
M.B. 41, Pg. 2
Tract 1
Linnie E. Hargrove
D.B. 2910, Pg. 801
lop 8g 15
E\
/
I
I
Charles Lee Harris I 1
D.B. 2229, Pg. 0 I F11 1
M.B. 29, Pg 157u
r /
II �U0/
I � /
EXISTING CHANNEL
±429 LF
I
I X'
1
V• v
1�\P
12p1 4g /
S 52 g3' g9
I
N 8 5° 0 2' 17' I
109 O$g19 1EP
W
W/w
_ZAll
/ of c\P'
lop 2��
I
I
99
CJ�ry.
=c ti 3 00
1�
J9,6 GD 109
loP Of 4.E66,
4
4
/
loP Of O\P
g4.
P
& Brake i
Gr eSt�
109 g4.54
E\
1
oW
/
0
h �
0
U
��O
/OrL w /
0
100' Tar —Pamlico Buffer
/—� *NOTE*
Building Setbacks Along Any Stream Or Body Of Water Begin At The
/ Top Of The Bank And Extend 50' Back From The Bank On Both Sides.
(Tar —Pamlico Buffer Rules)
96954
j 97 --..
Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, "Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water'. John 7:38
Ruth R. Ealing
D.B. 2540, Pg. 1
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
528 49'
E
PROPOSED CHANNEL
f493 LF
ca
m
CL
� I
7
O
3
2
\Ne6,06S /oc
W /N
�9
Aso
LIMI TS OF
DISTURBANCE
STOCKPILE
ARFA
Timothy C. Sturges
D.B. 2360, Pg. 305
M.B. 31, Pg. 349
SYMBOL LEGEND
p Existing Iron Pipe(EIP) O New Iron Pipe(NIP)
A
Existing PK Nail(EPK)
A
New PK Nail(NPK)
❑
Existing RR Spike(ERS)
❑
New RR Spike(NRS)
0
Ex. Conc. Mon.(ECM)
New Conc. Mon.(NCM)
®
50 Penny Nail
0
Existing Rebar
O
Existing Axle
0
Computed Point(CP)
0
Power Pole
CC
Control Corner
ESI
Existing Solid Iron(ESI)
®
Light Pole
-E'
Electric Lines
0
Grid Monument
(L
Center Line
Property Line
R/W
Right of Way
®
R/W Monument
®
Man Hole
T-
Telephone Lines
♦
Existing Planted Stone
Utility Lines
Tar River Land Conservancy
D.B. 2763, Pg. 639
M.B. 39, Pg. 86
TEAMPORARI'BUFFEA/AMPACl�'
OLDIOME2A07F1fR ff&ffiED M322VSF
OLDIOMEMBUFFEAAEAMOl�ED 12,9143SF
MEfYIOME2BUFFEP20,�77SF
rnrz) rMBUFFEP M7,7"SF
PEAAMAMEMTBUFFER//IMPACTS
IOME2BUFFEA/0Wff6,528SF
IOMEM04FFEA/AMPACrM,265SF
PEAAM ,MVTo0,Wi ffiff1IMPACTS
OLOC/f ,&f,F1 LEMCWH= 429LF
MElyO,W,V,ME1,ZZ07 ff = �93LF
OFFrM,,M91IMPACTS = M,87�SF
SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 50 100 125 150 175 200
00(D
Orn
-00
xI
O rn
M L0
O^
N
N
w
z
O
w
�10
U
C�
z
Ld
w
w
z
z
Z
z
w
Y
U
O
H
W`1�
w�
W�
zCo
O�
•
�
Z N
= U
z
�Z
_'
J
W
(n
a'
w=
Cn
z
00
BLN=C-1874
O
v �
O
J Z
Lij J
O
v
T
N
Z
u0 -
J �
o v
Z
N
CA O
of ES %o
Si,' /'L'�:
SEAL
19843
I NE������:
�10HAEL S� �,.�`•
' 5 12 2020
IMPACT MAP
REVISIONS
FILE NO.
2020-023
HORZ. SCALE:
1"=50'
VERT. SCALE:
NONE
CIE -0l

14
" 'y, iTir• f':=rR�'", �'� .'�; 'lip• L•• ."�" p �; .. 'r• ,�. w
Sri w , . � .►- T�.�••
"ty '' :+ � �• AdM." � ,p, ffA
Y�.i
- �.�•�.-4 �.�•� ter^
� � i'r�.�'.•` �• .`� •J . .. �"1 .. l: ar a `� '

:r.-.
61
40
- �or
� . - Y r � •jam j��r

Nash County Gold Dredge ■ Nash County, North Carolina Irerracon
Date Pictures Taken: June 3, 2020
Representative upland species in relocation area
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Nash County Gold Dredge ■ Nash County, North Carolina Irerracon
Date Pictures Taken: June 3, 2020
a
F
'i�
Ilk
V.
1. � 4 � • • ��•X V
At
Non-hydric soil (7.5YR 4/4; no redox)
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

IPaC: Explore Location https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV...
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
WaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However,
determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically
requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific
(e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Nash County, North Carolina
Local office
GONE_
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
1 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

INC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
2 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

INC: Explore Location https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV...
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that
area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the
dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the
area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed
by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this
requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the
Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
V%%1_ % ..s
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on
this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
3 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528 \46
Clams '�
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.-gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.-gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolate Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
4 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
� C�3
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Ilk
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds
/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds
'/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.adf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated,
see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee
that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where
birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the
E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your
list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the
relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
5 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

1PaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV...
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its rang
in the continental USA and Alaska. V�� �
Probability of Presence Summary
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF
THE DATES INSIDE WHICH THE
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to
be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have
higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
6 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week
12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability
of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season (
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area. A
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based
on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FFB MAR APR MAY JUN
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
........................................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
JUL AUG SFP OCT NOV DEC
--- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are
most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of
any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when
birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence
7 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are
conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It
is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating
or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird
Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology
Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it,
if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe
specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
8 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you
in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps
through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb
Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird tep�osop p g ry
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds
may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of
presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On
the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and
for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If
the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about
presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of
concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be
breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm
presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or
minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
9 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV..
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo
a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges
to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Invento
website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
10 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LBUWN236LBHKHOY6A7S3JVV...
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on
the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore
coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. t
11 of 11 6/11/2020, 1:46 PM

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12256
June 15, 2020
Katie Talavera
Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) a Terracon Company
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE. Gold Dredge NHP; HL207000
Dear Katie Talavera:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Gold Dredge NHP
Project
No. HL207000
June 15, 2020
NCNHDE-12256
Element Occurrences
Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project
Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
111111fElement
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date dhM
Rank
A
Amphibian
9293
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River Waterdog
2016-01-16
AB
3-Medium
Proposed
Special
G2
S2
Threatened
Concern
Dragonfly or
33749
Somatochlora
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
H?
5-Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Damselfly
georgiana
Low
Rare
Freshwater
10310
Elliptic fisheriana
Northern Lance
2019-01-28
E
3-Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Bivalve
Rare
Freshwater
22025
Elliptic lanceolate
Yellow Lance
2017-08-23
A
3-Medium
Threatened
Endangered
G2
S2
Bivalve
Freshwater
16027
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic Pigtoe
2018-06-21
A
3-Medium
Proposed
Endangered
G2
S3
Bivalve
Threatened
Freshwater
18491
Villosa constricts
Notched Rainbow
2019-01-28
E
3-Medium
---
Threatened
G3
S3
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish37255
Noturus furiosus
Carolina Madtom
2017-06-12
E
3-Medium
Proposed
Threatened
G2
S2
Endangered
Mammal
24389
Corynorhinus
Eastern Big -eared Bat
2006-Pre
E
5-Very
---
Special
G3G4T
S3
rafinesquii macrotis
Low
Concern
3
Natural
7214
Mesic Mixed Hardwood---
2008-07-21
A
2-High
---
---
G3G4
S4
Community
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural
36684
Piedmont Bottomland
---
2016-04-06
B
2-High
---
---
G3G4
S2
Community
Forest (High Subtype)
Natural
6637
Piedmont Bottomland
---
2014-03-13
AB
2-High
---
---
G2?
S2
Community
Forest (Typic Low
Subtype)
Natural
36686
Piedmont Levee Forest---
2016-04-06
C?
2-High
---
---
G3?
S2
Community
(Beech Subtype)
Natural
36685
Piedmont Swamp
---
2016-04-06
B
2-High
---
---
G3G4
S2
Community
Forest
Page 2 of 4

Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Shocco Creek Bluffs and Floodplain
TAR/Fishing Creek Aquatic Habitat
R2 (Very High)
R1 (Exceptional)
Collective Rating
C2 (Very High)
C2 (Very High)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Tar River Land Conservancy Easement Tar River Land Conservancy Private
Shocco Creek Game Land NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
Shocco Creek Game Land Dedicated Nature NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
Preserve
Tar River Land Conservancy Preserve Tar River Land Conservancy Private
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Funded NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust State
Project Fund
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on June 15, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

June 15, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
E]
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Q
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-12256: Gold Dredge NHP
1:20,457
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NIL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 4 of 4