20081539 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090421

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review:
Date of Report:
Date of Field Review: 1- - ?2` - n
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site:
1. Office Review Information:
Project
Number: 20081539 Project History
Name: Hargett Buffer Mitigation Site -
t Event Event Date
County(ies): Lenoir Jones
Report Receipt: Monitoring 5/27/2008
Basin 8? subbasin: Neuse 03020204 Report Review - Buffer 10/15/2008
Nearest Stream: Tuckahoe Swamp
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C;Sw; NSW `, lp?p'
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status: ?
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland:
Stream:
Buffer: 16 acres
Nutr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? No
Problem areas identified in reports? S?es No
Problem areas addressed on site? No
Mitigation required on site: 'Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20081539-1 16 acres Buffer Restoration 6
Evaluator's Name(s):
Report for Monitoring Year:
Evaluator's Name(s):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
x
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 16 acres Buffer Restoration Component ID: 20081539-1
Description: Planted buffers along Tuckahoe Swamp and ditch
Location within project:
III. Buffer Site Details:
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Stream or Ditches)
Streams verified by DWQ: Yes No Buffer Width: /
Comments: Comments:
I
Total Acres:
Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres:
Total Acres:
Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres:
Buffer Width: 50' > 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) Yes No
IV. Success Criteria Evaluation:
VEGETATION:
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/lo cover
NOTE: Success Criteria is 320 spa
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
SYIM I
'_MW Cfi mk
p I LLC-?l C)Ak
Date of last planting: ? 6A Kf5
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas and associated stream bank (e.g. bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc.)
i
Pvi
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
t
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
Easement Marking Method:
List any remaining issues to address (e.g. plant survival, easement encroachment, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional Comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Label and attach photos to
this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2

ma
Oo
3
3 g
40
N N 3
0 0 Z
10 -4
35°01.000' N S? ULVUU IV » w.vvv
v
"Ilk
06
_ ? V
oll
l --77-- if' A
?. 00
O O
1 sr?.
tit
O ` X40 \ s Y O
O -?? t - - - 4ti I O
'xi
I? 1 4 1
I-j
V
C) C)
C) C)
?I
1? Z'
A r 1 •n t? ''fit - O
00 - -- 14 l ?\( RRf ?\ O
N I ',5
11 o?l
if
n 1 / In
70
W
a
i
\ ti_,/f I _ ySJ \ O
35°01.000'N 35-02:000'N 35003.000'N
O
pos.
'2 oo <
CD 1
co 3
rl) CD CD
03
F
t
Ch m
CD =r
? y % +v f ? SS
V
n
O
r,
-- wtT ?'' ?•-'' 1 4?` jf
o {
i i W n
cut)
- ?_
? -. __ . i b• ?\ Wes` `?Il
CD :Z=4
T
3
0
O
SI
,c ? z
...........
=3
CD
n 3
(D (D
4 pr
0
co 0
C: X
= C')
CD
> 5D
cn
C)
CP
(D
0
co
cn
0
CP
PC
CD
N
-7
CD
0
CD

Ra Na
\Ra 60
Nb
Mu
P. Js Go
j s Go L y b 14ai�e-ft— -r6k C
Nb Ly Nb b wn
Rai crw Nh PC)
-ujn
Go
NI�
Mu - Nb No
Lo PC)
ul Pa
w
IN b w
y M u
N c M u
Nb Nb
R a P o
O -W SC,
(J
Pa M u 44
w lf"Flo
t" Lo
Lo IV
rl a
Nb
w
St
Mu Mu z
L.0
<
Pn
Ly
el m U�.
Lo
6B (D -W St Po z
w
W,O z
Js MU D
0
P, water U
B,i
La z
u LU
Lo
IV
Mu st
J1. Mu
PC) Lo Mu —14
Bri To Ln
e Al
ll
Po
PO Bii F5C) Ln St
PO We
M u
m u
Js
AuB NoB
Pa
Hn U. Ln Ln
Ln
K,
N
J5 GoA
Mu Mu
Pa
P, Mk Pa Ra
Lo Mu NOE3 Ly AtjH St
Mu Ln
Ln A B Pa A LIB Mu
Mu
Wo Mu st
st
st
Ln Ln Ln
To 1-n
Ln Mu AuJ3 m u Pa
AuB
m u
M u NoB
S t