20191403 Ver 1_Mitigation As-Built Plans_20200615

ID#* 20191403 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/15/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/15/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20191403
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Bohemian Mitigation Slte
County: Randolph
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: Bohemian _100108_AB_2020.pdf 6AMB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Bohemian Mitigation Project
DMS Project #: 1001081 Contract #: 7863 1 DWR # 2019-1403 1 RFP: 16-007703
Randolph & Guilford Counties, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
Randleman Lake Watershed
HUC 03030003
Prepared By:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
For Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
Prepared For:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
June 2020

fires
June 11, 2020
Jeremiah Dow
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Bohemian Mitigation Project: As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (NCDMS ID 100108)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on June 4, 2020 regarding the Bohemian
Mitigation Project Draft As -Built Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
1. Section 1.3 — Please change the buffer enhancement credits from 21,959.000 to 21,958.800
in both the paragraph and the table. Please change the Total Riparian Buffer Credits to
578,653.885.
Done.
2. Section 1.5 — States that planted tree species can be found in Table 2. Please change
reference to Table 2 to Table 5.
3. Table 1 — Please take all Riparian Buffer Credits to three (3) decimal places. On row five
223,740 riparian buffer credits should be changed to 223.740.
DonE
4. Figure 3b — Any fencing installed at the site should be shown on the As -built Map.
DonE

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description.......................................................
1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria .............................
1.3 Project Components...........................................................................
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach............................................................
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions ...............................................
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance......................................................
2 Reference.........................................................................................................
Appendix A: Background Tables and Site Mans
Table 1: Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3a: As -Built Map Bohemian West
Figure 3b: As -Built Map Bohemian East
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5: Plant Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
..................................... 1
..................................... 1
..................................... 2
..................................... 3
..................................... 3
..................................... 3
..................................... 4
..................................... 4
i

I Proiect Summary
L I Project Location and Description
The Bohemian Project is within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin within the
8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030003, 14-digit HUC 03030003010050 and DWR Sub Basin
Number 03-06-08.
The Project is located in both Guilford and Randolph County, approximately 5 miles east of Archdale,
North Carolina (Figure 1). To access the western portion of the Project, head east from I-74 on NC Highway
62 W, turn right onto Groonetown Rd, after approximately 1.5 miles the site will be on the left. To access
the eastern portion of the Project, head east from I-74 on NC Highway 62 W, turn right onto Frazier Farm
Rd, after approximately a half mile, the site will be on the left. The coordinates for the western portion of
the project are 35.914 °N and-79.884'W. The coordinates for the eastern portion of the project are 35.912
°N and-79.873 'W.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental
Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Monitoring Report for the Bohemian Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Project (Project) as a full -delivery buffer mitigation project for the Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) (DMS 9100108). This Project provides riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable
impacts due to development within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin, United
States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03030003) (Figure 1). The
Project is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and the
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0250.
The conservation easement of the Bohemian Project totals approximately 22.78 acres and is divided into
two distinct sections (east and west) and includes seven unnamed tributaries that ultimately drain into
Randleman Lake approximately 3,000 feet downstream of the Project. Land use within the western portion
of the Project was primarily cropland and disturbed riparian forest with the presence of invasive species.
Land use within the eastern portion of the Project was primarily actively grazed non -forested pasture and
disturbed riparian forest with the presence of invasive species. Furthermore, livestock have historically had
access to all stream reaches within the eastern portion of the Project. The lack of riparian trees and the long-
term presence of livestock in those areas contributed to bank instability and erosional rills within some
riparian zones.
The goal of the Project is to restore, enhance and preserve ecological function to the existing stream and
riparian buffer by establishing appropriate plant communities while minimizing temporal and land
disturbing impacts. Restoration of a native hardwood forest to the riparian buffer and surrounding areas and
the removal of livestock aid in filtering runoff from agricultural fields, thereby reducing nutrient and
sediment loads to Project channels and the overall watershed. Restoration, enhancement and preservation
of the Randleman Lake riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0250) results in a reduction of the
water quality stressors that affected the Project: livestock access and a lack of a vegetated and/or protected
riparian buffer. Immediate water quality benefits and pollutant removal within the vicinity of the Project
include the exclusion of livestock access to streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land -
uses. This Project is consistent with the management strategy for maintaining and protecting riparian areas
in the Randleman Lake watershed. Project attributes are summarized in Table 1.
Bohemian Mitigation Project 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Project 9100108 June 2020

1.2 Monitoring Protocol and Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring and visual assessments will be conducted. Riparian vegetation monitoring is
based on the "Carolina Vegetation Survey -Ecosystem Enhancement Program Protocol for Recording
Vegetation: Level 2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2". Monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100
meters squared in size and cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area. These plots were
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer mitigation area (11.81 acres) and are representative
of the riparian restoration and enhancement areas where applicable (i.e. when enhancement credit is being
generated from supplemental planting under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)). The following data is recorded
for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots
are flagged with flagging tape. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners
of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos
of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. There are 10 fixed vegetation monitoring
plots (Figure 2).
Photos are to be taken at all vegetation plot origins each monitoring year and be provided in the annual
reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained
and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Project are the survival of at least four native
hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a density of at least 260
stems per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance
standards as determined by NC Division of Water Resources (DWR).
A visual assessment of the conservation easement is also performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site (if applicable);
• No livestock access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• No invasive species in areas were invasive species were treated,
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement areas; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Component/ Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Vegetation Annual Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
vegetation community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
monitoring supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species
shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be
documented and reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will
continue through the monitoring period.
Invasive and Nuisance Visual Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become
Vegetation Assessment dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. Locations of invasive
and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
Project Boundary Visual Project boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
Assessment mitigation project and adjacent properties. Boundaries are marked with signs identifying
the property as a mitigation project and will include the name of the long-term steward
and a contact number. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post,
tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by Project conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/ signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Bohemian Mitigation Project 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Project 9100108 June 2020

Component/ Monitoring Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Road Crossing Visual Road crossings within the Project may be maintained only as allowed by conservation
Assessment easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or corridor agreements.
Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility of the landowner to maintain.
Livestock Fencing (if Visual Livestock fencing is to be placed outside the easement limits. Maintenance of fencing is
applicable) Assessment the responsibility of the landowner.
1.3 Project Components
This Project generates approximately 484,526.585 W (10.79 acres) of riparian buffer restoration credits on
existing non -forested pasture, 72,168.500 fe (1.66 acres) of buffer enhancement credits through livestock
exclusion, and 21,958.800 W (0.50 acres) of buffer preservation credits. The restoration and preservation
adjacent to the ephemeral Reaches Sa and Ma4 comprises 39,071 W (0.9 acres) of the Project, which is in
compliance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7) in that it is only 4.3 percent of the total area of buffer
mitigation, which is less than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation (22.10 total acres). In
accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4) and (5), "the area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation", only 5.04 acres
out of the 6.97 total acres available for preservation credit are allowable to be used to generate mitigation
credits. The total mitigation credits that the Bohemian Mitigation Project generate are summarized below
and a more detailed table is in Appendix A.
Mitigation Totals
Used Area Square Feet
Credits
Restoration
514,428
484,526.585
Enhancement
144,337
72,168.500
Preservation
219,588
21,958.800
Total Riparian Buffer
878,353
578,653.885
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
Restoration activities included planting a composition of native bare -root tree species based on reference
reach data and excluding livestock from the stream and surrounding riparian area. The restoration of plant
communities within the Project not only provide stabilization and improve water quality within the
easement limits but also provide ecological benefits to the entire watershed.
Enhancement occurred in forested areas within the Project, found in small patches along SQ1, SQ2, and a
small portion of Sa, where grazing occurs adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). All livestock was removed from the easement and the fence
was installed to exclude access to riparian areas and their associated streams.
Preservation was used along Reach MA1, MA3, MA4, and MA5 in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5). Mature hardwood forest is present on the right bank
of MA I, on the left and right bank of MA3, on the left and right bank of the most downstream portion of
MA4, and on the left and right bank of the most downstream portion of MA5.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the Site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Piedmont Alluvial Forest is
the target community type for the riparian restoration areas. The community is defined by Schafale (2012).
Bohemian Mitigation Project 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Project 9100108 June 2020

The planting of bare root trees occurred in May 2020. Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to
bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table 5. Additionally, a temporary and
permanent seed mixture was applied in areas where row crops were present. Among a variety of seed, the
mixture also included black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta) which is a perennial, pollinator species.
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
Monitoring of the 10 fixed vegetation plots was completed on May 11, 2020. Vegetation tables are in
Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are
exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from
850 to 1,214 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,068 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of
12 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but
are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was 1.5 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project and no invasive species were observed. The fence has
been installed, is in good condition, and is maintaining cattle exclusion. Additionally, there were no signs
of encroachment or concentrated flow in the easement area.
2 Reference
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2010. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0250 — Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (2020). Bohemian Mitigation Project — Final Mitigation Plan.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Bohemian Mitigation Project 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Project 9100108 June 2020

Appendix A
Proj ect Background Tables and Site Maps

Table 1. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Credit
Mitigation
Min -Max Buffer
Total Area
Creditable
Initial Credit
Final Credit
Riparian
Location
Subject? Feature Type
Feature Name
o �o Full Credit
Buffer
Type
Activity
Width (ft)
(so
Area (soRatio
(x:1)
Ratio (x:1)
Credits
MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5,
Buffer Rural
Yes I / P Restoration
0-100
SQ1, SQ2
433,768
433,768
1 100%
1
433,768.000
Enhancement via
Buffer Rural
Yes I / P Livestock
0-100
SQ1, SQ2, Sb
144,337
144,337
2 100%
2
72,168.500
Exclusion
Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101-200 MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5, 43,951 43,951 1 33% 3.0303 14,503.845
SQ1, SQ2, Sb
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 Sa, MA4 36,031 36,031 1 100% 1 36,031.000
Ruffer Rural Nn Fnhemeral Rectnrafinn 1n1-qnn Sa_MA4 F78 F78 1 amine 99374n
Totals
658,765
6589765
5569695.085
Eligible for Preservation (so 2199688
Riparian
Credit Mitigation Min -Max Buffer
Location Subject? Feature Type
Feature Name
Total Area
Creditable
Initial Credit o �o Full Credit
Final Credit
Buffer
Type Activity Width (ft)
(so
Area (soRatio
(x:1)
Ratio (x:1)
Credits
Rural Yes I / P 0-100
MA1, MA3, MA4, MA5
291,884
219,588
10 100%
10
21,958.800
Buffer Rural Yes I / P Preservation 101-200
MA1. MA3. MA4. MA5.
9.494
0
10 33%
30.30303
—
as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation 4.20

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Bohemian Site
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 4 weeks
Number of reporting Years : 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Jan-20
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
NA
Stream Construction
NA
NA
Site Planting
NA
May-20
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May-20
Jun-20
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Bohemian Site
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen
Monitoring Performers
RES / 3300 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Bohemian
County
Randolph & Guildford
Project Area (acres)
22.78
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 35.914 N Longitude:-79.884 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
11.81
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03030003
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03030003010050
DWR Sub -basin
03-06-08

35,914,-79.884
��,gram Farm
;and & Gravel 0 '
d9h
Full Range
Hanging Systems
k
4
ph Modlin Farm
ti
ap
nW
9 Cornerstone
ai Baptist Church
6I
„—A
0
no"a
0
Bible Truth v
Baptist Church
Above The M
Rainbow Florist
v
x
m
A
ea
fit
Router Bit Service
Company Inc
E
s
a
l7
b
A A'.
•P P �923 � 1g74
V
x
v
r
Deep River Tabernacle 4 Lowder Steel, Inc 9
Coll rare "w'?,
J's collections v Kemer� • 7 yy
r,�ygRd knley �•b
5
Greensboro
Q
_ Jamestown
Hohn Dairy
ab Farm (historical) Pleasant
T 98 Hig oint Garden
� V
gyny a -
chdale
0 Faith Baptist Church
S
homasville Trin Level rosy
Legend
tions
Conservation Easement Shear PByJe nie9
ndle an Gr
Randleman Lake Service Area =
N Figure 1 - Site Location Map Date: 5/19/2020
w e Drawn by: RTM res
Bohemian Mitigation Project
S Checked by: JRM
0 1,000 2000 Guilford and Randolph Counties,
North Carolina 1 inch = 2,000 feet
Feet

p. W-7.a I J I I I IF
..................
UZI U.-ML &-r—dVIA7"
res
. . . . . . . . ...... ...W E
0 200 400
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions Plan View
Ilk MYO 2020
A
Bohemian
Mitigation Project
Guilford and Randolph
Counties, North Carolina
Date 5/18/2020 Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: JRM 1 in =400 feet
Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
Ilk' 1.1
Stream Top of Bank
Buffer Mitigation
Restoration, 0-100'
ly Restoration, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
Restoration, 101-200'
Restoration, 101-200' (Ephemeral)
Enhancement, 0-100'
I v
Preservation, 0-100'
Preservation, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
APreservation, 101-200'
4
1k
-�A
A

Sealed Conservation Easement Boundaries
were provided by Ascension Land Surveying, PC
(FIRM # C-4288, CHRISTOPHER L. COLE L-5008),
dated 8/19/19 . Top of bank linework is based
on field measurements also performed by
Ascension Land Surveying, PC dated 8/19/19.
MA1
fires
N
w
F
s
0 125 250
Feet
Figure 3a
As -Built Map (Bohemian West)
MYO 2020
Bohemian
Mitigation Project
Guilford and Randolph
Counties, North Carolina
Date: 5/18/2020 Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: JRM 1 in = 250 feet
Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
Stream Top of Bank
Buffer Mitigation
Restoration, 0-100'
® Restoration, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
® Restoration, 101-200'
® Restoration, 101-200' (Ephemeral)
® Enhancement, 0-100'
Preservation, 0-100'
Preservation, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
Preservation, 101-200'
fy��►�:��►� ri�irl �i�

Sealed Conservation Easement Boundaries
were provided by Ascension Land Surveying, PC
(FIRM # C-4288, CHRISTOPHER L. COLE L-5008),
dated 8/19/19 . Top of bank linework is based
on field measurements also performed by
Ascension Land Surveying, PC dated 8/19/19.
0
fires
Z
m
0 50 100
Feet
Figure 3b
As -Built Map (Bohemian East)
MYO 2020
Bohemian
Mitigation Project
Guilford and Randolph
Counties, North Carolina
Date: 6/11/2020 Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: JRM 1 in = 100 feet
Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
Stream Top of Bank
Buffer Mitigation
® Restoration, 0-100'
® Restoration, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
® Restoration, 101-200'
® Restoration, 101-200' (Ephemeral)
® Enhancement, 0-100'
Q Preservation, 0-100'
Preservation, 0-100' (Ephemeral)
Preservation, 101-200'
x Fencing

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Bohemian Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2,200
Chestnut Oak
Quercus montana
1,900
Swamp White Oak
Quercus bicolor
1,500
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
1,500
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
1,000
Southern Red Oak
Quercus falcata
1,000
Black Walnut
Ju lans nt ra
600
Red Mulberry
Morus rubra
500
Black Cherry
Prunus serotina
450
White Oak
Quercus alba
400
Eastern Redbud
Cercis canadensis
350
Total
11,400
Table 6. Bohemian Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Plante d
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Ave rage
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.5
2
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.4
3
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.4
4
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.4
5
931
0
931
Yes
1.5
6
1214
0
1214
Yes
1.4
7
850
0
850
Yes
1.4
8
1133
0
1133
Yes
1.6
9
1174
0
1174
Yes
1.8
10
1214
0
1214
Yes
1.6
Project Avg
1068
0
1068
Yes
1.5

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7. Bohemian Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Bohemian
Current Plot Data (MYO 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
100108-01-0001
100108-01-0002
100108-01-0003
100108-01-0004
100108-01-0005
100108-01-0006
100108-01-0007
100108-01-0008
100108-01-0009
100108-01-0010
MYO(2020)
PnoLS
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
41
4
4
2
2
2
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
23
23
23
Cornusamomum
siIkydogwood
Shrub
9
9
9
13
13
13
1
1
1
8
8
8
31
31
31
Juglansnigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
6
6
6
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
5
5
5
29
29
29
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
31
31
31
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
8
8
8
3
3
3
11
11
11
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
18
18
18
Quercus bicolor
swamp white oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
7
7
7
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
6
6
6
1
1
1
31
31
31
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
10
10
10
Quercus montana
chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
10
10
10
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
1
1
1
5
5
5
8
8
8
6
6
6
7
7
7
54
54
54
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
27
27
27
231
231
23
301
301
30
21
21
21
281
28
28
291
29
29
30
30
30
2641
2641
264
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.25
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
5
5
5
7
7
7
8a�j
9
9
9
8
8
8
9
9
9
12
12
12
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012
1052
1052
1052
1093
1093
1093
931
931
931
1214
1214
1214
850
1133
1133
1133
1174
1174
1174
1214
1214
121
1068
1068
1068

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Bohemian Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1(5/11/2020)
Vegetation Plot 3 (5/11/2020)
Vegetation Plot 2 (5/11/2020)
*4 _y
�A
f
�Y
P
Vegetation Plot 4 (5/11/2020)

Vegetation Plot 5 (5/11/2020)
Vegetation Plot 7 (5/11/2020)
Vegetation Plot 6 (5/11/2020)
Vegetation Plot 8 (5/11/2020)

Vegetation Plot (5/11/2020)
Vegetation Plot 10 (5/11/2020)