20120747 Ver 1_Year 6 Monitoring Report_2019_20200615

ID#* 20120747 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/15/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/15/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream Pr Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
.................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20120747
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
County: Johnston
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: DevilsRacetrack_95021_MY6_2019.pdf 52AMB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

MONITORING YEAR 6
ANNUAL REPORT
FINAL

DEVIL’S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003989
DMS Project Number 95021
USACE Action ID Number 2012-00810
NCDWR Project Number 12-0747

Data Collection Period: March - November 2019
Draft Submission Date: December 20, 2019
Final Submission Date: February 20, 2020

PREPARED FOR:

NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609
February 20, 2020

Jeremiah Dow
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

RE: Monitoring Year 6 Report Comments for Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site (95021)
Neuse River Basin – CU# 03020201; Johnston County, North Carolina
Contract No. 003989

Dear Mr. Dow,
We have reviewed the comments on the Monitoring Year 6 Report for the above referenced project
dated February 17, 2020 and have revised the report based on these comments. The revised documents
are submitted with this letter. Below are responses to each of your comments. For your convenience,
the comments are reprinted with our response in italics.
1. Section 1.2.4
a. It may not be appropriate to remove sediment from Southeast Branch in MY7. The source of the
sediment (farm field) and cause (above average rainfall) are factors that will persist after
closeout, and the stream should be assessed on its ability to respond to storms and resulting
sediment pulses.
We understand your concern and that this will likely be a concern raised during IRT review. However,
this is the first time since construction sediment has deposited in the upper section of Southeast
Branch. It was due to a single slope failure in the adjacent farm field which caused a large slug of
sediment to aggrade the upper 100 feet of channel. While the channel was beginning to process the
sediment and move it downstream, we excavated some material with shovels to help speed the
process. We believe this aggradation is not a common occurrence and thought it was appropriate to
remove the excess sediment. We have added language clarifying the scope of the aggradation and
sediment removal.

2. Section 1.2.5
a. 2nd paragraph: Please add a sentence briefly summarizing prior monitoring years’ achievement
of success criteria for the three flow gauges referenced.
A sentence was added to Section 1.2.5 summarizing prior years monitoring data for the three
referenced flow gauges.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

3. Section 1.2.6
a. First paragraph: Please add a sentence discussing removal of groundwater gage 34 in MY6. Also,
please clarify the last sentence that states “…beginning of the growing season was extended by
20 days from March 21 to March 1…” Extended compared to MY5 or NRCS WETS data?
Two sentences were added discussing the removal of groundwater gage 34 in monitoring year 6.
The last sentence of the first paragraph was updated to clarify the growing season start date was
adjusted from the NRCS WETS start date based on soil temperature data.

4. Appendix 1
a. Figure 3.1 & 3.2: Please show flow gauge and crest gauge locations on the CCPVs.
Flow gauges and crest gauges were added to the CCPV maps.
b. Table 6: It seems likely that Devils Racetrack East could be a potential candidate for inclusion in
this table for continuing concern regarding bare areas and/or poor growth rates, specifically since
these concerns were referenced in the Maintenance Plan section.
The area east of Devil’s Racetrack Road was added to areas of poor vigor due to the smaller than
expected tree height during monitoring year 6.

5. Appendix 4
a. Some cross sections are missing the bankfull line (hardcopy only, electronic copy has all bankfull
lines).
Bankfull lines are now present on all hardcopy cross sections.
6. Appendix 5
a. Table 13: This table should be cumulative for prior years. We also recommend adding a
cumulative flow gauge table.
Table 13 was updated to be cumulative for prior years of bankfull event data. A cumulative flow
gauge table was added to Appendix 5.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609
7. Based on groundwater gauge data and the hydric soils delineation by Mr. Kevin Martin, it seems
possible that additional wetland credits could be unrealized in the area of gauge 26.
Two additional groundwater wells were placed in the area of groundwater well 26 to gain a better
understanding of this area. We recognize that some portion of this area may not ultimately achieve
wetland success and have added the wells to attempt to minimize credit loss.

If you have any questions, please contact me by phone [phone], or by email
([e-mail]).
Sincerely,

Jason Lorch, Monitoring Coordinator

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL ii

PREPARED BY:

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full-delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore and enhance a total of 18,748 linear feet (LF) of stream and restore
59.70 acres (ac) of wetlands in Johnston County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of five
unnamed tributaries (UTs) to the Neuse River. The largest of these streams, Devil’s Racetrack Creek (East
and West), drains directly to the Neuse River. The other four streams are small headwater tributaries to
Devil’s Racetrack Creek (Southwest Branch, Middle Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch). The
project proposes to provide 18,215 stream mitigation units (SMU’s) and 58.50 wetland mitigation units
(WMU’s). At the downstream limits of the project, the drainage area is 831 acres (1.30 square miles).
The Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County along Devil’s Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway 701 and approximately
one mile east of Interstate 95 (Figure 1). The Site is located in the western portion of the Inner Coastal
Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998) within the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) subbasin 03-04-02 of the Neuse River Basin (United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic
Unit 03020201140010).
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. The primary objectives of the project were
to re-establish wetland hydrology, restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland community,
restore a Coastal Plain stream system to promote hydrologic connectivity with the floodplains and
wetlands, stabilize stream banks, promote instream habitat and aeration, restore riparian buffers, and
further improve water quality through removing existing agricultural practices. Figure 2 and Table 1
present the restoration and enhancement design for the Site.
The following project goals were established to address the effects listed above from watershed and
project site stressors:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwater streams,
to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Stream and wetland restoration and enhancement construction efforts were completed in February 2014.
Baseline as-built monitoring activities (MY0) were completed between January and February 2014. A
conservation easement is in place on 96.065 acres of restored wetland and riparian stream corridors to
protect them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 6 (MY6) assessment and site visits were completed between the months of March and
November 2019 to assess the conditions of the project. Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation,
hydrology, and stream success criteria for MY6. The overall MY6 average planted stem density for the
Site is 557 planted stems per acre, which is greater than the year seven density requirement of 210 stems
per acre. All restored and enhanced streams are stable and functioning as designed. Southeast Branch,
Southwest Branch, and Middle Branch all had pressure transducers installed to monitor stream flow. All
three stream gages met the hydrologic criteria for MY6. Of the 37 groundwater monitoring wells on the
Site, 29 met the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing
season consecutively), three gages malfunctioned during the early part of the growing season, and five

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL iv
did not met criteria. Out of the five groundwater wells that didn’t meet success criteria for MY6, three
were within wetland areas determined to be at risk. Invasive and undesired competing vegetation will
continue to be monitored and treatments will be applied if necessary. The vegetation on the east side of
Devil’s Racetrack has improved drastically.

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL v
DEVIL’S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Monitoring Year 6 Data Assessment .......................................................................................... 1-2
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment ...................................................................................................... 1-3
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern ............................................................................................. 1-3
1.2.3 Stream Assessment ............................................................................................................ 1-3
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern ................................................................................................... 1-4
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment ....................................................................................................... 1-4
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment .......................................................................................................... 1-4
1.2.7 Maintenance Plan .............................................................................................................. 1-6
1.3 Monitoring Year 6 Summary ...................................................................................................... 1-6
Section 2: METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3: REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................3-1

APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Tables and Figures
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2a-b Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 1A Project Mitigation Credit History
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes

Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3.0-3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a-f Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs

Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)

Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a-f Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11a-f Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Section)
Table 12a-f Monitoring Data – Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL vi
Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 14 In-Stream Flow Gage Attainment Summary
Table 15 Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Groundwater Gage Plots
Soil Temperature Probe Plots
In-Stream Flow Gage Plots
Monthly Rainfall Data
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Detailed Hydric Soil Investigation

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 1-1
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW

The Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201) near the town of Four Oaks, North
Carolina. The Site is located along Devil’s Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway
701 and approximately one mile east of Interstate 95. The Site is in the western portion of the Inner
Coastal Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The project watershed consists primarily of agricultural
lands and forest. The only significant development in the watershed is a campground adjacent to Devil’s
Racetrack Creek on the western portion of the project site, a middle school in the upper portion of the
watershed, a low-density subdivision with single family homes, and a small section of I-95. The drainage
area for the project site is 831 acres (1.30 square miles) at the lower end of Devil’s Racetrack Creek (East).
The project stream reaches include Devil’s Racetrack Creek (East and West), Southwest Branch, Middle
Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch (stream restoration and/or enhancement level I/II
approach). Mitigation work within the Site included restoration and enhancement of 18,748 linear feet
(LF) of perennial and intermittent stream channel and restoration of 59.7 acres (ac) of riparian wetlands.
The stream and wetland areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect
water quality. The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the DMS in January of 2013.
Construction activities were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. (East Side) and Fluvial Solutions
(West Side) in February 2014. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural Systems,
Inc. in February 2014. Baseline monitoring (MY0) was conducted between December 2013 and February
2014. Annual monitoring will be conducted for seven years with the close-out anticipated to commence
in 2021 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history,
contact information, and watershed/site background information for this project.
A conservation easement has been recorded and is in place along the stream and wetland riparian
corridors to protect them in perpetuity; 96.065 ac (Deed Book 4221, Page 419-433) within two tracts
owned by Nell Howell Revocable Trust. The project provides 18,215 stream mitigation units (SMU’s) and
58.50 wetland mitigation units (WMU’s). Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1 and
project components are illustrated in Figures 2a and 2b.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized with the surrounding
wetland complex drained for agricultural purposes. Stream valleys and other low areas were filled to raise
wet areas and level the fields. At the same time the streams were straightened, and riparian vegetation
was also removed. The project area west of Devil’s Racetrack Road was used for row crop agriculture and
the eastern portion was used for timber production.
The channelization of streams on the Site resulted in severely over-enlarged channels that were extremely
deep in many locations. The alterations of the Site to promote farming practices resulted in complete
elimination of the ecological function of this small stream/wetland complex. Specifically, functional losses
at the Site include degraded aquatic habitat, altered hydrology (related to loss of floodplain connection
and lowered water table), and reduction of amount and quality of riparian wetland habitats and related
water quality benefits. Ongoing bank erosion was also occurring at some locations due to high, overly
steep banks and lack of bank vegetation. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 10a through 10f in Appendix
4 present the pre-restoration conditions in detail.

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 1-2
The Site was designed to meet the over-arching goals as described in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Devil’s Racetrack Creek Site project area, others, such as
pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The
following project specific goals established in the Mitigation Plan include:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters
streams, to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Secondary project goals established in the Mitigation Plan were to restore fish passage from the Neuse
River to Devil’s Racetrack Creek. This is a secondary goal because success will not be measured during
monitoring.
The primary project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Promote wetland hydrology by raising channelized stream beds and filling drainage ditches;
• Plant wetland areas with native tree species to restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp –
Blackwater Subtype community;
• Reconstruct stream channels to have the appropriate slope, planform, and cross-sectional
geometry for the region of the Coastal Plain in which the project is located;
• Size reconstructed stream channels to flood floodplains and wetlands frequently;
• Stabilize stream banks using bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading
to reduce bank angles and bank height;
• Install in-stream structures and woody debris to promote aeration of water, create habitat,
and influence the creation of bed forms commonly found in sand bed channels;
• Restore riparian buffer areas with native tree species to stabilize channels, filter flood flows
and runoff, and supplement wetland plantings; and
• Remove project area from agricultural production further improving water quality.
The design streams and wetlands were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding
landscape, climate, and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing
watershed conditions and trajectory. The mitigation project was developed to restore a large
stream/wetland complex directly adjacent to the Neuse River to a naturally occurring community to
create riparian and wetland habitat and improve water quality. Other intentions of the design were to
create stable habitats, improve riparian buffers, and restore the natural migration patterns for
anadromous and other fish for spawning.
1.2 Monitoring Year 6 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during MY6 to assess the condition of the
project. The stream and wetland mitigation success criteria for the Site follow the approved success
criteria presented in the Mitigation Plan.

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 1-3
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 51 10-meter by 10-meter vegetation plots were established within the Site during baseline
monitoring. The final vegetation success criteria is the survival of 210 planted stems per acre averaging
10 feet in height at the end of the seven year monitoring period (MY7).
The MY6 vegetative survey was completed in August 2019. The 2019 vegetation monitoring data suggests
a site wide average planted stem density of 557 stems per acre which is greater than the MY7 requirement
of 210 stems per acre, but approximately 21% less than the stem density recorded in MY0. Individual plot
data suggests planted stem density ranges from 162 to 769 planted stems per acre. When including
volunteer stems, the site wide average number of stems per acre is 781. This is above the MY7
requirement. Fifty of the 51 vegetation plots met success criteria for MY6 and are on track to meet the
success criteria required for MY7 (Table 9, Appendix 3). Vegetation Plot 49 averaged 162 planted stems
per acre; however, when volunteer stems are included the density is 243 stems per acre which is above
the final success criteria of 210 planted stems per acre. Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot
photographs and the vegetation condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Even though vegetation plot 49 does not meet the final success criteria, when including volunteer species
this plot meets the final success criteria of 210 stems per acre. Therefore, no remedial actions are
proposed in this area at this time.
The restoration area east of Devil’s Racetrack Road continued to receive significant treatment to improve
the soil quality and herbaceous cover. Approximately 5,000 pounds of fertilizer and 32,000 pounds of
pelletized lime were applied across the area during MY6. Additionally, the area was seeded with over 100
pounds of a native seed mix and live stakes were planted along Devil’s Racetrack (East). Herbaceous cover
and tree densities are sufficient; however, tree vigor is lower than expected for monitoring year 6. This
area has drastically improved and will continue to be monitored and remedial actions will be taken as
necessary.
An area of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) on the west side of the project between Devil’s Racetrack
(West) and North Branch was treated in September 2019. The contractor is scheduled to conduct a second
treatment on this area in the winter of 2019/2020. Scattered, low densities of Chinese privet were also
treated across the Site and will be assessed to determine if further treatment is necessary during the
winter. The Current Condition Plan View in Appendix 2 shows vegetation areas of concern.
Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) has continued to volunteer across the site. In January of 2019, pines were cut
across the site to keep them from competing with desirable vegetation. Wildlands will continue to
monitor and treat loblolly pine as necessary during subsequent monitoring years.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY6 were conducted in April 2019. All streams within the Site are stable and
met success criteria for MY6. In general, cross sections for all streams showed little to no change in
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width-to-depth ratio. Cross section surveys show that the bank
height ratios remain at or very near 1.0. Entrenchment ratios vary slightly from year to year due to minor
changes in bankfull widths. Small adjustments in width occur due to vegetation, sediment deposition, and
many other factors. These minor changes do not indicate channel instability. Surveyed riffle cross sections
fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type.

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 1-4
Cross section 8 on Devil’s Racetrack (West) has maintained a consistent bankfull width but has increased
in depth and area. This is due to the location of the cross section within the shallow. The shallow was
built with logs buried perpendicular to the stream banks at the stream bed elevation to provide grade
control. These logs create micro pools within the shallow. Cross section 8 was placed downstream of a
log in a micro pool. Cross section 8 is representative of micro pools and is stable and performing as
expected, even though there is an increase in depth and area.
Longitudinal profile surveys are not required on the project unless visual inspection indicates reach wide
vertical stability concerns. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual stability assessment table, the CCPV map,
and reference photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
The upper most one hundred feet of Southeast Branch aggraded with sediment from the upstream
agricultural field during MY6. This happened over the winter when the farm field did not have a cover
crop and above average rainfall occurred. A single slope failed in the adjacent farm field which caused a
large slug of sediment to aggrade in the channel. While the channel was beginning to process the sediment
and move it downstream, some material was excavated with shovels to help speed up the process. This
area will be monitored during MY7 and remedial actions will be taken if necessary.
At the end of 2018 several beaver dams were observed along Devil’s Racetrack (West). The USDA
removed beaver from the Site and there were no signs of beaver activity during 2019. The site will be
monitored for future beaver activity during subsequent monitoring years.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of MY7, two or more bankfull events must have occurred during separate years within the
restoration reaches. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on all the streams with crest gages and
pressure transducers during the MY6 data collection. All streams on the Site had multiple bankfull events
during MY1, MY2, MY3, MY4, and MY5. Therefore, the Site has met the required bankfull flow success
criterion.
Flow Gauges were installed on Southwest Branch, Southeast Branch, and Middle Branch to measure
stream flow. These pressure transducers were installed to show that the streams have adequate flow for
a portion of the year and are not ephemeral ditches. Per discussion with the Interagency Review Team
(IRT), continuous flow must be documented for at least 30 consecutive days during normal precipitation
circumstances on these streams. Stream flow must be documented to occur intermittently in all months
other than July through September. Southwest Branch showed consistent flow throughout MY6. Middle
Branch showed consistent flow for 276 consecutive days despite a gage malfunction from October to early
December. Southeast Branch maintained flow for 117 consecutive days, from the beginning of the year
until the end of April. All three streams have met the flow success criterion for MY6. All three streams
have easily exceeded stream flow criteria in all previous monitoring years except Southeast Branch during
MY2 when the gage malfunctioned most of the year. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment
Thirty-four groundwater monitoring gages were established during the baseline monitoring, four
additional gages were added during MY2, and three gages were added during MY5. Groundwater gage 34
was removed during MY6 due to poor performance. The area around gage 34 is already categorized as
wetland credits at risk and likely won’t generate wetland credits. Groundwater gages 8, and 32 were
placed outside of wetland boundaries to capture the extent of the wetlands and were removed during

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 1-5
MY5. Groundwater gage 10 performed poorly and was removed during MY4. The wetland area around
groundwater gage 10 was adjusted during MY4 as well. All the gages were installed at appropriate
locations so that the data collected will provide an indication of groundwater levels throughout the Site.
To provide data for the determination of the growing season, three soil temperature probes (2 on the
west side and 1 on the east side) have been installed at a depth of twelve inches. A barotroll logger (to
measure barometric pressure used in the calculations of groundwater levels with well transducer data)
was also installed on the Site. All monitoring gages were downloaded and maintained on an as needed
basis. The success criterion for wetland hydrology is there must be a free groundwater surface within 12
inches of the ground surface for a consecutive 8.5 percent of the growing season, during normal
precipitation conditions. During MY1 NRCS WETS Data was used to determine the growing season for the
Site. After discussions with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), it was agreed to use on-
site soil temperature data to determine the beginning of the growing season and use NRCS WETS data to
determine the end of the growing season. During MY6 the beginning of the growing season was extended
by 20 days from the NRCS WETS start date of March 21 to March 1 based on soil temperatures staying
above 41 degrees Fahrenheit at 12 inches below the ground surface.
The USACE requested pre-construction groundwater well data be overlaid on hydrographs with the
current monitoring year groundwater well data to see how groundwater levels are recharging after rain
events on the Site. Wildlands overlaid the pre-construction groundwater well data with the closest
monitoring groundwater well data and rain data. These plots suggest that the Site drained more rapidly
and to greater depths prior to restoration. Refer to Appendix 5 for pre and post construction groundwater
gage comparison plots.
Of the 37 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 29 met the success criteria (water table within 12
inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season consecutively), three gages malfunctioned in
the spring when they are most likely to meet wetland success criterion, and five gages did not meet the
success criterion. Of the 29 wells that met the success criterion, hydroperiods ranged from 11.5% to
29.5%. Groundwater wells 7, 21, and 22 malfunctioned during the spring of 2019. Wells 7 and 21 have
met success criteria every year in the past and well 22 met 4 of the past 5 monitoring years. These three
wells most likely would have met success criteria if they did not malfunction. Of the five wells that did
not meet success criteria three are in wetland areas at risk. Wells 20 and 23 are along the Site boundary
near North Branch. The eastern property boundary in this area is an open ditch that was not filled during
construction due to hydrologic trespass constraints. This ditch may be partially draining the groundwater
in this area. Wells 40 and 41 were added during MY5 to measure wetland hydroperiod farther west of
the ditch. Both of these wells recorded hydroperiods well in excess of the criterion threshold during MY5
and MY6. Well 13 is in an area along the easement boundary between Middle Branch and Southeast
Branch near vegetation plot 16. Well 26 recorded a hydroperiod of 7.3% during MY6 which does not meet
the wetland success criterion. The hydroperiod recorded at well 26 met the success criterion during MY1
– MY3 but has not met success criterion during MY4-MY6. The landscape around this well is no different
than other groundwater wells in the area, however it is located within the area used for staging equipment
during construction. This old staging area likely has compacted soils that may be limiting groundwater
from freely moving to the ground surface, but it is not obvious if this is causing the poor performance of
well 26. An additional groundwater well will be added outside the limits of the old staging area near well
26 to help determine if the compacted soils from the old staging area are affecting groundwater in this
area.
During MY6 a licensed soil scientist observed soil profiles in proximity to groundwater wells that were
marginal in attaining the success criterion. The purpose of this investigation was to document the
presence or absence of soil-based indicators of a contemporary, persistent high water table in these

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 1-6
questionable areas. The study areas are denoted by the orange boundary on the LSS report figure. The
detailed report is attached in Appendix 5. Evidence of contemporary wetland hydrology was observed
throughout the westernmost study area with the exception of a previous haul road which was slightly
elevated. A portion of this area was classified as wetland credit at risk. Boring 10 was located within the
at risk area, and evidence of a contemporary wetland hydrology regime was observed. Evidence of
persistent saturation was also observed throughout the entire study area surrounding GW5 and GW6.
The at risk study area surrounding boring 05, boring 06, and GW 34 exhibited only weak evidence of
saturation. This area may not have a persistent wetland hydrology regime. Evidence of a contemporary
wetland hydrology regime was observed throughout the entirety of the study area surrounding GW13
and boring 01, including the at risk area that lies within. All soil profiles observed within the study area
surrounding borings 02, 03, 04, and GW24 exhibited evidence of contemporary wetland hydrology. The
area surrounding boring 08 and GW 26 contained a potential upland area with non-hydric soil. The
remainder of this study area contained evidence of contemporary wetland hydrology. A potential upland
area was identified within the study area surrounding GW20 and GW23 which generally corresponds with
the area previously placed at risk. The entire study area east of Devil’s Racetrack road exhibited
contemporary evidence of a persistent high water table.
1.2.7 Maintenance Plan
Privet will be treated for on the Site during the winter of 2019/2020, especially in the area along North
Branch. Pines, and sweetgum will be monitored during subsequent monitoring years and will be treated
as necessary. Beaver activity will be monitored and dealt with as necessary.
Wildlands will monitor the soil quality of the eastern side of the Site by taking regular soil samples.
Additional amendments will be applied based on the results of these soil tests. This area will also be
monitored for areas with low herbaceous cover and re-seeded if necessary.

1.3 Monitoring Year 6 Summary
Vegetation plot data suggests the Site is on track to meeting the MY7 success criteria. Only one plot fell
short of the planted stem density criterion, but this plot exceeds the criterion threshold when including
volunteer stems. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. Each stream
documented multiple bankfull events during MY6. Of the 37 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site,
29 met the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing
season consecutively), three of the gages malfunctioned, three were in areas of wetlands deemed to be
at risk for credit, and two didn’t met success criteria. Invasive and undesired competing vegetation will
continue to be monitored and treatments will be applied if necessary. The vegetation on the east side of
Devil’s Racetrack has improved drastically. Soil samples will be taken regularly on the east side of the
project and additional lime and fertilizer will be applied based on the results of the soil tests.
Summary information and data related to the success of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS’s website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 2-1
Section 2: METHODOLOGY

Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All the Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded
using a Trimble handheld GPS with sub-meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcGIS. Crest
gages and pressure transducers were installed in surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly.
Hydrology attainment installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003)
standards. Vegetation monitoring protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-DMS Level 2
Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 6 Annual Report – FINAL 3-1
Section 3: REFERENCES

Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.

Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.

Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.

Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.

Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.

Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi,
Pages 12-22.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2002. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Climate Information for Johnston County, NC (1971-2000). WETS Station: Clayton, NC1820.

United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Devil’s Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh,
NC.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Devil’s Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Baseline
Monitoring Document and As-Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.

Winter, Thomas C., Harvey, Judson W., Franke, O. Lehn, Alley, William M. 1998. Ground Water and
Surface Water: A Single Resource.

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

03020201130030
03020201140010
0302020115002003020201150010
03020201100050
03020201150050
0302020112003003020201120030 03020201110070
Figure 1. Project Vicinity MapDevil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Johnston County, NC
0 10.5 Miles ¹
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of theNCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site mayrequire traversing areas near or along the easement boundary andtherefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access byauthorized personnel of state and federal agencies or theirdesignees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the termsand timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation oractivity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned rolesand activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Directions:From I-95 exit 90, turn left onto NC-96 N. NC-96 N turns slightly left and becomes Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils Racetrack Road south for 2.1 miles.
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
DMS Targeted Local Watershed
Project Location
US 701DEVILS
RACETRACKUS 701Figure 2a. Project Component/Asset MapDevil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Johnston County, NC
0 500250 Feet ¹
2017 Aerial Photography
Powerline Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Conservation Easement
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Devils Racetrack (West)Southwest BranchSoutheast BranchMiddle BranchNorth Branch
DEVILS
RACETRACK
Figure 2b. Project Component/Asset MapDevil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Johnston County, NC
0 500250 Feet ¹
2017 Aerial Photography
Powerline Easement
Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Devils Racetrack (East)Neuse River
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals 18,215 0 55.53 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Totals 0 0 2.97 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
As-Built
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Approach Mitigation
Ratio
Credits
(SMU/ WMU)
0+00-0+20 20 LF P1 N/A N/A
0+20-16+26 &
17+50-52+05 4,755 LF P1 1:1 5,061
16+26-17+50 196 LF P1 4:11 31
52+05-52+11 5 LF P1 N/A N/A
52+59-52+65 5 LF P1 N/A N/A
52+65-70+73
71+03-88+00 P1/2 1:1 3,509
88+31-106+85 P1/2 1:1 1,854
70+73-71+03 30 LF P1/2 N/A N/A
88+00 to 88+31 31 LF P1/2 N/A N/A
106+85-107+97 0 LF P1/2 N/A N/A
500+00-501+31
600+00-600+23 154 LF EII 2.5:1 61.6
501+31-502+06 75 LF EI 1.5:1 50
502+06-504+85
505+99-511+32 740 LF P1/2 1:1 812
504+85-505+99 111 LF P1/2 4:11 28.5
200+00-204+10 410 LF 1:1 410
204+10-219+06 1,326 LF P1/2 1:1 1,496
300+00-305+03
305+35-328+92 2,946 LF P1 1:1 2,860
305+03-305+35 30 LF P1 N/A N/A
403+76-424+18 --- P1 1:1 2,042
N/A 0.0 ac N/A 1:1 51.70
N/A 0.0 ac N/A 4:1 0.38
N/A 0.0 ac N/A 1:1 3.45
N/A 0.0 ac N/A 1:1 2.95
N/A 0.0 ac N/A 4:1 0.02
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
56.68 --
3.02 --
--
---
N/A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected 75% reduction in credits for stream restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements.
* Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as-built thalweg and updated to be calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 4 after discusions with NC IRT.
** Riparian Wetlands (West) credit calculations were updated for Monitoring Year 4 based on the performance of groundwater well 10.
Red denotes credits at risk.
Restoration At Risk
Devil’s Racetrack (East)Restoration 3,509
-
-
-
Preservation
Mitigation Credits
Restoration Footage/
AcreageReach ID Restoration or Restoration
Equivalent
Creation
Restoration 18,519
0.07
--
Enhancement I 75
Enhancement II 154
Middle Branch
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
32
Restoration
1.53
3.45
RestorationRiparian Wetlands (West)
Riparian Wetlands (East)
Restoration Level Buffer(square feet)
Restoration
(Partial Credit)
2,042
20
31
51.70
Headwater Wetland
Southwest Branch
Middle Branch
Wetlands
Southeast Branch (Easement
Break)
Southeast Branch Restoration
Restoration
(Partial Credit)
2,860
North Branch
Restoration 1,854
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland
Devil’s Racetrack Creek
(West) (Power Line
Easement)
Restoration
(Partial Credit)
Devil’s Racetrack (East) (DOT
ROW)
Southwest Branch
5,061
Restoration
(No Credit)6
Devil’s Racetrack (East)
(Easement Break)
Devil’s Racetrack (East)Restoration
(No Credit)112
Restoration
(No Credit)
Project Components
Enhancement
Restoration
(No Credit)
Devil’s Racetrack Creek
(West) (DOT ROW)
Restoration
(No Credit)
Devil’s Racetrack Creek
(West) (DOT ROW)
Restoration
(No Credit)6
Devil’s Racetrack Creek
(West)Restoration
-
Stream
(LF)
124
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
N/A
75
Enhancement
N/A
Streams
4,778 LF
Component Summation
Restoration 2.95
Riparian Wetlands (West)
(Power Line Easement)
Restoration
(Partial Credit)
-
Restoration
(Partial Credit)
Restoration
Restoration
410
154
Non-Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Restoration
114
1,496
812
Devil’s Racetrack (East)
30
Devil’s Racetrack (East)
(Easement Break)
Southwest Branch
(Power Line Easement)
Southwest Branch
Riparian Wetlands (West)
Riparian Wetlands (West)
(Power Line Easement)
Reach ID Approach
Mit Plan
Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY0 Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY1 Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY2 Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY3 Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY4 Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY5 Credits
(SMU/WMU)
MY6 Credits
(SMU/WMU)Notes
Devil’s Racetrack Creek (West) P1 5,061 5,061 5,122 5,122 5,122 5,061 5,061 5,061 2, 4
Devil’s Racetrack Creek (West)
(Power Line Easement)P1 31 31 32 32 32 31 31 31 2, 4
Devil’s Racetrack Creek (East) P1/2 5,363 5,461 5,364 5,364 5,364 5,363 3509/1,854 5,363 1, 2, 4, 6, 11
Southwest Branch EII 62 61.60 62 62 62 61.6 61.6 61.6 2, 5
Southwest Branch EI 50 50.67 51 51 51 50 50 50 2, 4
Southwest Branch P1/2 812 811 829 829 829 812 812 812 1, 2, 4
Southwest Branch
(Power Line Easement)P1/2 29 28.50 29 29 29 28.5 28.5 28.5 5
Middle Branch Headwater
Wetland 410 400 410 410 410 410 410 410 1, 2
Middle Branch P1/2 1,496 1,506 1,505 1,505 1,505 1,496 1,496 1,496 1, 2, 4
Southeast Branch P1 2,860 2,848 2,919 2,916 2,916 2,860 2,860 2,860 1, 2, 3, 4
North Branch P1 2,042 2,418 2,050 2,050 2,050 2,042 2,042 2,042 1, 2, 4
Total 18,216 18,677 18,373 18,370 18,370 18,215 18,215 18,215
Riparian Wetlands (West)N/A 51.4 57.9 57.9 57.9 57.9 54.65 51.70/2.95 51.70/2.95 5, 7, 8, 9, 10
Riparian Wetlands (West) (Power
Line Easement)N/A 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.40 0.38/0.02 0.38/0.02 5
Riparian Wetlands (East)N/A 3.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.45 3.45 3.45 5, 8, 9, 10
Total 55.2 62.1 62.1 62.1 62.1 58.50 58.50 58.50
Red denotes credits at risk.
Table 1A. Project Mitigation Credit History
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
9. During MY4 wetland credits were reverted back Mitigation Plan credits after discussions with the IRT, and the area around groundwater well 10 was removed.
10. Durining MY5 the IRT categorized a few areas as credits at risk based on groundwater well performance and soil conditions.
8. As-Built wetland credits were based on anticipated wetland boundaries which included stream channels. The stream channel areas were removed during MY4. During as-built
two small wetland areas not included in Mitigation Plan were added, but removed during MY4.
11. Durining MY6 site walk the IRT removed the lower section of Devil's Racetrack Creek (East) from credits at risk due to sufficient vegetation growth.
Streams
Wetlands
Mitigation Credits
1. As-Built credit calculations were not calculated correctly.
2. During MY1 credits were updated based on as-built thalweg alignments.
3. During MY2 a section of Southeast Branch was removed from credit because it was an easement crossing and not part of the powerline easement.
4. During MY4 credits were updated based on stream centerlines and Mitigation Plan credits after discussions with the IRT.
5. During MY4 DMS requested mitigation credits be calculated to 3 decimal places.
7. Wetland credits were miscalculated in the Mitigation Plan on the west side of the project. The IRT was sent a formal letter describing this and approved it.
6. Durining MY5 the IRT categorized the lower section of Devil's Racetrack Creek (East) as credits at risk due to the lack of vegetation.
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
919.851.9986, ext. 107
Planting Contractor
919.851.9986
Monitoring Performers
Green Resource, LLC
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Stream, Vegetation, and Wetland Monitoring, POC
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Jason Lorch
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Seed Mix Sources
Bare Roots
Live Stakes
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
(Claridge Nursery)
Mitigation Plan September 2011-
March 2012 January 2013
Fremont, NC 27830
Fremont, NC 27830
P.O. Box 1197
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Seeding Contractor
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Activity or Report Date Collection
Complete
Completion or Scheduled
Delivery
Vegetation Survey
Final Design - Construction Plans September 2011-
March 2012 August 2013
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area1 February 2014 February 2014
Construction December 2013-
February 2014 February 2014
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments February 2014 February 2014
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments February 2014 February 2014
Year 2 Monitoring December 2015
May 2014
September 2014
February 2014
Vegetation SurveyYear 1 Monitoring Stream Survey
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)Stream Survey February 2014
August 2018
August 2017
Stream Survey
Vegetation SurveyYear 5 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
June 2016
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey 2020
126 Circle G Lane
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Construction Contractor (East Side)
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Construction Contractor (West Side)
1Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Designer
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Fluvial Solutions
Jeff Keaton, PE
Willow Spring, NC 27592
June 2016
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Year 7 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
December 2014July 2014
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
November 2017
Hugel Beds Installed
April 2015
December 2020
December 2019
December 2018
December 2017
December 2016
2020
August 2019
September 2016
February 2017
June 2015
April 2018
May 2017
April 2016
Pine Tree Removal
Soil Amendments
Vegetation SurveyYear 3 Monitoring
Soil Amendments September 2018
December 2018
May 2017
Minor Stream Repairs May 2014
April 2015Minor Stream Repairs & Soil Amendments
Soil Amendments
Beaver Dam Removal
April 2019
Beaver Removal
Invasive Treatment October - November 2018
January 2019Pine Tree Removal
September 2019Invasive Treatment
Soil Amendments August & October 2019
Live Stake Planting March 2019
Southwest
Branch Middle Branch Southeast
Branch North Branch Devil's Racetrack
Creek (west)
Devil's Racetrack
Creek (east)
1,155 1,906 2,892 2,042 5,211 5,542
20.6 10.8 69.9 49.9 493.5 831.4
34.5 - 37 30 29 - 30.75 32 38 37.5
P P P/I P P P
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
Applicable? Resolved?
X X
X X
N/A N/A
X X
X X
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
03020201
Neuse
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Plan; Wildlands determined "no
effect" on Johnston County listed endangered species.
N/A
Project Information
Project Watershed Summary Information
35° 27'01.58" N, 78° 23' 18.08" W
96.065 ac
Johnston County
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Coastal Plain bottomland riparian forest
0%
Regulatory Considerations
Supporting Documentation
Drainage class
Regulation
FEMA classification
Native vegetation community
None
Soil Hydric status
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality
Certification No. 3885.
Essential Fisheries Habitat N/A
The project streams do not have an associated regulatory
flooplaing; however the downstream end of Devil's Racetrack
Creek is located within the floodwasy and flood fringe of the
Neuse River (FEMA Zone AE, FIRM panel 1680).
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Historic Preservation Act No historic resources were found to be impacted (letter from
SHPO dated 7/20/2011).
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Endangered Species Act
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
Project Name
Project Area (acres)
Parameters
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
NCDWR stream identification score
River Basin
Physiographic Province
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
County
831 ac
03-04-02
03020201140010
Upper Coastal Plain
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
DWR Sub-basin
Reach Summary Information
62% forest/wetland, 34% farm land, 4% developedCGIA Land Use Classification
Altavista fine sandy loam, Bibb sandy loam, Cecil loam, Goldsboro sandy loam, Leaf silt loam, Lynchburg
sandy loam, Nason silt loam, Norfolk loamy sand, and Rains sandy loam.
C/NSW
<1%
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Morphological Desription (stream type)
Underlying mapped soils
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post-Restoration
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-Restoration
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
Drainage area (acres)
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
Slope

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Sheet 1 Sheet 2
US 701De
v
i
l
'
s
R
a
c
e
t
r
a
c
k
R
o
a
d Neuse RiverDevil's Racetrack (West)
Middle Branc
h
Southwest BranchSoutheast BranchNor
th
B
ranch
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Figure 3.0 Integrated Current Condition Plan View(Key)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Johnston County, NC
0 1,000500 Feet
*2017 Aerial Photography
Legend
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Conservation Easement
Powerline Easement
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
US 701Devil's Racet
r
ack RoadXS 2
XS 3
XS 6
XS 8
XS 10XS 22
XS 23
XS 25
XS 27
XS 28XS 29
XS 30
XS 32XS 33
XS35
XS 36Devil's Racetrack (West)Middle BranchS o u t h e a s t B r a n c hSouthwest BranchNor
t
h Br
anchGW 35
GW 36 GW 37
GW 38
STP 3
GW 40
GW 41
GW 39
PP 9
PP 8
PP 7
PP 6PP 5
PP 4
PP 3
PP 2
PP 1
PP 98
PP 97
PP 96
PP 95
PP 94
PP 93
PP 92
PP 91
PP 90
PP 89
PP 88
PP 87PP 86PP 85
PP 84
PP 83PP 82
PP 81
PP 80PP 79
PP 78PP 77PP 76
PP 75
PP 74
PP 73
PP 72PP 71PP 70
PP 69PP 68PP 67PP 66
PP 65
PP 64
PP 63
PP 62
PP 61
PP 60PP 59
PP 58
PP 57
PP 56
PP 55
PP 28
PP 27PP 26
PP 25
PP 24PP 23
PP 22PP 21PP 20
PP 19
PP 18
PP 17
PP 16PP 15
PP 14PP 13PP 12
PP 11
PP 10
PP 103
PP 102
PP 101 BT
GW 9
STP 1
GW 7
GW 6
GW 5
GW 4
GW 3
GW 2
GW 1
GW 33
GW 27
GW 26
GW 25
GW 24
GW 23
GW 22
GW 21
GW 20GW 19
GW 18
GW 17
GW 16
GW 15
GW 14
GW 13
GW 12
GW 11
XS 9
XS 5
XS 7
XS 4
XS 37
XS 31
XS 34
XS 24
XS 1
XS 26
2
1 8
3
9
5
7
64
11
12
21
37
39
10
41
31
20
25
15
24
38
17
32
35
30
27
29
19
40
26
36
22
34
14
23
16
28
18
13
33
Figure 3.1 Integrated Current Condition Plan View(Sheet 1 of 2)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Johnston County, NC
0 500250 Feet
*2017 Aerial Photography
Legend
Cross-Section (XS)
Photo Point (PP)
Groundwater Gage (GW) Condition-MY6
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Soil Temperature Probe
Barotroll
Crest and Flow Gage
Crest Gage
Vegetation Plot Condition-MY6
Critera Met
Critera Not Met
Privet Removal - MY6
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Stream Area of Concern-MY6
Aggradation
Conservation Easement
Powerline Easement
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Wetland Partial Credit at Risk (0.07Ac)
Wetland Restoration at Risk (2.95Ac)
Devil
's
Race
t
rack
RoadNeuse RiverXS 11 XS 14
XS 16
XS 19
XS 20
Devil's Racetrack (East)
PP 99
PP 54
PP 53
PP 52PP 51
PP 50PP 49PP 48PP 47PP 46PP 45
PP 44PP 43
PP 42PP 41
PP 40
PP 39
PP 38PP 37
PP 36PP 35
PP 34PP 33PP 32
PP 31PP 30PP 29PP 28
PP 27PP 26PP 25
PP 104PP 103
PP 102
PP 100 GW 31
GW 30
GW 29
GW 28GW 26
XS 18
XS 13 XS 15
XS 21
XS 17
XS 12
48 51
42 44
50
46 47
41
45
49
43
Figure 3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View(Sheet 2 of 2)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Johnston County, NC
0 500250 Feet
*2017 Aerial Photography
Legend
Crest and Flow Gage
Crest Gage
Cross-Section (XS)
Photo Point (PP)
Groundwater Gage (GW) Condition-MY6
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Soil Temperature Probe
Barotroll
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Conservation Easement
Powerline Easement
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Wetland Partial Credit at Risk (0.07Ac)
Wetland Restoration at Risk (2.95Ac)
Low Tree Vigor
Vegetation Plot Condition-MY6
Critera Met
Critera Not Met
Devil's Racetrack (West) (5,211 LF)Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-BuiltNumber of Unstable SegmentsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjust % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationAggradation0 0 100%Degradation0 0 100%2. Riffle ConditionTexture/Substrate 74 74100%Depth Sufficient 74 74100%Length Appropriate 74 74100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)74 74100%Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)74 74100%1. Scoured/ErodedBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% n/a n/an/a2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat00100% n/an/an/a3. Mass WastingBank slumping, caving, or collapse00100% n/an/an/a00100% n/an/an/a1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs66100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill66100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.66100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%66100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow66100%1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.2. BankTotals3. Engineered Structures13. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg PositionTable 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191. Bed1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)
Devil's Racetrack (East) (5,542 LF)Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-BuiltNumber of Unstable SegmentsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjust % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationAggradation0 0 100%Degradation0 0 100%2. Riffle ConditionTexture/Substrate 85 85100%Depth Sufficient 85 85100%Length Appropriate 85 85100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)85 85100%Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)85 85100%1. Scoured/ErodedBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% n/a n/an/a2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat00100% n/an/an/a3. Mass WastingBank slumping, caving, or collapse00100% n/an/an/a00100% n/an/an/a1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs1717100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill1717100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.1717100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%1717100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow1717100%Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg PositionTotals3. Engineered Structures11. Bed1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)2. Bank
Southeast Branch (2,892 LF)Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-BuiltNumber of Unstable SegmentsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjust % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationAggradation1 100 97%Degradation0 0 100%2. Riffle ConditionTexture/Substrate 121 121100%Depth Sufficient 120 120100%Length Appropriate 120 120100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)120 120100%Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)120 120100%1. Scoured/ErodedBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% n/a n/an/a2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat00100% n/an/an/a3. Mass WastingBank slumping, caving, or collapse00100% n/an/an/a00100% n/an/an/a1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs6767100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill6767100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.656797%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%6767100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow6767100%1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.2. BankTotals3. Engineered Structures13. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg PositionTable 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191. Bed1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)
Middle Branch (1,906 LF)Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-BuiltNumber of Unstable SegmentsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjust % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationAggradation0 0 100%Degradation0 0 100%2. Riffle ConditionTexture/Substrate 79 79100%Depth Sufficient 78 78100%Length Appropriate 78 78100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)78 78100%Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)78 78100%1. Scoured/ErodedBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% n/a n/an/a2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat00100% n/an/an/a3. Mass WastingBank slumping, caving, or collapse00100% n/an/an/a00100% n/an/an/a1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs5252100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill5252100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.5252100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%5252100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow5252100%1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.1. Bed1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position2. BankTotals3. Engineered Structures1Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Southwest Branch (1,155 LF)Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-BuiltNumber of Unstable SegmentsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjust % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationAggradation0 0 100%Degradation0 0 100%2. Riffle ConditionTexture/Substrate 48 48100%Depth Sufficient 47 47100%Length Appropriate 47 47100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)47 47100%Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)47 47100%1. Scoured/ErodedBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% n/a n/an/a2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat00100% n/an/an/a3. Mass WastingBank slumping, caving, or collapse00100% n/an/an/a00100% n/an/an/a1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs2828100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill2828100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.2828100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%2828100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow2828100%1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.1. Bed1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position2. BankTotals3. Engineered Structures1Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
North Branch (2,042 LF)Major Channel CategoryChannel Sub-Category MetricNumber Stable, Performing as IntendedTotal Number in As-BuiltNumber of Unstable SegmentsAmount of Unstable Footage% Stable, Performing as IntendedNumber with Stabilizing Woody VegetationFootage with Stabilizing Woody VegetationAdjust % for Stabilizing Woody VegetationAggradation0 0 100%Degradation0 0 100%2. Riffle ConditionTexture/Substrate 35 35100%Depth Sufficient 34 34100%Length Appropriate 34 34100%Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)34 34100%Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)34 34100%1. Scoured/ErodedBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion0 0 100% n/a n/an/a2. UndercutBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat00100% n/an/an/a3. Mass WastingBank slumping, caving, or collapse00100% n/an/an/a00100% n/an/an/a1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs1010100%2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill1010100%2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.1010100%3. Bank ProtectionBank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%1010100%4. HabitatPool forming structures maintaining ~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at baseflow1010100%1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.1. Bed1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units)3. Meander Pool Condition4. Thalweg Position2. BankTotals3. Engineered Structures1Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Planted Acreage96Vegetation CategoryDefinitionsMapping Threshold (Ac)Number of PolygonsCombined Acreage% of Planted AcreageBare AreasVery limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.0.1 0 0.0 0.0%Low Stem Density AreasWoody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.0.1 0 0.0 0.0%00.00.0%Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorAreas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.0.25 Ac 3 22.7 23.6%0 22.7 23.6%Easement Acreage 96Vegetation CategoryDefinitionsMapping Threshold (SF)Number of PolygonsCombined Acreage% of Planted AcreageInvasive Areas of ConcernAreas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). 1,000 0 0 0.0%Easement Encroachment AreasAreas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none 0 0 0%TotalTable 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment TableDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Cumulative Total

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 1 DRT West - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 1 DRT West - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 2 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 2 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 3 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 3 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 4 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 4 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 5 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 5 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 6 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 6 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 7 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 7 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 8 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 8 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 9 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 9 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 10 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 10 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 11 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 11 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 12 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 12 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 13 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 13 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 14 DRT West - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 14 DRT West - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 15 DRT West - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 15 DRT West - downstream (04/30/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 16 DRT West - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 16 DRT West - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 17 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 17 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 18 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 18 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 19 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 19 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 20 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 20 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 21 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 21 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 22 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 22 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 23 DRT West - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 23 DRT West - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 24 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 24 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 25 DRT West - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 25 DRT West - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 26 DRT West - (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 27 DRT East - (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 28 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 28 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 29 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 29 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 30 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 30 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 31 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 31 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 32 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 32 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 33 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 33 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 34 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 34 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 35 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 35 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 36 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 36 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 37 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 37 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 38 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 38 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 39 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 39 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 40 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 40 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 41 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 41 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 42 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 42 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 43 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 43 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 44 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 44 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 45 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 45 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 46 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 46 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 47 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 47 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 48 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 48 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 49 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 49 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 50 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 50 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 51 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 51 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 52 DRT East - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 52 DRT East - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 53 DRT East - upstream (06/20/2019) PHOTO POINT 53 DRT East - downstream (06/20/2019)

PHOTO POINT 54 DRT East - upstream (06/20/2019) PHOTO POINT 54 DRT East - downstream (06/20/2019)

PHOTO POINT 55 Southwest Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 55 Southwest Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 56 Southwest Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 56 Southwest Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 57 Southwest Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 57 Southwest Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 58 Southwest Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 58 Southwest Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 59 Southwest Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 59 Southwest Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 60 Southwest Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 60 Southwest Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 61 Middle Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 61 Middle Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 62 Middle Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 62 Middle Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 63 Middle Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 63 Middle Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 64 Middle Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 64 Middle Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 65 Middle Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 65 Middle Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 66 Middle Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 66 Middle Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 67 Middle Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 67 Middle Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 68 Middle Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 68 Middle Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 69 Middle Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 69 Middle Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 70 Southeast Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 70 Southeast Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 71 Southeast Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 71 Southeast Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 72 Southeast Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 72 Southeast Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 73 Southeast Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 73 Southeast Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 74 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 74 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 75 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 75 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 76 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 76 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 77 Southeast Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 77 Southeast Branch - downstream (04/30/2019)

PHOTO POINT 78 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 78 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 79 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 79 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 80 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 80 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 81 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 81 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 82 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 82 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 83 Southeast Branch - upstream (06/10/2019) PHOTO POINT 83 Southeast Branch - downstream (06/10/2019)

PHOTO POINT 84 North Branch - upstream (04/30/2019) PHOTO POINT 84 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 85 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 85 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 86 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 86 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 87 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 87 North Branch - downstream(06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 88 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 88 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 89 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 89 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 90 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 90 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 91 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 91 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data - Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 92 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 92 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 93 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 93 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

PHOTO POINT 94 North Branch - upstream (06/11/2019) PHOTO POINT 94 North Branch - downstream (06/11/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 1 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 2 (08/07/2019)

VEG PLOT 3 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 4 (08/07/2019)

VEG PLOT 5 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 6 (08/07/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 7 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 8 (08/07/2019)

VEG PLOT 9 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 10 (08/07/2019)

VEG PLOT 11 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 12 (08/07/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 13 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 14 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 15 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 16 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 17 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 18 (08/01/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 19 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 20 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 21 (08/07/2019) VEG PLOT 22 (08/07/2019)

VEG PLOT 23 (08/29/2018) VEG PLOT 24 (08/29/2018)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 25 (08/29/2018) VEG PLOT 26 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 27 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 28 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 29 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 30 (08/01/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 31 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 32 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 33 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 34 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 35 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 36 (08/01/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 37 (08/08/2018) VEG PLOT 38 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 39 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 40 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 41 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 42 (08/01/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 43 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 44 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 45 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 46 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 47 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 48 (08/01/2019)

Devil’s Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data – Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 49 (08/01/2019) VEG PLOT 50 (08/01/2019)

VEG PLOT 51 (08/01/2019)

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
51 Y
10 Y
49 N
50 Y
11
12
7 Y
8 Y
9 Y
4 Y
5 Y
6 Y
Plot
Success Criteria
Met (Y/N)Tract Mean
1 Y
98%
2 Y
3 Y
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
48
28
29
30
31
43
32
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
39
40
41
42
Y
33
34
35
36
37
45
46
47
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
38
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
44
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Table - MetadataDatabase nameDevils Racetrack MY6 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdbDatabase locationF:\Projects\005-02129 Devil's Racetrack\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 6\VegetationComputer nameCARLYNN-PCFile size62914560DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------MetadataDescription of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.Proj, plantedEach project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.Proj, total stemsEach project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.PlotsList of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).VigorFrequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.Vigor by SppFrequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.DamageList of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.Damage by SppDamage values tallied by type for each species.Damage by PlotDamage values tallied by type for each plot.Planted Stems by Plot and SppA matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.ALL Stems by Plot and sppA matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------Project Code95021project NameDevils Racetrack Mitigation SiteDescriptionStream and Wetland MitigationRiver BasinNeuseSampled Plots51Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all TAcer rubrumred maple Tree1Alnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis Shrub 22Betula nigrariver birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 6 6 6Cephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash Tree 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1Ligustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum Tree 4 47219371Liriodendron tulipiferatuliptreeTree3 3 3Mimosasensitive plant Exotic1Morella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo Tree1 1 11Nyssa sylvaticablackgumTree3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2PinuspineTree4598Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore Tree2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 3 3 32 2 2 2 2 2Prunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oakTreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak Tree3 3 31 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1Quercus pagodacherrybark oak Tree1 1 1 1 1 1Quercus phelloswillow oakTree3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 11Quercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberryShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress Tree2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5UlmuselmTreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTree17 17 21 16 16 65 14 14 17 11 11 31 11 11 14 15 15 23 12 12 137 7 10 7 7 8 6 6 9 6 6 10 5 5 7 5 5 7 4 4 6688 688 850 647 647 2,630 567 567 688 445 445 1,255 445 445 567 607 607 931 486 486 526Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total Stems10.0210.0210.0210.0210.02Stem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE10.0210.02Table 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)VP 7Scientific Name Common Name Species TypeVP 1 VP 2 VP 3VP 4VP 5VP 6
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T1 41 2 3112 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 24 4 4 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 4 42 2 22172151 1 11 1 163441721 1 1 5 5 6 5 5 6 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 321 1 11 1 12 2 24 4 4 4 4 4514 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 10 10 1012 12 13 16 16 21 12 12 14 11 11 18 16 16 25 16 16 21 15 15 365 5 9 6 6 8 4 4 5 4 4 7 5 5 9 6 6 9 3 3 6486 486 526 647 647 850 486 486 567 445 445 728 647 647 1,012 647 647 850 607 607 1,45710.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02VP 13VP 14Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)VP 8VP 9VP 10VP 11VP 12
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T3 1 186 6 6 2 2 23 3 31 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 25 5 53556363 3 32 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 231214 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 14 4 42 2 25 5 5 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 14 4 41 1 11 1 141017 7 710 10 10 5 5 5 4 4 4 7 7 7 5 5 515 15 28 14 14 19 16 16 21 12 12 18 14 14 17 15 15 21 13 13 185 5 7 5 5 6 5 5 8 4 4 7 5 5 7 5 5 8 3 3 6607 607 1,133 567 567 769 647 647 850 486 486 728 567 567 688 607 607 850 526 526 72810.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02VP 19VP 20VP 21VP 15VP 16VP 17Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)VP 18
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T12 2 42 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 23 3 3 6 6 6 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 131 11 1 1 2 2 218 1 61 1 1 7 7 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 32 2 24 4 43 3 32 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 11 1 1 5 5 51237 7 7 3 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 6 3 3 3 8 8 8 1 1 116 16 16 14 14 17 17 17 17 15 15 18 11 11 12 15 15 15 14 14 175 5 6 4 4 6 5 5 5 4 4 8 5 5 8 5 5 7 6 6 8647 647 647 567 567 688 688 688 688 607 607 728 445 445 486 607 607 607 567 567 68810.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02VP 28VP 22 VP 23 VP 24 VP 25 VP 26 VP 27Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T51121 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 43 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 41 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22832 2 22 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 3 3 3251 1 14 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 7 7 711 1 27 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 41 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 12 2 251326 6 6 3 3 3 2 2 2 7 7 7 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 212 12 14 16 16 16 16 16 19 19 19 28 18 18 32 16 16 19 18 18 186 6 7 5 5 5 7 7 8 5 5 9 7 7 10 6 6 10 5 5 6486 486 567 647 647 647 647 647 769 769 769 1,133 728 728 1,295 647 647 769 728 728 72810.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02VP 29VP 30VP 31VP 32VP 33VP 34VP 35Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T14 334 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 31 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 24 4 4111321 1 1 2 2 21 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 41455522 2 2 2 2 26 6 6 5 5 5 3 3 31 1 21 1 215 5 5 1 1 11 1 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 31123 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 1 1 1 4 4 4117 17 19 12 12 13 9 9 9 15 15 18 17 17 21 15 15 15 11 11 21 12 12 207 7 9 6 6 8 3 3 4 5 5 8 6 6 9 6 6 7 4 4 9 4 4 6688 688 769 486 486 526 364 364 364 607 607 728 688 688 850 607 607 607 445 445 850 486 486 80910.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02VP 37VP 38VP 39VP 40VP 41VP 42VP 36VP 43Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T111 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 41 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 43 3 3 1 1 11 3 3 3 6 6 63 3 4 1 1 2322 2 22 2 27 7 8213142 2 2 4 4 512 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 51 2 2 4 4 4 61 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 13626 6 6 1 1 11 1 112 12 13 11 11 19 9 9 10 7 7 9 13 13 15 4 4 6 15 15 24 13 13 204 4 5 4 4 8 4 4 6 3 3 5 4 4 5 3 3 4 6 6 7 5 5 7486 486 526 445 445 769 364 364 405 283 283 364 526 526 607 162 162 243 607 607 971 526 526 80910.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.0210.02VP 49VP 50VP 51VP 44VP 45VP 46VP 47VP 48Current Plot Data (MY6 2019)
Acer rubrumred maple TreeAlnus serrulatahazel alder ShrubBaccharis halimifoliaeastern baccharis ShrubBetula nigrariver birch TreeCephalanthus occidentaliscommon buttonbush ShrubFraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash TreeLigustrum sinenseChinese privet ExoticLiquidambar styracifluasweetgum TreeLiriodendron tulipiferatuliptree TreeMimosasensitive plant ExoticMorella ceriferawax myrtle ShrubNyssa bifloraswamp tupelo TreeNyssa sylvaticablackgum TreePinuspine TreePlatanus occidentalisAmerican sycamore TreePrunus serotinablack cherry TreePyrus calleryanaCallery pear ExoticQuercus laurifolialaurel oak TreeQuercus michauxiiswamp chestnut oak TreeQuercus pagodacherrybark oak TreeQuercus phelloswillow oak TreeQuercus rubranorthern red oak TreeRhus copallinumflameleaf sumac ShrubSalix nigrablack willow TreeSalix sericeasilky willow ShrubSambucuselderberry ShrubTaxodium distichumbald cypress TreeUlmuselm TreeUlmus alatawinged elm TreeUlmus americanaAmerican elmTreeColor for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalPnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,T: Total StemsStem countsize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRETable 9. Planted and Total Stem CountsDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T27 25 8 3 213 434 283297 97 101 91 91 91 98 98 98 102 102 102 104 104 104 106 106 106 106 106 1062113 113 117 114 114 115 117 117 118 119 119 119 123 123 125 124 124 124 126 126 1269 2160 132 135 184 867 7 7 8 8 10 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 25 25 25 20 20 201 4348 48 54 48 48 49 53 53 54 54 54 54 59 59 59 64 64 64 60 60 606 6 12 6 6 11 7 7 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10159 73 232111 111 116 111 111 115 117 117 118 123 123 126 128 128 128 124 124 124 124 124 12413123 23 24 25 25 28 57 57 57 60 60 60 77 77 77 91 91 91 108 108 10840 40 49 44 44 45 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 14 14 1470 70 79 66 66 68 71 71 79 77 77 79 97 97 97 104 104 104 125 125 1251 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 7 1 1 321226 21 381331186 186 186 185 185 185 186 186 186 189 189 189 190 190 190 189 189 189 206 206 206811702 702 984 699 699 910 732 732 935 758 758 973 813 813 910 850 850 850 885 885 88511 11 24 11 11 22 11 11 17 11 11 16 11 11 15 10 10 10 9 9 9557 557 781 555 555 722 581 581 742 601 601 772 645 645 722 674 674 674 702 702 702511.26511.26511.26511.26511.26511.26511.26MY0 (2014)Annual MeansMY6 (2019) MY5 (2018) MY4 (2017) MY3 (2016) MY2 (2015) MY1 (2014)

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Devils Racetrack- WestParameterGageMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxBankfull Width (ft)4.88.02.66.34.76.15.67.64.79.6Floodprone Width (ft)7.818.0100300100300Bankfull Mean Depth0.81.20.30.51.11.30.71.00.40.9Bankfull Max Depth1.31.60.50.71.71.81.21.30.91.11.11.51.11.4Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.76.31.32.06.06.95.35.47.27.82.18.5Width/Depth Ratio4.010.55.419.43.65.45.711.010.119.714.014.510.614.8Entrenchment Ratio1.62.28.09.616.126.911.133.38.726.1 >20.9 >42.5Bank Height Ratio 1.94.51.11.31.11.21.01.11.01.1D50 (mm)Shallow Length (ft)3.786.87.454.2Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.026 0.0470.033 0.0510.0036 0.0277 0.0023 0.00720.0013 0.0593 0.0008 0.0195Pool Length (ft)5.563.118.772.9Pool Max Depth (ft)1.71.90.92.11.12.51.12.91.41.9Pool Spacing (ft)276721271659325514631881913238104Pool Volume (ft3)Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.7 14.3 7.216.29.19.814.020.021.036.012.072.015.092.013.053.016.073.0Radius of Curvature (ft)3.19.05.516.05.46.815.027.013.718.614.043.017.055.012.040.017.035.0Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.61.61.03.00.81.01.52.81.52.01.54.81.54.82.64.22.24.5Meander Length (ft)39.8 84.8 36.563.232.536.927153351965213370137Meander Width Ratio1.62.61.33.01.41.51.42.12.32.91.38.01.38.02.85.52.19.5Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 0.180.23Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Drainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.8 1.3 2.0 2.5 2.9 1.21.21.81.91.24.8Bankfull Discharge (cfs)9.210.6Q-NFF regressionQ-USGS extrapolationQ-ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity1.21.61.21.6Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0025 0.0087 0.0016 0.0022 0.0053 0.0054 0.0017 0.0023(---): Data was not providedN/A: Not Applicable1.0N/A>200>26.11.0N/A7.70.5>2000.74.014.514.00.0054 0.00150.0041 0.0260 0.01700.00400.00220.00401.21.4------------------------4,2459664,2399621.01.11.21.21.21.4------4,976---------------------------------------13.010.013.0---2.617.56.414.011.010.0E/C5E/C5E/C5C0.951.71.23.3<1%<1%<1%<1%Gc5E/C5bE5E5E5/C5E60.600.700.600.70<1%---------------Additional Reach ParametersN/A0.770.060.670.340.901.27N/AN/A------N/AN/A0.168/0.33/0.464/1.23/2.0/9.6---------------N/A---Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersN/AN/A------------50.0Pattern---N/A------1.20.6N/A1.53.1---N/AN/A0.0129---------------ProfileN/A---------------------0.4647.4>2.2>2.2>2.21.01.01.00.60.81.12.311.65.89.5>20>50>50>75>1500.81.2Devil's Racetrack - West(Reach 1)Devil's Racetrack - West(Reach 2)Devil's Racetrack - West(Reach 1)Devil's Racetrack - West(Reach 2)Dimension and Substrate - ShallowN/A9.79.39.011.5Devil's Racetrack - WestScout West 1Scout East 2Scout West 2Johanna CreekJarman OakParameterTable 10a. Baseline Stream Data SummaryDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Pre-Restoration ConditionReference Reach DataDesignAs-Built/Baseline
Devils Racetrack- EastParameterGageMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxBankfull Width (ft)8.110.4 2.6 6.3 4.7 6.1 5.6 7.612.2 13.7Floodprone Width (ft)14.218.6100 500 100 500 100 500Bankfull Mean Depth1.01.8 0.3 0.5 1.1 1.3 0.7 1.00.8 1.1Bankfull Max Depth2.12.8 0.5 0.7 1.7 1.8 1.2 1.31.4 1.8 0.8 1.01.3 1.7Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)14.219.1 1.3 2.0 6.0 6.9 5.3 5.4 7.2 7.810.3 13.9Width/Depth Ratio5.07.8 5.4 19.4 3.6 5.4 5.7 11.0 10.1 19.713.0 13.5 14.0 14.512.1 14.6Entrenchment Ratio1.61.88.0 9.6 16.1 26.9 7.7 38.5 12.5 62.6>21.9 >24.5Bank Height Ratio 2.64.3 1.1 1.31.1 1.21.0 1.1 1.0 1.1D50 (mm)Shallow Length (ft)13.0 80.1 20.8 42.4 11.3 25.9Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.026 0.0470.033 0.0510.0007 0.0025 0.0377 0.06710.0004 0.00990.0192 0.0318 0.0072 0.0675Pool Length (ft)16.0 77.3 16.5 66.1 13.0 34.2Pool Max Depth (ft)1.7 1.91.4 3.2 0.8 2.01.9 3.4 1.7 2.7 1.4 2.5Pool Spacing (ft)27 6721 27 16 59 32 55 21 91 39 6426 131 43 73 25 70Pool Volume (ft3)Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.7 14.3 7.2 16.2 9.1 9.8 14.0 20.0 21.0 36.0 17.0 65.0 10.0 40.015.0 55.0 21 41 12 32Radius of Curvature (ft)3.1 9.0 5.5 16.0 5.4 6.8 15.0 27.0 13.7 18.6 20.0 62.0 12.0 36.018.0 65.0 12 26 10 35Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.6 1.6 1.0 3.0 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.8 1.5 2.0 1.5 4.8 1.5 4.51.5 4.7 1.5 3.2Meander Length (ft)39.8 84.8 36.5 63.2 32.5 36.939 221 64 13662 203 101 140 52 112Meander Width Ratio1.6 2.6 1.3 3.0 1.4 1.5 1.4 2.1 2.3 2.9 1.3 5.0 1.3 5.01.2 4.0 2.6 5.0Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Drainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps) 0.3 0.4 1.3 2.0 2.5 2.9 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.91.2 1.6Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Q-NFF regressionQ-USGS extrapolationQ-ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity1.1 1.3 1.1 1.2Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0004 0.0008 0.0224 0.02510.0007 0.0008 0.0153 0.0166 0.0219 0.0231(---): Data was not providedN/A: Not Applicable------N/A11.9>36.51.0N/A---------8.2>3000.71.15.7------------------385------1.2------------310---------------0.9------E/C5---------<1%E/C51.14---8.50.01E/C517.017.56.414.01.30Gc5E/C5b0.0040---DesignAs-Built/BaselineDevil's Racetrack - East(Reach 2)---<1%<1%C11.0---------8.0---0.00030.02600.01700.00400.0022------------------3721.01.11.21.21.21.41.11.14,8334,844---------------4,840313---------------------------2.6------0.951.23.5---------16.03.017.016.01.30---<1%<1%C---------------E5E5E5/C5E6N/A1.300.060.670.340.90<1%---N/A---N/AN/AN/AN/A-/-/0.179/0.642/1.0/9.6---------------50.0N/A---N/AN/A---------------N/A---------0.6N/A1.53.1---N/AN/A0.0129---------------N/A---------------------0.1797.4>2.2>2.2>2.21.01.01.01.00.61.12.311.612.84.8>20>50>50>75>1500.81.2Devil's Racetrack - East (Reach 1)Devil's Racetrack - East(Reach 2)Devil's Racetrack - East(Reach 1)Devil's Racetrack - East(Reach 3)Devil's Racetrack - East(Reach 3)N/A9.79.313.08.0Reference Reach DataDevil's Racetrack - EastScout West 1Scout East 2Scout West 2Johanna CreekJarman Oak---<1%1.1---N/A1.141.27------Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data SummaryDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019>3001.0Pre-Restoration ConditionSubstrate, Bed and Transport ParametersAdditional Reach ParametersParameterDimension and Substrate - ShallowProfilePattern
Southeast BranchParameterGageMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxBankfull Width (ft)2.75.72.6 6.3 4.7 6.1 5.6 7.6Floodprone Width (ft)8.611.425 35 50 70 100 300Bankfull Mean Depth0.20.40.3 0.5 1.1 1.3 0.7 1.0Bankfull Max Depth0.41.40.5 0.7 1.7 1.8 1.2 1.30.4 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.2Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.11.41.3 2.0 6.0 6.9 5.3 5.4 7.2 7.8Width/Depth Ratio6.824.3 5.4 19.4 3.6 5.4 5.7 11.0 10.1 19.79.0 10.0 10.0 12.0 11.0 12.0Entrenchment Ratio1.54.28.0 9.6 16.1 26.9 8.3 11.7 12.5 17.5 18.5 55.6Bank Height Ratio 2.26.01.1 1.31.1 1.21.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2D50 (mm)Shallow Length (ft)2.1 64.4 3.4 144.4 6.0 47.3Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.026 0.0470.033 0.0510.0162 0.0681 0.0144 0.0384 0.0035 0.02850.0010 0.0803 0.0021 0.0272 0.0005 0.0168Pool Length (ft)2.1 36.7 3.1 33.6 3.2 61.3Pool Max Depth (ft)1.7 1.90.5 1.1 0.4 1.2 0.5 1.5 0.7 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.1Pool Spacing (ft)27 6721 27 16 59 32 55 15 24 20 32 9 38 4 76 8 90 14 52Pool Volume (ft3)Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.7 14.3 7.2 16.2 9.1 9.8 14.0 20.0 21.0 36.0 4.0 9.0 5.0 12.0 7.0 43.0 5.3 11.2 6.8 14.3 12.7 32.8Radius of Curvature (ft)3.1 9.0 5.5 16.0 5.4 6.8 15.0 27.0 13.7 18.6 5.0 14.0 6.0 18.0 8.0 26.0 5.0 23.5 10.0 25.6 10.4 29.5Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.6 1.6 1.0 3.0 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.8 1.5 2.0 1.5 4.5 1.5 4.5 1.5 4.8 1.7 7.8 2.6 6.7 2.0 5.6Meander Length (ft)39.8 84.8 36.5 63.2 32.5 36.924 51 32 68 16 92 22 63 33 70 32 74Meander Width Ratio1.6 2.6 1.3 3.0 1.4 1.5 1.4 2.1 2.3 2.9 1.3 3.0 1.3 3.0 1.3 8.0 1.8 3.7 1.8 3.8 2.4 6.2Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Drainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)1.3 2.0 2.5 2.9 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.9Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Q-NFF regressionQ-USGS extrapolationQ-ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.6Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0108 0.0227 0.0096 0.0128 0.0025 0.00890.0015 0.0119 0.0028 0.0030(---): Data was not providedN/A: Not ApplicableN/A1.0N/A1.0>9.91.0N/A>15.85.30.40.62.113.8>37.5>2003.8>600.40.51.310.83.0>302.42.20.51<1%G/F5 E/C5bDesignSoutheast Branch(Reach 3)<1%0.030.071.0---3.02.617.56.414.00.30.50.811.42.0------As-Built/BaselineSoutheast Branch (Reach 1)0.103.02.5---<1%5.40.02300.02600.01700.00400.00220.0040------------------713616---6171.11.30.01740.00301.01.11.21.21.21.42,976---------------1,559716---------------------------------11.01.50.951.71.41.52.01.4E/C5------1.4E/C5E/C5E5E5/C5E60.10<1%---------------<1%<1%0.03N/A0.190.060.67E50.340.901.270.07N/AN/A------N/A---N/A0.08/0.28/0.41/0.94/1.6/9.6---------------N/A50.0N/A---N/AN/A---------------N/A---0.40.6N/A1.53.1---N/AN/A0.0129---------------N/A---------------------1.01.01.00.40911.61.01.57.4>2.2>2.2>2.2>1500.81.20.50.61.12.3Southeast Branch(Reach 3)N/A9.79.33.04.0>20>50>50>750.0222Pre-Restoration ConditionReference Reach DataSoutheast BranchScout West 1Dimension and Substrate - ShallowProfileScout East 2Scout West 2Johanna Creek<1%1,5591.60.0221---1.51.9E/C5Additional Reach ParametersTable 10c. Baseline Stream Data SummaryDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019---ParameterPatternSubstrate, Bed and Transport ParametersJarman OakSoutheast Branch(Reach 1)Southeast Branch(Reach 2)Southeast Branch(Reach 2)
Middle BranchParameterGageMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxBankfull Width (ft)1.82.32.66.34.76.15.67.6Floodprone Width (ft)4.66.84060100300Bankfull Mean Depth0.20.30.30.51.11.30.71.0Bankfull Max Depth0.30.60.50.71.71.81.21.30.40.50.50.6Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)0.40.51.32.06.06.95.35.47.27.8Width/Depth Ratio6.912.05.419.43.65.45.711.010.119.710.010.510.012.0Entrenchment Ratio2.03.88.09.616.126.933.3 100.0 22.266.7Bank Height Ratio 5.36.51.11.31.11.21.01.11.01.1D50 (mm)Shallow Length (ft)2.546.67.916.1Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.026 0.0470.033 0.0510.0144 0.0489 0.0002 0.00740.0008 0.0492 0.0059 0.0236Pool Length (ft)2.917.311.219.8Pool Max Depth (ft)1.71.90.41.00.51.00.51.20.60.9Pool Spacing (ft)276721271659325515245228561824Pool Volume (ft3)Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.7 14.3 7.216.29.19.814.020.021.036.04.09.06.036.04.19.46.720.9Radius of Curvature (ft)3.19.05.516.05.46.815.027.013.718.65.014.07.022.07.023.99.223.5Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.61.61.03.00.81.01.52.81.52.01.74.51.54.83.210.92.76.9Meander Length (ft)39.884.836.563.232.536.92451147723443257Meander Width Ratio1.62.61.33.01.41.51.42.12.32.91.33.01.38.02.24.32.06.1Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 0.240.27Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Drainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.51.32.02.52.91.21.21.81.9Bankfull Discharge (cfs)0.60.7Q-NFF regressionQ-USGS extrapolationQ-ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity1.11.21.21.5Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0096 0.0163 0.0024 0.00770.0024 0.0066(---): Data was not providedN/A: Not Applicable1.0N/A>22.91.0N/A3.4>2000.30.51.110.1>58.82.2>500.30.50.76.70.0145 0.00640.0240 0.0260 0.0170 0.00400.00220.00400.01481.11.2------------------------1,0604361,0584321.01.11.21.21.21.4------9851,736---------------------------------------1.01.01.0---2.617.56.414.011.01.0N/AE/C5E/C5E/C50.951.30.81.40.9<1%<1%<1%<1%G5E/C5bE5E5E5/C5E60.010.010.010.01<1%---------------Additional Reach ParametersN/A0.020.060.670.340.901.27N/AN/A------N/AN/A-/-/0.083/0.498/0.9/9.6---------------N/A---Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersN/AN/A------------50.0Pattern---N/A---------0.6N/A1.53.1---N/AN/A0.0129---------------ProfileN/A---------------------0.083>2.2>2.2>2.21.01.01.01.12.311.60.91.57.4>75>1500.81.20.30.3Dimension and Substrate - ShallowMiddle BranchN/A9.79.33.04.0>20>50>50Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data SummaryDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Pre-Restoration ConditionReference Reach DataDesignJarman OakMiddle Branch(Reach 1)Middle Branch(Reach 2)Middle Branch(Reach 1)Middle Branch(Reach 2)As-Built/BaselineMonitoring Year 6 - 2019ParameterScout West 1Scout East 2Scout West 2Johanna Creek
Southwest BranchParameterGageMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxBankfull Width (ft)2.83.42.66.34.76.15.67.6Floodprone Width (ft)4.96.24060100300Bankfull Mean Depth0.20.30.30.51.11.30.71.0Bankfull Max Depth0.30.90.50.71.71.81.21.30.50.60.40.5Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)0.80.91.32.06.06.95.35.47.27.8Width/Depth Ratio10.014.05.419.43.65.45.711.010.119.79.010.010.012.0Entrenchment Ratio1.51.98.09.616.126.913.320.030.390.9Bank Height Ratio 10.010.71.11.31.11.21.01.11.01.1D50 (mm)Shallow Length (ft)3.851.68.344.1Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.026 0.0470.033 0.0510.0257 0.0648 0.0109 0.03080.0015 0.0339 0.0032 0.0228Pool Length (ft)1.719.94.323.4Pool Max Depth (ft)1.71.90.51.10.41.00.31.20.61.4Pool Spacing (ft)276721271659325515245238531251Pool Volume (ft3)Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.7 14.3 7.216.29.19.814.020.021.036.04.09.04.026.03.910.25.218.9Radius of Curvature (ft)3.19.05.516.05.46.815.027.013.718.65.014.05.016.010.019.07.420.3Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.61.61.03.00.81.01.52.81.52.01.74.51.54.83.18.5Meander Length (ft)39.884.836.563.232.536.92451105627502854Meander Width Ratio1.62.61.33.01.41.51.42.12.32.91.33.01.38.02.27.9Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 0.370.42Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Drainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps) 1.8 1.91.32.02.52.91.21.21.81.9Bankfull Discharge (cfs)1.61.7Q-NFF regressionQ-USGS extrapolationQ-ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity1.11.21.11.5Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0171 0.0216 0.0078 0.0096 0.0186 0.0191 0.0085 0.0088(---): Data was not providedN/A: Not Applicable>200.00401.4N/A 0.01293.1N/A---9.7 9.31.1 2.30.8 1.2>150>750.3---------0.3---Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersN/A1.0---------1.5------<1%------------0.02---0.0260 0.01700.0320---1,080---1.0N/A---1.27---N/A------0.06-------/0.065/0.105/0.336/0.4/9.6--- ---N/A---N/A0.6N/AMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Pre-Restoration ConditionDimension and Substrate - Shallow---Southwest Branch(Reaches 1 - 3)0.105--->2.21.0---7.41.01.0---N/A------N/A------>50N/AG5---E/C5b<1%0.033.3Reference Reach DataJarman OakProfileSouthwest Branch>50>2.2>2.23.0Southwest Branch(Reaches 1 - 3)Scout East 2As-Built/BaselineDesignScout West 2Johanna CreekSouthwest Branch(Reach 4)Southwest Branch(Reach 4)---1.2------0.90---<1%1.11.2------0.0040---------------0.02E/C5NA0.0191<1%0.951.7E60.0090---1.54791.51.06501.3---0.02Additional Reach ParametersE/C5<1%---64617.5---4821.5E5/C5E56.4N/A14.0E5N/A1.52.51.311.0------0.00221.22.6---------Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data SummaryDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)11.61.0Scout West 10.02N/APattern50.0------0.34---0.67---2.4>2000.30.40.69.7------------------Parameter------N/A82.31.0N/A---N/A---
North BranchParameterGageMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxBankfull Width (ft)2.6 6.3 4.76.15.67.68.69.3Floodprone Width (ft)100300Bankfull Mean Depth0.30.51.11.30.71.00.70.7Bankfull Max Depth0.50.71.71.81.21.30.91.11.01.2Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.32.06.06.95.35.47.27.85.76.5Width/Depth Ratio5.419.43.65.45.711.010.119.714.014.513.113.2Entrenchment Ratio8.09.616.126.910.932.6 >21.6 >23.2Bank Height Ratio 1.11.31.11.21.01.1D50 (mm)Shallow Length (ft)5.335.8Shallow Slope (ft/ft)0.026 0.0470.033 0.0510.0010 0.00650.0013 0.0163Pool Length (ft)8.580.8Pool Max Depth (ft)1.71.90.92.11.03.8Pool Spacing (ft)2767212716593255156417101Pool Volume (ft3)Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.7 14.3 7.216.29.19.814.020.021.036.012.074.01672Radius of Curvature (ft)3.19.05.516.05.46.815.027.013.718.614.044.01540Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.61.61.03.00.81.01.52.81.52.01.54.81.74.3Meander Length (ft)39.884.836.563.232.536.92815679129Meander Width Ratio1.62.61.33.01.41.51.42.12.32.91.38.01.97.7Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Drainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)1.3 2.0 2.52.91.21.21.81.90.80.9Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Q-NFF regressionQ-USGS extrapolationQ-ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity1.21.6Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0007 0.0020 0.0004 0.0020(---): Data was not providedN/A: Not Applicable------------N/A------ --- --------------------------- 0.0260 0.0170 0.0040 0.0022 0.0040--- --- ---2,418---2,4101.310.0016--- 1.1 1.2 1.21.21.4---------------------------------------------2.617.56.414.011.05.0C50.950.95.0---E/C5bE5E5E5/C5E60.19E/C50.19<1%---------------<1%<1%Additional Reach ParametersN/A0.080.060.670.340.901.27N/AN/A------------------N/A---Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersN/AN/A------------50.0Pattern---N/A------0.6N/A1.53.1N/AN/A0.0129---------------------------------ProfileN/AN/A1.01.01.0------2.37.4>75>150>2.2>2.2>2.21.2>20N/A9.79.311.65.9>50>500.80.61.1Table 10f. Baseline Stream Data SummaryPre-Restoration ConditionScout West 2Johanna CreekJarman OakNorth BranchNorth BranchDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Parameter>2001.0Reference Reach DataDesign As-Built/BaselineNorth Branch9.2Scout West 1Scout East 2Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Devil's Racetrack (West)Dimension and SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)135.4135.4135.4135.4135.4135.5135.5135.1135.1135.1135.1135.1135.2135.0131.0131.0131.0131.0131.0131.2131.0130.6130.6130.6130.6130.6130.8130.7Low Bank Elevation (ft)135.4135.4135.4135.4135.4135.4135.5135.1135.1135.1135.1135.1135.1135.0131.0131.0131.0131.0131.0131.0131.0130.6130.6130.6130.6130.6130.6130.7Bankfull Width (ft)9.67.67.77.67.89.09.010.710.110.29.89.28.17.29.510.010.010.09.310.08.811.111.411.411.411.211.811.4Floodprone Width (ft)>200>200>200>200>200>200>200N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A>200>200>200>200>200>200>200N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.60.70.80.80.70.70.70.70.80.80.80.91.00.90.90.80.80.70.80.80.71.00.80.90.80.70.90.8Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.11.51.51.41.41.31.41.71.92.01.92.01.81.61.41.41.41.41.41.51.31.71.71.71.71.61.71.6Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.25.65.85.85.36.26.07.87.68.68.18.17.86.78.58.18.27.47.18.56.210.79.49.98.68.010.79.0Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio14.810.410.110.011.513.213.614.613.412.212.010.68.47.710.612.312.213.512.111.812.411.413.913.115.115.613.014.4Entrenchment Ratio1>20.9 >26.2 >26.1 >26.3 >25.7 >22.2 >22.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >21.1 >20.0 >20.1 >20.0 >21.5 >20.0 >22.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio21.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ADimension and SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)125.3125.3125.3125.3125.3125.4125.3124.7124.7124.7124.7124.7124.9124.8120.8120.8120.8120.8120.8120.9120.8119.9119.9119.9119.9119.9119.4120.1Low Bank Elevation (ft)125.3125.3125.3125.3125.3125.3125.3124.7124.7124.7124.7124.7124.9124.8120.8120.8120.8120.8120.8120.8120.8119.9119.9119.9119.9119.9119.9120.1Bankfull Width (ft)8.98.68.68.69.310.110.38.78.28.68.58.09.18.29.58.08.08.78.710.38.44.74.84.84.24.22.84.7Floodprone Width (ft)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A>200>200>200>200>200>200>200N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A>200>200>200>200>200>200>200Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.80.80.80.70.70.70.70.70.70.60.60.50.70.60.80.90.90.80.80.70.70.40.71.20.81.00.80.9Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.51.51.51.51.41.41.41.11.21.21.11.01.21.01.61.71.71.71.81.81.51.31.31.71.21.71.01.5Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)7.57.06.86.26.57.57.06.05.35.65.24.36.04.67.67.47.37.07.07.65.92.13.35.73.34.42.14.0Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio10.710.610.911.913.413.515.212.612.613.414.014.713.714.711.78.78.810.810.813.811.910.66.94.05.44.03.75.5Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >23.0 >24.4 >23.2 >23.5 >25.1 >22.1 >24.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >42.5 >42.1 >41.9 >47.4 >47.4 >71.9 >42.3Bankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5Dimension and SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.3 116.4 116.1 116.1 116.1 116.1 116.1 116.1 116.1Low Bank Elevation (ft)116.4116.4116.4116.4116.4116.4116.4116.1116.1116.1116.1116.1116.1116.1Bankfull Width (ft)7.77.57.57.57.57.98.86.85.95.96.26.07.97.0Floodprone Width (ft)>200>200>200>200>200>200>200N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.50.70.70.60.60.50.50.60.80.80.70.70.60.5Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.71.01.01.11.00.91.00.91.01.01.00.90.90.8Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)4.05.44.94.74.64.04.14.44.74.64.54.04.43.7Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio14.510.411.412.112.415.518.710.67.57.68.59.014.013.5Entrenchment Ratio1>26.1 >26.7 >26.7 >26.7 >26.7 >25.4 >22.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio21.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.Cross Section 8 (Shallow)Table 11a. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)Cross Section 4 (Pool)Cross Section 1 (Shallow)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section 5 (Pool)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Cross Section 9 (Shallow)Cross Section 10 (Pool)Cross Section 7 (Pool)Cross Section 3 (Shallow)Cross Section 2 (Pool)Cross Section 6 (Shallow)
Devil's Racetrack (East)Dimension and SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)115.4115.4115.4115.4115.4115.5115.2115.1115.1115.1115.1115.1115.3115.2115.0115.0115.0115.0115.0115.3114.9114.6114.6114.6114.6114.6114.9114.6Low Bank Elevation (ft)115.4115.4115.4115.4115.4115.3115.2115.1115.1115.1115.1115.1115.0115.2115.0115.0115.0115.0115.0115.0114.9114.6114.6114.6114.6114.6114.6114.6Bankfull Width (ft)15.015.115.115.115.114.014.612.212.512.312.212.212.712.719.820.520.821.121.822.220.812.711.812.412.212.012.611.9Floodprone Width (ft)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A>300>300>300>300>300>300>300N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A>300>300>300>300>300>300>300Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.21.11.11.11.11.30.90.80.70.80.70.70.80.71.51.21.31.11.11.41.01.10.90.90.90.91.10.8Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.12.02.02.52.02.21.81.31.31.31.21.31.41.32.72.52.52.32.52.72.21.61.61.61.51.61.81.6Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)18.816.517.316.115.918.812.810.38.99.38.08.410.38.630.224.626.223.223.230.220.213.310.410.910.510.613.310.1Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio12.013.813.114.214.310.416.714.617.616.118.617.615.718.813.017.116.619.220.516.321.412.113.414.014.113.711.914.0Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >24.5 >23.9 >24.5 >24.5 >24.6 >23.6 >23.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >23.7 >25.4 >24.3 >24.6 >24.9 >23.8 >25.2Bankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0Dimension and SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)114.2114.2114.2114.2114.2114.5114.2114.1114.1114.1114.1114.1114.3114.3113.3113.3113.3113.3113.3113.4113.4112.6112.6112.6112.6112.6113.0112.6Low Bank Elevation (ft)114.2114.2114.2114.2114.2114.1114.2114.1114.1114.1114.1114.1114.4114.3113.3113.3113.3113.3113.3113.3113.4112.6112.6112.6112.6112.6112.5112.6Bankfull Width (ft)15.612.412.412.412.313.215.313.412.612.712.412.413.814.613.712.512.712.713.613.514.215.515.315.315.315.317.115.3Floodprone Width (ft)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.11.21.21.11.11.30.91.01.01.00.90.91.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.61.51.41.21.11.51.1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.11.91.91.81.82.11.91.71.81.71.71.71.81.81.71.71.72.12.12.12.02.82.72.62.12.02.62.1Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)17.314.514.313.513.317.313.413.212.012.311.511.313.214.013.912.512.713.213.413.914.125.022.421.018.816.625.017.5Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio14.010.610.711.411.410.117.313.613.213.013.413.514.315.313.412.512.612.213.813.114.39.510.511.212.414.111.813.5Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >22.3 >23.9 >23.6 >24.1 >24.3 >21.8 >20.5 >21.9 >24.0 >23.6 >23.7 >22.1 >22.2 >21.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.01.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ADimension and SubstrateBaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7BaseMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5MY6MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)112.7112.7112.7112.7112.7112.9112.8109.0109.0109.0109.0109.0108.9109.0108.1108.1108.1108.1108.1108.3108.1Low Bank Elevation (ft)112.7112.7112.7112.7112.7112.8112.8109.0109.0109.0109.0109.0109.2109.0108.1108.1108.1108.1108.1108.2108.1Bankfull Width (ft)13.314.314.212.614.014.113.98.27.97.98.38.28.17.78.88.99.17.87.89.08.2Floodprone Width (ft)>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300>300N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.90.80.80.80.70.90.70.70.70.80.80.80.70.81.21.11.31.21.41.21.1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.61.61.61.61.41.71.51.11.11.21.21.21.21.32.01.92.12.12.02.01.7Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)12.511.211.99.99.612.59.25.75.96.16.36.35.76.310.89.711.59.410.610.88.8Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio14.118.417.116.120.415.920.811.910.610.310.910.611.49.47.38.17.26.55.77.67.7Entrenchment Ratio1>22.6 >20.9 >21.1 >23.8 >21.5 >21.3 >21.6 >36.5 >37.8 >37.8 >36.3 >36.6 >37.2 >39.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio21.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.Cross Section 21 (Pool)Cross Section 20 (Shallow)Cross-Section 19 (Shallow)Cross Section 12 (Shallow)Cross Section 17 (Shallow)Cross Section 13 (Pool)Table 11b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Cross Section 18 (Pool)Cross Section 14 (Shallow)Cross Section 15 (Pool)Cross Section 16 (Shallow)Cross Section 11 (Pool)
Southeast BranchDimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)137.7 137.7 137.7 137.7 137.7 137.7 137.8 137.1 137.1 137.1 137.1 137.1 137.2 137.3 122.8 122.8 122.8 122.8 122.8 123.0 123.0Low Bank Elevation (ft)137.7 137.7 137.7 137.7 137.7 137.8 137.8 137.1 137.1 137.1 137.1 137.1 137.2 137.3 122.8 122.8 122.8 122.8 122.8 123.0 123.0Bankfull Width (ft)3.8 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.43.0 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.93.8 4.1 3.5 3.5 3.0 4.1 3.9Floodprone Width (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A>30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.50.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.30.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.20.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.70.4 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.70.8 1.1 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.91.3 1.7 1.1 0.9 0.7 1.3 1.3Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio9.3 6.6 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.8 6.711.4 7.7 8.3 8.2 7.9 8.6 9.011.2 9.4 11.7 13.5 12.7 12.9 11.5Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >9.9 >10.4 >11.4 >10.9 >12.5 >11.5 >30.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ADimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)122.7 122.7 122.7 122.7 122.7 122.9 122.9 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.8 116.8 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.7 116.6Low Bank Elevation (ft)122.7 122.7 122.7 122.7 122.7 122.8 122.9 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.6 116.8 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.5 116.6Bankfull Width (ft)3.8 3.9 3.8 2.7 2.4 3.6 3.55.3 5.1 3.9 3.5 3.5 8.5 4.66.3 5.8 5.0 3.6 3.7 4.9 5.1Floodprone Width (ft)>60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.40.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.40.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.5 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.70.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.60.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.6Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1.3 2.0 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.3 1.42.1 1.8 1.2 1.0 0.9 2.1 1.62.4 1.7 1.8 1.1 0.9 2.4 1.6Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio10.8 7.8 11.2 8.3 7.9 10.0 8.913.8 14.6 13.0 12.5 13.7 34.4 12.9 16.8 19.7 13.7 11.6 14.7 10.0 16.2Entrenchment Ratio1>15.8 >15.4 >15.8 >22.4 >24.9 >16.7 >17.2 >37.5 >38.9 >51.3 >57.9 >56.4 >23.5 >43.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio21.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.01.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.Table 11c. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Cross Section 28 (Pool)Cross Section 29 (Shallow)Cross Section 31 (Shallow)Cross Section 32 (Shallow)Cross Section 30 (Pool)Cross Section 33 (Pool)
Middle BranchDimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.6 136.7 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.5 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.9Low Bank Elevation (ft)136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.5 136.7 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.5 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.7 124.8 124.9Bankfull Width (ft)2.2 2.3 2.2 1.3 1.2 1.6 2.13.1 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.34.1 4.8 5.0 5.2 4.4 5.0 4.2Floodprone Width (ft)>50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.40.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.80.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.70.7 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.10.9 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.81.2 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.81.4 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.3Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio6.7 6.8 6.8 4.0 3.5 3.7 5.48.1 6.0 9.1 7.6 5.8 5.1 2.911.9 21.9 24.3 17.7 19.7 17.6 13.8Entrenchment Ratio1>22.9 >21.5 >23.2 >38.4 >42.9 >31.3 >23.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio21.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ADimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.7 124.8Low Bank Elevation (ft)124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.8Bankfull Width (ft)3.4 3.2 3.1 3.5 2.9 3.3 3.3Floodprone Width (ft)>200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.9 1.1 1.3Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio10.1 10.7 10.2 9.5 8.7 9.9 8.1Entrenchment Ratio1>58.8 >62.5 >64.3 >57.5 >69.8 >60.6 >61.3Bankfull Bank Height Ratio21.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.11Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.Cross Section 24 (Shallow)Cross Section 25 (Pool)Cross Section 26 (Pool)Cross Section 27 (Shallow)Table 11d. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Southwest BranchDimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.3 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.5 136.7Low Bank Elevation (ft)136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.4 136.6 136.7Bankfull Width (ft)4.9 4.8 5.0 4.5 4.2 4.2 3.62.4 2.9 3.0 2.5 1.8 2.0 3.5Floodprone Width (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.50.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.70.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 1.8 1.9 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.70.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.6 1.3Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio13.2 11.9 11.7 13.7 13.2 9.6 7.39.7 11.2 10.1 8.9 12.0 6.8 9.8Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >82.3 >68.6 >67.5 >79.4 >108.7 >98.8 >57.1Bankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.51Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.Cross Section 23 (Shallow)Cross Section 22 (Pool)Table 11e. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
North BranchDimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)118.6 118.6 118.6 118.6 118.6 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.8 118.7 116.8 116.8 116.8 116.8 116.8 116.7 116.7Low Bank Elevation (ft)118.6 118.6 118.6 118.6 118.6 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 118.7 188.7 116.8 116.8 116.8 116.8 116.8 116.7 116.7Bankfull Width (ft)9.8 10.0 10.2 9.7 9.5 10.1 10.08.6 9.2 9.2 9.2 8.9 9.6 8.79.3 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0Floodprone Width (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.60.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.60.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.31.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.11.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 7.5 7.2 7.5 6.7 6.9 7.5 6.55.7 6.0 6.4 5.4 5.1 5.7 5.06.5 7.0 6.9 6.9 6.7 6.5 6.6Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio12.8 14.0 13.9 14.0 12.9 13.5 15.3 13.1 14.1 13.2 15.6 15.4 16.3 15.3 13.2 11.5 11.7 11.8 12.0 12.5 12.3Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A >23.2 >21.7 >21.7 >21.7 >22.5 >20.8 >22.9 >21.6 >22.2 >22.2 >22.2 >22.2 >22.2 >22.2Bankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull Elevation (ft)116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.6 116.5Low Bank Elevation (ft)116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.5 116.6 116.5Bankfull Width (ft)10.6 11.1 10.7 11.1 11.7 11.6 11.8Floodprone Width (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 9.2 9.2 9.2 8.9 8.9 9.2 8.5Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio12.3 13.4 12.5 13.8 15.4 14.7 16.3Entrenchment Ratio1N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio2N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.Table 11f. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Cross Section 37 (Pool)Cross Section 35 (Shallow) Cross Section 36 (Shallow)Cross Section 34 (Pool)
Devil's Racetrack (West)ParameterMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate - ShallowBankfull Width (ft)4.7 9.6 4.8 10.0 4.8 10.0 4.2 10.0 4.2 9.3 2.8 10.0 4.7 9.0Floodprone Width (ft)>200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200Bankfull Mean Depth0.4 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.9Bankfull Max Depth0.7 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.7 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.7 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.5Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2.1 8.5 3.3 8.1 4.9 8.2 3.3 7.4 4.3 7.1 2.1 8.5 4.0 6.2Width/Depth Ratio10.6 14.8 6.9 12.6 4.0 13.4 4.7 14.0 4.0 14.7 3.7 15.5 5.5 18.7Entrenchment Ratio>20.9 >42.5 >20 >42.1 >20.1 >41.9 >20.0 >47.4 >21.5 >47.4 >20.0 >71.9 >22.1 >42.3Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 2.0 <1.0 1.5D50 (mm)ProfileShallow Length (ft)Shallow Slope (ft/ft)Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)Pool Spacing (ft)Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)Radius of Curvature (ft)Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)Meander Wave Length (ft)Meander Width RatioAdditional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationChannel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100% of Reach with Eroding Banks*Baseline, MY1, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data. Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryMonitoring Year 6 - 2019As-Built/BaselineMY1MY2MY3MY4MY7MY5MY60%0%Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)0%0%0%0%
Devil's Racetrack (East)ParameterMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate - ShallowBankfull Width (ft)8.2 13.7 7.9 14.3 7.9 14.2 8.3 12.7 8.2 14.0 8.1 14.1 7.7 14.6Floodprone Width (ft)>300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300Bankfull Mean Depth0.7 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1Bankfull Max Depth1.1 1.7 1.1 1.8 1.2 1.7 1.2 2.1 1.2 2.1 1.2 2.1 1.3 2.0Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.7 14.1 5.9 12.5 6.1 12.7 6.3 13.2 6.3 13.4 5.7 13.9 6.3 14.1Width/Depth Ratio11.9 14.6 10.6 18.4 10.3 17.1 10.9 18.6 10.6 20.4 11.4 15.9 9.4 18.8Entrenchment Ratio>21.9 >36.5 >20.9 >37.8 >21.1 >37.8 >23.7 >36.3 >21.5 >36.6 >21.3 >37.2 >20.5 >39.1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.2 <1.0 1.0D50 (mm)ProfileShallow Length (ft)Shallow Slope (ft/ft)Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)Pool Spacing (ft)Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)Radius of Curvature (ft)Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)Meander Wave Length (ft)Meander Width RatioAdditional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationChannel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100% of Reach with Eroding Banks*Baseline, MY1, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data. 0%0%0%0%0%0%MY6MY7Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryMonitoring Year 6 - 2019As-Built/BaselineMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5
Southeast BranchParameterMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate - ShallowBankfull Width (ft)3.0 5.3 2.9 5.1 2.6 3.9 2.7 3.5 2.4 3.5 2.6 8.5 2.9 4.6Floodprone Width (ft)>30 >200 >30 >200 >30 >200 >30 >200 >30 >200 >30 >200 >30 >200Bankfull Mean Depth0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4Bankfull Max Depth0.5 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)0.8 2.1 1.1 2.0 0.8 1.3 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.8 2.1 0.9 1.6Width/Depth Ratio10.8 13.8 7.7 14.6 8.3 13.0 8.2 12.5 7.9 13.7 8.6 34.4 8.9 12.9Entrenchment Ratio>9.9 >37.5 >10.4 >38.9 >11.4 >51.3 >10.9 >57.9 >12.5 >56.4 >11.5 >23.5 >17.2 >43.5Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 1.1D50 (mm)ProfileShallow Length (ft)Shallow Slope (ft/ft)Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)Pool Spacing (ft)Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)Radius of Curvature (ft)Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)Meander Wave Length (ft)Meander Width RatioAdditional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationChannel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100% of Reach with Eroding Banks*Baseline, MY1, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data. 10%0%0%0%0%0%MY6MY7Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryMonitoring Year 6 - 2019As-Built/BaselineMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5
Middle BranchParameterMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate - ShallowBankfull Width (ft)2.23.4 2.3 3.2 2.2 3.1 1.3 3.5 1.2 2.9 1.6 3.3 2.1 3.1Floodprone Width (ft)>50 >200 >50 >200 >50 >200 >50 >200 >50 >200 >50 >200 >50 >200Bankfull Mean Depth0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4Bankfull Max Depth0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)0.7 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.4 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.7 1.1 0.8 1.3Width/Depth Ratio6.7 10.1 6.8 10.7 6.8 10.2 4.0 9.5 3.5 8.7 3.7 9.9 5.4 8.1Entrenchment Ratio>22.9 >58.8 >21.5 >62.5 >23.2 >64.3 >38.4 >57.5 >42.9 >69.8 >31.3 >60.6 >23.8 >61.3Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.1 1.1D50 (mm)ProfileShallow Length (ft)Shallow Slope (ft/ft)Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)Pool Spacing (ft)Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)Radius of Curvature (ft)Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)Meander Wave Length (ft)Meander Width RatioAdditional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationChannel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100% of Reach with Eroding Banks*Baseline, MY1, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data. 0%0%0%0%0%0%Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryMonitoring Year 6 - 2019As-Built/BaselineMY1MY2MY3Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)MY4MY5MY6MY7
Southwest BranchParameterMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate - ShallowBankfull Width (ft)Floodprone Width (ft)Bankfull Mean DepthBankfull Max DepthBankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)Width/Depth RatioEntrenchment RatioBank Height Ratio D50 (mm)ProfileShallow Length (ft)Shallow Slope (ft/ft)Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)Pool Spacing (ft)Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)Radius of Curvature (ft)Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)Meander Wave Length (ft)Meander Width RatioAdditional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationChannel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100% of Reach with Eroding Banks*Baseline, MY1, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data. 0%0%0%0%0%0%MY4MY5MY6MY72.9>200Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryMonitoring Year 6 - 2019As-Built/BaselineMY1MY2MY32.4>2000.30.40.69.70.30.40.811.2>68.6>82.31.01.01.01.01.01.8>2000.20.30.312.0>108.71.3>98.86.80.60.40.32.0>2003.5>2000.40.61.39.8>57.11.53.0>2000.30.50.910.1>67.52.5>2000.30.40.78.9>79.4
North BranchParameterMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate - ShallowBankfull Width (ft)8.69.3 9.0 9.2 9.0 9.2 9.0 9.2 8.9 9.0 9.0 9.6 8.7 9.0Floodprone Width (ft)>200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200Bankfull Mean Depth0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7Bankfull Max Depth1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.3Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.7 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.4 6.9 5.4 6.9 5.1 6.7 5.7 6.5 5.0 6.6Width/Depth Ratio13.1 13.2 11.5 14.1 11.7 13.2 11.8 15.6 12.0 15.4 12.5 16.3 12.3 15.3Entrenchment Ratio>21.6 >23.2 >21.7 >22.2 >21.7 >22.2 >21.7 >22.2 >22.2 >22.5 >20.8 >22.2 >22.2 >22.9Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 1.0D50 (mm)ProfileShallow Length (ft)Shallow Slope (ft/ft)Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)Pool Spacing (ft)Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)Radius of Curvature (ft)Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)Meander Wave Length (ft)Meander Width RatioAdditional Reach ParametersRosgen ClassificationChannel Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity (ft)Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100% of Reach with Eroding Banks*Baseline, MY1, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data. 0%0%0%0%0%0%MY6MY7Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryMonitoring Year 6 - 2019As-Built/BaselineMY1MY2MY3MY4MY5
Cross Section 1-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions6.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)9.0 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.4 max depth (ft) 9.5 wetted parimeter (ft)0.6hyd radi (ft)13.6 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)22.1 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section Plots1321331341351361371380 102030Elevation (ft)Width (ft)9+38 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 2-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions6.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)7.2 width (ft)0.9 mean depth (ft)1.6 max depth (ft) 8.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.8hyd radi (ft)7.7 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191321331341351361371380 10 203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)9+70 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 3-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions6.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)8.8 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 9.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)12.4 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)22.7 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream12812913013113213313410 20 30 40506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)18+48 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 4-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions9.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)11.4 width (ft)0.8 mean depth (ft)1.6 max depth (ft) 12.1 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)14.4 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Cross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)View Downstream1281291301311321331340 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)18+80 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 5-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions7.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)10.3 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.4 max depth (ft) 10.8 wetted parimeter (ft)0.6hyd radi (ft)15.2 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1221231241251261271280 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)28+73 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 6-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions4.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)8.2 width (ft)0.6 mean depth (ft)1.0 max depth (ft) 8.5 wetted parimeter (ft)0.5hyd radi (ft)14.7 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)24.3 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1221231241251261271280 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)29+11 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 7-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions5.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)8.4 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.5 max depth (ft) 9.1 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)11.9 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1181191201211221231240 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Elevation (ft)Width (ft)37+04 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 8-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions4.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)4.7 width (ft)0.9 mean depth (ft)1.5 max depth (ft) 6.0 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)5.5 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)42.3 entrenchment ratio1.5 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream11711811912012112212330 40 50 60708090Elevation (ft)Width (ft)37+46 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 9-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions4.1 x-section area (ft.sq.)8.8 width (ft)0.5 mean depth (ft)1.0 max depth (ft) 9.1 wetted parimeter (ft)0.5hyd radi (ft)18.7 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)22.8 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1141151161171181191200 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)45+77 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone Area Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 10-DRC WestBankfull Dimensions3.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)7.0 width (ft)0.5 mean depth (ft)0.8 max depth (ft) 7.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.5hyd radi (ft)13.5 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Cross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)View Downstream1141151161171181191200 10 20304050607080Elevation (ft)Width (ft)46+14 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 11-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions12.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)14.6 width (ft)0.9 mean depth (ft)1.8 max depth (ft) 15.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.8hyd radi (ft)16.7 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)1121131141151161171180 10 20 30 40 50 60Elevation (ft)Width (ft)57+24 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 12-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions8.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)12.7 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 13.0 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)18.8 width-depth ratio300.0 W flood prone area (ft)23.6 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191121131141151161171180 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)57+74 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 13-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions20.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)20.8 width (ft)1.0 mean depth (ft)2.2 max depth (ft) 21.6 wetted parimeter (ft)0.9hyd radi (ft)21.4 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 20191121131141151161171180 10 20304050607080Elevation (ft)Width (ft)66+64 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 14-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions10.1 x-section area (ft.sq.)11.9 width (ft)0.8 mean depth (ft)1.6 max depth (ft) 12.4 wetted parimeter (ft)0.8hyd radi (ft)14.0 width-depth ratio300.0 W flood prone area (ft)25.2 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)1121131141151161171180 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)67+02 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 15-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions13.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)15.3 width (ft)0.9 mean depth (ft)1.9 max depth (ft) 15.8 wetted parimeter (ft)0.8hyd radi (ft)17.3 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191111121131141151161170 10 20 30 40 50 60Elevation (ft)Width (ft)77+04 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 16-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions14.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)14.6 width (ft)1.0 mean depth (ft)1.8 max depth (ft) 15.2 wetted parimeter (ft)0.9hyd radi (ft)15.3 width-depth ratio300.0 W flood prone area (ft)20.5 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream1111121131141151161170 10 20 30 40 50 60Elevation (ft)Width (ft)29+11 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 17-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions14.1 x-section area (ft.sq.)14.2 width (ft)1.0 mean depth (ft)2.0 max depth (ft) 14.9 wetted parimeter (ft)0.9hyd radi (ft)14.3 width-depth ratio300.0 W flood prone area (ft)21.1 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191101111121131141151160 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)86+95 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 18-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions17.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)15.3 width (ft)1.1 mean depth (ft)2.1 max depth (ft) 16.4 wetted parimeter (ft)1.1hyd radi (ft)13.5 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section Plots10911011111211311411520 30405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)91+00 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 19-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions9.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)13.9 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.5 max depth (ft) 14.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.6hyd radi (ft)20.8 width-depth ratio300.0 W flood prone area (ft)21.6 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 201911011111211311411511620 30 40 50 60 708090100Elevation (ft)Width (ft)91+48 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 20-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions6.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)7.7 width (ft)0.8 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 8.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.8hyd radi (ft)9.4 width-depth ratio300.0 W flood prone area (ft)39.1 entrenchment ratio1.1 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191061071081091101111120 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)102+92 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 21-DRC EastBankfull Dimensions8.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)8.2 width (ft)1.1 mean depth (ft)1.7 max depth (ft) 9.5 wetted parimeter (ft)0.9hyd radi (ft)7.7 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191051061071081091101110 10 20 30 40 50 60Elevation (ft)Width (ft)103+37 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 22-Southwest BranchBankfull Dimensions1.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.6 width (ft)0.5 mean depth (ft)0.7 max depth (ft) 4.0 wetted parimeter (ft)0.4hyd radi (ft)7.3 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1341351361371381391400 10 203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)509+04 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 23-Southwest BranchBankfull Dimensions1.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.5 width (ft)0.4 mean depth (ft)0.6 max depth (ft) 3.7 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)9.8 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)57.1 entrenchment ratio1.5 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream1341351361371381391400 10 203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)509+15 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 24-Middle BranchBankfull Dimensions0.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)2.1 width (ft)0.4 mean depth (ft)0.7 max depth (ft) 2.6 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)5.4 width-depth ratio50.0 W flood prone area (ft)23.8 entrenchment ratio1.1 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191341351361371381391400 10 20 30 40Elevation (ft)Width (ft)207+00 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone Area"Bankfull (Based on MY0 Area)"
Cross Section 25-Middle BranchBankfull Dimensions1.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)2.3 width (ft)0.8 mean depth (ft)1.1 max depth (ft) 3.5 wetted parimeter (ft)0.5hyd radi (ft)2.9 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191331341351361371381390 10 20 30 40Elevation (ft)Width (ft)207+08 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 26-Middle BranchBankfull Dimensions1.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)4.2 width (ft)0.3 mean depth (ft)0.6 max depth (ft) 4.4 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)13.8 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream1221231241251261271280102030Elevation (ft)Width (ft)216+22 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 27-Middle BranchBankfull Dimensions1.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.3 width (ft)0.4 mean depth (ft)0.7 max depth (ft) 3.6 wetted parimeter (ft)0.4hyd radi (ft)8.1 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)61.3 entrenchment ratio1.1 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1221231241251261271280 102030Elevation (ft)Width (ft)216+34 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 28-Southeast BranchBankfull Dimensions1.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.4 width (ft)0.5 mean depth (ft)1.2 max depth (ft) 4.6 wetted parimeter (ft)0.4hyd radi (ft)6.7 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream13513613713813914014110 20 30 40506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)310+03 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 29-Southeast BranchBankfull Dimensions0.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)2.9 width (ft)0.3 mean depth (ft)0.7 max depth (ft) 3.4 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)9.0 width-depth ratio30.0 W flood prone area (ft)10.4 entrenchment ratio1.1 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream13513613713813914014110 20 30 40506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)310+15 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 30-Southeast BranchBankfull Dimensions1.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.9 width (ft)0.3 mean depth (ft)0.5 max depth (ft) 4.1 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)11.5 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 201912112212312412512612710 20 304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)318+11 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 31-Southeast BranchBankfull Dimensions1.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.5 width (ft)0.4 mean depth (ft)0.7 max depth (ft) 3.8 wetted parimeter (ft)0.4hyd radi (ft)8.9 width-depth ratio60.0 W flood prone area (ft)17.2 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream1201211221231241251260 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)318+27 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 32-Southeast BranchBankfull Dimensions1.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)4.6 width (ft)0.4 mean depth (ft)0.6 max depth (ft) 4.9 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)12.9 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)43.5 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream1141151161171181191200 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)325+58 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 33-Southeast BranchBankfull Dimensions1.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)5.1 width (ft)0.3 mean depth (ft)0.6 max depth (ft) 5.3 wetted parimeter (ft)0.3hyd radi (ft)16.2 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 201911411511611711811912010 20 304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)325+73 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 34-North BranchBankfull Dimensions6.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)10.0 width (ft)0.6 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 10.5 wetted parimeter (ft)0.6hyd radi (ft)15.3 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream1161171181191201211220 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)407+67 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull
Cross Section 35-North BranchBankfull Dimensions5.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)8.7 width (ft)0.6 mean depth (ft)1.1 max depth (ft) 9.2 wetted parimeter (ft)0.5hyd radi (ft)15.3 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)22.9 entrenchment ratio< 1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 20191161171181191201211220 10 20304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)407+67 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 36-North BranchBankfull Dimensions6.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)9.0 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 9.4 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)12.3 width-depth ratio200.0 W flood prone area (ft)22.2 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringCross Section PlotsDevil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019View Downstream11411511611711811912010 20 30405060Elevation (ft)Width (ft)416+47 ShallowMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)BankfullFloodprone AreaBankfull (Based on MY0 Area)
Cross Section 37-North BranchBankfull Dimensions8.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)11.8 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 12.2 wetted parimeter (ft)0.7hyd radi (ft)16.3 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 4/2019Field Crew:Wildlands EngineeringMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Cross Section PlotsView Downstream11411511611711811912010 20 30 405060Elevation (ft)Width (ft)416+85 PoolMY0 (2/2014)MY1 (7/2014)MY2 (4/2015)MY3 (4/2016)MY4 (5/2017)MY5 (4/2018)MY6 (4/2019)Bankfull

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date of Occurrence Date of
Occurrence
Date of
Occurrence
Date of
Occurrence
Date of
Occurrence
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
3/28/2014 - 4/1/2014 3/5/2015 2/4/2016 3/14/2017 1/3/2018 3/6/2019 1/4/2019
4/29/2014 - 5/1/2014 6/3/2015 4/13/2016 4/25/2017 1/29/2018 3/6/2019 2/13/2019
6/9/2014 - 6/20/2014 10/2/2015 4/23/2016 5/24/2017 3/20/2018 3/6/2019 3/3/2019
9/7/2014 - 9/9/2014 10/8/2016 6/15/2017 4/24/2018 9/25/2019 4/13/2019
5/29/2018 9/25/2019 5/4/2019
8/21/2018 9/25/2019 6/10/2019
9/15/2018 9/25/2019 7/12/2019
10/11/2018 9/25/2019 9/6/2019
11/13/2018 11/27/2019 10/23/2019
11/24/2018 11/27/2019 11/24/2019
Unknown 2/26/2015 2/4/2016 3/14/2017 1/3/2018 3/6/2019 1/4/2019
3/28/2014 - 4/1/2014 6/3/2015 6/3/2016 4/25/2017 1/29/2018 3/6/2019 2/18/2019
6/9/2014 - 6/20/2014 10/2/2015 10/8/2016 5/24/2017 3/20/2018 3/6/2019 2/23/2019
4/24/2018 3/6/2019 3/3/2019
5/29/2018 9/25/2019 4/14/2019
8/21/2018 9/25/2019 4/20/2019
9/15/2018 9/25/2019 6/10/2019
10/11/2018 9/25/2019 7/12/2019
11/13/2018 9/25/2019 9/6/2019
11/24/2018 11/27/2019 10/20/2019
4/29/2014 - 5/1/2014 3/5/2015 2/4/2016 4/25/2017 1/13/2018 3/6/2019 1/4/2019
6/9/2014 - 6/20/2014 6/3/2015 10/8/2016 5/24/2017 2/12/2018 3/6/2019 3/3/2019
9/7/2014 - 9/9/2014 10/2/2015 9/15/2018 9/25/2019 7/12/2019
11/13/2018 9/25/2019 9/6/2019
3/28/2014 - 4/1/2014 3/5/2015 2/4/2016 4/25/2017 1/29/2018 3/6/2019 1/4/2019
4/29/2014 - 5/1/2014 6/3/2015 10/8/2016 5/24/2017 4/24/2018 3/6/2019 2/18/2019
6/9/2014 - 6/20/2014 10/2/2015 5/29/2018 9/25/2019 4/13/2019
9/7/2014 - 9/9/2014 9/15/2018 9/25/2019 7/12/2019
11/13/2018 9/25/2019 7/23/2019
3/28/2014 - 4/1/2014 Unkown 2/4/2016 3/14/2017 1/29/2018 3/6/2019 3/3/2019
4/29/2014 - 5/1/2014 10/2/2015 10/8/2016 4/25/2017 4/24/2018 9/25/2019 4/13/2019
6/9/2014 - 6/20/2014 5/29/2018 9/25/2019 7/12/2019
9/7/2014 - 9/9/2014 9/15/2018 9/25/2019 8/16/2019
11/13/2018 9/25/2019 9/6/2019
4/29/2014 - 5/1/2014 3/5/2015 2/4/2016 4/25/2017 1/3/2018 3/6/2019 1/4/2019
6/9/2014 - 6/20/2014 6/3/2015 10/8/2016 5/24/2017 1/29/2018 3/6/2019 3/3/2019
9/7/2014 - 9/9/2014 10/1/2015 3/20/2018 9/25/2019 4/13/2019
5/29/2018 9/25/2019 6/10/2019
9/15/2018 9/25/2019 7/12/2019
11/13/2018 9/25/2019 9/6/2019
Year 1 (2014) Year 2 (2015) Year 3 (2016) Year 4 (2017) Year 5 (2018) Year 6 (2019) Year 7 (2020)
Southwest Branch 114 Days/
143 Days
365 Days/
365 Days
365 Days/
365 Days
365 Days/
365 Days
*132 Days/
132 Days
329 Days/
329 Days
Middle Branch 102 Days/
243 Days
365 Days/
365 Days
365 Days/
365 Days
*345 Days/
345 Days
365 Days/
365 Days
*276 Days/
276 Days
Southeast Branch 86 Days/
134 Days
*16 Days/
24 Days
136 Days/
229 Days
70 Days/
128 Days
*123 Days/
216 Days
117 Days/
176 Days
Success criteria is 30 consecutive days of flow.
*A gage malfunction occurred during a portion of the monitoring year.
Table 14. In-Stream Flow Gage Attainment Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Summary of In-Stream Flow Gage Results for Monitoring Years 1 through 7
Reach Max Consecutive Days/ Total Days Meeting Success Criteria
Devil's Racetrach (West)
Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
Devil's Racetrach (East)
Southwest Branch
Middle Branch
Southeast Branch
North Branch
Reach
MY6
Method
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Year 1 (2014)** Year 2 (2015) Year 3 (2016) Year 4 (2017) Year 5 (2018) Year 6 (2019) Year 7 (2020)
1 No/7.5 Days
(3.1%)
No/16 Days
(6.0%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
Yes/28 Days
(10.8%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
Yes/48 Days
(18.4%)
2 No/14.5 Days
(6.0%)
Yes/ 58 Days
(22.3%)
No/21 Days
(8.1%)
No/15 Days
(5.8%)
Yes/35 Days
(13.4%)
Yes/57 Days
(21.8%)
3 No/2.5 Days
(1.0%)
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)No/9 Days (3.5%)No/11 Days
(4.2%)
Yes/35 Days
(13.4%)
Yes/56 Days
(21.5%)
4 No/13.5 Days
(5.6%)
Yes/57 Days
(21.9%)
Yes/25 Days
(9.6%)
Yes/30 Days
(11.5%)
Yes/67 Days
(25.7%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
5 No/12.5 Days
(5.2%)
Yes/34 Days
(13.0%)
No/18 Days
(6.9%)
No/12 Days
(4.6%)
Yes/36 Days
(13.8%)
Yes/32 Days
(12.3%)
6 No/11.0 Days
(4.6%)
Yes/53 Days
(20.3%)
Yes/23 Days
(8.8%)
No/13 Days
(5.0%)
No/14 Days
(5.4%)
Yes/30 Days
(11.5%)
7 Yes/21.5 Days
(9.0%)
Yes/66 Days
(25.6%)
Yes/25 Days
(9.6%)
Yes/23 Days
(8.8%)
Yes/51 Days
(19.5%)
No/7 Days *
(2.7%)
8 No/5.0 Days
(2.1%)
Yes/31 Days
(12.0%)
No/8 Days
(3.1%)
No/10 Days
(3.8%)
Removed During
MY5
Removed During
MY5
9 Yes/ 22.0 Days
(9.2%)
Yes/80 Days
(31.0%)
Yes/ 39.0 Days
(15.0%)
Yes/28 Days
(10.8%)
Yes/36 Days
(13.8%)
Yes/55 Days
(21.1%)
10 No/ 1.5 Days
(0.6%)
No/10 Days
(3.9%)
No/ 3 Days
(1.2%)
No/3 Days
(1.2%)
Removed During
MY4
Removed
During MY4
11 No/9.0 Days
(3.8%)
Yes/65 Days
(25.2%)
Yes/23 Days
(8.8%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
Yes/52 Days
(19.9%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
12 No/7.5 Days
(3.1%)
Yes/31 Days
(12.0%)
No/13 Days
(5.0%)
Yes/30 Days
(11.5%)
Yes/52 Days
(20.3%)
Yes/58 Days
(22.2%)
13 No/8.0 Days
(3.3%)
Yes/34 Days
(13.0%)
No/11 Days
(4.2%)
No/10 Days
(3.8%)
No/14 Days
(5.4%)
No/19 Days
(7.3%)
14 No/ 8.5 Days
(3.5%)
Yes/32 Days
(12.4%)
No/12 Days
(4.6%)
No/12 Days
(4.6%)
Yes/35 Days
(13.4%)
Yes/56 Days
(21.5%)
15 No/12.5 Days
(5.2%)
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)
No/14 Days
(5.4%)
Yes/30 Days
(11.5%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
16 No/12.5 Days
(5.2%)
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)
Yes/39 Days
(15.0%)
Yes/29 Days
(11.2%)
Yes/36 Days
(13.8%)
Yes/55 Days
(21.1%)
17 No/15.0 Days
(6.3%)
Yes/34 Days
(13.2%)
Yes/23 Days
(8.8%)
No/16 Days
(6.2%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
Yes/56 Days
(21.5%)
18 Yes/69.5 Days
(29.0%)
Yes/66 Days
(25.6%)
Yes/22 Days
(8.5%)
No/14 Days
(5.4%)
Yes/36 Days
(13.8%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
19 Yes/31.5 Days
(13.1%)
Yes/66 Days
(25.6%)
Yes/26 Days
(10.0%)
Yes/30 Days
(11.5%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
20 No/19.5 Days
(8.1%)
Yes/35 Days
(13.4%)
No/12 Days
(4.6%)
No/5 Days
(1.9%)
No/13 Days
(5.0%)
No/0 Days
(0%)
21 Yes/69.5 Days
(29.0%)
Yes/79 Days
(30.4%)
Yes/38 Days
(14.6%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
No/14 Days *
(5.4%)
22 Yes/ 31.0 Days
(12.9%)
Yes/66 Days
(25.6%)
Yes/24 Days
(9.2%)
No/16 Days
(6.2%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
No/9 Days *
(3.4%)
23 No/8.0 Days
(3.3%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.8%)
No/6 Days
(2.3%)
No/5 Days
(1.9%)
No/5 Days
(1.9%)
No/6 Days
(2.3%)
24 No/13.0 Days
(5.4%)
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)
No/ 5 Days
(1.9%)
No/9 Days
(3.5%)
No/12 Days
(4.6%)
No/16 Days
(6.1%)
25 Yes/25.5 Days
(10.6%)
Yes/66 Days
(25.6%)
Yes/23 Days
(8.8%)
No/16 Days
(6.2%)
Yes/52 Days
(19.9%)
Yes/60 Days
(23.0%)
26 Yes/39.0 Days
(16.3%)
Yes/83 Days
(32.2%)
Yes/25 Days
(9.6%)
No/14 Days
(5.4%)
No/14 Days
(5.4%)
No/19 Days
(7.3%)
27 Yes/29.5 Days
(12.3%)
Yes/67 Days
(26.0%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
Yes/32 Days
(12.3%)
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
28 No/19.5 Days
(8.1%)
Yes/81 Days
(31.2%)
Yes/106 Days
(40.8%)
Yes/102 Days
(39.2%)
Yes/111 Days
(42.5%)
Yes/77 Days
(29.5%)
29 Yes/70.0 Days
(29.2%)
Yes/81 Days
(31.4%)
Yes/56 Days
(21.5%)
Yes/78 Days
(30.0%)
Yes/76 Days
(29.1%)
Yes/63 Days
(24.1%)
30 Yes/52.5 Days
(21.9%)
Yes/83 Days
(32.0%)
No/11 Days
(4.2%)
No/9 Days
(3.5%)
No/22 Days
(8.4%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
31 No/9.0 Days
(3.8%)
Yes/77 Days
(29.7%)
Yes/40 Days
(15.4%)
Yes/32 Days
(12.3%)
Yes/66 Days
(25.3%)
Yes/61 Days
(23.4%)
32 No/ 7.0 Days
(2.9%)
Yes/78 Days
(30.2%)
No/11 Days
(4.2%)
No/3 Days
(1.2%)
Removed During
MY5
Removed During
MY5
33 Yes/69.5 Days
(29.0%)
Yes/84 Days
(32.4%)
Yes/51 Days
(19.6%)
Yes/46 Days
(17.7%)
Yes/64 Days
(24.5%)
Yes/63 Days
(24.1%)
34 No/2.0 Days
(0.8%)
No/16 Days
(6.0%)
No/10 Days
(3.8%)
No/4 Days
(1.5%)
No/9 Days
(3.4%)
Removed During
MY6
35 Added During
MY2
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)
Yes/42 Days
(16.2%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
Yes/67 Days
(25.7%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
36 Added During
MY2
Yes/34 Days
(13.0%)
Yes/40 Days
(15.4%)
Yes/31 Days
(11.9%)
Yes/53 Days
(20.3%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
37 Added During
MY2
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)
Yes/22 Days
(8.5%)
No/15 Days
(5.8%)
Yes/36 Days
(13.8%)
Yes/32 Days
(12.3%)
38 Added During
MY2
Yes/33 Days
(12.8%)
No/6 Days
(2.3%)
No/11 Days
(4.2%)
Yes/36 Days
(13.8%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
39 Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Yes/65 Days
(24.9%)
Yes/60 Days
(23.0%)
40 Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Yes/40 Days
(15.3%)
Yes/56 Days
(21.5%)
41 Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Added During
MY5
Yes/37 Days
(14.2%)
Yes/59 Days
(22.6%)
** NRCS WETS data was used to determine the growing season for monitorg year 1. After discussions with the US Army Corps
of Engineers, on-site soil temperature probe data is being used to determine the beginning of the growing season.
Success criteria is a free groundwater surface within 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season.
* Groundwater gages 7, 21, & 22 malfunctioned during the spring of 2019 (MY6).
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Table 15. Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Gage Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results for Monitoring Years 1 through 7
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #1 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #1
Well stopped recording on 5/22/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #2 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #2
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #3 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #3
Well stopped recording on 9/24/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #4 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #4
Well stopped recording on 5/22/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #5 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #5
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #6 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #6
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #7 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #7
Well stopped recording on 2/26/2019 and was replaced on 6/23/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #9 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #9
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #11Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #11
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #12Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #12
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #13Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #13Well stopped recording on 5/30/2019
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #14Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #14
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #15Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #15
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #16Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #16Well stopped recording on 11/5/2019
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #17Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #17
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #18Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #18
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #19Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #19Well stopped recording on 10/4/2019
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #20Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #20
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #21 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #21
Well stopped recording on 2/26/2019 and was replaced on 6/23/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #22 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #22
Well stopped recording on 2/26/2019 and was replaced on 6/23/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #23 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #23
Groundwater Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0-60-50-40-30-20-1001020Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallReference Gage DepthGage #24Criteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #24Well stopped recording on 5/30/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #25 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #25
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #26 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #26
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #27 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #27
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #28 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #28
Well stopped recording on 5/22/2019
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #29 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #29
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #30 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #30
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #31 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #31
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #33 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #33
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #35 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #35
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #36 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #36
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #37 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #37
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #38 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #38
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #39 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #39
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #40 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #40
Groundwater Gage Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 95021
Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/201923 days
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #41 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #41
Soil Temperature Probe PlotsDevils Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec30405060708090Temperature (F)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Soil Probe #1 TemperatureCriteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Soil Temperature Probe #1
Soil Temperature Probe PlotsDevils Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec30405060708090Temperature (F)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Soil Probe #2 TemperatureCriteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Soil Temperature Probe #2
Soil Temperature Probe PlotsDevils Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec30405060708090Temperature (F)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019Soil Probe #3 TemperatureCriteria LevelDevil's Racetrack Soil Temperature Probe #3
In-Stream Flow Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 9502130 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0135.50135.75136.00136.25136.50136.75Rainfall (in)Water Level (ft)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallSW Branch Water DepthThalweg ElevationBankfullDevil's Racetrack: In-Stream Flow Gage for SW Branch
In-Stream Flow Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 9502130 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0122.00122.25122.50122.75123.00Rainfall (in)Water Level (ft)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallMiddle Branch Water DepthThalweg ElevationBankfullDevil's Racetrack: In-Stream Flow Gage for Middle BranchGage stopped recording on 10/4/2019
In-Stream Flow Gage PlotsMonitoring Year 6 - 2019Devil's Racetrack Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 9502130 daysJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0120.75121.00121.25121.50121.75122.00122.25122.50122.75123.00Rainfall (in)Water Level (ft)Monitoring Year 6 - 2019RainfallSE Branch Water DepthThalweg ElevationBankfullDevil's Racetrack: In-Stream Flow Gage for SE Branch
1 2019 monthly rainfall collected from USDA weather station 317994 (Smithfield, NC).2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station 317994, in Smithfield, NC (USDA, 1989 - 2019).Monthly Rainfall DataDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)Monitoring Year 6 - 201901234567Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19Precipitation (in)DateDevil's Racetrack 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2019 Smithfield, NC2019 Rainfall Data (weather station)30th Percentile70th Percentile
Monthly Rainfall DataDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021) Monitoring Year 6 - 20191 2019 monthly rainfall collected from weather station 317994 Smithfield, NC.2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station 317994 Smithfield, NC.JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0123456012345678Daily Rainfall (in)30 Day Cumulative Precip (in)Devil's Racetrack 2019 Rainfall Analysis PlotDaily Rainfall30-Day Cumulative Total30% Rainfall Total70% Rainfall Total
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #1 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #1
Well stopped recording on 5/22/2019
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #6 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #6
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #8 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #8
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #12 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #12
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #19 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #19
Well stopped recording on 9/24/2019
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #21 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #21
Well stopped recording on 2/26/2019 and was replaced on 6/23/2019
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #28 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #28
Well stopped recording on 5/22/2019
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #36 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #36
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Monitoring Year 6 - 2019
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site(DMS Project No. 95021)Start of Growing Season3/1/2019End of Growing Season11/16/2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Rainfall (in)Water Level (in)Monitoring Year 6 -2019
Pre-Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre-Construction Gage Depth Gage #38 Criteria Level
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #38
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raren Ridge Road • Raleigh. Nath Carolina 27614 • Phone: [919 `06-5900 • Fax: (919) S 1b 9 467
%ww.SandECxo:n
DETAILED HYDRIC SOIL INVESTIGATION
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Upper Coastal Plain
Neuse River Basin
Johnston County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Mr. John Hutton
Wildlands
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
KEVIN C. MARTIN
000851
March 22nd, 2019
1

INTRODUCTION
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC, PA) was retained to perform a detailed evaluation to
assess the presence and extent of (current, i.e. not relic) hydric soil indicators within specific areas of the
mitigation site (See attached S&EC Hydric Soil Study Area Map). The solid pink areas have been identified
by the IRT as being "at Risk" and the areas outlined in orange are additional areas that Wildlands
requested that we evaluate. There are a number of restored streams that dissect the site. The areas
evaluated are within a completed wetland restoration project.
METHODOLOGY
On February 2611 and March 141h, 2019 Kevin Martin (LSS, PWS) of S&EC, PA performed a soil evaluation
at the site. Pits were dug with a sharp shooter and hand auger borings were advanced on the property at
locations as appropriate to approximately estimate the location and extent of hydric soils that exhibited
hydric soil indicators typically associated with current conditions within the parts of the project area. Each
pit boring was evaluated to assess the presence or absence of hydric soil indicators. Hydric soil indicators
were identified utilizing the NRCS Field Indicotors of Hydric Soils in the Unities States _ A Guide for
Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils (Version 8.2, 2018) and Redoximorphic Features for Identifying
Aquic Conditions, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, NC State University Raleigh, North
Carolina, Technical Bulletin 301 August 2015 which states:
(1)Contemporary redox concentrations (masses, pore linings) should have Hues of (Ferrihydrite) 5YR,
(Lepidocrocite) 7,5YR, (Goethite) 7.5YR, 10YR and (Jarosite) 2.5Y. They should not have hues of (Hematite)
10R, 5R, 2.5YR. Such features are associated with ped faces or root channels.
(2) An a, a'-dipyridyl dye can be used to testfor iron reduction. A pink color will appear in a few minutes
if ferrous iron is present. This indicates that the horizon from which the sample came is reduced for soil
classification purposes.
Oxidized rhizospheres were also used in this study because they are acknowledged as a wetland
hydrology indicator.
BACKGROUND
Prior to development of the mitigation site, an evaluation was performed by a NC Licensed Soil Scientist
to identify areas containing hydric soils. Upon review of the past soil profile description it was noted that
none referred to the presence of redox concentrations such as Fe masses or pore linings in the surface
layer (A horizon). Therefore, the presence of such features today would indicate a change to a wetter
condition significant enough to form such features within the last 5 years. The main hydric soil indicators
originally present appear to have been Depleted Matrix (F3), Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) and/or
Redox Dark surface (F6). We did not consider these indicators in our evaluation since they were present
prior to restoration and could be indicative of relic conditions.
RESULTS
Twenty five pits and numerous soil borings were performed within the study area. Soil
characteristics were evaluated and all areas identified as containing current hydric soil indicators
indicative of aquic conditions were identified. The location of each pit is shown on the attached
S&EC Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site Map. Where pits were dug adjacent to monitoring wells,
they have a GW label that corresponds to the existing well number. Where pits were dug that
were not adjacent to an existing monitoring well they are only represented by a number (e.g.
06). Areas where current hydric soil indicators were not observed are labeled as Potential
2

Upland Areas on the map and are outlined in blue with yellow hatching . An abbreviated soil
profile description for each pit and a photo of most pits appear on the attached Aquic Conditions
Table. The heading of each photograph indicates the current hydric soil indicators indicative of
aquic conditions, if present, and the reaction of an a, a'-dipyridyl test strips.
Conclusions
All but four areas evaluated appear to have hydric soil indicators that represent current aquic
conditions, they are:
(1) The area around pit 5, 6 and GW34. This area contains hydric soils but did not exhibit
pore linings or oxidized rhizospheres near the surface. Also, reaction with a, a'-dipyridyl
test strips was weak at best and did not stain the soil ped faces.
(2) The area around pit S. It does not contain hydric soils.
(3) The elongated area south of pit 11. This area contains hydric soils, but based on a review
of aerial photos taken during and after construction, compacted soil observed and
slightly higher elevation difference when compared to the surrounding area, it is believed
that this areas was used as a construction access road. Since areas observed on each side
of this long narrow strip are meeting aquic conditions, we believe by bringing the surface
elevation down so it is the same as adjacent wet areas, this area can be made to meet
aquic conditions.
(4) The elongated area south of GW20. This area contains hydric soils, but is slightly elevated
above adjacent areas that are meeting aquic conditions but the ditch along the eastern
property line is likely preventing adequate hydrology that would cause aquic conditions.
These areas are outlined in blue with yellow hatching on the attached S&EC Devils
Racetrack Mitigation Site Map.

NOTE: Parcel boundary shown is based on a georeferenced image fromthe Johnston Co. GIS mapping website, aligned based on NCDOT roadsGIS layer. As such, all calculated areas shown herein are approximateand subject to change based on new or better information.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.????????????????????????????????????????0706050403020111100908gw 2gw 34gw 24gw 28gw 13gw 14D E V IL S R A C E T R A C K R D
KRISTA LNJOEL LNKACY LNKELLI LNLARRY LNU S 7 0 1 H W Y S
P A T L N
gw 3gw 5gw 6gw 20gw 23gw 30gw 26gw 35NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.????????????????????????????????????????0706050403020111100908gw 2gw 34gw 24gw 28gw 13gw 14D E V IL S R A C E T R A C K R D
KRISTA LNJOEL LNKACY LNKELLI LNLARRY LNU S 7 0 1 H W Y S
P A T L N
gw 3gw 5gw 6gw 20gw 23gw 30gw 26gw 35NC Center for Geographic Information & AnalysisμDevils Racetrack Mitigation SiteJohnston County, NCProject No.Project Mgr.:KMScale:1" = 300'3/19/201906001,200300FeetLegend?Groundwater Wells MY5!.KM Boring LocationsPotential Upland AreasDRT SEC Hydric Soil Study limitsDRT Wetlands At RiskWetland Partial Credit at Risk
Matrix Redox Concentrations Sampling Location Depth (in) Color % Color Type, Location % Text. Class Reaction to α, α’ Dipyridyl Comment Date GW 13 0-6 2.5Y 4/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 On ped faces, Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 5 SL Yes 2/26/2019 6-12+ 2.5Y 6/2 60 7.5YR 5/8 Masses, Pore Linings 40 SCL Yes GW 35 0-9 2.5Y 4/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 On ped faces, Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 5 SL Yes 2/26/2019 9-12+ 2.5Y 6/2 60 7.5YR 5/8 Masses, Pore Linings 40 Lt. SCL Yes 01: No description taken F3 2" thick, Low Chroma within top6" 2/26/2019
GW13 Bt Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

GW13 Oxidized Rhizospheres

GW13 weak Positive α, α'-dipyridyl Surface and Subsurface

GW13 Weak Positive α, α'-dipyridyl surface

GW35 #2 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl (hard to see due to bright sunlight)

Matrix Redox Concentrations Sampling Location Depth (in) Color % Color Type, Location % Text. Class Reaction to α, α’ Dipyridyl Comment Date GW 14 0-7.5 2.5Y 4/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 Pore Linings 5 Weak 2/26/2019 7.5-12+ 2.5Y 6/2 60 7.5YR 5/8 Masses 40 Weak 02 0-6 2.5Y 4/2 95 7.5YR 4/4 Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 5 CL Yes 2/26/2019 6-12+ 10YR 5/1 75 7.5YR 4/6 Pore Linings 25 CL 03 0-7 10YR 5/2 90 7.5YR 3/4 Masses, Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 10 SCL Yes 2/26/2019 7-12+ 2.5Y 4/2 80 5YR 4/6 Masses, Pore Linings 20 CL 04 0-12+ 2.5Y 4/2 80 5YR 4/6 Masses, Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 20 CL Yes Similar to 03 Subsurface 2/26/2019 GW 24 0-7 2.5Y 3/2 98 Masses, Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres, all few to very few 2 SL Yes Approx. 100' N of location shown on map 2/26/2019 7-12+ 2.5Y 6/2 60 10YR 8/8 Masses 10 Lt. SCL 2.5Y 6/3 Masses 30
GW14 #2 Pore linings, small Masses but no Oxidized Rhizospheres

GW14 Weak Positive α, α'-dipyridyl surface and subsurface

B2 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B2 Oxidized Rhizoshperes

B3 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B3 Oxidized Rhizoshperes & Pore Linings

B4 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

GW24 #2 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

GW24 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

Matrix Redox Concentrations Sampling Location Depth (in) Color % Color Type, Location % Text. Class Reaction to α, α’ Dipyridyl Comment Date GW 34 0-9.5 10YR 4/1 95 7.5YR 4/6 Masses 5 SCL Weak 2/26/2019 9.5-12+ 2.5Y 6/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 SCL 05 0-6 2.5Y 5/3 100 SCL Weak, did not stain soil Fe conc.’s increasing w/ depth 2/26/2019 6-12+ 2.5 4/1 85 5YR 4/4 Masses 15 SCL Weak, did not stain soil 06 0-9.5 10YR 4/1 95 7.5YR 4/6 Masses 5 SCL Weak Similar to GW 34 2/26/2019 9.5-12+ 2.5Y 6/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 SCL GW 6 0-12+ 2.5Y 4/1 80 5YR 3/4 Masses, few Ox. Rhizospheres 20 SCL Yes 2/26/2019 GW5 0-12+ 2.5Y 4/1 80 5YR 3/4 Masses, few Ox. Rhizospheres, On ped faces 20 SCL Yes 2/26/2019
GW34 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B5 0-6” Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B5 6-12+” Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

GW6 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

GW5 pedface soft masses
Matrix Redox Concentrations Sampling Location Depth (in) Color % Color Type, Location % Text. Class Reaction to α, α’ Dipyridyl Comment Date GW 26 0-3 10YR 5/2 65 2.5Y 5/3 Masses, Ox. Rhizospheres 30 SCL Yes 3/14/2019 7.5YR 4/6 Pore Linings 5 3-12+ 10YR 4/1 95 2.5YR 4/4 Masses 5 SCL Yes 08 0-3 10YR 4/2 100 3/14/2019 3-12+ 2.5Y 6/4 60 7.5YR 5/8 Masses 10 SL 2.5Y 5/2 Pore Linings 30 Lt. SCL GW 30 0-3 10YR 5/2 65 2.5Y 5/3 Masses, Ox. Rhizospheres 30 SCL Yes Same as GW26 3/14/2019 7.5YR 4/6 Pore Linings 5 3-11 10YR 4/1 75 5YR 3/4 Masses 25 SCL 09 0-5 2.5Y 4/1 70 7.5YR 4/6 On ped faces, Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 30 SCL Yes 3/14/2019 5-13 10YR 5/1 85 7.5YR 4/6 Masses 15 GW 28 0-3 10YR 5/2 65 2.5Y 5/3 Masses, Ox. Rhizospheres 30 SCL Yes Same as GW30 3/14/2019 7.5YR 4/6 Pore Linings 5 3-11 10YR 4/1 75 5YR 3/4 On ped faces, Masses 25 SCL
GW26 Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B8 no redox

GW30 surface #2 Oxidized rhizospheres and Pore Linings

GW30 surface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

GW30 subsurface Masses on Ped Faces

B9 surface #2 Pore Linings

B9 surface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl
Matrix Redox Concentrations Sampling Location Depth (in) Color % Color Type, Location % Text. Class Reaction to α, α’ Dipyridyl Comment Date GW 23 0-8 2.5Y 3/1 97 Few Pore Linings, Few Ox. Rhizospheres 3 Lt. SCL Yes 3/14/2019 8-12+ 10YR 6/2 90 10YR 5/8 Masses 10 SCL GW 20 0-8 2.5Y 5/2 or 2.5Y5/3 95 7.5YR 4/6 Few pore linings 5 SCL No 3/14/2019 8-12+ 2.5Y 5/1 7.5YR 4/6 Few Pore Linings, Few Ox. Rhizospheres SCL Yes
GW20 Negative α, α'-dipyridyl surface

GW20 surface

GW20 subsurface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl
Matrix Redox Concentrations Sampling Location Depth (in) Color % Color Type, Location % Text. Class Reaction to α, α’ Dipyridyl Comment Date GW3: No description taken. Extremely compacted to 3 inches. 2/26/2019 07: No description taken. Extremely compacted to 3 inches 2/26/2019 GW2: No description taken. Only non-inundated area was not representative of surrounding conditions 2/26/2019 10 0-3 2.5Y 4/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 Pore Linings, Ox. Rhizospheres 10 SCL Yes 3/14/2019 3-12+ 2.5Y 4/1 85 5YR 3/4 On ped face, Pore Linings 15 SCL Yes 11 0-6 2.5Y 5/2 98 Very few Pore linings 2 SCL Yes 3/14/2019 6-12+ 2.5Y 4/1 70 10YR 4/6 Masses 30 SCL Yes Compacted
Near GW2 (Compacted area possibly due to old construction access, not meeting aquic conditions)

B10 subsurface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B10 surface #2 Pore Linings and Oxidized rhizospheres

B10 surface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B11 no rhizosphers or Pore linings surface

B11 subsurface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl

B11 surface Positive α, α'-dipyridyl