NCS000008_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20190730

°- -- STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET- --....
RESCISSIONS.
PERMIT NO.
FDOC'TYPE
COMPLETE FILE'- HISTORICAL
DATE OF
RESCISSION
❑ ��%7 01 JU
YYYYMMDD

Storm Water Prevention Plan
Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Elizabeth City, NC
STORM WATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) REGEjVt:j.;
SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR) JUL 8 0 2019
Calendar Year 2019
Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000008 or
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year is due to the DWQ Regional Office no
later than March 151 of the following year.
Facility Name: Fortress Wood Products, Inc., 899 Foreman Bundy Road, Elizabeth City, NC 27909
County: Pasquotank
Phone Number: [phone] Total number of SDOs monitored: 5
Outfall No. 1
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No 0
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No 0
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency []
Other 0
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No [X]
Parameter, (units), .
Total
'
Ammonia .
Copper ..,
r
Tier II Month ly
Rainfall, .
i nches
BODS
' 5 iia
( y)
;. CO©)- .
�. Total
eI
g
total ' „� _
TSS
'pH�
. Non�Tro ut
recoverable:
,�
A
Benchmark
NIA
30
120
7.2
0.007
100
6-9
'Date Sample "
. Colfected
,. 06I3012p19
Tier II
NO FLOW
Page 1 of 4

Storm Water Prevention Plan
Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Elizabeth City, NC
Outfall No. 2
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No []
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No []
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency p
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes a No [X]
�„ met Para er (units)s
.@
Tier II Monthl y
Total `
Rainfall
BADS
4
jE E6 4'
' COps
Ammonia'F
34k
total
\Io er;
a§��
K
Inches' 9
(5 day)
Nitrogenq
_
R
,
Non=Trouti
M
Benchmark
N/A
30
120
7.2
0.007
100
6-9
"" DatwSample`
Cglrected,��, ;;E.•;
"0613012019``�°
Tier II
NO FLOW
Outfall No. 3
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No (]
If this outfall was in Tier 11 for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency []
Other []
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes a No [X]
3
.. , `6P :AaramtbK (units) i '
`�
BOD5
�KV :
g'��
�AnAo—n
,Tier II Monthly E
Total
Rainfall
Ni
�i
No
re�5cover{ab{le�;
skf
�c.
,F =
P54
xi'3iAiY:n54 1 P.`S
.
i
Benchmark
NIA
30
120
7.2
0.007
100
6-9
:DatCSample ;
; WBCollected,4
O6l3012019
Tier 11
NO FLOW
Page 2 of 4

Storm Water Prevention Plan
Fortress Wood Products, Inc.
Luzavem carry, Nu
Outfali No. 4
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No a
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No a
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency p
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency Q
Other 0
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes a No [X]
k Viz, met Para r
� e units)
mrnonia,
Co er
=i
Tier 11 Monthl'
y,
Rainfall,
BOD5
g F
CODS
¢,� t,�
Total rp��-
%��,
Nitro ens P,E9t,�
s
N�4=
,,��p r €
,Anchesk,
;.(5:day)
.�
IVonTrout'' yfrecoverable
Benchmark
NIA
30
120
7.2 0.007
100
6-9
k' Date §arnple';
Collected
061301209
Tier II
NO FLOW
Outfall No. 5
Is this outfall currently in Tier II (monitored monthly)? Yes [X] No a
Was this outfall ever in Tier II (monitored monthly) in the past year? Yes [X] No a
If this outfall was in Tier II for the last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency 0
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency []
Other 0
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes 0 No [X]
9 :t§i
I'aametirj uA , in itS
'
Tier ll Monthly
Total
bRamfall;�
�BODS�
Ammonia '
,'Total
n
Coppe',"'-Al
dotal -
sty
� `�TSS �
N,,
H
Inches
(5 day)
COD
^fE
x
Nitrogen
J� ��
I�� �
, ap�a
t
�:s
ram �t9v.
recoverable,:
�
��
���,¢
Non -'rout
Benchmark
NIA
30
120
7.2
0.007
100
6-9
DateSampleg:<; i
CollectedEfas
061$0120,19; Y
Tier II
NO FLAW
Page 3 of 4

I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Responsible Official Signature:
Printed Name:
Title:. Director of Manufacturing
Date: 7/19/2019
Page 4 of 4