Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG020817_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20120511�V^ NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Qual STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCG PERMITS PERMIT NO. /v DOC TYPE HISTORICAL FILE ❑ MONITORING REPORTS DOC DATE ❑ ��! � � � 5 l I YYYYMMDD A 7-A' NC®ENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Governor Director May Ill, 2012 Robert Preston Willis CLD Pit PO Box 152 Smyrna, NC 28579 Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000 CLD Pit COC NCG020817 Carteret County Dear Mr. Willis: Dee Freeman Secretary In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on March 7, 2012, we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state — NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended). Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage. A requirement of this permit is compliance with the Division of Land Resources' (DLR) Minim Permit; therefore, you must hold a approved DLR permit before any mining industrial activities take place. `Phis site will discharge to a wetland near a receiving stream designated as High Quality Waters (M. QW) and a Primary Nursery Area (PNA), Williston Creek. Should the dewatering activities result in a discharge to Williston Creek, a now limit will be imposed in accordance. with 15A NCAC 213.0224(1)(b)(v). . Please note that mine dewatering wastewater includes wet pit overflows caused solely by direct rainfall and ;groundwater seepage for this type of mining operation. Any discharge of this water (and any stormwater commingled with it) is subject to the effluent limitations in this permit. T his geiieval pe�ii7lt allows the discharge of stori7iitiater and ceiiairi tyres of wastewater from your facility. In your application, you specified that only mine dewatering water would be Wetlands and Stormwater Branch One 1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 NorthCaroti na Locatim 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone. 91 M07-6300 Y FAX; 919-807-6494 Natmall1/ inleinei: ww,N,r1C*aiereivah'LV Dig ;/ An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer Mr. Robert Preston Willis CLD Pit—NCG 020817 discharged from this facility. If separate point -source discharges of stormwater occur (i.e., stormwater not combined with mine dewatering water), you will be required to adhere to the conditions in this permit for stormwater discharges. Additionally, new coastal stormwater management rules (SESSION LAW 2008-21 1) were implemented October 1, 2008. Due to these new rules you may be required to apply for an additional Coastal State Stormwater Permit. Please contact Kelly Johnson in the Wilmington Regional Office at 910- 796-7345 to determine if you will be required to submit an application for this additional permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Brian Lowther at telephone number (919) 807-6368. Sincerely, /'�' /4�& for Charles Wakild, P.E. cc: Wilmington Regional Office Central Files Storrnwater Permitting Unit Files Judy Wehner — NCDENR-DLR Lowther, Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:28 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: SW Permit for 16-74 They will need to monitor the discharge, our permit only requires quarterly, so that's as good as it gets. We need to trust them, we trust everyone else under this permit. LW From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:45 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: FW: SW Permit for 16-74 Linda, Judy said she is fine with issuing the permit as long as they are truthful about their pumping activities. Should I double check with the permittee about their pumping activities? Brian From: Wehner, Judy Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:40 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: SW Permit for 16-74 As long as they are telling the truth on their pumping activities. In Carteret Count 9S,000 GPD is not going to allow dry mining. From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:27 PM To: Wehner, Judy; Rodgers, Ashley Subject: SW Permit for 16-74 Judy and Ashley, I have a stormwater permit application for CLD Mine (16-74) and it looks like your permit has not been used yet. I have reviewed the application and received comments from our regional office and I am ready to issue our permit. Is it ok for us to go ahead and issue our permit or do you want us to wait until after your permit is issued? Thanks for the help. Brian Brian C Lowther Environmetrial hwlyineer NCDI NR I DWQ I Storinwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27664 (919)807-6368 1 0 Lowther, Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 3:02 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Follow Up Flag: Fallow up Flag Status: Flagged Brian, They are proposing discharge to a large wetland system adjacent to Williston Creek. Their discharge would have to travel approximately 1400-1700 feet before entering a tidally influenced LIT to Williston Creek. They will be submitting a written 0 & M plan and the appropriate maps for this site early next week. If you want to issue the permit, you may. I would like you to state in the letter that should the dewatering activities result in a discharge to Williston Creek, a flow limit will be imposed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0224(1)(b)(v). Thanks LW From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:30 AM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Yeah, I already sent you the NOI early but the permit number is NCG020817, From: Willis, Linda Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:09 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Do we have a permit number yet? I received an 0 & M that I can approve, I'll put it in BIMS as approved under events. Let me know. THX Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 4:16 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Thanks Linda! I did update their address already. Your calculations seems reasonable and I definitely understand about no guidance. That is why I asked about it. I am going to be out the beginning of next week and I will work on it when I get back. Have a great weekend. Brian 1 From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:57 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info There is tidal influence so I use a negligible flow rate to depict the situation for incoming tide (or reverse flow if you will). The width of the creek where the discharge is mostly likely to make it is 66' wide and I'm guessing'/ 'deep on low tide. i can't use a zero or negative flow for incoming tide situation so I use the situation where the tide is slack on the failing tide. So, I use .005 ft/s as the flow in stream when the tide is dropping. This is conservative (I think), since I cannot hike to the creek at that location and I haven't been given the ok to put in a kayak and paddle there to check the depth on the falling tide.. but the theory is.. that we are protecting the creek during the lowest flow scenario. (( 66' X .3/4' X .005 ft/s ) x 7.48 gal/tuft X 86400 sec/day ) = 159,952 then I rounded it down for safety factor .. that's how I got 150,000 gallons/day as the 7Q10. It's the best I can do given I have absolutely no guidance from anywhere on how to handle this and business keeps rolling in and we have to find answers. So, it's an answer and it's more protective than no flow limit. Sound ok to you? Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:04 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Hey Linda, Thanks for getting back to me on this one. I'll move ahead with issuing the permit but I haven't done a flow rate in the cover letter yet, can you tell me how you got that again? I just want to make sure there is not tidal influences. We have run into that before. I'll check with Judy to see if the mining permit is issued or if they are fine with us to go ahead and issued our permit. Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:15 PM To: meeakes(Qbaim.com; Lowther, Brian Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Wehner, Judy Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Mark, I have to apologize for my brain short circuiting, the work load in my office is taking its toll.. yes, l had delivered the application for CLD Pit in person. What we realized after Brian reviewed the application was that the mine pit would discharge to an ORW and DWQ couldn't allow a discharge to ORW waters (it's against our rules for ORW classified waters). So, that put me back to the drawing board with Mr. Willis concerning the discharge plan. I visited the site again and we talked about how to get the discharge to Williston Creek. Your recent plan takes care of that issue for us. Currently, the new settling basin proposed north of the site goes to a ditch and travels about a half of a mile before it discharges into a canal (that was dug for mosquito control many moons ago). The closest conveyance via the mosquito canal to the mainstem of Williston creek would put the discharge where the creek is about 66' across. I would request that the discharge not exceed a limit of 150,000 gallons per day (Brian, can you make that statement in the cover letter and request we get the 0 & M in writing within say 15 business days? I can share my crude talcs on that if you're interested, but since this creek is an HQW, we have flow limits to consider. The four settling basins located along the wetlands can only be used to the point that the discharge infiltrates completely into the wetlands so that you keep those hydrated and we won't need monitoring wells there, but he must ensure that no discrete discharge will occur from chose wetlands to the ditch on the south side of the property because that ditch discharges to the ORW (Howland Creek). I feel confident this will take care of our concerns. I do need this stuff in the form of a written narrative Mark so that I can give you approval for the 0 & M. If you can get that to me prior to any discharge.. I will have no concerns with this permit being issued at this time. Brian, Do you have any questions for me? Am I missing anything? Linda From: meeakes@aim.com [mailto:meeakes aim.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:33 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: Robert Willis pit permit info Linda Willis, Hello again Ms. Willis, Mark fakes here again, I had gotten everything back from Judy in Raleigh with only a couple of issues to correct and to provide. Then Robert got with me on you guys discussion. I met with him on site about 2 weeks ago and he explained what the two of you had agreed on and asked me to draw it and send it to you. I know that I still have to fix my detail on the bottom and darken the lines for the printable map for Judy, but I would like for you to take a look at it and review and tell me what your thoughts are. Also if anything else what do you need from us. Thanks so much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Mark Eakes Lowther, Brian From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:17 PM To: Lowther, Brian Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Patterson, Robert Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Brian, I did a quick check of the math based on her assumptions, and the calculation is correct. She really does not have anything else to go on, and I applaud her effort to estimate a limit on more appropriate low flow conditions for a tidal water. I'd suggest some language like this for the cover letter. It starts out like our current letter template (but slightly revised). SC uses a similar terra of comparable "tidal conditions" in their WQ standards_ Let me know what you think of this: "['his site will discharge to a receiving stream designated as High Quality Waters (HQW). As a result, a more stringent TSS limit and wastewater discharge volume applies. In the general permit, wastewater now is limited to 50 percent ol'the 7QI0 flow (See Part ill, Table S.), based on North Carolina Water Quality Standards. lirctuise estimates ot'7Q10 flows (the lowest seven day average flow that occurs in a 10-year peric)cl) f'or tid-Mly influenced waters are not readily available. the Division has estimated comparable low Ilovv lidal conditions in Williston Creek based on the creek cliniensions at the diseharge point and talling tide depth. The Comparable logy flow tidal conditions ror %Williston Creek at this location is estimated to be 150,000 Cu. Ft per day: thcref'ore, rvasteNvater discharge to Williston Creek should he limited to 7:+,1WO gallons per clay (cpd) Or Jess. 11'the perrnittee determines a dilTerent flow rate is moire representative ol'lo"' Ilowtidal Conditions through 110tiv monitoring, modcling, or ether alternatives. the permittee moy provide supporting doctimentation and request that the Diyisiort revise this wastewater discharge limit. Maybe we should get in touch with SC to see what they do for tidal waters. I think Linda's stab at it isn't too bad, as long as we offer the opportunity for the permittee to revise with an appropriate technical assessment. -Bg Bethany Georgoulias Environmental Engineer NCDENR I DWCI I Stormwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 Phone: (919) 807-6372 Fax: (919) 807-6494 NEW Website: http:l/portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ws/su E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From, Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:57 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info There is tidal influence so I use a negligible flow rate to depict the situation for incoming tide (or reverse flow if you will). The width of the creek where the discharge is mostly likely to make it is Eta' wide and I'm guessing %'deep on low tide. I can't use a zero or negative flow for incoming tide situation so I use the situation where the tide is slack on the failing tide. So, l use .005 ft/s as the flow in stream when the tide is dropping. This is conservative (I think), since I cannot hike to the creek at that location and I haven't been given the ok to put in a kayak and paddle there to check the depth on the falling tide, . but the theory is.. that we are protecting the creek during the lowest flow scenario. (( 66' X .3/4' X .005 ft/s ) x 7.48 gal/tuft X 86400 sec/day ) = 159,952 then I rounded it down for safety factor .. that's how I got 150,000 gallons/day as the 7Q10. It's the best I can do given I have absolutely no guidance from anywhere on how to handle this and business keeps rolling in and we have to find answers. So, it's an answer and it's more protective than no flow limit. Sound ok to you? Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:04 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Hey Linda, Thanks for getting back to me on this one. I'll move ahead with issuing the permit but I haven't done a flow rate in the cover letter yet, can you tell me how you got that again? I just want to make sure there is not tidal influences. We have run into that before. I'll check with Judy to see if the mining permit is issued or if they are fine with us to go ahead and issued our permit. Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent; Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:15 PM To: meeakesPaim.Com; Lowther, Brian Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Wehner, Judy Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Mark, I have to apologize for my brain short circuiting, the work load in my office is taking its toll.. yes, I had delivered the application for CLD Pit in person. What we realized after Brian reviewed the application was that the mine pit would discharge to an ORW and DWQ couldn't allow a discharge to ORW waters (it's against our rules for ORW classified waters). So, that put me back to the drawing board with Mr. Willis concerning the discharge plan. I visited the site again and we talked about how to get the discharge to Williston Creek. Your recent plan takes care of that issue for us. Currently, the new settling basin proposed north of the site goes to a ditch and travels about a half of a mile before it discharges into a canal (that was dug for mosquito control many moons ago). The closest conveyance via the mosquito canal to the mainstem of Williston creek would put the discharge where the creek is about 66' across. I would request that the discharge not exceed a limit of 150,000 gallons per day (Brian, can you make that statement in the cover letter and request we get the 0 & M in writing within say 15 business days? I can share my crude talcs on that if you're interested, but since this creek is an HQW, we have flow limits to consider. The four settling basins located along the wetlands can only be used to the point that the discharge infiltrates completely into the wetlands so that you keep those hydrated and we won't need monitoring wells there, but he must ensure that no discrete discharge will occur from those wetlands to the ditch on the south side of the property because that ditch discharges to the ORW (Howland Creek). I feel confident this will take care of our concerns. I do need this stuff in the form of a written narrative Mark so that I can give you approval for the 0 & M. If you can get that to me prior to any discharge.. I will have no concerns with this permit being issued at this time. Brian, Do you have any questions for me? Am I missing anything? Linda From: meeakes@aim.com [mailto:meeakesC@aim.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:33 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: Robert Willis pit permit info Linda Willis, Hello again Ms. Willis, Mark Eakes here again. I had gotten everything back from Judy in Raleigh with only a couple of issues to correct and to provide. Then Robert got with me on you guys discussion. I met with him on site about 2 weeks ago and he explained what the two of you had agreed on and asked me to draw it and send it to you. I know that I still have to fix my detail on the bottom and darken the lines for the printable map for Judy, but I would like for you to take a look at it and review and tell me what your thoughts are. Also if anything else what do you need from us. Thanks so much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Mark Eakes 3 Lowther, Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:01 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Fallow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status,. Flagged By the way, their address is P.O. Box 152 Smyrna NC 28579.. apparently they think their address says something else on the app and they want to be sure to get the mail (CoQ from you when it is issued. THx LW From: Lowther, Brian Seat: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:04 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Hey Linda, Thanks for getting back to me on this one. I'll move ahead with issuing the permit but I haven't done a flow rate in the cover letter yet, can you tell me how you got that again? I just want to make sure there is not tidal influences. We have run into that before. I'll check with Judy to see if the mining permit is issued or if they are fine with us to go ahead and issued our permit. Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:15 PM To: meeakes@aim.com; Lowther, Brian Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Wehner, Judy Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Mark, I have to apologize for my brain short circuiting, the work load in my office is taking its toll.. yes, I had delivered the application for CLn Pit in person. What we realized after Brian reviewed the application was that the mine pit would discharge to an ORW and DWQ couldn't allow a discharge to ORW waters (it's against our rules for ORW classified waters). So, that put me back to the drawing board with Mr. Willis concerning the discharge plan, I visited the site again and we talked about how to get the discharge to Williston Creek. Your recent plan takes care of that issue for us. Currently, the new settling basin proposed north of the site goes to a ditch and travels about a half of a mile before it discharges into a canal (that was dug for mosquito control many moons ago). The closest conveyance via the mosquito canal to the mainstem of Williston creek would put the discharge where the creek is about 66' across. I would request that the discharge not exceed a limit of 150,000 gallons per day (Brian, can you make that statement in the cover letter and request we get the O & M in writing within say 15 business days? I can share my crude talcs on that if you're interested, but since this creek is an HQW, we have flow limits to consider. The four settling basins located along the wetlands can only be used to the point that the discharge infiltrates completely into the wetlands so that you keep those hydrated and we won't need monitoring wells there, but he must ensure that no discrete discharge will occur from those wetlands to the ditch on the south side of the property because that ditch discharges to the ORW (Howland Creek). I feel confident this will take care of our concerns. I do need this stuff in the form of a written narrative Mark so that I can give you approval for the 0 & M. if you can get that to me prior to any discharge.. I will have no concerns with this permit being issued at this time. Brian, Do you have any questions for me? Am I missing anything? Linda From: meeakes@aim.com [mailto:meeakesC@aim.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:33 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: Robert Willis pit permit info Linda Willis, Hello again Ms. Willis, Mark Eakes here again. I had gotten everything back from Judy in Raleigh with only a couple of issues to correct and to provide. Then Robert got with me on you guys discussion. I met with him on site about 2 weeks ago and he explained what the two of you had agreed on and asked me to draw it and send it to you. I know that I still have to fix my detail on the bottom and darken the lines for the printable map for Judy, but I would like for you to take a look at it and review and tell me what your thoughts are. Also if anything else what do you need from us. Thanks so much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Mark Eakes Lowther, Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 3:02 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE7 Robert Willis pit permit info Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Brian, They are proposing discharge to a large wetland system adjacent to Williston Creek. Their discharge would have to travel approximately 1400-1700 feet before entering a tidally influenced UT to Williston Creek, They will be submitting a written 0 & M plan and the appropriate maps for this site early next week. If you want to issue the permit, you may. I would like you to state in the letter that should the dewatering activities result in a discharge to Williston Creek, a flow limit will be imposed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B4O224(1)(b)(v). Thanks LW From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:30 AM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Yeah, I already sent you the NOI early but the permit number is NCG020817. From: Willis, Linda Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:09 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Do we have a permit number yet? I received an 0 & M that I can approve, I'll put it in BIMS as approved under events. Let me know. THX Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 4:16 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Thanks Linda! I did update their address already, Your calculations seems reasonable and I definitely understand about no guidance. That is why I asked about it. I am going to be out the beginning of next week and I will work on it when I get back. Have a great weekend. Brian 1 From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:57 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info There is tidal influence so I use a negligible flow rate to depict the situation for incoming tide (or reverse flow if you will). The width of the creek where the discharge is mostly likely to make it is 66' wide and I'm guessing % 'deep on low tide. I can't use a zero or negative flow For incoming tide situation so I use the situation where the tide is slack on the falling tide. So, 1 use .005 ft/s as the flow in stream when the tide is dropping. This is conservative (I think), since I cannot hike to the creek at that location and I haven't been given the ok to put in a kayak and paddle there to check the depth on the falling tide.. but the theory is.. that we are protecting the creek during the lowest flow scenario. (( 66' X .3/4' X .005 ft/s ) x 7.48 gal/cuft X 86400 sec/day ) = 159,952 then I rounded it down for safety factor .. that's how I got 150,000 gallons/day as the 7Q10. It's the best I can do given I have absolutely no guidance from anywhere on how to handle this and business keeps rolling in and we have to find answers. So, it's an answer and it's more protective than no flow limit. Sound ok to you? Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:04 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Hey Linda, Thanks for getting back to me on this one. I'll move ahead with issuing the permit but 1 haven't done a flow rate in the cover letter yet, can you tell me how you got that again? I just want to make sure there is not tidal influences. We have run into that before. I'll check with Judy to see if the mining permit is issued or if they are fine with us to go ahead and issued our permit. Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:15 PM To: meeakes(daim.com; Lowther, Brian Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Wehner, Judy Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Mark, I have to apologize for my brain short circuiting, the work load in my office is taking its toll.. yes, l had delivered the, application for CLD Pit in person. What we realized after Brian reviewed the application was that the mine pit would discharge to an ORW and DWQ couldn't allow a discharge to ORW waters (it's against our rules for ORW classified waters). So, that put me back to the drawing board with Mr. Willis concerning the discharge plan. I visited the site again and we talked about how to get the discharge to Williston Creek. Your recent plan takes care of that issue for us. Currently, the new settling basin proposed north of the site goes to a ditch and travels about a half of a mile before it discharges into a canal (that was dug for mosquito control many moons ago). The closest conveyance via the mosquito canal to the mainstem of Williston creek would put the discharge where the creek is about 66' across. I would request that the discharge not exceed a limit of 150,000 gallons per day (Brian, can you make that statement in the cover letter and request we get the 0 & M in writing within say 15 business days? I can share my crude talcs on that if you're interested, but since this creek is an HQW, we have flow limits to consider. The four settling basins located along the wetlands can only be used to the point that the discharge infiltrates completely into the wetlands so that you keep those hydrated and we won't need monitoring wells there, but he must ensure that no discrete discharge will occur from those wetlands to the ditch on the south side of the property because that ditch discharges to the ORW (Howland Creek). I feel confident this will take care of our concerns. I do need this stuff in the form of a written narrative Mark so that I can give you approval for the O & M. If you can get that to me prior to any discharge.. I will have no concerns with this permit being issued at this time. Brian, Do you have any questions for me? Am I missing anything? Linda From: meeakes@aim.com [mailto:meeakes(a�aim.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:33 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: Robert Willis pit permit info Linda Willis, Hello again Ms. Willis, Mark Eakes here again. I had gotten everything back from Judy in Raleigh with only a couple of issues to correct and to provide. Then Robert got with me on you guys discussion. I met with him on site about 2 weeks ago and he explained what the two of you had agreed on and asked me to draw it and send it to you. I know that I still have to fix my detail on the bottom and darken the lines for the printable map for Judy, but I would like for you to take a look at it and review and tell me what your thoughts are. Also if anything else what do you need from us. Thanks so much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Marie Eakes 3 Lowther, Brian From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:45 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: 5W General Permit NCG020817 Yeah, I have the lat long. It is 34 47 57, -76 30 25. BTW, I don't think anyone has that other mine you asked about, Riverside Sand Pit #2. From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:43 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 Mr. Willis' address is.- P.O. Box 152 Smyrna, NC 28579 He doesn't have a physical address for the mine pit. , we'll have to use a ]at long for that. Do you have that? Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:35 AM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 Hey Linda, I hope you are having a good week. I wanted to follow up on this mine. I wanted to send out the letter but I am still waiting on you to verify the address. Thanks! Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 5:30 PM To: Lowther, Brian Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 I'll get all that info for you next week if that's ok.. just remind me. I'll have to look at what I have here to see what we'll need. Give me a few days. LW From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:02 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 Yeah, that is what I was thinking about. I didn't see it was divided by a jurisdictional feature though. i Should I go ahead and send them a fetter about waiting for the mining permit and requesting an O&M_ Do you know ! which address to use? Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 12:17 PM To: Lowther, Brian Cc: Steenhuis, Joanne Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 Yes, but you can be sure the wetlands will discharge to the creek. The wetlands are really wet and cannot infiltrate, they can only polish. And being contiguous to the surface water, it's still a direct discharge. They'll likely channelize. The mineable property is only 15 acres and the site is divided by a jurisdictional feature, I need to get a handle on whether it is a stream or a ditch and if there is any need to be concerned for it's integrity. Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 11:33 AM To: Willis, Linda; Wehner, Judy; Gregson, Jim Cc: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 Hey Linda, was wondering if that was a possibility. I was going to discuss this with Bradley to see what he thought, if the owner is going to discharge to Williston Creek how will this change the mining operations? I thought they were just going to discharge into the wetlands near the mine. Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 11:17 AM To: Lowther, Brian; Wehner, Judy; Gregson, Jim Cc: Jones, Jennifer Subject: RE: SW General Permit NCG020817 Brian, talked to the owner, . he's willing to discharge to SA/HQW Williston Creek, it's right there on the south side of his property. That way he won't have to discharge to an ORW. Linda From: Lowther, Brian Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 10:22 AM To: Willis, Linda Subject: SW General Permit NCG020817 Linda, We've received the NO] for the CLD Pit owned by Robert Preston Willis. The site is in Carteret County and applying for an NCG02. It looks like you have been working with them some already. I checked and they have applied for a mining permit but have not received it yet. We usually send out a letter stating we will wait until the mining permit is issued before we issue our permit. I was going to send that letter but I wanted to know if you needed me to include a request for an 0&M for this site? The site discharges stormwater to a Howland Creek (SA; ORW). I have attached the NOI. Also, the address on one of the applications was marked through and changed from PO Box 26 to PO Box 152. Do you know which one is correct? The county GIS shows 152 I believe. Please let me know if the Wilmington Regional Office has any concerns about issuing this facility a COC for this general permit, and are there any potential impacts to wetlands? If we don't receive any objections, we'll issue the COC once the mining permit is issued. Thanks, Brian [Irian C Lowther t'm,ironmewal Engineer INCDENR I DWQ I Stonnwater Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-16 ] 7 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 (919)807-6368 hri:3n.lo�tilhcr�ilncdcnr.�nv hitp:I/poi-t,i1.iicdei)r.org/%%,eb/\,\,q/wsisu E mad correspondence to and frorn this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Late and may be disclosed to third k)arties unlr-ss the content is exempt by _statute or other requlation. Lowther, Brian From: Willis, Linda Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:15 PM To: meeakes@aim.com; Lowther, Brian Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Wehner, Judy Subject: RE: Robert Willis pit permit info Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Mark, I have to apologize for my brain short circuiting, the work load in my office is taking its toll.. yes, I had delivered the application for CLD Pit in person. What we realized after Brian reviewed the application was that the mine pit would discharge to an ORW and DWQ couldn't allow a discharge to ORW waters (it's against our rules for ORW classified waters). So, that put me back to the drawing board with Mr. Willis concerning the discharge plan. I visited the site again and we talked about how to get the discharge to Williston Creek. Your recent plan takes care of that issue for us. Currently, the new settling basin proposed north of the site goes to a ditch and travels about a half of a mile before it discharges into a canal (that was dug for mosquito control many moons ago). The closest conveyance via the mosquito canal to the mainstem of Williston creek would put the discharge where the creek is about 66' across. I would request that the discharge not exceed a limit of 150,000 gallons per day (Brian, can you make that statement in the cover letter and request we get the 0 & M in writing within say 15 business days? I can share my crude talcs on that if you're interested, but since this creek is an HQW, we have flow limits to consider. The four settling basins located along the wetlands can only be used to the point that the discharge infiltrates completely into the wetlands so that you keep those hydrated and we won't need monitoring wells there, but he must ensure that no discrete discharge will occur from those wetlands to the ditch on the south side of the property because that ditch discharges to the ORW (Howland Creek). I feel confident this will take care of our concerns. I do need this stuff in the form of a written narrative Mark so that I can give you approval for the 0 & M. If you can get that to me prior to any discharge.. I will have no concerns with this permit being issued at this time. Brian, Do you have any questions for me? Am I missing anything? Linda From: meeakes@aim.com [mai Ito: meeakes@aim.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:33 PM To: Willis, Linda Subject: Robert Willis pit permit info Linda Willis, Hello again Ms. Willis, Mark Eakes here again. I had gotten everything back from Judy in Raleigh with only a couple of issues to correct and to provide. Then Robert got with me on you guys discussion. I met with him on site about 2 weeks ago and he explained what the two of you had agreed on and asked me to draw it and send it to you. I know that I still have to fix my detail on the bottom and darken the lines for the printable map for Judy, but I would like for you to take a look at it and review and tell me what your thoughts are. Also if anything else what do you need from us. Thanks so much for your time and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Mark Eakes �- �rrt ry �F•:r _ rc --,• .- -. T `-e -. '" w CARTERET.LAN D DEVELOPMENT; y-,y. LLC "1,. ..� . ° T-t:rr"'" ' �. �� � � `D g ,�^n .t' :1238 • _ I; SMYRNA NC 28579''' t 66-t246/531: G . 2 5d4-9999 O PH 25to r ` } 1 ~ f c�L H # t order. oF=� �/1�,1 s C3Lj o��hU ti... _.. ... ,._Dollars ". v =. Beaufort, NC 28516 ii'00 12 38o i!DS'll 4,246`6�: J We're putting North Carolina money back in North Carolina hands. by Vr a! I I CORRECTION 7o find out more about our Printing ENTERPRISES and Quick Copy Services, NO AJ'J Makirj 1rRf� Makin a Better. cal 1519.7L6.3600 or $bQ.241.p124 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY J Date Received \/ " Division of Water Quality /Surface Water Protection National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NCDENR E/1V1R0/1MCM ANO II.QWAL RL101M1Ce5 NCG020000 NOTICE OF INTENT I CettificateofCovemm I National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit NCG020000: STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as: SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code -14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below) The following activities are also included: • Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate products, finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations; • Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations; • Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or • Mine dewatering (wastewater) The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this G rmit: • Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal i • Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on sit wit stormwa�e�t'-€r. operations and/or concrete operations; A.14 • Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; n 7 ?012 • Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines bVery NR , . • NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NCS000150 The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (i.e., sand dredging or dipping operations) For new mining sites that require an authorization to construct (A TC) wastewater treatment facilities: This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATC for new wastewater treatment facilities. ATC requests must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction'. For existlRQ mining sites that require an Authorization to Operate (A TO) wastewater treatment facilities: This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATO for wastewater treatment facilities in place. Construction, modification, or installation of any new treatment components at an existing site requires an ATC. (If the site is already covered by NCG020000, the ATC request may be submitted without an NOI). Some wastewater treatment facilities used to treat or recycle wastewater at mining sites will require an ATC rp for to construction per 15A NCAC 2H .0138. Please see the NCG020000 General Permit for details about which treatment facilities require an ATC (summarized in Table 1 below). The authorization to construct or continue to operate will be issued at the same time as the Certificate of Coverage (COC) for the NCG02 permit. Design of treatment facilities must comply with requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0138 & .0139. Construction of wastewater treatment facilities subject to the ATC/ATO requirements in the NCG02 permit at new or existing mining sites requires submission of three (3) sets of plans and specifications signed Page 1 of 9 'As per 15A NCAC 2H .0106 ''Unless treatment facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees internal to the company who are qualified to perform such work for their respective companies in accordance with General Statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications must be signed and seated by a P.E. SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 06/07/2010 NCG020000 N.0.1. and sealed by a Professional Engineer (P.E.) or qualified staffz along with this application. A copy of the design calculations should be included. Please see questions 18 & 19. Table 1: Summary of Wastewater Permit Requirements Quarterly Monitoring? Requires A to C? Mine Dewatering (MD) Yes No Yes No MD Discharges that do not need treatment other than E&SC to meet permit conditions ✓ ✓ MD Discharges that need treatment other than E&SC to meet permit conditions ✓ ✓ Process Wastewater Other Recycle ✓ ✓ Closed Loop Recycle ✓ ✓ Any Other Process WW ✓ ✓ For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (See page 7) (Please print or type) 1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all permit corresRondence will be mailed): Owner Name Robert Preston Willis Owner Contact Robert Preston Willis Street Address TPO Box,26" 152 G City Smyrna` State NC Telephone No. _(252) 342-4508 Fax: E-mail Address �robertprestonwillis@hotmail.com 2) Location of facility producing discharge: Facility Name �CLD Pit 60 W Facility Contact Robert Preston Willis Street Address _PO Box 26 K'Z f City _Smyrna County _Carteret County Telephone No. _(252) 342-4508 Contact E-mail _robertprestonwillis@hotmail.com 3) Physical Location Information: ZIP Code T28679 State NC ZIP Code _28579 Fax: Please provide a narrative description of tow to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and distance and direction from a roadway intersection). Get on Highway 70 east towards Smyrna and go to first stop sign.Turn left on highway 70 and go approximately 3 miles to Willis Perry lane on the left. This is pit entrance. 4) Latitude 34*47'57.15*N Longitude 76*30'25.45*W (degrees, minutes, seconds) Page 2 of 9 SWU-NCG02-N0i Last revised 617/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. Permits: 5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following: X New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin upon receipt of permit ❑ Existing ❑ New Permit not applicable — ATC request only. NPDES Permit Number 6) Standard Industrial Classification: Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial activity at this facility SIC Code: 1442 7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: The material to be mined from this facility will be sand and other earthen materials. 8) Is this mine an inactive mine site? X No ❑ Yes If yes, do you posses an "Inactive Renewal' from DLR and notified the DWQ Regional Office or have you certified to the DWQ that the site has been stabilized? ❑ No ❑ Yes 9) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Land Resources (DLR)? X No If No, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: ' ❑ Yes If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number: Please also provide a copy of your DLR Mining Permit with this DWQ application. Note: DWQ cannot issue a COC for the NCG020000 General Permit until a Mining Permit is issued or renewed by the Division of Land Resources (DLR). 10) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits? X No ❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility: 11) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)? X No ❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility: 12) Does total area of this mine site include ready -mix and asphalt areas? X No ❑ Yes If yes, do they have DWQ stormwater permits (if owned by the same company)? ❑ No (provide permit number ) If not owned by the same company, who is the owner? 13) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site? ❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes 14) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties and will it add more than 10,000 ft2 of impervious service? Page 3 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.0.1. ❑ No X Yes If yes, you may be required to apply for an additional state stormwater permit. Check with your local Regional Office. See contact information and checklist below. 16) Is this mine located the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River Basin, or the Randleman or Jordan Water supply Watersheds? X No ❑ Yes If yes, what size stream buffers are included on site? ft. Please show buffers in site plans. Discharge Points, Receiving Waters_& Wetlands: 16) Receiving waters: What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater and/or wastewater discharges end up in? WnhERIMak i- U'0e m4ka If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). Receiving water classification (if known): SAI±Gyj I PON Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-11 to WS-V or SA must be approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. If DEH does not approve, coverage under NCG020000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of wastewater are permitted in receiving waters classed as WS-1 or freshwater ORW. Wastewater discharges to Saltwater ORW will not be approved under the NCG02 General Permit. 17) If your facility has wastewater discharges Rnd they are to HWQ, PNA waters (Primary Nursery Areas) waters,. what is the flow rate? 'r4 beG��' �'rn�4 (See http://www,ncdmf.nettmaps/FNA maps/index.html, for map) 18) Discharge Points: Number of discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc. that convey discharges from the property): Onsite: Stormwater: Mine dewatering: 2 Process Wastewater Overflow: (5ffsite: Stormwater: Mine dewatering: Process Wastewater Overflow: Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan. Please provide short narrative description. of discharges: a) Is your mine dewatering and discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering) ❑ No X Yes If yes, where to? _X_ Surface Waters and/or Wetlands (on -site or off -site) Other (on -site or off -site) Describe: b) Are you dewatering but not discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering) ❑ No X Yes If Yes, please explain how you are dewatering, and where that water will be directed: When mining activities start and we reach the water table we will dewater to the designated basins at which it will have time to settle the material. It will eventually reach the height of the level spreader so it can be dispursed over the level spreader across the 50 undisturbed buffer back to the wetlands. Page.4. of. 9. SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 617f2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. 19) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands? ❑ No X Yes Note. Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that have the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the Division. For sites that may drain wetlands — approval of_a Pumping O&M plan may he required prior to coverage under this general permit. The Pumping O&M Plan should be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office and must be approved prior to operation. The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance. See checklist at end of document. Contact your local Regional Office for questions specific to your mine. 20) If you are dewatering, are there wetlands or surface waters within 400' of the mine pit perimeter? ❑ No X Yes If yes, what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter? 50 feet. 21) Have you been required to obtain a 404f401 Certification permits? X No ❑ Yes If yes, please briefly describe below (include information such a required mitigation, BMPs, setbacks, and/or O&M plans for on or off -site wetlands or other pertinent information). Attach other sheets as necessary., 22) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers? ❑ No X Yes If yes, please attach to application submission. Stormwater BMPs: 23) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control? X No ❑Yes If yes, please briefly describe: 24) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? X No ❑ Yes If yes, when was it implemented? 25) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility? X No ❑ Yes Page 5 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. Wastewater Treatment Facilities: 26) Will mine dewatering discharges occur? (An ATCIATO is required for wastewater treatment facilities' dewatering discharges where E&SC devices alone will not meet effluent limits and/or protect water quality standards). ❑ No X Yes 27) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur? (ATC or ATO required, unless closed -loop recycle system) X No ❑ Yes If yes, answer the following questions for each wastewater treatment system: Please describe the type of process used to treat and/or recycle the process wastewater. Give design specifics (i.e. design volume, retention time, surface area, etc.). Existing treatment facilities should be described in detail, and design criteria or operational data should be provided (including calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General Permit. [Use separate sheet(s)] b. Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes If yes, please state the name, manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical additive Note: Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (PAMS) products for use in North Carolina. C. Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event? ❑ No ❑ Yes 28) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain? X No ❑ Yes If so, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. (Minimum design requirements for treatment works include protection from the 100-year flood, per 15A NCAC 2H .0219.) Other: 29) Hazardous Waste: a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility? X No ❑ Yes b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of hazardous waste? X No ❑ Yes c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of hazardous waste? X No ❑ Yes d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information: Type(s) of waste: Page 6 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised W12010 NCG020000 N.O.l. How is material stored: Where is material stored: How many disposal shipments per year: Name of transport I disposal vendor:, Vendor address: 30) Are you applying for a mining permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine? X No ❑ Yes If yes, specify permit number and name if known: 31) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary? X No ❑ Yes If yes, specify type: ❑ LCID ❑ Other: 32) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? See permit text online for secondary containment requirements. X No ❑ Yes Final Checklist: This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included and initialed for. Please show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each space below. X Fee of $100 made payable to NCDENR F Completed application and all supporting documents Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands, and other waters, etc. x� 2 copies of large-scale site plan with topographical lines with all outfalls, applicable buffers and wetlands clearly delineated A copy of your DLR mining permit n�W A copy of your US Army Corps -approved wetland delineation if you marked "yes" to question 22 above. If mine site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties, • Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State Stormwater permit. Regional Office Contact: Lk. ,i fln �W tj, %_%-, • Applicant has included a detailed list of impervious surface areas and percentages, sub -drainage areas and total drainage area. na If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface waters or groundwater, include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan (see below for contact information). You may be required to provide an approved Pumping O&M plan priorto NCG02 issuance. 2 copies of detailed Full Size Plans delineating areas on the plans and listing acreage (including: wetlands, ditches, well -placements, pits, borrow areas, overburden storage, stormwater controls/BMPs, vehicle maintenance areas, settling basins, product process (such as screening, stockpiles, waste piles), total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (if state sw programs apply), applicable buffers, and access and/or haul roads). Well information (design, depths, maintenance) Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas r Settling pond sizing information, if applicable Page 7 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. ILevel spreader design, if applicable Details about dewatering method Cone of influence calculations Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding UUDescription & information about 4011404 permits that have been obtained . Xopy of US'Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation (if applicable) I have contacted my local regional office about a Pumping 0&M Plan. Regional Office Contact —Linda Willis Date contacted: September 2011 -OR- r I will not any impact nearby wetlands, surface waters or groundwater by dewatering. 10-0 If an ATC or ATO is required, three (3) sets of plans, specifications, and design calculations, signed, sealed, and dated by a P.E. ATC and ATO requirements in NCG02000 are summarized in Table 1 on Page 2 of this N01 (see the permit text for more details). Plans shall show all pertinent design features, including the location of the outfall(s). If stormwater is flowing off -site, the plan must show that stormwater will not be mixed with wastewater. Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the (Environmental Management] Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual permit. w I agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit: 1. I agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid mining permit must be attached to this request. 2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore. 3. 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection so as to contain all spills on the site. 4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules governing solid waste disposal. 5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to not result in contamination of the surface or ground waters. Page 8 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6f712010 NCG020000 N.O.I. I agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as enforceable requirements of the General Permit. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. Printed Name of Person Signing: Robert Preston Willis Title: Ow r I Operator f r (Signature of Applicant) ( ate Signed) Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check ormoney orderfor $100.00 made payable to NCDENR. Mail the entire package to: Stormwater and General Permits Unit Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Note The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit. For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. DWQ Regional Office Contact Information: Asheville Office ...... (828) 296-4500 Fayetteville Office ... (910) 433-3300 Mooresville Office ... (704) 663-1699 Raleigh Office ..... _ .. (919) 791-4200 Washington Office ... (252) 946-6481 Wilmington Office ... (910) 796-7215 Winston-Salem ...... (336) 771-5000 Central Office ......... (919) 807-6300 Page 9 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 January 20, 2012 Ms. Linda Willis Division of Water Quality Wilmington Regional Office 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, N.C. 28405 Dear Ms. Willis: This letter is to serve as a narrative of raining operations and dewatering procedures for the CLD Pit (Robert Preston Willis) in Carteret County that you visited with us back on September 2, 2011. 'rhe type of discharge that will be present on the site will be mine dewatering. Reference is made to the site plan that illustrates the points of discharge from the mine. Robert Preston Willis proposes to dewater mining operations through the following sequence of events. 1. Erosion Control items will be installed prior to any mining activities on the site. Sediment Basins, Diversion Ditches, and Level Spreaders will be installed per plan design before mining activities begin in any area of site. 2. Excavation will begin in pit area 2 (indicated on map) in the southern most point and continuing north. When mining activities extend below the water table, water will begin being pumped into basin 1, where it will have time to settle and once it reaches the height of the level spreader it will flow over the 50 undisturbed buffer back into the wetlands rehydrating them. 3. Excavation will continue in pit area 2 leaving a 10 foot damn between the first 1 pond and the second pond area, still in pit area 2. Water will now be pumped into the first excavated area then it will be pumped to the basin area I and out through the level spreader. 4. Once the third pond area is done we will go back to the first 10 foot damn and knock it out creating a larger area of settling for the water to be pumped from pond area 3 into this larger area then out through the level spreader. 5. This process will continue throughout the entire site. 6. There are two extra basins proposed in the plans for dewatering if wetland hydration is inadequate and needs to be dewatered in multiple areas to distribute equally. These are indicated on the plans by basin 3 and basin 4. WNWA ow r ° Division of Water- Quality / Surface Water Protection 'rMCDENR National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Non:N C..0— D� o E!lYNlONMCH-D "RV P�CE5 NCG020000 NOTICE OF INTENT !Date Received Year I Month I Day Amount to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit NCG020000: STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as: SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below) The following activities are also included: • Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate products, finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations; • Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations; • Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or • Mine dewatering (wastewater) The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit: • Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal mining; • Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from asphalt operations and/or concrete operations; • Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; and • Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines • NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NCS000150 The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000: • Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (i.e., sand dredging or dipping operations) For new mining sites that require an authorization to construct (ATC) wastewater treatment facilities: This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATC for new wastewater treatment facilities. ATC requests must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction'. For existing mining sites that require an Authorization to Operate (A TO) wastewater treatment facilities: This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATO for wastewater treatment facilities in place. Construction, modification, or installation of any new treatment components at an existing site requires an ATC. (If the site is already covered by NCG020000, the ATC request may be submitted without an NOI). Some wastewater treatment facilities used to treat or recycle wastewater at mining sites will require an ATC rior to construction per 15A NCAC 2H .0138. Please see the NCG020000 General Permit for details about which treatment facilities require an ATC (summarized in Table 1 below). The authorization to construct or continue to operate will be issued at the same time as the Certificate of Coverage (COC) for the NCG02 permit. Design of treatment facilities must comply with requirements of 15A NCAC 2H _0138 & .0139. Construction of wastewater treatment facilities subject to the ATCIATO requirements in the NCG02 permit at new or existing mining sites requires submission of three (3) sets of plans and specifications signed Page 1 of 9 'As per 15A NCAC 2H .0106 zUnitiss treatment facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees internal to the company who are qualified to perform such work for their respective companies in accordance with General Statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications must be signed and sealed by a P.E. SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 06/07/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. and sealed by a Professional Engineer (P.E.) or qualified staff along with this application. A copy of the design calculations should be included. Please see auestions 18 & 19. „,i!Y 5 - I.d1.�,= Table Summary of Wastewater PermitlRequirements eA.-i...yr� v "Quarterly`fiwp• v Requires Mortitormg Mine MD Discharges that do not need treatment ✓ other than E&SC to meet permit conditions MD Discharges that need treatment other than ✓ ✓ E&SC to meet permit conditions Y- 1;T�,1 ? Y,Y ,�T - �1 -C" .y\ l- Yf 1� WProcessWastewater�`i •-r! - ♦ - 1 LFt4 �'�'f.4 Il: 'r.. ").t„• i li,` Other Recycle ✓ ✓ Closed loop Recycle ✓ ✓ Any Other Process WW ✓ ✓ i For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (Seepage 7)�- (Please print or type) 1) Mailing address of ownerloperator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed Owner Name Robert Preston Willis Owner Contact _Robert Preston Willis Street Address �PO Box E6 152- City Smyrna Telephone No. `(252) 342-4508 E-mail Address—robertprestonwillis@hotmai1.com 2) Location of facility producing discharge. Facility Name _CLD Pit Facility Contact `Robert Preston Willis Street Address _PO Box 26 I s.- City Smyrna County TCarteret County Telephone No. _(252) 342-4508 Contact E-mail robertprestonwiIlis@hotmail.com 3) Physical Location Information: State NC ZIP Code 28579 Fax. StateNCZIP Code �28579 Fax: Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and distance and direction from a roadway intersection)._Get on Highway 70 east towards Smyrna and go to first stop sign.Turn left on highway 70 and go approximately 3 mites to Willis Perry lane on the left. This is pit entrance. 4) Latitude 34*47'57.15*N Longitude 76`30'25.45*W (degrees, minutes, seconds) Page 2 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. Permits: 5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following: X New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin upon receipt of permit ❑ Existing ❑ New Permit not applicable — ATC request only. NPDES Permit Number 6) Standard Industrial Classification: Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial activity at this facility SIC Code: 1442 7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: The material to be mined from this facility will be sand and other earthen materials. 8) Is this mine an inactive mine site? X No ❑ Yes If yes, do you posses an "Inactive Renewal" from DLR and notified the DWQ Regional Office or have you certified to the DWQ that the site has been stabilized? ❑ No ❑ Yes 9) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Land Resources (DLR)? X No If No, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: ❑ Yes If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number: Please also provide a copy of your DLR Mining Permit with this DWQ application. Note: DWQ cannot issue a COC for the NCG020000 General Permit_ until a Mining Permit is issued or renewed by the Division of Land Resources (DLR). 10) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits? X No ❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility: 11) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)? X No ❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility: 12) Does total area of this mine site include ready -mix and asphalt areas? X No ❑ Yes If yes, do they have DWQ stormwater permits (if owned by the same company)? ❑ No (provide permit number ) If not owned by the same company, who is the owner? 13) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site? ❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes 14) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties and will it add more than 10,000 ft2 of impervious service? Page 3 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revlsed 6012010 NCG020000 N.O.I. ❑ No X Yes If yes, you may be required to apply for an additional state stormwater permit. Check with your local Regional Office, See contact information and checklist below. 15) Is this mine located the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River Basin, or the Randleman or Jordan Water supply Watersheds? X No ❑ Yes If yes, what size stream buffers are included on site? ft. Please show buffers in site plans. Discharge Points, Deceiving Waters & Wetlands: 16) Receiving waters: What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, streamriver lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater re - and/or wastewater discharges end up in? Wade-GeR ALf_j,�.a G-�eL If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). Receiving water classification (if known): SA H®vO I -PO . Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-li to WS-V or SA must be approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. If DEH does not approve, coverage under NCG020000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of wastewater are permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-1 or freshwater ORW. Wastewater discharges to Saltwater ORW will not be approved under the NCG02 General Permit. 17) If your facility has wastewater discharger, and they are to HWQ, PNA waters (Primary Nursery Areas). waters,. what is the flow rate? -Vo be AeA-e-tPow'o (See http://www.ncdmf.net/maps/FNA maps/index.html, for map) 18) Discharge Points: Number of discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc. that convey discharges from the property): Onsite:. Stormwater: Mine dewatering: 2 Process Wastewater Overflow: 011site: Stormwater: Mine dewatering: Process Wastewater Overflow: Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan. Please provide short narrative description.of discharges: a) Is your mine dewatering and discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering) ❑ Na X Yes If yes, where to? _X_ Surface Waters and/or Wetlands (on -site or off -site) Other (on -site or off -site) Describe: b) Are you dewatering but not discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering) ❑ No X Yes If Yes, please explain how you are dewatering, and where that water will be directed: _When mining activities start and we reach the water table we will dewater to the designated basins at which it will have time to settle the material. It will eventually reach the height of the level spreader so it can be dispursed over the level spreader across the 50 undisturbed buffer back to the wetlands. Page.4. of. 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. 19) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands? ❑ No X Yes Note: Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that have the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the Division. For sites that may drain wetlands — approval of a Pumping O&M plan may required prior to coverage under this general permit. The Pumping 0&M Plan should be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office and must be approved prior to operation. The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance. See checklist at end of document. Contact your local Regional Office for questions specific to your urine. 20) If you are dewatering, are there wetlands or surface waters within 400' of the mine pit perimeter? ❑ No X Yes If yes, what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter? 50 feet. 21) Have you been required to obtain a 4041401 Certification permits? X No ❑ Yes If yes, please briefly describe below (include information such a required mitigation, BMPs, setbacks, and/or O&M plans for on or off -site wetlands or other pertinent information). Attach other sheets as necessary. 22) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers? ❑ No X Yes If yes, please attach to application submission. Stormwater BMPs: 23) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control? X No ❑Yes If yes, please briefly describe: 24) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? X No ❑ Yes If yes, when was it implemented? 25) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility? X No ❑ Yes Page 5of9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. Wastewater Treatment Facilities: 26) Will mine dewatering discharges occur? (An ATCIATO is required for wastewater treatment facilities' dewatering discharges where E&SC devices alone will not meet effluent limits and/or protect water quality standards). ❑ No X Yes 27) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur? (ATC or ATO required, unless closed -loop recycle system) X No ❑ Yes If yes, answer the following questions for each wastewater treatment system: a. Please describe the type of process used to treat and/or recycle the process wastewater. Give design specifics (i.e. design volume, retention time, surface area, etc.). Existing treatment facilities should be described in detail, and design criteria or operational data should be provided (including calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General Permit. [Use separate sheet(s)] b. Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes If yes, please state the name, manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical additive Note: Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (DAMS) products for use in North Carolina. c. Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event? ❑ No ❑ Yes 28) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain? X No ❑ Yes If so, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. (Minimum design requirements for treatment works include protection from the 100-year flood, per 15A NCAC 2H .0219.) Other: 29) Hazardous Waste: a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility? X No ❑ Yes b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of hazardous waste? X No ❑ Yes c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of hazardous waste? X No ❑ Yes d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information: Type(s) of waste: Page 6 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6f712010 NCG020000 N.O.I. How is material stored: Where is material stored: How many disposal shipments per year: Name of transport/ disposal vendor:_ Vendor address: 30) Are you applying for a mining permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine? X No ❑ Yes If yes, specify permit number and name if known: 31) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary? X No ❑ Yes If yes, specify type: ❑ LCID ❑ Other: 32) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? See permit text online for secondary containment requirements. X No ❑ Yes Final Checklist: This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included and initialed for. Please show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each space below. ArU Fee of $100 made payable to NCDENR r Completed application and all supporting documents Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands, and other waters, etc. x 2 copies of large-scale site plan with topographical lines with all outfalls, applicable buffers and wetlands clearly delineated A copy of your DLR mining permit x'�I,J A copy of your US Army Corps -approved wetland delineation if you marked "yes" to question 22 above. If mine site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties, • Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State Stormwater permit. Regional Office Contact: l.k,u fln %jJ ►t..t..k.-, • Applicant has included a detailed list of impervious surface areas and percentages, sub -drainage areas and total drainage area. ra If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface waters or groundwater, include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan (see below for contact information). You may be required to provide an approved Pumpin4 O&M plan priorto NCG02 issuance. 92 copies of detailed Full Size Plans delineating areas on the Tans and frstin acrea a (including: wetlands, ditches, well -placements, pits, borrow areas, overburden storage, Stormwater controls/BMPs, vehicle maintenance areas, settling basins, product process (such as screening, stockpiles, waste piles), total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (if state sw programs apply), applicable buffers, and access and/or haul roads). Well information (design, depths, maintenance) Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas n Settling pond sizing information, if applicable Page 7 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010 NCG020000 N.O.I. jl�kt-evel spreader design, if applicable ,JJLJDetails about dewatering method Cone of influence calculations Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding Description & information about 401/404 permits that have been obtained Copy of US*Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation (if fjl-'�' f applicable) IRA have contacted my local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan. Regional Office Contact: —Linda Willis Date contacted: September 2011 -OR- 41 will not any impact nearby wetlands, surface waters or groundwater by dewatering. If an ATC or ATO is required, three (3) sets of plans, specifications, and design calculations, signed, sealed, and dated by a P.E. ATC and ATO requirements in NCG02000 are summarized in Table 1 on Page 2 of this NOI (see the permit text for more details). Plans shall show all pertinent design features, including the location of the outfall(s). If stormwater is flowing off -site, the plan must show that stormwater will not be mixed with wastewater. Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the (Environmental Management) Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit_ I understand that coverage tinder this permit will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual permit. agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit; 1. 1 agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid mining permit must be attached to this request. 2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore. 3. 1 agree that bull[ storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection so as to contain all spills on the site. 4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules governing solid waste disposal. 5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to not result in contamination of the surface or ground waters. Page 8of9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/712010 NCG020000 N.O.I. 1 agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as enforceable requirements of the General Permit. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. Printed Name of Person Signing: Robert Preston Willis Title: Ow r 1 Operator t (Signature of Applicant) ( ate Signed) Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100.00 made payable to NCDENR. Mail the entire package to: Stormwater and General Permits Unit Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Note The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit. For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. DWQ Reatonal Office Contact Information: Asheville Office ...... (828) 296-4500 Fayetteville Office ... (910) 433-3300 Mooresville Office __. (704) 663-1699 Raleigh Office ........ (919) 791-4200 Washington Office.-, (252) 946-6481 Wilmington Office- (910) 796-7215 Winston-Salem ...... (336) 771-5000 Central Office ......... (919) 807-6300 Page 9 of 9 SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 617/2010 ConnectGiS Feature Report Page I of I ConnectGIS Feature Report Page 1 of I 4PCONNECTGIS •�=�� Counry_Boundery �-. r-Tto Topo_10ft s Topo_5it :s 3. �• 'r�. centerlines Parcels _• Other_County "11 other Vales Cart •ram ���,�, \ '6 FN� y�. Sry+ 1 615 Feet ' -�` ` 4 1 http.Ilcarteret2.connectgis.com/DownloadFi ie.ashx?i=_ags_map6dd50b6e7be74bbgb4997e... 2/8/2012 LOCATION MAP: t` w_�-•-+-n r�� - e�. r-�"4y � _ fir.. _ +. „ a�� j. I }a ,¢ ,�.- _�: h '�,�„^�k-..;. ,r -"" r - s ' �' y`'.�rl • Zy fir. �, .•\n• 1y` - k •i L6wY f (' � Oil �- + Q- 1� k. { 't y� �hA. T` 1. J - f1 ' .a aD Pit -: - �, 3 - .��'� :�� . _ � , w•, IN ..atl rrw f`I I, NCG020817 E r S Map Scale 1: 24, 000 Robert Preston Willis CLD Pit Latitude: 340 47' 57! N Longitude: 761 39 25" W County: Carteret County Receiving Stream: Williston Creek Stream Class: SA; HQUJ River Basin: White Oak wI�■� .wP'ak. i��F �:Jw■11 ;� �i Facility Location STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020817 STORMWATER AND MINE DEWATERING DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Robert Preston Willis is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and mine dewatering wastewater from a facility located at CLD Pit Willis Perry Lane Smyrna Carteret County to receiving waters designated as Williston Creek, a class SA; HQW; PNA water in the White Oak River Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, 11, III, IV, V, and V1 of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached. This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 11, 2012. This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. Signed this day May 11, 2012. for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission VICINITY MAP DIGITIZED FROM AERIAL, NO SCALE AC ACRLS c0 SEWER %EANOUT DD BEHB ECM - 600TNN9 CONCRETE MONUMENT EIA - 00IIIINS IRON OU HIP EXISTINB IRo* PIPE EIR - EXOTINS IRON ROB ELEC - ELECTNIC EPX - EXIBTM PR W& RH - HYDRANT HWM - 1M1 WATER MARK IRS - IRON ROD SET LP - LNNiT POJ.E MB - IMP bom MtIL - MINIMUM BUILOM LINE N/f - NOW OR F©RIrERLY PO - PAIK POD - POINT OF OEONYNRIU R/W - RNlHT OF WAY Sf - SQUARE FEET TEL - TIlEPMW TV - cw Tv U - OVE*" UTLJTY LINE UP - UI TY PME wM - WATER METER © - CONTROL COkt1ER COURSE BEARING DISTANCE L-1 Af 27°56' S 34' - L - 2 46 N 18E 32' L-3 N 01°23't 30, L-4 N i$°16'N 56' L-5 T7 45°18'ir 54' L-•6 N 55°15'ir 28' L-7 N 336101ir 26, L -8 N A7°01'ir 25, L-9 N 50619'r 26, L-10 N 04°10'9 44' L-11 N i0656'N 52, L-19 N 48°1211r 20' L-13 N 960071' 28' L- 14 N 1062$`9' 31, L-15 N 91012111' 33, L-18 N 21°461 $3, L-17 N 48 S' 31' L-18 N 2b,1 93' L-19 N 70°46' 49' L -20 N 40°22'9 51, L-21 N 11°11'ir 47' L-22 N 01°111ir 30, L-23 N 04°221r 49' L-24 N 370411 21' L-25 N 03°03'E 50, L 26 N 26651'0, 32' L 27 N 09610' w 32' L-28 S 58°0311/ 31' L--29 S 12633'W 71' L-30 S 20°42N 30, L-31 S 28650'lr 36' L-32 S 886411F 48' L-33 N 71e33`11' 44' L-34 N 64024*W 45' L 35 N 72°32' fi 86, L-36 N 6e699'ir 9e' L-37 N 41°17 1r 19' L-38 N 09 81'ir 38' L-30 N 35054' W 106, L-40 N 14628'W 88' L-41 N 61'21'0' 30' L-42 N 19627,1r 28' L-43 N 124#510, 2El' L-44 N 216*#' 96, L-45 N 19°48')► $9' L-46 S 67021'>r 181, L-47 S i664611i' Is, L-48 S 15647'iF 19, L-49 S Oro I, N, 46' L-50 S 63600, Ir 34' L-61 S $5695,w 27' L-62 5 86031' Ir 27' L-53 S 73°34'K 42, L-54 S 58°40'ir 44' L-55 S 64642' lr 71' L- 56 S 49648' lr 129, L-57 S 55"14'lr 49' L-58 S 300191Ir 32' L-59 S 13643'E 37, L--80 S 5806610, 37' L-61 S 08642' W 37' ECM S 88°07'44"E 278.78' ECM WETLAND CALL TABLES' sd a CWVRSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE REARING DISTANCE EXISTING ROAD RECEIVED L 10. NO TE: 062 S 52s35'W III , L-82 N 93o36'W 100, L-115 S 88°41'W 23' ti� 1, ss., N WETLAND POINTS STAKED LABELED AND LOCATED WITH CPS MOBILE MAPPER CE WITH ARC PAD �8, /F y.33 N s6 33 W 38 11-83 N 04 25 E 29 L-118 N 83 41 it 21 y 44 N 85q 29 W 29' L-84 N 11°21'W 46' L-117 N 89^12'lr 30' y 005 N 380421' 38, L-85 N 36°23'lr 18' L-118 IV 64°59'1r 21' L, +TDB N 34°23'W 23' L-86 IV 600301lr 24' L-119 S 53°34'W 28' L �7 N 1201511r 50, L-87 N 43436'lr 23' L-120 N 35°10'W 19, L 4$ N 3761g'ir 64' L-68 N 33°97'Ir 90, L-121 N 78°211F 27' L "09 N 49°36's 24' L-89 N 54°39' fi 96' L-122 N 88°21' W 20, S 46'24'9 19, L-90 S 8$0001ir 27 L-123 N 52016'W 19, G-'0 11 S 60659's 25' L-91 N 5016551W 24' L-124 N 08°551w 19, L 12 S 76°48'11 64' L-92 N 8C613'ir 44' L-125 N 440591E 17' L. '73 S 04620'E 12, L-93 N 16°52'ir 28' L-126 N 536061E 14' L 14 S 27,1681E 20' L-94 N 080091-C 28, L-127 N 70048'E 36, L '75 S 40*16'.9 30' L-95 N 28°42'lr 24' L. '16 S 3662$1E 27' L-96 N 21°39'0' 26, L. 17 N 4662849 26' L-97 N 820111ir 31, L. S 876581E' 29' L-98 1V 510061lr 49' L 'X9 S 346$0'E Ir L-99 N 25°12'W 26' L. 40 345063'W 55, L-100 N 39°48't 30' y. T'J 1 S 88648' W 30, L-101 N 05° 181E 48' L--102 S 74°0519 45' L_403 S 366941 36, L-104 S 290131E al' L-106 S 52°56'E 41' L-106 S 57°17'E 47' L--107 N 58°5$'E 21' L-108 S 56642'E it, L-109 S 606411V 41' L-110 S 386051E 20' L--111 S O4647'E 30' L-112 S 150311 26, L-113 S 02025'0' 9' L-114 S 17°36'E 124' N/n OPEN GRO$jTND FARM r�+ 3/"4 z, t ' STATE Of NORTH 6'AR0./NA COUNTY OF RENEW OFFICER Of ------ -- COUNTY, C£RTifY THAT 7111E AMP OR PLAT r0 WffCH THIS CERTIFICAIiYW /S AfFIXffA MWfTk AL STATUTORY RE4VUIREMENTS P-00 RECOAPNG. REVIEW Of-FlCER DAIS ---__-__-- ' ER S 83 3� 0`19„E AIB 30 PG 992 ROBIs'RT P. WILLIS q�l 1058/394 AREA==418,194 SF+/- 9.55 AC+/- B Y COORDINATES TP 734904700529 +'lFIA( f 11�a'191r)�p t lldE TIMOTHY ft. MASON 5n9i 3(?S %3Y ` !t R4INATF.S fP 734904.702125 IV FIN 7.3. /, STEWN D.PONERS, CERWY 7MT THIS SURVEY IS OF ff+ETL4NOS ON � �7(/STIJVC rARCEL OF LANIl. J, S7EVLFN D. POWERS, CER71FY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY AYJPERVlr FROM AN ACTtJ46 SURVE J` ADE UNDER MY SUPERMOV (DEED DE50PIM RECf317DED IN 600K j.8PiAt iP�m1�: THAT THE 80UMDARIES Aff +OT sU�WMD AR£ Y MD AS OMAWN t* Mf lWORMAWN''7�t/W IN 1Z(ii" Zak HAT rTt 0 J7Ei As CAICtXAlW IR ltjolbt; MAr r9W PLAT 0A9 10EPARtD IN ' ;ACCORD 6.5 - AS AMENDED. li1'TA+m MY ORICrINAL 5Vm0 row, q ND !3 _�L DdY OIL 4 0., LL• REYiI (NMI IV A OWERS NO APPROVAL RVOUIRED BY THE CARTERET COUNTY' PLANNIING DEPARTMENT COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR OFTIiAR ' - s' N w'ITII SUB METER ACCURACY. BOUNDARY GPS COORDINATES ESTABLISHED TOPCON KITH GR3 RASlt i 7TH 2 METER FIXED POLE USING RAPID STATIC AND B017ER COMBO UNIT. ALL CPS COORDINATES ROTATED AND TRANSLATED TO RECORDED BOUNDARY MAP. x 404 r J I TLAND,� ,71 p 0.17 AC+/ ECM rd qp JSnnc 0, ,�3 L- i d �I- 1 e� I (S �• IIOW ,> o L-123 l c°/ ,o I L, < e (J•, L-119 ECM � 3 �r N/F v- c t2 / OPP'N GROUND FARM 13 UPLAND AREA 1 102 3/764 3 4 C� t 4? / \ r 32 1 404 WETLANDS rY 31.01 AC+/- hb 9 `i• R a0 ` 5� 3 -5 L-97 \ S 1 10511�k�G r / \ ITLI1 HOMEPLACE ` ry$I 30 155b t 29 r OJr a C1 J9 f ` 104 UPLAND A RKA 3 404 i1E7LANDS /�1i`�aK, 103 i 44 s7 -9 h� 1 45 j 0� 21\\ nNG OJ>CN 28 1 L� 46 yy 19 FlO' .to < try 27EkjS v,101 h / \ L-36. y _ ` ^% nNG � ,le. i 6 L-34, J3 1 % Q 1 p 100Lp �s >/ i i 1 47 1 11 i1! \�' 98 \ I ry0 30' 8 ' � 46 OM PT. 1,30 IRS T UPLAND '�\1°� -7 . -�° 97 t l AREAt 65 w ! 'YC 1r t_d20 hry-1 1t-3C ^, 94 1 4 L-63 z S I ROBERT P. WII,LIS 93 / 1198/288 ` 921 ARFA=1,355,474 SFf/ " UPLAND AREA 1 wl 31.12 ACI-/ BY COORDINATES \ l� TP 734904810000 90 I 0 404 �, as COMBINED AREA=1,553,792 •cT' 1 i WETLANDS r 36.67 AC+/- fil H a \ to ! \ 87 1 \ � 110 86 r }r, `5►�� � 85 � r` ob3 t\R B3 C \� 82 ROBERT P. IFILLIS A°'o 1288/ 204 198,318 SF+/- \ \ 4.55 AC`-/- so \ o+ N \� J79 EIP N 86°27'1F)"N' 570.72' i TIE Lit THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY CIF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT PURSUANT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANIUAL AS DF-TERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DAiE. UNLESS THERE IF; A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERRAINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY RE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. U.S. AM CQR ARMY S OF GAVE F. R. 5 OFFICIAL �~-� DATE o a rr ECM ' S 88°30'19"E °p o" 359.01- EIR n r,1 N/F SMITH MB 30 PG 992 1351/334 ROBERT P. WILLIS c> 1068/390 AREA=328,287 SF (/ -- f ;$ 7.49 AC4 / BY COORDINATFS TP 73490460845 r1(1,:8 r1.111,)' `i f;ir r i 1 jc 71'(11 lwol i \ 128.iB" r� rOr,�t. n€ LINE 1 36 07' a.} 9 LIN �, 4 -. _• e•q Rt - E S 88-15'0- 0-"4___.38.9 ... rlY �ib^i - TIE LINf .; �. W - 1 S('11TT PIP 11 i e 100 0 100 200 300 I ,00, -- J CRAPHIC SCALE - FEET` PT.78 LIMITS, OF EVALUA770N i m to CO O � ECM ' \ N/F I PITTMAN 875/257 ' \ , EIP N \ \ \ \ N/c \ MASON \\ 302/137 \ \� ,Riw w F ifILLI, 341 /4l53 OPEN R C OUND FARM 3/764 �I 11� AREA BY COORDINATES 1,563,792 SF+/- 35.87 AC+/= REFERENCES 341/454 843/250 922/392 1068/390 1058/898' 1058/394 599/356 M 30/22 M 30/992 FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT M: ON THE -DAY OF AND RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA MELANIE ARTHUR REGISTER OF DEEDS BY. ASSISTANT, DEPUTY WE SURVEY FOR ROBE.RT P. WILLIS MAY 16 2011 REC. WILM. FLD. OFC. IL,LISTON COMMUNITY, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TO �i'IV�SiYI ": SMYRNA COl`iN Y': CARTERET5'TA `E`: NORTH CAROLINA CLIL' Fi': ROBERT P. WILLIS DAM: 5 11 11 SCALE': i"- 100' ADD S,S': HWY 70 EAST PA0Mc : 98119A JOB: 98119AS L 10,11 WILLISTON NC, 28589 TAX PARCEL : 734904810000/734904805855 PHONE- ���_sA _d na arnrin �rtilcllr. PHONE: 25t-646-9393 PO BOX 26 31 TOP AND BOTTOM STRAN SHALL BE 10 GAGE MIN. f--WITH WIRE CG'MAX, MAX. WITHOUT WIRE) MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES SHALL BE 12 112 GAGE MIN. EJ u FILTER FABRIC J u FILTER FABRIC COMPACTED FILL Ili---Iji - 8 III 1 I STEEL POST 2'0' DEPTH EXTENSION OF FABRIC AND WIRE INTO TRENCH Hain Road Detail 20 --j 01, Diversion Ditch De-tai� 18' Min I 604M 2 Sq. Feet 13.9 Agee I l I \� L r f.- - -ji, i - -�T;7--., .r.+r -r-•v.,-- -1. _ _ ri 11t=i►313���Y �I --- - ------ DF P, BERT WILLISTON COMMUNITY, CARTERET W T i L L I S COUNTY, NORTH COROLINA TOWNSHIP: COUNTY, STATE I Cl lENJ-1 DATE: SCALE: A D D F<' CS S J PROJECT!J 171B; TAX PARCEL PILINF-: FLOOD ZDNE: T WILLISTON MC TON C T ------------- VICINITY MAP DIGITIZED FROM AERIAL, NO SCALE LECE-ND AC - ACRES CO - SEWER CLEANOUT DO - DEED OM ECM - EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT EIA - EOTING IRON AU EIP - EMT114G IRON PIPE EIR - E)a$11NQ IRON AM ELEC - ELECTRIC EPX - EMSTINS. PK NAIL FH - HYDRANT HWM - 2 WATER MARI( IRS - IRON ROD SET LP - LIGIff POLE me - MAP Dom MOL - MINIMUM BUILDING LINE N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY PO - PAGE POO - POW OF BEGINNING RAW - RMT OF WAY 9F - SOUARE FEET TEL, - TELEPHONE TV - CABLE TV U - OVERFIW UTILITY LINE UP - UTILITY POLE WM - WATER METER 0 - CONTROL CORNER C3 - CONCRETE CONTROL CORNER COURSE BEARING DISTANCE L-1 N 27*56'N 34' L-2 X 18*4610 32' L-3 N 01*23111 30, L-4 m 1601011IF 56, L-5 N46*18'lr 64' L-6 m 65016,w 26' L-7 X 33111011 26, L-8 N 27*01'W 25, L-9 m 50*191ir 25' L-10 N 04*10*9 44' L-11 Af 10*661111' 62' L-12 X 48*12W 20' L-13 N 36*27'IV 28' L-14 N 10*213'R 31, L-15 N 21012's 33, L-16 N 21*49'8 33, L-17 m "b"'s 31, L-ibr k 266521 ij§i L-19 N 70048't 42' L-90 N 40029-v 51, L-21 m 11011'r 47: L-22 Notaillir 30 L-23 N 04*291F 49: L-24 N 37*411 21 L-25 v 03006,1? 50, L-26 m 260511ir 32: L-27 N 09016,w 32 L-28 S 58*03,Ir 3i: L-29 S 1-9*33, #1 71 L-30 S 20*49'W 30: L-31 S 98656,or 36 L-32 S W41-F 48' L-" y 716531ir 44' L-34 N 04*24'W 45: L-35 N 72*32'0' 65 L-36 N 82"29'W or L-37 Ar 410171' 19: L-38 N 090214, so L-39 N 36*64'lr too: L-40 AV 14*28')r 66 L-41 N 51027W so: L-42 N 19627'W 28 L-43 9 12*45'W 26, L-44 k glas&* 26' L=46 N 10048'W 30 L-46 S 6709 VW 161, L-47 S 160461111' 16, L-48 S 15047'W 19, L-49 s arovir 45' L-50 S 63100'r 34: L-61 S 66*25,w 27 L-62 S 86031'W 27' L-53 S 73*34'lr 42: L-64 S 58*40'W 44 L-55 S 64"42'W 71' L-58 3 49048l' 129, L-57 5 515014'Ir 49' L-58 S 39*19'N' 32' L-59 S 13043'N 37' L-60 S 63056,ff 37' L-61 S 08*42'W 37' WETLAND GALL TAB, COURSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE B L--432 S 52*361w ill L-82 I - 6 0 N 8633r 8, -3 IL -44 N 86029,w 29, L- 84 I 4 I�5 N 38042'W 38' L-86 I L- -66 N 34*23'W 23' L-86 I L-07 N 12* 15* W60, L-87 I L- 108 m 3711191ff 64' L-88 i L-49 N 49*30'f 24' L-89 I L---'70 S 45*24*9 to, L-90 L--'71 S6005919 25, L-91 L-17172 S 76*461P 64' L-02 L-", S 0442OW 12' L-93 I L-174 S 270581r 20' L-94 L- 15 S 40016't 30, L-95 I L---16 S 36*28'9 27' L-96 I L-17 N 48029'9 26, L-97 I L­18 S 87.58-f 29, L-98 I L= rig S 34630,R 17' L-99 I L--00 S 45*53'jr 66, L-100 I L-61 9 66*46'W so, L-101 I L-102 L-104 L-105 L-106 L-107 L-108 L-109 L-110 L-111 L-112 L-113 L-114 N/F OPEN GROUNO FARM 3/764 4� iRs N 86-30,19-g- 1162, 73 S rA rE OF NORTH CARa- #A COUNTY OF /I REMW OFRCER OF ------ COUNTY C(RT#1'Y TWT PE M4P OR PLAT TO wffcH IRIS OEqrhL-rAr10N /5 AFFIXED MEETS AL STATUTORY AVOLMIEWNT5 FOR RECORDING. fifV" OFFICER DAIS - - --- - - - - EXR RC OF LAND- sffwN a PonRs, CERTIFY mA r THIs suRvEr is OF #E77 AINVS ON A S7NG . A EL S 7EWN D. PofiE RS, CERTIFY THAT THIS PEAT WAS DRA *W UfAWR MY SfW R wSAW FROM AN ACTUN.- SURWY W" UNOCR MY SUPER14SION (DEED DESCRPMW RECI)AVED IN 800K dj5PAOKA(&%; THAT TIE BOUAVARES SOT SURWYED ARE Y CATED AS DRAWN FROM #w~noN Fam iN #OOK AS r-kCUA" /5 r iw no :THAT THIS PLAT *As PREPARED x As AWW60. WnWSS MY ORVINAL 56M rtw, DAY OF atele D., toUL. D. 00 -29W r,ES RARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE r 23*36'ff 108, L-115 S 00*41'W 23' f 04*25'E 29' L-lis N 63*41'W 21' f 11-21')1' 46' L-117 N 69612111' 30, r 36*23'W is, L-118 N 64*69'W 21' f 500301w 24' L-110 S 53034'W 28' r 43W'W 23, L-120 N 306101w 1 90, L-121 N 76021'W 27 r 540&W 26, L- 122 N 86*21'W 20, 88*091F 27- L-123 N 52*161ir 19, r 60*55'W 24' L-124 N 08656111' 19, r 6611191w 44' L-igs X 44050'B 17l r 16*52'W 22, L-126 N 530051E 14' 1 086091E 98, L-127 N 70048E 36' F 28'42'W 24' r 21639')r 96, r 820111w 311 r 151*061w 49' f 95* 12'W 26' 1 32048't 30' 166016's 46' 7 74405'E 45' i 366241 361 i 29*13't al, 7 52*56'9 41' � 57617'E 47' 68*581z 21, 7 50*47117 41' ; 384051E 20' 7 04*47't 30' ; 1563119 26' 1 02*251w 7 17*36'E 124' EIR S S 66030119-,E NF-W 01VISION LINE TIMOTI-1Y W. MASON 599/366 AREA=206,911 4,76 ACf RY GOORDINATFS TP 734904702125 N/F 04 V/15 4901/1,156 MR 30 PC 992 ROBE'RT P. IFILLIS 1058/394 AREA-416,194 SF+I- !9.56 AC+1- ErY COORDINATES TP 734904100620 S 857,6(), NO APPROVAL REQUIRED BY THE CARTERET COUNTY PLANNIING DEPARTIVIENT COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR ECM S 88*0744"A" 278.78' ECM EXISTING ROAD NOTE: zet 'ro WRTUND -f`O1NTS STAKED, LABELED, AND LOCAT&D WITH GFS .MOBILE AIIAPPER CE KITH ARC PAD vl\ h 'a, b�T., SOJPTWARX frITH SUB-ACKYRR ACCURACr. BOUNDifir cps coommArrs ismasnip wim ropcoN V GR3 BASE WITH 2 AaVER FIXED POLE USING RAPID STATIC AND ROVER COMBO UNIT. 1 404 �PI-A Afn ALL CPS COORDINATES RO7*ArND AND TRANSLATED TO RECORDED BoumUARr MAP, WETLAND ECM 0.17 AC+/- de. F I I - .Dw 12 ECM11 , EC N/F u /t' OPXN GROUND FARM 13 UPLAND AREA 1 102 3/764 A. 14 32 404 0 WETLANDS 16 3 L01 AC+/- I- jr ary t L-97 17 oLP HOMEPLACE 30 29 UPLAND AREA 3 1©4 404 WETLANDS 4- 103 4 y- 18 A \ 0 -9 45 Of 28 48 0 19 27 -36 101 ICH b 1p \ L-34 Z 100 99 .148 L-72 7 ! 47 Z 50, to 98 TIE COVE FRO At PT 130 IRS 117 6, vn UPLANDD -7 �9 97 11" AREA 2 119 20 94 L-63 X ROBERT P. WILLIS 93 oI 92 ai AREA=1,355,474 SF+I- UPLAND AREA 1 37 $1.12 AC+1- 91 BY COORDINATES TP 734904810000 90 01 404 / 89 COMBINED AREA=1,553,792 SF+I- WETLANDS iD 35A7 AC+1- 88 87 `0 86 0 85 0 84 83 f 82 ROBERT 1'. WILLIS 1266/204 198,318 SF+I'- 4.55 AC+1-- ry so UP 79 N a6*27'15"Ir 570.72' S 86627*E 77' TIE UNE FROM PT.78 ECM EIP CO iVAL 6A 2'16N- S 86030'19"B 359.01' EIR N/F SMITH MB 30 PG 992 1351/334 RS ROBERT P. WILLIS 1068/390 tr AREA=328,287 SF+I- '0 7.49 AC+1- , BY COORDINATES TP 734904608145 SIP 'V 111f"35'00"9' co its------------ ---- k r 1 9 00 SIP cp OR c, L- N --------- - II ()O' - ------ IRS • ROBERT WILL4S 10 0 ?,g f 195 5 '3 9' Q4' A-REA =X�,278 1q` f - ----- -- -- - --- . t' 91 1-4 By COOPOINAfES IP ?3480"890914 tp TOTAL BE LINE t 0 S 86035-0011E EIP 36.07' 91 E! - --- -* ROBERT P- W11111is 11' 1p; �61'TI-1-i�:--, r -4 Elf 922/392 94,89 LINE - 86035'00"W 2,96-92 0 m 30/22 as I - S 861-1W00,1E TOIAt, -9. 436.92 TIE LINE rQ AREA - ECM 1& 161 V - / 6:� N O�42 AC-� r-,r-,I /F BY QCPORDINTE- 1 N/F MASON rP 7348027997.--. 1IR SCOTT 302/137 .68 MASON 890/350 N/F t 924/384 1,9 PITTMAN 99 4 876/967 FtR THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT PURSUANT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DtUwAMON MANUAL "AS DlitfERM-INE-b BY THE UNDtkSIGkEb ON THIS 'DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DIETERR41NATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOID OF FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. U.S. ARMY GORS OF(EfIGINEERS OFFICIAL DATE N/� w 1j, L 162/82 100 0 100 200 300 41- Cf GRAPHIC SCALE FEET o N/F WILLIS 341/453 N/F OPEN GROUND FARM 3/764 EI AREA BY COORDINATES 1,653,792 SP-t-1/- 35.67 AC-f-l-, - REFERENCES 341/454 843/250 922/392 1058/390 1058/393 1058/394 599/356 M 30/22 M 30/922 FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT M: ON THE ---DAY OF- , AND RECORDED IN BOOK- PAGE,_ OFFICE OF THF REGISTER OF DEEDS, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROUNA MELANIE ARTHUR REGISTER OF DEEDS BY ASSISTANT, DEPUTY RECEIVED MAY 16 2011 REG. WILM. FLD. OFC. WETLANDS SURVEY FOR ROBERT P. WILLIS WI LLISTON COMMUNITY, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TO WNSHIP: SMYRNA COUNTY Tr CARTERET STATE': NORTH CAROLIKA CLIENT: ROBERT P. NILLIS DATE': - 5/11/11 1 MIX-: 1,,- 100, ADDRESS: HWY 70 EAST PROJECT- 98119A IJOB: 98119ASLIO,ll NILLISTON NC, 28689 TAX PARCEL#: 734904810000/734904805855 PHONE: 2U-342-4508 FLOOD ZONE: STEVEN Do POWERS NC PLS L-299 PHONE: 252 646-9393 PO BOX 261, BARKERS ISLAND NC 28531 am AN'Tirotm-A I f2VAUA^ fleus 77 7- *.-, -,-. �7 -� ', - - 7 1.1'.4 !�, I N, 1-;6.