R-2611

UN d ?r'A
L
?a ar ?'?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
ACOE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Tugwell,
Subject: Removal of R-2611 from Section 404/NEPA Merger Process
NCDOT TIP Project R-261 1 calls for the widening of SR 1008 (West Market Street)
from SR 2007 (Bunker Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68 in Guilford County. A Merger
Team was established due to the unknown environmental impacts associated with this
project. The Merger Team met on August 15, 2002 and agreed to the Purpose and Need
(Concurrence Point 1) and Alternatives to be studied in detail in the NEPA document
(Concurrence Point 2).
Field studies for the five alternatives selected were conducted and it was determined that
there are no wetland impacts associated with any of the alternatives and stream impacts
ranged from 110 to 185 linear feet. Due to the minimal stream and wetland impacts
associated with the alternatives, the Merger Team agreed to sign the Concurrence Point
2a (Bridging Decisions and Final Alternatives to Carry Forward) form at the Concurrence
3 (Least Environmentally Damaging Practical Alternative) meeting and to proceed with
the project. The alternative selected to carry forward is the four-lane median divided with
curb and gutter. This is the preferred alternative by the City of Greensboro, The
Greensboro MPO and the DOT Division Office. An e-mail was sent to the Merger Team
on November 18, 2004 confirming the verbal agreement.
July 3, 2006
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
The Environmental Assessment was signed on June 16, 2005 and the Public Hearing was
held on May 22, 2006. Based on the impacts, it was not necessary to continue this project
through the Merger Process. An e-mail was sent to all Merger Team Members on June 6,
2006 and all responded in agreement to drop this project from the Section 404/NEPA
Merger Process.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT UNIT
1583 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1583
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
PARKER LINCOLN BLDG
2728 CAPITAL BLVD - SUITE 167
RALEIGH NC 27604
I am transmitting for your files the signed Concurrence Point 1 form, the signed
Concurrence Point 2 form, the November 18, 2004 e-mail, the June 6, 2006 e-mail and
the written confirmation from all merger team members to drop this project from the
Section 404/NEPA Merger Process. This package concludes the Section 404/Merger
Process for this project effective on the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
Ma ie L. Sutton
Project Planning Engineer
mis
attachments
cc w/o attachments:
Felix Davila, FHWA
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Chris Militscher, EPA
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Sue Homewood, DENR DWQ
Sarah McBride, SHPO
Craig McKinney, City of Greensboro
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Preconstruction
Mike Mills, P.E., Division. Engineer
Greg Brew, P.E., Roadway Design
Jerry Snead, P.E., Hydraulics
Roy Shelton, PDEA
Eric Midkiff, P.E., PDEA
Linwood Stone, PDEA
project file
0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\O? OG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Uj r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
O <
June 8, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Greg Thorpe, PhD., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Subject: Proposed improvements to SR 1008 (West Market Street) from SR 2007 (Bunker Hill Road) to NC 68 in
Guilford County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1008(9), State Project No. 8.2497401, TIP R-2611.
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
This letter is in reference to the application dated May 15, 2006 for the proposed improvements to the above
referenced project in Guilford County. The project is being planned in accordance with the 404/NEPA Merger
agreement. The purpose of the permit application is to solicit public input on the proposed reasonable and feasible
alternatives. At this time, the selection of a preferred alternative has not occurred. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H
.0507 (a), this application is not considered complete and does not qualify as the formal application for a 401 Water
Quality Certification. Therefore, our 60-day time limit has not been activated. We look forward to participating in
future team meetings on this project.
If you have any questions, please contact Sue Homewood at 336-771-4964.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Todd Tugwell, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Sue Homewood, DWQ WSRO Regional Office p
DWQ 401 Transportation Unit
'ION
?r1,yoFHR. wAr X666
SgNDSr0Q1
C,9
None Cazo)a
'
Transportation Permitting Unit atU a)l
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] Internet: htto://h 2o. en r. state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
A N
ub(
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
D tiw
Mq y 2(,
of 6
°SA'WATFR
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Ilk
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIP V T
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 15, 2006
Mr. Todd Tugwell, Transportation Project Manager
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
SUBJECT: SECTION 404 - N.E.P.A MERGER PROCESS Application for a Department
of the Army (DOA) Permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act TO
DISCHARGE DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS OF THE
UNITED STATES TO CONSTRUCT the proposed widening of SR 1008 (West
Market Street) from SR 2007 (Bunker Hill Road) to NC 68, Guilford County.
Federal Project No. STP-1008 (9)
State Project No. 8.2497401
T.I.P. No. R-2611
The following application, including separate attachments for (1) ENG Form 4345 and (2)
mailing list (labels) is submitted for your consideration. As you are aware, this project was
selected for treatment under the new "merger" process. At this juncture, the Regulatory Division
has provided concurrence with Purpose and Need and with the selection of Detailed Study
Alternatives. Based on the minimal impacts, the merger team members agreed to combine
Concurrence Point 2a with the Concurrence Pont 3 meeting. An Environmental Assessment (EA)
was prepared and signed on June 16, 2005. The document was circulated on July 21, 2005.
Please issue your public notice at the earliest opportunity so that we can jointly proceed toward
the bridge locations and lengths and selecting the LEDPA (least environmentally damaging,
practicable alternative which meets the purpose and need of the project) following analysis of
public input. Once the LEDPA is selected and approved, efforts will be undertaken to further
minimize impacts to wetlands and riparian buffers in the LEDPA corridor and to propose suitable
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts.
The following information is a summary of relevant project details and is being provided to assist
in the Section 404 regulatory review of the project. Please note that more detailed information is
available in the EA.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
4
GENERAL DISCUSSION OF PROJECT
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to widen West Market Street
(SR 1008) to a four-lane median divided curb and gutter facility from Bunker Hill Road
(SR 2007) at Colfax to NC 68 in Greensboro, Guilford County. The length of the West Market
Street (SR 1008) widening project is approximately 3.6 miles.
Improvements to West Market Street (SR 1008) are federally funded. Project Number
R-261 1 is included in NCDOT's latest approved Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Right of way acquisition is scheduled in the 2006-2012 TIP for federal fiscal year 2008 and
construction is scheduled to begin in federal fiscal year 2010. The estimated cost of right of way
and construction for the proposed action is $16,683,000.
West Market Street improvements are included in the 2030 Greensboro Urban Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization Long-Range Transportation Plan.
PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose is to increase the traffic carrying capacity on West Market Street (SR 1008).
The need is based on traffic volume being over the current facility's design. Improvements are
also needed to accommodate the expected growth in the area from the FedEx Hub and future
commercial development. The project is located in the area between Kernersville and the
Piedmont Triad International Airport (PTIA), which anticipates new development over the next
20 years even without the addition of the planned FedEx Hub. The airport is located just east of
the project limits. A new 9,000-foot runway and one million square-foot sorting facility is
included in the future plans for the airport. West Market Street is a major route to the nearby
PTIA and the surrounding interstate network.
The Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation is investigating alternative corridors for
commuter/intercity rail service in the area as part of a corridor that would stretch from Raleigh to
Asheville. According to the Triad Intercity Rail Study, one of the studied corridors would utilize
the existing Norfolk Southern line parallel to West Market Street. There is currently no station
locations proposed within the growth impact study area. However, according to Guilford County
planners, there could possibly be a station located in the Colfax area.
Traffic Volumes and Level of Service
West Market Street is classified as a rural major collector in the North Carolina Functional
Classification System. Current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes along West Market Street
range from 14,200 vehicles per day (vpd) near Bunker Hill Road to 21,600 vpd at NC 68. Truck
traffic is six percent of the total daily traffic. These volumes result in a Level of Service (LOS) C.
Design year 2025 volume is projected to range from 18,200 vpd at Bunker Hill Road to 26,600
vpd at NC 68, resulting in Level of Service F conditions without the proposed improvements and
a Level of Service C with the proposed cross-section..
M
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Two broad range alternatives were considered for the proposed project. The alternatives
include the No-Build and the Build Alternative. The No-Build Alternative offers no
improvements to the project area and does not alleviate existing and future traffic congestion in
the project area. In addition, the No-Build Alternative does not improve safety in the project area
by providing additional travel lanes, improved shoulders, bicycle and pedestrian
accommodations, and additional turn-lanes at intersections. Since the No-Build Alternative does
not address the purpose and need, it is not recommended.
The Build Alternative consisted of five alternatives that were identified by the Merger
Team:
Alternate 1, a four-lane median divided curb and gutter section;
Alternate 2, a five-lane curb and gutter section;
Alternate 3, a five-lane shoulder section;
Alternate 4, a four-lane median divided shoulder section, and
Alternate 5, a hybrid section comprising of the four-lane median divided curb
and gutter at the western end of the project and a five-lane curb and gutter section
at the eastern portion.
The Merger Team concurred that the four-lane median divided with curb and gutter is the
recommended alternative. Since there are no wetlands being impacted and less than 500 linear
feet of stream impacts, the team agreed to proceed with the recommended alternate (Alternate 1)
and sign the Concurrence Point 2A form at the Least Environmentally Damaging and Practical
Alternative (LEDPA - Concurrence Point 3) meeting. Table 1 contains a summary of the
quantifiable impacts associated with each alternate.
Typical Section
The proposed typical section is a four-lane median divided facility with 12-foot inside
travel lanes; 14-foot outside travel lanes; curb and gutter; and a 21.5-foot raised grass median.
Wide outside lanes are to accommodate bicycles and sidewalks are included on both sides of the
project located within the corporate limits of Greensboro at the time of construction and on the
north side in areas outside the corporate limits.
TABLE 1
COMPARATIVE SUMMARY
Category Units Alternative
1
4-Lane
Median Curb
and Gutter
Recommended 2
5-Lane
Curb and
Gutter 3
5-Lane
Shoulder 4
4-Lane
Median
Shoulder 5
Hybrid
Section
Corridor Length Miles 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
Residential Total 14 11 18 18 13
Relocations Minority 0 0 0 0 0
Business Total 5 4 5 7 3
Relocations Minority 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Profit Total 0 0 1 0 0
Relocations Minority 0 0 0 0 0
Total Relocations 19 15 24 25 16
Potential Hazardous Mat.
Sites Each 6 6 6 7 6
Wetlands Acres 0 0 0 0 0
Stream Impacts Linear feet 110 100 176 185 100
Biotic Community
Impacts Acres 42.8 42.8 42.8 42.8 42.8
Noise Impacted
properties 14 14 13 13 13
Air Quality 1-Hour
2025 * Carbon
monoxide
( m) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8
Right of Way Cost Dollars 4,083,000 4,083,000 7,245,000 8,312,500 4,920.000
Construction Cost Dollars 12,600,000 11,800,000 11,600,000 11,600,000 12,100,000
Total Cost Dollars 16,683,000 15,883,000 18,845,000 19,912,500 17,020,000
*ppm = parts per million, National Ambient Air Quality Standards: 35 ppm (1-hour)
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
Relocation Impacts
There are 19 relocations along the preferred alternate. These include 14 residential, 5
businesses and no minority relocatees.
Historic Architectural Resources
The area of potential effect (APE) for this project was determined and reviewed by
NCDOT staff. The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was consulted as
part of the process for identifying historic architectural resources located in the APE.
There are no properties either listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places within the project area.
Archaeological Resources
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area.
Since the proposed project will not affect any sites eligible for the National Register, further
investigation is not warranted. The State Historic Preservation Office concurs with the
archaeological review of the project.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Waters of the United States
There are no wetlands in the project area. One perennial stream is located in the project
study area: an UT to East Fork Deep River. This tributary flows southward crossing underneath
West Market Street at a perpendicular. The proposed road will cross the East Fork Deep River
UT near the beginning of the proposed project, impacting approximately 110 feet of stream.
Federally Protected Species
The USFWS lists one federally protected species for Guilford County. The bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is listed as Threatened, but is proposed for delisting.
No suitable habitat for the bald eagle is within or near the project area. The only nearby
waterbody is the East Fork Deep River UT, which does not provide suitable foraging or nesting
habitat for the bald eagle. Additionally, a July 16, 2002 review of the N.C. Natural Heritage
Program's database revealed no known populations within one mile of the project area.
Consequently, the proposed project will have "No Effect" on the bald eagle.
Hazardous Materials
A field reconnaissance survey was conducted and six (6) underground storage tanks (UST)
and three (3) aboveground storage tanks) AST sites were identified within the project area. The
monetary and scheduling impacts resulting from these sites is anticipated to be low to moderate.
There are no apparent regulated or unregulated landfills or dumpsites within the project limits.
Enclosed you will find a completed ENG form 4345 and mailing labels. This submittal is
in accordance with step four of the guidelines for integrating project review under the National
Environmental Policy Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This letter, along with the
previously distributed EA, should provide sufficient information for the issuance of a Public
Notice for the project. The hearing is scheduled for May 22, 2006.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Marie Sutton at
[phone] or Amy James at [phone].
Sincerely,
-m4u
fog Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington (Cover Letter Only)
Ms. Sue Homewood, NCDWQ (7 copies)
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Chris Militscher, USEPA
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Al-Ghandour, Program Development
Mr. Mike Mills, Division Engineer
Mr. Art McMillian, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E. Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Jerry Parker, Division Environmental Supervisor
Ms. Marie Sutton, PDEA
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
Public reporting burden for this collection of Information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should
require 5 hours or less. This Includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of Information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403: Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries
Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine
Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies. Submission of
requested information is voluntary, however, If information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE ILLED BY THE CORPS
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ITEMS BELOW TO BE FLLED BYAPPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business 919-733-3141 b. Business
it. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish, upon
request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
C --'?' -.. ? sly e la >?
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE D E
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OR PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions
West Market Street (SR 1008) widening from SR 2007 (Bunker Hill Road) to NC 68, Guilford County, NC
NCDOT TIP Project Number R-2611 (Federally Funded)
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Perennial Unnamed Tributary to East Fork Deep River & an
Ephemeral Stream which flows Into West Fork Dee River.
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Guilford County NC
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) Section, Township, Range, Lat/Lon, and/or Accessory's Parcel Number, for example.
West Market Street (SR 1008), Greensboro, NC Guilford County
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Please see attached vicinity map and cover letter.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
Widen West Market Street (SR 1008) to a four-lane median divided facility in Guilford County, Greensboro. It will cross one perennial stream that flows through
culverts underneath West Market Street near the eastern end of the project. West Market Street crosses this stream at a perpendicular. The ephemeral channel is
located at the western end of the project. This channel serves to convey stormwater overflow from a sediment pond on the north side of West Market Street. During
storm events stormwater flows from the pond through a pipe underneath West Market Street into the one-foot wide channel.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The widening will increase the traffic carrying capacity of West Market Street.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Widening West Market Street will result in roadway fill in surface waters.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Fill from roadway.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
See Merger Permit Application Letter
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes _ No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
See attached mailing labels.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent
of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APP NT DATE
SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized
agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
and Wilfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
ABBCD INVESTMENTS LLC 05- 09 W YJOHN M MICHAEL ATKINS
0 W MARKET CLAYTON
8615 MCGUIRE RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274100000 KERNERSVILLE, NC 272840000 GOLFAX, NC 272350000 t 1
R-2611 R-2611
ATKINS B GENE ATKINS BRIAN K & NATALIE L ATKINS D L
9032 W MARKET ST 9210 W MARKET ST 9022-R1 W MARKET ST
MCLEANSVILLE, NC 273019779 COLFAX, NC 2723 50000 COLFAX, NC 272359787
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
ATKINS JON CURTIS ATKINS LARRY G ATKINS STANLEY L
9018 W MARKET ST 120 MARSHALL-SMITH RD 9028 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272359787 COLFAX, NC 272359777 KERNERSVILLE, NCR 2761848419
R-2611 R-2611
ATTAYEK JOSEPH E & EVELYN L AVERITT PROPERTIES INC BALL HERMAN
9023 W MARKET ST 8814-NEAR W MARKET ST 8609 MCGUIRE RD
OAK RIDGE, NC 273109852 COOKEVILLE, TN 385020000 COLFAX, NC 272350084 611
R-2611 R-2611
BARNARD JOAN WELLS BARRON KEITH BEESON CALAB S
205 S BUNKER HILL RD 8923 W MARKET ST 9078 W MARKET ST
KERNERSVILLE, NC 272840000 COLFAX, NC 272359602 COLFAX, NC 2723 50205
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
BESSEMER IMP CO BETHEA TYRON NEAL BLACKBURN CARL WAYNE
9006-NEAR W MARKET ST 134 KIDD RD 8608 MCGUIRE RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274154220 COLFAX, NC 272359723 GREENSBORO, NC 274032719
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
BLACKBURN GERALD W BLACKBURN HERBERT LEON BLACKBURN ?RR SELL E
8711 SHERFIELD RD 211 S BUNKER HILL RD 8625 COLFAX, NC 272359725 COLFAX, NC 272359724 COLFAX, NC 272350281 81 t
R-2611 R-2611
BLACKBURN VIRGINIA BLUE RIDGE VALLEY BOWMAN DALLAS MISS
CHANDLER 9058 W MARKET ST 200 S BUNKER HILL RD
8620 MCGUIRE RD GREENSBORO, NC 274190000 COLFAX, NC 272359 724 t
COLFAX, NC 272350000 R-2611
R-2611
BRADY JAMES O JR. & TRACEY BROWN CLARENCE W BROWN HENRY D
9015 W MARKET ST 8936-NEAR W MARKET ST 8828 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274550000 COLFAX, NC 272350000 OAK RIDGE, NC 273100000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
BROWN SAM PAGE III BUCHANAN WILLIAM B BULL ARTHUR LINVII-LE
9068 W MARKET ST 9205 W MARKET ST 9078-R1 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 2723 50000 KERNERSVILLE, NC 272848737 KERNERSVILLE, NC 272840000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
BYRD BETTY N CAFFEY I H DIST CO INC CAINE DONALD R
3316 SANDY RIDGE RD 8749 W MARKET ST 121-R1 LANDMARK DR
COLFAX, NC 272359609 GREENSBORO, NC 274090000 GREENSBORO, NC 274099603
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
CAMCO MANUFACTURING INC
8600-NEAR W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 27409
R-2611
CAMPBELL DONALD RAY
7954 NATIONAL SERVICE RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274099416
R-2611
CANGIALOSI GIACOMO
115 LANDMARK DR
GREENSBORO, NC 274010000
R-2611
CAROLINA STEEL CORPORATION CAROLINA TEL & TEL CO
9035 W MARKET ST 8925-8935 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274200888 TARBORO, NC 278860000 R
R-2611 R-2611
COLFAX VOLUNTEER FIRE
9414 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350127 C
R-2611
CORP OF PRESIDING BISHOP
8940-NEAR W MARKET ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841500000 E
R-2611
CRUM BRUCE DANIEL & LINDA
8612 MCGUIRE RD
COLFAX, NC 272359726
R-2611
DDC PROPERTIES LLC
8717 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274070000
R-2611
DELUXE FINANCIAL SERVICES
116 LANDMARK DR
SHOREVIEW, MN 551262966
R-2611
DILLON FAYE F
9213 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611
DONATHAN NELLIE
8704 SHERFIELD RD
COLFAX, NC 272359725
R-2611
DDRLTD
8665 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274190867
R-2611
DEAN EVON WELCH
8934-NEAR W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274090000
R-2611
DEVANE DAVID DWAYNE
202 S BUNKER HULL RD
COLFAX, NC 272359724
R-2611
DODSON SHEILA F
8513 CIDER RD
COLFAX, NC 272359768
R-2611
DOUGHERTY DORETTE G
117 LANDMARK DR
GREENSBORO, NC 274102158
R-2611
COLFAX DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY LLC
9062 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274090000
R-2611
CREWS HANSELL WILSON JR
9111 W MARKET ST
STATE COLLEGE, PA 168012557
R-2611
DAVIS TIMOTHY P & LYNN P
132 KIDD RD
COLFAX, NC 272359723
R-2611
DEAN WILLARD
8748 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274099682
R-2611
DICKERSON RICHARD E
8836-NEAR W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272359786
R-2611
DONATHAN BERNICE J
203 S BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350044
R-2611
DUKE POWER CO
8800 W MARKET ST
CHARLOTTE, NC 282420001 R
R-2611
EASTER S LOWELL ENDURA PRODUCTS INC FABRISTEEL CORPORATION
8937-8943 W MARKET ST 100 LITTLE SANTEE RD 8416 W MARKET ST
HIGH POINT, NC 272650000 GREENSBORO, NC 274190908 GREENSBORO, NC 274099042
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
FIELDS REBA G FOWLER MICHAEL A GIRL SCOUTS TARHEEL TRIAD
214 S BUNKER HILL RD 8832 W MARKET ST 8818-NEAR W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272359724 GREENSBORO, NC 274104756 COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
GRAY ANNE M GRAY HERBERT C GRAY ROSCOE W JR HEIRS
9200 W MARKET ST 213 S BUNKER HILL RD 9213-R1 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350097 COLFAX, NC 272359724 COLFAX, NC 272350097
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
GRAY STEVEN PAUL GRAY ZANE H GUILFORD COUNTY
9223 W MARKET ST 217 S BUNKER HILL RD 8700 SHERFIELD RD
COLFAX, NC 272350085 COLFAX, NC 272359724 GREENSBORO, NC 274023427 C
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD HAGE JOSEPH A & JAMILEE C HALL RONALD GRAHAM
9112 W MARKET ST 8619 MCGUIRE RD 8921 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274011654 I GREENSBORO, NC 272350000 GREENSBORO, NC 274099003
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
HARDIN OIL CO INC HARLAN OPAL T HEIRS HARMSTON JAMES
9422 W MARKET ST 9404 W MARKET ST 216 LITTLE SANIEE RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274071310 WINSTON SALEM, NC 271079766 GREENSBORO, NC 274553459
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
HAYDEN LLOYD K HAYES ROBERT B HAYWARD BAKER INC
8707 SHERFIELD RD 8503 CIDER RD 208 LITTLE SANTEE RD
COLFAX, NC 272359725 COLFAX, NC 272350000 ODENTON, MD 211130000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
FIEDGECOCK STEVEN DALE HEDRICK JACK STANLEY HINTON, KIMBERLY
8607 MCGUIRE RD 9013 W MARKET ST 1583 MSC
COLFAX, NC 272350158 SUMIVIERFIELD, NC 273589014 RALEIGH, NC 27699
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
HOWARD JESSIE LEE INGOLD SHIRLEY S IRELAND REX
9215 W MARKET ST 8826 W MARKET ST 8712 SHERFIELD RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274099283 HIGH POINT, NC 272659106 COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
IRVIN JOHN L # 5 LLC JOHNSTON ANN KIDD HENRY L JR
8600-8640 W MARKET ST 8614 MCGUIRE RD 118 KIDD RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274030000 COLFAX, NC 272359726 COLFAX, NC 272350094
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
KRUSINSKI DARLISH RAY KRUSINSKI DONALD W LAWSON JESSE M HEIRS
8613 MCGUIRE RD 209 KRUSINSKI IN 9401 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 2723 50202 COLFAX, NC 272350081 MCLEANSVILLE, NC 273019732
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
LEWIS J DWIGHT LITTLE MARY LOUP LONG ERMALEE D
115 KIDD RD 8723 SHERFIELD RD 8507 CIDER RD
COLFAX, NC 272359723 KERNERSVILLE, NC 272840000 COLFAX, NC 272350327
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
LONG JOHN H MALONE EDWARD P MCGEE S JANE
3400 SANDY RIDGE RD 9038 W MARKET ST 3406 SANDY RIDGE RD
COLFAX, NC 272359610 GREENSBORO, NC 274090000 COLFAX, NC 2723596 10
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
MEARS CHARLES R MER ALCO INC MILLER RICHARD A
8807 W MARKET ST 120 N BUNKER HILL RD, ste 200 8714 SHERFIELD RD
COLFAX, NC 272359786 HIGH POINT, NC 272650000 COLFAX, NC 272350087
R-2611 R-1611 R-2611
MITCHELL RUSSELL A MORGAN & SONS WEEK-END NANCE LIMUEL A
9039 W MARKET ST 8709 W MARKET ST 215 S BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350000 GREENSBORO, NC 274199774 COLFAX, NC 272359724
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
NATIONSBANK OF NORTH NEAL JIMMY WAYNE NEEDHAM RUDY DARNELL
CAROLINA 114 BOBBY IN 9022 W MARKET ST
108 LANDMARK DR COLFAX, NC 272359722 COLFAX, NC 272359787
CHARLOTTE, NC 272550000 R-2611 R-2611
R-2611
NEWELL LUQLLE C TRUSTEE OLDCASTLE PRECAST EAST INC ONEAL METALS INC
123 KIDD RD 110 BURGESS RD 301 STANDARD DR
COLFAX, NC272350000 TUCKER, GA 300840000 BIRMINGHAM, AL 352022623
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
PACK ANTHONY WADE PARRISH ARMERIA B PARRISH DOLORES P HEIRS
204 S BUNKER HILL RD 104 N BUNKER HILL RD 105 MARSHALL-SMITH RD
COLFAX, NC272350000 COLFAX, NC 272359715 COLFAX, NC 272359701
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
PARRISH LARRY T & MARIE A PARSONS CARLTON R PATTERSON REZ D
9016 W MARKET ST 106 N BUNKER HILL RD 3404 SANDY RIDGE RD
COLFAX, NC 272359787 COLFAX, NC 272359715 COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
PENDRY MABEL PHARMAGRAPHICS LLC PIEDMONT TRIAD AIRPORT
3402 SANDY RIDGE RD 100 LANDMARK DR 109 BURGESS RD
COLFAX, NC 272359610 GREENSBORO, NC 274090000 GREENSBORO, NC 274255005 T
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
P-M TUBE & SPECIALTIES INC POTTS JAMES ALONZO POTTS JOHN T
217 LITTLE SANTEE RD 9069 W MARKET ST 9300 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274190000 SOUTHPORT, NC 284610000 COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
POTTS MARY S PRICE BOBBY JOE JR QUICK H W & KATIE M
9064 W MARKET ST 112 N BUNKER HILL RD 9219 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350000 COLFAX, NC 272359715 COLFAX, NC 272350086
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
QUICK JAMES A
3319 SANDY RIDGE RD
KERNERSVILLE, NC 272848435
R-2611
RAMCO FABRICATORS INC
9501 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611
RAYLE JOHN W TRUSTEE
3307-NEAR SANDY RIDGE RD
COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611
REGIONAL AIRLINE
8711 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC274190124
R-2611
RICE LOUISE J HEIRS
215 STANDARD DR
KERNERSVILLE, NC 272840000
R-1611
RMC CAROLINA MATERIALS INC
3415 SANDY RIDGE RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274199178
R-2611
SANDY RIDGE ASSOC LLC
9001-9005 W MARKET ST
GRAHAM, NC 272530000
R-2611
SHADY GROVE
119 N BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350098 E
R-2611
SIMPSON DONALD R
9052 W MARKET ST
SANFORD, NC 273304105
R-2611
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
9113-9117 W MARKET ST, ste 1650
ATLANTA, GA 303060000 R
R-1611
REGIONAL CENTER VENTURES
8642-8662 W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274250000
R-2611
RICE JOHN B & EDITH M
125 KIDD RD
COLFAX, NC 272350115
R-2611
RICHARDSON CORP RIDGE JIMMY D & SHARON S
8001-R1 INDUSTRIAL VILLAGE RD 123 MARSHALL-SMITH RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274020000 GREENSBORO, NC 274100000
R-2611 R-2611
ROGERS ROY CARL
114 N BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350222
R-2611
SAMET NORMAN G TRUSTEE
114 LANDMARK DR
GREENSBORO, NC 274190000
R-2611
SEIFRIED HOWARD R
9217 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272359789
R-2611
SHADY GROVE METHODIST
120-NEAR N BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350098 E
R-2611
SLATER STEPHANIE LINVILLE
212-NEAR KRUSINSKI IN
GOLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611
SELLERS MAXINE S BALLARD
8719 SHERFIELD RD
COLFAX, NC 272350091
R-2611
SHADY GROVE WESLEYAN CH
100-120 N BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350000 E
R-2611
SMITH JOSEPHINE COX
8714 W MARKET ST.
GREENSBORO, NC 274099415
R-2611
SOUTHERN REGION INDUSTRIAL SOUTHERN SECURITIES LTD
8201-8401 W MARKET ST 3408 SANDY RIDGE RD
ROANOKE, VA 240420028 GREENSBORO, NC 274040345
R-2611 R-2611
SPENCER JAMES WARREN SPILLERS WILLIAM J STANLEY BOBBY L
207 S BUNKER HILL RD 8905 W MARKET ST 106 BOBBY LN
COLFAX, NC 272840000 HIGH POINT, NC 272612758 COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
STANLEY RUBY C TENCARVA MACHINERY CO THOMAS CHARLES WAYNE
105 BOBBY LN 1115 PLEASANT RIDGE RD 9050 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350000 GREENSBORO, NC 274250000 GREENSBORO, NC 274090000
R-2611 R-2611 R-2611
THOMPSON & CARSON DELLOSA THOMPSON JULIA K
255-NEAR STANDARD DR 9220 W MARKET ST
HIGH POINT, NC 272650000 R COLFAX, NC 272350146
R-2611 R-2611
TRAC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
8713 W MARKET ST
RALEIGH, NC 276580000
R-2611
TUCKER LARRY EUGENE
8907-8919 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272359738
R-2611
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE WATSON LAURENCE GRAY JR.
1106 PLEASANT RIDGE RD 9400 W MARKET ST
WASHINGTON, DC 202600000 A COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611 R-2611
WELCH RICHARD LEE & MARY Q
8920 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611
WEST MARKET STREET
8760-NEAR W MARKET ST
GREENSBORO, NC 274199748
R-2611
WRIGHT JEFFREY ALAN
208 S BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350000
R-2611
DECKER, PHIL
99 SPRING ST
ATLANTA, GA 30303
R-2611
HARRIS, JAMES
1556 NEC
RALEIGH, NC 27699
R-2611
WELLS WILLIAM H JR
9302-9304 W MARKET ST
COLFAX, NC 272350034
R-2611
WOLFE JOHN G III
102 S BUNKER HILL RD
KERNERSVILLE, NC 272842757
R-2611
XTRA LEASE INC
8760 W MARKET ST
ST LOUIS, MO 631464020
R-2611
HINNANT, DAVID
1597 MSC
RALEIGH, NC 27699
R-2611
MUSSELL, WALTER
PO BOX 687
GRAHAM, NC 27253
R-2611
TISE JERRY C
121 KIDD RD
COLFAX, NC 272359723
R-2611
TYLER TALMON & PATRICIA A
209 S BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 2723 59724
R-2611
WEAVIL BRENDA M
103 S BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350011
R-2611
WELLS WILLIAM HOWARD SR
102 N BUNKER HILL RD
COLFAX, NC 272350034
R-1611
WORTH ALEXANDER M JR
3414 SANDY RIDGE RD
GREENSBORO, NC 274040012
R-2611
YORK GARY THOMAS
8766 W MARKET ST
WHITE PLAINS, NC 270310000
R-2611
THOMAS, DREW
1556 MSC
RALEIGH, NC 27699
R-1611
PV .
iiN'?sDHiaArrv
I
/

Ri'Uld / \ ? Oy'
'
`
?
?,ONI+IN
?AA?NAL
?Il 311IN
H ....... ?.• t CE 3b., "R")''
uR . ?N Wi'idgi 11:
?3110Wy!\VS I T 1
l
DN/
1IN iciE,a
Ji bbVtl
\. /
PN
(
' OOD DR
Al?
.• WINw
I
?(
'L \ I 1 2i
M ?-
n
H?da
b3µ
u
/ 41F11 H1 u? '..Sri o,lc / f 1° IP H1D?pWn E1 W
illcF lnl HoHD ndiw VI rlolygt1r?... Nu
?liD?ov') c o oN
v?9
Il ???b V ?,n > aX v N II d,?ti? ail
J flan I I Z ?jl •t'
.I 'QENR09Er-.+ 46VV ]131I1NdM 1 C7 ? W ,\ b)j v, O
I(IIIO DNIHa6M6111M MEADOW f","N-
I.. ?N NuvA_ _"I 1 r
IDGN09
G^RgIAG; ia ?C.a °A'Ydwn,l
IRON GIJiRIAOf,,r` i
' CF•'g vJA\ t'µ?;7y ?/I? UnNT'A! ? 5,.?1' NI ? ? ? / IrI BREF1t"'_.N n?, I OP( I' ,3\ ?
A3q( _„SYI 'l ! Mll 40 / J?!. SRI ??'1.7NI S(!iihM
MOUV3WA 10
pfi iuB
yyN?/Il Lp?,??1'I.
'c 1V?l, l{r
Va OA' / d O n o
)) WV DNilibSyy?' ) ??Il,
1i ?• rys 0U.. ii, I
,
1 INR15 yy (JH 'S I 1 /
?t3 rl/ r ? ( a J3N0 ,?( Otll I GN/,P?'OP Gw
?`a? ? cPr ?? 3 !0? ?K b/ v t Mi `III aryl CT ? ?? ?,1 ??. ..._.....- rwEr nr>L
\DU 1Hrfm, I o JG G.Ut: a s ?g qd?, Isli3'IA^uv rNl E
gg •FJ N3?71A3NWiln
?? G- ?bnsshDAasl
l?h0,1 4?1y1 GONE IID-N$a1(? P \ G RP T$RR'ER HILLS C_( 7RD? g W ?'H?. fV `g' _ pU !
EN,011
\??G f$? I j( atin eat ? d?JUnesdM-Id
SwIl I rLl"S ER
? 'ND N:)n?3??l ti (? Ow1Nd? cIC A ?,C NHnDUNN?NOI PO $ ???v1 MBE cF \1\ ?r ?pPP Pll
"ry ? "`Jl4441LL -i P i?Y 1 sy?7,`_. oP ?w, '1?ANV A.. -.2 _.
3DOIN IHY`,c?. 4 OU 3110 IA
^a
t1 ? sS ?' cM?+o.vB _ _ DR _ ? ? vii -?? ? ? .,
_o II C „? nti
OR vy^eiILP'IN I? ?1 ' ' ,, ?qA'
Q: a:
at ,
W ??W W T
/Iww W a, ?
YI
L
, 4f
,
I-ov C? aN17b-
Y
y1MP No -.r?? uR Srm>b+>A?°, _ R
I I ? ----'- I ,I?_ ON IIIYOV S
j/ ?e,r !? 1 rL a1.
HIE
?? JON. 16 ??.,? w i iYJIH' 1 UH ?b g/ Ab
NIH6NOB
NOIJ3NN00 3k101lId `. __ k, w ._ ,-? w•A?,,- o\ D MoTbY , Nol "Ip
0 f* b -
c,
\ tl N 111111
gi.?IP?`fi?av?? - Hs`F'? 1 1 1 Na 121,' -€1 !\ Js DNnn
y
`rA , q,' 6 I 11
PQ's L? ` ?I I
i ??• r ,
'!)11 6? --VN3R?
?' ?5 0131. 3!103 \. .. •y _
rc?
10 ill
001UEN AGP -0131S39nf'_.?2
io?1 .. ;s?d'tl LrG+r1 • :.,.'.. ? ??" '"'? - °\1 ? o'Sr . C._-I ? ?? st.iDHnn ?I W b'?Blra'?` ? f ?%
4 I
? ,? N1 lY e?. DoDNbS b'..
11,10f]
Q
IL I' Po. -- - ( U ? ??
DNIOHAM
§2 I I WV1 hJl!(N" ?. - I THA EP - ° - yS11 y? POP
Cc PRO
p
h i' ?, ?r ICI 1
FYIONg1pNE. GI ri -.. p? ? ? ?nU. _. din013M ;? wi-I,)vi iL IrylHYd91A
OA dR gl _ _ RO \ I EP D I I"r) YHVIY(INdj- ? - ... I
Y
.a`gp0... Bob 61 %:' / 3? - -AvY+o9d
oq•.._-.. cuR§. le mPl13w 1 R' I r$Y??7
0111 1130dWb F .. OH M3NjN3N '
i.•) ? I ?P`\'Ot
y4, / .. 1 -I I _ INDU 0'
gISt. PAULGW°
'??, ? f yo +l' ?eoND°!!?i I alb ,? f oP ?? I
' 10 / Wr ? f g ` P
t?, r RD -
H / ?, 1'^ IOYMAIYNIN3? /?QN%- \ _
`. ? ? w Ce, ? I ?I I Qk?
r + r-?I ?d,I 'r m
I
rlo I U\
Dill
i
\
J ? 1?I
HE
ON 1 ° - a3IN
z f\ ?,1 1 ? i O Oy
g\M\\l6tONE I?l? P' I N 1
O
V °a, H
i0N 3rJ61 AO tl6 •?2 ^•?`?'...
CARSQN 1:.
NOW (n V-
?N31 rvq ?l J .-•?• e3oin r- __ .
' _ : O O W.. A +J 31b631Y03Nb5
al
YI51
BoLL -j
I %
a]b NOigneHSV ?,{7 Q V N1 3 wH E
' ? ? I ID ?Inafinie?r / 4
_ ?? ? Hfnvul?? r-'
CEO
'Yy,DN ? ' y1 /L `. ? ABNIN9 I '`e
a xA i ) iIa wio O IT
Nn A / Fa.
wIMaNIL90N AimIN ?? tl)
?, J _... .? ... PO HE A30YI
\
o
?w I. ._ 1'I i1?aNq©N 'a r" .__
to
:) L
HER CY)
I I 1) i
' IIOg V11i a TINH3NNnL(S rOH ?. _` p ? I I ? 5
1
V, I
tsPD ii8 n--n' 'ki
IN)
I -I
1 1NO\y (VUJyOrll'1 - - - `.. _. I - ?
6 PP?v "? ?y+ S 40
UOVLSTON 1? 3Arjo'"N
?1 ?i ? ? j I N'Hf%111153M
it H<1 nN My\ , i ¢ N 1
< 1 A (s; - u ` q 4 ((111 ^Ar
u U U I M oe Ni
lU 31NN0 AD,A`- i.,
/. ? $? ?,Ifi -rfib?ii oy? i •NiNivedSo I
2 No
ND1
Rn : ?" \ - -y; 1flNNnD s S it
L c p ?vo
(I1J
1)'1O-IlIf1J aeienoru?p?rr," -- ``? /.
. WILL" CPEtx
0 do
?y a
yP1 ,.
rln
? ??/ I W ?? / ? ffP\E I :'Ijy?l., flfl (..RU ?\ I IlU
UI( A(vgv,.
3n3 L,A? A' 3LbBHS11A1 I ¢ 5
6n 'I
WR
Q M1 ( cE 31 DR -- I? WE ?00 .cryEES?" ?Y i G .a': s - pis r 3117 NJ-.?
0\AArIfI CT O ?'?' N
, ? P I BFFGII F G` g1 °?
by _ `? Z? d aiv3Witlm ?J -/'jbl l)11 N(' \U f1. JI r ( J4.F}?. \-? \ - kNO?;J\ N W? f N? INHpll.
•bbLfb?` fY P `Ln;- !Il )•t. V/ il. - HYO ?'? I QP\?'iV7 E
PDYIO W D '?' bb s u cF?PP
?q?'. d' 1`;Q NNd7.S?py • ' ? A?`4 r? 1 IN ?` /y? N ?? hr
iI ? f rN f0 e• N ??(? -- ^ ` ? '" ??fkT 1 yBI P'f?vna ? No i ? 5r '??c, ? ? j ?I ,rr`????IIIJJ
n. B \n 3 1 sr P 8 \ ?D / y\py
R....?
vvrF 1 cKF E 1 g? , ?E PD ras to a+ ri3auly Nu r! r, H10? 00
r P I NHIP GA E?T+'1 VI 1 PRE \ \. -V/d, ('?( ?w\.?tP 6 11(I.i 1'1YJI I \\> I1 ?.S N u N? P OH - °3N?11N
III. RE N,?v
t}?? N??I1I p !c Lm wA ? F?
PP,\ YN UPOV YCiC1 ?d0 rk..TSIPv aaa M MIJ{?,Ni ONIJNfi 31'1sm?Zr jf ?? 1 1?
` °.\ ?n?_
LL NN , .In lyy, / H ?b t ?5 ".; // m n 1'-1 0 .I YaA
w ODES cr
KALE
n S' A 1 ,IN. Y F N7173 zr? g I LIDJ9311d? flD
HO + r11ANnl? lJYI i NVIYNIII4 ,'.? `OP ¢ UlYIN15(IONI RI10.iN00NB '
by Ph JE U /1 )A VI 0. IAN,
_
NsT?irr.Y 1E^ ? ..... _.. y 3I.
._ _ J 1 811. ua
$d 3'
, J 1 Y
iWooD, -? :.".1
U 31TNl1 Y6 b0 - / ', 41 Ly?? 16
Y.
NVD a
rl ( 4 PPm' RD
3NIM \ l . J Nl1 -- RS? -S" I cn Hn
RI bnA
.y _ GIIIEMAV Y.,
? 111 MM ?!
6 I
i ON
BAOyD ? T D ? I Y 1 ?? "? I.?e ,: $,/--' 1„qYE+nl --
© ?,1 Ilu.vllvd ,alai I`n ,',1 cil•. ?' \ S.... G ' 1? f,?
a{7t /T°O?d9nIM1^ PARS 1?= Y PaY `'\?'??(P !.' Sr1s,?,.>"O yN'}? a,.` Sll 331 R 'F' n f/ c1S qJ YSId "?+ HU
2 OU `! / _ 0 IANFAS _DP - 1'i?` ? ?i ? NU IVO
,d..
8. ~v
of

? y

A ?r co z r?s ??p?Syaz°'za»»zzzG»zz
p T
oz ° O Z
0 0
N o z pC C O > ti Fn
w
p O ° .? C >>> w o T
. O
D TC 5 f r c > < < < « ° «< Z
> 00
n n z
Z z s
N H c c n s
C n
0
IN
¦
Ali ?I?

C. •
-,se --/

Match Line A
---------------
A?x

•
lie
is
Fi'
lilt,
d

6,

I
!am
4b g

? 1
J
177
B
r

T I
r r

h 4
? s
9
smo? r
p31
"
-d auiq g31nW
a
?-- IW O 0!I iM?00? ICI HS _ ? -

C $
s I
¦
., N

(Ag
?m

Match Line B
----------------
I
I
I I
I91 I
I Ij I
I ? I
Ir I
?IL_I
I I.
I
II
LP

?I
II?
U
I?,I
t I
Ig
I

?j
_-rl- $ ?
?a

? I

P?
Y

a ? ? O a O
1
n- n O 3 c Co
_I .O ' n r
ZO z o O Z m
Z y N
0 0
r O
O T
>
- -? n
ry n m
N N
-7^l J(1 w N
-- ? M
s ^
J1C)jU?
I
n
f

F

n C >m >m >T T m m m> T m w
m -? ??? Z L? Z >< Z N 7? i1 L1 Mq? w x C
?? Oy C7 7 H ?I @ T Q
O O OZ OZ Oa a Z Z Z ti NO Z=
? ??? C?jO CO m m O O O? m 0 0
w? N? M ? ?O O ? N
N30 ?T T.4 ON 0
on o C O O N i -=i
y
m} °mc C -1 .( O T
y
_ OO >
? Z;N IN N w > <
o0!=s mm
O OF Op O w
z
m c C n w O
S w n O
v

N
G
A
C

n

IOU
B
I I
----------------
g aut7 gjjeW
F
I
? ? ?a II
1 ¦ia i
-
e

N
J
+ n + ri
O n? O
F ;o 3 n O
O p O 11
/m NZ NN n O r ?v
-? N
G O
r
N N
a
JAU
_ -- --
? SRI. 1

00

s
m
/ t-
Match'°e 3sr, 03,40
a
•

S >Z 2tt Lim+w Kc_
-j O O" ?i1 Z {1 Z Ai M N Z Z Z& N Z Z
>< ?n ?O SO O O O C1 ; O O N
'" n nN nN -nl OO r>>w O O> n N II
Z n sl n >•
O n C> S y
O O O -+
-1 ? 4 O
H
nn s„' N O O
1 O G; >s w n m
Oup pc v M?
Z
„ C C n +
s a s n p
n
p
O
>
0
m
v
P?
3 •?Po
x of v..
Np ?_
QtO
4
V ? Ir
n VJ
??by o ?N
?O
4
?IIOM •?? _

6 y
A
n
?le
a -11)
r

/ 4v
/ ftl P F
V
P rr : a
r
n
?? ??? 0I II B 10/110011
K ? 1? K T C1? K? >> =K Z„ Z? } xN K X r n M C
1 ? 1 Cm ; "? N °•M'1 °H °O ? y H ? r 1 y ?
r? N Z m2 O O ^= OZ i1p M Z Z 2 ?i a 2=
Gtm O 2 IZiI °Q a 3 C1 a a }r T-ai p' 03 > ^' M r
K 1 E E K
o° m
o °mmT'K
O f ?' m• A. 00 > Z
N T m <
m <z =: s
N H 0°v°c o Mm
n Z 3C
° C C ^ 4 <
sn u ? = n v
O
? CREAT•S^-9
N? b
?, 00 C1
00??bx
C bo'b
?a
O ? 'n

Match Line D \
.- ----------------
a

•
----I
?K
-1
s?

? a
1?
b
0

vi.

?r
?l
A
4 ¦

P
e`61
V
?I
lilt
A
A
1I1i
a
dl?
?h glg
A
ela
Ali
l?
^
k-

LAI
(M1
E M?
i?
6?? C
? b
MJ
o? p o?
? wC)
N H
9C
y -.
?Q
A???r7ia?ttrR
'r-
on
?t1 t?oN rM?
R
oil
v?
now ,
r ?y s
------------- --- -
Q oui I g3juW

J ?`

Match Line E
2 7709 33S ---------
I
I? ? I
I -
"I i
N I ? I
c
r ?
CURE "Al
I ?
F

Ila,
?.
"Ji

r -.60
?d

MATCH LINE

r.
\ r

On n .? 1 T7 n C ZK >K >r
?j O z TZ O O OZ C1Z C1'
0 3r
O n 0 0 ? O ? mC m? 1
II ? Q 11,11 '
UI 2 T > < Z 3F a > In
OO > n O O= _= I
a n O !
N p o O
m?
I
o U?
,04
mqm ISFO I _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l I A0
_
? I \
J
jr . 7..

! A W
88
9s
+ 1

F
4

TA
®;??p??011118101110011
n T 111 T T1 n C >m >T >0 r K N )pt r r K C
T ? 1 0111 1;11 ? 1? yl °y °?I °T 1 ?I ? y ? °
r o z ?'y >> > rcn aZ cmlo?n cziczi czi zczi
O N
q. N O o r?° 1^ r to T 1 r N >. O O O z m
=0 ZO O z I=II ~ AO ..1C T-1C ~>°O ONC1
C Z
>? r N °?°' ?4>>>
?" m0 OT m? mmm > -C K < O O
O E N >• ?n m :? w i O O f >
3? ?F N T m <
N N O °° °° O N;
N z n n C O
N C m
m C T A
? A O
m
O

i

1`p
tl
d
Match Line F
g:
9
b
o?
i///P
/ aD
C
g
D
aD
CON
r
i
?n

?
x`
ti } 11.. rvo

I

h 1
I? s
om
.... ammd
r
Match Line G

s
I -"IN
A
b
x Ol
? C ?o b
? ooy?
n
cy n ??
N
O C? ?
O
y?
IOM . ,M
51? alp
n
d
r

9
e<
L
1
?a N
M
' N
T
N
low
-?
f
N
a
h?
C
C-) C)
y
G1

----------------
g aui-I q;)p tN

a
k
a
J
1
CONC
Cft-
f r
:J

?I? Ala
d
r
tit
I
• ? AFL ?j
FO _
e
--.............. n
Match Line H

d
I's
GG?
Y?
?1 G
G
i
? w
=1
•-P
y N
mmil? I _

a?
MY) «rt?
•_J
MJ
ti?sa• r?r
i
?IIpM ?'

I V ? :1
r'777'
n?
'C1

y
N
----------------
H au!'I yaiuW o
0
O
O ?
H
? all4
oil
1
59

NIO

fig
i

\ N
?\\V\

7,

x
I&

owl\ V /
G
J
N'' \ P
l
i
TA ,
1.
• ROD
O \ T
®? ???sk DI I 1181 ?III?011
^' ?? O Z i ?n-Z ?? O O OZ L1Z ilp a Z Z Z? 1:.\y01 Z Z
( n C >m >m » ? m m m> ? m w
< < ? ? X ? C? m ? ? ? ? ZK ZX Z! n X K K ? r x C
C T 3 r j? ?i N O y 0 0 0 O i ul y 0 y O
flx n O ; Iwll O -1 . >> 7! C (, C n C m m fit O Cl m m O O
? ? ? O ? O> m ? O M < ? ? ?O O ; O w
w= r M n n0 < O a lwn L' A r H ?: -wi ?. M 1? 0 0 O y l= it
>O >O T? 1^ Z< lOC O? > EE EN -1
E > > >
a
O E w mN wN !^ < O O E>
> n < O OS >;: Nr s w <<
n n<iZ 1z
> m
N M O OP OO O M;
N C c n T O
s u n p
m
0
?? - ?oF W A rFq p
\O G
o ?c
Michael F. Easley, Gov for
William G. Ross Jr., Sec- v
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Rer
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Dir
Division of Water Q.
August 12, ?MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
From: Sue Homewood
Subject: Comments on the Environmental Assessment for West Market Street (SRI 008) Widening From SR 2,
(Bunker Hill Road at Colfax to NC 68, Greensboro, Guilford County, Federal Aid Project STP-1008(.
State Project No. 8.2497401, TIP R-2611, DENR Project Number 06-0019.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issua
of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the U.S., including wetlands. It is
understanding that the alternatives, as presented in the EA, will result in impacts to jurisdictional streams and riparian
buffers. The project will have impacts to streams and riparian buffers associated with the Cape Fear River Basin and
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed.
The DWQ offers the following comments based on review of the aforementioned document:
A) East Fork Deep River is listed on the §303(d) list of impaired waters. Instream habitat degradation associated
with urban nonpoint sources such as high turbidity and sedimentation is a possible cause of stream impairmer'
Design plans should include ways to reduce turbidity both during and after construction.
B) After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of impac;i.
to streams and riparian buffers to the maximum extent practical.
C) In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules {15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the e
that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and
values. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(
the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
D) Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However, we realize thus
economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that culverts should be countersu t
to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover, in areas where high quality
wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove preferable. When applicable, DOT should not install the
bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent practicable.
E) NC DOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill, excavation and
clearing, to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need to be included in the final impact
calculations. These impacts, in addition to any construction impacts, temporary or otherwise, also need to be
included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification Application.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street
Internet: h2o.enr.slate.nc.us Winston-Salem, NC 27107
NpilhC? ?+:?,n
,afar [.l'
Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

F) Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands.
G) Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
H) The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for
stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to discharge directly into
streams and surface waters but it should instead be routed as sheet flow through buffer areas.
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Should you have any questions or
require any additional information, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 287.
cc: US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
NCDWQ Central Files
NCDWQ 401/Wetlands Transportation Unit File Copy
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
. Project Review Form
Project Number.
C?

l` County
r, i ?.i
K' n(l Date Received:
I`i D 5 (?) Date Response Due (firm deadline):
1
-11

This project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional OfTtcc Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville o Air ? Soil & Water ? Marine Fisheries
r
? Fayettevdle 0 Water ? Coastal Management

? Mooresville t Groundwater u Wildlife ? Water Resources

? Raleigh Land Quality Engineer ? Environmental Health
? Washington ? Recreational Consultant o Forest Resources ? Solid Waste Mgnt
? Wilmington o Land Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Winston-Salem o Parks & Recreation o Outer
q Water Quality \\I
? Groundwater
D Air Quality
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Datc: In-House Reviv"eT/Agrney:
Response (check all applicable)
o No objection to project as proposed.
? No Comment
C) Insufficient information to complete review
T
,s•
o other (specify or attach comments)

RETURN TO:
Melba McGee
Environmental Coordinator
Office of Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
RECEIVED
N.C °? of ENR
Y1,n5tcn•Salem
Regional Office
19 9 19 U \6 AUG 1 0 2?a
GD
JUL 2 7 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
0
?-n
N
N
O
N
N
It
N
?N
1

V

J? STATE.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT N
? LYNDO TIY. PETT'
MICHAEL F. EASLGY YVW,ATE?'r _
GOVERNOR SECRE TARY
MEMORANDUM TO: NEPA 404 Merger Participants
FROM: Daniel Keel, PE, Project Development Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
SUBJECT: SR 1008 (West Market Street) proposed widening from SR 2007 (Bunker
Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68 in Greensboro. State Project # 8.249740 1,
TIP # R-2611
A merger team meeting for the subject project was held on August 15, 2002 at 1:00 p.m. in the
Board of Transportation Conference Room. The following people were in attendance:
Jean Manuele
Cynthia Van Der Wiele
David Cox
Howard I Iall
Christopher Militscher
Renee Gledhill-Earley
Sara McBride
Craig McKinney
Brad Wall
Greg Brew
Wayne Best
Felix Davila
Donna Dancaussc
Joseph Cotton
Rob Ayers
Elizabeth Lusk
Mark Pierce
Rob Hanson
Linwood Stone
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
US Army Corps of Engineers
Division of Water Quality
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
US Fish and Wildlife Service
US Environmental Protection Agency
SHPO
SHPO
Greensboro DOT
NCDOT/ Division 7
NCDOT Roadway Design
NCDOT Roadway Design
FHWA
FHWA
FHWA
FHWA
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis
TELEPHONE [phone] LOCATION:
FAX [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
WEBSITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC

The meeting opened with a brief overview of the project. The City of Greensboro supports a 4-lane
median section with accommodations for wide outside lanes for bicycles and sidewalks for
pedestrians. NCDOT Division 7 is in favor of the 5-lane cross-section due to the amount of big
truck traffic in the area. There was discussion about sidewalks on the alternates with shoulder as
opposed to curb and gutter. It was noted that additional right of way would be necessary to allow
for sidewalks on the back slope of the ditch, and the lack of protection for pedestrians from
automobiles without curb and gutter.
There was discussion concerning the classification of streams in the area.
There was discussion about a hybrid alternate which would be a combination of the 4-lane and 5-
lane sections, and right of way width of 100' unless the shoulder section is used with sidewalk as
discussed above.
There was discussion of the current traffic volumes being over capacity, and that this is a high
growth corridor.
It was noted that this area will be added for ozone conformity for air quality.
The current project schedule is as follows:
Right of Way: 2006
Construction: 2008
Environmental Assessment Completion: April 2004
FONSI Begin: August 2004
FONSI Completion: April 2005
Concurrence Points I & 2 were both signed at the meeting.
wdk
attachments
Section 404/NEPA Merger Project Team Meeting Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 1. Purpose and Need.
Project Name/Description: SR 1008 (W. Market Street) Proposed Widening from SR
2007 (Bunker Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68, Guilford County, TIP Project R-2611,
Federal Aid Project STP-1008 (9), State Project No. 8.2497401.
Purpose and Need of Proposed Project:
The purpose of this proiect is to increase the traffic carrying capacity on SR 1008. The
need is based on traffic volume being over the current facility's design.
The Project Team has concurred on this date of August 15, 2002 with the purpose and
need for the proposed project as stated above.
t JSACK
IJSEP
NCWRC
NCDCR
NCDOT
USFWS ?'y?? /?`?`'1
NC D WQ C ,1.Gt&A V kK &-A k 4i&
FHWA
Greensboro MPO
Section 404/NEPA Merger Project Team Meeting Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 2. Alternatives to be studied in detail in the NEPA document.
Project Name/Description: SR 1008 (W. Market Street), Proposed widening from SR
2007 (Bunker Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68, Guilford County, TIP Project R-2611,
Federal Aid Project S'I'P-1008(9), State Project No. 8.2497401.
Alternatives to be studied in detail in the NEPA document:
1. No-build/routine maintenance continues
2. 4-lane, median divided, shoulder section best fit widening
3. 4-lane, median divided, curb & gutter best fit widening
4. 5-lane shoulder section best fit widening
5. 5-lane curb & gutter best fit widening
6. Hybrid section, consisting of a combination of 2 or more of the above alternatives
The Project Team has concurred on this date of August 15, 2002 with the "alternatives to
be studied in detail in the NEPA document" as stated above.
U S A C
USE
i
NCWRC ?c??-?? -?
NCDC
Greensboro MPO
NCDOT
USFWS A"4,M eZ
NCDWQ - t O
FHWA/-? ,-U-
-/{--
SR 1008 (W. Market Street) Widening (R-2611)
Federal Aid No.: STP-1008(9)
State Project No.: 8.2497401
NEPA Merger Project Team Meeting
August 15, 2002
Name Agency Phone
?c,rNr--,, 1avic--5-se F t4Lk A- 919 ? ?4,o - y 35 L) k I oq
a.? /J CDOT P D4 L=iar ?B?g, G? lh1N? 33- ?8`? nxT- Lt(p
i•-J?b . u? t i ?.? ' L C- /tax, D, Z/
F E Li ? 7 Avg L. 0, ? Kw P" (°1 19?a5 e -14-3 5 0 x-1 0
Li nwooct Stone N0007-- PDEA (9 19) 733-?S?f? 206
6:7A NCw&L 915 -szf?--,38k6
NC txr
? v
VI C
?\1E'Gic, l'nn,?.L r le ll (\C4. \h `d?l? `t',??11 X a-A
c` vI-I. s `rr xp *QL pAA A iss kk ? _ vac P - Qa?s3 Ct 9 S? - ga b ro
pct (??6t- r?C Do'f 9? 9 7-4 - 76 '/5? x. Z?7
8 200
UWE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ?AtiTMSECP91V
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASITY LYNDo TIPPF,TT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 1, 2002
MEMORANDUM TO: Jean Manuelle, US Army Corps of Engineers
Marella Buncick, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Chris Militscher, US Environmental Protection Agency
Joe H. Mickey, Jr., NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Renee Gledhill-Earley, NC Dept. of Cultural Resources-SHPO
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, NCDENR-DWQ/Wetlands
Felix Davila, FHWA
Tyler Meyer, Greensboro MPO
Greg Brew, NCDOT Roadway Design
Mike Mills, NCDOT Division 7
Craig McKinney, City of Greensboro
Mark Kirstner, Guilford County
Rob Hanson, NCDOT PDEA
FROM: Daniel Keel, PE J-
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
SUBJECT: R-2611
SR 1008 (W. Market Street) Proposed Widening from SR 2007
(Bunker Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68
Guilford County
Meeting to Discuss Project Purpose and Need and Alternatives
I em You are invited to attend a meeting for the above mentioned project on Juiy-24-,2002-at
out I? W.30 a.m. in the Board of Transportation Room at the Transportation Building in
Raleigh. The purpose of the meeting is to review, discuss, and reach consensus on the
"purpose and need" and "alternatives" being considered for this project. These two
project milestones are also known as Concurrence Points 1 and 2. The concurrence
process uses the consensus method of reaching agreement; it is an agreement that is
acceptable to all members.
If you need directions or additional information, please contact me at [phone] ext.
217.
wdk
attachments
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE. [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
I. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A. Summary of Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to increase traffic carryi cam it?on SR 1008
(W. Market Street). The need is based on the current facility being_over capacityand,
expected_growth to exceed capacity. The project begins at the intersection of SR 2007
(Bunker Hill Road) and ends at NC 68 in Greensboro as shown by Figure 1. The length
of the project is approximately 3.6 miles (5.8 kilometers).
B. Project Status
Improvements to SR 1008 are funded by state and federal dollars and are identified
as Project Number R-2611 in the NCDOT 2002-2008 "Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). Proposed improvements consist of widening the current two-lane
roadway to a multilane facility. According to the NCDOT 2002-2008 "TIP, right of way
acquisition is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 and construction is scheduled
to begin in FY 2008.
A Citizens Informational Workshop for the SR 1008 improvement project is
scheduled for summer 2002.
C. Traffic Capacity
Capacity is defined as the maximum number ot'vehicles that can be accommodated
in reasonable safety along a roadway within a specific time period. When traffic volumes
approach or exceed the capacity of the roadway, operating levels of service are
diminished and congestion results. Simply defined, level of service is a qualitative
measure that describes operational conditions of a traffic stream along a roadway or at an
intersection of two roadways. Six levels of service are defined from A to F, with Level
of Service A representing the best and Level of Service F the worst operational
conditions.
Estimated Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are being developed for the
proposed SR 1008 improvements for years 2002 and 2025.
1. Existing Conditions
Average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along SR 1008 for the year 2001 range
from 15,000 to 17,000 vehicles per day. These traffic volumes result in a Level of
Service F on SR 1008 throughout most of the project area.
2. No-Build Conditions - Year 2025
No-Build conditions in the year 2025 assume that the SR 1008 improvements
will not be constructed. By the year 2025, average traffic volumes are expected to result
in Level of Service F conditions throughout much of the project area.
3. Build Conditions - Year 2025
The multilane highway proposed with the Build Alternative will add capacity
and improve traffic flow along SR 1008. In the year 2025, traffic along much of the
proposed multilane highway is expected to operate at Level of Service C.
There are currently four signalized intersections along the length of SR 1008
improvement project. These intersections will remain signalized with the proposed
improvements along SR 1008.
11. ALTERNATIVES
The alternatives considered in this Environmental Assessment include the
Transportation Systems Management Alternative, Public Transportation Alternative, No-
Build Alternative, and Build Alternative. The Build Alternative uses the "best fit"
alignment to minimize impacts.
A. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated
Two of the four alternatives were considered but eliminated because they do
serve the purpose need for the project. Alternatives eliminated from further
consideration include the Transportation System Management Alternative and the Public
Transportation Alternative.
1. Transportation System Management Alternative
The Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative includes limited
construction activities designed to maximize the traffic flow and energy efficiency of the
present transportation system. TSM measures enhance roadway operations while
minimizing capital outlay. These measures can include physical improvements to the
roadway network as well as operational improvements. Potential TSM options include
optimizing traffic signal timing, coordinating signal operations, adding traffic signals at
congested intersections, minor realignment of sharp horizontal curves, adding turn lanes
at intersections, and other similar improvements.
Due to the dimension of the project, traffic signals will not significantly
improve the roadway capacity. Therefore, the TSM Alternative is not a substitute for the
subject project and will not be necessary if the proposed implements are completed.
2. Public Transportation Alternative
The public transportation alternative includes bus service to decrease
congestion. The limitation of mass transit is its inability to serve different trip purposes
and types. Greensboro currently has a bus service; however, based on the type of trips
generated along SR 1008, a bus system will not substantially reduce the single occupancy
vehicle rate in the project area. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase the
traffic carrying capacity of the roadway along SR 1008. The public transportation
alternative does not meet the purpose and need of the project and was therefore
eliminated from further study.
B. Alternatives Considered For Detailed Study
Of the four basic alternatives considered for this project, two were retained for
further study or for comparative purposes. These include the No-Build Alternative and
the Build Alternative.
1. No-Build Alternative
The No-Build Alternative consists of not constructing the proposed
improvements along SR 1008. All other projects currently planned or programmed in the
TIP will be constructed in the area as proposed. Continued roadway maintenance and
minor improvements along SR 1008 would be part of this concept.
The No-Build Alternative does not improve capacity along SR 1008. The
No-Build Alternative is the baseline for comparison with the Build Alternative
2. Build Alternative
The Build Alternative improves existing two-lane SR 1008 to a multilane
facility using the "best fit" widening approach to minimize potential social and
environmental impacts.
1) Length of the Proposed Project
The total length of the SR 1008 improvements is approximately
3.6 miles (5.8 kilometers). The proposed project begins along SR 1008 at the intersection
of SR 2007 (Bunker Hill Road) and ends at the intersection of NC 68.
2) Typical Section Description
Four typical sections are being considered for the SR 1008
improvement project (see attached sheets for typical section drawings). A four-lane
median section with curb and gutter or shoulder, a five-lane section with curb and gutter
or shoulder, or a hybrid section with curb and gutter inside the city limits and shoulder
section outside the city limits will be studied. Typical sections are shown in Figure 2.
The typical sections are described as follows:
• Four-lane curb and gutter - The four-lane curb and gutter section has four 12-foot
(3.6 meter) travel lanes, a 16-foot (4.8-meter) raised median and a>i&ht of way width
of 1030.5 meters). Z 12' , 2- 1,141
• Four-lane shoulder - The four-lane shoulder section has four 12-foot (3.6 meter)
travel lanes, a 16-foot (4.8 meter) raised median, 4-foot (1.2 meter) paved shoulders
and a right of way width of 100 feet (30.5 meters).
• Five-lane with curb and gutter - This typical section has a ri ! t of way width of 100
feet (30.5 meters) with a 12-foot (3.6-meter) continuous center left-turn lane and four-
12-foot (3.6 meter) travel lanes. 2- )z'ft1 2- f4 'f4 %
• Five-lane shoulder - This typical section has a right of way width of 100 feet (30.5
meters) with a 12-foot (3.6-meter) continuous center left-turn lane, four 1.2-foot (3.6-
meter) travel lanes, and 4-foot paved shoulders.
Yv
o U + Sidewalks
?r rLa
ba?
-k, Z"dziI4

O? w A 1?R Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\OC? pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
6 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 27, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator C4>dl-J
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for Widening of SR 1008 (West Market Street) to a multi-lane
section from NC 68 to SR 2001, Guilford County, State Project No. 8.2497401, TIP
Project R-2611.
In reply to your correspondence dated May 29, 2002 in which you requested comments for the referenced
project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that unnamed tributaries to East Fork Deep River
(Index No. 17-2, Hydrological Unit 030608) lies within the project area. These waters are classified as
WS-IV and lie with the Critical Area of the water supply watershed. The Division of Water Quality
offers these comments:
1. The project is subject to the Randleman Rules 115A NCAC 2B .02501.
2. Hazardous spill catch basins will be required for stream crossings within the critical area of the water
supply watershed.
3. East Fork Deep River is listed on the §303(d) list of impaired waters. According to the Cape Fear
River Water Quality Plan, the East Fork Deep River (7.1 miles from source to High Point Lake) is
currently partially supporting (PS) according to recent DWQ monitoring because of an impaired
biological community and violations of the state turbidity standard. Instream habitat degradation
associated with urban nonpoint sources is a possible cause of biological impairment. Fecal coliform
bacteria are also noted as a problem parameter. High turbidity may be from road construction
activities in the watershed. Design plans should include ways to reduce turbidity both during and
after construction.
4. Within the Cape Fear Basin, urban stormwater runoff is a major concern. Stormwater should be
designed to flow into buffer areas or retention basins rather than routed directly into streams.
Environmental documentation:
a. NCDOT may want to address secondary and cumulative impacts.
b. The document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on mitigation
plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if
not finalized) mitigation plan wiih the environmental documentation. For projects requiring
mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
6. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will
be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow.
?t
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Wetland delineation should be performed prior to permit application. Wetland and stream impacts
should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize
wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules (15A NCAC
21-1.0506(b)(6)), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be
designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands
Rules 115A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3) ), the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as
stream mitigation.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at [phone].
pc: Jean Manuele, USACE Raleigh Field Office
Marcella Buncick, USFWS
David Cox, NCWRC
Central Files
File Copy
AM SfATF o
:41y 200
STATE, OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1ANDs Gnoui,...,_..
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETT
GOVP.RNOR SISCRF I'ARY
May 15, 2002
MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele
Division of Water Quality/Wetlands
FROM: William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
SUBJECT: SR 1008 (W. Market Street) Proposed Widening from SR 2007
(Bunker Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68, Guilford County, Federal
Aid Project No. STP-1008(9), State Project No. 8.2497401,
TIP No. R-2611
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch has begin studying the
proposed improvements to SR 1008 (W. Market Street). The project is included in the 2002-
2008 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in
fiscal year 2006 and construction in fiscal year 2008.
The 2002-2008 TIP calls for widening SR 1008 to a multi-lane facility from SR 2007
(Bunker Hill Road) to NC 68 for a distance of approximately 3.6 miles (5.8 km). Several
alternatives will be studied including a 4-lane divided typical section and a 5-lane typical section.
We would appreciate any infonnation you might have that would be helpful in evaluating
potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or
approvals which may be required by your agency. Your comments will be used in the
preparation of a federally funded Environmental Assessment. This document will be prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond
by July 12, 2002 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Daniel Keel, P. E.,
Project Development Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 217. Please include the
TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments.
W DG/plr
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWWNCOOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
°TAFTaMf"Y'
(? I ? f ? > v vans rAfuc• I)A ©?? L ? ? ? ? PIN ,OgpVF
?.
r ,-? T \ ?_ --rte y Dfl ANVIL
YYY .
pF RFY /
APPLEOA .CI
}.4N?YIloo" IK.' / _, - e~gP 1sH 1000M
\? I app on
S I ?DaSFOxD d 1YYY 1 i \ y
'.
du IT S, r _ / Q S s L '? Asia Leo
IL ' - - ` N yy N3atl0
tl AtlONUIH\?d
Zf I N /i Y I .. F Dfl A',9 Hilo"
22 /?•I Y I . 7.µ4.T,,._B. ($? ,.LS "IAIIOJ 111 / Y
`I 00
Q A a A?";'` ?' A4 Ah. NNAII H/'n
O
?-41 f 1 j I G `"Nn ?* B? oc
Iv ...
kit-
I
\I I ? IH NGCd YDlr'?1 H033B
aet4
..........
TANfl1flR?:rswr .6 ?.:. ?
y,-" a.acYeAS.cww.c..- .,nw..+rt`rN ?m+e,+..;n.:aTx,,r,.. I-OI1SY111 CO'
qm 8
2 MOfllhi (:i111L I ORU CO.
8
Q-- IS I E
p t N N CE
C111- JECT 20.
'.w ffrr???f - flD T80Ujip C_ N Y °" ?;
Abp
NO ,?
1 11
- -,'° ,
1. rY ! ?.? I ?-.
Y t w Q F y n ? >o
M-
CT
mu 1.
rev -- - y t.y ? ?\ ''°
?y?r••?,?F ?\
tvl -??? \ TM0. ON s ?? d' o Fn/• 12. ^ \\ g JorW.,00D_
AFNBUXJ,QVCr
HOD%
\
,
,
CIOEN ;g . `??
OAK
.... ....
°, At 9ANOY I bE ..............?i?,.,... Tul AD
b 77`D
ze-l a sANrEE----,
CTEWNF .Ap
NN
0 8 ? K $ r ? ? V'1
3NO`a ?+
\ l€
AV,
rwwFFL ... nD. r _
- ?13
Pit.
?? E O -- -''guar ? g ,??,?.-__•----'--
00
Na - -?
A 1?
•
--
fog"
I \\ p
'lop
Nr
?gyv I\..,\ ?} I ? 8 ? `FUNHE CO
/rJp i\ ?. "" .? Cab.
IBUN9NJ wAY 6L R
____,__ 001 _.. /..._ 7 FRE A\^n \,1,. ? \•,?
.1 `l;i? r • ,? DDr{V/?71
u0 r I ADA??D -5 - 11 \ \?
---•?- If r \\ r
WO ? ,• I ? ?m !l .= "'8 aqA ? ? I BON
Fix t
...-
-- -11 -. _. .... _. ... L
O? ,
3.0
,I a rl \ / N
< G
/ yo a
~ TwRD y?? IRON ~ua iI PRA :; I RayExcr ?r.
x
I!V ? -?` ? d N3'fr
t NF $ va uaNOS rca
F711H n?XLi d? a`d
_ Z \ 10 %YHIAI Y ElK,H \
1 r ttYMMM 'If /fir W TAD( TONE NION D v` \ E{?j " v. 1- rl"h71'r Cr /,?
Nq
L r ?\ .c Y,' >? 7 ? `7! 11 = r ? J .i?? VSt$
g $ r/is r El ` '?"'k
YNEAOOWC 4 \\e?m •`r?k WN6 yN4 i \ #W to Ir (u 1??
vaLrugTDN
rt9 M -'
01 TATf?fl6HAllj ^1YN\? •
.rS3au ti}.ar ?' i7 tox-a/?\?$ /j.. .-
?
..5 r0111
LL"vnaN .- -- ?_ ._
,f _-.?? ?; I? _..?3ramod?n eEfvfro •?? ,@ r?? ? ?r????N' I ?? •s05r
A cANYDN CYI'
d9l S
R I LO• ftR_- -^ I 3. ? ^? M IJ .a Mr,. ?°'Y'"? Sc \ \ A,. V r6T' ?Qi S ?M '\ l
U% "y ivi dul r. Ldsley, Uovernor
9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Q G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
O Division of Water Quality
June 27, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
NCDENR Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator wp('-v
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for Widening of SR 1008 (West Market Street) to a multi-lane
section from NC 68 to SR 2001, Guilford County, State Project No. 8.2497401, TIP
Project R-261 I. State Clearinghouse Project 0213-0676.
In reply to your correspondence dated May 29, 2002 in which you requested comments for the referenced
project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that unnamed tributaries to East Fork Deep River
(Index No. 17-2, Hydrological Unit 030608) lies within the project area. These waters are classified as
WS-IV and lie with the Critical Area of the water supply watershed. The Division of Water Quality
offers these comments:
1. The project is subject to the Randleman Rules [ 15A NCAC 2B .0250].
2. Hazardous spill catch basins will be required for stream crossings within the critical area of the water
supply watershed.
East Fork Deep River is listed on the §303(d) list of impaired waters. According to the Cape Fear
River Water Quality Plan, the East Fork Deep River (7.1 miles from source to High Point Lake) is
currently partially supporting (PS) according to recent DWQ monitoring because of an impaired
biological community and violations of the state turbidity standard. Instream habitat degradation
associated with urban nonpoint sources is a possible cause of biological impairment. Fecal coliform
bacteria are also noted as a problem parameter. High turbidity may be from road construction
activities in the watershed. Design plans should include ways to reduce turbidity both during and
after construction.
4. Within the Cape Fear Basin, urban stormwater runoff is a major concern. Stormwater should be
designed to flow into buffer areas or retention basins rather than routed directly into streams.
Environmental documentation:
a. NCDOT may want to address secondary and cumulative impacts.
b. The document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on mitigation
plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if
not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. For projects requiring
mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
6. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will
be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
V"'
RMEf?Y
.1
Wetland delineation should be performed prior to permit application. Wetland and stream impacts
should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize
wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules (15A NCAC
21-1.0506(b)(6)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be
designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands
Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0506 (h)(3) }, the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as
stream mitigation.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at [phone].
pc: Jean Manuele, USACE Raleigh Field Office
Marcella Buncick, USFWS
David Cox, NCWRC
Central Files
File Copy

aSN d y??o
V
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
MEMORANDUM TO
FROM:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
May 15, 2002
Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director ! J
State Clearinghouse
Department of Administration
-o ./ f
William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
SUBJECT: SR 1008 (W. Market Street) Proposed Widening from SR 2007
(Bunker Hill Road) at Colfax to NC 68, Guilford County, Federal
Aid Project No. STP-1008(9), State Project No. 8.249740 1,
TIP No. R-2611
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch has begun studying the
proposed improvements to SR 1008 (W. Market Street). The project is included in the 2002-
2008 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in
fiscal year 2006 and construction in fiscal year 2008.
The 2002-2008 TIP calls for widening SR 1008 to a multi-lane facility from SR 2007
(Bunker Hill Road) to NC 68 for a distance of approximately 3.6 miles (5.8 km). Several
alternatives will be studied including a 4-lane divided typical section and a 5-lane typical section.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating
potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or
approvals which may be required by your agency. Your comments will be used in the
preparation of a federally funded Environmental Assessment. This document will be prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond
by July 12, 2002 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Daniel Keel, P. E.,
Project Development Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 217. Please include the
TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments.
WDG/plr
RECEIVED
Attachment
',JAY 2 8 2002
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] N
RTATION BUILDING
'
C
STA TE CLEAR
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS I
.
INQ
.
LMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

>?,. .?,nou .,,,, ..v .o - ...? "l?s? -
\ ? ? _ - - A 1, .r \? .. ':".? to Yt- M? ?•--?. s?.°c n ? _ , ? ? ?
1 ,. ?? T t` ? OV $ ? f ? ? U , L, 1
IE - ?/? (i a 7?''' 6YTtllld\1--?? ' ? ? 7 Hw I_..
_.
\ -/
? 1 7 '\ ? >3 !«Llns PUa'wI '? GI $JI ? L ?(? .. IN Qq?
r VE
I ,/? uxu'.
?, p
ml,rlu i l Ktpp°q ?, ? a ,? m?l . ?' _..
__. ` ? lkr flex I I ? y o -111--? , _ _
?I 8 I._ .. t m .. _._ ?.-._. ?. m ? ? ? ? ? '? ,.% ?` ? _1..+ ?"IPPLERni cr
', .. \ I?'?I i ? ? m 5 Lv'i? $ ? N I ? I ?? :, ? ?_-?l(waSLN'°N ? ?tl ? !rS... _ -•, g ? r? J \ -.... ?s't ? IsN '-- "?
?'lpW?nD o F :/' AI ?! AA '? ?,ar, nt
r E V
1? ? 7"A ? ?, ' s r , eLloosPONDUiDUSrnwm a ?I -g?"W1 ;ti ru E ? ? e°AI?, ? ? N 9
-? $ f 1q_ 10 1060 M3lY \
ON 'z tRESSCOTT NU ... o ?Ml' py ?]. 0110!N f 1'J MAID
~ /.. / j`y ..:.1.,? "A ?` 4p '/ I y •• I ?..1 I _ - c °'"?b YID{VNii9? pn '?'sNZ n k4Ww E ''a 1 ^ O,?r 1J'.3A u IAUDA311i THn? , i
$ cj' v,? / ?'? /,r°'°"' 1 / 1 m I n N a.rPM'P?,I?I .Up'dl, - Hi 3D'YI A N1B3 'Jl? 7 ?vr,`
P,..?no < \\?•!. .i % I --•'' N I EYp fl !i!tl, .._s ?3 ?F 1 M,LS.1 3 3 1 /a' ,i
pd 1 Oq1 II J / IN r? 4 ?t"tl ?r
,... ... - 6N-I. $/? •"'?y........ I... 'ti O I N (? S ? OL 1NA?''' (L9?? I ?C ??, 7 1S S p ? ? f Im
t,,', ? ?+1' I, \r I ! ? 1 -' ? ' , I ?. - .q ? N1?'6ifSe `Mnwm?",s>?S $L? ?`?C c ? ?D; 0k},,,???rra"`000r9??, :Y"`
o@
'i'It Ao _ _ II ?8 Ary-
00
IU ?\' . \ , $ '/'??. N _ 1033 m
?\ \? ................... 3A0 ? ? I Y' '? f 'm 101 311 6 ?.
r
`\ lDn III ('? RII
p v J
s ?- -.. E N i SA r:'\G' 1 I `? ?yy13Np`'UCB- ...
4rm.w4uap?urM?u+wwm... .ia.J , r YH41?ditili \ ? ._?? ? glsN F ..._ ua
IIIIII '.?wWIA4,IMAn1lM1.,,NN..•A rar.lwu;,• µyy \ ?? \??I - /. /?
PEA°°PY.. ., , RD, ? m !
?? ?.,., w lw::.pn?.Fdbl?i _ II?r??{/SKr pp r _. r
/ lC.` 7ANOARA CI1L? 1:.,'r Mti.-...,v L.:.w.,.? ww.,.,w,M..r N..
7„
?,? Y ).
,? / r ?1v0 / -YdJ GIIQUSC flD :'N33tl'J MO11N1 ? .. C.l1YYw. l?? r? ?n ?? 3M ',ib
¢. _..?. UNAEfl Mlli-..._ _... ?. i :' ? _.? O Od-_ I 4 N. ? - fPtl O?j o
T CE?pQq
Ir S$J,.
cLr._. e_rwr-.4tL n@ c-"?f444_. _._ / $ , r A ? u'., rr 9y 'd
-. - ....... -.. -. -. .. OU _. LONNIE CT - '„ri V. 1? _. .. _. _--.- ..
i ? 1 ?_
OKAY
?Aa?cv nu N fl4 r+ U1 }I i ' 4 % moony on
J'? 1y'- r N ,d / NINY 9
L1 ESTDOU ?•o?;• \ Y
- ?Ci Igl9lA0B .,
-. s is R:a qi n? .f)A r••F i \x'`00.,,\
- ... gal l
?..\ y ?, pU ??EL 1UI14 OR /,.... - do`faM
,? ?,,
W f r?A113 ]n .? i
ACE LN v' V ©.. zi^. - .. 1. _ - ... -..___._. {}-
Ttlld-_pT.. ,' - - NbCillAi.vuD I?. urvAR k\ \ - \...
r ? ?,,
qj{ ON 0 I"? O \
?y?a TRAIL OR \ tb Nf 6?• /0 \ JOYWOW?---
3iY iG1 ?? ??a ?! n `?' \ ASHI lava
' ?, IIEDOE -111
" I o
? g
--? O O
IAAEDAIE rg
ON INtEDAIE CI _ __-`. RU CIf/EN
_ .. _.-_ - cn ,'?
_ S
O
-. ,?u LIIV nD \
?p \ \
R )'
/?
r'P
3p
;1 / LII IESARIEE - - / 3 1
- ?i . I
,,. e ? L Wei ? ? ad --? 'a I ?
i
i I9 n`a''
0
' J
tau .. _.___. ?v -topltii+ntrva ?, vtl(? n/ ?,+d``? r.EHnw nArA CI _ ??r 44
/d" fi II?.I ? v t?
po i. ?? ? (? 1 cn
1 ..a ,
.// oup
I 7,Y(?• l?YvLN .Ir4:9bc;l,l ra.;;Ey'? ;?c k
_ 'tlLtl1911W;nsW',11VN ?y ?nONI llU ; *,..?-.? .. __. ..__ _ _..
/
Ip I- CAMPDEI 1 n i 1
geN eU IHO r ' Iyf4:7' \ \ N?ytlLOLnSWAY `?'? ... l 30n0 l'•?'J [[?? .., pp0'",I \\\ ,/
L_ _
i
8 -', $ I uuu3 l dA uo
?4 /? i / / ?._: ?.-PMA??.. ._ ? ? ?\,?•?' ? 1?' $ ?/ YO ?\REFO?VY' -
,Ill I / wt ra lPr _ Rn ?• rr. ...-
?• n
i__ ? '
>
1{1
tlp,ytl \',:,• ? %'pl? ? a `\ ?- 3ROL'Rll .. .._. -...-- \. IIU ?- ___._..... ._...__ ,
/ ' .. l ?: ? ` U Y__ _. -?. _-.....- fl0 Od '? _ wYIlUlUO I? ` - :?-, P.?
?,y\-AE UUIW lN'VA ?4 '/ / ' _. m _ - I _-? - \ \?? - -.... 'd
ENI ?. ,'b,i/ y. BUq 1...?f '-__ _ Z .-- -- PA -... ?, y-'JYN30laU
%/ _ / a '_• Sy ,y S OS•F,F?IEID EDOEFIM _ $
s , _, _ .-- ,?y? ? = ?, .. a. X13 ? !!??
o I,I _ v.
f l° 5 - - -
r- , `' T,.?.-.? 30a1U 1't?. ? ''L y ?? II AWIO IUM.... ? ? \' ^ HI TL ? ? M1 `, F
sr_. ?wAY --_1? .SAD--' ° -k>'.. L?0 D1-,..?q4?? , ??u, ?'a ?+I nl. su$R°^`u"?gti Q„ggECiOq
1'? SUNSNIN ?? '
?? i I V ?, \
V".,iV' (r ° / ........_ . Lit. N_Rm uNU I t? , 1 ?i. I `J 1 r \ DONYk'..'' \> -`=
,,P i b .. 1' ADA°i q0 ~I1' 'Fl ---.._ _- < L " ? 4 r -ON ` qO {A
CITE. .J. P Otl k?? °8?,. '?? ?,
q° i t '? uD A M>; v? ti IAA ?.:. /?g son `v ck ?" (\o +w
\r,.. ?
?? _ ? ? :.? ' nzn 11 7.91}I;q' 1 ^- '
_ 1
? L` niy Ali i I 9( ? ? 1
V,
y\ S
ILrY[
N4

bM
(`)i 4

,.._ r? , / `? p._ tKM1A ?'Rorlnr I Pn ?. ?M7w? 3
r I i ?? L II I4 ?? _ 0 3
'i. \q?Uf ?''' ` `? YdMM?'?'6N('' _'dY R n0 A'r IQOE
\ ?\ ,`NFL ? - ? ? `\? f ``?
ptl Y .-. ` \ \ ``•,?' , YkN'?W(y Tr Wqy, cT' UU3 fNyE! t 9 °r pl slrn I
•v • J\ 0 A
\ ?4 ,, ,Mope GWo,y4P ?? 11?_$ Is
-
-iileluLSw ,•\ ` ?, '';° /,.'a?vuLU1:' R?k`?, ?E?r .... .._.$ l ...
i l) ?. _.. 111'0 N3111 / J-a U _ry U3 ,`
•?\ Q? / SIN
N -
\? ? %pP? ? ? D 511111 u37aL? va ?- ??cq
\ ? ?,y???,.,. \ ' ?/?O 'bN? '?. ...? 101VYN1A 1f P?!??oq? dL?m
GIIEVIK..__.. -,1 tl0 1 N t, '?a G1WSiONEC ?b\"'T?J `? :1! (P?nr 1?0?.._\ `L/
?d A?NITII \ y, LS!'+D C\L• ) 'HS,.S,', /n. /
.* iROyC
L?11 ??r-€Ar \?'Y,r! 41',y'?. ?iU F??-?TJA.'O?[?i¢NA ??\\?`?% 1 rk?? ?'.?
7 -/ !t?'1i ?w4MlUaroa'?' \\ nom" ID M3iM' ,.7, L7@. ?.... I°l ?,'?
' Q Y MEA w Cy ' L • dm -"Ak. A NH,4 i Q' q9Y S O
vi9?rsTpfrt UJ / 11.:1; 'p ILW 1 , P N,O y y
J--'?l - €` 1Y.lYLP 't i,? 1?, oii -tiooiA3ti3ue \. fir' A ?n!1'LYltlptl? a - '?
/ + ?? l1P 1 I '? U3L Vtlp PI, ME, p C?
uuASwY ? Nv? ,?pYtl?I Yak ? ..'?. ? lnny:nsluu ?iVii??.
L ? .t uccoorNl? _
7Ji, 1A ,a(iTON nI -?
tl u -
'I Cr MITT O i . .
?'-IISIVONOUI '? 'a ` L !
3
.-Ji I'awAArV ?. ;0kov0 „'"l ,1?,y1$fl.' m 8 \ au':s G
f ..coon - R f . ,ro?o \,? -.• '003c W, Y - ?`? ,?
,1 "__'..._._, - v _.-- w1 SIWSPOINp _.. ,??O \ 0 \ /'- YEI ° TVN p Y.! - '?&
?G? 9 ¦, ??? 1133UD ? , pNI4 / •., / a ? \ ? ( L? ?' J I $
Eller..-..... Pl. ? (?'! _ . O ? ? '?,
X90 ?' °fi?..._ J $D u °a ?,,`?' \`T / `° I r.I ``
,4 `Clc IY..,'1N?! ei y. , 380UN3 - LNU ,U`I IY?F - ••QG n\? ?gsu n?'. unDra cT
O - - Y "l Al `-
IY .(N'" AI 3 (?, Ih nI110 G?0lIOE 1 U039u\? YWEWCMN11N1 h( ?1 Gl? J? N(-_'_-?-Q9 i? ?, .... 1 \,,
R ?1 ". LO'?,?,vMV .1111( , - 1 /p t„ I ,?rwri. I ?i? - 1'1? Y' L l\ I - y !I_ VALIEY Cfl0951N0 ??I?? `
` o?o? rll?
'19
>_ y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 3, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NCDOT, Project Development & Environmental Analysis,,
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator ( ,V0('--J
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for Widening of SR 1008 (West Market Street) to a multi-
lane section from NC 68 to SR 2001, Guilford County, State Project No. 8.249740 1,
TIP Project R-2611.
In reply to your correspondence dated March 19, 2002 in which you requested comments for the
referenced project. preliminary analysis of the project indicates that unnamed tributaries to East Fork
Deep River (Index No. 17-2, Hydrological Unit 030608) lies within the project area. These waters
are classified as WS-IV and lie with the Critical Area of the water supply watershed. The Division of
Water Quality offers these comments:
1. The project is subject to the Randleman Rules [15A NCAC 2B .0250].
2. Hazardous spill catch basins will be required for stream crossings within the critical area of the
water supply watershed.
East Fork Deep River is listed on the §303(d) list of impaired waters. According to the Cape
Fear River Water Quality Plan, the East Fork Deep River (7.1 miles from source to High Point
Lake) is currently partially supporting (PS) according to recent DWQ monitoring because of an
impaired biological community and violations of the state turbidity standard. Instream habitat
degradation associated with urban nonpoint sources is a possible cause of biological impairment.
Fecal coliform bacteria are also noted as a problem parameter. High turbidity may be from road
construction activities in the watershed. Design plans should include ways to reduce turbidity
both during and after construction.
4. Within the Cape Fear Basin, urban stormwater runoff is a major concern. Stormwater should be
designed to flow into buffer areas or retention basins rather than routed directly into streams.
Environmental documentation:
a. NCDOT is strongly advised to address secondary and cumulative impacts.
b. The document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on
mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present
a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. For
projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance
of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
6. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation
will be reQuired if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Wetland delineation should be performed prior to permit application. Wetland and stream
impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives
that minimize wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands
Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)1, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150
linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the
mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In
accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3)}, the Wetland
Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at [phone].
pc: Jean Manuele, USACE Raleigh Field Office
Marcella Buncick, USFWS
MaryEllen Haggard, NCWRC
Central Files
File Copy
1
SfA?o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 19, 2002
MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele
Division of Water Quality/Wetlands
LYNDo TIPPETT
SI'.C'RF I'ARY
FROM: William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for R-2611, Widen SR 1008 (W. Market
Street to a multi-lane section from NC 68 to SR 2001 at Colfax,
Guilford County, State Project 8.2497401
Attached for your review and comments are the Scoping sheets for the subject project
(see attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review
procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be
performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for Aprily25, 2002 at 2,00 PM in the Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with your
comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Daniel Keel, Project Development
Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 217. Please include the TIP Project Number in all correspondence
and comments.
W DG/plr
Attachment
w
1
4
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WE13SITE: WWW NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
W
w ?
IZI
ad ?
IX Q:
co , 3 W S?
m>
O
tt t5 t;
?1 U ? so I
I
t
? >Ln Wg
? t~
i
SR 2/33 .• ell /
ISR 187
i
i
i a.
SR 1843 ,
? o
SR /850
i
i
. i a
i
P
. ' Ul
v '
S '
o \,O*
V) g 5P. ,
/ I
J'
V)
i
i
i
i
W cn
SR 2007
¦1
¦ 1
W.
Date: 03119102
Revision Date:
TIP No.: R-2611
s
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Project Development Stage
Programming:
Planning: X
Design:
F.A. Project No.: STP-1008(9) State Project No,: 8.2497401
Division: 7 County: Guilford
Route: SR 1008 Length: 3.6 miles
Functional Classification:
Purpose Of Project: The purpose of the project is to increase traffic capacity and safety on SR 1008.
Description Of Project (including specific limits) And Major Elements Of Work: Widen existing roadway to a multi-
lane facility from SR 2007 at Colfax to NC 68 in Greensboro
Type Of Environmental Document To Be Prepared: EA and FONSI
Environmental Study Schedule: EA September 2003 FONSI June 2004
Right of Way: 2006 Construction: 2008
Type Of Funding: State and Federal
Will there be special funding participation by municipality, developers, or other?
Yes: No:
If YES, by whom:
If YES, by what amount? ($) or (%)
How and when will this be paid?
1
w
Thoroughfare Plan Designation:
•
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Type Of Access Control- Full: Partial: _
Number of- Interchanges: 1 Grade Separations:
Typical Section of Roadway: Multi-Lane
Traffic: Current():
%TTST:
Design Speed:
Preliminary Resurfacing Design:
%DUAL:
None: X
0 Stream Crossings: 0
Design Year (2025):
%DHV:
Preliminary Pavement Design:
Current Cost Estimate:
Construction Cost $ 12,300,000
(including engineering and contingencies)
Right of Way Cost ( $ 2,900,000
(including relocations, utilities, and acquisition)
Force Account Items $
Preliminary Engineering $
Total Cost $ 15,200,000
TIP Cost Estimate:
Construction $ 5,300,000
Right of Way $ 2,900,000
Total Cost $ 13,500,000
List any special features, such as railroad involvement, which could affect cost or schedule of project:
2
M.
01
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET

CONSTRUCTION
Estimated Costs of Improvements
X Pavement
X Surface (Widening)
x Fine Grading
X Resurfacing Existing Pavement
X Curb & Gutter
_ Shoulders: _ Paved
Earth
X Earthwork
X Clearing & Grubbing
X Subgrade and Stabilization
x Drainage (List any special items)
_ Sub-Drainage
Structures Width x
_ Bridge Rehabilitation X
_
New Bridge X
Widen Bridge x
_
Remove Bridge x
_
New Culverts- Size: Length:
_
Culvert Extension
_
_ Retaining Walls- Type: Avg. Ht.:
Noise Walls
_
_ Any Other Misc. Structures
_ Concrete Curb & Gutter
Ramp & Y line work
Guardrail
_
_ Fencing- W.W.: and/or C.L.:
X Erosion Control
_ Landscape
_ Relocate Existing Waterline
X Traffic Control
Signing: _ New
_ Upgrading
_ Traffic Signals: _ New
_ Revised
New
RR Signals:
_ _
Revised
With or Without Arms
_
Drainage Safety Enhancement
If 3R:
_
_ Roadside Safety Enhancement
_ Realignment for Safety Upgrade
X Pavement Markings- Paint: - Thermo: X
Delineators
_
X Other (Mobilization & Misc.)
Length
rm nt..
Shew:
Markers: X
$ 2,703,360
$ 177,400
$ 422,400
$ 418,000

$ 845,000
$
$
$ 140,000
534,325
1,296,000

$ 147,400

$ 144,000

$ 64,800

$ 3,807,315
Contract Cost (Subtotal)
3
$ 10,700,000
0.
I
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Contingencies & Engineering $ 1,600,000
Preliminary Engineering Costs $
Force Account $
Construction (Subtotal) $ 12,300,000
RIGHT OF WAY
Existing Right of Way Width:
Will Contain Within Existing Right of Way-
New Right of Way Needed-
Width:
Easements- Type:
Width:
Utilities
Est. Cost

Right Of Way (Subtotal) $
Total Estimated Project Cost $
The above scoping has been reviewed and approved by:
INIT. DATE
INIT
Highway Design Board of Tran. Member
Roadway Mgr. Program & Policy
Structure Chief Engineer-Precon.
Design Services Chief Engineer-Oper.
Geotechnical Secondary Roads Off.
Hydraulics Construction Branch
Loc. & Surveys Roadside Environmental
Photogrammetry Maintenance Branch
Prel. Est. Engr. Bridge Maintenance
Proj. Devel. & Environ. Anal. Statewide Planning
Right of Way Division Engineer
R/W Utilities F Bicycle Coordinator
Traffic Engineering Program Development
Project Management FHWA
County Manager Dept. of Cult. Res.
City/Municipality Dept. of EH & NR
Others Others
Scope Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engi neer for handling.
If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scopi ng, note your proposed revisions in Comments or Remarks
Section and initial and date after comments.
Yes: No:
Est. Cost
DATE
4

PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
COMMENTS OR REMARKS SECTION:
Prepared By: Date: