20200484 Ver 1_NCCP Site B Stream Crossing Grading 06-01-20_20200610

Strickland, Bev
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:11 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA); Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC /
Alamance County, NC
Attachments: NCCP Site B Stream Crossing Grading 06.01.20.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Good Morning Chris/Sue,
Thank you for the additional time to respond. On behalf of the applicant, please see the below responses and
attachments. Please let me know if additional information is required. Thanks.
USACE Comment 1) Because of this project's location within the Henderson Scott Farm District, an environmental review
through the NC Department of Cultural Resources has been initiated (email sent April 2, 2020). We cannot verify your
project's use of Nationwide Permit 39 without their concurrence.
Applicant Response: The applicant acknowledges.
USACE Comment 2) The road crossing that would impact the stream on -site is proposed with 3:1 side slopes. Please
discuss why steeper slopes (e.g. 2:1) and the use of retaining walls are not feasible to further reduce impacts.
Applicant Response: The 3:1 side slope up -gradient of the proposed building will be graded to tie into final building
grading, which is anticipated to be near the top elevation of the road. The 3:1 side slope up -gradient of the culvert was
shown to document that stream impacts were a result of the road crossing. The down -gradient portion of the culvert
was designed with a 3:1 side slope to reduce safety concerns and will require less maintenance than a 2:1 side
slope. The applicant considered the use of retaining walls on the down -gradient portion of the stream to further
minimize slope impact to the stream. However, the cost of the retaining walls compared to the relative little amount of
reduction of stream impact is not practical or a cost effective technique to further avoid impact to waters compared to
other avoidance and minimization techniques utilize during preliminary design of the proposed facility that result in
greater avoidance of stream impact. The applicant significantly reduced the square footage of the building and the
overall disturbance limits of the proposed facility which has minimized impacts to avoid Section 404/401 Individual
Permit. The applicant further reduced and minimized impact to the stream by lowering the elevation of the road and
aligning the proposed road crossing as close to the building as possible. In doing so, the applicant further reduced the
number of tractor docks and court spaces to align the proposed road as close to the building as possible while
maintaining safe and appropriate turn radius, width, grade, etc. for safe tractor trailer accessibility. This design
technique reduced the area of stream impact by at least an additional approximate 20 linear feet. The road alignment
cannot be shifted closer to the building that proposed because of safety concerns associated with tractor accessibility
and building structural design.
USACE Comment 3) As shown on sheet C-101, proposed grading on the upstream side of the crossing appears to be
designed to key into existing grades. Would the upper limits of this feature be preserved?

Applicant Response: Please see applicant response 2.
USACE Comment 4) If the answer to # 3, above, is no, there appears to be 60 or more feet between the proposed road
crossing and facility's footprint. Please discuss why moving the road closer to the facility is not feasible.
Applicant Response: Please see applicant response 2.
USACE Comment 5) Please provide stormwater control plans for our review of potential dewatering impacts to
receiving streams. Mitigation for dewatered stream length may be required.
Applicant Response: The applicant has designed a stormwater BMP to discharge proximate to the most down -gradient
limits of stream fill to supplement surface drainage area (attached). Based on preliminary calculations, it appears that
approximately 30% or more of the existing intermittent stream drainage area will discharge proximate to un-impacted
portions of the intermittent stream down -gradient of the proposed impact limits. Therefore, it is our opinion that de -
watering of the remainder of the un-impacted streams on the site is not likely to occur.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com [pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 10:40 AM
To: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC / Alamance County, NC
Good Morning, Brad:
On Friday I sent them a nudge via email. I have not received their letter yet. I'll give her another day and then try
another route.
Thanks for the update and I'm fine with the extension,
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0 [corpsmapu.usace.army.mill. Thank you for taking
the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 10:14 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue

<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC /
Alamance County, NC
Chris/Sue—I am still waiting on a drawing. As such, we request an extension to June 15, 2020. Let me know if that will
be an issue.
Chris -have you received anything in writing from SHPO? If not, can you please follow up and provide. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:27 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC / Alamance County, NC
I agree that'd be most efficient, thanks Sue! I suppose we should wait for Brad but if we can aim for sometime early
afternoon, that should give Renee an opportunity to respond.
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this
site and complete the survey.
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:21 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>; Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC /
Alamance County, NC
Would it make sense to try to do a conference call? I could set up a number for us. I'm available anytime today or pretty
much the rest of this week
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:17:55 AM

To: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC / Alamance County, NC
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Thanks for the notice, Brad: I'm happy to keep this one on -hold while you complete information gathering.
I'll call you shortly. I would like to check in with SHPO to learn the status of their review before we speak.
Thanks,
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: BlockedBlockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0 [corpsmapu.usace.army.mill. Thank
you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:15 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC /
Alamance County, NC
Chris/Sue—we request another extension to June 1, 2020. Let me know if that will be a concern.
Also, please give me a call on my cell to discuss. I am waiting on 1 piece of info to respond, but would like to talk it over
with you prior too. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 8:27 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC / Alamance County, NC
As will the Corps, Brad —the application will remain open. Thanks for the heads up.

Chris
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: BlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the
time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 8:23 AM
To: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC /
Alamance County, NC
Thank you for copying me Brad. DWR will keep the application on hold until we receive a copy of the response.
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 7:19 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Re: SAW-2018-01819 / NC Highway 119 / Scott Mayo Properties, LLC / Alamance County, NC
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Chris -the applicant has received the below request for additional information. We are working towards obtaining
information to provide responses; however, will not be able to provide within specified timeline. As such, the applicant
requests until 5/20/20 to provide the requested information. Please let me know if this will be an issue. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 9, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
wrote:
Brad:
We have completed review of your application to use Nationwide Permit # 39 for work within potential
waters of the United States associated with the construction of the proposed Industrial Facility— NC
HWY 119 project, received on March 13, 2019, in Alamance County, NC. Thank you for the application,
but we require additional information to verify the application is complete.
1. Because of this project's location within the Henderson Scott Farm District, an environmental
review through the NC Department of Cultural Resources has been initiated (email sent April 2,
2020). We cannot verify your project's use of Nationwide Permit 39 without their concurrence.
2. The road crossing that would impact the stream on -site is proposed with 3:1 side slopes. Please
discuss why steeper slopes (e.g. 2:1) and the use of retaining walls are not feasible to further
reduce impacts.
3. As shown on sheet C-101, proposed grading on the upstream side of the crossing appears to be
designed to key into existing grades. Would the upper limits of this feature be preserved?
4. If the answer to # 3, above, is no, there appears to be 60 or more feet between the proposed
road crossing and facility's footprint. Please discuss why moving the road closer to the facility is
not feasible.
5. Please provide stormwater control plans for our review of potential dewatering impacts to
receiving streams. Mitigation for dewatered stream length may be required.
Review of this application cannot be completed at this time. We will review and determine whether the
application is complete, or if additional information is required after you respond to the above requests.
Please provide the requested information within 30 days, or your application will be withdrawn. Feel
free to contact me with any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer
Service Survey is located at:
BlockedBlockedBlockedBlockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
fcorpsmapu.usace.army.mill. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Brad Luckey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 4:10 PM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>

Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] NC Highway 119 PCN, Alamance County, NC
Please find attached PCN for NC Highway 119 in Alamance County, NC.
Sue —this is an electronic courtesy copy. Hard copy and 401 fee have been mailed to Raleigh.
Thanks and have a good weekend.
Sincerely,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
336.708.4997 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]

I
o0
It
zE
-592
----- - - - - --
----------591------ - I I I I , l
�0.-
1 I I I I I
3u=i va
o�N�
Z
o
'
59 1
0 _ _ 1 I I l
xo
/WVL IN D60R
R,
i
----589------
% , I I I
Ifo
�M
�� ,� ��'
DOCKS AT ' /' / AT F,F'E ='60�. 00 �' /' ,'
' " — - -
- \\ l l l I I I I
l I
/ / ,
9- 6-.O- -EL
/
j588----
\ l l l l I I I
I I I
-5/130LF��E��VENf
—
— —\ 5,87r
I
0
o
/J-EV
'
SR AM/IMR<C
_586
/
,IN
I—
o
` \ \
t
\ \
10
DATE
0
0212412020
DRAWN BY
J. MOORE
IL
DESIGNED BY
J. MOORE
_ — / c
i
\
\ —
•
CHECKED BY
'
' ' / / / ^
' / / ' / ' / / / / / / /
\ `. \
I \ \ _ — — —
• •
SCALE
/ / — _ /
/ /
590
3-1 SLbPe
(TYP) / /
AA-1
OL
%D
z
/
SA
u
Ito
a. .1,
x
W
°=�
SCALE 1 "=40'
L
0.)
c~n
NOR W.
\\N = 83'5,109.2\5'
\ (/,L\ 1 bl \ 40' 80'
��
J SU
L5�
\ \\\ \ t " I < \ \ NO OUTLET PIP
\` "'�' \
v
� f
W
L51
"� 1 \ TIME OF
=
(j aH
I SA2 //
---
it
z
5
u)
BUFFER IMPACTS LEGEND
z
- ',
ZONE 1 BUFFER: 8,255 SF IMPACTED
Lu
u')
A-2
,
0 - - I _ ' , //'
_
/
WA-3 F
SA LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER: 5,525 SF IMPACTED
O
O
> 4W =
I
ZONE 2 BUFFER (TEMP. IMPACTS TO BE
JOB NO,
RE -VEGETATED): 1,540 SF
44902
SHEET NO.
C-101