20200519 Ver 1_More Info Received_20200501

Strickland, Bev
From: Richie Brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 12:16 PM
To: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc: Pullinger, Robert C
Subject: [External] Fieldstone
Attachments: Additional Clarification.pdf, Wetland Impact Map Reduced.pdf
ar"r-TrExternal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Emily,
Please see the revised impact map, PCN impact sheet and the additional clarification. If you approve of these, I'll then
go for the revised amount on the DMS mitigation form. To avoid confusion, I don't want to go back and forth with them
any more than I have to, so once we agree on the impacts, I'll get that part turned around pretty quick.
Thanks and have a good weekend.
Richie Brown, PE
Principal
Stroud Engineering, P. A.
107-B Commerce Street
Greenville, NC 27858
252-756-9352 x232
Click here [stroudengineer.sharefile.coml to upload files.
1

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each Welland area impacted,
"W." will bo usod In the table below (o reprosenl the word "wetland".
2a. site N 11)
���
2a1 R¢asmr (21
ffi. Impact typ (�)
2c, Type of W.°
2d. W. name
��
2e. Forested"
N. Type of
Jurlsdlcl(lonk(2)
2g, Impact
i
RoatlIUiIM1 y
P
Pine Flal
Welland pi
hb
oth B
��
0.147
(«.rest
2
Bac and Fill
P
Pine Fiat
Welland M2
No
Both
O'089
(xres)
3
Ba<k and FIII
P
Pine Flat
Welland i!3
No
Both
0.031
aackyard Fill
Pine Flat
Wetland p3
�
Both
0(acrs)
2g, Total Temporary Weflentl Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Welland Impact
0.308
2g. Total Welland Impact
0.308
2h, Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: �
Due to Na geonteln/ of Nis parcel, in order to keep the road conneclivilyI the sVeel Impact was unavoltlable. In other areas we Vied Ie keep
the Impacts to strait lines that are easily censtracled and minimize any type of impact to the adjacent wallands.(see attached clarification)
ib. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques:*
The use of equipment that Is large enough to handle the impact vdthout damaging me area adjacent to it. In areas vi ere Impacts are smaller, laborers
and shovels trey be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r• ves c No
2c. if yes, millgation Is requirod by (check all that apply):
r DWR A Corps
mitt
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this projecll
lJ Mitigagon banks Payment to in -lieu to rPer
ee Responsible
program I✓'tlgatlon
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a, Name of Mlligallon Bank:
Oeparlmenl of Miligalion Services
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and teller)
Type: Quantity:
Non -riparian wegand 0.462 ac
Attach Receipt and/or letter
aa;ft,gvalwm«am3 «daaprae; I�ea�arna««r«a
Fieldstone Secllon 2 DMS Acceptance Leller.pdf
FLEIVFEI.IiiTPE1�
3c, Comments
362.33KB
NC SVeam Temperature Classihcegon Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts lab on the WJminglon District's RIBRS xebslle.

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project.
"Due to the geometry of this parcel and to keep the road connectivity, the street impact was
unavoidable. The impact lines were kept as straight as possible for contractors for the ease of
construction so that adjacent wetlands could avoid accidental impact. This development is for the
construction of Duplex lots that will be built on slabs or with a minimum amount of crawl space. The
finished floor elevations will not be high enough to allow for raised decks/porches on pilings which
would typically minimize wetland impacts when they protrude into the wetlands. There is also not
enough relief on the site to allow for this type of construction which brings the need to be able to fill the
proposed areas. Duplex units typically have a storage room off the back of the residence and a
deck/patio. In order to provide room for these amenities as well as room for maintenance around these
areas, I feel the proposed impacts are justified. There are 1.15 ac of wetlands on this site and we are
proposing to impact 0.308 ac of the allowable 0.50 ac.

SITE DATA
T A¢W DR
, II 11
CEORUS DR GR AT LAUREL CT g ii
SWEET BAY DR ! II II !
— COBBLES 1 Il tl III
E OR
�--- , _---_ -NIS S89°24'55"E 263.00' Ell 1 IIII n !
'--" SITE II
yn
WOODED ! II II ! x
N N - _ 1 II
erg. eR 7c --- --- 144t .144B;
1
N;147t� `JW4 ) `.146A) .146$ ,145A; 145B, — i IIII MAIM' z
'
15 14 O
10,095 SF % lil
9.459 SF 9.854 SF �
25' MBL_
'- ---• ,
VICINITY MAP S69°55'17"W-..---..—.....................
- - ---
SCALE: i"=2000' NPFJ7 22.58 _
- - --- ______= BAY DRIVE x ----_
- - BG=T7.62X---------------------- SWEET ---- --
-= - ---- -
50°35 05"W (50'R/W 28' BC/BC PUBLIC)--
w�
50.00'
--_----------------
BC =77.55 SW 78.83 .-••-------- I I
sw 7e.ez .—..—........ I II I
Ell__�..—. I 1
5'SIDEWALK I1 �� III.! ,\- %
,� N89°24'55"W , 1 i It n II 169B
N — ---, — o 1.28' __ �M--- 168B` .68A, I I ---
w o — --- --- 166A; I it n It
.167B, - ZONE RIGS it i
r,165A ,166B; !I II
uw
m w a 1 2 an It
I
o 20,538 SF I 10,398 SF Z Jo I M N8III 11 III !
"m II 6°04'03"E 179.95' I'I II II EIP
wa I �J o
UPLAND DISTURBANCE = 13.04 AC
(INCLUDING OUTFALL SWALE)
WETLAND DISTURBANCE = 0.308 AC
TOTAL DISTURBANCE = 13.47 AC
173B) ,173A;
,172B; ',172A; -'
-_ `,17113; .171A; ` --
170B
'
,169A) a
-
N86- 04'03 IL 182.72'
11 18' 38 2I
E
Nl9. �� r
O
9,350 SF
�N E4vlS89°24'55"E 73.35' IIN8 1�3--ELLI �I -'� tXm II TEPCONSTR50'GRAVEIIIJIN O
S[ T FENCE
AR UNO PERIMILIl
_
ENTRANCE 9.350 SF `
N i 10 10,373 SF 9.350 S
I rn _ &73
_1 1 10.027 SF I x i SF 25 MBL
O ®'O
9.962 SF
WETLAND IMPACT#1 9 57SF I \\ 11.109 SF L_
10.233 SF 9,350 SF
ROAD/UTILITY CROSSING
6446 SF (0. 1 47AC) \ \ 25 MBL_ _
------
— LAUREL RIDGE DRIVE ,
(50 R/W 28' BC/BC PUBLIC)
WETLAND IMPACT
SUMMARY
IMPACT#
TYPE
SF
AC
1
ROAD/UTILITY
61446
0.147
2
YARD
FILL
3,894
0.089
3
YARD
FILL
19329
0.031
4
YARD
FILL
1,790
0.041
TOTAL
1 139459
1 0.308
SILT FENCE JUST —1
INSIDE IMPACT LINE
WETLAND IMPACT#2
BACKYARD FILL
3894 SF (0.089AC)
SILT FENCE JUST
INSIDE IMPACT LINE
WETLAND IMPACT NOTES:
1. ALL WETLAND IMPACTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE USACOE PRIOR TO IMPACTING.
2. PROTECT REMAINING WETLANDS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE FROM SOIL
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE AT THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND IMPACTS AND SEED/VEGETATE
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
PROJECT NO. : P1633-001
DRAWING NO.: 003
50 25 0 50 100
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=50'
/
SIDEWALK
— — — — LS ----
IS
19
— 7
2011
9,613 SF
I
��
1D,247
SF
E
I
,
m xJ
J
�`-_l13.522 SF
/
rn
/
Z
21,148 SF
y1 2 3
11 .911 SF
NIL -A
NIS
BEFORE YOU DIG:
NC ONE CALL
(TOLL FREE)
O
5
(OR 1-800-632-4949)
IT'S THE LAW:
8,234
SILT -FEN
t
25'MBL 1N86°04'03"E II
r — — 50.00,
I I
I 0 28 II
© 9,350 SF 10.257 SF
10.245 SF
i
I y:_ 4� I
m
z 9 I q m
/ - 19.635 SF i Tnm
MAIL,/ \v W3
K I OSK \� / ., \Zo
G \
s S�DEWALkr-�� \J/ \V 30
16,050 SF \\
'EXTILAI b \
/
J 5
23,628 SF
Ln
12,598 SF 1
89'
58 °O8'05"W 23• /I
SILT FENCE JUST)
OUTSIDE IMPACT LINE
I 34
II 10,938 SF
r`BARRICADE'
30'x 40'
TEMPORARY
HAMMERHEAD
WOODED EASEMENT
WETLAND IMPACT#4
BACKYARD FILL
1790 SF (0.041AC)
WETLAND IMPACT#3
BACKYARD FILL
1614 SF (0.037AC)
NANNIE SUE CRAWFORD BEST FIELDS
\\ 12,093 SF
EX NAIL WITH
FLAGGNG
EASEMENT
`TEMPORARY
HAMMERHEAD
TURN -A -ROUND
36
9,350 SF
TOTAL AREA .......................13.8097
AC
ZONING.................................R6
AND R6S
R6.....................................8.05
AC
R6S...................................5.77
AC
NO.OF LOTS....................................37
SMALLEST LOT SIZE ...........8,123 SF
LINEAL FEET IN
STREET ........ 2494 LF
ACRES IN PARKS,
RECREATION ...... 0
WETLANDS...........................1.14589
AC
COMMON AREA ........................6544
SF
PARCEL NO.................03940
AND 67549
`,174A) `J75B;
`,174B1 --'
'48'20"E 80.87'
NIS
O
10,681 SF
20
- — -
50'x 130'
TEMPORARY
30"R
I
HAMMERHEAD
EASEMENT
�/ \i
! �•
TEMPORARY
>
I
HAMMERHEAD
5y
TURN -A -ROUND
ZONE R65
---
ZONE LINE
P
_
it
ZONE R6
--
9,350S F
-' III �� IIIIII
-
ATER
CAI ON
N89°47'36"W 270.85'
LOO_..-..-.._.,�..-_.-.__LOD..-..
R E V I S I O N S
CONSTRUCTION
PLANS
I---1—I---�
WETLAND
IMPACTS
R SILT
FENCE
(LOD)
� ��'%°
✓
FIELDSTONE
RICHARD A. BROWN, P.E.
�+r� T
SECTION 1 0 1V�T
2
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
pw„140#9,
I,DEBORAH T. BOYETTE CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT AND
GREENVILLE ARTHUR TOWNSHIP PITT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
0(kSH....
CHARGE ROM AN
See
��
C��•.OFEgs� .�
DESCRRESPO(IPTION RECORDEDSIBLE
IN BOOK ,GPAAGE-tM,IEORMADE FROMUNDER BOOKSMREFERENEDSION HEREON):
THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION
owNBR: PITT LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
e+ �•(� -.
FOUND IN BOOK.�,PAGE tft'!; OR AS REFERENCED HEREON: THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION
p Q. O ,1,
•Q
ADDRE33: 1319 HUNTINGWOOD DRIVE
1A 7 s
0r
A CALCULATED IS 1:40,797: THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET
GREENVILLE. NC 27858
$Eq` ��
FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS AS APPLICABLE: THAT THE TOPOGRAPHIC
O L-4146
DATA WAS OBTAINED ON_]..n319;THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON 11/19/19;
PHONE: [phone]
Z 2 ;
THAT THE CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY NOT MEET THE STATED STANDARD;
THAT VERTICAL CONTROL WAS ESTABLISHED AT THE SITE TO THE CLASS "A" STANDARD: AND
OSURV•e,. !(�.+++
THAT THIS MAP MEETS THE REOUIREMENTS OF THE'STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING
�,�
DESIGNED: Rpg
DATE: 3/30/20
IN NORTH CAROLINA" (21 NCAC 56,1600).
�`"eiajaaoti:W9i
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL THIS THE I DAY OFMP•J, 2020.
A STROUD ENGINEERING. P.A.
DRAWN:
SCALE:
� Q (��
LHJ
1 "=50'
�
SIGNED 6LlX.�1.LJL�-�+ a LllL�.,o
I07-R COMMERCE STREET
PROFESSIONAL LAND SUR YOR PLS L-4146
((22521?SG-9332 Tx cnaDElRe 2TMse
APPROVED:
SHEET OF
LICEM6C xac-oMWT
RAB
C2 11