20191756 Ver 3_H - PETS Report_20200605

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
June 5, 2020
Mr. Rob Stout
Stantec
2127 Ayrsley Town Blvd, Suite 300
Charlotte, NC 28273
Subject: Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall
Improvements
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Dear Mr. Stout,
Stantec has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide a protected species
habitat assessment for the Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall
Improvements project. The Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall
Improvements project limits consist of an approximately 60-foot wide, 8,200-foot long corridor
that begins northeast of the University City Boulevard and East W.T. Harris Boulevard
intersection, and extends northward along Toby Creek to just southwest of the North Tryon
Street and the East Mallard Creek Church Road intersection. Just south of the North Tryon
Street and East Mallard Creek Church Road intersection there is an additional trunk that
branches off of the main corridor that will be used for a water reuse line. This trunk is
approximately 40-feet wide and 10,400-feet long, and extends northeast along Mallard Creek to
North Tryon Street in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1).
Methods
In -office Desktop Review
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the
project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of
Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County'. In addition,
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
Data Explorer2 on June 5, 2020 to determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat are located within the project
limits.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office. Accessed August 8, 2019. Endangered and Threatened Species
and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina. https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.htmi
2 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer. Accessed August 8, 2019. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/.
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Typical habitat requirements for listed species was discerned from multiple USFWS3 and
NCNHP4 online resources including, but not limited to, specific USFWS species profiles,
recovery plans, NCNHP's Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of
North Carolina, and List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. United States Department
of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of
Mecklenburg County5 and aerial imagery were also reviewed for potential habitat communities
of listed species within the project vicinity (Figures 2 and 3).
Field Survey
CWS scientists Megan Shelton, WPIT6, Project Scientist, Kerry Wright, Project Scientist, Arnie
Hoy, Staff Scientist III, and Ian Dunning, Staff Scientist I conducted a pedestrian habitat
assessment of the project area on August 20, October 22 and 23, 2019, March 12, 2020, and
April 17, 2020. Potential habitats for potentially occurring federally -protected species that were
identified during the desktop review were assessed in the field for the quality of physical and/or
biological features essential to the conservation of the applicable species. Additionally, during
the pedestrian habitat assessment, areas were reviewed for applicable federally protected
species. However, formal surveys were not conducted for the occurence of protected species.
Identification references for natural communities include the National Land Cover Database
(2011)7.
Results
Based on the NCNHP data explorer review, there are two occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower
within a one -mile radius of the project limits (Attachment A). The USFWS lists seven federally
protected species for Mecklenburg County (Table 1). An official species list has not been
obtained from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.
3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species. http://www.fws.gov/noes/es/plant_Survey.htmi. Accessed August 8, 2019.
4 Buchanan, M.F. and J.T. Finnegan. 2010. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. NC Natural
Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC. Accessed from https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylisttnc_counties.html
5 United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed 8/8/19.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
6 Wetland Professional in Training, The Society of Wetland Scientist Professional Certification Program
MLRC. National Land Cover Database, 2011. https://www.mric.gov/nlcdll_leg.php
Page 2 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Table 1. Unofficial List of Federally -Protected Species Potentially Occurring within the
Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements, Mecklenburg County,
NC.
Major Group
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status*
Record Status
Plant
Helianthus
Schweinitz's
E
Current
schweinitzii
sunflower
Plant
Echinacea
Smooth coneflower
E
Current
laevigata
Plant
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Current
Animal
Lasmigona
Carolina heelsplitter
E
Current
decorata
Animal
Bombus afints
Rusty -patched
E
Historic
bumble bee
Animal
Myotis
Northern -long-eared
T
Current
septentrionalis
bat
Animal
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
BGPA
Current
leucocephalus
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Three terrestrial community types were identified within the project area during the field survey.
These community types consist of deciduous, herbaceous and low intensity development
(Figure 3). Of the identified on -site community types, the forested and herbaceous areas are
considered potential habitat for federally threatened or endangered species that could
potentially occur within the project limits. A brief description of each species habitat
requirements and determination of effect findings are listed below by species.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
Habitat Description:
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb with yellow rays and yellow centers. They
can reach heights of five feet. Populations are limited to the piedmont of North and
South Carolina. It has been listed as an Endangered species under the ESA since
1991.8 The typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission
line right-of-ways, open areas, either natural or human -maintained habitats, or edges of
upland woods. Major characteristics of soils associated with suitable Schweinitz's
sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland interstream flats or gentle slopes,
soils that are clay like in both composition and texture (and often with substantial rock
fragments), soils that have a high shrinkage swell capacity, and those which vary over
the course of the year from very wet to very dry.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are two occurrences within one mile of
the project limits. The herbaceous areas throughout the project limits consist of the
Monocan loam soil series, which is not conducive to Schweinitz's sunflower habitat. In
addition, these areas are heavily maintained through the practices of mowing and
s United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Helianthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz's sunflower) Determined to be Endangered. hftp://ecos.fws.gov/docs/f`ederal_register/frl852.pdf.
Page 3 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
pesticide application, which is not supportive of Schweinitz's sunflower (Photographs 3
and 5). The on -site forested areas do not provide adequate sunlight and do not contain
the proper soil series to support Schweinitz's sunflower (Photographs 1, 9 and 10). On
October 22, 2019, CWS visited a nearby reference population, and noted that all plant
parts of the Schweinitz's sunflower were identifiable and the plant was approximately
five feet tall (Photograph 13). No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed in
the study area during the field review. As the survey was conducted during the optimal
survey window of late August to October and mature vegetation was present,
Schweinitz's sunflower would have been seen if present. Therefore, because no
individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed during the optimal survey window,
CWS concludes that this project will have no effect on the Schweinitz's sunflower.
Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)
Habitat Description:
Smooth coneflower is a tall, perennial herbaceous plant found in areas with abundant
sunlight where competition in the herbaceous layer is minimal. It has been federally
listed as Endangered under the ESA since 1992.9 Typical habitat for this plant includes
meadows, open woodlands, the ecotonal regions between meadows and woodlands,
cedar barrens, dry limestone bluffs, clear cuts, and roadside and utility rights -of -way. In
North Carolina, the species normally grows in magnesium- and calcium- rich soils
associated with gabbro and diabase parent material, and typically occurs in Iredell,
Misenheimer, and Picture soil series. It grows best where there is abundant sunlight,
little competition in the herbaceous layer, and periodic disturbances (e.g., regular fire
regime, well-timed mowing, careful clearing) that prevents encroachment of
shade -producing woody shrubs and trees. On sites where woody succession is held in
check, it is characterized by a number of species with prairie affinities.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
The majority of the project limits are forested, which does not provide the abundant
sunlight the smooth coneflower requires. In addition, Iredell, Misenheimer, and Picture
soil series commonly associated with the smooth coneflower are not found within the
project limits.10 Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS concludes that
this project will have no effect on smooth coneflower.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Habitat Description:
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous shrub. It is densely hairy with compound leaves
exhibiting evenly -serrated leaflets. Flowers are small, greenish to white, in terminal
clusters. Fruits are red drupes produced from August to October. It has been listed as
an Endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since 1989.11 It is
y United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1992. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Echinacea laevigata (Smooth
Coneflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_ register/fr2140.pdf.
10 United States Department of Agriculture, 2018. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed 8/8/19
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
11 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1989. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered
Page 4 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
found on the coastal plains of Virginia to Florida, with most populations occurring in
North Carolina. It prefers sandy or rocky open woods with basic soils, as well as,
highway right-of-ways, roadsides, or edges of artificially -maintained clearings.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Disturbed open areas conducive to early -succession species are not present in the
project area. The Monacan loam soil series that covers the majority of the site is too
acidic to provide suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac. Additionally, there are no current
records of this species within Mecklenburg County12. Due to the lack of habitat and
known occurrences, CWS concludes that this project will have no effect on
Michaux's sumac.
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata)
Habitat Description:
The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the
Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah
River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North
Carolina, the species is now known only from a handful of streams in the Pee Dee and
Catawba River systems. The species exists in very low abundances, usually within 6
feet of shorelines, throughout its known range. The general habitat requirements for the
Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers to small streams, often burrowed
into clay banks between the root systems of trees, or in runs along steep banks with
moderate current. Recently, the Carolina heelsplitter has been found in sections of
streams containing bedrock with perpendicular crevices filled with sand and gravel, and
with wide riparian buffers."
Biological Analysis:
There are ten perennial streams on -site, including Mallard Creek and Toby Creek. This
portion of Mallard Creek has been severely impaired by stormwater runoff from the
surrounding university14. The runoff has resulted in high nutrient levels and high
turbidity, which is not supportive of the Carolina heelsplitter. Toby Creek is severely
incised and highly turbid, and contains large amounts of silt throughout the stream,
which is not conducive to Carolina heelsplitter habitat. In addition, the other perennial
streams that drain into Toby and Mallard Creek are heavily embedded with silt and trash,
which is not suitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter. All of the on -site perennial streams
are connected to downstream waters via large culverts, which is also not conducive for
Carolina heelsplitter (Photographs 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11). Additionally, the NCNHP data
record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this species within the
Status for Rhus michauxii (Michawes sumac). http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_ register/fr1601.pdf.
12 USFWS Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan; https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/930430.pdf
13 NCDOT TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. 2015.
https://con nect. ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Compliance%20G u ides%20and%20 Procedu resfTE%20Ani mal %20 Habitat%
20Descri ptions%20Mar_6_2015. pdf
14hftps://files. nc.gov/ncdegNVater%20Quality/Planning/BPU/BPU/Yadkin/Yadkin%20Plans/2010%20PIan/6_03040105%20Rocky%2
OR-2010.pdf
Page 5 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A). Therefore, CWS
concludes that this project will have no effect the Carolina heelsplitter.
Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis)
The Rusty patched bumble bee was listed as Endangered under the ESA in January 2016.15
Rusty patched bumble bees once occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies of the Upper
Midwest and Northeast, but most grasslands and prairies have been lost, degraded, or
fragmented by conversion to other uses. According to USFWS guidance, "the rusty patched
bumble bee population has declined by approximately 90% or more. There are currently
records of Bombus affinis in isolated places within 13 states and 1 providence since 2000. In
these areas, surveys should only be completed by qualified biologists under the guidance of the
federal recovery/scientific permit under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. These surveyors must
also meet all applicable state permitting and reporting requirements. The presence of Bombus
affinis has been broken down into three zones. A high potential zone provides a reasonable
basis for describing where the species is likely to be present and where federal agencies and
others should consult with Fish and Wildlife Services to evaluate the potential effects of their
actions. A low potential zone buffers a high potential zone and are much less likely to support
existing populations. Scientists are hopeful that some of these low potential areas may contain
the bee, and they recommend that surveyors obtain a scientific recovery permit. The third zone
is the unoccupied zone. Scientists believe that the likelihood of finding the species in these
areas is so low that they do not recommend scientific recovery permits, unless a Bombus affinis
may have accidentally been collected.16 According to USFWS' Rusty Patched Bumble Bee
Interactive Map, Mecklenburg County is located within an unoccupied zone. Therefore, the
proposed project will have no effect on the Rusty -patched bumble bee.
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Summer habitat (roosting habitat) of the NLEB includes forests
and woodlots containing live trees and/or dead snags greater than three inches diameter at
breast height with cavities or crevices. Winter habitat (hibernacula) of the NLEB includes caves,
mines, rocky areas, or structures that mimic similar conditions such as culverts greater than
48-inch in diameter." The NLEB was listed as Threatened (T) on April 2, 2015.
The forested areas within the property are potential habitats for the NLEB. A Standard Local
Operating Procedure for Endangered Species Act Compliance (SLOPES) was established for
NLEB between the USFWS Asheville and Raleigh Ecological Offices and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District, on January 31, 2017.18 This SLOPES
defines how the USACE will make determinations of effect to the NLEB on projects in which the
USACE is the lead federal agency. Alternative Local Procedure 2 (ALP 2) applies for the
Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements project as the action
15 United States Fish and Wildlife Services.
https://www.fws.gov/midwestlendangered/insects/rpbb/pdf/Survey_Protocols_RPBB_12April2019. pdf
18 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. https://www.fws.gov/midwestlendangered/insects/rpbb/index.html
17 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016.4(d) Rule for the Northern Long -Eared Bat; Final rule.
hftps://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-01-14/pdf/2016-00617.pdf
18 USACE http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
Page 6 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
area is within range of the NLEB,19 the action area is located outside of a red 12-digit HUC as
defined by the Asheville Ecological Services Field Office,20 and consultation by the USACE is
required on other listed species or critical habitat.
The final 4(d) rule exempts incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater
than 0.25 miles from a known hibernaculum site and greater than 150 feet from a known,
occupied maternity roost from June 1-July 31. In accordance with ALP 2 and the final 4(d) rule
(effective as of February 16, 2016), any incidental take that may result from associated activities
is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Therefore, this project is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,21 enacted in 1940, prohibits anyone without a permit
issued, from "taking" bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. Habitat for the bald
eagle includes cliffs and forested areas typically within 1.0 mile of estuaries, large lakes,
reservoirs, rivers, seacoast, and as they become more abundant, stands of undisturbed forest.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as, the area within a 1 mile radius
of the project limits, was performed on August 8, 2019 using 2019 color aerials. No water
bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources were
identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project
study area and the area within the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of the
NCNHP database on August 8, 2019 revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0
mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, CWS
concludes that this project will have no effect on this species.
Summary
Based on the literature search and the results of the on -site assessment for suitable habitat of
federally -protected endangered, and threatened species, suitable habitat was not observed
within the project limits for smooth coneflower, Michaux's sumac, bald eagle, or Carolina
heelsplitter. Marginal habitat was observed for Schweinitz's sunflower. The project area is not
located within the currently occupied range of the rusty -patched bumble bee. CWS has
concluded that activities within the project area will not directly or indirectly jeopardize the
continued existence of Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, Michaux's sumac, bald
eagle, rusty -patched bumble bee, and Carolina heelsplitter. Additionally, based on the project
area location, no tree removal activities will occur within a 150-foot radius of a known, occupied
NLEB maternity roost from June 1-July 31 and no trees will be removed within 0.25 miles of a
known hibernaculum at any time of year. Therefore, any incidental take on NLEB that may
result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule and notifications will follow the
SLOPES agreement22. Biological determinations requirements for federally protected species
are summarized in Table 2.
19 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nieb/pdf/WNSZone.pdf
20 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Northern Long -Eared Bat.
21 https://www.fws.gov/midwest/MidwestBird/eaglepermits/bagepa.html
22 http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.htmi
Page 7 of 8

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Table 2. Biological Determination Requirements Summary Table for Federally Protected Species
Federal
Effect on Listed
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status*
Species
Determination
Required
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
No Effect
No
Echinacea laevigata
Smooth coneflower
E
No Effect
No
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
No Effect
No
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina heelsplitter
E
No Effect
No
Bombus affinis
Rusty -patched bumble bee
E
No Effect
No
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern -long-eared bat
T
Exempt
Yes**
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
BGPA
No Effect
No
leucocephalus
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
** - Required in accoradnce with SLOPES, ALP 2 agreement.
A biological assessment was not conducted for this project. All biological determinations of
effect represent the best professional opinion of CWS and are not official determinations of
effect. It is the responsibility of the lead federal agency to render an official determination of
effect. Should the lead federal agency agree with CWS's initial findings of no effect, then no
USFWS consultation is required to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Should the lead federal agency's determination of effect differ from the findings of CWS, formal
or informal consultation with USFWS may be required.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Megan Bollero at 757-576-6433 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
(firc?,_ B,&,,,
Megan Bollero, WPIT
Project Scientist
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Figure 1: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Map of Mecklenburg County
Figure 3: Aerial Map
Attachment A: NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment B: Representative Photographs (1-12)
Page 8 of 8

2a �
c -
[] yc
P "
4
f
Elem.
y
5
- -
..
V
$,per
1- CRr�kUS f
17
2 -Y
r' c
fl 9adr COinsital
AQXI
_
44
ga
r•{
iJV i'Ji RS+TV Rf? C.1rolInaN
f
13
t�
MARL
J
s
4-1 U at
�
P
Legend
Toby Creek Outfall Improvements (13 ac.)
Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension (12 ac.)
"'
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S): HARRISBURG, NC (2017).
-
SCALE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet
DATE:
6/5/2020
USGS Topographic Map
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2019-0234
DRAWN BY:
MLB
Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
CAR ❑ L 1 N A
and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements
35.315162,-80.733467
AVH
WETLAND SERVICES
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0234 Toby Creek\PETS\ArcGIS\Revised (6.3.20)\Figure1_USGS.mxd

Pxw'L (oZ£ 9) PalaP$1V9I,­MI D�9oJ,—I6IPZ--d�VL^s®D6I-1--C ureay%uOLosuoDAe^4RPa--D

pxwma�.va�plauatl £8 4I\COL£'9) Pasua2IVSI,tl—d\� D�-IKZO6I0--l-10 lo—D61—IOa—ureay%41-uo--Pa--D

Pxw'I.-v vE—(oz'£9)P--siDytlVSJ3dk -D Xq.1 b£Z0-6I0Z\ —d%COI^-6I0Z\6I0Z\ -meat'%m1I^ D amP PD
L91'EEL 08-'Z9696E 9E 5301AN35 CIMVIJ3M
Ei/�d near �aH� ale P-3 d N [] "� euipJEO MPON Xlunoo 6inquall3apj
sluawanojdwl Ilepnp Naajo Rgol pue uoisualx3 aui-1 asnay Naajo piepeW zz
91W b£ZO 66ON
A8 NMV 2J0 ON133f 021d SNP 5
Saab 00£ = 4au! I, dew �eiaad
ozozisi9 �,vos
ti
T(oD
igure 3B
Qa)o m EC
p5 ?
e
1 •- oc
-J •.
; .
V•t- Q � C� F
F O y
a. _
1'r' � . _ " T. ,F - - l;r, . t tom`• � , � ;; � � � z z ° w
s it
14
qz,Od
w
r do zc��
xc�y Wwo
T -

Pxw'La�tl £9) Xq.J, b£ZO 661-6 TO a— P Pa-9S D
L9bEEL 08-'Z966E 9E 53�IAOMV-113M
Find neaa��aH� 9e993 N 1-1 d 0 euiloJeo yPotJ X>.unoo 6inqualN3aW
sluawanojdwl Ilepno Naajo Rgol pue uoisualx3 aui-1 asnay Naajo piepeW °z
91W b£ZO-660Z
A8 NMV2o ON i33O21 SNP 5
Saab 00£ = 4Du! 6 dew leiaad /+A
ozozisi9 �,vos
x
LL
I d v o
Matches m
Figure 3C o
C C
N �
E X C
N W o
i o C
Q J _ cD
E o
n E a
I w m E m o
O Y N o
N
Y N C (n (6
o
U C a J
() � a
r
Y y
Barton�Gk Dr ~'•, * e 'f -
►ram r z ,�
6 ti
3rove Hill Dr .` , ••} +�� s ...,� r�� �^^ _ J°
Grove L-ake Dr
TOOT
o�
Ins1i1u1e Gr
�--� • u `i
Alm
gw
- Rup2.Ln_
+�ta1Le1�R n -j U Q y d
W
1. •;I ■i �• .� ll I

Pxw'La�tl £9)�9 b£ZO661-6TOa—ureay%m-uo- P Pa-9SD

Pxw'I.-v Q£—(oz'£9)P--sIDytlVSJ3dk -D X9.1 b£Z0-6I0Z\ —d%COI^-6I0Z\6I0Z\ -meat'%m1I^ D amP P9S D

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Attachments CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Attachment A:
NCNHP

Run Roy Cooper, Governor
■R 4, NC DEPARTMENT OF Susl Hamilton. Secretary
■�-ion NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
a Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12161
June 5, 2020
Megan Bollero
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, INC 28273
RE: Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements
Dear Megan Bollero:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httgs://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the INC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler(a)ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
INC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARIMEN 1 GF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. INC 27699
P OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

/
) °
o
a
n §
\
/
\
\
e E
z 0
/
/
J)
\
ro
/
\
\
\ N
0 0
21
®
°
aE/t
0
f
m
. o
0 u
e e o
0\%
z
2
E§z'E2'c
§
<
U
0)%
ƒ
m q
>
§
\
6
7
\ 0
0
@
\
J - / %
&u
3
\
%
,
,
_0
/ \ @ 3
� \
ƒ
/
{ a -0
t t
s/§}
\ >
o o
\ )
\ f
§
/
E 9 % f
)
\ 0
\ \ \ \
g/
u
&
>
@
ee
\ob/
/ 2
®
�
c 5 5 7/
8 8 2
< 5
0
4 0 0 2
7 J( 2
2 0
oa
t=a
o
u u@\§
3±
=3-
2 0
0
° c
o
e o
E
L e<
Id
) § /
c
U3
o=2
§
>b
/
\\f
U
\ o �
/
0 % `
l./
�3
`
\_0/ ±
0
§
^
o
coocn
7 § w O
\
\ ±
\
\
2 ` \
\ \ ( U
§
\
\
\ \ ® \
/
\
o)
»\\�t�
/ w
: °
`
a o
0 0 0\)
cn
o .g
U U -$
m/ M
u2
m
\�
E
\
/\\�
46
E E
eƒ
2
CID
£
roe
5 I
G R[
\ \
\
2 2 0=
\ § §
2® o
& \
7
E
<
U
J>> z@\\_
\ /
o U
ES
<
E
0 0
M
\
E9
ƒ\
\U
o
e/
U�
±o
I@
o
'/
�7
G
\\\(
0,
\
<
\j�/
\/
22
m
c
E
g
3
\
o
:
ocm
°z § \
\
a
o
\
%
/
0
E
\ b .0 @
\
5
%
/ \ cm}
\
\
\
/
\
ro
o
4-1
.0
0
2
\
$
* ) /
\\
\a
0
\\\
E
j\
<
\\
U
�
t
/\/0\
0
O
0
°
O
°
E
\ 0
.
.-
a) 0
\
\
/
\
\
2-=�
\
C:±
%
9
U)O�EIto®=e
0
E o ��
\ \
/
e
z
J
E%)\
k
U
\
E
<
%e
4-
) o
\\=a={
= c
e e
l
0
\e-0%'>
\
\>
\
\E \ n
�/E
(
ƒ_
j
ƒ
j
/
//%�)L
de o a
x
g
+_£_
/
>
>
/
f
zƒ
f f}
�� §
z ƒ
\
k
2

M
N
i
Q
U
N
O
n
4-
4-
4-
0
ro 4U�
N O
C
O Q
r6 E
C
ro
L 4-
4-
�0
to -Y
r6 N
i
QU
0)0000
c ~ O N
M-ON L,
ro US ro
c N = N
ca•� �
rU Q
Z ro N�U
QJ +- N
i X
Q W O
N n
@ C
4-
r6 N 4-
Z O
2
U _0
:3 U
U
O ro
+, @ c
N5- O
N ro
C
W �
O7
r6
C 1
U C
= N
l6 E
7 7
41 U
ro O
Z n
N S
+' C
M
M
M
N N N
M M M
M
M
@ @
(n Q,
En
LO
LO
Ur
Ur
Ur
C
_N
C
_N
C
@
_N N N N
i i i
N N C:
i i C
(p C:
i C
(p QJ
i
i�@
U U@
i
U U@
i
U U@
O7 O7 O7
O7 O7 U N
L U N
C
L
ro
41 ro
(n 4
O C
Q O
O
C
O C
Q O
O
C
O C
Q O
O C C C
C@@@
C C U r6
r6 r6
Q ;F- r6
•c
Q ro
•C N
EncnU
:3
U
�cnU
�C
��
a
a�
>
>
C C
>WWW
WWcn
cn
+,
M
ru
c c
�i41
ro ro
c
ro
c c
U
W W
i0
7
L
7 7 i
-C-C 7
7
7
U
J
N
=
N N i 0_=
N
N
N
N
In
N N
Q
M
M M
M
M
M
N
U
C C
E N r6 _
N U ry
W U
O
C
O O
41
ra �QO
FO
m
O
L
O
O
CO
M
C
O O
a N r
U
i
0 r-
O
co
c
ra
= Q X = = X _ = p
LO
N
N
LO N N
N
N
N
M N
i 0 0
O
Cb
co
O
O O) 0
0p 0 0
O
n
O
O
0O
N g O
i i
�n
1
coU
O
m O
00 �
N
O
N
N
N N
0 0
c
0
0
O
c c
c
C
CO
CO
Q Q
+N_, +N, ro
M
Q
@
@
i r6 y'
C C O
O
C
C
N C@
'� '� v� U
N U
.�
00
00
�oJ
@ O
@ O
O@ ro
_C)@
U U O O
_C)@
O O
N
U
U
0U1--
c10c10=1--
i C
�
N N
C
N am}
+_� L,
C C E
E
.0
.0
: ro @
7
7
E
N
N
r6 X
L ro
L
r6
L
N
L
N
L
� p 0
u
w w Q
Q
i
C
C
N U
@
7 7 C
@
C
0 7
Q
Q
_7
O E c
Z, a-+ O
O
L
C C
E
E
N v� Q
Q
Q
QU0
==ate
aC)
cn
�
CO
m
M
6�M
=
NO
U
N
N CO
4 -
c
+-
c
4 - +- 4 -
c c c
+- 4 - +-
c c c
4 -
c
+-
c
ra
ra
ra ra ra
ra ra ra
M
M
ra
ra
ra ra ra
ra ra ra
M
M
>
>
> > >
> > >
>
>
U
U
U U U
U U U
U
U
U)
N
N N N
N N N
N
N
O
Q
U
N
O
a
4-
4-
O
7
r6
E
C
O
r6
C
41
N
C
N
U
O
n
N
r6
w
ro
N
Q
ro
Z
O
Z
N -
Q :
C
m U
C
N
C
O
r6
C
L
41
C
N 1
>,
7 N i
0 � N
�Z
i
ro ro U
Q 4 C2
U
ro ro ro
C C —
r6 r6 r6
2: 2: 2:
LO
0
M
N
a

(
»
_
\
%
/
)
£
_
j
z
q
§
\
%/
/]
g2
c t
t t t
§}
E E
E E /
c c
c c c\
Co
\\
0 0
0 0 0
e e
e e e
b=
\ \ \
\ 2 \ u
/ \
O / /
/ \ / /
] >
o%
f0
\
8
\
§7
$
(\
§(
0
a)
\
�\
/
/ - -
> > >
\ q
< t t
t 0 c t
0 0
o c o o
..0
\
U U
U .\ / /
q -_
I o 0
o A o o
®
Co 46
\\\(3
/
:
D&
0 0
e222oa2
0± 2 0
\ \ § §
§ U § §
± \
o »
> z »
` ±
/
\G
\(
\/
E
6
\
n>
§@
\
§
go
w
i)
in
7
®
=e
\
.§
) [
\
��
/ro
E
/%\
§\
0 0 \ a
\ 14
#
/ E 4 %
° c
� 4 0
§ §
2 e c I
z °
y \
-»
(
®
%
)
\§\
%:
< lq\ E
a c>$
= 2
2 2 / E
/ \ : U
§ >
/M ƒ%/\0
.9{
7§
cc2a4
>t
f f / }
/ / \ m
ƒ §

m
�
m
E
$
7
0
Cl
E
�
�
❑
-�e
$
$
U
�
�
F-
�
E
m
E
O
.7
2
a)
x
W
$
E
�
$
$
�
$
ry
-�e
$
$
C)
-P
co
�
�
Q0
C%4
W
❑
2
Z
C)
Z
^
�
« .
. ƒ
�
�
\
~� ~kw
.
fc
_
. �
"~ ^
ILI
_
\ §
-
� } _
,
• g�

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Attachments CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Attachment B:
Photopage (Photographs 1-12)

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements
Attachment A: Photopage
June 5, 2020
CWS Project No. 2019-0234
' .. , � t :� �-� i f • �.f a .. .. �_ r�iJ--�- __ ': �..
-�:� ,� 7 R _ .- f- .-A-� "•;' may;, ,.A - _
All.�" ter= 'L'•_�e
Sol
Photograph 1. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, Smooth coneflower, and Michuax's sumac,
Photograph 2. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter (Toby Creek), facing south (8.20.19).
Photopage 1 of 6

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements
Attachment A: Photopage
June 5, 2020
CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Photograph 3. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, facing south.
Photograph 4. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, facing west.
Photopage 2 of 6

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Attachment A: Photopage CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Photograph 5. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, facing north.
Photograph 6. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, facing west.
Photopage 3 of 6

•. y } -`\.- � i _ �4.:t. .'1 �` .M ::fir .�r
��i 'k� ♦i�y� •• sue•- M _ � � '
611
>n
AW
AM
10.
'k . � .. 'r�.. � }' 1 � _ i � - tip-• :. 1 �r
0
- �+�-�� ,T_�- •t2 ��. '- ���: � -: i�_.;�--ram+' .r� ��� � -Yt�� ���-_- � -� '�
'.}� 'tl 1l �Uf. �b _.. . _ =�. � •fir":'-�.: ~��,. � '��1��
• I.I • F.I... •.�i'.` 1<1`'' i s 7Lf 1 ' j / !. +-` 41

e ��'—• is �.'_� 4j .� �`:• .v -iE_ k �:
, pppp
` }�=+Y�'Iy.= rye :. : iyy r.yl., } tv
�
VT
IMA
444.
,.r. ' �-i � � •. -; � Fix `�,,.
� _ 1, �.ti ,,�- , ,ram.• � �,:�;� �; �a�! ,'f-�.,�►.

Mallard Creek Reuse Line Extension and Toby Creek Outfall Improvements June 5, 2020
Attachment A: Photopage CWS Project No. 2019-0234
Photograph 11. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, facing northwest.
Photograph 12. View of Schweinitz's sunflower at nearby reference population.
Photopage 6 of 6