HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0003425_Alternate Schedule Request_20150311DUKE
►; ENERGY.
March 10, 2015
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
NPPES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: 316(b) Alternate Schedule Request
Duke Energy Carolina, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Attention Sergei Chernikov:
Environmental Services
Duke Energy
526 South Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Mailing Address:
Mail Code EC13K/ P.O. Box 1006
Charlotte, NC 28201-1006
,ECEtVEDiDENPJDWR
t aR 11 201`j
Water Q Sector.
PermitttnQ
Final regulations to establish requirements for cooling water intake structures at existing facilities were
published in the Federal Register on August 15, 2014 (i.e. regulations implementing §316(b) of the Clean
Water Act) with an effective date of October 14, 2014. The regulation applies to stations that
commenced construction prior to or on January 17, 2002 and have a design intake flow greater than 2
million gallons per day (MGD), utilize 25% of the water withdrawn for cooling purposes and are point
sources per the NDPES program. The stations Duke Energy has identified as being subject to the rule are
provided in Table 1.
The regulation requires the submission of information listed in 40 CFR 122.21(r). The extent of the
information that is required to be submitted per station is based on the actual intake flow (AIF). For
stations that have an AIF less than or equal to 125 million gallons per day (MGD), the regulation requires
the following information to be submitted:
§122.21(r)(2) Source Water Physical Data
§122.21(r)(3) Cooling Water Intake Structure Data
§122.21(r)(4) Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data
§122.21(r)(5) Cooling Water System Data
§122.21(r)(6) Chosen Method(s) of Compliance with Impingement Mortality Standard
§122.21(r)(7) Entrainment Performance Studies
§122.21(r)(8) Operational Status
For stations that have an AIF greater than 125 MGD, the regulation requires the above information to be
submitted and, unless waived, the following additional information:
§122.21(r)(9) Entrainment Characterization Study
§122.21(r)(10) Comprehensive Technical Feasibility and Cost Evaluation Study
§122.21(r)(11) Benefits Valuation Study
§122.21(r)(12) Non -water Quality and Other Environmental Impacts Study
The timing of the submission of the above information is connected to the timing of the NPDES permit
renewal application for the station. The regulation states that for a station whose current effective
NPDES permit expires after July 14, 2018, information required to be submitted must be included with
the subsequent NPDES permit renewal application. For stations whose current effective permit expires
on or before July 14, 2018, the owner may submit a request to the permit Director for an alternate
schedule for the submission of the above information'.
As shown in Table 1, every Duke Energy station in North Carolina either has an effective permit that
expires prior to July 14, 2018 or has a NPDES permit that has been administratively continued while the
permit is in the renewal process. Duke Energy hereby requests an alternate schedule for each of these
stations. The requested submittal date for the 316(b) information is provided in Table 1.
As indicated in Table 1, the Duke Energy stations that have an AIF greater than 125 MGD, with the
exception of Brunswick Nuclear Station, are located on reservoirs. Under the remanded Phase II 316(b)
Rule, stations located on reservoirs were not required to conduct entrainment monitoring. These
stations, therefore, will have to conduct 2-years of entrainment monitoring to complete the
§122.21(r)(9) submission. Entrainment monitoring has been conducted at the Brunswick Nuclear
Station; however, Duke Energy will need to evaluate whether the data collected is sufficient to satisfy
the requirements in the recently finalized rule.
The data collected during the 2-years of monitoring are necessary to complete the benefits valuation
study (§122.21(r)(11)); therefore, this submittal cannot be finalized until after the entrainment
monitoring is completed and results analyzed. Furthermore, the regulations require the Comprehensive
Technical Feasibility and Cost Evaluation, Benefits Evaluation and the Non -water Quality and Other
Environmental Impacts to be peer reviewed. Duke Energy estimates that approximately five years will be
needed to complete all the necessary studies and submission, based on the following:
1 year for the development of the Entrainment Characterization Study plans, which includes
preparing the plans, and review and approval of the plans by NCDENR.
— 2 years to conduct the entrainment monitoring.
1 year to complete the Entrainment Characterization Study Report, Comprehensive Technical
Feasibility and Cost Evaluation Study, Benefits Valuation Study and Non -water Quality and Other
Environmental Impacts Study.
1 year to complete the Peer Review.
This timeframe is very similar to the schedule presented in the proposed rule. Upon submission of the
above information, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources (NCDENR) determines what, if any,
' Refer to § 125.95(a)(1) and (2)
controls are necessary to address entrainment. Once BTA for entrainment is determined, a compliance
schedule will be developed to complete §122.21(r)(6) Chosen Method(s) of Compliance with
Impingement Mortality Standard.
The stations with an AIF less than or equal to 125 MGD have fewer submittal requirements; however,
these stations were either not subject to the remanded rule or have undergone extensive changes to
the operation since they were last evaluated. As a result, Duke Energy will need to develop a new
submittal for each of these stations. Duke Energy will attempt to use available historical information;
however, additional field work may be needed at some sites to complete the Source Water Physical
Data and Baseline Biological Characterization Data submissions. EPA concluded that 39 months will be
adequate for facilities with an AIF less than 125 MGD to complete all the required submissions. Given
the requirements will be implemented through the NDPES permit, Duke Energy request these submittals
are due with the NPDES permit renewal applications due after July 14, 2018.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact myself at 704-382-9622 or nathan.craig@duke-
energy.com.
Si rely,
ath n Crai
Senior Environmental Specialist
Duke Energy
Attachment
Table 1: 316(b) Alternate Schedule Request
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, LLC
NPDES
NPDES Permit
Current NPDES
Requested Date to Submit
Anticipated Next NPDES
Submittal Requirements, unless
PLANT
Method
Actual Intake Flow
Alternate Schedule Request
Number
Expiration Date
316(6) Information
Permit Expiration Date
waived
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
r(2) -r(5), r(7)- r(13)
once -through cooling (OTC)
Permit application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
BRUNSWICK
NC0007064
estuary
AIF > 125 MGD
11/30/2016
6/2/2021
11/29/2021
expiration date of the current NPDES permit.
entrainment is determined
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
r(2) -r(5), r(7)- r(13)
cooling water reservoir defined as
4.5-years from the effective
Permit application, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the effective date of the renewed
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
ROXBORO
NC0003425
waters of the U.S.
AIF from reservoir > 125 MGD
3/31/2012
date of the renewed permit
TED
permit.
entrainment is determined
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(1b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
r(2) -r(S), r(7)- r(13)
cooling water reservoir defined as
4.5-years from the effective
Permit application, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the effective date of the renewed
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
ASHEVILLE
NC0000396
waters of the U.S.
AIF from reservoir > 125 MGD
12/31/2010
date of the renewed permit
TBD
permit
entrainment is determined
A renewal application was submitted on Aug. 14, 2014, An alternate schedule request for the
316(b) submittals was submitted on Jan. 9, 2015. Duke Energy requested the 316(b) submittals
r(2) -r(5), r(7)- r(13)
cooling water reservoir defined as
to be due with the subsequent NPDES Permit application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
MCGUIRE
NC0024392
waters of the U.S.
AIF from reservoir> 125 MGD
2/28/2015
8/31/2019
2/27/2020
year expiration date from the expiration date of the current NPDES permit.
entrainment is determined
An alternate schedule request was submitted with the NPDES application renewal submitted on
Oct. 9 2014. Duke Energy requested the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent
rQ) -r(S), r(7)- r(13)
cooling water reservoir defined as
NPDES permit renewal application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-year expiration date
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
ALLEN
NC0004979
waters of the U.S.
AIF from reservoir> 125 MGO
5/31/2D15
12/1/2019
5/29/2020
from the expiration date of the current permit.
entrainment is determined
An alternate schedule request was submitted with the NPDES application renewal submitted on
Oct. 9 2014. Duke Energy requested the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent
r(2) -r(5), r(7)- r(13)
cooling water reservoir defined as
NPDES permit renewal application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-year expiration date
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
MARSHALL
NC0004987
waters of the U.S.
AIF from reservoir> 125 MGD
4/30/2015
10/31/2019
4/28/2020
from the expiration date of the current permit.
entrainment is determined
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
r(2) -r(5), r(7)- r(13)
cooling water reservoir defined as
Permit application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the
r(6) to be submitted after BTA for
BELEWS CREEK
NC0024406
waters of the U.S.
AIF from reservoir > 125 MGD
2/28/2017
8/31/2021
2/27/2022
expiration date of the current NPDES permit.
entrainment is determined
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
cooling pond (classification as
AIF from cooling pond > 125
4.S-years from the effective
Permit application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the
SUTTON
NC0001422
Waters of the US in review)
MGD
12/31/2016•
date of the permit
TBD
expiration date of the current NPDES permit.
TBD @ a minimum r(2) - r(8)
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
closed -cycle cooling (cooling
4.5-years from the effective
Permit application, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the effective date of the renewed
MAYO
NC0038377
towers)
AIF < 12S MGD
3/31/2012
date of the renewed permit
T80
permit.
r(2) -r(e)
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
closed -cycle cooling (cooling
4.5-years from the effective
Permit application, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the effective date of the renewed
SHEARON HARRIS
NCD039S86
towers)
AIF c 125 MGD
7/31/2011
date of the renewed permit
TBD
permit.
r(2) -r(8)
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
closed -cycle cooling (cooling
Permit application due after July 14, 2018, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the
CLIFFSIDE
NC0005088
towers)
AIF < 125 MGD
7/31/2015
1/31/2020
7/29/2020
expiration date of the current NPDES permit.
r(2) -r(8)
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due within 3-years of the
closed -cycle cooling (cooling
effective date of the renewed NPDES permit. Assuming an effective date of 8/31/2016, this date
BUCK
NC0004774
towers)
AIF < 125 MGD
8/31/2016
8/31/2019
8/30/2021
would be 8/31/2019.
r(2) -rg)
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due within 3-years of the
closed -cycle cooling (cooling
effective date of the renewed NPDES permit. Assuming an effective date of 4/3/2017, this date
DAN RIVER
NC0003468
towers)
AIF a 125 MGD
4/30/2017
4/3/2020
4/29/2022
would be 4/3/2020.
r(2) -r(8)
Duke Energy would like to request the 316(b) submittals to be due with the subsequent NPDES
closed -cycle cooling (cooling pond
4.S-years from the effective
Permit application, assuming a 5-year expiration date from the effective date of the renewed
H.F.LEE
I NC0003417
not defined as waters of the U.S.)
All < 125 MGD
5/31/2013
date of the renewed permit
TBD
permit.
r(2) -r(8)
• A NPDES application for Sutton was submitted to NCDENR on Feb. 23, 2015. Duke Energy requested the 316(b) submittals to be due with the next NPDES permit application, assuming a 5-year permit term.
The Smith Energy Complex receives water from a local municipality; therefore, the station is not subject to the rule