R-2801

authorizing development in 0nsl ow County at North Tc
r as requested in the p
sail Beach and the SR1568 alignment
mittee's applicationdated 1 /29/92 i ncl udi
wyrKN 1 an uraw I nus, SfleeLS I - 10 OT I u aaLea_-recel vea e/ I` V 92.
f This permit, issued on December 10, 1992 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
` with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be
subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
i
I
r
I
2) No excavated or fill material will be placed in any location or in any
manner so as to impair surface water flow' into-or out of any wetland
area.
3) The activity shall be conducted in. such.-°a manner as to prevent
significant increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or
construction-related discharge (increases. such that the turbidity in the
stream is 25 NTUs or less are not considered significant).
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
' other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
' issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
' initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on-site to. Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
' All work must cease when the permit expires on
_ December 31. 1 Wi
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Signature of Permittee
or-
4) To compensate for the loss of fish and wildlife habitat values,--prior to
completion of work, the permittee will submit.for the approval: of.=the Division
of Coastal Management and the Corps of Engineers a mitigation plan.- The plan
will account for the type and area of wetlands created by the stormwater
control ditches. Based on the relatively#:short time that the affected wetland
'communities could be restored, provided that elevation and hydrology.are
appropriate, an acreage compensation ratio of at least one-to-one.`will suffice
for filled habitats.
5) Wetland plant species will be planted to ensure the revegetation of-the
stormwater ditches.
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
No disturbance of any maritime shrubs thickets or:any wetland outside the
proposed alignment is authorized by this permit..
All stormwater features must be adequately maintained for the life of the
project.
Beach Access
Prior to completion of construction of Phase II of SR1568, the permittee will
transfer clear title to the two additional sites to be.developed for beach
access. The site or-sites will be selected.in coordination with the NCDCM,
North Topsail Beach and Onslow County.
Other Requirements.
Prior to any development of the entire authorized road (including',- but :not
limited to, land'clearing, grading, fill and-:culvert placing), the permittee V
shall present evidence to the Division of Coastal Management (e.g.", `deeds,
easements, right-of-way agreements) of legal authority to construct-.-.the
proposed road over all sections of the permitted alignment.
Any necessary relocation of any utility lines must be by modification of '.this
permit.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 17, 1993
Mr. Barney O'Quinn
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Subject: Proposed fill in Wetlands or Waters {.
Certification Modification, SR 1568
Onslow County
DEM Project # 93303
l?C.V V.
A AT.R?FA
147**A
C>EHNR
'Upon review of your request for 401 Water Quality Certification to place fill material in
an additional 0.5 acres of wetlands or waters which are tributary to New River for Certification
modification for utility line relocation located in Onslow County, as described in your submittal
dated 11 April 1993, we have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by a
modification to Water Quality Certification No. 2744 issued June 17, 1993.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
92303.Itr `
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

SrA7Z
A
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
March 25, 1993
Mr. Barney O'Quinn
Planning and Environmental Branch.
N.C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box. 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Wetlands or Waters
modification of earlier certification
Onslow County
DEM Project # 93163, COE # 199201037,
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
- additional fill
DCM# 124-92
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.055 acres of wetlands or waters which
are tributary to New River Inlet for road improvement located at
SR 1568 in Onslow County, we have determined that the proposed
fill can be covered by General Water Quality Certification No.
2744 issued June 16, 1992. Additional conditions.are'that 1)
excavated material should be removed from wetland areas and 2)
fresh concrete shall not come into direct contact with surface
waters.
if you. have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
pre>stonward, Jr. P.E.
APH:JD
Attachment
CC: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field-office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
C ent:ix :6i; ,, Noah Carolina 776117687 Telephone [phone] Fax t 919-733-0513
- An Equal Opporr u+icy Affirmative Acton Employer
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO May 14, 1993
Regulatory Branch
Action ID Nos. 199201037 and 199302343 and Nationwide Permit No. 12 (Utility
Line Backfill and Bedding)
Mr. B. J. O'Quinn, P.E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Reference your application of April 11,;;1993, for Department of the Army
(DA) authorization to relocate utility lines made necessary by relocation of
1.3 miles of S.R. 1568, southwest of New River Inlet, North Topsail Beach,
Onslow County, North Carolina, State Project 9..8034903, TIP No. R-2801. The
placement of fill material in wetlands associated with relocation of this
highway was authorized by DA permit No. 199201037.
For the purposes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program,
Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the
Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits.
Authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was provided
for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for utility lines,
including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change in pre-
construction contours.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance.with the enclosed conditions and provided
you receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) and, in the coastal area, a
consistency determination from the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM). You should contact Mr. John Dorney, telephone (919) 733-
1786, regarding water quality certification, and Mr. Steve Benton, telephone
[phone], regarding consistency determination. This nationwide permit
does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or
local approval.
_ This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued, or revoked. Also,
this verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
the nationwide permit authorization is reissued without modification or the
activity complies with any subsequent modification of the nationwide permit
authorization. If during the 2 years, the nationwide permit authorization

_ Permit Number
124-92
ACAMN/
STATE OFYNOR' M CAROLINA
,IVMOR • - ' d a
f Department of Environment, Health'' Natural Resources
f%r,., 'ands" A?}? p
Coastal Reso&ces 4omnu on
for.
X Major Developinentin an -Area of Environmental Concern
pursuanttoNCGS 11?3A-118`¢
% Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to NC Dent of Trans.-portation, Div of Highways, P O Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611
authorizing development in . Onslow County at North Topsail Beach and the SR1568 alignment
asrequested inthe rmittee's a plicationdated lettets dated 2/23/93
and 4/11/93 and attached wor an rawmgs described in ondition lYpo. 1.
This permit, issued on June 8. 1993 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and ngtes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may be
subject to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1) This permit modification authorizes, a) additional wetland excavation in the construction of bent
caps for two bridges depicted in the attached workplan drawings, 4, dated received 2/26/93, and
b) relocation of utility lines as depicted in attached workplan drawings, 3, dated received
4/14/93.
2) With reference to excavation for bent caps, there are no special conditions other than off site/
highground disposal of excavated material.
3) With reference to utility line relocation, the following conditions apply:
a. The surface wetland vegetation shall be stockpiled and used to revegetate
the cut.
(See attached sheet for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
This permit must be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not
covered hereunder requires further Departmental approval.
' All work must cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 1995
i In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina
I Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DEHNR and the
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission. .
Roger N. Schec er, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee
I,
F
Dept. of Transportation Permit #124-92
Page 2 of 2
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
b. All excavated material suitable for backfill shall be stored in filter
fabric,pens in order to minimize wetland impacts to the maximum extent
practicable.
C. The trenches shall be restored to the elevation of the adjacent wetlands upon
project completion.
r:
d. All excess or suitable materials shall be removed to an approved highground
disposal area.
4) This permit modification must be attached to the original of permit No. 124-92 issued on
12/10/92 and all documents must be readily available, on site when a Division
representative inspects the project for compliance.
5) All conditions and stipulations of the original petmit remain in force under this modification
unless altered herein.

PAGE
i OF .:..
Gi i PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS ON SLOW COUNTY
EROSION CONTROI
WETLAND MITIGATION
TRANSPLANTING WETLAND SPECIES:
THE WORK COVERED BY THIS SECTION CONSISTS OF FURNISHING AND
TRr1N'c;'1..ANT':LNG SMOOTH C;C.1RDGRi=SS (SPA TTNA ALT1•:I1N:LFLiai A) .
SPARTI NA SHAL..L.. BE TRANSPLANTED IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE
PLANS AS WETLANDS RESTORATION, OR BY THE ENGINEER ACCORDING TO
SEASONAL. LIMITATIONS.
FERTILIZER SE'itiL..L.. BED THE ONLY SOIL AE::NDMENT ADDED TO THE AREAS
TO BE TRANSPLANTED AMD SHALL. B riice;i'I...:I:EAl AS FOLLOWS:
THE TRANSPLANTING OF SPARTINA WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED BETWEEN THE
DATE OF MARCH 15 AND ..JUN 15 UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER.
THE SPARTT. aA AL..Th:RNI:F-L..OR.- SHi;L.;... BE FERTILIZED WITH A SLOW
REL EASE COATED FERTILIZER (OSPiOCOTE 1444-i4) . THE RATE
`=HA LL.. BE ONE OUNCE:: (i OZ. ) OF COATED SLOW REL E::r•''tSE:: (i 4-•i 4--i 4
PER PLANT AND `•"Hr;LL BE PL ACED IN THE TRANSPLA NT HOLE PRIOR
TO PLACING THE SPRIG.
S1=ART'INA ALTERNI1='LOi.A T'RANSPLANT'ING SHAi.-L. BE DONE AS A
SEQUENTIAL OPERATION TO FERTILIZING. SI°'AI?T:1 NA SHALL BE
UNIFORMLY TRANSPLANTED AFTER SEEDBED PREPARATION AT A MAXIMUM
PLANT SPACING OF FEETHAND PLANTING MAY BE DONE BY USING A
DIBBLE OR f31••10VEL TO OPEN A HOLE FOUi? TO SIX INCHES DEEP,
INSERTING ONE OUNCE (i OZ.) OF FERTILIZER, THEN INSERTING THE
AND PACKING THE SOIL AROUND IT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL B RESPONSIBLE FOR A SECOND APPLICATION
OF FERTILIZER APPLIED TO THE AREA TRANSPLANTED ;-:,IX TO EIGHT
WEEKS AFTER INITIAL TRANSPLANTING. THE AMOUNT OF PLANT FOOD
SHALL BE i00 LBS.i ACRE NITROGEN USING 32-0-0 SULFUR COATED
UREA AND 100 LBS, /ACRE" P205 USING 0-46-0 SUPERPHOSPHATE.
PLANT.
APPLICATION OF FERTILIZERS WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL
TO THE WORK OF °T'RANSPLANTING WETLAND SPECI:ES° AND NO DIRECT
PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR SUCH.
PAGE 2
/ ? OF
THE QUANTITY OF TRANSPLANTING SMOOTH C;ORDGRAS'= TO BE PAID FOR
WILL BE THE ACTUAL.. NUMBER OF SQUARE YARD OF TRANSPLANTS
ALONG THE Stli?FACE OF THE GROUND, WHICH HAS BEEN COMP'LET'ED AND
ACCEPTED.
THE QUANTITY OF TRANSPLANTING SMOOTH CORDGRASS, MEASURED AS
PROVIDED ABOVE WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE PER
SQUARE YARD FOR ° TRANSF••'I...ANTI NG WETLAND SPECIES".
PAYMENT WILL BE MADE UNDER:
TRANSPLANTING WETLAND SPECIES . SY

f?
.• ... a ,,.may°µ, - I - _
CHIEF ENC No-PRECONS UCTION
STAT! CAROLINA
SEP_2,2, t993:
DEPARTME' ATION ,/
RIW
9FkkJ.ELPRr@t W I11RF- -
JAMES B. HUNT. ]R P_S_ _ CPU_
P.O. F r 4 ? ---
GOVERNOR RE 'A
[ (=oi ?+{;;?:^Iofirailan
P.O.
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. D. J. Bowel-.
Division Engineer
FROM: W. R. Brown, P. E. -?
State Design Services Enginee&
F
SUBJECT: Project 4.6030011 (R,-2801) Ons.low County
Relocation of SR 1568 'from north of NC 210 to
existing SR 1568, south of'New River.
Construction Revision
Due to a permit modification which came in after the plans
were turned in, a construction revision is necessary to perform the
additional work required. At the time the plans were produced, the
North Carolina Department of Transportation had proposed to allow
natural establishment of wetland species for the mitigation plan.
As a condition of the actual permit, however, we are required to
plant an acceptable species. Therefore, this construction revision
consists of transplanting wetland species in the stormwater ditches
to ensure revegetation.
The revision will affect the pay item and special provision
for "Transplanting Wetland Species" as indicated below:
Transplanting Wetland Species 3630 SY
Please advise if additional information is necessary.
WRB/RDM
Enclosure
CC. Mr. J. T. Peacock, Jr., P. E.
Mr. L. A. Sanderson, P. E.
Mr. E.T. Cozart, III, P.E.
Mr. Randy K. Wise

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
May 14, 1993
f1 `r i 7 j y S
FR (111n I
Action ID Nos. 199201037 and 199302343 and Nationwide Permit No. 12 (Utility
Line Backfill and Bedding)
Mr. B. J. O'Quinn, P.E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
-- North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Reference your application of April 11, 1993, for Department of the Army
(DA) authorization to relocate utility lines made necessary by relocation of
1.3 miles of S.R. 1568, southwest of New River Inlet, North Topsail Beach,
Onslow County, North Carolina, State Project 9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801. The
placement of fill material in wetlands associated with relocation of this
highway was authorized by DA permit No. 199201037.
For the purposes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program,
Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the
Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits.
Authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was provided
for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for utility lines,
including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change in pre-
construction contours.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions and provided
you receive a Section 401 water quality certification from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) and, in the coastal area, a
consistency determination from the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM). You should contact Mr. John Dorney, telephone (919) 733-
1786, regarding water quality certification, and Mr. Steve Benton, telephone
[phone], regarding consistency determination. This nationwide permit
does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or
local approval.
This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued, or revoked. Also,
=..?s verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
-ze nationwide 17ermit authorization is reissued without modification or the
activity complies with any subsequent modification of the nationwide permit
au:z.orization. If during the 2 years, the nationwide permit authorization

-2-
expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such that the activity
would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit,
activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under
contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit will remain
authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date of
the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify,
suspend, or revoke the authorization.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeffery Richter, Wilmington
Field office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without e_ncloG>>re)'
Mr. Steve Benton
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. C. Robert Stroud, Jr.
Wilmington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845

Onslow County, Relocation of approximately 1.3 miles of SR
1568 at North Topsail Breach, beginning 2-.8 miles
northeast of NC 210 and ending approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet, State Project
9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
NCDOT Contact: Doug Huggett
7/18/91 Scoping comments requested from Environmental Unit.
8/01/91 NCDOT Scoping meeting held.
8/22/91 NCDOT personnel met on-site with Division of
Coastal Management to discuss environmental and
permit issues. Items discussed included bridging
coastal wetlands, location of drainage features,
CAMA setback requirements, and CAMA and 404 permit
requirements. NCDOT agreed to bridge the 2 areas
of coastal wetlands present. Other wetland areas
fell outside of CAMA jurisdiction, but would likely
require a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers.
12/11/91 On-site meeting held between NCDOT and various
environmental review agencies (USFWS, NMFS, COE,
DCM, DEM, NCWRC). Proposed project presented to
agencies. COE claimed jurisdiction over non CAMA
wetlands due to adjacency to estuarine waters. No
serious objections to project were raised by
environmental agency personnel.
1/07/92 Public hearing on project held.
1/25/92 Permit application received from Hydraulics Unit.
1/29/92 Permit applied for.
of noncoast
grass ands, shrub sw
proposed to mitigate
grasslands
d i -
Project will impact 0.60 acres
±s--(isolated marsh, wet
amp) at 4 sites. NCDOT
by creating 0.75 acres of wet
3e stormwater ret- eni?n ----
2/07/92 Corps stated in letter that project is a candidate
for General Permit 291, and DCM will handle
administrative processing.
3/03/92 NCDOT amended permit application to include a tie
in road for several property owners on the south
end of the project. Because of bridging of coastal
wetlands, these owners would not have access to
their lots from the relocated roadway. Therefore,
NCDOT would use approximately 800 feet of existing
roadway for access to these lots.
16
4/14/92 NCDOT requested that the Corps allow the Department
to proceed under the same 404 wetland delineations
and permit requirements as the original developer
(Mr. Roger Page).
4/14/92 DCM informed NCDOT that not all adjacent property
owners had been notified, and stated that
processing could not continue until this situation
had been corrected. Note that the DCM letter was
dated 4/14/92, but was not received by Planning and
Environmental Until 5/6/92.
5/14/92 COE stated that project must proceed under current
404 requirements, and not those under which
original developer was to operate.
5/15/92 Notified additional adjacent property owners. DCM
was notified of this action.
6/18/92 DCM extended processing an additional 75 days.
=6/23/92 ' 401 Water Quality Certification issued.
7/2/92 DCM denied permit application based on plans to
construct-part o project within setback limits.
Other-than-this issue, project was viewed
favorably. Therefore, NCDOT can apply for a
variance from the Coastal Resources Commission.
7/14/92 COE stated that project was denied due to denial of
State permit. However, even if a CRC variance is
granted, the Corps stated that, due to Federal
Agency concerns, it is unlikely that a 404 hermit
would be-available unless the Droiect can be
modified to lessen its impact.
8/6/92 NCDOT replied to Corps of Engineers concerns,
stating that project impacts have been minimized as
much as is practicable, and emphasizing how closely
we have coordinated with environmental agencies on
this project.
8/12/92 Will apply for CRC variance. Variance request will
beiearff"- t-September 24, 1992, CRC meeting.
J ? c e ? C to, g/i ???
y

Lr•1 y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Bob Jamieson
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary July 22, 1992 Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Mr. A. L. Hankins, Jr., P.E.
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Subject: Additional Information
Stormwater Project No.920510
State Road 1568 Continued Relocation
State Project No. 4.6030011 (R-2801)
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Hankins:
The Wilmington Regional Office received a Stormwater
Submittal for the Continued Relocation of State Road 1568 on June
23, 1992. A preliminary review of that information has
determined that the following information is needed to continue
the stormwater review:
1. Provide additional vegetative swales at the following
(approximate) locations:
From Station
150+50
156+30
166+00
167+75
170+75
200+75
202+00
210+75
215+00
To Station
151.75
157+75
167+00
170+00
171+25
201+25
204+25
213+75
217+00
2. Define the type of stormwater control at Station 201+75
(e.g. weir?).
-continued-
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
r
Mr. Hankins
July 22, 1992
Stormwater No.920510
---------------------
3. Provide swale cross sections on the following profile
sheets:
Station Sheet
149 to 157 X-1 & X-2
167 X-4
168 X-4
169 X-4
170 X-5
171 X-5
201 to 203 X-10
216 X-12
217 X-12
4. Provide stormwater control weirs at Stations 167+50 and
170+50.
5. Provide cross sectional detail of stormwater control
weirs.
6. Show control weirs on all applicable profile sheets.
The requested information should be received by this Office
prior to August 21, 1992, or the submittal will be returned as
incomplete.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
call me at [phone].
Sincer ;y,
Ms. Alexis I. Finn
Environmental Engineer
DA/aif: 920510.JUL
cc: mtm Dorney, CAMA'
John Parker, CAMA
Jim Gregson
Mike Williams
(2) Alexis Finn
Central Files
2
10

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO July 14 , 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199201037
Mr. B. J. O' Quinn
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O' Quinn:
D (T
22
ii?
By copy of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources letter to you of July 2, 1992, we have learned that State
authorization for you to place fill material in approximately 0.6 acre of
wetlands adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean associated with relocation of
approximately 1.3 miles of S.R. 1568, southwest of New River Inlet, North
Topsail Beach,r 19w County, North Carolina, State Project 9.8034903, TIP No.
R-2801, has been denied. Under the administrative rules of our regulatory
program, denial of required State authorization precludes favorable
consideration of a Federal permit. Accordingly, your Department of the Army
application is hereby denied, and your file has been retired.
Additionally, we received comments from the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (copies
enclosed). Their reaction to your proposal is the result of anticipated
adverse impacts. I have provided these Federal agencies' comments to alert
you to concerns in addition to those identified in the State's denial letter.
While appealing the State permit is the next step in pursuing State
authorization, you should be aware.that Federal agency comments will be
unchanged by the outcome of that appeal. Because of the Federal agencies'
influence on Department of the Army permit decisions, it is unlikely a
Department of the Army permit would be available unless your project can be
modified to lessen its impacts.
Mr. Jeff Richter of my staff is available to answer any questions you may
have or to assist you in developing a revised plan. He may be reached at
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
C. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosures
A

-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosures):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
-,,Im Larry Hardy
'National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Regulatory Unit
345 Courtland Street, NE.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. James Herstine
Wilmington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845

".ST
4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 2'), 1992
Mr.. Barney O'Quinn
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Subject: Certification Pursuant
Clean Water Act,
Proposed relocation of
Project # 92065
Onslow County
George T Everett, Ph.D.
Director
to Section 401 of the Federal
SR 1568
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 2744 issued
to N:C. Department of Transportation dated June 16, 1992.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
Ge rge T. Everett
Attachments
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker
Central Files
RKA )NAI. OFFICFS
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Ralcigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-47(X) 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/890-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
N.O. Box 2953.5, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 4)535 Telephone [phone]
An Fqual Opp),; tv Att-nxi- km Employer

NORTH CAROLINA
Onslow County
CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the
requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the
United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500
to N.C. Department of Transportation pursuant to an application
filed on the 7 day of February 1992 to relocate SR 1568 in Onslow
County.
The Application provides adequate assurance that the
discharge of fill material into the waters of Stump Sound in
Onslow County will not result in a violation of applicable Water
Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State
of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate
Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application and conditions
hereinafter set forth.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as
to prevent significant increase in turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction
related discharge (increases such that the
turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less.ar.e
not considered significant).
2. A stormwater management plan must be approved by
DEM before the CAMA permit is issued.
3. Mitigation must be done to the satisfaction of the
Division of Coastal Management.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in
revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the
above conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit.
This the 16 day of June, 1992.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Geo e T. Everett, Direct r
WQC# 2744 C
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890 >•
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO June 15, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199201037
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Parker:
JUN 2 41992
Reference the application of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, Division of Highways, for a Department of the Army permit to
place fill material in approximately 0.6 acre of wetlands adjacent to the
Atlantic Ocean associated with relocation of approximately 1.3 miles of S.R.
1568, southwest of New River Inlet, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County, North
Carolina, State Project 9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
The Federal agencies have completed review of the proposal as presented by
the application and your field investigation report.
We recommend that the following conditions be included in the State
authorization:
a. To compensate for the loss of fish and wildlife habitat values, prior
to completion of work, the permittee will submit for the approval of the Corps
of Engineers a mitigation plan.
(1) The plan will account for the type and area of wetlands created
by the stormwater control ditches. Based on the relatively short time that
the affected wetland communities could be restored, provided that elevations
and hydrology are appropriate, an acreage compensation ratio of at least two
to one will suffice for filled habitats. Estuarine marshes that are to be
bridged would not lose all of their functions and can be compensated for on a
one to one basis.
(2) Also, the plan will mitigate for the loss of the maritime forest
adversely affected by relocation of the road.
b. The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in
trace quantities.
c. No excavated or fill material will be placed in any location or in any
manner so as to impair surface water flow into or out of any wetland area.
I
-2-
d. The activity will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent a
significant increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or
construction-related discharge. Increases such that the turbidity in the
waterbody is 50 NTU's or less are not considered significant.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeffrey Richter, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished:
t. Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental
Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636•-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Regulatory Unit
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. James Herstine
Wilmington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845

¦
TAIE?
Td- IN
United States Department of the Interior
AMMU
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office ¦
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 -
June 9, 1992
Colonel Walter S. Tulloch
District Engineer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Regulatory Branch
Dear Colonel Tulloch:
This is the report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
on Public Notice 199201037, dated May 6, 1991. The North Carolina
Department of Transportation, Division of Highways has applied for
a Department of the Army permit to place fill in wetlands
associated with the relocation of S.R. 1568 at North Topsail Beach,
Onslow County, North Carolina. This report is submitted in
accordance with the requirements of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d),
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531-1543), and Section 6 of the Coastal Barrier Resources
Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), as amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990. It is to be used in your determination of
compliance with 404(b) (1) guidelines (40 CFR 230) and in your
public interest review (33 CFR 320.4) as they relate to protection
of fish and wildlife resources.
According to information provided in the Public Notice and in the
December 12, 1991, State Environmental Assessment/ Finding of No
Significant Impact, approximately 2.6 acres of wetland habitats
would be filled or bridged to complete the highway relocation. A
total of about 1.0 acre of estuarine marsh, scrub/shrub, and fresh
(non-tidal) marsh at eight locations would be filled for road
crossings or bridge footings. Approximately 1.6 acres of estuarine
marsh would be bridged. Stormwater ditches and weirs would be
constructed to control runoff to adjacent estuaries that have been
classified as Primary Nursery Area and adjacent to outstanding
Resource Waters. The stormwater ditches would also serve as
wetland creation sites to compensate wetland losses. In addition,
0.4 acre of maritime forest would be cleared and filled to
accommodate the roadway.
Service policy regarding mitigation of damage to habitats considers
G?S??
both the value of those habitats to fish and wildlife and their
relative scarcity. The estuarine and palustrine marshes, and
scrub/shrub that would be affected by the proposed project have
high fish and wildlife resource value and are considered to be
relatively scarce on a national and regional basis. Maritime
forests that would be affected by the project are of high fish and
wildlife habitat value and are unique and irreplaceable on a
national basis. Wetlands in the project area are vegetated by
cattail (Typha sp.`), black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus), big
cordgrass (Spartina cynosuroides), pennywort (Hydrocotyle sp.), wax
myrtle (Myrica cerifera), eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana),
sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), and willow (Salix sp.). Maritime
forest in the project area is dominated by live oak (Quercus
virginiana), eastern redcedar, and wax myrtle. Wetlands in the
project area provide valuable nesting, roosting, and foraging
habitat to resident and migratory waterfowl, songbirds, wading
birds, and shorebirds. Other resident wildlife species expected to
occur in project area wetlands include marsh rabbit, opossum,
raccoon, and numerous reptiles and amphibians.
Wetlands in the project area also provide plant detritus to
estuarine waters and contribute to the production of recreationally
and commercially important fisheries and shellfisheries. Project
area wetlands perform water quality functions such as reduction of
excessive dissolved nutrient levels, removal of suspended sediment,
and storage of flood waters.
The proposed highway relocation would eliminate all of the fish and
wildlife habitat and wetland functional values of 1.0 acre of marsh
and scrub/shrub habitats. The bridged estuarine marshes would lose
much of their fish and wildlife habitat value as 1.6 acres of
vegetation become shaded but would retain many hydrologic
functions.
Construction of the new highway location would also remove 0.4 acre
of maritime forest. These habitats are not jurisdictional wetlands
subject to Corps of Engineers, Section 404 regulation; however,
maritime forests are of high fish and wildlife habitat value and
are unique and irreplaceable on a national basis. They are
especially important for their structural and plant species
diversity. A well-developed canopy provides a buffer from salt
spray that supports wildlife forage plants that otherwise would not
survive in coastal barrier areas. Maritime forests also perform
important soil binding and fresh groundwater recharge functions.
The Service's Mitigation Policy (Federal Register, 46(15):7656-
7663, January 23, 1981) for impacts to special aquatic sites (i.e,
wetlands) requires the minimization of impacts by avoidance or
reduction, and the compensation of unavoidable impacts. For
wetlands in the project area, the Service requires full replacement
of fish and wildlife habitat values by restoration, enhancement, or
creation of corresponding wetland types (i.e, replacement in-kind).
Although the applicant proposes to grade areas to marsh level,
there is no mention of the acreage of mitigation proposed, nor of
marsh vegetation planting or monitoring to ensure that wetlands
restoration is successful. Also, there is no plan for compensating
maritime forest losses.
North Topsail Beach lies within the Coastal Barrier Resource System
(Topsail Unit L06). All of the proposed highway route is within
that unit except for approximately 1900 feet adjacent to the
existing Galleon Bay development. The Coastal Barrier Resources
Act prohibits Federal expenditures and subsidies for projects in
the Coastal Barrier Resource System. Although there are several
exceptions to that restriction for maintenance of existing roads,
it does not appear that the proposed relocation would qualify for
such an exemption.
Therefore, in order to fully compensate the loss of fish and
wildlife habitat values related to the project, the Service
recommends that a Department of the Army Permit not be issued for
this project until the applicant provides:
1. An accounting of the type and area of wetlands to be created
by the stormwater control ditches. Based on the relatively
short time that the affected wetland communities could be
restored, provided that elevations and hydrology are
appropriate, an acreage compensation ratio of at least two to
one should suffice for filled habitats. Estuarine marshes
that would be bridged would not lose all of their functions
and can be compensated at a one to one acreage ratio.
2. Documentation that no Federal monies have been, or will be,
spent on the planning, construction, and maintenance of the
relocated highway in a Unit of the Coastal Barrier System.
3. A mitigation plan for the maritime forest that would be
adversely affected by the proposed road relocation.
The Service has identified no endangered or threatened species, nor
critical habitats that would be adversely affected by the proposed
project. However, if new information reveals that the project may
jeopardize an endangered or threatened species, or their critical
habitat, then further consultation with this office will be
necessary. This consultation requirement also applies to species
and critical habitats that are proposed for listing as threatened
or endangered.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project.
Please advise us of any action taken by the Wilmington District,
Corps of Engineers. You may contact David Dell, Permit
Coordinator, of this office if you have any question regarding our
recommendations.
Sincerely,
L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor
JUN-10-1992 13:29 FROM EHNR WILM REU UFFIC:E lu ti?1?'(SS1SSti x.10'1
J 1 !'Z l
To: John Dorney
Planning Branch
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CANA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
PROJECT NAME: Secondary Road 1568 Relocation
COUNTY: Onslow Project #: 92191
STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: ICW at Stump Sound
CLASS: "SA"
OPEN OR CLOSED: Open and PNA
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, DATE APPROVED. Plans not yet submitted. See attached
letter to applicant.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Department of Transportation is
proposing to relocate approximately 1.3 milci,.. of secondary road
1568, 150 to 250 feet landward of it's pr,?-sent location. The
existing pavement is frequently damaged by severe storms, and
does not allow safe evacuation of the residents living in the
2300 units on the north end of the island. The project as
proposed consists of two bridges, numerous equalization pipes,
culverts, stormwater berms, and swales. The ,avement width as
proposed is 24 feet, within an 80 foot right-of-way. Additional
wetland areas are proposed to be excavated to adjacent wetland
elevations to mitigate for unavoidable losses.
REVIEWER: Williams JOINT NOTICE: Yes
DATE APP. RECD: 5/8/92 RECOMMENDATION: Issue
RETURNED: (ISSUE/DENY/OTHER)
RESUBMITTED:
INITIAL REPORT
FINAL REPORT: 5/22/92
WAITER QUALITY CERT. (4011
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE:
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: N/A
(EXISTING, PROPOSED, SEPTIC TANK ETC.)
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
(DEM, DHS, COUNTY)
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
W1,TERLWETLAND F1
AREA OF FILL: WATER: N/A
WETLAND: Approximately .6 acres
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? N/A
DREDGING
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS
OF RESOURCE? N/A
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? N/A
Post-It' brand fax transmittal memo &-71 - of pages
lr 42., L /:. .4 /," __< i. From
TOTAL P.01
JUN-10-1992 13:30 FROM CriNR WILM RELY UH-ICE iu i??1?'(SS1SS?i t. W1
Page Two
SR 1568 Road Relocation
May 22, 1992
MARINA
ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: N/A
MARINA SERVICES: N/A
OXYGEN IN BASIN: N/A
CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS: N/A
(ATTACH A MARINA USE
ATTAINABILITY EVAL.)
$ECONVEMM COIMITIONS OR PERMIT RESTRICTIOLQS
1. That the project be done in such a manner so as to not
cause turbidity outside the immediate construction area to exceed
25 NTU.
2. The project has not yet received stormwater management
certification from this Division. Prior to issuance of a CAMA
permit, a stormwater management plan must be submitted and
approved.
3. The applicant proposes to mitigate wetland losses by
creating stormwater retention ditches, however, constructed
stormwater ditches are not considered mitigation of wetland
resources. At least .6 acres of wetland should be constructed to
offset the proposed loss.
NW:92191.MAY
Cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office Files
DCM--Bob Stroud
TOTAL P.01

DIVISION OF COASTAL
FIELD INVESTIGATION a"110
t of Trans rtati S-AW68 low cc
1. Applicant's nonce N. C. Departmen
f,
2. Location of project site Town of North Topsail rh -_ -M-2t- exist'
PE10M INDX: 1989: Between Photo 167-14 and 167-17 1984: Between Photo 25-276
and Photo 25-277
STALE PLANE OOOg2DIlUUM: X: 2480700 Y: 281800
3. Investigation type: Dredge & Fill - CAM X
4. Investigative procedure: (A) Dates of site visit 9/15/91 , 12 9 91 , 2 24 92
(B) Was applicant present Yes Yes Yes
5. Pracessing procedure: Application received 3/9/92 Office WiRO
(Will be North Topsail
6. Site c3e`scriptioai: (A) Focal Iand Use Plan Onslow Co. Beach when Approved)
Land Classification from IUP High density transition -
Conservative
Development constraints identified in IUP None for
this project
(B) ABC(s) involved: Ocean Hazard X Estuarine Shoreline _X
Ooa.cta1 Wetlands X Public Trust Waters X
Estuarine Waters X Other
(C) Water dependent: Yes No Other Both (Bridges) -
(D) Intended use: Public X Private Commercial
(E) Type of waste water treatment: Existing W
Planned L
(F) Type of structures: Existing Roadbed wJdispursed culverts
Planned 2 bridges, roadbed - culverts, stormwater wiers, mitigation areas
(G) Estimated annual rate of erosion 4' /yr-5' Zn Source CAMA erosion rate tables
7. Habitat description: AREA
Dredged Filled Other
(A) Vegetated wetlands:
Corps of Emineers Wetlands App 0.6-1.0(ac)
Brackish Marsh bridged (App 1.6 ac)
(B) Non-vegetated wetlands:
(C) Oder:
High ground (road) 10.0 ac
(D) Total Area Disturbed: App 0.6-1.0 ac 11.6 ac
8. Project Summary The applicants propose to relocate the existiM SR 1568 to a
more landward alignment in order to protect it from ongoing erosion pressure from
the Atlantic Ocean. Two bridges will be provided as well as numerous culverts to
N.C. Department of Transportation
Se=ndary Road 1568 - Onslow Ca mty
Page 2 of 6
8. PROJECT SUNMARY - Continued:

9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is located adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean in the Town
of North Topsail Beach, Onslow County, North Carolina. It begins
at the junction of the recently relocated portion of SR 1568
approximately 2.8 miles northeast of NC 210 and terminates
approximately 1.2 miles southwest of the New River Inlet and will
connect back into existing SR 1568. A portion of this segment of
road continues to be threatened by the waters of the Atlantic
Ocean. A temporary run-around for this segment of road was
recently constructed by the Department of Transportation to
ensure the safe passage of property owners from that portion of
town on the inlet side of the threatened segment. Approximately
2300 residential units exist on the inlet side of the proposed
project. A general permit for a temporary.roadbed was issued for
the construction. This temporary segment has an aggregate
composition and if necessary can be relocated to the final
alignment of the approved roadbed. The existing paved portion of
SR 1568 has a travelway width of approximately 18' and shoulders
ranging in width from 0' to 3'. There is a 60' right-of-way
provided for the road. Approximately 2700 vehicles per day
utilize the road within the project area and the projected rate
for the design year 2011 ranges from 4400 to 9400. It is
estimated that a 50% increase in usage occurs during the summer
months. The land forms within the project site consists of both
high ground and wetlands. Approximately 10.0 acres of high
ground are involved including plant communities classified into 4
distinct groups by the DOT-FONSI submitted with the permit
package materials. These include: disturbed post-dune which
include a variety of introduced landscape species; dune
grass/maritime grassland which includes sea oats, salt meadow
hay, prickly pear cactus, herbaceous and woody vines such as
greenbrier and Virginia creeper and shrubs such as wax myrtle and
yaupon; maritime shrub which is dominated by wax myrtle and
maritime evergreen forest which includes live oaks, eastern red
cedar, wax myrtle and American holly. The wetlands contain
approximately 2.6 acres of area and are separated into the
following five groups:
unavoidable losses.
N.C. Department of Transportation
Secondary Road 1568 - Onslow County
Page 3 of 6
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - Continued:
Maritime Wet Grassland - Which has two widely separated
representatives and includes in the species identified as
belonging to this classification; sedges, wax myrtle and rush.
One of the two sites is dominated by penney wort.
Wet Swale - A six foot wide feature with black willow, rush,
sedge and penney wort.
Isolated Marsh - Two communities of this class are found within
the study area - They may well be part of a single swash system.
The species found within each are emergent cat-tail, black needle
rush, wax myrtle, eastern red cedar and seashore mallow.
Brackish Marsh - Also two representatives within the project area
- both contain channels which connect directly or indirectly to
adjacent waters of Stump Sound. The community located at the 210
end of the project is nearly surrounded by another wetland
identified as maritime shrub swamp. - The dominant species with
the brackish marsh are cattails, black needle rush, and giant
cordgrass marsh. Glasswork and sed-oxeye are found along the
fringes of these systems.
Maritime Shrub Swamp - As mention above located nearly
surrounding the brackish marsh at the southwestern end of project
site. This community is dominate by wax myrtle, swamp dogwood,
sweetbay magnolia, black willow and red bay.
There are both developed and undeveloped properties located along
the proposed alignment of the relocated roadbed. The existing
setbacks for development within the project area varies from 1201
to 1501. Beginning at the NC 210 terminus the 120' setback
extends toward New River Inlet for a distance of approximately
26301. At this point (approximately one third the second
proposed bridge) the setback changes to 150' and extends toward
New River Inlet for approximately 36001. Here the setback again
becomes 120" and the last 700' of the proposed project falls
within this segment.
The project is located almost entirely within the Coastal Barrier
Resource system as defined by the Coastal Barrier Resources Act
(COBRA). This fact may very well preclude federal funding.
The original permit for SR 1568 relocation required that the
private developers provide 634 parking spaces (approximately 150
spaces per mile of relocated roadway). The current applicants
are in the.process of identifying these spaces but thus far have
not made a final selection of sites.
N.C. Department of Transportation
Secondary Road 1568 - Onslow County
Page 4 of 6
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - Continued:
The adjacent waters of the Atlantic Ocean are identified as SB.
The waters on the estuarine side of the island are classified as
SA open for shellfishing and are a designated primary nursery
area. This project is near but not in an ORW area.
The applicants propose to relocate existing SR 1568 landward
approximately 150' to 250' northwest of its present position.
Approximately 6,930 linear feet (1.3 miles) of 24' travelway with
61 shoulders will be built. The elevation of the roadbed will be
approximately 7.0' msl. The right-of-way will be 30' to either
side of the centerline. A 10' permanent easement will be
provided on either side of the right-of-way to give a total width
of 80'. In the Galleon Bay area the permanent easement will be
dropped on the landward side of the roadway resulting in a total
width of 701 in this section. Further adjustments may be
necessary to satisfy easement agreements. Actually, of this
total length, approximately 775 linear feet will be two bridges.
The new road bed will begin at a point approximately 2.8 miles
northeast of NC210 and will extend to approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of New River Inlet. The first bridge (approximately
3521) will begin at a point approximately 900' from the southwest
terminus. The second bridge will be located approximately 1225'
from the northeast end of the 1st bridge and will be
approximately 4231 long. In order to approach the ist bridge
approximately 0.2 acres of the maritime shrub swamp will be
filled (see Sheets 3 of 16 and 5 of 16). The next impact will
occur at approximately Station 167+25+/ This is one of the
areas identified as isolated marsh. Approximately 0.1 acres will
be filled at this location. Two 8" culverts will be installed
for connected drainage (sheet 8 of 16). Extending from this
station to approximately Station 169+89+/- fill of approximately
0.3 acres will be placed in additional isolated wetlands. Three
18" culverts will be located near Station 170+00 (sheet 10 of
16). Beginning at Station 201+75+/- three 18" culverts will be
installed and approximately 0.06 acres of wetlands will be filled
(sheet. 15 of 16).
Stormwater control ditches are identified on sheets 3 of 16; 5 of
16; 6 of 16; 8 of 16; 10 of 16; and 15 of 16. These features
will serve the initial function of stormwater retainment as well
as wetland habitat creation. Also shown are features identified
as stormwater control wiers. The structures are aligned on the
estuarine side of the two bridge crossings and are also scattered
along the project alignment. They are shown on the enclosed
plans on sheets 5 of 16; 6 of 16; 10 of 16; 13 of 16; 15 of 16
and 16 of 16. The stormwater ditches and wiers are designed to
retain stormwater at bridge sites and cross pipe location as well
N.C. Department of Transportation
Secondary Road 1568 - Onslow County
Page 5 of 6
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - Continued:
as within the ditches to store the first 1.5" of run-off. All
ditches slopes and shoulder -will be vegetated in order to
facilitate infiltration.
At the southwest end of the project there are 10 parcels of land
on the oceanward side of the relocated roadway which will become
isolated or will have unsafe entry into the proposed roadway. In
order to avoid this problem DOT has proposed to build a connector
road between the proposed SR 1568 and the existing SR 1568. This
segment would be located approximately 460' eastward of the
beginning of the proposed project. A connector road of
approximately 240' would be constructed in a southward direction
to connect with existing SR 1568 and then would turn again in an
eastward direction approximately 10551. All remaining portions
of SR 1568 would be removed upon the completion of the new
portion.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The proposed relocation of SR 1568 will help provide for a more
protected ingress and egress for the 2300 existing housing units
now located inletward of the existing segment of road. The
temporary run-around now constructed has helped with the existing
problems caused by the temporary wash overs of the existing hard
surface road. Along the proposed alignment eight wetland areas
have been identified. These are comprised of five different
communities with three having two representatives. Of these
wetlands the two brackish marsh communities contain connected
coastal wetland species. The impacts to these two areas, will be
minimized by the. use of bridges. These two areas contain
approximately 1.6 acres of marsh. The other 4 communities
contain approximately 1.0 acres of total wetlands of which
approximately 0.6 acres will be consumed. These are all under
Corps of Engineers jurisdiction as are the two brackish marshes.
In order to offset the unavoidable losses, stormwater retention
ditches will be created and it is expected that wetland
vegetation will establish in these features.
The combination of stormwater ditches and stormwater wiers should
minimize the impacts of the relocation on adjacent estuarine
waters.
The original project, as stated above, required the establishment
of 634 parking spaces based on 150 spaces per one mile of
relocated road. Of the total number the applicants are proposing
to provide 326 spaces. Onslow County is now in the process of
providing 308 spaces in a new regional access site. This action
begun with the former private developers. There is an ongoing
search to identify suitable site(s) to provide these spaces.
N.C. Department of Transportation
Secondary Road 1568 - Onslow County
Page 6 of 6
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS - Continued:
As mentioned in the previous section, the applicants propose to
provide an access road to serve 10 lots whose access to the
relocated segment of 1568 will be blocked by the proposed bridge
and wetlands. It appears to be within the realm of certainty
that the long term cost of maintaining the remaining existing
segment of SR 1568 may exceed the current market value of the
property. it may be possible for DOT to acquire the 10 lots and
convert them to a portion of the required parking spaces.
The change in setback since the original project. appear to impact lin a segment of the relocated roStation li 6 5+ 550 ±ear
feet. This would begin at approximately
Station 211 + 75 ±L_. Based on the current interpretations of
the regulations it appears that a variance from the Coastal
Resources Commission will be necessary to place the roadbed aand
re
second bridge along the proposed alignment. The applicants
conducting an investigation to determine the potential owners impacts of
the existing setbacks on the various property-involved
with an easement for the new_--alignment. This Division has field
identified the -first line of stable natural vegetation or the
adbe used
ththe at relocation
erosion escarpment along the length of
those to
jacent
,for that purpose. It also appears
landowners who are directly adjacent to either the bridges or
wetland alterations have been identified and notified as to the
proposed project. All adjacent riparian property owners along
the entire project length on the ocean front and/or estuarine
shoreline should be identified and notified.
As mentioned above this road segment will be within the area of
North Topsail Beach covered by the Coastal Barrier Resources Act.
Federal funding requirements apparently dictate that new roads
not be built within those areas. This matter must be resolved
prior to construction if Federal monies are involved.
Submitted By: C. Pzbext Stroud Date: 35, 1992 1r7M Office
1000N Ad00
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
troL If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 14 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
y APPLICANT
a. Name ATTN: .B.J. 01 Quinn
N. C. Department o ransportation
Address P-11- Box 25201
City Raleigh State-N.6,
Tp 27i 1 Day phone [phone]
Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name,(if any)
c. If the applicant is not the landowner,
owner's name and address.
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1568
b. City, town, community, or landmark
North Topsail Beach f. Man-made features now on tract nano
C. County Onslow
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Atlantic Ocean
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a horse, motel, marina, bulkhead.
or .pier). Twn hri riges uer marsh with
relocation of SR 1568
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP 2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
New work
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
Public transportation
AND WATER
ive the #AARACTERISTICS
YEB 19 1992
a. Size of entire tract n1 a
NWSIGN OF
G t.M ENpf individual lot(s) , 1a
• c, -Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract .
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation Y Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
IL How is the tract zoned by local government?
Residential
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
SA
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? ---Ale-- If so. by whom?
3/91
1000N - "03
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes anyiand
development.
IL Type and number of buildings, facilities, or M. Water supply source. n / A
strucxuresproposed n/A
IL If the project is oceanfront development, describe
b. Numberoflots or parcels n a ' the ste that will be taken to maintain established
accessways orprovide new access

c. Density (Give the number of residential um .
units per acre.) n a
FFa 19 J"
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
.
n La D I V I
S FO W OF Projed is on the oceanfront, what will be the
COASTAL
e
If th
-- MA F.!*°ve mean sea level of the first habitable
.
e proposed pmject will disturb more than one - "WAS n/a
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion 6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resourcea
n/ INFORMATION
.
a
L. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
mean high water to be covered by impermeable or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops. covered in Section 7).
g. List the materials, such as mad, paver stone, asphalt, Access channel
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces. (MLW) or (NWI
Asphalt
Boat basin
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan Other (break
been submitted to the Division of Environmental water, pier,
Management? boat ramp,
L Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste rock jetty)
water treatment facilities. n/a Fill placed in
wetland or below
M]w
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval? Upland fill
- n / a areas
Length Width Depth
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
k Describe existing treatment fa
cilities. water level in cubic yards We
n/a
c. Type ofmaterial_ n/a
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,'
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of swamps, or other wetlands?
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary _ n/a
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent. "wash
down")._ surface runnff C. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
fl/A
2
3/91
L000N -- AdOO
L Dimensions of spoil disposal area
n/a
g. Location of spoil disposal area
n/a
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? _ n Z a
If not, .attach a letter granting permission from the
owner. r-1% tI=tee:
i. Will a disposal area be available for
maintenance? nLa Tutuf?A
If so, where? rrk , 9
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas? ` D IVI S I C
a Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet n/a
d. Type ofbulkhead material n/a
e- Amount of fill , in cubic yards, to be placed below
. mean high water n1 n
fill material n/e
"DDITIONAL INFORMATION `
to the completed application form, the follow-
wst be submitted:
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high
water? no
L Amount of fill in cubic yards _ n /a
In. Type offill material non-plastic granular
n. Source offill material suitable borrow site
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands?_ yes
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
See Plan View 0.60 acres total
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
Silt fences and storm water _nn - nl
ditches as Tyne B s .i 11 i ng hasi n
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard rnadway. r-nnstrurti nn
eq 'ment
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a Length of bulkhead or riprap n/a
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal waterlevel n/a
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not. claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title. plus written permission from the owner to carry out
the project..
An accurate work plat ('including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 71.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings art preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
that opportunity.
3/91
1000N - Adoa
Name
Address _ SAP atta _h _d lint
Name
Addr=
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. include permit numbers.
permittee. and issuing dates.
A check for $350 made payable to the Departinent of
Environment, Health. and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C,G.S.113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject m conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant. and do in
fact. grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project
. DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

4 3/91
FEB 19 1992
PROPERTY OWNERS
R-2801, SR 1568, Onslow County
DQa 2 Smith 1a?aes `V. ?i Pittman
107 Cole Ave. 4308 Belwood Lane
Raeford, NC 28376 Matthews, NC 28105
K*kM-m ripope -Farms, Snc.
Address Unknown ck'Creek Rd.7
Freemont, NC 27830
X?than.L.:.Newsome
.Route 1 0t111P1nno
Freemont, NC 27830 1104 Raleigh Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
1200 Raleigh Rd. "0ean-,Say-:Y111age--vt opsailk
Wilson, NC 27893 Island, Inc.
PO Box 7
af?rtt,1 6. Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
ish Fredrick ?M
12 Delwood Rd. Sa dry Vii, deck ? ? ? F
Darien, CT 06520 3100 Avondale Ct. l+?'
Raleigh, NC 27613
Golden Acres, Inc FEB 19 1992-
1798 New River Inlet Dr won-filler,
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460 Rt. 1, Emerald Isle DIVISION OF
Morehead City, NC 285?UbASTAL MANAGEMENT
zOi tovner _
5713 Glenwood Rd. Fwd A.,.-Frisco
Bethesda, MD 20817 29 Lake Riconda.Dr.
Ringwood, NJ 07456
.. 'ki
t
• sroNtx yE,j?
4L
UAL
L
• 110.
5PS
SAM
3t
t? .
ukk
N
1 „K - ?! •i
N
Mt
I Utt. !
SAOt
ull sm.
tiri..w• t,. the 1•
R
11
i
)Nttr 1
b. ?
aa;
1
1
1
r
JtlL . r .0.
w ? 1
i3 t.i /? „p • 1
S LOU tttl )fir w } twilit / !` .. it
UAL 4
1K! .. H N?13?
PAS r
us so
;???- Ito iCAtE
1 HOLLY • t a > .fazes -
lr..wtm Cathenselate •j t S ?- r
" -? • +hckSon ill
i'
F s ? '?ref3 ? I C3
Tr' Gle %tet t K e tbdws Part
Maws 1) + OF ten
r It rd •I- sw h
l S l ` 1I•nu 1 'Z. CAMP if~ t1 1
a? w•'? t f` "As" am tIt
r i
wallss
oiaM. •? ?^-w! FEB 19 Im
t .
KNrtaw : ?? ? / . e 1 b
DIVIVON OF
Mds Grw.r
?E N ?' ILN,N;ae` 4 WASTAL U NAGUEN
•, . j {?J/J 1 wat Ob31wr ?•sdi
1 A.CtT Past I1 ' t0?W QUO A- }
&W City
r.
Masts*
1
?"..d N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
I IS Castle ? 5\ ?Nwr Ti?.willwlw
Name fe•IIst1A DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
hot Wi mina a Rk* ? ONSLOW COUNTY
•d33. w*r , PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801 a
Amle
o s N eo RELOCATION OF $R 1568
_ 30
trxcorOWES
.. SHEET
L to ;o p .c_ .? twill a SLOWTtNs OF (!0
•J.
- -- __? - - .. -
5. ` NG
to •q• a, .?• ?i? ? ? ,? ?? ?. iii W, ?. ?. ??? a a ? w ??.
VAR, 2:1-3:1 ?'' `~ VAR.=2:1 3?I
0
STORM WATER
CONTROL DITCH
(VAR, DITCH WIDTH)
MITIGATION AREA 0.75 AC.
a E 1?q
TYPICAL X-SECTION FEB 19 1992
WITH STORM WATER
- CONTROL DITCHES DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
HO RI Z • 1y-20`
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
VERT5 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
• ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 2 OF 1(o
v?
W
ix Z
4

~
W
a a
0r 0
C N
W
a
& o
m c)
W vn
ix (X
i
L a
v
FEB 19 1992

oz i
w 2 DIVISION OF
02
ow
COASTAL
225
v ww

z

/
f-

DENOTES FILL IN

i .MARITIME SHRUB SWAMP

W
a AR OF FILL IN
MARITIM SHRUB SWAMP
STA. 154+00 o 7 ac.
w
O SO
scats I" -- 50'
N.C. DEPT. OF-TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATIONOF SR 1568
SHEET 2) OF

L
o ?
J ?
W
o a
STA. 15G }00
F-!0
3:1T
5 - NG?_
• - 21 = ?PROP. STORM
.0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL
-HORIZ. 1=20 DITCH
VERT. - 1y-5
154 155 156
14 PROP. GRAD
FINISH E
ELEV. = 7.0
-5 NG
0
PROFILE VIEW
HORIZ.1h? 50'
FEB 19 1992
VERT. 1"- 5
DIVISION OF
COASTAL 1VMANAGEMF
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET Q OF 1b
PROP RJW
MATCH S"t'A. 161 +c, C-
o
?
r

:lc 3
6 2 H wi W.
?

x C
ww _S
16 0
_ cL
CA _
?
W
OL
0-
a
WJ
f7
-
40

t'RLP EASE.

..
6

J .
1 ?-- 'A

W

o=

? 2 tLi N ? ?
r (?[ L117 z

STORM W
J

V/Et K
el .
of ?L W
tL a?
o
:
a
i LIMIT a
7 f r OF M AA S H .n t0
0 f 0
iW _ '-
list ?4
k IM P.
Orr I'c _ ?"'
-? cJ
d? J jWI YF
p . < ; I I Ix U a 0 (.n
19 1992
FEB Zoo
FP I
f 14-1 - - COA DIVISION OF
CEMENT
J
o 1- A uu
r r N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
r7-0 10 ? 1 -
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ,
A D' (A 4 ONSLOW COUNTY
%j PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
• MATCH STA. 156+50 RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 5 OF 1.
f
{
I
a

1 T-a t
7. EXIST ? ? ? - --!-?- .
op z4? I 1 L t- ?- W_ -
1 I C- M i
F-XIST
FE SE
O ? _I STORmWATE R CONTRCI. pITGH
IND
°c EXIS, - R/w
STMMWAV-R I V1
iy .
y1 pi7CM
1rW?nrr OF ul ?XIS'f F-ASE.
C.-MLAVAlStI MARSH •'
• LIMIT 0 MARSH
F-me- a, 30' 4--5- PROP RlW
O vs ?, w PRoY F-
?QROP Rf w ? ? ?-?-
'"` NI ATGH _ STA . 161+00
STORM
\jjk-IEtz
copiR0-
1Nr:_1 R
BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH HARSH
i . LA
FE B 19 1992
Std 0 SO
SC ALA ? O
DIVISION Of
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
REI,pCATION OF SR 1 568
SHEET ?to_ OF

f O
O O

cJ

t

a

s
_. m ?0 J
N
.. W
W
y o
-- ?1

s Q D
Z O

? 1
Q
Q m

a•
o" :• a ?° r
?- w
?
v

N

M

` O
W

Ll

' a
o
- a . - o
? v
° C o!
- a a

a- CD
CL

o_

o an is
? o
o
N
a N
o
o
. N
/ H
s ? U
W
O °
s W a
--t a co
h '
at
¢ s
.v
vw;
fEB i 8 1992
DIVISION OF
COASTAL. MANAGEMENT
W - N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
`n DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
' ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
cJ RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET OF 110
LIFT STATION
WETLANDS
EXIST Rj14
-- - --- - -E
OCEAN BAY VILLAGE
EXIST EASE.
@ 18" RCP
ev-
T ! EXIST
'
EXIST 141w , EA5E .
STORM MATER CONTS
DITCH
t C- j
MAIL
BOXES
fi
t
FILL IN I
0.06
ED MARSH
SO O 50
SCALD % so'

SFIo
DENOTES FILL IN-
ISOLATED MARSH
a 19[r.-
Mv
FEB 19 1442
DIVISION OF
C0ApT4 jyKj fk M
N. C. DEPT. 0
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET _ $ -)F 1l
10 - `fl c9
ELEV 70 PROP FINISH GRADE
0
PROFILE VIEW
HOR I Z. 1' 50E
VERT. 1": 5"
STA. 167+20
1-10
1g? RCP
NG
0
FEB 19 1992
SECT ION A -A
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
HOR I Z. i` =20 ? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VE RT. 1 - 5 ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
.? SHEET ?1 OF M o
O w i
v i
V
0
W
0

L
J
7
d
?o
(f)
<
U W
a
,?
. n.
r
?w
5
W
Ln m
rz.j
cr
Q U
Q
} 12 p
1 cr
a I--
?? a U
i
is
I? -
n: w
aW
=50 0 SOS
j SOLE ?.? 250,
i7O
DENOTES FILL-IN
ISOLATED MARSH
FILL IN ISOLATED -MARSH :
acres
FI 1J
J-EQ 19 X1992
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
.N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
.ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.6034903 R-2601
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET %O OF 1 t9
STA. t68 ? 26
10
5
PROP. STORM
0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL x
HORIZ.1=20 DITCH
VERT. V-5*
STA. 1704-30
1--t0
18" RCP
SEC B -B
HORIZ. I =20
VERT. 1= 5
f EB 19 t4S
DIVISION OF
N.C. DEPiPAiA94N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET A OF %lp

O

}
W
J
w
o
? i

CD -

%
A

Q =

L
_
Z
LL-

o
c
ul )

,
mil oil
O w
S >
c;
FEB 19 1992
DMS1ON Off'
N. C. DEFWASj?t4iWMW ?N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
.ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 11 OF Akp
cc 3 r
W ?>
a ... s
3 '
o © ? ?_ i
cc o. 1 0 J
o: +
0 h N !1! ? g 1
U W a _
aG y 1 _ t? . _ .. .
IF- W V j BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH MARSH
?• 0: 9
z m
o °- w o w
N OJ J W
cc = p
a w w
ku 50 O 50 1
SLI SCALE 50,
i
. ? I
FEB 19 1492
i
DIVISION OF
Q .??qq V MENT
N.C. DEW F4 AMORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET \'3 OF W
J?
10
r?
w
9,
s 3
W a _3a
-J 0
0a
z W
O tyUw
.0; y
w d
w
G: .
#
i
?
4
O
N
SLf
j j
l N
. N to ao
0- s
.p j BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH MARSH
U
w 4
A ix
a m m.
z
w 0 LL `
a ;
O w
cc
a w w
j
so O 30
SC.AL? - ?., - SOS
f
FEB 19 02
DIVISION OF {?{
N.C. DM F4 EZATION t
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET ?'3 OF 1lv
o O o +n O. H
f o
N W1 ? tf) N 1D
s a? aH9
? c tr
M* as ok 0
_ W ` Ip a 400
0 1
10 4" flit W 0
W +c W j >b o s c? E
o., ? ? w ? 'vxHHC?t?
p q a r 2 W IaHou?W
M q ? ? ? ? OG aatxi?
pt 4 a •
? a
d = t?' x
O
a
? IA
4 Id ? i
J
arl ? ? p I
o-
O ;c < S
!Ii Iq
?I a
Ik
d {
IU . `
IV ) r?
o w Z FEB 19 1992
'' DIVISION OF
o %n? z N i COASTAL MAhAGEMEN?
• - --
o O

s
<
o .
P ? M ^ -
flz

to +? Id W 7
v 4z
W
o
as v
2 W

d
`
o
N DI ?_.

fu

o Ir
z

rJ ?

v
w <
I u,
Q x ?C ?

UI 9

III ?'
O ,c
r,

o to

r -
Id 1

o
M ?
Nt
•
IV. 4r

0

?.
u. I CD 00

H n 9

Ir a a a .?-

'
%all Lo) t9 rh y
(3k
a4°u?
u
'' O
?coo
,? z
o S ' .H
?
Q tN
C
O
?OW.
O ? h
?
W
O 01 40
N

ci a

W
J '
4
0
e

R 1'S
?r ?Z FEB. 18 1992 I
DIVISION OF
y? o COASTAL MANAGEMENN
STORM .?1NATER AGOLDEN ACRES
ONTRO DITCH STORM WATER
CONTROL WEIR
. t
EXIST. SR 1568
k EXIST. R/W
FILL IN MARITIME WET GRASSLAND DENOTES FILL IN +
0.04 acres MARITIME WET GRASSLAND
i
FED 19 M
DIVISION Of
N.C.- DEPOOAOFAtr SAt ?N
_ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
Sm. O 30 PROJECT 9.5034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SCALD 1=Spy i SHEET OF %lP
0
.
10 N N
• PRO1? FIN ISN GRADE
ELEV-
NG
PROF ILE Vl W
HOR IZ . 1.*' = 50"
VERT. 1* --5
E
M
STA. 201 +65
. is --- - I
3:1? _ r3,i STORM WATER
5 = CONTROL WEIR
18' RCP
SECTION A-A FEB 19 Inz
HOR IZ. 1 ??= 20-
?
VERT. I" _ 5 DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT.
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET I lc OF t ?v
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 13, 1992
To: ;Dbrney
Planning Branch
From: James H. Gregson
Wilmington Regiona Office
Through: Dave Adkins
Wilmington R giona1 Office
Subject: Regional Office Review and Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
Central Office Permit #92065
NC DOT Bridge SR 1568
Onslow County
This Office will provide comments on this project upon
review of the CAMA Bio-report which should be forthcoming.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office Files
Central Files

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO January 4, 1993
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199201037 and State Permit No. 124-92
Mr. B. J. O'Quinn, P.E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
17 lJ ? ? L! ? ( c•.
D
JAN 13 i9M
UV CI
4kIATER
Reference your application for a Department of the Army permit to place
fill material in approximately 0.6 acre of wetlands adjacent to the Atlantic
Ocean associated with relocation of approximately 1.3 miles of S.R. 1568,
southwest of New River Inlet, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County, North
Carolina, State Project 9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
Your proposal has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the
provisions and objectives of general permit No. CESAW-C080-N-000-0291.
Therefore, you may commence construction activity in strict accordance with
applicable State authorization and the enclosed plan. Failure to comply with
the State authorization or conditions of the general permit could result in
civil and/or administrative penalties.
If any change in your work is required because of unforeseen or altered
conditions or for any other reason, plans revised to show the change must be
sent promptly to this office and the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management prior to performing any such change or alteration. Such action is
necessary as revised plans must be reviewed and the authorization modified.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeffrey Richter, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
-2-
Copies Furnished with enclosure:
Director, Atlantic Marine Center
National Ocean Service
ATTN: MOA 232X1
439 West York Street
Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1114
°Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental
Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Regulatory Unit
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. C. Robert Stroud, Jr.
Wilmington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Ms. Jan Riddle
State Property Section
North Carolina Department of
Administration
116 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603

• lift
.
c ?o s i ?
i
i
t E 40S caner
t N
i _
421
rl H C?
H
r
N?
v/it•
• I °r?r-,r
a
t
k
I:
?? ' .7 I I
C ?l q
. 1
SCALE
er..?•• !t sires rrrv
YMOn• 'i. t,w/ uXwr (1 1/7 \?? r..ii
1 /?Qj r
Oiean
I FEB 19 M2
I
S ?b 1
oil, an ?•?tr v.KR,.,.Ml.. DIYi.S?ON OF
COASTAL MANAGEIl f;N.7
i
I Well Dodge, stock
Il I lnry"!•LAN ......
1 Sort City
?Twesil $•acA
?ON:•r•rn,s.tlPW v N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
ourwswthdo DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
%•* I'sw
ONSLOW COUNTY
ti.w PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
e - RELOCATION OF SR 1568
uuca..us ,.
SMI O/lkowttRi SHEET ?_ OF 1 Co i

T
F-10
5 % (NG
L
/l/ ?^ nl it,
VAR. 2:1-3:I-'Z'' t y ii i z iii a a= •ii.
VAR.=2:1-3:1
0 STORM WATER
CONTROL DITCH
(VAR. DITCH WIDTH)
MITIGATION AREA 0.75 AC.
TYPICAL X-SECTION FEB 19 1992
WITH STORM WATER
_ CONTROL DITCHES DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT l
HORIZ• 1"-20/ N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
VERT. I 5' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS of- ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 2• OF Ro

?Z
w
C) *-
w a
0
rr o
p V
w to
m rx
u. a

A
w
ah
o?
5s( L w
z
J cc
J w
U z
CY >
U ?
Lif f
in
Q u,

z
w
cr g
o
?
w .
0 IL
aC o
0 U
p W N
cr a: a
n. LL CL
J
FEB 19 1992
w o` _ -t c DIVISION OF
°c COASTAL MANA _.v-
v A/7
DENOTES FILL IN
-MARITIME SHRUB SWAMP
iW
a
w
O
?` a J AR OF FILL IN
w MARITIM SHRUB SWAMP
MATH STA. 154+00 o Z \\ .2 ac.
of >
so 0 30
'
SCAVV 1= 50,
!0
STA. 156;-00
3,C' i3
7' = r.l PROP, STORM
.0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL
HORIZ.1=20 DITCH
VERT.. 1y-5
154 155 156
!0
PROP FINISH GRADE
E LEV = ?.0
fNG
5 . 0
PROFILE VIEW
HORIZ. I?- 50' FEd 19 1942
VE RT. 1"- 5
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMEN1''
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET -A OF llo

ATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 5 OF 1 1n
MATCH STA 156+50 PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOC
FRo? RIW
MATCH STA. IG 1 +C o
PROP CASE.
- --- o -o o==---- ---?
J }??
..t1 X ? I 1 % i ?-- '^ ,mil
fez x? ?" hi
% Ww •.S 1 %A z. z
V) 40c
0.0
16 0
=o a w r ?? 3??? .n
lu ? 7
L Z N- x
W 7 STORM
? U
N
,? ? CGN?IZ G L t4
WF-1K ! •a
CL ? ft- w w
10
7 n
?n LIM rf
W OF MhRS!13 Gq
S ?W ? I ? Z ?
?v? ? i? I -_+I d
I 7T
t- 5 ac rJ F- ?"-
d ?) W I
? 1 .n
?. 4 ti l l I`X Is: ? v a a N FEB 18 1992
?-+- I DIVISION OF
x c F I I 1? ----?COA GEMENT
w p co `nd
??
?x w I ^ o N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
A 4- Ix x DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
?? t1-? 0 a ONSLOW COUNTY
• Ll '
7

I
i'.
1.
t
i
1
I
I
1
i
1
1
I
1
- 1
r --? - -' i
C 1 M
STORMwATE9, CoNTFIC .. DITCH
1 i r-- E xl s'? . R/w
lit
LIMIT OF MAP-"
{- -{?- .
S` PRDP R/w
01 1 1 1
w w PRor F-A3E
?` N1 ATCH STA . 1 G 1 +O v
EXIST ?

z4,
z
1
xI.ST
F
I
-
F-hSE.

CC)

0
C

STMMWA9ER V)
C Y CONTR?I.
? pr?c?1
1?LIM+Y of
gRASHISH MARSH .
b
?
?

-z--?r-
v- 3
,STD IZM
wprT E 1:
COQIROL
WEI R

BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH NPKbn T ?J- =-
T - _ FEB 19 1992
DIVISION OF

scat, = ,oN.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
' SO O 50
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET Cn OF
1 -

I 1
., 1
i -
iM
j c ! b
t
N
?D J
t N_ in
i U Q
O, J O c
i ••
` oC ,k a .
U W ? O
Q n H
1 Z CD = M U
i Q Q Qs
0 t4
o- _ Z a
W -- >
uLi w U
w 2
? a
w
> is
o % IA _ N
oc
¢ '
A a) W
111 Q .
N •y V1
FLE
l .?
a = FEB 19 1992
ul - o
M-
0
- p 2 ?
CL ? DIVISION OF
CL m COASTAL MANAGEMENT
?. N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
I ?? I ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
,.n RELOCATION OF SR 1568
LIFT STATION
WETLANDS
EXIST l4 `-'
OCEAN BAY VILLAGE
A EXIST EASE.. ,?
"F=. ---- E -- -
1
2.tb 180 RCP
_12_
'I -
} STORM WATER
I , J ! DITCH
1 C s
MAIL
BOXES
.EXIST EASE .
EXIST W I I I . 0?
FILL IN ISd'LATED MARSH
0.0 6 a 'res
SC ALL ? ?= CONTROL
S0 0 SOS
I {
SF4o,
DENOTES FILL IN
ISOLATED MARSH
FEB 19 1992
DIVISION OF
COAPT? J&y hWS;
N.C. DEPT. O
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION (IF SR 1568
SHEET Q, •)r 1i g

c9
10
i
ELEV 7.0 PROP FINISH GRADE
0
_PaOFI E V IEW
HOR I Z. I? 50?
VERT. I' 5"
STA. 167+20
_10
RCP
18
NG
-0
t
SECT ION A -A FEB 19 1992
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
HOR I Z. 1 =20'
DIVISION OF. HIGHWAYS
VE RT. I` = 5? ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET q OF 1?,o

0 W
I

o U ?
I?mCC

0 M l
0? I

d
J
d
J
O
ts.i
W
0 a:
oC O
w c
? N?
3
I

w
J
tce- ?
v9

F Q
V) U
' o s0
50'

I >_ r ? l
LAS
H
=

0
1 cr.
a
?--

,Q

I
app: t.,.i
I CQ
Q. W
170
DENOTES FILL'IN
ISOLATED MARSH
FILL IN ISOLATED MARSH
acres
R J G?
yo 18 X1992 a
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
.ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET \O OF 1Ln

0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL
HOR IZ. I -20 0 t.TCH
VERT. ly-5STA. 170 --30
STA. I68 ? 26
10
,R3:I
PROP. STORM
-10
5
VERT. 1= 5 1- .
NG-- 18"' RCP
0
SEC B -13
HORIZ. I"
a w. .?I
r
FEB 19 1992
DIVISION 'OrF??F?T
' N. C. DF,4qpgA ? ? c7R?AI N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET OF \u
i
i
1.
1

o

w
J
U

/

9

t /

OD -

0 =
Q

-
to
z
Q0

O a tl) j

j Lo Lr;
4 t i it
N I..:
Lr
O w
_ >
FEB 19 1942
MIS10N OF
N. C. DEPdQAW)xAU1k?'!6$0Et' bN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 12 OF lu

l
s
J\
ti
°?°
r
V
w
J a <
0
O
. ? a
o
U W
0: (A
H w
1 . 0: '.
o
IX
o n.
t
SLI

----------- -
1 N
I ? C7
i 1 ao a
.N cr
.O Y BRIDGE OV
W V Q ER BRACKISH MARSH , LAJ
r? cr i
d m
w o LL
e .?
° = o
4 a w w i
! !? M.
? I
50 0 50
n,
? I
1-01
FEB 19 1942
i
I e?pp DIVISION OF
N. C. c D??'i'ST4 -Yg A PORTA-ION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
? RELOCATION OF SR 1568
1 1 SHEET ?'3 OF \u

lu

..
O u?

a?

? Ul

r -
1d
u.

o ,
M ?
lh

lu
Z

0

a

p
v, O

o Iu
z

t- III
V

I u?
a
XQ
la ?
-
a? a a
da
aC
to lQT
o
N ?

pi

0 0'
i

i
?

0°

la -
,?
> Z ? o
o h ? i`
Ill o

o %J w
s >
w
W
M q cc ? Z
4
o ? O
(rl
(A
Zia `
I•
IU
iu
u?
ui
IM-
U?
In
W
J '
4
?A O

N

is

n
x
H r1
E-4 O
.? CJa co cc
tV %c
• o>4 1w
04 ? >+
cn c9 m car,
o v r C
a
Oz3cap
o S rn a
E-rc4?HU
l?HOta(r?
Q as
V W
z
fill
Mr
k z FEB 19 1992
"- DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT '

a° W 18*RCP
E .PQ.L'E
PROP P/Mt
?AGOLDEN ACRES
ONTRO DITCH
STORM WATER ,
CONTROL WEIR {
-I
i
EXIST SR 1568
_ t
k EXIST R/W
x
FILL IN MARITIME WET GRASSLAND ° DENOTES FILL IN
04 acres 'MARITIME WET GRASSLAND {
t
FEB 19 M
DIVISION OF
N.C.- DEPOOAOFAIrNAQZTnJPN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY SO 1
_ O SOS PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SCALD = 1= 50,. --- SHEET _15 OF IlD i
STORM. WATER

O
10 N

N
O
• N

rl. PROP. FINISH GRADE

0
NG
PROFILE VIEW I
HOR IZ. 1":50'
VERT. I"= 5"
STA. 201 +65
_ 10 I
3,1 r3 ; I STORM VVAT E R
5 CONTROL WEIR
N
C' 18' RCP _ _ - , -- 0- - - D-- 0 t T.
SECTION A-A FEB 19 1992
HOR IZ. 1 20'
VERT. ! 5 DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAG L M 4
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET Ito OF 1 Vo
SR 1568
From 2.8 miles northeast of NC 210
to approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet
North Topsail Beach
Onslow County
State Project 9.8034903
T.I.P. # R-2801
R, m > 7v -n
cl-i
co
?? cf,
C'"
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/FINDING OF
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
In Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
For further information contact:
A
I
Mr. L. J. Ward, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
/Z-IZ- 9/
Date
Manager of Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
SR 1568
From 2.8 miles northeast of NC 210
to approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet
North Topsail Beach
Onslow County
State Project 9.8034903
T.I.P. R-2801
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/FINDING OF NO
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
December, 1991
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
16
cott A. Stevens \?'y 'Q?` " ?y'•
Project Planning Engineer = •? ?,, (•?
- S? ? -
r% 6
Lubin V. Prevatt P. E. .'? °"'V•????,
Rural Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
SUMMARY
State Environmental Assessment/Finding
Of No Significant Impact
Prepared by the
Planning and Environmental Branch
of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1. Type of Action
This is a State Highway Administrative Action, combined Environmental
Assessment/Finding Of No Significant Impact.
2. Additional Information
The following person can be contacted for additional information
concerning this proposal and statement.
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone [phone]
3. Actions Required by Other State and Federal Agencies
A CAMA permit from the Division of Coastal Management will be
required for this project. Due to the width of the barrier island in the
area of the proposed relocation, NCDOT will not be able to meet the CAMA
setback criteria. Therefore, a variance will be necessary along certain
sections of the project.
A permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) will be
required for this project under the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act Amendments of 1977. A Section 401 Water Quality Certification
S from the Division of Environmental Management will also be required.
4. Description of Action
x The N. C. Division of Highways proposes to relocate approximately 1.3
miles of SR 1568 in Onslow County.
This project on SR 1568 begins 2.8 miles northeast of NC 210 and ends
approximately 1.2 miles southwest of the New River Inlet. The total
estimated cost of the project is $4,350,000.
Alternatives Considered
The following alternatives were considered in the development of the
project.
a. Improve Facility at Existing Location
b. "No Build" Alternative
c. Postponement of the Proposed Action
6. Basis for Environmental Assessment/Finding Of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the planning and environmental studies, it is
determined that this project will have no significant detrimental effect
upon the quality of the human environment. The proposed relocation of
SR 1568 will cause no significant changes in route classification and land
use, and is not controversial in nature. The project has been reviewed by
appropriate state and local agencies and no objections have been raised.
As a result of the reviews by the appropriate agencies, it is concluded
that a combined Environmental Assessment/Finding Of No Significant Impact
is applicable to this project.
1. Special Commitments
Special emphasis is to be placed on protection of the Brackish Marsh
systems from sediment and toxin contamination via storm runoff. These
communities are highly valued by resource agencies.
Due to the presence of high concentrations of anadromous and resident
species in the brackish marshes during spawning events, a moratorium on
bridge construction will be observed between March 1 and June 30 of any
year.
To minimize possible impacts to the freshwater marshes, swamp waters,
brackish water marshes, the Intercoastal Waterway and its adjacent waters,
NCDOT plans to use "Best Management Practices" in constructing this
project. Measures to be used include the following: (1) Promote
infiltration by providing and retaining vegetated surfaces where
practicable, (2) Retain and dispose of surface runoff where practicable
with a system of grass lined retention ditches, (3) Span the two areas of
brackish marsh with bridges, and (4) Use storm water control wiers at the
two bridge sites and at crosspipe locations to retain and dispose of
surface runoff.
The project will impact 2 geodetic survey markers. The N. C.
Geodetic Survey is to be contacted prior to construction.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT ............................ 1
A. General Description of Project ...................... 1
B. Historic Resume and Project Status .................. 1
• C. Characteristics of Existing Facility ................ 1
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied .............. 1
• 2. Route Classification ........................... 1
3. Cross-Section Description ...................... 1
4. Right of Way ................................... 1
5. Utilities ... ..... ..................... 2
6. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment .............. 2
7. Speed Limit ................................. 2
8. Access Control ................................. 2
9. Degree of Roadside Development ................. 2
10. Traffic Data ................................... 2
11. Intersection Treatment ......................... 3
12. School Bus Data ................................ 3
13. Flooding and Erosion ........................... 3
0. Accident Analysis ................................... 3
E. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community ........ 4
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................... 5
A. General Description .. ... ........................ 5
B. Summary of the Proposed Action ...................... 5
1. Cross-Section Description ...................... 5
2. Right of Way ................................... 5
3. Bikeways ....................................... 5
4. Proposed Design Speed .......................... 5
5. Access Control ................................. 5
6. Intersection Treatment ......................... 5
s 7. Drainage Structures ............................ 6
8. Anticipated Permits Required ................... 6
9. Cost Estimates ................................. 7
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ...................... 8
A. Improve Facility at Existing Location ............... 8
B. "No Build" Alternative . ...................... 8
C. Postponement of Proposed Action .................... 8
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
V
a

PAGE
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CONSIDERED ... 9
A. Social Impacts ...................................... 9
1. Land Use ....................................... 9
a. Status of Local Planning Activities ........ 9
b. Existing Land Use .......................... 9
c. Existing Zoning ............................ 9
d. Future Land Use 10
e. Project Compatibility With Local Plans ..... 11
f. Farmland ................................... 11
2. Cultural Resources ............................. 11
a. Historic Architectural Resources ........... 11
b. Archaeological Resources ................... 11
3. Neighborhood Characteristics ................... 12
4. Relocation of Families and Businesses .......... 12
5. Public Facilities and Services ................. 12
B. Economic Factors .................................... 12
C. Environmental Impacts ............................... 12
1. Biological Resources ........................... 12
a. Plant Communities ......................... 13
1. Uplands .............................. 13
2. Wetlands ... ..... .............. 15
3. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to
Plant Communities ............... 17
b. Wildlife .................................. 18
1. Terrestrial Communities .............. 18
2. Aquatic Communities .................. 19
3. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to
Wildlife ........................ 20
2. Physical Resources ............................. 21
a. Water Resources ........................... 21
1. Streams, Rivers, Impoundments, etc. ... 21
2. Water Quality ........................ 21
3. Anticipated Impacts to Water
Resources ....................... 22
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
PAGE
b. Soils .......:............................. 23
C. Hazardous Materials ....................... 23
3. Wetlands ....................................... 23
4. Study Area Wetlands ............................ 23
5. Mitigation ..................................... 24
6. Protected Species .............................. 24
a. Federally-Protected Species ............... 24
b. State Protected Species ................... 28
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts ............ 29
7. Air Quality and Traffic Noise Analyses ......... 30
8. Flood Hazard Evaluation ........................ 30
9. Construction Impacts ........................... 31
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION ................................ 33
VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 34
TABLES
Table 1 - Accident Summary
Table 2 - Estimated Impacts to Plant Communities
Table 3 - Federally Protected Species in Onslow County
Table 4 - Federal Candidate Species Listed for Onslow County
Table 5 - State Protected Species in Onslow County
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1 - Geographic Location Map
Figure 2 - Photos of Existing Conditions
a Figure 3 - Aerial Mosaic
Figure 4 - Wetland Location Map
Figure 5 - Estimated 1991/2011 Average Daily Traffic
Appendix
SR 1568
From 2.8 miles northeast of NC 210
to approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet
North Topsail Beach
Onslow County
State Project 9.8034903
T.I.P. at R-2801
I. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A. General Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
relocate 1.3 miles of SR 1568 approximately 150' to 250' northwest of its
present location (See Figure 3). The project is located in North Topsail
Beach, Onslow County (See Figure 1).
B. Historical Resume and Project Status
The proposed project was added to the 1991-1997 NCDOT Transportation
Improvement Program (T.I.P.) in July, 1991. The estimated cost is
$4,600,000. Right of way and construction are scheduled to begin in
fiscal years 1992 and 1993 respectively.
SR 1568 immediately southwest of the proposed project has been
relocated. This 1.3 mile section of SR 1568, which is threatened by the
Atlantic Ocean, is the last remaining section of proposed SR 1568
improvements.
C. Characteristics of Existing Facility
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied
The length of the studied section along SR 1568 is approximately
1.3 miles.
2. Route Classification
SR 1568 is classified as a Rural Major Collector along the
project limits.
3. Cross-Section Description
The existing SR 1568 consists of an 18-foot travelway with 0-3
foot soil shoulders.
4. Right of Way
Existing right of way along SR 1568 is 60 feet.
2
5. Utilities
The following is result of preliminary field investigations. A
more indepth study of all utilities will be performed during project
design.
Telephone - Underground telephone cables run the length of the
project on the mainland side of existing SR 1568. Underground cables
also service the Ship Watch Development complex.
Water - A 12" water line is buried on the mainland side of
existing SR 1568, but reduces to an 8" line approximately 200'
northeast of the southwestern project terminus. The 8" line then
runs to approximately 1050' southwest of the Onslow County rest area
where it turns northwest and runs for approximately 201'. Then it
turns northeast again until it reaches the existing SR 1568 and
continues northeast along the shoulder of the road. There is
approximately 36" minimum cover over this line. There are also water
lines located in the Ship Watch Development complex and a 6" line
crosses our survey centerline (proposed alignment) approximately
1400' northeast of the southwestern project terminus.
Sewer - A 10" forced main line is located on the ocean side of
SR 1568. It is approximately 6' from the edge of pavement. This
line runs northeast along the existing SR 1568 and at some point,
turns northwest for approximately 100'. Then it continues northeast
once again. Two lift stations have been located along the project.
Television - Aerial and underground cable exist in the project
area.
6. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
Level terrain exists along the subject section of SR 1568. Both
the horizontal and vertical alignments are judged to be good.
7. Speed Limit
7 The subject section of SR 1568 has a 45 mph posted speed limit.
8. Access Control
There is currently no control of access along the project.
9. Degree of Roadside Development
Roadside development is light to moderate throughout most of the
area.
10. Traffic Data
Current traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5 for the NC 210 and
SR 1568 intersection. As shown in Figure 5, 1991 traffic volumes
along SR 1568 are 2700 vehicles per day (VPD). These volumes are
expected to range from 4400 VPD to 9400 VPD in the design year 2011
3
depending on the amount of development that occurs along SR 1568.
During the summer months, these volumes could increase by as much as
fifty percent (50%). It is anticipated that the proposed roadway
will adequately handle anticipated traffic volumes.
11. Intersection Treatment
All intersections are at grade and stop sign controlled.

12. School Bus Data
Two school buses travel the studied section of SR 1568 twice a
day, for a total of four daily trips.
13. Flooding and Erosion
The subject section of SR 1568 is frequently flooded during
storms or extremely high tides. This contributes to the erosion of
the sand berm between the road and the ocean and presents a threat to
the roadbed due to the possible undermining that can occur. At times
the road is impassable due to the amount of water covering the road
and danger presented by the ocean.
D. Accident Analysis
An accident study of the subject project was conducted by the
Accident Studies Section of the Traffic Engineering Branch of the NCDOT
for the time period from July 1, 1987 through June 31, 1991. Summarized
statistics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Accident Summary
Statewide Average
Subject Section for Similar Rural
of SR 1568 "SR" Routes (1990)
Total Accidents 12 N/A
Fatal Accidents 1 N/A
Non-Fatal Injury Accidents 4 N/A
Total Accident Rate 209.06 306.1
(ACC/100 MVM)*
Fatal Accident Rate 17.42 3.7
(ACC/100 MVM)
Non-Fatal Injury Accident
Rate (ACC/100 MVM) 69.69 147.3
*ACC/100 MVM = Accidents per 100 Million Vehicle Miles.
4
The Total Accident Rate is currently somewhat lower than the
Statewide Average for similar routes. Review of the accident data shows
that vehicles running off the road account for fifty-eight percent (585.)
of the total accidents, while pedestrians, fixed objects, left turns
crossing traffic, angle, and sideswipes account for forty-one and one half
percent (41.5%) divided equally between these five types of accidents.
The recommended improvements to SR 1568 should help to alleviate these
problems.
E. Benefits to State, Region, and Community
This section of SR 1568 is the last of proposed SR 1568 improvements.
The need for this relocation is evident due to the danger presented during
storms and high tides. This section is the only link to the mainland for
approximately 2300 housing units. This section of roadway is frequently
washed over during storms or high tides. It presents a maintenance
problem and a hazard to those who use the roadway.
5
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. General Description
The NCOOT proposes to relocate SR 1568 approximately 150' to 250'
northwest of it present location. This project is located in the Town of
North Topsail Beach in Onslow County (See Figure 3).
B. Summary of Proposed Action
1. Cross-Section Description
The relocated segment of SR 1568 will consist of a two lane
roadway with a 24-foot pavement and 6-foot soil shoulders. It is
noted that the roadway centerline is proposed to be at an elevation
approximately 7 feet above mean sea level (MSL).
2. Right of way
Much of the right of way along the project has been donated.
This relocation will require 30 feet of right of way on each side of
the proposed center line and a ten foot permanent easement on each
side, for a total width of 80 feet. Due to the development in the
Galleon Bay area, 30 feet of right of way and a ten foot permanent
easement will be acquired on the ocean side of the proposed center
line and 30 feet of right of way will be acquired on the sound side
of the proposed center line, for a total width of 70 feet in this
area.
3. Bikeways
There does not appear to be any need for special accommodations
for bicycles on this project. This section of SR 1568 does not
correspond to a bicycle T. I . P. request, nor is it part of NCDOT' s
Bicycling Highway system. There are no indications that there are
unusual levels of bicycling on this roadway. As with many of our
roads and highways, bicycle travel will occur as part of the overall
traffic mix.
r
4. Proposed Design Speed
The relocated segment of SR 1568 will have a minimum 50 mph
design speed. The design speed reflects the geometric design of the
roadway and provides for a margin of safety for safe vehicle
operation. It should not be confused with the posted speed limits or
vehicular running speeds.
5. Access Control
No control of access is proposed for this project.
6. Intersection Treatment
All intersections will be at grade and stop sign controlled.
6
7. Drainaae Structures
There are two bridge structures proposed for the subject
project. The southern brackish marsh will be spanned by a bridge
approximately 352' in length (8 @ 44' spans). The northern brackish
marsh will be spanned by a bridge approximately 423' in length (9 @
47' spans).
At the two bridge sites concrete storm water control wiers will
be constructed on the Intercoastal Waterway side of the bridges to
provide retention of stormwater runoff from off site development and
• runoff from the bridge deck. At cross pipe locations storm water
control wiers will be constructed to provide retention of storm water
runoff from off site development.
Storm water retention is being provided by construction of
longitudinal storage (retention ditches) at all practicable sites
within the proposed (80 feet) right of way and easement. All ditch
slopes and shoulders will be vegetated to promote infiltration. The
bottom elevation of the retention areas has been set at a minimum
elevation of 3.0' above MSL with provision for overflow prior to any
roadway flooding. Capacity of the retention ditches has been
established to store as a minimum the first 1.5 inches of runoff.
8. Anticipated Permits Required .
Based upon the nature and size of the non-CAMA jurisdictional
wetlands (Maritime Wet Grassland, Swale, Isolated Marsh and Maritime
Shrub Swamp), the anticipated impacts to these wetland resources
would normally be authorized under Nationwide 26 [33 CFR 330.5 (a)
(26)], which permits the filling of up to one acre of isolated (or
"above headwaters"), nontidal wetlands. However, the U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers (COE) issued a District Regulatory Operating Policy on
March 1, 1989, in which they require Individual Section 404 Permit
treatment for certain isolated wetlands which lie within 200-300 feet
of a major water resource (Ocean, sound, river, estuary, etc.). This
"Adjacency" requirement will be exercised in the case of the
aforementioned wetlands.
NCDOT recognizes that certain permits will be required in order
to proceed with this project. Due to the urgency of this project,
early coordination with those in charge of issuing necessary permits
has and will continue to be done.
Based upon statements from Division of Coastal Management staff
at a site meeting on August 15, 1991, it appears that CAMA major
development permits (required for development activities in or near
AECs, which also require federal permits) were previously issued to a
private developer for relocation of the same roadway. These permits
have expired and in order to proceed with the proposed action, a new
application for permits will be required.
Due to the development and narrow width of the island in the
Galleon Bay area, NCDOT will not be able to meet the required CAMA
setback distance. Therefore, NCDOT will need to obtain a variance in
the setback requirement.
A second meeting was held on December 9, 1991, at the North
Topsail Beach Fire Station. Representatives from the: U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine
Fisheries Service, N. C. Wildlife Resource Commission, N. C. Division
of Coastal Management, N. C. Division of Environmental Management,
and Town of North Topsail Beach were present. The purpose of this
meeting was to inform these representatives of the proposed project
and give them a chance to voice their concerns. After an on-site
investigation, the COE determined that a Individual Secton 404 Permit
will be required for this project to proceed. As a result of this
determination, a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the
Division of Environmental Management will also be required.
9. Cost Estimates
Construction
Right of Way
S 3,000,000
S 1,350,000
Total $ 4,350,000
8
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Improve Facility at Existing Location
This action would limit impacts to the natural environment and would
decrease the cost of the proposed project due to the limited amount of
right of way that would need to be acquired. Although this alternative is
possible, it would not provide a solution to the threat presented by beach
erosion in the project area. Therefore, this alternative is not
recommended.
• B. "No Build" Alternative
The "no build" alternative would avoid some negative impacts of the
proposed project, such as the disruption of the natural environment by the
use of additional land for highway purposes. However, this alternative
would ultimately result in the loss of access along SR 1568 north of the
proposed project. Consequently, the "_no build" decision is not considered
feasible and it is not recommended.
C. Postponement of Proposed Action
Due to the danger presented by the presence of the ocean, postponing
the implementation of the proposed relocation is not considered a prudent
course of action.
9
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CONSIDERED
A. Social Imoacts
The proposed action will not disrupt community cohesion. It will not
interfere with the accessibility of facilities and services, and it is not
anticipated to relocate any individuals, families, and businesses (One
property will need its driveway to be relocated in order to have access.
The possibility of relocating this driveway will be determined during the
final design phase.). In addition, no neighborhoods will be functionally
split as a result of the proposed project.
1. Land Use
a. Status of Local Planninq Activities
The proposed relocation lies within the municipal
boundaries of the Town of North Topsail Beach in Onslow County.
The Town has been incorporated less than two years. In that
time it has adopted a zoning ordinance and is now completing its
first CAMA land use plan. The draft land use plan was available
for review in September, 1991. Until that plan is approved by
both local officials and the Coastal Resources Commission, the
1986 Onslow County Land Use Plan remains in effect for North
Topsail Beach.
b. Existing Lane Use
The area of the proposed relocation can be characterized as
a resort community, with significant seasonal fluctuation in its
population. Development along the proposed alignment is
residential, comprised primarily of multi-family structures, but
also includes areas with traditional beach cottages. The
multi-family developments that will be impacted by the project
include the Ocean Bay Village and the Shipwatch Villas
Townhomes. The project is likely to have a positive economic
impact on the townhomes, as the project will relocate the
roadway so that it is no longer between the townhomes and the
beach, creating "ocean-front" units. Some vacant land also
occurs within the project area. A public beach access area is
located at the northeastern end of the project, but should not
be adversely impacted by the proposed relocation.
According to town officials, approximately seventy-three
percent (73%) of the town's 761 permanent residents live on the
northeast end of the island, and therefore rely solely on
SR 1568 for access to and from the mainland. Approximately 2300
housing units (permanent and vacation) are located at the
northeast end.
C. Existing Zoning
The area of the proposed relocation is zoned for resi-
dential uses, with a number of districts containing a variety of
10
density requirements. Most of the area is zoned R-15 and R-20,
single family districts requiring minimum lot sizes of 15,000
and 20,000 square feet, respectively. Other residential
districts in the area include R-5, which permits mobile homes,
R-8 (8,000 square feet minimum lot size), and R-10 (10,000
square feet minimum lot size).
One commercial district is located in the project's
vicinity, B-3 Marine Business, which includes the site of an
abandoned fishing pier, now on the beach.
d. Future Land Use
The 1986 Onslow County Land Use Plan indicates that the
area of the proposed relocation is classified as Higher Density
Transition. The marsh area adjacent to the project is
classified conservation.
Lands classified as transition are those expected to
experience intense urban development during the ten years
following adoption of the Plan. The Higher Density Transition
classification includes areas within Onslow County that are
experiencing rapid growth, and have public services available
such as water, streets, and package wastewater treatment plants.
The conservation classification is designed to provide
"long-term management of significant, limited, or irreplaceable
resources, specifically, and at minimum, all of the statutorily
defined Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC)." The Plan states
that the conservation classification should not be construed as
a "preservation" class. It lists various uses and activities
that may be permitted in some conservation areas. One such use
is roadways, "when construction of roadways can be conducted
without significantly altering the ecological system, and in
compliance with existing federal, state, and local regulations."
A survey of residents and property owners conducted by Ken
Weeden and Associates, the firm now completing North Topsail
Beach's first land use plan, indicates that the public prefers
new residential development in the town to be low density,
rather than the high density residential development described
in the Onslow County Land Use Plan. This will likely be
reflected in the Town's land use plan.
The draft 1991 Town of North Topsail Beach CAMA Land Use
Plan is now being reviewed by the public and various state
agencies. The Plan is expected to become effective early in
1992. The draft Plan indicates that additional resort-type
development is expected in North Topsail Beach, with the number
of permanent residents increasing to 1,800, and the peak
population reaching over 26,000. However, the Plan also states
that development will be directed away from environmentally
sensitive areas, such as ocean hazard areas and Areas of
Environmental Concern. Additionally, development will only be
II
permitted to occur in accordance with the water and sewer
system's capacity to accommodate that growth.
The relocation of SR 1568 is discussed and supported in the
draft Plan. It is noted that needed improvements to the water
and sewer lines located adjacent to the existing SR 1568 will
not be completed until the relocation of the roadway is
completed.
e. Project Compatibility With Local Plans
The project as proposed is compatible with the existing
Onslow County Land Use Plan, which anticipates intensive urban
development in the area. Other than by boat, the existing
roadway is the only access to that portion of the island north
of NC 210. The roadway is currently threatened by the
encroaching beach. Maintenance of access is critical to the
safety of current residents and to the prospect of new
development in the area.
f. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal
agencies and their representatives to consider the potential
impacts to prime and important farmland soils by all
construction and land acquisition projects. Land that has. been
previously converted to non-agricultural uses, either physically
or through planning applications is exempt from the requirements
of the Act. Therefore, the area of the proposed roadway
relocation is exempt from further consideration under the Act,
as it has been officially designated for urban development.
It should be noted that the soils generally found on
barrier islands are not normally conducive to agriculture
activities and are unlikely to be classified by the US Soil
Conservation Service as prime or important farmland soils.
2. Cultural Resources
a. Historic Architectural Resources
An architectural and historic review of the area of
potential effect of the proposed project was conducted by the
State Historic Preservation Office. The review identified no
properties of architectural or historical significance that
would be effected by the project.
b. Archaeological Resources
The Office of State Archaeology was contacted concerning
the potential for adverse impacts upon archaeological resources
in the project area. Due to the location of the proposed new
roadway alignment, the project has very little potential to
impact any significant archaeological sites and therefore no
archaeological survey of the project area is required.
12
3. Neiqhborhood Characteristics
The proposed project is located in Onslow County. Onslow County
is in the southeastern section of the state and is bounded by the
Atlantic Ocean and Pender, Duplin, Jones, and Carteret Counties.
According to the 1990 Census Report, Onslow County has a population
of 149,838.
The proposed action is in the resort beach area of North Topsail
Beach. Development consists of residential units composed of beach
cottages and condominiums.
4. Relocation of Families and Businesses
It appears that the proposed project can be constructed without
having to relocate anyone.
In the event some relocation may be required, it is the policy
of NCDOT to ensure that comparable replacement housing will be
available prior to construction of State and Federally assisted
projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina Board of Transportation has
the following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of
relocation:
* Relocation assistance
* Relocation moving payments, and
* Relocation replacement housing payments or rent
supplement.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be relocated
will receive an explanation regarding all available options.
5. Public Facilities and Services
The proposed action will not adversely impact public facilities;
and, it will not terminate or impede services to the area.
B. Economic Factors
During the month of June, 1991, Onslow County had a civilian labor
force of 39,860. Out of that number, 37,770 persons were gainfully
employed. This left an unemployment total of 2,090 or 5.2 percent
(information taken from the NC Preliminary Civilian Labor Force
Estimates).
In general, the proposed project should have a positive economic
impact on the project area.
C. Environmental Impacts
1. Bioloqical Resources
A biological assessment was conducted along the project site on
August 14-15, 1991 in order to evaluate potential impacts of proposed
improvements on natural resources in the area.
13
a. Plant Communities
Terrestrial plant communities are presented within the
context of two broad categories, Uplands and Wetlands (See
Figure 4 for the location of Wetlands). Attempts were made to
use a plant community classification scheme as in Schafale and
Weakley (1990) and/or USFWS wetland community classifications.
To avoid unnecessary duplication, plant names are presented
using the common name (if known) followed by the scientific
binomial, in parentheses. When repeating a plant name in
subsequent narrative, only the common name is used. Scientific
binomials used are taken primarily from Radford, Ahles and Bell
(1968).
1. Uplands
Upland plant communities likely to be impacted by the
proposed project can be described within the context of
four classifications: Disturbed Post-Dune, Dune Grass/
Maritime Dry Grassland, Maritime Shrub and Maritime
Evergreen Forest.
It is important to point out that barrier island
ecology is extremely dynamic, particularly along the ocean
perimeter. The windswept, salt-sprayed zones are
characterized by migrating sand dunes, storm surges, and
overwashes. The rapid transitions between Dune Grass
communities, Maritime Grasslands, Maritime Shrub
communities and even some of the wetland zones can occur
over extremely short intervals. As a result of the
constant flux, distinctions between some of these
communities may be subtle, as best.
Disturbed Post-Dune
These areas may be described as highly modified sites,
impacted by residential and/or public works development.
Single-family residences, condominia, paved and unpaved
roadways/driveways (including shoulder zones), and cleared
undeveloped sites constitute this classification of plant
communities. The sites display a preponderance of
nonindigenous flora, or selectively emphasize and promote
the development of native plants. Groundcovers are mostly
grasses, including common and hybrid bermuda grass (CC nod?on
dactylon, C. x hybrida), although these zones are typically
invaded by such species as pennywort (Hydrocotyle
bonariensis) and lippia (Li is nodoflora). Woody
plantings include wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), oleander
(Nerium oleander), pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana),
shore juniper (Juniperus conferta), Russian olive
(Elaeagnus up ngens), Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii)
and Spanish bayonet (Yucca aloifolia). The unmaintained
fringes of these sites undergo rapid succession toward one
or more variants of the Dune Grass or Maritime Grassland
14
community. These ecotonal areas are vegetated with plants
from either community.
Dune Grass/Maritime Grassland
These loosely-delimited communities occur immediately
behind the ocean beach and are characterized by coarse
shifting or recently stabilized sands. Because a narrow,
low primary dune and the existing roadway lie between this
community and the ocean a distance of 100-200 feet, this
community is buffered enough to assume characteristics,
somewhat transitional between, and inclusive of, Dune Grass
and Maritime Dry Grassland communities.
Herbaceous perennials predominate in this community.
Certain areas have more or less of one or two species and
patterns of zonation are apparent throughout the community,
owing to microenvironmental or dispersal phenomena.
Herbaceous plants observed in this community include: sea
oats (Uniola latifolia), marshhay cordgrass (Spartina
patens), prickly pear cactus (0 untia compress a, or _0.
drummondii) pennywort, lippia, horsemint (Monarda
punctata), seaside evening primrose (Oenothera humifusa),
dewberry (Rubus sp.), bear grass (Yucca filamentosa),
croton (Croton punctatus), goldenrods (Solidago
sempervirens, S. spp..), bermuda grass, Indian blanket
(Gaillardia pulchella), euphorbia (Euphorbia
polygonifolia), diodia (Diodia sp.), beach pea
(Strophostyles helvola), heterotheca (Heterotheca
gossypina), sea rocket (Cakile sp.) and broomsedges
(Andropogon spp.). Numerous herbaceous and woody vines are
also present throughout this community, including: hempvine
(Mikania scandens), seaside morningglory (I op moea
sagittata), trumpet honeysuckle (Lonicera sempervirens),
peppervine (Ampelopsis arborea), Virginia creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), muscadine grape (Vitis
rotundifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) and
greenbriers (Smilax laurifolia, S. spp.). Sparse
development of woody plants is the rule throughout this
community, although isolated pockets of shrubs may be
rather dense. Chief among these are wax myrtle, eastern
red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), cotton shrub (Baccharus
halimifolia), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria), elder (Iva
imbricata), seedlings of live oak (uercus virginiana),
sand laurel oak (4. hemisphaerica) and hercules club
(Zanthoxylum clava-herculis).
Maritime Shrub
Remnants of this type community appear throughout the
alignment and some areas appear to be exhibiting
successional patterns that may ultimately lead to this type
community. The only section of the community that can be
termed Maritime Shrub at present is a small thicket located
15
at the northeastern project terminus. This community is
virtually dominated by wax myrtle, growing in a dense
thicket, 8-10 feet in height.
Maritime Evergreen Forest
This community lies at the southwest end of the study
area, although portions of this zone are predominately
wetland. Dominate species include salt/wind-sculptured
live oaks, eastern red cedar, wax myrtle, winged sumac
(Rhus copallina), yaupon, American holly (Ilex opaca),
hickory (Carya sp.) and cotton shrub. The dense canopy
permits little light to enter so little groundcover is
apparent, except for stoloniferous shoots and other
adventitious growth. Greenbrier is apparent in this
community and numerous other herbaceous and woody species
occur along the fringes.
2. Wetlands
Wetlands are variously defined, but ecologically, they
tend to be ecotones, or transitional areas between uplands
and deeper water systems. These areas can be important to
wildlife, and depending on individual attributes, can serve
to buffer flood flow and remove pollutants from surface
waters. Although the term "wetland" is often viewed only
jurisdictional ly, it is important to give ecological
perspective to these resources prior to discussing their
jurisdictional realities. In this section, only the plant
community component of a wetland is described. In a later
section, other important aspects of wetlands in the study
area will be reported.
In all, eight wetland areas will be variously impacted
by the proposed action. These areas can be described within
the context of five community types: Maritime Wet
Grassland, Wet Swale, Isolated Marsh, Brackish Marsh and
Maritime Shrub Swamp (See Figure 4). At this time, it is
understood that all but the Brackish Marshes will receive
fills during construction. The Brackish Marshes are to be
spanned by bridges.
Maritime Wet Grassland
Two widely separated wetland zones occur in the study
area with characteristics which can be assigned to this
community classification. One site can best be described
as an isolated pocket. Its hydrology may arise from ground
water, or periodic overwash from adjacent sites. Dominant
plants in the community include cotton shrub, wax myrtle,
pepper vine, hemp vine, sedges (Cyperus spp.), marshhay
cordgrass and rush (Juncus sp.). The second site is a low
lying area near the southwestern end of the study area.
This site is dominated by pennywort.
16
Wet Swale
This community consists of a narrow (6 feet wide)
swale, which lies perpendicular to the study area.
Dominant plants include black willow (Salix nigra)
seedlings, rush, sedge, lippia and pennywort.
Isolated Marsh
Two isolated marshes occur within the study area. The
origins of these marshes is speculative, but it is highly
likely that they were historically continuous with the
brackish water marsh system that is separated from these
wetlands by narrow upland strips of land. It is entirely
possible that both were part of a single "swash" system,
which ran between the lower beach and the backwaters of
what is now the Intracoastal Waterway. These drainages
were actually washes, which collected ocean water at high
tide and during storm surges and flowed seaward during
falling tides. Construction of the existing roadway, or an
earlier facility could have sealed the oceanward end of the
system and later development could have placed fills
between the brackish marsh and what remains of the system
today. Such isolation would result in the transition of
the systems from brackish/marine habitats to predominately
freshwater habitats that exist today.
Both marsh communities are dominated by emergent
cattail (Typha latifolia), black needle rush (Juncus
roemerianus), wax myrtle, peppervine, goldenrod, poison
ivy, hemp vine, eastern red cedar and cotton shrub and
seashore mallow (Kosteletzkya virginica). Soils are totally
saturated and standing water is abundant. At the perimeter
of these two marsh communities is a fringe of non-marsh
habitat that retains wetland characteristics. This fringe
zone contains wax myrtle, false nettle (Boehmeria
cylindrica), pepper vine, cotton shrub, elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis), goldenrod, poison ivy, yaupon and
creeping cucumber (Melothria enp dula).
Brackish Marsh
Two Brackish Marsh communities lie within the study
area. They are both served by one or more channels which
communicate directly or indirectly with the back waters of
Stump Sound. The community nearest the southwestern
terminus is enveloped by Maritime Shrub Swamp to the
northeast, northwest and southwest.
The dominant vegetation in the marshes is cattails,
black needle rush and salt-reedgrass (Spartina
cynusoroides). The northernmost marsh also contains duck
potato (Sagittaria falcata). Marsh fringes retain wetland
character and support a variety of vegetation including
cotton shrub, wax myrtle, marsh elder, seashore mallow,
poison ivy, false nettle, pepper vine, creeping cucumber.
17

Glasswort (Salicornia sp.) and sea ox-eye (Borrichia
frutescens).
Maritime Shrub Swamp
This community lies adjacent to the southwestern
Brackish Marsh and is dominated by wax myrtle, swamp
dogwood (Cornus stricta), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia
virginiana), black willow and red bay (Persea borbonia).
Groundcover includes poison ivy, pepper vine, cinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnamomea), royal fern (0. regalis), hemp vine
and false nettle.
3. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Plant Communities
The entire study area occupies approximately 12.6
acres. Table 2 summarizes estimated impacts to each of the
inventoried plant communities.
Table 2. Estimated Impacts to Plant Communities
PLANT COMMUNITY
Uplands-
Disturbed Post-Dune
Dune Grass/Maritime Dry Grassland
Maritime Shrub
Maritime Evergreen Forest
Subtotal
Wetlands-
Maritime Wet Grassland
Swale
Isolated Marsh
Brackish Marsh
Maritime Shrub Swamp
Subtotal
TOTAL (Uplands and Wetlands)
ESTIMATED IMPACT
4.2
5.3
0.1
0.4
10.0
0.2
0.4
1.6*
0.4
2.6
12.6

Note: Values reported are in acres. Based upon impact
widths of 80 feet. Actual impacts will be less.
(*) No fills are expected in these communities.
Since the study area is a new location alignment, it
is obvious that existing plant communities will be
permanently lost to construction. The site of existing
roadway is likely to be lost to dune encroachment in the
near future and some vegetation will undoubtedly find a
foothold in this new habitat, at least temporarily.
19
Birds that are frequent visitors to habitat zones
similar to that found in the study area include mourning
dove (Zenaida macroura), savannah sparrow (Passerculus
sandwichensis), common grackle ( uiscalus quiscula),
boat-tailed grackle ( uiscalus major), red-winged blackbird
(Agelaius phoeniceus), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata),
killdeer (Charadrius vociferus) and Osprey (Pandion
haliaetus).
2. Aquatic Communities
• A variety of aquatic habitats exist in the study area,
from freshwater to brackish. Both ecological systems
support numerous amphibians, reptiles and birds, in
addition to fish and invertebrate species. Crawfish frog
Rana areolata), bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), pickerel frog
(Rana palustris); American alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis), snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina),
eastern mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum), diamondback
terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin), rainbow snake (Farancia
erytrogramma), redbelly water snake (Nerodia
erythrogaster), banded water snake (N. fasciata), brown
water snake (N. taxispilota) and cottonmouth (Agkistrodon
piscivorus) are a few of the amphibians and reptiles most
likely to occur in these aquatic habitats. Mammalian fauna
which may frequent these aquatic zones include muskrat
(Ondatra zibethicus), beaver (Castor canadensis) nutria
(Myocaster coypus), mink (Mustela vison) and river otter
(Lutra canadensis). Numerous birds would rely heavily on
the aquatic system in this area, namely the great blue
heron (Ardea herodias), osprey and clapper rail (Rallus
longirostris).
These organisms rely on the aquatic milieu for some or
most of their life history, either as forage, refuge, or as
nesting habitat. Numerous fish and invertebrates, which
occur in these zones, are totally water-dependent
throughout their lives.
.
In the freshwater zones various minnows, killifish
(Fundulus spp.) and perhaps sunfish (Le omis spp.) occur in
relatively small numbers. In addition, resident
populations of blue crabs (Callinectes sa idus) may survive
for long periods after brackish water overwash events from
the nearby brackish marshes. Fiddler crabs (Uca spp.) and
grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) may also frequent these
areas. Although not of economic importance, these
communities are highly productive zones and serve abundant
wildlife functions.
The brackish water zones have a richer fauna due to
their natural tidal flush and continuity with the larger
marsh and sound ecosystems. These areas are undoubtedly
frequented by a rather large number of organisms throughout
20
the year. Concentrations of one or more species may
fluctuate diurnally and seasonally. Numerous fish are
likely to occur in marsh channels and in larger channels
and canals adjacent to these marsh sites. Among the most
likely species to be routinely found in these areas
include: flounder (Paralichthys spp.), spot (Leiostomus
xanthurus), Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus),
blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis), spotted seatrout
(Cynoscion nebulosus), American eel (Anguilla rostrata),
shad (Oorosoma spp.), anchovy (Sardinella spp.), catfish
(Ictalurus spp.), yellow perch (Perca flavescens), sunfish,
striped mullet (Mu it cephalus) and hogchoker (Trinectes
maculatus). Blue crab, shrimp (Penaius spp.) and hard clam
(Mercenaria mercenaria) are additional commercially
important species which are known to occur in or near such
marsh ecosystems.
3. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Wildlife
Since a rather large strip of habitat (relative to the
island's width) will be lost, it is obvious that such loss
will result in the elimination of some animals. Those
organisms utilizing the proposed study area will be
displaced into adjacent zones, resulting in overutilization
of resources and ultimately loss, of less capable
individuals.
In general, the brackish marsh resources are viewed as
significant in terms of their contribution to natural life
systems throughout the fresh-brackish-marine ecosystems.
Their role in sustaining commercially important aquatic
species is also vital. Based upon the current design, it
does not appear that the brackish marshes will receive
direct construction impacts, but it is extremely important
that proper erosion/sedimentation controls be put in place
to insure that these important habitat zones do not receive
unnecessary impacts through sedimentation, etc.
Furthermore, due to the presence of high concentrations of
anadromous and resident species during spawning events, a
moratorium on bridge construction will be observed between
March 1 and June 30 of any year.
The freshwater zones will be lost to construction
fills and the role they play in providing drinking water to
the wildlife in the area will undoubtedly result in changes
in animal migration patterns through the immediate area.
Their contribution to productivity, life cycle events of
aquatic and terrestrial species, and as refuge for wildlife
will be lost.
21
2. PHYSICAL RESOURCES
The following two sections describe soils and water resources
that occur within the study area, or that relate in one way or
another to the study area.
a. Water Resources
The topic of water resources is presented in two major
subsections. The first section describes the physical aspects
of the resource and its relationship to major water systems.
The second section discusses water quality and any special
resource assignments. (Water Resource discussions herein
center on surface waters and do not address groundwater,
aquifers, or soil-borne waters.)
1. Streams, Rivers, Impoundments, etc.
The water resources in the study area are of three
types, freshwater marshes, swamp waters, and brackish water
marshes, including their channels.
Freshwater Marsh: These areas are relatively small (0.4
acre, combined) and vary in depth, from a few inches to
more than 2 feet in small open water zones. Substrate is
composed of l+ inches of organic detritus, under which lies
varying amounts of organic muck and sand. These areas are
charged by subsurface and surface flows. Storm tides,
seasonal extreme high tides and rare ocean wave overwash
events may contribute some salinity to these systems from
time to time.
Swamp Waters: The swamp waters associated with the
Maritime Shrub Swamp occur as standing surface water with
depths up to several inches. Substrate is mucky and highly
organic. Hydrology of this area probably stems from a
combination of impervious subsoils and perched water table.
Some overwash from adjacent marsh and, rarely, ocean may
periodically occur.
Brackish Marsh: These marshes are subject to lunar and
wind tidal influences. Water levels throughout marshes
vary from ±1 inch to several inches in response to these
diurnal events. Marsh channels are 3-8 feet in width and
depth is 3-4 feet. Substrate is soft and muddy, with a
sand mixture at depths. Marshes are charged from constant
interchange with adjacent backwaters of Stump Sound, which
lies within the White Oak River Basin.
2. Water Quality
The only water resource in the study area which
qualifies for assignment of a best usage classification by
the Division of Environmental Management (NCDEHNR) is the
brackish marsh systems. Although unnamed, these systems
are tributaries to named, classified stream systems;
22
therefore they are assigned the same classification as the
stream(s) to which they are tributary. The Intracoastal
Waterway is the most likely receiver stream for these marsh
systems. The portion of the Intracoastal Waterway nearest
the study area is classified SA. Class SA waters are tidal
salt waters which are best suited for shellfishing for
market purposes and any other usage specified by the "SB"
and "SC" classes. Best usage of "SB" waters is primary
recreation; class SC waters are best suited for aquatic
life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife and
secondary recreation. Water quality standards designed to
protect class SA usage are designated High Quality Water
(HQW) standards.
Immediately adjacent to the Intracoastal Waterway are
waters designated outstanding resource waters (ORW). These
waters (Stump Sound, Intracoastal Waterway-southwest of
study area) are classified as unique and special waters of
state or national recreational or ecological significance,
which require special protection to maintain existing uses.
The water quality standards which are designed to protect
these waters are also designated HQW standards.
- The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
(Survey), was undertaken in 1983 by the NC Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development (presently
known as NCDEHNR) in an attempt to monitor and correlate
water quality changes as a function of biotic community
dynamics. Although no data is available for the immediate
project area, data taken in the vicinity of Snead's Ferry
reveals that taxa richness dramatically increased between
1983 and 1985 (43 to 69 species) and has remained
relatively unchanged (mean = 70) during the years
1986-1990.
Neither Wild and Scenic Rivers (Federal), nor Natural,
Scenic and Recreational Rivers (State) are located in the
vicinity of the proposed action.
3. Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Isolated freshwater marshes and swamp waters will be
directly impacted by proposed construction. Brackish
marshes will be bridged. Potential impacts to brackish
marshes include: increased sedimentation from
construction-related erosion; increased input of relatively
concentrated toxic compounds from highway runoff and/or
spills; changes in ambient water temperature and incidence
of light due to elimination of adjacent vegetation and
installation of bridge spans.
In view of the proximity to designated ORW zones and
the existing "SA" classification of brackish marsh waters,
it is imperative that sedimentation/erosion control
23
mechanisms be employed that are designed to protect HQW
waters. Serious consideration is to be given to generous
use of vegetated berms/swales in stormwater distribution in
attempt to ameliorate effects of toxic inputs to marsh
waters.
b. Soils
• A completed soil survey is not available for Onslow County.
Study area soils throughout upland zones are uniformly comprised
of recent sand deposits with little or no soil development.
Exceptions to this may be in disturbed sites where intensive
gardening practices are observed. Many of these unstable sand
deposits may be mapped as Aquic Quartz ipsamments, Typic
Psammaquents or Typic Quartzipsamments.
Soils in the Maritime Wet Grasslands remain sandy, but are
uniformly wet and zones of color have developed in them,
suggesting that soil formation is underway. Maritime Shrub
Swamp soils are wet mucks of the Histic Humaquept type. Soils
of the marshes are mostly organic with varying amounts of sand
present.
C. Hazardous Materials
No hazardous waste sites, service stations, or underground
storage tanks were noted in the project area.
3. Wetlands
In accordance with the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344), the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) has
primary responsibility for reviewing actions which propose to place
fill into "waters of the United States". Jurisdictionally, wetlands
(subsets of the so-called "waters of the United States") are defined
as "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or
groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and
that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions."
In addition to the COE jurisdiction, the Division of Coastal
s Management (NCDEHNR) has jurisdiction for reviewing actions which
propose to place fill in Coastal Wetlands as in any of the 20
designated coastal counties, including Onslow. Authority for this
jurisdiction is specified by the Dredge and Fill Act (G.S. 113-229)
or the NC Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
The Division of Environmental Management (NCDEHNR) also has a
jurisdictional role under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
4. Study Area Wetlands
All of the wetlands in the project area qualify as COE
jurisdictional wetlands. Based upon site reviews by Division of
Coastal Management staff, only two wetlands (the Brackish Marshes)
qualify as CAMA jurisdictional wetlands.
24
In each case, study area wetlands exhibited all three COE
jurisdictional criteria: preponderance of hydrophytic vegetation
(dominance by facultative, facultative wet, obligate vegetation
classifications); hydric soils; wetland hydrology (saturation to
within 18 inches of the surface at least 7 days during the growing
season). The vegetation characteristics of these communities are
briefly described in the Environmental Impacts section. Soils in all
areas were either predominantly organic, or were characterized by
mottling. Hydrological criteria was determined by presence of
standing water, or proximity of water table to surface.
Both Brackish Marshes qualify as Areas of Environmental Concern
(AEC), the wetland resource given highest priority for protection by
the Division of Coastal Management.
5. Mitigation
It appears that every opportunity has been explored to avoid
impacts to wetlands. Based upon the objectives of the proposed
westward relocation, limited opportunities for a new alignment exist.
None of these permit avoidance of wetland areas. Horizontal
realignment opportunities are further limited by the presence of
large numbers of occupied residences. Minimization will be achieved
by bridging of Brackish Marshes.
The COE will require conformity to the "Adjacency" rule.
Therefore, a formal mitigation plan will be required. Such
mitigation will follow the stepdown procedures outlined in the 1989
Memorandum of Agreement between the COE and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Mitigation sites will be located adjacent
to the sites of impact, or in a reasonable proximity and attempts
made to replace wetlands on an "in kind" basis.
6. Protected Species
Under federal law, any action, which is likely to result in a
negative impact to federally-protected plants or animals, is subject
to review by the USFWS, under one or more provisions of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended. The USFWS and
other wildlife resource agencies also exercise jurisdiction in this
resource area in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act. North Carolina laws are also designed to protect certain plants
and animals, which are endemic to North Carolina and/or whose
populations are in severe decline.
a. Federally-Protected Species
Plants or animals with status designations E (Endangered),
T (Threatened), or P (Proposed) are provided protection under
the ESA. Two major provisions of the ESA have implications in
NCDOT projects. Where federal funds, or federal permits are
required, Section 7 requires consultation with the USFWS prior
to taking any action which may jeopardize, or threaten a
25
protected species. Section 9 provides
jurisdiction in cases where no federal
required, if the proposal results in the
species.
the USFWS with
funds or permits are
"taking" of protected
As of September 18, 1991, nine federally protected species
were listed by the USFWS for Onslow County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally Protected Species in Onslow County
SCIENTIFIC NAME
Dermochelys coriacea
Lepidochelys Kempi
Caretta caretta
Chelonia mydas
Alligator mississippiensis
Picoides borealis
Felis concolor cougar
Thalictrum cooleyi
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
COMMON NAME STATUS
Leatherback Sea Turtle E
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle E
Loggerhead turtle T
Green Sea Turtle T
American Alligator T(S/A)
Red-cockaded Woodpecker E
Eastern Cougar E
Cooley's Meadowrue E
Rough-leaved Loosestrife E
"E", "T" and "T(S/A)" denote Endangered (a taxon that is
threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range), Threatened (a taxon that is likely to
become endangered in the foreseeable future) and Threatened due
to similarity of appearance (a taxon which is afforded
protection in order to safeguard a related species which is
similar in appearance).
Leatherback Sea Turtle
Endangered
Species' range is similar to the Loggerhead Turtle and has
been found in N.C. off-shore/estuarine waters. Its preference
for open water and sandy substrate makes it highly unlikely that
this species will occur in impact areas of the subject project.
No impacts to this species are anticipated.
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Endangered
Although this species has been inadvertently captured in
North Carolina waters numerous times over many years, it
requires high salinity waters where it feeds on penaeid shrimp,
crabs, jellyfish, etc. It only nests on tropical sandy beaches.
Only an occasional visitor to N.C.'s marine waters, it is even
more unlikely that it would venture deep into relatively small
marshes via narrow, soft-bottomed channels. It is highly
unlikely that this turtle ever occurs in the study area, or its
vicinity.
26
Loaaerhead Sea Turtle Threatened
The range of this Endangered species extends from Nova
Scotia to Argentina, the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico. It
is found along the entire coast of North Carolina from Spring
through Fall and routinely nests along stretches of open
beaches. The turtle does occur in sounds and estuaries, but
prefers open, pelagic habitat. It nests only on open beaches
and is not likely to come ashore in areas where shoreline
sediments are muddy. Suitable habitat for this species does not
exist in the project study area. No impacts to this species are
anticipated.
Green Sea Turtle Threatened
This species is considered to be essentially tropical,
although it does migrate northward to Massachusetts during the
summer. It is known to occur during Summer in waters off North
Carolina and in its sounds and estuaries. However, it does not
breed in temperate zones. Suitable habitat for this species
does not exist in the project study area. No impacts to this
species are anticipated.
American Alligator Threatened (S/A)
The American alligator's range extends northward into
counties bordering on the Pamlico Sound. Frequent sightings of
this species in Onslow and neighboring counties over the years
suggest a reasonable likelihood that it may utilize Brackish
Marsh and swamp habitat located in the study area. Although it
is listed as threatened by the USFWS, it is important to clarify
that this status was assigned in order to protect the salt water
American Crocodile in its last stronghold in Florida. The
American Alligator can be legally harvested commercially in
Florida, but after being dressed for market (meat or hide) it is
not easy for field enforcement agents to distinguish between the
alligator and the crocodile. Since the resemblance is
potentially confusing and therefore poachers could be harvesting
the crocodile and saying it is alligator, the status T (S/A) was
assigned. Since no crocodiles occur in the waters of North
Carolina, this protection is unnecessary here.
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Endangered
The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) requires stands of pine
or pine-mixed hardwood (minimum 50% pine), with pines at least
30 years old for foraging. Furthermore, foraging stands need to
be contiguous with suitable colony trees (minimum 60 year old
pine) and within 0.5 mile of colony sites. No such habitat
occurs in the vicinity of the project. No impacts to this
species will occur.
27
t

Eastern Cougar Endangered
Although some researchers are optimistic that the Eastern
US populations of this endangered cat are rebounding from near
extirpation, frequent sightings are routinely unverified.
Reliable natural history studies of this animal describe its
requirement for large tracts of remote, rugged terrain. The
urbanized nature of the project area is considered highly
undesirable for this reclusive animal. No impacts will occur to
this species.
Cooley's Meadowrue Endangered
A weak, erect, dioecious herb with mostly ternately
decompound leaves. Plant attains a height of up to 1 meter;
flowers yellowish to white. This species differs from all
others in its section (Leucoma) in its lavendar (instead of
white) filaments, much narrower leaflets and its fewer leaf
divisions.
Plant is found in moist to wet savanna-bog habitats in the
Coastal Plain of North Carolina and northwest Florida. It is
usually found scattered among grasses and sedges that grow on
alkaline or marl-bearing substrate on the fringes of wet
habitat, usually adjacent to hardwood drainages. Populations
are known to occur in Columbus, Onslow and Pender Counties in
N.C.
Only one zone of suitable habitat for this species exists
within the impact zones of the project. Such habitat, along the
fringes of the Maritime Shrub Swamp, was searched on a
plant-by-plant basis. No specimens were located; therefore it
can be concluded that no impacts to this species will occur.
Rough-leaved Loosestrife: Endangered
This slender, erect, sparsely-branched member of the family
Primulaceae, is endemic to the Carolina Coastal Plain, where it
prefers moist, boggy habitats. Its preferred habitat is
ecotones between pocosins and Longleaf pine savannahs. It is
currently known from only nine' sites, including sites in
Carteret County. Large yellow flowers occur above whorls of 3-4
leaves in May-June.
Even though this plant's preferred habitat, in the
strictest sense, does not exist within the study area, enough
marginal habitat occurs to justify study area surveys. Walking
surveys were conducted throughout the study area. No specimens
of the subject plant were found. No impacts to this species are
anticipated.
In addition to these protected species, the USFWS lists 10
other Candidate species, which, although not protected by law,
are in line for protection. It is possible that one or more
species may become listed as Endangered, Threatened or Proposed
2s
prior to the completion of the project. In this event, NCDOT
would be responsible for determining whether the action had the
potential for impacting the newly listed species. Table 4 lists
these species and indicates whether suitable habitat for these
species occurs in the study area.
Table 4. Federal Candidate Species Listed for Onslow County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS HABITAT
Amaranthus umilus
Asplenium heteroresiliens
Litsea aestivalis
Lobelia boykinii
Parnassia caroliniana
Rhexia aristosa
Solidago ulp chra
Solidago verna
Sporobolus teretifolius
Tofieldia lg abra
Sea-beach Amaranth C2 Yes
Wagner's Spleenwort C2 No
Pondspice C2 Yes
Boykin's Lobelia C2 No
Carolina grass-of-
Parnassus C2 No
Awned Meadow-beauty C2 Yes
Carolina Goldenrod C2 No
Spring-flowering
Goldenrod C2 No
Wireleaf Dropseed C2 No
Carolina Asphodel C2 No
C2 denotes a taxon for which there is some evidence of
vulnerability, but for which there are not enough data to
support listing as Endangered or threatened at this time.
Listing is warranted but precluded by other pending proposals of
higher priority.
b. State Protected Species
Plants or animals with state designations of Endangered,
Threatened or Special Concern (SC) are granted protection by the
State Endangered Species Act (G.S. 113-331 to 113- 337) and the
State of NC Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979 (G.S.
196:106-202.12 to 106-202.19), administered and enforced by the
NC Wildlife Resources Commission and the NC Department of
Agriculture, respectively.
29
Of the species listed in Tables 3 and 4, Table 5 designates
those protected by the state of North Carolina.
Table 5. State Protected Species in Onslow County
SCIENTIFIC NAME
Dermochelys coriacea
Lepidochelys Kem i
Caretta caretta
Chelonia mydas
Alligator mississi iensis
Picoides borealis
Felis concolor cougar
Thalictrum cooleyi
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Amaranthus umilus
Asplenium heteroresiliens
Parnassia caroliniana
Rhexia aristosa
Solids o verna
Sporobolus teretifolius
COMMON NAME STATUS
Leatherback Sea Turtle E
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle E
Loggerhead turtle T
Green Sea Turtle T
American Alligator T
Red-cockaded Woodpecker E
Eastern Cougar E
Cooley's Meadowrue E
Rough-leaved Loosestrife E
Sea-beach Amaranth T
Wagner's Spleenwort E
Carolina grass-of-
Parnassus E
Awned.Meadow-beauty T
Spring-flowering
Goldenrod E
Wireleaf Dropseed T
"E" and "T" denote Endangered (any native or once-native species
of plant or animal whose continued existence as a viable
component of the State's fauna or flora is in jeopardy) and
Threatened (any native or once-native species of plant or animal
which is likely to become an Endangered species in the
foreseeable future).
Of this list of plants and animals not previously treated
in the section for Federally-Protected Species, only two require
habitat which is known to occur in the study area, sea-beach
amaranth and awned meadow- beauty. Although no specific
searches for these species were conducted during the ecological
investigations, neither of them were seen during the course of
other surveys in the area. The NC Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) was consulted and their records indicate that both the
American alligator and the sea-beach amaranth have been observed
in areas adjacent to the study area.
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Based upon a thorough investigation of protected species in
the study area there-is only remote likelihood that any of the
subject species will be impacted by the proposed action. The
most likely species to occur in the study area is the sea-beach
30
amaranth, a state Threatened species. It is also possible that the
American alligator will occur in or near the Brackish Marsh habitats
near the southwestern terminus of the project. However, since these
wetlands are to be bridged, no direct impacts are anticipated.
7. Air Quality and Traffic Noise Analyses
The project is located within the Southern Coastal Plain Air
Quality Control Region. The ambient air quality for Onslow County
has been determined to be in compliance with the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards. Since this project is located in an area where
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) does not contain any
transportation control measures, the conformity procedures of 23 CFR
770 do not apply to this project.
The project involves relocating approximately 1.3 miles of
SR 1568 from northeast of the already relocated segment of SR 1568 to
northeast of Shipwatch Development. SR 1568 dead-ends approximately
1.2 miles northeast of the northeastern terminus of this project.
Hence, this route only serves local traffic and tourist traffic in
the immediate area. Many natural noise sources are present in the
immediate area that would contribute to the over-all acoustical
environment along the project. The transmission loss characteristics
of nearby natural features and man-made structures are believed to be
sufficient to moderate any future obtrusive traffic noise. Due to
the expected traffic characteristics and volumes, the noise
transmission loss characteristics of natural features and man-made
structures, and other noise sources present in the area, the traffic
noise and air quality impacts from the proposed project will not be
significant.
If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be
done in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the
North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2D.0520. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements in
Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 772 (highway
traffic noise) and Part 770 (air quality) and no additional reports
are required.
8. Flood Hazard Evaluation
Onslow County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Emergency Program. A detailed flood study has been published and
storm surge elevations have been computed. The construction of this
project will have no effect on the 100 year storm surge elevation.
Siltation of adjacent areas due to project construction will be
kept to a minimum with stringent use and maintenance of standard
erosion control measures and devices.
31
9. Construction Impacts
To minimize potential adverse effects caused by construction,
the following measures, along with those already mentioned will be
utilized during the construction phase.
1. Solid wastes created as a result of highway construction
will be disposed of in accordance with Section 802 of the
NCDOT Standards Specifications.
2. Borrow pits and all ditches will be drained insofar as
' possible to alleviate breeding areas for mosquitoes. In
addition, care is to be taken not to block existing
drainage ditches.
3. An extensive rodent control program will be established
where structures are to be removed or demolished in order
to prevent the migration of rodents into surrounding areas.
4. Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable
local laws and ordinances, along with regulations of the
North Carolina Plan for Implementing National Ambient Air
Quality Standards. Burning will be done only on the right
of way, under constant surveillance, with good atmospheric
conditions, and as remote from dwellings as possible.
5. Precautions are to be taken to prevent waterlines along the
project from being damaged and to minimize disruption of
water service. The contractor is to prepare a work
schedule which will minimize possible impacts on water
service.
6. The contractor shall maintain the earth surface of all
waste areas, both during the work and until the completion
of all seeding and mulching or other erosion control
measures specified, in a manner which will effectively
control erosion and siltation.

7. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for
use on this project, the contractor shall obtain a
certification from the State Department of Cultural
Resources certifying that the removal of material form the
borrow source will have no effect on any known district,
site, building, structure, or object that is included or
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places. A copy of this certification shall be furnished to
the Engineer prior to performing any work on the proposed
borrow source.
8. Traffic services in the immediate area may be subjected to
brief disruption during construction of the project. Every
endeavor will be make to insure that the transportation
needs of the public will be met both during and after
construction.
32
9. The project will impact 2 geodetic survey markers. The
N. C. Geodetic Survey is to be contacted prior to
construction at P. 0. Box 27687, Raleigh, N. C. 27611.
Intentional destruction of a geodetic monument is a
violation of N. C. General Statute 102-4.
33
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
Input concerning the effects of the project on the environment was
requested from appropriate Federal, State, and Local agencies in preparing
this Environmental Assessment. Listed below are the agencies which were
contacted.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
*U. S. Department of Commerce-(National Marine Fisheries Service)
*U. S. Department of the Interior-(Fish & Wildlife Service)
U. S. Geological Survey-Raleigh
U. S. Federal Emergency Management Administration
*U. S. Coast Guard
*N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
N. C. Department of Human Resources
*N. C. Department of Public Instruction
*N. C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
*Onslow County
Town of North Topsail Beach
*Denotes agencies from which written input was received. Letters
received are included in the Appendix. The agencies' comments were used
in the preparation of this document.
34
VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon the assessment of environmental impacts included in this
document, it has been determined that the project will not have a
significant adverse impact on the environment. This FONSI completes the
environmental review. An Environmental Impact Statement will not be
prepared for this project.
SAS/plr
J", i ? ? i , 1 \ \ tY7 \ l \
\
Stier ad*
? FOREST ,..:
/?'^r•? ?\ (X\ 1 r yt.'. CnUn 111n: ? ?, ? ??•, '1 +\
i KNlum/ ,• l
?Mnf l71141 Jacksanviii S,IvwdN. ,
' .`
If- 4
Mf.7/ ,l;r \41Mrirfen - . \ 1
10 q f\y , S fn
\ VNOnf I CA-01f1fU-4
na.rM??etA
Yi• s: ..Rwf LAM `
'w?-? ' L+l..v Bow
37. C/
3^ b
??? ` SQ) jls? of
atston ? R«?
?.?• •?j/ ;IO W Onllor dffcn
?..? ? fwa •ww
?. ? ? ,S.N ISURaO ?
Goq h.
F'
72
TRAPS ?• \
SAY
EIVRIVE
SAY 7
i1a
F. I
• / 1 Ca.o
y ACRES PROJECT LIMITS
POP, 13
i in I) I '' _?
Llli?
40
•. Slo \ ?s
?' \l Mill
t= J`
. r r
K
710 PAS
i
I_ f y I I
•
t '
tr'
IT7? 1P J .an7; V I
u71 + _ 1 l
1 111 u ?.
1 U.,
rrbR?1. ? _ I .
17% UL, '
s
31Z ,• + w ? i
LUL 7Afl.a ,' , I
sfz rs .:
im ?..
[zi : 7 UtaR.?o ?. a c ;1 1
:.o
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTIN ENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVLSION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP
SR 1568
ONSLOW COUNTY
T.1. P. PROJECT R-2801
0 miles 2 FIG. I
t )

NORTHERN TERMINAL
LOOKING SOUTHWEST
THROUGH SHIPWATCH
VILLAS TOWNHOMES
LOOKING NORTHEAST
ALONG EXISTING
SR 1568
LOOKING SOUTHWEST
ALONG EXISTING
SR 1568. OCEAN
BA`( VILLAGE ON RIGHT
FIGURE 2
PHOTOS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
4L k zw
/ c f a'
V 3NTIHDiVW
r
ON
_
6
r M' fss: ? . ?, ., .? '
l 4
t•
A Ln

a
i
}
i
r - .
s ,^

fi

? ?' `??
?n r? ? _ -.
. :.??'?
??",!''"
'?'. fir,' !?i ? ,. i i
..?,," ,

yy Q' a
,y

9 v u - a •. . l ? ?? yq{
l??Y' ?-'Sv??x -L i ..- y.3 ? ^.3,1;'_?? .";. `fli ["?G'I1r -3
A _ J
7r ' Y ?7
Ne,
? - C F i i
y ?
f x 4og? .d r b
ti
Fogy ?? - ?s=
F
eL r r 47 S F ?? a' Y
H W , l•O e•.. <
Oa W
., t
1.0
! W a ' ,? _ 1
a a w ?c a x ^?t
U) w 3 w ?. ? ? ?w. F -. x
H H "?
t7 a a a V N { h 4 T 4?
t
QI Q1
F 51
1 rR
S (S G 0 77 Y {} t l ? ?
A F
y r r
f r ` :.'
SR 1568
ESTIMATED 1991/2011 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)*
NC 210
5300
11800
WITH ADDITIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
ALONG SR 1568
1900
4200 6200 2700
aoo ? eaoo
NC 210 ? SR 1568
800
3200
NC 210
1 5300
9700
WITHOUT ADDITIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
ALONG SR 1568
1900
4200 3100 2700
' 6900 4400
NC 210 SR 1568
Aft.
800
1300
TTST - 1%
DUALS - 2%
DHV - 12%
*VOLUMES MAY INCREASE UP TO FIFTY PERCENT (50%)
DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS.
PROJECT R-2801
FIGURE 5
A-1
.N United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
• Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Distribute t .
Poole_,___ Vick O'Ouinn
Dudeck P:avail t - Croton August 23, 19
Nowna n _ Davis Shuller
Norwood- Eillon Ncdwidek
Modlin Webb Springer_
Tewall Elmore _
L. J. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
ems ?
a 3AV'M ?H
jO h'OISIAIrl
4UG 28 1991
Division of Highways 0
Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201 I>
Raleigh, North Carolina
27611-5201
Dear Hr. Ward:
Reference is made to your August 5, 1991, request for a description of
potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed relocation of
State Road 1568 at North Topsail Beach, onslow County, North Carolina. The
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) makes the following recommendations in
accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), and Section 6 of the Coastal Barrier
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) as amended by the Coastal Barrier
Improvement Act of 1990.
Relocating State Road 1568 may adversely affect wetlands along the new right
of way. As you are probably aware, review by the Wilmington District, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers will be required to determine the presence and
extent of wetlands along the proposed route. Areas of concern to the
Service include marshes, submerged aquatic vegetation, shallow estuarine
waters, scrub/shrub, and forested wetlands. Such wetlands are of high fish
and wildlife habitat value, and perform important water quality and land
stabilization functions. If wetlands are likely to be affected, the Service
will recommend the use of alternatives that avoid wetland impacts.
Unavoidable wetland impacts should be reduced, and the fish and wildlife
habitat value of affected wetlands should be replaced with suitable
mitigation.
Maritime forests will also likely be affected by highway relocation. These
habitats often are not jurisdictional wetlands subject to Corps of Engineers
regulation. However, the Service will recommend that impacts to maritime
forests be avoided to the maximum extent possible. Maritime forests are of
high fish and wildlife habitat value and are unique and irreplaceable on a
national basis. They are especially important for their structural and
plant species diversity. A well-developed canopy provides a buffer from
salt spray that supports wildlife forage plants that otherwise would not
survive in coastal areas. Maritime forests also perform important soil
binding and fresh groundwater recharge functions.
Several endangered and threatened wildlife-and plant species occur in Onslow
County (see attached list). Additionally, there are other species that are
candidates for the federal endangered and threatened species list. Your
environmental'analysis should address all possible impacts to these species
and their habitats. Your analysis should consider direct affects, as well
as secondary, indirect impacts that may result from such project related
effects as altered drainage patterns and induced development along the beach
A-2
front. If any threatened or endangered species are likely to be affected,
further coordination with this office will be required.
The legal responsibilities of a Federal agency under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, were detailed in material sent
to your agency previously. If you would like another copy, or if you have
questions, please contact us.
North Topsail Beach lies within the Coastal Barrier Resource System (Topsail
Unit L06). All of the proposed highway route is within that unit except for
approximately 1900 feet adjacent to an existing development (see attached
map). The Coastal Barrier Resources Act prohibits federal expenditures and
subsidies for projects in the Coastal Barrier Resource System. Section 6 of
the Coastal Barrier Resources Act outlines several exceptions to that
restriction, including a provision for maintenance, replacement,
reconstruction, or repair of existing highways. That exception does not
extend to the expansion or relocation of highways. If federal money has
been, or will be spent on this project, the Federal action agency should
consult with this office to determine if Federal expenditures for the
proposed highway construction project are allowed under Section 6.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. If you
have any questions, please contact David Dell, Permits Coordinator for this
office (919/856-4520).
Sincerely/,,
A. Michael Wicker
Acting Supervisor
A-3
REVISED APRIL 19, 1991
Onslow County
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) - E
Green sea turtle (Chelonia mvdas) - T
Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) - T
Rough-leaved looseetrife (Lvsimachia asperulaefolia) - E
Cooley•s meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi) - E
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for
listing as endangered or threatened, are under status review by the service.
These "Candidate" (C) species are not legally protected under the Act, and
are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they
are formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. we are
providing the below list of candidate species which may occur within the
project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification. These
species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be protected
under the Act. In the meantime, we would appreciate anything you might do
for them.
Pine barrens treefrog (Nola andersonii) - C
Sea-beach pigweed (Amaranthus pumilus) - C
Riverbank sand grass (Calamovilfa brevipilis) - C
Carolina grass-of-parnassus (Parnassia caroliniana) - C
Spring-flowering goldenrod (Solidaoo verna) - C
Wireleaf dropseed (Snorobolus teretifolius) - C
Boykins lobelia (Lobelia bovkinii) - C
Awned meadow-beauty (Rhexia aristosa) - C
A-4
Hl" Q?W
• ? ?{ -?•" '`.?. `}' CC,.1 Y '? ?'? /.?'.7i+:??iR ?•w. , J \ `I. \ .,? ?•,.? $MlY ?igH.r•.
• ? .?..? ?" ?• I f?.? Iy??1"?"? //? ? yf ?f?J "^!'?_jfS?u.w?r. .??T??:r ^??••\r ::•,??,?Ji•
r ` _!? -A . ?? ••, ? EMI. pt • ? . ? •!?...? \v? ? f•'?.`: _
<` ?Y Y (`71 r?'•• S T U M P f S'0`
/?•?V tl is `.'.- _?•? 1
Croak { ; . •i F 'fn+ H.l ?? - ?. '1.c.?
.? vas .f ?'^-?1?'? r•? I' .l. I .? ?;
J'ij
NEW R
'pw - +r X115 }
A.M
? ?'?? ,? ? _ EXCLUDED
-tier
Q w•Q,.• EXCLUDED
4LUC4roi swr• • I ,/ ?•
r
'Ot
414
•
Lis
i'f ..ter .
i
A-5
?. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
' National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
`?r NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
?"'A"'°'OSoutheast Regional Office
9450 Koger Boulevard
'Itb St. Petersburg, FL 33702
C 7
Mr. Ward',°P,•.
Manage Plariritg and Environmental
N. C. Depar In' nt of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Attentinn Scott St,.---vt-ns
Dear Mr. Ward:
August 16, 1991 F/SER21/RSS
919/724-5090
Branch
This responds to your August 5, 1991, letter requesting our
comments regarding the potential environmental impact of the
proposed relocation of a portion of SR 1568 near Ship Watch
Development, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County, State Project No.
9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
This road realignment on Topsail Island, runs parallel to a portion
of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) which connects
Alligator Bay and Chadwick Bay. These waters provide habitat for
a variety of estuarine dependent species. The alignment under
study, may cross wetlands that support both commercially and
recreationally important fishery resources. Therefore, we
recommend that the Environmental Assessment (EA) include the
following:
1. The EA should describe the location , species, and acreage of
wetlands potentially impacted by the replacement alternatives
considered.
2. The EA should provide a description of the aquatic organisms
found in the project area and an assessment of the impacts of the
project's alternatives on these resources.
3. The EA should address road alignment alternatives that will
avoid and minimize wetland losses.
4. The EA should describe construction alternatives that will
minimize wetland losses. We recommend bridging all wetlands to
avoid loss of these important resources.
5. The alternative analysis in the EA should demonstrate that the
recommended alternative also represents the least environmentally
damaging alternative. The proposed road realignment will likely
stimulate further development of this fragile barrier island. The
EA should address the cumulative adverse impact of such development
on adjacent waters and wetlands and the fisheries they support.
i
? Y
A-6
6. Bridge construction often requires temporary filling and/or
excavation. The EA should address the impact on wetlands and
fishery resources of any construction related temporary wetland
losses or fishery habitat alterations.
7. If, after avoidance and minimization of wetland involvement,
the selected alternative requires unavoidable wetland losses, the
EA should provide a mitigation plan to compensate for wetlands
lost. Unless compensation for wetland losses is incorporated as
part of the project, we will likely recommend against the issuance
of a Corps of Engineers' Section 10/404 permit for the project.
The N. C. Division of Marine Fisheries is an excellent and reliable
source of data concerning specific fishery resources in the project
area. A representative of our Beaufort field office is available
to discuss National Marine Fisheries Service concerns at any time
during this process.
r ,
Sincer V/-51
11 t
A
nd eas Mager, r.
As istant Reg al Director
Habitat Conservation Division
A-7
US. Department
of Transportation '
United States ..?r
Coast Guard
Commander
Filth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, VA C?EfP - "
Platt : TVb4 ) 398-6422
Phone:
Distribute to:
Poole Vick V 0%luinn
Dudack Prevatt _ Bruton
Newnam. _ Davis Shuller
Nofwocd _ Elliott Nedwidek
Modlin Webb Springer
Tewd Elmore _
Grimes _,.._
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
?9t`11NVb?
6590
1?
Sf 9
C rn
53 b
yy?y `b ?
Q
This is in response to your letter dated August 5, 1991,
regarding the proposed improvements to SR 1568 in North Topsail
Beach, Onslow County, North Carolina.
We have reviewed the information you provided and determined that
there are no waterway crossings involved. Therefore, a Coast
Guard Permit will not be required for this project.
The fact that a bridge permit is not required does not relieve
you of the responsibility for compliance with the requirements of
any other Federal, State, or local agency who may have
jurisidiction over any other aspect of the project.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact Mr. Bill H. Brazier at [phone].
Sincerely,
C"-111
T. E. BERNARD
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard
Chief, Aids to Navigation
and Waterways Management Branch
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
A-8
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
225 North McDowell Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 2`602 James G. Martin, Governor Roger N. Schecter
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
TO: Melba McGee, Division of Planning & Assessment
FROM: Stephen B. Benton, NC Division of Coastal Management
SUBJECT:* Review of SCH # 4) DATE: ? % ?/
REVIEW COMMENTS: / Reviewer Comments Attached
This document is being reviewed for consistency with the NC Coastal
Management Program. Please forward a copy of agency comments to us as
they are received.
A CAMA Permit or Consistency Determination is/may be required
for this project. Applicant should contact
in phone no. for assistance.
Proposal is in draft form, a consistency response is inappropriate.
A consistency determination should be included in the final document.
A CAMA Permit or Consistency Response has already been issued,
or is currently being reviewed under a separate circulation.
Permit/Consistency No. Date Issued
Proposal involves < 20 acres or a structure < 60,000 sq.ft. and no
AEC's or Land Use Plan problems.
Proposal not in the Coastal Area and will have no significant
impacts on the Coastal Area.
Proposal is exempt from CAMA by statute. Other (See attached)
CONSISTENCY POSITION:
The proposal is consistent with the NC Coastal Management Program
provided that all State authorization and/or permit requirements are
met prior to implementation of the project.
A consistency position will be developed based on our review on, or
before
i
The proposal is inconsistent with the NC Coastal Management Program.
Not Applicable
Other (See attached)
1'0. Mix 27(47. ILdrielt N,)nh C:amliua 77611.74V T.•L..J..v... QM.721,11no
A-9
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Planning and Assessment
Project Review Form
? Protect located in 71h floor library
Protect Number: County: Date: Date Response` DDue tum doadlina):
This project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review
I
? Asheville
D Fayetteville ?All RIO Areas
Ir Pastal and Water arne Fsheries
Management ate( Planning

D Mooresville aler ter Resources nvironmental Health
i

D Raleigh roundwater
d Quality Engineer
t Wildlife ? Solid Waste Management
Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Washington reatlonal
Consultant I-qLand Resources David Foster
i

Coastai Management Consultant t
Parks and Recreation tJL0ther (specify)
ilmington

D Winston-Salem
? Others _
Environmental Management

?Nzt??,a? C
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by aglogal Manger. in-House Reviewer complete individual response.
D No objection to project as proposed Not recommended for further development for reasons
slated In attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
? No Comment t 'l ?Applicant has been contacted
'J
? Insufficient Information to complete review f °
?Applicanl h ?be?h cd d
D Approve
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked)
? Recommended for further development with recommendations for
strengthening (comments attached)
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes Incorporated by funding agency (comments
attachedlauthority(ies) cited)
may.
Project Contr..,y`? slat (comments altacff )
,. ,GO
D Consistency'?tate
_X I edalcomm attached)
9 ? 30
D Consistency emenen?Aeeded
Ol ,?
D Full EIS must b red and t?fe rovisions of
NEPA and SEPA y(y i tik L?
D Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO:
Melba McGee
Division of Planning and Assessment by Due Date shown.
t .w
A-10
!fit ?'J I4 lr??
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
A
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Douglas G. Lewis
Director
Planning and Assessment
C%
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee
Project Review Coordinator
RE: 92-0081 - Scoping, Proposed Improvements to SR 1568
Onslow County
DATE: August 4, 1991
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
has reviewed the proposed project. The attached general comments
are a result of this review. More specific comments will be
provided during the environmental review process.
The Division of Marine Fisheries has not responded to the
proposal. Should comments be received at a later date, they will
be forwarded to you under separate cover.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. If during the
preparation of the environmental document, additional information
is needed, the Department of Transportation is encouraged to
notify our respective divisions.
MM: bb
Attachments
V0. Nix 271?V. Uti1;h. Kurth (aru6tw 27WIJtA7 14•Irp1xwn 919.733[,37(
A-11
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
395-3900

M E M O R A N D U M
•lTO: Steve Benton, Consistency Coordinator
From: James H. Herstine, District Manager
Subject: Relocation of S.R. 1568, North Topsail Beach
Date: August 22, 1991
Our office met with DOT officials as a pre-application review on
August 15, 1991. The project site was walked from beginning to end and
several adjustments made to initial plans. We will continue to work
closely with DOT officials to prepare a CAMA Major Development Permit
Application.
Thank you.
JHH/tlh
A-12
yY? t r .? ?i
J '
U?
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor David W. Sides
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
August 14, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee ?J
FROM: David Harrison v
SUBJECT: Proposed relocation of part of SR 1568 in Onslow
County. Project No. 92-0081.
The proposal is to relocate a section of.SR 1568 in Onslow
County approximately 150 feet to 250 feet northwest of it's
existing location. Project length is 1.3 miles.` Soils in this
area are deep sands with little importance for agriculture.
There should be no adverse impacts on unique, prime or statewide
important farmlands.
There are wetlands in the area. The environmental assessment
should identify the types and value of the wetlands that will be
affected by the relocation of the road. Impacts should be
minimized.
DH/tl
err •?? ,yt
71,x- Irlrpl> me 40 711 ? AI?
A-13
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Reviewing Office:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: Due Date:
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) indicated must be obtained in order for this project to
comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding tnese permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same
Regional Office. Normal Process
Time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES Or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)

C3 Permit to construct d operate wastewater treatment
f
i Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 da
s
ac
lities. sewer system extensions, d sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post•appitcaiion y
systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES - permit to discharge Into surface water andlor
i Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
? perm
t to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply (NIA
time, 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichever Is later.
? Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(NIA)
? Wall Construction Permit
NIA 7 days
(t5 days)

?
Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each riparian property owner.
On-site Inspection
Pre-a
li
ti
f 55 days
.
pp
ca
on con
erence usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Pettit.. _

? Permit to construct d operate Air Pollution Abatement

facilities andlor Emission Sources
NIA f
u 60 days
(90 days)
^ r ^
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
?•
! _ 1 ;;ZJ
must be In compliance with 15 NCAC 20.0520.

Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be In compliance with - "?-?
?
NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal NIA ? •?;, 60 days
prior to demolition.

C3
Complex Source Permit required under 15 NCAC 2D.0800. (90 days)
? The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion b sedimentation control plan
will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect.) at load 30 days bufofo begin activity.
U Thu Sudhowulullsm Pollution Guulrul Ael of ,u/J mu:d bu audruseud will% ruupucl to ilia rulurrencud Local Ordinance:
On-silo Inspection usual. Surely bond filed with EHNR as shown:
Any area mined greater than one acre must be permued.
? Mining Permit AFFECTED LAND AREA AMOUNT OF BOND 30 days
Less than 5 acres S 2,500
5 but less than 10 acres 5,000
10 but less than 25 acres 12,500 (60 days)
25 or more acres 5,000
1:1 North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources If permit 1 day
exceeds 4 days _ (NIA)

? Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit .22
counties to coastal N
C
with or
anic soils On-site inspection by N.O. Division Forest Resources required "it more t day
.
.
g than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
Should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned."

Oil Refining Facilities
NIA 90.120 days
(NIA)
It permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.
?
Dam Safety Permit Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans,
i 30 days
nspect construction, certify construction is according to EHNR approv-
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. An a (NIA)
404 permit from Corps of Engineers.
M106 Continued on reverse
A-14
Normal Process
Time

PERMITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
File surety bond of $5,000 with EHNR running to State of N.C. 10 days
? Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well conditional trial any well opened by drill operator snail, upon (NIA)
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations.
? Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with EHNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application lorm. (NIA)

? Slate Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size Is Charged. Must Include
d
i
ti
b d
i
t
t
&
f
i
f
f 15.20 days
escr
p
ons
raw
ngs o
s
ruc
ure
proo
ownersh
p
o (NIA)
of riparian properly.
60 days
401 Water Quality Certification NIA (130 days)

? 55 days
CAMA Permit for MAJOR development $10.00 fee must accompany application (160 days)

?
CAMA Permit lot MINOR development
$10.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(60 days)
a Several geodetic monuments are located In or near the project area. It any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
? Abandonment of any wells. It required, must be in accordance with Title 15, Subchapter 2C.0100.
• Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority):
Co
L"X s L"? -\O ?S (A /4G PrL Z 4. (o04).
V
reviewer signature
agency
date
REGIONAL OFFICES
? Asheville Regional Office
59 Woodlin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
? Mooreeville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
? Washington Regional Office
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, NC 27889
(919) 9466481
? Fayetteville Regional Office
Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
? Raleigh Regional Office
Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
[phone]
Wilmington Regional Office
225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
(919) 2564161
? Winston-Salem Regional Office
8003 Silas Creek Parkway Extension
Winston-Salem. NC 27106
[phone]
A-15
'l In //
r?
r7 ) ^91 y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
1 V
James C Martin. Governor PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Chartes'Hi.-' Sara er
Wlillam W. Cobey, Jr.. Secretary Director
i
Project Number: `71.-00-j l County:
:n
Project Name: D.O?. ???;eG+ t4o• 7•$034`103 i .iPF40. R-??Ol
Geodetic Survey
? This project will impact 2 geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic
Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
Fo more n contact the Geodetic Survey office at [phone].
eviewer ate
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
No comment

This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more
xhan one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy. Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
' /of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
V If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
L The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the _
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at
.-- 2 -.2 7 -5/
Reviewer / Date
P.O. DOA 27687 • Raleigh.N.C. 7.7611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An filual Opportunity Alfinnitrve Action Fmployet
[phone].
A 16
^J1 J'
6L.1 a
If ! • a,
, 1449"
i _ m
..
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission U
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Assessment
Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
FROM: Dennis Stewart, Manager Habitat Conservation Program Date: August 29, 1991
SUBJECT: State Clearinghouse Project No. 92-0081: Request for
information from the N. C. Department of Transportation
regarding fish and wildlife concerns for the SR 1568
relocation, North Topsail Beach, Onslow County, North
Carolina
This correspondence responds to a request from Mr. L. J.
Ward of the N. C. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for our
concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources
resulting from the State's assumption of responsibility for the
relocation of SR 1568. The Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC)
is concerned over direct and indirect adverse impacts on
wildlife, fisheries, and wetland resources within and adjacent to
the construction corridor.
Due to limited information in Mr. Ward's memorandum of
August 5, 1991 we can express our concerns and requests for
information only in general terms. Our ability to evaluate
project impacts and provide beneficial recommendations when
reviewing project environmental documents will be enhanced by
inclusion of the following information:
1. Complete inventories for wildlife and fisheries
resources within, adjacent to, or utilizing the study
corridors. Potential borrow-areas to be used for
project construction should be included in the
inventories.
2. Accurate data on State and Federally listed rare,
threatened, and endangered species, including State and
Federal species of special concern, within, adjacent
to, or utilizing study corridors.
Memo
A-17
Page 2
August 29, 1991
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by
the project. Wetland acreages should include all
projected related areas that may undergo hydrologic
change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or
filling for project construction.

4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife
habitat impacted by the proposed project. Potential
borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent of habitat fragmentation in uplands and
wetlands and impacts associated with fragmentation.
6. The need for channelizing or relocating portions of
streams crossed and the extent of such activities.
7. Mitigation for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for
direct and indirect degradation in habitat quality as
well as quantitative losses.
8. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes
the environmental effects of highway construction and
quantifies the contribution of this individual project
to environmental degradation.

Be advised that the Wildlife Resources Commission is not
likely to provide a favorable review for any alternative which
does not clearly avoid, minimize, and mitigate destruction or
degradation of wildlife and fisheries habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early
planning stages for this project. If we can further assist your
office, please call on us.
DLS\lp
cc: Bobby Maddrey, District 2 Wildlife Biologist
Bennett Wynne, District 2 Fisheries Biologist

ti
,4
North Carolina Department of Cultura ,Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Archives and History
Patric Dorsey, Secretary 'illiam - rice, Jr., Director
7
August 14, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook, Deputy State
Historic Preservation Officer/C-41
SUBJECT: SF 1568 from north of relocated segment of SR 1568
to existing SR 1568 north of Ship Watch Development,
North Topsail Beach, Onslow County, 82801, 9.8034903,
CH 92-2-4220-0081
Thank you for your letter of August 5, 1991, concerning the above project.
We have also received notification from the State Clearinghouse concerning
this project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as currently proposed.
These comments are made in accord with C.S. 121-12(a) and Executive
Order XVI. If you have any questions regarding; them, please contact Ms.
ltcuee Cicditill-Lu rlcy, utviroumcuLal review courdiuaLur, at: 733-4763.
DB:slww
cc: " State Clearinghouse
B. Church
Scott Stevens
109 EastJones Strut - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
A-19

North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Emergency Management
Joseph W. Dean, Secretary 116 W. Jones St., Raleigh, N. C. 27603-1335
[phone]
August 9, 1991
f
MEMORANDUM
To: N.C. State Clearinghouse, Department of Administration
From: J. Russell CaDivision of Emergency Management,
NFIP Section
Subject: Intergovernmental Review
-----------------------------------------------------------
Re: State # N.C. 92-E-4220-0081
N.C. DOT - Proposed Improvements to SR 1568,
Topsail Beach
For information purposes, the Commission is advised that
on July 24, 1990, Governor Martin signed Executive Order
123, a Uniform Floodplain Management Policy, which must be
followed for development on any site.

An Gµrd qy%muniry I Attimtiti% Acti,wi Ems 1, r
A-20
S 'r ORTH CAROLINA
'?• A
v r
"DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
y
i

116 iVest Edenton Street, Education Building BOB ETHERIDGE
Raleigh, NC 27603-171
State Superintendent
Distribute to-
Poole Vick %0'Ouinn - August 14, 1991
DnAerk Pravaii ` Berton
Ncvm m Cap`; Shdier
Piomut;c-41
E11.a:r Nedwidek '
_
Mt,otht Wt bb _ _ Springer
MEMORANDUM Towou Emore-
Grimes-
•`?? / `

L. J. Ward, P.E.
TO:
_
Manager of Planning and Research _
bb` ?:
NC Division of Highwa \ -
y \. _
FROM: Charles H
W
Assistant
uperintendent
Auxiliar r ices `?.?.:;::?.• '?
RE: SR 1568, from north of the relocated segment of SR 1568 to existing SR
1568 north of Ship Watch Development, North Topsail Beach, Onslow
County, State Project No. 9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801
Please find attached communication from C.T. Hoyt, Assistant Superintendent for
Onslow County Schools, relative to subject project.
mrl
Attachment

tin vqw d up1mmu mviu/f rnman• ui u.nr empL,r,v
A-21
-aUa ntendcnt Onslow County Schools
3r. uunald B. Singletary P.O. Box 99, Jacksonville, North Carolina 28540
Aist. Ruperintnndents Phone [phone]
Freddie S. Canady August 12, 1991
Charles T. Hoyt. Jr.
Barbara B. Newman
AUG 14 1991
Dr. Charles H. Weaver
Assistant State Superintendent
Auxiliary Services
116 West Edenton Street
Education Building
Raleigh, NC 27603-1712
Board or Education
Fred W. Hargett, Chm.
Lee Sewell. V.Chm.
Howard E. Aman
Mary J. Jones
C. Cary Lanuermeier
Lois C. Meadows
Thomas J. Pitman
Re: SR 1568, from north of the relocated segment of SR 1568 to
existing SR 1568 north of Ship Watch Development, North
Topsail Beach, Onslow County, State Project No. 9.8034903,
TIP No. R-2801
Dear Dr. Weaver:
. Our only concern regarding the subject relocation of SR1568 deals
with its final elevation and its effect on the safe passage of school
buses during high tides. We should assume that there will be no prob-
lem regarding this relocated road being under water, since its reloca-
tion deals with that very subject, but still foremost in our mind is
the safe passage concern.
Sincerely, -
i
C. T. Hoyt
Assistant Superintendent
fk
pc: Mr. Kern Everett
Dr. Ron Singletary

A-22
0
ONSLOW
Office of the
Planning Department
COUNTY
604 College Street
Jacksonville. NC 28540
Telephone [phone]
CF
?
L
491
f
August 8, 1991
L.J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
SUBJECT: Relocation of SR 1568, State Project No. 9.8034903
Onslow County has no jurisdiction on North Topsail Beach.
Permitting and approval responsibilities were assumed by the newly
incorporated Town of North Topsail Beach during 1990.
Z suggest that you contact Mr. Gary Britt, Town Manager, Town of
North Topsail Beach, P.O. Box 2709, Surf City, NC 28445 (919) 328-
1349.
Sincerely,
Charles Hedgepeth
Planning Director
a
11
A-23
R EI_ O CAT i 0" R E R O FZ T North Carolina Department of Transportation
X E.I.S. _ CORRIDOR _ CESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PRD.JECTa 9.8024903 COI.NMYI Onslow Alternate 1 of 1 Alternate
I.D. NO.= R-2801 F.A. PROJECT= N/A
DESQ?T ICN GF pRojErT• SR-1568 from 2.8 miles north of NC-210 to approximately 1.2 miles soutt
of the New River Inlet, North Topsail Beach in Onslow County.
a
6 fIM4TED DIS IACEES INOXE LE1.EL
01ype sp i oar Owners Tenants Total Mt es? G_Lsm LS-ZBM 25-35M 35-GM 50 LIP
Individuals 0 0 0 0 - - - - '
Families 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Hus 1 nesses 0 0 0 0 VAL r E OF EX-El .LING 05S n.R t rNGS AVAILAELE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Nary-Prof i t 0 0 0 0 0-212'1 s D-15o Q-2a" s 0-150 _
ANSWER ALL OIBT ION3 ZD-412"1 0 150-a0- ZI-40M 4 1511-ZMI
I -
YES NO EXPLAIN ALL "YES" ANGLERS 4 --713M 0
1 MCI-4M - 40-70M 30
Z5a-4M -
X L. W i l l special relocation 713-1131 1 40G--4,Mj - 70-10II 48 400-6131 -

X services be necassary
2. W i l l schools or churches 6e

1110 L F

0

6110 LIP -

100 L.P

95 600 LP

-

X affected by displacement
3. W i l l business services s t l i l
TOTAL
1
-
177
-
be available after project
4. Will any business be dis- Ri3°IARCS (Respond by Number)
X Placed. If so, indicate size 3. Since there are no businesses involved, the same
typep estimated-number of
services will be available after the project.
minoritiess etc
l
s
X .
emp
oyee
r
5. Will relo=atian cause a
6msi
shorta
e

6. Local Multiple Listing. Service, Realtors, Propert
g
ns
b. Source for available hous- Managers, and Classified ads.
x i
(list)
X ng
7. Will additional housing 8. Only on an "as needed" basis and required by law.
s be needed
o
a
gr
m
pr
x 13. _ShOuId Last Resort Housins NOTE: Since there are no residential tenants involv
,sIdot-ad
o
be l
c
r uc
the project, available rentals are not inc
X 9. Are there large, disabled,
it is noted that there i
the report; however
families
etc
elderl ,
.
y,
.
of DSO FOR DESZM
abundance of rental property available in dif
10. Will public housing be rental ranges should the need for such arise.
roject
n
eded far
p
e
11., Is pub I i c 1 Cus l ng avail-
bl
e
..a
12. Is It felt there will be ad-
equate DOS housing available
relocation period
durin
g
13. Will there be a problem of
housing within financial
ans
me
14. Are suitable business sites
available (list source)

. Number mon hs estimated to
lets RELOCATION
type
y
ed it
ed it
s an
ferer
I Robert B. Chbdwick ll_ 11-12-91 ?1Z_ j C7-
Oate
Relocation Agent to proved
brm 15.4 Revised 5/913 Original L 1 Copy* State Relocation Agent
2 Copys Area Relocation File
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
February 7, 1992
IN REPLY REFER TO S: April 7, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199201037
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the application of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, Division of Highways, for Department of the Army authorization
and a State Water Quality Certification to place fill material in 0.6 acre of
wetlands adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean associated with relocation of
approximately 1.3 miles of S.R. 1568, southwest of New River Inlet, North
Topsail Beach, Onslwo County, North Carolina, State Project 9.8034903, TIP No.
R-2801. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid
request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our
administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same
law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the
certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt
of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action.
Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by April 7, 1992, the District
Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeff Richter, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
ne Wri t
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. James Herstine
Wilmington Regional office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845

JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY

7
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
January 29, 1992
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
ATTENTION: Mr. John Parker
Dear Sir:
RECEIVEr)
r-JAN 3 1 1992
REGULATORY BRANC9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Onslow County, Relocation of approximately 1.3
miles of SR 1568, beginning 2.8 miles northeast
of NC 210 and ending approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet, State Project
9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation plans to
relocate 1.3 miles of SR 1568 in North Topsail Beach. This
section of SR 1568 is the last section of the proposed SR
1568 improvements. The need for this relocation is evident
due to the danger present during storms and high tides. This
section of roadway is the only link to the mainland for
approximately 2300 housing units, and is frequently washed
over during storms or high tides, presenting a maintenance
problem and a hazard for those who use the roadway.
NCDOT examined several alternatives to the proposed
action. One alternative examined was to improve the
facilities on existing location. This alternative would be
possible, but would not provide a solution to the threat
caused by beach erosion in the area. Therefore this
alternative was not recommended. A "no build" option was
also investigated. This alternative would avoid some
negative impacts of the proposed project, but would not solve
the problems associated with road closures due to erosion and
high waters. Consequently, this alternative was not
considered feasible. A third alternative examined was to
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
•l
S
postpone the proposed action. Due to the danger presented by
the presence of the ocean, postponement of the implementation
of the proposed relocation was not considered a prudent
course of action.
The proposed action will lead to the unavoidable fill of
0.20 acres of maritime shrub swamp habitat, 0.36 acres of
isolated marsh habitat at two sites, and 0.04 acres of
maritime wet grassland, totaling 0.60 acres of wetland loss.
It appears that every opportunity has been explored that
would allow for avoidance of wetland habitat. Based on the
objectives of the proposed westward relocation, limited new
alignment opportunities exist. The extent of wetlands in the
area do not allow for avoidance of wetland habitat, and any
relocation further west would increase wetland impacts.
Realignment opportunities are further limited by the presence
of large numbers of occupied residences throughout the area.
In order to minimize impacts, NCDOT will bridge two areas of
brackish marsh habitat, resulting in an estimated savings of
1.6 acres of this valuable coastal wetland habitat. Best
Management Practices (BMP's) will also be used to minimize
possible impacts to wetland habitat.
Mitigation for the loss of 0.60 acres of wetland habitat
will take the form of wetlands creation in longitudinal
storage or retention ditches at all practicable sites within
the proposed 80 foot right-of-way. It is expected that
wetland hydrology will occur at the bases of these ditches.
It is also a reasonable assumption that appropriate wetland
vegetation (ie. cattails, sedges, rushes) will become
naturally established in these ditches. Successful
implementation of NCDOT's proposed mitigation plan will lead
to the creation of 0.75 acres of wetland habitat. Due to the
disturbed nature of much of the wetlands habitat that will be
impacted by this project, NCDOT feels that our mitigation
plan adequately replaces the functions of the lost wetlands.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will
also be required to provide regional public access
facilities. These facilities will include a total of 326
parking spaces. The Department is in the process of
identifying potential sites where the access facilities could
be located. It is requested that the processing of this
permit application proceed while a location(s) for beach
access facilities are located. As soon as a suitable site(s)
is located for the beach access facilities, NCDOT will submit
design plans to The Division of Coastal Management for
approval.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting
that the proposed work be authorized under the appropriate CAMA
permit as indicated by the above mentioned activities. Enclosed
please find a permit application and permit drawings, as well as a
copy of the Environmental Impact Statement for this project. A
'f
processing fee has been requested from our Fiscal Unit, and will
be forwarded to your office as soon as possible. By copy of this
letter, we are also requesting issuance of 401 Water Quality
Certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management
and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit. If you have any
additional questions regarding this matter, please contact.Mr.
Doug Huggett of NCDOT's Environmental Unit at [phone].
S' c rely,
B J. 'Quin , P.E.
A ant anch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
BJO/dvh
cc:v istrict Engineer, COE
Mr. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR
Mr. Kelly Barger, PE, Project Management Unit
Mr. Don Morton, PE, Highway Design Branch
Mr. A.L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, PE, Structure Design
Mr. Dennis Pipkin, PE, Environmental Unit
Mr. N.L. Graf, PE, FHWA
Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental
Mr. David Foster, DEHNR
Mr. Jim Lee, PE, Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. D.J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
?
t
LOOON - AJOO

1
S? o?'-
?J1 ?Oy
,0,? ,?SS AS
LON
'too
to e
coelo
:s aQQ1'caaor ?CP+?P,
ert?t
c
alp
0a 1?S
Coast Gs-
>>??
???a?e Sa ?3 Zti9 ??cabor ??orl
CG
' Ce RNs
?'11a0tQ a?, INS oq Pad' gal
G fy,(Y?4
cam a
11•C tto L Qta
V08 *
?AO e?"s/at?oo
tiCGS ?A6 tee<?tta'?' ,U?S,oc ct??,S99
'110MI'ts fi
?. v,Sab?e 16-All
?? abbe a?ata°
% e fi atcOal
?a?:g
CGg. F Oc00r,0
?5?000 4 ????v??5
s
Ovvet r%0 o eA°?? al as c P,6
Sectxo ?Soc`?et? gate
?`scraty?at o cs
0
ge 5 P?? oC??stnct
1000N AJ0J
Division of Coastal Management
Field Offices
Raleigh Central Office
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
225 N. McDowell Street
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
[phone]
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, N.C. 28402
(919) 3434639
Elizabeth City
Route 6. Box 203
Highway 17 South
Elizabeth City. N.C. 27909
[phone]
---•;I------ --------------- -----------
Gates
Hertford
------------------
0, s+
Bertie y
Tyrrell
Washington
Washington ---
P.O. Box 1507 '
=--%
1424 Carolina Avenue Beaufort
Washington, N.C. 27889 Hyde
[phone]

Craven
Pamlico
.
'
C

.............

nslow
rtret
e
Ca
..... ' ,

Pender ,
Morehead City
'• P.O. Box 769
3411 Arendell Street
Morehead City, N.C. 28557

New
.00 [phone]
'• Hanover 1-800-682-2632
r
/ Wilmington
Brunswick 7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington. N.C. 28403
[phone]

OF
Dare

LOOON AdOO RECEIVED
JAV 3 1 1992
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, M ling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
a. Name ATTN: B.J. O'Quinn
N. C. Department o Transportation
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State N.6.
Zip 27611 Day phone [phone]
Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any)
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
New work
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
Public transportation
4 LAND AND WATER
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the CHARACTERISTICS
owner's name and address.
a. Size of entire tract n.a
b. Size of individual Iot(s) n / n
c, Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1568 e. Vegetation on tract
b. City, town, community, or landmark
North Topsail Beach
c. County Onslow
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Atlantic Ocean
L Man-made features now on tract
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation Y Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). Tian bri riaecz mror march t-13
reloca on of SR 1568
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Residential
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
SA
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? --Pls- If so, by whom?
3191
1000N - AdOO
i
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structuresproposed
b. Number of lots or parcels n / a
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.) _ n /_a
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
n/a
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? n / a
m. Water supply source n / a
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach accessways or provide new access.
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? n/ a
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
mean high water to be covered by impermeable or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops. covered in Section 7).
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
Asphalt
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management?
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities.
n/a
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Length Width Depth

Varies Varies

0.60 cre tot
I ....
: .
.

j. Have these facilities received state or local approval? Upland fill
n / a areas
k. Describe existing treatment fa c i ities.
I. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down"). _ sur_fa .P ri innff
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards n / a
c. Type of material n/a
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps, or other wetlands?
n/a
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
n
2 3/'91
1003N -- AdOJ
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area
n/a
g. Location of spoil disposal area
n/a
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? n / a
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? n /a
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas?
n/a
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high
water? no
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards n / a
m. Type of fill material non-plastic granular
n. Source of fill material
suitable borrow site
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? yes
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
See Plan View 0.60 acres total
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
Silt fences and storm water control
ditches as Type B stilling basin
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard rnadwsy rnnctr irti nn
equipment
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap n / a
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level n / a
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet n / a
d. Type of bulkhead material n/ s
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below
mean high water n /;;
f. Type of fill material n/ a
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to cant' out
the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings ara preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
that opportunity.
3/91
1000N - Ad00
Name
Address
i
Name
Address
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the QL day of
X
Lando r Ajthorit?ent
4 3/91
r
t
PROPERTY OWNERS
R-2801, SR 1568, Onslow County
Dorothy H. Smith
107 Cole Ave.
Raeford, NC 28376
Askews, Inc
Address Unknown
Nathan L. Newsome
Route 1
Freemont, NC 27830
John H. Whitley
1200 Raleigh Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
Roe Holding Co.
Tish Fredrick
12 Delwood Rd.
Darien, CT 06820
Golden Acres, Inc
1798 New River Inlet Dr
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Carol L. Rovner
5713 Glenwood Rd.
Bethesda, MD 20817
Delores M. Pittman
4308 Belwood Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
Newsome Farms, Inc.
Black Creek Rd.
Freemont, NC 27830
Lee Otis Pinno
1104 Raleigh Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
Ocean Bay Village of Topsail
Island, Inc.
PO Box 7
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Sandra M. Beck
3100 Avondale Ct.
Raleigh, NC 27613
Nelson B. Miller
Rt. 1, Emerald Isle
Morehead City, NC 28557
Fred R. Prisco
29 Lake Riconda Dr.
Ringwood, NJ 07456
f 1
C O S / N
I
lim I ?
a lta+tae
tetd.y Isg I
V i
! 1IIL
IJ Ifsr i:u ff1 `Y!
I rN Ise %j r
1 L MO1"
1. 44
ii7!
%b !et>t
I^!Gfi
I JO ?AS rJ ¢+ y " » r, SCALE
i \ ash UK
??? HOMY A t o 1 2 l A M IS
j ?. RIDG>< .. '
.1-M.- -¦ r: Stiff PITT ? ? _?,
`.-- - ChlrlpuaDln Catherine Lake '1- ? s KNhim •, •\? r _ --q I
s s retriever t 1 0 tN 258 $? L W
10 i; ? Jackson ill Silverdale
'! 4 2 1 ?• ^.ypress I i s C\
leek
Tin City 16 Mldwa Park at
/ r O
E - - Nlrs Il may reon 24 Qi
i 5 \ C\ ..,SIN fe vefona CAM' LE/EUNf
6 1 .9 MARINE aASE r
? Wathav ? qo' \ I
1 12
7 n.n
e \ Diaon ? _?//
% 50
Sri_
or T Olksttln FerI1a.Vea• Rnw Inlef
Irtls COfnlf \
Holly Ridte L awl ?1Npwb' a.«N A(re0
I E N . JIQTi
?I ` / l West Onslow Beach
Rp?.n./ a..n. A«Mr
5 Rocky Pant r lJ 1 TOPSAIL ISLAND
r
r ?jM Suit City
it 117
T ampstaa spw.a laa[N Attar
i \ 5
' 421 ITopsail Beach
is Castle I ` \ L h\ ^ONm• r wsod /nld
Scotts H II ?J
II' Mayne 1 S : f L. \ DId Toosod inter
N 'G1l H A 0 Y _R ,llcn Inlet
IL'gvia :'Wi mingto IJ -13 9 Mason Inlet
1 0 S 10 20 3
SCALE Of MILES
0 10 20 30 40 SCALE Of KILOMETERS
i
i
i
i
i
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS I
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568 1
SHEET ?_ OF 1(o ?
f
t ?

-10
5
If/ %J' /11
VAR. 2:1- 3:1 zz'
0

STORM WATER
CONTROL DITCH
(VAR. DITCH WIDTH)
MITIGATION AREA
0.75 AC.
NG
<VAR.=2:I -3:i
TYPICAL X-SECTION
WITH STORM WATER
CONTROL DITCHES
HORIZ. C-2-0
VERT. 1 5
I
E
1
i
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 2 OF l (o

uv
w ?
`t
O ~

w
a W
o
o
J
?

MATCH STA. 156 + 50 w
°

W `U 1
VA.
0
L)

u'
W
u- a cr. (- (
I
I a ? CL
I
J
N
w !1 z w w
1 M V) O T ? (n
1 0 w u? O?
U
/7//A

N
1 DENOTES FILL IN
MARITIME SHRUB SWAMP

I 1 ? N
1 Q ? ? ? I Q
J
1
J w a: V) a:
> AREA OF FILL IN
Q ?p a? a -i w MARITIME SHRUB SWAMP
MATCH STA. 154+00 0 Z 2 ac.
I 0
Q
U ?
50
0 50
i
'
SCAL: ?" - 50'

STA. 156 --00
_NG2k _
117 PROP. STORM
0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL
_HORIZ.1=20 DITCH
VERT. IV-51
154 155 156
10 PROP FINISH GRADE
ELEV = 7.0
5 NG
0
PROFILE VIEW
HORIZ. 1// 50"
VERT. 1"- 5
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 4 OF 1(o
?e
-ID 0

Q U
= 3
QZ f- ?i u.1
<
X Z
W111 J I
16 0

a

o- ?
I?
w

q U1
of <
L
73 -

? ? l u?

f
yr
E o `? j
f?

,o c.-
0
?x
i,! ; ,-
G
?
?v

PRo? CASE.
0 ?, -- --_
Imo'- u J Lu 1 n
W 1 ? "?

X? Z

O
1

. tw
-o
Ln
W rj "? til d
?? OR w
ST M ?
-= WAIE9
C(iN7IZGL cn
u 1N?1 l? - a
ul
2 a4
c°Li w w
o
?- w
0
LIMIT
_ a
M RR S !-t J? ?t1
u OF
d
o[ j-
?- r s
T? CC a 0
LL! CAL
? p
I-
s to .
C?r N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
a DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 5 OF i In
STA. IGI+c,v (,--PROP Rlw
MATCH STA. 156+50
7
! A
(i}}?
l?
I%

EXIT I
t??w I

? I
24,
'
I l
? ?xlsT
i 1=/45E . I

I ?

sTOKM WAIF R Vl
7• CONTRUL
y! DITCH
1 LI ht ?T OF lil
L? 13RASr11SH MAM"4 -

O
P0.o?
I
I ? ti
I I- - ? M I-?
5?oRMwA7F-R CONTROL OIT?M
I ?
I I ? EXIS-t R/1ti
:I >?X? ST ?11tSF...
LIMIT OF MARSH
i-
EhS? -?" a? 30S- PROP ?Z1w
O PRor ARSE.
0?1-pROP RVW I-
?lj
I
s
-)P M ATCh STA. 161+00
,STO lz m
wj?--T EP,
CaN71:ZOL
WE_I R
BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH MARSH

so S0
SC ALA. - `, (J
TRANSPORTATION
N.C. 7ION
OF HIGHWAYS
COUNTY
P034903 R-2801N OF SR 1568
E SHEET Co OF
O ? O
s

Z

M ;
I

N - `

13-
10-

N-
L
?
1

> a
tn . N
J

I 0 W ? O ?

oC d

Q
Q ul
?
H

i Z
Q m

o

x
44

O
>
w .. w Z
s to ul
s
z
d
w
a
w >
w ;
O
CD) ?
o

a
CL C .., a
d '
o Ln :O lr1

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET -T OF to
LIFT STATION
WETLANDS
EXIST ?W
OCEAN BAY VILLAGE
EXIST EASE.
A -E_ _-- _- - - E - - -
2 tb 18" RCP

-T?TTT EXIST EASE.
EXIST qW 1
! I STO?IM WATER CONTROL
I DITCH
f MAIL
BOX E
FILL IN ISOLATED MARSH
0.0 6 acres
SCgtC 1" = 50SPII>
50 0 SO

DENOTES FILL IN
ISOLATED MARSH
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION (T SR 1568
SHEET Q )F 11
io
to
i PROP FINISH GRADE
III =
0
PPOFILE VIEW
HORIZ. 1'- 50/
VERT. 1"! 5"
STA. 16 7 +20
10

I$' RCP
? NG
0
SECTION A -A
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
HOR I Z. 1 _ 20" DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- S ONSLOW COUNTY
VERT - 1 PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET ?1 OF 1?p
I ?- 50 0 SO
'-''1 ? C SCALD 1- 50la Co 3
I? a ! v
U
-- ?/ 1
om i=
jtw @)
{ - - 170
Q U
:7 U-) cr f
D: F-
L) Z
L
!? DENOTES FILL IN
ISOLATED MARSH
FILL IN ISOLATED MARSH
w 0.3 acres
<
E 0_ LLJ _
L) a.
? C O
E

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
-,, ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
C Q RELOCATION OF SR 1568
Q_ W SHEET o OF 1 Lv

STA. 168 * 26
-5
NG
0
3:1
II
SEC A-A
HOR Q. 1 -20VERT. 1 '-5X3:1
PROP. STORM
WATER CONTROL
DITCH
? STA. 170-? 30
1
-10
-5
NG ?,
O 18", RCP
SEC B -8
HORIZ. 1"=20'
VERT. I = 5

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET A OF \u

? O

W
J _
U

4 Z
i
o
{

i _

R
1 /

>
II
11
/ IV
'
O W
} - _ >
i /
04

W 4
i
t < I
i
0

(
Z N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
? - ONSLOW COUNTY
_ a PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
O O RELOCATION OF SR 1568
CL SHEET I Z OF llp

? t
40
.Yr
3
s
a `
? oa
e 0 N
? V W n. = I
? lJf I N ?
Fw,. W .0 U BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH MARSH
n: n
+ a w co
3 0
? w w
0
J
k j
SO 0 50SCAL? 1 = 50'
SL I -;-
t
I
ti
3
I
I
1
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
' ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
i RELOCATION OF SR 1568
i I SHEET ?''? OF

o p
I I
Ir
d lu
ul
o h
Itl
? v
oQ
cc CC
M q
lit
ul
o
N in
Dt

o
r?
0
w j
w
W
Z
L?
a
o °
?QT
IN
r -
O ? Q
(11
to
??n
p?
311
m
(n
IV
lu
ui

O •+
N O
E-4 Go co
oc to
F>4 N %0
t tn9
Ix 4 9 T-4
aI? a
tnC9H enEn
H. 0
x0 OU
w
HWU ch
° o
W
3 co0Q
'
0 E
-4
H
'
o
A
z
E4 r E-4 E,
w
° w?w
>
GN hwx
a 0Zcn

v a
Q (11
Z
?
O
F-. III

,Ln i II?
0 x Q
4t
{N

111
O

qt
t
zz
0 Itl

d
I
Ilt
0
M
lit
-.

?
O

p I
vz I
O

9
r -
T
r -
Id
111
? W
J
to 0
7
lit e
p1
NI
s
`tM
`a
WI
z
I
i
I
IY
11
wZ
\'1_ I I I
4 ! • a
O
N 30 18"RCP
f ? t
E Pt?O PE
15TORM, WATER AGOLDEN ACRES
]CONTRO DITCH STORM WATER
? CONTROL WEIR
f '
E X IST_ SR 1568 ?
EXIST R/W
i
s
,
,
f
`a
t?
FILL IN MARITIME WET GRASSLAND DENOTES FILL IN
0.04 acres 'MARITIME WET GRASSLAND
t
l
s
r
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
50Q 50 PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
?y RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SC AL 1 = 5 0 SHEET _15 OF I lD

° I
10
-PROP FIN ISH GRADE
tLy F
EV, 7.0
NG
0
PROFILE VIEW
'
HORIZ. IW:50
VERT. I- = 5"
STA. 201 +65
10
3, I r 3.1 STORM VIAT E R
IS"' RCP CONTROL WEIR
0
SECTION A-A
HCR IZ. 1'= 20"
VERT, IA/ = 5'
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET Ala OF. 1`o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
l,V\`3V DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[ P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON October 29, 1991 WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
SECRETARY HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
OCTn
Mr. Steve Tedder
DEHNR Division of Environmental Mangement;
Water Quality Section, Archdale Building
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
RE: SR 1568, from north of the relocated segment of SR 1568 to existing
SR 1568 north of Ship Watch Development, North Topsail Beach, Onslow
County State Project No. 9.8034903, T.I.P. No. R-2801
Dear Mr. Tedder:
This is to confirm the rescheduling of the meeting concerning the
above referenced project. The meeting has been changed from Thursday,
October 31, 1991 at 1:00 P. M. to Monday, December 9, 1991 at 10:00 A.M.
The meeting will be held in the same location as before, the North Topsail
Beach Fire Station (Directions are enclosed).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If there are any
questions concerning this meeting, please call Scott Stevens, Project
Planning Engineer, in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
L. Ward, P. ., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SAS/rfm
Enclosure
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
R

177 1 .
I/ r
TRAPS
SAY
\? RIVE,
STONES
Gop n.
E RlVa
?-
???' = Tr Sn..d• l' Alla
1 \? ?-+? ferry ?' \ ? 1
CH^OVfKX
ACRES
Y+nx. 13
177
PROJECT LIMITS
1311 ,.
rrs G? = w
710 Fire Station is located
in a big blue building on
r f t the sound side of NC 210.
Approximate location is
t'21 710 shown on map.
7.0 Ila y I rI l
? ti?l. :TO• 1J.
1
Ill/' ?? 1{
72 -j L=
Y UM 1144
`lip NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
uli n uu DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
,77. ^ BRANCH PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
.4 ' lw.q
4 0,\ GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP
k SR 1568
ONSLOW COUNTY
?\ "? `' ll7L r T.1. P. PROJECT R-2801
uu
lndw0 ' .h •d
::? •_. ^ 1. LJ 710
-?'? a 1 o miles 2 FI(; 1
' ull :.o

John, f
The meeting at North Topsail. Bach on the road relocation was
cancelled and rescheduled for I called the contact in
DOT Scott Stevens and told him.that we needed more information on
the wetlands impacts before we could justify sending someone from
Raleigh to the meeting. He sent the attached info. I'd like you
Ron or Cherri to look at it and decide if someone.from Raleigh
should attend. If yall think Jim G. or Dave Adkins can adequately
addess our concerns, let them know that we will not be going You
may want to sent them a copy of this. The important thing for us
is to find all the concerns. we can now so we want have to slow
down the EA when it is prepared.
thanks
Boyd
E!
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE (9b? U t? 19??

n
TO:
14 REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.

FROM:
?
?
? REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
I
.CJ
L.6
C/L/ C o "C.:3 /.+?
/ ?Cil?.' ! ? / J
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER 9UR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER f El
? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
,per f ,,1
e, luct citpfloxIll t; jacal/ayvs 0-;
-At wPi (G "? cF G f ,

leas?e call 3 :? -
R-2801
SR 1568 in North Topsail Beach
Onslow County
Summary of Wetland Impacts
In all, eight wetland areas will be variously impacted
by the proposed action. These areas can be described within
the context of five community types: Maritime Wet Grassland,
Wet Swale, Isolated Marsh, Brackish Marsh and Maritime Shrub
Swamp (See Figure 4). At this time, it is understood that
all but the Brackish Marshes will receive fills during
construction. The Brackish Marshes are to be spanned by
bridges.
Maritime Wet Grassland
Two widely separated wetland zones occur in the study
area with characteristics which can be assigned to this
community classification. One site can best be described as
an isolated pocket. Its hydrology may arise from ground
water, or periodic overwash from adjacent sites. Dominant
plants in the community include cotton shrub, wax myrtle,
pepper vine, hemp vine, sedges (Cvperus spp.), marshhay
cordgrass and rush (Juncus sp.). The second site is a low
lying area near the southern end of the study area. This
site is dominated by pennywort.
Wet Swale
This community consists of a narrow (6 feet wide) swale,
which lies perpendicular to the study area. Dominant plants
include black willow (Salix nigra) seedlings, rush, sedge,
lippia and pennywort.
Isolated Marsh
Two isolated marshes occur within the study area. The
origins of these marshes is speculative, but it is highly
likely that they were historically continuous with the
brackish water marsh system that is separated from these
wetlands by narrow upland strips of land. It is entirely
possible that both were part of a single "swash" system,
which ran between the lower beach and the backwaters of what
is now the Intracoastal Waterway. These drainages were
actually washes, which collected ocean water at high tide and
during storm surges and flowed seaward during falling tides.
Construction of the existing roadway, or an earlier facility
could have sealed the oceanward end of the system and later
development could have placed fills between the brackish
marsh and what remains of the system today. Such isolation
would result in the transition of the systems from
brackish/marine habitats to predominately freshwater habitats
that exist today.
Both marsh communities are dominated by emergent cattail
(Tvpha latifolia), black needle rush (Juncus roemerianus),
wax myrtle, peppervine, goldenrod, poison ivy, hemp vine,
eastern red cedar and cotton shrub and seashore mallow
(Kosteletzkva virginica). Soils are totally saturated and
standing water is abundant. At the perimeter of these two
marsh communities is a fringe of non-marsh habitat that
retains wetland characteristics. This fringe zone contains
wax myrtle, false nettle (Boehmeria cvlindrica), pepper vine,
cotton shrub, elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), goldenrod,
poison ivy, yaupon and creeping cucumber (Melothria pendula).
Brackish Marsh
Two Brackish Marsh communities lie within the study
area. They are both served by one or more channels which
communicate directly or indirectly with the back waters of
Stump Sound. The community nearest the southern terminus is
enveloped by Maritime Shrub Swamp to the north, east and
west.
The dominant vegetation in the marshes is cattails,
black needle rush and salt-reedgrass (Spartina cvnusoroides).
The northernmost marsh also contains duck potato (Sagittaria
falcata). Marsh fringes retain wetland character and support
a variety of vegetation including cotton shrub, wax myrtle,
marsh elder, seashore mallow, poison ivy, false nettle,
pepper vine, creeping cucumber. Glasswort (Salicornia sp.)
and sea ox-eye (Borrichia frutescens).
Maritime Shrub Swamp
This community lies adjacent to t
marsh and is dominated by wax myrtle,
stricta), sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia
willow and red bay (Persea borbonia).
poison ivy, pepper vine, cinnamon fern
royal fern (o. regalis), hemp vine an
and
Wetlands-
Maritime
Swale
Isolated
Brackish
Maritime
Wet Grassland
Marsh
Marsh
Shrub Swamp
Total
he southern Brackish
swamp dogwood (Corpus
virginiana), black
Groundcover includes
n (Osmunda cinnamomea)
false nettle.
4
0.2 % l
0.4
1.6?
0.4
2.6
Note: Values reported are in acres. Based upon impact widths
of 80- feet. Actual impacts will be less. () No fills are
expected in these communities.
41

P
00000
w > O H ? O O
t7i r? x a ? ? a d
> H
x x z tOq rn
> co
> H
C? Ll
() O
a C? v
;d H
L4 H
in O
z
A:
,
l
lid
7 `Y
1

.i

t
412
Y 4 .1
R
A
Z
J I _l
a
r'.
? •:ar'
/ f' Ir
f

..
PAZ
RUN
s4
?tD
W
J
m abd 'z
a fl z a
C/) z
M C/)
Q
0 m
C- 0
m Dorn>ya
--i C CO o to -?-# Z }
00
c ?'..
m z
7
- ? n:?
F ? ? ?? t F y ?
r r?'u ,? ?'' . x3r
4_ z y ,.s,
i -' i

STA7r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
October 14, 1991
Mr. Steve Tedder
DEHNR Division of Env. Mgmt.
Water Quality Section, Archdale Bldg.
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Tedder:
ARLEY, JR., P.E.
`ADMINISTRATOR
. -o
RE: SR 1568, from north of the relocated segment of SR 1568 to existing
SR 1568 north of Ship Watch Development, North Topsail Beach, Onslow
County, State Project No. 9.8034903, T.I.P. No. R-2801
This is to request that you or a member of your staff attend a meeting
concerning the above referenced project. This 1.3 mile section of SR 1568,
which is threatened by the Atlantic Ocean, is the last remaining section of
proposed SR 1568 improvements. This project was scheduled to be designed
and constructed by a private developer before December 31, 1991. In July
of 1991, no work had been started on this section of SR 1568. Therefore,
the NCDOT Board of Transportation added this project to the Transportation
Improvement Program. Because of the threat posed by the ocean, this
project is on a very tight schedule. For this reason, a combined State
Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact is being prepared
by the Planning and Environmental Branch of the NCDOT.
In order to coordinate the project with the appropriate environmental
agencies, an onsite meeting has been scheduled for October 31, 1991 at 1:00
P. M. at the North T_oosail Bea h Fire ration (directions are enclosed).
This meeting will provide a chance for environmental agencies to comment on
the proposed action.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If there are any
questions concerning this meeting, please call Scott Stevens, Project
Planning Engineer, in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SAS/wp
Enclosure
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

., .I / tars I

Pita "bw g
! Ric Nands Belgrade
FOREST , t \
. j
Cathmne 4--
?

henna lake KNlun - ,?"? t
0 -N zse 51 L ` W
+ Jacksomill*'
' Siberdale?
f 5 P
? 16 I ?
I Mlowa Park M en
?
?
t
Maws 17l
`
may N _

,
G
reen?
Ru
1
Vfrona
\
• Swan
o G
2
CAMP rE/EUI.rE
'A MAelr?E YSE ir•....oaf'
•••?ey, Roq
•••• 1 17I Bear /n/er•
\ Di son
t
, In/e1 ,
••
•? •. ` 50 E I
r b
?
••
••?••
1 olkslon Sn s
I
Far ,V Itjvr Inlet
•?•
a.ybAm...
e
J ?

'

.• I
I s•
W Onslow Beach
&
•
•• ' - A-
SAI ISI.V,o ••
r
•
•
•
Crop h.
\ .: f G d•r Pant
172
,
.
J .
;
J
V - TRAPS
BAY
FR v' w Lmcdm RIV!
-
.8A r
?I"
ry
I 1

-? F-M r
? `. CMADWKX "
F' Q
ACRES 111-5
PROJECT LIMITS
POP. ¢:rii •S
Is
!]L1
;Y.<'
?'.. 10 1771 w.. ? /
1711 ? It.'t
PAS •`
Gam w
7ID ?" ' Fire. Station is located
""' Ilk in a big blue building on
1 f
r the sound side of NC 210.
Approximate location is
"" 7lJ f
.,5 shown on map.
I I
lll/
t t,I LIU e a 177E .:,
!71t a :. !? r
Fdk
11p1•` • ' Imo, - ?I \ .1 1'
»u ?' t 'a Im
lni
T
h-
,

..
'I r
lownq . 1-u
-
liil ,

task ..
? r • 7 I
JAL . I
tin A?a.rit b.,

e"`S?A7E°
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201 ??4
RALEIGH 27611-5201 s!.
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
January 31, 1992
MEMO TO: John Dorney
FROM: Doug Huggett ?-47?
Environmental Unit'
DIVIpION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIA . MARLEY, JR., P.E.
S Ty?, WAY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Onslow County, Relocation of approximately 1.3
miles of SR 1568, beginning 2.8 miles northeast
of NC 210 and ending approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet, State Project
9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
Enclosed please find a set of design plans which provide
specific data on the drainage ditches proposed for the above
mentioned project. If you have any questions regarding these
plans, please contact Mr. Max Price of NCDOT's Hydraulics
Unit at [phone].
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
s
SEVEQ
puw
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
January 29, 1992
Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
ATTENTION: Mr. John Parker
Dear Sir:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
n>
--e m M
? m ov
? v N
SUBJECT: Onslow County, Relocation of approximately 1.3
miles of SR 1568, beginning 2.8 miles northeast
of NC 210 and ending approximately 1.2 miles
southwest of the New River Inlet, State Project
9.8034903, TIP No. R-2801.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation plans to
relocate 1.3 miles of SR 1568 in North Topsail Beach. This
section of SR 1568 is the last section of the proposed SR
1568 improvements. The need for this relocation is evident
due to the danger present during storms and high tides. This
section of roadway is the only link to the mainland for
approximately 2300 housing units, and is frequently washed
over during storms or high tides, presenting a maintenance
problem and a hazard for those who use the roadway.
NCDOT examined several alternatives to the proposed
action. One alternative examined was to improve the
facilities on existing location. This alternative would be
possible, but would not provide a solution to the threat
caused by beach erosion in the area. Therefore this
alternative was not recommended. A "no build" option was
also investigated. This alternative would avoid some
negative impacts of the proposed project, but would not solve
the problems associated with road closures due to erosion and
high waters. Consequently, this alternative was not
considered feasible. A third alternative examined was to
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

postpone the proposed action. Due to the danger presented by
the presence of the ocean, postponement of the implementation
of the proposed relocation was not considered a prudent
course of action.
The proposed action will lead to the unavoidable fill of
0.20 acres of maritime shrub swamp habitat, 0.36 acres of
isolated marsh habitat at two sites, and 0.04 acres of
maritime wet grassland, totaling 0.60 acres of wetland loss.
It appears that every opportunity has been explored that
would allow for avoidance of wetland habitat. Based on the
objectives of the proposed westward relocation, limited new
alignment opportunities exist. The extent of wetlands in the
area do not allow for avoidance of wetland habitat, and any
relocation further west would increase wetland impacts.
Realignment opportunities are further limited by the presence
of large numbers of occupied residences throughout the area.
In order to minimize impacts, NCDOT will bridge two areas of
brackish marsh habitat, resulting in an estimated savings of
1.6 acres of this valuable coastal wetland habitat. Best
Management Practices (BMP's) will also be used to minimize
possible impacts to wetland habitat.
Mitigation for the loss of 0.60 acres of wetland habitat
will take the form of wetlands creation in longitudinal
storage or retention ditches at all practicable sites within
the proposed 80 foot right-of-way. It is expected that
wetland hydrology will occur at the bases of these ditches.
It is also a reasonable assumption that appropriate wetland
vegetation (ie. cattails, sedges, rushes) will become
naturally established in these ditches. Successful
implementation of NCDOT's proposed mitigation plan will lead
to the creation of 0.75 acres of wetland habitat. Due to the
disturbed nature of much of the wetlands habitat that will be
impacted by this project, NCDOT feels that our mitigation
plan adequately replaces the functions of the lost wetlands.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will
also be required to provide regional public access
facilities. These facilities will include a total of 326
parking spaces. The Department is in the process of
identifying potential sites where the access facilities could
be located. It is requested that the processing of this
permit application proceed while a location(s) for beach
access facilities are located. As soon as a suitable site(s)
is located for the beach access facilities, NCDOT will submit
design plans to The Division of Coastal Management for
approval.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting
that the proposed work be authorized under the appropriate CAMA
permit as indicated by the above mentioned activities. Enclosed
please find a permit application and permit drawings, as well as a
copy of the Environmental Impact Statement for this project. A
t
processing fee has been requested from our Fiscal Unit, and will
be forwarded to your office as soon as possible. By copy of this
letter, we are also requesting issuance of 401 Water Quality
Certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management
and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit. If you have any
additional questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr.
Doug Huggett of NCDOT's Environmental Unit at [phone].
S' c relfy,
B ' J. 'Quin , P.E.
A ant anch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
BJO/dvh
cc• District Engineer, COE
V r. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR
Mr. Kelly Barger, PE, Project Management Unit
Mr. Don Morton, PE, Highway Design Branch
Mr. A.L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, PE, Structure Design
Mr. Dennis Pipkin, PE, Environmental Unit
Mr. N.L. Graf, PE, FHWA
Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental
Mr. David Foster, DEHNR
Mr. Jim Lee, PE, Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. D.J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer

a
LOGON - nd0:D
I
00? ??ON
?o9???P
gT
v???epts o
Nets
GP>
a44?'ea?°r
't''ofi
? event p?c<<
51
Coate S?3P,1
CC'
???aSe Sa ?3 '9
11 CG cQ???a 115 4 ok paR''?s atea>
rtt ?,? 4ta'
?
Mpg ??A
?Ogsa`'°r>>S?
ti?CGS -Vl%6" ate<?cta't' P? ot c`o??gg9
abie?i ,44 Q?G? dog ate its P?
?aai? S 16 ?? ?teA able ??,a
GG acv°n i? to"' ecsa? ateral
?1`t?s, ?e4?• ??ies°J`C?
G• ? i
Cotes c`?ook
ptb NOV* c?geA°?e?ar-sate" ?,et
S ?,sG?atye
e e?'
fatootC? eel
:ot° onQ?` of
Sew Pfiy ?? ct .
1.000N Adoo
Division of Coastal Management
Field Offices
Raleigh Central Office
N.C. Department of Environment
Health & Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687 """- --------------- 225 N. McDowell Street % Gates
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 ;
[phone]
Hertford 'O
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - O S
Wilmington District o ;
P.O. Box 1890 Bertie `?y?•--?
Wilmington, N.C. 28402
[phone]
Washington
P.O. BOX 1507
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington,N.C. 27889
[phone]
Craven
,
Pamlico
,
,
,
- -------
Pender
New
• Hanc
Brunswick
sow ,_..-
•.? Carteret
Morehead City V
P.O. Box 769
3411 Arendell Street
Morehead City, N.C. 28557
[phone]
1-800-682-2632
Wilmington
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, N.C. 28403
[phone]
Elizabeth City
Route 6, Box 203
Highway 17 South
Elizabeth City, N.C. 27909
[phone]
,•.
?rG
C*I
Washington Tyrrell
Beaufort
=-
Hyde
01

17
1.000N Ad00
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-.
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
a. Name ATTN: B.J. O'Quinn
C. Department o Transportation
Address _P_0. Box 252M
City Raleigh State N S
Zip 27611 Day phone ( 919) 733-9770
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
New work
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
Public transportation
Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any)
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
4 LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. Street address or secondary road number
b. City, town, community, or landmark
North Topsail Beach
C. CountyOnslow
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction?
_? es
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Atlantic Ocean
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). Twn hri HnnQ over marsh with
relocation of SR 1568
a. Size of entire tract n In
b. Size of individual lot(s) N a
c, Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract
f. Man-made features now on tract none
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation _x Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Residential
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
SA
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract?. If so, by whom?
3/91
1000N - AdOD
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structuresproposed_ n/a
b. Number of lots or parcels n/ a
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.) n/ a
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
n/a
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? n / a
m. Water supply source n- /,q
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach accessways or provide new access.
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? n/a
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
mean high water to be covered by impermeable or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops. covered in Section 7).
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, Access channel
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces. (ULW) or (NWL)
Asphalt
Boat basin
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan Other (break-
been submitted to the Division of Environmental water, pier.
Management? boat gyp,
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste rock jetty)
water treatment facilities. n/a Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval? Upland fill
n / a areas
Length Width Depth

Varies Varies f Y

0.60 a cre tot ' .
t
..A:.

b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
k. Describe existing treatment facilities. ities. water level in cubic yards n / a
c. Type of material n/ a
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of swamps, or other wetlands?
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
n / a
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down")._ surfs P runnff e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
2
3/'91
1000N -- AdOO
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
n/a feet n/a
g. Location of spoil disposal area
n/a
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? n/a
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Type of bulkhead material n./ a
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below
mean high water n/ s
f. Type of fill material n/ a
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance?_ _n/a
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas?
n/a
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high
water? no
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards n / a
m. Type of fill material non-plastic granular
n. Source of fill material suitable borrow site
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? yes
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
See Plan View 0.60 acres total
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
Silt fences and storm wa .Pr .on .rnl
ditches as Type B stilling hasin
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?_ Standard roadway rnnstructi nn
equipment
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap n/ a
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level n/a
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
12 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
that opportunity.
3/91
1000N - Ad00
Name
Address SPP a .tarhpd list
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Name
Address
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the QL day of
or
4 3/'91
PROPERTY OWNERS
R-2801, SR 1568, Onslow County
Dorothy H. Smith
107 Cole Ave.
Raeford, NC 28376
Delores M. Pittman
4308 Belwood Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
Askews, Inc
Address Unknown
Nathan L. Newsome
Route 1
Freemont, NC 27830
John H. Whitley
1200 Raleigh Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
Roe Holding Co.
Tish Fredrick
12 Delwood Rd.
Darien, CT 06820
Golden Acres, Inc
1798 New River Inlet Dr
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Carol L. Rovner
5713 Glenwood Rd.
Bethesda, MD 20817
Newsome Farms, Inc.
Black Creek Rd.
Freemont, NC 27830
Lee Otis Pinno
1104 Raleigh Rd.
Wilson, NC 27893
Ocean Bay Village of Topsail
Island, Inc.
PO Box 7
Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
Sandra M. Beck
3100 Avondale Ct.
Raleigh, NC 27613
Nelson B. Miller
Rt. 1, Emerald Isle
Morehead City, NC 28557
Fred R. Prisco
29 Lake Riconda Dr.
Ringwood, NJ 07456
1 ?
STONES y?/y
BAY
r
I?
'+i r per- f -? l
s.
!!!
I
Im
ii)) b
i?
?.? RAVER
?r-?? en 1 l
0
Early Im
,
Q CKADWKX
ACRES .?
?a, a
lldi. :.
c ISO... y??

i

1
14t
Itle
' Vr
im
J:u
a?
li? rlsia
rEM
a
.a
t
Itt:
?r I
ls?idp
PC i
i
R/YER war
PR TECH
I
it
I
i
I
I
I
II
1 0 ?? ' n ytltn r7?. ;
- LI:I. flit t Merril ~a
Lt? FT1 tl? l '?j - iro
. .a .t iltt ..
!4E
Imo` Jd? so PAS r3 c , SCALE
HOLLY • ltff t o 1 t 3 a Amm
j RIUG?I
¦ r: suaa nyr
' 2 Chinquapin Catherine Lake 5 Kellum
5 L reenever O tN 258 L •NV
10 ?; + Jackson ii Silverdale
2
1 Ti City w e k t 1 16 /? 5 Midwa Park C at
Haws 11 iney een- 24
, I
i lard I Run y SwonYl
S Verona 1 ?• CAMP IEJEUNE
1\
I ? \ ` ?? ?u.III ?+qo r 6 ? 49 MARINE aASf ?'omm i
WatMy
1a 2 Rrvrune \ Dixon
1
I I 'p ?
BurQaw'. ?? 50 + 1 b
? o
rrds Corner t olkstonRnw Inlet
E I N Holly Ridge E ,oJ R.9-0 a.«h Ac-
? I / L ateiJ ?
j / I West Onslow Beach
6 1 ` - R.e.uwi a.xh A-
Rocky Point % 11 / rOPSAII ISLAND _
Surf City
33 11) I ampstea a Q R.9-Of a.,.% Amer
s
421 , Topsail
1S Castle l r N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
I ONeu/ Topsait inlet d i
I' Hayne SoottsHill y Q DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS i'
9 1 s; N??.c r. ? Old Topsoil Inlet
N HA O
Ruh Inlet ONSLOW COUNTY
6h°WIInIngtO 11 J? PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
* Inlet
9 h" zo - "- 3 - ---- RELOCATION OF SR 1568
I SCALE of Muss SHEET _L OF ?1(D
0 10 20 30 40 to SCALE OF KILOMETERS
y
-10
5

V, c
?NG
<VAR.=2.1 -31
VAR. 2 -1-3-1 0

STORM WATER
CONTROL DITCH
(VAR. DITCH WIDTH)
MITIGATION AREA 0.75 AC,
TYPICAL X-SECTION
WITH STORM WATER
CONTROL DITCHES
HO R I Z • 1"-2-0'
N . C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
VERT. 1??- 5" DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 2 OF l (o
Z
w Q
cr-
4 vl Z

o a a f
~
J
w ~
MATrW OZTe irr .rte, 0 2
?0?? ? a? O
I
O W v
V) 09 11 /1
W
jr a a a a cr
LL a
J
N a
w ?J ~ w w
o w ?? o2
a w '- t) a
55( w w 3a
U
F-
DENOTES FILL IN
MARITIME SHRUB SWAMP
i
w m It Li
Q in
J w w
U Z O ! U
a > a AREA OF FILL IN
a a
cr a? J uJ MARITIME SHRUB SWAMP
MATCH STA. 154+00 o Z- 0.2 ac.
>
Q o
v ?
50 0 30'
SCAM 1= 50'
STA. 156 +00
10
3 , ?ti F3; ?
5 NGy
r' = PROP. STORM
0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL.
HORIZ,1'-20 DITCH
VERT, lV-51
154 155 ' 156
10 PROP FINISH GRADE
ELEV = 7.0
5 N-z
f--0
PROFILE VIEW
HORIZ. I// 50'
VERT. 1"- 5'
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 4 OF 110
STA. PRvP R/W
16 I + ?v ?-
o

Qs ?
u-L
X W w ?y
16 d

u
l N

?3 a

ct W
I O N
Lu

I x

yr
j

f
?j1
x iv J

C
O ?
Z

A d ??
v
MATCH STA
O
ST
RM
- ` WATER N
CUtv?i??? ?
WE{ K

0

Q
LIMIT ~
OF MRRS!-{ m

?o
_o
L
w
U
a.
-+I
oc y
X ` ce L?
Ulm
O
In "" - _. _. _. .. -- -- ... _... -. .. ...
?- r N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
4 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
O PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 5 OF Iln
..........
PROP CASE.
O O
----
? L
' 0 C t
i ? 2.1? zw-- x
I
?- EXEST
--1-?-PC
24 i I cn i
-x rp
M-
o I ao - -?-
STORM WA7ER CONTROL D ITZPf
p -? 1 p
ct
j r -sTOPMWA
C0? R LrER I V) I2/w
V7 PITCH
1pl,IMIT OF u.[ Ul
a 113RASH ISH MAM14 .I I ?F-xl ST RASE.
t LIMIT OF MARSH
( PA??, 4-
0-1 30' PREP RJw
w 'w
SE.
I
VIATCti STA. 161+00
5TO R M
WA--t E R
COIJI RUL
VVEI R
BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH MARSH
50 0 SO
Sc ALA = ` 0
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET (o OF 1ln
? Z
i 4?
C ,
N - ` to - ev
? j
I 0 J °, 0 x
of d
r U W ?
I a <
t W
It
p
i
ut w 2 ° .. o
= w
w a
> m
i Vv1 - V i
?I W
4 N ? In
F `
r ll-
' a
u! - o .
av rz ac
n a
a_ m J
cc vi
I
o ?n 's0 ? l11
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET '1 OF J D
LIFT STATION
WETLANDS
EXIST t14
i
OCEAN BAY VILLAGE
EXIST EASE.
2. C, 18" RCP
-L2-
T ? T EXIST
EXIST ?/ S EASE..
STOP M HEATER CONTROL
DITCH
? I
C:]
MAIL
BOX E
f
FILL IN ISOLATED MARSH
0.06 acres

5F
DENOTES FILL IN
ISOLATED MARSH
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
50 0 50 ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
SCALD 1_ 50RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET $ .)F 1l
10 Qo
EL
PROP FINISH GRADE

0
PROFILE VIEW
HOR I Z. 1 50?
V E RT . 1' 5
10
STA. 167+20

0
18RCP _
? NG
SECTION A -A
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
HOR I Z. 1 _ 20? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
V E R T, i - 51, ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET q OF \?p
i
o LL,
v ;
2
I oco
coo
0 i
C(f re)
?f
1
J
7

r
Q
.d
t
s0
w
U)
s
{ w
U Q:
? C O
CL
n ill !?'IT.. -
?cc c:
L ,Gil w
.of t- 3:
?o
50 0 50
'i
Sr- 1" - 50,

1

W

c
`-
1
N p

Z
CL O

170
DENOTES FILL.IN
:ISOLATED MARSH
It
FILL IN ISOLATED MARSH
0.3 acres
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
Q?uj PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
C ¢
a W SHEET o OF 1 Lo
STA. 168 * 26
10
i f,3: .l
f?
I
Zill NG ?,\,? :.11
i
0 SEC A-A WATER CONTROL
s HOR iZ. I -20D ITCH
VERT. i°-5' 1
STA. 170?30
i
f
}
}
Ho
r NGti
18° RCP
SEC B -8
HOR IZ. 1 "-20
VERT. I : 5

'N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET OF \lv
5
- ?? PROP. STORM

i
i
- ?i
O

w

u

-z

E /
i
/
R
i
Q9 LLJ
O
`
> Lr)
IV F-
y
cr
LL
O w
_ >
s
i
1 /
M

W
i
0
e :
`
v
/

z N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
= DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
?-
U / PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801

O
a:
u)
/ O RELOCATION OF SR 1568
a SHEET 11 OF llv
! 1
i -l
? Jti\
?S
V
i
CC j
lU Q
I -Ja
°
o
? a
F- ?
? o
U h
w
t !- w
s .-f
0
mo a
N
i
t
Lu
sti 1

i
I
{ ? a

1 a
%440

a =

.o U BRIDGE OVER BRACKISH MARSH
w U
n
a
o
m
w Q ti

D
+
50 0 50
I SCALD : 1" = 50+
i
?N
ti
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET \'3 OF
n
S
d
a Q
W
? o h
W ?
? v
O Q
Cc CC
M n to
0
N
O
0

N
O
i M
0
0 0
I
Ir
lu
UI
III
III
pl
III
GI
(II
Z
?
O
? III
V

? I III
XQ
Ip

iu

III
GI

pl
(1(
III

Iit
(u
?
? I
V3 O
° VN 0
I ;?
{.1 I

to
'
?11

? ? III
r
c
uj j 111
N w

W III
r

cl:
O w IN

`-
Qc
a
cc
, {1
1

? ul

I?1
W
J
{h O
7

9
n -

u
UI
i

r -
ni'
4i
14
U
wZ
T
= In p
z
o r4
H O

aW
E+ >+ N?
1 in 9
IX

x ON O U
O
E4 W U ci
°
i3: O0
<1
oz? •H-
0 E-4

E+ C z E1 U E+
W
° W
> SW
°G
aau
U
a
z

E -R-W- - L-6,3-E-N

O
N 3918 RCP
SSTORM WATER) L-1qA,\G0LD ACRES
CQNTRQ DITCH STORM WATER s
CONTROL WEIR
€
F
i
E X IST_ SR 1568
t
R
k EXIST. R/yv
i
t
1
j?
FILL IN MARITIME WET GRASSLAND DENOTES FILL IN 4t
0.04 acres 'MARITIME WET GRASSLAND
i
i
50 0 50
SCALD 1" = 50,
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET 1!5 OF IlD
r

N
10 ON 0
? n PROP FINISH GRADE
NG
I0
PROFILE VIEW
HORIZ. I"=50VERT. I" = 5"
STA. 201 +65
10
STORM WAT E R
3?1? r3? I
18' RCP CONTROL WEIR
NG y-
0
SECTION A-A
HCR IZ, ('= 20"
VERT, 1 = 5?
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT 9.8034903 R-2801
RELOCATION OF SR 1568
SHEET ?lg OF 1\O