Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020451_CORRESPONDENCE_20030812NPDES DOCUNENT SCANNING COVER SKEET 0 NPDES Permit: NC0020451 West Jefferson WWTP Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Correspondence Instream Assessment (67b) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: August 12, 2003 0 Z`hia documaxxt i; printecl an reuae pmper - igma re a my o�]Mte=st C>rm the reYerae aide o�o� w A r�9Q� r E', Kenneth 'T. NicFadycrt Town of West Jefferson Post Office Box 490 Wcstjefferson, NC 28694 Dcar NPD1".S Pertnittcc: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G, Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality August 12, 2003 Subject: NPDES Permit NCO020451 i\lerairt Requirement 1 PA Method 1631 / Additional Information \Vcst Jefferson WW'I'I' Ashe County In a previous letter elated !'August 30, 2002, }'our facility was notified of being subject to a new low-level mercury analysis (F PA Method 1631) for NPDI S monitoring requirements beginning September 1, 2001 The notification letter was mailed to 155 subject facilities. Since that mailing, the Division has participated in several tNfercury 1631 Workshops to provide the regulated community with information on the new analytical requirements and clean sampling rccomnlendarions. Based on comments received at these workshops, the following items are intended to clarify certain NPDE;S requirements for the 155 subject facilities. 1. MerCLIEY SampliriV and Compliance: It is recommended that facilities collect some effluent samples for Method 1631 analysis prior to the 9/l/2003 effective date, in order to gain experience with the recommended clean sampling techniques as well as the analysts requirements. NPDES compliance will be judged using the new method results beginning 9/ 1 /2003. 2. What Samples arc Subject to Method 1631: Beginning 9/1/2003, all effluent samples collected for mercury From the subject facility are requircd to perform low level mercury analysis. This includes effluent samples collected for any of the following requirements: a) monitoring specified in tour "4ffluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements" page of your NPDI_.S permit; b) monitoring specified in your NPDIrS Pretrcatment Short 'Perm Monitoring Plan (STMP) or Long 'term Monitoring Plan (L'l NIP); and c) NPDL:S permit renewal requirements. The effluent samples must be analyzed by a laboratory certified by the Division for !Method 1631, and effluent results must be submitted with the applicable monthly Discharge \tonic>ring Report (D N1R). 3. drab Sampling_ The Environmental Protection Agency (I PA) currently recommends that mcrcury samples for Method 1631 analysis he collected as grab samples, since automatic composite samplers may he more subject to contamination. 'Therefore, the Division will allow permittees to collect single grab samples directly into Iab- provided sample hottics for permit re:cluirements, even though tl,c NPI)EIS permit Inay specify "composite" samples for mcrcurv. 'Ihc grab sample must be representative of the discharge. 4. Laboratory- Reporting Level: Based on the Division's review of commercial laboratories currently performing \Method 1631, It majnrity of labs were reporting a minimum level of quantitation (NIL) of either 1.0 ng/l or less. The Division will requite an NIL, of 1 ng/l beginning 9/ I /2003, which is considered reasonable and economically achievable. 5. Field Blank Collection: NIcthod 1031 requires that a minimum of one field blank accompany each set of samples collected From the same site at the same time. The fide] blank is used to identify contamination during sample collection and transport activities. I F mercury is present in the Field blank at levels that would compromise rchable measurement ()f mcrcun in the wastewater- sample, you should assume that the effluent sample .vas contaminated during; collection or transit, and you will need to eliminate any source of contamination that has been identified. The per-niirtec shall report all effluent saml7le results On the applicable monthly Di1IR. If a field blank fails to meet quality control criteria, the permittee should note that fact in the IINIR Comments Section, and append the lab sheet for that field blink. For those: facilities sampling for mercury under a limited monitoring frequency (quarterly or less, such as Pretrcatment I : NIP/Sl NIP monitoring), S'ou must resamplc if the Field blanks are outside duality control criteria. I-lo.vever, For those facilities with more frcqucnt effluent nxxaitoring rcquircmcnts ♦* .r N. C. Division of Water Duality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-7015 Agi. Customer Service 1 800 623-7748 NCDEIMR NPDE:S Mert.ury Rcrluiretnenk Ptgc; 2 of 2 (i.c., monthly- or more frequent), resampling is not required it field blank quality control criteria are not achieved for s given sample event. Rcfcr to Mcthod 1631, Revision 1_: (Section 9A.5.2- Quality Control- Ficld Blanks), for specific quality Control criteria regarding field blank acceptability and effluent sample reliability. 6. Field Blank Subtraction: Mcthod 1631 provides for subtraction of field blanks (provided they meet quality control criteria defined above) from the effluent sarnplc; result if deemed appropriate bti- a regulatory agency. Upon rcvieu the Division will not allow field blank subtraction from cfflucnt Samples for reporting purposes. Based on a recent study using Method 1631 for wastewater samples collected at 38 wastewater treatmenr plants, Field blank concentrations were generally bcic:rw the method gttarttitation level. Therefore, beginning 9/ 1 /2003, the permittcc shall report the result Of the effluent sample as provided by the certified lab, without field blank subtraction, on the monthly D11IR submission. In the event of a mercury limits violation, the pul-nittcc retains the option to request remission of any penalty. if the permittec believes that the violation resulted from back�;r()und contamination its indicated by the field blank, the permittcc will need to document that facr with field blank duality control clata. 7. Sample Preservation/ 1-1 c)ldinV "Times: Samples for total mcrcury analysis by Method 1631 mast be collected in tightly -capped flUoropolymer or glass bottles and preserved with BrCI or HCI within 48 hours of sample Collection, The time to sample preservation may be'extcncicd to 28 clays if a sample is oxidized in the sample bottle. SampiCs must be analyzed within 90 days of sample collection. 1 f yotl have any questie?ns about the contents of this letter, please contact the applicable Division staff listed below: tNiereury Method: Certified Labs for Nlethod 1631 NPDfS Permitting: NPD11S Compliance: NPD1S Pretreatment. Roy Byrd l'rccl Bone Tom Belnick Vanessa 1M.-Inuel Dana Folley Sincerely, 919-733-3908,-extension 213 919-733-3908, extension 273 919-733-5083, extension 543 919-733-5083, extension 532 919-733-5083, extension 523 Original Signed By David A Goodrich Alan W. Klimek, P.1'i. cc (hardcopy): CLANC, c/o Lew flicks, Environmental Chemist Inc., 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 DWQ Rcgional Offices, Water Quality CC (cm;iil): F'PA Kcgiun 4, Alaclolyn 1]ominy, iNlarshsdl I-tvatt M Q Water Quality Section; RCgIonal Office Supervisors 13WQ Laboratory Section; Steve Tedder, Larry rlusicy, f im McN,er, Roy Byrd, Fred Bone DWQ M(Alding/TIMDL, Aliclhclic W(.)Olfolk DWQ NPDES Compliance, Vancssa Manual 1)W() Pretreatment Unit DWQ NPDES Unit NC Leas ue of \lunicipalitics, rlriita Watkins NC labs Certified for MC1110d 1631c 0�0� vN A769 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources > Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director 0 r Division of Water Quality August 30, 2002 Subject: NPDES Mercury Requirement Implementation of EPA Method 1631 Dear NPDES Permittee: Mercury continues to be a water quality concern throughout North Carolina. Fish consumption advisories and impaired stream segments as a result of elevated mercury levels have been issued for several locations. NPDES permittees have worked with the state to reduce potential risks from this pollutant, including tasks associated with collecting and reporting more accurate data. The most commonly used laboratory analysis for total mercury (EPA Method 245.1) has a method detection level of 0.2 ug/l, while the current water quality standard is an order of magnitude lower at 0.012 ug/l. Thus, true compliance with the water quality standard could not be judged. A more recently approved laboratory method (EPA Method 1631) should produce a detection level below the water quality standard, which would allow the Division to assess potential water quality impacts from dischargers more accurately. Therefore, this letter serves as notification to your facility that effective September 1, 2003, you will be required to begin using EPA Method 1631 for subsequent low-level mercury methods approved by EPA in 40 CFR 136) when analyzing for total mercury. Your facility is subject to this new requirement because either 1) your facility has a current total mercury limit in its NPDES permit that is <0.20 ug/1; or 2) your facility has limited instream dilution (i.e., the instream waste concentration (IWC) is >6%). This requirement complies with 15 A NCAC 2B.0505(e)(4), which requires that "test procedures must produce detection and reporting levels below the permit discharge requirements." Mercury Laboratory Analysis - EPA Method 1631 On June 22, 1999, the US EPA approved a new analytical method (EPA Method 1631) for measuring very low concentrations of mercury in water. Subsequent revisions to Method 1631 include Revision C (current approved method) and Draft Revision D (scheduled for promulgation in October 2002). Method 1631 has a minimum level of quantitation of 0.0005 ug/1 (0.5 ng/1), which is 400-times more sensitive than Method 245.1. The new method requires a clean laboratory environment which generally requires some lab retrofitting; thus, many permittees will likely contract a commercial lab to perform the analysis. Based on data compiled by Ohio EPA, commercial labs that are currently analyzing for EPA Method 1631 charge between $50-90 per sample, with turnaround times ranging from 5-28 days. Currently there is one commercial lab certified by North Carolina for EPA Method 1631. However, it is anticipated that several additional labs will also offer this analysis in the future as the demand for this method increases. When selecting a lab to perform low level mercury analyses, the permittee should review the lab's performance, experience, and reliability with the method, as well as cost considerations. Attachment A provides additional information on this method. Mercury Clean Sampling Techniques - EPA Method 1669 The greatest risk of contaminating the wastewater sample for tow -level mercury analysis is during the sample collection effort. Thus, those facilities subject to EPA Method 1631 will also need to evaluate clean sampling recommendations provided in EPA Method 1669. Attachment A provides highlights on this method. NPDES Compliance All mercury monitoring data submitted to the Division will be reviewed for compliance with current effluent limits. If the permit contains monitoring only, the new method must still be used, and the need for a permit limit will be evaluated at a later date by comparing a statistical evaluation of the effluent data with the water quality standard and corresponding allowable effluent concentration. Therefore, the potential problem of sample contamination cannot be overemphasized, since it could result in, NPDES effluent limits for total mercury, increased monitoring costs, and possibly unnecessary violations. All data submitted to the Division for NPDES compliance monitoring requirements are the responsibility of the permittee. Therefore, facilities subject to this new method are strongly encouraged to begin evaluating sampling methods and commercial labs before the deadline date, to ensure that field staff are properly trained in the use of "clean sampling" techniques, and sampling and lab procedures are fully developed to minimize sample contamination. j*A NCDENR N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-7015 Customer Service 1 800 623-7748 NPDES Mercury Requirement Page 2 of 3 Additional Information For additional information and guidance regarding EPA Methods 1631 / 1669, the permittee may consult the following resources: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Laboratory Analysis: Roy Byrd, 919-733-3908, ext. 213 Lab Certification: Lab Staff, 919-733-3908 Clean Sampling: Sandy Mort, 919-733-2136, ext 245 NPDES Permitting: Tom Belnick, 919-733-5083, ext 543 Pretreatment:: Tom Poe, 919-733-5083, ext 522 US Environmental Protection Agency Method 1631 / 1669 Questions: Maria Gomez -Taylor, 202-566-1005 EPA Sample Control Center, 703-461-2100 Websites: http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/guidance/permitIOatt3.t)df The state of Ohio EPA provides an updated listing of laboratories providing contract services for EPA Method 1631, including costs, turnaround time, and lab contacts. The labs are identified for informational purposes only, and do not constitute an endorsement. The listed commercial laboratories may also provide advice on training, equipment, and sampling techniques appropriate for Method 1631. http://www.epa.gov/ost/methods/ 1631.html This EPA site provides information on the 1631 Method requirements and implementation guidance. htt www.esb.enr.state.nc.us lab This DWQ site provides information on 'EPA Methods (including 1669 clean sampling techniques), and a listing of state -certified labs for EPA Method 1631. http://www.h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/NPDESweb.html;click Documents This DWQ website includes a copy of this letter plus a list of facilities currently subject to EPA Method 1631. Conclusion The Division realizes that changing the method of mercury measurement will not be without difficulty on the part of the permittees. The requirement will affect approximately 155 facilities with mercury limits and/or monitoring requirements. These permittees will need to evaluate available laboratories, costs, and sampling techniques. For these reasons, the implementation date for EPA Method 1631 was delayed until September 1, 2003, The Division thanks you for your cooperation and understanding in this matter. If you have any questions about the contents of this letter, please contact the applicable staff listed above. Sincerely, J. William Reid, PE Supervisor, Point Source Branch cc (hardcopy): CLANC, c/o Lew Hicks, Environmental Chemistry Inc., 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 cc (email): EPA Region 4, Marshall Hyatt, Scott Gordon, Roosevelt Childress DWQ Water Quality Section; Coleen Sullins, Regional offices DWQ Laboratory Section; Steve Tedder, Larry Ausley, Jim Meyer, Roy Byrd, Connie Brower DWQ Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Sandy Mort DWQ Pretreatment Unit, Tom Poe DWQ Modeling/TMDL, Michelle Woolfolk DWQ NPDES Compliance Unit, Shannon Langley DWQ NPDES Unit MCIC, Michael Johnson NC League of Municipalities, Paula Thomas Clean Water Fund of NC, Hope Taylor Severn Trent Lab, Ohio, Mark Bruce NPDES Mercury Requirement Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A Summary of EPA Methods 1631/ 1669 Effluent samples collected for mercury may become contaminated by numerous routes, including: 1) metal - containing labware, reagents, containers, and sampling equipment; 2) improperly cleaned or stored equipment; and 3) atmospheric mercury inputs in dirt and dust. Even human contact can be a source of mercury contamination (e.g., mercury amalgam fillings in the mouths of lab/field personnel can contaminate samples directly exposed to exhalation). Thus, it is essential that every effort be made to minimize sample contamination during collection. The US EPA provides recommendations to minimize contamination during sample collection in EPA Method 1669: Sampling Ambient Water for Determination of Trace Metals at EPA Water Quality Criteria Levels. This guidance describes a "clean hands/dirty hands" sampling technique to collect mercury samples, which is ideally performed with two people. A designated "clean hands" sampler handles all operations involving direct contact with the sample bottle, while the "dirty hands" sampler is responsible for all activities that do not involve direct contact with the sample bottle. This team sampling technique is recommended as a means to minimize sample contamination, but is not required. The US EPA is developing a trace metal sampling guidance strictly for effluent collection (Method 1670). The permittee will need to evaluate the various sampling recommendations and develop a sampling strategy appropriate for their particular situation. The overall philosophy behind any mercury sampling strategy should be to ensure that any object or substance that contacts the sample is nonmetallic and free from any material that may contain metals, in order to produce a reliable mercury measurement. Requirements and recommendations for EPA Method 1631 and clean sampling for low level mercury include: ■ It is strongly recommended that the permittee discuss sample collection, preservation, and shipping requirements with their laboratory, to ensure that the most current requirements of Method 1631 will be met. There have been several revisions to EPA Method 1631, and Revision D is proposed. ■ Each laboratory must perform and meet the minimum requirements of Method 1631 Quality Control. ■ Effluent samples for mercury analysis must be collected in clean fluoropolymer or borosilicate glass containers. It is recommended that the permittee request appropriate clean sample bottles or a mercury sampling kit from their lab. ■ Method 1631 requires that a minimum of one field blank accompany each set of samples collected at a given site. The field blank is used to identify contamination from sample collection and transport. If mercury is present in the field blank at levels that would compromise reliable measurement of mercury in the wastewater sample, you should assume that the sample was contaminated during collection or transit, and you will need to eliminate any source of contamination that has been identified and possibly resample. Including the field blank, the permittee should budget for two samples per monitoring event. • Samples must be preserved or analyzed within 48-hours after collection. Samples do not need to be refrigerated/iced during shipment provided they are tightly capped, shipped overnight to the lab, and preserved or analyzed by the lab within 48 hours of collection (per Draft Revision D). ■ If the samples are preserved within 48 hours, then they have a maximum holding time of 90 days prior to analysis (per Draft Revision D). • Sampling personnel must wear clean, non -talc latex gloves during sample collection and handling. ■ EPA currently recommends that mercury samples for Method 1631 analysis be collected as grab samples, since automatic composite samplers may be subject to contamination and loss of mercury via volatilization. Therefore, the Division will allow permittees to collect single grab samples directly into lab -provided sample bottles for permit requirements. The grab sample must be representative of the discharge. ■ If the person collecting the sample cannot directly reach the wastewater stream, a pole -type sampler may be attached to the sample bottle to extend the reach for sample collection. The pole and bottle clamp should be made of plastic and/or stainless steel and the mouth of the bottle should be held facing upstream of the pole. The use of a transfer vessel should be avoided. • All sampling equipment must be nonmetallic, or free of material that may contain metals. All materials that will directly or indirectly contact the sample must be cleaned using the procedures in Method 1631. • To minimize atmospheric contamination, do not sample during rainy weather or when the wind could blow dust particles into the sample bottle. To minimize human contamination, do not breathe into the sample bottle if you have mercury amalgam fillings in your teeth. ■ Sampling personnel should be trained in techniques for sampling mercury at low levels. Sample collection via the "clean hands/dirty hands" technique is recommended, but not required. • Since Method 1631 is performance -based, there is some flexibility in Method requirements.