20090165 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090423

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: Log Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Presen
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: Site is located to the south of US 64 Alternate, approximately 4 miles southeast of Tarboro
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20090165
Project Name: Manning Farm
County(ies): Edgecombe
Basin & subbasin: Tar-Pamlico 03020103
Nearest Stream: Knight Canal
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; NSW
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status:
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland:
Stream:
Buffer: 10 acres
Nutr. Offset:
Project History
Event Event Date
j Report Receipt: Monitoring 2/12/2009
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? `Yes ; No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and Ill.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20090165-1 10 acres Buffer Restoration
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
r
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 10 acres Buffer Restoration Component ID: 20090165-1
Description: 200-foot buffer along Knight Canal and ditches
Location within project: See maps
III. Buffer Site Details:
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only) ?-Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Streams verified by DWQ:
Comments:
Total Acres:
Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres:
Yes No
Buffer Width: 50' > 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) Yes No
Buffer Width: 100
I?
Comments:
Total Acres: t
Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres:
IV. Success Criteria Evaluation:
VEGETATION: Dominant Plant Species
_Species Story TPA/'1* cover
NOTE: Success Criteria is 320 spa
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report): -Ld_L
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Date of last planting:
- BUY
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas and
associated stream bank (e.g. bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc.)
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009)
Page 1 of 2
,i
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated a
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cc
Easement Marking Method:

List any remaining issues to address (e.g. plant survival, easement encroachment, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component i;
List specific reasons for lack of success for this co
Ily successful not successful
Additional Comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Label and attach photos to
this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2
rm
so
E?
=r
r1
0
0
O
o N
o Z
?
Z
O - =)I
O
.. .1-1"?l.000' N 35052.000' N
ALA
AaA AaA RO
\ N, PU
UB I
we
AaA
PU
N RC)
Ro
PO
AaA
Ro
rlannin2_ Rd. PU
AaA
Ca
TV8
AaA
o We
We RO
R AaA
AaA
U FU
PU
Ka
CeB
RO R. Ca
Ge 9
A,? A
Map Sowce. '-Srx� "Survey -of Edgew, Ul� '-,- ,-ity , 197-11
NC EEP Land Management Group, Inc.
Manning Farm Environmental consultants
Buffer Restoration Project Wilmington, N.C.
Edgecombe County I November 2008
--=MUNK
SCALE 1 1000'
Figure 3.
Generalized Soil Map
Edgecombe County, NK'

"r0' Buffer Ranting Area (10.0 acres!
Boundaries Care approximate
niean! to be absofiul!e.
Mal) 1993 Aeriap Photography NCG!A
4
Y

N P and Management Group, Inc. Figure 4.
i, arm E..;fr n? ni Cen?gsum n's C?e? '1? t.,-;
f '." t ELi 3a ?- vVil fi gnaton N _
November 2C'?
"Manning Farm Property"
Buffer Restoration Project
Edgecombe County, NC
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
(Cataloging Unit #03020103)
2008 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 3 of 5)
(Task 9)
NC EEP Contract #D05026
Prepared For:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
rN.-
1
Ecosystem
December 2008
Table 2. Manning Farm Plant List.

Buffer Zone Zone 1
(Trees) Zone 2
(Shrubs)
Stem Target:

Species 600/ac.

# planted 4,500
(% of
total 1,200/ac.
#
planted 3,000
(% of
total
River Birch Betula ni ra 1,200 26.67%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 800 17.78%
Green Ash (Fraxinus enns lvanica) 500 11.11%
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata) 200 4.44%
Water Oak (Quercus ni ra) 500 11.11%
Red Bay (Persea borbonia) 500 11.11%
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tuli ifera 1,000 22.22%
Sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia) 500 16.67%
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) 1,000 33.33%
American Beaut ber Callicar a americana) 1,000 33.33%
Wax Myrtle M rka cerifera) 500 16.67%
TOTAL 7,700
TABLE 3. ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET (YEAR 3) - VEGETATION PLOTS
MANNING FARM RIPARIAN BUFFER SITE
Year 3
SPECIES PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 TOTAL
American beautyberry 13 32 45
Baccharis 26 18 3 8 12 67
Elderberry 15 2 13 30
Green Ash 1 5 14 20
Overcup Oak 0
Persimmon 1 1
Privet 0
Red Bay 1 1
River Birch 29 4 23 56
Sweet Gum 50 50 18 0 35 153
Sweet Pepperbush 1 1
Sycamore 19 14 20 53
Tulip Poplar 11 1 18 30
Water Oak 9 37 46
Willow Oak 4 1 5
Wax Myrtle 0
Winged Sumac 2 2
TOTAL 142 102 85 37 144 510
Total Counted toward
Success 92 52 67 37 109 357
Stem Density (per ac) 920 520 670 370 t790777 1 714
Map Source: Del-orme: North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer., 1997 p. 46.
SCALE 1" = 2.0 miles
NC EEP Land Management Group, Inc.
Manning Farm Environmental consultants Figure Site Location
n
Buffer Restoration Project Wilmington, N.C. Map
Edgecombe County November 2008
' NJ
1
Boundaries are approximate
and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1990, USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle. Conetoe Quadrangle SCALE 1 = 2000'
NC EEP Land Management Group, Inc.
Manning Farm Environmental Consultants Figure 2.
Buffer Restoration Project Wilmington, N.C. 1990 Topographic Quad
Edgecombe County November 2008
I We
Ro
Ro
Ro We
J We
CeB J ?,\ PU
AAA
AaA Ro
1 Pu 1
CeB
TaB
a
Pu (AaA J
F ?
57
Ro °
Ro 1
CeB
I \° R°
Ro ` - CeB AaA
Ro Ca }
CeB
?' r. AaA
AaA
Ro
Mannin R ., Pu V
Ca
?a
TaB SITE r AaA
.'fi`t r`
ce : ca
Ro AaA
_i AaA
AaA Pu Pu
Pu /
i / Ro
Mimi
Map Source: Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, 1977. SCALE 1" = 1000'
NC EEP Land Management Group, Inc. Figure 3.
Manning Farm Environmental Consultants Generalized Soil Map
Buffer Restoration Project Wilmington, N.C. Edgecombe County, NC
Edgecombe County November 2008
M '
200' Buffer Planting Area (10.0 acres)
Boundaries are approximate
and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1993 Aerial Photography NCGIA SCALE 1" = 500'
NC EEP Land Management Group, Inc. Figure 4.
Manning Farm Environmental Consultants Buffer Planting Overview
Buffer Restoration Project Wilmington, N.C.
Edgecombe County November 2008
0
CL
rn
C
d
N M ,-. ,p a0 n P
' 'n
P P
O C N OD 00 ?-
O M d
s t n 00
O N c N
"'o 0? O? '?2? 'o

U cl)
?^ V O
p
D n
o V N
'0 N
? , .
Lo co f? p
Lo 'o I? .
z -0

'o -
u
Lo c)
ur)
O V M
V
co
N V r7
I, N co n N
E = n N t? N I` N
m
a

: ?- N
(y)
d'
a

0
?oc?
Nua
w

\H
V:
2
017,
E
z
w=?
F
803; N = _ ?

,
, 0 0
/ \
// ? / / \ W w
_E,

`
I
\ I , I
----r I
\
\?)
CO ? I I

1
1
?
yY _ i .
'SJI?d
7
,I
? fII

'I
0
r L;? }
yi.. -
n
v
c
N
O
a
c
Z
N +0
d C
7 0
Cf ?
?r
3
m
Z
0
tV
' U o
eZ Nc
U
C
d -4 O (L)
NocE
tnc >
co o- Z
G
w`
a
c
`0
J
U
O
O L oU
W m On
_c o
U c w o
Z?
m W
00