R-2204B C

.,t
Updated 12/11/03
NC 11/NC 903 from Kenansville to Pink Hill
TIP Project R-2204B, C
Status of Sections:
¦ Section A (completed in 2002)
¦ Sections B, C (unfunded)
Planning Documents:
¦ January 1990
¦ February 1996
¦ October 1996
¦ May 1998
Project initiated
EA approved
FONSI approved
Programmatic 4(f) approved
Purpose and Need for Project (from EA):
¦ Curved portions of roadway limit travel speed and passing sight distance.
¦ Current route through Kenansville and Pink Hill delay travel. (Part of
this problem was solved.with Section A).
¦ Farm machinery using the roadway increase accident potential and delays
vehicular traffic. t
¦ Along with R-? and R-2201, will provide a continuous network of
multilane roads between I-40 and Kinston.
Recommendation (from FONSI):
¦ B3, and C2
¦ Typical Section - four-lane divided with 46-foot median.
Reasons for Recommendation:
¦ B3 chosen over B2 - in order to avoid the power substation.
¦ C2 chosen over C1 or C3 -to avoid the impacts to downtown Pink Hill
but keep the bypass as close as possible.
Outstanding Environmental Issues:
¦ Further testing for one archaeological site (Miller Plantation House site).
¦ Wetland and stream minimization efforts along recommended alignment.
v"w
%
V• ``\ .'?Z 1! % . I `,
r( ,4 -?' LJ ,A-. . s a , ?, e,`,? ? ??5, . ? .. ?,V, ; . ;„ : fEND PROJECT i
? `? ay ?a O r `' .3> ? F
F`R `\ R/VET \?7? - J' ` ,r. a / /
i
14
1.6
1.2
\001 00
&3A 1.v
kMn
cr.
1.6
'570 1.0
.S b •° .04 v
J7D, j•ye y1a. s5? Y `i\ - g1?y?y ?A\?\ C
s C,Y?
'o ON
1.5
NfX
Yo
.0 1.2
m°`?LFO? 10 . ??U \.A \ y? o
0. ? I ? r d` \ c \ ?' • ?s
M1 1
w
a?S;', h
-4s -0
00
c4 ??y a 1 Fns ,1 k ? ?`eto?, ? `Y?
s.6 5 e m m ?t aY° 1 \7 '?` Gib ) 9Ck
N,9L V.
Q° b `? F5 1 .m i /
b .7 c `5/ O`. b t Gob \ i ?.? q 1j10
G 1.6
? ? ??°Jj?y .a6 ,1 ?' ?t?o YS it 9',N. `! DoJ ?I`
JIN
FAS 6 a5% J / 2 b ? j0 aY1 \`\ `0"pe0 '1
5
PAS b ti
?.i .o0 c•,?.. ?7 ?.B FI•P
No. .3
1.3
9 i s `Y? `ems n
`'F' 9 5 048' . c, y
a o` ? ????'
G40
2.1 F1.P `70 V`, ?qi O ?? `sSyl?. ..?
t as
M1 '? tl`,q@ apaV°`? I? / \'I? 14 19 I. ,Yj I e •.a`.
?1 1.1
0
.7 B ?? U 'J q/ 0 .. ?? - `B/ ,°O q
.7 d"
Eft,
-BEGIN PROJECT ,q.
e ? a y9
.a FPS aC ,j?. i 7.6 ???'
•? Mosh pS1sq,? .'4) y9• _/. "?'!-,\ ?',J C°b 'F`s, / `qds ??\ .
??! QaF : ® / ?a.. \ SD / Ito W? M1.
FAS i \?J b` Y
.n `fib ?? ? ? ? m `°ye. I.1 '? ?a.y ` "., 43
a
1.0
5 °o
m SfOCkin °
9 Head Creek
1y" O/ ,gM1S ,1L S` N NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF °
9 Y? 4 1 a
s Oe ?q1' `? ?- •> ???> % TRANSPORTATION
T \.. ?q 1.9 s Aj qo? a ;Q qy} / = ?q4` DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
n ° •yy n PLANNING AND RESEARCH BRANCH
.,\qoa. 1.0
S. M1
1??5 .fl /.l 0 NO
NC 11-90 3
/ m A ?vp9' '?' KENANSVILLE TO PINK HILL
DUPLIN AND LENOIR COUNTIES
10
B / ' \
\ ?,9 °`' `°- ?J ?.?' ?a FIGURE 1A
Y
Wetland
Section Site No. Impact (ac)
61 4 0.66
5 0.44
6 1.03
7 0.55
8 0.92
9 0.83
10 0.47
11 0.77
12 2.17
13 0.44
14 3.31
15 36.43
16 11.09
17 4.04
18 0.11
19 0.29
25 1.95
Subtotal: 65.5
Wetland
Section Site No. Impact (ac)
C1 28 0.75
29 1.36
30 1.1
31 1.35
32 0.11
Subtotal: 4.67
R-2204 Wetland Summary
(From 1996 EA)
Wetland
Section Site No. Impact (ac)
B2 4 0.66
5 0.44
6 1.03
7 0.55
8 0.92
9 0.83
10 0.47
11 0.77
12 2.17
18 0.11
19 0.29
20 0.84
21 14.65
22 0.48
23 8.37
24 0.11
26 2.13
Subtotal: 34.82
Wetland
Section Site No.
Impact (ac)
C2 27 0.62
30 1.14
31 1.35
32 0.11
33 1.54
34 1.01
Subtotal: 5.77
Emma of
131, C1 Alternative Combinations:
70.17
131, C2 71.27
B1, C3 70.41
B2, C1 39.49
B2, C2 40.59
B2, C3 . 39.73
B3, C1 52.39
B3, C2 53.49 (Recommended)
B3, C3 52.63
Wetland
Section Site No.
Impact (ac)
B3 4 0.66
5 0.44
6 1.03
7 0.55
8 0.92
9 0.83
10 0.47
11 0.77
12 2.17
18 0.11
19 0.29
20 0.84
21 14.65
22 0.48
23 21.27
24 0.11
26 2.13
Subtotal: 47.72
Wetland
Section Site No. Impact (ac)
C3 27 1.32
32 1.54
33 1.54
35 0.42
37 0.09
Subtotal: 4.91
1? It
?.
CA)
rrl
/ 1 • I , it ,,} ?' ?'?' ? ' ? g / i' ? i
/ / -?' •ti' o ,? -cc,
17..
.r"•?? .. ? .'?'' / / , ?. i, / IPA _ \?
41
i
• ?. ? ? ??, A , X11 / / ' i ? ? - ? ? °?? r
a ?`^`'i? ? /?, , • '; , (n yeti . , ! ,
m III ? _ / /
' • '.1 ? ICI ? ? i
00
f ?
100,
/
, /f
•% rn / / 3e?•. V J p
ytiti
07 -
MATCH LINE A '? /"

MATCH LINE A _
77-
.01
lo,
oooo"
%
C corn
14
q? LO
til ,?.' - ?' ? eft` ? j / '/ r•/ '? ? y/; ?/ / ? \
00,11,
m
/ 111
// ? ?' ?• mot,` ? ? N ? r ? l?{,/ r / / / / .??J /? ,T// /? /.. )mil
Ira
o, of
Jl?
. ol' .
t a. ? _ .. - .• Wit. ? / ? , l ,
N '
lao
Cn
r-n
z \ ird
Lg
1
MATCH LINE B
?
f 71
00
,4000000
0
I,
Ili --- \ \ _ o - - --i? I LOt ?ret? l
- ;, 3
\ c \\? Fes' \ ,? -_-`? „• I ? ' ? \. I
I ?
`?) ?, ?TT ?. 1\\\ 1 S??r?U!! '-. ak ,I?\ a \\
??? ??I``I ?, ? ?1??; ? ??•?,1? 1? \. Ill
e = `i ?
3 -I
I
F.y 3 x
71
1
_ co
Lo
Clj i m r
LO
t. •? 4:6 fin! e
h
- - _ J = ? I • • I ' \ ? J VV?" V t -?- CAS ? `"- _"i -
4A
DUPLI;N Co _
LENOIR Co -
L' Cl?
£ n
j C ''of
&as
a
C/) LO is' fes
01
w - ??

C,

N -n?
nz
z

-
o
?- E) ?

z x
o
Z -0
z
-. m c
io0a
= V)
V! -
1-0
O mi ?r
`-, Tl - Z = z D
n o n o
-i - Z to -p
n
-

T n m
Z

t! -
- O
D n
T? Z
C)

C '
1

q0t
' a5-5,0
- ZZ.OY
Mr. William D. Gilmore
Department of Transportation
Project Management
P.O. Box 1548
Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
DEC ©`? ?nM
V°C
November 28, 2001
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Enclosed you will find a copy of a recently completed petition urging DOT to
change N.C. highway 11 to follow N.C. 241 rather than the existing N.C. 11 from Pink
Hill to Kenansville. The petition is signed by Northern Duplin citizens who believe the
N.C. 241 route to be a much better choice. We believe that in the interest of the county,
the state, and the nation, N.C. 241 from Pink Hill to Beulaville is the best choice.
We urge you to abandon the current choice and choose N.C. 241 from Pink HUI to
Beulaville.
Sincerely,
r ,-
k/
J. Kenneth Maxwell,
?, cc: David Timpy
Ir

PETITION
We the undersigned oppose the proposal to four-lane N.C. Highway
(11 from Pink Hill to Kenansville. We believe that the best four-lane
route to connect with Interstate 40 is N.C. Highway 241 from Pink Hill
to Beulaville. There it would connect with N.C. Highway 24 from
Beulaville to Kenansville, which already has four-lanes. We petition
the State of North Carolina and its subsidiary and related agencies, to
change the proposed route from Highway 11 to Highway
241 /Highway 24.
The Highway 241 route is preferred because:
1. There is less environmental impact. Highway 11 goes
thfough a major wetlands area (Goshen Swamp).
2. It is safer. Highway 241 is a perfectly straight route with no
turns and only minor variations in elevation.
3. It is more economical. Highway 241 would require only 9
miles of construction versus 17 miles on Highway 11.
4. There is less impact on farmlands, farmsteads and
forestry. Less of these critical lands would be affected on
the shorter Highway 241 route.
5. It is less susceptible to flooding. The elevation of Highway
24 is greater than the wetland areas (Goshen Swamp,
Northeast Cape Fear River) of the Highway 11 route.
SIGNATURE ADDRESS
76 k W 9 P-5 'rl::?J e- 11?D t?c Nl?l?'SUII??Z? YL?
7q l [V at N. C. 11 P"

Uej K
00

PETITION FOR HIGHWAY 241
SIGNATURE
f -

4y 111
C4
Page z of 4
ADDRESS
H; 7-7
?7- 6-7- e779111

??Y,5 C),v

c9- Y Y3
i
1
1'q16G z8,5-7z
A 0-? 6ML11".4 /33 Y a"j 1 Q??

f
PETITION FOR HIGHWAY 241
I
SIGNATURE ADDRESS

/ r
Qm?? L
L 7fi,

Page 3 of -4

?, zI
V.jj
5) /V Xlll?
C, /? /// ?? •?N ??'???5? rIIF_ roc ? ? 3?/9
I C y
? c
l /G q A1 N G 1145 ??b N
11 (g .? /?c-1I -?- 9 0 3
r^
rnz?lll? klt?? ?? ?? SIC
f/ Al-o t t ,
,N

PETITION FOR HIGHWAY 241
SIGNATURE
Page 4 of
ADDRESS
ewl