20181416_Complete File_20070129

ow A rF9QG
r
0 Nq=r- "?
P11?? r-.._ ?1 l5
F :007
QUALITY
tVETlAt - SAN) STORMINATER BRANCH
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
. Division of Water Quality
January 29, 2007
MEMORANDUM
To: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., North Carolina Department of Transportation, Manager
From: Polly Lespinasse, NC Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Subject: Scoping Comments for the Proposed Widening of NC 24-27 from NC 740 in Albemarle,
Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, West of Troy, Montgomery County, TIPs R-2530B, B-
4974, and R-2527, WBS Numbers 34446.1.6, 39922.1.1,.and 35572.1.1
Please reference your correspondence dated January 8, 2007 in which comments were requested for the
above referenced project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to
jurisdictional streams and wetlands in the project area. More specifically, impacts to:

Mountain Creek Yadkin WS-IV 13-5-(0.7)
Pee Dee River Yadkin WS-IV, B, CA 13-(1)
Rock Creek Yadkin WS-IV, CA 13-8-(0.5) and 13-8-(2)
Dumas Creek Yadkin C 13-16-1
Clarks Creek Yadkin C 13-16
Lick Fork Yadkin C 13-16-4
Smith Branch Yadkin C 13-25-30-1
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the Division
of Water Quality requests that the NCDOT consider the following environmental issues for the proposed
project:
Specific Project Comments:
Review of the project reveals the presence of surface waters classified as Water Supply Critical Area in
the project study area. Given the potential for impacts to these resources during the project
implementation, the DWQ requests that DOT strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled
"Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 0413.0124) throughout design and construction
of the project. This would apply for any area that drains to streams having WS CA (Water Supply Critical
Area) classifications. For bridge projects located within the Critical Area of a Water Supply, the NCDOT
will be required to design, construct, and maintain hazardous spill catch basins in the project area. The
number of catch basins installed should be determined by the design of the bridge, so that runoff would
enter said basin(s) rather than flowing directly into the stream, and in consultation with the DWQ.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone[phone]
Fax [phone]
One
f Carolina
Nb
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Page 2
General Project Comments:
2. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required by
15A NCAC 2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the
environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401
Water Quality Certification.
3. Environmental assessment alternatives should consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives should include road designs that
allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the
most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as grassed swales,
buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
4. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and
minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In accordance
with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules {15A NCAC 2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be
required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation is required, the
mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as wetland mitigation.
5. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules {15A NCAC 2H.0506(h)},
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In
the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost
functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as stream
mitigation.
6. DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. NCDOT
should address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic
environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
7. If a bridge is being replaced with a hydraulic conveyance other than another bridge, DWQ believes the
use of a Nationwide Permit may be required. Please contact the US Army Corp of Engineers to
determine the required permit(s).
8. If the old bridge is removed, no discharge of bridge material into surface waters is allowed unless
otherwise authorized by the US ACOE. Strict adherence to the Corps of Engineers guidelines for
bridge demolition will be a condition of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
9. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
10. Whenever possible, the DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel realignment.
The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges allow for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, do not block fish passage and do not block navigation by canoeists and boaters.
11. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater should be directed across
the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed scour holes,
vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of NC
DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices.
Page 3
12. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct contact
between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should
not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and
fish kills.
13. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species should be planted. When using temporary structures the area should
be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other
mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-vegetate
naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
14. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage.of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being maintained if
requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting
features encountered during construction, please, contact DWQ for guidance on how to proceed and to
determine whether or not a permit modification will be required.
15. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they should be designed to mimic natural stream cross section
as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where appropriate.
Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of
structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased
maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
16. If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is
approved under General 401 Certification Number 3494/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey Activities.
17. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
18. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise
approved by NC DWQ. Approved BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT
Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other
diversion structures should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
19. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands and streams.
20. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
21. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their
inherent inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to
permit approval.
22. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This equipment
should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking
fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
Page 4
23. In most cases, the DWQ prefers the replacement of the existing structure at the same location with
road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and located to
avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing stream banks. If the
structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed and the approach fills
removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed and restored to the natural
ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with native tree species. Tall
fescue should not be used in riparian areas.
24. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that
precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed,
sized and installed.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The NCDOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met
and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information,
please contact Polly Lespinasse at [phone].
cc: Steve Lund, US Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Field Office
Ron Lucas, Federal Highway Administration
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Marella Buncick, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Sonia Gregory, DWQ Central Office
File Copy

s,.a SfATF °'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
January 8, 2007
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
Ms. Polly Lespinasse
Division of Water Quality/Wetlands
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager V
Project Development and Environmental Analysis

SUBJECT: Revised Start of Study for the Proposed Widening of NC 24-27 From
NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, West of Troy
in Montgomery County; WBS No. 34446.1.6, TIP No. R-253013;
WBS No. 39922.1.1, TIP No. B-4974; and WBS No. 35572.1.1,
TIP No. R-2527 I'?11 uur1?
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is combining the project
development, environmental and engineering studies for the proposed widening of NC 24-27 from
NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west of Troy in Montgomery County. This
section encompasses three different TIP projects - R-2530B, B-4974 and R-2527. The projects are
included in the Draft 2007-2013 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and are scheduled
for right of way and construction as follows: R-2527 - R/W FY 2010, Construction FY 2012; B-4974 -
R/W FY 2011, Construction FY 2013; and R-2530B - R/W FY 2013, Construction FY unfunded.
Project development studies began several years ago on the separate projects; however, they will
now be combined into one study. Attached for your review and comments are the combined scoping
information sheets for the proposed projects. Although you have already had an opportunity to comment on
the projects individually, we would appreciate any additional information you might have that would be
helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the projects. We would appreciate your response by
April 5, 2007.
It is anticipated that a federally-funded Environmental Assessment will be prepared for these
projects. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Lisa Feller, P. E., Project
Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 262. Please include the TIP Project Number in
all correspondence and comments.
GJT/plr
Attachment

LY}Vb0°TIPPETT
SECRETARY
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWWNCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Scoping Information Sheet
TIP Nos.: R-253013, B-4974
& R-2527
WBS Nos.: 34446.1.6,
39922.1.1 &
35572.1.1
Federal Aid No:
Divisions: 8 & 10
Sent Date:
Revision Date:
Meeting Date: ?-
Counties: Stan ly&Montgomery
rro eci uescri tion:
Widen NC 24-27 from NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west of
Troy, in Montgomery County
NOTE: All three proiects are beinq studied in one combined Environmental Assessment.
General Proiect Need:
Transportation deficiencies exist along NC 24-27 in the project study area and are
projected to decline substantially by the year 2030. The purpose of these projects will be
to improve traffic flow and level of service (LOS) on the section of NC 24-27 in and around
the stud area.
Metropolitan / Rural Planning Organization Piedmont Triad Rural Planning Organization
Area: & Rocky River Rural Planning Organization
NEPA/404 Merger Candidate?: ? Yes ? No ® Not sure
Feasibility Study Completed?: ? Yes ® No Date
Type of Environmental Documents to be Prepared / Project Schedule:
TIP Project No.
Document:
Right of Way:
Let:
Air Quality Status:
R-2530B B-4974 R-2527
EA - February 2009
FONSI -June 2010
FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2010
Unfunded FY 2013 FY 2012
Non
Maintenance
attainment
® Attainment
PAGE 1 OF 2
Design Criteria:
Length of Proiect Limits: 14.6 miles
Type of Access Control:
(Existing / Proposed)
Structure Inventory:
Functional
Classification:
Existing - None, Proposed - Partial
Pee Dee River Bridge (Bridge No. 51) and the
Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway overpass bridge
Rural Principal Arterial
Strategic Highway Corridor
Information:
CTP/Thoroughfare Plan
Designation (Facility Type):
Roadway Typical
Section: -
(Existing / Proposed)
Future Expressway on the Strategic Highway
Corridor Vision Plan Ma
Expressway
Existing: 2-lanes to 3-lanes
Proposed: 4-lane, median divided
Typical Section in Compliance with Conformity Determination:
® Yes ? No
Right of Way:
(Existing / Proposed)
Existing: 60 to 100 feet
Proposed: 150 to 200 feet
Existing Posted
55 mph Proposed Design 60 m h
p
Speed: S-peed.

Traff ic (AADT): % TTST: 4 to 8 %
Current Year: (2005) ,600 to 14,500 vpd
1 % Dual: 3 to 5 %
Design Year: 2030 9,000 to 30,000 v d
+ % DHV: 10 to 11, %
Design Standards Applicable: C? AASHTO 3R
Railroad Involvement: NC 24-27 passes under the Aberdeen Carolina & Western
Railway overpass bridge.
Cost Estimates:
R-2530B: TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
B-4974: TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
R-2527: TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
r1nnctri intinn- Rirtht of Wnv• Total Cost:
$22,300,000 $5,750,000 $28,050,000
$22,300,000 $5,750,000 $28,050,000
$15,000,000 $1,500,000 $16,500,000
$15,000,000 $1,500,000 $16,500,000
$32,300,000 $4,100,000 $36,400,000
$32,300,000 $4,100,000 $36,400,000
PAGE 2 OF 2
°

W
0
C) a
o 0
o -
0 ?
Q oo
°
,
p
U °
Q ?j O
/rte
O
o

-°
/?
?

o

D

?

4
m o e
° o -i m
o Cl) n

^^
O ° p O

° O Q o
• O O ° C
° Q D M
o X39

r
a
° Ctf
/ o
P p ?
OD O

r
X
i° co 0

a
a

O
12
SR 1150
? sR ??so
eQ
O
o O
-n D? Q
mp
N D
CD ZX
® D X
+t.r ° arm
n
6 ; 4 O
?, ? N't
1 ? p
1134
°
o
C a o
.>dd 8>w
n OO "?, :F? 9FO D _o
a
Z ? ? d c

3 q v Y p`
-0-1 ;u Z
70 D 00 O Z v
V a
? M m-V v0z 4+?
D o l ?z C;U 7 m0 °
O -?
ca o co) > o M Z5
s
?Z ?'oo z-zzo _ o
cNi? Z r. n mm-noCO) ? ?-/
° o V A
y 0 P yr2DZ
m Z r n? O -? a °
j o e a
N; m~ D3DZm r X
Ul 0z ?ZN n 2 0 o
(A) 0 ic ca t<
C
ca c D O m D n -? m `'y a
?Z ?Z ?0 m °d ca n $ 0
'n n ? ° d, o o _ d
00 m 00 z
c co) V
M Z
4 z
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form
Project Number: 07-0255 County: Montgomery and Stanly Date Received: 01/30/2007
Due Date: 02/26/2007
Project Description: Proposal to widen NC 24-21 from NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass,
west of Troy, in Montgomery County. TIP Nos. R-253013, B=4974, R-2527
This Project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville _IL Air Soil & Water Marine Fisheries.
-T Fayetteville -F[- Water Coastal Management Water Resources
Mooresville TT Groundwater Wildlife TT Environmental Health
Raleigh
-TLand Quality Engineer Solid Waste Mgmt
TWildlife -DOT
Washington Radiation Protection
_T Forest Resources
Wilmington Other
Winston-Salem Land Resources
T Parks & Recreation
Water Quality
_T Water Quality - DOT
Air Quality
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
No objection to project as proposed.
Insufficient information to complete review
No Comment
Other (specify or attach comments)
Regional Office Only:
Please log into the IBEAM system and`update your comments in the DSS (Decision Support System) application,
SEPA module. If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail]
919AW,
?4/v 3
-' zoos
??1A?NpS StTQUAC/yy
' B%r

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO
January 8, 2007
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
Department of Administration
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmt
4 200
x,
/1016 9
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Revised Start of Study for the Proposed Widening of NC 24-27 From
NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, West of Troy
in Montgomery County; WBS No. 34446.1.6, TIP No. R-253013;
WBS No. 39922.1.1, TIP No. B-4974; and WBS No. 35572.1.1,
TIP No. R-2527
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is combining the project
development, environmental and engineering studies for the proposed widening of NC 24-27 from
NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west of Troy in Montgomery County. This
section encompasses three different TIP projects - R-2530B, B-4974 and R-2527. The projects are
included in the Draft 2007-2013 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and are scheduled
for right of way and construction as follows: R-2527 - R/W FY 2010, Construction FY 2012; B-4974 -
R/W FY 2011, Construction FY 2013; and R-2530B - R/W FY 2013, Construction FY unfunded.
Project development studies began several years ago on the separate projects; however, they will
now be combined into one study. Attached for your review and comments are the combined scoping
information sheets for the proposed projects. Although you have already had an opportunity to comment on
the projects individually, we would appreciate any additional information you might have that would be
helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the projects. We would appreciate your response by
April 5, 2007.
It is anticipated that a federally-funded Environmental Assessment will be prepared for these
projects. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Lisa Feller, P. E., Project
Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 262. Please include the TIP Project Number in
all correspondence and comments.
GJT/plr
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
UC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
T548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
l_
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Scoping Information Sheet
TIP Nos.: R-253013, B-4974 Sent Date:
& R-2527
WBS Nos.: 34446.1.6, Revision Date:
39922.1.1 &
35572.1.1 - - _ __
Federal Aid No: Meeting Date:
Divisions: 8&10 -? Counties: Stan lywontgomery
Proiect Description:
Widen NC 24-27 from NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west of
Troy, in Montgomery County
NOTE: All three projects are being studied in one combined Environmental Assessment.
Ueneral Proiect Need:
Transportation deficiencies exist along NC 24-27 in the project study area and are
projected to decline substantially by the year 2030. The purpose of these projects will be
to improve traffic flow and level of service (LOS) on the section of NC 24-27 in and around
the stud area.
Metropolitan / Rural Planning Organization Piedmont Triad Rural Planning Organization
Area: & Rocky River Rural Planning Organization
NEPA/404 Merger Candidate?: ? Yes ? No ® Not sure
Feasibility Study Completed?: ? Yes ® No Date
Type of Environmental Documents to be Prepared / Project Schedule:
TIP Project No.
Document:
Right of Way:
Let:
R-2530B B-4974 R-2527
EA - February 2009
FONSI - June 2010
FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2010
Unfunded FY 2013 FY 2012
r
t
,f
Design Criteria: ".
Length of Proiect Limits: 14.6 miles
Type of Access Control:
(Existing / Proposed)
Structure Inventory:
Functional
Classification:
Rural Principal Arterial _
Strategic Highway Corridor
Information:
CTP/Thoroughfare Plan
Designation (Facility Type):
Roadway Typical
Section: _.
(Existing / Proposed)
Future Expressway on the Strategic Highway
Corridor Vision Plan Ma
Expressway
Typical Section in Compliance with Conformity Determination:
® Yes ? No
Right of Way:
(Existing / Proposed)
Existing - None, Proposed - Partial
Pee Dee River Bridge (Bridge, No. 51) and the
Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway overpass bridge
Existing: 60 to 100 feet
Proposed: 150 to 200 feet
Existing Posted 55 mph Proposed Design 60 mph
Speed: Speed:
Traffic (AADT) % TTST: 4 to 8 %
Current Year
Design Year:
(2005) 9,600 to 14,500 vpd
2030 19,000 to 30,000 v d
% Dual: 3 to 5 %
% DHV: 10 toll %
Design Standards Applicable: ?X AASHTO 3R
Railroad Involvement: NC 24-27 passes under the Aberdeen Carolina & Western
Railway overpass bridge.
Cost Estimates:
R-2530B: TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
B-4974: TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
R-2527: TIP Estimate:
Current Estimate:
Construction: Riaht of Wav: Total Cost:
$22,300,000 $5,750,000 $28,050,000
$22,300,000 $5,750,000 $28,050,000
$15,000,000 $1,500,000 $16,500,000
$15,000,000 $1,500,000 $16,500,000
$32,300,000 $4,100,000 $36,400,000
$32,300,000 $4,100,000 $36,400,000
PAGE 2 OF 2
4?-
??:
r;1'
TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: Marla Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: May 12, 2004
SUBJECT: Review of NCDOT scoping sheets for NC 24-27 widening from NC 740 to west
of the Pee Dee River, Stanly County. TIP No. R-2530B.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is requesting comments from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) regarding impacts to fish and
wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. Staff biologists have reviewed the
information provided on the scoping sheets and have the following preliminary comments.
These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The NCDOT proposes to widen NC 24-27 to four lanes from NC 740 to west of the Pee
Dee River. It appears the project will impact drainages of the Pee Dee River (Lake Tillery),
including Mountain Creek and Jacobs Creek, both classified as WS-IV. The Pee Dee River is
classified WS-IV and B CA. The Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), Federal Species of
Concern and state Endangered, and notched rainbow (V. constricta), state Special Concern,
occurs in the Mountain Creek drainage. The eastern lampmussel (Lampsilis radiata), state
Threatened, occurs in Jacobs Creek and other tributaries of Lake Tillery. Mussel surveys should
be conducted in any directly impacted perennial streams. If state or federally listed species are
found, NCDOT should consult with the appropriate resource agencies. Strict sedimentation and
erosion control measures will be important for this project.
In addition, to help facilitate document preparation and the review process, our general
information needs are outlined below:
NC 24-27, NC 740 to West of Pee Dee R.
Mountain & Jacobs Creeks, Stanly Co. 2 May 12, 2004
Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of
federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern species. Potential
borrow areas to be used for project construction should be included in the inventories. A
listing of designated plant species can be developed through consultation with the
following programs:
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1615
[phone]
and,
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. If applicable, include the
linear feet of stream that will be channelized or relocated.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreage impacted by the project. Wetland acreage
should include all project-related areas that may undergo hydrologic change as a result of
ditching, other drainage, or filling for project construction. Wetland identification may
be accomplished through coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE). If the USACE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be
identified and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreage of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the proposed
project. Potential borrow sites and waste areas should be included.
5. Show the extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of
wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Include the mitigation plan for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and
indirect degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. Address the overall environmental effects of the project construction and quantify the
contribution of this individual project to environmental degradation.
8. Provide a discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources, which will result from
secondary development, facilitated by the improved road access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal, or private
development projects, a description of these projects should be included in the
environmental document, and all project sponsors should be identified.
NC 24-27, NC 740 to West of Pee Dee R.
Mountain & Jacobs Creeks, Stanly Co.
May 12, 2004
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages of this project.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Marella Buncick, USFWS
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, NCDWQ
Sarah McRae, NCNBP
Melba McGee
R-25306. Scoping Letter
April 27, 2004
Page 2
Design & Construction Issues
¦ If this project is widened along the existing facility, DWQ believes that this project should not be
included in the Merger/Concurrence process.
¦ Hazardous spill catch basins will be required in the vicinity of the Pee Dee River due to the
project's proximity to the water supply critical area. More information will be required on project
truck volume, avoidance options, etc. during the merger process and hydraulic design review.
¦ Within the Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin, sedimentation and storm water runoff are major water quality
concerns. In order to reduce sedimentation in receiving waters, same day seeding and mulching
is strongly encouraged. Storm water runoff from the project should be designed to be directed to
grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins or other site-appropriate
means of receiving pre-treatment, rather than routed directly into streams.
¦ Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be
removed from any water pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the
stream.
¦ Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation
will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow as well as utility relocations.
¦ Stream verifications (intermittent/perennial) by DWQ and wetland delineation shall be performed
prior to application for §401 Certification.
¦ Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical, particularly
parallel impacts. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be
chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules {15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial
stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be designed to
replace appropriate lost functions and values. Onsite mitigation is preferable, however, NC
Ecological Enhancement Program (EEP) is available for use as compensatory mitigation.
The Mountain Creek watershed, including Little Mountain Creek, is one of 55 watersheds in the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin that has been identified by the NCWRP as an area with the greatest
need and opportunity for stream and wetland restoration efforts. This watershed will be given
higher priority than a non-targeted watershed for the implementation of NCWRP restoration
projects. Please contact NCWRP or the NC Division of Ecological Enhancement for more
information if this project requires mitigation.
¦ DWQ prefers that existing bridges be extended with bridges rather than replaced with culverts.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact John Hennessy at [phone].
pc: File Copy
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
. Division of Water Quality
April 27, 2004
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
NCDENR Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NC Division of Water Quality C-U Q-1
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for NC 24-27 Widening from NC 740 to west of the Pee Dee
River, Stanly County, TIP No. R-2530B. State Clearinghouse Project No. 04-0285.
In reply to your correspondence dated April 16, 2004 (received April 19, 2004) in which you requested
comments for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that the following water
resources in Hydrologic Unit 030708 will be impacted:
Stream (Index) Water Quality Class cation
¦ UT's to Mountain Creek (13-5) WS-1V
¦ UT's to Jacobs Creek (13-9) WS-1V
¦ Lake Tillery/Pee Dee River and UT's (13-(1)) WS-IV & B Critical Area
NC 24-27 is described as a major rural collector. The purpose of the project is to improve safety and
traffic carrying capacity. NC Division of Water Quality understands that the project proposes to widen to
a 4-lane median divided facility. Inside the Albemarle city limits, the median will be 23 feet, while
outside the city limits, the median will be 46 feet. DWQ has the following comments:
Environmental Documentation
¦ The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on
mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a
conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the
NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects
requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401
Water Quality Certification.
Planning and Access Control Issues
¦ From 2000 to 2020, the estimated population increase for Stanly is 21 percent. Growth
management within the next five years will be imperative, especially along highway corridors, in
order to protect or improve, water quality in this sub-basin. Growth management can be defined
as the application of strategies and practices that help achieve sustainable development in
harmony with the conservation of environmental qualities and features of an area. On a local
level, growth management often involves planning and development review requirements that are
designed to maintain or improve water quality.
¦ A qualitative analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project
may be required.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
N
.rain
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH
DEPARTWNT OF
April 1, 2004
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
Department of Administration
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environr
y• a
l 'V
r`J
a
ON -?
L Do TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: NC 24-27 Widening from NC 740 to multi-lanes west of the Pee
Dee River, Stanly County, WBS Element 34446.1.6, TIP Project
R-2530B
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch has begun studying the
proposed improvements to NC 24-27 from NC 740 to multi-lanes west of the Pee Dee River.
The project is included in the 2004-2010 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program
and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 2009 and construction in post year.
The proposed project will include widening NC 24-27 to a four lane median divided
facility. Improvements to NC 24-27 will utilize the existing facility. Approximately 150 to
200 feet of right of way will be required to accommodate the proposed improvements.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating
potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or
approvals which may be required by your agency. Your comments will be used in the
preparation of a federally funded Environmental Assessment. This document will be prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond
by June 7, 2004 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Beverly Robinson,
Project Development Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 254. Please include the
TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments.
GJT/plr
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

-II
I .p
X

X?j
y i ???,,,? . -•r ?.r? j 17]Q
A i A`"st17311 N stare
` rate ? j rr,`3X • ?`• r \ ? \ i ? ? `•` ? i? .?
17- 11
ow _7
' ?,;•, , , i ' 1736 `? / ? \ . ? ?% •

?.
Z)
sv z

u1
s am: a O
J

1,
_ %
END PROJE CT

J 12
!RILES
;IORTH CkROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TR.iNSPORTATION
_ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
'•. .v' ENVIRONMENTAL .aNALYSIS BRANCH
NC ?4-27-73
FROM NC 740 IN a LBEM a RLE
TO MULTI-LANES WEST OF
THE PEE DEE RIVER
ST.-?NLY COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2550B
FIGURE I

O?O? W A",
RQG
r
>
o ?
MEMORANDUM
April 13, 2004
TO: Beverly Robinson, Project Development Engineer
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NC Division of Water Quality Ct&j
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for NC 24-27 Widening from NC 740 to west of the Pee Dee
River, Stanly County, TIP No. R-2530B.
In reply to your correspondence dated April 1, 2004 (received April 7, 2004) in which you requested
comments for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that the following water
resources in Hydrologic Unit 030708 will be impacted:
Stream (Index) Water Quality Classi cation
¦ UT's to Mountain Creek (13-5) WS-IV
¦ UT's to Jacobs Creek (13-9) WS-1V
¦ Lake Tillery/Pee Dee River and UT's (13-(1)) WS-IV & B Critical Area
NC 24-27 is described as a major rural collector. The purpose of 'the project is to improve safety and
traffic carrying capacity. NC Division of Water Quality understands that the project proposes to widen to
a 4-lane median divided facility. Inside the Albemarle city limits, the median will be 23 feet, while
outside the city limits, the median will be 46 feet. DWQ has the following comments:
Environmental Documentation
¦ , The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on
mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a
conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the
NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects
requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401
Water Quality Certification.
Planning and Access Control Issues
¦ From 2000 to 2020, the estimated population increase for Stanly is 21 percent. Growth
management within the next five years will be imperative, especially along highway corridors, in
order to protect or improve water quality in this sub-basin. Growth management can be defined
as the application of strategies and practices that help achieve sustainable development in
harmony with the conservation of environmental qualities and features of an area. On a local
level, growth management often involves planning and development review requirements that are
designed to maintain or improve water quality.
¦ A qualitative analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project
may be required.

Michael F. Lasley, Uovemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis
R-25306 Scoping Letter
April 13, 2004
Page 2
Design & Construction Issues
¦ If this project is widened along the existing facility, DWQ believes that this project should not be
included in the Merger/Concurrence process.
¦ Hazardous spill catch basins will be required in the vicinity of the Pee Dee River due to the
project's proximity to the water supply critical area. More information will be required on project
truck volume, avoidance options, etc. during the merger process and hydraulic design review.
¦ Within the Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin, sedimentation and storm water runoff are major water quality
concerns. In order to reduce sedimentation in receiving waters, same day seeding and mulching
is strongly encouraged. Storm water runoff from the project should be designed to be directed to
grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins or other site-appropriate
means of receiving pre-treatment, rather than routed directly into streams.
¦ Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be
removed from any water pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the
stream.
¦ Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation
will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow as well as utility relocations.
¦ Stream verifications (intermittent/perennial) by DWQ and wetland delineation shall be performed %
prior to application for §401 Certification.
¦ Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical, particularly
parallel impacts. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be
chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)1,
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial
stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be designed to
replace appropriate lost functions and values. Onsite mitigation is preferable, however, NC
Ecological Enhancement Program (EEP) is available for use as compensatory mitigation.
The Mountain Creek watershed, including Little Mountain Creek, is one of 55 watersheds in the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin that has been identified by the NCWRP as an area with the greatest
need and opportunity for stream and wetland restoration efforts. This watershed will be given
higher priority than a non-targeted watershed for the implementation of NCWRP restoration
projects. Please contact NCWRP or the NC Division of Ecological Enhancement for more
information if this project requires mitigation.
¦ DWQ prefers that existing bridges be extended with bridges rather than replaced with culverts.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact John Hennessy at [phone].
pc: Chris Militscher; USEPA
Marella Buncick, USFWS
Marla Chambers, NCWRC
File Copy
sy° w=Na
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETP)V
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
April 1, 2004
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch has begun studying the
proposed improvements to NC 24-27 from NC 740 to multi-lanes west of the Pee Dee River.
The project is included in the 2004-2010 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program
and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 2009 and construction in post year.
The proposed project will include widening NC 24-27 to a four lane median divided
facility. Improvements to NC 24-27 will utilize the existing facility. Approximately 150 to
200 feet of right of way will be required to accommodate the proposed improvements.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating
potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or
approvals which may be required by your agency. Your comments will be used in the
preparation of a federally funded Environmental Assessment. This document will be prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond
by June 7, 2004 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Beverly Robinson,
Project Development Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 254. Please include the
TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments.
GJT/plr
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele
Division of Water Quality/Wetlands
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental
NC 24-27 Widening from NC 740 to multi-lanes *est of the Pee
Dee River, Stanly County, WBS Element 34446.1.6, TIP Project
R-2530B
"81401
OR IGI?040
y'gT?R ®? 200A
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWWWCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
Van
a? puM ?a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 30, 2004
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO: File
FROM: Beverly Robmso 19) ? Y?
Project Development Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
SUBJECT: Scoping Meeting Minutes for NC 24-27 Widening from
NC 740 to west of the Pee Dee River, Stanly County, WBS
Element 34446.1.6, TIP Project R-2530B.
A scoping meeting was held on January 14, 2004 in Room 470 of the Highway
Building. The following persons were in attendance.
Clarence Coleman FHWA
Sarah McBride DCR/SHPO
Betsy Watson Traffic Engineering/Signals & Geometrics
Benjetta Johnson Traffic Engineering/Plan Review
Spencer Franklin Traffic Engineering/Traffic Control
John Stewart Right of Way Utilities
Kirby Warrick Right of Way
Roy Girolami Structure Design
Jurek Gedzior Photogrammetry
Tony Houser Roadway
Lee Moore Roadway
Jay Twisdale Hydraulics
John Taylor Location & Surveys
Aldie Whitmore Division 10
Ray Lotfi Program Development
Micheal Turchy PDEA - Office of Natural Environment
Rob Hanson PDEA
Jay McInnis PDEA
Beverly Robinson PDEA
The following is a summary of the comments made at the meeting and through
written comments:
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the subject project is to improve safety and traffic carrying
capacity along NC 24/27.
Project Description
The proposed project will include widening NC 24/27 to a four lane median
divided facility from NC 740 to multi-lanes west of the Pee Dee River.
The proposed project is approximately 5.5 miles long.
Existing Typical Section
Existing NC 24/27 is a two to three lane facility with grass shoulders.
Proposed Typical Section
NC 24/27 is proposed as a four-lane median divided facility. Curb and gutter is
proposed within the city limits of Albemarle. Grass shoulder will be constructed outside
the city limits. A 23-foot median is proposed within the city limits and a 46-foot median
is proposed outside the city limits.
The city of Albemarle has requested sidewalks be constructed within the city
limits. Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch Staff (PDEA) will
coordinate with the city further to obtain their agreement on sharing in the cost of the
sidewalks.
Right of Way
The existing right of way on NC 24/27 is 60-100 feet. Approximately 150-200
feet of right of way will be required to accommodate the proposed improvements.
Intersections
There is currently a traffic signal at the intersection of NC 740 and NC 24/27. All
other intersections are stop sign controlled. Stoney Gap Road, Valley Drive and Indian
Mound Road are locations under consideration for new signals.
Access Control
Existing NC 24/27 has no control of access. No control of access is proposed
within the city limits and partial control of access (one access per parcel) will be obtained
outside the city limits.
Utilities
The utility impact rating for the proposed project is medium. Existing utilities in
the project area include telephone, power and water and sewer within the city limits.
Adjacent Projects
TIP Project R-2527 - This project involves improvements to NC 24/27 from east
of the Pee Dee River to the Troy Bypass. The schedule for R-2527 includes right of way
acquisition for Section A in Fiscal Year 2008 and construction in FY 2010 and right of
way acquisition for Section B in FY 2007 and construction in FY 2009.
Proposed Alignment
The existing alignment will be the only alignment alternative studied for the
widening of NC 24/27.
Traffic Volumes
The current year (2003) volumes for NC 24/27 range from 9,400 to 14,500
vehicles per day (vpd). Projected 2030 volumes range from 19,000 to 30,000 vpd.
Cost
The 2004-2010 TIP cost for the proposed project is $17,600,000 which includes
$400,000 for right of way acquisition and $17,200,000 for construction.
The current estimated cost for the proposed project is $22,700,000 which includes
$400,000 for right of way acquisition (TIP) and $22,300,000 for construction.
Additional Comments
The proposed project meets the FHWA logical termini criteria because it ends at
an existing multi-lane section. However, additional discussion regarding logical termini
and cumulative effects may be required.
Sufficient right of way will be required to accommodate relocating power poles
along the proposed project. Approximately 18-22 feet will be required within the
proposed right of way limits.
The Hydraulics Unit recommends widening NC 24/27 to the north to lessen
impacts to parallel streams located along the south side of NC 24/27. Portions of the
project are within the water supply watershed critical area, so hazardous spill catch basins
will be required at stream crossings within the critical area.
Two known populations of the schweinitz's sunflower exist within the project
area. Known populations of Georgia aster also exist along the project. Michael Turchy,
Office of Natural Environment, will forward maps identifying the locations of these
species.
Currently, the eastern terminus of this project is west of the Pee Dee River. An
existing four-lane median divided section with dual bridges over the river exists in the
vicinity of the river. This multi-lane section transitions to two lanes on either side of the
river. Bridge No. 51 which carries the westbound lanes of NC 24/27 over the Pee Dee
River, is in poor condition and is very narrow. The replacement of this bridge is not
currently programmed in the TIP. A question has been raised as to whether this bridge
should be replaced as a part of either this project or Project R-2527. After some
discussion, it was decided the northern most Pee Dee River bridge will not be replaced as
a part of this project. Per the Program Development Branch, federal bridge replacement
funds can be used to replace this bridge therefore, it should be a separate project.
Division 10 ranks this bridge replacement 5' of 15 in the Division.
NC Division of Water Quality has requested the proposed project follow the
merger process in a letter dated January 13, 2004. The suggestion was made that PDEA
staff meet with the Corps of Engineers representative and FHWA to discuss after wetland
and stream delineations are obtained for the project.
The Uwharrie National Forest is located east of the Pee Dee River. It is believed
this project is outside the National Forest Boundary, but PDEA staff will confirm location
of boundary.
Schedule
Citizens Informational Workshop
Preliminary Design
Environmental Assessment
Public Hearing
FONSI
Right of Way Acquisition
Construction
March 2004
May 2005
November 2005
March 2006
November 2006
FY 2008
PY
If there are questions or corrections concerning the above information please feel
free to call Beverly Robinson at [phone] extension 254.

PROJE ?. \ Y
Y f ! I 1 ' -?""' "j /`r / 1730
1731
IS,B _ -/' 1. ` L °"1? '? 1 1`? _'? 4??y}P ?i ` 1`\•,
L rya ' 1734 '/ \ l/ y i 1\? I is
1783
y '?•` / `17381 1 II ? ' \. d/ \ //f//?? ./
- 1720 / .3? \\11?/' /
i, ?• "?y 1736
/, t N `rtu 25822
/ is ?: ? ??11, }
• ?. `•+ , ''? •! 7 \ O.
na _
{ ? ' y _ f - - ? `+ru' , END PROJECT
? ? ( •? `?' rl?? ?\ ; \ ? oily i r .,yeav,l I ?
Z?11 -.1
\ 8•am
??Ihe uir?•'.'
..ne (t .mo., r
S 7? A
D 12 1
MILES
YORTH CAROL.IN-A DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL .iN.aLYSIS BR.aNCH
NC 24-27-75
FROM NC 740 IN' .3LBEMARLE
TO MULTI-L A INES WEST OF
THE PEE DEE RIVER
ST.3,NLY COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2550B
FIGURE 1
b

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Marla Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: March 11, 2004
SUBJECT: Review of NCDOT scoping sheets for NC 24-27 widening from NC 740 to west
of the Pee Dee River, Stanly County. TIP No. R-2530B.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is requesting comments from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) regarding impacts to fish and
wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. Staff biologists have reviewed the
information provided on the scoping sheets and have the following preliminary comments.
These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The NCDOT proposes to widen NC 24-27 to four lanes from NC 740 to west of the Pee
Dee River. It appears the project will impact drainages of the Pee Dee River (Lake Tillery),
including Mountain Creek and Jacobs Creek, both classified as WS-IV. The Pee Dee River is
classified WS-IV and B CA. The Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), Federal Species of
Concern and state Endangered, and notched rainbow (V. constricta), state Special Concern,
occurs in the Mountain Creek drainage. The eastern lampmussel (Lampsilis radiata), state
Threatened, occurs in Jacobs Creek and other tributaries of Lake Tillery. Mussel survey should
be conducted in any directly impacted perennial streams. If state or federally listed species are
found, NCDOT should consult with the appropriate resource agencies. Strict sedimentation and
erosion control measures will be important for this project.
In addition, to help facilitate document preparation and the review process, our general
information needs are outlined below:
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
NC 24-27, NC 740 to West of Pee Dee R.
Mountain & Jacobs Creeks, Stanly Co. 2 March 11, 2004
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area, including a listing of
federally or state designated threatened, endangered, or special concern species. Potential
borrow areas to be used for project construction should be included in the inventories. A
listing of designated plant species can be developed through consultation with the
following programs:
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1615
[phone]
and,
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. If applicable, include the
linear feet of stream that will be channelized or relocated.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland. acreage impacted by the project. Wetland acreage
should include all project-related areas that may undergo hydrologic change as a result of
ditching, other drainage, or filling for project construction. Wetland identification may
be accomplished through coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). If the USACE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be
identified and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreage of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the proposed
project. Potential borrow sites and waste areas should be included.
5. Show the extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or fragmentation of
wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
.?'
6. Include the mitigation plan for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and
indirect degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. Address the overall environmental effects of the project construction and quantify the
contribution of this individual project to environmental degradation.
Provide a discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources, which will result from
secondary development, facilitated by the improved road access.

9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal, or private
development projects, a description of these projects should be included in the
environmental document, and all project sponsors should be identified.
NC 24-27, NC 740 to West of Pee Dee R.
Mountain & Jacobs Creeks, Stanly Co.
March 11, 2004
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages of this project.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Marella Buncick, USFWS
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, NCDWQ
Sarah McRae, NCNHP
C3
ArF,
QG
y
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 13, 2004
MEMORANDUM
TO: Beverly Robinson, Project Development Engineer
NCDOT Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator Ndk
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for NC 24-27 Widening from NC 740 to west of the Pee Dee
River, Stanly County, TIP No. R-2530B.
In reply to your correspondence dated January 5, 2004 (received January 7, 2004) in which you requested
comments for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that the following water
resources in Hydrologic Unit 030708 will be impacted:
Stream (Index) Water Quali , Classification
¦ UT's to Mountain Creek (13-5) WS-IV
¦ UT's to Jacobs Creek (13-9) WS-1V
¦ Lake Tillery/Pee Dee River and UT's (13-(1)) WS-IV &B Critical Area
NC 24-27 is described as a major rural collector. The purpose of the project is to improve safety and
traffic carrying capacity. NC Division of Water Quality has the following comments:
Environmental Documentation
¦ The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on
mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a
conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the
NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects
requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401
Water Quality Certification.
Planning and Access Control Issues
¦ From 2000 to 2020, the estimated population increase for Stanly is 21 percent. Growth
management within the next five years will be imperative, especially along highway corridors, in
order to protect or improve water quality in this sub-basin. Growth management can be defined
as the application of strategies and practices that help achieve sustainable development in
harmony with the conservation of environmental qualities and features of an area. On a local
level, growth management often involves planning and development review requirements that are
designed to maintain or improve water quality.
¦ The scoping letter was not specific as to the extent of the improvements to NC 24-27 being
contemplated (number of lanes, typical sections, etc.). A qualitative analysis of cumulative and
secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project may be required.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/

NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis
R-2530B Scoping Letter
January 13, 2004
Page 2
Design & Construction Issues
¦ The DWQ requests that this project follow the Merger/Concurrence process.
¦ Hazardous spill catch basins may be required in the vicinity of the Pee Dee River due to the
project's proximity to the water supply critical area. More information will be required on project
truck volume, avoidance options, etc. during the merger process and hydraulic design review.
¦ Within the Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin, sedimentation and storm water runoff are major water quality
concerns. In order to reduce sedimentation in receiving waters, same. day seeding and mulching
is strongly encouraged. Storm water runoff from the project should be designed to be directed to
grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins or other site-appropriate
means of receiving pre-treatment, rather than routed directly into streams.
¦ Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be
removed from any water pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the
stream
¦ Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation
will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow as well as utility relocations.
¦ Onsite wetland delineation shall be performed prior to application for §401 Certification.
¦ Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not
possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the
NCDWQ Wetlands Rules 115A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)), mitigation will be required for impacts
of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream In the event that mitigation becomes
required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values.
In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules 115A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3)1, the NC Wetland
Restoration Program (NCWRP) may be available for use as stream mitigation.
The Mountain Creek watershed, including Little Mountain Creek, is one of 55 watersheds in the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin that has been identified by the NCWRP as an area with the greatest
need and opportunity for stream and wetland restoration efforts. This watershed will be given
higher priority than a non-targeted watershed for the implementation of NCWRP restoration,
projects. Please contact NCWRP or the NC Division of Ecological Enhancement for more
information if this project requires mitigation.
¦ DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. When practical, the DWQ requests that
bridges be replaced on the existing location with road closure.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at [phone].
pc: Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office
Chris Militscher, USEPA
Marella Buncick, USFWS
Marla Chambers, NCWRC
File Copy

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
January 5, 2004
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the subject project
(see attached map for location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review
procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be
?iltiU'`, performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
•' project is scheduled for?Janfflary'14, 2004'at 2:00 PM in the Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with your
comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Beverly Robinson, Project
Development Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 254. Please include the TIP Project Number in all
correspondence and comments.
GJT/plr
Attachment
Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele
Division of Water Quality/Wetlands
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental
Review of Scoping Sheets for N 24-27 Wi
West Z the Pee Dee River, Stanly County,
34446.1.6, TIP Project R-2530 B
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY

JAN 0 7 2004

MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
WBS Element
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Date: January 5, 2004
Revision Date:
Project Development Stage
TIP # R-2530 B Programming
® Planning
PROJECT # 34446.1.6 F Design
F.A. PROJECT
DIVISION: 10 COUNTY: Stanly
ROUTE: NC 24-27
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: Rural Major Collector
LENGTH: 8.9 Miles
PURPOSE OF PROJECT: To improve safety and traffic carrying capacity along NC 24-
27.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (INCLUDING SPECIFIC LIMITS) AND MAJOR
ELEMENTS OF WORK: Widen NC 24-27 to multi-lanes from NC 740 to west of the
Pee Dee River:
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT TO BE PREPARED: Environmental Assessment
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCHEDULE: EA November 2005
FONSI November 2006
WILL THERE BE. SPECIAL FUNDING PARTICIPATION BY MUNICIPALITY,
DEVELOPERS, OR OTHERS? Yes No
IF YES,13Y WHOM AND AMOUNT: ($)0, or0 (%)
HOW AND WHEN WILL THIS BE PAID?
N/A
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL: Full E] Partial ® None
NUMBER OF: Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 1
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY:
Existing: 2 to 3 lane shoulder section
Proposed: 4 lane curb and gutter section within city limits
4 lane shoulder section outside city limits
TRAFFIC (ADT): Current (2003): 9400-14500
Design Year (2030): 19000-30000
% TTST DUAL DHV
DESIGN STANDARDS APPLICABLE: AASHTO ® 3R
DESIGN SPEED: 60 mph (97 km/h)
CURRENT COST ESTIMATE:
Construction Cost (including engineering
and contingencies) .. .. ........... . $ 22,300,000
Right of Way Cost (including relocation,
utilities and acquisition) . .........: . $ 400,000
(TIP)
Preliminary Engineering . .... .... ... :.
Total Cost . .:.. .. ... $ 22,700,000
TIP COST ESTIMATE:
Construction............ .......... ...... $ 17,200,000
Right of Way... .. $ 400,000
TOTAL TIP COST ESTIMATE .................. $ 17,600,000
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
LIST ANY SPECIAL FEATURES, SUCH AS RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT, WHICH
COULD AFFECT COST OR SCHEDULE OF PROJECT:
ITEMS REQUIRED (X) COMMENTS COST
Estimated Costs of Improvements:
® Pavement:
?Surface ... , .. . . .... .. .... ... ..
. $
$
600
449
3
® .. ...............
New.. ..... ....... ,
,
Milling & Recycling ....... .. ... .... . $
® Resurfacing....... . .. ........... ...... $ 644,800
® Widening $ 750,880
? Shoulders:
? Paved..... .. .. ... . ........... . $
$
? Earthern ..... .. .. . ...... ... ..
Earthwork ......... ... ..... . .. . .. ..... $ 3,800,000
® Fine Grading.. . ..... .......... ............ $ 150,000
? Subsurface Items ....... .. ... ............ ...
. $
$
750
525
® Subgrade and Stabilization ...... . .................... ,
® Drainage (List any special items) ........................ $ 1,120,000
? Sub-Drainage .. ...... .......... .. ........ $
Structures Width x Length
? Bridge Rehabilitation x ..: .. • • • $
New Bridge x .......... $
? New Bridge x .......... $
? New Bridge x .......... $
? Widen Bridge x ......... $
? Remove Bridge x .. .. $
F] New Culvert: Size Length ... .. $
Culvert Extension . . . $
? Retaining Walls. .... .. ..... .. .... $
Noise Walls : ............ ....:..... . .
Q Other Misc. Structures ........ ............ ..
$
? Concrete Curb & Gutter ... .......................... ... .
? Concrete Sidewalk .. $
? Guardrail . $
Fencing: W.W. ? and/or C.L.? .. • • $
Z Erosion Control .. . ... $ 591,500
? Landscaping .......................................

PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
ITEMS REQUIRED (X) COMMENTS COST
? Lighting ..... ... .... .. .. ......... .....
® Traffic Control ... ....... ... .... ......... . $
$
196,000
? Signing:

? New ...... ........ ... ......... $
Upgraded.... ...... .... .... ............. $
D Traffic Signals:
? New .. " ..... .... . .... . $
? Revised........ . . ............... ........ $

? RR Signals:
?New. .... . .... . ..... $
Revised....... .... ...... ... ...... $
? With or Without Arms.......... ... ... • • • $
? If 3R:
? Drainage Safety Enhancement.. ... .. ....... $
? Roadside Safety Enhancement.. . ......... . $
? Realignment for Safety Upgrade............ ... ... . $
? Pavement Markings:
? Paint.. .......... .. $
Thermo & Markers.... ........... .. ... . . $ 134,400
?' Markers.... . .... . ..................... $
? $
? Delineators .. .................... . .. . ...
z other clearing,grubbing,mobilization,misc............ .......... $ 7,997,070
Contract Cost Subtotal .. . ... ........ . $ 19,360,000
Engineering & Contingencies ...... ....... ......... • . $ 2,940,000
Preliminary Engineering Costs . .. ...... .. $
CONSTRUCTION Subtotal .. $ 22,300,000
Right of Way:
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH: 60-100 feet
WILL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY CONTAIN IMPROVEMENTS?
Yes ? No'®
R New Right of Way Needed: Width 150-200 feet .... $
? Easements: Type Width $
?. Utilities: • • .. $
RIGHT OF WAY Subtotal: $ 4001000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: .$ 22,700,000
Prepared By: BGR Date:
THE ABOVE SCOPING INFORMATION HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED
BY:
INIT. DATE INIT. DATE
Highway Design Board of Tran. Member
Roadway Board of Tran. Member
Structure Dir. Plan. & Prog.
Design Services Dep. Admin.-Preconst.
Geotechnical Chief Engineer-Oper.
Hydraulics - Secondary Roads Off
Loc. & Surveys - - Construction Branch
Photogrammetry Roadside Environmental-
Pref. Est. Engr.' Maintenance Branch
Planning & Envir. Bridge Maintenance
Right of Way Statewide Planning
R/W Utilities Division Engineer
Traffic Engineering Bicycle Coordinator
Project Management Program Development
County Manager FHWA
City/Municipality Dept. of Cult. Res.
Others Dept. of EH & NR
Others Others
Scoping Sheet for local officials wil l be sent to Division Engineer for handling.
IF YOU ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH PROPOSED PROJECT OR SCOPING,
NOTE YOUR PROPOSED REVISIONS BELOW AND INITIAL AND DATE AFTER
COMMENTS.

U Is /? D q q C-r e? K
r347Og' 13?s
(4vs-/ v
ylle?e Oey)r,'v 4- U T,5
L
-----------------------
13-0) 0 J0?09
t AT Jot ©l-i c,-,e -e k

L/6-I vb-B c 4
T! 'J SaNti113M-0Ma:3WdN 26e9z2Z6T6:-131 TS:TT 3(11 b002-2T-Ndf
M ?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LYND M"Ert
MICI- A£L F. SASL£Y SDCMUARY
Cd:VER?OR
FAIL COVER SHEE
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
BRANCH
DATE: _ . I i1jq -0 f
NUMBER CALLINGA3 3
NUMBER OF PAGES: &
Please Deliver the Following Pages to:
Name:
Department or Firm:
Address or Room Number:
This fax being sent by:
Name!
7 ?-23; IIi - : ti i 4?t
Phone Number:.
NOTES:
WggSjrE; A%W.D0H,00r.STArE.NC,u8
T66 LSO'rN 268922L6 <- 03Qd 1SQ 3N
MAILING ADDRESS:
ryG QEPARTMENTOr TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPME'a" AfQ ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1$48 MNL SERVKe CENTER
RhLEIa+ NC 27699.1548
TaAPHONE: 919-733-3141
FAX: [phone]
LOMT10N!
Tj"KV RTATWN BUUVNO
1 SOUTH VkMo--- ST C
BS'-ZT bWZ/ST/TB

SGNU113M-0M0:3WdN 2689€2L6T6:131 TS:TT 3f"11 b002-2T-NUf
r 7 L.
'ent ? _ ??? 11
7
f ? ' ? ?' ua.alm , l
_ $?31 l 1z? ? , , aye f "?? '• ti"" ?5
r 720
s ? ,mot,
all
V20 IRZ s
7 lei*
52 }.--
. yam,
` r t ? . t?t
Y '
f i
inr
] vrK
?p(yf [?'JS] r t
0]° IX
t
tl `• I?
' fs ?r
? ? ff
r?
NORTH CAROLINA UBPAR7XW4T OP
TRANSPORTATION
plJOH ! DRVUOPMRNT AND
RN'VMGNMBNTAL ANAUMN BRANCH
2 ^-73
FROM NC 740 IN ALSEMARTE
TO xULTI-LANES WEST op
THB PER DEL IUVRR
STANLY COUNTY
TIP PROIBCT R-3OB
FIGURE I
E06 LSO'ON 268922L6 <- U3Qd lOQ ON BS:ET VOOE/ET/TO