NC0089290_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2016

Mickey, Mike
From:
Belnick, Tom
Sent:
Monday, November 23, 2015 11:10 AM
To:
Chuck Willis
Cc:
Mickey, Mike
Subject:
RE: Mocksville WTP
Chuck- there is no need to establish temporary power, as the Duke electrical connection will occur shortly. I've copied
Mike Mickey with Winston-Salem Regional Office, to keep them in the loop.
Tom Belnick
Supervisor
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit, DWR
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6390 office
[e-mail]
512 North Salisbury Street
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27669
-'" 'Nothing Compares -,,.,-
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Chuck Willis [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 8:34 AM
To: Belnick, Tom <[e-mail]>
Subject: Mocksville WTP
we r],II 0
Thank you for speaking with me on Friday regarding the new Mocksville NPDES Permit at the Water Treatment Plant
(NC0089290). Did you have an opportunity to speak with your staff and the Regional Office regarding flow recording? As
of Dec 1 the Town will be required to continuously monitor flow. Their new Parshall flume is in service but we are still
awaiting power. We can get temporary power to the site if necessary but would prefer to continue visual monitoring and
daily flow estimations for a few weeks if that is acceptable. Please let me know so we can make the appropriate
arrangements.
Thank you for the consideration.

- Chuck
Charles A. Willis, Jr., P.E., BCEE
Willis Engineers
10700 Sikes Place, Suite 115
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
704.377.9844 office
704.338.4668 direct
704.641.1621 cell
To find out more about Willis Engineers,
visit us online at www.WillisEngineers.com

Mickey, Mike
From:
Mickey, Mike
Sent:
Friday, August 21, 2015 10:17 AM
To:
'Scott Smart'
Subject:
RE: Mocksville
Scott —
Just FYI — After our discussion yesterday, I looked up the WTP General Permit (NCG590000). The permit does not have a
flow cut off and it also covers conventional WTP's. The main benefit of the general permit is a reduced annual fee (from
$860 to $100) and reduced toxicity testing (from quarterly to annual). Might be something Mocksville would want to
consider at renewal in December 2016. The permit and technical bulletin can be found at the following link under
General Permits.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Scott Smart [mailto:ssmartCcOenvirolinkinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 5:26 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Cc: Heather Adams
Subject: Mocksville NC0021491 Rotary Drum Screen
Mr. Mickey,
In recent weeks, the influent rotary drum screen's motor failed and the unit had to be removed from the influent lift
station. The unit came equipped with a backup screening basket that fits into the drum screen's bracket at the influent
pipe. That basket has been installed, while the repair to the rotary drum screen is being resolved (see attached
picture). Please let us know if you require any additional information.
Scott Smart, PE
Senior Quality Manager
Envirolink Inc.
[e-mail]
www.envirolinkinc.com
252-235-4900- Office
252-290-5646 —Mobile
This E-mail (including attachments) is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain confidential or
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution, or

copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the
sender and delete this email from your computer. Thank you.

i
Mickey, Mike
From: Ruhlman, Carrie
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 8:08 AM
To: Saunders, David; Kyle Ketchum ([e-mail])
Cc: Mickey, Mike; Bell, Carol
Subject: RE: Town of Mocksville WTP
• We are not aware of any water plants that are currently members. Are there any other water plants that have had
their own in -stream monitoring requirements waived because of they were associated with a member
WWTP? I'm assuming you mean in other coalitions. See 3rd bullet below.
• How many WTP's with permitted discharges lie within the Basin, and could benefit from a similar arrangement?
with and/or without additional monitoring sites being required Will need to check into this... it'll require a little time.
• Is this a common practice used in other NC monitoring coalitions? WTPs are/have been members of the MCFBA
(Ft. Bragg, Harnett Co., Fayetteville, Dunn), TPBA (Rocky Mt, Enfield, Washington), and UCFRBA (Pilgrim's
Pride). Some of these used to have instream turbidity requirements that were dropped in the last permitting cycle
— the facilities have remained members.
• Are there any other benefits or drawbacks from your perspective that need to be considered? The decision to
allow any member to join the YPDRBA is pretty much yours. There are very few facilities that the Division would
not allow to join a coalition (or would not be able to offer the benefit of an instream monitoring waiver). I
personally see no drawbacks, especially if the WTP owner is already a member (with a WWTP) of the
Association. While it would be pretty difficult to determine their membership dues based on flow, I think the other
coalitions may do a flat fee structure for WTPs (not positive though, we'd have to check).
Hope this helps. Let me know if you would still like to discuss and we can set something up.
Carrie Ruhlman
NC Division of Water Resources
Phone: [phone]
carrie. ruhlmanOu,ncdenr.gov
htty://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/`ess/­eco/coalition
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
,A Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: Saunders, David [mailto: David. [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 2:10 PM
To: Ruhlman, Carrie; Kyle Ketchum (kketchum(.amonroenc.org)
Cc: Mickey, Mike; Bell, Carol
Subject: RE: Town of Mocksville WTP
Thanks, and let me know if this would easier to manage if we arranged a conference call.
. David
From: Ruhlman, Carrie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:58 AM
To: Kyle Ketchum ([e-mail])
Cc: Mickey, Mike; Bell, Carol; Saunders, David

Subject: FW: Town of Mocksville WTP
Importance: High
Hi Kyle,
I've checked with both the NPDES Section and Winston-Salem Regional Office, and there are no issues with allowing the
town of Mocksville WTP (NC0089290) to join the Association. Also, no additional monitoring will be required with the
addition of this facility to the membership.
If the Association approves membership, I will proceed with preparing the amendment to the MOA. This will require
signatures from Mocksville's authorized representative, you and the Division Director. Once the amendment is
executed, the WTP will receive a letter from NPDES waiving the in -stream monitoring requirements in their permit.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Carrie Ruhlman
NC Division of Water Resources
Phone: [phone]
Carrie. ru hlmanCa';ncdenr. gov
http: / / portal.ncdenr.org/web /wq / ess/eco / coalition
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: Ruhlman, Carrie
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:18 AM
To: Kyle Ketchum (kketchum(c monroenc.org)
Cc: Mickey, Mike; 'Saunders, David' (David.Saunders(d)hdrinc.com)
Subject: RE: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hi Kyle,
Just got the inquiry below about the Town of Mocksville's WTP. Their WWTP is currently a member of the Association. I
don't see any issues with adding this facility. Though none of the current Association facilities are WTPs, other coalitions
do have WTPs as members. It's up to you all whether or not you want them to join.
I used to send these requests to Roger ... I don't know what to do now that he's retired!! Please let me know how you
would like to proceed.
Thanks!
Carrie Ruhlman
NC Division of Water Resources
Phone: [phone]
carrie. ruhlman(a,ncdenr. eov
http: / / portal.ncdenr.org/web /wq / ess /eco /coalition
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
`,A Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

x
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 2:45 PM
To: Ruhlman, Carrie
Subject: FW: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hi Carrie —The Town of Mocksville wants to know if their water treatment plant could join the discharge coalition in
order to waive up and downstream monitoring? The WTP NPDES permit does not have a flow limit. What are the
guidelines? Thanks, Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Heather Adams[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 12:54 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hey Mike,
Since the Town is a member of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Associatiation and they cover the stream monitoring
requirements in the WWTP Permit (Dutchman Creek POTW — NC0021491) can this requirement be noted the same way
in the WTP discharge permit (NC0089290). The staff is expressing safety concerns in regards to the sampling locations. I
have not looked at the sites but wanted to get your thoughts.
Thanks
11,A..- 46r
Director of Operations
Envirolink, Inc.
PO Box 670
Bailey, NC 27807
252-235-4900

Yadkin/Pee D�e
River Basin Association I
Dues Invoice #2016-07-01-014
Date: July 1, 2015
To: From:
Jeanette Harps Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin Association
Town of Mocksville c/o Donna Davis, Treasurer
171 Clement St Stanly County Utilities
Mocksville, NC 27028 1000 N 1st Street Suite 12
Albemarle, NC 28001
Amount now due $ 394.68 This amount is past due after August 21, 2016.
Dues are invoiced twice each year. The billed amount represents the yearly total.
Permitted
Percent of
YPDRBA Member
Flow (mgd)
Total
FY 15-16 Dues
34
of Dues
LP Corp
2.000
1.107%
$ 2,321.66
$
1,160.83
Anson County
3.500
1.9370A
$ 4,062.91
$
2,031.46
ITG, Inc
1.200
0.664%
$ 1,393.00
$
696.50
Cabarrus County
24.150
13,364%
$ 28,034.10
$
14,017.05
Cleveland, Town of
0.270
0.1490A
$ 313.42
$
156.71
Davie County
1.500
0.830%
$ 1,741.25
$
870.62
Denton
0.800
0.443%
$ 928.67
$
464.33
Duke Energy
1,000
0.553%
$ 1,160.83
$
580.42
YVSA (formerly Elkin)
1.800
0.9960/0
$ 2,089.50
$
1,044.7.5
Greater Badin WWTP (Stanly County)
0.550
0.304%
$ 638.46
$
319.23
High Point
6.200
3.431%
$ 7,197.16
$
3,598.58
Performance Fibers (Invista,KOSA)
2.310
1.278%
$ 2,681.52
$
1,340.76
Lexington
6.500
3.597%
$ 7,545.41
$
3,772.70
Mocksville
0.680
0.376%
$ 789.37
$
,
Monroe
10.400
5.755%
$ 12,072.66
$
6,036.33
Mooresville
7.500
4.150%
$ 8,706.24
$
4,353.12
Mt. Airy
7.000
3.874%
$ 8,125.83
$
4,062.91
Mt. Gilead
0.850
0.470%
$ 986.71
$
493.35
N. Wilkesboro
2.000
1.107%
$ 2,321.86
$
1,160.83
West Stanly WWTP (Stanly County)
0.900
0.498%
$ 1,044.75
$
522.37
Pilot Mountain
0.500
0.277%
$ 580.42
$
290.21
Rockingham
9.000
4.980%
$ 10,447.49
$
5,223.75
Salisbury
12.500
6.917%
$ 14,510.40
$
7,255.20
Statesville
10.000
5.534%
$ 11,608.32
$
5,804.16
Thomasville
6.000
3.320%
$ 6.964.99
$
3,482.50
Troy
1.200
0.664%
$ 1,393.00
$
696.50
Union County
2.000
1.107%
$ 2,321.66
$
1,160.83
Wilkesboro
4.900
2.712%
$ 5,688.08
$
2,844.04
Winston-Salem
51.000
28.222%
$ 59,202.45
$
29,601.22
Yadkinville
2.500
1.3830A
$ 2,902.08
$
1,451.04
Total
180.710
100.0000/6
$ 209,774.00
$104,887.00
Aqua NC
$
100.00
Thank you for your prompt payment and support of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Association.
Please remit your dues to the Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin Association, c/o Donna Davis, Stanly County Utilities,
1000 N 1°t Street, Suite 12, Albemarle, NC 28001. If you have questions about this invoice, please feel free to call
me at [phone] or email me at [e-mail].
Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin Association http://www.yadkinpeedee.org

Mickey, Mike
From: Christine Bralley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:26 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; Mickey, Mike
Subject: YPDRBA
Attachments: D00081215-08122015122036.pdf
Heather,
The Town of Mocksville already is a member of the YPDRBA and paid dues on 7/21/15.
Thank you,
Christine
Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
Mocksville, NC — "Time Well Spent"
336-753-6701
[e-mail]

Mickey, Mike
From: Heather Adams <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:58 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hey Mike
Christine asked us to look into it so I would assume they would be ok with the fee but I will double check with her once
we hear back from the Association. As far as Construction, I have not heard a progress status lately. I will send Chuck
Willis and email to find out.
Thanks,
Heather
From: Mickey, Mike [mailto:mike. [e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:44 AM
To: Heather Adams ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Town of Mocksville WTP
Heather — Still waiting to see what the Association says about adding the WTP. I assume the fee the town pays to the
association would go up if the WTP is added. Is the town okay with that?
Most WTP's do not have up and downstream monitoring. I assume the turbidity requirement was added to Mocksville's
permit due to the lack of settling basins. Maybe the requirement can be removed at the next renewal.
Do you know how construction on the settling basins is proceeding? The limits become effective 12/1/15.
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
From: Ruhlman, Carrie
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:18 AM
To: Kyle Ketchum (kketchum('0monroenc.org)
Cc: Mickey, Mike; 'Saunders, David' (David. Saunders(&hdrinc.com)
Subject: RE: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hi Kyle,
Just got the inquiry below about the Town of Mocksville's WTP. Their WWTP is currently a member of the Association. I
don't see any issues with adding this facility. Though none of the current Association facilities are WTPs, other coalitions
do have WTPs as members. It's up to you all whether or not you want them to join.
I used to send these requests to Roger ... I don't know what to do now that he's retired!! Please let me know how you
would like to proceed.
1

Thanks!
Carrie Ruhlman
NC Division of Water Resources
Phone: [phone]
Carrie.ruhlman(ii ncdenr.gov
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 2:45 PM
To: Ruhlman, Carrie
Subject: FW: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hi Carrie —The Town of Mocksville wants to know if their water treatment plant could join the discharge coalition in
order to waive up and downstream monitoring? The WTP NPDES permit does not have a flow limit. What are the
guidelines? Thanks, Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
From: Heather Adams[mailto:hadams(�benvirolinkinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 12:54 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hey Mike,
Since the Town is a member of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Associatiation and they cover the stream monitoring
requirements in the WWTP Permit (Dutchman Creek POTW — NC0021491) can this requirement be noted the same way
in the WTP discharge permit (NC0089290). The staff is expressing safety concerns in regards to the sampling locations. I
have not looked at the sites but wanted to get your thoughts.
Thanks
lleatle,- fkws,
Director of Operations
Envirolink, Inc.
PO Box 670
Bailey, NC 27807
252-235-4900

Mickey, Mike
From: Ruhlman, Carrie
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:18 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: Town of Mocksville WTP
Sure! The decision will be up to the Association, but the Division has no problem allowing WTPs to join. I'll forward this
along and maybe they can discuss at their meeting on Friday.
Carrie Ruhlman
NC Division of Water Resources
Phone: [phone]
carrie. ruhlman(d ncdenr.gov
http: / /portal.ncdenr.oriz/web/wq /ess/ eco/coalition
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
rA Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 2:45 PM
To: Ruhlman, Carrie
Subject: FW: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hi Carrie —The Town of Mocksville wants to know if their water treatment plant could join the discharge coalition in
order to waive up and downstream monitoring? The WTP NPDES permit does not have a flow limit. What are the
guidelines? Thanks, Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Heather Adams[ma iIto: hadams(&envirolinkinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 12:54 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Town of Mocksville WTP
Hey Mike,
Since the Town is a member of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Associatiation and they cover the stream monitoring
requirements in the WWTP Permit (Dutchman Creek POTW — NC0021491) can this requirement be noted the same way
in the WTP discharge permit (NC0089290). The staff is expressing safety concerns in regards to the sampling locations.
have not looked at the sites but wanted to get your thoughts.

Thanks
{leather Awv
Director of Operations
Envirolink, Inc.
PO Box 670
Bailey, NC 27807
252-235-4900

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:02 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Chuck Willis ([e-mail])
Subject: Hugh Lagle WTP
Attachments: NC0089290.pdf
Radenka —Attached is a copy of the inspection letter that will be mailed today. Also, per your question about the
operator rules, I have attached some regulation cites below with applicable Grade I Physical/Chemical conditions
highlighted in yellow. Additionally, the entire operator rule book and a schedule of future training classes can be found
at the following link:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/tacu
Thanks, Mike.
(b) biological grade U, III, and ICJ systems, other than those cyst
this Mule; five days per week, excluding holidays;
(c) surface irrigation systems with the exception of Sub -item (2)
(d) collection systems; within 24 hours of knowledge of a bypas
from the system unless visited by a collection system Back-ul
(e) domestic wastewater systems with a treatment capacity of 150
year with a six month interval between visits;
(f) domestic wastewater aerobic treatment units (ATUs) with a tre
day or less; weekly;
(g) systems permitted under rules adopted by the Commission f

whose treatment processes are augmented by physical processes, is classified as a ode L
Control System. Any reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, and ultrafiltration system is classi
Water Pollution Control System
(c) Any water pollution control system that has, as part of its treatment process, a biologi
subject to additional classification as a biological water pollution control system.
(d) Any water pollution control system subject to classification under Rule .0302 of 1
chemical process to enhance an activated sludge or fixed growth process, is not subject k
Rule.
SECTION .0400 - ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR E4
(2) be at least 18 years of age;
(3) have a general knowledge of typical wastewater characteristics and to
(4) have the ability to:
(A) read and understand the statutes and rules which govern water
and the operation of the type of system for which certificatic
(B) perform mathematical calculations required to operate the syL%
sought;
(C) complete and maintain logs and regulatory reporting forms
operation of the system; and
(D) safely and effectively operate the equipment employed i
certification is being sought; and
(E) describe the general maintenance requirements for such equi
15A NCAC 08G .0405 ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PHYSICAL/CH]
CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS

possess a valid Grade I P1 Water Pollution 4
! have one year of !'rience at a Grade i Physicalt
System; and
tc) have succemMy completed approved training for Grade H I
Control 1 #' Q
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
[phone]
Please note new address and telephone number.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

A5A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
January 23, 2015
Ms. Christine Bralley, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Mocksville
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO089290
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
On January 21, 2015, Mike Mickey and Michael Shepherd of this office met with Radenka Dragas,
John Garland and Chuck Willis to perform a Compliance Evaluation Inspection on the NPDES wastewater
discharge from the Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The inspection findings are detailed
below and an inspection checklist is attached for your records.
I. Permit
The NPDES permit was issued December 1, 2013. The effluent limits in the permit are set to become
effective on December 1, 2015, in order to allow time for construction of the new filter backwash treatment
units. The project is currently at bid.
H. Self -Monitoring Program
The monthly self -monitoring reports (DMR's) were reviewed for the period January 2014 through December
2014. As noted previously, the effluent limits are not effective until December 1, 2015 (See data summary
attached). In regards to the permit monitoring requirements, it was noted that all sampling was performed
per the frequencies specified in the permit except for one quarterly copper value that was omitted for the
period January through March 2014. This violation was previously addressed in correspondence from this
office.
M. Flow Measurement
Instantaneous flow estimates are currently being reported. The permit will require continuous flow recording
upon installation and operation of the flow meter per footnote 2 of the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring
Requirements Page.
IV. Sludge Handling and Disposal
At present, the facility does not have the capability to remove solids from the filter backwash and
sedimentation basin wastewater until the settling units are constructed.
V. Operations and Maintenance
The project is currently at bid to construct two 250,000 gallon settling tanks along with a dechlor unit and a
continuous flow recording meter.
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncwaterguality.ors
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Ms. Christine Bralley
Page 2
January 23, 2015
VI. Records/Reports
A review of the facility files found the operators records to be thorough and maintained according to the
permit. A comparison of the December 2015 self -monitoring report with the corresponding operator records
showed that all field measurements were transcribed correctly onto the DMR.
VII. Effluent/Receiving Waters
The system discharges into an unnamed tributary to Bear Creek, class "WS-1V" waters in the Yadkin River
Basin. The effluent was observed to be clear on the day of the inspection.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Mike Mickey or me at (336)
776-9697.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, PE
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
cc: Radenka Dragas ([e-mail])
Chuck Willis, PE ([e-mail])
Central Files
WSRO

If
Mocksville - Hugh A. Lagle WTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO089290
Self -Monitoring Data Summary
January 2014 — December 2014
Parameters
Monthly Avg.
Permit Limit
Monthly Avg. Limit
Violations per DMR
Daily Maximum
Permit Limit
Daily Max. Limit
Violations per DMR
Flow (MGD)*
-
NA
-
NA
TSS (mg/L)*
30.0
NA
45.0
NA
pH (S.U.)*
-
NA
(6.0 — 9.0)
NA
R. Chlorine (ug/L)*
-
NA
17.0**
NA
Turbidity (NTU)
-
NA
-
NA
Total Iron (ug/L)
-
NA
-
NA
Total Copper (ug/L)
-
NA
-
NA
Manganese (ug/L)
-
NA
-
NA
Flouride (ug/L)
-
NA
-
NA
Total Zinc (ug/L)***
-
NA
-
NA
Aluminum (ug/L)
-
NA
-
NA
T. Nitrogen (mg/L)
-
NA
-
NA
T. Phosphorus (mg/L)
-
NA
-
NA
Chronic Toxicity
P/F @ 90%
NA
-
NA
* Limits, including the continuous flow recording requirement, become effective December 1, 2015.
** TRC values reported below 50 ug/L are considered compliant.
*** Monitoring not required since no zinc additives are used.

Permit: NCO089290 Owner - Facility: Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Inspection Date: 01/21/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
1
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
0
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The NPDES permit for the Huqh Laqle WTP became effective December 1. 2013. The
existing WTP currently does not have any treatment units for the filter backwash and
sediment basin wastewater. Permit limits for total residual chlorine TSS and DH will
become effective after completion of construction of the wastewater treatment facilities or
no later than December 1. 2015. The project has just gone to bid to construct and install
dechlor, flow measurement and two 250,000 gallon settling tanks.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment: For flow reporting the permit requires the instantaneous flow estimates until the flow meter
installed on or before December 1, 2015. Then the continuous flow recording requirement is
in effect.
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
❑
❑
N
❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: They system discharges into a ditch that leads to an unnamed tributary
of Bear Creek.
The
effluent was clear on the day of the inspection.
Page# 3
1

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 2:27 PM
To: Carter, Jenifer
Subject: FW: NCG590000 - WTP
FYI — Conversion at renewal. It is in the permit under Part 1.A(3).
From: Hennessy, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 2:17 PM
To: Weaver, Charles; Grzyb, Julie
Cc: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: NCG590000
Due to the existing staffing levels and current permitting volume, it was our intention to process these on their original
renewal schedule. I hope this answers everyone's questions. Please let me know if you have any questions, or require
any additional information. Thanks.
From: Weaver, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 2:01 PM
To: Hennessy, John; Grzyb, Julie
Cc: Mickey, Mike
Subject: FW: NCG590000
I know that we won't require a fee to modify existing NC00 permits to NCG59. However, are we allowing changeovers
before a permit is due for renewal?
Let me know, and I'll forward the answer to Mike.
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 4:26 PM
To: Weaver, Charles
Subject: NCG590000
Charles —I assume existing WTP's that meet the criteria will be moved to the new general permit at renewal. If a facility
wants to transfer in mid -permit cycle, can they go ahead and submit Short Form C — WTP without a fee? Will it be
processed? Thanks, Mike.
[e-mail]
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105
[phone]
Please note new address and telephone number.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From:
Weaver, Charles
Sent:
Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:53 AM
To:
Mickey, Mike
Subject:
RE: Mocksville WTP - NCO089290
Mike — I set the Zinc monitoring to Optional in BIMS. The violations should resolve overnight.
Sorry I missed that one. Thanks for letting me know.
CHW
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 3:16 PM
To: Weaver, Charles
Subject: Mocksville WTP - NCO089290
Charles — BIMS is generating quarterly monitoring violations for zinc at the Mocksville WTP. However, they do not have
to monitor for zinc since they do not use any zinc additives (per footnote 6 in the permit). Can the zinc monitoring
expectation in BIMS be turned off? I attached the limit page. Thanks, Mike.
NCO089290
Monitoring Violation
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Frequency 2014 3 001 Zinc, Total (as Zn) 03-31-2014 Quarterly
Violation
Mike Mickey
Mike. [e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
June 17, 2014
Ms. Christine W Bralley, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 South Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (# NOV-2014-MV-0038)
NPDES Permit No. NCO089290
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Davie County
Dear Ms Bralley:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
A review of the Hugh A. Lagle WTP monitoring report for March 2014 showed the following
violation:
Parameter
Date Omitted
Measuring Frequency
Values Reported
# of Violations
Total Copper
March 2014
Quarterly
0
1
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action
by the Division of Water Resources for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Mickey at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, PE
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
cc: Radenka Dragas ([e-mail])
Central Files - SWP
WSRO
N.C. Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street, Winstion-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

hD�MR Review Record%
Facility: Permit No.: \v��Q� ��� Pipe No.:
M thl Average Violations
Month/Year:�\3���
Mama er Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit Action
We*bklv/Dally Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limit ;LimlitDMR Value % Over Limit Action
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations Action
C,4 \
Other Violations/Staff Remarks:
supervisor Remarks: tl
Nov , Aoeti
y
Completed by:
Assistant Regional
Supervisor Sign Off:
Date: � " \k-", "\\ -
Date:
Regional Supervisor Sign ' Off: Date: 4 Zv 1 'f

NPDES PERMIT NO.: NCO089290
PERMIT STATUS: Active
FACILITY NAME: Hugh A. Lagle WTP
OWNER NAME: Town of Mocksville
GRADE:PCNC
PERMIT VERSION: 1.0
CLASS:PCNC
ORC: Not Required
ORC HAS CHANGED: No
COUNTY: Davie
ORC CERT NUMBER: 995491
eDMR PERIOD: 03-2014 (March 2014) VERSION: 1.0 STATUS: Processed
COMPLIANCE: Non -Compliant CONTACT PHONE #: [phone] SUBMISSION DATE: 04/14/2014
SAMPLING LOCATION: EFFLUENT DISCHARGE NO.: 001 NO DISCHARGE*: NO
A
e
y
sn
U
E
a
U
Fe
E
F
-
'�
a
o
1.
O
rn
a
°
a
F
E
.9
O
d•
rn
C
V
O
g
�
C
e
�
Z
50050
00400
50060
C0530
C0600
C0665
00070
01045
01105
See Permit
2 X month
2 X month
2 X month
Quarterly
Quarterly
2 X month
Quarterly
Quarter)
Estimate
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
FLOW
PH
CHLORINE
I TSS - Cone
TOTALN-
TOTALP-
TURB
IRON
ALUMINUM
2400
Hrs
2400
Hrs
YB/N
m d
su
u I
mg/l
m I
mg/I
ntu
ug/1
u I
1
0.05
2
0.07
6.8
275
3
0.07
4
0.07
1336
30
5
0.07
6
0.07
7
0.07
8
0.08
-.s,,,
9
0.05
10
0.07
11
0.07
12
0.07
,
.4;
13
0.07
14
0.07
15
0.07
16
1
10.07
17
0.05
6.71
245
18
0.05
131
1.57
1.4
1.8
7.89
24.8
19
0.07
20
0.05
21
0.05
22
0.07
23
0.07
24
0.05
25
1
10.05
26
0.05
27
0.07
28
0.05
29
0.07
30
0.05
31
0.05
Monthly Average Limit:
Monthly Average:
0.0626
6.755
260
233.5
1.57
1.4
15.9
7.89
24.8
Daily Maximum:
0.08
6.8
275
336
1.57
1.4 130
7.89
24.8
Daily Minimum:
0.05
6.71
245
131
1.57
1.4
1.8
7.89
24.8
Monthly Avg % Removal (85%):
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
MAY 0 12014
VVINSTON-REGIONAL OFFIC.

NPDES PERMIT NO.: NCO089290
FACILITY NAME: Hugh A. Lagle WTP
OWNER NAME: Town of Mocksville
GRADE:PCNC
eDMR PERIOD: 03-2014 (March 2014)
PERMIT VERSION: 1.0 PERMIT STATUS: Active
CLASS: PCNC COUNTY: Davie
ORC: Not Required ORC CERT NUMBER: 995491
ORC HAS CHANGED: No
VERSION: 1.0 STATUS: Processed
COMPLIANCE: Non -Compliant CONTACT PHONE #: [phone] SUBMISSION DATE: 04/14/2014
SAMPLING LOCATION: EFFLUENT DISCHARGE NO.: 001 NO DISCHARGE*: NO (Continue)
A
p
a
e
V
e
F
=
e
F
e
i
�
t
O
B
iz
°
0
F
O
m
°
0
O
C
C
3
Z
01092
01055
00951
01042
TGP3B
Quarterly
Quarterly
-Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
ZINC
MANGNESE
FLUORIDE
COPPER
CERI7DPF
2400
Hrs 12400
Hrs
Y/B/N
u 1
u l
u l
u l
ass/fail
1
2
3
4
Nb.'',,
5
;\ r
I
6r8
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
0.238
< 0.1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly Average Limit:
Monthly Average:
0.238
0
1
Daily Maximum:
0.238
0
1
Daily Minimum:
0.238
0
l
Monthly Avg % Removal (85 % ):

NPDES PERMIT NO.: NCO089290
• FACILITY NAME: Hugh A. Lagle WTP
OWNER NAME: Town of Mocksville
GRADE:PCNC
eDMR PERIOD: 03-2014 (March 2014)
COMPLIANCE: Non -Compliant
PERMIT VERSION: 1.0
CLASS: PCNC
ORC: Not Required
ORC HAS CHANGED: No
VERSION: 1.0
CONTACT PHONE #: [phone]
PERMIT STATUS: Active
COUNTY: Davie
ORC CERT NUMBER: 995491
STATUS: Processed
SUBMISSION DATE: 04/14/2014
04/14/2014
ORC/Certifier Signature: R denka Dragas E-Mail:[e-mail] Phone #:[phone] Date
By this signature, I certify that this repo is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
The permittee shall report to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office any noncompliance that potentially threatens public health or the environment.
Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be
provided within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances.
If the facility is noncompliant, please attach a list of corrective actions being taken and a time -table for improvements to be made as required by part II.E.6 of
the NPDES permit.
COMMENTS: There is no result for Total Copper. The operator that collected the quarterly samples omitted to list Total Copper on the Laboratory Chain of Custody. It was the
first time the operator sampled the discharge.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the
system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
- - 1__1%
04/14/2014
Permittee/Submitter Signature:*Gf Radenka Dragas E-Mail:[e-mail] Phone #:[phone] Date
Permittee Address: 771 Sanford Ave Mocksville NC 27028 Permit Expiration Date: 12/31/2016
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES
LAB NAME: Statesville Analytical
CERTIFIED LAB #: 37755
PERSON(s) COLLECTING SAMPLES: Mitch Wyatt; Radenka Dragas
PARAMETER CODES
Parameter Codes assistance may be obtained by calling the NPDES Unit [phone] or by visiting the Surface Water Protection Section's web site at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp and linking to the unit's information pages.
FOOTNOTES
Use only units of measurement designated in the reporting facility's NPDES permit for reporting data.
* No Flow/Discharge From Site: Check this box if no discharge occurs and, as a result, there are no data to be entered for all of the parameters on the DMR
for entire monitoring period.
** ORC on Site?: ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8G .0204.
*** Signature of Permittee: If signed by other than the permittee, then delegation of the signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B
.0506(b)(2)(D).

Mickey, Mike
From:
Manuel, Vanessa
Sent:
Wednesday, March 12, 2014 3:15 PM
To:
Mickey, Mike
Cc:
Reid, Steve
Subject:
RE: Mocksville WTP - NC0089290
If the facility was able to successfully submit their Jan2014 eDMR, then I would recommend they submit other eDMRs
the same. If the facility is unclassified, then I would think the DMR would still need to be signed by an operator, whether
or not it is the ORC. For eDMR, the report will need to be certified (by an operator associated with the permit) before it
can be submitted.
Sorry for the response delay. Hope this helps.
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 2:49 PM
To: Manuel, Vanessa; Reid, Steve
Subject: RE: Mocksville WTP - NC0089290
Vanessa or Steve — Never got a concrete answer on the signature question below. Thanks, Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. MickevCa)NCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 2:01 PM
To: Manuel, Vanessa; Reid, Steve
Subject: FW: Mocksville WTP - NC0089290
Vanessa or Steve — Should a DMR be signed if the system is currently unclassified? Mocksville submitted their first DMR
in December for their WTP that was just permitted. The facility is existing but no treatment system constructed yet. See
emails below. Thanks, Mike.

N.t:.bWt CftMRJ.y
FM 10 io�a EMUErrr t.mY 6'"`
1MN5?OH-tsALEkI
�'MSs zu�a
REGIONAL OFFICE
FM
NPDBS PWArr NO.,,_ NODOIQ290 DISCHARGE NO._ p0 1 MONM— Dscsnbor YEAR, 2013
FACnM NAME MlocllsVIbMugh A. Lagle WrP CLASS COUNV— 0wlo
CERTIMM LABORATORY (1)_ Town of Moc(a+rlla 040 SW
(Iht nddKional labormorin on the backaldelogp 2 of tbu faro)
opEltATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHAROE (0RC1 D CERIMCATIOZ"O,___
pERWN(S) coLL.HC r[H0 SAMPLESRa=M sOX IF 011C KaCHANOW { —7 NO YLSfR
M2H OURNAL and ONE DOPY to:
ArIM- CWMAL PiLBa
ZAV1a11M1 OP WATIM QUw"
Mike Mickey
Mike.MickevCMNCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
From: Radenka Dragas [mailto:rdragas(d)mocksvillenc.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:53 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: DMR
Good morning Mike,
We still do not have a discharge treatment facility, and therefore the facility has not yet been classified, and can not have
an ORC designation or operator. The Permit Data System reflects that an operator designation of "Not Required"
We have already submitted our January DMR electronically, and mailed the computer printed eDMR.
Please, let me know if the January eDMR was done correctly.
Thanks,
Radenka
From: Mickey, Mike [mailto: mike. mickeyCd)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wed 2/12/2014 1:35 PM

To: Radenka Dragas
Subject: December DMR
Radenka —The December monitoring report just made it here from Raleigh. Noticed that the operator signature was
missing on the front. Just make sure that future reports are signed. Enjoy the snow. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. [e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:28 AM
To: 'Radenka Dragas'
Subject: RE: Permit 0089290 March eDMR
Radenka —There is nothing you can do since the sample was not collected. Just provide comments with the March DMR
explaining the situation. We will probably end up sending a letter for the omission. Mike.
Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Radenka Dragas [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:55 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Permit 0089290 March eDMR
Good morning Mike,
I have just realized that we are missing the copper result for the March report. Is there anything we still can do about this?
I was off because of my husband's injury, and the operator omitted to list it on the Chain of Custody. It was the first time
he sampled the discharge.
Thanks,
Mocksville Water Plant
Radenka Dragas

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 1:35 PM
To: Radenka Dragas ([e-mail])
Subject: December DMR
Radenka —The December monitoring report just made it here from Raleigh. Noticed that the operator signature was
missing on the front. Just make sure that future reports are signed. Enjoy the snow. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. [e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 10:34 AM
To: 'Radenka Dragas'
Subject: RE: Zinc - December DMR
Thanks. I will update the database so it will not to expect zinc monitoring. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. MickevO)NCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Radenka Dragas [ma iIto: [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 10:25 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: Zinc - December DMR
Good morning Mike,
' Zinc was not analyzed because the footnote on the pages of the Permit says "Monitoring for Zinc is only required if Zinc
containing additives are added to water used for filter backwash."
We do not add any additive to our filter back wash water.
Radenka
From: Mickey, Mike[mailto:mike.mickey(&ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Fri 3/14/2014 3:07 PM
To: Radenka Dragas
Subject: Zinc - December DMR
Hi Radenka —The computer noted that zinc was omitted from the December report. Any chance it was collected and
analyzed but just not transcribed? Thanks, Mike.

NCO089290
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Monitoring Violation
Frequency 2013 12 001 Zinc, Total (as Zn) 12-31-2013 Quarterly
Violation
Mike Mickey
Mike.Mickey@ NCDEN R.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Facility: k%\,
Parameter
DMR Review Record
Permit NoA)uxi'a Pipe No.:
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value
Wee Dailv Violations
MonthNear: 6c abQ)
% Over Limit Action
Date Parameter Permit Limit Limit Type MR Value % Over Limit Action
`��c---`i\�«`onitoring Frequency Violations \
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Repo e
--2-%
Other Violations/Staff Remarks:
Supervisor Remarks:
Completed by: "V° Date: v,
Assistant Regional
Supervisor Sign Off: Date:
Regional Supervisor Sign
Off: Date:

11aRS UJAW .LIMEld OZ 1XMKaZdd11S
Part I
A: (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
a. During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored 1 by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS 2 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARCTER.ISTICS
Monthly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample Location
Avera e , Maximum Fre uenc
Flow _
Total Sus ended Solids 30.0 in 45.0 m Continuous Recording Effluent
H g/L 2/Month Grab Effluent
>_ 6.0 SU > 9.0 SU 2/ Month Grab Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine 2° a 17 g/L 2/ Month Grab
Turbidity Effluent
Turbidity 2/ Month Grab Effluent
Total Iron Monthly Grab U , Down
Total Copper Quarterly5 Grab Effluent
Manganese Quarterly5 Grab Effluent
Fluoride Quarterl5 Grab Effluent
Total Zinc 6
Qy5 Grab Effluent
Aluminum QuarterlGrab Effluent
Total Nitrogen uarterly5 Grab Effluent
Total Phos horns Quarterly Grab Effluent
Whole Effluent Toxicity Quarterly Grab Effluent
Monitorin 8 Monitor and Report Quarterly Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. No later than 90 days from the effective date of this permit, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports
electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A (3).
2. Limits, including the requirement for continuous flow recording become effective December 1, 2015, or upon
completion of the wastewater treatment facilities, whichever comes first. Instantaneous flow estimates and
discharge duration shall be recorded until the flowmeter is operational. Upon completion of construction of
wastewater treatment facilities, the Town shall notify the Winston-Salem Regional Office of DENR at (336) 771-
5000, and the Central Office of the Division of Water Resources, NPDES Permitting Unit at [phone]. All
Emits become effective the first of the next month. Monitoring is required beginnin
permit. g on the effective date of this
3. Up is Upstream in Bear Creek at least 50 feet above Discharge location, Down is Downstream in Bear Creek at
least 100 feet below Discharge location.
4. Limit and monitoring apply only if chlorine or chlorine derivatives are used for disinfection. The Division shall
consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/ L to be in compliance with the permit. However, the
Permittee shall record and submit all.values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field
certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/ L.
5. Parameter should be sampled in conjunction with Quarterly Toxicity Testing.
6. Monitoring for Zinc is only required if zinc containing additives are added to water used for filter backwash.
7. Total Nitrogen (TN) = (NO2-N + NO3-N) + TKN where NO2-N and NO3-N are Nitrite and Nitrate Nitrogen,
respectively and TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.
8. Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring (Ceriodaphnia dubia) at 90%; March, June, September and December; refer
to Special Condition A. (2.).
b. All samples must be collected from a typical discharge event.
c. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 6

DR. F. W. SLATE
Mayor
Commissioners:
WILLMARKLIN, Mayor Pro Tern
JOHNNYFRYE
LASH GAITHER SANFORD, JR.
ROB TAYLOR
AMY VAUGHAN-JONES
January 21, 2014
Jown o/ mockville
INCORPORATED 1839
171 S. CLEMENT STREET
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
Point Source Branch
Surface Water -Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority
Mocksville — Hugh A. Lagle WTP
NPDES No. NCO089290
To Whom It May Concern:
CHRISTINE W. BRALLEY
Town Manager
HENRY P. VAN HOY II
Town Attorney
RECEIVED
N.C.Dept. of ENR
JAK 2 2 20%
Winston-Salem
Regiom I office j
By notice of this letter, I hereby delegate signatory authority to each of the following individuals for all
permit applications, discharge monitoring reports, and other information relating to the operations at
Mocksville - Hugh A. Lagle WTP as required by all applicable federal, state, and local environmental
agencies specifically with the requirements for signatory authority as specified in 15A NCAC 213.0506.
Name
Radenka Dragas ORC WTP
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 336-753-6700.
Sincerely,
CC. w.�
Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit ,
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
www.mocksvillenc.org

}
"To preserve, Protect
and enhance a 7
North Cardinas water._."
North Carolina (NC) eDMR Reports
eDMR Registration Form
eDMR is an electronic reporting system, which will provide a facility Owner the ability to submit
discharge monitoring reports via the internet. eDMR is only currently available to facilities that
have an NPDES Wastewater permit issued by the Division of Water Quality. Registration for
eDMR must be completed by the legal Owner of the facility(s), and this legal Owner must be the
same Owner to which the permit(s) have been issued. Once an Owner is registered for eDMR, all
permits held by the Owner will also be registered and able to submit reports via eDMR.
NO Before completing and submitting the registration form, the legal Owners as specified
above should verify the permit facility, Owner, and ORC designations for all permits. This
information can be verified using the eDMR Owner Information Search provided on the
eDMR website. This information is maintained in the DWQ data management system, as
provided by the permittee, and contained in the permit issued to the Owner. Should any
discrepancies with this information be determined, the appropriate DWQ contact should
be notified so information can be corrected prior to registration. It is important that the
permit information be correct prior to eDMR registration.
Please provide all information in Part A, B, C and D. An Owner signature is required for
eDMR registration. Should the registration information be incomplete, the registration
process may be delayed.
Part A: Owner Registration — Permit/Facility Information
Please provide a Permit Number and the associated facility information. Only a single permit
number is needed for registration. If multiple permits are involved, the permit number provided
will be used to identify the Owner and all associated permits. All associated permits issued to the
Owner will be registered for eDMR.
NC eDMR Registration Form (Revision 3) Page I of 4

Part B: Owner Registration - Owner User Details:
Please provide the following information which is needed for creating the Facility Owner in
eDMR. The Owner is the legal entity to which the permit(s) have been issued and may be an
organization or individual. For an organization, the information provided for the owner details should
be the official contact person or the person with delegated signatory authority for the Owner.
Last Name:
Idle Name:
rMa
ame: ��1v�S-�► ��,
Number: 2�0 - "� C�'� (D"1 Q U
G ,✓Ya lty rV�U LIC(lC• 96V
: (Assigned by DWQ eDMR Administrator)
Part C: User Account Information — Submitters
Please provide the users, in addition to the Owner, who will need Submitter permissions.
Submitter permissions can only be assigned by the DWQ eDMR Administrator. The Owner specified
above will be given full eDMR permissions including Submitter permissions.
The Submitter is equivalent to the individual who signs the certification statement on the back of the
discharge monitoring report. In most cases, the Submitter will be the Owner but may be other
delegated individuals. The Submitter must be an individual with delegated signatory authority. If
individuals other than the duly authorized person for the Owner have been delegated signatory
authority, the Division of Water Quality must be notified in writing of such delegations. A delegation
of authority form is available from the eDMR website.
In addition to the User Details, please specify the permit(s) that each user will be associated with for
eDMR submittal. Should additional space be needed for users and/or permits, please make additional
copies of the Submitter User Details page and complete as needed.
NOTE. The Owner will be responsible for creating all facility users except those with Submitter
permissions.
In addition to the Owner and Submitter user, there are four additional user types identified
by user permission level: Facility Administrator, Certifier, Data Entry and View Only.
The Owner and Facility Administrator will have the ability to manage facility users. The
Facility User Administration Guide will provide the appropriate procedures for facility user
management.
NC eDMR Registration Form (Revision 3) Page 2 of 4

Submitter User Details
Permit No. (s):
N(,pU Z40
First Name:��
�G•-
Middle Name:
Last Name:
YU QcJ
Phone Number:
Jl.o' 14-1-1--15L(U
Email:
r3 ratga5 @ lwck V, Ise.
User lD
(Assigned by DWQ eDMR Administrator)
Submitter User Details
Permit No. (s):
First Name:
Middle Name:•
Last Name:
Phone. Number:
Email:. User YD'i (Assigned by DWQ eDMR Administrator)
Phone Number
Email: User ].E (Assigned by DWQ eDMR Administrator)
Submitter, User Details
Permit No. (s):
First Name:
Middle Name:
Last Name:
Phone Number:
Email:
User ID:
(Assigned by DWQ eDMR Administrator)
NC eDMR Registration Form (Revision 3) Page 3 of 4 �e

Part D: Registration Certification:
I request the facility identified above be allowed to submit DMR data using the NC DWQ eDMR
system.
I understand that electronic submittal of the DMR does not fully satisfy US EPA's electronic signature
requirements and as a result, I understand I will be required to print, sign, and submit hardcopies
(one signed original and a copy) of the eDMR to NC DWQ under the same reporting requirements as
paper -based DMRs as specified in Part II, Condition D(2) of the NPDES Permit.
I agree to protect the security of my user ID and password from compromise and shall take all
necessary steps to prevent its loss, disclosure, modification, or unauthorized use.
Owner (Permittee) Name (type or p ' t) Official Title (type or Print)
A�' Vj - 1-21-1y
Owner (Permittee) Signatur&J Date
Please return the completed Registration Form to the NC Division of Water Ouali
Fax: or Email: or Mail to:
[phone] eDMRadmin(&ncdenr.eov Information Processing Unit
Attn: eDMR Registration
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NC eDMR Registration Form (Revision 3) Page 4 of 4

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 9:56 AM
To: 'Radenka Dragas'
Subject: RE: NPDES Permit
Radenka —The December report is due by the end of January. Buried deep in your permit, Part II, Section D(2) states the
"first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit...".
The following link has instructions for filling out the form along with example DMR forms (w/conventional parmeters
and w/o conventional parameters) to use. Hope this helps. If not, holler back. Mike.
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes/forms
Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Radenka Dragas[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 9:31 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: NPDES Permit
Dear Mr. Mickey,
The effective date of our NPDES Permit (NC0089290) was December 1, 2013. The limits became effective starting on
December 1, 2015.
We started the discharge monitoring on December 1, 2013.
When is the first DMR due? How do we report until we register for eDMR?
Mocksville Water Plant
Radenka Dragas
336-751-2635

Mickey, Mike
From: Boyd, Tom
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 2:51 PM
To: Radenka Dragas
Cc: Mickey, Mike; Basinger, Corey; Edwards, Lisa
Subject: RE: NPDES
Radenka,
Please contact Mike Mickey. His number is 336-771-4962.
Tom Boyd
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, Public Water Supply Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice [phone]
FAX [phone]
*************************************
E-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Radenka Dragas [mailto:rdragas@mocksvillenc gov]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 2:31 PM
To: Boyd, Tom
Subject: NPDES
Hello Tom,
We will start discharge monitoring beginning on the effective date of the NPDES Permit, December 1.
Who would be the contact person for this? We want to make sure that the sampling points we chose are going to be
satisfactory until the construction is complete.
Thanks,
Radenka

RECEIVED
N.C.Dept. of ENR
" FAA DEC 10 2013
� J Winston-Salem
NCDENR Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
ewal
December 5, 2013
Attn: Heather Adams
Envirolink
PO Box 670
Bailey, NC 27807
Subject: Receipt of permit ren
Permit NCO021491
Davie County
Dear Mrs. Adams:
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on December 2, 2013. A member of the
NPDES Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to
complete your permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days
before your existing permit expires.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Jackie
Nowell [phone].
Sincerely,
1*9 —Ir
Wren Thedford
Point Source Branch
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet:: www.ncwater.org
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer

November 25, 2013
NCDENR/DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal -Dutchman Creek NCO021491
Dear Permitting Department:
ENVIROLINK
DE: 0 2 7013
On behalf of the Town of Mocksville, Envirolink Inc. appreciates the opportunity to
submit the NPDES renewal application package. Please find enclosed (1) one original
and (2) two copies of the following:
• EPA Form 3510-2A
• Facility Map and Outfall location
• WWTP Process Schematic
• Sludge Handling Plan
In discussions with the Division of Water Quality, and since the Town of Mocksville has
not had a pre-treatment program since 2011, the Division stated that there was no need
to submit Part D and Part E of the application.
If Envirolink Inc. can be of any further assistance or additional information is needed,
please contact me at 252-235-4900.
Sincerely,
Heather Adams
Director of Operations
Envirolink, Inc.
Envirolink, Inc.
3Cout d°attu t to 9fidIV dYa=Vaff a t
PO Box 670, Bailey, North Carolina 27807
252-235-4900 (phone) 252-235-2132 (fax)

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Dutchman Creek WWTP, NCO021491 Renewal Yadkin -Pee Dee River
FORM
2A
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions 6.1 through 13.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP, NCO021491
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Renewal
River
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name Dutchman Creek WWTP
Mailing Address 171 Clement Street
Mocksville NC 27028
Contact Person Christine Bralley
Title Town Manager
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 295 Garwood Road
(not P.O. Box) Mocksville NC 27028
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Town of Mocksville c/o Envirolink. Inc.
Mailing Address PO Box 670
Bailey, NC 27807
Contact Person Heather Adams
Title Director of Operations
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
❑ owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
® facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO021491 PSD
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Town of Mocksville 4655 Separate Municipal
Total population served 4655
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP Renewal Yadkin -Pee Dee
NCO021491 River
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12`h month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 0.98 mgd
Two Years Apo Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 0.423 0.354 0.416
C. Maximum daily flow rate 1.240 1.420 2.009
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii. Combined sewer overflow points 0
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks) 0
V. Other 0
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
d.
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
❑ Yes
mgd
mgd
® No
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP Renewal Yadkin -Pee Dee
NCO021491 River
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
e.
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous
or ❑ intermittent?
mgd
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 4 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP Renewal Yadkin -Pee Dee
NCO021491 River
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a.
Outfall number 001
b.
Location Mocksville
27028
(City or town, if applicable)
(Zipr Code)
Davie
NC
(County)
(State)
35°53'33"
80°30'07"
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C.
Distance from shore (if applicable) NA
ft.
d.
Depth below surface (if applicable) NA
ft.
e.
Average daily flow rate 0.416
mgd
f.
Does this ouffall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes
® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g.
Is ouffali equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes
® No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Dutchman Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Renewal
NCO021491
River
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal %
Design SS removal %
Design P removal %
Design N removal %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorine
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.0
S.U.
pH (Maximum)
7.5
s.u.
0
Flow Rate
1.240
MGD
0.423
MGD
365
Temperature (Winter)
10
°C
10
°C
3
Temperature (Summer)
25
°C
24
°C
3
• For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
METHODSamples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BODS
5.2
m /L
2.0
mg/L
40
SM5210B
2.0
DEMAND (Report one)
CBODS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FECAL COLIFORM
290
#/100m1
2.8
#/100ml
40
SM9222D
1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
1.9
m /L
1.7
m /L
40
SM2540D
25.0
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Renewal
NCO021491
River
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Inflltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
25,000 gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Smoke test/CCTV to find I&I sources and make repairs as necessary
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within '/, mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name: Envirolink, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 670
Bailey, NC 27807
Telephone Number: [phone]
Responsibilities of Contractor: Operation's Management Firm for the Dutchman Creek WWTP
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
RIVER BASIN:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Renewal
NCO021491
River
C. If the answer to B.5.b is 'Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational Level
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the Indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not Include Information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All Information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
0.2
mg/L
0.08
mg/L
3
350.1
0.045
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
30
ug/L
23.3
ug/L
3
4500cl-g
<17
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
7.54
mg/L
7.51
mg/L
3
4500-0-C
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
1.5
mg/L
0.83
mg/L
3
351.2
0.16
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
30.5
mg/L
21.79
mg/L
3
353.2
1.2
OIL and GREASE
<5.0
mg/L
<5.0
mg/L
3
1664A
3.0
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
4.2
mg/L
3.12
mg/L
3
365.4
0.024
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
350
mg/L
260
mg/L
3
2540C
10
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
RIVER BASIN:
Dutchman Creek WWTP
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Renewal
NCO021491
River
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
❑ Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
Ej Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
❑ Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title _t io(c�l;svii __o_vV1 i_P,nanaat :
n-;Ijrtsun_E_rtlle
Signature
Telephone number jab 53 6 f 00
Date signed 11- (z " 4013
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

Town of Mocksville WWTP Sludge Management Plan
NCOO21491
Sludge residuals are stored on -site in the 180,000 gallon aerobic digester. The Town of
Mocksville currently contracts with the EMA Resources, Inc. to land apply the WWTP
residuals on an as needed basis through DWQ permit WQ0003351.
Envirolink, Inc.
Yoat pr'attaet to 4lttlq oKamVement
PO Box 670, Bailey, North Carolina 27807
252-235-4900(phone) 2520235-2132(fax)

FF
A� �.
�i�`\S , �v � rr.!' ` '�• `� '�=-�'Vt ����J� 11 , � � 1 /1 � � f � a
0
c
Town of Mocksville - NCO021491
USGS Quad Number: D 16 NE Lat.: 35053'33"
Receiving Stream: Dutchman's Creek Long.: 80030'07"
Stream Class: C
Subbasin: Yadkin 03-07-05
Outfall 001
G'
I�
r - `j X//,/I'
11 e y_
Facility k
Location .
North Scale 1:24,000

`fed/f7 !l lbtly il:'1J JJbl0lbJ4U UMMT . nu" ci-I
CREEK
1�
10
9-Q---------------- _ EFFLUENT
SAMP NG 14
POINT LOCATION DEc21lOR
CONTACT
PARSHALL FLUME 600 GAL 1 NEW
IftEFFLUENT MANHOLE CHLORINE 1 CHLORINE
RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE CONTACT I CONTACT
AEROBIC DIGESTER 18.7K GAL I 18.7K GAL
Y
rQ-� e V -� �`
_ xi '
D I- SCUM
d
io mil m
i; 1.0 I L I j i (2 ARRIFIE I I 6" p 6' WAS
•� 16.WAS I —�——
I I 1 TI
�I ' R oN w
o
ZJ Z(O - O !F�_F
II III
wv Ya II
11`
W� In
NQ I Wd NQ IN �O Nd
<" z�
I II .. I III
I I II I
J w�
SLUDGE I .� a _ 6 RA5
d STORA z W I a
NEW Eew,
i ( 6rINFLUENT J L____�_l- a z a
PUMP a 4- ,Q
STATION 28K GAL L_ 28K GAL a — -� 6" — — — r A GP
SLUDGE
` STORAGE
e � - - - - 1-------o--^I - `. - - - - - I NEW AEROBIC
TIT 12" _ - - _ - - - - --g.- o— — — -1 DIGESTER
Lit- PIP
0.968 MCO AVG FLOW NEW SPUTTER SLUDGE TO LAND
APPL.ICA710H
NEW
DECHLOR
it ,� CONTACT
600 GAL
GREY ENGINEERING, INC. TOWN O F M O C K S V I LL.E
Civil Design and Surveying
P.O. Box 9 MlocksvNe. N.C. 27028
9+wwrbsA-n (3W)751-2110 DUTCHMA WWTP s*XT
DRAVN B1: I: SMULL D Peon. Na: 101311W PROCESS SCHEMATIC FOR STMP
DESIC�1 BY. & 81ALARD DATE: 10 1 � OF 1

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 4:40 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: '[e-mail]'; Basinger, Corey
Subject: FW: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville - NCO021491
Christine — Per the regulation cite below, the reuse of wastewater within a treatment facility is allowable. The Division is
in agreement with using non -potable water for the influent bar screen auger system at the Mocksville Dutchman Creek
WWTP. Please consider this email as permission to proceed. Thanks, Mike.
ENR —ENVIRONMENTAL AL4NAGEMENT 05VO1106
SECTION .1000 —CLOSED—LOOP RECYCLE SYSTEMS
15A NCAC 02T .1003 PERMITTING BY REGULATION
(a) The following systems are deemed permitted pursuant to Rule .0113 of this Subchapter provided the system meets
the criteria in Rule .0113 of this Subchapter and all criteria required for the specific system in this Rule:
(1) Return of wastewater contained and underroofwithin anindustrialorcommercialprocesswherethere
is no anticipated release of wastewater provided the facility develops andmaintains aspill control plan
in the event of a release and no earthen basins are used.
(2) Recycling of rinse water at concrete mixing facilities for concrete mix removal from equipment
provided the wastewater is contained within concrete structures, there is sufficient storage capacityto
contain the runoff from a 24-hour, 25-year storm event plus one foot freeboard and the facility
develops and maintains a spill control plan in the event of a wastewater release. The facility must
notify the appropriate Division regional office in writing noting the owner, location, and that the
design complies with the above criteria.
(3) Recycling of wash and rinse water at vehicle wash facilities provided the wastewater is contained
within concrete, steel or syntheti c structures (i. e. not including earthen b asins), all vehicle washing is
conducted under roof and there are no precipitation inputs (direct or indirect), and the facility develops
and maintains a spill control plan in the event of awastewater release.
(4) The reuse or return of wastewater within the treatment works of a permitted wastewater treatment
system
Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Christine Bralley [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:55 PM
To: Basinger, Corey
Cc: Mickey, Mike
Subject: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Mr. Basinger,
I would appreciate your consideration regarding the email below. Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Christine Bralley
Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
Mocksville, NC - "Time Well Spent"
336-753-6701
[e-mail]
From: Heather Adams [mailto:hadams(a)envirolinkinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:16 AM
To: Christine Bralley
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Ms. White
The Town of Mocksville has evaluated the operational expenses at the WWTP and is expensing approximately $55,000-
$60,000 towards potable water at the influent bar screen. The bar screen at the WWTP is comprised of an auger system
that must use water to aid in rinsing the screenings and the water has to run 24/7 as designed. In order to save on
water costs, the Town is proposing to install a non -potable water line from the effluent to the auger system. The line
would be labeled as non -potable water to avoid any potable use. Please advise if the Division is in agreement with this
change and if any further permission is necessary.
Thank You,
'Plea Adal"
Durea m 4 dAatatio,a
ENVIROLINK, INC.
PO Box 670
BAILEY, NC 27807
PHONE: [phone]
FAx: [phone]
hadams(aD-envirolinkinc.com

Mickey, Mike
From: Belnick, Tom
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 3:46 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: FW: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Mike- based on Jon's response, I'm fine with WSRO verbal approval for reuse at bar screen.
Tom Belnick
Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
NCDWR/Water Quality Programs
919-807-6390
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Risgaard, Jon
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:23 AM
To: Belnick, Tom
Subject: RE: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Tom,
This is deemed permitted per 02T .1003(a)(4) — Closed Loop recycle: Permitting by regulation.
"The reuse or return of wastewater within the treatment works of a permitted wastewater treatment system."
Jon
Jon Risgaard - Supervisor, Land Application Unit, Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6458
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/main.html
From: Belnick, Tom
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 5:53 PM
To: Risgaard, Jon
Subject: FW: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Jon- proposed reuse within WWTP- does your Unit get involved with any permitting conditions?
Tom Belnick
Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
NCDWR/Water Quality Programs
919-807-6390
1

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:09 PM
To: Belnick, Tom
Subject: FW: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Tom — Is the regions verbal approval sufficient to allow the Town of Mocksville (Dutchman Creek / NC0021491) to start
using treated effluent instead of potable water at the bar screen?
See email chain below. Thanks, Mike.
Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
From: Basinger, Corey
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:00 PM
To: Christine Bralley
Cc: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Mike,
Please make sure that this information is forwarded to the appropriate permit writer in Central Office for review and
comment.
Thanks.
CB
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
From: Christine Bralley [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:55 PM
To: Basinger, Corey
Cc: Mickey, Mike
Subject: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Mr. Basinger,
I would appreciate your consideration regarding the email below. Thank you for your time.
Regards,

Christine Bralley
Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
Mocksville, NC - "Time Well Spent"
336-753-6701
[e-mail]
From: Heather Adams[ma iIto: [e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:16 AM
To: Christine Bralley
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: WWTP Non -Potable Water Use-Mocksville
Ms. White
The Town of Mocksville has evaluated the operational expenses at the WWTP and is expensing approximately $55,000-
$60,000 towards potable water at the influent bar screen. The bar screen at the WWTP is comprised of an auger system
that must use water to aid in rinsing the screenings and the water has to run 24/7 as designed. In order to save on
water costs, the Town is proposing to install a non -potable water line from the effluent to the auger system. The line
would be labeled as non -potable water to avoid any potable use. Please advise if the Division is in agreement with this
change and if any further permission is necessary.
Thank You,
Dee , n 4 OAC=&Cad
ENVIROLINK, INC.
PO Box 670
BAILEY, NC 27807
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
hadamsCa)-envirolinkinc.com
FNV1 ROL[NK

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 1:57 PM
To: Giorgino, John
Subject: Mocksville Dutchman Creek - NCO021491
John — Just noticed that the monthly toxicity summary incorrectly shows the chronic limit for the Mocksville Dutchman
Creek facility to be 7% @ <0.68 (see below). The current NPDES permit issued 5/1/10 has a chronic limit of 37% @ 0.98
MGD. The 0.68 effluent page was deleted from the last permit due to completion of WWTP expansion to 0.98
MGD. Thanks, Mike.
MocksvilleWWTPDutchman's Cr. N00021491/001 County: Davie
Ceri7cIPF Begin: 8/1/2005 chr lirn: 7% @ <0.68 NonComp: Single
Mike Mickey
Mike. M ickevCa) N CDEN R.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: Weaver, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:27 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: Major? - Mocksville's Dutchman Creek - NC0021491
Mike — we consider NC0021491 a Major permit because it has an active pretreatment program.
However, EPA's threshold for Majors is a permitted flow of 1 MGD or greater.
That's why on internal documents we refer to NC0021491 as a Major, but the "EPA Major Permit" box in BIMS is not
checked.
There are about 10 permits like this statewide.
CHW
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:58 AM
To: Weaver, Charles
Subject: Major? - Mocksville's Dutchman Creek - NC0021491
Charles — Just noticed that Dutchman Creek was not noted as a major in BIMS. Should they be? Permitted flow is 0.98
MGD w/pretreatment program. They were colored orange on the list you emailed 7/31/13 requesting a staff
report. Thanks, Mike.
Permit: NCO021491 Version: '3.0
Permit Type: lvlunicipal NastewaterDischarge, < 1NIGD
Permit Classification: In JiViCIUal
Program Category: NPDES
Facility: Dutchman Creek ;'0.,.TP
Owner: -Town ofMocksvHle
Issued: 0411012010
Effective:
0 5)'0112010
............... ......... .
Status: Active
Primary Related* Permit:
*Admin Region: Winston-S,
Details... County 'Davie
lvlaintain� Project Type: Renewal
-- Dates —
O
❑ EPA Marig Issued_ 111982 j or Permit '.
Hai:
Statutory: t2f31f2008
New arm ? EAsting Farm
r.. -- 7
1

Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 1:50 PM
To: Heather Adams ([e-mail])
Subject: Dutchman Creek WWTP - NCO021491
Heather— Below are the toxicity test results since 2008.
Mocksville WWTP Dutch rn an's C r. NCD021491/001 County: Davie
Ceri7clPF Begin: 8J1/2005 chr lim: 7% @ c0.68 NonCornp: Single
Region: WSRO
Basin:
YAD05
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC JOC:
7Q10: 2.54
PF: 0.68
IWC:
37.5 Freq: Q
1 F
M A
M
J J A
S O N D
2008 Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass Pass Pass Pass
2009 Pass
Pass
Pass
- Pass
2010 Pass
- Fail
>74
>74 Pass
Pass
2011 Pass -
- Pass
- Pass
Pass
2012 Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
2013 Pass
- Pass
Pass
- - -
Just FYI —The Dutchman Creek WWTP is classified as a major NPDES facility which requires EPA Form 2A for renewal
(which is what I assume you are having to fill out). A major facility is defined as: Design Flow > 0.1 MGD -OR- having a
pretreatment program.
Holler back if any questions. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. Mickev@WIDEN R.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing and Self Monitoring Summary
Mebane WWTP NCO021474/001
County: Alamance
Region: WSRO
Basin:
CPF02
Ian Apr Jul Oct
SOC_JOC:
Cer17dPF Begin: 11/1/2006 chr lim: 90%
NonComp: Single
7Q10:
0.0
PF: 2.5
IWC:
100 Freq: Q
J
F
M
A
M
J J
A
S
O
N
D
2008 Pass
*
"
Invalid
Pass
• Pass
•
•
Pass
•
'
2009 Pass
*
'
Pass
'
• Pass
`
"
Pass
•
'
2010 Pass
•
"
Pass
'
• Pass
*
'
Pass
•
'
2011 Pass
*
'
Pass
"
' Pass
•
'
Pass
2012 Pass
*
`
Pass
`
* Pass
"
"
Pass
2013 Pass
'
`
Pass
•
' Pass
"
s
s
■
■
Miller Brewing Co. NCO029980/001
County: Rockingham
Region: WSRO
Basin:
ROA03
Feb May Aug Nov
SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 6/1/2012 chr lim: 2.1%
NonComp: Single
70:10:
313
PF: 5.2
IWC:
2.51 Freq: Q
J
F
M
A
M
J J
A
S
O
N
D
2008 •
Pass
'
'
Pass
` `
Pass
`
'
Pass
2009 •
Pass
•
*
Pass
` *
Pass
'
•
Pass
`
2010 `
Pass
■
"
Pass
• •
Pass
*
'
Pass
2011 '
Pass
"
'
Pass
• •
Pass
•
*
Pass
2012 •
Pass
•
*
Pass
` `
Pass
•
•
Pass
2013 •
Pass
•
*
Pass
Mocksville WWTP Dutchman's Cr.NCO021491/001
County: Davie
Region: WSRO
Basin:
YAD05
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC_JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 8/1/2005 chr lim:7%@a <0.68
NonComp: Single
7Q10:
2.54
PF: 0.68
IWC:
37.5 Freq: Q
J
F
M
A
M
J J
A
S
O
N
D
2008 Pass
"
•
Pass
•
' Pass
'
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
2009 Pass
•
"
Pass
"
• Pass
*
'
Pass
2010 Pass
•
`
Fail
>74
>74 Pass
*
*
Pass
•
`
2011 Pass
*
•
Pass
•
` Pass
•
*
Pass
'
2012 Pass
`
`
Pass
*
` Pass
'
"
Pass
*
`
2013 Pass
•
*
Pass
*
` Pass
Motiva,Enterprises LLC-Greensboro NCO022209/001 County: ; Guilford Region: WSRO
Basin:
CPF08
SOC_JOC:
Fthd24Ac Begin: 9/1/2006` 24hrLC50acmonite NonComp: 7Q10:
0.0
PF: VAR
IWC: 100
Freq: A
J
F
M
A
M J
J A
S O
N
D
2008 >100
■
s
#
■ r
■ #
r #
r
#
2009 >100
•
r
■
r ■
■ #
# #
r
■
2010 ■
#
>100
#
■ #
# #
■ ■
■
■
2011 s
>100
#
#
# #
# #
# #
■
■
2012 #
#
■
■
>100 ■
i s
# ■
■
■
Page 14 of 25

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 8:48 AM
To: Mckay, James
Cc: Basinger, Corey
Subject: RE: Draft Permit NCO089290 - Mocksville WTP
Jim — WSRO has no concerns/comments. Okay to issue on our end. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike.MickevPNCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Basinger, Corey
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:44 AM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: FW: Drtaft Permit NCO089290 - Mocksville WTP
Please look this over. I've briefly looked at it and didn't find any errors, however I didn't pull the file to compare. I know
this is a new permit so there may be nothing in the file to compare.
Thanks.
CB
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
From: Mckay, James
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 1:07 PM
To: Basinger, Corey; Reid, Steve; Meadows, Susan
Subject: Drtaft Permit NCO089290 - Mocksville WTP
Attached is a copy of the subject permit. Please send any questions or comments to me.

Thank you!
Jim McKay, Environmental Engineer
NC DENR / Division of Water Resources
Complex NPDES Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919/807-6404 (work); 919/807-6489 (fax)

RECEIVED—
Xja
N.C.Dept. of ENR
= SEP 2 4 2013
NCDENRWinston-Salem
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natt.iral Res SRegional office
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
September 11, 2013
Ms. Christine Bralley
Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject:, Revised Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NCO089290
Mocksville Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Davie County
Class PC Facility
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the revised draft NPDES permit for the Hugh A. Lagle
Water Treatment Plant. Please review the draft carefully to understand the conditions,
measurement units, and requirements. In accordance with NC Statutes and rules, this draft
permit must go back for public review and comment before it can be issued.
Please note that the receiving stream is listed as an impaired waterbody on the 2012 Final North
Carolina 303(d) Impaired Waters List for copper and Ecological/ biological integrity Fish
Community. Addressing impaired waters is a high'priority with the Division, and instream data
will continue to be evaluated. If there is noncompliance with permitted effluent limits and
stream impairment can be attributed to your facility, then mitigative measures may be required.
The primary change from the December 19, 2012 Draft Permit is the addition of a 24 month
compliance schedule. Under the compliance schedule, you can continue running the water
treatment -plant, -providing drinking-water-to-your-customers.--the-new-limits-on Total.- Residual --
Chlorine, Total Suspended Solids and pH will go into effect 24 months from the effective date of
this permit, or sooner if the wastewater treatment facilities are completed and operational prior to
that date. You must begin sampling for all required parameters beginning on the permit effective
date.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: 91H07.8489
Internet:: www.ncwaterguality.org
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

Concurrent with this notification, the Division is publishing a notice in the newspaper having
circulation in the general Davie County area, soliciting public comments on this permit draft.
Please provide any comments you may have regarding this draft to DENR — DWR, NPDES
Program no later than October 18, 2013.
Following the 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments
and take appropriate action prior to issuing a final permit. If you have questions concerning the
draft for your facility, please call me at [phone] or by email at
[e-mail].
If no adverse comments are received from the public or from you, this permit will likely be
issued in October 2013, with an effective date of December 1, 2013, expiring on November 31,
2016. This allows for 24 months of construction of wastewater treatment facilities and one year
of monitoring data before renewal of the permit. The expiration date is out of sequence with
expiration dates of other permits in the Yadkin River basin, so renewal in 2016 will be for
approximately 2 1/2 years, expiring on April 30, 2019.
Sincerely,
)&�' X e
Jim McKay
Complex NPDES Permitting
Attachments
cc:
• Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection - via email
• Winston-Salem Regional Office, Attn: Lisa Edwards, DWR.
• NPDES Unit
• Steve Reid - via email
• Aquatic Toxicology, Susan Meadows - via email
• Charles A. Willis Jr., P.E. of Willis Engineers, Inc. - via email
(chuck@willisengineers. com)

Permit NCO089290
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Mocksville
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
771 Sanford Avenue
Mocksville
Davie County
to receiving waters designated as UT of Bear Creek in the Yadkin River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and applicable conditions set forth in
Parts I, II,1II and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective tbd.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on tbd, 2016.
Signed this day tbd.
DRAFT
Thomas A. Reeder, Director
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 4

S
Permit NCO089290
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
The Town of Mocksville is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a conventional water treatment plant with a discharge of filter -backwash,
sediment basin flush and untreated raw water.
This conventional water treatment plant has a design potable flowrate of 2.0 MGD and a monthly
average wastewater discharge of 0.0675 MGD, up to a peak of 0.081 MGD. The facility is located
at Mocksville's Hugh A. Lagle WTP (771 Sanford Avenue, Mocksville) in Davie County.
A wastewater treatment facility will be constructed in order to treat filter backwash and other
wastewater streams. During the construction period, a 24 month compliance schedule is granted,
such that during the construction of the treatment system, certain limits and conditions will not be
enforced for a maximum of 24 months after the effective date of this permit.
Wastewater will be treated by two 250,000 gallon flow equalization tanks that equalize flows from
filter backwash and sediment basin cleaning. Solids will be allowed to settle, and the water
dechlorinated with sodium thiosulfate liquid solution before discharging to an unnamed tributary of
Bear Creek in the Yadkin River Basin. A continuous recording flowmeter will measure the
discharge of treated wastewater. Solids will be pumped out as a sludge and land applied by a
contract hauler as needed.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into a UT to
Bear Creek, classified WS-IV waters in the Yadkin River Basin.
Page 2 of 4

Permit NCO089290
Part I
A. (L) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
a. During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration. the Permittee is authorized to discharge
from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARA►GTERISTICS
LEWrs 1
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
` Nlonathly
erae. `
Daily ` ` "
Mamani
`lt7easutre�6
Fre ueic`
; S4iq a Type
Sain'ple Location`
Flow
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 m
45.0 m
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
H 1
>_ 6.0 SU > 9.0 SU
2/ Month
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine 1,3
17
2/ Month
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity
2/ Month
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity
Monthly
Grab
Up, Down
Total Iron
Quarterly-'
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarter l
Grab
Effluent
Manganese
QuarterV
Grab
Effluent
Fluoride
Quarterl
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterl
Grab
Effluent
AluminumQuarterly-'
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Whole Effluent Toxicity
MonitoringMonitor
and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Limits and the requirement for continuous flow recording become effective 24 months after the effective
date of this permit, or upon completion of the wastewater treatment facilities, whichever comes first.
Instantaneous flow estimates and discharge duration shall be recorded until the flowmeter is operational.
Upon completion of construction of wastewater treatment facilities, the Town shall notify the Winston-
Salem Regional Office of DENR at [phone], and the Central Office of the Division of Water.
Resources, NPDES Permitting Unit at [phone]. Monitoring is required beginning on the effective
date of this permit.
2. Up is Upstream in Bear Creek at least 50 feet above Discharge location, Down is Downstream in Bear
Creek at least 100 feet below Discharge location.
3. Limit and monitoring apply only if chlorine or chlorine derivatives are used for disinfection. The
Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/ L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified
laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/ L.
4. If 12 months of instream data show no effect on turbidity in Bear Creek, the Permittee may request
instream monitoring be removed from the permit.
5. Parameter should be sampled in conjunction with Quarterly Toxicity Testing.
6.Total Nitrogen_(TN) =_(NOS-N ± NO3-N�, + TKN where NO2-N and, NO3-N„are Nitrite and Nitrate
Nitrogen, respectively and TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.
7. Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring (Ceriodaphnia dubia) at 90%; March, June, September and
December; refer to Special Condition A. (2.).
b. All samples must be collected from a typical discharge event.
c. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 4

Permit NCO089290
A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL MONITORING (QUARTERLY)
The permittee shall conduct quarterly chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent
versions.
The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure document is 90%. The testing shall be
performed as a Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-day pass/fail test. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September and December. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity
testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below
all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DWR Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed
in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating
the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of
"No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences
Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test requirement will revert to
quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified
to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT Forms
submitted.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day
of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Page 4 of 4

t --�
41
r 130
OD
\\1
'
kiern
P
u �
M �
M� l Bear Creek �'� `� � • �+ �
t
� +,� � `••, � •-, '�.
AU
r • "
Outfall 001
''
oA
.� r ten,.
� �71j•
1♦ Y
f1
� •
1
� L
•
y i,
j� 1.
.• -J 1
Latitude: 35153' 22"
Longitude: 80° 34' 43" NC0089290
Facility
Quad # D16NE/ Mocksville
Stream Class: WS-IV
Subbasin: 03 07 06 Town of Mocksville
HUC: 030401020603
Location
(riot to scale)
North
Davie County
Receiving Stream: UT to Bear Creek Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Yadkin River Basin

l� I �
RMENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
September 11, 2013
Ms. Christine Bralley
Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: Revised Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NCO089290
Mocksville Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Davie County
Class PC 1 Facility
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the revised draft NPDES permit for the Hugh A. Lagle
Water Treatment Plant. Please review the draft carefully to understand the conditions,
measurement units, and requirements. In accordance with NC Statutes and rules, this draft
permit must go back for public review and comment before it can be issued.
Please note that the receiving stream is listed as an impaired waterbody on the 2012 Final North
Carolina 303(d) Impaired Waters List for copper and Ecological/ biological integrity Fish
Community. Addressing impaired waters is a high priority with the Division, and instream data
will continue to be evaluated. If there is noncompliance with permitted effluent limits and
stream impairment can be attributed to your facility, then mitigative measures may be required.
The primary change from the December 19, 2012 Draft Permit is the addition of a 24 month
compliance schedule. Under the compliance schedule, you can continue running the water
treatment plant, providing drinking water to your customers. The new limits on Total Residual
Chlorine, Total Suspended Solids and pH will go into effect 24 months from the effective date of
this permit, or sooner if the wastewater treatment facilities are completed and operational prior to
that date. You must begin sampling for all required parameters beginning on the permit effective
date.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Internet:: www.ncwaterguality.org
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmaflve Action Employer

Concurrent with this notification, the Division is publishing a notice in the newspaper having
circulation in the general Davie County area, soliciting public comments on this permit draft.
Please provide any comments you may have regarding this draft to DENR — DWR, NPDES
Program no later than October 18, 2013.
Following the 30-day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments
and take appropriate action prior to issuing a final permit. If you have questions concerning the
draft for your facility, please call me at [phone] or by email at
[e-mail].
If no adverse comments are received from the public or from you, this permit will likely be
issued in October 2013, with an effective date of December 1, 2013, expiring on November 31,
2016. This allows for 24 months of construction of wastewater treatment facilities and one year
of monitoring data before renewal of the permit. The expiration date is out of sequence with
expiration dates of other permits in the Yadkin River basin, so renewal in 2016 will be for
approximately 2 1/2 years, expiring on April 30, 2019.
Sincerely,
Jim McKay
Complex NPDES Permitting
Attachments
cc:
• Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection - via email
• Winston-Salem Regional Office, Attn: Lisa Edwards, DWR.
• NPDES Unit
• Steve Reid - via email
• Aquatic Toxicology, Susan Meadows - via email
• Charles A. Willis Jr., P.E. of Willis Engineers, Inc. - via email
(chuck@willisengineers. com)

Permit NCO089290
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
DRAFT PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Mocksville
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
771 Sanford Avenue
Mocksville
Davie County
to receiving waters designated as UT of Bear Creek in the Yadkin River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and applicable conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective tbd.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on tbd, 2016.
Signed this day tbd.
DRAFT
Thomas A. Reeder, Director
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 4

Permit NCO089290
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
The Town of Mocksville is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a conventional water treatment plant with a discharge of filter -backwash,
sediment basin flush and untreated raw water.
This conventional water treatment plant has a design potable flowrate of 2.0 MGD and a monthly
average wastewater discharge of 0.0675 MGD, up to a peak of 0.081 MGD. The facility is located
at Mocksville's Hugh A. Lagle WTP (771 Sanford Avenue, Mocksville) in Davie County.
A wastewater treatment facility will be constructed in order to treat filter backwash and other
wastewater streams. During the construction period, a 24 month compliance schedule is granted,
such that during the construction of the treatment system, certain limits and conditions will not be
enforced for a maximum of 24 months after the effective date of this permit.
Wastewater will be treated by two 250,000 gallon flow equalization tanks that equalize flows from
filter backwash and sediment basin cleaning. Solids will be allowed to settle, and the water
dechlorinated with sodium thiosulfate liquid solution before discharging to an unnamed tributary of
Bear Creek in the Yadkin River Basin. A continuous recording flowmeter will measure the
discharge of treated wastewater. Solids will be pumped out as a sludge and land applied by a
contract hauler as needed.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into a UT to
Bear Creek, classified WS-IV waters in the Yadkin River Basin.
Page 2 of 4

Permit NCO089290
Part I
A. (I.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
a. During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
`CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS'
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Fre uenc
Sample Type
Sample Location
Flow
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 m
45.0 m
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
H 1
> 6.0 SU >_ 9.0 SU
2/ Month
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine 1,317
/L
2/ Month
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity
2/ Month
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity
Monthly
Grab
Up, Down
Total Iron
Quarterly'
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarterly'
Grab
Effluent
ManganeseQuarterly"
Grab
Effluent
Fluoride
Quarterly'
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc
QuarterlyDGrab
Effluent
AluminumQuarterly'
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen 6
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
uarterly
Grab
Effluent
Whole Effluent Toxicity
Monitorin
Monitor and Report
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Limits and the requirement for continuous flow recording become effective 24 months after the effective
date of this permit, or upon completion of the wastewater treatment facilities, whichever comes first.
Instantaneous flow estimates and discharge duration shall be recorded until the flowmeter is operational.
Upon completion of construction of wastewater treatment facilities, the Town shall notify the Winston-
Salem Regional Office of DENR at [phone], and the Central Office of the Division of Water
Resources, NPDES Permitting Unit at [phone]. Monitoring is required beginning on the effective
date of this permit.
2. Up is Upstream in Bear Creek at least 50 feet above Discharge location, Down is Downstream in Bear
Creek at least 100 feet below Discharge location.
3. Limit and monitoring apply only if chlorine or chlorine derivatives are used for disinfection. The
Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/ L to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified
laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/ L.
4. If 12 months of instream data show no effect on turbidity in Bear Creek, the Permittee may request
instream monitoring be removed from the permit.
5. Parameter should be sampled in conjunction with Quarterly Toxicity Testing.
6. Total Nitrogen (TN) = (NO2-N + NO3-N) + TKN where NO2-N and NO3-N are Nitrite and Nitrate
Nitrogen, respectively and TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.
7. Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring (Ceriodaphnia dubia) at 90%; March, June, September and
December; refer to Special Condition A. (2.).
b. All samples must be collected from a typical discharge event.
c. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 4

Permit NCO089290
A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL MONITORING (QUARTERLY)
The permittee shall conduct quarterly chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent
versions.
The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure document is 90%. The testing shall be
performed as a Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-day pass/fail test. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September and December. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity
testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below
all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DWR Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed
in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating
the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of
"No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences
Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test requirement will revert to
quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified
to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT Forms
submitted.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day
of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Page 4 of 4

Latitude: 35° 53' 22"
Longitude: 80' 34' 43"
Quad # D 16NE/Mocksville
Stream Class: WS-W
Subbasin: 03 07 06
HUC: 030401020603
Receiving Stream: UT to Bear Creek
Yadkin River Basin
NCO089290
Town of Mocksville
Hugh A. Lagle WTP
Facility
Location
(not to scale)
North Davie County

DENR/DWR
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO089290
Facili Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Town of Mocksville/ Hugh A. La le Water Treatment Plant
Applicant Address:
171 Clement Street, Mocksville North Carolina 27028
Facility Address:
771 Sanford Avenue, Mocksville North Carolina 27028
Permitted Flow
Not limited. Design capacity is 0.081 MGD at maximum flow.
Type of Waste:
Conventional filter backwash
Facility/Permit Status:
Existing facility, new permit
Facility Classification
PC 1
County:
Davie
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
UT to Bear Creek
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Stream Classification:
WS IV
State Grid/
USGS Too uad:
D16NE/
Mocksville
303(d) Listed?
Impaired on 2012
Final List for copper
and Ecological/
biological Integrity
Permit Writer:
Jim McKay
Subbasin:
03-07-06
Date:
August 22, 2013
12 digit HUC:
030401020603
Facility Location
memo
Amp
��
Drainage Area mil :
N/A
Summer 7 10 (cfs):
0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0
30Q2 (cfs):
0
Average Flow (cfs):
0
IWC %):
100 capped at 90%
Prim SIC Code:
4941
SUMMARY
The Town of Mocksville uses a Conventional Water Treatment Plant to treat water drawn from Hunting
Creek, which is impaired for low pH on the 2012 final 303(d) list. The facility is designed to provide 2.0
Million Gallons per Day of treated potable water. The backwash wastewater is estimated to be 0.081
Million Gallons per Day at peak rates. Wastewater is comprised of filter backwash and sediment basin
cleaning flushes, and consists of finished treated water containing chlorine, fluoride and untreated source
water. It is discharged to an Unnamed Tributary of Bear Creek in the Yadkin River Basin. In current
operation, fixed speed intake pumps on Hunting Creek can cause untreated intake water to overflow the
sediment basin with effluent water. This can lead to high turbidity in the effluent of over 500 NTU.
Bear Creek is not impaired for turbidity, so turbidity monitoring of the effluent along with upstream and
downstream turbidity monitoring in Bear Creek will be required. If 12 months of instream turbidity
monitoring show that the discharge is not causing turbidity problems in Bear Creek, the Permittee may
request removal of instream monitoring.
The receiving stream (Bear Creek) is classified WS-IV waters in the Yadkin River Basin. This reach is
listed on the 2012 Approved 303(d) list as impaired for copper and Fair Bioclassification Ecological/
biological Integrity Fish Community.
This Conventional WTP has been operating without an NPDES discharge permit since 1946, and has
been expanded and modified during this time frame. The goal of this permit is to bring the town into the
NPDES Program, with a compliance schedule to allow the Town to construct facilities required to meet
the terms of the NPDES Permit, including TRC, Flow Monitoring, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), pH,
Turbidity and Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring (WET).
Town of Mocksville Ilugh A. Lagle. WTI' Fact. Sheet
NPDES Permit. NCO089290
Page 1 of 3

Permitting Strategy:
Permitting Strategies for Conventional Water Treatment Plants and Zero Flow streams are followed for
this facility.
Facility Description:
The existing WTP has several fixed speed pumps of various capacities, with an intake in Hunting Creek.
Raw water is pumped to the WTP where it is flow metered and dosed with chlorine, caustic, phosphate,
fluoride and a polyaluminum chloride flocculant. There are two 45,000 gallon settling tanks with a
chemical mixer, and one 112,000 gallon settling tank with a chemical mixer. The water enters a settling
tank and solids allowed to settle out. Clear water is decanted out and filtered, then stored in a 1.0 MG
clearwell for finished water. The finished water is flow metered and pumped to the Town's Distribution
System. Filters are backwashed with finished water, and discharged to an unnamed tributary to Bear
Creek. Settling tank rinsewater and uncontrolled untreated raw water are also discharged to the UT.
The Town proposes to construct two 250,000 gallon concrete storage and settling tanks for filter
backwash and sedimentation basin flush, with floating decanting systems to drain clear water from the
solids. An 8 inch Parshall Flume will measure discharge flow rate, which will be continuously recorded
and totalized. A dechlorination system will be provided, using liquid sodium thiosulfate. The treated
wastewater will discharge to a UT to Bear Creek. Solids will be removed by a contractor for disposal
offsite. Existing facilities will be repaired/ upgraded to improve flocculation and sedimentation basin
operation. The plant has various raw water pumps available with different flowrates that can be selected.
By choosing the right pump, and controlling the plant throughput to match the raw water feed rate, the
operators are able to minimize overflow and discharge of untreated water to the wastewater disposal
system.
Timing:
The Town estimates that it will require 24 months to complete construction and be positioned to meet all
NPDES Permit requirements, so a 24 month compliance schedule is granted. The permit is expected to
issue in late 2013. The permit expiration date for the subbasin is April 30, 2014, which is well before
completion of wastewater treatment facilities can occur. Three years permit life is planned in order to
provide time to construct treatment facilities (24 months) and gather 1 year of data for renewal, so
expiration will be 36 months after the permit effective date. A 2 year compliance schedule will allow the
Town time to construct the wastewater treatment facilities. Monitoring for all parameters will begin on
the permit effective date, but enforcement of limits and conditions will not begin until two years after the
permit effective date. The renewal should be for the length of time required to bring the renewal
expiration to April 30, 2019, which is back on the basin schedule. This should be approximately
2 years - 5 months renewed permit life.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing
Chronic toxicity testing using Ceriodaphnia dubia at 90 % will be required per the permitting strategies
for Conventional WTPs and for zero flow streams.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
September 2013 (est.)
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
October 2013 (est.)
Permit Effective Date:
December 1, 2013 (est.)
2-year Compliance Schedule ends:
December 1, 2015 (est.)
Permit Expiration Date:
November 30, 2016 (est.)
First Renewal Expiration Date:
April 30, 2019 (Basin Schedule)
Town of Mocksvihe l-iugh A. L,agle WTP Pact Sheet.
NFIDES Permit NCO089290
Page 2 of' 3

STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Jim
McKay at [phone], or by email at [e-mail].
NAME: DA
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT: (USE EXTRA SHEETS IF NEEDED)
NAME:
NPDES SUPERVISOR COMMENT:
TE:
NAME: DATE:
Town of Mocksvillc Hugh A. Lagle WTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit NCO089290
Page 3 of3

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina
Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
Prepared By: Charles A. Willis, Jr. P.E., SCEE
Willis Engineers (F-0114)
10700 Sikes Place, Suite 230
Charlotte, NC 28270
Date: July 1, 2013
Table of Contents
1. Overview
2. Background
3. Treatment Process Improvements
4. Storage Basin Options
5. Regulatory Requirements
6. Financial Options
7. Recommendations
Attachments
1- Overview
Technical Memorandum
A,.�` N CARP / O
AA I
0 Y
°- SEAL
17710
//11 rf h
I �,/q zatS
As requested, Willis Engineers has investigated options for wash water disposal at the Hugh A.
Lagle Water Treatment Plant. We understand the Plant has served the Town well for many
years, but has never been equipped with wash water disposal facilities other than a direct
discharge to a tributary of Bear Creek. Under State and Federal regulations, the Town is
required to have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for the
discharge of wash water from the Plant.
Our evaluation is intended to identify several options for wash water disposal facilities
sufficient to comply with regulatory requirements, assist the Town in negotiating an
appropriate NPDES Permit, and define the future efforts necessary to construct the wash water
facilities. The results of our evaluation and recommendations are included herein.
2 - Background
The NPDES program in North Carolina is administered by the NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources — Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Under this program all point -source
discharges of wastewater are required to obtain an NPDES Permit, setting forth limits on the
quantity and character of wastewater to be discharged. For most water treatment plant
LrdiiiiSENGINEERS
z

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina
Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
Technical Memorandum
operations, only limited treatment is required in order to comply with normal Permit limits.
This treatment usually consists of some form of settling to remove suspended material and
dechlorination. At that point typical water treatment plant wash water has little, if any, impact
on a receiving water course.
At the Mocksville Water Treatment Plant we would expect an NPDES Permit would require daily
flow monitoring and include limits for suspended solids, total residual chlorine and regular
monitoring of several other constituents. The State has previously provided a Draft NPDES
Permit including these requirements; however, the Draft Permit assumed that adequate
treatment facilities were already in place. The Town therefore could not accept the Permit as
proposed.
The Lagle Water Treatment Plant has the capacity to produce 2.0 million gallons per day (MGD)
and currently operates between 0.8 and 1.2 MGD. Sources of wash water at the Plant include
backwash from filters, drains from sampling locations and other typical functions. In addition
to these normal daily discharges, the Plant staff will periodically drain the sedimentation basins
for cleaning resulting in a discharge of 250,000 gallons. These activities only scheduled several
times a year, nonetheless sufficient capacity should be made available for receiving this amount
of drainage.
In addition to the normal backwash functions, the Plant also has experienced some difficultly
with maintaining flow control within the treatment process. Currently the raw water pumps
located at Hunting Creek convey water to the Plant at a fixed rate. Flow through the Plant is
controlled by rate -of -flow control valves at each filter. When the raw water pumping rate
exceeds treatment rate, excess water is diverted to the overflow drains and is discharged.
All of the water draining from the Plant exits through a common drain and discharges to a ditch
in the northwest corner of the property which is tributary to Bear Creek.
3 — Treatment Process Improvements
The primary facility necessary to handle wash water from the Plant will be some form of
storage basin. This basin would allow for flow equalization, settling solids and decanting clear
water for discharge. An adequate storage basin, in combination with chemical addition for
dechlorination, should be sufficient to meet the anticipated NDPES Permit limits. Options for
the storage facilities are discussed in Section 4.
The staff has also expressed interest in reducing the total quantity of flow discharged through
the drainage system, primarily by reducing basin overflow. One option that was investigated
includes the addition of a rate -of -flow control valve on the raw water line entering the Plant.
WIIrSENGINEERS

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina
Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
Technical Memorandum
This valve would allow the Plant staff to control the raw water rate to match the filters, thereby
reducing overflows and the quantity of wash water produced. Although this idea has merit, we
are concerned that the addition of a raw water rate -of -flow valve will increase the operating
pressure on the raw water lines. These pipelines are made of asbestos cement and have never
been subjected to any significant pressure in the vicinity of the Water Treatment Plant. Control
of the flow in this manner may create an increased risk of a line breakage.
The Plant staff has also experimented with controlling filter flow rates to more closely match
raw water pumping rates. In recent months they been very successful in managing the flow
rate of the Plant to minimize the quantity of excess wash water produced. This management
strategy is far safer and can be accomplished without any major capital improvements. We
would recommend replacing an existing valve on the raw water line that is difficult to operate.
This would allow for easier modulation and flow control by the operation staff.
The nature of the settled water at the Lagle Water Treatment Plant is somewhat unique. In
most treatment facilities raw water is combined with coagulant and other chemicals such that
suspended matter (turbidity) flocculates and settles to the bottom of the sedimentation basins.
At the Lagle Water Treatment Plant a substantial amount of this material tends to float to the
surface, creating a scum layer across the top of the sedimentation basins that is difficult to
remove. A portion of this floating scum is carried away when the sedimentation basins
overflow during the backwash process, but nearly half of the basin is not equipped with an
overflow drain. In the downstream sections of Sedimentation Basins 1 and 2, floating sediment
accumulates and creates a thick earth mat floating on top of the water (Photo 1). The condition
is not as bad in Sedimentation Basin 3 (Photo 2). The floating sediment may be partial
attributed to poor mixing and flocculation. The original baffle style flocculation serving basins 1
and 2 have deteriorated and should be renovated (Photo 3). Although improved mixing and
flocculation would likely help, testing tends to indicate it would not entirely eliminate floating
scum. It is therefore advisable to provide additional scum removal. Several options are
available including additional overflow pipes or a rotating weir assembly that could be utilized
during the backwash cycle to periodically remove the accumulated scum.
Prior to discharge, wash water will need to be dechlorinated. Fortunately, dechlorination can
easily be accomplished using one of several sulfur -based chemicals, either in gaseous or liquid
form. Given the size of the Plant, we recommend using liquid sodium bisulfite or sodium
thiosulfate. These chemicals can be purchased in barrels or "totes" and dispensed with a
simple chemical dosing pump.
U911115ENGINEERS

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina Technical Memorandum
Hugh A. lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
4 - Storage Basin Options
The main component of the wash water disposal system will be the construction of storage
basins suitable for holding wash water and equalizing discharge flows. These basins should be
large enough to accommodate at least several days flow and provide for adequate storage of
sediment between cleanings. Several options for this facility have been evaluated including
construction of earthen storage basins or concrete tanks. The overall construction costs of
these facilities are similar, as demonstrated on the attached Basis of Design and Cost Estimate.
Previous proposals have included construction of several circular concrete tanks with the idea
that mechanical equipment could be provided to allow for removal of sludge, dewatering and
disposal. Unfortunately, this type of facility is fairly expensive to build and operate. If the Town
builds concrete tanks, it may wish to undertake the project in multiple phases. The first phase
would include the concrete tanks, with mechanical dewatering equipment added at a later
date.
Construction of concrete storage tanks would include two circular 250,000 gallon tanks
equipped with piping to allow water to be discharged to either basin. A floating decanter
would be provided on a flexible hose in each basin to allow staff to withdrawal clear water from
the top of the storage facility. As sludge accumulates, the basin could be drained and the
sludge removed for dewatering by a contract operator. The general arrangement of the
facilities is shown on the attached Figure 1. The estimated costs of undertaking the
improvements using concrete storage basins would be approximately $614,000.
Another option would be to construct earthen storage basins. These basins would be
somewhat larger, with each basin having a volume of approximately 400,000 gallons. The
topography of the site is difficult for the construction of earthen basins; therefore, it would be
advisable to construct these facilities closer to Sanford Avenue and utilize a pumping station.
These shallow basins will allow for increased settling time and use a similar decanter
arrangement as provided in the concrete basin. The advantage of the earthen basins is that the
sludge removal could be accomplished utilizing traditional construction equipment, possibly
undertaken by Town staff, thereby reducing the overall operating costs. The general
arrangement of these facilities is shown on the attached Figure 1.Construction costs for these
facilities would be approximately $595,000.
Another advantage to undertaking earthen basin storage is that a portion of the facilities could
be constructed by Town staff or a local grading contractor. Town staff has expressed interest in
undertaking this option and estimates that a substantial cost savings could be realized utilizing
Town forces. The disadvantage to this option is that an additional pumping station would be
WIII1SENGINEERS

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina
Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
Technical Memorandum
required to convey drainage to the earthen storage basins. This work would likely require the
services of a specialized contractor with experience in constructing pumping stations.
5 — Regulatory Requirements
The Town has had conversation with DWQ representatives who have indicated the willingness
to issue a NPDES Permit with substantial time available for compliance. In our conversation
with DWQ they concur that a two-year timeframe for compliance would be satisfactory which
should allow sufficient time for construction of the proposed facilities. They have also
indicated that Permit limits would likely include 30 mg/I Total Suspended Solids and 17 µg/l
Total Residual Chlorine. Both of these limits should be achievable using either storage option
outlined above.
In addition to the NPDES Permit, the Town will need approval for construction of the new
facilities from the Division of Water Resources and Division of Land Quality. These approvals
are fairly routine and could only be undertaken after issuance of the NPDES Permit and
completion of detailed construction documents.
b - Financial Options
The construction of the proposed facilities will require a significant capital investment which
may be beyond the immediate capabilities of the Town. Unfortunately, grant funds for such
work are scarce in the current economy. Several options for low or no interest financingmay
be available should the Town wish to pursue them. If the Town is to undertake a portion of the
work utilizing Town forces, it is unlikely that these loan mechanisms would be available for the
entire project. The work would likely need to be divided into multiple contracts with loan
packages arranged only for those services provided by outside contractors.
7 - Recommendations
We recommend the Town comply with NPDES requirements by entering into a Permit as issued
by DWQ. The Permit could be issued with sufficient time for construction of the facilities with
an anticipated completion date of two years. In order to undertake these improvements the
Town will first need to decide which type of facility will be constructed and undertake its
detailed design. Either concrete tanks or earthen storage basins would be acceptable and the
decision is primarily based on how much Town labor would be acceptable in the construction
and operation of these facilities.
WIIIISENGINEERS

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina
Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
Photo 1— Sedimentation Basin #2
Photo 2 — Sedimentation Basin #3
WIIIISEN61NEERS
Technical Memorandum

Town of Mocksville, North Carolina
Hugh A. Lagle Water Treatment Plant
Wash Water Disposal
Photo 3 — Baffled Flocculator
Technical Memorandum
UUMI5ENGINEERS

Town of Mocksville
Wash Water Disposal
Existing Facility Improvements
Piping
Flocculation
Sedimentation Basins
Dechlorination
Chemical
Feed Method
Wash Water Storage
Type
Number and Size
Volume (each)
Piping & Valves
Inlet Piping
Outlet Piping
Flow Monitoring
Size and Type
Sampling
Controls
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Existing Facility Improvements
Dechlorination Facilities
Grading and Driveways
Back Wash Tanks
Piping and Valves
Floating Decanters and Hoses
Flow Monitoring and Sampling
Site Work and Fencing
Electrical Service
Subtotal
Construction Contingencies (10%)
Technical Services (15%)
Total Estimated Project Cost
Willis Engineers
1984.001 (20)
Concrete Tank Option
Basis of Design & Cost Estimate
Raw water valve replacement
Baffle replacement
Skimmers, rotating weirs and piping
Sodium Bisulfite or Sodium Thiosulfate
Peristaltic feed pumps, manual controls
Cast -in -place concrete tanks
Two, 60-ft diameter, 12-ft SWD
250,000 gal
200 If of 12-in, isolation valves
250 If of 8-in and 12-in, floating decanters
8-in Parshall Flume
Grab sample point
Continuous flow recording, totalizer
$35,000
10,000
120,000
225,000
40,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
15,000
$485,000
I• off
$614,000
July 2013

Town of Mocksville
Wash Water Disposal
Basis of Design
Existing Facility Improvements
Piping
Flocculation
Sedimentation Basins
Dechlorination
Chemical
Feed Method
Wash Water Pump Station
Size and Type
Pump Type (s)
Pump Capacities
Wash Water Storage
Type
Number and Size
Volume (each)
Piping & Valves
Inlet Piping
Outlet Piping
Flow Monitoring
Size and Type
Sampling
Controls
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Existing Facility Improvements
Dechlorination Facilities
Back Wash Pump Station
Earthen Basin
Piping and Valves
Floating Decanters and Hoses
Flow Monitoring and Sampling
Site Work and Fencing
Temporary Dewatering Area
Electrical Service
Subtotal
Construction Contingencies (10%)
Technical Services (15%)
Total Estimated Project Cost
Earthen Basin Option
Basis of Design & Cost Estimate
Raw water valve replacement
Baffle replacement
Skimmers, rotating weirs and piping
Sodium Bisulfite or Sodium Thiosulfate
Peristaltic feed pumps, manual controls
10-ft diameter, 20-ft deep, precast concrete
Low -head vertical turbine or submersible
One @ 200 gpm, two @ 2500 gpm
Earthen Basin, unlined
Two, 140-ft by 100-ft, 5-ft deep
400,000 gal
200 If of 12-in, isolation valves
250 If of 8-in and 12-in, floating decanters
8-in Parshall Flume
Grab sample point
Continuous flow recording, totalizer
$35,000
10,000
220,000
80,000
40,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
25,000
$470,000
47,000
M
$595,000
Willis Engineers
1984.001 (20)
July 2013

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Christine W Bralley, Manager Town
Town of Mocksville
171 S Clement St
Mocksville NC 27028
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
February 13, 2013
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION #NOV-2013-LV-0105
Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
A review of Dutchman Creek WWTP's monitoring report for November 2012 showed the
following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved
11/08/12
5 mg/1
3.8 mg/l
Daily
Minimum Not
Reached
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above
noncompliance problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in
enforcement action for this by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional
violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Sue White at [phone].
cc: SAT - Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
One
NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Action Employer

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
February 13, 2013
Christine W Bralley, Manager Town
Town of Mocksville
171 S Clement St
Mocksville NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION #NOV-2013-LV-0105
Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
A review of Dutchman Creek WWTP's monitoring report for November 2012 showed the
following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved
11/08/12
5 mg/l
3.8 mg/l
Daily
Minimum Not
Reached
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above
noncompliance problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in
enforcement action for this by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional
violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Sue White at [phone].
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
NorthCarolina
Aaturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

5
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
N,p\( 26 L.;3 , C>(OS Regional Supervisor
DNIR Review Record
Facility: Pe�tlPipe No.: t� cco2l�9 l Month/Year l d l'z—
C�—
Monthly Average Violations
pe� DMR Value % Over Linut
Parameter
Weekl aily iolations
C�i.�Ot2
Value o gi Linn t
Date Parameter Permit Limit/I'vbe D� ----
�. too
-------------
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Freouencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality Date:
Supervisor Sianoff:
po V

=01#UwJ1IL 1 / • 1-...
No_... 2
NPDES Permk #Ngqq2M
)IS�tearge No. 1 Class 3 Gounty Davie Phone: 336 477-S096
'ertifed Laboratories STATESVILLE ANALYTICAL Operator in Responsible Charge: Eric Mc
Person(s) Collecting Samples OperZtore: Eric Mot4i�
Signature of Operator in Responsible charge) Date Mete to the best of my knowledge.
o
t
0
0
0�
a
a
LO
CD
a
o
�o
o
00LO
cn
0
o
a
o
m
pa
E
h
�r
m
C
°
Q
0
y
O
a
E
Fes-
a
CO
a
I
4
rUA
N
'0
4
E
ct1
(o
60
1
6
U
v
p
O
'�
O
°
F
^-
IL
m
S
rO/B
an d
m
mk
1
900
2,00
Y 1
0.337
15
6.52
<
20
1 3,5
0.5
1 2.61
1
8.8
2
930
2.00
Y
0,341
17
3
0.3181
4
0.301
5
900
2,00
Y
0.296
16
6
900
2.00
Y 1
0.306
16
7.15
<
1 20
20
20
2
< 0.5
2.78
1
8,4
7
900
2,00
Y
0.298
16
7.05
<
3-2
0.5
2.94
19
7.2
8
900
2.00
Y
0.2S4
16
6.99
<
3
0.5
2.82
4
3.8
9
900
2.00
Y
0.309
16
10
0.319
11
0.294
12`
0.314
HOLIDAY
13
9001
2.00
Y
0,337
16
6.74
<
1 20
3.9
0.5
1 5.31
2
7,2
14
9001
2.50
Y
0.336
16
6.91
20
21
< 0.5
A 2.81
1
8,0
15
9001
2.00
Y
0.339
14
7.041
<
20
2
4 0.5
4 2.8t
1
8.9
16
12301
1,00
Y
0.327
14
17
0.313
18
0,308
19
9001
2,60
Y
0.348
15
7.04
<
1 20
2.81
0.5
2.8
2
8.8
20
9001
2.50
Y
0,331
15
7.2
<
20
4.1
0.5
2.7
1
8.4
21
000
2.50
Y
0,324
15
7.07
<
20
4.6
<
3.81
1
7.6
22
0.307
23
0.292
u • .
n:L[:.D q *,
24
0,307
25
0.296
26
830
2.00
Y
0.326
9
6,38
<
20
1 2
0.67
5.6
2
8.6
27
900
2.00
Y
0.328
9
6.+
20
3.1
0.5
4.8
20
6.8
28
9001
2.00
Y
0.32.9
8
6.75
<
20
3
0.5
2.8
1
8.1
29
9001
2.00
Y
0.319
30
900
1.000
0.332
31
Average
0.318
0,34e
11,520
20
3.01538
0.5130e
3,42615
2.0817009
7.9
¢ONn)!
MVIO!
Maximum
4.8
0.67
5.e
20
6.9
0
0
Minimum
0.292
tle.P29
20
z
0.5
2.5
1
3.8
0
0
CompC / Grab G)
Weekly Limit Apr-OCI
MonthlyLimit Apr- Oct
7.6mgn
a myn
45mgR
a001tO0ml
MA
nn
nn8
�
6 mpn
2 men
30m
2o01100m,
5mo
nn
nn
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
MonthlyLimit Nov -Mar
15 mgq
12 mgn
45NA
4001100mi
M
nn
0.981
M
v�
10 mpn
a mgn
30mgn
200/10omi
smgA
N+
nn
Y__oRC B=Back
uD
ORC O=other
oorerator

Facility Status_ (Please check one of the following) L� 1
All monitoring data and sampling encies meet Permit requirements Copmpl4mt
t
All monitoringoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet peanut requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a timetable for improvements to be made.
This is an tin Mded DME decal results were om ttPd from a lexical error. The results have > n hwut on illJis amended cgm. Ifyou
have any apes ions gj concerns plSW call 33 -4 7-5096 gj 336-284 0
,I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attacbumems were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualufiicd persotuiel properly gather and evaluate the iinformadon submitted. Based on nay
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the infloxnnation, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and WDprison meat for knowing violations."
Petmittee Address
Perroine (Please print or type) Town of Mocksville
L PwL -
Signature of . ermittee* Date
Phone Number
Permit 5 p. Date
PO BOX 768 Cooleemee NC 27014 336-284-2028 6/30/2014
PARAMETER CODF,S
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADM1)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BODS
00340 COD
00400 pi•1
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitratcs/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Homvalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Ahlminuam
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal. Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 blow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorin
71880 Formaldehyde
71.900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter' Code assistaaace pray be obtained by calling the water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extensiou.581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal eoliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC paean. Use only units designated in the reporting
facility's permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (A).
** If signed by other tban the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 213 .0506 (b)
(2) (D)-
N

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 02/13/13 Page: 1 of 1
Permit: nc0021491 MRs Between: 11 2011 and 10-2012 Region: % Violation Category: % Program Category: %
Facility Name: % Param Name: % County: % Subbasin: % Violation Action: %
Major Minor: %
PERMIT: NCO021491 FACILITY: Town of Mocksville - Dutchman Creek WWTP COUNTY: Davie REGION: Winston-Salem
Limit Violation
MONITORING
OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT
PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
% OVER LIMIT
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
10 -2012
001
Effluent
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
10/13/12
3 X week
mg/I
7.5
8.93
19.11
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Concentration
09 -2012
001
Effluent
Cadmium, Total (as Cd)
09/30/12
Monthly
ug/I
7
14
100
Monthly Average Exceeded
No Action, Facility
Reporting Error
01 -2012
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
01/28/12
3 X week
#/100ml
400
476.22
19.06
Weekly Geometric Mean
No Action, BPJ
Broth,44.5C
Exceeded
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT
PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
% OVER LIMIT
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
03 -2012
001
Effluent
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved
03/03/12
3 X week
mg/I
Frequency Violation
No Action, BPJ
07 -2012
001
Effluent
Silver, Total (as Ag)
07/31/12
Monthly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
07 -2012
001
Effluent
Zinc, Total (as Zn)
07/31/12
Monthly
mg/I
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 3230 0000 9861 6863
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
February 5, 2013
Mrs. Christine W. Bralley, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Notice of Violations with Intent to Enforce NOV-2013-PC-0036/Compliance Evaluation
Inspection, Dutchman Creek WWTP, NPDES Permit No., NCO021491 Davie County
Dear Mrs. Bralley:
Sue White and Aana Taylor -Smith of the Winston-Salem Regional Office performed a Compliance Evaluation
Inspection (CEI) on the Dutchman Creek wastewater treatment plant on January 24, 2013. Eric Moten, ORC was
present for the inspection. The inspection consisted of two parts: an on -site inspection of the treatment facility and a
file review. The following are the findings from the subject inspection.
I. Permit
The NPDES permit for the Dutchman Creek WWTP became effective May 1, 2010 and will expire on June 30, 2014.
Please be aware that the permit renewal application must be received by Division of Water Quality 180 days prior to
the permit expiration date. The permitted components of the 0.98 MGD wastewater facility are influent pump station,
flow measurement, grit removal chambers with mechanical bar screen, three aeration basins, three secondary
clarifiers, chlorination and dechlorination units, sludge recirculation and wasting and an aerobic digester and solids
storage.
II. Records/Reports
A review of the laboratory reports and Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) for the Dutchman Creek WWTP showed
no reporting violations during that period. The files and all required log books were on -site and in order.
III. Facility Site Review
The facility site review indicated that the 0.98 MGD treatment works is consistent with the permitted components with
the exception of the bar screen, which is listed as manual in the permit but is a mechanical screen. The actual
treatment system consists of the abovementioned components. The flow meter had been calibrated on 1/24/12 by
ForTech Automation Controls. All meters must be calibrated at least on a yearly basis. Failure to do so is a
violation. Documentation has since been received in this office showing that the meter was calibrated on January,
29, 2013.
The mechanical bar screen is equipped with an aluminum chute that is designed to deposit the trash and
rags from the bar screen into a plastic sleeve attached to it. The bottom of the sleeve is tied off and when the
screenings fill the sleeve, it is cut off and tied off. The filled bag is then deposited into the dumpster until
removed from the site. The sleeve is then tied off creating a new bottom and process begins again. When
the site was inspected, the bottom of the sleeve had not been tied but simply inserted into a garbage can.
The wind blew the unsecured sleeve out the the can and the screenings were blown all around the area. This
does not constitute proper disposal of screenings/trash and is a violation.
The caustic room inspection showed that the Caustic Soda Liquid container had been leaking. The leak had
since been corrected, but a hole had been drilled into the base of the wall to allow the caustic liquid to drain
freely out of the building and into the storm drain located directly behind the building. (see attached photos)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCaroHna
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org NatunillY
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer ;/

This is an illegal discharge and as a result the following violations are noted:
Item I. Removal of use
15A NCAC 02B .0211 (2): The waters shall be suitable for aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological
integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture; sources of water pollution which preclude any of these uses
on either a short-term or long-term basis shall be considered to be violating a water quality standard.
Item Il. Oils; deleterious substances: color or other wastes:
15A NCAC 02B .0211 (3) f: Oils; deleterious substances; colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not
render the waters injurious to public health, secondary recreation or to aquatic life and wildlife or adversely affect the
palatability of fish, aesthetic quality or impair the waters for any designated uses;
IV. Laboratory
All of the sample analyses are conducted by Statesville Analytical Labs. The laboratory was not reviewed at the time
of the subject inspection.
V. Sludge Utilization/Disposal
Solids are removed from the WWTP as necessary by a licensed contract hauler.
VI. Pretreatment
Not evaluated during this inspection.
VII. Stormwater
Not evaluated during this inspection.
Vill. Sewer Overflow
Not evaluated during this inspection.
IX. Pollution Prevention
Not evaluated during this inspection. .
Please be advised that the Division of Water Quality currently has on staff a wastewater treatment plant consultant,
Mr. Gary Hudson, to offer technical assistance for facilities with operational concerns. The WWTP Consultant is
available during regularly scheduled workdays. In order to request this service, please contact Gary at (336) 771-
5000.
The Winston Salem Regional Office is considering preparation of an enforcement action for the violations of permit
conditions. To prevent further action, carefully review these violations and deficiencies and respond in writing to this
office within fifteen working day of receipt of this letter. You should address the causes of noncompliance and all
actions taken to prevent the recurrence of similar situations. If you have questions or comments regarding this Notice
of Violations, or if this office can be of assistance, please contact Sue White at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Water Quality Supervisor
Winston Salem Regional Office
Cc: Davie County Health Department
WSRO
Central Files
Johnny Lambert, Director of Public Works

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 1Nl 2 I sI 31 NCO021491 111 121 13/01/24 117 181r1 19Li 20U
ltJ� �--! LJ t�
Remarks
21IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA -------------------Reserved ------- —------- ___
67 I 169 70 71 U 72 73 I W I 174 751 I I I I I I 180
�t----�' �t----��
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
11:30 AM 13/01/24
10/05/01
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
295 Garwood Rd
Mocksville NC 27028
12:30 PM 13/01/24
14/06/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
///
Eric D Moten/ORC/336-477-5096/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Christine W Bralley,171 S Clement St Mocksville NC 27028//336-753-6701/3367519187 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance 0 Records/Reports
Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Sue White /I - WSRO WQ//336-771-5000/ Z1 C. ( 3
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
I
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3I NCO021491 11 12I 13/01/24 1 17 181 _,
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

t
Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/24/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Caustic leak drained into near by storm drain.
o,,. 16 Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Record Keeping
Yes
No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
❑
Name of individual performing the sampling
❑
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
Dates of analysis
❑
Name of person performing analyses
❑
Transported COCs
❑
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 3

Permit: NC0021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/24/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Drying Beds
Comment: Sludge beds were being used to store exacavated material from spills and
screenings from the grit chamber. The front boards of the beds were not in place
allowing the rainwater to wash out leachate.
Yes No NA NE
Page # 5

a
r

\\:IN
-
�.�f
.
-
d\�2\d�i .
.a

��1FOIRMECH
Automation Controls
SERVICE REPORT
01/29/13
Dutchman's Creek WWTP
Service Person: Hing Wong, P.E.
Contact: Eric Molten
Date of Service: 01/29/13
Arrival Time: 10:00 AM
Departure Time: 12:00 PM
Travel Time: 2 Hr.
Instrument Calibration
1. Verified instrument calibration for three ultrasonic flow transmitters used for
influent flow.
Influent Flow Channel #1 Prosonic FMU 861 set to measure flow.
Verified zero flow with actual zero flow.
Verified the output of the instrument to be:
4.00 mA. = 0 GPM
12.00 mA. = 500 GPM
20.00 mA. = 1000 GPM
Influent Flow Channel #2 Prosonic FMU 861 set to measure flow.
Verified zero flow with actual zero flow.
Verified the output of the instrument to be:
4.00 mA. = 0 GPM
12.00 mA. = 500 GPM
20.00 mA. = 1000 GPM
Influent Flow Channel #3 Prosonic FMU 861 set to measure flow.
Verified zero flow with actual zero flow.
Verified the output of the instrument to be:
4.00 mA. = 0 GPM
12.00 mA. = 500 GPM
20.00 mA. = 1000 GPM

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Christine W Bralley, Manager Town
Town of Mocksville
171 S Clement St
Mocksville NC 27028
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
January 14, 2013
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION #NOV-2013-LV-0037
Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
A review of Dutchman Creek WWTP's monitoring report for October 2012 showed the
following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) -
10/13/12
7.5 mg/l
8.93 mg/l
Weekly
Concentration
Average
Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above
noncompliance problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in
enforcement action for this by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional
violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Sue White at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: SWP — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office One
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 NorthCarolina Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 ���������
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

_003--1 Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DNIR Review Record
Facility: ZL�-r_tst�llst`l. Permit/Pipe No.: L, C zL4,a L_ Month/ ear i� 1
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter
Permit Limit -D Value % Over Limit
Weekly aily Violations
Value %Over Limit
Date Parameter Permit Limitf voe DMA_____-_
i
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Freouencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Date:
Completed by:
Regional Water Quality Date:
Supervisor Signoff:

_ITluenr utuchman UreeK it
Oct-12
NPDES Permit #NC0021491
)ischarge No. 1 Class 3 County Davie Phone: [phone]
;ertified Laboratories Pace Analytical Operator in Responsible Charge: Eric Moten
Person(s) Collecting Samples Operators :Eric Moten and Michael Weir
/Cinnafiira of n rafnr in Rasnnncihla rharnal nnta inlPte to tha hact of my knnwl-ino
O
Lo
O
O
U)
O
-
O
O
O
O
O
It
O
O
O
0
O
O
to
O
c 7
O
O
O
r
(o
O
O
O
M
tr)
O
O
O
Co
(13
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
LO
Co
(O
O
O
m
O
E
@
c
<
o
°
On
N
U)
C
O
F=
Q
O
N
O
�
O
o
ca
m
N
e1
n
E
H
0-
C
O
o
N
O
m
Q7
m
O`
Z
m
c
E
<
3
N
a�
n
°
°
E
°
o
U
U_
Q
X
O
o
>
N
c
o
L
z
H
y
2
O
n
O
a-
70-
H
HRS
HRS
Y/O/B
mgd
C
units
ugl
< mgA
< mg/I
< mgn
#/100m1
mg/I
< mgn
< mg/l
1
830
2.00
Y
0.372
20
2
900
2.00
Y
0.421
20
7.02
<
20
4
< 0.5
4.48
4
8.0
0.67
4.6
3
900
2.00
Y
0.354
19
7.15
<
20
3.5
< 0.5
2.63
1
7.2
4
900
2.00
Y
0.348
24
6.94
<
20
3.4
1.23
2.75
12
8.1
5
900
2.00
Y
0.361
24
6
1
1 0.385
7
0.350
8
800
2.00
Y
0.360
15
9
900
2.00
Y
0.332
17
6.42
<
20
4d
0.5
3
1
8.0
10
900
2.00
Y
0.326
20
6.89
<
20
17.9
< 0.5
3.7
2
7.4
11
900
2.00
Y
0.311
20
6.8
<
20
4.9
< 0.5
3.7
10
8.2
12
9001
2.00
Y
1 0.305
18
13
0.291
14
0.311
15
900
2.00
Y
0.369
17
6.75
<
20
8.6
16
1100
2.00
B
0.326
17
6.86
<
20
< 2
< 0.5
6.7
10
8.9
17
800
2.00
B
0.326
16
6.49
<
20
3.7
< 0.5
8.1
21
8.3
18
8451
2.00
B
1 0.338
171
6.61
<
201
1 2.9
< 0.5
4
3200
8.5
19
1600
1.00
Y
0.328
18
20
0.310
21
0.298
22
800
2.50
Y
0.325
18
23
900
2.00
Y
0.315
18
6.9
<
20
4.27
< 0.5
4.1
1
8.4
24
9001
2.00
Y
0.326
18
6.99
<
201
1 4
< 0.5
4.4
11
8.8
25
900
2.00
Y
0.328
18
6.77
<
20
5.6
j 0.51
1 4
1
8.2
26
10.3
2.00
Y
0.330
15
27
0.318
28
0.331
29
1100
1.00
O
0.331
15
6.9
301
9001
2.00
Y
0.322
13
6.94
<
1 20
4.1
< 0.5
3.4
19
8.4
311
9001
2.00
Y
0.331
14
6.52
<
20
2.2
0.5
< 2.8
3
8.2
Average
0.335
17,8696
20
1 474786
055214
1 412571
4.8054889
82
0.67
4.6
Maximum
0.421
24
7.2
20
179
1 23
8.1
3200
89
0-67
4.6
Minimum
0.291
13
6.4
20
2
0.5
2.63
1
z2
0.67
4.6
Comp C / Grab G
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
Month) Limit Apr- Oct
7 5mgn
6 mgn
45mgn
4001100ml
n/l
nil
nn
6-9
28 ug/L
5 mg1l 1
2 mgn
30mgn
200/100ml
5mg/l
nn
nn
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Limit Nov -Mar
15 mgn
LI 12 mgn I
145mgA
400n00ml
nn
0981
nil
6-9
28ug/L
10mg/I
4 mg/l
30mg/I
200/100m1
5mg/l
n/l
EnllMonth)
r=UKG ti=uacK up UKc U=other oprerator
EC d TCJL
RECEIVED
I.C. Dept. of ENR
JAN 0, 7 201
jl'linston-Salem
Regional Office

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a timetable for improvements to be made.
The week of October 8 thru the 12`h theplant was non compliant due to high BOD spike coming into the plant The issue has been
addressed we increased wasting rates to bring solid inventory down to help achieve lower BOD values I also contact Sue White
and made her aware of this non compliant issue. If you have any question about please feel free to contact me at 336 477 5096"1
certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permitte (Please print or type) Town of Mocksville
Signature of Permittee* Date
Permittee Address Phone Number
PO BOX 768 Cooleemee NC 27014 336-284-2028
PARAMETER CODES
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
Permit Exp. Date
6/30/2014
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting
facility's permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (B).
** If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
(2) (D)•

Davie
NCO021491 Dutchman Creek WWTP
Limit Violation
Average BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C) Milligrams
Exceeded 201210> 001 Concentration 10-13-2012 3 X week per Liter 7.5 8.93 19.11111

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc0021491 MRs Between: 10-2011 and 9-2012 Region: %
Facility Name: % Param Name: % County: %
Major Minor: %
Violation Category:
Subbasin:
PERMIT: NCO021491 FACILITY: Town of Mocksville - Dutchman Creek WWTP COUNTY: Davie
Limit Violation
MONITORING
OUTFALL /
REPORT
PPI LOCATION
PARAMETER
09 -2012
001 Effluent
Cadmium, Total (as Cd)
01 -2012
001 Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
Broth,44.5C
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
OUTFALL /
REPORT
PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
03 -2012
001
Effluent
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved
07 -2012
001
Effluent
Silver, Total (as Ag)
07 -2012
001
Effluent
Zinc, Total (as Zn)
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE %OVER LIMIT
09/30/12
Monthly
ug/I
7 14 100
01/28/12 3 X week #/100ml 400 476.22 19.06
VIOLATION
UNIT OF CALCULATED
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE LIMIT VALUE % OVER LIMIT
03/03/12
3 X week
mg/I
07/31/12
Monthly
mg/I
07/31/12
Monthly
mg/I
Report Date: 01/14/13 Page: 1 of 1
Program Category: %
Violation Action: %
REGION: Winston-Salem
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
Monthly Average Exceeded
No Action, Data
Entry Error
Weekly Geometric Mean
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
Frequency Violation
No Action, BPJ
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV
Frequency Violation
Proceed to NOV

A�A�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 22, 2012
Christine W Bralley, Manager Town
Town of Mocksville
171 S Clement St
Mocksville NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2012-MV-0103
Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
A review of Dutchman Creek WWTP's monitoring report for July 2012 showed the following
violations:
Parameter
Date
Measuring
Frequency
Violation
Silver, Total (as Ag)
07/31/12
Monthly
1-Failure to monitor
Zinc, Total (as Zn)
07/31/12
Monthly
1-Failure to monitor
Remedial actions should be taken to correct this problem. The Division of Water Quality may
pursue enforcement action for this and any additional violations of State law.
To prevent further action, carefully review these violations and deficiencies and respond in
writing to this office within 30 working day of receipt of this letter. You should address the
causes of noncompliance and all actions taken to prevent the recurrence of similar situations. If
you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Sue White at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Winston Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc: Central Files —SWP
WSRO
585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 336-771-5000 (Telephone) 336-771-4630 (Fax)

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
oio3 Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
j�Tc_uM t� � lZ
Facility: �'Lr-- Permit/Pipe No.: N��Z�49 l �gonth/Year
Parameter
Date Parameter
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value
Weekly/Daily Violations
Permit Limit/Tvpe DMR Value
% Over Limit
% Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Completed b
Compl : Date: y
Regional Water Quality;✓
Supervisor Signoff: Date:

-"w a • YlY4111118CM ----
Jul-12
NPM Permit #N(=21491
)Isdarge No. I Class 3 County pavle Phone: [phone]
:ertifmd Laboratories Pace Analytical Operator in Responsible charge, Eric Moten
a Person(s) Cog" Samples Operators :Eric Moten
S' nature
of
O erator
in R
O
O
tt�
nstote
O
O
O
char
o0
d
O
a
CI
O
O
uale
o
M
O
Cp
V0
« W ...
CI
O
O
-1 �• •
CD
M
CDo
O
O
O
O
m
O
O
p
i=
Q
c
E
~
0
p
C
0
O
Q
U-
w
tD
a
rJ
N
N
m
z
C
C
Q
a
`
40
�°
L
O
g
0
$'
z
0
e
CL
C
a
0
HRS
HRS
YtOIB
m9d
c
units
ugl
mgA
<1 mgA
< mgA
01100m1
MO
<1 mgA
<
1
0.283
2
10001
2.00
Y
0,310
20
3
9001
1.50
Y
0.298
241
6.5
<
20
5.15
3.1
1
6.8
4
0.298
5
900
2.50
Y
0.290
241
6.37
< 1
201
1 4.7
1 0.0361
1 0
11
7.7
6
900
2.00
Y
0.293
24
6.62
<
201
8.3
1 0.04
1 0
1
7.4
7
0.289
8
0.276
9
8001
2.00
Y
0.301
24
10
9001
2.00
Y
0.441
24
6.18
<
20
7.7
0.073
0
5
7.1
11
9001
1.50
Y
0.382
231
6.62
<
20
1 3.5
0.0421
1 2.6
32
8.2
12
9001
2.50
Y
0.333
22
6.4
<
20
1 3.2
0.0551
1 0
1
7.6
13
9001
2.50
Y
1 0.391
24
14
0.369
15
0.458
16
9301
1.500
0.332
26
17
9001
2.00
Y
0.315
26
3.9
0.091
0
1
0.84
1 3.3
18
9001
2.00
Y
0.305
26
6.6
<
201
1 4.4
0.0791
0
2
7.7
19
9001
2.00
Y
1 0.313
26
6.47
<
201
1 4.2
0.0781
1 2.5
1
8.0
20
9001
3.00
Y
1 0.304
26
6.74
<
20
1
1
6.5
21
0.317
22
0.302
23
900
1.50
Y
0.313
26
24
900
2.00
Y
0.310
28
6.93
<
20
3.8
0.03
0
1
7.2
25
900
2.00
Y
0.304
25
6.86
<
20
3.3
0.033
0
2
7.0
26
900
2.00
Y
0.301
28
6.74
<
20
3.9
0.047
0
1
8.2
27
900
2.00
Y
0.325
28
28
0.310
29
0.287
30
900
2.00
Y
0.305
24
31
900
1.00
Y
0.304
24
7.24
<
20
2.9
0,069
0
4
8.5
Aveme
0.3211
24,8571
20
453462
0.056
O.W0771
1.8288257
7.5
0.84
33,
Maximum
0.458
28
72
20
83
009
31
32
8.5
0.84
33
Minimum
0.276
20
62
20
2.9
003
0
1
6.5
0.84
3.3
Comp C I Grab G
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
MonthlyLimit r- Oct
17,5mgA
6 mgA
45m
4001100mf
M
M
M
6 9
28 ugfL
5 mgA
2
0m
2001100m1
M
M
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
15 m
,2
45OW
4001100m1
nA
M
O.s81
M
6-9
29
10 mgA
4 m
2001100mt
M
M
Y=ORC 8=68CK up ORE; O=otner opreraxer
iiEcF',IVrI0
N.C. pent, of FNR
OCT 0 2012
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
SEP 5 ��

Dutchman Creek
Month:Dec Year:2012
NPDES Permit #NC0021491
urge No. 001 Class 3 County Davie
,ified Laboratories TRITEST
Person(s) Collecting Samples ®perators David Nobles _ Eric Moten
,0 By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and
tignature of Operator in Responsible Charg• Date complete to the best of my knowledge.
{
t
t
t
WIN
MIN
WIN
1101111
will
ON
4111111
I
NINE
WON
110
WIN
111111N
NOR
WIN
WIN
WIN
WIN
WWI

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 10/17/12 Page: 1 of 1
PERMIT: NCO021491 FACILITY: Town of Mocksville - Dutchman Creek WWTP
COUNTY: Davie
REGION: Winston-Salem
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT PPI LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
% OVER LIMIT
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
01 -2012 001 Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, M-FC
01/28/12
3 X week
#/100ml
400
476.22
19.06
Weekly Geometric Mean
No Action, BPJ
Broth,44.5C
Exceeded
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT PPI LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
% OVER LIMIT
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
03 -2012 001 Effluent
DO, Oxygen, Dissolved
03/03/12
3 X week
mg/I
Frequency Violation
No Action, BPJ
Reporting Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT PPI LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
% OVER LIMIT
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
07 -2011
08/31/11
Late/Missing DMR
No Action, BPJ

i
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
OlC),� Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
s —z ( 2—
Facility: rP�`� � Permit/Pipe No.: �ya4-12(. MontivYear
Parameter
Date
Parameter
Date Parameter
z (zt PEON -
Other Violations
41 1-2— MC:4
Monthly Average Violations
Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Permit L-jD t/ly e DMR Value % Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
MtdTR(.`( �IN 3 I� alb
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality v{�� ! X---
Supervisor SiQnoff: Date:
Nab

'
EFFLUENT'
NPDES PERMIT NO. 64726
DISCHARGE NO. 1
MONTH July YEAR
2012
FACILITY NAME East Bend Industrial Park
CLASS
2 COUNTY Yadkin
OPERAT c N RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC)
Mark Matthews
GRADE 2 PHONE [phone]
CER IED LABORATORIES (1) R&A LABS
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED - - - - - 0
ERSON(S)t.., TING
SIMPLES Mark Matthews / Mitch Long
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY-to;j
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
?
DIV. OF WATER QUALITY j } �s`(
ins n Sal
��
/ �
DENR j
( TTATURE CF-©PER
-OR-1N RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) `DATE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
BY THIS SIGNATURE, I CERTIFY THAT THE REPORT IS
�?
��
RALEIGH. NC 27699-1617
ACCURATF ANn COMPI FTF
T(1 THE RFAT nR nev VKInlnn Gnco
r am'
50050
00010
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
oo665
00
FLOW
p
ENTER PARAMETER CODE ABOVE
E
in
CI.
EFF p
w
C
y
NAME AND UNITS BELOW
LU
A
o
O
a
y
INF ED
H h
>
Q Z
>—
�c�
Q W
Za
W W
0-
U.
W Z
> w
W
-'O
Q
O
J D:
C7
p
¢`o
O
�lA
uj J
=
a
p�
0
Go
00
OO
��
fnp
py
o.`
U
JO
0
O}
�O
w
Qo
� 2
o2f
o
9
w
>-
W
.0
fn J
wx
m N
QZ
!n W
J W
ty
Q o
x
U)0
0
~Z
0 a
~0
O
0
O
J
F-
F.-
U m
p
S
0
0
0
LLB?
a
HRS
HRS
Y/N
MGD
C
UNITS
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
#100ML
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Mg/1
2
17:00
1
Y
0.004
.....................
...................................
3
�..............
0 UD3.......
;;. d.5 ...
...:::;:;:::::
69
...:.:.:
.. 2.:.:.t).:`i��....6.5
:..:.:.:
::::::::::
1....
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:.6,45.:..::
:::.:::....
4
0.007
XXX
HOLI
DAY
5.........,05......1.........Y.........Q,OR4
17
j
..............
..:.....:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::
:::::::::::
6
17:00
1
Y
0.005
o ;;
U>#1.............XX
.........................:.,......,.,...,.:..:...:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.....:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
;`
::::::::::::;::::::::::
;::::::::::777
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
8
0.003
XXX
10
11:00
1
Y
0.004
25.6
7.51
2.19
0.155
1.5
1
7.33
5
7.0......1.........
Y.........0,#1Q4
......................:.:.:.:.:.:.:......
..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:::.:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
12
17:00
1
Y
0.006
14
0.002
XXX
15
.................................................Q,UC�3.:.,..:.......
....
.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.;.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
;
::;;:
:::::;:;::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
16
17:00
1
Y
0.004
0..0
.:.:1.:.:..:.:Y
..
..O:fl03......24,.:.::.:.1
.:..:.:.:.:.:.::.:.
48,
18
17:00
1
Y
0.003
20
17:00
1
Y
0.006
z....
0,003
xc
..:..:.::..
..........
22
0.004
::....:.........
XXX
.......
....
t
2
Y...,
,... Ut1...3................................................:............::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:::::.::.::::::::::::::..
24
10:00
1
Y
0.004
25.2
7.4
3.52
0.214
4.75
1
1 7.3
5
All
0..::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::.:::,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::.:.:::::.::::::::::::::::..::::::
.:.:.:.:
26
17:00
1
Y
0.005�
........
......
.......
j
2.........b0......1.........Y.........0:006
......
......
28
0.006
........
XXX
.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:.::::::
............
..........:
.....:.:..........................................:.:................................................:................................
.:::::...
;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.
..................................
P.
.. .
........:
30
17:00
1
Y
0.003
3 .........:
<Ul......1
......................Q....
............
_................:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:..::.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:::.:::.:.::.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:........:.:.:.:...:.:....:..............:.
.: ....:....:.:.:.:.:.:..::::::::::::::::::::::::::.
AVERAGE
0.00413
24.9
3.103
0.222
3.688
1
6.9075
5
b,flQ7.,.,..,.2.5.�s.......7,69
..................4,
....fl,
A8
.... a, .:......1..........T.3
...:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:
MINIMUM
0.002
24.3
7.31
1
2
0.155
1.5
1
6.45
5
A::::.:::::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.::.:::..::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:::::::.:..:::::.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:
Monthly Avg. Limit
0.01
6 9
30
3.5
30
200
>Weel�lyAv.,.L.mlt..................................:...........................:..........:.5.:.::.:IQ.S...:.:.45.....:..:QO.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:
Daily Maximum Limit
>5
DEM Form MR-1 (12/93)
Forms by ChemSW(707)864-0845;p/n11158;v5.24;1/1/2000;s/n111583152

A74 JW
��_
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mrs. Christine Bralley, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Division of Water Resources
Thomas A. Reeder
Director
January 3, 2012
Re: 2011 Water Plant Inspection
Mocksville, Town of
PWSID #NCO23010, Davie County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On November 18, 2011, Tom Boyd inspected the Town of Mocksville's water treatment plant. This letter is in follow-up
to that inspection as well as communicating other major issues of concern. These issues were discussed with you during a
meeting on December 12, 2011 at Town Hall. Robert Midgette, Deputy Section Chief for the Public Water Supply
Section, and Tom Boyd were also present.
As you know, the town's raw water source, Hunting Creek, provides variable water quality and is characterized as being
"flashy" or not stable. Historically, high turbidity measurements have been documented as well as elevated fecal coliform
bacteria counts which, obviously, can compromise public health. Variable raw water quality presents challenges for the
water treatment plant (WTP) as well as the operators. It is imperative that the WTP be well maintained and operated to
ensure compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act and, ultimately, to protect public health.
One of the greatest concerns at Mocksville's WTP is detention time in the sedimentation basins. As established by 15A
NCAC 18C .0706 of the Rules Governing Public Water Systems (RGPWS), the minimum theoretical detention period
shall be four hours in the sedimentation basins. Calculations performed by this office confirm data provided to the town
in a Water System Evaluation conducted by Grey Engineering (2009) indicating a maximum of 3.1 to 3.6 hours under
ideal conditions (i.e. no sludge). (Note detention time decreases as sludge is accumulated in the sedimentation basins.) It
has been noted in the past that sludge levels in the basins were up to ten feet providing less than one hour of actual
detention time. In the past month, the basins were cleaned and personnel reported about three feet of sludge. This equates
to approximately 2.2 hours of actual detention time. Overall, even during optimal conditions (no sludge and low flow),
the sedimentation basins are undersized and need to be replaced.
Mocksville should immediately take steps to address the undersized sedimentation basins and sludge removal system.
Currently, the sludge is removed from the sedimentation basins once per year. The plant's sludge removal strategy should
be evaluated and management plans need to be established and implemented to maximize sedimentation basin efficiency.
In summary, the town needs to address the undersized sedimentation basins and inefficient sludge removal strategy. As a
temporary adjustment, the town can slow the flow through the plant and increase operational hours to increase detention
time, especially during wet weather and high turbidity events. It is important to recognize this interim fix would require
addressing raw water pumping capacities. Currently, the raw water pumps are not capable of variable speed and a new
pump(s) may be necessary to allow for the variable flow control and operational hour extension. In addition, increased
sludge removal is also necessary to increase the detention times in the sedimentation basins.
Public Water Supply Section — Jessica C. Godreau, Chief
Winston-Salem Regional Office One
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: ncdrinkingwater.state.nc.us Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

I
Town of Mocksville
NCO230010
January 3, 2012
Page 2
Another reoccurring concern is the contact time of finished water with the disinfectant in the clearwell. The most recent
CT study, a parameter to evaluate inactivation of Giardia and viral cysts, conducted at the WTP resulted in a
recommendation of installation of baffles to greatly increase mixing. The town should take measures to immediately
install the baffles in the clear well. Upon completion, another CT study will be required to determine actual time of
contact time to ensure inactivation of harmful pathogens.
Until system improvements have been completed to alleviate concerns, Mocksville should ensure proper standard
operating procedures (SOPs) are in place and the staff are well trained to detect upsets early. All WTP staff should
immediately and properly respond to any concerns (such as filtered water not meeting turbidity standards) so that the
interconnection with Davie County Water System can be activated while WTP effluent is pumped to waste until the
hazard is eliminated. Although this beneficial interconnection provides some relief, it is only valuable if staff is properly
trained and the interconnection is tested regularly to ensure non -compliant water does not enter in to the town's
distribution system.
Finally, during the inspection, it was documented that the screens on the clearwell vents are rusted and require
replacement. This was conveyed to the operator during my visit. Please have these screens replaced as soon as possible,
but no later than January 15, 2012.
The issues discussed above are of great concern and need to be addressed promptly. It is notable that this water treatment
plant does not meet current design standards and the town needs to take steps to improve public health protection. Please
respond to this office, in writing, by February 29, 2012 of the specific actions the town plans to take to address the issues
discussed above. It is important to establish a timeline to ensure all items are addressed in a timely manner. If you need
any assistance, or have any questions, please contact me at [e-mail] or via telephone at 336.771.5073.
Sincerely,
Lisa Edwards, PE
Regional Engineer
Public Water Supply Section
cc: Jessica C. Godreau, P.E., BCEE, Chief, Public Water Supply Section
Geoff Beane, Water Plant ORC, Town of Mocksville
Corey Basinger, DWQ Regional Engineer (via email)
WSRO File

GREY
ENGINEERING, INC.
September 27, 2011
Monti Hassan
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Water Quality - PERCS
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC, 27699-1617
RE: Town of Mocksville Pretreatment; Townsends (Crestwood Farms) name change and status
Dear Monti:
Please review the IUP history entry below for the Town of Mocksville's Industrial User Permit number
0003 (Omtron USA, LLC, d/b/a Townsends) for information regarding ownership change. The permit
was originally written to Crestwood Farms, however, the parent company for Crestwood Farms was sold
to Omtron, USA, LLC who has since elected to close the facility effective October 1, 2011. Please also
note that we expect the permit to be extinguished at that time.
4/5/11 IUP Modiflcation Omtron USA, LLC purchased Crestwood Farms. Permit revised
to reflect name change associated with new ownership.
CEO of Omtron USA, LLC is David Purtle. Corporate
headquarters is located at 22855 DuPont Blvd., Georgetown,
DE, 19947. Locally, Jim Harrison remains in place as plant
manager for the facility located at 251 Eaton Road, Mocksville,
NC, 27028 now known as Omtron USA, LLC d/b/a Townsends.
We are working with George Smith and Mike Mickey to navigate orderly permit closure and will
correspond with you as events unfold.
I have enclosed for your records copies of the purchase agreement and the name change request from
the industry, as well as the front page and IUP history portions of the permit reflecting the new name:
Omtron, USA, LLC d/b/a Townsends. No other parts of the permit have been changed.
Thank you,
John C. Grey, Jr., PE
Acting Pretreatment Coordinator
cc: George Smith
P.O. Box 9 . Mocksville, NC 27028 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] . www.greyengineering.com

Mickey, Mike
From: Eric Moten [Eric. [e-mail]. nc.us]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 12:23 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: Dutchman DMR - June 2011
Mike- Yes I omitted it by accident. I will send in a amended next week the value that left out was 9.2. I would like to apologize for my
mistake.
Regards,
Eric Moten
-----Original Message -----
From: Mickey; Mike[mailto:mike.mickey(2ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wed 9/14/2011 4:03 PM
To: Eric Moten
Subject: Dutchman DMR - June 2011
Eric - The computer picked up a missed D.O. value for the week 6/6 - 6/10.
Any chance the value was simply omitted? Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike.MickevCa,NCDENR. aov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

rt\b
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DNIR Review Record
Facility: ���v�. Permit/Pipe No.: Cb���°�--- Month/Year
Mon y Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekl aily Violations
Date Parameter Permit L' v e DMR Value % Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
`D\atte_\\ Paramet r Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Completed by: � Date:
Regional Water Quality I vo r, 1
Super-isor Signoff: Date: _
r
�- k«-•. �+� �� �f '� � ,moo ✓ -- CP,�- ,

Effluent Dtuchman Creek
Jun-11
NPDES Permit #NC0021491-
Discharge No. 1 Class 3 County Davie Phone: [phone]
Certified Laboratories TRITEST Operator in Responsible Charge: Eric Moten
Person(s) Collecting Samples Opemtors_Eric Moten Jimmmmmv Peel
....... in l7ocnnncihlo rho o nl fa 1 1Pt. fn tha hart of my knnwlarina
O
Lr)
O
O
Lr)
O
-
O
O
O
O
O
rt
O
O
O
(D
O
O
L0
O
-
M
(D
O
O
-
(O
O
O
(D
M
Ln
O
O
(O
.--
(O
c)
O
O
Cl)
O
O
O
O
(o
O
O
V)
CO
cfl
O
O
p
E
i-
'FZU
C
o
0
O
E
O
O
O
O
L1_
>
m
67
m
a
a)n
m
c
a
L
N
Y
0
m
0)�
o
Z
o
E
Q
a
m
t°-
E
�O
U
LL
c
X
0
o
c
m
Z
m
°-
O
o
S1
a
m
H
HRS
HRS
Y/O/B
mgtl
C
units
ugl
< mg/l
< mg/1
<1 mg/I
#/tooml
mg/1
< mg/1
<I mg/1
1
900
3.00
Y
0.431
231
6.4
<
201
1 3
0AI
1 7
21
8.3
2
900
2.50
Y
0.449
23
6.8
<
20
2
0.6
10
1
7.4
3
1200
2.50
Y
0.413
24
6.6
<
20
8.8
4
0.389
5
0.339
6
1000
2.50
Y
0.369
23
7
900
3.00
Y
0.432
22
6.89
<
20
2
0.3
3
8
8.0
8
900
3.00
Y
0.444
24
6.47
<
20
2
0.2
3
21
9.6
9
900
3.00
Y
0.437
24
6.7
<
20
7
0.3
4
1
10
830
3.00
Y
0.588
24
11
0.511
12
0.393
13
830
3.00
Y
0.348
22
14
900
2.50
Y
0.412
20
6.12
<
20
2
0.3
5
1
8.4
15
900
2.50
Y
0.423
21
6.5
<
20
2
0.3
3
3
8.8
16
900
3.00
Y
0.420
20
6.74
<
20
2
0.1
3
33
7.7
17
815
3.00
Y
0.399
22
18
0.410
19
0.341
20
1000
2.50
Y
0.379
20
21
900
2.50
Y
0.426
22
6.98
<
20
2
0.1
3
2
6.2
22
900
3.00
0
0.419
21
6.92
<
20
2
0.1
6
1
7.6
23
900
2.50
Y
0.437
20
6.91
<
20
2
0.2
4
9
7.7
24
830
4.00
Y
0.419
23
25
0.394
26
0.339
27
900
2.00
Y
0.361
24
28
900
2.50
Y
0.412
24
6.99
<
20
2
0.2
4
1
7.1
29
900
3.00
Y
0.411
24
6.73
<
20
4
0.4
4
13
8.4
30
900
3.00
Y
0,391
23
6.8
<
20
4
0.2
4
19
9.1
31
Average
0.411
22.4091
20
2.71429
1 0.26429
4.5
3.8332525
81
#DIV101
#DIV/01
Maximum
0.588
24
7.0
20
1 7
0.6
1014001100ml
9.6
0
0
Minimum
0.339
20
6.1
20
2
0.1
3
62
0
0
CompC / Grab G
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
Month) Limit A r- Oct
7.5mg11
6mg/I
45mgA
nh
nA
nil
6-9
28 ug/L
5 mg/1
2 mgtl
30mg/1
5mglf
nil
nP
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
15 mg/l
12 mgn
45mg/1
4001100m]
nA
nfl
0 981
n/1
6-9
28 ug/L
10 mg/1
4 mgA
30mg/f
20D/100ml
Smg/l
n/
I InA
Y=ORC B=Back up ORG U=other oprerator
kzsa f('�
AIN
I RECEIVE17
1 N.C. Dent. of ENR
AUG17,011
Regional Salem
Regional Office

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a timetable for improvements to be made.
THE DMR ONLY SHOWS THAT SAMPLES WERE TAKEN FOR 2 DAYS D URING THE
FIRST WEEK OF THE MONTH. HOWEVER SAMPLES WERE TAKEN 3 TIMES
THE WEEK OF 512 912 011 THR U 61412011. I
SO I WO ULDN'T HA VE TO CHANGE MY SAMPLE DA YS. THE RESUL TS FOR
513112011 ARE AS FOLLOWS: EFF BOD <2, AMMONIA N 0.4, TSS 3. FECAL 1, INF
BOD 203AND TSS 132. IF YOU HA VE ANY QUESTION PLEASE FEEL FREE TO
CALL.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permittee Address
PO BOX 768 Cooleemee NC 27014
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
Permitte (Please print or type) Town of Mocksville
L, �� -I- 2:3—k I
Signature of Permittee* Date
Phone Number
336-284-2028
PARAMETER CODES
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
Permit Exp. Date
6/30/2014
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting
facility's permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (B).
** If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 213 .0506 (b)
(2) (D)•

DR. F. W. SLATE
Mayor
Commissioners:
J. C. "BUSTER" CLEARY, Mayor Pro Tern
RICHARD BROADWAY
WILLIAM L. "BILL" FOSTER
WILL MARKLIN
LASH GAITHER SANFORD, JR.
August 8, 2011
NCDENR
Mr. Gary Hudson
Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
jown o/ mockville
INCORPORATED1839
171 S. CLEMENT STREET
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
Re: Town of Mocksville Wastewater Annual Report
Dear Mr. Hudson,
CHRISTINE W. BRALLEY
Town Manager
HENRY P. VAN HOY II
Town Attorney
RECEIVED-.
N.C. DeoL of ENR
AUG 2 2 2011
Winston-Salem
Regional 0friice
Enclosed are three copies of the Wastewater Annual Report for the Town of Mocksville. If you have any
other questions or concerns please contact me at 336-753-6701 or [e-mail].
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
jo� Lg(��
FAlIrAUG X 2011
NR-WAT
o..,.,T.,_.. CIUALIiY I
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
www.mocksvillenc.org

Town of Mocksville — Wastewater Annual Report
The Clean Water Act of 1999, passed by North Carolina General Assembly, requires
utilities like Town of Mocksville Utilities to provide an annual report to their wastewater
customers. This report summarizes the performance of our Wastewater Collection
System and Wastewater Treatment Plant over a 12-month period (July 1, 2010 — June 30,
2011).
Each day, we collect, transport and treat an average of 863 thousand gallons of
wastewater; about 315 million gallons a year. We are proud of our collection/treatment
system and the job we do in protecting public health and the environment, meeting
regulatory requirements and accommodating the orderly growth of the community.
Our Mission
Overall, there are two key elements in wastewater treatment- the collection system and
the treatment process. Our highly -trained, state -certified staff does an excellent job with
both. Wastewater collection/treatment is a 24-hour-a-day, 7 day -a -week responsibility.
Ultimately, our goal is to protect both the environment and the quality of life not only for
the Town of Mocksville, but for our neighboring communities as well. Each city and
town along Dutchman Creek is affected by the quality of water we discharge from our
respective wastewater treatment plants. Today it is more important than ever for all of us
to join together to protect the quality of life that only a clean river can offer.
What is Wastewater Treatment?
Wastewater treatment is the biological process of removing pollutants from the water so
it can be returned safely to the environment. It is the "last line of defense" against water
pollution. The Town of Mocksville Wastewater Treatment Plant protects the
environment from water which may cause disease -causing bacteria or other pollutants.
Our community is continuously expanding with the addition of new industries, businesses
and homes. Along with this growth comes added waste to be collected and treated. It is
an enormous task to keep up with this growth and properly manage the increases in
wastewater collection and treatment. The Town of Mocksville accepts this task by
planning and upgrading its wastewater and collection facilities as necessary in order to
meet our customers' needs.
About Our Collection System
The Town of Mocksville Utilities wastewater collection system includes 81 miles of
sanitary sewer mains (pipes), and 7 pump stations with their associated force mains.
These pipes and pump stations collect and transport an average of 863 thousand gallons
of wastewater per day from homes and businesses in Mocksville and parts of Davie
County. Wastewater is collected through approximately 2500 individual connections to
the system and delivered through a network of pipes ranging in size from 6" to 18" in
diameter. The collected wastewater is transported to the Wastewater Treatment Plant
where it is treated prior to being returned to the Dutchman Creek.

Overflows Create Problems
Essentially, the collection system is like a transportation system. The pumps and pipes
transport wastewater from our customers to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. We have to
do all we can to make sure "traffic" isn't allowed to back up. On the highway it would be
called a traffic jam. In our case, when "traffic" backs up, it's called an overflow.
Overflows are bad for the environment, and result in stiff penalties from state regulators.
Overflows occur when wastewater builds up in the pipe and can't get out. This water
potentially could seep out of the top of a manhole or clean -out. The majority of
overflows on our system are caused by blockages, which often occur as a result of
improper disposal of grease. Some overflows are caused by excessive inflow and
infiltration (I/I) or leaks into the sewer system. To a lesser extent some problems are
caused by tree roots, pipe failure or construction damage, but most result from grease
and/or other debris.
How We Protect the System
We work very hard to protect our system from overflows in a variety of ways and our
record is excellent. The following is a brief overview of the various ways we try to
protect our system and prevent overflows:
Pre-treatment Program
There are provisions in our Sanitary Sewer use regulations for pre-treatment of
wastewater, principally by our industrial customers. We issue permits to
applicable industries and they pretreat their wastewater before it is discharged to
the Town of Mocksville system.
Grease Interceptors
Commercial customers that serve food or process meat, etc. are required to have
grease interceptors. These devices are designed to remove grease, a leading cause
of sewer line blockages.
Inspections
We regularly inspect our sewer lines for obvious problems. We also inspect other
locations such as streams, creek crossings and outfalls.
Pipe Cleaning
Each month we routinely clean an average of more than 4150 feet of sewer pipe
with special high pressure equipment designed to remove grease and other debris
from the system. This routine cleaning program further reduces the potential for
system blockages and overflows. Approximately 311 ft of collapsed pipe was
replaced or repaired.

I/I Investigations
I/I (infiltration/inflow) is extraneous water that gets into the wastewater collection
system; any water other than sewage. We have an extensive program that
includes smoke testing, closed-circuit TV inspection and flow monitoring to
enable us to identify areas of extraneous flow. Once we have located problem
areas, we take steps to remediate the problem.
Public Education
We are in the process of an educational campaign with our customers involving
fliers, door hangers, newsletters and advertising designed to inform the public on
ways they can help us protect the sanitary sewer system.
What You Can Do
Mocksville Utilities does everything it can to prevent sewer spills. But we can't do it
alone. You play an important role in helping us maintain an efficient public sanitary
sewer system. Since the majority of overflows are caused by improper disposal of items
into the sewer system, we ask you to be aware of the following guidelines:
Avoid pouring fats, oils or grease from cooking down the drain. Instead, collect
them in a container and dispose in the trash.
Don't use your toilets as a wastebasket. Place a wastebasket in the bathroom to
dispose of items such as disposable diapers and personal hygiene products.
Unless you have a garbage disposal, please don't use your drain to dispose of
food scraps. Place food scraps in waste containers or garbage bags for disposal or
composting.
Don't pour hazardous products such as paint, pesticides or herbicides down the
drain.
If your business generates waste grease, fats or oils, you should have a grease
interception system that works effectively. A company that recycles fats, oils and grease
should regularly clean out the grease trap. Commercial grease traps are checked
quarterly.
Wastewater Treatment Process
Our Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is responsible for removing debris, solid
materials and pollutants from the water which comes into the facility, and then filtering
and disinfecting the water before it is returned into Dutchman Creek.
System Performance
The North Carolina General Assembly enacted legislation in July 1999, requiring
municipalities, animal operations, industries and others who operate waste handling
systems to issue news releases when a waste spill of 1, 000 gallons or more reaches

surface waters. A waste spill of 15, 000 gallons of more requires a news release as well
as a paid public notice.
During the past twelve months, there have been a total of 75 blockages with 11 overflows
on the Town of Mocksville wastewater system. Most of these overflows were the result
of blockages due to grease and debris. The total estimated volume from all recorded
overflows was 29,900 gallons of wastewater that was collected, transported, and treated
by our system.
The Town of Mocksville staff and employees continue to improve maintenance and
prevention procedures.
Capital Improvement Plan
We are working towards completion of a new Capital Improvement Plan. The audit for
the Annual Wastewater revenue has not been completed at this time. Information can be
provided at a later date.

Mickey, Mike
From: Mauney, Steve
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 2:53 PM
To: Mickey, Mike; Basinger, Corey
Subject: RE: Mocksville-Oil in sewer
Mike West called back at 2:44 and indicated that A&D responded and pumped out 1741 gallons and after separation
there was 241 gallons of oil. He stated that A&D would have tests run to try and determine the type of oil. Nothing was
spilled to surface waters. They are checking backwards in the collection system to try and locate a source. They police
have been notified and involved. The weekly Mocksville paper runs on Wednesday and I suggested that they try to get
an article in the paper about the incident. Someone might talk about it if given a little encouragement by the Town.
Steve Mauney
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
Main # [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Mauney, Steve
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Mickey, Mike; Basinger, Corey
Subject: Mocksville-Oil in sewer
At 8:40 this morning, Mike West of Mocksville called to say that they had about an inch of fresh oil in the Bear Creek
Pump Station. He was planning to contact S&ME or others to have the oil removed. His cell is 336-345-8384 if there are
further questions. He asked if a report was required and I advised him that unless there were problems with the WWTP,
I did not think so. They did not have an indication of a source for the oil.
Steve Mauney
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
Main # [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

2010 Performance Annual Report
- RECEIVED
N.C. Npt. of ENR
1.General Information MAR 14 2011
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Facility Name: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Responsible Person: Eric Moten
Mailing Address: P.0 Box 768 Cooleemee, NC 27014
Phone: [phone]
Permit Number(s): NCO021491
Description of Treatment Automatic and manual Bar -screens. secondary
System or Process: Clarifiers, chlorine gas disinfection and sulfur dioxide
Gas for chlorine removal.
II. Performance
Summary of Performance: (list all violation, corrective actions, improvements, etc.)
Mav 2010 had 2 weekly B.O.D violations 1 on 05/08 and 1 on 05/312010
April 2010 toxicity failure. Aug 2010 exceeded monthly ammonia limits no
violations where given for ammonia. The actions taken correct violations
where to waste more often to bring B.O.D levels down and continue to keep
monitoring plants Dissolved oxygen level for proper ammonia removal. We
will also monitor chlorine levels more closely at all times and especially
during the time toxicity samples have to be taken.
III. Notification
State how customers/users have been provided access to this report
(mail ing,posted,etc.)
The customers and user of the system will receive a notice in their monthly
water bill stating when this report will be posted in the local newspaper
IV. Certification
Sign and `date to certify that the reports is accurate and complete:
UL�� 2-2-II
Signature of Permittee Date Mail original and two copies to:
C� . C D
D
F� EB 18 2011
7
DENR-WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Sys Performance Annual Report
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

FWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
February 7, 2011
Mrs. Christine W. Bralley, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Mocksville's Dutchman Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Davie County.
Dear Mrs. Bralley:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On January 31, 2011, Mike Mickey of this office met with Eric Moten, ORC, to perform a Compliance
Evaluation Inspection on the Town of Mocksville's Dutchman Creek wastewater treatment facility. The inspection
evaluated the overall ability of the facility to comply with limits and conditions contained in the NPDES permit.
The attached EPA inspection form notes the eight (8) areas that were evaluated. The findings and observations are
outlined below
I. Permit
The NPDES permit was reissued effective May 1, 2010. At renewal the Dutchman Creek facility was reclassified
from Grade II to Grade III which increased the effluent monitoring frequency from weekly to 3/week.
Additionally, a May 30, 2010 letter from the Division advised that Dutchman Creek was being changed from a
minor to a major facility since the town administers a pretreatment program.
II. Self -Monitoring Program
The monthly self -monitoring reports were reviewed for the months January 2010 through December 2010. The
facility was in consistent compliance except for one weekly and monthly average BOD violation, one NH3-N
monthly average violation and one toxicity violation (see data summary attached). The violations noted above
have already been addressed by this office. In regards to permit monitoring requirements, it was noted that all
sampling was performed per the frequencies specified in the permit except for, 1) a single silver value omitted in
March, 2) for a BOD, TSS, NH3-H and fecal value omitted the week of July 26, and 3) for a single temperature
value omitted October 22. The inspection noted that the March and July omitted parameters were collected and
analyzed as required but were inadvertently omitted from the monitoring reports. Corrected copies of the above
mentioned DMR's should be resubmitted with the additional data.
III. Flow Measurement
Part II.D (3) of the permit requires annual calibration of meters used to report flow. The three influent Prosonic
flow meters used at Dutchman Creek were last calibrated on August 26, 2010 by ForTech. Additionally, it was
noted that flow proportioned composite samples are now being collected of the effluent as requested in the previous
inspection.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
Nne
orthCarohna
Natura!!rf

Mrs. Christine Bralley
February 7, 2011
Page # 2
IV. Sludge Handling and Disposal
Solids can be stored in the three available digesters. Residuals are land applied under non -discharge permit #
WQ0003351 by EMA Resources, Inc.
V. Operations and Maintenance
The facility appeared to be competently operated and maintained. The only concern noted involved the fact that the
influent pump station does not have off -site notification capability should pump failure occur.
VI. Facility Site Review
The 0.981 MGD facility consists of the following: influent pump station with mechanical screening, flow splitter
box, three manual bar screens, three parshall flumes w/passive grit removal, three rectangular aeration basins with
two surface aerators each, three circular secondary clarifiers, gas disinfection, dual contact chamber w/aeration and
sulfur dioxide gas dechlorination.
VII. Records/Reports
A review of the operator's files indicates that all records are being maintained according to the permit. The Annual
Performance Report for calendar year 2010 was submitted on 2/2/11as required by Part II.E.(12) of the NPDES
Permit.
VIII. Effluent/Receiving Waters
The system discharges into Dutchman Creek, Class "C" waters in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. The effluent
was clear on the day of the inspection.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Mike Mickey or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�-J�/4-cu 4�?�
W. Corey Basinger
Interim Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
cc: Eric Moten (1940 Gay Street, Statesville, NC 28625)
Central Files
WSRO

Town of Mocksville
Dutchman Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0021491
Self -Monitoring Data Summary
January 2010 — December 2010
Parameters
Monthly Avg.
Permit Limit
Monthly Avg. Limit
Violations per DMR
Weekly Avg.
Permit Limit
Weekly Limit
Violations per DMR
Flow (MGD)
0.981
None
-
NA
BOD (mg/L)
(5.0 / 10.0)*
6.25 mg/l in May
(7.5 / 15.0)*
8.0 mg/1 for May 3-7
TSS (mg/L)
30.0
None
45.0
None
NH3-N (mg/L)
(2.0 — 4.0)*
2.1 mg/1 in Aug
(6.0 — 12.0)*
None
Fecal (#/100 ml)
200
None
400
None
Cadmium (ug/L)**
7.0
NA
15.0
None
pH (S.U.)
-
NA
(6.0 — 9.0)***
None
Chronic Toxicity
P/F @ 37 %
April
-
NA
T. Chlorine (ug/L)**
-
NA
28.0****
None
* (Summer/Winter) limits
**Daily maximum limit.
***Daily maximum and minimum limits.
****All total residual chlorine values below 50 ug/l are considered to be compliant.

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 —2 151 31 NCO021491 111 121 11/01/31 117 18-I 19JG20L
Remarks
2111111111111111111111111111111111Jill 111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 Qp---
671 169 70 U3 71' I 72 I N I 73 � 74 751 I I ( I I I 180
'-�
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 11/01/31
10/05/01
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
295 Garwood Rd
Mocksville NC 27028
11:05 AM 11/01/31
14/06/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(syPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Eric D Moten/ORC/704-284-2028/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Christine W Bralley,171 S Clement St Mocksville NC
Yes
27028//336-753-6701/3367519187
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael M Mickey WSRO WQ//336-771-5000/
Signature f Man gem t Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
!�L141i"MIA
EPA Form 3560-3 (R v 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The Dutchman Creek facility appears to be competently operated and
maintained. The only concern noted involves the lack of an autodailer system for the
influent pump station for off -site notification of after hour pump outages.
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The NPDES permit was reissued effective 5/1/10. As part of the renewal
process, Dutchman Creek was reclassfied from Grade 2 to a Grade 3 facility which
increased monitoring frequencies from weekly to 3/week. Additionally, a 9/30/10 letter
sent by DWQ advised the Town of Mocksville that the WWTP would status would
change from minor to major since the town administers a pretreatment prdgarm.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page # 3

r
Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
❑ ■
Comment: The annual report for 2010 was submitted to the region on 2/2/11. In
regards to the permit monitoring requirements, all data was reported correctly except
for; 1) a single silver value omitted in March, 2) the BOD, TSS, NH3N and fecal values
omitted the week of 7/26-30 and 3) the single temperatire value omitted on 10/22. The
records review found that the March and July samples were collected and analyzed as
required but were inadvertantly omitted from the monthly reports. Corrected DMR's are
to be resubmitted with the addtional data.
Pump Station - Influent
Yes No
NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are all pumps present?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are float controls operable?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment: The Town of Mocksville maintains the influent pump station. The station
has three pumps and mechanical screening. It was noted that the pump station does
not have off -site notification capabilities should pump failure occur.
Flow from the pump station is routed to a splitter box located ahead of the parshall
flumes. Additionally, caustic soda is fed prior to the splitter box.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No
NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
01100
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
Comment: Three influent Prosonic flow meters are located at the parshall flumes.
Flow from each meter is electronically totalled by the SCADA system for reporting
purposes. The meter was last calibrated by ForTech on 8/26/10.
Bar Screens
Yes No
NA NE
Page # 4

Y
Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
■
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■ 0 Q Q
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■ ❑ 00
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■ n n p
Is the unit in good condition?
■ 0 Q Q
Comment: The three parshall flumes each have a manual bar screen. The flume
troughs are also used for passive grit collection and are cleaned approx 1/year. Grit is
placed in the unused drying beds at the plant. A mechanical bar screen serves at the
main influent pump station.
Aeration Basins
Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
❑ ❑ Q ■
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■ Q 0 0
Are the diffusers operational?
❑ Q ■ O
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■ ❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■ ❑ ❑ Q
Is the DO level acceptable?
Q ❑ O
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
■ Q ❑ Q
Comment: Three rectangular basins with two surface aerators each.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■ 0 Q ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■ ❑ ❑ Q
Are weirs level?
■ ❑ ❑ 0
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■ Q Q Q
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■ 0 Q Q
Is scum removal adequate?
■
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■ n Q n
Is the drive unit operational?
■ Q ❑
Page # 5

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/< of the sidewall depth)
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: Three circular secondary clarifiers.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
❑
❑
❑ ■
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
❑
❑ Cl
Comment: Three digesters are available for storage. Residuals are land applied
under Nondischarge Permit No. W00003351 by EMA Resources, Inc.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
❑
■ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Chlorine was being fed manually. The flow proportional feed apparatus
was not operating properly. There are two contact chambers that are aerated.
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA NE
Type of system ? Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 6

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/31/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De -chlorination Yes No NA NE
Are the tablets the proper size and type? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The sulfur dioxide gas was being fed by flow proportion.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: .
Effluent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is proper volume collected? .
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Flow proportional sampling is now being performed.
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The effluent at Dutchman Creek was observed to be clear with no foam.
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the generator tested under load?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment: The 400 kW generator is tested every Monday under load and can operate
the entire facility except for the post air blowers at the contact chambers.
Page # 7

AGia
..
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Ms. Christine Bralley, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Division of Environmental Health
Terry L. Pierce Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
December 22, 2010
Re: 2010 Water Plant Inspection
Mocksville, Town of
PWSID #NCO23010, Davie County
On November 09, 2010, I inspected the Town of Mocksville's water treatment plant. Below you will find a list of
observations resulting from this inspection.
The water plant does not have alum sludge or a back wash water disposal system. This has been mentioned
in the last ten inspections. Provisions must be made for the disposal of water treatment plant wastes.
(15A NCAC 18C .0404 (k) (1))
2. The water plant's settled water detention time is not sufficient. The old side of the plant has approximately
30 minutes of detention time, and the newer side has around 45 minutes. This has been mentioned in the
last ten inspections and in a letter from Lee Spencer, dated October 11, 1999. A theoretical detention
time in the sedimentation basins is to be a minimum of four hours as specified by the
Rules Governing Public Water Systems. (15A NCAC 18C .0706 (b))
3. The water plant does not have a way to adjust the raw water pH. This office suggests installing a chemical
injection point for pH adjustment before the coagulant feed point on the raw water line.
4. According to the plant operator, the raw water pumps do not perform as rated when on regular line voltage.
When the pumps are operated under emergency generator power, they tend to perform as expected. This
may be caused by power lines that are insufficient in the amount of load that can be maintained. To possibly
prevent pump motor failures this issue should be investigated and resolved.
Public Water Supply Section — Jessica C, Godreau, P.E., BCEE, Chief
Winston-Salem Regional Office One
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 NorthCarofina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: ncdrinkingwater.state.nc.us a ���u�,g /J
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer �/ Y `li„

%
Ms. Christine Bralley, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
December 22, 2010
Page 2 of 2
During this inspection the raw water quality was discussed. The plant operator reports that during wet
weather events the fecal coliform counts have been recorded at levels of 26,000 per 100 milliliters of sample
volume. Normally the raw water contains bacteria levels from 300 to 2000 per 100 milliliters. Applying the
multiple barrier concept to public health protection includes source water protection. This office encourages
the Town to adopt a source water protection plan that encourages upstream dischargers and land owners to
better protect the Hunting Creek Watershed. Many resources are available such as funding and guidance
that support source water protection.
6. The chlorine contact time (CT) study that was requested during the 2009 inspection showed that short
circuiting through the clearwell was probable. According to the tracer study report 70 percent of the fluoride
tracer was recovered. Baffling the clearwell would help ensure better inactivation of disease -causing
organisms.
To summarize, the plant's waste residuals are still being disposed of improperly. The plant's settled water detention time
has not been addressed. Adding a tap for pH adjustment in the raw water line before the coagulant tap would enable a
wider range of coagulants that could be considered for maximum total organic carbon removal. Replacing damaged pump
motors can be very costly. Evaluation of the raw water station's electrical supply should be considered. Due to the
volatile nature of the Hunting Creek Watershed, a source water protection plan should be considered by the Town.
Multiple issues continue to emerge that could possibly affect the Town of Mocksville's ability to provide safe and
reliable drinking water to its customers. Early in 2009 this office received a draft water system evaluation report that
was requested in April of 2007. This report addresses the limiting factors of the Town's water system and proposed
corrections to long outstanding concerns. On January 4, 2010, this office received a letter from the Town stating that it
was currently looking for financing for upgrades to the water system that would address these concerns. Since then this
office has not been made aware of any further efforts. Please respond to this office in writing by January 31, 2011,
with what actions the Town has initiated in moving forward with correcting the long outstanding concerns that
have been documented over the previous ten years.
Mr. Beane was very helpful in providing the information needed to complete this inspection. If you have any questions
or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tom Boyd
Environmental Senior Specialist
Public Water Supply Section
cc: Jessica C. Godreau, P.E., BCEE, Chief, Public Water Supply Section
Geoff Beane, Water Plant ORC, Town of Mocksville
Public Water Supply Section — Jessica C. Godreau, P.E., BCEE, Chief
Winston-Salem Regional Office One
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 NorthCarol..ina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: ncdrinkinmater.state,nc.us a ����t,Rl/�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer (/ V `

Alk, — 119
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Christine W. Bralley
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement St
Mocksville, N.C. 27028
Dear Permittee:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
September 30, 2010
___RECEIVED
N.C. Not. of EN4
OCT 0 5 2010
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Resources
Dee Freeman, Secretary
SUBJECT: Notice of Facility Status Change
NPDES Permit NCO021491
Dutchman's Creek WWTP
Davie County
A recent internal review of the Division's facility classifications determined that the subject
municipal wastewater treatment plant is improperly classified as a Minor facility. The Dutchman's
Creek WWTP should be classified as a Major facility, per the definition for Major/Minor facilities
found in the General Statute:
§ 143-215.31). Fee schedule for water quality permits.
(a) Annual fees for discharge and nondischarge permits under G.S. 143-215.1. —
(1) Major Individual NPDES Permits. — The annual fee for an individual permit for a point source
discharge of 1,000,000 or more gallons per day, a publicly owned treatment works (POTW)
that administers a POTW pretreatment program, as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations
§ 403.3 (1 July 1996 Edition), or an industrial waste treatment works that has a high toxic
pollutant potential is three thousand four hundred forty dollars ($3,440).
Beginning in 2011, you will be billed the permit fee for a Major NPDES permit for the subject
facility. If at any time your pretreatment program becomes inactive, your facility status will revert
to Minor.
If you have questions regarding preparation of the report, contact Mr. Tom Belnick at (919) 807-
6390 or via e-mail [[e-mail]].
Sincerely,
/Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office / Corey Basinger
NPDES file
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: www.ncwaterquatity.org Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/1
0% Post Consumer Paper

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:47 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: 'Eric Moten'
Subject: FW: Change in permit status for 16 POTWs
Attachments: Pre-trt muni fee increases.xls
Christine —Just FYI - Please see the email below. Dutchman Creek is on the attached list to be reclassified as a
municipal major. This would increase the annual fee to $3,440/yr (previously $860). Mike.
Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
INC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Weaver, Charles
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:00 AM
To: Edwards, Roger; Menzel, Jeff; Krebs, Rob; Allocco, Marcia; Hodge, Al; Shiver, Rick; Glazier, Kipp; Tedder, Steve;
Smith, George; Carter, Jenifer; Mickey, Mike; White, Sue
Cc: Poupart, Jeff; Belnick, Tom; Mckay, James; Grzyb, Julie; Berry, Ron; Manuel, Vanessa; Phillips, Jeanne; Mcpherson,
Fran; Gore, Deborah; Morrison, Sarah
Subject: Change in permit status for 16 POTWs
Tom Belnick reviewed both the General Statute (NCGS 143-215) and our MOA with EPA. We have been mistakenly
considering some municipalities with pretreatment programs as Minor facilities. Per the General Statute, any POTW
with a pretreatment program should be considered a Major:
§ 143-215.31). Fee schedule for water quality permits.
(a) Annual fees for discharge and nondischarge permits under G.S. 143-215.1. —
(1) Major Individual NPDES Permits. — The annual fee for an individual permit for a point source
discharge of 1,000,000 or more gallons per day, a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) that
administers a POTW pretreatment program, as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 403.3
(1 July 1996 Edition), or an industrial waste treatment works that has a high toxic pollutant
potential is three thousand four hundred forty dollars ($3,440).
Modification letters are being sent to the affected facilities, listed in the attached Excel file. They will be billed as Majors
starting in 2011. Copies of the letter will be routed to the Regional Offices.
Fran — Please reset the fee categories for each of these facilities to Major. I was able to change the ones that are in-
house for renewal; only you can change the active permits.
Jeanne — BIMS has been updated to show these permits as Majors. Let me know if you need additional information.

Jim / Ron / Julie — you each have a permit on the list currently in-house for renewal. Send the draft to EPA as you would
any other Major.
PLEASE NOTE: If any of these POTWs cease accepting industrial waste, their facility [and permit] status will revert to
Minor.
Let me know if you have questions.
CHW

s
Mickey, Mike
From: Weaver, Charles
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:00 AM
To: Edwards, Roger; Menzel, Jeff; Krebs, Rob; Allocco, Marcia; Hodge, Al; Shiver, Rick; Glazier,
Kipp; Tedder, Steve; Smith, George; Carter, Jenifer; Mickey, Mike; White, Sue
Cc: Poupart, Jeff; Belnick, Tom; Mckay, James; Grzyb, Julie; Berry, Ron; Manuel, Vanessa;
Phillips, Jeanne; Mcpherson, Fran; Gore, Deborah; Morrison, Sarah
Subject: change in permit status for 16 POTWs
Attachments: Pre-trt muni fee increases.xls
Tom Belnick reviewed both the General Statute (NCGS 143-21S) and our MOA with EPA. We have been mistakenly
considering some municipalities with pretreatment programs as Minor facilities. Per the General Statute, any POTW
with a pretreatment program should be considered a Major:
§ 143-215.31). Fee schedule for water quality permits.
(a) Annual fees for discharge and nondischarge permits under G.S. 143-215.1. —
(1) Major Individual NPDES Permits. — The annual fee for an individual permit for a point source
discharge of 1,000,000 or more gallons per day, a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) that
administers a POTW pretreatment program, as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 403.3
(1 July 1996 Edition), or an industrial waste treatment works that has a high toxic pollutant
potential is three thousand four hundred forty dollars ($3,440).
Modification letters are being sent to the affected facilities, listed in the attached Excel file. They will be billed as Majors
starting in 2011. Copies of the letter will be routed to the Regional Offices.
Fran — Please reset the fee categories for each of these facilities to Major. I was able to change the ones that are in-
house for renewal; only you can change the active permits.
Jeanne — BIMS has been updated to show these permits as Majors. Let me know if you need additional information.
Jim / Ron / Julie —you each have a permit on the list currently in-house for renewal. Send the draft to EPA as you would
any other Major.
PLEASE NOTE: If any of these POTWs cease accepting industrial waste, their facility [and permit] status will revert to
Minor.
Let me know if you have questions.
CHW

Li
Permit Owner
Facility
County
Region
NC0021733 Town of Marshall
Marshall WWTP
Madison
Asheville
NC0020290 Town of Burnsville
Burnsville WWTP
Yancey
Asheville
NC0024279 City of Conover
Southeast WWTP
Catawba
Mooresville
NC0020036 Town of Stanley
Lola Street WWTP
Gaston
Mooresville
N00078361 Salisbury -Rowan Utilities.
Second Creek WWTP -
Rowan
Mooresville
NC0049867 Town of Cleveland
Cleveland WWTP
Rowan
Mooresville
NC0044776 Town of Hamilton
Hamilton WWTP
Martin
Washington
NC0087947 Columbus County
Columbus County WWTP
Columbus
Wilmington
NC0056863 Town of Rose Hill
Rose Hill WWTP
Duplin
Wilmington
NC0021113 Town of Burgaw
Burgaw WWTP
Pender
Wilmington
NC0026913 Town of Sparta
Sparta WWTP
Alleghany
Winston-Salem N ,
NC0021709 Town of Jefferson
Jefferson WWTP
Ashe
Winston-Salem
NC0020451 Town of West Jefferson
West Jefferson WWTP
Ashe
Winston-Salem
N00026689 Town of Denton
Denton WWTP
Davidson
Winston-Salem
NC0021491 Town of Mocksville
Dutchman's Creek WWTP
Davie
Winston-Salem
NC0026565 Town of Ramseur
Ramseur WWTP
Randolph
Winston-Salem �Ij��

Type
Class
Expires
Flow
Pre?
Subbasin
Contact Person
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
9/30/2010
400000
Complete
04-03-04
Mayor Lawrence Ponder
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
9/30/2010
800000
Complete
04-03-07
Mr. Thomas W. Storie
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
4/30/2010
600000
Complete
03-08-32
Mr. Michael L. Fox
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
7/31/2010
500000
Complete
03-08-35
Mr. Thomas E. Datt
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
3/31/2014
90000
Complete
03-07-06
Mr. Matt Bernhardt
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
3/31/2014
270000
Complete
03-07-06
Mayor James A. Brown
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
5/31/2012
80000
Complete
03-02-09
Mr. D.G. Matthews III
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
11/30/2011
125000
Complete
03-06-17
Mr. William S. Clark
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
1/31/2012
450000
Complete
03-06-22
Mr. Thomas G. Drum
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
1/31/2012
750000
Complete
03-06-23
Mr. Douglas A. Riesden
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
3/31/2011
600000
Complete
05-07-03
Mr. Bryan Edwards
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
3/31/2011
300000
Complete
05-07-01
Mr. Timothy Hightower
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
3/31/2011
500000
Complete
05-07-02
Mr. Kenneth T. McFadyen
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
1/31/2014
800000
Complete
03-07-08
Mr. F.E. Isenhour
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
6/30/2014
981000
Complete
03-07-05
Christine W. Bralley
Municipal, < 1MGD
Minor
4/30/2011
480000
Complete
03-06-09
Mr. Jim McIntosh

Mickey, Mike
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Cc: "jgrey <jgrey"@greyengineering.com
Subject: Re: Mocksville WTP
Mike,
Thanks so much for meeting with me on Thursday. John and I have a meeting scheduled for
Wednesday, and I am sure we will discuss moving forward with an application.
Lee
Lee G. Spencer, P.E.
2934 Buena Vista Road
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106
336-414-3336 (cell)
-----Original Message -----
From: Mickey, Mike <[e-mail]>
To: leegspencer <[e-mail]>
Sent: Fri, Sep 10, 2010 9:06 am
Subject: Mocksville WTP
Lee — To apply for a NPDES permit Mocksville would need to submit Short Form C (attached) and an Engineering
Alternatives Analysis (guidance attached).
I have also attached a copy of the Divisions water treatment plant permitting strategy. Page 6 gives the typical effluent
monitoring requirements for conventional WTP's.
The application fee for new minor individual NPDES permits is $860 (see fee schedule link below):
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes/feeschedule
Our office previously issued NOV's on 3/1/04 and 2/22/08 for the unpermitted discharge from the WTP. The town's
response is attached. As I indicated yesterday, Mocksville really needs to submit an application for either a sewer
extension permit or a NPDES permit to show that they are moving forward to achieve compliance.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mike
Mike Mickey
Mike.MickevBNCDENR.aov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 8:35 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: Mocksville WTP
Attachments: NCShortFormC-WTP-20090710-DWQ-SWP-NPDES. doc; EAA-Guidance-06232005-DWQ-
SWP-NPDES.doc; WTPPerm ittingStrategy-20090710-DWQ-SWP-NPDES. pdf; 3-31-08 NOV
response.TI F
Lee — To apply for a NPDES permit Mocksville would need to submit Short Form C (attached) and an Engineering
Alternatives Analysis (guidance attached).
I have also attached a copy of the Divisions water treatment plant permitting strategy. Page 6 gives the typical effluent
monitoring requirements for conventional WTP's.
The application fee for new minor individual NPDES permits is $860 (see fee schedule link below):
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/­­`swp/ps/npdes/­­feeschedule
Our office previously issued NOV's on 3/1/04 and 2/22/08 for the unpermitted discharge from the WTP. The town's
response is attached. As I indicated yesterday, Mocksville really needs to submit an application for either a sewer
extension permit or a NPDES permit to show that they are moving forward to achieve compliance.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mike.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Mickey
[e-mail]
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From:
Manuel, Vanessa
Sent:
Wednesday, September 01, 2010 8:25 AM
To:
Weaver, Charles
Cc:
Mickey, Mike
Subject:
RE: "<" calculation
Mike,
Facilities will only be able to amend DMRs through the EDMR application if the DMRs were created within the
EDMR application. Because Mocksville's original DMRs were not submitted through EDMR, they will need to
submit paper copies of the amended DMRs to central files. As for using "<" within EDMR, the application will
translate the value to "0" for calculation purposes, and anything reported as ">" will be reflected as the
reported numeric value for calculation purposes.
If further questions, please let me know.
Vanessa
From: Weaver, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:33 PM
To: Manuel, Vanessa
Cc: Mickey, Mike
Subject: FW: "<" calculation
Vanessa — can you answer Mike's question regarding the e-DMR system?
Thanks,
CHW
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:44 PM
To: Weaver, Charles
Subject: "<" calculation
Charles —Just learned that the Mocksville Dutchman Creek POTW has been submitting DMR's w/o less than symbols.
Finally caught up with them when trying to run a headworks analysis. Anyway, they need to resubmit several years
worth of DMR's. Would the a-DMR work for that? I assume the new a-DMR automatically converts less than values to
zero when computing averages. If not, do we have another version of the DMR they could use (if they can't put "<" on a
monitoring report, I doubt they can figure out how to submit an a-DMR anyway)? Thanks, Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. Mickev(&NCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
August 17, 2010
Ms. Christine W. Bralley, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 South Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of the Dutchman Creek monitoring report for May 2010 showed the following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
BOD
5/2-5/6
7.5 mg/1
8 mg/1
Weekly Average Exceeded
BOD
May 2010
5 mg/1
6.25 mg/1
Monthly Average Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the
Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Mickey at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
Nne
orthCarolina
,Naturally

Cover Sheet from
�• ' Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
�\ DMR Review Record
Facility: ��\�,\� Permit/Pipe No.: LdO-,�), Month/Year a \�
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Valuem
% Over Liit
lu
ee ill Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limit/Tvpe DMR Value % Over Limit
5,a�sw
a tk moo T �
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
� P o �c�� 'AV _ �j`� �\x„ � S •�� t 5.03�
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff: Date:

L iI I LII.I II
Discharge No. 1
Certified Laboratories
~ Month:' May AU6 0 3 20
NPDES Permit #NCO021 91
Class 2 County Davie GRADE 2; wig �toa,_one 336-477-51
TRITEST
Person(s) Collecting
Operator in Responsible charge ---Eric Moten
as Operators David Nobles Eric Moten
�1.1 Iy By this signature, I certify that this report is accur�
_ r —j
SIM
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Nunn
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
Weekly
..
-
„ ■ ■®®��
®:.
, .
cam..
„■■
Y=ORC B=Back up ORC O=other oprerator

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a timetable for improvements to be made.
We had a high B.O.D spike on 5/4/2010 . We changed wasting rates to correct this problem.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permittee Address
PO BOX 768 Cooleemee NC 27014
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
Permitte (Please print or type) Town Of Mocksville
-Z4 -10
Signature of Permittee* Date
Er � �_ Nno k r�
Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
336-284-2028
PARAMETER CODES
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
6-30-09
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at (91.9) 733-5083, extension 581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting
facility's permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (B).
** If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 213 .0506 (b)
(2) (D)•
r y

Mickey, Mike
From: John Grey [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:13 PM
To: Jackie Nowell [e-mail]); Mickey, Mike; Reid, Steve
Cc: Christine Bralley; Beth Dirks DC
Subject: Dutchmans Creek WWTP operations rating NCO021491
Dear Jackie, Mike and Steve:
I understand from conversations with each of you on behalf of the Town of Mocksville that the Dutchmans Creek WWTP
was incorrectly rated as a Grade II operation previously but must be rated a Grade III plant in accordance with current
rules requiring all plants with permitted flows between 0.5 and 2.4 mgd to be Grade III facilities.
I further understand that the new permit is scheduled to become effective in May. However, in order for the Town to
renegotiate its operations contract with Davie County, and to allow for budgeting into the new fiscal year, we request that
the Town be allowed additional time for Grade III compliance.
We therefore request a Grade III compliance extension until approximately September of this year.
Thanks for anything you can do.
John Grey, PE
Grey Engineering, Inc.
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

A7iA.
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7006 2760 0001 9282 0556
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 S. Clement St.
Mocksville, North Carolina 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION'
Effluent Toxicity Testing
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek W WTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Bralley:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
June 23,2010
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
JUN 2 8 2010
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Dee Freeman
Secretary
This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self -monitoring report form for the month of April 2010 indicates a violation of the
toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit.
You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity violation(s). Your efforts
may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE), a site -specific study designed to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity,
isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity control options, and confirm reductions in effluent toxicity, Please be aware that
North Carolina General Statutes provide for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and requirements.
The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring and Reporting
Requirements. Please note appropriate mailing addresses for submitting your Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic Toxicity (AT)
Test Forms. We encourage you to review this information; if it would be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent
toxicity noncompliance, please contact Mr. John Giorgino with this office at [phone].
cerely,
U"'V' 0 .0 6N
Cindy A. Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
cc: Steve Tedder/ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Jenifer Carter/ Winston Salem Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Location: 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1.877.623-6748
Internet: hfp://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslesb/
One
NorthCarolina
Ngtulrallff
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY MONITORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION
➢ The following items are provided in an effort to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity testing and reporting
information. Please take time to review this information. The items below do not address or include all the toxicity testing and reporting
requirements contained in your NPDES permit. If you should have any questions about your toxicity testing requirement, please contact Mr.
John Giorgino with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] or another Unit representative at the same number.
➢ The permittee is responsible for ensuring that toxicity testing is conducted according to the permit requirement and that toxicity report forms are
appropriately filed.
➢ The reporting of whole effluent toxicity testing data is a dual ree uirement. All toxicity test results must be entered (with the appropriate
parameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
IN ADDITION
Toxicity test data (original "AT" form) must be submitted to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
➢ Toxicity test results shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period
(eg, January test result is due by the end of February).
➢ Toxicity test condition language contained in your NPDES permit may require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any
single quarterly toxicity test. If the initial pass/fail test fails or if the chronic value is lower than the permit limit, then at least two multiple
concentration toxicity tests (one per month) will be conducted over the following two months. As many analyses as can be completed will be
accepted. If your NPDES permit does not require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any single quarterly test, you
may choose to conduct either single concentration toxicity testing or multiple concentration toxicity testing per the Division's WET enforcement
initiatives effective July 1, 1999. Follow-up multiple concentration toxicity testing will influence the Division's enforcement response.
➢ Toxicity testing months are specified by the NPDES Permit, except for NPDES Permits which contain episodic toxicity monitoring
requirements (eg, if the testing months specified in your NPDES permit are March, June, September, and December, then toxicity testing must
be conducted during these months).
➢ If your NPDES Permit specifies episodic monitoring and your facility does not have a discharge from January I -June 30, then you must provide
written notification to the Environmental Sciences Section by June 30 that a discharge did not occur during the first six months of the calendar
year.
➢ If you receive notification from your contract laboratory that a test was invalidated, you should immediately notify the Environmental Sciences
Section at [phone] and provide written documentation indicating why the test was invalidated and the date when follow-up testing will
occur.
➢ If your facility is required to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs, you should complete the information block
located at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county and the month/year of the subject report.
You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form, sign the forth and submit following normal procedures.
➢ The Aquatic Toxicity Test forms shall be signed by the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) except for facilities which have not
received a facility classification. In these cases, a duly authorized facility representative must sign the AT form. The AT form must also be
signed by the performing lab supervisor.
➢ To determine if your AT test forms were received on time by the Division of Water Quality, you may consider submittiny your toxicity test
results certified MA return receipt requested to the Environmental Sciences Section.
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 One
Location: 4401 Reedy Creek Road. Raleigh. North Carolina 27607 North Caro] ina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] i Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 ��t�r�IC�
Intemet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/esb/
An Equal Opportunity'. Affirmative Action Employer

�F WATF9 Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
?G Dee Freeman, Secretary
y y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
� r
Paul E. Rawls, Chairman
O Y Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
March 3, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Christine Sanders, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, North Carolina 27028
Subject: Classification of Water Pollution Control System
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Permit No. NCO021491
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute § 90A-37, the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission is required to classify all water pollution control
systems. The classification of Biological Water Pollution Control Treatment Systems, found
at 15A NCAC 8G .0302, was adopted by the Commission to classify water pollution control
systems. The classification of a facility is determined by permitted flow and biological
nutrient reduction limits.
The Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission has determined that
the subject facility is classified as a Grade 3 Biological Water Pollution Control
Treatment System.
As required by 15A NCAC 8G .0202 and your permit, you must designate a Grade 3 or
higher Biological Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) and a Back-up Operator with at
least a Grade 2 Biological certification. Please complete and return the enclosed designation
form so we may update our database.
If you have any questions concerning this classification or the designation of operators,
please contact me at 919.733.0026 ext. 314.
Sincerely,
Extension Education & Training Specialist
Cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office — Mike Mickey via email
TACU File
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
W'mm
Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/adminttacu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mickey, Mike
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 3:07 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: RE: Mocksville Dutchman Cr
Attachments: image002.gif; image003.jpg
Hi Mike, looking at the 0500 regs, some of the parameters should be changed to 3/week, limited metals will probably
change to weekly, and monitored metals should be 2/month. The previously issued permit had the same frequencies
and it was my mistake in not catching that before going to public notice. Mocksville will have to adjust their sampling
budget to account for this increase in monitoring.
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:16 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: FW: Mocksville Dutchman Cr
Jackie — Attached is TACU's letter to Mocksville reclassifying the Dutchman facility to Grade III. 1 hadn't heard back from
you regarding the draft permit comments. Will the monitoring frequency change from weekly to 3/week? Thanks,
Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. MickevONCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Reid, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:36 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Mocksville Dutchman Cr
Mike -
Attached is copy of letter to go out tomorrow, for your files.
sr
Extension Education & Training Specialist
NCDENR, DWQ,Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
919.733.0026 x314
Steve. reid@ncdenn gov

219 E. North St. (physical)
Raleigh NC 27601
1618 Mail Service Center (mailing)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
919.733.1338 (fax)
http://www.ncwaterguality.org/tacu will automatically redirect to http://portaI.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/tacu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:08 PM
To: 'Eric Moten'
Subject: FW: Mocksville Dutchman Cr
Attachments: mocksville dutchman 21491.pdf; image001.gif; image004.jpg
Eric — Just FYI — The attached letter was generated as part of the NPDES permit renewal. Evidently Raleigh's records
erroneously showed Dutchman to be a Grade II (regulations classify activated sludge systems with a permitted flow of
0.5 MGD to 2.5 MGD as Grade III). This change will probably affect the monitoring frequency in your next permit since
Grade III plants are required to sample 3/week instead of weekly. Let me know if you have any questions. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. [e-mail]
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Reid, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:36 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Mocksville Dutchman Cr
Mike -
Attached is copy of letter to go out tomorrow, for your files.
sr
Extension Education & Training Specialist
NCDENR, DWQTechnical Assistance & Certification Unit
919.733.0026 x314
Steve. reid@ncdenr. pov
219 E. North St. (physical)
Raleigh NC 27601
1618 Mail Service Center (mailing)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
919.733.1338 (fax)
http://www.ncwaterguality.org/tacu will automatically redirect to http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/tacu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: Mickey, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:46 PM
To: Nowell, Jackie
Subject: RE: Mocksville Dutchman -Creek WWTP
Jackie — Below are my comments. One item I still have a question about is the monitoring frequency. Dutchman is a
grade III plant. Shouldn't they have 3/week monitoring instead of weekly?
Cover letter
The town managers name is Christine W. Bralley (not Sanders). She married the county manager.
Fact Sheet
There is no "s" on the end of Dutchman (found 4 times).
For the treatment plant narrative I recommend the following change to the first two items:
• Influent pump station with mechanical fine screen
• Grit chambers with manual bar screens
(additionally, you can add "gas" before chlorination and dechlorination if you want)
Draft permit
Remove "s" from Dutchman (once first page, twice supplement sheet).
On supplement page I recommend the first three items of the treatment components be listed as follows:
• Influent pump station with mechanical fine screen
• Grit chambers with manual bar screens
• Flow splitter box
On the effluent limit and monitoring page.
• Put footnote "6" beside Effluent Pollutant Scan.
The sample type for Effluent Pollutant Scan is listed at "grab". Is that correct? Asheboro's permit
(NC0026123) says "composite", East Burlington's permit (NC0023868) says "grab/composite" and
Winston-Salem's Elledge permit (NC0037834) says "See A.(3)". I'll let you figure that out. Good luck.
I'll send you the signed fact sheet by courier with corrections marked by hand once I hear back from TACU on 3/week.
Let me know your thoughts on 3/week and holler if you have any questions. Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mike. Mickev(&NCDENR.eov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Tedder, Steve [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 8:58 AM

To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: FW: Mocksville Dutchman -Creek WWTP
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:31 PM
To: Hyatt. [e-mail]; Tedder, Steve; Reid, Steve; Moore, Cindy; Morrison, Sarah
Subject: Mocksville Dutchman -Creek WWTP
The attached permit was sent to public notice on February 17, 2010. Please review and forward any comments.
WSRO, please sign and return/fax the factsheet.
Thank you.
Jackie Nowell

Mickey, Mike
From:
Mickey, Mike
Sent:
Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:15 PM
To:
Reid, Steve
Cc:
Nowell, Jackie
Subject:
RE: Mocksville-Dutchman Cr
Attachments:
image002.gif; image003.jpg
Steve — I would go ahead and send the letter. No need to wait. Thanks, Mike.
Mike Mickey
Mlike.Mlickev(cDNCDEN R.eov
NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Reid, Steve
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:10 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Mocksville-Dutchman Cr
Mike -
Greetings! Beth passed on your email on the subject facility. I'm the NPDES dude for classifications.
Not sure why, but this was set up long ago as a Grade 2 in BIMS. It should, based on flow, be a Grade 3, as you guessed.
I can generate a classification letter for them to go out on issuance or before, whichever you think best. According to what's in BIMS,
they have a Grade 2 ORC and Grade 3 Backup ... not sure why they chose that route...
Just let me know when you want me to send the letter out to them notifying of the Grade 3 requirements.
Or, call me to discuss...
Thanks!
sr
Extension Education & Training Specialist
NCDENR, DWQ,Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
919.733.0026 x314
steve.reid@ncdennuov
219 E. North St. (physical)
Raleigh NC 27601
1618 Mail Service Center (mailing)
Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
919.733.1338 (fax)

http://www.ncwaterguaIity.org/tacu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.

Mickey, Mike
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:08 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Re: Dutchman Creek WWTP
My is doing much better now, thanks for asking. We have both types of barscreens at Dutchman. The manual
barscreens are apart of the long channel grit chambers. The automatic one is down by the influent pumps.
Eric Moten
Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!

i NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Bevgrly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
February 17, 2010
Ms. Christine , Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, North Carolina 27028
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit
Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. saes.
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has received your application and has drafted a NPDES permit
for the above referenced facility. The draft permit authorizes the Town of Mocksville to discharge wastewater
from the Dutchman Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to Dutchman Creek, a class C water in the Yadkin -
Pee Dee River Basin. The draft permit includes discharge limitations/or monitoring for flow, BODS, ammonia
nitrogen, total suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, total residual chlorine, fecal coliform, cadmium, cyanide,
silver, copper, zinc, and chronic toxicity.
The following procedure has been implemented by DWQ: Total residual chlorine (TRC) compliance level
changed to 50 ug/l. Effective March 1, 2008, the Division received EPA approval to allow a 50 ug/1 TRC
compliance level. This change is due to analytical difficulties with TRC measurements. Facilities will still be
required to report actual results on their monthly discharge monitoring report (DMR) submittals, but for
compliance purposes, all TRC values below 50 ug/1 will be treated as zero. A footnote regarding this change
has been added to the effluent limitations page in the draft permit.
The following modifications have been made to the draft permit:
• The deletion of the effluent page for 0.68 MGD based on the completion of the plant expansion to 0.98
MGD. The wasteflow for the plant will be 0.98 MGD instead of 0.981 MGD, based on information in
the permit application.
• A monthly average and a daily maximum limit for cadmium will be added to the permit based on the
results of the reasonable potential analysis that indicated the potential to exceed the water quality
standard instream. The monthly average limit will be 7 ug/1 and the daily maximum limit will be 15
ug/ 1.
• Additional treatment components have been added on the supplement to permit cover sheet. Please
review the permit cover sheet to confirm these additions.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org �aturaltr�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

• There have been minor language changes and the addition of a new paragraph regarding data
submittal in special condition A. (2) Chronic Toxicity Permit Limits. (The new paragraph is located
second from the end of the condition.)
• An annual effluent pollutant scan has been added to fulfill EPA's application requirement for major
municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
• Monthly monitoring for total chromium, total nickel, and total lead has been deleted from the permit
based on the results of a reasonable potential analysis conducted on submitted monitoring data. The
results indicated that there was no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards in the
receiving stream.
• The effluent limit for total cyanide has been removed from the permit based on the results of a
reasonable potential analysis conducted on submitted monitoring data. The results indicated that
there was no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards instream. It is recommended that
total cyanide be monitored quarterly in conjunction with the whole effluent toxicity test.
At this time, the Division is submitting a notice to the newspapers of general circulation in Davie
County, inviting comments from you or your representative, the public and other agencies on the draft
permit. The notice should be published on or about February 24, 2010. Following a 30-day comment
period, we will review all pertinent comments received and take appropriate action on the permit issuance.
Please provide written comments on the draft permit no later than March 26, 2010. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact me at telephone number [phone] or
[e-mail].
Respectfully,
Original signed by
Jacquelyn M. Nowell
Western NPDES Program
Attachments
cc: Winston Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section (ecopy)
EPA Region IV/Attn. Marshall Hyatt
Aquatic Toxicology Unit/ Cindy Moore (ecopy)
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit (ecopy)
ESS/Carrie Ruhlman (ecopy)
NPDES File/NC0021491

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO021491
Facility Information
Applicant Facility Name:
Town of Mocksville - Dutchmanj Creek WWTP
Applicant Address:
171 Clement St. Mocksville, N.C. 27028
Facility Address:
295 Garwood Road Mocksville, N.C.
Permitted Flow
0.98 MGD
Type of Waste:
Domestic and industrial
Facility/ Permit Status:
Renewal
Facility Classification
III
County:
Davie
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Dutchman Creek
Regional Office:
Winston-Salem
Stream Classification:
C
USGS To o Quad:
D 16NE
303 d Listed?:
No
Permit Writer:
Jackie Nowell
Subbasin:
03-07-05
Date:
February 16, 2010
Drainage Area mil :
108
-
Summer 7Q 10 cfs
2.54
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs):
11.95
Average Flow cfs :
106
IWC % :
37.5
Primary SIC Code:
4952
SUMMARY OF FACILITY INFORMATION AND WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
The Town of Mocksville has requested a permit renewal for the Dutchman%s Creek WWTP.
Previous permit was issued July15, 2005, expired on June 30, 2009 and has been
administratively extended. During the last permit cycle, the existing 0.68 MGD WWTP (which
consisted of two parallel 0.34 MGD systems) has been expanded to the proposed flow of 0.98
MGD according to renewal application. The facility discharges into Dutchman Creek, a class C
water, in Yadkin subbasin (030705). The plant serves a population of approximately 2200
people.
The expanded Dutchman Creek treatment plant consists of:
o Influent pump station
o Flow splitter box
o Three aeration basins
o Three secondary clarifiers
o TANlorination contact units with aeration
o Tw*;*echlorination contact units
o Aerobic digester and sludge drying beds
Mocksville currently has a modified pretreatment program with one SIU. It is recommended
that the modified pretreatment program for the Dutchman Creek WWTP be continued in this
upcoming permitting cycle.
At the last permit modification/ renewal in 2005, limits were developed for the expansion to
0.981 MGD. A Level B model predicted that the expanded wasteflow would require tertiary
limits (BOD5-= 5 mg/1 , NH3=2 mg/l, DO = 6 mg/1) for the protection of the dissolved oxygen
standard in Dutchman Creek. This renewal application indicates the design flow at 0.98 MGD.
The new permit will reflect the reduction of 1000 GPD of flow.
Existing Effluent Limits n 0.98 MGD
Qw = 0.98 MGD
Summer BOD5 = 5 mg/l
Winter BOD5 = 10 mg/1
Summer NH3 = 2 mg/1
Winter NH3 = 4 mg/1
Summer DO = 6 mg/1
Mocksville-Dutchman Creek WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

Winter DO=5 mg/1
TSS = 30 mg/1
Fecal Coliform = 200/ 100ml
TRC = 28 ug/1
pH = 6-9 SU
Cyanide = 22 ug/ 1 (daily max.)
Monthly monitoring for cadmium, chromium, nickel, lead, silver copper and zinc.
Weekly monitoring for TP and TN
Chronic Toxicity P/F @ 37%; January, April, July and October.
Instream monitoring for temperature and dissolved oxygen is waived because Mocksville is
member of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Association.
It is recommended that the existing limits for BOD5, NH3, DO, TSS, fecal, and pH, in addition
to the chronic toxicity test of 37%, be renewed at the expanded wasteflow of 0.98 MGD. Limits
or monitoring for all metals will be evaluated through a reasonable potential analysis and
results will be documented in the RPA section of the factsheet.
RECEIVING STREAM INFORMATION:
Drainage Area = 108 sq. mi.
QA = 108 cfs
s7g10 = 2.54 cfs
w7g10 = 11.95 cfs
30g2 = 17 cfs
Updated flow information from USGS was submitted in January 2005, and the previously used
7Q 10 flow was reduced based on the new calculations. Notes from the 2005 factsheet:
During the speculative limit development for this facility, it was determined that the stream flow
data previously being used was incorrect. USGS confirmed that the 7Q10 value at this location
should be 2.54 cfs, not 15 cfs as had been used in prior permits. A level B model run using this
new stream flow information showed that a 0.981 MGD discharge is allowed in this receiving
stream, under very stringent limits, however it is unlikely that the assimilative capacity could
accommodate any additional future flows from this facility.
The facility was informed that there would be a significant change in permit limits at the
proposed flow and they decided to move forward with the expansion request. According to the
EAA and discussions with the regional office, much of the flow justification for this expansion is
based on the need to relieve high flows at the town's Bear Creekfacility. It was indicated that
the town might apply for an expansion at that facility as well. (June 2005- T. Fields)
Dutchman Creek was not listed on North Carolina's draft 2008 impaired streams list or the
final 2006 303(d) list of impaired streams. The 2008 Yadkin Basin Plan indicates that
Dutchman Creek is impacted by habitat degradation with sources of impervious surface,
agriculture, and natural conditions. The creek is also impacted by turbidity with sources as
impervious surface and agriculture/pasture.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirement: Chronic Toxicity P/F @ 37.5% at 0.981 MGD; January April July
October
The Mocksville-Dutchman Creek WWTP overall has a good toxicity testing record. All toxicity
tests have been passed since January 2005.
Recommendation: Renewal of existing chronic toxicity test @ 37% at 0.98 MGD in
January April July October
Mocksville-Dutchman Creek WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 2

COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
The Mocksville-Dutchman Creek WWTP has had compliance problems in the recent year.
There were enforcement cases in 2008, 2007 and 2005. Problems with meeting the BOD5
weekly average limit (2008), fecal coliform weekly average limit (2007) and cyanide in 2005 and
2006. A review of recent data indicates that there appears to have been some improvement in
compliance with limits and a reduction in the frequency of violations.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
NO INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIRED BECAUSE OF MOCKSVILLE MEMBERSHIP IN THE YADKIN PEE
DEE RIVER BASIN ASSOCIATION. STREAM MONITORING IS DONE THROUGH THAT COALITION.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS:
Analysis was conducted using discharge monitoring reports from January 2007 through
November 2009, in addition to 2008 Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) data. The parameters
that were analyzed were cadmium, chromium, copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, nickel, silver,
zinc, chloroform and phenols See attached RPA results.
• The analysis of the following parameters sampled in the PPA did not show reasonable
potential to exceed the chronic allowable concentrations. The maximum predicted
concentrations were less than the chronic allowables and therefore no limit or monitoring
will be required: Mercury, Chloroform and total phenolic compounds.
• The analysis of the following permitted parameters did show reasonable potential to exceed
the NC action level standard. Per current NCDWQ procedure, no limit will be recommended
since there are no chronic toxicity testing failures or problems. It is recommended that
monthly monitoring be continued in the permit for these parameters: Copper, silver
and zinc.
• The analysis of the following parameters did not show reasonable potential to exceed either
the acute or the chronic allowable concentrations. The maximum predicted concentrations
were less than the allowables and therefore no limit or monthly monitoring will be
-required: Nickel, chromium, lead,
• Cyanide no longer showed reasonable potential to exceed the allowable chronic or acute
concentrations and therefore the existing daily maximum limit of 22 ug/1 will be deleted.
Recommend that cyanide be monitored quarterly in the permit, because the parameter
is still being detected in the effluent.
• Cadmium showed reasonable potential to exceed the chronic allowable concentration but
not the acute allowable. The maximum predicted concentration indicated the potential to
exceed the water quality standard instream. It is recommended that a monthly average
limit of 7 ug/l and a daily maximum limit of 15 ug/l for cadmium be added to the
permit.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
The following modifications have been made to the permit:
• Cadmium limits of 7 ug/1 (monthly average) and 15 ug/1 (daily maximum) will be added
to the permit based on results of the reasonable potential analysis which indicated the
potential to exceed the water quality standard instream.
• The cyanide limit of 22 ug/l will be deleted based on showing no reasonable potential to
exceed the water quality standard. However, quarterly monitoring for cyanide will
remain in the permit because the parameter is still being detected.
• Monthly monitoring for nickel, chromium, and lead will be dropped from the permit
based on the data analysis showing no reasonable potential to exceed the water quality
standard.
• Deletion of effluent page for 0.68 MGD.
• Modification of wasteflow to 0.98 MGD instead of 0.981 MGD based on information on
in the renewal application.
• The requirement for an annual effluent scan will be added to the permit based on its
new status as a major discharger based on the design flow of nearly 1 MGD.
ALL OTHER EXISTING PERMIT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WILL REMAIN
THE SAME.
Mocksville-Dutchman Creek WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 3

PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 02 / 17/ 2010
Permit Scheduled to Issue (Tentative): 5/ 1/2010
Projected Effective Date of Permit: 6/01/2010
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Jackie Nowell at [phone].
NAME: DATE:
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
NAME: " DATE:
NPDES SUPERVISOR COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
man Creek 1Ji'WTP Fact Sheet
PDES Renextial
p ge `!

Permit NCO021491
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
DRAFT PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Mocksville
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Dutchman\Creek WWTP
295 Garwood Road
Mocksville
Davie County
to receiving waters designated as Dutchman Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions
set forth in Parts I, II,111, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2014.
Signed this day XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
DRAFT
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NCO021491
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this
permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive
authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and
provisions included herein.
The Town of Mocksville is hereby authorized to: ���01)
1. Continue to operate th& existing 0.98 MGD wastewater treatment system that
includes the folloeg components:
➢ CFlow splitter box
➢
➢ Grit removal
➢ Flow measurement
➢ Three aeration basins
➢ Three secondary clarifiers
➢ Chlorination and dechlorination units
➢ Sludge recirculation and wasting
➢ Aerobic digester and solids storage
This facility is located at the Dutchman\Creek WWTP (295 Garwood Road,
Mocksville) in Davie County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map
into Dutchman\Creek, classified C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.

Permit NCO021491
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING RE UIREMENTS (0.98 MGD)
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and las IshIl
until permit expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges be limited and monitored by
the Permittee as snecified below:
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MO ITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
easurem nt
Sample
Sample
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequenc
Type
Locations
Flow
0.98 MGD
Continuou
Recordin
I or E
BOD5 20 °CZ
5.0 mg/l
7.5 mg/l
Weekly
Composite
I, E
(April 1 - October 30)
BOD5 20 °CZ
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
1, E
(November 1 - March 31)
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/1
45.0 mg/1
Weekly
Composite
I, E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Dissolved Oxygen3
Weekly
Grab
E, U, D
Fecal Coliform
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Weekly
Grab
E
(geometric mean
NH3 as N
2.0 mg/l
6.0 mg/1
Weekly
Composite
E
(April 1- October 30
NH3 as N (winter)
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
November 1 - March 31
Total Nitrogen
Weekly
Composite
E
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
E
Total Residual Chlorin'
28µg/l
2/Week
Grab
E
Chronic Toxicitv5
Quarterly
Composite
E
Cadmium
7 u /1
15 u /1
Monthly
Composite
E
Copper
Monthly_Composite
E
Zinc
Composite
E
—..Monthly
C anide
lQuarterly J
Grab
E
Silver
Monthly
Composite
E
Effluent Pollutant Scan �,
nnuall
�
EE
H
6.0 - 9.0 standard units
eekl
Grab
Notes: %—i
1. I= Influent. E= Effluent. U= Upstream approximately 100 feet upstream from the outfall. D= Downstrea
approximately 0.5 miles downstream from the outfall. Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab
samples collected 3/week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the rest of
the year. As a participant in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Association, the subject facility is not
responsible for conducting the instream monitoring requirements as stated above. Should your
membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division immediately and the instream
monitoring requirements specified in your permit will be automatically reinstated.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 percent
of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l from April 1 to
October 31, and no less than 5.0 mg/L from November 1 to March 31.
4. The Division shall consider all effluent total residual chlorine values reported below 50 µg/1 to be in
compliance with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported
by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/l.
\ 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 37%: January, April, July, and October (see condition A. (1)).6�1 See Condition A. (3).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
S'•'r'2� ::Lr �. �'�c`�� Vic• �`_�

Permit NCO021491
A. (2.) QUARTERLY CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (0.98 MGD)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 37%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent
versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998)
or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October.
Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all
treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the
permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two
following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure'
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that
does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment,"
collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina
Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed. If reporting pass/fail results using the
parameter code TGP3B, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is sent to the below address. If reporting Chronic Value
results using the parameter code THP3B, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR/ DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating
the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of
"No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences
Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will
be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified
to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT Forms
submitted.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last
day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NCO021491
A. (3) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the attached table
(using a sufficiently sensitive detection level in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136). Samples shall represent
seasonal variations. Unless otherulise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
1'rans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen
1,2-dichloropropane
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite
1,3-dichloropropylene
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Lthylbenzene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease
Methyl bromide
2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus
Methyl chloride
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids
Methylene chloride
Chrysene
Hardness
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony
Tetrachloroethylene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic
Toluene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium
1,1,2-trichloroethane
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium
Trichloroethylene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper
Vinyl chloride
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead
Acid -extractable compounds:
Diethyl phthalate
Mercury
P-chloro-m-cresol
Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,6-dirarotoluene
Silver
2,4-dimethylphenol
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Fluoranthene
Zinc
2,4-dinitrophenol
Fluorene
Cyanide
2-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds
4-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
Volatile organic com ourd,:
Pentachlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein
Phenol
Hexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene
Bare -neutral compound
Isophorone
Bromoform
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anthracene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane
Benzidine
N-rurosodimethylarnine
Chloroethane
Benzo(a)anthracene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethylvinylether
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Chloroform
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane
Benzo(ghi)perylene
1,2,4-tnchlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
Benzo(k) fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- A MR-PPA1 or in a form approved by
the Director within 90 days of sampling. The report shall be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section, Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory RECEIVED
Laboratory Certification No.165 N.C. Dept of ENR
FEB �n�
2010WinsSalem
Regional office
Contact: David Noble __ .
Report Date: 12/29/08
Client: Mocksville -Davie Co.
PO Box 768 Project: Dutchman- PPA
Cooleemee, NC 27014 Date Sample Rcvd: 12/9/08
Meritech Work Order #
12090831
Sample: Effluent Composite
12/8-9/08
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Total Dissolved Solids
502 mg/L
12/9/08
10 mg/L
SM 2540 C
Ammonia, Nitrogen
< 0.1 mg/L
12/15/08
0.1 mg/L
EPA 350.1
TKN
Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen
< 0.20 mg/L
28.4 mg/L
12/16/08
12/10/08
0.20 mg/L
0.10
EPA 351.1
Nitrogen, total
28.4 mg/L
12/16/08
mg/L
0.20 mg/L
EPA 353.2
EPA 353.2
Antimony, total
Arsenic, total
< 0.025 mg/L
12/17/08
0.025 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Beryllium, total
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
12/17/08
12/17/08
0.010 mg/L
0.005
EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total
< 0.002 mg/L
12/17/08
mg/L
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
11.7 mg/L
12/23/08
0.100 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Copper, total
< 0.005 mg/L
0.003 mg/L
12/17/08
12/17/08
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
EPA
Lead, total
< 0.010 mg/L
12/17/08
0.010 mg/L
200.7
EPA 200.7
Magnesium, total
3.54 mg/L
12/23/08
0.100 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Nickel, total
Phosphorus, total
< 0.010 mg/L
12/17/08
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Selenium, total
7.07 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
12/17/08
12/17/08
0.020 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
Silver, total
< 0.005 mg/L
12/17/08
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Thallium, total
< 0.020 mg/L
12/17/08
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Zinc, total
Hardness, total
0.115 mg/L 12/17/08
43.9 mg eq CaCO3/L 12/23/08
0.010 mg/L EPA 200.7
0.662 mg eq CaCO3/L EPA 200.7
EPA 625 BNA
Attached
12/16/08
Meritech Work Order #
12090832
Sample: Effluent Grab
12/9/08
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Cyanide, total
Oil & Grease (HEM)
< 0.005 mg/L
< 5
12/17/08
0.005 mg/L
EPA 335.4
Phenols, total
mg/L
0.039 mg/L
12/9/08
12/16/08
5 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
EPA 1664A
EPA
EPA 624+A+A
Attached
12/12/08
_
420.1
Trip Blank
Attached
12/12/08
_
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
aboratory epresentive
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoroanthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
n„+yl benzyl phthalate
'2-chloroethoxy)methane
uis(2-chloroethyl)ether
B is(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MERITECHy INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Dutchman Creek
PPA
Effluent
12/09/08
Meritech ID#:
Analysis:
Extraction:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result Parameter
<10 ug/L
Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Fluorene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
<50 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
<10 ug/L
Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug/L
Isophorone
<10 ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
<10 ug/L
Naphthalene
<10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L
Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L
Pyrene
<10 ug/L
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
p-chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L
2-Chlorophenol
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
<10 ug/L
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
<10 ug/L
2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
<10 ug/L
Phenol
<10 ug/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
12090831
12/16/08
12/10/08
MC
1
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
1.c, 4a-
i
ab Representative

MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Client: Dutchman Creek Meritech ID#: 12090832tb
Project: PPA 624 Analysis: 12/12/08
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Analyst: VW
Sample Collection: 12/09/08 Dilution Factor: 1
EPA -6241 VOIAT-IEIE-:ORGANICS
Parameter
Result
Benzene
5 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00, ug/L
Bromoform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
< 5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane
< 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
< 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1 2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans- Q-Dichloropropylene
<1.00 ug�1
Ethyl bOizene
< LOU ug/L
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< 1.00 ug/L
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
< 5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
-
Acrolein
<50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile
<10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory-�P resentative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Dutchman Creek Meritech ID#: 12090832
PPA 624
Client.Sample EN Effluent
Sample Collection: 12/09/08
Analysis: 12/ 12/08
Analyst: VWV
Dilution Factor: 1
- ------EEC 624 Vf1i:ATIEE E}Ri- _.
Parameter
Result
Benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
< 5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane
< 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
< 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
6.01 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
IJ-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L=-
Ethyl benzene
< 1.00 ug/-L
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< 1.00 ug/L
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
< 5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
<50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile
<10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
It sks
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

v
MERITECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
�V, "I L k rv, at.1S C C,e t
Client: Davie County Water
PO Box 768
Cooleemee, NC 27014
Attention David Nobles
NPDES # I4CO021491
Date Sampled
Digested
Analysis
Analyst:
11/21/08
11/21/08
12/03/08
PS
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analvsis
Meritech ID #
Sample ID
Result
Reporting Limit
MBLK1202B
Method Blank
<0.5 ng/L
0.5 ng/L
M11210807
Field Blank
< 1.0 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M11210808
Effluent
1.48 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
i ,• /' [& l
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

• o
o Page 1 of 4
� 0 To"`ST
Laboratory Report
Cob L oco(ion 'R' Lob L ocobbn 'C' Lob L oco(ion 'W'
NC/WW Cart.#: 067 NC/DW Cert.#: 37731 NC/WW Cert.#: 103 NC/DW Cert.#: 37733 NC/WW Cert.#: 075 NC/DW Cert.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.:01 Report Date: 11/20/2008
Project ID: PPA Date Received: 10/9/2008
--- Prepared for
DAVID NOBLE Work Order M 0810-00853
DUTCHMANS CREEK VWYrP
P.O. BOX 768 Cust. Code: 800990
COOLEEMEE, NC 27014 Cust. P.O.#:
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
0EFFLUENT
10/9/2008
10:00 WW
Composite
4 +/- 2 deg C
Method
Results
Lab Loc
DaedTime Qualifier
ilr-
Test Performed
Ammonia
SM 4500 NH3 F
0.2 mg/ L as N
C
10/14/08
9:30
otal Kjeldahl Nitrogen
ASTM D3590-89(A) 2002 <1 mg/L
C
10/15/08
8:30
nitrate -Nitrite
SM 4500 NO3 E
19.54 mg/L as N
C
10/10/08
13:00
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P E
8.2 mg/L
C
10/16/08
12:15
Total Dissolved Solids
SM 2640C
447 mg/L
C
10/13/08
15:00
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Antimony
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Arsenic
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Beryllium
EPA 200.8
<0.002# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Cadmium
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Chromium
EPA 200.8
0.018# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Copper
EPA 200.8
<0.003# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Lead
Nickel
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Selenium
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
EPA 200.8
<0.002# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Silver
EPA 200.8
<0.005# mg/L
R
10/30/08
12:18
Thallium
EPA 200.8
0.376# mg/L
R
1116108
13:17
Zinc
R
0:00
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
EPA 200.8
16.2 mg/L
R
11/18/08
16:34
Calcium
SM 3111B
2.11 mg/L
R
11/18/08
16:34
Magnesium
Total Hardness Calculation
CALC.
49.2 mg/L
R
11/18/08
16:34
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002 EFFLUENT
10/9/2008
10:00 ww
Grab
4+1- 2 deg C
Method
Results
Lab Loc -Daleed
Time Qualifier
Test Performed
Oil & Grease
EPA 1664A
7.3 mg/L
R
I
8:00
Cyanide
LQC10-20"044 <0.005 mg/L
R
10117/08
14:35
Phenols w/chloroform extr.
EPA 420.1
<5.0 ug/L
R
10123/08
12:00
VOCs by 624
EPA 624
R
10/14/08
15:08
Benzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L .
R
10/14/08
15:08

r •
O
O
�G 0TEST
6701 Conference Drive Page 2 of 4
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone] NC/WW CerL M 067
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
NC/DW Cert. #: 37731
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 0810-00853
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
4 +1- 2 deg C
002 EFFLUENT
10/9/2008
10:00 WW
Grab
Method
Results
Lab Loc
DaedTime Qualifier
Test Performed
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
10/14108
15:08
Acrolein
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
10/14/08
16:08
Acrylonitrile
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Bromodichloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Bromoform
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Bromomethane
EPA 624
<2 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Dibromomethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Chiorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Chioroethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
.Chloroethylvinyl ether
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
—hloroform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Chloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
16:08
Dibromochloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10114/08
15:08
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
1,1-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10M4108
15:08
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10114/08
15:08
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
16:08
1,2-Dichloropropane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Ethylbenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Methylene chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
16:08
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Trichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
Trichlorofluoromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10114/08
16:08
Vinyl chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
15:08
-is
EPA EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
10/14/08
16:08
SVOCs (A&B/N) by 625
SVOCs (A&BI
EPA 625
R
10/13/08
15:00
AcenaAcenaphthyiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
.15:00
Benzidine
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Benzo(a)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
M_---II.%4n..---4&&.---
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00

O
O
UROOTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 0810-00853
Page 3 of 4
NC/WW CerL M 067
NC/DW Cert. M 37731
No.
Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002
EFFLUENT
10/9/2008
10:00
WW
Grab
4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc
DaedTime Qualifier
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
16:00
Benzo(a)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
16:00
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Benzyl butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Bis(2-chioroisopropyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
-Chloronaphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
-Chloro-3-methylphenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
2-Chlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Chrysene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Di-n-butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
2,4-Dichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Diethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
2,4-Dimethylphenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
16:00
Dimethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
2,4-Dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Di-n-octyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Fluorene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Hexachiorobutadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
lexachloroethane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
wdeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Isophorone
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
24Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Naphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00
Nitrobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13108
15:00
2-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
16:00
d-Nitmnhpnnl
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
10/13/08
15:00

Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
0
UROOTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 0810-00853
Page 4 of 4
NCNVW CerL M 067
NC/DW CerL M 37731
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 EFFLUENT 10/9/2008 10:00 WW Grab 4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc DaftzedTime Qualifier
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
Pentachlorophenol
EPA 625
<30 ug/L
R 10/13/08
16:00
Phenanthrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
Phenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
Pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
Diphenylhydrazine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 10/13/08
15:00
r Level Mercury
EPA 1631
<1.0 ng/L
R 10/15/08
6:49
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
003 BLANK
10/9/2008
10:00 WW
Grab
4 +1- 2 deg C
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc DaftzedTime Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 <1.0 ng/L R 10/15/08 6:49
#ANALYZED BY TRITEST LABORATORY, INC., WILMINGTON, NC (NC/WW
CERT. #75; NC/DW CERT. #37721).
Reviewed by:
for T , Inc.

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: 1 /21 /2009
To: Mr Charles Weaver
c/o Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NCDENR/DWQ/Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
GREY ENGINEERING, INC
254 West Water Street
P. O. Box 9
Mocksville, NC 27028
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Job # 102.139
Re: Town of Mocksville - Dutchmans Creek NPDES Renewal (#NC0021491)
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
Prints
Change order
Under separate cover via
Description
31Copies of Nov. and Dec. PPA Reports
X Attached Submittal
Copy of letter Samples
Plans Other
RECEIVE
As requested Approved aD iW4 WATER OUALITY
X For your use Approved �,5OURCE BRANCH
For approval Returned f. c 1I
For review and comment Return corrected prints
Resubmit copies for approval Submit copies for distribution
Remarks: ** Please add the following reports to the NPDES Permit Renewal
Request (#NC0021491.)
COPY TO:
0 �i.11F -
If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once.

1
.1
-r--r Z
' z
I W
Z IL
, 1
� 1 ,
'
1 I
' , I
� ; 1
1
' 1 I
' I I
CHLORINE
CONTACT
� , 1
1
, ��--
r------- r--------------
I I I 1 I I`
t-------1
W
�♦ ',�; ;
' i 1 y------ J i i .♦ AERATION
1 I j i i--I----,----r----r ----
',�-----
i
r1 r� '
PARSHALL rf
FLUME '' ii i i i ii I I
x i
' L--M---j ' I
w
W 11
1
J
`♦ C.J
♦:zyy ,
m F�
r-'Z---1 1
�rJ I.T 11 1 , I I
1 ' I F' 15 Y ��il , i ♦♦ 1 1
I -, ♦ I 1, I I
�y
� �
a__l _______ y---_____-
I
iJJ 1 N � j I
I l
I�___________________________
I i ; I �'e�^♦N N LL
I` I va J
RAS/VYAS----�-'
I 1 1
1
-----------------------------
---�
♦ `�-1 I J ==______________________________________ PUMP, STA
---- --
♦\_1=.I-----r-----Z-------------------------------------------r------------
4
----------------------------------------�
i-, —_
RAS/WAS
i-_______ i I
' 1 I I I
1
3 I
w a
ZN ���
'w r------------------------------n
�, c� a ------------------------------
y tea' 11`. .'1 I
, ,
' �� PUMP STA
L-r-cl---1
N
i' a r
I m I
�jl
i i �`♦ i
I
f AERATION ,'� i
W to 1 1 ''
st=,
1
4
11 Z 1
il----l----T----r----rf f' ♦
1 1
PARSHALL i i i ii
T
J
a J I
-
�L�
_-' *1 f7
'I
L-
FLUME I I I I
O
o"
ems, , �; -
11 1 1 1
I yl I
I' I ---------------------------�y
I IL------------------------------J
II
`♦ ' '
i i
L------------------------------------7��
Lr------- i
/
II L--i
I,
CHLQRINE � U
L
I---------L
� CbNtAdT_�
i�
I I q �------------ /
I�
NEW CHLORINE �s
I F <<
I \
I
NEW SLUDGE �I
I \\ CONTACT I
w O
—w
3 g NEW
z v RAS/WAS
I I I PUMP STA
STORAGE L -------=----=======——====--iJ-1
PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 60'
GREY ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil Design and Surveying
P.O. Box 9 Mocksville, N.C. 27028
greyengineering.com [phone]
DRAWN BY. G. BULLARD PROJ. NO.: 102.150.GE
DESIGN BY: G. BULLARD DATE: 5/26/04
TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE
DUTCHMANS CREEK WWTP UPGRADE
DUTCHMANS CREEK WWTP
EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE
FIG. 5

i.
INT

DUCTHMANS CREEK WWTP
DRAINAGE AREA
DUCTHMANS CREEK 7Q10 — 9.69 MGD
BEAR CREEK 7Q10 = 0.676 MGD
limmommonowTo14f
SCALE: 1 "= 15000'
GREY ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil Design and Surveying
P.O. Box 9 Mocksville, N.C. 27028
greyengineering.com [phone]
DRAWN BY: G. BULLARD PROJ. NO.: 102.150.GE
DESIGN BY: G. BULLARD DATE: 5/26/04
TOWN OF MOCKSVI LLE
DUTCHMANS CREEK WWTP UPGRADE
AREA OVERVIEW FIG. 1
of 5

mi6N
mm, 1%
� ol
Ok
au L i.,..
kL
'111111 "ll, 1 700
a.
f 1p
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.

Division of Water Quality / Water Quality Section
NCDENRNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
4�_-
FHYrtoNMrvi AIM NRl1VJ. i�Kro
NCG110000
NOTICE OF INTENT
Permit
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG110000:
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
Treatment Works treating domestic sewage or any other sewage sludge or wastewater treatment
device or system, used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal or
domestic sewage, with a design flow of 1.0 million gallons per day or more, or required to have an
approved pretreatment program under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 403,
including lands dedicated to the disposal of sewage sludge that is located within the confines of
the facility; and like activities deemed by DWQ to be similar in the process and/or the exposure of
raw materials, products, by-products, or waste materials.
(Please print or type)
1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed):
Name
Street Address
City State ZIP Code
Telephone No. Fax:
E-mail Address
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name
Facility Contact
Contact E-mail
Street Address
City State ZIP Code
County
Telephone No. Fax:
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection).
(A copy of a county map or USGS quad sheet with facility clearly located on the map is required to be submitted with this application)
4) Latitude I Longitude (degrees, minutes, seconds)
5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following :
❑ New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin
❑ Existing
Page 1 of 4
SWU-226-071408 Last Revised 7/14/2008

NCG110000 N.O.I.
6) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at thisfacility
SIC Code: `�
7) Provide a brief narrative description of the types of industrial activities and products manufactured at
this facility:
8) Discharge points / Receiving waters:
How many discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc.) convey stormwater from the property?
9) Receiving waters:
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
discharges end up in?
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer).
10) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
❑ No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
11) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
❑ No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
12) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No
❑ Yes
If yes, please briefly describe:
13) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ No
❑ Yes
If yes, when was it implemented?
14) Are vehicle maintenance activities occurring at this facility?
❑ No ❑ Yes
15) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
❑ No ❑ Yes
Page 2 of 4
SWU-226-071408 Last Revised 7/14/2008

NCG110000 N.O.I.
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
❑ No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
❑ No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored: _
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport / disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
16) Certification:
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management] Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing:
Title:
(Signature of Applicant)
(Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100.00 made payable to NCDENR
Page 3 of 4
SWU-226-071408 Last Revised 7/14/2008

NCG110000 N.O.I.
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
❑ Check for $100 made payable to NCDENR
❑ This completed application and all supporting documents
❑ Copy of county map or USGS quad sheet with location of facility clearly marked on map
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Central Office or Regional Office for your area.
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ......
[phone]
Fayetteville Office ...
[phone]
Mooresville Office ...
[phone]
Raleigh Office ........
[phone]
Washington Office ...(252)
946-6481
Wilmington Office ...
[phone]
Winston-Salem ......
[phone]
Central Office .........(919)
807-6300
Page 4 of 4
SWU-226-071408 Last Revised 7/14/2008

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
W ATF9QG Technical Bulletin for N.C. General Stormwater
=� Permits NCG05, 079 119 & 13
Technical Bulletin for NCG050000/ 070000/ 110000/ 130000, Volume IV
Last Revised 12/2/2008
What activities are covered by these general permits?
NCGO50000 allows stormwater discharges
associate ith activities classified as establish-
ments prima ' engaged in: Apparel and other
finished products ade from fabrics and similar
materials [standard i ustrial classification (SIC)
23]; Printing, publishin , nd allied industries
[SIC 271; Converted paper a paperboard prod
ucts [SIC 267]; Paperboard containers and boxes
[SIC 265]; Miscellaneous manufacturing industries
[SIC 39]; Leather and leather products [SIC 311;
and Rubber and miscellaneous products [SIC 30];
and similar activities (see permit.) Excluded:
Leather tanning and finishing [SIC 311] and Tires
and inner tubes [SIC 3011.
G070000 allows stormwater discharges
associated activities classified as establish-
ments primaril gaged in: Stone, Clay, Glass,
and Concrete Produ [standard industrial classi-
fication (SIC) 32]; simila ctivities. Excluded:
Ready -mixed concrete [SIC 3 3] and Hydraulic
Cement [SIC 32411.
NCG110000 allows stormwater discharges
associated with activities classified as Treatment
Works treating domestic sewage or any other sewage
sludge or wastewater treatment device or system,
used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and recla-
mation of municipal or domestic sewage, with a design
flow of 1.0 million gallons per day or more, or facilities
which are required to have an approved pretreatment
program under Title 40 CFR §403, including lands
dedicated to the disposal of sewage sludge that is lo-
cated within the confines of the facility.
NCG130000 allows stormwater discharges
associate ith activities classified as establishments
primarily eng d in: wholesale trade of non-metal
waste and scrap after referred to as the non-
metal waste recycling 1 ustry, a portion of standard
industrial classification (S 093); similar activities.
Excluded: wholesale trade of me waste and scrap,
iron and steel scrap, and nonferrous metal scrap;
waste oil recycling; and automobile wrecking for
scrap.
What does this permit require me to do?
Key Permit Requirements
• Implement a Stormwater Pollu-
tion Prevention Plan (SPPP) (Part
II, Section A).
• Provide secondary containment
for all bulk storage of liquid mate-
rials. (Part II, Section A, 2.(b)).
• Perform and document semi-
annual qualitative monitoring
during a representative storm
event. (Part II, Section B).
• Perform semi-annual analytical
monitoring for vehicle mainte-
nance area, if present, and submit
the results on the monitoring re- Non -Structural BMP's
port forms provided with the per- Non-structural (practices or activi-
mit. (Part II, Section Q. ties) BMPs include:
What are BMPs, and why are
they important?
The SPPP should include the use of
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to control discharge of pollutants
from a facility's stormwater out -
falls. BMPs include a variety of
things that the industrial facility
can do to minimize the potential for
pollutants to get into the stormwa-
ter draining from a facility. There
are different types of BMPs:
* Eliminate exposure of materials
and equipment wherever possible
by moving materials and equipment
to indoor locations.
* Practice good housekeeping on -
site. Keep materials handled and
stored at the facility in an orderly
fashion.
* Exchange hazardous materials
for non -hazardous ones wherever
possible.
* Establish routine leak and main-
tenance checks to minimize the
chance of spills before they occur.

PAGE TECHNICAL BULLETIN FOR N.C. GENERAL STORMWATER PERMITS NCGOS, 07, 1 I, & 13
What does this permit require me to do? (continued)
When spills occur, clean them up
immediately.
* Establish bulk storage tank
protocols that minimize the risk of
spills during loading and unload-
ing procedures.
* Store used pallets and process
waste dumpsters inside or under
a roof where water cannot flow on
or around them.
Structural BMPs
Structural (equipment or devices)
BMPs include:
* Build containment dikes around
the loading areas of bulk liquid
storage containers.
* If practical, change painting
operations from liquid systems to
powdered systems that do not
Could I monitor at fewer
outfalls?
All outfalls associated with vehi-
cle maintenance must be moni-
tored. However, the facility may
request approval of "Represent-
ative Outfall Status." This status
allows analytical monitoring at
fewer outfalls. To request repre-
sentative outfall status, send a
letter to the DWQ Regional Office
explaining which outfall(s) can be
considered representative of other
discharges and include all neces-
sary supporting documentation.
Where can I find more
information?
Additional information is avail-
able at our website (see right).
Another valuable source is the
Division of Pollution Prevention
and Environmental Assistance.
The DPPEA has specific informa-
tion about how to minimize pol-
lutants at various industries.
Call [phone] or visit
http://www.p2pays.org/
generate solvent wastes.
* Build roofs and secondary con-
tainment around materials stored
outside where stormwater cannot
contact them.
Could I be exempted from
an NPDES stormwater
permit?
Possibly. A facility with any indus-
trial activity subject to the NPDES
Stormwater regulations that elimi-
nates all potential stormwater ex-
posure may be eligible for a No Ex-
posure Exclusion from a stormwa-
ter permit. A facility that meets
this condition may submit a No
Exposure Certification application
form (see NC DWQ's Stormwater
Do I need a certified lab to
analyze stormwater samples?
Monitoring under all NPDES per-
mits must be conducted in accor-
dance with test procedures ap-
proved under federal regulations in
40 CFR § 136. All labs certified by
North Carolina perform analysis in
accordance with those procedures.
While N.C. certification require-
ments do not apply to stormwater
only discharges, any data gathered
under an NPDES permit must con-
form to federal requirements. Us-
ing a certified lab is one way to en -
LAST REV. I ZWO8
Permitting Unit's website:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su) to
apply for a No Exposure Exclu-
sion. The facility must re-
certify No Exposure every five (5)
years.
What if I sell my business,
or the name of my business
changes?
This change is a minor modifica-
tion and requires the Director's
approval. You should complete
the Name/Ownership Change
Form SWU-239. This form is
downloadable from our website,
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su.
sure compliance with these re-
quirements. A list of certified labs
is available from: http://
h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lab/cert.htm
Note that pH is a field parameter
and must be measured within
15 minutes. You must either
train on -site staff to measure pH
in accordance with approved
methods or contract with commer-
cial services. All entities with
field parameter certification as
per 15A NCAC 2H .0800 can ana-
lyze pH in accordance with federal
procedures (see website for list).
Who can help me with questions?
Your questions about stormwater permit requirements can be
addressed to the Division of Water Quality Offices:
Asheville Office.........
[phone]
Washington Office........
[phone]
Fayetteville Office......
[phone]
Wilmington Office........
[phone]
Mooresville Office......
[phone]
Winston-Salem Office....
[phone]
Raleigh Office...........
[phone]
Central Office ..............
[phone]
M_
more information about the programs of the Division of Water
Stormwater Permitting Unit, see our home page at:
http: //h2o.enrstate.nc. us/su

x
Mickey, Mike
From: Eric Moten [[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 12:38 PM
To: Mickey, Mike
Subject: Incident Report
Attachments: Incident Report.docx
Mike,
Sorry for taking so long to get this to you. I was injured on the job on Thursday. I got sprayed in the face
with caustic soda.
Please let me know if you need anymore information about the incident.
Eric Moten (O.R.C)
Davie County Public Utilities
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.

Incident Report
Upon my arrival to the Dutchman's Creek waste water treatment plant on Jan 26 2010, 1 notice that the
number 2 aeration basin had over flowed. This was a direct result of the heavy rains over the weekend.
The back up operator was onsite on Monday the 25th. He stated that the basin was not overflowing at
the time he checked on the plant. He also stated that he had turned the air off and increase the
chemical feed. There was a small amount of sludge on the ground, but it didn't reach the river. The
corrective actions taken were to put lime down on the exposed areas on the ground. I also called and
made a verbal statement to Mike Mickey about the incident.
Reported By
Eric Moten
ORC of Dutchman's Creek

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DNIR Review Record
Facility: 4 �v� Permit/Pipe No.:Month/Year
MoN ly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
W ly/Dail�, Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limit/Type DMR Value % Over Limit
M itoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Pe t Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
(lr},cr V;nl�t;nnc
Completed by: Date:_ ry
Regional Water Quality
Supers isor Signoff: W Date: r!

Effluent Dutchman Creek
-N- Month: October 2009
NPDES Permit #NC0021491
Discharge No. 1 Class 2 County Davie GRADE 2.0 Phoni 336-477-5096
Certified Laboratories Tritest Operator in Responsible Charge Eric Moten
Person(s) Collecting Samples Operators David Nobles Eric Moten
� � ✓ �1-LD-uA By this signature, I certify that this report.is accurate and
ic[,... ",...f n.,.,r�+nr In Rocnnncihln (`harm al nata mrnnlete to the best-ofmv knowledge.
MEMO
SUHHHEI
•
�Wi
l'asli
0®��
u •
ul
11
MMMO
ON
©
11
ME
Key'".
WON
• 1 /
1 /
1 •
�_�________-��
M___
1 1 •
___________-.�
___-..
MIMMM
IN
me
IMM—
mom
ON
mom
OM
• •• •
-®�
MEMO
I
•
•
a M.
• -� •
WIN=
•
: •
1 •
�
1 •
•• ••
Y=ORC B=Back up ORC O=other oprerator
AM
US
eteF.ftilt.Of,

A�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mrs. Christine Bralley, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Dear Mrs. Bralley:
Division of Environmental Health
Terry L. Pierce Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
December 17, 2009
Re: 2009 Water System Inspection
Mocksville, Town of
PWSID #02-30-010, Davie County
On November 10, 2009, I inspected the Town of Mocksville's Water System. Below you will find a list of requirements
and recommendations resulting from the inspection.
1. The water plant does not have alum sludge or a back wash water disposal system. This has been mentioned
in the last nine inspections. Provisions must be made for the disposal of water treatment plant wastes.
(15A NCAC 18C .0404 (k) (1))
2. The water plant's settled water detention time is not sufficient. The old side of the plant has
approximately 30 minutes of detention time, and the newer side has around 45 minutes. This has been
mentioned in the last nine inspections and in a letter from Lee Spencer, dated October 11, 1999. A
theoretical detention time in the sedimentation basins is to be a minimum of four hours as specified
by the Rules Governing Public Water Systems. (15A NCAC 18C .0706 (b))
3. In an effort to help ensure compliance with the Disinfection By -Product Rule this office suggests adding
chlorine to the top of or before the plant's filters and discontinue applying chlorine at the head of the
plant. Chlorine in contact with total organic carbon forms disinfection by-products. Much of the
organic carbon is removed in the first half of the settling basins before reaching the plant's filters.
4. The water plant does not have a way to adjust the raw water pH. This office suggests installing a chemical
injection point for pH adjustment before the coagulant feed point on the raw water line.
Mrs. Christine Bralley, Town Manager
Public Water Supply Section - Jessica G. Miles, Chief
Winston-Salem Regional Office one
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 NorthCarol..ina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: ncdrinkinowater.state.nc.us a ��� �,a /C„
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer �/ V ` Y

t, V
Town of Mocksville
December 17, 2009
Page 2 of 2
5. In light of the piping change to the clearwell that improved the disinfection contact time for the plant, a new
chlorine tracer study will be needed to determine the new T-10 time through the disinfection process. This
study should be conducted from the filter effluent to the point of entry (POE). Please conduct this tracer
study and provide this office with the new T-10 information by March 1, 2010.
To summarize, the plant's waste residuals are still being dumped improperly. This has been mentioned in the last nine
inspections. The plant's settled water detention time has not been addressed. This item has also been mentioned in the
last nine inspections. This office suggests moving the chlorine feed point or adding an additional chlorine feed point to
the top of the filters to help limit the disinfection by-product formation. The town must install a backflow preventer on
the number one and two filter sweep supply lines. All backflow preventers must be inspected yearly and records
kept in conjunction with the town's backflow policy. This office is requiring a new contact time tracer study because of
the change in the clearwell configuration. The surface sweep backflow preventer and new tracer study must be
completed and submitted to this office by March 1, 2010. Adding a tap for pH adjustment in the raw water line before
the coagulant tap would help ensure optimum coagulation by supplying alkalinity when the source water alkalinity is very
low.
Your attention in addressing the requirements and recommendations outlined in this letter in a timely manner will be
greatly appreciated. Mr. Beane was very helpful in providing the information needed to complete this inspection.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tom Boyd
Environmental Senior Specialist
Public Water Supply Section
cc: Jessica G. Miles, Chief, Public Water Supply Section
Geoff Beane, Water Plant ORC
Public Water Supply Section — Jessica G. Miles, Chief
Winston-Salem Regional Office One
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 NorthCarofiina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: ncdrinkingwater,state.mus �%turat`
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

I;`' WORK INC�uvr� i t7c r uLLvwlivC� tLtMtN i b:
NOT
TH EF
A.
E &-ff
PUMP STATION WORK:
1.
TEMP. INFLUENT PS BY-PASS
2.
WET
WELL MODIFICATIONS
3.
NEW
DISCHARGE PIPING .
4.
NEW
INFLUENT PUMPS
5.
NEW
MECHANICAL FINE SCREEN
6.
NEW
ELECTRICAL AND CONTROLS
7,
NEW
SCADA INTEGRATION
8.
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
,�}�i,,w�b �s C✓eeK
W
,f.ov P,4-V C
B. WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT WORK vlvvv" _
1.
SITE
PIPING MODIFICATIONS
2.
SITE
ELECTRICAL WORK
3.
NEW
EMERGENCY GENERATOR
4.
NEW
SCADA SYSTEM
5.
NEW
FLOW SPLITTER
6.
REPLACE EXISTING AERATORS AND AERATOR CONTROL PANELS
7.
NEW
340,000 GALLON AERATION BASIN AND AERATORS
8.
NEW
36' DIA. CLARIFIER
9.
NEW
50' DIA. AEROBIC DIGESTER (PRESTRESSED COMPOSITE TANK)
10.
NEW
RAS/WAS PUMP STATION AND PIPING
11.
NEW
SCUM PUMPS AND VALVES
12.
NEW
CHEMICAL FEED BUILDING AND EQUIPMENT (CL2, S02)
13,
NEW
CHLORINE CONTACT AND DECHLOR BASIN
'k
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1i.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42. COt
43. DEN
44. DEN
45. DEN

ivv i • i tit WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM SHALL REMAIN OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES.
THERE SHALL BE NO UNTREATED DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER AT ANY TIME.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
EXCAVATE, FORM AND POUR NEW CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN
CONSTRUCT NEW GRAVITY PIPING FROM EXISTING EMH-1 TO NMH-2
INSTALL BLOWERS AND AIRLINES IN NEW CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN
MODIFY EXISTING PIPING IN EXISTING CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN
CONSTRUCT PIPING AND SET MANHOLE NMH-3
MODIFY CHLORINATION AND CONSTRUCT DECHLOR SYSTEMS
PROVIDE ALTERNATE CHLORINATION POINT TO NMH-3
CONSTRUCT NEW CLARIFIER
CONSTRUCT NEW RAS/WAS PUMP STATION
CONSTRUCT NEW AERATION BASIN
CONSTRUCT NEW PARSHALL FLUME
CONSTRUCT NEW AEROBIC DIGESTER.
CONNECT DIGESTER WASTE LINES TO EXISTING HOLDING TANKS.
CONNECT DIGESTER DECANT LINES TO BASINS #3 AND #2.
AND CONTACT BASIN
CONSTRUCT NEW FLOW SPLITTER AND CONNECT PIPING TO PARSHALL
CONSTRUCT NEW INFLUENT FORCEMAIN TO NEW FLOW SPLITTER
CONSTRUCT NEW INFLUENT BYPASS PIPING
CONSTRUCT NEW ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND INSTALL NEW GENERATOR
INSTALL NEW AERATORS. OPERATE PARALLEL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AS
CONSTRUCT NEW DIVERSION PIPING FROM EXISTING CLARIFIERS
ACTIVATE NEW CHLORINATION/DECHLOR SYSTEMS
22. DIVERT EFFLUENT FLOW TO NEW CHLORINATION BASIN
23. MODIFY WEIRS IN EXISTING CHLORINATION BASIN
24. ACTIVATE FULL CHLORINATION/DECHLOR CAPACITY
#3.
REQUIRED
25. MODIFY EXISTING SCUM PUMPING STATION (BYPASS AS NEEDED)
26. CONSTRUCT NEW INFLUENT BYPASS PUMPING SYSTEM AT MH-1.
27. PREPARE WAS PIPING FOR EXISTING SYSTEM TIE-IN
28. TRANSFER MIXED LIQUOR TO NEW AERATION BASIN #3 FROM #1 AND #2
29. TRANSFER MIXED LIQUOR TO NEW CLARIFIER
30. ACTIVATE AERATORS IN NEW AERATION BASIN
31. BLIND NEW SPLITTER WEIRS TO PARSHALL FLUMES #1 AND 2 TO CUT OFF FLOW
32. (NOTE: BASINS 1 AND 2 SHALL BE OFF-LINE NO MORE THAN 36 HOURS)
33. ACTIVATE NEW RAS PUMPING SYSTEMS
34. ACTIVATE BY-PASS PUMPING SYSTEM
35. CONNECT PIPING FROM NEW FLOW SPUTTER TO PARSHALL FLUMES #1 AND #2
36. CONNECT WAS PIPING FROM EXISTING PUMPS TO COMMON WAS FORCEMAIN
37. ACTIVATE NEW WAS SYSTEMS
38. ACTIVATE AEROBIC DIGESTER
39. REMOVE INFLUENT WEIR BLIND PLATES. ALL TREATMENT SYSTEMS SHOULD BE FULLY ACTIVE.
40. RENOVATE INFLUENT PUMP STATION
41. ACTIVATE INFLUENT PUMP STATION AND MECHANICAL SCREEN
42. COMPLETE SITE WORK
43. DEMOLISH EXISTING CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN #1
44. DEMOLISH AND REMOVE OLD CHLORINATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS
45. DEMOLISH AND REMOVE DEFUNCT ELECTRICAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS

i
6 4
v s.
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 0.5 MILE
ABBREVIATION & SYMBOL LEGEND
U/G
UNDERGROUND N.I.C.
NOT 1N CONTRACT
EIP
EXIST. IRON PIPE -
NEW GATE VALVE
RS
RAILROAD SPIKE 0 VAL
EXIST. VALVE
CM
CONTROL MONUMENT ET
ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
N/F
NOW OR FORMER Opp
POWER POLE
JB
JUNCTION BOX -S3 ASPH
ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
CMP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE GRVL
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY
DI
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
RCP
REINFORCED CONC. PIPE
PVC
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE
MH
MANHOLE
SS
SANITARY SEWER
LINETYPE LEGEND
EROSION
CONTROL
SYMBOLS LEGEND
R PROPERTY LINE
DIVERSION STRUCTURES
— -- —
— -- Q, CREEK/EDGE OF RIVER
.$, -9--0..9..$.
SILT/SEDIMENT FENCE
n
- CLEARING LIMITS
ROAD EDGE
TOPO LINES
ROCK STRUCTURES
--------------
INDEX TOPO LINES
O
ROCK CHECK DAM (RCD)
PLAN & PROFILE
—x-x-x—x-
FENCE LINE
-w—w—w—w--
WATER MAIN
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
—FM—F+—FM
FORCE MAIN SEWER
STORM DRAINAGE CULVERT
-E —E —E
-E — OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL POWER
— UE — UE
— UE — U/G ELECTRICAL POWER

Ts,
�k
SHEETINDEX
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
TITLE SHEET, VICINITY MAP AND INDEX
2
EXISTING OVERALL SITE PLAN
3
PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN
4
HYDRAULIC PROFILE
SECTION & DETAILS
AES.
5
EXISTING INFLUENT PUMP STATION
PLAN, SECTION & DEMOLITION
BASIN
6
INFLUENT PUMP STATION REOVATIONS
PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
7
NEW SPUTTER PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
8
NEW PARSHALL FLUME, BAR SCREEN &
GRIT CHAMBER #3 PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
9
NEW AERATION BASIN #3
PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
W �jv(�/S ►���'�'
10
NEW CLARIFIER #3
n
PLANS, SECTIONS & DETAILS
cl, ,n,4
w
/
11
NEW CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN
PLAN, SECTION
Y���
w wp
& DETAILS
12
NEW SLUDGE PUMP BUILDING #3
PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
13
NEW AEROBIC DIGESTER
PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
14
CHLORINE BUILDING #2 RENOVATIONS
PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
15
SCUM PUMP STATION & VALVE BOX
RENOVATIONS PLAN, SECTION & DETAILS
16
STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES
17
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS & NOTES
E1.1
ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS, SYMBOLS
AND MISC. DETAILS
E2.1
ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN AND
INFLUENT PUMP STATION ELEVATION
E3.1
PARTIAL ELECTRICAL PLANS
E4.1
ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM
ACTIVE.
E5.1
PANEL SCHEDULES
M1.1
MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review �Record
Facility: �cc-` OMW O� Permit/Pipe No.: YMM A'-\M Month/Year
S�I�,
MonthINAverage Violations
Parameter Permit Limit \ DMR Value % Over Limit
*4y/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit LiJni1gype DMR Value % Over Limit
Monitoring Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff: Date:
V�-

&:tnuent uumnman ureek
- Month: September 2009 °` °` °' ENR
NPDES Permit #NC0021491 �y.Ie 2
Discharge No. 1 Class 2 County Davie GRADE 2 Phom 336-477-5096
Certified Laboratories TRITEST Operator in Responsi lie , C_haFge Eric Moten
Person(s) Collecting Samples Operators Eric Moten/ David Ni0bft ------ -,1
By this signature, I certify that this report is accur'ai
An
jai nature or v erator
in Kesponsibie cnar e) uate complete to the best of
my kripwked e
0
L0
0
0
ui
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
NT
0
0
0
(D
0
0
L0
0
r
(Y)
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
0
r
Cl)
0
(Y)
0
0
0
(fl
0
0
(O
0
0
l_ '.
❑
o
a
O
U)
C
°
E
F
`o
°-
O
a
p
o
LL
❑
U
V%
U
a
1
a`>
aEi
I-
=
a
C
U
m
a�i
CD
N
u�
O
m
C
0
°
w
Z
=o
E
<
N
K
a
m
o
t
2
U
a"i
L.L
(D
>
x
O
a�
>
N
o
C
2
Z
o
F-
N
O
`o
N
0
d
o
1, �� ��
_,.
0 iJ.
H S
I HRS
Y/O/B
mgd
I C
I units
ugl
i mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
#/100ml
mg/I
I mg/I
tmg/I
1
1030
4.00
Y
0.474
22
6.38
<20
7.5
2
1000
3.00
Y
0.405
22
<20
<2
0.2
6
21
8.19
9.7
3
1030
2.50
Y
0.413
21
4
900
3.00
Y
0.430
20
5
0.348
6
0.302
7
0.317
8
900
3.00
Y
0.401
18
6.3
<20
6.4
9
1030
3.50
Y
0.436
22
<2
0.2
4
2
51.5
4
10
900
5.00
Y
0.461
22
11
1000
3.50
Y
0.422
22
<20
12
0.421
13
0.390
14
800
3.50
Y
0,405
20
7.11
<20
6.7
15
930
3.00
Y
0.445
21
1
2
<0.1
3
16
63.3
8.1
16
1045
2.50
Y
0.487
22
17
1100
3.50
Y
0.486
22
18
830
2.50
Y
0.507
22
<20
19
0.430
20
0.385
21
1100
3.00
Y
0.411
22
22
1030
3.00
Y
0.440
22
7.44
<20
<2
0.2
5
18
5.7
5181
9.5
23
1000
2.50
Y
0.470
22
24
1030
3.00
Y
0.465
22
25
800
3.50
Y
0.470
23
26
0.590
27
0.506
28
8001
3.00
Y 1
0.467
18
6.71
<20
29
900
5.00
Y
0.462
18
3
0.2
11
23
32A
8.4
30
930
3.00
Y
0,419
17
<20
6.0
31
Average
0.436
21
#DIV/Of
2.5
0.2
5.8
12.271
6.5
41.8
7.94
Maximum
0.590
23
7.4
0
3
0.2
11
23
7.5
63.3
9.7
Minimum
0.302
17
6.3
0
2
0.2
3
2
5.7
8.19
4
Comp (C) / Grab (G)
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
-Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
n/I
7.5mg/I
6 mg/I
45mg/l
400/100m1
5m /I
n/I
rill
n/I
rill
6-9
28 ug/L
5 mg/l
2 m /l
30mg/I
zoorooma
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
0.981
rill
15 mgl1
12 mg/ 145mali
400/100mI
5mq/I
n/I
rill
rill
nil
�
6-9
28 ug/L
10 m /I
4 , /i
30mg/I
200/100m1
vR� o-0a0r, Up VM%, 0=other oprerator
09

e
Mickey, Mike
From: Mauney, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Tedder, Steve; Mickey, Mike
Subject: Emailing: CIMG0144, CIMG0145
Attachments: CIMG0144.JPG; CIMG0145.JPG
The attached pictures were made yesterday at Mocksville Dutchman's Creek plant, where an
overflow occurred from 2am till shortly after Sam on Monday. Eric Moten, ORC called on Monday
to report the plant overflow that he found on Monday morning at an open top channel between
one of the aeration basins and the clarifier. A German shepherd dog had fallen into the
channel and then blocked the pipe adjacent to the clarifier. A single return sludge pump was
operating and it had pumped down the clarifier while returning the liquid to the aeration
basin. I visited the plant and viewed the spill area at the clarifier and in the adjacent
woods with Eric and Johnny Lambert, Director of Public Utilities. The sewage sludge had
pooled near the fence and then spread out in the woods, leaving a 1/2 inch layer of solids on
the leaves. The activated sewage sludge had flowed a total of about 400-500 feet before it
stopped. Lime had been applied to the solids. I advised Eric to remove the deposits of
collected solids around the clarifier and in the concentrated areas of the woods. The
incident # is 200902499.
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
CIMG0144
CIMG0145
Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving
certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how
attachments are handled.
1

f
u• A` ` ti. ' „+' �'� ^ ` f +d .+'!ate % i
Y
s.
'2L.:�

Overflows- Telephone Message
From:
(Name) (Facility)
Date of Overflow: 1�Time of Overflow: 2 m
Location:'4 D (IT6
Date/Time Call Recd:
Arrived: _ 0 ��
Cause: Grease
Roots
Other
Heavy rain
«k
Completed:
Repair/Remediation:
Amount of Overflow: ?% '�'Ao oount reaching water: <�fD
Receiving Water: /�

� � �D D� �Dq/� i//� �t ��
�� �G k i%�� ova ��qU�G /��PIG�

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: �'"�"''�'�`� �"�Permit/Pipe No.: �(bl�I�`M Month/Year
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
totN 5.0 S' 0 "16
W'& cJy/Daily Violations
Date Parameter Permit t/Tv e DMR Value % Over Limit
Monito v Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit auencv Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Completed by: ` Date:
Regional Water Quality p-
Supervisor Signoff: LWIDate: o �� df

tmuer.,t "FOt. °' M" uuicnrndn %..reeec
r ���s Month: MAY 2009
NPDES Permit #NC00214
WinstonSalelaSS County Davie GRADE 3 Phoni 336-2 -2028
Discharge No. 1 R,�;,al c�r,�E
Certified Laboratories -TRITEST--_-- -_" Operator in Responsible Charge David N les
Pers4n(s) Collecting Samples Operators David Nobles Eric Moten (4 k
,cA By this signature, I certify that this repoes accurate and
(Si nature of O erator in Responsible
charge) --- - Date complete to
the best
of
my Knowleoge.
Ln
o
o
m
O
(o
O
�O
C)
0
O
O�
O
14
O
co
O
co
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U)
O
O
to
2
�c
E
o
>
x
O
rn
°
L
n
F
3
U
o
z
a
o
a)
O
t-
L
`o
°
O
o
ti
a
a
°
cv
in
E
°
;
rn
U
>
Z
d
p
L
p
O
0
E
F�
Q
a
O
m
E
Q
H
o
0
F°-
mgd
C
units
ugl
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
#/100ml
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
HRS
HRS
Y/O/B
1
950
6.25
Y
0.440
17
2
0.422
3
F4
0.4 22
950
4.00
Y
0.439
21
6.22
Y
0.473
18
20
4
0.1
4
1
32.8
14.5
5
1030
3.50
6
1100
3.50
Y
0.534
18
20
8.0
7
1130
2.50
Y
0.562
21
8
950
3.00
Y
0.515
17
9
0.540
1Q
0.480
11
1030
3.50
Y
0.694
17
12
1100
3.50
Y
0.511
21
1015
1.50
Y
0.459
19
6.75
20
6.8
0.1
6
4
7.5
16.3
10.7
13
14
1200
4.00
Y
0.444
18
20
15
950
1.50
Y
0.433
18
16
0.396
17
0.385
18
1040
1.75
Y
0.445
15
19
1000
6.00
2.50
B
Y
0.424
0.409
16
17
4.9
0.4
8
18
34.5
10.6
20
1000
21
10301
2.50
Y
0.418
17
20
7.9
22
900
2.50
B
0.420
19
6.24
20
23
0.373
24
0.371
25
1315
1.50
B
0.197
19
26,
1000
6.00
B
1 .459
21
27'
1130
4.75
1.50
Y
Y
0.438
0.458
24
23
6.56
20
20
4.4
0.1
2
35
8.0
35.9
13.5
93.50 0
P92911200
1
B
0.384
24
0
0.377
P31
0.137
Average
0.434
19
20
5.025
0.175
5
7.0852
7.8
29.9
12.3
Maximum
0.694
24
6.8
20
6.8
0.4
8
35
8.0
35.9
14.5
Minimum
0.137
15
6.2
20
4
0.1
2
1
7.5
16.3
10.6
Comp (C) / Grab (G)
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
7.5mg/I
6 mg/I
45mg/1
400/100MI
n/I
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
5 mg/l
2 mg/I
30mg/I
200n00MI
Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
n/I
5m9/I
n/I
n/I
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
15 mg/I
12 mg/I
45mg/I
400/100MI
n/I
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
10 mg/I
4 mg/I
30mg/l
200/100rd
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
0.981
pi
5mg/I
n/I
n/I
Y=ORC B=Back up ORG C)=otner oprerdwr

A��
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
July 9, 2009
Mrs. Christine W. Bralley, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 South Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Mrs. Bralley:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A review of the Dutchman Creek WWTP monitoring report for April 2009 showed the following
violation:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
Fecal Coliform
04/25/09
400 #/100ml
600 #/100ml
Weekly Geometric Mean Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action by the
Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Mickey at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877.623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
NorthCarolina
Naturallff
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

.e
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility:V `a.,RermitlPipe No.:Qa\''1o\ Month/Year
Parameter
Date . Parameter
Average Violations
Permit Limit N-1 DMR Value % Over Limit
N
Date Parameter
Other Violations
eekly Violations
Permit Urnit/TVDe DMR Value % Over Limit
tA00
Frequency Violations
ISIKI ME
Values Reported # of Violations
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff: Date:

L:rr►ue►:
Discharge No. 1
Certified Laboratories
eJv a. e+e ee uu.. r+. v.... �..v. vcui. �� �'...
Month: APRIL 2009
NPDES Permit #NC0021491 J U��C
Class 2 County Davie GRADE 3 Wnstcn1?JQ,11( 336-l284-2028
TRITEST Operator in Responsible Chafje'kvid Nobles
� Perso () Collecting Samples Operators David Nobles Eric Moten
a �� � - L_y - u� Hy this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and
__ . �----.,-;��, her o� natP complete to the best of my knowledge.
(aignatuie
ui
OperaLo
111 RU�Vullalulu
-1"Iy��
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
CO
O
U
Lr)
O
O
OO
O
O
M
CD
(D
CD
Lr)
0
Cl)O
O
U
CDO�
O
p
O
O
M
O
--
_O
m
U
E
a
N
cC
N
a
N
W
v
o
E
N
0
a,
O
s
z
N
°
E
o
X
O
N
a>
L
0
o
is
O
O
tL
m
n
>
N
C
o
(>
>
Z
CL
a
c
(6
n
0i
>,
M
o
a
v
t
7
n
a
N
a
0
O
m
E
E
Q
o
r
t�
H
H
p
O
HRS
HRS
Y/O/B
mgd
C
units
ugl
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
#/100ml
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
1
1015
2.75
Y
0.536
13
3.1
0.1
4
1
25.5
7.14
as
2
1115
1.75
Y
0.550
13
�_
n
3
1015
2.50
Y
0.673
14
4
0.510
5
0.470
_
6
1200
4.00
Y
0.548
17
7
945
3.00
Y
0.518
14
1130
4.00
Y
0.483
15
6.33
20
_
_8
9
10301
1.50
Y
0.467
13
20
5.7
0.5
5
9
7.9
31.5
9.48
10
HOLIDAY
0.643
_
11
1.152
_
12
0.490
_
13
1350
1.00
Y
0.456
13
6.45
_
14
830
4.75
Y
0.607
13
20
2.6
0.1
1
23.3
6.84
15
1110
5.00
Y
0.499
15
20
8.3
_
16
1530
3.00
B
0.488
15
_
17
1100
1.00
B
0.468
14
13
0.476
19
0.461
20
1245
2.50
Y
0.509
18
6.71
20
21
1030
1.50
Y
0.470
17
20
5.1
0.4
10
600
7.9
29.2
13.1
22
1300
3.75
Y
0.459
15
23
1430
2.00
Y
0.444
16
24
905
6.25
Y
0.447
16
25
0.432
_-
26
0.406
_
27
920
2.00
Y
0.428
21
6.65
20
8.9
2.8
1130
4.25
Y
0.441
21
20
29
855
2.50
Y
0.469
21
6.4
0.8
10
12
38.7
12.3
30
1100
3.75
Y
0.435
18
31
Average
0.515
15.8
20
4.58
0.38
6.8
9.1689
8.2
29.6
9.77
Maximum
1.152
21
6.7
20
6.4
0.8
10
600
8.9
38.7
13.1
Minimum
0.406
13
6.3
20
2.6
0.1
4
1
7.9
23.3
6.84
Comp (C) / Grab (G)
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
7.5mg/I
6 mg/I
451'ng/I
400i100ml
n/I
n/I
I
6-9
28 ug/L
5mg/I
2 mg/I
30mg/I
200i100nil
Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
n/I
5mg/I
n/I
n/I
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
15 mgll
12 mg/I
45mg/I
aoo ioo�,i
nll
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
10 mg/I
4 mg/I
30mg/I
2ooiioo� i
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
0.981
n/I
5mg/I
n/I
n/I
Y=ORC B=Back up uret, U=outer upreiawl

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a timetable for improvements to be made.
T'� 21 4} o � A o C-" I w e h a � q1, q >' L� 1 L � ►�,� � 0 �. „4
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Pemuttee Address
PO BOX 768 Cooleemee NC 27014
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
Permitte (Please print or type) County of Davie
,-a'8 S-Z9-v9
Signature of Permittee* Date
Phone Number
336-284-2028
PARAMETER CODES
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
Permit Exp. Date
4-30-09
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting
facility's permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (B).
** If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
(2) (D)•

(no subject)
Subject: (no subject)
From: Steve Mauney <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:54 -0400
To: Steve Tedder <[e-mail]>, Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
Met with John Grey today about the Lake Louise permit certification and it is on the way.in the near
future (10-15days). He asked to input on some projects and they are as following:
1-Mocksville WFP-They expect to submit plans in 60-90 days. There are 2 proposed 50 foot diameter
settling basins and both will have 30 hp mixers. The basin for backwash water will have a floating
decant system. Solids from this basin can be transferred to the other tank. Land application of the solids
is proposed. The big question is if they may be able to discharge the treated wastewater at this location
after dechlorination. I told him that I would pass this question to Mike for evaluation and response. The
second basin will primarily receive the settling basin solids from the water purification process.
2-Spillman pump station. This system is now documented on plans that are 75% complete. He gave me
a copy of them (on your desk) and will send an e-mail to discuss the parts that may need variances from
the MDC.
3-Bermuda Run consideration of an expansion and relocation of WWTP to Carter Creek area which
will discharge below Idols Dam. Carters Creek is "C" and the Yadkin -at this point is "WS-V". We
discussed the review of the project by PWS staff. This could be considered as a slight improvement in
the location of the discharge, even though they will be going from the current 0.19 MGD to an initial
1.0 MGD. Expansion to 2 MGD would be planned for that site in the future. This is still on the QT for
the near future.
Steve Mauney
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
Main # [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Steve Mauney <Steve.Mauney(j NCmail.net>
WSRO
NC DENR
�IAAN)N�\k
oK
1 of 1 4/20/2009 8:12 AM

Utilities Department
Subject: Utilities Department
From: "Jeff Crisco" <Jeff. Crisco@co. davie.nc.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:39:49 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>, "Mike Mickey" <[e-mail]>
All,
am just giving you a heads up as of April 10th 2009 1 am going to work for a private Utilities company. Regretfully
leaving is the best option for the family. I am not sure who will succeed me but in case of an emergency and you
do not get the action you want from Johnny, Jimmy, Mike Weir, David Nobles call Beth Dirks. Thank you and it
has been a great pleasure working with you.
Jeff Crisco
Davie County Director of Public Utilities
261 Chaffin St.
Mocksville, NC 27028
336-753-6090 office
336-751-5855 fax
1 of 1 3/25/2009 2:50 PM

Re: Mocksville Dutchman Creek - NCO021491
Subject: Re: Mocksville Dutchman Creek - NCO021491
From: Kathy Stecker <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:19:29 -0500
To: Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
CC: Tom Belnick <[e-mail]>, Pamela Behm <[e-mail]>
Thank you, Mike, for spotting this!
You probably know that Susan Wilson, who signed the letters, is no longer with DWQ.
Your message is an excellent reminder for us to follow up and see if anybody is
doing as we asked.
To my knowledge, no one protested or said they couldn't do the extra monitoring.
I'm copying Tom Belnick in case he knows of anyone.
Sounds like they might in fact need prodding. Please tell us how that goes!
Thanks again.
-Kathy
Mike Mickey wrote:
Hi Kathy - I was reviewing the above file in preparation for an inspection next
week and noticed the 5/23/08 letter sent to the town requesting additional
monitoring for the High Rock TMDL study. Is the extra monitoring being followed
up on? The recent DMR's for Dutchman only contain total nitrogen values. Just
thought I would ask in case they need prodding. Thanks,.Mike.
Mike Mickey
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Main Office: [phone]
Voice: [phone] FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
NOTICE: Emails sent to and from this account are subject to Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
Kathy Stecker <Kathy.SteckerAncmail.net>
Modeling and TMDL Unit
NCDWQ
1 of 1 3/9/2009 7:43 AM

/*,4r—
��G�p� oF�
�G tic' Performance
gyp\ *(YC
)
5
t�eA�a�
LAInform_ ation
Facility Name: n /
Responsible Person: Do o ; 1�! I g� NT SO U RC�,��
Mailing Address: i7 O Box -76 kLo dL z ZW Ll
Phone Number: ?� I-) - 2 r-4 -. Z O 1 k
Permit Number(s): �..-Cl I ` 4 9 1
Description of Treatment ho, r tCesi n 1 a2 �c� i �r �saS' ^ Sew �n nary
System or Process:
II. Performance
Summary of System Performance: (fist all violations, corrective actions, improvements, etc.)
Feh-�9 L,o8 a Oukl p o.f-Qj_PQ YsApclA hod a WQ.klu I monA14
1.j-0'�g I.a
o4�011 ROD 1/,'"�" /ANQ -0( _1 OQILkly �0-0( D'o
��Nbler`, by r')L3D Ir% UUN5 r,
III. Notification
etAtP hnw mwtnmem/users have been provided access to this report (mailing, posted, etc.):
IV. Certification
Sign and daft to certify that the report is accurate and complete:
Signature of Permittee Date
Mail o iOW and taro dies to:
System PafWnarwe Annual Report
NC Division of water Quidity
1617 Mad service Cep
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
(Attach additional sheets if neoesswy)
f;. n
VU

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 16, 2009
Mrs. Christine W. Bralley, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Mocksville's Dutchman Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Davie County
Dear Mrs. Bralley:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On March 12, 2009, Mike Mickey of this office met with David Nobles, ORC, Eric Moten and Jeff Crisco
to perform a Compliance Evaluation Inspection on Mocksville's Dutchman Creek wastewater treatment system.
This type of inspection consists of two basic parts: an in office file review and an on -site inspection of the
treatment facility. The attached EPA inspection form notes the eight (8) areas that were evaluated for this
inspection. The findings and observations are outlined below:
I. Permit
The NPDES permit expires on June 30, 2009. Your renewal package was submitted as required and was received
in our Raleigh office on January 5, 2009. Additionally, it was noted that Davie County staff took over operation of
the facility beginning in August. Their efforts have improved the operation and effluent quality of the facility
considerably. - As discussed during the inspection, the total residual chlorine compliance level changed to 50 ug/l
per the attached May 1, 2008 correspondence. Also discussed was the requirement that all test results on the
characteristics of the effluent, including but not limited to NPDES Permit Monitoring Requirements, shall be
reported on the monthly report forms per 15A NCAC 02B .0506(b)(3)(J).
II. Self -Monitoring Program
The monthly self -monitoring reports were reviewed for the months January 2008 through December 2008. The
facility experienced one TSS weekly average violation, two fecal coliform weekly average violations and numerous
monthly average and weekly average BOD violations over the first part of the year. In October two daily minimum
pH violations were noted (see data summary attached). The facility was in compliance with all final NPDES
effluent limits for September, November and December. The violations noted above have already been addressed
by correspondence from this office. In regards to permit monitoring requirements, it was noted that all sampling
was performed per the frequencies specified in the permit, except for the missed total nitrogen, total phosphorus
and NH3-N values for the week of December 15-19.
III. Flow Measurement
Three Prosonic flow meters are used to report influent flow. Our regulations require annual calibration of meters
used to report flow on the monthly reports. The meters were last calibrated on May 7, 2008 by Carolina Technical
North Carolina Division of Water Duality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Aahma Y
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer "

Mrs. Christine Bralley
Page # 2
Services, Inc. In regards to sample collection, please note that flow proportioned effluent composite samples must
be collected. At present, composite samples are being collected by the constant time and constant volume method.
Per the definition of composite sample in the NPDES permit (See defmitions in Part H.Section A), the constant
time/constant volume method may only be used in situations where daily effluent flow rates vary less than 15
percent. Since the daily flow values at Dutchman Creek vary more than 15 percent, flow proportioned composite
samples must be collected. The composite sampler must be able to received electronic flow input signals from the
meter to comply with the above requirement.
IV. Sludge Handling and Disposal
Solids are stored in the large aerobic digester. Residuals are land applied under non -discharge permit #
WQ0003351 by EMA Resources, Inc.
V. Operations and Maintenance
No concerns or problems were noted with the operation of the facility. The emergency transfer of sludge this
winter to the Cooleemee WWTP helped to lower the solids inventory at the Dutchman facility allowing it to
maintain compliance the BOD limit.
VI. Facility Site Review
The 0.981 MGD facility consists of the following: influent pump station, splitter box, three manual bar screens,
three parshall flumes w/passive grit removal, three rectangular aeration basins with two surface aerators each, three
circular secondary clarifiers, gas disinfection, dual contact chamber w/aeration and sulfur dioxide gas
dechlorination.
VII. Records/Reports
A review of the operators daily operation and monitoring logs found that they were being maintained according to
the permit. The Annual Performance Report for fiscal year 7/07-6/08 was prepared as required by Part II (E)(12) of
the NPDES Permit. Please note, however, that the annual report did not list any effluent limit violations that.
occurred at the Dutchman Creek facility for the time period covered by the annual report. All violations should be
included in future reports per the guidance provided during the inspection.
VIII. Effluent/Receiving Waters
The system discharges into Dutchman Creek, Class "C" waters in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. The effluent
was clear on the day of the inspection.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Mike Mickey or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Crisco (Director of Public Utilities, County of Davie, 261 Chaffin Street, Mocksville, NC 27028)
Central Files
WSRO

Town of Mocksville
Dutchman Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Self -Monitoring Data Summary
January 2008 — December 2008
Parameters
Monthly Avg.
Permit Limit
Monthly Avg. Limit
Violations per DMR
Weekly Avg.
Permit Limit
Weekly Limit
Violations per DMR
Flow (MGD)
0.981
None
-
NA
BOD (mg/L)
(5.0 / 10.0)*
Feb, April, May, June,
(7.5 / 15.0)*
Feb, April, May, July
JujY
TSS (mg/L)
30.0
None
45.0
April
NH3-N (mg/L)
(2.0 — 4.0)*
None
(6.0—12.0)*
None
Fecal (#/100 ml)
200
None
400
April & August
Cyanide (ug/L)
-
NA
22.0**
None
pH (S.U.)
-
NA
(6.0 — 9.0)***
October
Chronic Toxicity
P/F @ 37 %
None
-
NA
T. Chlorine (ug/L)
-
NA
28.0** .
None
* (Summer / Winter) limits
**Daily maximum limit.
* * *Daily maximum and minimum limits.
BOD Monthly Averace Limit violations:
11.28 mg/l for February 2008
12.92 mg/1 for April 2008
8.1 mg/1 for May 2008
5.4 mg/1 for June 2008
7.84 mg/1 for July 2008
TSS Weekly Average Limit Violation:
67 mg/l for the week 3/31-4/4
Fecal Coliform Weekly Average Limit violations:
600/100 ml for the week 3/31-4/4
480/100 ml for the week of 8/24-8/29
pH Daily Minimum Violations:
5.33 S.U. on 10/10
5.88 S.U. on 10/31
BOD Weekly Averace Limit violations:
16.9 mg/l for the week 2/25-29
30.2 mg/l for the week 3/31-4/4
7.6 mg/l. for the week 4/14-18
17.6 mg/1 for the week 4/28-5/2
8.2 mg/l for the week 5/12-15
13.8 mg/l for the week 5/19-23
8.2 mg/l for the week 7/14-18
11.0 mg/l for the week 7/21-25
9.7 mg/1 for the week 7/28-8/1
Monitoring Omissions:
N113-N, Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus missed the week of 12/15-19

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
I 201 1
1 I N� 2 31 NCO021491 111 121 09/03/12 117 161'I 191 GJ
U u U -1
Remarks
21111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIH6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---- -------- —------- --- Reserved --------- -------- --
67 j 69 70 ) 3) 71 I tyI 72 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I I 180
=—t u u�
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:55 AM 09/03/12
05/08/01
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
295 Garwood Rd
Mocksville NC 27028
11:05 AM 09/03/12
09/06/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(suPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
David William Nobles/ORC/336-284-2028/
Jeff Crisco/County Davie Dir Public Utilities of/336-753-6090 /
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Christine W Bralley,171 S Clement St Mocksville NC
27028//336-751-2259/3367519187 Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See'attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael M Mickey WSRO WQ//336-771-5000/
Signature of nagement Q A Re ' r Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
3'
4
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Davie County took over operation of the Mocksville Dutchman Creek
facility starting in August 2008. The noncompliance issues experienced in the first of
the year have been remedied by improved solids management and other operational
changes.
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The permit expires next on 6-30-09. The renewal package from Mocksville
was received in Raleigh on 1-5-09.
Record Keeping
Yes No
NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ ❑
❑ Q
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Page # 3

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ■ ❑ n n
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The operators maintain daily operation and monitoring logs as required by
the permit. A comparison of the laboratory data sheets and the monthly monitoring
reports revealed that the data is being transcribed onto the DMR correctly. An annual
report was submitted for the review period 7/07-6/08, however, it did not list the NPDES
violations that occured during the period of review.
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
n n ❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■
❑ ❑ n
Are all pumps present?
■
n ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
■
n ❑ n
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The pump station is maintained by the Town of Mocksville.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑ ❑ n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑ n ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
n
n n ■
Comment: The facility has three influent flow meters (Prosonic FMU 861) located at
the parshall flumes infront of the aeration basins. The flow from each meter is
electronically totaled by the SCADA system for reporting purposes. The meter was last
calibrated by Carolina Technical Services, Inc., on 5/7/08.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual ■
b.Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ■ n n n
Is the screen free of excessive debris? ■ ❑ n n
Page # 4

Y
Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Is disposal of screening in compliance? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The screens are located prior to the parshall flumes. The flume troughs
are also used for passive grit collection. Cleaning occurs approximately twice per year.
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment: Three rectangular basins with 2 surface aerators each.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No
NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black- and odorous wastewater?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Are weirs level?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the drive unit operational?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the return rate acceptable,(low turbulence)?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/. of the sidewall depth)
❑ ❑
❑ ■
Comment: Three circular secondary clarifiers.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No
NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
❑ ❑
❑ ■
Page # 5

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No NA NE
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
ODDS
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
❑
n Q ■
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
❑ n Q
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
Q n
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■
n n n
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
n
■ n n
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
n
Q ■ n
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: The chlorine is fed manually.
De -chlorination
Yes
No NA NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑
■ n Q
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
❑
n Q ■
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
❑
0 n ■
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
n
❑ ■ n
Comment: Dechlor is also fed manually.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
n
n ■ n
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: -
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Q
■ n n
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
Q n n
■
❑ Q Q
Is proper volume collected?
'
Is the tubing clean?
■
O n n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
Q ❑ O
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
■
D n n
Page # 6

Permit: NCO021491 Owner - Facility: Dutchman Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Samglina Yes No NA NE
Comment: Samples are not collected by flow proportion. They are collected by
constant time and constant volume (96 mis). Please note that flow proportioned
composite samples must be collected of the effluent. Per the composite definition in the
NPDES permit (See Part II, Section A), the constant time/constant volume method may
only be used in situations where daily effluent flow rates vary less than 15%. Since the
Dutchman Creek values vary by more than 15%, flow proportioned composite sampling
is required. The composite sampler must be able to receive electronic flow input signals
from the flow meter. This change should be accomplished in 2009.
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other.than trace amounts and other debris?
■
❑
❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Comment: The discharge to Dutchman Creek was observed to be clear.
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No.
NA NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
1100
Is the mixing adequate?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
❑
❑
❑ ■
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: The new large aerobic digester is the only tank used for sludge storage.
Residuals are land applied under Nondischarge Permit W00003351 by EMA
Resources, Inc.
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is the generator tested under load?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑
❑
❑ ■
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
❑
❑
❑ 0
Comment: The 400 kW generator can operate the entire facility. It is tested every
Monday.
Page # 7

To:
Subject:
May 1, 2008
NPDES Permittees
Total Residual Chlorine 50 ug/1 Compliance Level
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
In a previous letter dated August 14, 2001, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) notified
NPDES permittees that water/wastewater treatment facilities with Total Residual Chlorine
(TRC) effluent limits would be required to use analytical methods that produce detection levels
below their permit limit by July 1, 2002. [Note: TRC permit limits are typically set between 17
to 28 ug/1 for discharge to freshwater systems, and 13 ug/1 for discharge to saltwater systems].
This requirement was based on an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) audit of the NC
enforcement program. It was also necessary to ensure water quality protection and compliance
with state monitoring regulations [15A NCAC 213.0505(e)(4)].
Since that time, DWQ has received several inquiries regarding difficulties with the new
analytical methods, primarily focused on 1) lack of precision with field instrumentation at low
TRC levels for both water and wastewater treatment plants; and 2) manganese interference with
TRC measurement at several water treatment plants. Some facilities have overcome these
problems through various changes, such as: 1) switching dechlorination chemicals; 2) adding a
second dechlorination feed; 3) changing analytical methods; 4) incorporating manganese
correction; 5) switching to UV disinfection; 6) removing sludge from water treatment plant
settling basins. Also, the DWQ Laboratory Certification staff have provided extensive field
assistance for the new lab methods. Still, some analytical issues remain. In response to the
permittee's concerns, the Division is providing the following changes to its TRC requirements:
o TRC Compliance Level Changed to 50 ug/1. DWQ continued discussions with EPA
regarding analytical difficulties with TRC measurements, and in March 2008 received .
EPA 'approval to allow a 50 ug/1 TRC compliance level. This will not change the.
analysis, annual verification of meter performance, or data reporting, but simply how the;
reported values will be evaluated by DWQ from a compliance standpoint. Facilities will
still be required to report actual results on their monthly DMR submittals, but for
compliance purposes all TRC values below 50 ug/1 will be treated as zero. For example,
if the facility has a TRC limit of 17 ug/1 and reports a TRC value of 40 ug/1 on the DMR,
this value will be considered compliant under this new policy. This new compliance
level is effective March 1, 2008 (beginning with March 2008 DMR submittals).
DWQ will continue to incorporate TRC effluent limitations into NPDES permits for all
water/wastewater treatment facilities that discharge chlorine -bearing wastestreams to surface
waters. While this new TRC compliance level of 50 ug/1 is effective beginning March 1, 2008, it
will. be incorporated into existing NPDES permits with TRC effluent limits upon permit renewal.
At that time, the following TRC footnote language will added to the Effluent Limitations Sheet:
"The facility shall report all effluent TRC values reported by a NC certified laboratory including
field certified. However, effluent values below 50 ug/1 will be treated as zero for compliance
purposes."
Division of Water Quality, Point Source Branch Telephone [phone] tIeU4911h,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 FAX [phone] Carolina
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 On the Internet at http://h2o.ennstatenc.us/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2 of 2
May 1, 2008
TRC 50 ug/1 Compliance Memo
DWQ reserves the right to modify this policy in the future as analytical methods evolve. If you
have questions about the content of this letter, please contact Tom Belnick at [phone],
extension 543. If you need assistance with your TRC analytical methodology, please contact
Gary Francies with the DWQ Water Quality Lab at [phone]
Sincerely,
Matt Matthews, Supervisor
Point Source Branch ,
2

Ty.tchrM Creek WWTP
Subject: Dutchman Creek WWTP
From: Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:09:06 -0400
To: Jeff Crisco <[e-mail]>, David Nobles <[e-mail]>
Jeff & David - Although we discussed the fact last Thursday that flow proportioned
composite samples are not currently collected at Dutchman Creek, I did not indicate
that this was a problem. I should have. The NPDES permit requires the collection
of composite samples by flow proportion. Attached is an electronic copy of a
letter previously sent to the town. A later email from Nick indicated that the
flow proportion issue would be addressed during the upgrade of Dutchman. Evidently
that did not happen. The inspection letter that goes out tomorrow will mention the
deficiency and require that flow proportioned samples be collected. I imagine that
you need to contact Carolina Technical Services to see if the Prosonic meters can
be connected to the composite sampler. Is that something that can be accomplished
in the near future? Thanks, Mike.
Mike Mickey
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Main Office: [phone]
Voice: [phone] FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
C
Dutchmans composite letter-l.docontent-Type: application/msword
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 3/16/2009 3:09 PM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 6, 2006
Christine W. Sanders
Town of Mocksville
171 S Clement St
Mocksville NC 27028
Subject: Flow Proportional Composite Sampling
Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman's Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
The Division is reviewing sampling procedures at facilities throughout the State during routine
inspections; in particular, with regards to composite sampling requirements as defined in North
Carolina's Administrative Code [15A NCAC 2B .0503(4)] and in the POTWs NPDES permit (Part II
Section A).
Dutchman's Creek WWTP's permit contains a definition of a `composite sample', along with four
methods for performing such sampling. Dutchman's Creek WWTP's composite samples are obtained
using the `constant time/ constant volume' method, which can only be used in situations where
effluent flow rates vary less than 15% and with prior approval from the Director. Records show that
the flow at Dutchman's Creek WWTP varies more than 15%, and this office feels that this will
continue to be the case after future upgrades are completed.
Therefore, this office requires the POTW to begin using one of the other three, flow -proportional
methods for pulling composite samples in order to comply with the permit. The deadline for
implementing an approved composite sampling method is December 1, 2006. If you cannot meet the
deadline, please call the regional office as soon as possible to discuss the possibility of extending the
deadline. Failure to implement an approved method may result in a violation, and possible
enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Jenifer Carter at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
cc: SAT — Central Files
WSRO Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

/r
Lop
NOod Ln
\
f
1
a I
I
��
Covenant
o� oo
i`
ai r
Cypru
CV.Dr
O✓
'
r m ,N
Cree-.kside _r
o
e
�
c°�
44—
CD
Jo
3huas WyAo
o G
cc
_ r,
nCD
Gr�
v
mcn
/
64
zII )
T
C,acW09"
cy-
U L
w T(09
<n
i
�
Faith
New Calvary Ch. Wy
Ln_
y-
.._
Cockerharn Ln
T

F
WDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 6, 2009
Ms. Beth M. Dirks, County Manager
Davie County
123 South Main Street
Mocksville, North Carolina 27028
SUBJECT: Flow Reallocation
Eastern Davie County
Dear Ms. Dirks:
It was a pleasure to meet with you, Jeff Crisco, Davie County Utilities and John Grey, P.E on
January 27, 2009 to discuss the reallocation of flows to the projects in Eastern Davie County.
The data that was presented at the meeting has been further refined by Mr. Grey and was
received at our office on February 4, 2009.
These calculations show the initial allocation at 554,026 gallons and a current average daily use
of 221,000 gallons. The remaining available sewer flow of 333,026 gallons is further divided
into the committed but unpermitted category which shows 175,285 gallons of reserved flows.
The final calculation yields 157,741 gallons of retrievable allocation. While there may be some
uncertainties in this type evaluation, we are comfortable with the numbers that have been
presented. It is our recommendation that you consider 75% of the 157,741 gallons or 118,300
gallons as available for new projects. This is in addition to your reserved flow of 175,285
gallons. We must caution you that the ultimate responsibility to comply with the allocation from
Winston-Salem / Forsyth County Utility Commission at the flow metering station rests with
Davie County. If there are any significant changes in flow conditions and you would like to
revisit this issue, please contact me.
If you have any questions on this letter do not hesitate to contact me or Steve Mauney at 771-5000.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
CC: David Saunders, P.E., Director of Utilities, City County Utility Commission
John Grey, P.E.
Deborah Gore, PERCS
SWP-Central Files
WSRO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
naturally

Flow Allocation
Number
I Name
Allocation
Percent
Completion
jAverage
jDailyUse
I Permitted
I Flow
Retrievable
Allocation
lCommitted
jUnpermitted
1
A Child's World
850
100%
790
850
60
0
2
A Cleaner World
2,500
100%
941
2,500
1,559
0
3
Ace Hardware
300
100%
165
300
135
0
4
Adams Egloff
69,000
60%
37,648
41,400
3,752
27,600
5
B R West, Hidden Creek
Nursing Home, Golf Course,
Residential
75,000
95%
30,437
71,250
40,813
3,750
6
Bank of Davie
150
100%
136
150
14
0
7
Bermuda Run
17,500
0%
0
0
17,500
8
BP Gas
300
100%
289
300
11
0
9
Car Wash
7,000
100%
4,837
7,000
2,163
0
10
Carl Johnson
4,500
100%
2,092
4,500
2,408
0
11
Country Cove
6,480
100%
1,641
6,480
4,839
0
12
Dr. Jerry Hauser
800
100%
221
800
579
0
13
Dr. Suzanne Hess
150
100%
74
150
76
0
14
Hillsdale Baptist Church
400
75%
258
300
42
100
15
Hillsdale Group
80,000
50%
5,425
40,000
34,575
40,000
16
Hillsdale Kennel
750
100%
750
750
0
17
Image Matters
1,600
100%
164
1,600
1,436
0
18
Jeff Harrison
22,500
100%
5,245
22,500
17,255
0
19
Mrs. Carl Johnson
550
0
0
550
20 -
NC Dot - 1-40 Rest Area
30,000
100%
8,550
30,000
21,450
0
21 Oak Valley
140,000
80%
98,160
. 112,000
13,840
28,000
22 Shady Grove School
10,000
100%
1,558
10,000
8,442
0
23 Texaco Express Lube
250
100%
127
250
123
0
24 Vanhoy Johnson
175
100%
18
175
157
0
25 Wachovia First Union
175
0%
0
0
175
26 Wayne Webb
2,500
100%
224
2,500
2,276
0
27 Wendys
3,760
100%
1,287
3,760
2,473
0
28 Yadkin Valley Telephone
50
100%
15
50
35
0
29 Brandon Rehab
1,500
-
0
0
1,500
30 Dr. Emily Robinson
400
100%
217
400
183
0
31 Hillsdale UMC
400
85%
283
340
57
60
32 Dr.Beeson
500
100%
375
500
125
0
33 Northwest Property Group
(Hillsdale
Commons Proj.)
8,800
50%
72
4,400
4,328
4,400
34 Cox Auto
100
0%
0
0
100
35 Bandy Insurance
400
0%
0
0
400
36 MBHF Properties
100
100%
39
100
61
0
37 Dr. Thomas Browder
1,000
80%
101
800
699
200
38 H & V
600
0
0
600
39 Todd Bailey
200
100%
119
200
81
0
40 Tribeh Properties
350
0
0
350
41 BB&T
100
100%
11
100
89
0
42 WFBMC Medical
650
100%
86
650
564
0
43 Twin Cities Youth Soccer
1,000
100%
1,000
1,000
0
44 Moby's
150
100%
334
150
-184
0
45 Creekwood
50,000
0%
0
0
50,000
46 W. Ellis Middle School
10,536
100%
447
10,536
10,089
0
Total for All:
554,026
202,386
378,741
176,355
175,285
221,000
-18,614
157,741
2/6/2009

RE: Rowan Pointe
Subject: RE: Rowan Pointe
From: "Christine Bralley" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:46:46 -0500
To: "Mike Mickey" <[e-mail]>, "Todd Poteet" <[e-mail]>
Hello Gentlemen,
Hard copies were mailed yesterday. Thanks for checking, Bralley is correct, I got married.
Please make the email change for your records: cbralley(aD_mocksvillenc.gov
Regards,
Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
336-753-6701
From: Mike Mickey [mailto: Mike. [e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:14 AM
To: Todd Poteet; Christine Bralley
Subject: Re: Rowan Pointe
Todd & Christine - A revised copy of the FTSE form for Rowan Pointe just arrived. However, the
form was not signed and dated. Can you resend? Also, the name in the certification statement was
listed as Christine W. Bralley. Is that correct? Thanks, Mike.
On 1/16/2009 3:19 PM, Todd Poteet wrote:
I have not received anything from the Town. Thanks for the reminder, I will check and see what the hold up is.
Todd
From: Mike Mickey [mailto: Mike. [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 2:17 PM
To: Todd Poteet
Subject: Re: Rowan Pointe
Todd - Just following up on our previous email. I have not seen a revised FTSE form yet for the
above project. Is is still in the works? Thanks, Mike.
On 1/5/2009 11:54 AM, Todd Poteet wrote:
Mike,
1. Yes, the wastewater will go through the pump station.
2. Yes, the calculations appear to be correct.
I will revise the FTSE form to include the pump station and resubmit.
Thanks,
Todd Poteet
West Consultants, PLLC
1 of 3 1/21/2009 10:08 AM

W)rdt canon,
�l
Division of Environmental Health
Terry L. Pierce, Director
Public Water Supply Section
Division of
Environmental Health
Jessica G. Miles, Section Chief
December 1, 2008
Ms. Christine Sanders, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
State of North Carolina
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
William G. Ross, Secretary
Re: 2008 Water System Inspection
Mocksville, Town of
PWSID #02-30-010, Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
On November 10, 2008, I inspected the Town of Mocksville's Water System. Below you will find a list of
requirements and recommendations resulting from the inspection.
1. The water plant does not have alum sludge or a back wash water disposal system. This has been
addressed in the last eight inspections. Provisions must be made for disposal of water treatment
plant wastes. (15A NCAC 18C .0404 (k) (1))
2. The water plant's settled water detention time is not sufficient. The old side of the plant has
approximately 30 minutes of detention time, and the newer side has around 45 minutes. This
has been mentioned in the last eight inspections and in a letter from Lee Spencer, dated
October 11, 1999. A theoretical detention time in the sedimentation basins is to be a
minimum of four hours as specified by the Rules Governing Public Water Systems.
(15A NCAC 18C .0706 (b))
3. The elevated tanks, emergency inter -connections, and any future distribution system appendage
should have E911 addresses assigned and posted. This would be invaluable for emergency
responders during a crisis (i.e. an injured employee) and for system mapping purposes.
4. The older 120,000 gallon clear well has excessive concrete deterioration. The larger 1,000,000
gallon clear well is starting to show signs of concrete spalling. The town should consider recoating
the outsides of both clear wells to prevent any more deterioration.
5. It would be advantageous to test all four emergency inter -connections with Davie County. This
would help determine what needed to be done in order to make the connections useful. This was
mentioned in the 2007 inspection.
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Telephone [phone] ♦ Fax [phone] ♦ Lab Form Fax [phone] NorthCarohna
http://ncdrinkingwater.state.nc.us/ Naturally
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

ri
Ms. Christine Sanders, Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
December 1, 2008
Page 2 of 2
This office is aware of the Town's effort in establishing and maintaining the multiple barrier approach to
protection of public health. The source water intake has been protected from livestock, and the plant's clear
well has been reconfigured for a better disinfection contact time. Please submit to this office a current
timeline and descriptions of the different phases of the plant upgrade and system improvements.
Your attention in addressing the requirements and recommendations outlined in this letter in a timely manner
will be greatly appreciated. Mr. Beane was very helpful in providing the information needed to complete this
inspection.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tom Boyd
Environmental Senior Specialist
Public Water Supply Section
cc: Jessica G. Miles, Chief, Public Water Supply Section
Geoff Beane, Water Plant ORC

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: t✓ +—. �� Permit/Pipe No.: "MWM\ Month/Year
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
W ail iolations
D to Parameter Permit Limitfl'vpe DMR Value % Over Limit
Monito ' g Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Permit Frequency Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violations
Completed by: d\ ' Date: b `' rz)! \
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor Signoff: Date:

tmuent',__' uumnman c:reeK
Month: OCTOBER 2008
NPDES Permit #NC0021491 qvsh I j
Discharge No. 1 Class 2 County Davie GRADE 3' Phgni 336-284-2028
vYinston as om
Certified Laboratories TRITEST Operator in Responsible ChaFgei &mid Nobles
Person(s) Collecting Samples Op
(Signature of Operator in Responsible charoe)
Date
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and
complete to the best of my knowledge.
O
to
O
O
to
o
,-
O
O
O
O
O
It
O
O
o
(0
O
O
tt")
O
M
O
O
O
r
CO
O
O
o
M
to
O
O
(0
(0
-
CO-
O
O
M
O
O
o
O
(0
O
O
to
(0
(0
O
O
O
♦-
m
Q
o
m
0
C
1-
8
�°
N
O
Y
c
O
U
O
1
3
O
LL
01
N
U
li
li
y
E
F-
I aI
`o
r
U
f0
3
N
oU
0
0
co
2
m
'E
E
Q
a
m
c
a
N
rn
N
E
o
-
U
lL
N
X
O
v
N
>
0
rn
o
""'
Z
v
1-
L
CL
0
o
a
m
I-
A
0
fjl.
HRS
HRS
Y/O/B
mgd
I C
I units
I ugl
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
#/100ml
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
1
1110
1.50
Y
0.677
20
6.42
20
21
0.1
11
180
8.1
19.2
7.53
2
945
1.00
Y
0.532
18
3
1250
2.75
Y
0.511
18
4
0.502
51
1
0.429
6
1045
3.75
Y
0A72
19
2
0.1
1
9
20
7.8
7
1015
1.50
B
0.510
21
8
950
3.00
Y
0.558
19
26
9.5
9
835
5.00
Y
0,554
19
10
950
4.75
Y
0.5351
21
5.33
22
11
0.483
12
0.433
13
1435
1.50
Y
0.473
19
6.14
14
1010
4.50
Y
0.484
18
21
5.1
0.2
2
5
9.6
84.6
7.01
15
1155
2.50
Y
0.439
19
20
16
1040
4.75
Y
0.440
20
17
1000
3.50
Y
0.513
20
18
0.451
19
0.385
20
1020
2.00
B
0.394
14
20
21
950
3.00
B
0.451
13
3.7
0.1
10
1
31.9
6.78
22
1054
1.50
B
0.445
14
23
23
1020
3.00
B
0.439
12
6.21
12.1
24
905
4.75
Y
0.440
13
25
0.467
26
0.374
27
1100
2.50
Y
0.408
15
20
11.9
28
1110
1.50
O
0.424
13
29
1010
2.50
B
0.442
12
20
2
0.5
2
1
31.1
7.52
30
1050
4.50
B
0.434
12
311
15151
0.417
13
5.88
Average
0.468
16.6
21.333
2.96
0.2
3.2
6.0492
10.2
37.4
7.33
Maximum
0.677
21
6.4
26
5.1
0.5
10
180
12.1
84.6
7.8
Minimum
0.3741
12
5.3
20
2
0.1
1
1
8.1
19.2
6.78
Comp (C) / Grab (G)
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
n/1
7.5m /1
6 mg/1
45mg/I
400/100mi
5mg/I
n/I
n/I
n/I
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
5 mg/1
2 mg/1
30mg/1
200/100mi
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
0.981
n/I
15 mg/I
12 mg/I
45mg/I
400/100m1
5mg/1
n/1
n/I
n/l
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
10 mg/I
4 mg/1
30mg/I
200/100mll
Y=ORC B=Back up ORC O=other oprerator

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
0
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Compliant
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a timetable for improvements to be made. _ , , ,
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permittee Address
PO BOX 768 Cooleemee NC 27014
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
Permitte (Please print or type) Town Of Mocksville
Signature of Permittee* Date
Phone Number
336-284-2028
PARAMETER CODES
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
Permit Exp. Date
6-30-09
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting
facility's permit for reporting data.
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (B).
* * If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
(2) (D)•

0 `\
f�Q�E a�'`l0�
e �

Weekly Average Violation
Subject: Weekly Average Violation
From: Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:46:04 -0500
To: "jeffic >> Jeff Crisco" <Jeff. Crisco@co. davie.nc.us>
Jeff - As you are aware, the recent civil penalty document (LV-2008-0421) sent for August violations
at the Mocksville Dutchman Creek facility actually involved data that was reported in July.
Specifically, the 9.7 mg/l BOD value reported on 7/29/08 was listed as an August violation of the BOD
weekly average limit. This was due to there being a "split week", where part of the week falls in July
and part in August.
The definition of weekly average contained in the permit is "The arithmetic mean of all daily discharges
of a pollutant measured during the calendar week". A calendar week is defined as Sunday through
Saturday. So, even though your sample was collected on 7/29, the computer had to wait until the
August report was received so it could include August 1 st (Friday) and August 2nd (Saturday) in the
calculation had more data been reported.
I hope that makes sense. Mike.
1 of 1 11/25/2008 10:46 AM

0
November 24, 2008
Sherri Knight, Regional Supervisor
DWQ-Aquifer Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
RE: Town of Mocksville Sludge Transfer
Dear Ms. Knight:
This letter is a follow-up request discussed with Derek Denard of your office on Friday,
November 21, 2008. On behalf of the Town of Mocksville, we are requesting the emergency
approval for the transfer of approximately 200,000 gallons of aerobically digested sludge. The
sludge has been generated at the Town of Mocksville's Dutchman's Creek WWTP. The
proposed receiving facility would be Davie County's Cooleemee WWTP.
The Dutchman's Creek WWTP is generating a greater amount of solids than their historical
record. Davie County personnel began operations of the Dutchman Creek WWTP in July 2008.
The plant has already wasted four times the annual volume in just five months.
This request is due to the pressure that this volume has placed on the small land based in the
existing permit (WQ0003351). We are proposing to the Town of Mocksville to increase the land
base by 100-150 acres.
The proposed transfer to the Cooleemee WWTP would have the sludge off-loaded into one of
two sludge storage basins. The Cooleemee WWTP is fortunate to have a 1.5 MG and 3 MG
storage basins. The blended sludge would be land applied under the Davie County permit
(WQ0010583) in 2009.
If you have any questions concerning this request, you may contact Roy Whitaker at 336-909-
1718.
Respectfully,
EMA Resources Inc.
Roy L. Whitaker
Roy L. Whitaker
Director Business Development/Operations
cc Ed Hardee, Derek Denard
Phone [phone] —Fax 336*751.1442
755 Yadkinville Road — Mocksville, NC 27028

[Fwd: RE:tPutchmans Creek]
0-
Subject: [Fwd: RE: Dutchmans Creek]
From: Steve Tedder <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:27:32 -0500
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
fyi
•------- Original Message--------
Subject:RE: Dutchmans Creek
Date:Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:31:39 -0500
From:jgrey <jrrey(a,greyengineering.com>
Reply-To:<i grey(&greyengineering.com>
To: <Steve. TedderAN C m ai l . n et>
References:<491 AD5F6.2050909 &ncmail.net>
<795920253-1226533564-cardhu decombobulator blackberrv.rim.net-1545863575-(dbxe303.bisx.prod.on.blackberry--
<492153FB.9080201(aD,ncmail.net>
Steve,
�1.
David Nobles became ORC of the Dutchmans plant on and discovered that
the MLSS/VLSS were much too high. He worked intensively get them down and
remove solids. The plant was compliant for BOD in August (3.5) and September
(2.0).
It appears that the plant will produce good results when properly operated.
We have also been working to discover the source of low pH influent but as
yet have not been successful. Work on that continues.
Hope this helps.
John
-----Original Message -----
From: Steve Tedder [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 6:23 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Dutchmans Creek
Morning John,
Any response from David?
Steve
Steve Tedder
[e-mail]
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(336)-771-4950
Fax [phone]
On 11/12/2008 6:46 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Steve,
> I have asked the operator (David Nobles) to fax me some data and will
respond more substantialy tomorrow (Thurs.).
> John
> Sent from my B1ackBerryR wireless handheld
> -----Original Message-----
* From: Steve Tedder <[e-mail]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:11:18
> To: john Gray<[e-mail]>
> Subject: Dutchmans Creek
> John,
> Since 11/07 till present there seems to be a pattern of noncompliance
1 of2 11/18/2008 7:52 AM

[Fwd: ,RE: *f�)utchmans Creek]
> with BOD at the Dutchman facility. You have any insight as to what their
> problems are?
> Thanks
> Steve
Steve Tedder
[e-mail]
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(336)-771-4950
Fax [phone]
Steve Tedder <Steve.Tedder(d,NCmail.net>
WSRO
NC DENR
2 of 2 11/18/2008 7:52 AM

2tiormer Mocksville workers plead guilty
http://www.printtliis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=2+for...
Winston-Salem Journal
Click to Print
2 former Mocksville workers plead guilty
Public -works director took kickbacks, falsified reports
By Michael Hewlett
JOURNAL REPORTER
Published: November 8, 2008
MOCKSVILLE
C='_21 PRINTTHIS
SAVE THIS I EMAIL THIS I Close
Mocksville's former public -works director pleaded guilty tin federal court his week to charges that he ordered employees to
falsify reports on the quality of the town's drinking water, had them dump extra chemicals into the town's wastewater plant in
order to get kickbacks, and used town equipment and state inmates for his side business.
Daniel L. Smith, who became the public -works director in 1994, pleaded guilty Thursday in U.S. District Court in Greenville,
according to a news release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District. Smith resigned in December.
Nicholas Slogick, who oversaw operations at the town's water- and sewage -treatment plants, pleaded guilty Wednesday in
Greenville, the news release said. Slogick was fired in July.
State environmental officials say that there no threat to the town's water at any time.
"We have no evidence that there was a health concern," said Tom Boyd, a senior environmental specialist in the public -water
section of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
The charges were the result of a yearlong investigation by the criminal division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and the State Bureau of Investigation.
The town has to submit data to the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources about the turbidity of the town's
water in order to meet federal environmental regulations.
Turbidity refers to the amount of cloudiness in water, Boyd said. If the water is too cloudy, that may obscure disease -causing
bacteria, he said.
Smith is accused of instructing employees to send false data that understated the turbidity of the town's drinking water.
He also conspired to violate the Clean Water Act by getting town employees to "pour massive amounts of degreaser and caustic,
a corrosive chemical," into the town's sewer system, according to federal prosecutors. Smith received kickbacks because he
would dump the chemicals and then get the town to buy more.
The extra chemicals caused problems in the wastewater -treatment process and resulted in a town violation of state
environmental requirements, Boyd said.
Smith also is accused of using town equipment and employees for his personal business, Danny Smith Enterprises, said Ivan
Vikin, the acting special agent in charge of the EPA's Criminal Investigation Division in Atlanta. The company provided
maintenance and repair services to other towns and residents. Smith is also accused of using state inmates assigned to town
projects to work for his company. According to federal prosecutors, he never asked permission or reimbursed the town.
Smith knows what he did was wrong, said his attorney, Walter C. Holton Jr., but Smith's intent in sending false data was to
protect the town from a fine by state and federal environmental agencies.
"His motivation was not to enrich himself," Holton said. "It was to protect the town of Mocksville from getting a several hundred
thousand -dollar fine from the EPA."
1 of 2 11 / 12/2008 7:57 AM

21former Mocksville workers plead guilty
http: //www.printthi s.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=2+for...
Town officials knew about Smith's personal business, Holton said: Town Manager Christine Sanders said that the town did know
about the company but never gave Smith permission to use town equipment or employees for his company.
Kickbacks came in the form of what Holton called gift checks. He said that Smith received $4,000 to $5,000 over several years.
As for the chemicals, Smith was just trying to dump them in the best place environmentally that he could think of, he said.
"He shouldn't have done that," Holton said. "It's better than dumping it in the wetlands or in the lakes. He dumped it into the
system that would be purified and cleaned up. It's not like a big oil spill into the Yadkin River."
Slogick, who pleaded guilty to knowingly submitting false data to the state, released a statement yesterday.
"I submitted a letter to the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Water Supply Division on May 7, 2007,
where I humbly took responsibility for the data that was submitted under my signature and do not know why the EPA pursued it
further and singled me out," he said, reading the statement over the phone.
Slogick is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 2, Vikin said. Holton said that Smith would be sentenced in either February or March.
Sanders said that all employees are expected to follow rules.
"When someone chooses to betray the public trust, they have to be held accountable," she said.
■ Michael Hewlett can be reached at 727-7326 or at [e-mail].
Find this article at:
http: //vwA,v2.journalnow. con Vcontent/2008/nov/08/2-former-mocks\ i Ile-workers-plead-gui Ity
r ::i CK t<; Print
Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article.
©2008 Media General Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Member agreement and privacy statement
SAVE THIS I EMAIL THIS I Close
2 of 11/12/2008 7:57 AM

24 2008
Town of Mocksville — Wastewater Annual Re o
We are pleased to present our first Wastewater Annual Report to you.... -The Clean Water
Act of 1999, passed by North Carolina General Assembly, requires utilities like Town of
Mocksville Utilities to provide an annual report to their wastewater customers. This
report summarizes the performance of our Wastewater Collection System and
Wastewater Treatment Plant over a 12-month period (July 1, 2007 — June 30, 2008).
Each day, we collect, transport and treat an average of 800 thousand gallons of
wastewater; about 292 million gallons a year. We are proud of our collection/treatment
system and the job we do in protecting public health and the environment, meeting
regulatory requirements and accommodating the orderly growth of the community.
Our Mission
Overall, there are two key elements in wastewater treatment- the collection system and
the treatment process. Our highly -trained, state -certified staff does an excellent job with
both. Wastewater collection/treatment is a 24-hour-a-day, 7 day -a -week responsibility.
Ultimately, our goal is to protect both the environment and the quality of life not only for
the Town of Mocksville, but for our neighboring communities as well. Each city and
town along Bear Creek and Dutchman Creek is affected by the quality of water we
discharge from our respective wastewater treatment plants. Today it is more important
than ever for all of us to join together to protect the quality of life that only a clean river
can offer.
What is Wastewater Treatment?
Wastewater treatment is the biological process of removing pollutants from the water so
it can be returned safely to the environment. It is the "last line of defense" against water
pollution. The Town of Mocksville Wastewater Treatment Plant protects the
environment from water which may cause disease -causing bacteria or other pollutants.
Our community is continuously expanding with the addition of new industries, businesses
and homes. Along with this growth comes added waste to be collected and treated. It is
an enormous task to keep up with this growth and properly manage the increases in
wastewater collection and treatment. The Town of Mocksville accepts this task by
planning and upgrading its wastewater and collection facilities as necessary in order to
meet our customers' needs.
About Our Collection System
The Town of Mocksville Utilities wastewater collection system includes 69 miles of
sanitary sewer mains (pipes), and 6 pump stations with their associated force mains.
These pipes and pump stations collect and transport an average of 800 thousand gallons
of wastewater per day from homes and businesses in Mocksville and parts of Davie
County. Wastewater is collected through approximately 2500 individual connections to
the system and delivered through a network of pipes ranging in size from 6" to 18" in 99
RECEi tM I
OCT 0 6 2
!:tinsior-S.iin7
Regirnal Office

diameter. The collected wastewater is transported to the Wastewater Treatment Plant
where it is treated prior to being returned to the Bear Creek and Dutchman Creek.
Overflows Create Problems
Essentially, the collection system is like a transportation system. The pumps and pipes
transport wastewater from our customers to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. We have to
do all we can to make sure "traffic" isn't allowed to back up. On the highway it would be
called a traffic jam. In our case, when "traffic" backs up, it's called an overflow.
Overflows are bad for the environment, and result in stiff penalties from state regulators.
Overflows occur when wastewater builds up in the pipe and can't get out. This water
potentially could seep out of the top of a manhole or clean -out. The majority of
overflows on our system are caused by blockages, which often occur as a result of
improper disposal of grease. Some overflows are caused by excessive inflow and
infiltration (I/1) or leaks into the sewer system. To a lesser extent some problems are
caused by tree roots, pipe failure or construction damage, but most result from grease
and/or other debris.
How We Protect the System
We work very hard to protect our system from overflows in a variety of ways and our
record is excellent. Our overflows represent just 10 % of the292 million gallons of
wastewater we treat annually. But we would like to reduce that to 0%. The following is
a brief overview of the various ways we try to protect our system and prevent overflows:
Pre-treatment Program
There are provisions in our Sanitary Sewer use regulations for pre-treatment of
wastewater, principally by our industrial customers. We issue permits to
applicable industries and they pretreat their wastewater before it is discharged to
the Town of Mocksville system.
Grease Interceptors
Commercial customers that serve food or process meat, etc. are required to have
grease interceptors. These devices are designed to remove grease, a leading cause
of sewer line blockages.
Inspections
We regularly inspect our sewer lines for obvious problems. We also inspect other
locations such as streams, creek crossings and outfalls.
Pipe Cleaning
Each month we routinely clean an average of more than 5 miles of sewer pipe
with special high pressure equipment designed to remove grease and other debris
from the system. This routine cleaning program further reduces the potential for
system blockages and overflows.

I/I Investigations
I/I (infiltration/inflow) is extraneous water that gets into the wastewater collection
system; any water other than sewage. We have an extensive program that
includes smoke testing, closed-circuit TV inspection and flow monitoring to
enable us to identify areas of extraneous flow. Once we have located problem
areas, we take steps to remediate the problem.
Public Education
We are in the process of an educational campaign with our customers involving
fliers, door hangers, newsletters and advertising designed to inform the public on
ways they can help us protect the sanitary sewer system.
What You Can Do
Mocksville Utilities does everything it can to prevent sewer spills. But we can't do it
alone. You play an important role in helping us maintain an efficient public sanitary
sewer system. Since the majority of overflows are caused by improper disposal of items
into the sewer system, we ask you to be aware of the following guidelines:
Avoid pouring fats, oils or grease from cooking down the drain. Instead, collect
them in a container and dispose in the trash.
Don't use your toilets as a wastebasket. Place a wastebasket in the bathroom to
dispose of items such as disposable diapers and personal hygiene products.
Unless you have a garbage disposal, please don't use your drain to dispose of
food scraps. Place food scraps in waste containers or garbage bags for disposal or
composting.
Don't pour hazardous products such as paint, pesticides or herbicides down the
drain.
Wastewater Treatment Process
Our Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is responsible for removing debris, solid
materials and pollutants from the water which comes into the facility, and then filtering
and disinfecting the water before it is returned into Bear Creek and Dutchman Creek.
System Performance
The North Carolina General Assembly enacted legislation in July 1999, requiring
municipalities, animal operations, industries and others who operate waste handling
systems to issue news releases when a waste spill of 1, 000 gallons or more reaches
surface waters. A waste spill of 15, 000 gallons of more requires a news release as well
as a paid public notice.
During the past twelve months, there have been a total of 39 overflows on the Town of
Mocksville wastewater system. Most of these overflows were the result of blockages due

to grease and debris. The total estimated volume from all recorded overflows was 7100
gallons, or approximately 0.0025 percent of the total volume of wastewater that was
collected, transported, and treated by our system.
Overflows were reported in accordance with State regulations to the NC Division of
Water Quality. No penalties were assessed for any violation.

W A T F9QG
c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Ms. Christine W. Sanders
Town of Mocksville
171 South Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
September 16, 2008
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
A review of the Dutchman Creek WWTP monitoring report for June 2008 showed the following
violation:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
BOD
June 2008
5 mg/1
5.4 mg/1
Monthly Average Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action
by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Mickey at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
N.C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone]
N_o;`titCarolina
atunilly
Customer Service
1(800)623-7748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: U\�,.o l.,�ermit/Pipe No.: �'�Ma, �\ Month/Year Sup
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Weekly/Daily Violations
Date Parameter
Monitoring Frequenc
Date Parameter Permit Frequent
DMR Value % Over Lin -lit
Violations
v Values Reported # of Violations
Other Violation _\
Completed by: J�, Date:
Regional Water Quality (� ✓ Ok
Supervisor Signoff: Date:
,VUV

Lffluent D"t of ENR Dutchman Creek
AUG ,� �(�(�� Month: June Year: 2008
,.ton -Salem
_
NPDES Permit #NC0021491
Discharge No. 1 «�,"'I Of-tce Class',, 2 County Davie Grade 4 Phone [phone]
Certified Laboratories 5le-r Technology Operator in Responsible Charge Nick Slogick
Person(s) Collecting Samples Operators
t /1�.r� f1 o-/ .� rC�/c•� c /� �/- 2 2 -0 By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
�
•
•
•
•
i
•
OR
•
Minimum
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
���ffw
M.,
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
Y=ORC B=Back up ORC O=other,oprerator

NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Water Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107
Phone: [phone]
000
IDENR
Fax: [phone]
TO:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM: ����� mike.micke ncmail.net
DATE:
Number of pages (including cover page):
M_
COMMENTS: N QNIV, N 'C�� �\�0 `� �( e� S s. �te
ryi

Amn-UmA (�v
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
-E;'F
February 29, 2008 - v
Christine W. Sanders MAR 0 3 2008
Town of Mocksville N1lnston-Salem
Reyionai Off'"
171 S Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Advance Notice of Renewal Application Requirements
Permit NCO021491
Dutchman's Creek WWTP
Dear Permittee:
Your NPDES permit for a municipally owned/operated WWTP expires on June 30, 2009. This notice is
being sent to explain the requirements for your permit renewal application.
You are receiving this advance notice because your facility has a permitted flow at or above 1
MGD, or the facility receives industrial [pretreatment] wastewater. If either of these criteria no
longer applies, contact the NPDES Unit before submitting a renewal application.
Federal (40 CFR 122) and state (15A NCAC 2H.0105(e)) regulations require that permit renewal
applications be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of the current permit. Your renewal application is
due to the Division postmarked no later than January 1, 2009. Failure to apply for renewal by the
appropriate deadline may result in a civil penalty assessment or other enforcement activity at the discretion
of the Director.
The U.S. EPA revised and expanded the application requirements for municipal permits, effective August 1,
2001. EPA form 2A is attached to this Notice, and must be used for your permit renewal application. The
new application requirements mandate additional effluent testing:
1. Conduct three Priority Pollutant Analyses (PPAs) and submit results with your renewal
application. Collect samples for the PPAs in conjunction with sampling for your current
quarterly toxicity test. The new PPA requirements differ from previous versions. Each PPA
must include:
➢ Analyses for all total recoverable metals listed in Part D of form 2A. This includes metals
that are not normally monitored through your NPDES permit.
➢ Analyses for total phenolic compounds and hardness.
➢ Analyses for all of the volatile organic compounds listed in Part D.
Analyses for all of the acid -extractable compounds listed in Part D.
➢ Analyses for all base -neutral compounds listed in Part D.
➢ Analyses for Total Mercury must be performed using EPA Method 1631.
2. Conduct four toxicity tests for an organism other than Ceriodaphnia and submit results with
your renewal application. The tests should be conducted quarterly, with samples collected on the
same day as your current toxicity test. Call the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] for
guidance in conducting the additional tests.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone], extension 511 / FAX [phone] / [e-mail] Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Renewal Notice for Permit NCO021491
Davie County
Page 2
The pollutant and toxicity analyses described above must accompany your permit renewal
application, or any major permit modification request. The Division cannot draft your permit without the
additional data. Any data submitted cannot be over 41h years old, and must account for seasonal
variation (samples cannot be collected during the same season each year if collected over multiple years).
PLEASE NOTE: If your existing permit contains a requirement for annual PPAs, additional PPAs
are not required [provided you have conducted at least 3 scans prior to submitting your application].
If any wastewater discharge will occur after the current permit expires, this NPDES permit must be
renewed. Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate Federal and North Carolina law.
Unpermitted discharges of wastewater could result in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Use the checklist below to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you
must submit with the permit renewal application. If all wastewater discharge has ceased at this facility and
you wish to rescind this permit, please contact me. My telephone number, fax number and e-mail address
are listed at the bottom of the previous page.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES File
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
o A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o The completed EPA Form 2A application (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to the
Authorized Representative (see Part II.B.11.b of the existing NPDES permit).
o A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies. This information can be included in the cover letter.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Renewal Notice for Permit NCO021491
Davie County
Page 2
The pollutant and toxicity analyses described above must accompany your permit renewal
application, or any major permit modification request. The Division cannot draft your permit without the
additional data. Any data submitted cannot be over 41/2 years old, and must account for seasonal
variation (samples cannot be collected during the same season each year if collected over multiple years).
PLEASE NOTE: If your existing permit contains a requirement for annual PPAs, additional PPAs
are not required [provided you have conducted at least 3 scans prior to submitting your application].
If any wastewater discharge will occur after the current permit expires, this NPDES permit must be
renewed. Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate Federal and North Carolina law.
Unpermitted discharges of wastewater could result in assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Use the checklist below to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you
must submit with the permit renewal application. If all wastewater discharge has ceased at this facility and
you wish to rescind this permit, please contact me. My telephone number, fax number and e-mail address
are listed at the bottom of the previous page.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES File
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
o A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o The completed EPA Form 2A application (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to the
Authorized Representative (see Part II.B.11.b of the existing NPDES permit).
o A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies. This information can be included in the cover letter.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

May 23, 2008
Christine W Sanders
Town Manager
171 S Clement St
Mocksville, NC 27028
A,it,
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
��fVlp—
WZ. Dem. of ENR
MAY 2 8 2008
Vrnswr�-..
Regional Office
Subject: Monitoring for High Rock Reservoir (Permit - NCO021491)
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study (chlorophyll a and turbidity)
Dear Ms. Sanders,
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ), in partnership with the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Association (YPDRBA), has begun monitoring of the High Rock Reservoir watershed for the
purpose of chlorophyll a and turbidity TMDL development, as of April 2008. The monitoring
is scheduled to last for two years (April 1, 2008 - March 31, 2010).
Ms. Kathy Stecker, Supervisor, Modeling and TMDL Unit, discussed additional effluent
monitoring needs for NPDES dischargers at the YPDRBA meeting held October 5, 2007.
These increased nutrient and turbidity monitoring needs are not currently included in your
facility's permit effluent monitoring requirements. Members of YPDRBA have agreed to
perform the additional monitoring for the duration of the two-year study, in order to supply
sufficient data to perform a comprehensive TMDL for High Rock Lake. Although your permit
is not being reopened to include this additional monitoring, should the voluntary monitoring
falter, the Division will reconsider this decision to include the additional monitoring for the
time necessary.
The additional effluent monitoring requirements for your facility are:
Parameter Description
Parameter
Code
Measurement
Fre uenc
Sample Type
Sample
Location
TKN as N (m /L)
NO2+NO3 (m /L)
Nitrogen, Total (as N)
(m /L)
00625
00630
00600
Weekl
Weekl
Weekly
Composite
Com osite
Composite
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Turbidi (ntu)
00076
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
On
e NhCarolina
IlvatUAMI&
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newateraualit rg Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/101/o Post Consumer Paper

Additional Monitoring for High Rock Lake
Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance with this monitoring effort. This data will be
invaluable to model development and improve model predictions. If you have any questions,
please contact Ms. Susan A. Wilson, ext. 510 (Supervisor, Western NPDES Program) or Ms.
Kathy Stecker, ext. 505.
Sincerely,
N , U
oleen H. Sullins
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office / Steve Tedder
Central Files
NPDES Files
TMDL and Modeling Unit, Planning Section
Jennie Atkins, Environmental Sciences Section
Nicholas Dmitri Slogick

Additional Monitoring for High Rock Lake
Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance'with this monitoring effort. This data will be
invaluable to model development and improve model predictions. If you have any questions,
please contact Ms. Susan A. Wilson, ext. 510 (Supervisor, Western NPDES Program) or Ms.
Kathy Stecker, ext. 505.
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office / Steve Tedder
Central Files
NPDES Files
TMDL and Modeling Unit, Planning Section
Jennie Atkins, Environmental Sciences Section
Nicholas Dmitri Slogick

(�ilk L
�OF W A TFgo Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 15, 2008
RECEIVED
N.C. Deot of ENR
Ms. Christine Sanders
AUG 15 M
Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
RE: Renewal of the Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin Association's Monitoring Coalition
NPDES Permit Modification for Instream Monitoring
NCO021491 Dutchman's Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
For the past ten years, the members of the Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin Association (YPDRBA) have broadened
understanding of the watershed through water quality monitoring. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) greatly
appreciates the association's continued support of the monitoring and the time and expertise contributed by its
members.
By this letter the DWQ confirms the waiving of instream monitoring requirements within your individual NPDES
permit in exchange for the YPDRBA's monitoring of the watershed as specified within the renewed
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) effective August 12, 2008. The agreement identifies the stations,
parameters, and frequency of monitoring required of the association in order to maintain the instream monitoring
waivers for your individual permits. Effluent monitoring requirements are not affected. Should your membership
in the association be terminated, you must notify DWQ immediately and the instream monitoring requirements in
your permit will be reinstated.
All other terms and conditions in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. These modifications are
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or the coalition, please contact Jennie Atkins at [phone] or
[e-mail].
Since ety,
l�
Olt
oleen H. Sullins
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
NPDES Western Unit
Jennie Atkins, Environmental Sciences Section One
Central Files hCarolina
NoNaturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
May 2, 2008
Ms. Christine W. Sanders, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 South Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
A review the Dutchman Creek WWTP monitoring report for February 2008 showed the following
violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
BOD
2/25 — 2/29
15 mg/1
16.9 mg/l
Weekly Average Exceeded
BOD
February 2008
10 mg/l
11.28 mg/1
Monthly Average Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action
by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Mickey at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
None Carolina
Naturally
N.C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone] Customer Service
1(800)623-7748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

a
4
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DMR Review Record
Facility: 0 �1s�� Permit/Pipe No.: ��'J1 Month/Year
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
Q*Violations
Date Parameter Permit Limit/Tvpe DMR Value % Over Limit
Mon it ^ 'ng Frequency Violations
Date Parameter Perna Fre uencv Values Reported # of Violations
C1thPr Vinlntinnc
Completed by:` Date:
Regional Water Quality <— / — Oj�"
Supervisor Signoff: Date:
41V/

r''.Eu f vtu '
.7•t.r. oeot. t1f=f4fR 'Dutchman Creek
AF
a �« onth: FebruaryYear: 2008
#r NPDES Permit #NC0021491
QA
APR 0 4 ?0
Discharge No. 1 r', 5c n-s..', Class 2 County Davie Grade 4 Phone 751,-2635
Certified Laboratories Water Technology Operator in Responsible Charge Nic 'Sjio ick
Person(s) Collecting Samples Operators
-0 ' By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and
(Signature of Operator i esponsible charge) Date complete to the best of my knowledae
us,
—
•
M
sa-
Mom�q�pr- Oct
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
Y=URG B=Back up ORC O=other oprerator

-:,rytYur a uUgv uaauoa . • --If! Lujaa aq,
Igpn.ras o � 3uan 1 89'Q) q 41q-qxa a f I33a ue 3e br
I6�iZ0 `LjL�117 .LIL�2I�`I'I.LIJIXp .� ou �e IIeus a�zeu s P 3uanT�3a a�a`�
s__� CDNInwa_r 1, Jj1�IpuIjJ qL
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS Ar,„� . __ __ _ _ _
During the period beginning after expansion above 0.68 MGD and lasting until permit expiration, the '
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by
the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location'
Flow
0.981 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD5 20 °C2
5.0 mg/1
7.5 mg/1
Weekly
Composite
I, E
(April 1— October 30)
BOD5 20 °C2
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
I, E
(November 1— March 31)
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/1
45.0 mg/1
Weekly
Composite
I, E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Dissolved Oxygen 3
Weekly
Grab
E, U, D
Fecal Coliform
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Weekly
Grab
E
(geometric mean)
NH3 as N
2.0 mg/l
6.0 mg/1
Weekly
Composite
E
(April 1- October 30)
NH3 as N (winter)
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
(November 1— March 31)
Total Nitrogen
Weekly
Composite
E
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Weekly
Composite
E
Total Residual Chlorine
28µ /1
2/Week
Grab
E
Chronic Toxicit Y4
Quarterly
Composite
E
Cadmium
Monthdy
Composite
E
Chromium
Monthly
Composite
E
Copper
Monthly
Com osite
E
Nickel
Monthly
Composite
E
Lead
Monthly
Composite
E
Zinc
Monthly
Composite
E
Cyanide
22.0 µ /l
2/Month
Grab
E
Silver
Monthly
Composite
E
H
6.0 — 9.0 standard units
Weekly
Grab
E
Notes:
1. I= Influent. E= Effluent. U= Upstream approximately 100 feet upstream from the outfall. D= Downstream
approximately 0.5 miles downstream from the outfall. Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab
samples collected 3/week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the rest of
the year. As a participant in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Association, the subject facility is not
responsible for conducting the instream monitoring requirements as stated above. Should your
membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division immediately and the instream
monitoring requirements specified in your permit will be automatically reinstated.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 percent
of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l from April 1 to
October 31, and no less than 5.0 mg/L from November 1 to March 31.
4. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 37%: January, April, July, and October (see condition A. (2.)).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

DR. F. W. SLATE
Mayor
Commissioners:
J. C. "BUSTER" CLEARY, Mayor Pro Tern
RICHARD BROADWAY
WILLIAM L. "BILL" FOSTER
H. LEE ROLLINS
LASH GAITHER SANFORD, JR.
3/31 /2008
JOW111 o
Pd
CHRISTINE W. SANDERS
// Town Manager
ocG��vc e
INCORPORATED 1839
171 S. CLEMENT STREET
MOCKSVILLE, NIC 27028
Mr. Steve Tedder
NCDENR/WSRO — Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Re: Response to NOV Dated 2/22/08
Water Plant Wastewater Disposal
Town of Mocksville
Dear Steve:
HENRY P. VAN HOY II
Town Attorney
IFRECEIVED
ti' .. Dept. of E4?
MAR 3 1
I '�'. rrtpnacleT
In regards to your NOV concerning wastewater disposal from the Town's water treatment plant,
we intend to separate the solids to land application and equalize the liquid portion to the sewer
system that will be tributary to the Cooleemee WWTP.
The Town has constructed a 12" forcemain from its Bear Creek WWTP to the Cooleemee WWTP
collection system and will award the final construction contract for Bear Creek pump station
renovations at the Town's Board meeting tomorrow night. The renovations are to be completed
within 6 months of the Notice to Proceed. We, therefore, expect project completion approximately
7 months from now (allowing time for contract execution).
We, therefore, will not apply for an NPDES permit to discharge water plant wastewater but will
construct an equalization and separation facility and place it into operation within the next 8
months.
Please call with any questions.
Sincerely, 4
Christine Sanders
Town Manager
Cc: John Grey
PHONE: [phone] - FAX: [phone]
www.mocksvillenc.org

Re: Water question
Subject: Re: Water question
From: Tom Boyd <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:32:13 -0500
To: [e-mail], Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
CC: Lee Spencer <[e-mail]>
Hello Kevin,
The Mocksville plant is not under any other permit that I know of. The plant was
in use when the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 took affect. Mocksville must
adhere to current EPA regulations as well as the State of North Carolina drinking
water regulations. The plant currently discharges treatment plant residuals
straight back to Bear Creek with no treatment. This is a violation of the Clean
Water Act. We have encouraged Mocksville to change this practice for at least the
past seven inspections with little effect.
Please let me know if I can be of any more assistance.
Tom
On 2/15/2008 12:31 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
Hey Tom -
Hope all is well in Winston Salem. Yes the Mocksville case is
progressing. If you want some details you can call me. I'm doing some
homework for the U.S. Attorney's Office and I need some assistance.
I know Mocksville's water plant is assigned a system ID# 02-30-010
(Davie County). I also know they are subject to North Carolina's Rules
Governing Public Water Systems. Is this plant subject to a site
specific water permit like a wastewater plant would be? If it is, could
you provide a copy to us? If there is no site specific permit and they
only operate under the North Carolina Rules Governing Public Water
Systems, is there anything else that is site specific relative to this
plant that I am missing?
What I am trying to determine under the federal enhancement guidelines,
is if any operators violated a permit in addition to the false
reporting. Violating the Public Water Rules does not mean they violated
a permit. This is normally a very easy question to answer when dealing
with wastewater, not so much with drinking water!
Thanks for any help,
Kevin S. LaPointe
Special Agent
U.S. EPA, Criminal Investigation Division
Charlotte Resident Office
704-344-6844(Office)
704-344-6846(fax)
Tom Boyd [e-mail]
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC DENR - Public Water Supply Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice [phone]
FAX [phone]
Tom Boyd <Tom.BoydRNCmail.net>
1 of 2 2/22/2008 8:29 AM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
February 12, 2008
Ms. Christine W. Sanders
Town of Mocksville
171 South Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NPDES Permit No. NCO021491
Dutchman Creek WWTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
A review of the Dutchman Creek WWTP monitoring report for November 2007 showed the
following violations:
Parameter
Date
Limit Value
Reported Value
Limit Type
BOD
11/12-11/16
15 mg/1
19.3 mg/1
Weekly Average Exceeded
TSS
11/01-11/30
30 mg/1
34.75 mg/1
Monthly Average Exceeded
TSS
11/12-11/16
45 mg/1
74 mg/1
Weekly Average Exceeded
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the above noncompliance
problem. Please be aware that violations of your NPDES permit could result in enforcement action
by the Division of Water Quality for this and any additional violations of State law.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Mickey at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Cc: Central Files - SWP
WSRO
N.C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone]
None Carolina
Naturally
Customer Service
1(800) 623-7748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

DMR Value
,T�_
Frequency Violations
Over Limit
W'l
Values Reported # of Violations
Cover Sheet from
Staff Member to
Regional Supervisor
DNIR Review Record
Facility: �S Permit/Pipe No.: �L��\`��� Month/Year \\
Monthly Average Violations
Parameter Permit Limit DMR Value % Over Limit
: 7�, �-- � -:1w)— �` -I c v
Week] Violations
Date Parameter Permit LirTiit/ Fvpe
Moni
Date Parameter
5 Ce�� Ce�e.v�g \0-
�).A%
Completed by: Date:
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor SiQnoff: Date:

EfVuent Dutchman Creek
i t� N 1 2008 Month: November Year: 2007 4) �
NPDES Permit #NC0021491 �[
Discharge No. 1 Class 2 County Davie Grade 4 Ppo�tef . r.2635
"il,ertified Laboratories Water Technology Operator in Responsible Charge Nick log
Person(s) Collecting Samples Operators
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and
(Signature
of Operator
k(Responsible charge) Date complete to the
best of
my knowledge.
O
o
-
C)`a'
C)O
0
C)(0
O
0
O
CD
to
0
. -
M
C)O
O
0
CO
CODO
o
c•)
L
O
io)
00Ln
C)CD
CI)C)
OO
O
C)
C)
as
p
~
_
Q
L
Q
o
E
L
O
CL
O
(I
(n
C:3
O
O
�
N
m
U
_�
aEi
F
=
n
�
L
C)
a�i
�'
CD
O
m
a
m
2
E
<
a)
C:
0-
3
o
F-
E
8
_
U
aa)i
tL
�'
X
O
_0
>
N
CD
2
z
o
I-
i
�
0
I o
I 0
Q-
p
-.11 -
0
t-
RECE
N.G. Dea
Winstu
Region2
------
IVE
of E
c
-Saier
iOfflc-
--
'R
(ny
�3
----
-
----
-
HRS
HRS
Y/O/B
mgd
C
units
ugf
mg/l
mg/I
mg/I
#/100mlt
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
1
8151
0.75
Y
0.516
15
2
9351
0.50
Y
0.488
16
3
0.528
4
0.519
5
10401
0.75
B
0.451
14
T21
< 20
5.11
0.3
7
5
11.6
4.05
6
840
0.50
Y
0.504
15
20
8.7
7
930
0.50
Y
0.494
13
8
920
0,50
Y
0.514
12
9
745
0.75
Y
0.520
12
10
0.501
11
0.502
12
0.422
13
1000
0.75
Y
0.479
14
6.6
420
8.9
14
815
0.50
Y
0.514
15
15
1000
0.50
Y
0.510
17
24
16
1120
0.50
Y
0.606
14
19.3
5.4
74
23
15.21
12.4
17
0.517
18
0.516
19
9001
0.75
B
0.439
13
7.4
8.9
20
8001
1.00
B
0.525
13
20
21
10151
0.75
B
0.510
13
4 20
8.9
0.8
23
1
19
10.7
22
0.499
23
0.466
24
0.420
25
0.471
26
940
0.50
Y
0.440
12
7.1
< 20
27
1105
0.50
Y
0.527
14
20
8.5
28
1050
0.75
Y
0.519
13
5.9
0.4
35
1
13.6
7.4
29
930
0.75
B
0.512
11
30
1 0-501
1.25
Y
0.525
11
Average
0.498
13.5
20.5
9.8
1.725
34.75
3.2747
8.8
14.9
8.64
Maximum
0.606
17
7.4
24
19.3
5.4
74
23
8.9
19
12.4
Minimum
0.420
11
6.6
< 20
5.1
0.3
7
1
8.5
11.6
4.05
Comp (C) / Grab (G)
C
G
G
G
C
C
C
G
G
C
C
Weekly Limit Apr -Oct
Monthly Limit Apr- Oct
n/I
7.5mg/I
6 mg/I
45mg/I
400/100mi
5mg/l
n/I
n/I
n/I
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
5 mg/1
2 mg/I
30mg/I
200,'100m1
Weekly Limit Nov -Mar
Monthly Limit Nov -Mar
0.981
n/I
15 mg/I
12 mg/I
45mg/l
ao0/looms
5mg/I
n/l
n/l
n/I
n/I
6-9
28 ug/L
10 mg/I
4 mg/I
30mg/l
200/100m1
Y=ORC B=Back up ORC O=other oprerator

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
e
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements
Compliant
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my
inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Town of Mocksville
Permijee (Please print or type)
Signature of Permittee* Date
171 Clement St. Mocksville, NC 27028 336-751-2635 6-30-09
Permittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp. Date
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
00080 Color (Pt -Co)
00082 Color (ADMI)
00095 Conductivity
00300 Dissolved Oxygen
00310 BOD5
00340 COD
00400 pH
00530 Total Suspended Residue
00545 Settleable Matter
00556 Oil & Grease
00600 Total Nitrogen
00610 Ammonia Nitrogen
PARAMETER CODES
00625 Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
00630 Nitrates/Nitrites
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720 Cyanide
00745 Total Sulfide
00927 Total Magnesium
00929 Total Sodium
00940 Total Chloride
00951 Total Fluoride
01002 Total Arsenic
01027 Cadmium
01032 Hexavalent Chromium
01034 Chromium
01037 Total Cobalt
01042 Copper
01045 Iron
01051 Lead
01067 Nickel
01077 Silver
01092 Zinc
01105 Aluminum
01147 Total Selenium
31616 Fecal Coliform
32730 Total Phenolics
34235 Benzene
34481 Toluene
38260 MBAS
39516 PCBs
50050 Flow
50060 Total
Residual Chlorine
71880 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at [phone], extension 581 or 534.
The monthly average for fecal coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting
r--_11 -e- ----.. Z----- -- A-`-
*ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 8A.0202 (b) (5) (B).
** If signed by other than the permittee, delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
(2) (D)• LG b ; jjj

Town of Mocksville
A To C No. 021491 AO 1
Issued April 13, 2006
D4Eckwtans CIr'eak CJwTP
Engineer's Certification
ToNa C. 4&rq, Ta. , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe periodical weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Du c man's Creek WWTP,
located on 295 Garwood Road in Davie County for the Town of Mocksville, hereby state that, to
the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction:
A new influent vertical fine screen with a 7 mm opening, three new 1150 gpm
influent pumps, a new 0.34 MG extended aeration basin with two 25-HP surface
aerators, replacement of four 25-HP aerators in two existing aeration basins, a
new 36' diameter clarifier, a new 50' diameter aerobic digestion facility with a
25-HP surface aerator, two new 350-gpm RAS pumps and one new 275-gpm
WAS pump, two new 174-gpm scum pumps, a new chlorination and
dechlorination facility with a 120 scfm blower assembly, and a new 400-KW
emergency generator in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and
other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
We understand that the new limits associated with the modifications to expand to 0.98 MGD
now apply.
Signature �'Y �-- Registration No. 1540 1
Date io[44,1d'f
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
CARO4�N
,�WS S IO,Y%,
SEAL
15407 -
FNGINE`�P`'���
AC C,R
l ONIV -7

Re: [Fwd: NCO021491- Mocksville Dutchman's Creek WWTP]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NC0021491- Mocksville Dutchman's Creek WWTP]
From: Jeanne Phillips <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:42:36 -0500
To: Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
Mike,
The changes in BIMS have been made effective l l/1/2007.
Jeanne
Mike Mickey wrote:
Jeanne - The effective date for Dutchman's new limits should be l l/l/07. Mike.
On 2/11/2008 1:29 PM, Charles Weaver wrote:
Jeanne - please update the phased limits for the NCO021491 per Mike's message.
Mike - only Jeanne has permission to make such changes in BIMS. Let her know whether the
0.98 MGD limits should be effective 10/12007 or l l/l/2007.
CHW
Subject:
NCO021491- Mocksville Dutchman's Creek WWTP
From:
Mike Mickey <Mike.Mickeynncmail.net>
Date:
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:34:35 -0500
To: Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
To: Charles Weaver <Charles.Weaver(c�ncmail.net>
Charles - Trying to find out if Dutchman's new limits are active in BIMS. We have a copy of
an Engineer's Certification in our files that was submitted in October for expansion from 0.68
MGD to 0.98 MGD. I assume the original certification form went to CG&L. A recent data
pull of November violations still shows the old limits in effect. Can you tell if BIMS has been
updated so the new limits kick in? Thanks, Mike.
Mike Mickey
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Main Office: [phone]
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
1 of 2 2/11/2008 2:44 PM

OFWATFR
mot
IIPSA
-i
May 5, 2004
Nicholas Slogick
Town of Mocksville
771 Sanford Avenue
Mocksville, NC 27028
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
MAY 11 2004
Winston-Salem
R&gional Offiice
Subject: Return No. 2214
NPDES Permit Application
Town of Mocksville/Hugh Lagle WTP
Dear Mr. Slogick:
The Division received your NPDES permit application for a proposed surface water discharge from a
conventional water treatment plant on March 22, 2004. The Division is returning the application as
incomplete for reasons listed below.
Fee Not Included. A fee of $715, made out to NC DENR, must be submitted with your application
package. This fee covers the annual fee for the first year, assuming the permit is accepted. A fee
schedule is attached.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Not Included. With every application for a new NPDES permit,
the permittee must evaluate alternatives to a direct surface water discharge, including connection to
an existing wastewater treatment facility, land application options, and reuse alternatives. An EAA
Guidance Document is attached.
Please include a copy of this letter with your future resubmission. If you have any questions about the
contents of this letter or the NPDES permitting process, please call me at 919-733-5083, ext 543.
Sin ��ereelMly,
Ur•t
in Belnick
NPDES Unit
cc: NPDES Return Letter File
Winston Salem Regional Office, Water Quality <J /
fi/1 rM
ftJr �j��r Ct,ip✓�� � wn��rm����l
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] A A Customer Service
N7-%- F� 1 800 623-7748

�0F W A TF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
�(' 61 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
c r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
February 22, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7007 3020 0000 2315 0963
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Christine Sanders, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation — Illegal Wastewater Discharge
Town of Mocksville WTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
It was recently brought to the attention of the Division of Water Quality that the Mocksville
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) has a non -permitted discharge of wastewater to the waters of the state.
Specifically, filter backwash wastewater from the facility is discharged to Bear Creek, Class WS-IV
waters, without the required NPDES permit.
Please be advised that the discharge of any type of wastewater onto the lands or into the waters
of the State without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1. An
NPDES permit application for the existing WTP discharge should be submitted to the NPDES Unit in
Raleigh on or before March 31, 2008. A complete application package should consist of the
following: the Short Form C-WTP Application, a source water analysis, an Engineering Alternatives
Analysis and a $860 non-refundable processing fee. The necessary forms can be obtained at the
following link: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/documents.html#individualapps.
Please be aware that discharging without a permit could subject the Town to enforcement
action with the possible assessment of a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day, per violation.
Your cooperation in this matter would be appreciated. Should you have questions, please
contact Mike Mickey or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lee Spencer - PWS
Central Files/WSRO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Phone [phone] Customer Service
Winston-Salem Regional Office Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Fax [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
pne
r Carolina
NNaturally

Re: Water question
Subject: Re: Water question
From: Tom Boyd <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:32:13 -0500
To: [e-mail], Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
CC: Lee Spencer <[e-mail]>
Hello Kevin,
The Mocksville plant is not under any other permit that I know of. The plant was
in use when the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 took affect. Mocksville must
adhere to current EPA regulations as well as the State of North Carolina drinking
water regulations. The plant currently discharges treatment plant residuals
straight back to Bear Creek with no treatment. This is a violation of the Clean
Water Act. We have encouraged Mocksville to change this practice for at least the
past seven inspections with little effect.
Please let me know if I can be of any more assistance.
Tom
On 2/15/2008 12:31 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
Hey Tom -
Hope all is well in Winston Salem. Yes the Mocksville case is
progressing. If you want some details you can call me. I'm doing some
homework for the U.S. Attorney's Office and I need some assistance.
I know Mocksville's water plant is assigned a system ID# 02-30-010
(Davie County). I also know they are subject to North Carolina's Rules
Governing Public Water Systems. Is this plant subject to a site
specific water permit like a wastewater plant would be? If it is, could
you provide a copy to us? If there is no site specific permit and they
only operate under the North Carolina Rules Governing Public Water
Systems, is there anything else that is site specific relative to this
plant that I am missing?
What I am trying to determine under the federal enhancement guidelines,
is if any operators violated a permit in addition to the false
reporting. Violating the Public Water Rules does not mean they violated
a permit. This is normally a very easy question to answer when dealing
with wastewater, not so much with drinking water!
Thanks for any help,
Kevin S. LaPointe
Special Agent
U.S. EPA, Criminal Investigation Division
Charlotte Resident Office
704-344-6844(Office)
704-344-6846(fax)
Tom Boyd [e-mail]
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC DENR - Public Water Supply Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice [phone]
FAX [phone]
Tom Boyd <Tom.Boyd@,NCmail.net>
1 of 2 2/20/2008 3:24 PM

Re: [Fwd: Conventional WTP]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Conventional WTP]
From: Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:18:52 -0500
To: Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
CC: Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
Usually facilities will submit the results of past analyses that they've done for
public water supply. If they don't have anything recent (within about 2-3 yrs) ,
I'd say that they should use the sample effluent page (page 6 of the document) as a
reference. We like to see something as thorough as possible so that we can
determine if we need to add monitoring for anything that is NOT on that list. But
when we don't have much information, thats pretty -much the permit they will receive.
So, yes they do need to send us something. At a minimum it should be the pollutants
listed on page 6. Ideally they'd have a more comprehensive, recent scan that
they've done for PWS or for some other purpose.
Mike Mickey wrote:
Toya - The NPDES Permitting Strategies for Potable Water Treatment Plants
9/2007 (see paragraph below) says that new applicants are required to submit
complete source water analysis. Any idea of what that might entail or if it is
necessary for Mocksville?
*I. PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS*
An NPDES permit application is available on the NPDES website. The application is
titled Standard Form
C-WTP and can be used for all WTPs, regardless of technology. This application
differs from those used in the past
in that new applicants are required to submit a complete source water analysis
and an engineering alternatives
analysis that fully explores all feasible alternatives to a surface water
discharge.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/documents/WTPpermittingstrategyO7 OOO.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2/21/2008 1:15 PM, Charles Weaver wrote:
Toya - can you suggest a list of parameters to Mike? I'm not sure where that
list [if we have one] would be.
Thanks,
CHW
Subject:
Conventional WTP
From:
Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:50:32 -0500
To:
Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
To:
Charles Weaver <[e-mail]>
Charles - The Town of Mocksville has an non -permitted discharge from their
1 of 2 2/22/2008 8:02 AM

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number NC00
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
Facility Name_
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number ( )
Fax Number ( )
e-mail Address
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road
City
State / Zip Code
County
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
4. Ownership Status:
Federal ❑
State ❑
Private ❑
Public ❑
Page 1 of 3
C-WTP 03/05

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
5. Type of treatment plant:
❑ Conventional (Includes coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation, usually followed by
filtration and disinfection)
❑ Ion Exchange (Sodium Cycle Cationic ion exchange)
❑ Green Sand Filter (No sodium recharge)
❑ Membrane Technology (RO, nanofiltration)
Check here if the treatment process also uses a water softener ❑
6. Description of source water(s) (i.e. groundwater, surface water)
7. Describe the treatment process(es) for the raw water:
8. Describe the wastewater and the treatment process(es) for wastewater generated by the
facility:
9. Number of separate discharge points:
Outfall Identification number(s)
10. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ❑ Intermittent ❑
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration:
11. Plant design potable flowrate MGD
Backwash or reject flow MGD
12. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude):
Page 2 of 3 C-WTP 03/05

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
13. Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals or disinfection
treatments, that have the potential to be discharged.
14. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No ❑
15. Additional Information:
➢ Provide a schematic of flow through the facility, include flow volumes at all points in
the treatment process, and point of addition of chemicals.
➢ Solids Handling Plan
16. NEW Applicants
Information needed in addition to items 1-15:
➢ New applicants must contact a permit coordinator with the NCDENR Customer
. Service Center.
Was the Customer Service Center contacted? ❑ Yes ❑ No
➢ Analyses of source water collected
➢ Engineering Alternative Analysis
➢ Discharges from Ion Exchange and Reverse Osmosis plants shall be evaluated using a
water quality model.
17. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed name of Person Signing
Signature of Applicant
Title
Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
Page 3 of 3 C-WTP 03/05

DWQ ­NPDES:: Fee Schedule
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/FeeSchedule.html
N.C. Division of Water Quality
'To preserve, protect
and enhance
Moab Carolina's water
home > sections > swps > npdes
Navigation Links
NPDES Home
Organization
History
Permitting Processes
Public Notices
Enforcement
Fees
Regulations
Documents and Forms
FAQs
Links
NPDES :: Fee Schedule
search:
about the division I contact us I dwq sections I glossary
On July 31, 2007 the North Carolina General Assembly and Governor Easley put into effect a new
budget that included a 20% increase to most fees associated with Division of Water Quality permit
renewals, permit modifications, certifications, and project fees. The change did not affect SOC fees.
(Express permitting fees for non -discharge permits may be changed at a later date.)
This increase represents the first change in fees since 1999 and reflects inflationary costs associated
with program delivery.
Beginning September 1, 2007, all permit fees collected must meet the legal requirements of
these changes.
The following fees schedule is effective September 1, 2007
Activity
(Category A) See Notes 1,2
New Permit Application Fee
/ Annual Fee
Major Modification Fee
See Note 3
Major Individual NPDES Permits
$3,440
$1,030
Minor Individual NPDES Permits
$860
$260
Single Family Residences
$60
$20
Stormwater and Wastewater
Discharge General Permits
$100
Not Applicable
Recycle Systems
$360
$110
Animal Permits (Small Operations)
$60
Not Applicable
Animal Permits (Medium
Operations)
$180
Not Applicable
Animal Permits (Large Operations)
$360
Not Applicable
Nondischarge Major Permits
$1,310
$395
Nondischarge Minor Permits
$810
$245
Activity
(Category B) See Note 1
Additional Annual Fee
See Note 4
Project Fee
See Note 4
Special Order by Consent - Major
$500
$400
Special Order by Consent - Minor
$250
$400
Activity
(Category C) See Note 1
Project Fee
See Note 5
Sewer Extensions
$480
State Stormwater
$505
Water Quality Certifications -
Major
$570
1 of 3 2/21 /2008 11:14 AM

NPDES PERMITTING STRATEGIES FOR POTABLE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
September 2007
Background
In 1992, the Division of Water Quality (Division) implemented a general water treatment plant (WTP)
permitting strategy that was intended to apply to WTPs. However, after further research and discussion, it was
agreed that different technologies in water treatment yield very different pollutants of concern and impacts on the
environment. As a result, four permitting strategies were developed specifically geared towards certain water
treatment processes. This document summarizes the permit application and permit development procedure for
WTPs and serves as a reference tool for permit writers and permittees. Other available resources include
Assessment and Recommendations for Water Treatment Plant Permitting: Findings of the Water Treatment Plant
Workgroup, and the Conventional WTP Report, both of which further explain the collaborative interdepartmental
effort and data study that went into the development of these permitting approaches.
L PERMITAPPLICATIONPROCESS
An NPDES permit application is available on the NPDES website. The application is titled Standard Form
C-WTP and can be used for all WTPs, regardless of technology. This application differs from those used in the past
in that new applicants are required to submit a complete source water analysis and an engineering alternatives
analysis that fully explores all feasible alternatives to a surface water discharge. New facilities using ion exchange
(IE) or reverse osmosis (RO) technology are also required to perform a water quality model. New IE (includes
water softeners) and RO discharges will not be permitted in freshwater unless it is demonstrated that the
environmental impact would be minimal.
Based on their potential impacts to aquatic life all new IE and RO facilities, and conventional WTPs with a
discharge of over 0.5 MGD, must also initiate a tiered notification process that will serve to alert other divisions
and agencies through the Customer Service Center (CSC). The notification process, as illustrated in Figure 1, is
initiated when a new or expanding WTP project is first presented to a permitting agency or the CSC. When an
agency is first contacted, it becomes that agency's responsibility to direct the applicant to the CSC and notify a
CSC permit coordinator.
Figure 1— W
iter l reatment rtant lvonftcanon rtowcnart
Water Treatment Plant Notification Process
Potential Applicant
Acronym Ivey:
planning/design phase
Permitting Agency
..Perm
EDWO, DWR, DLR, DCM)
DWO EH- Div of ater Environmental
Div
DEH - Div of Environmental
Health
- Div of Land
Permit Coordinator
Resource s
Customer Service Center
Detour Dews of Water
Tier I Notification
ACOUS Army Corps of
En9 -
DCM - Div of Coastal
Management
DMF-Divof Marine
DWO DEH DLR DWR ACOE DCM DMF WRC USFWS NHP NMFS
Fisheries
Applicant
WRC - NC Wildlife
Resources Commission
with formal application
Permitting Agency
USFWS - US Fish and
Wildlife service
R (DEH, DWO, DWR, DLR, DCM)
y
NHP - NC Natural Heritage
\\\y
Program
NMFS - National Marine
Permit Coordinator
Fisheries Service
SEPA - State
Customer Service Center
Environmental Policy Act
Permitting Agencies
Tier II Notification
-I-
Comment/Review Agencies
Notifitation via
SEPA Process

Once the CSC has been contacted they will distribute a notice, via email, summarizing the proposed project
to the appropriate agency contacts. Tier I notification should begin for new or expanding WTPs upon initial contact
by the applicant, regardless of project stage. Following Tier I notification, each agency will determine its level of
involvement (i.e. requests for additional details, participation in meeting, etc.). Tier II notification should begin
when a significant development in the process has occurred, such as when a permit application has been filed or an
environmental document has been submitted. Throughout the process, CSC will coordinate communication with
the agencies and the applicant. Additional notifications may be necessary to update agency representatives of
important developments or to coordinate meetings. Again, these various tiers of notification will only include a
summary of developments. Agency involvement is discretionary. The notification process concludes once all
applicable permits are issued.
As previously mentioned, this process should only apply to new IE/RO facilities and conventional plants
with a predicted discharge of greater than or equal to 0.5 MGD. Copies of proposed draft permits for these
facilities should also be forwarded to the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Wildlife Resource Commission.
No inter -agency notification will be required for greensand filter systems.
H. PERMIT DEVELOPMENT FOR MEMBRANE AND ION EXCHANGE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
2.1 Background
In 2002, the Division established an inter -departmental Workgroup, which then led to the development of a
technical subcommittee tasked to study the impacts of membrane and sodium cycle cationic ion exchange WTPs on
receiving waters. The subcommittee first identified potential environmental concerns and then conducted an
analytical study, data review, and analysis of several existing WTPs in North Carolina. Foremost amongst water
quality concerns were the total residual chlorine (TRC) and chloride levels present in discharges and the potential
toxicity of these pollutants on the receiving stream. Based on the results of the analytical study, the following
permitting strategy has been adopted for all WTPs using membrane and ion exchange technologies.
Portions of this strategy pertaining to the use of "membrane" technologies will primarily involve reverse
osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), microfiltration (MF), and ultrafiltration (UF) processes for the treatment of
groundwater. Though less common, electrodialysis/electrodialysis reversal (ED/EDR) processes also use
membrane technology and should be guided by the membrane permitting strategy. Other portions of this document
pertain to WTPs using ion exchange (IE) as a primary or secondary component of the treatment system. "Water
softeners" are also IE processes. It is important to determine whether any part of the permittee's water treatment
process uses an ion exchange system. If so, their permit may incorporate relevant components of this strategy,
however the permit writer should use discretion when considering relative volumes of wastewater components.
These technologies (both membrane and IE) are of particular concern because they concentrate dissolved solids,
generating highly concentrated wastestreams. The wastes can have a toxic effect on the receiving water,
particularly if the system is freshwater in nature. For this reason, new discharges from membrane and IE WTPs
should not be permitted into freshwaters unless it can be demonstrated that the environmental impacts would be
minimal. All new IE/RO dischargers must perform dilution modeling.
2.2 Pollutants of Concern
Based on a review of actual data from existing IE and RO facilities, iron, copper, chloride and zinc showed
reasonable potential to exist in concentrations that may exceed water quality standards. In addition, arsenic and
fluoride seem to pose a particular concern for membrane WTPs, while manganese and lead were typically found in
significant concentrations in IE process effluent. Chlorine was determined to be a parameter of concern for IE's in
general, however it is important to note that TRC could potentially be problematic for any facility that chlorinates
its finished water. Any treatment prior to discharge (i.e. feed disinfection, pH adjustment, antiscalant additives)
should be considered when determining permit limits. The only additives that should be introduced prior to
separation of product water and reject stream are acids (to reduce deposits) and corrosion inhibitors. Any other
additives might introduce additional pollutants of concern. Facilities must obtain approval and request a permit
-2-

modification for any significant change that would alter the characteristics or nature of the discharge. Tables 1 and
2 provide sample effluent limits and summarize the minimum recommended monitoring requirements for
membrane and IE WTPs.
Table 2.1: Monitorinp Requirements for Membrane WTPs
The Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Membrane WTPs included below identifies various pollutants of concern
including conventional parameters, nutrients, and toxicants. A brief rationale for the inclusion of these contaminants can be
found in Appendix A. Other toxicants were not included because they were either not detected or rarely detected in the
effluent data surveyed, however, if a pollutant specific problem is detected in the receiving stream, effluent, or source water
then a monitoring requirement may be added for that parameter. Likewise, if data indicate that a pollutant is not present in
the facility's discharge, that parameter may be dropped from the requirements. These are minimum monitoring requirements.
Limits should be added if the facility shows reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards for toxicants. New
facilities should monitor for parameters of concerns regardless of whether or not there is a water quality standard. Monitoring
requirements can be re-evaluated during subsequent renewals.
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ,
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Average'',
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample _
Sari ple
Average
Maximtim
ire uenc
Type
Locations
Flow
Limited
Continuous
E
Temperature
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Salinity
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Conductivity
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
pH
Saltwater: 6.8 — 8.5
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Freshwater: 6.0 — 9.0
Dissolved Oxygen
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Total Dissolved Solids
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Freshwater:
17 28 µg/L
Total Residual Chlorine2
Saltwater:
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
13 /L
Total Arsenic
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Copper
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Chloride
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Iron
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Fluoride
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Zinc
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Ammonia Nitrogen
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen (TN)3
Quarterly
Grab
E
Total Phosphorus (TP)3
Quarterly
Grab
E
Whole Effluent Toxicity
Quarterly
Grab
E
Monitoring'
Notes:
1. Sampling locations: E= Effluent, U= Upstream of discharge location, D= Downstream of discharge location.
2. Limit and monitor only if the facility adds chlorine to water that is eventually discharged.
3. Facilities under 0.05 MGD should only monitor for nutrients if discharging into a NSW. Monitoring frequency should align
with basin -specific requirements if those are more stringent.
4. See section on WET testing for details (Table 5.2).
-3-

Table 2.2: Monitoring Reauirements for Ion Exchange WTPs
The Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Ion Exchange WTPs included below identifies various pollutants of concern
including conventional parameters, nutrients, and toxicants. A brief rationale for the inclusion of these contaminants can be
found in Appendix A. Other toxicants were not included because they were either not detected or rarely detected in the
effluent data surveyed, however if a pollutant specific problem is detected in the receiving stream then a monitoring
requirement should be added for that parameter. Likewise, if data indicate that a pollutant is not present in the facility's
discharge, that parameter may be dropped from the requirements. These are minimum monitoring requirements. Limits
should be added if the facility shows reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards for toxicants. New facilities
should monitor for parameters of concerns regardless of whether or not there is a water quality standard. Monitoring
requirements can be re-evaluated during subsequent renewals.
Notes:
1. An exception to the composite sampling is provided by 15A NCAC 213.0505 (C), which states that facilities with design
flows under 30,000 gallons per day may use grab samples to characterize their effluent.
2. ,Sampling locations: E = Effluent, U = Upstream of discharge location, D = Downstream of discharge location.
3. For intermittent discharges, instantaneous flow monitoring is required and the duration of the discharge must be reported.
Include provisions for monitoring the instantaneous maximum flow rate from the facility.
4. For existing plants, TSS limits may need to be phased in over a period of time to allow for the construction of new treatment
facilities
5. Limit only in effect if the facility uses chlorinated water in the filter backwash process (and discharges filter backwash).
6. See section on WET testing for details (Table 5.2).
7. Fluoride monitoring should apply only if the facility backwashes with fluoridated, finished water.
8. Facilities under 0.05 MGD should only monitor for nutrients if discharging into a NSW. Monitoring frequency should align
with basin -specific requirements if those are more stringent.
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
- LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Fre uen
Sample
Type'
Sample
Location
Flow
Limited
Instantaneous
or
Continuous3
E
Temperature
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Salim
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Conductivity
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
PH
Saltwater: 6.8 - 8.5
Freshwater: 6.0 - 9.0
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Dissolved Oxygen
See Table 5.1
Grab
E,U,D
Total Dissolved Solids
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Suspended Solids'
30 m /L
45 m /L
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorines
Freshwater:
17 28 µg/L
Saltwater:
13 /L
See Table 5.1
Grab
E
Total Copper
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Total Chloride
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Total Iron
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Total Manganese
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Total Lead
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Total Zinc
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Ammonia Nitrogen
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Fluoride'
Limit based on potential
See Table 5.1
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen (TN)8
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus (TP)e
Quarterly
Composite
E
Whole Effluent Toxicity
Monitoring'
Quarterly
Composite
E
-4-

2.3 Instream Monitoring
Both RO and IE WTPs will require instream monitoring. This requirement may be waived for facilities
discharging to zero flow streams. For discharges where no water quality model was performed, the facility should
monitor 50 feet upstream and at least 100 feet downstream of the outfall. For discharges where a model was
performed, locations should be determined on a case -by -case basis, but should take in consideration the size and
shape of the effluent plume.
III. PERMIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONVENTIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
3.1 Background
Following the completion of the IE/RO report, a second workgroup was formed whose objectives dealt
exclusively with concerns associated with the discharge of filter backwash from conventional treatment processes.
This report summarizes NPDES permitting strategy recommendations for conventional water treatment plants
based upon chemical and physical data from various facilities around North Carolina. The assessment and strategy
detailed here applies only to those facilities using surface water sources and the referenced technologies.
Most of the state of North Carolina (west of I-95) uses surface water as a drinking water source. It is
generally recognized that the water quality issues associated with surface water are those relating to particulate
matter, microbiological content, color, taste and odor. Conventional treatment processes are designed to address
these water quality issues. A conventional treatment process is described by the American Water Works
Association as including coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation, usually followed by filtration and
disinfection.
3.2 Pollutants of Concern
Aluminum, calcium, magnesium, and manganese were detected effluent data from the five conventional
WTPs used to supply data for this report. All five facilities had high maximum predicted concentrations for these
parameters, therefore they are considered to be pollutants of concern and should be monitored. Zinc should be
monitored if a permittee uses zinc orthophosphate as a corrosion inhibitor.
In addition to pH, flow, and total residual chlorine, which will be limited, the permit writer may need to
determine the necessity of a limit for some other parameter of concern that may have been identified in the
application. DWQ will perform a reasonable potential analysis (RPA) on any available data to determine the need
for monitoring or limits. For existing facilities collecting toxicant data, the RPA would employ these data. The
reasonable potential procedure may also be used as a tool for analyzing the source water of proposed water
treatment plants. Table 3 provides sample effluent limits and summarizes the minimum recommended monitoring
requirements for conventional WTPs.
-5-

'fable :3.1: Monitoring Requirements Igor Conventional WIYs
The Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Conventional WTPs included below identifies various pollutants of concern
including conventional parameters, nutrients, and toxicants. A brief rationale for the inclusion of these contaminants can be
found in Appendix A. Other toxicants were not included because they were either not detected or rarely detected in the
effluent data surveyed, however, if a pollutant specific problem is detected in the receiving stream, effluent, or source water
then a monitoring requirement may be added for that parameter. Likewise, if data indicate that a pollutant is not present in
the facility's discharge, that parameter may be dropped from the requirements. These are minimum monitoring requirements.
Limits should be added if the facility shows reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards for toxicants. New
facilities should monitor for parameters of concerns regardless of whether or not there is a water quality standard. Monitoring
requirements can be re-evaluated during subsequent renewals.
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Averse
Weekly
Averse
Daily Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample', ;
Location
Flow'
Limited
Continuous
Effluent
TSS
30 m /L
45 m /L
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
H
Freshwater: 6.0 - 9.0
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine 2
17-28 /L
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Aluminum
Quarterl 7
Grab
Effluent
Calcium
Quarterl 7
Grab
Effluent
Magnesium
Quarterl 7
Grab
Effluent
Manganese
Quarterl 7
Grab
Effluent
Fluoride
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc 3
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Ammonia Nitrogen 4
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Iron
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorus (TP)5
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (TN)5
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Whole Effluent Toxicity
Monitorin 6
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1. See Appendix A for guidance on determining an appropriate flow limit.
2. Limit and monitor only if the facility adds chlorine to water that is eventually discharged.
3. Zinc should only be monitored if a Permittee uses zinc orthophosphate as a corrosion inhibitor.
4. Facilities using chloramination will be required to monitor ammonia nitrogen on a quarterly basis.
5. Facilities under 0.05 MGD should only monitor for nutrients if discharging into a NSW. Monitoring frequency should align
with basin -specific requirements if those are more stringent.Parameters should be monitored in conjunction with toxicity
test.
6. See section on WET testing for details.
7. Parameter should be monitored in conjunction with toxicity test.
IV. PERMIT DEVELOPMENT FOR GREENSAND WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
4.1 Background
The following permitting strategy applies to new and existing water treatment plants using greensand
filtration to generate potable water from groundwater. This categorization would also include many community
well systems, "iron filters", and "manganese filters" as long as they do not backwash filters with a sodium solution.
The permit writer should contact the facility to verify that there is not a briny discharge. This permitting strategy
-6-

does not apply to any other kind of cationic exchange unit used in water treatment. If any portion of the water
treatment process includes an ion exchange/water softener unit, then the RO-IE Permitting Strategy will apply as
well.
Typically, a greensand filtration unit is preceded by the use of an aeration tower along with potassium
permanganate to oxidize dissolved iron in the ground water. The particulate ferric hydroxide (and some minor
quantities of soluble ferrous material) is then removed via filtration through a manganese based greensand media.
Greensand is a proprietary material that does not require sodium cycle regeneration, only backwash with finished
(potable) water. Since the discharge from such a facility is not as saline as that from a sodium cycle cationic
exchange unit, this may be considered a more environmentally friendly technology for the treatment of
groundwater. For that reason, unlike other types of ion exchange systems, non -discharge options are sometimes an
alternative and should be explored for new permits. Filter backwash water is usually collected in a settling basin,
and the supernatant is then discharged to surface waters or a regional treatment works.
4.2 Pollutants of Concern
Typical chemical additives to such treatment systems are an anti-scalant (such as zinc orthophosphate), fluoride,
chlorine and potassium permanganate.
Table 4.1: Monitoring Requirements For Greensand WTPs
The minimum monitoring requirements for greensand WTPs included below identifies various pollutants of concern
including conventional parameters and toxicants. A brief rationale for the inclusion of these contaminants can be found in
Appendix A. Other toxicants were not included because they are not expected to be detected, however if a pollutant specific
problem is detected in the receiving stream then a monitoring requirement may be added for that parameter. Likewise, if
data indicate that a pollutant is not present in the facility's discharge, that parameter may be dropped from the
requirements. Limits should be added if a facility shows reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards for
toxicants. New facilities should monitor for parameters of concerns regardless of whether or not there is a water quality
standard. Monitoring requirements can be re-evaluated during subsequent renewals.
LIMITS
N10MTORINGREQUIREMENTS =`
EHARACIItT5i7C'.
Monthl Y
Dail Maximum
Y
Measurement
Sam le "
P
Sann le
P
Average
Fre acne
Type
Location
Flow'
Limited
Instantaneous
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Freshwaters: 17- 28 µg/L
Total Residual Chlorinez
Saltwater:13 /L
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Fluoride3
Based on potential
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Iron
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc''
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Total Manganese
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
pH
Freshwater: 6.0 — 9.0 S.U.
See Table 5.1
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. For instantaneous flow monitoring, the duration of the discharge must be reported in addition to the total flow.
2. The TRC monitoring requirement applies only if the Permittee backwashes with chlorinated water.
3. Fluoride should be monitored if the permittee backwashes with fluoridated finished water.
4. Zinc shall be monitored if the Permittee uses any zinc -based additive in the water treatment process.
-7-

Y. IMPLEMENTATION
5.1. Monitoring Frequency
In order to be consistent with the monitoring guidance employed for other permits across the state,
monitoring frequencies will be based on the flow divisions used to define facility class in the 15A NCAC 08C
.0302 regulations. Requirements described in 15A NCAC 2B .0508(d) for water supply plants were used as
guidance. Table 5 summarizes the monitoring requirements. After sufficient data have been collected (eight to 12
data points over at least one year) the permittee may petition for a reduction in monitoring.
Table 5.1: WTPMonitorinQ Requirement
Facility Class
Conventional Parameters and Toxicants
(Effluent and Instream)
If limited - 2/Month
Permitted Flow < 0.5 MGD
Not limited - Monthly
If limited -Weekly
Permitted Flow >_ 0.5 MGD
Not limited - 2/Month
5.2. Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing
Membrane, ion exchange, and conventional WTPs should be required to conduct quarterly WET tests for
monitoring purposes. Eventually, the Division may choose to use this data to develop additional policy. The type
of WET test conducted will vary depending on receiving stream characteristics. In addition, the level of available
dilution and tidal effects will determine whether the facility should perform an acute or chronic test, while the type
of water (freshwater or saltwater) will determine which organism should be used. Table 1 summarizes WET -
testing requirements. Appendix A includes sample WET language.
Greensand filter systems will not be required to monitor whole effluent toxicity.
Table 5.2: WET Test Requirements- Monitor Only
�?4�"y.Kl ,_ dk.
j. W sLR x:, j
Te$k F t ak tl A
�.rVlR�}�tV14 K;�
t4
IWC < 0.25%
Acute 24-hour Pass/Fail at 90%
Dilution
IWC >_ 0.25%
Chronic test at IWC (maximum 90%)
Modeled Tidal discharge
Chronic test at chronic mixing zone characteristics
Tidal Effects
Tidal Discharge- not modeled'
Acute 24-hour Pass/Fail at 90%
Acute test organism: Fathead minnow
Freshwater
Chronic test organism: Cerioda hnia dubia
Water Type
Acute test organism: Fathead Minnow OR Mysid Shrimp
Saltwater
OR Silverside Minnow (permittee's choice)
Chronic test organism: Mysid shrimp '-
Notes:
1. Applies to existing dischargers only.
2. Permittee may choose to conduct comparison studies showing Ceriodaphnia dubia to be greater than or equal to Mysid
Shrimp in degree of sensitivity to the facility's effluent.
5.3. Peer Agency Review
At a minimum, the permit writer should consider providing a copy of draft permits for all membrane and
ion exchange facilities to the following agencies: Division of Marine Fisheries (for saltwater discharges), US Fish
and Wildlife Service (Sara Ward), Wildlife Resources Commission, and the Division of Environmental Health.
Draft permits proposing a discharge to shellfish waters (SA) must also be sent to the Shellfish Sanitation for review.
-8-

Major permits for conventional water treatment plants should also be sent to the same agencies.
Permits for greensand filter systems will not require inter -agency notification.
5.4. Special Considerations — SA Waters
SA waters are, by default, classified as High Quality Waters. Therefore, limits should be calculated using''/2 the
water quality standard. Draft permits proposing a discharge to SA waters should be sent to the Shellfish Sanitation
for review.
M

APPENDIX A. RATIONALE FOR PARAMETER INCLUSION
I. CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Conductivity (IE and RO facilities)
Conductivity provides information on the inorganic nature of a wastewater by tracking the relative concentration of ions
By requiring effluent and instream monitoring of conductivity, it may be possible to assess some of the ionic impacts of
the discharge on the receiving stream.
Dissolved Oxygen (IE and RO facilities)
Low dissolved oxygen concentrations were observed in the effluent of the facilities evaluated. A facility may petition
DWQ to reduce/eliminate DO monitoring requirements if they can demonstrate that the discharge has no significant
impact on DO levels in the receiving stream.
Floiv
Flow is an important consideration for dilution modeling and mixing zone calculations. Continuous flow monitoring is
required for all but intermittent discharges. All water treatment plants will have flow limits, determined by either the
facility design or the maximum monthly average flow in the most recent three-year period. For new facilities the flow
limit may be determined based on the proposed discharge flow as submitted by the permittee, provided reasonable
justification supports the flow.
Temperature (IE and RO facilities)
Literature reviews indicate that temperature is a potential cause for concern. If a permittee can demonstrate that its
discharge is not significantly impacting temperature in the receiving stream, the permittee may petition DWQ to
reduce/eliminate the temperature monitoring requirements.
Total Dissolved Solids (all types except RO)
Total dissolved solids can be a good general indicator of potential toxicity and may be present in elevated concentrations
in the wastestream. Since some existing WTPs only have minimal treatment prior to discharge, TSS limits may need to
be phased in over a period of time to allow for the construction of new treatment facilities.
pH
Some of the chemicals used in water treatment can depress or raise pH, and as such, it should be monitored and limited.
For discharges to fresh waters, pH will be limited in the range of 6.0-9.0 standard units. For salt waters, pH should be
limited between 6.8 and 8.5 standard units.
Salinity (IE and RO facilities only)
If effluent salinity is much higher than the salinity of the receiving stream, there may be localized acute toxic effects.
II TOXICANTS
Arsenic (RO facilities only)
For membrane systems, average values of arsenic were slightly below the aquatic life standard and the maximum values
observed exceeded standards.
Calcium (conventional WTPs only)
Calcium is a pollutant of concern for conventional WTPs and should be monitored in conjunction with the facility's WET
test.
Chloride (IE and RO facilities)
Foremost among the water quality concerns for ion exchange and membrane plants are the levels of chlorides present and
the effect of these discharges on the receiving stream.
Copper (IE, RO, and conventional systems)
A data survey indicated the potential for copper to be present in concentrations exceeding NC water quality standards
(WQS). While average values were slightly below the aquatic life standard, maximum detected levels exceeded the
standards. Since this is an action level parameter, it will be monitored but not limited unless toxicity can be linked to the
presence of this parameter in the potable water byproduct.
Fluoride
Fluoride can be a pollutant of concern for conventional, IE and greensand systems if potable, fluoridated water is used for
backwash water.
-10-

In membrane plants, fluoride levels can be quite high if the source water contains fluoride. In many of the facilities
sampled, fluoride levels in membrane WTP discharges showed reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards.
Iron
Iron is typically a primary pollutant of concern for all types of water treatment processes. This parameter should be
monitored (with no limit) since no WQ standard currently exists.
Lead (IE systems only)
Lead values present in the IE discharges studied demonstrated the potential to exceed NC water quality standards.
Manganese (all facilities except RO)
Similar to Iron, manganese is a frequently occurring parameter of concern. However since there is no WQ standard for
this pollutant, it should be monitored without a limit.
Total Residual Chlorine
Chlorine is introduced through the use of finished water in the filter backwash process, and adds a toxic component to
backwash effluent. Note that it's also possible for chlorine to mask toxicity from other sources. Using non -chlorinated or
dechlorinated water sources during the backwash process can reduce TRC toxicity, however if a WTP discharges filter
backwash water and uses chlorinated water in the backwash process, the discharge will receive a TRC limit from 17-28
µg/L as a daily maximum (for freshwaters). All Saltwater dischargers should receive a daily maximum limit of 13 µg/L.
Most plants will need to build dechlorination facilities to achieve this level in their discharge.
Zinc
Zinc is a pollutant of concern for all types of facilities. This is an action level parameter and should be monitored without
a limit.
III. NUTRIENTS
Ammonia
The ammonia nitrogen results at conventional water treatment plants indicated very low levels in the potable water by-
product. It is important to note, however, that none of the facilities surveyed use chloramination to disinfect the source
water. DEH regional office staff has suggested that facilities using chloramines for disinfection should have finished
water ammonia levels between 0.2-0.5 mg/L but may have levels higher than this. For this reason, those conventional
treatment facilities using chloramination will be required to monitor ammonia nitrogen on a quarterly basis.
A review of data for IE and RO plants indicated that levels of ammonia nitrogen were considerably higher than
background. In addition, a number of WTPs discharge to nutrient sensitive waters, making the need to monitor effluent
nutrient levels necessary. Therefore, TN and TP will be monitored quarterly. When sufficient effluent data have been
collected, the need for nutrient limits will be assessed on a case -by -case basis.
Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Nutrient monitoring will be added for all facilities except greensand filters. Monitoring should be added according to
basin specific requirements, in order to be consistent with other dischargers throughout the state
IV. WET TESTING
Because of the potential toxic effects of WTP discharges, all WTPs (except greensand filters) will be required to monitor
for toxicity. Limits will not be implemented at this time.
V. SAMPLE TYPE
Membrane IVTPs
Although variability may occur between plants and within a particular facility, the Workgroup felt that grab samples were
adequate to characterize the effluent. After reviewing existing data, the consistency in the individual source water and the
treatment process over time suggests that grab samples are appropriate.
Ion Exchange WTPs
Over the course of the regeneration cycle, the effluent characteristics can experience significant variability. Composite
samples should be collected for all parameters except flow, total residual chlorine, temperature, dissolved oxygen, TDS,
-11-

salinity, conductivity and pH. These parameters can only be measured properly using grab samples. An exception to the
composite sampling is provided by 15A NCAC 2B.0505 (C), which states that facilities with design flows under 30,000
gallons per day may use grab samples to characterize their effluent.
IV. ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS OF CONCERN
Additional parameters of concern, most notably metals, may be identified in the application package and source water
data. Source water data should be entered into a Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) in order to assess the need for
limits. Such determinations are to be made on a case -by -case basis.
-12-

APPENDIX B — SAMPLE WET MONITORING LANGUAGE
CHRONIC TOXICITY MONITORING (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct quarterly chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure document is XX%. The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The tests will be performed
during the months of and . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form
(MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP313. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original)
is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of
the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association
with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be
measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee
will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit
number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months
specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
.S Current Verswns�luxLcnr�mge Rfesvlt.%<QCH PL- Cergo (RO) Fi'TP.doc
- 13 -

9. f 'r, C <,6 l
t & "-7 be-lce,Lk
773
- 's-0Q83
!/C L, ,
/ _ , ` tG
0ti
��LUA,-
F1-• 11-7

For
A.M.
Date Time P.M.
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
Of
U Phone
U Fax
J Mobile
Area Code Number Extension
Message
Signed
TELEPHONED
PLEASE CALL
CAME TO SEE YOU
WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU
URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
SPECIAL ATTENTION

DR. F. W. SLATE
Mayor
Commissioners:
J.C. "BUSTER" CLEARY, Mayor Pro Tern
RICHARD BROADWAY
WILLIAM L. (BILL) FOSTER
LASH GAITHER SANFORD, JR.
VERNON THOMPSON
CHRISTINE W. SANDERS
Town Manager
Dear Mr. Tedder,
c7own
0
rt
Moc�sville
INCORPORATED 1829
171 CLEMENT STREET
MOCKSALLE, NC 27028
DANIEL L. SMITH
Director of Public Works
JACK KELLER
Chief of Police
RECEIVO PHILCROWE
. ,C. Npl.of RMNA Fire Chief
pp�ENRYP. VAN HOY 11
MAR 17 ZTown Attorney
Wip"i.stc,I'r'" SaleM
RekqiionalOffico
March 10, 2004
The Town of Mocksville is currently in negotiations with a property owner to acquire the
needed land for the construction of a backwash basin for the Hugh A. Lagle Water
Treatment Plant. The Town of Mocksville is also in the design phase with its engineer for
the backwash basin and should be completed within 6-12 months. The Town of
Mocksville would request no punitive sanctions be levied at this time due to the efforts
being made at this time to remedy this situation. If there are any concerns or questions
please contact Nick Slogick, Water Plant ORC at 336-751-2635 or Danny Smith, Public
Works Director at 336-751-2519.
w� %1
Sincerely, R Rho4 f y
Christine Sanders ti�f h•;� Q/
Mocksville Town Manager
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
E-MAIL [e-mail]
www.mocksvillenc.org

`,'�
Michael F. Easley, Governor
�``"G
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\V
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
�^ ( \ r
`•,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
>
!
Division of Water Quality
March 1, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL #7002 2410 0005 2713 8266
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Christine Sanders
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Discharge of Wastewater without Benefit of a Permit
Town of Mocksville
Mocksville WTP
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
On February 18, 2004, Derek Denard of this Office investigated a complaint concerning this
facility. The complaint concerned the unpermitted discharge of alum sludge and backwash from
the Town of Mocksville's water treatment plant located on Sanford Avenue. Upon inspection of
the facility this office confirmed that the water treatment plant is discharging to an unnamed
tributary of Bear Creek Class "C" waters of the State. Nick Slogick, with the Town of Mocksville,
was present for the inspection.
You are hereby advised that the discharge of waste or wastewater without benefit of a permit from
the Division of Water Quality is a violation of North Carolina General Statue 143.215.1(1) & (6),
which states:
(a) Activities for Which Permits Required. -- No person shall do any of the following things or carry
out any of the following activities unless that person has received a permit from the Commission
and has complied with all conditions set forth in the permit:
(1) Make any outlets into the waters of the State.
(6) Cause or permit any waste, directly or indirectly, to be discharged to or in any manner
intermixed with the waters of the State in violation of the water quality standards applicable
to the assigned classifications or in violation of any effluent standards or limitations
established for any point source, unless allowed as a condition of any permit, special order
or other appropriate instrument issued or entered into by the Commission under the
provisions of this Article.
The enforcement options available to the Division for violations of the previously referenced
statute are found at NCGS 143-215.6 A, B, and C and include civil penalties, criminal penalties,
and/or injunctive relief. Unpermitted discharges of wastewater may result in assessment of civil
penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day, per violation.
Our office is considering a recommendation in favor of the pursuit of punitive sanctions for this
violation. Prior to making such a recommendation, we need to be certain that we have all relevant
information. If you wish to present an explanation for the violations cited, or if you believe there
are other factors which should be considered, please send such information to me in writing with G�3 P3
fifteen (15) days following receipt of this letter. Any additional information will be reviewed, and, if
an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, that information will be forwarded to the
N.C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone] Customer Service
1(800)623-7748

Ms. Sanders
March 1, 2004
Page 2 of 2
Director with the enforcement package for his consideration. Should you have any questions on
this matter, contact Derek Denard or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
cc: Nick Slogick, ORC
Central Files
'IIVSRO

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C-WTP
For discharges associated with conventional water treatment plants
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number 0000
Please print or type
1. Contact Information:
Facility Name
Owner Name
Street Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number ( )
Fax Number ( )
e-mail Address
Operator Name
Street Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number ( )
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name (If different from above)
Street Address or State Road
City / Zip Code
County
3. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes:
4. Principal process(es):
5. Ownership Status:
Federal = State Private Public
6. Check here if discharge is continuous ❑
If not continuous,
Frequency of discharge during the day:
Frequency of discharge during the month (week):
7. Number of separate discharge points:
S. Description of source water(s) (Le. groundwater or surface water)
Page 1 of 2 Version -08103

NPDES PERbUT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C-WTp
For discharges associated with conventional water treatment plants
9. Name of receiving stream(s)
tongitude: (Provide of map of exact location of each outfall, including latitude and
lo
10. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications (check all that apply and provide
Permit numbers or check none if not applicable):
TVPe Permit Number
M None
0 UIC
M NPDES
0 PSD
E3 NESHAPs
TyDe
Non -Attainment
0 Ocean Dumping
0 Dredge/Fill Permits
RCRA
Other
11. Is this facility located on Native American lands? (check one)
YES =
NO a
Permit Number
12- Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals, that have the
potential to be discharged.
13. For NEW water treatment plants, please submit all analyses of source water collected.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best
of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed name of Person Signing
Title
Signature of Applicant
Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or
certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any
recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental
Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000, or by
imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or
imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
Page 2 of 2
Version -08103

COMPLAINT REPORT
Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Did caller ask to remain anonymous? Yes No
(If YES, skip to directions section)
NAME OF CALLER: D e.,
DATE:r
TIME: am/pm
COUNTY: �ay�c'
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
DIRECTIONS.
SOURCE OF POLLUTION:
L
NATURE OF COMPLAINT: SPe 6�y�� I L f ' /
REFERRED TO:
RECEIVED BY: INVESTIGATOR: D �R �K �/✓ n

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources A74*A
Division of Environmental Health
Michael F. Easley, Governor R
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary February 11, 2004 R -
Terry L. Pierce, Director N.C.[)epg. of ENNR
Ms. Christine Sanders, Town Manager FEB 1 1 2004
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street Wl?t-A
Mocksville, N.C. 27028 Regional Office
RE: Year 2004 Water System Inspection
ID #02-30-010
Town of Mocksville
Davie County
Dear Ms. Sanders:
On January 27, 2004 I inspected the Mocksville water system. Listed below are the
deficiencies that were observed during the inspection.
1. Currently the water treatment plant has no alum sludge or backwash disposal system,
which is required by NCGS 143.215.1 (1) & (6).
2. Settling time at the water treatment plant is marginal at best and needs to be increased
in accordance with 15A NCAC 18C .0706 (b) of the Rules Governing Public Water
Systems (reference letter from this office dated October 11, 1999).
Item One has appeared on the 1998, 2000, 2001, and 2002 inspections. Item Two
has appeared on the 2000, 2001, and 2002 inspections. Your cooperation in correcting
the above problems in a timely manner will be greatly appreciated.
Nick Slogick and his staff are doing an excellent job regarding the operation and
maintenance of the water treatment plant. If you have any questions or if I may be of
assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
i
Bert King
Water Treatmen lant Consultant
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION
BK/smm
cc: Jessica G. Miles, Chief, Public Water Supply Section, Raleigh
Danny Smith, Public Works Director, Town of Mocksville
Nick Slogick, Assistant Public Works Director, Town of Mocksville
Steve Tedder, Regional Supervisor, DWQ
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241
Phone: 336 - 771-4600 \ FAX: 336 - 771-4631
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
11

Re: Mocksville WTP
Subject: Re: Mocksville WTP
From: Steve Tedder <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:58:34 -0500
To: Steve Mauney <[e-mail]>
CC: Derek Denard <[e-mail]>
I agree. Derek you need to visit the site before the snow and rains hit if possible
and do your documentation.
On 2/11/2004 10:48 AM, Steve Mauney wrote:
Bert King came down today and said that he had just inspected the Mocksville WTP
and that their sludge was discharged into the dry ditch near the plant. I looked on
the data base and in the file and did not find any evidence of a permit or any
monitoring. He is going to include this information in their inspection letter.
Looks like a candidate for an NOV and enforcement. -Steve
Steve Tedder
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone] ext 259
FAX: [phone]
1 of 1 2/11/2004 2:39 PM

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Ms. Christine Sanders, Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
A. Signature _.—. (. __.... _....
X� {��L.- J V ti'L�W �i� ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) I C. Date of Deliven
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. ice Type
Certified Mail Express Mail
Certified
Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. 7007 3020 0000 2315 0963 ✓ C2 1 'ga N(� V
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return eceipt— 7 z/ _ ^ , ,a.- 102595-02-M-154

UNITED STATBrQCiAb'ERMI@EC�T: {^q:�a:
ntt^—a+►rr-a c c t.vc.: ns ct-'�t sn s
:.=:: :: N.-•;. �:-�.: .;.:.><_:.... -�.. eo.-�u -» :ate
NCDENR-Water Quality Section
585 Wau htown Sheet
g
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
1 „l,1 {,,,1„Jill ►„{ ►„I„1►1 „1,1 {,,,1,1,1,1„{, J,1 „i„1 {

■ Completejtems 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Ms Christine Sanders
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville NC 27028
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) I B. Date of Deliver
C. Signature r
U ❑Agent
X Addresse
iW 'jh
D. Is delivery address different fro4 item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
;2!(�rtified Mail ❑ xpress Mail
❑ Registered .Aeturn Receipt for Merchandise
El Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7002 2410 0005 2713 8266 Nov
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic 102595-00-M-0952

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail
��tqe 8`,F�e� 4?laid
VJ
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, ad` s a(P+4 in tiJil
. '.
MAR 0 4 2004
NC DENRj r1 St01 aii e (li
Water Quality Section 14 n �31 i CEi
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem NC 271u7-2241

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print vour name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mrs. Christine W. Bralley
Town Manager
Town of Mocksville
171 Clement Street
Mocksville, NC 27028
A.
\ ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
�1B. Received by (Printed Name) I C. Date of D liver)
l-r�bf►nG W, rd:Yz
D. Is delivery address diff rent from item 1? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
7008 3230 0000 9861 6863
3. SS ice Type
� Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
DR Form 3811. February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt , - I '2 — i -1 102595-02-M-154

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
I
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
,S,, Ulh d 4,e,
Surface Water Protection Section
N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107-2241
HiPt"Hi'li if, "IT