20001432_Jurisdictional Determination_19970501

PORT
L R
FINA
E

WETLAND DELINEATION FOR LEE COUNTY, SANFORD BYPASS
(US 421/ NC 87)

State Project No. 8.T540402
T.I.P. No. R-2417
NCDOT Contract No. A302758
Consulting Project No. 96-LM-07
' (L&M No. 96-024-07)
Provided for the `
' North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch

Box 25201
Office
Wilmington
One South
2761 l
North Carolina
Raleigh,
attn.: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.

Issued: May 1997

Langley and McDonald, RC.
Engineers
Surveyors 5544 Greenwich Road, Virginia Beach VA 23462
Planners [phone] Fax [phone]
Landscape Architects
E
i
t
l C
m
l 201 Packets Court,Willamsburg, VA 23185
-
0
nv
ron
en
onsu
a
tants [phone] Fax (757) 229
49
0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

u
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................1
2.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................1
2.1 Project Description .........................................................................................................................1
2.2 Study Purpose ................................................................................................................................2
2.3 Study Area .....................................................................................................................................2
3.0 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................................2
3.1 Hydric Soils ...................................................................................................................................3
3.2 Hydrophytic Vegetation .................................................................................................................4
3.3 Wetland Hydrology ........................................................................................................................4
4.0 FINDINGS ........................................................................................................... ..............................6
4.1 Soils ................................................................................................................................................6
4. L I Hydric ...................................................................................................................................6
4.1.2 Non-Hydric with Hydric Inclusions ......................................................................................6
4.1.3 Non-Hydric ...........................................................................................................................6
4.2 Wetland Types ...............................................................................................................................7
4.2.1 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ............................................................7
4.2.2 Piedmont Bottomland Forest ................................................................................................7
4.2.3 Man-made Pond Fringe Wetlands ........................................................................................ 8
4.2.4 Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (Blackwater Subtype) ..................................................8
4.2.5 Low Elevation Seep ...............................................................................................................8
4.3 Marginal Non-Wetland ..................................................................................................................8
4.4 Agricultural Fields .........................................................................................................................9
4.5 Potential Mitigation Sites ...............................................................................................................9
5.0 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION CONFIRMATION ............10
6.0 WETLAND MAPPING AND NCDEM RATINGS .........................................................................10
7.0 APPENDICES
' 7.1 Exhibits
7. 1.1 Location Map
7.1.2 Phase I Wetland Delineation Maps
7.1.3 Phase II Wetland Delineation Map
7.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Data Sheets
7.3,N.C. Division of Environmental Management Wetland Rating Sheets

NC Department of Transportation May 1997
' Langley & McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. Confirmed wetlands in both phases listed by community type ................................... 9
TABLE 2. NCDEM wetland rating scores by community type .............................................. 11

NC Department of Transportation
Langley & McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07
May 1997
Page ii
n
0

n

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Langley and McDonald, P.C. was retained by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) to perform a wetland delineation of the 21 kilometer Sanford Bypass in Lee County, North
Carolina. This scope of work included: 1) preparation of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers data sheets
for each type of wetland area and its associated non-wetlands (uplands); 2) preparation of North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management data sheets for each type of wetland present; 3)
confirmation of our field work by the Raleigh, North Carolina office of the Wilmington District U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers; and 4) preparation of draft and final reports. The draft report of findings
was prepared upon completion of Phase I of our work effort. Services provided in Phase I included
delineation of wetlands within the common areas for two alternative corridors evaluated by NCDOT.
Services provided in Phase II included delineation of wetlands in corridor B-1. All field flagging data
(locations, numbering) for both phases of this study has been provided to Mr. Emory Kincaid of the
NCDOT Department of Locations and Surveys.
There were a total of 16 wetland areas located in Phase I of this study, which traverses portions of the
Piedmont and upper coastal plain physiographic provinces. The five wetland types observed included:
Piedmont Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest, Piedmont Bottomland Forest, Man-made Pond Fringe
' Wetlands, Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (Blackwater Subtype) and Low Elevation Seep. The
Corps of Engineers confirmed these findings in the field on January 28 and February 25, 1997.
' Phase II contained 30 wetland pockets, all occurring in the Piedmont physiographic province. These
wetlands were Piedmont Mixed Mesic Hardwood Forests, Low Elevation Seeps and Man-made Pond
' Fringe Wetlands. The Corps of Engineers confirmed the delineation of wetlands and headwaters within
Phase II during a site visit on April 9, 1997.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
' The following Wetland Delineation Report is submitted to assist in obtaining required permits for the
construction of the Sanford Bypass in Lee County, North Carolina. This report describes the wetland
communities that occur within the Phase I and Phase II study areas and provides North Carolina
' Division of Environmental Management (DEM) wetland ratings for each wetland type. Attached as
appendices to this report are: maps of the field-confirmed limits of wetlands (locations, shapes, and
sizes are approximated), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wetland data forms, and DEM rating sheets.
Wetland boundaries are currently being located by survey by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT).
2.1 Project Description
This project is part of the construction of the Sanford Bypass from US 421 northwest of Sanford to NC
87 southeast of Sanford, North Carolina in Lee County (Exhibit 8.1). The bypass will be a four lane
N.C. Department of Transportation May 1997
Langley and McDonald, P.C., 96-024-07 Page I

divided roadway with a 21 meter (69 foot) median on new location and, as proposed, is approximately
21 kilometers (13 miles) long. Study corridors for this project were approximately 300 meters (984
feet) wide. This project is identified in the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as TIP No. R-2417.
' 2.2 Study Purpose
a The purpose of this study was to 1) flag the physical limits of all wetlands located within the study
corridors of the Sanford Bypass as previously located by NCDOT during their ground-truthing of the
' corridors and reported in the Natural Resources Technical Report prepared March 27, 1996 by Mr.
Christopher A. Murray, Environmental Biologist for NCDOT, 2) prepare a report of our methods and
findings, and 3) obtain confirmation from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers as to the accuracy of the
wetland delineation.
' 2.3 Study Area
The study area for this project included all portions of the Sanford Bypass (US 421/87) study corridor
' common to both alternative alignments (Phase I) and the area included within alternative B 1 (Phase II).
See Exhibit 7.1.2 for the exact location and limits of the study area.
3.0 METHODS

u

11

Prior to performing wetland delineations within the study area, published resource information on the
project area was reviewed to clearly understand the project limits and determine the location, size and
type of potential wetland delineations necessary. Information sources included: U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle maps "Colon, NC", "Broadway, NC", and
"Sanford, NC"; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps of
those quadrangles; topographic base maps (1:5000 metric scale) containing approximate wetland limits
prepared by NCDOT; aerial photography containing wetland locations and data, aerial photography of
the project's corridor alternatives; the Natural Resources Technical Report (March 27, 1996) prepared
for the project; and the Soil Survey of Lee County, North Carolina published by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) (formerly the Soil Conservation Service
(SCS)) in 1989.
The delineation (field flagging) of wetlands in Phase I of the study area was conducted in January and
Februaiy 1997 with the delineation of Phase II occurring in March 1997. The Principal-in-Charge of
this study was Kenneth A. Dierks, while the Project Manager was Robert P. Kerr, R.E.P., P.W.S. The
qualifications of the principal investigator are as follows:
Investigator: James F. Shem
Education: B. S. in Forestry, 1992, North Carolina State University
N. C. Department of Transportation May 1997
' Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 2

0

1
1
Expertise: Wetland delineation & permitting, Section 7 endangered species surveys
The identification of wetlands in the field was based on the mandatory technical criteria and methods
described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual together with guidance
published by the Corps National Headquarters (October 7, 1991 and March 6, 1992). A jurisdictional
wetland is defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as:
"...those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency
and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands
generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas [33 CFR Part 328.3(b)]."
Therefore, as explained further in the Corps Manual, the three mandatory technical criteria which must
be present under normal circumstances for a finding of wetlands are: hydric soils, prevalence of
hydrophytic ("water-loving") vegetation and wetland hydrology. An overview of the procedures used
to evaluate each of these three mandatory criteria is provided below.
Areas inspected were selected based on preliminary wetland mapping provided by NCDOT and
detailed examination of topographic maps and the Lee County Soil Survey. Transects were walked
across wide floodplain areas previously identified as wetlands. A wetland line, often parallel to the toe-
of-slope, was flagged. Scattered isolated non-wetland inclusions were noted but not flagged within the
Buffalo Creek floodplain (wetland area 5).
Wetlands not associated with major floodplain systems were discovered by walking minor tributaries,
intermittent streams, and draws. Some wetlands previously identified were found not to be
jurisdictional (e.g., area 9), while the inspection of other potential areas yielded previously unidentified
wetlands (e.g., portions of wetland area 14 and wetland area 20). The vast majority of the extensive
linear footage of streams (waters of the United States) and draws examined contained no jurisdictional
wetlands.
3.1 Hydric Soils
' The Corps Manual states criteria that render a soil hydric based on drainage class and the duration of
soil saturation. Due to the seasonal nature of these conditions, soil saturation may not always be
observed, but the Corps Manual provides specific field indicators that provide evidence of this criterion
' being met. Of these indicators, one of the most readily utilized in the field is soil color. Soil colors are
categorized into numerical codes using Munsell Soil Color Charts, a collection of predetermined color
codes zorganized in a systematic soil color identification book. The Corps Manual identifies and
discusses the color codes that usually characterize a hydric mineral soil (Section 44J). Hydric mineral
soils usually have one of the following features within ten inches of the soil surface:
t 1) matrix chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils
2) matrix chroma of 1 or less in un-mottled soils
N. C. Department of Transportation May 1997
Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 3

Field samples were taken for color readings within or immediately below the A horizon (surface layer),
compared to color samples in the Munsell Charts, and recorded. Soil texture was also determined and
recorded.
Infrequently, soil samples taken within wetlands did not meet the low chroma criterion as they were
' derived from red Triassic mudstone parent material. These soils are problematic since their soil color
will not change under anaerobic conditions and may occur within jurisdictional wetlands. Some red
parent material soils were considered hydric when strong evidence of an aquic moisture regime
' (wetland hydrology) was observed. Such redoximorphic soil features included concretions and
oxidized rhizospheres.
3.2 Hydrophytic Vegetation
' The Corps Manual states that an area has hydrophytic vegetation when, "under normal circumstances
more than 50 percent of the composition of the dominant species from all strata are obligate wetland
(OBL), facultative-wetland (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC) species" (Corps Manual, Section 35.a).
As defined in the Corps Manual, obligate wetland species "occur almost always in wetlands (estimated
probability greater than 99 percent)", facultative-wetland species "occur usually in wetlands"
(estimated probability 67 percent to 99 percent), and facultative species are those "with a similar
likelihood of occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands" (estimated probability 33 percent to 67
percent).
Two additional indicator statuses are designated for non-wetland plants. Facultative-upland (FACU)
species "occur sometimes in wetlands" (estimated probability one percent to less than 33 percent) and
' obligate upland (UPL) species "occur rarely in wetlands" (estimated probability less than one percent).
' The scientific names of all species identified were recorded, and dominants were determined as
recommended in the Corps Manual (Section 65.7). Scientific nomenclature is according to the
Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas (Radford et al., 1968). The 1988 U. S. Fish and

' Wildlife Service's National List of Plants That Occur in Wetlands: Southeast (Region 2) was used to
determine the wetland indicator status of dominant vegetation.
3.3 Wetland Hydrology
' The Corps Manual defines wetland hydrology as "...all hydrologic characteristics of areas that are
periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface at some time during the growing season."
' "Areas with evident characteristics of wetland hydrology are those where the presence of
water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to
anaerobic and reducing conditions, respectively. Such characteristics are usually present
in areas that are inundated or have soils that are saturated to the surface for sufficient
N. C. Department of Transportation May 1997
' Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 4

n

C

duration to develop hydric soils and support vegetation typically adapted for life in
periodically anaerobic soil conditions" (p. 34).
Subsequent guidance published October 7, 1991, and March 16, 1992, by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' Headquarters further clarifies the minimum threshold that define wetland hydrology. The
three conditions necessary to establish whether hydrology is present include: the time-frame of the
"growing season", near-surface groundwater levels, and the consecutive period of time groundwater
must be present within this surface zone. The growing season in Lee County, North Carolina (defined
as the period of time between the last 28 degree temperature reading in the spring and the first 28
degree temperature reading in the fall) extends from April 10 to October 24 (196 days) five years out of
ten. The March 16 Memorandum requires groundwater to rise to the soil surface for specific
uninterrupted periods, during the growing season. The Corps Manual stipulates that areas which are
seasonally inundated and/or saturated to the surface for more than 12.5 percent of the growing season
(25 days in Lee County) possess wetland hydrology. Areas saturated to the surface for between 5
percent (10 days) and 12.5 percent of the growing season sometimes possess wetland hydrology and
sometimes do not. Areas saturated to the surface for less than 5 percent of the growing season do not
possess wetland hydrology.
As a result of the substantial amount of time and effort required to determine whether wetland
hydrology exists in a given area over time, the Corps Manual lists readily observable, "primary" field
indicators that aid in evaluating whether wetland hydrology is present. Areas observed to contain at
least one primary indicator of wetland hydrology are generally considered to satisfy the wetland
hydrology criterion. Examples of these indicators include: observed inundation, soil saturation,
watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, and wetland drainage patterns. The March 16, 1992
Memorandum lists "secondary indicators" as well which, when two or more occur together, also
constitute evidence of wetland hydrology. These "secondary" indicators are: oxidized root channels in
the upper 12 inches of soil, water-stained leaves, local soil survey data, passage of the FAC-neutral test,
and other morphological or physiological plant adaptations to wetland conditions.
Of these "secondary" indicators, passage of the FAC-neutral test and observations of plant adaptations
are mainly independent of short-term fluctuations in water-table and precipitation levels, and are thus
viewed by the Corps as important in abnormal rainfall years. A sampling point "passes" the FAC-
neutral test "when more than 50 percent of all considered species are wetter than FAC". In essence, the
FAC species (including those listed as FAC- and FAC+) are considered as neutral, and the decision
regarding hydrology is based on whether the majority of species are typically found in wetlands (OBL,
FACW) or non-wetlands (UPL, FACU) (Corps Manual page 23, paragraph 35a).
As all field work in this study was performed "outside" of the growing season, secondary indicators of
hydroi'ogy were relied upon more heavily than primary indicators for determining areas that met the
hydrology criterion.
NC. Department of Transportation May 1997
Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 5

n

4.0 FINDINGS
Field investigations for this study occurred from mid-January to late-March, 1997. Forty-six wetland
pockets were delineated within the study area with on-site Corps confirmations on January 28,
February 25, and April 9, 1997. The following sections detail wetland characteristics observed in the
study area. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Data Sheets were taken for each wetland pocket
within Phase I and its associated upland, except for wetland pockets 1, 2, and 3 which were grouped
due to their small size and similar attributes. Wetland Data Sheets were taken from representative
pockets in Phase II (wetland pockets 31, 33, 34, 36, 41, and 48 and associated uplands 3land 44). The
N.C. Division of Environmental Management Wetland Rating Forms were taken for one wetland
pocket representative of each of the 5 community types observed in Phase I and one wetland pocket
representative of those in Phase II. All data and rating forms can be found in the attached Appendices.
4.1 Soils

As explained previously, hydric soil is one of the three wetland criteria. Some soil series are listed as
hydric in Hydric Soils of the United States (USDA, 1989). Although all wetlands occurred on hydric
soils, some were found in areas mapped as non-hydric. The following sections detail which wetlands
occur in areas mapped as hydric or non-hydric soils. It should also be noted that wetlands adjacent to
man-made ponds in Phase I of the study area occurred on fill material.
4. 1.1 Hydric
' The only hydric soil mapped as occurring within the study area is Wehadkee fine sandy loam. This soil
is poorly drained and typically develops in floodplains. Areas mapped as Wehadkee soils contain
wetland pockets 10, 11 and 12. All wetland pockets within Phase II of the study area (except pocket
' 27) as well as pockets 14, 15, 16, 17 and 20 are believed to occur on inclusions of Wehadkee soils.
4.1.2 Non-Hydric with Hydric Inclusions
cla
The only non-hydric soil with hydric inclusions mapped as occurring within the study area is Chewa
silt loam. This soil typically develops along major streams in Piedmont floodplains and is somewhat
' poorly drained. Although Chewacla silt loam was mapped as occurring only within pockets 4, 5, 7 and
8, pockets 1, 2, 3 and 27 are believed to occur on Chewacla inclusions.
' 4.1.3 Non-Hydric
Thirty-eight small wetland pockets were found to occur on inclusions of Wehadkee or Chewacla soils,
but in areas that were mapped by the NRCS as non-hydric soils. Each of these wetland pockets was
smaller than the minimum mapping unit used by the NRCS (3 acres) and therefore were not separated
' out on their maps. These soils were Mayodan, Pacolet, Pinkston and Cecil fine sandy loamy and Gilead
loamy sand.
N. C. Department of Transportation May 1997
Langley and McDonald, P.C., 96-024-07 Page 6

J

I

0
Mayodan and Pinkston soils typically form from weathered Triassic rock and sediment on Piedmont
uplands. Seven wetlands were found within the Mayodan series (pockets 1, 2, 3, 29, 30, 51 and 52)
while 13 wetlands were found within the Pinkston series (pockets 20, 27, 28, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44,
46, 48 and 50). Pacolet and Cecil soils form from the weathering of acid crystalline rock. Fourteen
wetlands were found within Pacolet soils (pockets 14 - 17, 22 - 26, 31, 33, 35, 37 and 39), while
wetland pocket 21 was observed within soils mapped as Cecil. Finally, Gilead forms from fine
textured sediments, primarily on coastal plain uplands and contained three wetland pockets (41, 43 and
45).
4.2 Wetland Types
All wetlands observed within the study area were one of five community types as defined in
Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina (Shafale and Weakley, 1990). As the
Fall Line (the separation between the Piedmont and upper coastal plain physiographic provinces)
dissects the study area near N.C. Highway 42, significantly different community types occur at the
beginning of the study area than were found at the terminus. The following sections describe the
various wetland communities observed. A complete list of wetlands by community type can be found
in Table 1 (page 9).
4.2.1 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
Twenty-two wetland pockets are Piedmont mixed mesic hardwood forests. These forests occur in
relatively narrow bands on well-drained, somewhat acidic soils along small perennial streams, lower
slopes, ravines and north-facing slopes in the Piedmont. Canopy dominants typically include
sweetgum (Liquidambar styracijlua), American elm (Ulmus americana), red maple (Acer rubrum), and
various facultative oaks (Quercus sp.). Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), and other hydrophytic species compose the
fairly open midstory. Vine and herb layers in this community range from wetland species such as soft
rush (Juncus effusus), possum-haw viburnum (Viburnum nudum), and false nettle (Boehmeria
cylindrica) to drier species such as Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and Christmas fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides).
' 4.2.2 Piedmont Bottomland Forest
Three wetland pockets (4, 5 and 7) were found to be Piedmont bottomland forests. These forests occur
within wide floodplains on Chewacla silt loam throughout the Piedmont portion of the study area.
Canopy dominants in these forests include willow oak (Quercus phellos), sweetgum, yellow-poplar
(Liriotendron tulipifera), red maple, and American elm. Well developed midstory layers contain the
' same species as in the overstory layers as well as black willow (Salix nigra), musclewood (Carpinus
caroliniana), chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia), and tag alder (Alnus serrulata). The herb layer in this
' community type is typically sparse and varied with primarily Facultative Wetland (FACW) and
Obligate Wetland (OBL) species.
N. C. Department of Transportation May 1997
Langley and McDonald, P.C., 96-024-07 Page 7

' 4.2.3 Man-made Pond Fringe Wetlands
' The third and final wetland community occurring in the Piedmont section of the Sanford Bypass study
area exists at the edge of man-made ponds. These wetlands occur on ponds created by the
impoundment of small streams and creeks throughout the study area. Of the 17 ponds that occur in
' Phase I of the study area, seven contain a wetland fringe. Two of these are part of wetland pocket 11
and have well developed forested edges. The remaining five occur in residential lawns and livestock
pastures. They have a few stems of woody species such as sweetgum, red maple, and alder, but
' primarily consist of upright emergent species such as giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), cat-tail (Typha
latifolia) soft rush, and various sedges. Pond fringe wetlands occur in narrow bands around these
ponds. All of the wetland fringes adjacent to man-made ponds in Phase II of the study area (pockets
' 26, 32, 34, 38 and 52) are fully wooded with sweetgum, red maple and musclewood as canopy
dominants and a fairly thick shrub layer of tag alder, possum-haw viburnum, and elderberry.
' 4.2.4 Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (Blackwater Subtype)
Eight wetland pockets (10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 20) are small stream swamps on blackwater
streams in the coastal plain. These communities occur on Wehadkee fine sandy loams in primarily
narrow bands along perennial streams with steep slopes. Canopy dominants are typically part of both
' the wetland community and upland communities further upslope. These overstories are diverse and
contain such species as yellow-poplar, sweetgum, red maple, American elm, green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), and oaks. Saplings are typically absent, but thick shrub and vine layers may develop
r including species such as Chinese. privet (Ligustrum sinense), sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana),
highbush blueberry, giant cane, cat-briers (Smilax spp.), blackberry (Rubus argutus), and Japanese
honeysuckle. Except for the occasional Christmas fern and strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus),
' the herb layer in this community is typically absent.
' 4.2.5 Low Elevation Seep
Low elevation seeps are groundwater fed systems that occur at the base of slopes. Eight pockets in
' Phase II (28, 29, 36, 40, 44 & 46) are seep communities and wetland pocket 15 in Phase I contains
seeps. These communities occur on mucky loams and silt loams of much darker chroma than the
adjacent well drained upland soils. Overstory and midstory vegetation is similar to that of the coastal
' plain small stream swamp, but the herb layer is typically quite dense and hydrophytic. Species
common to low elevation seeps include lizard tail (Saururus cernuus), Christmas fern, rushes (Juncus
sp.), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), royal fern (Osmunda regalis var. spectablis), and netted
' chain fern (Woodwardia areolata).
' 4.3 Marginal Non-Wetland
' Area 9 was originally identified by NCDOT and inspected by Langley and McDonald. However due to
its marginal nature, it was confirmed by the Corps to be a non-wetland.
N.C. Department of Transportation May 1997
' Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 8

11 C.P.= Coastal Plain
Table 1. Confirmed wetlands in both phases listed by community type.
Observed Community Type I Wetland Pockets
Mixed Mesic Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) 1, 2, 3, 8, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 31, 33, 35,
37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 48 & 50
Piedmont Bottomland Forest 4,5 & 7
Man-made Pond Fringe Wetlands 6, 11, 26, 32, 34, 38 & 52
C.P. Small Stream Swamp (Blackwater Subtype) 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 & 20
Low Elevation Seep 15, 28, 29, 36, 40, 44 & 46
*Numbers 13, 18,19, 47 & 49 were not used and number 9 represented a marginal non-wetland.
4.4 Agricultural Fields
The study area for the Sanford Bypass included a large number of agricultural fields and pastures.
Although none of the fields were mapped as occurring on hydric soils, one pasture was found within
' Chewacla silt loam, a soil known to have hydric soil inclusions. Upon inspection of this area, it was
determined to contain wetlands and was included as part of wetland area 7.
' Agricultural fields that were illustrated as being on non-hydric soils in the Lee County Soil Survey were
not inspected for wetlands since they were predominantly located on well-drained soils in areas remote
from natural drainage features and waterbodies. Those fields containing drainage features and/or
waterbodies (such as ponds) were inspected.
4.5 Potential Mitigation Sites
' Opportunities for wetland mitigation were evaluated while performing this wetland delineation. This
investigation was performed with the understanding that, typically, restoration or creation of wetlands
is preferred over wetland enhancement opportunities immediately adjacent to the roadway. Off-site
' mitigation is typically accepted by the regulatory agencies only after on-site alternatives have been
evaluated and found not to be feasible.
There were no large scale wetland restoration opportunities observed within or immediately adjacent to
the study corridor. The only restoration/creation opportunity was in the farmland adjacent to wetland
' pocket 7. This farmfield is mapped as Chewacla silt loam (contains hydric inclusions) and possesses a
gradual slope along its southern border. This site alone, however, will not satisfy the mitigation
requirement for this project and would require excavation. The only other method of wetland creation
' availagle would be the clearing and grading of forested, non-wetland, bottomland hardwood forests
within the flood plain of Buffalo Creek. The Corps has indicated that they discourage for use as
mitigation sites non-wetland, floodplain hardwood forest similar to those observed on Buffalo Creek
(Ken Jolly, personal communication). Consequently no wetland creation opportunities were observed
within or adjacent to the corridor. In addition, no large, degraded wetland areas were observed that
would be eligible for enhancement.
N. C. Department of Transportation May 1997
' Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 9

0
I I
n

Due to the absence of mitigation sites within the corridor that would provide all the compensation
needed, off-site alternatives will need to be evaluated. These options may include the purchase of
credits from a State or private mitigation bank. Several private banks are being constructed, and the
State is currently accepting contributions to the Wetlands Restoration Fund (WRF). Currently this
program only satisfies the compensatory mitigation requirement for conditions of the Section 401
Water Quality Certification, administered by NCDWQ. However, the NCDWQ is consulting with the
Wilmington District of the Corps of Engineers to develop within the year a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA), to make the WRF available for use on wetland impacts permitted by the Corps
(Ron Ferrell, personal communication).
Absent these alternatives, off-site mitigation sites will need to be located by NCDOT, to either satisfy
all mitigation needs, or those not met by the farmland adjacent to wetland pocket 7. The area
immediately surrounding wetland pocket 7 needs to be evaluated further for its suitability as mitigation
since portions of the area were outside the study corridor and could not be inspected.
5.0 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION CONFIRMATION
Wetlands occurring in Phase I of the study area were confirmed in the field by Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on January 28 and February 25, 1997. Wetland pockets 5 and 7
contain several upland pockets. Based on consultation with Mr. Alsmeyer, it was decided that wetland
flags be hung at the toe of slope with the understanding that as much as 35% of the area included as
wetlands is upland inclusions. The highly complex mosaic of uplands and wetlands, based on slight
microtopographic variations, may warrant additional study within specific impact areas once the
preferred alternative has been selected and design drawings are available for permitting purposes. Mr.
Alsmeyer confirmed wetlands within Phase II on April 9, 1997.
6.0 WETLAND MAPPING AND NCDEM RATINGS
All base mapping was sketched in the field on NCDOT 1:5000 scale metric maps. It was later
compiled on 1:24,000 scale U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles for conciseness and clarity.
These maps are included in Appendix 7.1 of this report.
C

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management ratings for the values of wetlands within the
study area were based on guidance provided by NCDEHNR Report No. 95-01 and notes from a July
1996 training session presented by Mr. John Domey of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
Wetlands which received the highest scores were generally large in size, contiguous to surface water,
had gi7adual topography, contained diverse vegetation, and maintained some areas of standing water
most of the year. Table 2 (page 11) presents NCDEM scores by community type. Data sheets are
included as Appendix 7.3 of this report.
N.C. Department of Transportation May 1997
' Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07 Page 10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Table 2. NCDEM wetland rating scores by community t
Community Type NCDEM Score
Mixed Mesic Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) 68
Piedmont Bottomland Forest 76
Man-made Pond Fringe Wetlands 68
C.P. Small Stream Swamp (Blackwater Subtype) 82
Low Elevation Seep 57
Isolated Wetlands 44
A
N. C. Department of Transportation
Langley and McDonald, P. C., 96-024-07
May 1997
Page 11
1 ll?
.0

m
z
v
X

r
C

r

`b

Ridge
O
wd,
t??t
SCALE 1:100,000 (at center)

FIGURE 7.1.1
LOCATION MAP
NCDOT SANFORD BYPASS
Langley and McDonald, RC.
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
Landscape Architects - Environmental Consultants
VIRGINIA sEACN WILLIALMUR0

46
m
m
m
y
W
O
Ul
0
4 .II
m

s
j
V ?
r? v r pSZ_ ?:-
OD ; 11
g
c L7 - co
o
j 1 - -
17
C)of
--
if
ti \
t / Iio? C6
C?l
cl?
SEE SHEET 2 OF.5
r C V_
? N ICI
n
n
c? CC CC -F.?J
m n ?. m Q N Q . H
(D (D
N
S = C Q _
p, CO C Q
m t-4
(D c C:
Q
Q FD Q ICI
f ad m°
C) C)
O O Z O
S o d O T p O
Q C
m ? d Q Q
y n

m m m m m ! m m i m m m m m m m m m
SEE SHEET 1 OF 5
O :W ozc ?
•
C?t
vil
ti
`? I I _ / ` I .l DSO J
? O
C '
C V'v
r CA r '
C1 ? VI/,
r
rD ? II Q ? ? ? ?
70 ?y (D (D
GN = 00 C Q
a
T,0 3 „ o > > y Z
9 ^ C9 Z ?
; D D e--s
f d ? O mm Q a p
fl ?••? ?
r ° O Z? W O
r
3 In O T v, p O
rl e Q D p_ Q
x C)
n
y
N
r rr rr rr r r r r r r r r r r r r rr r ?r
'. ?lllao
II• _ - ^ //i - L
_r P
0
•
Nit
c
- o ,
Big - 0 1
r
(ti ?i o - ?' y o (l ?, -
Ilk _ I.
FF
'?^ ??. ? J r? ? ?? ?_-11-JCd?_ ? `?.r ?i ?j'??,%? ? \? ? '' ? ?, ?N{ v ?lL^ ??jj? it
?qBO T IU
i
ll?
?
`` ,y T -a ?y n\l ?iF t?
?? ?'? COAST` CiI?
? Y
- I
-- - ?_
-
. ??u sF a 0? ??1? s/ ?
01,
N - ?. ?..5 / / 1 1 Jam' J? 'Y _ _ - '.
o
_ o
•
J
SEE SHEET 4 OF 5
C V-0
d d
a
A
i gr v?
r
m a ;• ?..F m fl N Q fl H
pad t;? m m
o o 3 n Z y ?d
3
Co c 0-
So a ~ { (D c
R _
_Q
c n 3 I z a D D a F-JI
?Y O O Q
Z? O [?
CD
( m O
s n a ?F C
3 ? m ? 7
CA 2 ? v Q_ a
c Q Q
Rl Fn z <
? n
G:
ww w w w w w w w w w w w ww w w w iw w ?w
SEESHEET 3OF5
m
m

< L
3
A
N .w VI

<
y '° ? (D
m o '^ ? 77 Q p CD
?
(U
(l?
?i t
o0 o a -
y
a? C 6 ?
a
5.0 3
?o
Z
1
D
D J

?" n
o
m
a y Z
>> o c Zm Co O
dp 3
3 m p ?,? o
7 0

N
co
? ?
a

Q °-

Q ?1

? A

woo
10
\? ?, • ? o `••J / ? 11 -?• fi t`$^,> ® 4 1, _ - ? ? _ w\{ ,
o ti f_c i.'
15
wo 000
40P -
_-
Z
- - - - - -
m I
„ - - r ?_ -- - N I 1
?. ? --- ?. mm,
\? o
?i
,Q4h
OImo
m-?r
CO
100
W ?_ CA
rri
\\° \\ VCZ NIT,
- .° CA) o Z
_? - - ---
? Z y
3,l a! 7
,?, o o < w

w?''•
wo
.
I
y
adpa-
Soya
"
0- V
?3pd-? -- w - - -
{ ?I

HED
r r
G u
r
n
r^
V1

? n (Q

?
a ° o
l
Z ^
ll
w
we

S N
lJ
a N Q
c

In
0
?

5. o
2 -
II
o N
3 , v
G
3 w^
lam/
O
3
D n ?
r„ 3 0 ?
vJ N 3

/?
2
C C Q.
I
y
T A
m L1
y m Cf
t
?ml
Z y ?
b y ?
Z ?
O ww
7
cn '

t

i
i
D
m
z
0
X
v

' DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLANO DETERMINATION
(1987 COE wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: ?J? "Ufs I'?i?-t? Date:
V
Appl i cant/Owner
County:
Lee-
Investigator: yF She.Yr? ,
State: Nl.
Oo Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No
N
Y
f
i
i Comumity ID: --'
Transect
I0:
o
es
tuat
on)?
icantly disturbed (Atypical S
Is the site signi
.Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes .
Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
' VEGETATION
1
1
Dominant Plant Sp ecies
. Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
.
/'C?rrt??nYt)PJt --t- Fes, F fki:? C? Ltd
. ?birt?'tir ?? ? ?.I' ?5 „r e "?"" - la. FA?+
3r B:a1tn\ fs st) 71 A r 11.??"R't`?f17'I W .1il'J t'`aiticrl V.
4. L11 ) 5 no r; r.r, n r> rNAI 13` a--,
SCLb ni rte,,. S.. aU C ZL- - L4h;cera
T ia92n;ern
6. ``fit Y?"=,?f?=r?t•?, ?+'?3::"?""??.Y'?,...` ?j?" -?VI:.?? ?, f?1 ? v _
car art ? s ? ?,.I-r? 1 ? ? i a?1c.: ?c? ? •?'? E? -?•? ?.aL??:?C. ? r?
8. Czrnul _;c.0 FPCW-+-- t y'!naus P4?RA-n s ? . AF LO
t •
Percent of Dominant species that are OBL, FACW and/or.FAC: _. .^ C
/? -
(excluding FAC-): L '
Remarks: _

HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs _? Inundated
_
Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 inches
_
No Recorded Data Available. Water Marks
Ko Drift Lines
Ivy Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: 7 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves ?-
Depth to Free Water in Pit:_ (in.) KO :Local soil survey Data

14
0
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) v' Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
(.t'?? I-`.ray w•U•,
J
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Wd IJ(A-1P d
(Series and Phas(!):t field Observations
CA ? Confirm Mapped Type' Ye No
Taxonomy (Subgroup
o ofile Descriotion:_
Mottle
Texture, Concretions, .
Depth
rizon
H Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(riunsell Moist) AbundanceiContrast
Structure` etc.+
o
inches
0- to
-
---------------
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions Soils
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Toet?-V? +Accaed T?Yr- 110ro
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No
Hydric Soils Present? CY-e) No
Remarks:
(Circle)
is this Sampling 'Point Within'a Wetland? Yes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
v ,I - I-,,

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: CjQ(t?QQ? Date: l ?l (p??t7
Applicant/Owner: NCDO i County: Lce
Investigator: p+ al. State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? e N Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ` Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum !ndicator
1 R Cam. r (Ah Iru, T E12C 9.
io.
3. na.1?s On ?Y'Irnln l I S-,n

$. { !j ., ?1_I7/wAw.f' 1ri< 13.
V Frx?
14.
Ali u'" tr .^ yt !'c3 ?/ FA(--- 15.
A.iws 4L." V 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
??
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
?NO Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
f,16 Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
I Drift Lines
1 Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ! Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: rt-. (in.) N o Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: -K-
(in.) F Water-Stained Leaves
9 Local Soil Survey Data -
QQ i-- FAC-Neutral Test d 1
Depth to Saturated Soil: C? (in.) ! Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
((?? ?,, ? ?y,,? ?
(Series and Phase): 1"1L1.(.I,(7?tJl.[ 1 r? C?i
s ?;1''??,(„(,; L..6rj ('l""• Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): U r Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
10 1t2 3!y _ Ct?c(_ ?CC?ff1
Q
Hydr,c Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils Ust-
Gleyed or Law-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Pressnt? Yes N Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
11 Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: y(?I? ?Y $l"?'? Date- l
? 1? 7G?i
er:
O
li }
County:
wn
cant/
App _
Investigator- State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Comrnlnity I0:
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es 0 Transect ID:-
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID: y f_ 4
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
' VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

IPk 7ZC"r?, J "' 10.J??'r???.r°tiY^`'t?l %'•ui5 _'
.
n-y- .in 4-0u0) 3
4. t 12.
?
VC TI-lu
LA 1 C'?f?'?1?,? SQL! Yak
i C
13.
14.
,
g
A#1 15.
ro
?torom
16.
?
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
(excluding FAC-): FACW and/or FAC:
Z;; t _ 0al
Remarks:
I
HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs `f Inu-,dated
_
other ? Saturated in Upper 12 inches
_
X No Recorded Data Available 'b Water Marks
?- iJj Drift Lines
LIP-.,Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _LL ,,Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SecondaryIndicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) P_1o oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
L ? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) N. Local Soil Survey Data
/ FAC-Neutral Test 2 C)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) a Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name /?yy Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): CA-cl> d Field Observations
?{?t?> pT:a Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Taxonomy (Subgroup):?rit. iri,
Profile Descriation

Depth
zon
H
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
st)
(Mun
s!! Moi Mottle Texture, Concretions,

c
.
e
t
Structure
AbundancelContrast
ori
inches
? is
? (
ns
?? `i 1y ?r? i
?
y
'
x
L
Zo. t'l 2.on kf1'4Wai1ry J[LS?Rti'a' Ott o
?'?? .
•

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ HHistosol _ Concretions
istic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic odor
_ Aquic moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing conditions t/ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? , es No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(Circle)
is this Sarnpling"Point Within a Wetland? yJ Yes?tNo
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: rr;;E' g a.?
Applicant/Owner: (S[-
Investigator: ?JF S'fyyy-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
HYDROLOGY
Date: ?7 t Ctn...
County:
State:
Yes No Community ID:
es to Transect ID: --
Yes Plot ID: --LT
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima{ Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs 1?? 01 Inundated
_ Other
v r'40 Recorded Data Available
'-' I Saturated in U
pper 12 Inches
i Water Marks
_T Drift Lines

Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: Qone, (in
) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
a
. Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data ?`tl

Depth to Saturated Soil: , (in
) FAC-Neutral Test
O
. ther (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ?Q(L "t 1Pt _; n , n
Jl L-car't'°) Drainage Class: P ?
?" ! t Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): r ?(,{1(? (l( }`{ } ?' i )r..? f ire Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description: U
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
I j
} } ?? ?t G s
ll! ?''1 i sf " Vic} "D t r`c " AA 1, Il ? a
r
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosoi _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions 71-isted on National Hydric Soils List
?Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes `( !o (Circle)
Yes No
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes e
11 Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua()
Project/Site: rW'"A"lta Date:
Applicant/Owner County: ? e'eg'
Investigator: SL C' <.tt?l C?° nk State: tvz..
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community I0:
0
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? rNq
' Transect 1
:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No
Yes Plot 10:-.
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
' VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

t?li?rft ft (1 i{?timte,? ?'
iriora
: F/?G to.
.
,
Mer-i ?c'na
c
.Q ll Mu5 C 11.
.
.
l
f t"" TCLCCLS T ?i 12.

5. F'o5 mxr,, '7,r n_1 c-
L 13.
l `(LIa`I. ,
7(?I
It l 1 r
YYI t 5 , ?s F??" 14.
.
.
.
v
?C? r Y1.i10YlJ M -C-
; ?'1
(-
F
P
15.

a ?Ur'1Cu? ?1rt'??1?1?5
14 . ?
?
yy.
ipk( C!
16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
C FACW and/or FAC:
l
-):
(excluding FA
Remarks:

I
HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs Inundated
_
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
No Recorded Data Available v' Water marks
Drift Lines
_, Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: .Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 2 2? (in.) 114n. Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
i Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Pie Local Soil Survey Data tin
I
1! FAC-Neutral Test
Remarks)
i
i
l
E
h
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) a
xp
n
n
er (
? ot
Remarks:
1? ?^

5
SOILS
FmapS'riUnies t Name Drainage Class: !'??r
and Phase): Field Observations
L Confirm Mapped Type. Yes No
axonomy (Subgroup):
i
Profil?iption:_

Depth
Matrix Color
i
t?
l M
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) mottle

Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,

Structure etc.
inches Horizon o
s
(Munsel -
+
e %- 'Y r
?
I o `? R 2 2 to s
6
rnfln .

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosot - Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
organic Streaking in Sandy. Soils
_ Sulfidic odor
_ Aquic moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
?Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors
Remarks:,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
L) -)

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
N
Project/Site: Date: l 2? ct7'
Applicant/Owner: i ' County: t e+?
Investigator: 4-Y `",YI1 State: t-V_'
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? , Ye N Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: -
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:3" 1
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator

'lug,! t?htoi.

4. 01,(Ef?tAS -(:rI000i+O_ -r FhL_0 12.
11X??t 'E'i.?il !1Y ?+l (lt li n 0 13.
?!EtC; t.d eta L 14.
?!k ^.? r
at "€ f I0i L' 7c- ?-d F 1 1s.
*
S?G?CA?OIft(V ! 4?RI - FALL 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC aa
(excluding FAC-). '2 !J
Remarks:
V
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Na Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) Na Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
I Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > ( (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
1 FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: > (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name - ?'" - j u
(Series and Phase): `cT( m ;;re ;
Ar6kt x) Drainage Class:
I Field Observations
?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (?, ' rA I I )r te) J (? ?_t 1 ?' Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color- Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inch
s) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
(?e
r
t? ?0 y? ?Ql 1€6 ?.)?t .!?7fJ16
v
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ,N (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Presant? Yes o is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
I Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
F,oject/Site:CZ (1?Y€ 4 ?` ??1 {J Date: +-t-7
_)o? County: E2.
Applicant/Owner
Investigator: 1 Sr"' _-f r eA- CL? State: ?.? .
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: -
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
No
Y Transect ID:
Plot ID:
s^) n
tCt
es
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _
,
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
' VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Spe cies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
14. (.i il.ttr!f?} 1(Y.e r' E#(_+ 9.
ureu i'a, rb r-kCLA) 10.

L'SI 4 ? i"4
l E'T
^ tZ+ 12.
_
g
.
5. 13.

6. 14.
7. 15.

8 a
16..
.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW and/or FAC: ?( _ 1(
/ - 1
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:

0
HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): wetland Hydrology Indicators:.
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs inundated
_
other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
IL No Recorded Data Available /V5 hater marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: r) ' (in.) NA Oxidized Root Channels.in Upper 12 Inches
LLL Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water-in Pit: 's (in.) N0 Local Soil Survey Data ?1(1.. v
i FAC-Neutral Test 2
Depth to Saturated Soil: ''L, (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

" :A
S01 LS -
Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Profile Descri tp ion:
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Matrix Color mottle Colors
Abundance Contrast Structure etc
Depth
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Hansen Moist) .
Vt r_'
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Sultidic odor
_ Aquic moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_,? Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Id Yes, No
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling•Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
U I-L11 1C..1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: I Pass Date'
Applicant/Owner: I?CY-1 J County: I e
Investigator: OF Sherr e-i" State: UG
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes (0 Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Co Plot ID: -Vr ? n
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator

2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15. - ..
S. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
(M aced rct gyp
{
UL n

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
V No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
1v0 Inundated
/Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
n Water Marks
t Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: I Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: iv?ne On.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
N)r.'Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 512- (in.) -a-- Water-Stained Leaves
( Local Soil Survey Data
T FAC-Neutrai Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: .10 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H-q &? I o u:L s I e- ` I S 1.?7 + I(")
row /

SOILS
Map Unit Name n?
(Series and Phase): 01.,0!01 ?-?,,
??i I.,t..1,QHA ,+(?) Drainage Class; ([p? ????
?y Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup):> ii, iv tTt (? '' I '?.wi- Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion: --F?P iC i lp,?1
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
c? .5 Y 12 314

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
oG
{"
t
n CA44
1
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils Lis
w
1-L
1
-
fc s
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
+
Remarks.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes .No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes cNoj
I Remarks:
J
t7 P
_yV_ P

0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE VETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: y11_r?l'<_ `'; t'" Date:
Applicant/Owner- Q111-DOT County:
??? ?.
Investigator- C6 1
State- ?_.!L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 1',eD ,. o Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect 10:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes lQJ Plot ID: -7
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION

1
uvnani nrv
11

1

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
t/U < M?r?( ?,?2tYC1?, Fes'"` 9.
?raCosrdint'(AnA? L 1o.
.
ter f ubrUl"A 11.
tt Ylir rr J C?? 12.
sy}n.l
?'.r1;G
f°l C1 Ci nlasA
r 13.
`
'
L
1 l?Ci ar`C'>Y?cAr sruror' 'SCIO 14.
A Stir :ioi 15.
! i) , 1014 Spy. F&Qa- 16. .

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW and/or FAC:
(excluding FAC-): " ± s
Remarks:

T1T'
_DoNt i Yl C.
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
?Inundated
_ Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
" Other
No
V _
Recorded Data Available No Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: h_ Orl.) 1/ oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
X10 Water-Stained Leaves

Depth
to Free Water'in Pit:
(in.) ?r
/13b Local Soil Survey Data ? t..
? FAC-Neutral Test S b
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
LL?

SOILS
p Unit Name } E C Drainage Class:
eries and Phase):-ia?L?i?VC)J )t' L1?nM field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? G No
FTaxOn,
ubgroup): r a-?
my (s
Profile Description:

Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,

t Structureetc.
a
tr
AbundancelCon
inches Horizon (Muni Most (Mansell Moist) ?
2
n
?o ?o
!a

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon High organic content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic odor
_ AGuic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
=XlGleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es o (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Tes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 1Dr? l? ??G155 Date:
Applicant/Owner: ?lADT i? Couinty:
Investigator: ?_\'F State: J'_
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ),es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes N(g Transect ID: -
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: -?r -7
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies
1. l^ (?_? l.,aJ Stratum Indicator
?
A G Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
?CU
Y) G
_ .U
tUC?6
L' r ??P? on tr n _ S m i do (ka) ? FAG.

(? F
FPC
12.
nn
s. l Q(X Xlt 1? 4 Y t Yl1 (t?
]?
13
. .
C'Qn ru?fL?fY1
'.?
14.

( r K nu C.' 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). a
Remarks---T ,, ,_ „, rani :5
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
__?,/No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
t?Inundated
I Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
T Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: Q r) -; (in,) 00 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 12 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves 1
Local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Soil: > i 2, (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): P?n?n 1 ?-?- ?
L(Y;(f} Drainage Class: J

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Feld Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? ?Q No
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moisti Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
-1SZ x`12.4 u n
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils .
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils'
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? as Nri (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? es N
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ( is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
11 Remarks:

i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COG Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: -t:5) -F>6S:5 Date:
Applicant/Owner: )3C,ZpT County:

Investigator: :Z-F S:,.e fr , _
State: !JG
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Xes No Community ID: -
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes o Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes % Plot ID: ," .
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soe
ies Stratum Indicator
c _
Ft -1
3. c-
?i mo5 arrerlc6(-,5;'
cc
4.

6. nds S'_Y"f k1oLC'GU Sryh rat 14.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
l
1C
00/
(exc
uding FAC-). ? .
Remarks:
- jrr, ( iiZ11`T? S
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_"Inundated
_"Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
W Water Marks
Nu Drift Lines
NO Sediment Deposits
Fold Observations: ,? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

F
D
h \/ Water-Stained Leaves 1
NQ L
l S
il S
D .v?.-
to
ept
ree Water in Pit: (in.) oca
o
urvey
ata
FAC-Neutral Test Q
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) PLO Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
DLU PC, NTH ` ?? ° E G?-k
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ??( tCl(?J ?1
jT L YY1 Drainage Class: ^ r
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): - \. C. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
O 1 ! ?-5--:S \ 0'4 P- 5 Few /IX ski nf+ CkDA l,00 j"
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions ?Listed on National Hydric Soils List
\ lGleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present) rfQ No
Hydric Soils Present? es No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
11 Remarks:
p

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: s?rCa 'Pass
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator: _%?
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
HYDROLOGY
Date: 1f??..?-7... .
County:?
State:
es N Community ID:
Yes Transect ID: ---?
Yes N Plot ID:
Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stre
am, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs U Inundated
11
Other
ded Data Available Saturated in U
pper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines

tions: Sediment Deposits
L Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
urface Water: (in
) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
?p Oxidi
d R
, ze
oot Channels in U
pper 12 Inches

ee Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
turated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Ramarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name _
n1c5Ajr
S
d
i
(
er
es an
Phase): 1 Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Sub rou )• t ts•? '^1? `',t ^^_; ?S Confirm Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color. Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munseli Moist) (Munsel) Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
a
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Snits Present? Yes to is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
11 Remarks:
? 1v
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: Sa ffb d -t- q - ?&5s Date: '1' 2Z (R7 '
Applicant/Owner: M County: C
Investigator: eT C X State: 0c,
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ' No
F Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es
1
1 Transect ID: -
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes
00 Plot ID:?Q
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
1. s n i r--11b ' ifloircu r A CLj
2. Ctter(?t ' T _ X 11`)uS Senate--t.. - Sap Eft.LO-lr

'?s kae `' F?1 S t?i'1cc?scf r•I ?

?CtF'lr i'I.?Y )#Z(1 FAC 14.

?f? 1{ n i t) (? Ir t fyi zhrk EAU) ' 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC

(
l
di
Q /
e?
exc
u
ng FAC-). (?,
/C?
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
V"'No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
V Inundated
ool Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
/vo Water Marks
Y'Drift Lines

Field Observations: _?Sadiment Deposits
T'brainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) No Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

d /Water-Stained Leaves
r
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
(in.) Local Soil Survey Data
?°
•
?
?! FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): 6(l)l
Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): L N Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color- Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Mu
n
seelll Moist) (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
+
? pyp?

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
?
_
?Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _
r Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present) es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es No
i Remarks:
1

k

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:r
Applicant/Owner: J
Investigator: ,?F
Date: f 2Z
County:
State: C, r''
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation). Yes 'N X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes rNo Plot ID: ?"-
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION

F1
L

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
-4-aedl y T EF,c,
?. Query ?s a1 cc+ T' &u
4. ?r utdo T FH-" -
3 I^? t
7.C a n U.+ m arm
a. ?-.1C1 tAS?rU M Sir e'nse. ah rb
Dominant Plant Soeci.s Strat.Um Indicator
0." ?n V G
v•
13.
14.
15.
16.

7

Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: "? °
-7\ d/ ti?im art-S
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
YNo Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 2 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 (in.)
(0 /1(-?'= hd°)/o
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
T Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
I Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data - ?r
+ FAC-Neutral Test 2
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
!r?
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(S
d Ph
i
)
es an
er
ase
: J Drainage Class: G`:.?Ck

Taxonom
(Sub
? Feld Observations
y
group):
1 t1 Confirm Ma
pped Type? t Yes No

Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color. Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

v
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes ug, (Circle) (Circle)
es o
Yes o Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
( Remarks:
?- I 1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE VETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE wetlands Delineation Marxtal)
Project/Site 5G()-'?DY-6 - Dater 231-0
Applicant/owner: I -DOD- x
??
County: -•t
Investigator: (
1
State: ?lf
No
Do Normal.Circumstances exist on the site? P Community ID:
e
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: St-- Il
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

.LIc4u,ACVY1 f1 1`0 - r--Ac
r- A64 ?ni-y?: t-,
4. Woc(uf amdio I rarPz) J'A Ffkf--
O L
.Meer rubnxm T FRG Non 'Ai lax(16, ;,11 on , Fkb-)
E(}; mbo- V T i+nt'ano" -Y-Nt Mcy t"aC.m t-t UtcaJ
(??r?? rice iara, Shrb ?? 13.

1 UC?G? 1 YIGU?t a, ? l . m 1al a, r
`.?? .i.
F
14.
I m,? rQdi( n
CIOj,$r y mcu 15.
.
SMltcut ?GLI.?YtCZ)1ld.f 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI,
(excluding FAC-): FACW and/or FAC:
`l,lZ?? Ct2D?a
Remarks:
ik)
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs /"Inundated
_
other 7.--Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
No Recorded Data Available /4. Water Marks
Drift lines
14a Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ?-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) ' oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
?' Water-stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) 7Local Soil Survey Data 1?y
? FAC-Neutral Test 7
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
QCs other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
rTs. Unit Name Drainage Class:
ries and Phase): ??e C1 I Field Observations
G v ?. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
onomy ( Subgroup):
Profile Description:
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon fMunsell Moist) (Hu sell Hoist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
< L41
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions i Soils
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy _ Sulfidic odor
organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ AGuic Moisture Regime fisted on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
=V--'?Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes o (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling*Point Within 'a Wettand? ryes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

r ;? +
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Sn_'( fL r Date: -?
Applicant/Owner:_L('" `? County:
Investigator: J Sxi? State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? N
o Community ID: --°?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes
? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: ??
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
-
' Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
'
T
F?, L J"i, err?
r G ??,i - --
r?
10.
1`(I 0)?' F I' 71.
-_ UA Ltt c PAm AC -$ 12.
• \ r?_ ,??,,')??j.??.I; (2 ??3YP11 i1
YO- V(aC i 1.1^'=')i iO vore'a? 4 . (Z ,??_? 13.
14.

ILL
Percent of Dominant Species that ar e OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). d=-,?r
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
V -N. Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Ne Inundated
4 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
( Water Marks
i Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: .(in.) 9o Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

D
h
F
> I Water-Stained Leaves
ept
to
ree Water in Pit:
(in.) Local Soil Survey Data
4

Depth to Saturated Soil: ?Y (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
p Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ,{ALA L oa r3 n Drainage Class:
m
Feld Observations
j 'j i i ca
Taxonomy (Subgroup): '\(r. tattoe1 t i_lL Confirm Mapped Type? Ye No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color. Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc
.
h
S
1 L
am
i
rtPlr,41
V
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Su(fidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_. Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Presant?
faa s(Circle)
Yes < (Circle)
s
'
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes /No }
11 Remarks:
.!G
1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Mary-tat)
Project/Site: (, _d; Pass Date
Appl i cant/Ouner:KXgi,,-0-
Investigator- F- fSI of n County:
state: ?y `'
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes N Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:__'9Z1 2-
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
V9nPTATTnN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Mt??n virn T R',,L Q+ r
( ?Mu?dCl cinY?Grrr sr°rs.?
Pr"ig
.?
T? f-U tir!7ikA "r

i6? a?a ?
fs?r?dLnc

,
F
f
-
-
T ®?
yy
1. tCl{?l(l?4fr 1l /
?
?
FTK W?"
4_ J' tC V 'f?l
l 1?
5. .a l f. i CC bona-nox V_
13. ,
{
6.1 +t Q Y??l S 1/??` 14.
7. (` ?iri`? a. fG•c ?Mtila,r? hrbc, 15.
Cc, -y" 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW and/or FAG: ;1 (excluding FAC-):
Remarks:
-Dom i r-lar, ?
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs
h / Inundated
?.Saturated in upper 12 inches
er
_ Ot Water Marks
No Recorded Data Available r o
Drift Lines
T
T Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ,Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

a Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
er 12 Inches
Channels in U
d Ro
i
i
(in.)
Depth of Surface Water: pp
ot
ze
d
^ Lo ox
"
_I Water-Stained Leaves ??
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) l Local Soil Survey Data O
?FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated soil: 0 (in.) t4 zo other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Uni t Name )?AnC-, ? L ) Orainage Class:
(Series and Phase): l/V 1' 3LScX?' i?? Field Observations
lpn Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Taxonomy (Subgroup):?? y
Profile Descriotion;_
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Color mottle Colors
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Struc,; ri etc-
l,O l o 2
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Hi'stosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic odor .-
_ Aquic moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions L Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Lou_Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling•Point within a Wetland? Yes No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

1

1

i
C
F
11

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: G rl D'r cl p 5
Applicant/Owner. `,m ( Q
Investigator:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
Date: /
County: f e(?!;
State: t??C
Ye Community ID: ---
Yes Transect ID: ---
Yes Plot ID: -- ?- I
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Pm ??J frj j?l? `1• Indicator
Eb
2. 2.r . -7 ACU.
3. •I CI le, Ct't?f' ?i.1
? T IF CU _
4.1
I C.t i d Fr?'r?r ? a pt 7 FACt

ke-. Li ri
7.
L, (1D?(Y' }ir1cEr. iQ
SL
F?!C
?E?._Acer ru yuVVI SG
? FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL
, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: -,X- ry- ;r"C r z
vyn nn ant rianr Jpe -
?.?x;Iclendrt?,m Qr'?r Stratum
?Gfl Indicator
. N=
?.?tFi?Ct_tS Ccl ? S?c? FAC U
FMW
2 _Zz r\M !rl~ ? > + i":(! r r in sir. r Pc
,,
13.V -b -lln t (I cu, V FAC_
44Aib-e_ lcL, re-Dens FACc?-f
15.
16.
(v/9 =
HYDROLOGY
ata (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
rial Photographs Primary Indicators:
IJ Inundated
her
Zd Data A vailable Saturated in U

T pper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines

Field ns:
7 S
ediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Dece Water:
i Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
:
`
(
n,) i
J Oxidized Raot Channels in U
pper 12 Inches
DeWater in Pit- (in.) T Water-Stained Leaves
Local Sail Survey Data
f
-tud
Derated Soil. ?4 (in) FAC-Neutral Test 2
T Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
'J

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(S
i
d Ph
[
C
'
LA + 1^r
?
^
?
er
es an
ase):
,A
.
, - c? ?{
.( ? ?
!
Drainage Class:
Ayer) v 1 Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): , ?4 1LQ ?-tS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes j No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
! 2 ,5`l ?? LoC?ml? Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Hisiosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Ya p (Circle)
Yes
Yes N
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wedand? Yes No )
) Remarks:
-V-- 1 --

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: so ?mrfJ ( u; pc ;
: 1x13? .'I
Applicant/O Date: C 12Z>15?
County:
Lce,
wner
Investigator J ??l ,n
State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Ye No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes 'No Transect ID:
Plot
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
&A- l.?er PAS r?n? c °D ', Fli rt i OLN n
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
+ned (',u 0 R\c 9.
-1 n yi d n mha ' s4ton',
t 10.
.?
p
C l l) X01 S`. ` ,
V 11.
.
,?m11t?`? rt?tl?,!C'G ?? FCC 12.
.
Once. - so 13.
14.
7.
8. 15.
16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
(excluding FAC-): FACW and/or FAC: !! _ J/
f'^
Remarks: p / y /•
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
_
Other ? Saturated in upper 12 Inches
/
No Recorded Data Available
? ."?° Water marks
_ No Drift Lines
#a Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0-14 (in.) oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
No Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water'in Pit: 0 (in.) ria Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test 1 0
Depth to Saturated Soil- 0 (in.) / Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Uni t Name e + ?n-,?'l??I Drainage Class: #(
(Series and Phase): field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Il f?-•
Profile Description:

Matrix Color
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Structure etc.
Depth
izon
H (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Hoist) "bundance/Contrast
or
inches

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions Soils
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic odor
_ AGuic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
(Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?l-Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Yes No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? I
Remarks:
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
FFProject/Sitcject/Site: ? tf'st*,r-r-L 6U
A
` Date:
pplicant/Owner: t_Yt
f?T
Investigator: JF ht n r County: L-2e'
State: „L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes: No Community ID: -
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No"? Plot ID: --( --) ?+?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
Pr)Qs +Qedcu ?JCip FAC ,O.
r.tCLr F-
i k e?
1 1.
`a (fi
y 12
_
t
sm 1 a'Y
! a a? `t°r
1 ?.. .
13.
1
•
??S Cti'`'r1it? d s??Sl?I ?? 14.

r 16.
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
cluding FAC-). 515 0/0
Remarks:
DO r y,-1 I'1 car
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
?o Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
NO Inundated
?Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
/o Water Marks
Drift Lines

Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: Q c)n ' (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
NO Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: -;;4'Z (in.) I Water-Stained Leaves
T- Local Soil Survey Data J

Depth to Saturated So
ii: (in,) = FAC-Neutral Test U C)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
`
Remarks: C)L( C? (?r{"wIi iq Se ka?t i -1,0 6 1•. I it
Crerwinq season,
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):??
Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): enl:c' Feld Observations
(C t Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
1 O 10 2 2 10 p _ Fiw I FC.un+ Sand.(. ern
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
educing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: SC?11I bO4Cca ?:?.(2.- ?/lG?11S1T?G^?`. t^t1 I,l F;L?Li(L?, 4c G'u

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? as No
Hydric Soils Present? es No i's this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ?No
II Remarks:
p
' DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: r7&-cl a `TK?` Date: ? - -7
Applicant/Owner: County:
Investigator: 'T F{ State: N?
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? qs C=munity ID:.
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
o Transect ID: -"'
t ID: `14 157
Pl
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes N o
on reverse.)
' VEGETATION
r
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
L?al?idGmb s?uY.
, ? ± -.lV?i u<i??t?r?,?tl^Y:?1 5h?1? r
.
cc?
2 _
T FK, ?Srn.?r\ 6(`r)a ryrriye a t=ACU>+
-
1 Ca
nr+rt^I -6 T TLC- 7Xi - dI on rri cu GAr 6l H
-
t.lAt AoAar ?t'rCG
?raxl?US r sl,iV4 i? ?
s ??
Sam
FAU,I? ? ? h'Cjf1t) rt 1 G1t rbs?cQi<?5 ?
\
?
Qt?? I? is 1
?'a.?^n?(O?X ? f --A G
rf?? R>?"
.
?6 Vb S l +^^ b t (--0A .I i }
4 . 'r?!'GL' bCY 'r;t t' t b \
?
Y Ltu
i.i
V(A n? Li ?ApfilOhcsuv Y-r-
-?` 1Ct r--p
.?f
(
A 11) rAA t'?Pt?R:t?
4 16.
1-
J ,i •
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
(excluding FAC-): FACW and/or FAC: r? p
Remarks: ?e
HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wettand Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary indicators:
_
Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
_
Other ' Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
V No Recorded Data Available li_F Water Harks
+ Drift Lines
L Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: - CO (in.) ti- Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_?,-Water-Stained Leaves
H
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ,4i Local Soil Survey Data
V' FAC-Neutral Test '7
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) j10 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

N/ tJ
SOILS
Map Unit Name ?A? Drainage Class tM?? ?rGl?1c
(Series and Phase): t v T field Observations
' C- 4a ?l udu?- j Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Taxonomy (Subgroup)s
Profile Description:
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Hatrix Color Mottle Colors
Depth
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist (Mansell Moist) AbundancelCo^trast structure etc.
Sa66L, Cta?c;l.aa?
1p ?
Hydric Soil fndicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions i
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic odor
_ pquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local•Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
-/ Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
r
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Present?
il Yes, No
s
Hydric So
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? V- '/ No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

U 15

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site:[ X Date: 21 )CIS
Applicant/Owner: _ T County: :u e__
Investigator: s'f-err' e 1 State: NL
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical. Situation)? Yes o Transect ID: -?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: 't f 15
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator

Cat 'rte. -??:ECG "?t? T rPCU - 10.
. (.k< vela-?
4._?I l(C?t?l.t?D '? )'4
I.L( ? F P,
S 12.
???
0%€,t'? ykUlU aytUt??)
, R N 13.
FM
t)? Qyn()C?,O,?-61' C.'4..1 ?. = F N_0 14.

8- t'Z3d>ls'?lltrKl OCY[?toi T1 Frt? 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 06L. FACW or FAC
l
(exc
uding FAC-).
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Ida Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
V"'No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
! Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
T
Sediment Deposits
Fold Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 1vUY1?° (in.) (4 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 1 2 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ?sT , f (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
4 FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >1 ?3 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name ((''?? F t?-?
(Series and Phase): t"Q?E -4- t"t re '?)n 1^rtu ! _?JN
1.C?- Drainage Class: . 5? i
4
Taxonom
(Sub
ro
)
?? G
l
t Field Observations
y
g
up
:
t
d
G ?2 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors " Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Cinches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
t,

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes a (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (VA
Hydric Soils Present? Yes a Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
II Remarks:
proved
_?Y_ 1 (D
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA FORM
RCUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
P ite: _) i4)1'f'i ?RU-t"ct?'? _
0 Date:
Applicant/Owner: County: Le
ator: SFSherr) e+ o_\.
ti
v
I State- VAC
g
n
es
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community 10:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID: 4, 1.'O
(If needed, explain on reverse-)
VFGFTATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

-r FAC-t
T ,,.

t11Q41' 1)IIrC?1Ytltrll.>ihAlvlA?-k-
%?(? 12.
.
4yu m rb FA(-,
5
Uru 13.
.
_
'a„ tY 3L'f t+r?'i
6
?
\Gt !`v?sll?r6?Fr-1 14.
.
?
.
v
8. Lor\yce"&- k4A?,OnieU 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW and/or FAG:
r
(
-I
,
i
O
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:
??5(O ^}p` ti1- yeq
uyncni my
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
- Stream, Lake, or Tide G auge Pri my Indicators:
Aerial Photographs
_ Inundated

12 I
h
U
i
Other nc
es
pper
n
saturated
_
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
AT Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _.t. Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water ° 2 (in.) _LVo Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
..e-Water-stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Q (in.)
_p 11 Local Soil Survey Data
L
v FAC-Neutral Test 3
k
i
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) n Remar
s)
X10 Other (Explain
Remarks:
?? "' ??? rte'-.??•.,?` ?.uE ,?a?FE ?? Y'?l l? ?1??.??G.?4.,+?.

1
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: ' Va€ri
(Series and Phase): } field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): TuQi c 1r{a? } A•? Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texturef Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
lJhece, ir?nda- ?? Is) Yf ' tz . ?
eri
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosot _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
sulfidic odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
AGuic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
LL
WETLAND DETERMINATION
• (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Yes No is this sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present?
Remarks:
0-M
Approved by KOUSACE 3/92

1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COS Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: r-A- QI as Date:
Applicant/Owner: Coun
Investigator:
State: :
1;) L
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? %Ye
s. No -
,?.
Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (At
ypical Situation)? .
I
h _
Yes ? Transect ID:
s t
e area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum !ndicator

CIA A
NO F-A to

SmlQo.x r''"'L asn ? lCc, 4\? tP _ 14.
.?_ la ?-.L15 5?. ? •f?? 15

U .l.C' l1 BL' 16.

Percent of Dominant Specibs that are OBL, FACW or FAC
?
°
(excluding FAC-). (D
l U
?'?
Remarks:
-* 1T.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
V No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
K-)O_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
i Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
iD Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
> ,
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
(in.) Water-Stained Leaves _
Local Soil Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Soil: -10 (in,) FAC-Neutral Test 0
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ??J 0 r) so
LO I? t
w? t
\2 ?? ??? g? tng won,
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(S
i
d Ph
)
{^ #' ?
??
er
es an
ase
:
Z Q (n Drainage Class:
-y--
Taxonomy (Sub
rou
): 1 t Feld Observations
g
p Confirm Mapped Type? .Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_. Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Presant7
es (Circle)
es *1.0)
Yes
(Circle)
is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
11 Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE VETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: S,4?rd -ae--rsc Date:

Applicant/Owner: a
County: ?-?
Investigator: ?4 =?r'f', ?t• State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (T s No Cmmunity I0-
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Iq Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes 1N0 Plot ID:--V
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
' VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1\mv)s imp-irr-kr_
.? 7 O-0
,
L 1 Al 1 AA YYI?0GI.C' IT r- 4- 10.
n t

(` orTl'-.. S1eri daj t! FPILU 12.

1
13.
14.
v
-? GVSLYU Cot S1 i +wise- 7 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW and/or FAC::
`O
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:

I
HYDROLOGY

Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_
_ Aerial Photographs \Amxu dated
V,Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Other
V No Recorded Data Available

Water Marks
77
/{a Drift Lines
1.o Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: \/Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secorldary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 1 ' (in.) No Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) tL Local Soil Survey Data
.-FAC-Neutrat Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
1`.i other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

1
i
t
4
SOILS 111I?, `
rTaxoUnomy t Name Drainage Class: we['- bmi
and Phase): Poly ???_s- ?l t Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
(Subgroup):T J b?
Profile Description:
mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Mansell Moist) AbundancelContrast .. structure etc.}
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosot _ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Histic Epipedon
Organic Streaking 'in Sandy Soils .
_ Sulfidic odor
_ Aquic moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Lou-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
F[Wettand egetation Present? YNo (Circle)
No
logy Present? bYe'
Present? ('Ye
NO
Remarks:
(C ircle)
is this Sampling Point Within a j, Y No
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: S P&AW
? Date: 12 1 t1 '
Applicant/Owner: Fes' D6 County:'
Investigator: j f: S" fn ? State: to C
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site?e No Community ID: ----
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
V EG ETATI O N
Dominant Plant Species
?l Stratum
-
" Indicator Dominant Plant species Stra*.-urn indicator
.
e,? bRat? I F ? ?- ?. l??tic.?u I•n PIS mSi°i , ? t?'A G
2.1 fu0i , T 10.
(2 ry, bar c,?JT . RCfi. ,,.
4. kr r-I, lbru m `
7-_
F AG
12.
?C 1r1+IbYU M 13.
? v (A ei
t h(10 14.
14.
tl ?crr? tG.Gc?nicC?r ?0 FF??-- 1s.
L or) I' c?>rGL 1C,iT FII C° 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
l
(exc
uding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
?' No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
PO Inundated
?Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
K_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: ?C (in.) QoOxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: ( (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
{ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test r?
Depth to Saturated Soil: CO (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Pao F11`?% „
Sarclt_-(
Lan,"`t Drainage Class: _
?,?
\ Q?IC 4
T
S
b
U "??
4 Feld Observations
u
group):
axonomy (
--o je,- Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
(OQ;rtr-,

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ks No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes (0 is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
I Remarks:
y
_-Y_ G ?J

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: rC?? 12t &6? Date: a
Applicant/Owner: County:
Investigator: S3'?l } State: l
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ye No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: -"
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes
SNo Plot ID: Zt?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stra*.um indicator
X1 - F'w ruhr{AM 7 FRC 9.
•'"C:!t E4( r)tnf-C._J T )O 10.
r ubr( I NA S:,' FT?r_ 11.
nlnrou (DBi- 12.
-Anus se_?rLA4cu Sa C') Fri 13.
r
t-t t
.`T1 ID?`c .a 1 C'?"1
1 i oj T
O lal._.
14.
_
m
4. SU C'us e i,? SL?S ?4 is.
ti??f?)C Cf?. _H 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC r j _ `DO ?/t

(excluding FAC-). ?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
`?' No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
?Inundated
v' Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
tJ? Water Marks
1, Drift Lines

Feld Observations: uo Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) ?/ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
h)o Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: l? (in.) Nc Local Soil Survey Data
:, FAC-Neutral Test S
Depth to Saturated Sod: (in.) t-i•^Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name 1_
(S
i
d Ph
2
n 6+
r)
?? L
S
er
es an
ase): _
?
o t
O l( Yti Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): l L - G 5 Field Observations
.(G Confirm Mapped Type? Yes . No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color- Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Cinches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
a ?r z CIO Lcra ry-)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Su)fidic Odor
?A
i
M
i _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
qu
c
o
sture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: FIreC,Ucrr (' CL/j,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Y No (Circle)
No
es No
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
11 Remarks:
L) 4-L-W
1
1
1
1
r
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: SQ,{'S urc` Zk_k {'? Date:
Applicant/Owner:' V County:
Investigator: State: K)
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? .,Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes N
o Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: ->s 2p
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecfes Stratum Indicator
.I
iri©dcnc?lrb(?
1 lS
T _
G
A
r rtit
,
t
Q
C
CA
S??
K)
?
M
G ,A • ,' (r IT (.s (?..1t i 100
7- s
t
t
1' ?LS V ?
?y
r
f
?
-XQ
.?
tic) -
H i':IL-
3 //?
1- a tQ?C"
FIa
CU~ s

'1»LQYI?CQj1G ?U(?61t11CfnJ

FRe.
%
.1er 7 ,nf tErit?rtfCCu
I
UQL
12.
5
• Ce4r r V ((b l,fm T ML 13.
6. U C,,, W H.-, rv i?crx S1'u ( IX , 7- FnC-.I.. 14.
.3-06+(%Equs O Tin 'vn Tarr, SCE D FI)CL- 15.
YIOS "t I Or iLCt FA-C.U 16.
Percent of Dominant Specie's that ar
(
l
di
FAC e 08L. FACW or FAC
13`/o
exc
u
ng
-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
\, "No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
N° Inundated
I Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: i Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: Ndne. (n.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

r ?' Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
? ?., (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test O 7
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in,) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
d i ,?
)
?
I
(Series an
Phase): Wa (Y) Drainage Class:
,
?

Taxonomy (Subgroup): 'RaD41 C- Field Observations
tc? '`" S Confirm :(F, Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colon Mottl e Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.

Hydric Soii Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes to (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
I Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: err ?rr1 a PG"i 5S Pnos,?_ Er Date:
Applicant/Owner: U GDC -
l County:
Investigator: L a State: N c,
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID: 31
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
L-1 1C ? (" T Indicator
FAC+ Dominant Plant Species Stratum
?'
S r n ? (O X
b
d V Indicator
-
r
.z. LI n?raCnCtr? r, ? A U.l
T
_ ? ,
f; ? e.
-) n
ro
.
. ?I voce tyc?rr?l?!I_ n 1-i?ndr??.. #-l F
[\
C?
T 3 . x l h?I£ ? Y? M A %(hn"O KA ? Il.) 7r i i . arex -,D,
nLAS (1rAN???{hi r1 FA C. 7 2. ArlsQelr r_ -,IQ \11 o A ? ??-
? Ie s )f brit r Al
l -
?
-
=
13.
11
L
t"c(t k f 1 C -Irif ` ;"t Q I Qr'?r?"1 PCk ,
J 14.
1C L
r
?
FJ
+?.. - is.
t 1+.. `r'taZi ?r-i?' 14tY3 SinrE ?
?
,?
.F 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
?

Remarks: 1-
HYDROLOGY
Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
ded Data Available Wedand Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
N .L Inundated
-saturated in Upper 1 2 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
[ _-Sediment Deposits
tions:
.1db -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

rface Water. Second ry Indicators (2 or more required):
?Oxidizad Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

e Water in Pit: 2r (in.) 1 /O Water-Stained Leaves
1?i0 Local Soil Survey Data
L/FAC-Neutral Test
turated Soil: (in.) /_/ - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name (n
n- 4. r
l
P
D
?
,,C
(Series and Phase):
e
rIQ O an , `rinm Drainage Class: ?l
rGl 'o-

S
T
b
y Feld Observations
t
?
axonomy (
u
group):
; LA ((, ,? ?
L?(
t v Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color- Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) ell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
(Muns

_ 10 '1 ? ?P t /?
t
l o i a (a s Pl '?'>f t_ t Lcna( N
,J
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
vGleyed or low-Chroma Colors _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 4Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? as No
Hydric Soils Presant7 as No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Y No
I Remarks:
proved by

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:. 'C rb5 , Ph r C' Tr Date:
Applicant/Owner: County:
Investigator: L T1(Y(Qt_:t State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? Y'?es)
Nc C
i
f
?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes `?Nz ommun
ty ID:
Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Io Plot ID: --?T 31
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Straru.. Indicator
tic sW FA Li- -4T
;?? - E- - FIq If-
a.Lir (rxlPnrt~n t -',#l. ?,,orn u
?cc? r`ttea i{r T r-nC
Aar rtj het trn P-nr 1a.
.-TWI S52? PAC- 14.
Lo rl?us -?loi dCi F1C is.
16.
Percent of Dominant Speci6s that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
!-? () r "t?17
Remarks:
.-?tI?f
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
_V No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
V Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: r),?, (in.) No Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves ?.?
Local Soil Survey Data

D
th t
S FAC-Neutral Test 4
r
ep
o
aturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name !! `
(Series and Phase):+ ^?(?. C?LI?`tl I ICCLIn Drainage Class: ?.r?.,t 1 r1t°

Taxonomy (Subgroup): V Field Observations
(1 ! { a C) t r ? Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No

Profile Description: v
Depth Matrix Color- Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (M
unsellM
o
ist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
'
L
>
10 OC C?t &A L-Ocx 1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ,!-No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 00
Hydric Soils Present? Yes 6N. Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
II Remarks:
r
Appro

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ;-_-,Cc "TOI° '{ (? '? ` ; ??,??r??' ?
Applicant/Owner: H (_DCG '
Investigator: LG?t?Ctta t-.:l I'l n roc# Pf, ice.? = 6
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
HYDROLOGY
Date: y- 2 (c-q?
County: Loo
7 i State: 1i C.
-IG No Community ID:
Yes ON_ Transect ID:
Yes 1Vo Plot ID:
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or 7de Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
?No Recorded Data Available
Feld Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
Remarks:
(in.)
(' C (in.)
.r?
(in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_,-Inundated
_l Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Water Marks
l` 1 Drift Lines
No Sediment Deposits
?6rainage Patterns in Wedands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
N i Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
/'Water-Stained Leaves
-) Local Soil Survey Data ?V_
FAC-Neutral Test d
4L,? Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS
Map Unit Name (?
(,
d Ph
Pocbb-
'
e
Q
`wm
?
(Series an
ase):
-l
1
n
- ? LI
Drainage Class:
r Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ?
tr,"TS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Motde Colors Motde Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
/Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 'Y?e'.s No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? {Ye51 No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes' No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
II Remarks:
A

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: SCr Q+,,t`. ?ZGtSz. ?U7 Date:
Applicant/Owner: County: Ut
Investigator: k,,,G1.,fZr, F S >r n State: NC,
v
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? [Yes) No
Community ID: ?--?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: ---?
es
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ?o Plot ID: 3t4y 3 -AL
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum. indicator

AC 0 A lrl.t.br (,1f'r'', 10.

4• nl - _X C?'? 7 v c o I" A (_t,), 12.

0-r D11115 fY?fO f
?
?_ 13.
_ s
1
'
V
UYnvm n dA,rn v
_ ?r<.Wt

4.

Onoc k o _ se r66 i Us H_ ±? C W 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
l /
?r
(exc
uding FAC-). ,CQ
q
Remarks:
:'?? r4r
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
ZNo Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
No Inundated
7 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Pif Water Marks
/t Drift Lines
No Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: LL* Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 00rl,-_ Gn.) N - Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) IV Water-Stained Leaves
/'Local Soil Survey Data Y
V FAC-Neutral Test 5 -
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) l.-) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name 11 _ i
l -t
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: LA)d
? I

(Sub
o
m
)
T Feld Observations
no
y
group
:
ax Confirm Mapped Type? Ye N

Profile Description: v
Depth Matrix Colon Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, e:ic.
l0 10 231
t.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
educing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
1ZGGleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
I
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ism No
Hydric Soils Present? CL No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland7 t Yes No
11 Remarks:
\V- H i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:. Date:
Applicant/Owner: C_DCDT°` County: (r_
Investigator: ? a f Ai s?. I ' )?`'?r?.L °cy-rat State: E
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: S4 41
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
p?(S?fa? :1?^r)r?niu r6 F47" 9.
ibilcu KaC.Q 1o.

", moL7 -4 12.
Ol^ t, (c'°?At?, r???LCI 13.
Carr o n+ (11r1i"k')l'n'f) .r1 OR?- 14.
7. 15.
S. 16.
Percent of Dominant Specie's that are OBL. FACW or FAC
?`
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:- 5•.l ?i'y°'ilr")e'-NA_
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream. Lake, or fide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
? No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
L0 Inundated
?/ aturated in Upper 12 Inches
(Epwater Marks
Lo Drift Lines
%/Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: vl;?Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
++ 11
Depth of Surface Water: Q01-1e_ Cn.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves .?-
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 1 (in.) #1,:Po Local Soil Survey Data
?FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: O (in.) 5-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) :};R(? ( ?? j frt /? '') Drainage Class:

Taxonom
(Sub
) Feld Observations
y
group
: Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
0
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color- Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (
Munsell Moist*) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc
.
V L4 L h
-
1 7 ` *
J?` 1 i 7 ?Yl' Iii/ t t 1 00it i I '`_f^!r( Ln

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
2 6Ieyed or Low-Chrom
C
l _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
O
i
i
a
ors
o _
ther (Expla
n
n Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? (Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland) Yes I No
I Remarks:
i?' Lfq

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

1
1
1
1
1
1
Project/Site: Date: 31aulq T
Applicant/Owner: 1JG1 ?T County: l 2?
Investigator: ?,?F S?e(n State: 4.) r,
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? Ye$t No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes N Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: -17
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator
? n ? k?z ? r? ` V CCa ni v nckown±:t S is k F (A,
ILI ?. SP _ V.?. -.
10.
*
12.
v
M rLk'crurn
Ci
`
13.
6. € /l.lr` 15rk ?lY`lti tltf'S?Yc`(1i Y5 . r'? s
i? 14.

16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC D
?
(excluding FAC-). t]
Remarks: ° oYritYl Ctf'
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ other
V 'No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
O Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines

Feld Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
?^y
Depth of Surface Water- too n. "Gn.) N L Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches

' IQ Water-Stained Leaves
l S
il S
D
t
L
Depth to Free Water in Pit: /
(in.) urvey
a
a
oca
o
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ?n S1 Lz)o

Drainage Class: ??(J%'?!(
- t G Field Observations
F
(S
b
T
group):
axonomy
u
1 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Color. Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)(Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 'o ) (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes !o is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes `?.
II Remarks:
p

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
„ .. (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: YaC?fbtrCi Date: '- =(0:-qr
Applicant/Owner: County: L r'_-
Investigator: C F j'l '?"1 State: QC,
Do Normal Circumstances exist.on the site? ? es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? `des ? Transect ID:
_
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes I` 0 Plot ID: (a
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stra
*.um Indicator
1. L> e t r C OLC i
"n'. fill
6.0 cu -T_ Ffl
L 10.
t ` dliyclrkr n fi j [L? _ 1
?rtC 1" 1 1.
fl C c U -ruk m Ir ?. 12.
\J?hurnum nwjun n Fp?GU_)+ 13.
:0Clr,(yrvs e I i„(6 14.

16.

Percent of Dominant Specie's that are OBL. FACW or FAC
t iC) o'/-
t
)
(excluding FAC--). o
,
Remarks:=
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_Aerial Photographs
_ Other
V_ No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
NO Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
/ o Water Marks
N b Drift Lines

Feld Observations: 011 Sediment Deposits
?brainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: I?One- (in.) h a Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
VWater-Stained Leaves..
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Jn.) No Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test a
Depth to Saturated Soil: ® (in.) E90ther (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
}
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): P? 1Y n ,?1?? 1 (`?}
Drainage Class: nc6

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Feld Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Motte Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Muns
e
ll Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
\
' , f

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
Ieyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y as) No
Hydric Soils Present? es No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
If Remarks:

V

1

in

n
L

0

D
m
z
v
is

7
I.J

1
1

J
?I
iJ

S fC? Nearest road ?- l 2
)ject name feet
unty etland area acres Wetland width
_ .? tartl G? Date T t?la??
"l -Wetland type (select one)*
Vtottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna ? Bog forest
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh ? Bog/fen
? Swamp forest ? Estuarine fringe forest ? Seep
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland ? Other_-
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
R Water storage 2 x 4.00 =
Wetland Score
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization 4 x 4.00
= vq
Pollutant removal rJ * x 5.00 `
Wildlife habitat- x 2.00 =
.3 x 4.00 =.
t Aquatic life value
1000
M7
N Recreation/Education l x 1.00 =
G * Add 1 pant if in sensitive watershed and > 1096 nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
57

r
L.
L
7

J

u

1
1
11
IL
roject name
°P - Wetland
Name of evaluator J F Sin L?
Nearest road
acres Wetland wid;A???---- -feet
'l
Date
UBottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna ? Bog forest
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh ? Bog/fen
? Swarm forest ? Estuarine fringe forest ? Seep
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland ? Other.
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
Water storage x 4.00 Wetland Score
Z x 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
?q
Pollutant removal* x 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =
t Aquatic life value x 4.00 =
U V Recreation/Education x 1.00 =
G * Add 1 pant if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
57

0

(r
2
Project name
County.?-
Name of evalua
h55 T- Nearest road \IdYiOt]S
eland area --acres Wetland width feet
>-- n D Date llc-00-7
*7he rating system cannot tse appiiea to sail Ui
weight
Water storage x 4.00 - Wetland Score
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 - :...,:..:

Pollutant removal x
* v'
5.00 - :,<
>-
Wildlife habitat O x 2.00 -
Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 - Q:.
U V Recreation/Education x 1.00 -
G * Add 1 pant if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius

Y

1
11

r-
Project name A-= ?
County 1 "?
Name of evaluators E
Nearest road S2 1123 }?w? 4?
a acres Wetland wi t -feet
Date 11Z4 17
57
I
I
I
I
I
r roject name i- ??
ounty f 'r--Ae.-
Name of evaluator -??
Wetland type (select one)*
Nearest road
area acres Wetland Wid h eet
Date
C"Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna ? Bog forest
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh ? Bog/fen
? Swamp forest ? Estuarine fringe forest ? Seep
? Wet flat ? Ephemeral wetland ? Other
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
R Water storage 3 x 4.00 Wetland Score
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 3 x 4.00
v;.y
Pollutant removal * x 5.00
_
T
Wildlife habitat_ x 2.00 =
: Aquatic life value 3 x 4.00 =. '
N Recreation/Education 3 x 1.00 =
(? * Add 1 pant if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
57
t

1

?J
1

0
r
yr. .,h. .o .::: ....: ....
--oject name Nearest road se 1558
Mounty LCG Wetland area acres Wetland width feet
Name of evaluator J F Sher n Date
I?

f
U
r

c?
' ?r:::{4?.f:ii .,?:{.'R{;{:?;ii>ti!47;ti!{:??;`;:%Y?.:t.r..?-•;:;:::cr-?h:;:?;?•p . ;...?, ew • _ • ?,ro -y..
!I'll,/lllIY3l??! ,'I !'!!!!!llfllf?I?l7!l!!!/I!!!!!l!! !% /'/?
Wetland type (select one)*
? Bottomland hardwood forest ? Pine savanna ? Bog forest
fen
? Headwater forest ? Freshwater marsh Vteep
? Swamp forest ? Estuarine fringe forest ? Wet f
lat ? Ephemeral wetland ? Other
? Pocosin ? Carolina Bay
S
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels t
R weight
Water storage x 4.00 = ..... Wetland Score
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 = %
Pollutant removal * x 5.00 '
Wildlife habitat 2 x 2.00 = % t
Aquatic life value x 4.00 = % i
Recreation/Education x 1.00 -
lope, a' radius
G* Add 1,,,,,,pant if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, ups
,,,,,,,,
57

n

11
ICI
LJ

u

1
I