20070505 Ver 1_401 Application_20070307

.~
t
~ ~ CWS
Carolina Wetland Services
a~-
March 15, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly,
NC Division of Water
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
07.4545
PAYMEfV
RECEIVED
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39
and Water Quality Certification No. 3402
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Harrisburg, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2007-1789
The Brelvi Harrisburg site is located in Harrisburg, North Carolina, along the north side of NC
Highway 49 between the Rocky River and Blackwelder Road (see location map, enclosed). Brelvi
Realty has contracted CWS to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
Applicant Name: Brelvi Realty, Mr. Munir Brelvi
Mailing Address: 6350 Cumberland Drive, Harrisburg, NC 28075
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: [phone] ~
Street Address of Project: NC Highway 49 ~ ~"' ~ ,
Waterway: UT's to Rocky River MAC ~ ~ D
Basin: Yadkin River (HU# 03040105) ~'~~~
City: Harrisburg _ ~';':'.I'r
County: Cabarrus ~ ~
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35.33448° W80.62584°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Harrisburg, North Carolina, 1996; Concord SE, North Carolina, 1991
Current Land Use
The current land use for the project area is wooded with adjacent agricultural areas. Typical on-site
upland vegetation includes red maple (Ater rubrum), hackberry (Celtic laevigata), shagbark hickory
(Carya ovata), box elder (Ater negundo) and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Typical on-site wetland
vegetation includes sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), hackberry, ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana),
green ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica), red oak (Quercus rubra)
According to the Soil Survey of Cabarrus County', on-site soils consist of Armenia loam (Ar), Iredell
Loam, 0-2% slopes (IdA) and Mecklenburg loam, 2-8% slopes (MeB). The NC Hydric Soil Database
lists Armenia loam as a hydric soil in Cabarrus County and lists Iredell Loam, 0-2% slopes as
potentially having hydric inclusions.
Jurisdictional Determination
On January 31, 2007, CWS's Craig Wyant delineated (flagged in field) and classified jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. within the property boundary. Jurisdictional areas were delineated using the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Routine On-Site Determination Method. This method is defined in
t United States Department of Agriculture, 1988. Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
CHARLOTTE COLUMBIA RALEIGH
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (v)
704-527-1133 (fax)
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

March 15, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Page 2 of 4
the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual? Jurisdictional stream channels were
classified according to recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)3 and USACE
guidance. NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
representative of Streams A-C are enclosed (SCP-A ,SCP-B, SCP-C). CWS is requesting written
verification from USACE regarding the extent of all jurisdictional features within the property.
The results of the on-site field investigations conducted by CWS indicate that there are two
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A and C) and one jurisdictional wetland area
(Wetlands AA) located within the property (Figure 1, enclosed). There is also a section of non-
jurisdictional ephemeral channel present (Stream B). Ephemeral Stream B is the upstream
continuation of Unimportant Intermittent Stream A and is represented by SCP-B (enclosed).
Photographs of Ephemeral Stream B are enclosed. Routine On-Site Data Forms representative of
Wetland AA as well as non jurisdictional upland areas have been enclosed (DP1-A, DP1-B and DP2-
A).
On-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. include unnamed tributaries to Rocky River. Rocky River is
located within the Yadkin River basin (HiJ# 030401054). Rocky River is rated "Class C" by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). On-Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were GPS
surveyed by CWS using asub-meter GPS unit and total approximately 2.32 acres (101,088 square
feet). Linear footage and acreage of on-site jurisdictional waters are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of On-Site Jurisdictional Waters
Potential
Jurisdiction
Classification Approximate Length
1 Approximate
Acrea e
Stream A Unim ortant Intermittent 145 <0.01
Stream C Perennial 364 0.02
Stream Subtotal: 509 0.03
Wetland AA Forested N/A 2.32
Wetland Subtotal: N/A 2.32
On-Site Total: 509 2.35
Perennial Streams
Stream C flows west across the southwestern portion of the property and is approximately 364 linear
feet in length. Stream C was evaluated to be perennial. This channel exhibited ordinary high water
widths of 1.5-3 feet, persistent flow, moderate sinuosity and a moderate continuous bed and bank.
Biological sampling of Stream C revealed a strong presence of filamentous algae. Perennial Stream C
scored 56 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Form and 30.5 out
of 71 possible points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form, indicating perennial status (SCP-C,
enclosed). Enclosed are photographs of Perennial Stream C.
Intermittent Streams
Stream A flows west across the western portion of the property and is approximately 145 linear feet in
length. Stream A was evaluated to be unimportant intermittent. This channel exhibited ordinary high
water widths of 1.5-3 feet, persistent flow, moderate sinuosity and a moderate continuous bed and
bank. Stream A scored 55 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment
Form and 22 out of 71 possible points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form, indicating
2 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s North Cazolina Division of Water Quality, 1999. Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0.
a "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Cazolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.

March 15, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Page 3 of 4
unimportant intermittent status (SCP-A, enclosed). Enclosed are photographs of Unimportant
Intermittent Stream A.
Wetlands
Wetland AA is located in the western portion of the property and is approximately 2.58 acres in extent
(Figure 1, enclosed). This forested wetland area is hydrologically connected to Unimportant
Intermittent Stream A and Perennial Stream C. Dominant vegetation within these areas includes
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana),
green ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica), red oak (Quercus rubra) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
These areas exhibited low chroma soils (lOYR 3/1 at 0 -3 inches, 10 YR 2/1 at 3-11 inches and 2.SY
2/1 at 11-15 inches), drainage patterns, water marks, and water stained leaves. A Routine On-Site
Determination Form representative of Wetland AA is enclosed (DP1-B). Photographs of Wetland AA
are enclosed. Routine On-Site Determination Forms representative of non jurisdictional upland areas
are also enclosed (DP1-A and DP2-A).
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on March 14, 2007 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. As of the date of this submittal, a response from SHPO has not yet
been received.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on March 14, 2007
to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical
habitat located within the project area. As of the date of this submittal, a response from NCNHP has
not yet been received.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of the project is to construct amini-warehouse storage facility and associated offices.
The property has been zoned and valued for this use.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Total wetland impacts have been reduced to 0.30 acre. Impacts to highest quality
contiguous wetlands have been avoided. Proposed impacts are necessary to accommodate the
minimum widths of buildings and driveway. Impacts to jurisdictional streams have been avoided.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Unavoidable impacts to Wetland AA total 0.30 acres and are the result of the placement of fill related
to the construction of the proposed project. There are no impacts to jurisdictional stream channels.
On behalf of Brelvi Realty, CWS is submitting aPre-Construction Notification Application with
attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 13, and pursuant to
Nationwide Permit No. 39 and Water Quality Certification No. 3402 (enclosed).

March 15, 2007
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Page 4 of 4
Compensatory Mitigation
Brelvi Realty proposes to mitigate for the unavoidable impacts to Wetland AA by avoiding impacts to
the highest quality contiguous portion of Wetland AA and by avoiding all stream impacts.
Additionally unavoidable impacts will be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. This will leave
the majority of Wetland AA intact.
Please do not hesitate to contact Craig R. Wyant at 704-527-1177 or [e-mail] should you
have any questions or comments regarding these findings.
C,~'
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Thomas J. Blackwell
Vice President of Natural Resources Staff Biologist
Enclosures: USGS 7.4' Harrisburg, NC Topographic Quadrangle
NRCS Cabarrus County Soil Survey
Figure 1 -Wetland Boundary Survey
Figure 2 -Proposed Impacts and Mitigation
Storm Water Management and Water Quality Plan
Certification of Agent Authorization Form
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39
and WQC No 3402
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP-A, SCP-B, SCP-C)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP-A, SCP-B, SCP-C)
USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP1-A, DP1-B and DP2-A)
Representative Photographs
cc: Mr. Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Regulatory Office
File

07.0505
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Prosect No. 2007-1789
• �� �r/ i ,-\-� ! / of �/ irk !� �� `�� i Bit 61 � f j �``,� _
.11`• � 1 �\ ��',r� �%�� f''.J 64 � r � t.;\�`,$ a`a� 11 .\ / c IE...
7�r
Blackwelder Road
tl
600 (`330
�- �6�" QA I
Highway 49 `+-
r i. �', • / 1307
`+`_ /• - :� �-".�:�%: �_ /`-` .�--"`."'f/ f•A �r ! �,_, '593/ _..� 1 ,% f r ..,,t ,g/' -,
f Project Boundary
IN'�(
60 V
Shamrock Road
J, %
/el
BM
:�-' ' r,,% 600 � _ _._._-.%• � ��.J � ti.1 i � �'- - : � ?�_� -` � _ ,� -`-
�f�'T- r 1� )r - •�
1138- -O \ ���5\_, `,'L�.\ T/ ��uJ •/
Image Courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Harrisburg, North Carolina, 1996, Concord SE, North Carolina, 1991.
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'

Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Nationwide Permit No 39 Project No. 2007-1789
7 ® J 8 5
~~

Soil Survey Courtesy of the USDA-NRCS
NRCS Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, North Carolina, Sheet No. 5 and 6, dated 1976.
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'

- ~~ N
Legend ~ ~ ~ 5 0 5 ~~'~
,,~ ,;
Jurisdictional Streams
,-
_ ;Jurisdictional Wetlands
~'
Roads %'
..
~.
~,
.~: -
_~.
'; Buildings
_.....
,~...
~~ Property Boundary -..
• DP 1-B Data Point
• scP-s Stream Classification Point
Jurisdictional Wetland AA
(2.32 acres)
... ~
:. ~~..,_
~ _.__
~~ ~j'/ • DP 2-A
,.e.
- ... /~
~,
~/ Perennial Stream C
.. ~, (363.5 linear feet)
~. .
SCP-A r~ SCP B ~;,~1 ~
,; /
- i
~ ,
`- ~: , ,;.
I,J ~ '~
\ / `~
/ '~
/1~
a' %
't. • DP 1-A
.,~ .~
;,
,~
Imprortant'Intermittent ~ ~ `» , ~~
Stream A (145.02 linear feet) ' '~ %~
;;
:-
- ,~ .:
..
..~
;~ ~. -
~ ,-
_. ,
r % SCP-C F -' ~. __
~,
Wetland AA cont, ~'~ .~ ,.~~'
. ,
,, ,
,, ~ ,~ .
,,
..
....f
-.; ,-~
- a~ l
,.
,-
,-
,%
,~ ., .
,,
,. :.."'
~,- f ,
~; ~~
i~
~ //~
r'
A ,~
9 ~ /
,, „ ,i
VC ~ /
r: .~-
G '~
~ ~ ~
-~ /
,.
,. :~ .,
°,
___
200 100 0 200 Feet ,: / , ' .:~,,,
,_ Carolina Wetland Services Figure 1. Wetland Boundary Survey
~~~ 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd. Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 Harrisburg, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
_~~j«'~^a we°~^~se~.«E; CWS Project Number: 2007-1789
[phone]

*•
e
e

Avoided Stream A
(145.021f}
sPILLW~Y~
• 3'x3' WttH I"~
cwwur ~oL z~
EkEFS~drq SrtwWY{;
3'WIOE NG, f{,0 wJ/I'W9R.`:
Tar ct` 6>x/INV• ~ EL Yo
~I

BYmdleary~melmoaLandel-yrc2e-homy®ad+dYYaYma Avoided 5iream C `1
paiodot486snwryeueihe~oH4~mlholmcEmmmddb"tmmn lweawr•
paiadcf2msayi ~
• nsei~e~,wpem,lemYde,rxd. (363
51[}
smelm~mermepoedrhaueeb.eeoQmmY:lm®ewmrY;Yl. ~
.
BewdN.dmdmWdm veLL.iYh•leeeeelllp®IrcApmIY1e160 e•rWaifim nmmra

.Omoanemlminheporikd WYkle&dml6rkwye JYm,,. ~t
. 3,x,e eeLL kedYN dm+~I~faePpile hnndaelmat Flf ~,"rMR1
12 W~S~
L
eoy+malmdpYtewmmmtmYwemlgoraearYa~amm~m. c
7>nemmue,r~wna~mea~aM•tzcecm~rep~olma amomYlmYmt•orm
IO dYpeemlQeLIr11A dY0 mlhe 6LQYY ieYdllienn

itrhlmamhe ge6il®dWhlddryl ofasrnuleo. 7lie euphtkulhefimoffioel M'1~1
V'+~~
~'
1eddldm.aemmgaLLY erwa[pmtlle`mY11YJm mol lEe leKlYlm hmmelam0liehed. I
,,,•••.
:'•
~
QNe Foie wu reddWymalwetlmueYdlmmltWeamp,lnm dl hleiemiY hee4nN •
.
au, plded, end replied wlttio udeyl M~hemmdwim oteamm~etlm
NeddhLmm Oedellotlm wlume,dYdellp mYlpmrW6rfineedimml LLYed•Ihllhgmin

Y196 dlhe dLLamimrdime YWv„,,,.~~~~~
w~R:l•1~ dR~ ~-
IolYemmdacEmmlelhmldbpemrleddwmYYeaairyhi{hBewlhemluplm®1. 5NT1oN
IN
(To tE CoNSf W.~tC4 To
N~Ie 9rn Ps NaEp
IN e3roPttWMf2 ~5r
MPN66EM6hT PWwTILe.S°,
~,bae1,al,oat„y„eemowtyeeeuedwi<wormlal.emard~~'wunLLewelm
Jnmw~a
'
i pMro-6PWEIg49~
.
mm
Y ~ykhlYmmlmmorlN6P~r90IP~ardmddNfi WlleNaapeY
ila
d
p
°d
hY4 d•Meed YNmlLLesumdWmhnpld6LLUtWJY.agWriN6Wuootnlee
DmYiWo Wlieluwllldemvoam1111~I'•~w,mmy dp dpuadmbuiYLLeeA
~~wm.iL~mOuml~he ...
eHYdroeaep ~dYmYnntlmofaeiemY4iY~~
BegidleaLLwNY6dIeM4
• ARPY+n1YYeaIYat+ded4<Yd~hWnlhalld hemeMed LLlelrtalltt NmldlY.
01madmmtlacldehdl•eodhlmeWheYamsd.smewH
&IeedddadUalloohlr6LLw
LLeemlWaaiYkmlrrimeomelly. ..
iheMUnlhoeNheWrpeeLLd~Ye~d1e0 eruammaee0elhhepeneneY dm9wi• ............................
r~
E I
;,
i+
I?
Legend
Impacted Wetlands
\\ .•
~ '.
~~
..~ \
`.

li ~~: Avoided Wetlands
:i
~
.1
r:
I' ~, (2.02 acres}
I
I;
1j
:5--

.
` I
~ ~. i unlTS of '
~
~',~
' ~i WI2,MPAC7 (FILL)
~
I
3 ~ t •0.30 <tREs
`.
)

uMKSaP .: r
3 eatlsiWV
WeTlk+a s ~'1
.\
vs
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc•
~ ~~~' 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
~+ ~~~~~~~.~~,, in,~~•• Charlotte, NC 28273
REFERENCE: IMPACT DRAWINGS PROVIDED SY CIVII.TECH ASSOCIATES, DATED 02123/07
Figure 2• Proposed Impacts and Mitigation
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Harrisburg, Cabarrus County
North Carolina
CWSProjectNumber; 2007-1789
~T ~:
~\ glp~',t~;
~\
~\

_\
~\\
~~o
rryp.P
s
sa ~ \
~~ _
Q
i ~ ~ ~ \~
~ ~ ~+ ~~ ~
1111111111111111
~QSN~~0~1'j,•r
do2'o OfE8di10 `9 ':
`~ "~' ~ f ` ssu
`,y' ~y ~h ( ~2sre
7fIG 4raRMWbTfaz µf.,Ir~Wp1E¢• QU,~y f'IfN I'o~ THIS fT~tJC27'
Is Groi'~ Td ~E rl+an~ao ~ y~ss svvft~s I~NIa~ iw PFVCO
haees To r+N 2icrf~laro qw D~•(ENTlord MsIN Or 1FI~ I.oWei'• ENO cp
~ srre •
Elm syJbl~ t5sz v~mv«. r#w)
Rcr~vlrev swldt55 Fay 35~ T~ 1'eMOJaL: l0.' Faz sl:. P•b Db•= 2.lofc.
LoN61TIJDINa.. SI.oF>; = I.'IG7
SItR StotES = 3:1 paggq wlon{ ° 2'
.t~adlDra 5W<uya `~ 510 ~ ~ 2lotar(p~gv~
6XT6tJDEU Pry! 4~lEhrft~N BesIN (~~ fzBNWt<+• EPf,~
bt:blN•~E dGfa ~ 6MP = 111'111 s4'.Pr. c 2.low•
Yr~gD ~~7otJ VaLIR~ (Id smana tuJNcrr):^91,111cq,ozx(IXoa833)
7Gk5 w'r~• ar~o~5
Gd%(f~1TbN 1d~11Nr~ PIeoVIG6p I SI 6 uJ•al: Sropo66
pErEltfloM1l TIME (MRJIM~M 48I~~ ~ (07.4 f~• /)SING < I'IOGWFic6
('ROPVSEp IMf~P-VIU~S irxA = "f 711'71 sir Fr ~ I ~T`t ,~ ~ '~
I nns 7 = ~•
~PdM NcG>ElN~1 SToWNW6TBP- $C~r 4U~NkErN6Yr hYLTI~ 1X14[,1949
p.Y~ = 0.05 + o. ~, (r) L = 35.'1
fzv ~ o,3~t3
STop,rcd: YOUJbE ° LESI6N IzpINF6U. X Krr %D.P.
~aK~ f° RWN~M.t,:
p~UIRJiO VoI.d1Me (I'~(0.3113)~I~ZxS•cnk~
O.15k~ FrrFT = G?'~ a.Fl:
:. Ti~Z 6Mr's IN SERIES Wlw MEN( 652'135 KPaM/~-•
0o iJ ~ ~ 0 ~ V
I~lv~
_ - K
-- _ - _ -1
I y _
:` `' a
~ _ 1 ~ .. .
f0'
~~
mlmu®
xm/db
.. 0s~ ~~ I +RP
_-+~~~~+~--- ------~~ ----~--------->-----r--
3(e I•f
x ~~
~~ ~•.
10.59.
•4

61o W
Sp nF•PLLL.
NG Ii6uWlby'•...49
. u;~.awmel6muhelYlmeammYeellmtpemmemlemasdYa ..............
.......
I. nla~paftheYalelYmoapideYWY. :~
3.umimame uki and e~ode~eadfnrlmme4
d. Yd'mvleamedLLlm 31waY•and
S.emdiom aflheemagemYW '
d. rnody Rw~e Odx rmbn~
O
c0 ~ o0
c'/ \4p
a O dou
eF C0
TABLE OF
TOTAL WETLANDS
IMPACTED
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 101,088 ngft (2:32 a) 121988 egl't (0.30 ¢)
JURISDICTIONAL STREAMS 5GN.52 If 0

.......k...........
2'
!
ILLYOIrH o®el ~1 m.W$mnm rthlun YILE u meYllnj i6E IGnddNg
..-il -~.. swnle-•'•e,~.~heaanr «r,~.~ee
3i I'_I.5~ n;N Yhrn y~peaode eedmxet l.mwal,iEsi~cemdeposm0°
NogII+H~~FN VK+~ ~nfnlmedufo8orrc
!8p(tiN~Sg5o :II~NcI' • At keu Dace meeilly,lmox acre nedimml.eeprclnRYfinm the LLplunmedge,mmmum
IN5Wlmcsrr+= 1_- II=1I?~~=111
cc~U Illc~ll ~wNani and g+dlnE
~ ~°N5 =~1 . GRAPHIC SCALE
m o a m . +m m
L-if~AsSC-D SvV~I~.
N'(5 (a rar )
I'°?I snr=
Tn
awudn~.
~ t.•o:
8c e.~ a~ j-
r~lua

The Stormwater Management/Water Quality Plan
~~~y„
t~ ~-,
~~ ; ~~
..~~s"""/ .\~T
i/~ ~'~ ~
~.~ ~
c ,~~ ~~~
e,op~unery~~~,
w~,`,` ~N CAq ~~~'
~Q. ,,...... , ~~~ ',~
' °' SEAL y9r'
_ 92976
TNT ST~r~I~1bT~- MhNb~-NtE~.1~~W.6T~ f~U,~u f'I ~~'N ~o+~ `rNls f'~oJ~
IS t'fzap0~ Tb t~ i't~aVl~ t/Y ~izbSS SIrJb 17)zelNl~6 ~U-~ t'~v~
bl/-~~S TD ~rE ~j~.'t~Nt~ btz.~ bETENT[ON ~bslN fiT `fF-1>; LoVJG-y~ ~N~ Gt;
-rug str~ -
(al~~t~ St~lpl/E5 ~ 3S9 1?~MaVl~- ~~
~Qvl~-~ `~W/>l~s ~1'L 35°l~ TSS I~MOVpL: (oa' ~, ~. D.b ~"J./~.= Z•Ib~G.
LoN,~ITU~IN~t~ S(.ol~ = I.°JCo~e
SIt~ SLal~s c 3:I E~1roM w1t~17-~ = 2'
-i/~ovi r7~r stwvb ~S ~ S I o >`>= 7 2 to I.~ (~~
~XT~IJI~Et~ 17~/_ t7~T~NT i~N ~ I N ~ ~ ~ (~I~to/~ ~~~
bt~lN.aoE ~t?~ To (3YV11' ~ ~ I r X71 ~. ~~. = 2. to ~•
I~~ L~Te~J-(1an1 vOLUM'/ C 1'~ src~-nom WJnt~~ : `f l,"1 `l t ~q.~: x (I ~(0.0833~
7~~i-5 ~v. >rq: sTOr~~
~~"ftoN ~/cwM~ ~'IzOvli`.~.p : SI7 ~ ~• ~r. sror~~
~e7~~lTior.! "7~M~ C M IN 11.1tvM A-~ N~,~ ~ X7.4 His . UsIN~ 6 I "~ O(21FIGt;
Torte sly ~~ ~ 2t 7, Bay ~. r-r - 5. c>J ~
ptzor'a~co Ir~tt~~-Vtcv~ 6~ = 77,~t"I~ ~ ~- = I •`l~t ~.
~~ IM1~f VIUJ~ °jo = 35.^l ~n
r
i`P-~M N~.N~- , STatz-rv~ w,~-(~ty ~3~r MbN,~vL~~ {'~~TIc~S , bt°~z-tom t9~tq
~V O. b~ -~- O. 00`1 C T) Z = 3~v.~(
~2 ~ = D .3"713
5'rop~~ UbWMB = 1~s1~N i~lN~~,c, x ~~ x t~.p.
~o~- i" tzblN~~
~-~v12~~ vouJr.~~ = C ("~(0.3'113~~1/2~~~.oa6~J
O.154~ ,~' FT = ~73~ cv. r-r
.•. THE ~t~'s W ARIES wtw r.~~ 85I~ Tss ~Md/~~- .
s;

agent authorization (1700x2200x24b jpeg)
dannarv rZ 2007
C:~rali~r~ i~%etlanti Scrti'ices Pro osa~! \c~. 21)07-17$9 ADD
AGENT Ch.:12Ti~'ICATIt7N OF` r~UTfIQRIZATiC.).iti
k. ~°tunir Brek~i, hereby certifp that 1 laa~~e autllorjzect t~'raig ~. ~1~'yr~ar~t i,f Carolina 1~'Gtlan.d ~erviees, inc. to .-3et
~~n mv. behilf'and take all actions raecessar~° to the processing, issuance, and acceptance uf'this retluest. for
wetlands deternlinatit~n and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
1~'e hereby certify that the Libove inti~rmation submitted in this application is true allc3 acirrate to the. best of out°
knu«-ledge.
..r.-
applicant's sib==nature
~ ~~~~-
Date
~~ •,
' r
--,~'~~ •
~~
.~~gent's signature
January ??, 2007
_. __ ,
Date
V71

®f~ce iJse ®nlyo
bT~A~E Actf®n III N®.
Form Version Apri12001
~~~~® 07.0505
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
FtiYP~z~EIVT
RECEIVED
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
^ Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit No. 39 and Water Quality Certification No. 3402
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section ~IIII -Mitigation), check here: ^
II. ApplicantInf®r~xiati®xi D ~~~.5~+~~5
D
1. ®wner/Applicant Information ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~
Name: Brelvi Realt Attn: Mr. Munir Brelvi
Mailing Address: 6350 Cumberland Drive gyp®m~"-~~j~rp
Harrisbur North Carolina 28075
Telephone Number: 704-401-6873 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: munir brelvi(a~wachovia com
2. Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Crai R. W ant
Company Affiliation: Carolina Wetland Services
Mailing Address: 550 East Westin house Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273
Telephone Number: (704527-1177 Fax Number:~704) 527-1133
E-mail Address: crai~(a~cws inc net
Page 1 of 7

III, I'r®,~ect Inf®x°mala®n
1. Name of project: Brelvi Harrisbur Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCD®T ®nly): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (linear~pro~ect)
4. Location
County: Cabarrus Nearest Town: Harrisburg, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate ~5 (I-85), travel
east on NC 49 for approximately ~ 7 miles The project site is located on the north side of
NC 49 after the Rock River brid e and before Blackwelder Road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35.3344~° W80.625~4°
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
The existin land use of the ro'ect area is forested.
7. Property size (acres): 5 00 acres from engineers drawing)
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rocky River
9. River Basin: Yadkin River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to construct a
mini-warehouse stora e facilit and associated offices.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe loader, bulldozer
and typical construction equipment will be used for this project.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The land use surrounding the project is a
mixture of commercial industrial and agricultural with some adi acent forested areas.
Page 2 of 7

Ida
~o
~I.
Pri®r Pr®ject Mist®ay
I+'utnax~c Px®~ect Plaaa~
There are no future ro' ect lans antici ated for this site.
Px®p®sed Impacts t® VVatcrs ®f tlae gJnited States/~ate>rs ®f tlae Mate
1 _ Wetland Impacts
Located within
100-year
Floodplain*
(ves/no)
Wetland Impact Area of Impact
Sheet Number Type of Impact* (acres)
(indicate on map)
Wetland AA fill 0.30 ac.
F' 2
**
***
no
Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
301f
Type of Wetland*
forested
figure g adin fill,
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearin , gr g,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pon ,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 2.32 ac.
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.30 ac.
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams N/A
Stream Impact
Sheet Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)

~~
Average Width Perennial or
Stream Name* * of Stream Intermittent?
Before Impact (leases ecif•
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
Page 3 of 7

3. Open Water Impacts, including .Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. I~/A
Open Water Impact Area of
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(indicate on map) (acres)
Type of Waterbody
Name of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(if applicable) bav. ocean, etc.)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts.
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Ianpact J>usti~cati®n (rev®idance and Miniinizati®n)
Im acts to on-site 'urisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable Total wetland impacts have been reduced to 0.30 acre. Impacts to iurisdictional
streams have been avoided. Pro er sediment and erosion control measures will be used to
minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
VIII. Mitigati®n
Brelvi Realtyproposes to mitigate for the unavoidable impacts to Wetland AA by avoiding
impacts to the highest quality cont~uous portion of Wetland AA and by avoldms; all stream
impacts Additionally unavoidable impacts will be minimized to the greatest extent
practicable This will leave the majority of Wetland AA intact.
1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
Page 4 of 7

reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Envir®nanental I)®cumentation (IIV6~Q ®nly)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ^ No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at (919) 733-503 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^ N/A
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^ N/A
X. Pr®posed Impacts ®n Riparian and Watershed Buffers (I)WQ ®nly)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional ®ffice may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: )?
Yes ^ No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 5 of 7

Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.l~T/A
Impact Required
Zone* ,~~,,,,,,o f o*~ Multiplier Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total ~ ~ ~
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel, Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
~. Stormwater (D~6'Q ®nly)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Pro osed total im envious acrea e will be 1.79 acres. The total acrea e of the site is 5.00 acres.
There is currentl no im envious cover on the site. Surface waters and wetlands located
downstream of the ro ert will be rotected b rass swales drainin all aved areas to an
extended dr detention basin at the lower end of the site. These BMPs will meet 85% TSS
removal.
~I. ~evv~ge Drip®sal (DWQ ®nly)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 6 of 7

VIII. Yi®lati®ns (I~W~ ®xaly)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
DIV. ®ther ~Ci~c~amstances (®pti®nal)o
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to begin immediately following receipt of the appropriate permits.
e~ z.-~
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ~ 7 ~ Q `~
DATE: March 15.2006
COUNTY Cabarrus County North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT 5 acres
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Brelvi Harrisburg Site
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
Brelvi Realty -
POC• Mr Munir Brelvi at (7041401-6873
6350 Cumberland Drive
Harrisburg North Carolina 28075 _
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services Inc
POC• Mr Craig R W ant at 704) 527-1177
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
(X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: Commercial Development )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( )Project already completed
(Type of project: 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted -forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS 7.5-Minute Harrisburg, NC Topographic Quadrangle
(X) NRCS Cabarrus County Soil Survey
(X) Wetland Boundary Survey (Figure 1)
(X) Proposed Impacts (Figure 2)
(X) Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39
(X) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP-A, SCP-B, SCP-C)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCP-A, SCP-B, SCP-C)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Forms (DPI-A , DP1-B and DP2-A)
(X) Representative Photographs
c-,~~
Signature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Craig R. Wyant

0 7 0 50 5
®ATA ~®RI1611
R®IDTIN~ VV~T~AN® ®ET~~IVIINATI®N
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjectlSite: ~relvi ~-Iarrisbur~ bite
Applicant/Owner: li~ltainix ~xelvi
Investigator(s): Craig ~• Wyant
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(tf needed, explain on reverse.)
VECETATI®N
ninant Plant Species
1. Celtis laevigata Stratum
tree Indicator
FACW
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC
3. Acer negundo tree FACW
4. Fraxinus americana tree FACU
5. Celtis laevigata sapling FACW
6. Quercus rubra sapling FACU
7. Quercuspalustris sapling FACW
8. Fraxinus americana sapling FACU
rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
HY®R®L®GY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 1`TA (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >l~ (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >l~ (in.)
dad n®>t reveal evidence ®f
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Dominant Plant Soecies
9. Liquidambar styrc
10. Vitis rotundifolia
11. Lanicera japonicc
12. Chickweed
13.
14. ~_
15.
16.
Date: ®1/~1/®9
County: ~C~b~rrea~
State: ~~
Community ID: 1
Transect ID: 1
PIotID: 1°A
Stratum
ipling FAC+
vine FAC
herb FAC-
herb
~~%
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
DP 1-A UPLAND

~dIIE~~
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgrou
I~l~c~arnbeax~ ~®~mg 2 ~®~ »er~eait~ s~®~e~ Drainage Class
Field Observations
TT14in u~nl» rlalfe Indicate Map
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist)
0-3 0/A lOXIa 3/~
3-12 A 10~'I2 ~/3
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors

Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Well drained
„P~ Yes No
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
L,oailn
Sandy 1®am
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
~~Im 1 LF-'~I~IJ 6J~ 1 ~rr3avesa~pa a ~~ee
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
n~ r~ll~>re~lrnttative ®~~ ~n
„Nr~....... i ._
DP 1-A UPLAND

p 7 0 50 5
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Project No. 2007-1789
Soil profile at upland data point 1-A.
Test pit at upland data point 1-A.

Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminarv Wetlands Determination Protect No. 2007-1789
lilt: 1
'~ 1
Vegetation community at upland data point 1-A.
Vegetation community at upland data point 1-A.

®~a9°A- ~®~IVI
~®UTIN~ i~~TLAN~ b~?~Ri~IINA•fl®N
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
~roject/Site: ~Irelei I.larriisbux~ Sate
Applicant/Owner: 1~/dunitir ~relvii
Investigator(s): ~irai~ ~• ~6'yant
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VE('sET~4T106VV
rinant Plant Species
1. Platanus occidentalis Stratum
tree Indicator
FACW-
2. Fraxinus americana tree FACU
3. Celtic laevigata tree FACW
4. Quercus rubra tree FACU
5. Ulmus americana tree FACW
6. Celtic laevigata sapling FACW
7. Ligustrum sinense sapling FAC
8. Carpinus caroliniana sapling FAC
:rcent of Dominant Species that a re OBL, FACW or FAC
Yes No
Yes No
Yes Mo
9. Lonicera
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Date: 01/1/07
County: ~~b~lrir>tas
State: ETC
Community ID: 1
Transect ID: 1
PIotID: 1'~
Stratum Indicator
herb FAC-
67%
t.
HY®~®L®CY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: l~/A (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 1 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ® (in.)
i Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
DP 1-S WETLAND

~®Il.~
'Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
~ofile Description:
Ir~d~ll l®~aai9 ®k® ~, ~~tr~e>~~ ~1®n~~
Drainage Class Moderately well drained
Field Observations
Indicate Mapped Type? Yes No

Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle
AbundancelContrast
(Munsell Moist)
i
(inches) Horizon stl
(Munsell Mo
0-3 0/A lOYlZ 3/1 __
3-11 A 10_/1
11-15 ~ 2.~I'la 2/1 ._--
----
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
larks:
9d19~T1.~lV® ®ET~~NEIN~+TI®!d
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:

Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
~~~~' 1®~1CI1
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
DP 1-B WETLAND

i .
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Project No. 2007-1789
a
Soil profile at wetland data point 1-B.
Test nit at wetland data point 1-B.

Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Protect No. 2007-1789
isI'.F:it t
~~
Vegetation community at wetland data point 1-B.
Vegetation community at wetland data point 1-ti.

f~At~ ~®E$IVI
~®~tENf~ Vl9~tLAN~ I~~tE,~NEII~~tI®6d
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
>roject/Site: ~relvi ~Iarriisburg Mite
~pplicant/Owner: l~unix ~releit
nvestigator(s): ~~°~~~ ~• Wy~nt
Jo Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
s the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
s the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
Date: ®1/1/09
County: ~~~~~'~'~§
State ~~
V~CETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus americana tree FACU
2. Celtis laevigata tree FACW
3. Carya tree
4. Quercus rubra shrub FACU
5. Acer rubrum shrub FAC
6. Celtis laevigata shrub FACW
7. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC
8. Quercus phellos sapling FACW-
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 1~/1~ (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 1~ (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1~ (in.)
Yes
Yes
Yes
No Community ID:
No Transect ID:
No Plot ID:
A
1
~-A
9. Vitis rotu
10. Lonicera
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
at
60%
vine
herb
FAC
FAC-
i Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
DP2-A UPLAND

~®I~,~
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
Ix~d~l~ ~®aan, ®t®~ ~D~ir~~1CA~ ~~®1~~~
Drainage Class Moderately well drained
Field Observations
Indicate Mapped Type? Yes No
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle

Abundance/Contrast
(Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist)
0.3 0/A 10~'1~ 3/3
3-10 A 10~'1~ 3/2
10-12 ~ 10~'R 3/3 7.~~'1~ 4/4 ;~aaany/stir®ng
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
arks:
®f
~PVETL~4N® ®ETERl~E9N~-TE®N
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hvdric Soils Present? Yes No
®f
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
L®~IITY)!
Clav 1®am
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Is this
(Ci
Point Within a Wetland? Yes
DP2-A UPLAND

Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Project No. 2007-1789
- ~;
~;~:
"'" ~'~
~ ~, ~ ~.~ ~ a.-~.~
I I I~ I - I I I I I • i ~ ~-~- ~,
~~`t;;, j„ ~„ 3,. 4„ ~,. 6„ 7~~ 8~~ 9' 10 11 12 i '.a~~* ,
~~~sc .",.. ':re4~ t .. ~' s~+aa'. '; Vie.
.Q
.:,ycti: ~ ~~ ,.
~.~~ ~ ~ (3[tf~.l \ I ~~
1j} R'lA
~" ~yy
yR ~~ ~ , ~ ~"`~-•~ -
t.- ~ , ~,~ , -. "~ ~
9 .r ~ ~'
~* .,r~" r a
Soil profile at upland data pc~il~~ ~-A.
Test pit at upland data point 2-A.

~ n
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Project No. 2007-1789
,~ < <
~ ~ t
'
~~
~ ` '

" ~~
~~
~
~ i r .,
°
t ~ .~ }.,
lnv-: ~ s ~~ v ~ 'z
i ~~
~ i i
ti.
~ ~ ~ ~'~
-;~
a .
y. ~

IiF'i i i ,
-A
Vegetation community at upland data point 2-A.
Vegetation community at upland data point Z-A.

[~c~rtft ~att~9irEa ®i~i~iara of ~"Vat~r ~u~litlt - ~tre~m [c9entificatiat~ Farm„ V~rsi®~ 3.1
Prc~jeCt:
~r~l~i ~I~xxi~be~xg ~it~
3
` Latttud~. N3§,~3~~0~ „_
_~, _ ~-,..__, -. ,__
L
atp: O1/~1/200
1
- q,~_
,.
Site:
r
t
t
~~peE~ Longitude: g~y~0e6~~8~4
lJa
~
~~a
: CRW Interxniitt~nt ~tre~en A
`~atat ~tart'tt~.
Sft-eaazr cs at t~sf irrternti€tent '`}l'~1 ®® Caunt'~'
~~~D~~t"dll~ Other
e.g. Quad Ndart~°:
?f ? f 301' e~an~idt of ? 3Q fr `+ •
,u
~rrotnar~ho(r~g~r (subtotal = 10.0 )
R ~ l~b~ent"_ , _ 1Neak~ I _Rtid~er~te ~~trori~
.._ .~_.2 ~ ~ ~ -~;
_ _ _ . _
.
1 ,. C~ntinuvu:s bed and bank _ _=__.
_. _
2~:Q _, 1
1= 2
d
2. 'Sin~rasity O
~ 1 2 3 -~.

_
3. ln-ehanruef structure: riffle-pool sequence
.

'
y
1.0,x. ~~ - ---
~~"
- °--?~~~"'-' 3
1 ~ 2
4. SoC texture or stream substrate sorttnc~} I
0
1.0 is 1 ~~ 2 3
5. Acti~elrei!icfNoodplain 2.0 ~. 0
-' 2 3
~ ; t
8. I~efsasiti°rtaE bars or benches __~... _ 0
0,0_.,..... - -_ ._ .~,~.~,....,ayw,,~,..~n...~--~{
2
1
---

7. 13rai~fecf chanr~et 0.0 0
}
d
0
x
1 i
t 3
;
1 ~ 2 {
_ _ _.
.=a...,~~~--~-~
8_ F2ec~ertt a6luvial d~epasits
.__~_a~,.~...-,.,
~
_
_
.
_~---
0
01 ~
8
~
'
g 3 t~iatural levees, 0.
.
-~ ~
~' 3 -.
2

5 I 0 i
0 0. ~. 1 1.5
~ '
~
11. Ode ~sntrols __, .
0 O.S 1. 1.5
:
12_ lti~atu,ral era€[ey or drainage~r,~y 0.5
13_ Second or greater order channel on existirt .
~° = 0 `t`es J 3
I,ESCS or MRCS map or other dace~rnented
~
evictience. 0.0
f~ian-rns.de ditches are not rated; see discussions in marpuai
B. E•-4yd~~ta (~ubtrstai = ~.0 --~
1 ~ '
0
14. Orounc{t+terfla~rfdtschar e _1.0, -
~ -_ -
-- __-~----=J•y.~~"`~
15. 4~~a:ter in t<hartnel and = ~8 hrs since rata, ar
0 1 ~ Z
'
-
~r~;tat+3r iri ckrannel -dry or_ gravving seasori 3.0 i _
5 ~ 1-5
0 ~~°~ ~
1 ~ i.
1 ~_Leafli#ter . ~ I 1 ~ 1.5
o
t 17. S~cfirrrner€t on plants ar debris a
1.0 .
5 1 l 1.5
0
18. Organic del7rs lines or plies (Wrack lines} l.Q. 0

f~a = 0
dric s°i{s (redoximorphic features) present?1.5
l-f
19 .

~ 'des = 1.~
y
,
C- 8iolag Subtotal = 4.00 _)
t _ .
0 3
1 2 ~ 1 ~ 0
'_ Fibrous roots in channel
ZCt
nts in channel
d H
' .
3
0
3 2 t 0
~---~. - - --~~ •-"°°-
a
. Rante
21 ~,
22. Crayfish ~•~

0
0 2 3
1 1
23. Bivadvss .
~
0
0 ®.5 1 1.5
24_ Fish .
0
0
0 ®.~r 1 1.5
.
F 25. ArrSphibuans
o
20- Macroberr<thos (note daversty and abundance) 0.0 1.5
©.s 1 1
i Z d 3
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.0 0 1
05 1 I 15
e
l 28. iron oxtdiztn: bactenaffun us
g 9 0
0 0
FAC 0 5 FAC~fV 0 75 013E 1 5 5AV = 2 0; Other = 0
0 00 :..
_ -
Item ~ .._~_..__ .._
29Y'- Wetland !ants to streambed p
29 focuses on the
land !ants
f u -

presence of aquatic or vletEand p en s.
p
(terns 20 and 1 focus an the presence o ,
Sketch:
hJotes: t:use bacfc side of Phis form far additional notes.)

OFFICE USE ONLY:
E ~~ d
USACE AID#
~C~-A - Iffit~rmatteaat Str~a>~ A
07.0505
DWQ #
STI~EAlVI QTJAI~I~'~' ASSESSIVIEI®TT ~'®I~SIIEErI'
~~ ~ ~
,,
1. Applicant's Name: Munir Brelvi 2. Evaluator's Name: Crai R. W ant
3. Date of Evaluation: 01/31/07 4. Time of Evaluation: 1:00 m
5. Name of Stream: UT to Rocky River 6. River Basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate Drainage Area: ~15 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 145 if 10. County: Cabarrus
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks) From Interstate 85 (I-851 travel east on NC 49 for
. ~,_ _ __..~,...;,ao „f~.Tr as afte r the Rocky River bride and before Blackwelder
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.33448° W80.625844°
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: rainfall within the ast 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: cloud 55 de ees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:-
18. Does channel a ear on USGS quad map? YES ~ 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
pp
o % Industrial 15 % Agricultural
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: _% Residential _/o Commercial )
85 % Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1-1.5'
21. Bankfull Width: 3-5'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) .-Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander .-Very Sinuous Braided Channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of
100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 55 Comments:
]late
Evaluator's Signature
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals fln
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to iTSACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 05/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QITALIT~' ASSESSI~IEl~T W®RI~SI~EET
SCF-~, -Intermittent Stream A
INT RANGE
ECOREGION PO
. SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain

Presence of flow I persistent pools in stream ®~ ~ 0 _ 4 0 - 5 1
1 ~no flow or saturatit~n ~ 0' strong #7aw ~ max points`
__.__
Evidence bf pact ftuman altertttian 0 .~ 6 0 ~. ~ 0 - 5 5
o
'" extensive alteration ~ 0' na altera~ian.~,t~~.x~~~lts~~,r~..:_,
_ Riparian xtitte 0 a 6 0-~ 0- 5 4
3 no buffer = 0; coati uous, wide burr ~ tnt{lt~bints~. ~.~_ _ -,_-
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 - ~ 0 - 4 0 - 4 4
4 extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es =max Dints _
a Groundwater discharge 0_ 3 0- 4 0- 4 1
d 5 do dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = tnax Dints
V Presence of adjacent flobdplain 0_ 4 p- 4 0- 2 1
~ 6 no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain =max Dints
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0_ S 0- 4 0- 2 4
~ dee 1 entrenched = 0• fie uent_floodin =max hints
Presence of adjacent wetlands 0_ 6 0- 4 0- 2 2
8 no wetlands = O; lar a adjacent wetlands :a txtax oit~ts
Channel sinuosity 0 9 5 0- 4 0- 3 4
9 extensive chamlelization = 0; natural meander ~ max_ Dints
Sediment input O m s 0- 4 0- 4 4
10 extensive de osition= 0; little or no seditrtent =max .hints
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 ~ 4 0 - 5 1
11 homo enous = O; lar 2, diverse sizes '- max Dints
fine
,
Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 _ 5 p _ 4 0 - 5 4
~., 12 dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks =max Dints
~ Presence of major bank failures 0 _ 5 p _ 5 0 - 5 5
~ 13 severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable batiks =max Dints
hoot depth and density on banks 0 _ 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
~ 14 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe bout =max Dints
~ impact by agriculture or livestock production 0 _ 5 0.4 0 - 5 4
15 substantial im act =0; no evidence =max. giYtts _ _ _ __ _ _ _
Presence of riffle-pool/rtpple-pool complexes 0 y 3 0 ®~ 0- 6 1
16 no riffles/ri les or Dols = 0• well-develo_ _ ed =max_ Dints . __...__ _ ._ ___ ._ . -
E'"
~ Habitat complexity 0~ 6 0 m~ 0- 6 0
F
~+ 1 ~
_
little or no habitat = 0; fi•e uent, varied habitats c mix Dints _ ._
~ Canopy coverage over streambed 0 _ 5
0-5 5
0-5
1~ no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano =max ..Dints
Substrate embeddedness Np* p- 4 0- 4 1
19 dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure =max
Presence of stream invertebrates 0_ q 0_ 5 0- 5 0
20 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = ma_x Dints
~ Presence of amphibians p g 4 O v 4 0- 4 0
(,~ 21 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es max dints _ ._ __ _ -
r-1 Presence of fish 0 _ ~ 0 ®4 0 -° 4 0
C~ 22 commtiti, numerpus t ~~ - tax }SDiilts) _
no evidence = 0, _ _
~ _
Evidence bf wildlife use 0 ~ 6 0 ®$ 0 -- 5 0
23 no evidence ~ 0• abundant evidence =' tnax " oiiits _
'Total faints Passible 100 100 100

`I`OTAI. SCOIIE (~~~~ ~rat~r art First pa~~~~ 55
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

~,'--
P
Brelvi Harrisburg Site ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Protect No. 2007-1789
1
View of intermittent unimportant stream A looking upstream.
View of intermittent unimportant stream A looking downstream.

i~f~rrth ~arolirr~ ia?iv~sis~n of W~atee Qt~alit~ - ~trea~ [~l~ntficati®ra ~orrn; \fersi~an 3.1
Date: Projerrt: t_atitucie: I~1~5.~~450~
O1/~1/~00~ _. _ ~r~iva I~[~rr>«b~x~ ~>:tt~ , _-,__,_ ,_-
site:- _ l,~orsa_ittjde: ~'~0.6~5~4~
Evatuatae:,~1g~I ~~~~~
`~otai i~e~nts, Other Ephenxeral ~tire~xxd ~
Sfreatn is of teesf itr"~rwroiftent Gouttty: e,g. QuaBJVeme:
€? i3 orr~ererrrPt~+f ifi? 3D Calb~rr>iai~

~ G~omorpl~olc~t~Y tSubtotal= 5.5 1
~ :--
A~ser~t __.: 11V~a4~--- Mcs~_ratc ;__--._`r~ang _~
- 3
1 ~. Continutrus beet and bank 1.0 ' 2 '~-="
1 -°~_-'
_
2. Sinrtosity 2.0 0 ~
1 ? 3

3. In-chanrre~ str[~cture: riffte-pool sequence
1.0 3
_ ~-
-
~~-.~.-.-.-_ -1 =-_- - 2 .~.v ,
3
~. SaiC texture or stream substrate sorting 1.0 0 2 3
5. Actvefrelic fir~odplain 0.0 0 I 1
?
1 3

6. Depositional bars or benches
0.0 0
_.-_ _ _
_
v
_-! ..m.~.. -
- - ~"`
2~ ....~.
- 3
_
7. Braided dhar~n~e9 0.0 0 1
2
1 3
8. E2eceert afiuvial deposits 0.0 _ ~ _ w.._...
_ _ ~ _ =~5,.-~.-~~m. - -~-
' 9 Natl.ara[ lieve~s 1 2 3
1 Q_ k~eadcuts 0.0 _ ~
t -
i 1
~ O
1.5 _,
11. Grade controls 0.5 C
-
~ .
1
; a.5 1.5
12 NaturaP va4few+ or rfrairtag~ray 0 0
' 1 ~. Second or greater order channel on ex~ tin
~ No = © Yf?s ° 3
~ ~S~S or NI~GS map c5r other documented
~ e<atdence. 0.0
ttrfan-rYtSd~ ~t~cltsa are naf Mated; see discussions in manuaf
B. I-lydrfalogy St~il~ot~l. = 6.0
a 2
,_._.,~~..._,
.
~
1 ~
~..~.z.._--,-_
Grata€tdtfaterflo~,~~ldtseEiar e
~ 14
~
- 1-~Q---
- __
--= _
-~ „_~
----
~
.
.__
_- -
15_'d~later in channel and > 43 hrs since rain dr ~
S
2
{ 1 I 3
Water in channel --dry or gro~~uirtg season _2 _0 -_.-

1
~ ~
j - -- _-- -s~~ ,~
1 ; 0.5 a - `~
16. Leaflitter 0.5 '
p
a.5 i 1 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.0 1
~
i 0 1.5
18. L~rganic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 1.0 ~ .
i
- - _ I Yes =1
5
19. Hydric soils (recloximarphicfe~tures) present'?1.5 .
No = 0

~. Biology {St~btofal = 2.50 } ..
1 t a
2d`~. Fibrous roots in channel 0.0 3
3 2
1
2
1 Q
21°. Ftoated plants in channel
_ 2,0
0
0
D ~_
-~
D.5 ~ 1 1.5
i 22. Crayfish . _-_- - 2
1 3
i 23. Bivalves 0.0 ~ 5 1
D 1.5
24_ Fish 0.0 O .
1 1.5
0
0 D.5
i 25_ Amphibians .
'
0 1
©.5 1.5
~. 6 I~+lacrobent#~os 4ntate diversity and abundance) 0.0 i _., 3
{ 27. Fiiamentous algae; periphyton 0.0 0 1 ~ 2
1
5
0 1 5
2e3. iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.0 .
0
1
5 SAV - 2 -`
Other= t~
50
0 ~,
.
~; i=AGW -0.75 OBt-`
.
SAG 0
T ~
•
.
_9 .Wetland tents ~n streambed __ _
nts
or wretlandpf
Item 2J focuses on the presence of aquatic
esenceTof up{and plants
~ ~ ~ p th
"
e r
items 20 and 21 focus crr p ,
Sketch:
Notes: Buse back side of this form far additional notes.)

0 7 0 50 5
OFFICE USE ONLY
~ ~
~~s a
~~Pa~ - Eph~~~r~l S~x~am ~
DWQ#
~'T~Al~I ~UAI~I'T~' A~~ES~I@~IEl®I'I' ~V®I~S~IEET
1. Applicant's Name: Munir Brelvi
3. Date of Evaluation: 01/31/07
5. Name of Stream: UT to Rocky River
7. Approximate Drainage Area: ~15 acres
~' ~• :~:
;:
2. Evaluator's Name: Crai R. W ant
4. Time of Evaluation: 1:00 m
6. River Basin: Yadkin
8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1001f 10. County: Cabarrus
__
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks) From Interstate 85 (I-851 travel east on NC 49 or
a roximatel 8.7 miles . The ro'ect site is located on the north side of NC 49 after the Roc River brid e and before Blackwelder
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.33448° W80.625844°
13. Proposed Channel Work (if
14. Recent Weather Conditions: rainfall within the ast 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: cloud 55 de ees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 .-Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-N)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:-
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ~ 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 15 % Agricultural
85 % Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1'
21. Bankfull Width: 3-4'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of
100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 47 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 05/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.
USACE AID#
1

STILE ~ZTALIT~' ASSES51VIE1~dT ~®~SIIEET
SCF_~ _ E herrieral Str~atn B
COREGION POINT RANGE
E
## CHARACTERISTICS CaastaL Ptedmant Mauntaln
Presence of flaw /persistent pools in stream 0 _ 3 0 - 4 0 - 5
i no flew or safiuration ~- d; strnn flaw -' fliexA poln.~s~.,.._ _ _.~--
^° °®°®
Evidence of past human alterntlon 0 ~, ~, p ~- 5 0 -° 5
2 extensive alteration ~ 0: nn alteratit~n ~ ~nax_ ©in,~
_
Riparian zone 0 - ~ 0 - 4 0 - 5
3 no buffer = 0; Conti uous wide buffer ~ max Dints
Evidence of nutrient or ehemical discharges 0 ~ $ 0 - 4 0 -- 4
4 extensive dischar es ° 0, no disch~r~es ° tax ®ints __,... , _ - -
Groundwater discharge 0-~ 0- 4 0 -- 4
a
~C 5 no dischar e = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands etc, ~' triaX Dints
U Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 ®q 0 -- 4 0- 2
~ 6 no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints
Entrenchment / floodplain access O v S 0- 4 0- 2
7 'dee 1 entrenched = 0; fre went floodin ~ 1~iax Dints _
Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 ~. ~ 0 _ 4 0 - Z
8 tlands =~ O; lar a adjacent w®tlands ~ max ollYts
no we
Channel sinuosity 0_ 5 0_ 4 0- 3
9 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max Dints
Sediment input p ~ 5 0- 4 0- 4
10 sive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max Dints
t
en
ex
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0 - $
11 h us = 0• lar e diverse sizes = max Dints
SCORE
1
5
4
4
1
0
0
2
4
4
0
fine, omo eno
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 ~ 5
0 _ 4
0 - 5
~,,, 12 dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints
E-+ Presence of major bank failures 0 _ 5 0 _ $ 0 - 5
'~ 13
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Dints _

-
Root depth and density on banks 0 ~, 3 0 ~ 4 5
0
~ 14 no visible roots = 0' dense roots thro hoot ~ maX _b1ntS _ -~•~
H
~ Impact by agriculture or livestock protinction ~ _ 5 p _ 4 0 - 5
15 ~.~t =~;_nta ~~itl~tl~e -max ~irlt~
substantial im -.
_
Presence of riflle~pooUripple-pool complexes b ~ 3 0 _ 5 - 0 - 6
16
_
Iri les or Dols = 0; well-deyelo ~d_= max - Dints
no riffles -
E"'" _
Habitat complexity 0_ 5 0- 6 0- 6
E~~ 17 little or no habitat ° 0; fre uent; varied habitats = max Dints
'~" Canopy coverage over streambed 0 _ 5 0 - 5 0 - 5
18 no shadin vegetation = 0; continuous cano = max Dints
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 _ 4 0 - 4
19 dee 1 embedded = O; loose structure ° tnax _ __
Presence of stream invertebrates 0~ 4 0 ~- 5 0- 5
20 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints _ _ _ _ -
~" Presence of amphibians 0 ~ 4 0 ~- 4 0 -- 4
u,.
~ 21
_
no evidence ° 0; common numerous es -= Yn~~t ': hints _ _ -
.
r~ Presence of fish 0 ~ 4 0= 4 6~ 4
22 no evidence = 0~ cginmon nur~iei`o~ts e5 ° ii5ak_. oilit"s __ _~ _._____ .__ ~ ____~___..
_
evidence of wildlife use 0 = ~ 0 m 5 0 " $
23 no evidence ~ 0' abundant ~_yid'enee _mac _birlts .
Total Polnts I'asstble
100
100
100
TOTAL SCOIIE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
4
5
4
4
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
47
2

~;
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
~~ei3~n'iair•~. t'Vetlands Determination Protect No. 2007-1789

Nort9~ Car®9r',a ~~v~s~an of 1tVater C~c~ality -~ ~trearrr 6det~fii~€ic2~~i~r~ ~eft`re; ~Jer~ion 3.1
-sate' O1/~1/~009 Praje~t. ~r~ldi I3arri~
Eva.{uator:~Ig~y Site: ~~Pm~
Total ~ai:rtts: C~urrt~+:
Strum is of feast ir7termiftent ? ®.CO ~~~~)r]C>tb~
if - 9 9 ar nererttaiat if ? 3(T J /
~. Caeon~or~f-~olagY (subtotal = g3'.de 7 -
1". Continuous bed and bank _ .2.Q.
2. Sinuosity 2.0
` 3. ln-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence~_~ 2.0.,
~. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 2.0 _
f 5 l~ctivet`reliefioocfpfaln 2.0 _
G. Depositional bars or benck~es 0:0
1
7. )3raided chanrtef
s 8. F~ecent alluvial deposits 0.0
F g ~ ltlatural levees OA L _
~. 1 G Headcc~ts 1.0 t
11- Cxade controls y_.s
~ o.s i
12. l~latc~ral valley or drair~age+rfay 0
` 13. Second or greater order channel on existin
FJSt3S or I~tRCS map car other doct~rnented
e~riden:ee. 0.0 !.
`t~ian-made d'ttcE~es are not rated; see d.isou:s:sions in marFUai
B HE/~lra~ogy (~tabfataE = 10.0
14- Groundvvaterflo~~td~soharge ~y_~~,_,~,y„Y~, .~.,3~.~.~
j 15.1ttirater to charl;net and > 4~ hrs since rain, ~
0
o
3
V
n
~n~seas
f V`tilater rn channeG -- dry or graE .,
,-..
.
16- Leaflifter 1.0 ~
0
5~
~ 17- Sediment on plants cr debris .
p 18. Organic debrus 6ines or piles ~°Jtfraclk lines 1.0
! 19- Ffydric soils ~redoximorphic features) present'?1.5
l~b~~~t
_ G
G
G ___~
0
0
G
G
- ~ -y--
a
o_
G
Sate t_af{ftt~a: 1~3~,~~~~®~
ir.oil~itead~: ~~0.~2~~t~4
t3tEter Perennial ~tr~arn C
e.g. 6~uad Name:
k-_
a
_ ~/t1~ __ Mod~r~te _^~trc~ng _..:.-,
_ Y
_
_

1 2 ~
1 2
~ 3 -
y
~~~ ~ i ~
i -• 2 G - ----

1 2 ~____-_ ~ .
------
o.~ -~~ ,~

_ 1.5
-.
05 _ ~ 1 1.5
BV©s CJ Yes = 3~

Q 2

_._ '

~ a_ -_~..~
s..
~.
~

G 1
; 2
~ ---

1-5~

1
Q.~ ~
G Q.5 1 1.5
G f7.5 1 1.5
Ido = 0 Yes =1-5
C- 'Biofiogy (Sul7tO~~l = i.~e~ ~ ~ --~ ~ 1 G r.
2G`'. Fibrous roots in channel 2.0
3 2 i 1 G

21~. F7ooted p{ants in channel 1.0
3
-
__
_.._
t°~`' ~j
-
1.5
';; 22. Crayfish: 0.0

G
1 2 3
23- Bivalves 0.0
0
0 G-S j 1 1.5
24- FisE~ .
0
0 ~ G 5 ~ 1 1.5
25- Amphibians

26- Maerobenthos (note diversify and abundances .

0;0
G

G
D.5 i 1
1 1 2 1.5

3 -
{ 27- Filamentous, algae; periphyton 3.0 ' 1
5 1
Q 1.5 _ ____
,
23- Iron oxici~ing bacterialfungus.

d
b
~' 0 0

50
1 _
.
G
~ ___
'
FAC b 5- FACW 0 75; Q€~~ = 1.5 SA~1= 2-G; Other = G
., ns_,_..T..__.......___-_-_-__.._..-----___..._..-..___-...-.-
_
.
_ _ _ ir..,~-... .~.,. ......
e
. Vlietland plants in stream
29
Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or ~nretkand plants.
Band plants
f u
p
J Stems ~0 and 21 focus on the presence o ,
sketch:
h3ofes: fuse back side of this form for additional notes.)

0 7 0 50 5
OFFICE USE ONLY:
~ ~
~~~sm
USACE AID#
~ECP•C - P~x~naa~~l ~tr~~axa ~
DWQ#,
S'I'REAIVI ~~JAEIT~' ~S5ESSl~I~l'T'I' ~'®1~S~IEE'T
1. Applicant's Name: Munir Brelvi
3. Date of Evaluation: 01/31/07
5. Name of Stream: UT to Rocky River
7. Approximate Drainage Area: ~15 acres
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 3641f
,'•A
2. Evaluator's Name: Crai R. W ant
4. Time of Evaluation: 1.00 pm
6. River Basin: Yadkin
8. Stream Order: First
10. County: Cabarrus
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks) From Interstate 85 fI-851 travel east on NC 49 for
a roximatel 8.7 miles . The ro•ect site is located on the north side of NC 49 after the Roc River brid e and before Blackwelder
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35.33448° W80.625844°
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: rainfall within the ast 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: cloud 55 de ees
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:-
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ~ 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 15 % Agricultural
85 % Forested _% Cleared /Logged _.% Other
21. Bankfull Width: 4-5' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1-2'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each
characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the
worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or
weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character
of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more
continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of
100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 56 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the iJnited States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to IJSACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 05/03. To Comment, please ca11919-876-8441 x 26.

ST1~EAlVi QiTAI~IT~' ASSESS1VIEl~TT ~®I~SIiEET
r,,,, r „_______..~ c~~. ~.,, r
~7d.r~4. - 1 ~a ~aaaaaua N va e,w,,, ~..
ECOREGI
ON POINT RANGE
SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS Caastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow / persibtent pools in stream 0 - ~ p _ d 0 _ S 4
1 no flow oi° satiaratian ~ ~; stt'a~ll~w ~~ rrtax„~int~ . -__ ,, ~,,,,~,,,...~ ~.--
Evidence of pASt humafl altcrattan 0 ~. ~ 0 .., ~ 6 -~ 5 3
,~ 'extensive alteration ~ 0' na alteration ~ r~t~x„~ftltg~ ~ _ -
1'tiparlan xnne 0 .- 6 0- 4 0_ 5 2
3 no buffer ° 0; conti uous, wide buffer ~ rnax blots _~ ___ -
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 a ~ 0 - ~ 0 _ 4 4
4 extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es ~ max~aints _ _ . ____ _
a Groundwater discharge 0 ®3 0- 4 0- 4 4
d 5 no dischar e = 0; s rings, see s, wetlands, etc, ~° mix Dints
~ Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0_ 4 0- 2 2
~ b no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max hints
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0 ~, $ 0 _ q 0 - 2 4
~ 7 dee 1 entrenched = 0;1"re uent t~oodin = tnax ®ints•
Presence of adjacent wetlands ©_ b 0- 4 0- 2 1
8 no wetlands = 0• lar a adjacent wetlands ~' max hints
Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 2
9 extensive channelization = 0, natural meander c rltax oint~
Sediment input 0_ 5 0_ 4 0- 4 4
10 extensive de osition= O; little or no sediment = max Dints
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 _ 4 0 - 5 1
11 fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max Dints
Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 _ 5 0 _ ~} 0 - 5 4
~., 12 dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max Dints -
~ Presence of major bank failures 0 _ 5 0 - 5 0 - 5 5
~ 13 severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Dints
Root depth and density on banks 0 ~ 3 0 - 4 0 - 5 4
~ 14 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hoot = max Dints
~ Impact by agriculture or livestock produttibn 0 ~. 5 0 - 4 0 - 5 2
15
.
substantial im act =0, no evidence ~ max . Dints , _
. _ ~ _ _
_. .
Presence of riffle-pooUripple-p+Dol ctttnplexes 0 m ~ ' 0 ~ 5 0 - b 3
16
~~
no riffles/ri les or Dols ~ 0` well-dev~1D ~d =` tn~x . oil'1ts
~
~ Habitat cotnple~Ity 0_~ 0_ b 0- 6 2
F 17 little or no habitat = 0; fre went, varied habitats = mix ,Dints _
~ Canopy coverage over streambed 0 _ ~ 0 _ g 0 - 5 1
18 no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cano = rnax Dints _
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0_ 4 0- 4 2
19 dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max
Presence of stream invertebrates 0_ 4 0- 5 0- 5 0
20 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = ma_x ,Dints
~ 0
~ Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0_ 4 0- 4
~'j 21 no evidence = 0; common, numerous es _= max ..Dints .
Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
O 22 = 0' common numerous es ~ ~nnx ::Dints
no evidence _.
~ .
Evidence of wildlife use
0-d
0-5
0-$ 2
23 no evidence = 6' abundant. evid~n~e_~ ~isaxints
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCO1tE (al~n inter Orl first page) -- sb
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

r
Brelvi Harrisburg Site
Preliminary Wetlands Determination Project No. 2007-1789
L3RE1:~'l
Ot-31~-0?
View of perennial stream C looking upstream.
0 7 . 0 50 5
View of perennial stream C looking downstream.