20071825 All Versions_Complete File_20100727

imap://rob. ridings%40dwq. derv. ncmail.net(a)cros.ncmail.net:143/fet...
Subject: Person County: R-4906
From: Rob Ridings <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:48 -0400
To: [e-mail]
CC: "Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW" <[e-mail]>
Tom,
We received a copy here at DWQ of the JD areas you did for this project. Since this
isn't in a buffer-basin, and the JD drawings look complete to us, then as long as
Eric signs off on them, we don't feel it needs to be checked in the field. (Unless
you need us to look at anything there, of course.) If Eric feels they need to be
checked, then we'll be more than happy to accompany. Just contact me and we'll set
something up.
Let us know if you need anything else from us,
Rob Ridings
1 of 1 6/16/2006 10:27 AM
1'!'F ' Jurisdictional Meeting (Person County)
Subject: RE: Jurisdictional Meeting (Person County)
From: "Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW" <[e-mail]. mil>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:00:24 -0400
To: "Tom Barrett" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
CC: "Wendee Smith" <[e-mail]>, "Harold Brady" <[e-mail]>, "Pam
Williams" <[e-mail]>
Tom: I think the best way to handle this is for you to mail me your jurisdictional info (including data
forms and at least a sketch of the JD areas; GPS is better if you have it), and I will review it, and decide,
based on my workload and priorities, if it is necessary to do a site inspection. If not, I will do a desktop
JD review, and send you a written verification.
Thank you,
Eric Alsmeyer
Project Manager
USA rmy Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Tel: [phone], ext 23
Fax: [phone]

Regulatory Homepage: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS
Please help us better serve you! Take our brief online Customer Service
Survey (http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/scripts/rws3.pl?FORM=regulatory).
From: Tom Barrett [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:35 AM
To: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW; [e-mail]
Cc: Wendee Smith; Harold Brady; Pam Williams
Subject: Jurisdictional Meeting (Person County)
John and Eric,
Mulkey would like to setup a meeting to review the jurisdictional resources located adjacent to two
bridge replacements in Person County. These bridges (59 and 86) are part of the TIP# 4906. Please let
us know when would be a good time to review these resources. Look forward to hearing back
from everyone.
Thanks.
Tom
T1101nas B. B'11-rett, RF,
Project Manager
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27511
I of 2 6/1/2006 3:39 PM
R- Jurisdictional Meeting (Person County)
Direct: (919)-858-1817
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
tbarrctt a mulkeyinc.com
Engineering Bright Futures at www.inulkeyinc.com
2 of 2 6/1/2006 3:39 PM
m
I
<f
I
J
.1
III
O
U
rg
m
fY
W
lil
I_
U
7
W
0
c?
DI-Oh ,? '3 r O
??Otl FNR' WA?A?R'?A?VO?
SAND ST????
-?--MULKEY
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS
PO Box 331 27
RALEIGH, NC 27636
PHONE: 919-B51-1912
FAx: 9 1 9-B 5 1- 1 9 1 8
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: John Hennessy, USACE Date: June 9, 2006
Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: Jurisdictional Determination for R-4906
Person County Bridges # 59 & #86
I am sending you the following item(s):
Job No.
Standard Mail
2004224.23 &
2004224.24
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 06/08/06 - Wetland Data Forms, wetland maps, and site vicinity
map for Bridge #86
1 6/08/06 - Wetland Data Forms, wetland maps, and site vicinity
map for Bridge #59

These are transmitted as checked below:
? As requested ? For your use
? For approval ?
® For review and comment ?
Remarks:
Copy to: Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
c
Signed:
A phone call will follow to verify receipt of this package and to determine if the NCDWQ requires a site visit for
this jurisdictional determination. Thanks.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ProyMe the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:- IYME 2. Evaluator's name:
3. We of evaluation: 74. Time of evaluation: 11a.1"
5. Name of stream: (J7 b,-V,I C,,eek 6. River basin: 0e2r70ke-
7. Approximate drainage area: y z 0m; 8. Stream order: -;--' 2 n OY -er
9. Length of reach evaluated: h- 2-oo / 10. County: ers0tl
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): -/-1
Latitude (ex 34 872312): %, 4'S375? " !V Longitude (ex -77 556611): 2/? '1. QU f q 5 10y/
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
15. Location of reach under evaluation (note near y roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
doWh,Itrealy? 01 -&I'doe
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions :
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
,,,,-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
N 3Yn % u .//?-,&am
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: N C.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: .S % Residential
'75% Forested
22. Bankfull width: Ps 0,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ?Flat (0 to 2%)
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
_% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank
):n
Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ?lOccasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Z.S Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form i ntended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and en ronmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
>f??r?hti g?
SCOR
r

Presence offlow /pools in stream
persistent
l no
saturation = 0• strop flow = max Dints 0 5 0 -4 0 5
2 Evidence of fast human alteration "

-
extensive altetation.= 0' no alteration_ inaic pints) p
b 0-5 0-5
3 Riparian zone
do buffer = 0• Conti pus Wide buffer = max Dints 0 6 0"- 4 0- 5
4'
Evidence of n4h3ent or chemical disc urges
extensive disch
es - p n9 disc laar es = aiax Dints)
0 - S
0 •- 4
b 4
?l
T
5 Groundwater discharge
(no dischara:= 0 •s nn s, sees wetlands, etc. ° max Dints
0-3 '
0-4--
0-4

3

6' Presence of adjacent flood plain
`
m'
no #lood ain = 0 extensive flood'`lam max points) 0-4 ?0-4 0-2
2
7 Entrenchment 1 f o' dplain access
.
`
d
' 0- 0 4 ? 0-2

,
dee 1
(
eep]
trenched= 0 fr went tloodin mar points)_ ,

2
8 `"Presence of adjacent wetlands
' 0 - G
0
4
0 - 2
no wetlands =.6 large -ad•acent wetlands= minx, omts -
9 Channel `sinuosity '

'
extensive channelization = o; natural meanders max points) 0 - S: 0 - 4 O- 3
10 Sediment input'.
dePo sition=0 little`ornoseduttent=max Dints)
p?-51
0 4 '
0-4
l l - Size &, diversity of channel bed substrate
A
*
?
0
4
0
(fine, homo enous° O;,lar e; diverse
sizes = max oints) ,
. 1
, - - 5 2J
12 _
Evidence of;cl,annel?incision or widening .

;yr
dee 1 incised - 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0 -.5, 0 - 4 - 0-5
3
F 13 Preserve of ma jor bangfailures.

d

severe 'erosion = 0, no erosion, stable banks -7 max ints) 0-5 - 0-5 0-5
3
14 ;Root depth and density on banks
no visible roots 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
0 - 3 `
0 - 4
0 S
3
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber- production

(substantial im act ?° no evidence -max Dints) :' 0.-5 0-4 0-5
l6 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes

H
no riffles/n `les or pools 0; yv 11-devel2 ed = max points 0 -3 0 5 0-6
7 H complexity . , '
, (little or no habitat = 0;_$ ° wen' varied habitats = max points) 0 - 6 0- 6 0 - 6
18', . ,' Canopy coverage over'streambed
di
h
e
t
tion 0•
n
nu
'
=
'
0 5
0 - 5
0 5
3
no s
a
ng v
ge
a
co
ti
ous cano
py
max
points)

19 Substrate euibeddedness
r
`rf ?`'
0 - 4
0 - 4
dee 1 embedded= i) loose structure = max j
, 3

20 Presence of streams invertebrates (see,page 4)

(no evidence = 0• comtno numerous es ,-,max ints)
0 - 4 -
0 , 5
Q - 5
3

21 ,
.O. Presence ofamphibiatis
"I I
. `-
(no evidence
0• oonmon' numerous tvnes = max points)
0-4
6-4 ''i
0=4
2

72 Presence' of fish
no?evtdence = 0; common' bumeroits es = max Dints
p - 4
0 4
0 4
,
23

_
EAdence of wildlife'

no evidence
0 tin x'ewiden ina?c Dints

0 6,

01- 5:

0
?. .
?, Fx4 a` t y ?!{?' ?r1

i nese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: S /? U6 Project: f90G Latitude: 3C- [f.8:;? 7.5-6 "IV
Evaluator: Site: ?% jd9 e J2 Longitude: -;"? 00I / ZS' [Al
Total Points: Other
Stream Is at least intermittent County: f 21?JUY1 ./
if 2 19 or erenniai if z 30 e g Quad Name: 9'0X40 ? ,,4 C-
A. Geomor holo subtotal = (? Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 ?;?'-275 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 -3
7-
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 _
3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9 ° Natural levees 0 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11, Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on xistin
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
-ui rn?ovc uua.nca -V nvt wtuu, see umwssrons in manual
B. Hvdrnloov (SuhtntA = q' r 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = /0 1
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 . 1 15
25. Amphibians 0 .
k?l 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversy and abundance) 0 .5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants In streambed
.--- ^ FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0

ov')AIE'
t'--w ,,, „r„a„u Ntat rts, tuant cy rwuses Orr ene presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
-- - --- --?a
USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
FE- STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: _ , 1?
1. Applicant's name: C 007- 2. Evaluator's name: 7V r-A rre//
3. Date of evaluation: S// 7D 4. Time of evaluation: ZZP --n
_
5. Name of stream: (s?, J -eek UT 6. River basin: D 170 L'
7. Approximate drainage area: G /71/z 8. Stream order: _
9. Length of reach evaluated: ?U / 10. County: QrJOn
11. Site coordinates (if known): 2 prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34 872312): 36.457TJ0/y - Longitude (ex -77.55661 1): 7q. V(? a b
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
fo Cbt?raJ -/nf o.,?c a1c)pe weit (e?k e? -id f 7 hco, br; e
.smazz 14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:/9U rl / wll /7 -'IKh . lal-C?e ra/eve/Jl- w// K
16. Site conditions at time of visit:-- a?2=` azldijl ?h?
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 --Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: /V/,+...
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES N 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ,% Residential _% Commercial Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged Other ( _
22. Bankfull width: / / 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: / Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):- Comments
Evaluator's Signatur I /I Date_ 511712-VO6
This channel evaluation form is intende a used only as a guide to assist landowners and en ronmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
' Sa fi
}3fi/ a ?t 1YL 1y?Kr irol tr 'fis
-,Y
A? i.: ?j L r z
Gi
# ?
t
j l
S ?'O
¢fltriont+ OUllf91? .
A1
1 Presence of Flow / pars steatpoi 11 in stream?
`' no flow or saturation - 0;'stron ;flow, "max ' Dints 0 - 5 0 - 4 0-5 '
„? ? : : Evidence o,f pasthutnan alterations
`

eictensiye alteration - 0; uo; alteration max_ omts -
.
0 6 -5

0
0=5
3 ? RipariAt? zone ?
no buffer = 0 coati ous rvtde bGffer max points) _ 0-6 0-4' 0- 5.
44 4 Evident a of nt trient oechemical discharges
*

extensive disc hat eS = 0• na drscnar es = riiax omts 0 0 0-4
rr.?}

<C?
GrounQv?ater.dlscharge
disch
"0 s
n°
i
aln4
_
=
p
no
ar a =
n
s see vs;
v
l
etc:
max
oints
??•+`
6 :Presence of adjacent flood lain, . ?
?
no flood plain extensive; flogd I`ain tpx outs) ` 0-4 0 - 4 0 - 2
' - Entrenchipoent 1 tloddplajq,access ; "1, ' =

dee pi entretlched = 0 fre went boo n max Dints 0 - 5 0 - 4 0
2 7J

8 Presence of pdjaeegtw ano" `

:no.wetlands :0, r ad acent0-01 ands?-max'
mts) 6 0-

-
9 Channel sieitosity ` 9 0 "
extensive cltannn natural meander -max Dints . 0 4 0 ?- 3 °
]p Sediment inpat .
, extensive, de sition; 0 little o"r no sediment = max Dints}
Si
e'& div
' 0 4 0 = 4 3
z
ersity of channel bed substrate.
fine; homo enou5 - 0 ]are diverse sizes max oitits)

E
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0
5
0
4
-

dee 1 incised 0;'stable bed & banks max omts - 7 0
5
13' Presence of major bank faiiares 0 - 5 0
5 0
5
severe erosion 0 no erosio table banks = max outs - - `7-
l4 Root depth and density od banks

no'visible roots - D+ dense;toots throw out =anax pmts) 0-3 0 4 0 - 5
15 lmpatt by sgricYtlture, livestock, or timber production

t:
sUbsttinfial irn act -0, no ;evidence = ,max points), . ; ; 0 _ 5 0-4 0-5
m_ i 16' Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-*ol complexes
61 -
rifle
/
1
o
ool
lt=d
w
n

0-3

0-5

0-6 Q
s
n
es
r p
s -
e
evelo ed _ r
ax points

.?

17 Aa_bitatcomptelrit?

hale Dino habit = O; fr wen : e hAb tats -max points
'0-=6
0-6
0-6
18 Canopy coverage over strefimbed
t?
n
hadi
t
ti
0
i
' 0
5 0-5 0,-5
o s
nve e
a
on =
cont
ft
ous ano max Points
)

,
19 Substrate-embedd nC

SS
mi
de
l
dde
`lo
`
c
??

`
0 4
0-4
F (
y e
Se
ep
d 0
ose
stru
titre-max) ?4l;ai
' 20 Presence of stream invelrtebrates; (see page 4)
?
'
'
) 0 4 0 5 0 - 5
no
dvtdepce'.1 cornino
umerous
" es=ma?c oints .
i
O 21 !!,?+ Presence of ainphlbiaris
n
evid
0
omm
um
s
ma 0 4 0 4 0' 4
-
' ence
o
c
on n
etau
es
x Dints . ,
?
r
p fish F
{presence f
n6 vidence = 0c o '' "}iiieo?
' ; e
a
i
ts

" 0 4 "

0, 4
p 4
m
x p
•
n
n
e
"

,.
.y
23
?
e
?i
< <w, lt?[if -
sue
tar, .r, E
n eV?anoe b ;` c
,
t
t
j
°
0 6
0_ 5
0" 5
,
. :
n
.ev t
s
o.
max pin
`+ eyr j 3, t.r ,

* T hese c haracteristics are not assessed in cnasrai QhPamc
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ?' f 7 Project: a; e Latitude: T? 6 ° z9 40D?UN
Evaluator: r e_4f-- Site: G Longitude: 7G)" OD' 6 rr
Total Points: 1 J Other •''yMrn ' S RB
Stream is at least intermittent n county: r?01l e g Quad Name' OXI ?,Ur? NG
if 2 19 or erennial if z 30 r
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = X ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5 Active/relic floodplain 0 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 -1 -2 3
9° Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls p 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
avian-mdue uncnes are nol rare0; see oiscusslons in manual
R Hvrlrnlnnv Mi thtntal = 4_. J5 I
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0-575 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= -/.7 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 1 1 5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75 BI = 1.5 AV = 2.0; Other = 0
?• •? ?• P?cooiioC u1 UP-1lu pianis, nem za focuses on ine presence or aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: k
v e o J/? e 1
?i?

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/ Site: ri 29 (R
Applicant / Owner:CP07
Investigator: T WOE Date: 17
County: Aso
State: C

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ?
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ?
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID:We+ A
Transect ID: -
Plot ID: -
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

All/ %A/'IIIA.
1.
ee
()SL
9.
2. erb FACW 10.
3._ eV ;r c? P-A(-vV- 11.
4, e e e- e?k LPSLA + 12.

5.??r?en C.t h
9 L°G
W _
13.
6._S0,? rush cr W± 14.
7. _ 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
.- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
? Saturated In Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in
) ? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
. ? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: GrGI fsh rrloun
SOILS
Map Unit Name
CI'
1
d / I i
b
d L
l
'
6_
(Series and Phase):
leWa C We
4
Ie ICLN
Y,1SDrainage Class: t uo ec
C hewacla --+ A uv4r6ve4tKe_ 77?nc?rJ"? i r
Taxonomy (Subgroup):whc4fk«=rTgc Fluv6cauerls _ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No -v-'
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
Z A7_ 2.5Y9 5/3 -- -- Clau loavn
_JOYR s/? ?0Lj l 5/& Coinlmbr t Claw to am
ro -l Z 10 YR '7/1 7 5YR I/& n'1 Ioarn
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
_ Sulfidic Odor --Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions ?Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes v? No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: rl e, #?j I? -
Applicant/ Owner:
44Xr '-
Investigator: Date: S /? D

County: ?B ?A77
State: /IC-

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ?
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID :I)-o-A
Transect ID:
Plot ID: -
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. &"? ,IV-,KI Aat? - 9.
2. ?SUrarn() re- 4-r
- 1o.
3.R
ye r- 1,5i o- k FAC 11.
4.-G!?erl (51s ! FA-CL 12. -
5.3'c%AR-- I w herb FA-CW 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
B. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 5= gd?o
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated

ZNo Recorded Data Available _Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: ??? (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: /V/A- (in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_
. Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 7 2 (in,) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: //v ??V/D(/J hy?1'ro??9/G /iCGtfUrr
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):0,,w1- ?0dQ L WeiIjkC6 LAarKJ Drainage Class:
C w --? F(uvn c- rgp+1
Taxonomy (Subgroup):Wp?izadkeLl: Ti'p' F(u?a ue.'+j Confirm Mapped Type? Yes-No--Z
Proflie Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
U-l2 /0YR 5/j4 10YR % Carnmu? ?i?i? d?,hk? CIa4 ?oarn
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -7 Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes
Yes
No ?
No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Remarks:
. t .: _ ?• ?i r ( 'nl ????"U. Jam„ ?.,1 1.
?? ? ??? 1?t ;?t' .? ? f!1 .a?j??t ? ,' ? r;? \ f ; 1J?? ?,}:; '?\ (? \ • ?. ?_rv' ? w/!'?„"-..''""r ?/ `?+ y
'it
ft ? ? ?.1 .?? ? <,1? V ?,? ,,???,,,,,,,, ?.J`''"`?•,
71 :rte 1v L5• ?• e ?? '..,? t --?.\'-•,
. I +.
a'; (, 1':r ?,.?.± rV 1? r b? t ;? ;'7 •I C.J' .? (?i. r, - ! u r. ? `? ?,.C ,
• ?l
?'?V?1., ?(rJ rl// .?,'li J ?y '7t;j^_?i •_../ t\r.? ?"•\!, +-. ? P •;i ' u?
V, i
-??i I.,\ ,'?? I \ ?//ii w1 ??.` I. '1 ?"`r' j? ll;i. y? _ ?? a ? f,n {rA'c`.. ??,•? 1 { `.X ;u? ? .\?,
® f 1? ? tV,_';11 I ?7?,f,ypp1 ^\. ? \, !r' 4 ?9??.(:)?rry •\` Chit J { 11 ? s"6_ ..? ./.°'' ?'i % v
,1r U1 ' ` ? a 1 ?1° r - N ;\` ?. V 1? ? '4t `lad.,. '?f ?..'O ;W? ).I \ ? - V'?,?.. e r i • ;I 11• ? l '1. -/"
m a lei '• ?? ,,.? ? \\ ?'.. .:J , ?, t r .1 r?'.`I j . ' i _? ?t' ! ;, ?'"' s ., k'' ,,,,,?
? ? _ 1 -'?i(r I? ) , (? mil)-? I ?( ? ? \ ? V / •? ?? •? ?' f ?.? ?- .? ? ,' `7 aM1 ? ? r??
,
A ? ., CISn ?(11 1 ? s??' of '? ?\tr : ? ,"'?r ) -? ) 1??? ' V , (\, lk? ?. ? ?i, a ?- ?k aaa7// `1 ,rk
I\ ?? ,??? °°s?r ;??U? ?'?!/i! r?,A? ,1 ???GG-w?aw ri• ??•w. t!_' `?y,.- 7z. ?In..l?lal???}(l,,?l?'? ?".??? ? ??, ?',
(I ;? I -
L7 ? ?? \ti yt I , f
',
r Ir, s Jj? r s.
? ,11 f " ?1,??? ? ? ^?`? ; ?r?? l !I '??i S ? I ? - ?•?,. :',r I ?.?], I 1 ' ` ?Ti ., i
`.{ {??? J 1? ? _ - - %1;}?? ? , r? -? ?'\ I ?? - lt1`V Ak .`y? -r»•^ ? " .. , ?/ ° f ) ..dly?. I 1 ? I ? ?\1 pill
_ 1 r' I i l1 / 1
IDA
II ?b X-,
rt J t/ j0 .!1 j?lsi ^=?1 j?T !(' llt? " _ ?r c 1 0
go ,p
...r-.7. `i` ! _- '\` /'( \ ,\ ?, '. 7„. ? ,.. Iii
1 ,!? ;? -r? ?4P}• i f?,_. j .. ,I.,,? ? .Llp`1, ,. ,? ?"` `_?";
Q xS ?{ } ?) n '',? ?`11 ?x ,\? ?../+?\? )I, \' - f, ? ''il ` ,« ? ?..1 ,,..-..J ??I,??' -5 :, la?.? i 1',;'?'" ?? •?,nr:?' .. ^ A..
x Rf r l: !\ ?:?" ?J) ?? ?'?. Jr t ll? r t ? v ??rl p
p
li'd ;it
?•• r
av rt ? ' , s w ' r '? /'?'?' i$a `? ' rr I s i, . P ?. L iC N I ? ( ? r ? c sa.• S? .
:? •`1?'? ? ????(? \r - i (J ° "?? -?? 1C ? \ filly ? ? 1 , f?` j 1 I i ? ., 'K ^";•'
i r 1 ?1., 1 , : ' ?,?,, ..sl? , t\ ,, p r?r /. + V'c7K(. r. ,'?`W..... _ y'w,-, .'?. li -i?)• t •\ '?.:?
fli
Nt `? . ,,,/^'/ `•1 ?,?•? ?' h/`ti`' ?t'y i ?.???I 1 ?`w:'4 li , ? ?I ?? ` ":?C? ?, `• L'
77 -.-Arc 2
111i?.. I 1,ey_ ? ? ,4 r %• oe F ,S ? ?, ,IC JAI ??? :.
1 ` / ,?,' , ? p ? ? , ?1 ? I 1 ,9r ? ?'I ?? - ,, - C t? r..' n ?(Wll I I u 1?- i ?? t.l • ?.;
?ap "' y s' r ti i rl j`'' w " l? .?--/?,.,r C ?) }/? 1 ?: \ ?,, ??() ? {'?,,Y"1 h J j+•??j ?'t .? :n ' "•n? M''
"',r. C-•W...; n\ a `O'. { ?.\,l?f)ji? e ti y, Ir??i? R ?) -??'?l ?I I': t ) ? .•?4-wd??°' w ;?{?'' f
{ .,.?5"•eee5???,?'???pr .:.•,•,/?'? ' V' f
-t _ "-' ?),l i ?77? •, s "' 1 __ .'4 yh, ?! ? `?.•' ? \ ,?. j /? ^i , t`r, .? ,.` (?, ?, /hn,?e1
Q
y
=3 CD
1 , 1 u ? t t`,''rrVA i. •- )..; ?l ..: i / ..l,r .rr(?'' j 1.. ,J _ St,\ , I..r i i r',I ? .z
J
."1?
0 00
=3 0 ??? C?? ?? 11 tl \ J a c s r ?,; r h
IV I/ r-t
-.? C
Z 0 Z t, rl::..?\\? \,? i C '?.v ,,r d. eat .<l -r s I,i\?3 k{ \J t rr -?.
O t jp , i,l \\ ?it
(CD
,.•k• ? l ?s t I i ,{ '?l' '? '? _' _ 1 , r; ? i?('• r' r :? ?' 1 ,.ly I I { 1
"??rr" t • . I I ?ll
iir'l
r:
Ire h4
a ? J yh ? •.?C,? ltli
Creek.
J/
' 1 ji, ,Ilf tt,
v ? , . If r Sl
it , r it 1 1 r 'tor` a'-? -! f (I r I'` 0
J r t ? v ? I, v `. ,. ::
le 4rL,-
O O ? Li,,/'?' N; t l y ?? -ii \(1 r \\. I V \, r J 11\ • 1, t t ? 11
r `\ t ` f A' °a? a I
J
v l 13
CA 0)
U VI
m O N 1 i'. \ .. {)? )? {\ r P Y? 0_ S"B _ C? 1 a o
m / ?1 a
-01
/
to J Z,
I +
a it ?
W W
1
o1a
1 ?
/.... _... l \ V
tc a ?, w*rG - -i-
41 t
iD O t "? ,?- _... -. ? .. _. - _ -, IS If
y ?o it ?( --. / ? ,a ??? ? 1 e? 'r SI ? i ? ??? ?? y ? a r .. ??
0 111
1 1 yb,+ -?+C ?- ?i/ { `? A1 S ! _ 1 ( I I \? ?4fte:, i1.. a
C?;fl. ( , \i, ?1?, `x r ,.'J(r V r•::?A \)?? .,?? ,A ;? ',A ?t?'t 't/?f?' 1,?+ 1 V RIP ,.
w <. •.,''? 1 ?,? ? ??? ri,- 1, ? A, Irt ?`:!'1 ??? i ? `1 ;r' •t?.,Y?'t ,t,t???i' A?? ?' ? f., ?~,J?•? ?L
? ':? , '? f.`?,Ik, Cr':.,` , /. tJ,1; ? ii- 1 7 -' ? ? is 1•,f ,.;Y` ?.V?{ti QiW . `tl ??, rw'? ' IJ•, r? 'C>A
a ,Y
O { "`.`:? Iii •_?? _• t V o? \r?•? I `a? °°i,.??I?{?. ?;?,/?' :iI/o hll tjll ?!? / Is y r ,?, . y i',, e,, 4
rn _:. _. „?? \. t'?A 11 Ilt '? 3fj.,:I r`J' 1\ ?? !.r 1 „ •,) / p7?i• 1,,, r.il-:J ,' i
t'`- 1 K. ( ?7 ,.1 i ti } \ \ \ .. ? 1 I 1i? . lam- ??1 •r ??p ???Ni ?4 ??\ !r )1
l
r ` Noll,
0 00 x •) 1 . J r..
p• TOO $ •\ (':' . ??_ ?; ? ?+' ' '?1 ? AX V, -1 _7
ZI f 1. •, p •. ' 1 , , . • ,, \ ? 1 ? ? r ?`i ? + ? • l i rl I . O ? ? 1 ?_ ?
it .ry
` - ??
USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
;0STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET L)o
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: I(1,907- 2. Evaluator's name: 14y z&-1ee- 8. C/ ?,, /?
3. Date of evaluation: ??,L/7 O(o 4. Time of evaluation:-- _ JrI )m
5. Name of stream: Chen, r Crce- k 6. River n:- A OQ OK e
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: 7
9. Length of reach evaluated:-/- ?U U 10. County: ?e/J d /1
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34.872312): IUlp ° longitude (ex -77 556611): Q/
/ /,l )I
Method location determined (circle): GPS opo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
?- /5U' Uo,,rfrean?r /.1"d ? a?Qr.??Jt??? o? ?i?dQe ??6
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather cond
16. Site conditions at time of visit: //&,
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 ,-Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
--Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed __(1-1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (9 If yes, estimate the water surface area: ^-
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: h% Residential Commercial _% Industrial ?% Agricultural
a% Forested _% Cleared / Logged ?% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 2-5-301 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): !?-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):. 7y Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form i ntended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners n nvironmental professionals in
gathering the data required the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAC_E approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1 '7PA.r ry7, ( I Ai ir`a"I? ? ?'?P.iiOWINA
ty ' OA1 ? ?]
SCOR
J
?
" v4 5
C
nastaih dtnaui ?1lou
t
iti'`
1t ± r u
r
r . x?
} e n
a
l Presence of flow !persistent jiools in stream
? 0-5 0-4 ?0 - 5
no fl6w C+ saturation'= 0•
]4ron flow= max pmts)-
2 Evidence of past;human alteradon_, 0 `- 6 D
5 0
5 L

(e nsive alteiatiori 0; no alteKation -max Dints " - - ?
3 Rzparhnzones
no buffer 0' ciintt pus wide buffer = max points) 0-6? 0-4 0-5
4 Evidence of nktrient-or chemicul discharges S' 0 4 ? 0-4 L

extensive dischar es 0• iio discliaij es,=utax " Dints ' - ?
Grounti?ater discharge

5 ,

no dischar e=0; s rin sees' wetlands"etcf:=malt points)
0-3
0-4 `
0-4
6 ; . Presence of adjacent ildodplain`
'
'
'
` 0 4 0 - 4 .. 0 -2
7

no flood
laze = 0; extensive flood
lain
-:
grax Dints J
.:'Ent!renchmentI, floodpia q access
t
`
"
"
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 = 2. -
3
0; fr
(deep 1 en
fenclied
uent floodiq ='max points)
8 Presence of att scent wetlands '> ?

no wetlands = 0; lar, a ad"acetit wetlands = ax' Dints
0 -6:
4
0 - 2 a
9 Channelsinuosity.
{extensive'con = O'natural meander = max pmts
0=5
0 - 41
0 - 3
10 Sedlment input
' extensive d osi6on=0 litfle-or no seduttenf'=maxPoints
) 0 - S 0 - 4 .. 0- } ' G
11 "' Siie' pvel-sity of'chanol bed substrate
` 0 - 4 D-5

fine homb enous - 0;1 e
diverse sizes = max points),

? '? ' ? 1?• . .
l? Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 - 5?" 0-4 0 -5
(dee 1 ,incised =-0• stable bed & banks =-tnax oints) ;

13 Presence of ma or bank failures`
severe erosion = 0' no erosio stable banks = 'Max pints)
0-5
= 0-5
0 - 5

l4 Root depth and `density on banks

.
....
,

0-3

0-4

0-5
no
visible' roots = Q' dense roots
throughout = max"oints) ?

Impact by; agriculture,. livestdck, or, tiinberp' rlu "on _
1 S substantial im act no evidence = max oints)' 0-5 0-4 0 - 5
I
16 ` Presence of rffle-pool/rlpple-pool complexes 3 0- 6
no ritllesC'' les or' Dols = O',well-develo ed = max Dints) 0- 0- 5 3
Habitat Complexity
little or n, ,habitat = 0; fi uen varied habitats = max `oints)
0 - 6
0 -6
0 - 6 -
?G
18 Canopy, coverage over steeambed
no shading ve btation = 0; conttnuous cano = max Dints 0 - 5 0 - 5 - 0 -5
19- I Substrate embedde Hess 11,

d
4
0 '

0 - 4
dee l embe
ded O loose structure = max) tiro 3
Presence of stream in .ertebrates (see page 4) 4
20 , "

no evidence,, , 0; comma n l' '`
umero`.U?: es?nax rots) • 0 = 0-5,
0 5 _
L?
21 Presence bi ;amp3lSlans ' '.
no evidence,=.6; cofnmon :numeroiu es = traax ` "itits -

0=4'

0 4

0 ,
4
22 ` ..;)presence of tisli:? ?
.
(no evidence, 0; co
nufnarous? es =,?maz rots). D - 4 0 4
23 EvidOnc6 af mjldldeuse
no e?+ ?e re? .0'
t1UticnCeYttl?ncef.,nriaxpQiztts).
r S

11 0 i
I 7f ?,,}}fP'r'° I ,ja
'
N ?k'
,.r "?u y?v M,?? r y , -r•;y r11?t77T ?„'" ,-?.,• r:?,s ? ?r{a,? J?"+*r r ?'-, »-x I ? ,4?7 ;-, ,?,{ -I-?,..

* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ?117/D6 Project: ,4 ?t9d? Latitude: 56.903106 "A
Evaluator: / Site: ?jrid G ??6 Longitude: -7 pl23S-5[ (t/
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent ?[/ County: FeI'J U/) a Quad Name: ff /? /VC-
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30 7 9 ?P i A. Geomor holo Subtotal = G`? ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong

18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure. riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
98 Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes -3
1Viairmeut$ mtcnes are not ratea; see aaiscussions in manual
R Hvtirnlnnv fCtthfnf=l = 9 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 05 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1
?: 1 5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes
= 1.5
H
C. Biology (Subtotal = _)
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish ]
0 4 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 -2 -3
24. Fish 0 1 1.5
25 Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 075; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items cu ano L1 rocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
-Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) - Sketch: I
171-
J
Lo &V d; vr°.r%.7
/VD^/c "
-77t FAK BED
- - FFtJGE
USACE AID#
DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
INK
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: All "1)07-
3. Date of evaluation: 6-11 71U1
5. Name of stream: fD /YC _
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: - ZJr

2. Evaluator's name: 14Ai6e
4. Time of evaluation: t/ bm
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: 10. County:- _/ ev C)4
11. Site coordinates (if know/n): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if anyy):Q
Latitude (ex 34 872312): co/c)b o /y Longitude (ex -77 556611): / / . / 01 23? `
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
SD f%6W l- 1f'CUZ 0/ 1-he ov ?C S ?l`?i/tGf (-;-P 7V-,- 4-,:71au/J4JhZZ,,X -/,J-
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: ,oVO '1 W/ j/1'J TO `j ; 1,1;raG
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters - Nutrient Sensitive Waters !Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: _
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
11 Esti
. mated watershed land use: % Residential

Forested
22. Bankfull width:
_% Commercial ?% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged I v % Other ( a f/vr? ?)
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ? Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: -Straight !-Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ! U Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date - /114V144 This channel evaluation form intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United Stales Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
t Y7 j(3??y4 f??... /? fr ? `5 yR 'y,1{? Mt`.y,' 4[?'??J2 ?6s ) Y IS y I?• ? ? ? Y? i `+ - l . ? ?+ ??.,.y',
??` s" , ? # t? r ?Cohst$1 , Win
Mountain
Presence o6"O, w / persistent pools iu 'stream, 0
5 0
4 0
5
(no flow'or saturation = 0 strong flow " max oints - - -
"
2> ;Evidence of past human alteration

`
0-6
0-5
0-5
nax "points)
extensive,alteration = O,qo alteration„

3 Riparlan zone

.611 ffer = 0• Conti ous; wide buffer ` niaz oints
0-6
0=4
0-5
Evidence of.nutrlent:or chemical discharges ? - z
extensive dischar es.- Q; no dischar es =max_ omts

5 Gr6undWiter discharge ;
'
0 3
0 - 4
0 - 4
no dischar e = 0 s din
s; see s, wetltuids etc. = n oints
??
°
6. . Presence of adjacent floodplain?
-
m
no flood" lam 0' elctensiye flood' lam uiaX oints) 0
4 0-4 0-2 ,
1

7 entrenchment/f loodplaiq

access .
`
1;1 1

0 - 5

- 4

- 2

7
(deep entrenched:- fre ucut flood 9 Max oitits) J

8 ,.
Presence of adjaceQt Netlands
no wetlands -,O; lar a ad•aeent Wetlands -max Dints)
"0-4
0-2

/
9 Chancel sinuosity
extensive channeliiation = t) natural meander'-_:- max points 0 -5 0 =4 0- 3 '

10 Sediment input

extensive. de osition, 0 little"or no sedunent= max points)

0- 5

0 4

0= 4
' 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate 0 4 0 -5
fine, homo enous= 0 lar e, diverse sizes = tnax points) _ t • ,

1 Evidence of channel incision or widening . ;,
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
dee l incised = 6 stable lied & banks = max points)

13 Presence of in" ".Bank failures,
,. .
0' 5
0-5
0-5
-

severe erosion = O; no eroso stable banks = max points) ' I

t Root depth and density on banks 0_3 0-4 0-5
U
, no visible roots =,0•"dense roots throu out = max points)

15 lmpact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial"im act no evidence =.anax points),,

16 Presence of riffle=poolhipple-pool complexes
'
?
0 - 3
0 -5
0 - 6 f1
CJ
no riftleski
les or?
Dols =;0• well-developed - max oints)
"1 Habitat complexity
little or no habitat =fr uen varied habitats. `fiias 6 oints)
0 - 6
0 - 6
0 - 6

18- Canopy coverage over strea"mbed

no shadin ve etatlon= 0; continuous Cann = max Dints)
0 5;
0 5
0-5 D

'19, Substrate embeddedness
'
?
0 - 4
Q - 4
dee l embedded - 0; loose structure = max) ` 4
tN
;
' Presence of stream invertebrates"(seepage 4),,", " ' "

y 20
no evidence 0 common 'nurfierous-ty
s 'max points) 0-4 0 - 5
. 5
0

21 lresence of amptiibiuns
0-4
0-4'-
'0=4
O no evidence 0 common pumerous es inax dints "

22 presence of fish',

no evidence, , 0 common,;numeroirs es max points
0-4
0-4
0-4"
23 )Etti3?eniCe , w?ldhfe use
?e
id
?`0 `abun
?=
aiay
i
t
?•
-
n 0- 6 D 5 0- 5
v
no
etiCe
ce
.
anl
exlde
c
s
n c1

,K
-

Ip

MEM, 011

?
?n. t!L'?"..
1?4 MN
.. l
?' >f,- it sll ?a?,
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ?/?7 ?? Project: 2fie Latitude:
D6 36. 3/06 N
Evaluator: M Wec g sm,A Site: X3ri l e ? Longitude: 7.9011- 3-5- 14/
Total Points: Other 2 d- Stream is at least Intermitt ant County: Pe?Jr yr e . Quad Name: Y ?r
if z 19 or perennial if k 30, 9 ??i C ?l 41C
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = /o Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
98 Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway D 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
-.. I-n.cuc unwiea die nut iaieu; see oiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Suhtntal = /D..5'- 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 .5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Suhtotal = 7:5- 1
200. Fibrous roots In channel 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
----- -- - - - ..___- -.. •..? r•••••••"•••• ••-F.... ? F... iu%,uaea un Me pluum u of aquauc or wetiano plants,
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch: \I I ' /
6e% et, ec? 1je b?V'-"1iCZ/--Y I( 741
?oNE rN
srezoh SED
Fehr e
Fence
c
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: 12, V ld 2 ? U J6 6
Date: 5
117
Applicant / Owner: "'A 4 r
Investigator: ,
,
County: e o
State: C-

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / No Community ID: V?e4- A
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. M 41rxwe4w uJ Ce b fA(W-t" 9.

C r um e/b 691-
2. -ha
10.
3. ?GY?it' JD, el 11.
4.
- - - 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16. _
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). Z/3
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
T_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
_ -Saturated in Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ?}- (in.)
) v- Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves

4" Local Soil Survey Data
(in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ? FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name ,A/ II
(Series and Phase): VV i ? f OGc i'1'i Drainage Class: We( l_A r ai?1ecf
Taxonomy (Subgroup): TT.pIG 1)x-1 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
finches Horizon (Munseli Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
____
Q 7 5 y1? 16 Comrrrm. vned• , nramhe
dad
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ ' Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Solis Present?
Yes V No Is the Sampling Point
Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes_,-' No
Yes ? No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: ?3rf e :tPT6 (9-"06) Date: S 17 U 6,
Applicant I Owner: /INIDOT County: err
Investigator: State: NG

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:-ap A
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. /-? IGVG 12CK-k FAC?U?L 9-
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12. -
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). %
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
_ _Saturated in Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available . Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: -' (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: -"" (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name JJ
(Series and Phase):-Wj I kfs loam Drainage Class: Clr_ l?l
Taxonomy (Subgroup): '-T pludaj -?-s Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
C? - 'q- /y y/? ?/z - - - /a-4r4
/ OYR % - - /oa"I

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol ? Concretions relmq)
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No ? Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No v- Within a Wetland? Yes. No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No ?
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/ Site: 4 Ro - Date:_ 511-7
10L
Applicant I Owner: O _
Investigator: 01 1
County: Kron
State• c

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID: el- F?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species . Stratum Indicator
1.wwlt -?hljmb erb 613L- 9.
e t,ru
2. i'1/sh (Tuncu ) herb Fncw+ 10.
?
3.0,8M 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. is.
B. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 21?= (v(o X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
?Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: b (in•) Secondary Indicators:
? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) v FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):C)rW'4CL4 -d-,AleWkee lourns Drainage Class: •e&X -Jed
C.hewc lrt - r1UV4.tUe 'e- jpy.pi-ro[hrrrH
Taxonomy (Subgroup):Weh4dk4e::?')c F1u?eAo„-n-?S _ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No ,i
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon _ (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
/OYR s/z 16M `/-t- c6rnr0nn,04 ? C/a+/
(L) - IZ?,. /UXR S/3 sy(' 3/2 Comm2d,r,?rLmT,} C/uy (darn
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime VListed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions vListed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes v No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes / No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes v No-
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: on d ee (R-?J06) Date: 0 1?
Applicant/ Owner: ?J&P j County: zKs ors
Investigator: W State: NC--..

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID:?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No t,,"
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Transect ID:
Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.9x eider rc. ' ?C ? 9.
2. adz 10.
3. - i6ele ei fAK: - ?P 11.
4.6 CGOihO 4ra.L, ??f,!rw,Eryr,1 i?
- fK f 12.
5. ??
? 13.
6. 14.
7.
- ?- - 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _(in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):?{ICU//iC?l l?IM104-,MJ Drainage Class: ?r?yUPrI?G? v?de?
'U)CG?.tC?C? -r' ?-7vvq?venfiZ Dylhzch?li 11
Taxonomy (Subgroup): WeAkAieee--0- ivr%,- G7u?oyr, ri1 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes__ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
/C?w y/ - - _ /warn
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes - No _?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No ?7
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
)
Project / Site: )3ri cle -trR, (g-"06 Date:/? 06
,
Applicant/ Owner: Qo County: Fe on
Investigator: JS>8 WEB 5 State: /Vc

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes V No Community ID: Wei-c.
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No .? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. t?'AYer 0Gt- gi'ccyl) 2! b Cl? 9.
2. Sewe l w«-' --7T g?w 10.
3. Box elder ree- v? 11.
4. G?-tcn a,h rem 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7.
---- 15.
8. 16. ------
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
- Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: O (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels In Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:J (in.) y Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):CheH/Qdct-4 Wt h
adkec lparru Drainage Class: Lcc tjer, k =6voded
Chew4ck -FIUU6c6uen-HC- Py..rl- .k'
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Wedhe4kee-rTyp,c FiUva4!t Confirm Mapped Type? YesNo %
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
/bYR s/3 - - "/AV 44"n _
(Z- ?! /yYR s/v / AYR s/G W ire ? _? /o??
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Solis
- Aqulc Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No-
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: # ,,M (6- 4L106) Date: 5 19 DG
Applicant 1 Owner: C120! County: W06y?
Investigator: WF's State: AIC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID:(JprC-
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator_
1.]?b)( e?(der -ems FCW 9•--
2 ;C. icebUl 1i shrub rkw_ 10.
3. rec i GJS tyros a> Y A(j - 11.
4. ?hi? ?ree?er ??.?- 12.------
5. I 13. - -----
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 4/t = JQOa "
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
- Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: fin.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Ch_W444- W
&Jke-e- lochs Drainage Class: yr ,,e4,4-iV 4400jJ
'
Chcwgtla--I-F c T, f-chrepfs
1Uv& ve
Taxonomy (Subgroup): webcwJkce-_:: y„ic -F:-1uvquerrhs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No v
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-/0 /oyR S/3 _" - - C 4 /O AA
/O ye si3 7.syR b curr/mM? rned?u+t.d, T,1? ?++
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
-Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
? No Is the Sampling Point
No Within a Wetland? YesNo
No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: njYld'm #? ?'1 - ?9(Xo? Date: S /7106
_
Applicant / Owner:
Investigator: T County: _Ae?-ioo
State: IVC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ?
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ?
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID:L"-
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1._ 601 iL-laclO ,y ?jerb F/tC 9.

2. _--
10.
3. _ 11.
4. _ 12. --
5. 13.

6. _
14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). /00 To
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: - (in•) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: -' (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: _ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cl?eWC(dC(- 4- We
JxiC1keC 10aMS Drainage Class: if: v2.cl
ChCk?QC/Q-+G/v/?Ci?lvP??-i? Dy.r7`ruchr[?/.r
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Vehadkee -tTr pi_ c F1b1r45Fven'.r confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

(o -! Z All /o yR y/3 -- /oar
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfldic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _
Hydric Soils Present? Yes _
No Is the Sampling Point
No ? Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: er;dye(9-
7e
Date: / oL
Applicant I Owner L4(=-bo( County:,-e&o,1
Investigator: State: NG

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes V No Community ID: 14/e-FP
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
rk no 1- 9.
2. rrr IV197 2rb bQ?4 10.
4/tC 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). -"l3 = 1 co ?e
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other ? Inundated( i n _5 or+c led, CJ)
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
- Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: D (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
-vl FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name I
(Series and Phase): G'hewocla e- DYe hlicl/c'ec 106-4f Drainage Class: ?r?dznld y v o?co/
C we?ela-fF?!/?l??d Q?JfYdGhe5p,'l
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Wehadkee --Ty y;? F?,.li?dtr?J Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munseli Moist) (Munse
ll Moist) Abundance/Contrast
Structure, etc.
o-(, ??yn / / el
1
??YR /6 eammpn j(,4, e elQh, c to Da
.yR

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol ?Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor `Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions ?' Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks:
O? WATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
OCR QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 26, 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Summers, NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit
FROM: Rob Ridings, NC DWQ, Transportation Permitting Unit 10e oo
THROUGH: John Hennessy, NC DWQ, Transportation Permitting Un C
SUBJECT: Scoping Review of NCDOT's Proposed Bridge Replacement Project: R-4906, Person County
in reply to your correspondence dated April 24, 2006 (received April 26, 2006) in which you requested comments for the
above referenced project, the NC Division of Water Quality offers the following comments:
Project-Specific Comments
Bridge No. 59 over Storys Creek, Stream index # 22-58-12-(5), Roanoke River Basin
Storys Creek is class C waters of the State. DWQ is concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result
from this project. DWQ recommends that highly protective sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to
reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to Storys Creek.
Bridge 86 over Ghents Creek, Stream Index # 22-58-10, Roanoke River Basin
Ghents Creek is class C waters of the State. DWQ is concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result
from this project. DWQ recommends that highly protective sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to
reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to Ghents Creek.
General Comments Regarding Bridge Replacement Projects
DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from bridge projects. NC DOT should
address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic environments and any
mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is approved under
General 401 Certification Number 3494/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey Activities.
If a bridge is being replaced with a hydraulic conveyance other than another bridge, DWQ believes the use of a
Nationwide Permit may be required. Please contact the US Army Corp of Engineers to determine the required
permit(s).
None Carolina
Naturally
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o enr state nc.us/ncwetiands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
4 , if the old bridge is removed, no discharge of bridge material into surface waters is allowed unless otherwise
authorized by the US ACOE,. Strict adherence to the Corps of Engineers guidelines for bridge demolition will be a
condition of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
5. Whenever possible, the DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work within
the stream or grubbing of the stream banks and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal and
vertical clearances provided by bridges allow for human and wildlife passage beneath the structure, do not block fish
passage and do not block navigation by canoeists and boaters.
6. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater should be directed across the bridge
and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.)
before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management
Practices.
If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct contact between
curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should not be discharged to
surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills.
8. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
9. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and
elevations. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and appropriate native woody species
should be planted. When using temporary structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area
with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact
allows the area to re-vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
10. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and maintained in
accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
11. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise approved by NC
DWQ. Approved BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance
Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures should be used to prevent
excavation in flowing water.
12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This equipment should be
inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials.
13. In most cases, the DWQ prefers the replacement of the existing structure at the same location with road closure. If
road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize
the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old
structure should be removed and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be
removed and restored to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas.
General Comments if Replacing the Bridge with a Culvert
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be below the elevation of the
streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter
for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and
placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down
stream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting
features encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for guidance on how to proceed and to
determine whether or not a permit modification will be required.
If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they should be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as closely as
possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where appropriate. Widening the stream
channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes
aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed, sized and installed.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification
requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met and designated uses are not
degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Rob Ridings at (919) 733-
9817.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Chris Murray, Division 5 Environmental Officer
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
File Copy
04-?
V, 1 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EAST-EY
GOVERNOR
April 24, 2006
John Hennessey
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Request for comments on replacing Bridge Nos. 59 and 86 in Person County,
NCDOT TIP No. R-4906
Dear Mr. I-lennessep:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDO'I) is preparing the planning and environmental
studies for the replacement of the subject bridges. We anticipate that the projects will be processed as
Minimum Criteria Checklists. The projects are included in NCDOT's 2006-2012 Tranpodation Improvement
Pnogwm (TIP) as TIP No. R-4906.
The purpose of this letter is to solicit your input concerning the potential impact of the proposed projects
upon social, economic, demographic, land use or environmental conditions near the projects. A vicinity map
is attached illustrating the location of the projects, which consist of replacing Bridge No. 59 on SR 1322
(McGehees Mill) over Sto>ys Creek, and Bridge No. 86 on SR 1322 over Glicnts Creek.
Please note that there will be no formal interagency scoping meeting for these projects. This letter constitute
solicitation for scoping comments related to the projects. To allow us to fully evaluate the impacts of the
proposed projects, please respond in writing by June 26, 2006 to the address below concerning any beneficial
or adverse impacts of the proposed projects relating to the interest of your agency.
If you have any questions or comments concerning these projects, please contact me at [phone].
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Mike Summers U g@ IN ME D
Project Manager `'J D
Bridge Maintenance Unit
APR 2 6 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
lm/MS WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE UNIT FAX: [phone] BERYL ROAD
1565 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1565 WEBSITE: WWWDOH. DOT. STATE. NC.US

q y ? 1
?y-.J ?1 _ F 1•: ?I 1
r
d( Y,
HYCO REST; IR MD
;1rC
?-rte
Woods
? \MCO.MSr MTiINR?.
I
V-1
Ork 0rt uroh Rd.
im
M1
j
43? Chub E.
I
+33Q ? ? I
lr i
? ?Q 0
`cmari ??, ?' Hi? I
c, 49
r, Ca-Vr i?i I
1
C'.1i1 rJ I } ?.',
?7 l.'?np.fuir;t
R_? * 5 U N`
'-, Roxboro +
'rl in
1 _^
I Ru?,!ta 15? 57 1
? ,.Trnl?rnal«.. I
49
t .> >.; • P,1 c, r e-
PROJECT VICINITY
North Carolina Department Of
Transportation
s, Project Development &
?. Environmental Analysis
PERSON COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 59 ON SR 1322
OVER STORYS CREEK
BRIDGE NO. 86 ON SR 1322
OVER GHENTS CREEK
R-4906
o Z.r 0.5 Him Lo
FIGURE 1
0 `.
z -s?'-12-<J?
030 2 OS-
Pj) 7 C rQ-f??
C?? oz os-
s-