20190800 Ver 1_AsBuilt Report_2020_20200601

ID#* 20190800 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/01/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/1/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands rJ Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
LINDSAY CROCKER
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20190800
Existing IDI
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Boseman
County: Edgecombe
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: * 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: Boseman_100119_AB_2020.pdf 5.32MB
Rease upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* LINDSAY CROCKER
Signature:*

Baseline Monitoring Report
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Edgecombe County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7872
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
RFP No. 16-007711
Prepared for:
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
May 9''', 2020

ROY COOPER
Governor
7,a
MICHAEL REGAN
Secretary
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May 28, 2020
Sent via email to: [e-mail] and [e-mail]
Scott Frederick
EcoTerra
Subject: DMS Comments on the Draft Baseline/As-Built Report
Boseman, Project ID #100119, DMS Contract #0007872
Scott,
After receiving the draft Baseline Report on 5/18 and conducting a site visit 5/28/2020, DMS observed
that the site was planted as described and all monitoring devices and easement boundary markers meet
contractual requirements and satisfy the Mitigation Plan approved by DWR. DMS offers the following
comments on the baseline report:
1. Page 2, remove second bullet about requirements of In -Lieu Fee Instrument as this is N/A to this
report.
2. Page 2 contributing staff, correct typo for landowner title
3. Page 4, 15Y paragraph- if you intend to put the credits in the text of the report, ensure they are
shown as credits (riparian buffer mitigation units- BMU), not in an area (SF).
4. As discussed in the field, please add/clarify in the report details planned in the mitigation plan
and if/how they were carried out in the baseline report / baseline conditions section:
a. Planting Zones
b. Installation of temporary and permanent seed mix
c. Pre-emergent/post spray planting
5. Remove N and P columns in the asset table or zero out those columns per DWR previous
comments.
1. Provide CVS datafile with resubmission
Thanks for your work,
Lindsay Crocker, DMS
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center 1217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000 I Raleigh, NC 27609-1652
919 707 8976 T

BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Edgecombe County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7872
DMS ID No. 100119
Tar -Pamlico River Basin
RUC 03020101
Prepared For:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared By:
%10
ecolerra..
1117 Peachtree Walk NE, Suite 126
Atlanta, GA 30309
404.840.2697
This Baseline Monitoring Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the
following:
• 15A NCAC 02B.0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory
mitigation.
Contributing Staff
Ted Griffith, Principal in Charge Ryan Perry, Landowner Laison
Michael Bienenson, Quality Assurance Lead Scott Frederick, Construction and Baseline
Jamey O'Shaughnessey, Quality Assurance and Monitoring Lead, SWE
Construction Oversight Heather Smith, QA/QC, VHB

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Mitigation Project Summary..................................................................................................1
1.1 Project Goals..........................................................................................................................1
1.2 Existing Conditions and Parcel Viability............................................................................... 2
2.0 Determination of Credits........................................................................................................ 2
3.0 Baseline Summary................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Site Preparation......................................................................................................................3
3.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities.....................................................................................3
4.0 Annual Monitoring and Performance Criteria.................................................................... 4
4.1 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................4
4.2 Photo Reference Stations.......................................................................................................4
4.3 Visual Assessments............................................................................................................... 5
4.4 Annual Reporting Performance Criteria................................................................................ 5
4.5 Maintenance and Contingency Plans..................................................................................... 5
5.0 References.................................................................................................................................5
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
Figures and Tables
Figure 1:
Vicinity Map
Figure 2:
Project Component/Asset Map
Figure 3:
Monitoring Plan View
Table 1:
Buffer Project Attributes
Table 2:
Buffer Project Areas and Assets
Appendix 2 DWR Correspondence
NCDWR Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter (Date:
July 17, 2019)
NCDWR On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer
Rules (Date: June 14, 2019)
Appendix 3 As -Built Survey
Appendix 4 Site Photographs
Appendix 5 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 3: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Vegetation Plot Photographs
`,0 Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Report
ec fte ra, DMS ID No. 100119 Page i May 2020

1.0 Mitigation Project Summary
The Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site (Site) is a riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas
restoration project located approximately 2.5 miles southeast of the Town of Rocky Mount in
Edgecombe County, NC (Appendix 1: Figure 1). The Site is approximately 14.91 acres (649,889
ft2) of a total 276 ac tract situated along two unnamed tributaries to the Tar River (Appendix 1:
Figure 2). The project is located in a targeted local watershed (TLW) within the Tar -Pamlico
River basin hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020101120030 and Subasin 03-03-02. The unnamed
tributaries flow into the Tar River approximately one and half miles downstream of the project.
According to the as -built survey and most recent DWR Buffer Mitigation Calculation Tool V.2
(Updated 1/17/20), the Site is expected to generate 617,518.702 riparian buffer credits.
The Boseman Buffer Mitgation Site will
help to reduce future sediment and
nutrient loading into the unnamed
tributaries and downstream Tar River. It
will also improve terrestrial habitats along
this stream by establishing a riparian
corridor and allowing the land to convert
to forested communities. The surrounding
area is primarily agricultural fields. The
. r.
project restored forested riparian buffers
and adjacent riparian areas to a maximum
of approximately 115 feet from the top of
bank of the streams and removed rotating
crops and fertilizer inputs. The restored
Tar -Pamlico riparian buffer and adjacent
riparian areas will filter runoff from the surrounding farm fields and provide shading to improve
stream temperatures and aquatic habitat. Invasive vegetation will be treated as needed within the
project area to promote native vegetation.
1.1 Project Goals
According to the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services' (DMS) 2010 Tar -Pamlico River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) document, amended 2018, the project will support the identified
goals for the TLW, as well as the overall HUC. As stated in the RBRP, restoration of riparian
buffers and adjacent riparian areas to address agricultural runoff is a high priority for this 14-digit
TLW HUC.
The major goals of the proposed buffer restoration project are to address agricultural runoff,
including nutrients and sediment, protect the project site in perpetuity, and restore terrestrial
habitat. The detailed goals and objectives are:
`,i Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Report
ec fte ra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 1 May 2020

Reduce Nutrient Levels — Nutrient inputs will be decreased by filtering runoff and sequestering
nutrients dispersed from stormwater flows from agricultural fields. These nutrients will be
absorbed through the 30-115 ft wide riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas restored with
native woody vegetation. This goal is supported by both the TLW and RBRP for reducing
nutrient inputs to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
Reduce Sediment Levels — Sediment inputs will be decreased by filtering runoff and attenuating
flood flows from agricultural fields through 30-115 ft wide riparian buffer and adjacent riparian
areas restored with native woody vegetation. This goal is supported by both the TLW and RBRP
for reducing sediment inputs to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
Project Protection in Perpetuity — Implement a project in a TLW and record a conservation
easement. This goal is supported by the RBRP to protect aquatic habitat and surface waters.
Restore Terrestrial Habitat — Riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas will be restored with
native vegation and invasive vegetation will be managed. This goal is supported by the RBRP
and is a DMS Programmatic Goal (NCGS 143-214.10).
1.2 Existing Site Conditions
The buffer restoration project contains approximately 14.9 acres of agricultural fields along two
unnamed tributaries (hereinafter referred to as UT 1, and UT 2). The fields have historically been
in rotating row crops and early successional herbaceous vegetation since at least 1955 as noted on
historical aerial photographs. The property owner also states the land has been in agricultural use
including row crops for at least 75 yrs.
UT 1 enters the project site along the western property boundary and flows in an eastward
direction. UT 1 meets the definition of at least intermittent per the NCDWR On -Site
Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules Letter dated July 9, 2019
(Appendix 1). UT 2 originates within the property boundary as an ephemeral channel (Reach 2a)
and transitions to an intermittent channel (Reach 2b) prior to it's confluence with UT 1. There is
a third tributary with a stream origin point within the property boundary and flows in an eastward
direction to the confluence with UT1. This tributary is at least intermittent per the Buffer Letter,
but is not being used to produce riparian buffer credit for this project.
NCDWR visited the Site on June 14, 2019 to determine subjectivity of on -site resources to the
Tar -Pamlico buffer rules and their suitability for riparian buffer mitigation per the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295). The two unnamed tributaries and land use
within the project boundary were found suitable for riparian buffer mitigation in the Tar -Pamlico
River Basin. The resulting NCDWR letters are included in Appendix 2.
2.0 Determination of Credits
Riparian buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration was accomplished in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) including the alternative
`,i Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Report
ec fte ra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 2 May 2020

mitigation option of restoration activities along ephemeral streams. Restoration was
accomplished specifically by:
Buffer Restoraiton on Ephemeral Channels (15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(7)):
a.) NCDWR conducted an on -site stream determination of subject streams and ephemeral
channels on the property
b.) Ephemeral channels are directly connected to intermittent or perennial stream channels
c.) Total mitigation area of ephemeral channels is less than 25% of the total buffer mitigation
area (Table 2, Appendix 1).
All areas within 115 ft of the top of bank of subject streams as measured from the top of bank
landward, will be devoted to generating riparian buffer mitigation credits. Total mitigation area
on ephemeral channels is 12.7% of total buffer mitigation area. Mitigaiton credits generated are
found in Table 2 and Figure 2 in Appendix 1 and are based upon the most recent DWR Buffer
Mitigation Calculation Tool v 2 (Updated 1/17/20) and as -built survey (Appendix 3).
3.0 Baseline Summary
The project construction was completed in early March 2020, following mitigation plan approval.
Eco Terra and supporting team members successfully planted and restored the proposed areas
dedicated for riparian buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration with high quality native trees
and shrubs.
3.1 Site Preparation
All requests to prepare the site per the NCDWR Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient
Offset Letter (Date: July 17, 2019) were addressed. A telephone pole and steel girder used as a
bridge for the center -pivot wheel on the agricultural field were removed. One small pipe noted in
the initial site visit, providing drainage from upslope and under a farm access road outside of the
project, was examined and confirmed that diffuse flow toward the conservation easement was
occurring through an existing rip rap dissipater, also located outside the conservation easement.
Temporary and permanent seed mix was installed in any disturbed soil areas following debris
removal and planted with native trees to secure sediment from entering surface waters.
Temporary and permanent seed mixtures planted included Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and
Indiangrass (Sorgastrum nutans), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and big bluestem
(Andropogon gerardii), respectively. No invasive species were noted for herbicide treatment
prior to construction. No disking or tilling was necessary to prepare the site or remove any
historic plow pan in the soil.
3.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Restoration of the riparian areas involved planting bare root one to two -year -old trees and shrubs
in designated planting zones based on soil wetness and in accordance with the mitigation plan. In
addition, five to six -year -old trees were planted at representatively selected areas designated for
plots to aid in identifying plot locations. These trees are not included in any individual plot tree
count. However, they are an overall beneficial component of stem diversity and age -class in the
CCOlCi I C7. Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Report
DMS ID No. 100119 Page 3 May 2020

restored forest ecology and serve as important components in restored habitat, nutrient
sequestration, leaf litter for trapping sediment, and soil health. A combination of machine and
manual planting techniques were used depending on site conditions. Older trees were planted by
a combination of hand and machine.
Species planted within the riparian areas included: overcup oak (Quercus laurifolia) 2,500 stems,
laurel oak (Quercus lyrata) 1,000 stems, water oak (Quercus nigra) 3,000 stems, willow oak
(Quercus phellos) 3,000 stems, green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 500 stems, silky dogwood
(Cornus amomum) 1,000 stems, button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) 500 stems, and swamp
blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora) 300 stems. Approximately 12,300 stems (825 stems/ac)
were planted within the riparian areas designated for restoration. Differences in stem density and
quantities occurred relative to the proposed planting list in the mitigation plan due to plant
availability at the time.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a sufficient density of stems was planted to achieve
260 trees/ac at the end of a minimum five-year project monitoring period whereby no one tree
species planted was greater than 50% of the planted stems, and a minimum of four native
hardwood tree and native shrub species were planted. In total, eight species were selected and
planted in specific areas depending on soil type, landscape position, soil wetness, community type,
and reference forest stands nearby. Initial vegetation management post planting included specific
preemergent herbicide band application over planted trees for herbaceous competition that may
compete with planted stems, conducted by a North Carolina licensed applicator.
4.0 Annual Monitoring and Performance Criteria
The Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers (15A
NCAC 02B .0295) and RFP 16-007711 set forth specific performance criteria for the successful
development and close-out of the Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site. Performance criteria
monitoring includes standardized vegetation plot establishment and annual monitoring for planted
stems including individual plot photo documentation, overall site photo documentation, biannual
visual assessments for project status and easement integrity including herbaceous and/or invasive
species competition, stem mortality, stand health, incidental damage from agricultural equipment,
and stem loss or damage from natural causes such as fire, disease, or animal predation. Figure 3
(Appendix 1) illustrates the location of project easement, permanent vegetation plots/photo points,
as well as overall site photo points.
4.1 Vegetation
Twelve permanent vegetation plots were established according to the most recent Carolina
Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocol within the restored buffer area. Representative vegetation
plots were established at a minimum density of 2% of the planted area. Specifically, vegetation
monitoring was obtained for all plots according to Level 1-2 protocols from the CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation V4.2 (2008) manual. Baseline, or monitoring year zero
(MYO) vegetation stem data is included in Appendix 5, Table 3.
4.2 Photo Reference Stations
Individual plot photos taken at the southwest corner (origin) of each plot are included in this
baseline monitoring report. Additional Site reference photos were taken at designated points
along the conservation easement boundary providing an overall view of the project success
CCOlCi I C7. Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Report
DMS ID No. 100119 Page 4 May 2020

(Appendix 1: Figure 3). All photo points were located by survey and georeferenced for map
production to provide a consistent means for photo replication annually and in the event a plot or
photo location must be reestablished during the monitoirng period. Photo orientation (direction
and bearing) were recorded as well as approximate vertical position for consistency in photo
logging.
4.3 Visual Assessments
Additional observations were made of site conditions and vegetation conditions outside of
monitoring plots. This biannual effort will be made in order to appropriately monitor changing
site conditions and address any issues to ensure Site success and performance criteria are met
after the monitoring period. Any Site problems will be noted and discussed in the annual reports
and monitored biannually to ensure performance criteria are met following any remedial action.
4.4 Annual Reporting Performance Criteria
All monitoring reports, including this baseline report, will be compiled and submitted to DMS
annually in accordance with the Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Buffer Baseline and Annual
Monitoring Report Template Ver. 2.0 (May 2017). Annual monitoring will occur for a minum of
five years or until performance criteria are met.
4.5 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
Any Site observations identified through vegetation plots or visual assessments, whereby the
performance criteria is not met, will be noted and discussed in the annual reports and addressed
with a contingency plan as necessary. DMS/NCDWR will be notified, and if necessary,
collaborate with Eco Terra to develop a contingency plan with remedial action steps to correct the
performance criteria deficiency. Any contingency plan and remedial actions will occur within an
agreed timeframe and monitoring adjusted accordingly, if necessary. Site problem areas will be
monitored biannually to ensure performance criteria are met following any remedial action.
5.0 References
15 NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers. 2015.
Lee, Michael T. Peet, Robert K., Steven D. Wentworth, Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-levl-
2.pdf
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). Web Soil Survey of Edgecombe County.
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS). 2017. Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Buffer Baseline and Annual Monitoring
Report Template Version 2.0.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS). 2018. Tar -Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities.
`,i Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Report
ec fte ra. DMS ID No. 100119 Page 5 May 2020

APPENDIX 1
FIGURES AND TABLES

Ij
El
IR D- Old TcRN P
CU 11
J.
IL
-.7 :97'
%
ICI
Legend
17
F 7? i�,s
%Jf� \
Parcel Boundary
Conservation Easement 14.9 acres
%
7
Y
Vicinity Map
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Report (MY 0) N
0 Tar -Pamlico 03020101 1,200 600 0 1,200
to 00 Edgecombe County, North Carolina Figure
eco terra: V May 2020 Feet
2013 Hartsease USGS Quadrangle

ecolerra
�r I
_y AdL
am'"ON
i f
iG
Project Component/Asset Map
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Report (MYO)
Tar -Pamlico 03020101
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
May 2020
2017 Aerial from NCOneMap
F l
Legend
Buffer Restoration (0-100') LIT 1
Buffer Restoration (101-200') LIT 1
Buffer Restoration (0-100') LIT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
Buffer Restoration (101-200') LIT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
Buffer Restoration (0-100') LIT 2 Reach 2b
- Buffer Restoration (101-200') LIT 2 Reach 2b
LIT 1 (At Least Intermittent)
LIT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
LIT 2 Reach 2b (At Least Intermittent)
A
52
N
200 100 0 200
Feet
Figure
2

Legend
■ Vegetation Plot (N=12)
Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 1
4 Photo Points Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 1
FConservation Easement 14.9 acres Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
UT 1 (At Least Intermittent) Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral)
UT 2 Reach 2a (Ephemeral) Buffer Restoration (0-100') UT 2 Reach 2b
UT 2 Reach 2b (At Least Intermittent) ■ Buffer Restoration (101-200') UT 2 Reach 2b
r *P
%#A.0
ecolerra
vhb
Origin Latitude/Longitude (Decimal Degrees)
Plot Number
Y Coordinate
X Coordinate
1
35.96294899
- 77.70073591
2
35.96341822
-77.70147906
3
35.96396443
- 77.70243013
4
35.964284
- 77.70433461
5
35.96448024
- 77.70544498
6
35.96394198
- 77.70670793
7
35.96322236
-77.7070397
8
35.96440173
- 77.70664643
9
35.96480553
-77.70528385
10
35.96433174
- 77.70271205
11
35.96408549
- 77.70191544
12
35.9635377
- 77.70111746
Note- Vegetation Plot photos are from the origin
of the vegetation plot. The origin is located in the
southwest corner of each plot.
� i l
+77 M1'
Monitoring Plan View Map
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Report (MYO) N
Tar -Pamlico 03020101 200 100 0 200
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
May 2020 Feet
2017 Aerial from NCOneMap
Figure
3

Table 1: Buffer Project Attributes
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
Monitoring Year 0 — 2020
Project Name
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
I Hydrologic Unit Code
1 1 1 1
River Basin
IGeographic Location (decimal degrees)
72
35.96451,1 • •
Site Protection Instrument (BK, PG)
1 •
BMU)
617,518.702
yp�es of Credits �
.Riparian
Mitigation Plan Date
.
2020
Flnitial Planting Date
Baseline Report Date
1 1
Report Date
November 2�1 1
IMY2 Report Date
November 2021
IMY3 Report Date
November 2022
�MY 4 Report Date
November 2023
IMY 5 Report Date
November 2024
IClose out Report Date/Visit
1

Table 2: Buffer Project Components and Assets
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DIMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
Monitoring Year 0 — 2020
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE, PROJECT NO. 2019-0800, 617,518.702 CREDITS
Tar -Pamlico 03020101
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft'/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft'/pound)
19.16394
297.54099
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch')
Feature Te
Type
Mitigation Activity
Mitig
Min-Max Buffer
Width (it)
Feature Name
Total Area (ft')
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ft')
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient
Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N (Ibs)
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
P (Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
0-100
UT1
484,072
484,072
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
484,072.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
101-200
UT1
6,496
6,496
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
2,143.682
N/A
0.000
0.000
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
1 0-100
UT2 (Reach 2a)
78,631
78,631
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
78,631.000
1 N/A
0.000
0.000
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
UT2 (Reach 2a)
82
82
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
27.060
N/A
0.000
0.000
Buffer
Rural
Yes
/ P
Restoration
0-100
UT2 (Reach 2b)
52,641
52,641
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
52,641.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
101-200
UT2(Reach 2b)
12
12
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
3.960
N/A
0.000
0.000
Totals:
621,934
621,934
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Elieible for Preservation ift'j: 207,311
Total (Creditable)
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Feature Name
Total Area (sf)
Area for Buffer
Initial Credit
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Riparian Buffer
Width (it)
Ratio (x:1)
Ratio (x:1)
Credits
Mitigation (ft)
Buffer
Preservation
—
Preservation Area Subtotal (ft'): 0
Preservation as %Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0%
Ephemeral Reaches as %Total Area of Buffer Mitigation:
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250 (5)(a).
last updated 01/17/2020
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Restoration:
621,934
617,518.702
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
0
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
621,934
617,518.702
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
I Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
Nitrogen:
0
0.000
Phosphorus:
0.000

APPENDIX 2
DWR CORRESPONDENCE

Roy COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S, REGAIN
5errelary
LINDA CULPEPPER
p"reItor
Eca Terra Partners, LLC
Attention: Ted Griffith
1117 Peachtree Walk NE,
Suite 126
Atlanta, GA 30309
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 9, 2019
DWR Project # 2019-0800 V2
Edgecombe County
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0259)
Project Name: Baseman Buffer Mitigation Site
Parcel ID Number: 388038633500; PIN 3880-38-6335
Address/ Location: 7488 NC 97, Battleboro, NC 27809, Edgecombe County
Lat. 35.963791, Long.-77.703655
Stream(s) Evaluated: Unnamed Tributaries to Tar River, Classified as C; NSW
Determination Date: 6/14/2019 Staff DWR, Shelton Sullivan
Dear Mr. Griffith,
On June 14, 2019, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) Central
Office conducted an on -site review of features located on the subject property at the
request of Ted Griffith of Eco Terra Partners, LLC. The purpose of the inspection was to
determine the presence or absence of streams on the site and their ephemeral /
intermittent/ perennial (E/l/P) characteristics and transition points and the applicability
of the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0259) within the
proposed project easement.
The enclosed maps depict the Features evaluated and this information is also summarized
in the table below, Streams that are "Subject" are shown on the most recently published
MRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) maps, have been located on the ground at the site, and
possess characteristics that qualify them to beat least intermittent streams. Features that
are "Not Subject" are not depicted on the required maps, not present on the property, or
have been determined to not be at least intermittent.
aE
T6n6u�..,ni vu.nr
North Cam{Ina Oepattrnenr of Environmental Quality I division of Water Resources
512 North 5alisbui y 5treel 1 407 Map service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27649-loll
".707.9000

DWR #20190800 V2 Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
Edgecombe County
Page 2 of 3
Please note that there may be other streams or features located on the property
beyond the proposed project easement that may be subject to the Tar -Pamlico
Riparian Area Protection Rules, considered jurisdictional according to the US Army
Corps of Engineers, and subject to the Clean Water Act.
See the following table for the features rated during the DWR site visit:
Feature 1D
Feature Type
*E/1'P
Subject to
Start @
Stop @
Depicted or)
Depicted on
Other
Buffer Rules
Soil Survey
USGS To o
Labeled as R1 on
aerial map
Continues
"I" at
provided, at
downstream
R1
Stream
least
Yes
northwestern
to the eastern
Yes
Yes
project
project
bioundary
boundary
Labeled as R2A
Continues to
on aerial map
the flagged
"g"
provided, the
point H28
R2A
Stream
No
southwestern
to rn
where the
Yes
Yes
project
stream
boundary
becomes
intermittent
Labeled RZB on
Continues
11213
Stream
1 at
Yes
aerial map
downstream
yes
Yes
least
provided
to confluence
with RI
Stream
Labeled R3 on
(not in the
aerial map
Continues
R3
current
"1" at
Yes
provided; Begins
downstream
yes
Yes
proposed
least
an the eastern
to confluence
project
side of the main
with 111
boundspath
* E: Ephemeral, 1: Intermittent P: Perennial
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may
request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60)
calendar days of the date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
DWR- 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
c/o Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
if sending via delivery service [UPS, Fed Ex, etc.]
DWR- 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
c/o Karen Higgins
512 N Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) calendar days.

DWR #20190800 V2 Baseman Buffer Mitigation Site
Edgecombe County
Page 3 of 3
This letter only addresses the stream features on the subject property and within the
proposed easement and the applicability of the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any additional questions
or require additional information, please call Shelton Sullivan at [phone]. This
determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
c Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures. Photographs with Description; Site Map, Soil Survey, USGS Topo
cc: Joel Boseman, P.D, Box 550, Battleboro, NC 27809
Joel Boseman via email bosemariforms ahoo.com
Ted Griffith, Eco Terra Partners, LLC via email [e-mail]
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files
Filename: 20190800V2_eoseman_Edgecombe 5treamCalls.docx

r
O
Q}
E E O o°
a d c 4.
W N
aD ( c
LLi co o
U
c p c Qy
o Lo
L •4+
0 a. wU
J
_r
0
�n
U-
a
0
0
N
e�
d =
N .O
NooV
O cvo� w
�MZG()
C2p TNZ
U L 0 c o
. � IL 0
W E I- G o
N
M
W
d �
r�
IL t
Nk
r , r

n.

►T1'i■
■
a"
i rw
0

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICRAEL S. REGAN
Secretory
LINDA CULPEPPER
airretor
Ted Griffith
Eco Terra Partners, LLC
1117 Peachtree Walk NE, Suite 126
Atlanta, GA 30309
(via electronic mail: Tedt&EcoTerra.com)
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 17, 2019
D WR# 2019-0800
Edgecombe County
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Boseman Site
Located near 8019-7621, NC 97, Battleboro, NC
Tar -Pamlico 03020I01
Dear Mr. Griffith,
On June 7.2019, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from Eco Terra Partners, LLC (ETP) for an onsite mitigation determination near the above -
referenced site (Site). The Site is located within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin in the 8-digit
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020101. The Site is being proposed as part of full -delivery nutrient offset
and riparian buffer mitigation project for the Division of Mitigation Services (RFP #16-007711).
Staff from the Division of Mitigation Services were also present onsite. At your request, Ms. Merritt
performed an onsite assessment of riparian land uses adjacent to streams and channels onsite, which
are shown on the attached map labeled "Figure 1B-Existing Conditions".
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Feature
Cla5Sification
ISublet t
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
?Nutrient
sMitwgation Tyke Deterniination
wlin riparian areas
onsite
ter
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
(0 2DU')
Viable
Viable
Rule
Rl
Stream
Yes
Non -forested row crop fields
'Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration
with areas forested
forested ag
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
downstream @ confluence W
fields only)
R3
Forested Areas - Preservation Site
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)[5)
Drain tiles shall be removed to restore
diffised flow
R2A
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested row crop fields
°Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(7)
Norlh Carollna Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 107 Mail Service Center I Ralriylr, Nurtrr Caruilna �7h99 lhl'T
919,707-9000

Boseman Site
Eco Terra
July 17, 2019
Feature
Cla5silication
'Subiect
Riparian Land use
Buffer
Zlllutrient
sMitigation Type Determination
UQ
offset
w1in riparian areas
opsite
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Buffer
0[ 200')
VViiabl
YOM
Bilk
R213
Stream
Yes
Non -forested row crop fields
Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
R-3
Stream
Yes
Non -forested row crop fields
Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 0213
.0295 (n)
Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated July 9, 2019 using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle
topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
NC Division of Writer Resources - Methodolopv and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated wit% Riparian Bi&r
Establishment
Inc area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per I SA NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
;The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of'the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
'All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easemcnt established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even when no credit is viable within the 50' riparian
butler.
The maps attached to this letter were prepared by ETP and were initiated by Ms. Merritt on July 17.
2019.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written
approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for
buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240, a proposal regarding a proposed nutrient
load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior to any
mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must fallow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Page 2 of 3

Boseman Site
Bco 'terra
July 17, 2019
This viability assessment will expire on July 17, 2021 or upon the submittal of an As -Built Report to
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in all stream and wetland,
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
Sincerely,
7 r
4 Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
KAH/km
Attachments: Figure 1 B-Existing Conditions Map/Stream Determination
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Jeff Schaffer- DMS ( via electronic mail)
Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX 3
AS -BUILT SURVEY

VICINITY SKETCH
NOT TO SCALE
LINE TYPE LEGEND
BOUNDARY
TOP OF STREAM BANK
CONSERVATION EASE.
EXISTING EASE.
0
00
0D a
0
QI
z "n
oU
�a-
c�
U
Z
}
F-
W
a-
0
a
THIS MAP IS NOT FOR
RECORDATION, SALES OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES
NOT COMPLY WITH G.S.
47-30 MAPPING
REQUIREMENTS,
NOTES:
1- ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND IN US SURVEY FEET.
2- METHOD OF COMPUTATION: AREA IS CALCULATED WITH CAD SOFTWARE METHODS.
3- BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. THERE ARE NO KNOWN CHANGES IN RIGHT
OF WAY & THERE MAY BE EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES, EITHER RECORDED OR UNRECORDED, NOT SHOWN HEREON.
4-THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE AS -BUILT AREAS FOR RIPARIAN BUFFER CREDITS WITHIN THE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT. THIS PLAT IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE LAND PARCELS AND THEIR BOUNDARIES AFECFED
BY THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ARE NOT CHANGED BY THIS PLAT.
5- REFERENCE CONSERVATION EASEMENT PLAT RECORDED IN PC 13 PG 16 AT EDGECOMBE COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS,
1
TERRESTRIAL SURVEYING PC
Professional Land Surveying License C-3903
P.O. Box 91041 Raleigh North Carolina 27675 'i
919.219.4218 [e-mail]
101'-200' Credit Area UT 2 Reach 2a
INSET 1
1 "= 40'
I, TIMOTHY P. MURRAY, AS DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CERTIFY THAT THIS
101'-200' Credit Area UT 2 Reach 2b
INSET 2
1 "=20'
BUFFER MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE
C'4RQ�
AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE
FIELD, THAT THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY IS BASED PLAT CABINET 13
' E SS/Q •; y9
ON
=OQ; OF .;
ti9•:
PAGE 16 RECORDED IN EDGECOMBE COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS
OFFICE, AND THAT THE BUFFER AREAS SHOWN ARE CALCULATED FROM =
QQ�
,
AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON, _
L-4833=
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
0-• -
THIS 30th DAY OF APRIL, 2020.
SUR4
. �0, .
-�
/1 y P.,
Timothy P. Murray, PLS L-4833
= 0'-100' Credit Area UT 1 = 484072 SF/11.1127 AC
= 101'-200' Credit Area UT 1 = 6496 SF/0.1491 AC
= 0'-100' Credit Area UT 2 Reach 2a = 78631 SF/1.8051 AC
= 101'-200' Credit Area UT 2 Reach 2a = 82 SF/0.0019 AC
= 0'-100' Credit Area UT 2 Reach 2b = 52641 SF/1.2084 AC
= 101'-200' Credit Area UT 2 Reach 2b = 12 SF/0.0003 AC
PLANTED AREA= 621933 SF/ 14.2776 AC
TOTAL CE AREA (INCLUDING STREAM)= 649889 SF/ 14.9194 AC
UT 1 = AT LEAST INTERMITTENT
UT 2 Reach 2a = EPHEMERAL
UT 2 Reach 2b = AT LEAST INTERMITTENT
BANK
AS -BUILT SURVEY
BOSEMAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE DMS # 100119
PREPARED FOR
ECO TERRA PARTNERS, LLC
TAR—PAMLICO RIVER BASIN HUC 03020101
NO, 7 TOWNSHIP, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
DATE: 4/15/2020 SCALE: 1 "=200'
200 i 100 200 400 800
BAR GRAPH 1 inch = 200ft.
BOSEMAN—NC-97—W—ASBUILT.DWG

APPENDIX 4
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Q WNE (i) 35°57'45"N, 77°42.1"W t19ft A 64ft
See N157:36r
NW N NE E
300 330 0 30 60 90
I I I I I I I I I• I• I•! I• I! I I• I I
j* .. ,�•'�
P-3. - . S.'... _�--n�°. • � '. •semen
our lvalernktrk-ISee Se!tings _ _ 5.r. 17.22:34
5 sw '{I NW N
1([0 21. 24. . .
I• I I . I I . I
w NW IN NE
270 300 330 0 30 60
• I I 1 I I i I I I 1 I I I I I 1I
PP-2
=7r ft:larn:lrrk -See Se:t:nr: Rpr�1p7[]� �T'147'-37 `
w NW 1N NE
210 300 300 0 30 60
I I • I • 1 • I • 1 • I • ! • I • I • 1 • 1 • ! • I • I • I • I • I -
Settings x�- "`:' ^ 's." c
NW N l NE E
330 0 30 60 90 120
I• I I . I• I• I- I - 1- I - I - I - I - I . I - I - I
F k
PP 6 .., - SSA. 1A •�':'.•�r'� i.; 1 "1'-; .'�' •! QPSB.rffal�.
Your Wnlemlgrk -Soo K'2 (I�l q • Zr ++�--
$e g �. .•{j5/ij02(1. T7;3i;4B(�

N NE E SE
p 30 90 96 I- ,50
{ 1 I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I[ I E
vp
Your watermark - See Se!@ngs - I, Apr 202A. 11:31!1)4
E SE 1 s sw
90 :20 1$C 1an 2:0 "1
• I I I I I! I I I I I I I I f I I I I
E SE Is sw
90 ,20 150 loo 2,0 2e0
I• I I I f• I I I I I I I• I• f• I I I
kE E G = s SV
60 90 J150 180 210
• I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I - I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I -
Yoyf. WdWTm
SE 5 I SW W
87 210 240 271)
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
sw W I NW N
21p 2e0 270 300 330 0
I I I I I I I•]• I I I f• I I I !• I I
PP-12 - 'i- .. 6osemen
Your Wai2nttarli ; SetjSeltihgs ;i5 Apr Z020, 17;49:04

APPENDIX 5
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS

Table 3: Planted and Total Stems
Boseman Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 100119
DWR Project No. 2019-0800
Monitoring Year 0 — 2020
Current Plot Data (MY-0 2020) - Total Stems
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
VP1
VP2
VP3
VP4
VPS
VP6
VP7
VP8
VP9
VP10
VP11
VP12
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
4
2
2
1
5
2
2
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
9
5
5
4
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
5
2
10
1
2
3
1
3
5
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
10
2
4
2
9
7
6
3
9
9
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
Tree
12
1
1
4
6
Cephalanthus occidentalis
butonbush
Shrub
Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora
swamp blackgum
Tree
11
Stem Count
16
20
16
13
19
14
18
18
13
16
14
15
Species #
3
4
3
4
4
3
5
4
4
3
4
3
Vigor
3 61
3.8
3.8
3.81
3.91
3.91
3.91
3.81
3.81
3.81
3.81
3.6
Stems/ac
6481
810
648
ft 5261
7691
5671
7291
a
7291
5261
6481
567
Annual
Summary
Ex�O stems/ac) by 10%
Exceeds criteria (260 stems/ac), but by less than 10%
Fails to meet criteria (260 stems/ac), by less than 10%
is (260 sy more than 10%
Plot Size (ares/ac): 1 / 0.0247
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Total
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
20
Quercus lyrato
overcup oak
Tree
24
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
36
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
73
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
Tree
24
Cephalanthus occidentalis
butonbush
Shrub
0
Nysso sylvatica var. biflora
swamp blackgum
Tree
11
Total Stems
192
Species #
8
Avg Vigor
3.8
Total Stems/ac
648

NW N 1 NE E
300 330 0 3 60 W 120
I . I I.
I• I• I . I• I . I . I . I . t. I• I.
I• I• I
New
MP¢7_
- Youf Wal er m:tr k - S., S.I t: rig sue. _ t 6 Apr 2020. 16:50;56
NE
330
0
60
0 38'NE
{T) ® 35°57'50"N,
77°42'8"W
t22ft ■ 61ft
Fa=' mow: �'' •t _ ,s.: 7.:se
2�w
Your•Wafer4ar, e'�Arlc,•s � ;. t5Aprad 15;05,42
NW N I NE E
390 0 30 6
0 :A ill
• I• I• 1• I• 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1
Your Wa ..iT+:•..:'`,-�. ..1 :.. .5328'Sy
NW N 1 NE E
}7 330 0 30 60 90 120
I• I• I• I
" ,# car - , - > • `
4
Yw:r 1"lniermnrk-SPe Seetalgs ��\ - 75 Apr.2Q24.1 4a;4B
NW N (JE E S1
3W 0 30 60 90 120
1• I I.
I[ I• I• I• I• I I I• I• I• I.
I• I• I . I
I a�
Yn,:r'Walermark -ySee Se't,ngs . �5 2. G. 14;10;2B
NW N I NE E
300 330 0 l0 6C w :N
• I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I! I 1 I-!
MP06 Baseman
Your Watermark - See Settings 15 Apr 2020, 13, 12, 12

NW N I NE E
NP. -.. �Fn �� �M1. l• i��R .1
W N NI: E SE
330 0 3a tx0
• I I I I I I- I I 1 I 60 00 l! I I I I 1 I
1 �
Y - Baseman,
Ymir Walermark -See Se.tm 1 Apr 2020, 15!50'61�J
NW N . .
. I• I.
I. I . I I• I• I - I'
® 41°NE (T) * 35°57'51"N, 77"42'2,YW t19ft ■ 58ft
Qc
flefax+4ar' gs; , _ a£4r:14Apr2020 G10:55
120
0 48°NE (T) Q 35°57'51"N, 77°42'9"W t22ft A 63ft
F.
41m-
'4GKa16rrn a[k - S��- Sett ng%• - ,=i.0 9.rr ?n20. I5c3,7.12
NW N I NE E
330 0 30 HO W 120
I I I I• I I 1 I I I I I I I• I• I• I I•]
Yf
.a.F
s 1,1 Apr 2020.• t 5: