20061334 Ver 1_401 Application_20060806

KCI
TECHNOLOGIES
Transmittal Letter
NGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
LANDMARK CENTER II, SUITE 220 ~ 4601, SI?FFORKS ROAD ~ RALEIGH. NC 27609 ~ 919-783-9214 ~ (FAX) 919-783-9266
!r
Date: August 14, 2006 2 0 0 6 1 3 3 4 r2 ~[~',Q~ L~ Q
D l5
Aura ~ 7 zQO6
Company: North Carolina Division of Water Project: Harrell Wetland Rest$~~~o~r~~~~~ ~,
Quality ,Dtl ' °~~"
Contact: John Dorney Subject: 401 Permit Application
^ In accordance with your request ^ For your use/files
^ For your review ^ Please call when ready
® For processing ^ Please return to this office
^ Plans reviewed and accepted ^ Approval requested
^ Plans reviewed and accepted as noted ^ Conference requested
^ For revision by you at your convenience
Comments: Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
application.
Steven Stokes
Soil Scientist
cc: File
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

NOTE ~ T~1i5 /S 0.. Full ~t~iVGry '~o~tcf ~or 1VC.E.E P
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 ~ ~ 8 1 3 :~ 4
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I.
II.
Processing
~.; ~;
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
Applicant Information
AUG 1 1 2006
S
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: KCI Technologie
Mailing Address: Landmark Center
Telephone Number: [phone] x 187 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to sun-ounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Harrell Wetland Restoration Site
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 3882-98-0552
4. Location
County: Edgecombe Nearest Town: Battleboro
Subdivision name (include phase lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Travel toward Rocky
Mount on US 64 E. Take the US 301 Bypass exit and head north on US 301 for about 7.5
miles. Upon reaching Battleboro, turn right on E. Battleboro Avenue, which becomes
Battleboro-Leggett Rd. Once on Battleboro-Leg_ett, you will drive past the first turn-off for
Morning Star Church Rd on the left, but continue to the second Morning Star Church Rd
turn-off on your left after about 5 miles from Battleboro (the road loops around). Go about 1
mile and turn right onto a dirt road (farm path) opposite Benson Farm Rd on the ri hg t. The
wetland site is 1/3 mile down the dirt road on the left.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.0221 °N 77.6826 °W
6. Property size (acres): 22.3 acres (Conservation Easement)
Name of nearest receiving body of water: Swift Creek
River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 12

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site has been ditched and used for agriculture for manX
years. A small portion of the site shown in green on the USGS topo was cleared about 1980.
A series of agricultural ditches drains the site and allows it to be farmed with row crops.
Aerial maps prepared by NRCS show the site as PC (Prior Converted). The project
watershed upstream is agricultural and there is low development pressure in the area.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This
project will restore the site to a nonriparian wetland. A bulldozer, front-end loader on tracks,
a dump truck and/or a track hoe will be used to fill the ditches within the project boundary
and to recreate wetland microtopo~phy.
1 l .Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This project is part of a Full Delivery Project for
NCEEP. The site will be restored to a nonriparian wetland, which will increase the amount
of wetland along the Swift Creek Corridor and buffer Swift Creek from upstream agricultural
drainage.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Yes, we will be applying for Nationwide Permit 27 to restore about 6,337 if of stream channel as
part of a Full Delivereject at an adjoining location on the property.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 7 of 12

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The project site does not contain
wetland conditions except in the bottoms of some of the ditches that were previously
constructed to drain the site. The project proposes to fi110.24 acres of the ditches on the site
in order to restore wetland h. d~logy.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-Year
Floodplain
( esbo) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Fill ditches Herbaceous Yes 1200 0.24

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.24 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage. bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Page 8 of 12

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.24
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Irri act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.24
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
This nroiect aims to restore agricultural land to a functioning wetland. In order to accomplish
this goal ditches will be filled in order to return the site to its historic pre-agricultural wetland
conditions.
Page 9 of 12

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page ] U of 12

Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multinliers.
Zone* I Impact I Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitieation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
Zone l extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 1 1 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This is a Full Delivereject for NCEEP.
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

}~
I Hillcross
ti~

?a
/ HALIFAX
- B°
Q BERTIE
m'
o NASH
EDGECOMBE

999~~1~~1 97 r MARTIN
0
P
c
S hl
~e99eri E `~
w

WILSON

PITT

Harrell Wetland Restoration Vicinity Map ~~

~

~•
Project Site Location

N ~
~~
K C I
/~/ Major Streams and Rivers w~E nssoa,~TES of Nc.
Municipalities S
L63,360
Roads 1 inch equals I miles
--

TECH
NOLOGIES
I
o.s o I

M1Ies
~
x
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
AND CONSTRUCTION. INC.
Edgecombe County, North Carolina

i~ ~ =J.k~ \ 11 ~'s~s 'stn 1 '~tWWtI _ 6. ~i'` `~ j/ 51 ,)U _ ~~'n -, 1t ~0 ~ ,_- _ "` _ ~-~ ' .~~; t ~ -
/ _ ~, , ~ _,. ,~ ~ , ~' I,
~, r- '
.\ ,~ ~ ;~1~ t I
SISISf 'ti. .~,f,I1'/Yr .gyp.
~y \ ~ f . -. :~ ".
't~=;__~ ;`'°~ 1 .~~ ,'~" ~. NilaterTa~~v _ -~ r'~ =.,n~_~ 1` ~ 4~ ~ -
s f
-~
Harrell Wetland Restoration Topographic Image
~~
~~
~~
N KCI
w ~ e ASSOC:IAT'FS OF h!C
Project Site Boundary _
5 .;x t
1:24,000
1 inch equals 2,000 feet
TECHNOLOGIES z,ooo I,ooo o z,ooo
Source: US(iS Topugraphir Ouu,Gvngle N7riluA-ers, 196/ FBC[ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
AND CON$iRnCT1ON, INC.

MaB o�
a o6
NoA
GoA NoB
StB
GoA NoA
Nog W kB y
St6
Nab
AuB": 9 AaA
d
- y St6 '.-._ • : i
idid _ _:.vim ii
CeB
t DgA Aa
W aB Co -
.ice 9
Nob Mab y AaA; c '
Wa6 t Nob " dlnlry U /
Co O 41d DgAu: 1
r^ 9
MaAa �_
Nri6 rRo Aa7€
NoA 3,6
j GoA Pt
Aa
A Ta + \
Ceo 1_ 1,
M 4 DpA t
Pu�PU
Ta
t[[ — AaA f
Ca AaA
i Wa6
No / 11, � — (\ `aB I StB AFto,
t
`
AaA e AaA
AUB T i j P a
�! W a€S'
� TUBA Ta
fto -
1
DA—
(Rd
gA(Rv i [`moo
Aug j Mab 4"
Cog r , ;,c,A L Wa8 �jp St8 - COBt,
�.
W
tom, a6`a
t I Ip
f .Ct•aA- ^.. '' �'`�'" � - } 4�� ! F3 � AaA
— St
Nob .x
i
DgA
NoA
Rn
1 1
DgAWkII
l' StB AaA
_
.l 9 -
�A '' -�tB i /" ...,DgA �y
AaA \` i Ro We
Fj,� {{ Sib Dfi
Ro �a 4Ve �.w '._ DgA € �� Aat
AaAi�RgA I z1
Ro S,13
v- El 476
k a,.. aA
f 4 K r ^. a
9 - i a 528. c
s e
--_..__... 1 Mile
1 s4 Y2 Y4 0
5000 Feet
5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Scale 1020000

r

;.

~ ^ E~~ ~~ „
Y"..
.. ~-, ~
..
~ 'll
c
,..-.,
~ ~~. " i
~ r~

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Harrell Farm Date: 5-12-06
Applicant /Owner: KCI Associates of NC County: Edgecombe
Investigator: Steven F. Stokes, LSS State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No X Plot ID: 1
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Cotton 3 UPL 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). N/A
Remarks:
Agricultural Crop
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _>40 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >40 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Roanoke Drainage Class: Poorly
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Endoaquult Confirm Mapped Type? Yes X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-7 Al lOYR 5/2 sl, lfgr
7-16 Bt~l lOYR 5/1 7SYR 4/4 c2p sc, 2msbk
16-27 Btu lOYR 6/1 lOYR 5/6 c2d scl, lmsbk
27-40 2C~ lOYR 6/1 lOYR 5/6 c2d c, massive
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Remarks:

M ~ '
~
®~~~~
~ ®
®~
~
~ rtan m•nacr ems '"rm v'm¢LLm
JL
V
!L
ll b 7
~L
~~1 c
D05o25-1
o E ~~~u ~ ]E~®~~Y~~IEI~I IE1~T]~~I~T~IEI~IEI~T~ I~~$®~ll~~~ .
.

N ,~
~;.~_
'"q:.
a
•~
t 4ok0 ~ A 9llBYIiREDVdM AESfgUTIgIPLW .WO70DR
~
u,T'
Hya
0 ate" ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ m REVISIONS .R .,.•t•
4
a
~ ~
~ ~ i./
V e
£
°~~.,
~ ~

.
; ~:
°~~
LOCATION: HARRELL SITE
~
r
~ ~
~ MORNING STAR CHURCH ROAD
~
a PRO.I~CT
~
~~~ EDGECOJ?biBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA

,~ ~a.,.r
~

~
,~
~*
TYPE OF WORK: WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
~'~ ~.,.. ,R~~wyxa,m~°, ~ ~
VICIMTY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
,~.
.~• '~.
.
•'' '~
.~
.
.~. .~.

•~ '~.
~OE~e9R~ ••` `~•~ ,
`'
~~~
~, •~„i
•~ ~ + •
..,
.
N , ,,
~~ I '•
O coNSTRUCrsTAeIERED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
ALONG MORNING STAR O i %
SCE I
~

CHURCH ROAD ~ •

I
~ ~
O ~
I
• ~
~
~ ~~
~
'~
•
I
•
I ..~,,J

~
1

~ ,r
• .•~•.~'
I•,,
,l,
9?

~i
!',c
'~
o
b
V

PROJECT ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES PROJECT DATA Prgoa~ed In tte GYtks d: Prepund tore
SCI l~asociaEes
-200-100 0 100 400 WE TLAND RESTORATION AREA = 653,400 SQUARE FEET ~ of NarEh Carolina, p.~.
SLATE 220 LAIAYARK CENTER R, 46q SIX FOARS RD, RAU]CH, NC '~`
[15 ACRES) ENGINEEflS •PLANNER$ •ECOLOGIST$
TITLE SHEEP

-6O -3O
O 6O H2O
JAMES W. BLAKE, P.E
,aACO>~ .~
~ ~.a
~
O LETTJNG DATE: fr
~
k
PLAN SHEET GARY M.MRYNCIAP.H. ~~
~
~
~
JIBSSRd SNGAA~ ?RY£D(i~$:At,4
V GUYPEARCE
L CSANA~ lR6S7IX
TU P$ CONDIAG7 A-IAfWS771A71DB
NA
RA .VINAlURH