20200709 Ver 1_G5d1_MathesonAve_JD_120919_20200528

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 -
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Matheson Avenue Streetscape
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional Fv—(] Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Matheson Avenue improvements
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: City of Charlotte; POC: Leslie Bing, 704-577-8609; [e-mail]
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Mr. Dan Zurlo
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
Southeast of the North Tryon Street and Matheson Avenue intersection in Charlotte, North Carolina
35.2453460,-80.8126660
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: Linear project encompassing multiple parcels.
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Little Sugar Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba (HUC 03050103)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
E
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
✓❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑� Section 10 & 404
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
To: Mr. David Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2017-0469
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: December 4, 2019
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ✓ Preliminary JD Package ❑ Approved JD Package ❑ Other
ON BEHALF OF: City of Charlotte.; POC: Leslie Bing
ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED:
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
2
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
3
Agent Authorization Form
4
Figure 1. Vicinity Ma
5
Fi ure 2. USGS Topographic Ma
6
Figure 3. Aerial Imagery
7
Figure 4. USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg Count
8
Figure 5. USDA-NRCS Published Soil Survey of Mecklenburg Count
9
Figure 6. National Wetland Inventory
10
Figure 7. Jurisdictional Boundaries
11
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms DP1-DP5
12
NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms SCP1-SCP4
13
Photo a e (Photographs 1-10
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
✓ For verification and signature ❑ Revisions per field visit ❑ As requested ❑ As submitted
REMARKS: Mr. Shaeffer, we are submitting a preliminary JD for your verification and signature.
Please do not hesitate to contact Dan Zurlo at 717-460-3466 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Dan Zurlo
Project Scientist
Christine Geist, PWS, CE
Principal Scientist

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington district
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ug latoryPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Southeast of the North Tryon Street and Matheson Avenue intersection in Charlotte, North Carolina
City, State:
Charlotte, North Carolina
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Linear project encompassing multiple Mecklenburg County tax parcels
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: CWS Inc.; POC: Mr. Dan Zurlo
Mailing Address: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd,
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 717-460-3466
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
EI am the current property owner.
aI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
1-1 Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
This project is a linear project that will include
Mailing Address: multiple parcels. City of Charlotte will obtain
road right-of-ways through the emminent
domain process.
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 10 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.245346
-80.812666
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
✓❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorL/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_Apy A Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see hlW://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiy-Permit-Proizram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: December 4, 2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: CWS Inc.; POC: Mr. Dan Zurlo, 550 E. Westinghouse
Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District- Asheville Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Southeast of the North Tryon Street and
Matheson Avenue intersection in Charlotte, North Carolina
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.245346' Long.:-80.812666'
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S
Name of nearest waterbody: Little Sugar Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
"may
Site Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non -
be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404
Wetland AA
35.247481
-80.814671
0.01 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland BB
35.24634
-80.814013
0.06 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland CC
35.24721
-80.813764
0.01 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
Stream A
(Little Sugar
35.246781
-80.814277
761f
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Creek)
Stream B
35.247138
-80.814439
2441f
Non -Wetland
Section 404
(Perennial)
Stream B
35.247543
-80.814671
81 if
Non -Wetland
Section 404
(Intermittent)
Stream C
35.247497
-80.813999
105 if
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream D
35.244628
-80.811783
61f
Non -Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Vicinity and Jurisdictional Boundaries
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 Minute Topographic, Derita and Charlotte East,
NC (2019).
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County, Sheets 6 and 7, 1980.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS, 2019.
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FENIA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): ESRI, 2019.
or ®Other (Name & Date): Photolo , 2�019.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
12/4/19
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
representing the City of Charlotte., hereby certify that I have authorized
Dan Zurlo of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination/
permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Authorized signature
Agent's signature
11.25.19
Date Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Tennessee
15
2
ante High
a
�a¢
a6
Ikea _
d9
North side
Christian 1.45 C(M'
South Carolina Acade
v -
Georgia y rx
m
-------------
_ � p
_ -
r _-
a
I'
Horn : 9,
0 94 0
f°4i 21
Y V
0d4j
rr. a 4
5
hoc
,•f �� �y P�k�n°gAre
�}JVarchey�yt a ti Charlotte
aCountry74 Q��cl��
Charlotte ti
d,'
R 49 - j2i� r phi Cer+tra! Are
y 03
F
I. Se
7
x�
Virginia
�I7
5
0
{�-A
© -rpr
�asr
m
V
a.Pl
E l .IL-in.I
Evrnjr-_ n
err1E[:•�. fail!
41
CY
❑ ¢
Alharn.
47
d10
a
@
Legend
�a
=� MO"
Project Limits (10 ac.)
b
5,000 2,500 0 5,0 00 Feet
REFERENCEBACKGROUND VICINITY
MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, 2019.
q
WA
n
SCALE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet
DATE:
11/15/2019
Vicinity Map
FIGURE NO.
1
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:Is
2017-0469
JKM
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
of
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
C A R O L I N A
Mecklenburg County
35.245346,-80.812666
CAG
WETt_AND SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-TBD Matheson\JD\ArcGIS\Figure1_Vicinity.mxd

7 V
� i
V
=ter; s< � $ -
- "�❑
r`�
3
"
A5BURY
Arb
SFRIKG EW
l EY
• i
=Lke
AVE Dnrld Hills
EISo
$ f
T
Suger Crrrk - .
t] :garter
Otrf ian
adept aw
olry
�
'I
Ahs «the
-
I
a
MOR ETZ V 9 ,
4
i
HrghlSnd
•
-wi
Z7 I, 1
' % 1•
cl +
�Vaa ----�
ph
jr
'Q
R
,
I I ❑
��
P
agi
t
[]
jy4
I 29 }" 1
tMQRF ST
`-
1 H
�
land ill -
edo arlatt
�- arfcal ear ' 1 _
tr
pnst
�y
ONS
LION AVE
r
' F sT
r
n' Vk
0�z 3
k�
IShamt Cl
.ram• , +
4
Elemmt a5y—
[�
First:
-
AVE
d`�'LPnreLi•
Legend
.4
Tr
_
J '
_
" ; -
Project Limits (10 ac.)
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE: DERITAAND CHARLOTTE EAST, NC (2017).
_f
F
SCALE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet
DATE:
11/13/2019
USGS Topographic Map
FIGURE NO.
2
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2017-0469
JKM
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
of
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
C A R O L I N A
Cabarrus County
35.245346,-80.812666
CAG
SERVICES
WETLANDE
Charlotte, North Carolina
7
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-TBD Matheson\JD\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

GAShared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-TBD Matheson\JD\NrcGIS\Figure3_aerial.mxd

A,
C11
MkB
ID
°
�
CeD2 eB2
ti/Sq�F
9GO0 CuB
CUB
APT p�°��
C9
Cu - '�F
O�
p
9G�
M eB
r
19 �� Op
F
—
CeD2 eB
�O
Ur Q
C�
Q�
CeB2
L�U
U
eB
Gs�
20
RITCH PVE
Hu B
Qp
_ P
28Ty CUB
p��
S
6ENPRo
MO
N PEE
T
r
S�'
Pve
Ur
GP
GO CeD2
CeD2
29Ty
yQ`�
CuB
LID
Q
u
ST
O�l�
\GO
�p m
ZI
MkB
QO
T
Ur <
�QTyST �STyST
N
�Hu
Z��
5�
T
�L� Fq/SO
yPO
SdT
�,P�
5�
���F
OST
cNgR�E
' S qVF
P �Tti
�y� O�
M'
CeD2 r T
M
CeB2
MO
JpR�
qN Pt
CHgR� ESAVE
yP
u B
�JP
sT
�Tti
m
Q�Q'
QJ�
ST
SQ/
Tys
r'6 �.���
TyST
LE►GFi AV r
v�0 P�
csT
WOppSIDE AU,E _� o
S�
v
o
ART
y
(/NSF u B
)
S
S� Cl)
p
ST
Q
CATAWSA a
Z D
Z
Legend
c.
.. r.9- . .
_
. . ..-
A
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8
to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded No 11.9
CATAWBA
CUB Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No 37.9
A
Project Limits
(10 ac. )
MS Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded
No 31.1
uJ
Ur Urban land
No 19
c Q ��
Roads
Totals for Area of Interest: 100—
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY OF CABARRUS COUNTY, NC, DATED 2017.
Q
GO
1,000 500 0
1,000 Feet
WOODAVE
CUD
SCALE: 1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE:
11/13/2019
USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey
Y
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
of Mecklenburg County
T
2017-0469
JKM
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
of
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
Cj A R O L I N A
Mecklenburg County
35.245346,-80.812666
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
7
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-TBD Matheson\JD\ArcGIS\Figure4_CurrentSoil.mxd

U IrLB ti Ll' i
CUB
MeB Mk8
u oe
CUB
CHARLOTTE MO EnB
GeI52 CLIS M R CvO
HeB FnEl VaB, C)
C uki
Qey) r. no
fy, C F r'B
V, k E Mkt}
�P lid
U, C'b L)
za
4--,R
J C ea
CUB Hen
CUB
U.1, 'A&r_
Mo
CUB
CUB,
U
Ur (f I LjF3
LZ C;
j J" North Tryon Street Ur Mo
E n B
MD MkB CUB
CUB
Jr
Ur CLAD
lJr iMatheson Avenue C I(.)
PaE
CUB
OF CUB
I
CUD CeD2
CUB I 1.1D CU I) CeI32
C oa H 6:Jr
y 0
Map Unit Symbol and Description Hydric (Y/N) i C U D
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded No Legend 1�
CUB Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes No 12
MS Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded No i
Project Limits (10 ac.)
Ur Urban land No
REFERENCE:USDA-NRCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY NC, SHEETS 6 AND 7, DATED 1950. 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
SCALE: 1 inch = 2,000 feet DATE 11/15/2019 USDA-NRCS Published Soil FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY Survey of York County
2017-0469 JKM Matheson Avenue Streetscape
COORDINATES CHECKED BY: C A R O L I N A Mecklenburg County
35.245346, -80.812666 1 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Charlotte, North Carolina 5-1
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0469 Matheson Avenue\JD\ArcGIS\Figure5_Historicsoil.mxd

v Q CD
o�G c SS o
S 2
O
dao
qt- 1 �a
N TN on St
c q �a
o
N on St
TN
S\°° y W �9`
or gti
FtA Av
o/s9
�w QoQ\a�B` �2
�Ct`1°rs�
�tGrP� BerardAv
153 en and Av
P
l2 �'pe i s� NCH
NJ or
Berard Qr�\em
� •,� � o��SrQ�a
or5� c� m
rn (on
Or Ra O� �O w 1 v
FzO\\e� cr d'r 0 c)
oV�\Or
�G
GG2Ar �26�6
Fc,,�h r �L
rae�5
s� \eta
/
'v2 r�l � a`p d�`SO
gt
� ^a eta Gj'� GCS CjQ
t
L`�
c S
✓ordan
r�Sf
Char�esAv
5 ,a Pl
�Q�Ge
Charles
Av CharlesAv ,
P
e�
Math,,OnAv fee\
Leigh Av aches
Leigh Av qG
Woodside A,,
Legend
0
Project Limits (10 ac.)
S� ohs Qm
Ev
Park ' d
wOpdAv
Roads
Catawba �o
Av N
National Wetland Inventory
Ca �'
�fhd,
®Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Parkwood A� = Grace ° o
St
co (Z 65 a -
O c xz
00
Riverine
PJ
REFERENCE: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROVIDED BY UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, ACCESSED 2018. BACKGROUND LAYER(S) PROVIDED
65
Q)
vi°i OC
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2019.
N�
Q'
m v
SCALE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE:
11/21/2019
National Wetlands Inventory
FIGURE NO.
6
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2017-0469
JKM
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
of
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
C A R O L I N A
Mecklenburg County
35.245346,-80.812666
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0469 Matheson Avenue\JDWrcGIS\Figure6_NWl.mxd

1�
1 \
`• D�P4 e
�IU '
Perennial Stream C
105 If
'o
i
�� Wetland CC
Stream B �� o ♦ SCP3
0.01 ac.
Intermittent: 81
Perennial: 244 If
20 "9L
Perennial Stream A / I , • D1P3, \ / • DP5
(Little Sugar Creek)
76 If -` 1 Inch = 1004 et
Wetland BB /
0.06 ac.
�j Intermittent Stream D e
6 If
• DP1\
• e
'A SCP1\
0
DP2 \
1 inch = 20 feet
S C P 4 \ I`
Wetland AA \A`SCP2
0.01 ac.
\
CNgRLESq�F
�/
1 inch = 50 feet
o
Legend
�
co
Project Limits (10 ac.)
z C
O NgRIES
\/ co SA-
Q
o
Perennial Streams
jS
�Q
- - - Intermittent Streams
�O
® Wetlands
---- Pipes
Roads
\
i
Tax Parcels
✓ORpgNP�
*DP Data Point
/
♦ SCP Stream Classification Point
Indicates Flow
N Photo Location and Direction
/ /
REFERENCE:BACKGROUND GIs LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG
-720
COUNTY GIs DEPARTMENT, DATED 2019.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED
IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT CAPABLE GPS
UNIT BY CWS, INC., ON NOVEMBER 14, 2019. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE
yS 200 100 0
200 Feet
NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXTENT
CALCULATED IN GIs AND MAY NOT REFLECT COUNTY TAX PARCEL INFORMATION.
SCALE:
1 inch = 200 feet
DATE:
11/22/2019
Boundaries
FIGURE NO.
Jurisdictional
7
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Mecklenburg County
2017-0469
JKM
CAR ❑ L I N A
of
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
35.245346,-80.812666
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
7
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2017\2017 Consulting\2017 Projects\2017-0469 Matheson Avenue\JD\ArcGIS\Figure7_JD (2).mxd

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue Streetscape City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/14/19
Applicant/Owner: HDR Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): DJZ/JKM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.247706 Long:-80.814796 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions: Abnormally dry (according to NIDIS). Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional upland areas
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Ligustrum lucidum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Rosa multiflora
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Vitis rotundifolia
4. Smilax rotundifolia
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
_ 20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
5 Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 =
20 Yes UPL
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
25 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
15 No FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
30 Yes FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40 Yes FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 No FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 18
height.
15 Yes FACU
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
50% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: gravel fill
Depth (inches): 10
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue Streetscape City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/14/19
Applicant/Owner: HDR Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): DJZ/JKM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.247425 Long:-80.814667 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions: abnormally dry (according to NIDIS). Data point is representative of jurisdictional Wetland AA
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acer negundo
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex lurida
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Acer negundo
4. Vitis rotundifolia
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 28
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
_ 20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
5 Yes FAC
FAC species x 3 =
5 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
10 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
15 Yes OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
30 Yes FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5 No FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 No FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
55 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 11
height.
5 Yes FACU
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
66.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 2/2 97 7.5YR 4/4 3 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
7-20 10YR 4/2 60 7.5YR 4/6 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue Streetscape City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/14/19
Applicant/Owner: HDR Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): DJZ/JKM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.246367 Long:-80.813988 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions: abnormally dry (according to NIDIS). Data point is representative of jurisdictional Wetland BB
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (63) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1.
Betula nigra
5
Yes
FACW
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
2.
Cercis canadensis
5
Yes
FACU
FACU species 105 x 4 = 420
3.
Ailanthus altissima
10
Yes
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 205 (A) 580 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.83
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
_
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Carex lurida
50
Yes
OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Juncus effusus
30
No
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Persicaria pensylvanica 5 No FACW
4.
Rosa multiflora
10
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
Rubus argutus
50
Yes
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
Solidago altissima
10
No
FACU
height.
7.
Vernonia gigantea
10
No
FAC
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
165
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
83 20% of total cover:
33
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
33.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 2/2 97 7.5YR 4/4 3 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
7-20 10YR 4/2 60 7.5YR 4/6 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue Streetscape City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/14/19
Applicant/Owner: HDR Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): DJZ/JKM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.247876 Long:-80.814329 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions: abnormally dry (according to NIDIS). Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional upland areas
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
X Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 13
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acernegundo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Allium canadense
3. Toxicodendron radicans
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
40 Yes FAC
qu - I ULdl 1luVU1
20% of total cover:
8
20 Yes
FACU
3 No
FACU
3 No
FAC
20% of total cover: 6
5 No FACU
50 Yes FAC
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
66.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 4/3 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority. AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Matheson Avenue Streetscape City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 11/14/19
Applicant/Owner: HDR Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP5
Investigator(s): DJZ/JKM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.246367 Long:-80.813988 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan and Arents soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climatic/hydrologic conditions: abnormally dry (according to NIDIS). Data point is representative of jurisdictional Wetland CC
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (63) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Persicaria pensylvanica
10 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Lonicera japonica
8 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 5 Yes OBL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
23 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
12 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
3 No
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
3 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
2 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
66.7% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 2/2 97 7.5YR 4/4 3 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
7-20 10YR 4/2 60 7.5YR 4/6 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11
Date: 11/14/19
Project/Site:
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Latitude:
35.247542
Evaluator: DJZ JKM
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude:
-80.814671
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
22.5
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP1/ Stream B
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
9
Absent
Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
7
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
6_5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 A
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Obligate grasses in streambed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11
Date: 11/14/19
Project/Site:
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Latitude:
35.247334
Evaluator: DJZ JKM
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude:
-80.814554
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
30
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP2/Stream B
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
13
Absent
Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
9_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
7_5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
0.5
1
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 A
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11
Date: 11/14/19
Project/Site:
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Latitude:
35.247515
Evaluator: DJZ JKM
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude:
-80.814017
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
31
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Perennial
Other
Stream Name:
SCP3/Stream C
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
15
Absent
Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict flood lain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
0.5
1
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 A
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11
Date: 11/14/19
Project/Site:
Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Latitude:
35.24462
Evaluator: DJZ JKM
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude:
-80.81178
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
21
Stream Determination: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Intermittent
Other
Stream Name:
SCP4/Stream D
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
9_5
Absent
Weak Moderate Strong
1. Continuity of channel bed and bank*
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict flood lain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley0
0.5
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
7_5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
4
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
0.5
1
1
1 1.5
25. Algae
0 A
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Notes:
Sketch:

Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Photopage
December 4, 2019
CWS Project No. 2017-0469
- .i s: .car• :�.• �.., i-'_ ak �. ''.Y: -: n..:.Sr. ._: `'?; r
Yr 1• _ $•
3 - �sG -'��•r 1. ..
AN
�: rk ��^�•ril y
'�; 'r - ..gip .r�C{, - fq •; d- - � ,� , -
■ ` jy�
Photograph 1. View of Wetland AA, facing southeast.
Photograph 2. View of Wetland BB, facing southwest.
Photopage 1 of 5

. Yeti f �.,. rS-�' -. -'J Ss=� �r-� � 11f:s L Q.�;.^•
' .. .. :, An;.Z'°1%�;� - Wit:: �l:': �,. '..1.'•.r,.:..s; -:.were_-_
�'J-r _ '�•.~:.: ash, x' -
WM6�: r
Imo. - �4 .y � �l i•, E� � Fes_ _ ..
�::. �,��, .• ,ter' - `'� -

Matheson Avenue Streetscape
December 4, 2019
CWS Project No. 2017-0469
.rp 'Y •r p9 t!�
A.•: � v • �kA� ..J:s .'} e f��+.��I�r��� �'ry
.F�.'.i !' • i .. YV. � .•.JEr�.�. �-4y �.r-]Y�.YS�l9 �Sa7�
T_— n'IWO'
,... � '. .
'�j'f4.•i:.%j._,>.�,�ae :��'•r.,} ^-. :'x.-Yf:: en. �: .����.� Y
�� q�'. ._.. . tip, "si;M1�?-•::`j' _
Ay, tF a
Photograph 5. View of the intermittent section of Stream B, facing downstream.
_ f � • p �.��� 7.e RR I Y., y n .� ��iT ti
* i• y � ,°_ is •tij:.� ��.—. '::'�+1+'. iSi�i- ``�,�p
.sue - _ �. .�,a�,:• ���r? _''����'�' _ .
Mi�L�e µ �' p��:�+'?=.......+rya L'�'�'?ti �•.`_�:- �
��. ,. ��(s,''Yr �� :�r,•� � a`��:,,�i:��=. fig;. �Y
•INr /% - .Y• ...$� `-fir 1'-.'.: .
TO fO
Photograph 6. View of the perennial section of Stream B, facing downstream.
Photopage 3 of 5

Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Photopage
December 4, 2019
CWS Project No. 2017-0469
Photograph 7. View of Perennial Stream C, facing upstream.
Photograph 8. View of Intermittent Stream D, facing upstream.
Photopage 4 of 5

Matheson Avenue Streetscape
Photopage
December 4, 2019
CWS Project No. 2017-0469
�� . 5[ - � l _ Ci• �� I _ ..-.': � fir.-'.
. ..... Ak
�! f`1 .•..s;?R� e `i�A •�R.�. ten..
k-?:.*;;�"*'...
Photograph 9. View of non -jurisdictional upland area (DP1), facing northwest.
Photograph 10. View of non -jurisdictional upland area (DP4), facing northwest.
Photopage 5 of 5