Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutU-3825OF V H i F,?QG ? r ? y o June 5, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator NCDENR Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator elVd4li SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for SR 1365 (Stallings Road) from SR 1009 (Old Monroe Road) to US 74, Union County, F.A. Project MASTP-1365(1) State Project No. 8.2692601, TIP No. U-3825. State Clearinghouse Project 03-0333 In reply to your correspondence dated May 23, 2003 (received May 27, 2002) in which you requested comments for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that the following water resources in Hydrologic Unit 030712 will be impacted: Stream (Index) Water Quali Classification ¦ South Fork Crooked Creek (13-17-20-2) C; 303(d) list of impaired waters NC Division of Water Quality has the following comments: Environmental Documentation A. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. B. The letter was not specific as to the extent of the improvements to SR 1365 being contemplated. A quantitative analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project may be required. Design & Construction A. The DWQ requests that DOT adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled, "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0124) and use Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters (March 1997) throughout the design and construction of this project due to the presence of §303(d)-listed streams. B. Within the Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin, sedimentation and storm water runoff are major water quality concerns. In order to reduce sedimentation in receiving waters, same day seeding and mulching is strongly encouraged. Storm water runoff from the project should be designed to be directed to grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins or other site-appropriate means of receiving pre-treatment, rather than routed directly into streams. C. NCDOT shall be aware that local riparian buffer ordinances may apply to this project. NCDWQ is wnrking with TTninn (`nnntjr and Inca] onvarnmentc to di-Cie and imp lament ri arian hnffarc nn North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/ ivucnaei r. masiey, uovernor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality wa RAN intermittent and perennial streams as a result of the Monroe Bypass and Monroe Connector projects. D. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be removed from any water pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the stream. E. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow. F. Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules 115A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6) ), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules 11 5A NCAC 211.0506 (h)(3) }, the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation. G. Onsite wetland delineation shall be performed prior to permit approval. H. DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. 1. When practical, the DWQ requests that bridges be replaced on the existing location with road closure. If a detour proves necessary, remediation measures in accordance with the NCDWQ requirements for General 401 Certification No, 3366/Nationwide Permit No. 33 (Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering) must be followed. Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost: If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at (919) 733.5715. Attachment pc: Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office Chris Militscher, USEPA Marella Buncick, USFWS Marla Chambers, NCWRC Central Files File Copy 31' r ?o STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY GOVERNOR MEMORANDUM TO: May 8, 2003 NR is 14 LYNDO TIPPETT SECRETARY Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse Department of Administration MAY 2003 FEE(-E,`JED crelzry'S Cgke OCA - FROM: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. V / Environmental Management Director, PDEA SUBJECT: Stallings, Widening of SR 1365 (Stallings Road) from SR 1009 (Old Monroe Road) to US 74 (Independence Boulevard), Union County, State Project 8.2692601, TIP Project U-3825 The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch has begun studying the proposed improvements to SR 1365 (Stallings Road) .m deis scheduled is included i h 2004-2010 North Carolina Transportation Improvement P ogr acquisition in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2006 and construction in FFY 2008. The project proposes to widen SR 1365 (StaVladsRoad) t llings nn Union County. (Old Monroe Road) to US 74 (Independence Boule ) through S We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or approvals which maybe required by y onme t 1 Assessment. This document will be prepared in preparation of a federally funded Env> accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond by July 7, 2003 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this document. If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Jay McInnis, Project Development Unit Head, of this Branch at (919) T7844, Ext. 249. Please include the TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments. GJT/plr Attachment MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH W ILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH NC v FEET 0 1000 2000 0 200 400 600 METERS NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH SR 1365 (Stallings Road) SR 1009 to US 74 Union County TIP Project U-3825 OY vY.,,rRpG r O `C June 17, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator NCDENR Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator Gc>611,U SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for SR 1365 (Stallings Road) from SR 1009 (Old Monroe Road) to US 74, Union County, F.A. Project MASTP-1365(1) State Project No. 8.2692601, TIP No. U-3825. State Clearinghouse Project 03-0349. In reply to your correspondence dated June 4, 2003 (received June 5, 2002) in which you requested comments for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that the following water resources in Hydrologic Unit 030712 will be impacted: Stream (Index) South Fork Crooked Creek (13-17-20-2) Water Quality Classification C; 303(d) list of impaired waters NC Division of Water Quality has the following comments: Environmental Documentation 1. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. 2. The letter was not specific as to the extent of the improvements to SR 1365 being contemplated. A quantitative analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project may be required. Design & Construction 1. The DWQ requests that DOT adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled, "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0124) and use Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters (March 1997) throughout the design and construction of this project due to the presence of §303(d)- listed streams. 2. Within the Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin, sedimentation and storm water runoff are major water quality concerns. In order. to reduce sedimentation in receiving waters, same day seeding and mulching is strongly encouraged. Storm water runoff from the project should be designed to be directed to grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins or other site-appropriate means of receiving pre-treatment, rather than routed directly into streams. 3. NCDOT shall be aware that local riparian buffer ordinances may apply to this project. NCDWQ is working with Union County and local governments to design and implement riparian buffers on intermittent and i arannial straamc cx,ithi-n cPVPraI lnral uiatarcharlc ac n rasnlt of rmm?lativr+ impart rnnrerne N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) (919) 733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands) Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748 -„ . William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director Division of Water Quality 4. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be removed from any water pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the stream. 5. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow. 6. Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 211.0506(b)(6) 1, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3) 1, the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation. 7. Onsite wetland delineation shall be performed prior to permit approval. 8. DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. 9. When practical, the DWQ requests that.bridges be replaced on the existing location with road closure. If a detour proves necessary, remediation measures in accordance with the NCDWQ requirements for General 401 Certification No. 3366/Nationwide Permit No. 33 (Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering) must be followed. Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at (919) 733.5715. Attachment pc: Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office Chris Militscher, USEPA Marella Buncick, USFWS Marla Chambers, NCWRC Central Files File Copy f w ?5CA7ro STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LYNDO TIPPETT MICHAEL F. EASLEY SECRETARY GOVERNOR ??121314 May 8, 2003 Q?0 ?6f, MAY 2003 REEVED ?cretary's p{Sce Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director MEMORANDUM TO: 00A State Clearinghouse , Department of Administration Zl? FROM: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director, PDEA SUBJECT: Stallings, Widening of SR 1365 (Stallings Road) from SR 1009 (Old Monroe Road) to US 74 (Independence Boulevard), Union County, State Project 8.2692601, TIP Project U-3825 -- The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch has begun studyinthe proposed improvements to SR 1365 (Stallings Road). The project is included i the w 004-2010 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled or right way acquisition in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2006 and construction in FFY 2008. The project proposes to widen SR 1365 (Stallings Road) oSm linl sn Union County. 'Old Monroe Road) to US 74 (Independence Boulevard) through g We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or ents will the approvals which maybe required by your agntal Assessment?This documentused will be prepared in preparation of a federally funded Environm accordance with the National Environmental Policy Ache It esirable at your agent ency respond by July 7, 2003 so that your comments can be used in preparation If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Jay McInnis, Project Development Unit Head, of this Branch at (919) 733-7844, Ext. 249. Please include the TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments. GJT/plr Attachment MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH NC WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG a{;-? FEET 0 1000 2000 0 200 400 600 METERS NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS o PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH SR 1365 (Stallings Road) SR 1009 to US 74 Union County TIP Project U-3825 \ NA rF Michael F. Easley, Governor O R William G. Ross Jr., Secretary QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ?r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality O `C November 12, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch FROM: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator G0011610 SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for SR 1365 (Stallings Road) from SR 1009 (Old Monroe Road) to US 74, Union County, F.A. Project MASTP-1365(1) State Project No. 8.2692601, TIP No. U-3825. In reply to your correspondence dated November 1, 2002 (received November 7, 2002) in which you requested comments for the referenced project, preliminary analysis of the project indicates that the following water resources in Hydrologic Unit 030712 will be impacted: Stream (Index) Water Quality Class cation ¦ South Fork Crooked Creek (13-17-20-2) C; 303(d) list of impaired waters NC Division of Water Quality has the following comments: Environmental Documentation A. The environmental document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. B. An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project may be required. Design & Construction A. The DWQ requests that DOT adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled, "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0124) and use Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters (March 1997) throughout the design and construction of this project due to the presence of 303(d)-listed streams. B. Within the Yadkin-Pee Dee Basin, sedimentation and stormwater runoff are major concerns. In order to reduce sedimentation in receiving waters, same day seeding and mulching is strongly encouraged. Stormwater should be directed to grassed swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes or retention basins rather than routed directly into streams. C. NCDOT shall be aware that local riparian buffer ordinances may apply to this project. NCDWQ is working with Union County and local governments to design and implement riparian buffers on intermittent and perennial streams as a result of the Monroe Bypass and Connector projects (see attarhmPn4 A AN North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ D. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be removed from any water pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the stream. E. Do not use any machinery in the stream channels unless absolutely necessary. Do not remove vegetation from the stream bank unless it is absolutely necessary. Avoid removing large trees and undercut banks. If large, undercut trees must be removed, then cut the trunks and leave the stumps and root systems in place to minimize damage to stream banks. F. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow. G. Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be chosen. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values.. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 214.0506 (h)(3) }, the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation. H. Onsite wetland delineation shall be performed prior to permit approval. I. DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. I When practical, the DWQ requests that bridges be replaced on the existing location with road closure. If a detour proves necessary, remediation measures in accordance with the NCDWQ requirements for General 401 Certification. No. 3366/Nationwide Permit No. 33 (Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering) must be followed. Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at (919) 733.5715. Attachment pc: Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office Chris Militscher, USEPA Marella Buncick, USFWS Marla Chambers, NCWRC Central Files File Copy JIM RESOLUTION OF AGREEMENT BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONROE BYPASS PROJECT AND THE EXTENSION PROJECT TO THE CHARLOTTE OUTER. LOOP R-2002-43 .-WHEREAS, the City. of Monroe supports. the development and improvement of existing and proposed roadways serving Monroe and Union County; and, WHEREAS, the City of Monroe recognizes the importance of the Monroe Bypass (TIP R-2559) and the Extension Project to the Charlotte Outer Loop (TIP R- 3329) for the transportation network serving Monroe and Union County; and, WHEREAS, the 'North .Carolina Division of Water. Quality, as part, of the environmental approvals for Monroe Bypass and the future Extension Project to the Charlotte Outer Loop, is required to issue a 401 Water Quality Certification; and, WHEREAS, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality has indicated that local responsible governments .will need to indicate their willingness to work with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to develop and adopt additional water. quality protection measures and, in turn, will be able to. issue the 401 Water Quality Certification. NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Monroe hereby agrees to work with the . North Carolina Division of Water. Quality to develop and implement mechanisms within the impact area of those projects which address, to the satisfaction of the Director of the. North Carolina Division of ' . Water Quality,. the following items: I. Stream Buffers; :. II. - On-site Stormwater:Management; III. Enhanced Sedimentation and Erosion Control from Construction. The City of Monroe agrees to work with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to properly adopt these mechanisms within six (6) months of.. written approval of the final mechanisms by the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water. Quality. . The City of Monroe understands that in return the North Carolina Division of Water Quality agrees that cumulative impact issues concerning these projects are adequately addressed and that the North Carolina Division of Water Quality will then issue the required 401 Water Quality Certifications for the Monroe Bypass and Extension projects. Adopted this l" day of October 2002. JIM RESOLUTION OF AGREEMENT BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MONROE BYPASS PROJECT AND THE EXTENSION PROJECT TO THE CHARLOTTE OUTER LOOP R-2002-43 WHEREAS, the City of Monroe supports the development and improvement of existing and proposed roadways serving Monroe and Union County; and, WHEREAS, the City of Monroe recognizes the importance of the Monroe Bypass (TIP R-2559) and the Extension Project to the Charlotte Outer Loop (TIP R- 3329) for the transportation network serving Monroe and Union County; and, WHEREAS, the North . Carolina Division of Water. Quality, as .part of the environmental approvals for Monroe Bypass and the future Extension Project to the Charlotte Outer Loop, is required to issue a 401 Water Quality Certification; and, WHEREAS, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality has indicated that local responsible governments will need to indicate their willingness to work with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to develop and adopt additional water. quality protection measures and, in turn, will be able to. issue the 401 Water Quality Certification.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Monroe hereby agrees to-work with the North Carolina Division of Water. Quality to develop and implement mechanisms within the impact area of those projects which address, to the satisfaction of the Director of the North. Carolina Division of Water Quality, the following items: I. Stream Buffers; II. On-site Stormwater Management; III. Enhanced Sedimentation and Erosion Control from Construction. .The City of Monroe agrees to work with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to properly adopt these mechanisms within six (6) months of written approval of the final mechanisms by the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The City of Monroe understands that in return the North Carolina Division of Water Quality agrees that cumulative impact issues concerning these projects are adequately addressed and that the North Carolina Division of Water Quality will then issue the required 401 Water Quality Certifications for the Monroe Bypass and Extension projects. Adopted this l" day of October 2002. /nF M Attest: (18 t. AV 44 . Judy L. Davis, Mayor r COP Y eanne M. Deese, City Clerk R-2002-43 r STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA MICHAEL F. EASLEY GOVERNOR November 1, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele Division of Water Quality/Wetlands FROM: for 'Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. #4, Environmental Management Director, PDEA LYNDo Tip--Pl SECRETARY SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for SR 1365 (Stallings Road), from SR 1009 (Old Monroe Road) to US 74, Union County, Division 10, F. A. Project No. MASTP-1365(1), State Project No. 8.2692601 - - Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the subject project (see attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this project is scheduled for ,-vb 22 at 1:30 PM in the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date. ? g Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Ben Upshaw, Project Development Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 252. Please include the TIP Project Number in all correspondence and comments. GJT/plr, Attachment G MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH INC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH INC PROJECT SCOPING SHEET TIP # U-3 825 PROJECT # 8.2692601 F.A. PROJECT # MASTP-1365 (1) DIVISION: 10 COUNTY: Union ROUTE: SR 1365 (Stallings Road) FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: Urban Collector LENGTH: 1.4 miles Date: November 4, 2002 Revision Date: Project Development Stage Programming ® Planning ? Design PURPOSE OF PROJECT: The purpose of this project is to improve the safety and traffic carrying capacity of the existing roadway. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (INCLUDING SPECIFIC LIMITS) AND MAJOR ELEMENTS OF WORK: It is proposed to widen the existing 2-lane portion of SR 1365 from SR 1009 to US 74 to multilanes. TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT TO BE PREPARED: Environmental Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCHEDULE: EA-May 2004 FONSI-Feb. 2005 WILL THERE BE SPECIAL FUNDING PARTICIPATION BY MUNICIPALITY, DEVELOPERS, OR OTHERS? Yes ? No IF YES, BY WHOM AND AMOUNT: ($)N/A, or (%) HOW AND WHEN WILL THIS BE PAID? N/A PROJECT SCOPING SHEET TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL: Full D Partial [] None NUMBER OF: Interchanges: 0 Grade Separations: 0 Stream Crossings: 1 TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY: Existing: 2-lane, with grass shoulders Proposed: 4-lane raised median or 5-lane, with curb & gutter TRAFFIC (ADT): Current (2002): 11,200 Design Year (2025): 18,400 (16,400 with proposed Monroe Connector) % TTST 3 DUAL 3 DHV 10 DESIGN STANDARDS APPLICABLE: AASHTO ® 3R DESIGN SPEED: 50 mph (81 kin/h) CURRENT COST ESTIMATE: Construction Cost (including engineering and contingencies) 4-Lane Alternate ..................... $ 5-Lane Alternate ..................... $ (Both estimates include the cost of bicycle lanes.) 6,200,000 4,800,000 Right of Way Cost (including relocation, utililities and acquisition) ...... ............ $ 800,000 (TIP) Force Account Items ........................... $ Preliminary Engineering ......................... $ Total Cost: 4-Lane Alternate ........................... $ 7,000,000 5-Lane Alternate ........................... $ 5,600,000 TIP COST ESTIMATE: Construction .................................. $ 3,000,000 Right of Way .................................. $ 800,000 TOTAL TIP COST ESTIMATE .................. $ 3,800,000 r THE ABOVE SCOPING INFORMATION HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: INIT. DATE INIT. DATE Highway Design Board of Tran. Member Roadway Board of Tran. Member Structure Dir. Plan. & Prog. Design Services Dep. Admin.-Preconst. Geotechnical Chief Engineer-Oper. Hydraulics Secondary Roads Off. Loc. & Surveys Construction Branch Photogrammetry Roadside Environmental Prel. Est. Engr. Maintenance Branch Planning & Envir. Bridge Maintenance Right of Way Statewide Planning R/W Utilities Division Engineer Traffic Engineering Bicycle Coordinator Project Management Program Development County Manager FHWA City/Municipality Dept. of Cult. Res. Others Dept. of EH & NR Others Others Scoping Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engineer for handling. IF YOU ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH PROPOSED PROJECT OR SCOPING, NOTE YOUR PROPOSED REVISIONS BELOW AND INITIAL AND DATE AFTER COMMENTS. f' ,C 1420 141 Z 142: i i i i c ?s+ 1367 74 A8 END PROJECT 1365 ?A o? F WE' T /' EIR ; ,?P ' o ? OOGS do S?iT 5? 0 ? 1419 T y o EARS '', 9< < ` /6B? Qq? 1366 w ? 0 1460 i ', ? ?? 0y \ 40 0 1365 ---- -\ \ .--- 2833 77 w ` BEGIN PROJECT 2830 ;290 \ 361 o / I cr 1009 2905 I ` 2832 T 9y?? 1367 900 q •8? \ 1 \ \ \ \ FEET 0 1000 2000 0 200 400 600 METERS ls, F? S