HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180785 Ver 1_More Info Received_20200424Strickland, Bev
From: Tim Morris <Tim.Morris@kci.com>
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 3:15 PM
To: Davis, Erin B
Cc: Haupt, Mac; Kim Browning; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Dow, Jeremiah
J; Xu, Lin
Subject: [External] RE: Hip Bone Restoration Site - Request for Additional Information
Attachments: KCI Planting Addendum for Hip Bone 2020.04.24.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
report.spam@nc.gov
Erin — Attached is our response to your comments. Let me know if you have any questions.
From: Davis, Erin B [mailto:erin.davis@ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 2:14 PM
To: Tim Morris <Tim.Morris@kci.com>
Cc: Haupt, Mac <mac.haupt@ncdenr.gov>; Kim Browning <Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV
USARMY CESAW (US) <Todd.J.Tugwell@usace.army.mil>; Dow, Jeremiah J <jeremiah.dow@ncdenr.gov>; Xu, Lin
<lin.xu@ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Hip Bone Restoration Site - Request for Additional Information
Ti m,
In reviewing your letter response to agency comments for the Hip Bone Restoration Site, DWR is concerned with your
answers to comments 12b and 13 and the precedent that they could set.
DWR is requesting additional information in order to issue the 401 permit approval. Please provide a brief addendum to
be attached to the previously submitted final mitigation plan that addresses the following:
1. Please provide at least one target community type for the proposed planting areas. Identifying a target
community is a common practice to aid in the selection of appropriate plant species for a restoration planting
plan. Additionally, observing whether a mitigation site is trending towards a target community is a consideration
in evaluating site success. 'Target community' is referenced in the 2016 NCIRT Mitigation Guidance Update
(IV.A. pg.4; V.A.6. pg.5; XII.C. pg.26).
2. Please provide an updated planting list that includes all desirable species that you are requesting to count
towards stem density and vigor success. The 2016 NCIRT Mitigation Guidance Update states that: "For any tree
stem to count toward success for standard 1 or 2, it may be either planted or volunteer, but it must be a species
from the approved planting list included in the Mitigation Plan. Other species not included on the planting list
may be considered by the IRT on a case -by -case basis." Please note that since black walnut is a allelopathic
species and could have a negative impact on establishment of planted stems and site diversity, we would not
consider it a desirable restoration species.
Please email the addendum to me and cc Mac, Kim and Todd. Once received we will continue processing the 401 permit
application. Note that we are not requesting re -submittal of the final mitigation plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Many thanks,
Erin
Erin B. Davis, PWS
Stream & Wetland Mitigation Specialist
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-3684 office
erin.davisa-ncdenr.gov
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
ISO 9001:201 S CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783-9266
Date: April 24, 2020
To: Erin Davis, NCDWR
CC: Kim Browning, USACE
Jeremiah Dow, NCDMS
Mac Haupt, NCDMS
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Lin Xu, NCDMS
From: Tim Morris, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Subject: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Planting Addendum — Response to NCDWR 401 Permit Comments
Cape Fear River Basin - 03030003
Chatham County, North Carolina
DEQ Contract No. #7528
DMS Project #100059
USACE AID #: SAW-2018-01160
We received your follow-up questions about the Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site Mitigation Plan in
relation to the 401 permit application and our previous response to IRT comments from 3/17/2020. Please
see our most current responses below.
Mac Haupt and Erin Davis, NCDWR:
12. Page 26, Section 6.8
b. Please identify target communities.
KCI Response 311712020
In general, we prefer not to designate a specified community type since a site can generally not
be converted to that community within the timeframe of monitoring. We do select trees that are
in line with the surrounding community types, though.
DWR Response 4/23/2020
Please provide at least one target community type for the proposed planting areas. Identifying a
target community is a common practice to aid in the selection of appropriate plant species for a
restoration planting plan. Additionally, observing whether a mitigation site is trending towards a
target community is a consideration in evaluating site success. "Target community' is
referenced in the 2016 NCIRT Mitigation Guidance Update (IV.A. pg.4; V.A.6. pg.5; XII.C. pg.26).
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KC.COM
KCI Amended Response 412412020
We propose to restore a Piedmont Alluvial Forest as described in Schafale 2012. This community
type will cover the riparian and floodplain zones of the project streams with a mixture of alluvial
and upland species, with distribution varying from the drier, upper ranges of the site to lower,
broader floodplains.
13. Page 30, Vegetation Performance — Note that only volunteer species that are included on the
approved mitigation plan plant list may count toward the vegetation performance standard.
KCI Response 311712020
We added: "Volunteers that are included on the approved mitigation plan plant list must be present for
a minimum of two growing seasons before being included in performance standards in Year 5 and Year
7." Additionally we added an extra list of native trees that could be used for substitutes or seen as
desirable volunteers. This text reads, "Other native desirable species that have the potential to volunteer
at the site or be used for planting substitutions towards the performance standard include other native
oaks (Quercus sp.), native Celtis species (Celtis sp.), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), native hickories
(Carya sp.), native dogwoods (Cornus sp.), native elms (Ulmus sp.), black walnut (Juglans nigra), native
Nyssa species (Nyssa sp.), and cottonwood (Populus deltoides)."
DWR Response 4/23/2020
Please provide an updated planting list that includes all desirable species that you are requesting to count
towards stem density and vigor success. The 2016 NCIRT Mitigation Guidance Update states that: "For
any tree stem to count toward success for standard 1 or 2, it may be either planted or volunteer, but it
must be a species from the approved planting list included in the Mitigation Plan. Other species not
included on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case -by -case basis." Please note that since
black walnut is a allelopathic species and could have a negative impact on establishment of planted stems
and site diversity, we would not consider it a desirable restoration species.
KCI Amended Response 412412020
Updated Tree List (Planted plus anticipated volunteers)
Buckeye
Aesculus sylvatica
FAC
River Birch
Betula nigra
FACW
American Hornbeam
Carpinus caroliniana
FAC
Pignut Hickory
Carya glabra
FACU
Shagbark Hickory
Carya ovata
FACU
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
FACW
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
FACW
Flowering Dogwood
Cornus florida
FACU
American Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
FAC
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
FACU
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
FAC
American Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
FACW
Cottonwood
Populus deltoides
FAC
White Oak
Quercus alba
FACU
Southern Red Oak
Quercus falcata
FACU
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWw.KCI.COM
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
FACW
Pin Oak
Quercus palustris
FACW
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
FAC
Northern Red Oak
Quercus rubra
FACU
Winged Elm
Ulmus alata
FACU
American Elm
Ulmus americana
FACW
Slippery Elm
Ulmus rubra
FAC
Sincerely,
Tim Morris
Project Manager
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KCI.COM