Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070461 Ver 1_401 Application_20070320FILE COPY North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 3 ~ Project: }-~Q,W~Y'r1 S~ Latitude: Evaluator: ~~ Site: G - (~` Z, Longitude: Total Points: Other Stream is at least intermittent ~ County: G ~h ~ `~, if ? f 9 or erennial if 2 30 e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomor hol0 (Subtotal = h~ ) Absent Weak Moderate Str 1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 5. Active/relic floodplain 0 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 7. Braided channel , 0 1 2 8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 9 a Natural levees 1 2 10. Headcuts 0 2 11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 5 12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5 13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence. , No ~ Yes = 3 a Man-made ditches are not rated; se(e~discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ` ~ ~ ) 14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3 16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5 18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1. C. Biology (Subtotal = ~ ~ ~ ) 20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0 21b. Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0 22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 23. Bivalves 1 2 3 24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 t 1.5 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3 28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5 29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 ° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Sketch: Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 Date: 31 ~ Project: ~ ~h5 Latitude: Evaluator: ~ Site: Longitude: Total Points: Other Stream is at least intermittent County: ~ ~ t~ e.g. Quad Name: if >_19 or erennial if ?30 'C t/1V1 A. Geomor hol0 (Subtotal = ) Absent Weak Moderate. Strong 1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 9 a Natural. levees 0 1 2 3 10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5 13. Second or greater order channel on existing. USGS or NRCS map or other documented evidence.. No = 0 Yes = 3 ° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual R Hvrtrnlnnv (Suhtntal = 1 14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3 15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3 ~ 16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 C_ Bioloav (Subtotal = 1 20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0 21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0 22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3 24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5 27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3 28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5 29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0 "Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland.plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants. Sketch: Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) s ~~~ ~ v~~ v 03 121 CL ..\ \\ 104 TT CH --~ ` LEGEND _ JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS /PONDS THAT ARE ALSO NOTES: ~~i~~-~~- SUBJECT TO THE NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES 1.) THE DESIGNATION AND LIMITS OF THESE FEATURES MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE NORTH ._ _ ,_ F JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS THAT ARE NOT SUBJECT CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY. TO THE NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS FLAGGED WITH CENTERLINE j/" JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS A DRAINAGE DESIGNATIONS CL CENTERLINE TT TIE TO CH CHANNEL PL PROPERTY LINE 2.) THE LOCATIONS OF THESE FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATE AND DEPICTED HERE TO FACILITATE SURVEYING. THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL /ISOLATED WATERS OF THE US. 3.) STREAM CHANNELS WITH A CLEAR BED AND BANK WERE NOT FLAGGED. SURVEYORS NEED TO LOCATE THE CENTER LINE OF THESE STREAM CHANNELS AT EACH BEND OR MEANDER AND NOTE THE WIDTH OF THE CHANNEL AT EACH POINT. GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 300' 300' 0 300' 600' ....N.... SURFACE WATERS AND WETLANDS EVALUATION MAP DATE: 03-12-07 • •• SCALE: 1" = 300' w E'~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. HAWTHORN SUBDIVISION PHASE II DRAWNBY: TMB 308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 PANARA DEVELOPMENT CHK'D BY: JAB . S Telephone (919) 841-9977- Fax (919) 841-9909 CREEDMOOR, GRANVILLE COUNTY, NC PROJECT #: 7124 FIGURE #: 3