U-4444

• ? O?O? W AT
co
>
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 26, 2006
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, NC DENR
From: Rob Ridings, NC DWQ Transportation Permitting Unit
Through: John Hennessy, NC DWQ Transportation Permitting Un j..
Subject: Scoping comments on proposed improvements to NC 210 in Cumberland County,
Federal Aid Project No. STP-210(11), State Project No. 36492, TIP No. U-4444,
DENR Clearinghouse No. 07-0086.
Reference your correspondence dated September 11, 2006 in which you requested comments for the
referenced project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to
perennial streams and jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. More specifically, impacts to:
Stream Name River Basin and
Subbasin Stream
Classifications Stream Index
Number
Cross Creek, Texas
Pond, Smith Lake, CPF 15 WS-TV 18-27-(1)
& UTs
Little Cross Creek, WS-IV
Bonnie Doone Lake, CPF 15 *303(d) Listed 18-27-4-(1)
& UTs
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Quality requests that NCDOT consider the following environmental issues for the
proposed project:
Project Specific Comment:
1. Little Cross Creek and Bonnie Doone Lake are class WS-1V; 303(d) waters of the State. DWQ
is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. DWQ
recommends that the most protective sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce
the risk of nutrient runoff to these waters. DWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment
of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most recent version
of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices.
No ehCarolin
Transportation Permitting Unit
atura!!y
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncvvetlands
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
General Project Comments:
1. The environmental documents and permit applications should provide a detailed and itemized
presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If
mitigation is necessary as required by 15A NCAC 211.0506(h), it is preferable to present a
conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. Appropriate
mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. Environmental assessment alternatives should consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives should include road designs
that allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed
in the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as grassed
swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
3. Prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded
that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and
streams) to the maximum extent practical. In accordance with the Environmental Management
Commission's Rules {1 5A NCAC 211.05 06(h)), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater
than 1 acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be
designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program may be available for use as wetland mitigation.
4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules ( 15A NCAC
211.0506(h)), mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed
to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may
be available for use as stream mitigation.
5. DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
NC DOT should address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the
aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
6. If a bridge is being replaced with a hydraulic conveyance other than another bridge, DWQ
believes the use of a Nationwide Permit may be required. Please contact the US Army Corp of
Engineers to determine the required permit(s).
7. If an old bridge is removed, no discharge of bridge material into surface waters is allowed unless
otherwise authorized by the US ACOE. Strict adherence to the Corps of Engineers guidelines for
bridge demolition will be a condition of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
8. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
9. Whenever possible, the DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
require work within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel
realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges allow for human and
wildlife passage beneath the structure, do not block fish passage and do not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
10. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater should be directed
across the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed
scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current
version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices.
11. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct
contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured
concrete should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and
possible aquatic life and fish kills.
12. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species should be planted. When using temporary structures the area
should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or
other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-
vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
13. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and
20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low
flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result
in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream
of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock
or other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be
required.
14. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they should be designed to mimic natural stream cross
section as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where
appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the
inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition
that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
15. If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work
is approved under General 401 Certification Number 3494/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
16. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
17. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise
approved by NC DWQ. Approved BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT
Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and
other diversion structures should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
18. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands and streams.
19. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands
in borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
20. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of
Wetland Significance (NC-CREWS) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent
inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit
approval.
21. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams.
This equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface
waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
22. In most cases, the DWQ prefers the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
and restored to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted
with native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas.
23. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner
that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly
designed, sized and installed.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact Rob Ridings at [phone].
cc: Richard Spencer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Clarence Coleman, Federal Highway Administration
Dr. Gregory Thorpe, NCDOT PDEA
James Rerko, Division 6 Environmental Officer
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office copy
File Copy
1y 5TATEo
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GovERNoR
Mr. Rob Ridings
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1716
Dear Mr. Ridings,
SUBJECT: Start of Study for Improvements to NC 210, From NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard) in
Spring Lake to the Proposed Fayetteville Outer Loop, Cumberland County, TIP Project
U-4444
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is starting the project development,
environmental and engineering studies for the proposed widening and improvements to NC 210
(Murchison Road) from NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard) in Spring Lake to the Proposed Fayetteville
Outer Loop (TIP Project X-2) in Cumberland County. The project is included in the 2006-2012 North
Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 2008 and
construction in fiscal year 2009.
Attached for your review is a project vicinity map. We would appreciate any information you
might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable,
please identify any permits or approvals that may be required by your agency. In order to ensure your
comments are included, we would appreciate your response by October 20, 2006.
It is anticipated that a federally funded Environmental Assessment will be prepared for this
project. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Jay McInnis, Project Engineer, of
this Branch at [phone], Ext. 249. Please include the TIP project number in all correspondence and
comments.
Sincerely,
n
i3f `11(? ?
!For egory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
September 5, 2006
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
n

?
iSpring I
24 "Lake
t
210
87
Pve"
\r9,

Fort Bragg
" Military Reservation
?
J ? `
?
... / E i -f •
_?.
.._. _ ..............

Fort Bragg °??
Military Reservation
Honeycutt Rd '\

LO

?0

.. ,
24
?

87 210 Fayetteville

N
W E
Limits of Project
s Study Corridor
Fort Bragg Military
Miles Reservation
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Boundary
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
%
r {•r
M 3 S '!' j Y 4r f -' - l ?, ?t I r '` • 1 , ?,'// _ %?- j1 '1.Jr "' ?'1 %i. ,? - A ``? t4
r.y . 4.-' l ,l ' ?? 4 .-i 'lr \ 4c,; r y 'r ` t ,I
i/ JJ l
1 r J rt //
1, , _,? i, O " ? /
- ?) ri? -,r - 24 ' y: ; . ,)???, "1 .,.,( r ? ???%%% , ti"`_?,, T-' i ,?? iI _ fc - ,., -/r
Q,x _ j V _ i Imo` t 1 )' ) u? ' `
- ,d l
l .lam ?? A\ 'b' :fib41sr o 1"J r' -J . )J),i,,.. ' /
?. ?? . I ?t r ' ?' / / /- '. - f !r'' V 1 11
?," - '_
':ice, t, /-,`07 '.` l? ?J \:, 5- r/ 1v .,j}"',? .,?::r / r ?S \ .'I ?:??. ~``
210 A
\ ! r? q
. ,
f, y t r , .,f 1 ,/ ,
?ejll
I k 4 ? r 1 ' _- ' u? t' 1/ 1
'.,, ?? 1 •:.1 f-'?rji. •'t C:... •?? ?;VI ?F - S .` 7 r ,1;/i ?,•^, .,,?? 1"??
S 4 n -ti i ti ?? i - 1/ . , ?? r) .
?_, "
3" 1 , I -.
1 ' `\
"'t, ti I ,, ???.?; i'? .: d , I.? "? 1 --I i1r _ ? :'4i / t V ' ,'iJ - '?. ? V i ?{ I '{ /''r' t o -?- -, - , T?;?. , , 7- ?v l"?-?< 1 ?."? ll?' b t+ a/`? ;:t f ?`j ??? "I7„', , 11Y , V f Y ; 1-.
-- ,. , t f .- s' f' w ° A { - j 1 ` + f Ala / i, fj ! ?l 1
f ?.
?? k Y ' ,
--
,t
r.
,, %?' ? .ir, "I ?
rr? 4 f! t , it ?t r. .l ! ?1l, rr? - 'j? n i rte` - t._.? :.
\ a ti r ! > i- . i, \ r/ C, ','I } I f , t 'S.J .1 -+?,1, i'1 , 7 r -K,?_?.? cif
.ter, , / Y - ?' .
w? i?/) i, - - I ?? - ?? li \v rI ? l 1?{ l/ . 1(?/1 Pv ,/ r % _ o i. F-
b t \ r,\ k .t ??? _ /
w.
, , , - - ? "?? , ? -?-? 4fi B-E- I ? I ,? I ?, ' r, }p j ? 1 I Y,` 1 _ T 1 hrs. ?> _? `?- ?? /, I
/ _ \
#; v !Jy! ' '.' I ^"??' ,z 413 - v/ - j'1 -? ` .`; ,, _ { ~'t-"I J /' i') t (?.' F?
y„ , '<?.k r rl !' I" n, t? V .> -. ?' 11 :_?'"f-,_" , L _ t<r r `":L r ??:? ?c. _ ter. ,? - ?
r _i,pi 1 ?_"' )ltrr r ?} \---,I- \. 1,,1 t? ^, - .,fir
,.+? l
j // (j 'L -L - I -, 4L`, ., - . ?r f t 3un?,dcan A3 , ?\ `_--- ? " CI ?
I f. 11 ?.
o
I
11 ?W-At A ??l ? . , I 4 ' ! i'i ' ?1 S f.J ?: .r /r', _ r _? , I, _ %'?i °i ? tit c ?'? 1 1, IL f
11
( ? 1 Z -
t _?
?. l S f
'C ?/ , i - r.? Ex `4 " ?? ? f }
y 1
.. \ ; ''.,?' ?' .'' , J1. If i l yk....... al 1 i, ..(t J lit 1 f / ,-_`_ ',.. ' 7? t !? /•''
1 l ,y-? I
,Tntl", ` r` t+ Y'tiiYiilf L C . ' rf / t1', N`
t J. =U ?I `•tlSy r ,b 1Vit 11/1{7{5 1fk14111 1f 11 Ik"N?? - ?? ?./
?I 7 s"-- y, L, ;D tl?? ! L Y`S lIS Y4.....1 }'tI` iwlt t`, -,- ??? O _. ?? _ r '? f ` 1\ I _ _ ?}
? ?q i• ?1 li tkt1 - 11 y'. ' _ :'n 1 _ ?o '
_?
.1 1 r
E i , - ?? )
C9 ?? -
* \) '1 x
r _ I _ ?`
}
_ , 4
, :.. - . It 1 - __ 111k w
..
i
1'!. x"-- c ^{?Y,-?V t• .j}.. r,?.. F'`t c,t k4s?41tktkil ?, liiii^-; r,'5, ' `h` ??../? -} I r.. 11 {_. r;._. ;-ill , ;f" I ?• .. . ?[? ?. i ?q?t{ 9t[ti ,n41i
Y1t ?kk Lul tti t,I_. ^ ?" -' I,_ :'j"
.i a., -?.? -..., r . - ? ,.: LLi1S1i17Y 1115Q 141l1i Yi54tYK, (,i ?_ j 11 ??
{r 1t 7l
.
3 r m ?' r?
{ - I ' i? ' ? tip o f
.
r ,yII _ 1? ?? i_,_?? ?,
'? -
. r. ...
-. dfr
t
?.I -?- \ -I ` i1+ u, f-?..? '. + t ? 1,??F;. t' l\ .nV? r. ??.?r0\ jy -__ I .+?
t?
}s' ??? 1 "r ?`\?v. ? 1_
r
a
I Mll? L I .
r `
- __ - ,? ? _'?' _- . ? I
` F '`
;'
?? `v /r s ?t i j i / \ / YS, . ? ' ? E /I
-"^t _ - ...? ?? ? , - ?( ,
. . ? ' ?L?, ? 1 L? . . ,; ? - . , , , " I ,?- I ? , ?k ?. }L. / - ? " _ ? ? sc7 V '.? .`,, ????-? ?Y /
j 1 ", ) - ,_
„a t• 4 t _
_
/ p?? 11 _j?
RfiS1. ; mwy` ).. mow'. ;,, ,/ ) _ k ., `•,•>` 1 ,,J / o r ' '' Sl-_. ?? ?-
?*` i t r' ( { C; /`? ?] Y i?? + t
k ' ? I ! i !. 5 x.11`' y ? ..t. i, ,;. t. 1? "`--''\ ?, 1 \__ l j , 1 t :.': ` I , i, L t} -
?,-,,1 r 4?? `,F j? 1\ l? °? I`.? ` I,?' L ?"., ., q _ , ^r.'' };, / 1 l ,?.,
d ? 4} 1 r, `f :_'I , --",•... +4 1 1•,? j", I _ ` ?1R ?r ?' i r•4 j, ,?.`t a ?- ; / 1?r '+ :..
I 11 hrv a f> - r? - 5 LGrli np `?? it i .,:. "? ., ? f .d (" '"-` ?i .!.1 _ .$ ?,, ` s ' ;_ .
+?
.u'-'` •• Iw-...: a .. - ^ l.. j `?,f'.;;: r' a l ?rl 1 ., h.'" - , `'`{ }`\?\ ?.-* Fem. %
„• t : "' '
] >`?, `?,: d f, ?
L yT Grt r a ? i
•_ a k 1-. lyi = a w e p y- ?}' r, ` _r y a .* / I f 1 c. J F°
/{tt'1 -g _ a .> i\ r - I ?`"l. .j?/? .1f`k\ Ufa Y! I i':A-. I I- ?.G.J {??1'"'.r ,
r. \ , J
? - , ?? ) 6 I * - -, - - .
, , I ?? - ', ,., ,
7 y
t 3 - ` _ - " .?- ?-"a_-`.. _?` , 1 ,(te { r _
_? uLj w - x"'? 13 r2.r{te a
3t e' } .,: { ?? -C y P
) '? }2 87 l " ? , ? /1, I , , ,-,-? I f?'/ , ' Y `
, ?/ t

*
_. North Carolina
Department of Transportation .- Limits of Project
Study Corridor
?
-
N

NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC WE
T.I.P. No. U-4444 S
WBS No. 36492

Figure 2 Project Location Feet
0 1,000 2,000

_ i'r -.1`+ " `Wi'tA\/'` `
" '- -1 I 1 v t { .. c?
, 1 ? ?_ti .3
„L ` " ? ,, !/ .
i OW t o av l F? Jr t (? `
,',.
L- S t ? t,- a? r ?. r i_ i
i4
-;1 , I? i
5tt = r / ?`
r°•. _
r ' -- ,'
?:F
•-„ 1 { ? tJ""'i t
'U
-4.0
<1r ?r;,t,? -:/?, ' ,
4
A
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form
Project Number: 07-0086 County: Cumberland
Due Date: 10/06/2006
Date Received: 09/11/2006
Project Description: Proposed improvements to widen NC 210 (Murchison Rd) from NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Blvd.) in
Spring Lake to Fayetteville Outer Loop in Cumberland Co. TIP No. U-4444
This Project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville T Air Soil & Water Marine Fisheries
1Z Fayetteville Water
T-T Coastal Management Water Resources
Mooresville - Wildlife T Environmental Health
T Groundwater
Raleigh Solid Was te Mgmt
? Land Quality Engineer ? Wildlife -DOT
Washington Radiation Protection
Forest Resources
Wilmington Other
Winston-Salem Land Resources
T Parks & Recreation
Water Quality
TT_ Water Quality - DOT
Air Quality
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
No objection to project as proposed. No Continent
Insufficient information to complete review Other (specify or attach continents)
Regional Office Only:
Please log into the IBEAM system and update your comments in the DSS (Decision Support System) application,
SEPA module. If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail]
oe?
SEP 14
?a
'OsZLST? QU,gt{ 46
MWq?R8%CH
cx?r ?1?
?d
1E
O? p )
. r.nn
'C'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO `X F
Zll OZ
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Ms. Chrys Baggett
NC State Clearinghouse
1301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1301
Dear Ms. Baggett,
September 5, 2006
SUBJECT: Start of Study for Improvements to NC 210, From NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard)
in Spring Lake to the Proposed Fayetteville Outer Loop, Cumberland County, TIP
Project U-4444
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is starting the project
development, environmental and engineering studies for the proposed widening and improvements to
NC 210 (Murchison Road) from NC 24-8--210 (Bragg Boulevard) in Spring Lake to the Proposed
Fayetteville Outer Loop (TIP Project X-2) in Cumberland County. The project is included in the 2006-
2012 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal
year 2008 and construction in fiscal year 2009.
Attached for your review is a project vicinity map. We would appreciate any information you
might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If
applicable, please identify any permits or approvals that may be required by your agency. In order to
ensure your comments are included, we would appreciate your response by October 20, 2006.
It is anticipated that a federally funded Environmental Assessment will be prepared for this
project. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Jay McInnis, Project
Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 249. Please include the TIP project number in all
correspondence and comments.
Sincerely,
bar Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WE SITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
i
/
\
r \
/
/

Spring Lake 401
-JA v.
?401 r ttevlIle Y
- '21

/
spring
24 'Lake
2 10
;
87
SP?i?9_P?e
%

Fort Bragg
:Military Reservation
?

?
is0
J ?3
Fort Bragg ? X
Military Reservation X01 `;.._.._; _...>-.
_....
Hone
-- -_
ycutt Rd -3 --- -..
_..

-
;:. -
24
..
'y
87 ------- 210 EZ; 210 Fayetteville

N
W E
Limits of Project
S Study Corridor
Fort Bragg Military
Miles Reservation
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Boundary
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
.@ ? 00 o? ?=
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO s?6???Z1 6?e??`? F
?z U
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Ms. Chrys Baggett
NC State Clearinghouse
1301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1301
Dear Ms. Baggett,
September 5, 2006
SUBJECT: Start of Study for Improvements to NC 210, From NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard)
in Spring Lake to the Proposed Fayetteville Outer Loop, Cumberland County, TIP
Project U-4444
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is starting the project
development, environmental and engineering studies for the proposed widening and improvements to
NC 210 (Murchison Road) from NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard) in Spring Lake to the Proposed
Fayetteville Outer Loop (TIP Project X-2) in Cumberland County. The project is included in the 2006-
2012 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal
year 2008 and construction in fiscal year 2009.
Attached for your review is a project vicinity map. We would appreciate any information you
might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If
applicable, please identify any permits or approvals that may be required by your agency. In order to
ensure your comments are included, we would appreciate your response by October 20, 2006.
It is anticipated that a federally funded Environmental Assessment will be prepared for this
project. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Jay McInnis, Project
Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 249. Please include the TIP project number in all
correspondence and comments.
Sincerely,
rm(?
bar Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WE3SITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

t ?1

? .,may ? ` ? ? •?) t `.,'- ? ??1 ?!?-r/ ? --' ? _

ooo'Z 000' o u011e001 JoafoJd Z aan6l_A
taa?
Z6t9C 'ON SeM
s tttt-n 'oN 'd'I'1
3 M ON 'Alunoo puepagwnO
ApnlS Iuawanoidwl 02 ON
aoplajoo Apn;S uoile:podsuejl;o juawpedaa
;oafoad do slluall eull0Je0 4PoN

L8 f?lTt
{ U Z t7 Z
.\ j J r.r ;-i• 1 ({ ?\ ` ?r ?`..
d / ? 1 rr ) ? J?? j' 15y` ( ?? ; u.Y J•-?a. V d?A ?? f t 11 t ? - ?? ?.A J - ???
N4
J q
( • `'. ? ?'t I,'?-? ,??`? ,#, , ?__'""", 1? r "sue >_ ? ?? ? ? ?" a a*?t???`l; ?? r t., < + rti . a n ? ' 1:
-.-?-
.,
W
dil-
_ CC r yf?1
i 1 - `ti`p \. _ t •\ - + r?. Y { J` 1y\ ?•t f
1 ? •. x
? ,
.<4'f ?? i? k ' '. ?? 1 ??, 'Bt kttttltit S ttt.ttifitctttUI ; t _ `,??,
?7"T'" ).' r r / LLyy11 43. 4ri iirttr {,i,ttru`?trt" .t tr /
? '?...,?% /^\(1 h ?` ? s,,?tttT til?lttit?1 ?rtattt?t_ ?, •?t ? 1r l.. ,
,1 ? ,??" r:?-JI ? i rte. r} N `.'{ ? ` ? ?' ?,.??tytiittttt?t({S _ _ `? ??. ? ? «!- ,? '.? ? ,'
i
{
1
1 Nt? tit qt t"t ° _ ? f
E !t, t i 1
?? ,71 ,. '>?R ? ? ? ?!`' ` ?`?? ? ?iNtl it tt? ? -?. ,,,?, Y,?,, .?, ? (?? , ? ` ,r ? I (??az?' r?w{1
! J ' J ,f ?.. '- ..w• r `?.6 \?ya/' rt t 1 } ; r . 4"'` tr ?? \\ t ' ; >.r
41
l:',?' 1f? ? /?/ J? ? = '} _.-,- < It ( A 1 :? f "? ; e t h?. `,l k t?AJ? ? ? s tU?Vt;,i'.
r
pit IF
1` T 1 r?. ?' h x
? (K
1 r ?? ,+rr
l ryf j??
`? ?t ?.? r ?? ?- ?' ?w? • ! 'GYM i
~? _ ' • t 1 1? -.. t ?? r t .-? `\ ;?'-.\ \ ` ?- 1 V t???t2 i_`_.r' t?t\:,.• _. ?? r r ..
I CPA
- _ _
qrt
0- T L_
r
r (jf
D
- r?
,c ru' •.? ?j > ?L'7fi !J
?? r r t', e / r°r t, ? t ?+? t J? ?• ? ;t t I i? 1, ??',.?r ,! ,
\4 ,l ''\ l\ ?, ??!r ?? 1 r/?. 1 l4 Z .S UZ
d q - ,r, •?--•?
r y1 s ? ?`: ,j'rf.'tZ?;.r7'? -1 ??.. i f?i ? ? v:. .t 1? q r r ? .. •jrv? I??• ?t -. ??J1 ?I
17
3 ?`? ?j i 7 A (t r tI
1 41
t
Y
I,
i
r
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i

Spring Lake 4011
1 Fayell"I'd ea
i?10

24 \Lake
210
87
SP??r
Fort Bragg
Military Reservation

:,yam

Fort .Bragg
:Military Reservation ;

-
-
c?cl? `;
-
is

Honeycutt R `\ ..
d
W
-,
L'
va
to

a

24 % ,
-

87 210 Fayetteville `;

N
W +E
Limits of Project
Study Corridor
s
Fort Bragg Military
Miles ' Reservation
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Boundary
/ZN North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
`g`pve:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO s?6?Fjll 6`?`??? F
tl iZ
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Ms. Chrys Baggett
NC State Clearinghouse
1301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1301
Dear Ms. Baggett,
September 5, 2006
SUBJECT: Start of Study for Improvements to NC 210, From NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard)
in Spring Lake to the Proposed Fayetteville Outer Loop, Cumberland County, TIP
Project U-4444
The Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch is starting the project
development, environmental and engineering studies for the proposed widening and improvements to
NC 210 (Murchison Road) from NC 24-8--210 (Bragg Boulevard) in Spring Lake to the Proposed
Fayetteville Outer Loop (TIP Project X-2) in Cumberland County. The project is included in the 2006-
2012 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal
year 2008 and construction in fiscal year 2009.
Attached for your review is a project vicinity map. We would appreciate any information you
might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If
applicable, please identify any permits or approvals that may be required by your agency. In order to
ensure your comments are included, we would appreciate your response by October 20, 2006.
It is anticipated that a federally funded Environmental Assessment will be prepared for this
project. This document will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
If you have any questions conceming the project, please contact Jay McInnis, Project
Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Ext. 249. Please include the TIP project number in all
correspondence and comments.
Sincerely,
bor Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WESITE. WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form
Project Number: 07-0086 County: Cumberland
Due Date: 10/06/2006
Date Received: 09/11/2006
Project Description: Proposed improvements to widen NC 210 (Murchison Rd) from NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Blvd.) in
Spring Lake to Fayetteville Outer Loop in Cumberland Co. TIP No. U-4444
This Proiect is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville T Air Soil & Water Marine Fisheries
T-T Fayetteville Water Coastal Management Water Resources
Mooresville - Groundwater Wildlife TT Environmental Health
Raleigh Solid Was te Mgmt
? Land Quality Engineer ? Wildlife -DOT
Washington Radiation Protection
Forest Resources
Wilmington Other
Winston-Salem Land Resources
_T Parks & Recreation
Water Quality
_T Water Quality - DOT
Air Quality
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
No objection to project as proposed. No Comment
Insufficient information to complete review Other (specify or attach comments)
Regional Office Only:
Please log into the IBEAM system and update your comments in the DSS (Decision Support System) application,
SEPA module. If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail]
SEP 14 Wk P''F"P Wore,,. 06
ANDSrDR Q ki
NCH
'PW
1,?, G r ,,, « ` I }J1 i ( j rx?{,q-.., 1 _ ,Iy ?' y.(tr l - Y --•-.' J. \ ?'l. 'tY u ?,/? r? ,1 ,\
_ /' ?/ f f st ?}. w,?, ?? l..l "?} "y, ,t' I .y, r' ?? 5 ? , _'?-?. •.,. ?,+,.?t t ? \/ r. r' l l r /'??'`ti?vi ^„"'?.. ?( .tC._; `?.~'1 J t .fit t ? 'l? l i
. 1 JJ
'' G t+4??t+ h6 , 1_: \??:. « ? t `•' „J, ? t\ '- r ? rz .' ? ? / rti ('`L ,>t t rr ?ti t r ? f }``'\; ^ ` •
r
;,J ill ? t {-J t jr
??f-;V ?'?. ,j. `:,. 'r,?_,?%;? ! `,I .-d?/1 ? ? A G y?,?'s 'r• ;u'"? ??;I +' >rf ? :r'....' (;? ????111'?--._1'i
? {{? ` .tit^..iri-1 ` ? -? . \ '?r \v'k--?, JJ ??.. y?r?^•,,-' i? l4 l /'j???+Jj!?%. ?? - I P I.. (l ? :? ti!, ,. ? 1 ,. .?`.
87
1? -nf Its \ r,>, ?i. 21
2'-5 ?i
i ??" ? • j ., 1 ii.- v 'ft?`5.74?.?.:,1 ? ,';?"'"? r ?r ??iS?t' ??? /? ? v-?i iJ? ?--??-v.?I I'i r- ?'? ? ? ,•?? ?'? ?? _
? J 1 i? ? ? ? n at rl ? f? q ?? t„ ' ?; ? ?', ?, ? a' .? ° ? ? / ?' x ,. I ?? ? ? ? ? ?` ? Ste, ?..?•.....?s t ?,
f . ? r J N " sa
of '? ` ? ?'- '? ?l? ? •. l.+ li • t sE `; '1 -=-',??'.ijF l? A,,y "f st` •-'"j! 1\.\, ? _?."), i ???J(x,h. 1 ?''??"
???j?• •\?. ' ? ? •• ..l . t'1 l t ter,' y? i.?r p l +.'-?i; f n ?. _
'
4.;lti
?:;. ,• ?,? r?\?}` ? ? ??//r{?f A -', \.,? ? <? e.?+?.i ??1-"'/?,??.?1.? frl ??.1..a•.? .1 }?"'." ,-?f ,L> --? i'1 \?. y-f". rZ? ?F ??%+'r.t,``,''?/1.
?'
'^??j t?r?x? ._ _ '? '•' ,1?• ?\ ? ? ff 1? G I?`l'??-...? ?.l l?l-??,,?/l? ?'.t?, r .?` <',1 « '`fir ?.? / r ,? ?'=1.??? ?t,`r'?, µ?'^ ? i?1i ? -.,•, h 1
7 JN
? ? ?. •r- ? ,??,? ? f 'j'\ ??? .? t ?,,? 'I l ? mil'-;.?_,_,\ J ? fG>;=y?? ?.._. ,, !j l'? 1 ? 5 t?{ ? !i J'i.
t?lli1
? i ?? ? r .+ z? t +? 4- ? _ _ I'? ? I ? 7 f ? ?', E } ?(. ?_???? rte- a J(1 ? ??•"i? ? ??
• ? ? ?`"'' ? . ,.„u' S? ?4;? ? ? ? ,8•`l ? 3 \\.. l l - ? J / ?r -i ? i` 'l ? - ?.r'"`?.. ?? ? } 1 i `. ?' - A ? I T,. .
LF,
•''?? ??,t ti t? -? ? nl ' ?????? • ??i `?? r: 1>??? J?"?'+?_._?? ? 1? N
`9• IEr t '(yv?"3!,-.?F`? F. II111?? t 1tl?llll It F ,?' ?`. 1 ??"??D ;.:.?1? f .??C??-'.??`e?') •t t`
??..
• •, . ' ?-. l ?e <? _ s.t_ ? ' h ' .?' ' `f, ? , v ? t l;??il r-- _..-???' ` + ? ? ?+ l , , t ' ? >vy? ' r r ? ? rKl /? i/?I??
4 -=$ i., E?Y
4 Yt -, i74 k' • r, 11114 u l A? F? ?w . ? rr t,?.
Iiiiiiis?lr?ii ' Ntliftli
- ? l L 1 ;"_`' ,<? n'?^, - +1H1itRT1;1?t? i ..r. _.." I i ? ? ? ? \ ? ? ?J -` ?.,°? ? i ? Gl d?.I , J"-"?t I-'? ?? ..,,"?:{ ?? i
,j„ ls?i;; 14115{Nt? C?
?f
??\'??•;° xt it,.A r ?' .•I ?l .... A •,, ? •?. r \ ?? i 11'}I`?" r? -%'..'
?? „`ti,•?/h_ `?-h. .. ?, st 42-
4 A// 2
YY^ ?.?*t i{:r 4/ 1.' i? - `~ ? 1 i ';? A ??.{ f ?r ?}\ ?,."_ -C-` u. f'Y? (a } - f , i ?/•i
?''? Jr ? ?? '? %l / ?A I ?; ??? /?>?(4 ?1?(-._„ \r ?_ r)I, ? _J ? r ? 1J?1/ ,J?, {.•? ,f?
In y? •, ? .? ' 1 ? 1` ?,? ? \• / // ? ram„24?Q ._r/ {y?.y 7_?'?'-?t,+?\ 1 ? l ?.:
r„?"` ? \??{1'?IJ//I?J-1?i ? I.... -- ? ?! ?t?\-L-`?1 ?i?,.- ? ?' ? I'?l` 67,_ \?-mA?,` v ?? '`r'_^^??-- _ 'L7'.?1.?"i7s.9«•;3f'i#?1,I s'. ?`?
?r ?`'?? - ° ? 1 \ ? ` :--?' -{' ,?A? ?•( J c - >??i r,? 1:\. "???.'._.;ti ?• `n• t ? ? ?. µ p t I ? i .---?,":? - ?. ? 4 ?
\ u1. +nQ`. i 1rJ? +_ Jr* d Y- tt \ lOr>KVi°6k i'?'3 ^ y .
.t ? O?.> i ty i,?' >o ? l t` U?P vF ? c,2 M •!d?''G'/f ;3f('+'1?`t?t?? wr icy
+'jr's"art *11?^'r"Kt"r'rrr, tq
1 (1 "? P + n 4 a ^ - V y?, s r 4? q
J '1: + -rAf{-?? r!'?ofi •?y.,? t? c o ?E q/? sa'?? ql. ,7l'L.1 ??A..t !"`,"".
• / 1.. ??. ? '. ,?? \V"j('aa'?^rAN V ??. ?_q oa..'v` ?'. ?', C./ ?,r5 t;?E.:??• ?Y-,.:?C!? Vt4???'.
??` ? Pv f?t< ? v i?3s` ?a ??r? o w'''ay ? ? Y,. q, ,/?61-` ? '.•t 1rS,t o?7 V,? ?+ t??t ...i'? ?
V
°r?`?'" ,??+' ..? ?-a ?? ..?. i '} ???.. ;ranks ?? .? v ?: ,` ?"? c J° 'b a•.o?t V; ?' ? ? '?.:'o SLR `? .n+? : 1
- ? ?'•r. -mss ?'?+Elt ;..£ ? ??S '?Y??i y I? G.... \? ., ?'a? P"` `a ?:'•'- t k ??h?`?? ? - i ? ?r??? i' ?, ¢?3????- ,,. 1???'. _:Yt ?Li ? ?'t, ?, F%C % l
»•???t ? I ? ? ? ? `? .?'? ? ? '+'`v? " ? ?Oa ? ?"??` l'£`r :?GO??\f?;? '? ? I/I,' ? y27?'nD "?r. v f' ? c
G f l / I -J? j?j, \r j i f.« ) 1 i/r f J_:•
/1
l} rri tL is 5 ` s :1 ti // .
I? , \\) ? {?? ? `t w 4y W,
\ r' 11
24
fr?? iV a ?' ? 1 ?.•? ? ?J J ',?1??-?-`.- ` - - ?, ?.?'1? ?^:/?.?? i? ??.?^ ? C?47 i ^^ ? y ? ?`? 210 .•;?'-f?5 r* _
? < "a/.??''?: ? ' i ? ?? r _ cf yv 1/? ., - ? ? - i i ';: y ? .i + i '? ? ,? ,. d May '
,?'+ ??--??--.--:? r! .:` ,^-??f?•.Y?` ? ,n.- ",?y?, . S `}-?.J Bar1. ie ?z?. v,G: `>t?,• '. f,,. :'?'?; ?? r,..
87
r
WQMAIJ
North Limits of Project
Carolina
y Department of Transportation Study Corridor
NC 210 Improvement Study %Ch
-,
- Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
+ r+ 'aw.---r., ,r o , <ar
Figure 2 Proj Faa`
ect Location o ,,ooo 2,000
'? ?? °' " '` • ? ?,,?
rir .ti ?w
3
I'
y}
r
i
i
i
i
i

i
i

i
i

Spring Lahe . 401
i
')401 Faye?r? 1 rlle "
(2101"

Spring
24 Lake

2 10
87
pc?r9.P?:

:,y
am
Fort Bragg "
Military Reservation

A

Fort Bragg
Military Reservation
____,. Honeycutt Rd

m - ---
N
W

m 24 / / .
.

87 210 Fayetteville
r,
N
W +E
Limits of Project
S Study Corridor
Fort Bragg Military
Miles = Reservation
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Boundary
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
JURISDICTIONAL VERIFICATION PACKAGE
NC 210 (Murchison Road/South Bragg Boulevard) Improvement Study
Cumberland County, North Carolina
TIP No. U-4444
Federal Aid No. STP-210(11)
WBS No. 36492
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Raleigh, North Carolina
May 2005
p@PZOWT3 p
MAY 6 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WEWNAND $MRMMM WANM
•
•

t ri
Spring
24 Lake
210
87
Spring P"le
Fort Bragg
Militarv Reservation
Fort III-a-, ?
Ylilihu•N Reservation
• J
\ ?o Honeycutt Rd
o?
a
??co OSer\\\?d
T
87
24 ??d 210
Sra
•
.A '-s North Carolina
IL-- Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
N
w E:
Limits of Project
Study Corridor
S
Fort Bragg Military
® Reservation Miles
Boundary 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
• • •

V; '-j

North Carolina
Department of Transportation Limits of Project
Study Corridor
N

NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC V,
T ! P No U-4444 S
.'.?S No 36492

Figure 2 Project Location Feet
0 1,000 2,000

. "?. Ai rhi!I
? ? __ ??( ham- ? L / ..- ?' .- '? •^? - J ` o? ?- :'?:? ._? y
-rJ
Ilk
v \
za:
Lan ro - -?!!(? '?..
?' ?. ?'l` l ?? - r ? t•( 1?/'s '>.? .tea cr =?, ?\a? ? '. /.. ,? r+4 ?.. '
•?rtt _..?,,, Vlt? y r i?;•r Qtr ?? ,? t
1fi ( Y ?? -^CEo °: ''/i ' '? "t/?.?,??• ."?rf ,.?
\ •/ ? . sir I ?? ?0. Y.1 i`ce' - \ 4444? 4"i 27 1, .
210
24 '•S?od.
Ronnie 1)
87
r-
0 - - -
+r a

' m

'

'

' C
a) C
a) C
2 z
.
a) m
. m z

' C
m
_ c c c c = E c c c w
L L L '_
L L L L L L L L L L L
a a a n. - C C IL C a a a -
Q
c
E E
0 N
N i
N 0
W 0
T
Lo
ap
Lo
O
CD
f-
Lo
M
M
M
N
N
It
0
f-
00
N
M
Lo
ln
CO
O
M
Lo
?aU)

>
>
ry
V
M _
d O
L i+

co V

Ln

?
Lo
N

U)

O
V)

?
Lo
ti

?
U')
N
0 * N N T N * - ln C3) N N
N (n N ?
I N N N
? R
ZV
.Q co ca ca ca
m M Lo Lo Lo 0 I- ? ti ti ti ti Lo
W

E
Y
() Y
?
?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y
L p L) U N N N N N N
U w
co C)
cn 0
U !t ,
o
u
N cn
y cn
N cn
to U

co U
V) v)
N v)
y y
w cn
w cn
w
U 0
U 0
U 0
U OL
U
0 c
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
V?
Q ~ ~ I- I- U U H H ?- I- I-
Z J :D Z) 0 n D
J

'Q cCa
m c ?

E LO 0 W W W W W H W P W W W W
C) CL T N M d' LO - Cfl (O Il- CC) m C )
R
d
L W+
Q

d
L_
s 0 ,? ?
ca
U)
E
ca
m
()
cn
a)
fa
L_
0)
C
U
.0
C
a)
U
C
a)
.O
m
0)
C
O
O
a)
7
a)
N
E
O
U
O
C
a)
cn
E
LO
LL
C
O
ca
U
L
M CU
?U
E
H ca
U
? -
C C
L L
r Z Q
i?
m M m
0 m m 0 0
L_ R T T T LL CL LL LL T
3:L- LL LL LL O m = = w
o 0 n- IL 0- LL T T T
U
m
v -
CL w
CL w
(L

Q a) a) a)

Z y _ _ _ _
L=
O 'C
m a)
>_ a)
>_ ?
>_ C
'i
a) ?
>_ m
> m
> a)
? ? ? ? W W. (
p
L
C
C
0
O
O
O
O
> Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
R

C
? R
d
Q
.Q ? O
N ?
? OO
? N
OO CO
N OO
N LL?
? ?
N

Z

m
M
LL-)
Lo co
~
I?
ti
ti
W ~

R
c
O

V 'O
O LL LL LL LL m co 0L

m 0 W
Q W
m W
U w
w 1-
W I-
CD W
2
-2

c
O

N
d
{II
H
U
L O
? L
co
Ow
a 0
c ?
m ?
aE
C ?
ca ?
O-
U)
0
C D
O
a)
co
U
coU)
a)
U?
O ?
C
a)
O L
G? .D
co LL
? M
W )
C co
mm
_N -
O (1)>
UW
LL
a)
co
Ua
J C
c O ?
0)
° C
co :E
0 Q m
U=?
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section II-A-2
June 1991
HYDRIC SOILS
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Hydric codes (HC): 1 = Hydric soils, only because of saturation for a
significant period during the growing season;
2 = Hydric soils that are frequently flooded for long or
very long periods during the growing season; and
3 = Hydric soils that are ponded for long or very long
periods during the growing season.
Vegetation codes (VC): 1 = Hydric soils that support woody vegetation under
natural conditions; and
2 = Hydric soils.that do not support woody vegetation under
natural conditions.
IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) Hydri c soils in this county cannot be farmed under natural conditions
without removing woody vegetation or hydrology manipulation. (2) Same map units and included soils
listed as hydric soils in this county may not meet the definition of hydric soils and wetlands because
the hydrology has been altered through drainage or other manipulations.
` A. Map units that are all hydric soils or have hydric soils as a major component.
Map Unit
Symbol HC VC Map Unit Name
By (860) 1,3 1 Byars loam
Cf (800) 1,3 1 Caoe Fear loam
Co (847) 1 1 Coxville loam
CT (MA) 1,3 1 Croatan muck
De (80) 1,3 1 Deloss loam
Gr (877) 1 1 Grantham loam
JT (JO) 1,2, 1 Johnston loam
3
Le (582) 1 1 Leon sand
Mc (429) 1,3 1 McColl loam
Pg (836) 1 1 Pantego loam

..
Page 2
Cumberland County
A. Map units that are all hydric soils or have hydric soils as a major component.
i
Map Unit
Symbol HC VC Map Unit Name
Ra (830) 1 1 Rains sandy loam
Ro (88) 1 1 Roanoke and Wahee loamy (Roanoke part)
Ru (81) 1 1 Roanoke-Urban land complex (Roanoke part)
TR (864) 1 1 Torhunta and Lynn Haven sails
Wo (833) 1 1 Woodington loamy sand
8. Map units with inclusions of hydric soils or have wet spots.
Map Unit Hydric Normal location
Symbol Map.Unit Name Inclusion HC VC Inclusion
OgA Oogue fine sandy loam Roanoke 1 1 shallow depression and drainageways
(558)
On Dunbar loam Coxville 1 1 depressions
(563)
Rains 1 1 depressions
Ku8 Kureb sand Leon 1 1 depressions
(7048)
Torhunta 1 1 depressions
Lynn Haven 1 1 depressions
Ld (56) Lenoir poorly 1 1 depressions
drained
soils
Ly Lynchburg sandy loam Rains 1 1 depressions
(417)
Woodington 1 1 depressions
Na (458) Nahunta loam Grantham 1 1 depressions
Rains 1 1 depressions
St Stallings loamy sand Woodington 1 1 depressions
(420)
Wm8 Wickham fine sandy Roanoke 1 1 depressions
(5408) loam. 1 to 6 percent
slopes i

r

1 <
s
Miles
0 0.5 1
Limits of Project
Study Corridor
Fort Bragg
Military Reservation
Boundary
Ile .? North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Index Map
•
I1. Oil" i1

1
t
Fort Bragg
Military Reservation
lob
1 ?
t rr ? '
i
p<
?r
00-
i
E.
I I,

R
IN
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary " Wetland Data Point
- Perennial Stream 0 Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Military Reservation
Stream Flow Boundary
is •
•.s c

w
F
S
Feet
0 100 200 400

.? North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 1

K• } + •}?~} ,fir .?` ' * t,..
7,
See Exhibit
Ilk
r •. ? ll r .

A

.40
4"W
4OF
See Exhibit 7
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream 0 Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow -Military Reservation
Boundary
w
s
I I I Feet
0 100 200 400
{ i'!N
? Irk
K
4
illr ?,?+4 F ?'
_ AL- AA
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 2
0 0 0

Mi
ER
1

r. 'J?. N l ?'+P s'Ii'? ?h'• V s'•'.. ??T''t' \?e1?y
- 4r
Wetland AER, K
Wetla,-ic AER` 7 s? .
ZT-
Wetland Point AER x 4 [ j -?.
= 4 J
V 4t
41
Stream 2ER?y?
V; Amy
4 w
V ?d
Upland Point AER'' ,
?i l yp?f : S"
"ja
q is'
14
Stream 'ER 4
'? 3 Y
f
.
4.4. ? t ?,•i fir
.,ice 7Z,° t r t - ?. j'°tr,
41
,y (?.1?r`.s 'x
.?i • _l!.!L ;: R? } .4 -Y_.`Y' 'JCR tl[r
-Y AMR Y •Ii J ( ? j C?f ? t ?
Y 3 .c
r f?fyyy f{{I
_h
+/?'+T? ?j?}• f o i ?]f. fl?f•Y vSf s???'? ,?r L'?`? .. '?^ff _
:Re .ate ? ?+?g'-.; .t '}*y? - -.?'?/ ? - •? •???T?. ,,., ^'?`tYt ? ='{
A y r, s r''yX ,,
a E
kv.
14 -
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary C Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream Q Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Military Reservation
Stream Flow Boundary
J S J
T 0 ??
• t: ?, ?? tai[
y
?'`.
'IV
w
F
s
I ' I I Feet
0 100 200 400

r<

Bragg
r
r
North Carolina
i Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 3
0
•
•
1
f ?r
WMI\
¦

. ..

r'

Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Wetland Boundary
Limits of Project
Feet Study Corridor
a
m ¦ m
%
? z
ti
t f ? ¦
?ci A ¦ . r
¦
m
¦
¦?:N.
.

A ER WE-T
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: U - 4444 Date: 1,25.0.5
Applicant/Owner: N CD o T County: m6 d
Investigator: T Rasst4te!_ E. Rarkj&y State: ijC.
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: R WE
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pin vs +ae da G 177A c
bri dro AC
Are, rubrv - C.
oraglaja. H C78L

+ u r i
heso-
S
G
Sc?iunr.? 6+0 4h}-
Mi?Q rO'ttr tiC)'+?O i V FAG
S ? V ??.
+hr ant+c i S FACV
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) ?$
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
)C Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
V Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
V Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: I " (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?cP?;ng Cov1?a%ns ,,,?) fa.o? l?yo/rolo9}. ?.?d+'ca')aaFS
Community ID: PEp 'Project/Site: V-444*
Transect ID: Date: I, 25 05
Plot ID: AER
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): -6hns+.n 'vim
nn
Taxonomy Subgroup: 1 (?m?tlic R1J0 rlauPafS Drainage Clas: l M A4
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 to fz
411 - - Si2n4v loom
- 8 I 4 - - tom ran,[
Pi - 121 10 2 f to Iz 414 r`ew4 faint Cla loa

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ScwnpJ ny pia4- Ca,-he%As ydn, c. see ;not;ca.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? f Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ? Yes No.
Hydric Soils Present? ? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ,? Yes. No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
A ER UPL
Project/Site: V -444 4 Date:
Applicant/Owner: hIGDOT County:
Investigator: 7 ,$As_t? F. poclli y State: NG
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes V_ No Community ID: ()PL
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No V, Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No -? Plot ID: 12 pL
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Euivs 4-ge-Ag, FA
A r brwm C G
L;4vc+rUr. -` S G
Mie-nolr Viraihian^ S F CW+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 100170
Remarks: Sa.v???+nq oan() eq? rns 0. rerG/e„?e c-P- Ayaor 4 ik_ V
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
X Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: N Sediment Deposits

De
th
f S
f
W
t
6 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
p
o
ur
ace
a
er: 1
(in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more r(kuired):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves

>
D
th t
S
t ^11 Local Soil Survey Data
°
ep
o
a
urated Soil:
12 (in.) I
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Io hydrolD nd1Cr?} at
sa d ?c;n'?
Community ID: VPG Project/Site: (,(, • 4444
Transect ID: Date: /, 25. O5
Plot ID: PER UPI,
SOILS
Map Unit Name ?j
(Series and Phase): t
I? au t oo

m &eJ Drainage Clas: twea ram e

Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: Am ic- H,2. i„AU its X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 0 313
- tod'?
3-4 lo K 614 to /Z 2 c dis4incf a la
Z+ 4 )tlZ 4/3 /0 X 414
a inF
P
Cla ndvn

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High, Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: y
No 11ydre Soil "n¢icaforz qt 54'p/.7 po;A
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hvdric Soils Present?
this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
? Yes No
Yes No
Yes ? No
Yes V No
(Remarks:
A92
Project Name `- N Vy` j Nearest Road
a
+unty Wetland Area a• a acres Wetland Width feet
-a.me of evaluator 6 % C4C bS Date- 0 .021
Wetland Location

on pond or lake.
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstrearn, divide
other
Adjacent land use
.(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope,_ r ra
forested/natural vegetation %
an %
agriculture, urban/sle%
impervious surface Soil series Jahn -' la?;ti?

Hydraulic factors
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Dominant vegetation
(2) r
Flooding and wetness
semipermariently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width z 100 feet
rr euana type ?setect one) .
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
. Headwater forest Freshwater. marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be a_pelied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
R Water storage
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization
T Pollutant removal
I Wildlife habitat
N Aquatic life value
Recreation/Education
7-
2
_ x 4.00 =
_ x 4.00 =
* x 5.00 =
_ x 2.00 =
x 4.00
x 1.00 =

Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >I 0% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
u sto e, or radius----
--e-------------- -------------------------------------------------------=----
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
1 E
E??EE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:

1. Applicant's name:- Ur-11f 2. Evaluator's name: Al.
3. Date of evaluation: /
? oaf ?A ' 4. Time of evaluation: ?'?j() =-
5. Name of stream: ?+?'{"?"`?C., ? ? Pf CAOCi& 6. River basin: C,-i02 &,arp
7. Approximate drainage area: anknow.. 8. Stream order: ! fi and ;Z 5 _
9. Length of reach evaluated: b}? 10. County:- Ceawe6P•e?W
11. Site coordinates (if known): u i9 ?4e W4 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) ocation):
On ues+ sidr- * '' turchis°n Ra- north of 6rAer Rd.,
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ,,,,n known * 4441 r6qd iCV1Aa
-Ad
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed ?(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES `@ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
w 6 C'44A
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE 1N0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surve YE ea?s a!
es #to+
estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agriculturagv
2&1. Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ?Ir h ?cr ,rn ?_?
22. Bankfull width: T'l 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):?"7`'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) ,Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion.. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion: Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ?) Comments: rld eni)(a Mi
Evaluator's Signature Date ( S
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and nviro mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
filar mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
w
s
' "
?
?
a, ast

,
? dln
F VLounta
ll-

?
P?i es?nce of floN
r"pEr?istellf pools nI sfre cnl
I .
no ow ,or'- O
:stron T Ilo« zna buts} Cl ?i o-1 1Q
,.
J ??JdenCeCflf dSf
ILUtI1an°' IttratlOn3 ? `
.
'n ?•=`F' {te
?? ? 7`? r5
?J
`-
.+
r , ` !
J? Y e

R?

r
?
,
?
,
oYteusl?e.alteratiorio alfevta
?c?n. '
a s ;Zlparian zone Y b y ?y ,Ft
?I?(1 brif€ez 0 conttloiis; «rde 1u£fer i?ia oiljt5}; i3 6 4 G 4
0?
t

`.., I ??; ? ',` '.? ' UroundkraterdlsCh'ar c ? = '?
>?, ? >?no 3i??har e ;0 s rums see s ?te?ancts et?;??? cttuts? ? ? ?
??;
-?
t , ?,
z
?ia F
?(/?} LI 3

. ??ff11
? 25iY r •r,{i? '4,t, .:. Sri l?'? ?k
? ,?nofl?o? Ian , (?;eusn?e tl
dod 1au?
rna's ?s
?? ?
}? ?Q4 I. k??e. ? ?
t
L1 N ^Ka
kT.r ' ,
?
', "? u Eut? enchrtie}rt l ftoodpfaiu access t?} v j, ? .,h
``'

? ,
0 2 ,
n " ?
s 'res
i?
O
I
I 8 i
lace
r
l rt
F
?
?
"
rrIk t o:wekla
;
0 1
i3ad)a?e_nt
D(
? k
r ? 1
.
`;.
?F r„r m ?`?Ir?I1I1@1 SIIlIIOSIt? 7rSe
it
?,i +? 3` Y L ,r
, ° ' r a rF ?w
-
?
.
,
?
s ? '?

'
m
o dr ?
?} }« r cz ronn 1
?cr no
m
t
F a
? r Ize c4d?? erz o Glaannet >it' subs` -
cos ar?ie, c?ti?essXZes Is
a -,Af tI Incas
c o- 1
€
?
Qe DtC?' rv? ,

q mix= t 1 roioi tIlc*bIII,s'

"yY

g
?
'
rS..
v-4
ti

4 s1 s p r? r "?T'" z? - •k ? ? -s-?
J `
? ? 9 i
?t
vat
J? ` S
F :
y G
?'? ::. j
a
r3.¢i
:T ,, ? .. .. .? yam, ,_? v•. _.. _. _. t?k })
,. _ ?
niLFC,?

n ?ecIdECiness
t
?
r
; .
F <
` i

g
r
lr"„
'
?:

mikip ca

f41OF"t
i _
?
?
?
? '?
f? ?
O ?y ?
(''t y?i°'2?r•. #,??}
?.?res i 'iR1 ?? ,...
.. /*n
,'{} y?
j
µ L ??i
rJ
? !1 {??
? (?.
ll•?4 ?F? '?' t-t '? ?- ??-' kY .} 14, '.
f. `tt ?;<
??f
'?j E -
}
,,
] ?1+1O E??t1 ,414G
L? ?.. f

°e ,dam

iuwc ?.uaia?tci?uw a1G L&A abbubbuU 1R cUdstai sue3IDS.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
i t
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2FR
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDoT 2. Evaluator's name: C Rackle-3. Date of evaluation: 1. 25.05 4. Time of evaluation:- 4 0o o.
5. Name of stream: 2 E P, VT Li M Cross 6. River basin: Cant fear
7. Approximate drainage area: "AkAawn 8. Stream order: ? S+
9. Length of reach evaluated woZSd 14- & ' ' .'s ' ' l 10. County. Gmbarland.
11. Site coordinates (if known): yAnhnvon 12. Subdivision name (if any): E Sraao
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Vr-M side of Myrchiso.n Rd. ' hoof, of Gcyber Rok14. Proposed channel work (if any): whaLtln? Ay?en'4ia? P w?ti?t°nitq
15. Recent weather conditions: W rain, th east 48 h. 'J
16. Site conditions at time of visit: $un m!V MCI
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES. t?b If yes, estimate the water surface area: n
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?( YES) NO
estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
I% Forested _% Cleared / Lo ed
gg _& % Other (Mi I F+66, ,SCA -
22. Bankfull width: 1 - 10 ' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):-_i
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) ? Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight / Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The. total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): J? Comments: pw nia ' reouirez n,,4?aafior%
v
Evaluator's Signature-
' Date I. 25. Os
This channel evaluations m is intencO to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
!y. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
----!ular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
y ?i ?'4C ' ? ' ;Gr ?????? ? "?~ `?. ' "? ?.? { ?? ? ?#?' `?
? EC
t ildi'?'.P ? ?~ '"?'-:?'«;.
f f tE? S f? l l'
t11?`iC l i::i12
: f st •
C
t -_

?? ?:• ? a
5
pas
a
rr
p
IeC?IT101I? 1IQUIItaII7 .<., =_
{ ,t`?fesen?e=of?]owl persistent povIs?In?streanl? - ? ? ? ??? ? ? ? ??
??z points y
F s
sti
?Lvide>«ce
sr
afspa4tliumabaIterat?on??':? 4
=y
y?t
[
tj _ ??.} ,? n F pp ?F
_ Y
?
^
?
p
?
c
"Teti ensl? e;aitera on _ Tt, zto alteration
pIa
s 1
point
_
_

? r: s parlan zotle
?
no b"tttier 'C? ?`o1lt?uails ti«de
bufter `` -? ? 6 Q
'? p ?` , S'
.
??: ?gx ??3'.? x z?denc otnuEr`Ierrt or'chenuO' 18Ftialges?3'
-
c
?
:,? 3 t?n?kk? ;d?s
llar?es 0 IfL dlsuhar?es ns]? Dints i
?? r,
? ?_ s r
r? r
t t Y' ` t
?

t . a Y' J ' h" G> allndfti ater d scharae 1? `w y
r a
_
r, v t- i
-i
^ (110 discl?r? e 0; r`mas see _s, ,n`etlanc?s etc ; mar otrlts)

??.
' <f Y?Tesence 2lljacent`1]oo11p1aIn t' {i °
C <f 5 1 iz z,.- -. r
r r, ?1 r.?Y? }max
tJ Y
+
'
~? "?
z-..
a tensr?e?t odd ta]tk, s t n V.. .x-
Ifo
f 7?
,-
entloaclptaia`cces '^
h W
'
! yr y
d
'; sf "¢
?
i4r
r ?sT? . '
h
f „f
M??
r?Ilt?'t'Ir ll y? µlU L'II tlQO ?1D ' ll cl J Cw'kx. ? ?.
?

; far . w Yresen% ofall?acent Nivetlands__
ti
?
` : no?eta]] ?3" ar`eradacenti?etl3nds?Yru?c oita ?
,. _

. "`
•
$, ? ?`4
ti ? ? mil'` .? is t ? -..:
E- 5, .+? 41 '-
3n edllneltt input h ..,.yx 1 ? a ? v x i.
'', << ete?rsiu? d} os]on t}
httlccr r]o:Sed]melitna
}
;
Q
nt ?
, ,
,
.
?
s _Y ,

r? ' _ ¢E;llaunl.ed StT "I q4

e{riclslon F'
Q- i ;r z 5r ,
r! t ??dee l? me]sed 6,stanle b_zd & ban Fs ?mx ointc} _s 4 ?R;? ° Q 3
y
13 i '?} f} Y t •z? .,2?,;?
wcgfmIar bal(ti iailiires $ f 'r'
if ,Cr'i• 'X?t' e1 t
Wa
0 C /?
' l _
x
s an fs
_

1 se s
Til ?Yur?

}

'?
r
NA

_nvin?erteixates '(seej?e 4
t >a
?

,
la ??
? 6 r
? r C+'?-r. \ ? '?` t ??
'? AIL LIII?e?C2lIS
? J
t} ? ?V ? ? ?(
,, ? ,
_
- ?
cE . t 8 "€ r v .. k art i

r
9
:y° 58

uwv vu... uv waau ua.o atv llvl 4JJ033GU 111 %;UdbliU SI Uarn .

? s,

z p

f ??
i
7-7
7
;'?t ?qfql?

Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary O Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow - Military Reservation
Boundary
w
F
,s
I ' I I Feet
0 100 200 400
.. North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
TIP No. U-4444
WBS No 36492
FWetlands and Streams Exhibit 5

Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream ® Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow Military Reservation
Boundary
k-
F
.s
I ' I I Feet
0 100 200 400
. North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
TIP No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 4

u
•
I,

NIL
a
i ° ° !• %
¦R _
-
¦ i i i9 ?? j •
a ° ¦
- r-
?aa,
¦
¦
° ? M
• ¦ \
UP
I" jr . ot
Perennial Stream L A °
Intermittent Stream ¦
Wetland Boundary
Limits of Project i"
o zco a F- Study Corridor
u ¦
R R
?t3
wZO:Sw+
Una;! Je
r
f'? i
QER WET
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
:cvoae: V- 4444 Date:
icant/Owner. NIC-DOT County:
stigator: T, BOX, * E. J?aaaoj State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
Yes / No Community ID:
Yes No y, _ Transect ID:
Yes No // Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
a n Sr ; • I? Cw?
rv, a °i S PAW
FAC.
"rv C FAC,
14y r U%'km C, EA C
Q, h-1',i; V ,.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) [00%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
?-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil
Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: in. FAC INeut al Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
`
Remarks:
Community ID: Pro Project/Site: U-444-4
Transect ID: Date: I. 24. oS
Plot ID: BER WET
SOILS
Map Unit Name ! Drainage Clas: Very rl
(Series and Phase): c loknsfon IOAM Confirm Mapped Type.
Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: nn
PAnhu lia ?urt,rcr rn+c __ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
- 2 0 R 2/'l
-" em ,
2- 0 4 --
9-12-4 UP Ul

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditi ons Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Sot 1'md, C4
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? _ /Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? p/ Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? _ /Yes No
Remarks:
tF4Z M
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: V - 4444 Date: 1, 2-1. O5
Applicant/Owner: Nc.OOT County: 7EU-Mb"O"J
Investigator: T BASS e #te E. ?AC1c 1 tW State: N C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID: t) PL
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No !i Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: SEP VPL
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
P,mvx - C FA C,
C'gierafx ski C A
?VMI ! 1 N}k'Q. CW

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
Remarks:

SaPl,itq o's

/D zt?n?

fa- ?0,r.Ie'/i
CP dtC? /b ?C
y ve?e .rnq
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
(?{} Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits

Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: IZ (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No ? j.
Q hya rolagy inG7?CaTars W iAA ?ra.wP tAq paiwf'
Community ID: UpL 'Project/Site: U^4444
Transect ID: Date: 1, z4. ps
Plot ID: 13ER UPL.
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Clas: Well ; ed,
(Series and Phase): V/2QC1 ys-- 10 61214 SOnA Confirm Mapped Type?
_ Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: ?ve7? (-la nl ?d d is ?_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2. to R 3/1 - --- unA
2-8 to R la R i ft
2? l0 4 R mm S

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
1\10 k-46ric- SO-11 ivJJiCbd0r.S dt-? SQZoo?a+7
14& e
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Presl
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hvdric Soils Present?
this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes ?- No
[Remarks:
^:4::: - -- - - - -
t? -
p??..;?
jr :•:
ICA
»
#<^
•>r
C- I\
Project Name U" y ? N?arest Road N / v ?s?
7ounty G...Iberl& Wetland AreaSidA"?s letland Width f
E r?eet .n •con'%c%
dame of evaluator cir. led ;
Date Q a DS'.
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2' mile upstream, upslope, o radius
forested/natural vegetation _G % a
- < agriculture, urban/suburban 30 °fo
impervious surface .-- %
! Dominant vegetation
Soil series John,sfm loam
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral- non-sandy
predominantly sandy Hydraulic factors

=D?•steep topography ieJa- r?TD -t? e' CasAtI
ditched or channelized ?la,n
total wetland width ?I00 feet
(1) &C?c rjr
(2) Pi-0.AITohi VJ ra;n?cc?a
L;r'vd&0'rfA *14 to
FIooding and wetness
semipermartently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
1 intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
vv euana type (select one)`
Bottornland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater. marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
stream --nets ------------------------
weight
R Water storage x 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization IP- x 4.00 = >'r`r
T Pollutant removal * x 5.00 =
I Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =
N Aquatic life value x 4.00 = L
Recreatior/Education x 1.00 =
Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
u slo e, or radius
--------P-------------------------------------=--------------------------------------------- ------------- -
WE T
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: -V-4444 Date: 1.2 . o5
Applicant/Ownen NIC4 01 County: M I&A
Investigator: T &azxeJ4e, E. RArAJ#,, State: C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No of Plot ID: `ER WEET
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
ri C AC
< rv C
r v J. ; IA. FACW
FACW4

?i

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 14
Remarks: Sa?rRq pe.`iF? Ca1'WAS a 'ore va c? 4- A yell" 4y4,c v:Fe,'/r lot
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
,/ Inundated
k/ Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

De
th to Free W
t
i
Pit Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
p
a
er
n
: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

Community ID: fFo 'Project/Site: U-4444
Transect ID: Date: 1. 27.OS
Plot ID: CEle WE
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Clas: Ve ( ; eJ-
(Series and Phase): Johnsfoh (oakn Confirm Mapped Ty e.

Taxonomy Subgroup: //??
CW y b c- Nwwatyf-T Yes
_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Co ntrast Structure, etc.
10-2 It) vp 312- -- r- 10AI4
2- S It 4 10% G Urhm-on d; s In
b 2 I -, -' Sad

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditi ons Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: s n j!n
T //
,ni" +%?'?nl?{5 ,,.'jyC Ser? /r!p(GR.
po ?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?/ Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
i
CER up/
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: -U-4444- Date: _
Applicant/Owner: Nczo-r County: ,1 05
Investigator: T. Susr+6, E Rock „ State: IVc.
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: pL
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No y/ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(if needed, explain in remarks)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
MAQh0lig
U,
FACw+
rv rv G F C

S rni ba
o S
i l '
-Llelusfru? i
rmnre-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) O'qo
Remarks: 5,_ 1?? ?:fi}" Cavt?rns cu.?hQec?t GESr? r?°- fly II?1? L ?!?€. ref
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
rI TV t- Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: JJ 11 /
No ?y d ro l09 Y ? ?rCa7bt`S q,T- Sapp/i?g X00
Community ID: L)PL ,Project/Site: U -444¢
Transect ID: Date: 1, 2 . OS
Plot ID: CE R UPL
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): VQUGly3t? 1oam
1 sand. Drainage Clas: Wett ea
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: _ ?? ur)cr lt.s ?_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
I
0 VA 443
-?
!
0am
.6-12-4 0 V'IZ 314

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
NO Kg6ric- Soil Indicators C!4
J
WETLAND DETERMINATION
hytic Vegetation Present?
d Hydrology Present?
Soils Present?
this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
V_Yes No
Yes V No
Yes No
Yes ,/ No
(Remarks:
WeftAa CeR,
Project Name t1-`fL/yy .
4ounty C4?Ao/ O We
Mame of evaluator 1 ??ss_s
Nearest Road Al GRID & soya
acres Wetland Width -2q0_ fe t
Date Q?L27
Wetland Location Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or adios
on pond or lake .
on perreerrnial stream forested/natural vegetation . %
. on internuttent stream agriculture, urban/suburban °fa _ID
within interstream divide - impervious surface %
other
Soil series sbhns-fon /Oa.?
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral- non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width 2100 feet
Dominant vegetation
(2)
I1?c%11/1l/la/Y .
(?)
? J
Flooding and wetness
semiperma.nendly to permanently
fl ooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
rr cudnu type ?seiect one)-
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater. marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral we tland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the ratin s stem cannot be a lied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
R Water storage x 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 =
T Pollutant removal * x 5.00 =
I Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =
lY Aquatic life value
x 4
00 =
.
Recreation/Education x 1
00 =
.
Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 112 mile upstream,
____ u2slope_ or radius ---------------------------------------
Provide the following inforlmttatioonn for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: wo / 2. Evaluator's name: __ I ;.,. i ciS S f (,
3. Date of evaluati%?d 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: a Ge 6. River basin:- . Caa e Ft
7. Approximate drainage area: VAknown 8. Stream order:- IS+
?,illi*r. ...: gal / j
9. Length of reach evaluated: O?,ta,ut 10. County: lout s?4 Ems! ,,?r??
11. Site coordinates (if known): ,^kn vwA 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under. evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
on eas+ s;Ee of Mix?h+so„ Rd ho?+h o? (?r?t1?r Rd in$erse?#ieir,
14. Proposed chanty
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions
iv. identity any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed Z (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? G NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (YES) NO
estimated watershed land use: _% Residential Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
Forested Cleared / Logged 16/ Other ( /`1i i<iroQtrr',ou5
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):. L - 2 r
24. Channel slope down center of stream; Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2):. Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be. evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide.an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): l (
_ Comments: ?Gllh 6 PPG t,t r/C.S iM t 1'?Ga^! ?i.?
J
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and env roam ntal professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
ME . The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
filar mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
*Pl
® a
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
.Huse ellaraelensucJ are not 1WJGDJel1111 coastai streams.
USAGE AID#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
4 EA
to STREAM QUALITY ASSESSME NT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NMOT 2. Evaluator's name: E RR?klev
3. Date of evaluation: 1.2 7.0 5 4. Time of evaluation: 9: jo a .
5. Name of stream- 4ER C (i ('toss cm k) 6. River basin: Cape Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: ,A n c wA 8. Stream order: ( aF
9. Length of reach evaluated: ti SO ?Pn`?`re ;? cne? P } 10. County: GUMberland.
11. Site coordinates (if known): i o know 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
c4a4 side of inUrrhican Ra '}rib fo 3EP- -Herr Widtnd CER-
14. Proposed channel work (if any): -4 A kA Own ro
15. Recent weather conditions:-- N° roi„ n° rf 4o h
16. Site conditions at time of visit: _ Coil. Cloud a
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed TT (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES t?0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES [
estimated watershed land use: Residential -% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
70 O/o Forested _% Cleared /Logged % Other( i i bit .I irnpF/'tf+Q?S 5u
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): G " -
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) , Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 100/.) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ? Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Verysinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: berr,...raQ; Peovires thrR iron Ox;di 6c terra
Prescr.4 1h S}r ?.,. i
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation fo m is intended be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
may. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
nn==ular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#,
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
A ucac %,uaLaVLVLLbuw aLO LLVL abbob'SCU LII COd.Sidl SireaM.
U-r civ ;

? ?*y

NCDWO Stream Classification Form sit' mow} E.
Project Name: PAVrehison Redd River Basin; i -?• °-> County: Evaluator:
i t CttftlLlC/%Lt+{a
DWQ Project Number: V _444+ Nearest Ndme&Stream: U04 Geese Latitude: Signature:
Date: e7 1 1 a2CV USGS QU?1D' ",+er Longitude: Location/Directions: :_
'
((1r EiiSt ?:ede. ?
MvrchScv- Rt, nor-V, e4
?-b?+•?ycJtta2d.
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNmnberPerline)
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) N A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 3
(*NOTE., IfBed&Bank Caused ByDitchingAndWITHOUT Sinuosity Thencrnr._p{l
10) Is A V Order Or Grea nel (As Indicated
On Tooo Mao And/ In Field resent? Yes=3? °
PRIMARY GEOMORPRVL'VGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
tt ern-R,hrnne T?nr,ro Ar.?....r 7.. Ct..?...isa9 a n
PRIM" Y BIOLOGY INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumberPerLbw)
T
3) Does Topography Indicate A rd /
Natural Drainage Way? ( J
0 S 1 1.5 ? }`?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINT?,\,9-
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 S 1
Last Known 1Z Ain? * l h Indicated #11 Above Aip 77iisStep And #5 +
5) Is There Water In Chkidl During Dry 0 S i c
?? /1 9) Are Wetland Plants In Streamoea7 SAV Mostly OBI, Mostly FACW MostlyFAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
I"A (RNOTE. IfTatalAbsence OfAllPlants lnStreambed 2 1 .75 ,5 0 0
Ls Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV PresenPl °
SECONDARYB,IpOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1 . S
i
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) _ 91d (If Greater Than or =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
dY
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.- 5 3"
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
I USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) I
5E
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSFIEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: E. Ibce T,?e? 1S ?n
3. Date of evaluation: L 2}. 05 4. Time of evaluation: [ / ;?0 ?...
5. Name of stream: .SER (UT Goss Cmi,-) 6. River basin:-- Caoc Fear
7. Approximate drainage area: UAkywn 8. Stream order: l'O /
9. Length of reach evaluated:! '(e rHrC u.nir 91 10.. Coun
ty: _Cumb ian
erjL
11. Site coordinates (if known):-- onk,ocV Ins 2?Subdivision name (if any): f. Dboa
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
On eas} side of Myrroh'%.nn M - keadwaker fa por{;on of Wef1 CEP-
14. Proposed channel work (if any): t? vVM-L&f," 1 rd wk1eal"I&
15. Recent weather conditions: No r6 in 9,%sf 49 h
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Gov dv Co l rk
17. Identify any.special waterway classifications known: ,-Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed -X-(I-Iv)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES @ If yes, estimate the water surface area: ^
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ®O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _%a Industrial _% Agricultural
-10 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged 30 % Other ( PhION _6as Tr ,.WJ',
22. Bankfull width: 1-311 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2-41
"Y
24. Channel slope down center of-strewn: u! Flat (0 to 2%0) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ?' Straight -Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2):- Begin. by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream.reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the continent section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Evaluator's Signature 39.?, Date 1. 15. 05
This channel evaluation fo6m is intend to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
may. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
?cular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
NCDWO Stream Classification Form FEP,
{?yh Project Name: Mvrch Rol, as A RivtirBasin: Yc Fee,,r County: (?jurr,i? i { Evaluator: E ? ea
DWQ Project Number: U,.41.1 ¢ Nearest Named Stream: DOSS reek Latitude: Signature: +??16e-e
Date: 2 .05 USGS QUAD: ? bv) chest+cr Longitude: Location/Directions: E& 11d e
of Mvrchaso.n R-• norhn c C
Honycv?4 ReC.
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLlne)
1. Geomo holo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? AT 1 2 3
1% Tn rM. TTSTI A T.v.... T., cf-.. l-A
JJ is inere An Hcuve kvr iceuc)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present?
0 1' - 3
(NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchinn And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Scare=0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Great el (As Indicated
PRIMARY
INDICATOR
R. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strons
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter r
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 5
Wn Rai ? ONOTE.- If Ditch Indicated n# t A ove nd #5 RAk-)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 S 1 1.5
N))k o) Are Wet and Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE:IfToral Absence Of All Plants InStremubed 2 1 .75 5 0 0
N ted bove Thi e S SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POEM. 1-C
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secon&ry) = 2-+ (If Greater Than or= 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharn Present? 0 1 (2) 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:-Q, ?j_
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATORPOINTS: 7
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
r STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCO o T
3. Date of evaluation: i. 21.05
5. Name of stream:- S. 5 9z f UT Cr cc Cr-"k?
7. Approximate drainage area: 6,A*A0W4
9. Length of reach evaluated: ?- l aS r `?i r
11. Site coordinates (if known): Jkno wn
5.5E?2
2. Evaluator's name: -C 1Zajd..,, /T. ,8a.ssoMe
4. Time of evaluation:- 2: 3o b .
6. River basin Ca io.,
8. Stream order: i
10. County: .CL:,, ?2nA
12. Subdivision name (if any):_FI' B?MQ
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby
?+roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
V its+ si& iLUrd isa t'M41- Or On 1 h ` OA I'7 I?Y?+a
14. Proposed channel work (if any): u, k4C1WA ", ??o'1?n' is r-6e4 IA,.
15. Recent weather conditions: No m., ?as+ q8 h. J
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Coil S u „r, ,
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10. -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters L Water Supply Watershed ,a-(I-m
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES @ 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES TO
estimated watershed land use: Residential _% Commercial _%o Industrial % Agricultural
M% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ?ase.11,1XI(ow S
22. Bankfiill width: - 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): I - S
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) L Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) ,-Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Z Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a .score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Z4 Comments: 16}uvn t4v„ r
,.i` 4._ _ 1 * _ L _ w
Evaluator's Signature Date 1.27.0S
This channel evaluation fo is intendedo be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
may. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
?cular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
C055 k
V '
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: Mvt-4:,Aison Roaj River Basin:04p, Fed,
LIJ d
S. -Cr,
County: wma,,q Evaluator:E. Rae44c,1
01 ^3
DWQProject Number: 0'4444 Nearest Named Stream: CossCredc Latitude:
Date: {. 24, as USGS QUAD: Nlanc w,;hr Longitude:
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNunberPerllne)
Signature: U?s J,
Location/Directions:(V, S,4o -;:
WrCINSa.., ltd. (+i4i>? •,° !`,.. , ,;
T.
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 U 2 3
(WOTE: IfBed & 271 Caused By Ditch(ng And IWrMOUT Sinuosity Then Scare=O')
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greate annel (As Indicated
PRIMARY GEOMORPIlVLiTGY INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 n 15
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0 S Q 125
Last Known Rain? (*NQ-rZi If Ditch Indicated 1 #11 Above s ' 77* Slen A ad #5 l w•
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 S 1 1.5
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = a `I ra(`'If Greater Than or =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
1. Geomo bolo Absent W Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter _
is) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL MostT,Y?FACW MostlyFAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE. IfTomlAbseneeOfAl(PlantslnStreambed 2 1 (75\ S 0 0
USACE AID#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
I f
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 7r
3. Date of
5. Name of
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
116

2. Evaluator's name: 1i rr. ass 1?C
4. Time of evaluation: ; 0 m
6. River basin:--
8. Stream order: _ n
?10. County:_
JCI'kn?
11.'Site coordinates (if known): Last know y
12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Easy sidr- of tJuroh;son pi horfl, of }(on4acatt Rd' ? +o ws Gr k.
14- Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions
10-S ite conditions at time of visit:
11.4dentify any special waterway classifications know
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters
-Section 1.0 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
_ Nutrient Sensitive Waters V Water Supply Watershed Z (I-M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (NO? If yes, estimate the water surface area: /1J
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does chann? el appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
estimated watershed land use: _% Residentia Commercial Industrial _% Agricultural
7% Forested _% Cleared / Logged Zja% Other ( M/ Parv 6ASG ? i n pe o o-S a =te..
-?&-
22. Bankfull width: ---? --- tI 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) ,-Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends -Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
-Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the.character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
Evaluator's Signature t/l m / Date Q2 S'
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and envir nmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
Eky. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
=ular mitigation ratio-or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ#
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
v".?
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: tkrch+sm RW River Basin: Cape Fear County: ??nbcrk+rtd
W der; 0J
DWQ Project Number: U-4-141- Nearest Named Stream: CjosS C,.,(-Latitude:
Date: 4. U2 05 USGS QUAD: -f{Anc{?cs+cr Longitude:
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One NwnberFer Une)
11ef?
Evaluator: E. Ractd,7
Signature: Zey
Location/Directions: i Sid, a?
hlurch?sa, Rd, nit,. oC
14"'Yttt PA, UT to Goss
creek-
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 F? 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed _
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 3
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Catucd By Ditchint, And WITA'OVT Sinuosi_tiTlten Score=O*)
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated _
PRIMARY
INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: Circle OneftniberPerUne)

1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? -?
0
5 1 .]41 Vll
1 5
2) Is There. A Grade Control Point In Channels 0 5 li 1 5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainaee Way?
l?
5 1
I
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
P cnt In Streambed'?
1
2 Is Sediment On Plants O Debris) Present? 0 .5 1.
3 Are Wrack Lines Present? .5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since
Last
Known Rain? * (*NOT'E.-ffDitchkdiwtedbL#IlAbov,! S 0

kip TkUSej) And -5
1
„,

S
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or I Growing Season)? 0 S 1 ` 1.5
Are H dric Soils Present In Sides O Channel Or Headcut ? Yes 1.5 No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: Say
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =22,25 (if Greater Than or =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Internuttent).

II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/DischgMePresent? __ 0 I 2
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 'Y
-, s..,. •• , .-.- -, .quo-U.-, 0A V 1vl0suy UiiL Moses ACW MostlyFAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: IfTotal Absence Of AllPfunts In Stremubed 2 1 7)5 .5 0 0
t d b ve Skip Thir a UNLESS SAVP-resenM.
-AS SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
0 0 0
J
Y

4
37
l4.

t .
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
- -- Wetland Boundary C Wetland Data Point
- - Perennial Stream Q Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow Military Reservation
Boundary
1
r '?f
' ? _ 3 yt ~i IMP' `l '? ? 7 r Y , 9 '?` .? . , a!'
ti
w
E
s
I ' I I Feet
0 100 200 400
.,? North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 6
• •
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary C Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream 0 Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow Military Reservation
Boundary
w
F
s
I I I Feet
0 100 200 400
?J7 North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 7
•
0 4
If Y"
r?}'d ,•N .d -.. .?? gyp. .?. a •? ,
i A:1Oi? :..ems ti ?¢ ?i F ° ,t
jk_
T
• r -iw
7 r7
{...! Ili -•.. V '+? . > ?,: '?
4kO
Y#4 r ''`y •.4 ' Fp +I. l ' FT'' ?f R 4 i ," \ t+ + •aA. t a2
All 14
- r. T M ?` t `iO?.r b •?j ,`"? Y''f'M°?'.1Ik ?-?,
Wetland EER kr? '
16
Y,`^.. ":;.r: ` 'x. °?„e e? y ' ,+\. - F-a 1? R f •?I'?p?,?°+'C ?•,?pr +r. .'?. ._F f1('`j^_'?? -.?
";r Stream 8ER Stream 9ER
./ -? yr a .'{, Si • " ?4 3
f - 'R „•?''bp'R` i? e+ . ?? y. -A"'R'?. .? ??h4 ? ?? `: 'YT a „?"Z W, ? t (?? ? '? t?C ire
j, I L ? ? ' ' G ? ? aT , ? r , w f ?, ,,? "k?Z k°i ? i ??` •?j
` Scream 10ER,
s+17I? •? k ,g x a ,? s t d i r? ?z .
ILI
. v 4 ?" osf". 1?y?'?y.. '7°?. ??• ; .a
.d { , ???,5?'}dt??d?R?i ll? ?? •.. ..? £ ' t y ? ,sc?-s:. ??. +j?'? r`?'7l
.. t
Y
- , a
f? .... ?- Stream 9ER
X`.:" ' ?,,? ski , We • ,? y,• .+.
• ' ? - ''? ? -ten
.vit -_ .IYL n ? -^,.ft. ? ? *4 4'R'? r?•K `•'' `u N? ••?,? ; K •?'
t .y s a > . ?, iiG? r.g>3+ ^ 4 > 6. r t
%
i i",., ? ? ? ` i?: ? ?. SYR" t ?. ?''s . • s .y.7. _ ; • 4'R. ' '}• _ ?'?' ?f `, j.?.'?1
Fw A.
Apt
?. St,_rr. DER' , =`,?3:.,` , »: ?` ?.? "''
??, >, .?4'. r ?:? , , ?y/? K .. ' ?r-,? _ `• ,?;, Stream 6ER s?
t Y.f..:. t?• f"... `r` ` w .•'.> s • ti r*e3?? V ?• /.>Mr •r/ y?f,-.?•;''?'
v •"'1?`v`• .t` yak •s_'r' /s'R d.?
y ? ?'? t _2 A.
Air .
x?RM `3pj s• • ,y_?f, _ y `r' s. {fir ?:
il 4t
i F ?? 't6 t't ra .mot a _ a
4" '44
JAL Is
? ? s • . .e, ?f' ?3,? ; ? • • _ v ? r ? ' ? "d y?,- '?j ,?; ? - 4 t . N ,fit' ...
f ,r,v `?? , ,Rr. r '*'S s „v #. d'¢ X 0;, ta'• wr. f,
:61 +
`fh(• ,* ? ?r}s l...y„ '? :" ! t d -. ? fir ` - ?, ,'4'??.5'?, ??{?, . ??,'/.'
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
- Wetland Boundary Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow Military Reservation
Boundary
AV
w
E
s
I ' I I Feet
0 12.5 25 50
14="b. I
s . North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 7a
•
OF-

I+
¦
1'.
I
r
,. v

1 0
I •
J
r
11111 •
r
r?
Jr ? r ?•
Perennial Stream
" Intermittent Stream
Wetland Boundary
Limits of Project
2 400
' 00 4F.e1 Study Corridor
¦
% 7
k,
•A : :
¦
rm
•n !
a
?: ?? ? yew
O YA

?-?A41a73°?i?!eA1$d?
EER Wt
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 11- +44+ Date: (, 2 ,fly
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT County: Cum er(
Investigator: 'P, Sasgeft;J F. pacWy,,, State: r_
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes. ? No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No V, Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ? Plot ID: ECR
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
c !r C F-AC
u rubr F' C
noIc Wt

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) j. 100q _
Remarks: Sal?9P::n#- Cpvr?a;ns y f?r?4siPr?ct a°? ?vro??p Ve$P '"?
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
X Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
v/ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

Depth to Free Water in Pit: _(in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
V Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?ctf's.lq ?o??' Con"?a?ns wc"Ka? (?y?rc,l?Y irolicc?}oRs
Community ID: PFO 'Project/Site: U -4444
Transect ID: Date: I, Zg. O?
Plot ID: EE R WET
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Gi(w (oanw
ma Drainage Clas:_ moderate Lid,( drn
Confirm Mapped Type?
%I F Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: A urG 14nnt udclu < No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 19 1Z I
3- o R I -? n
to 512.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: So.+??.'?l fro?it{. Csa-}RigS ,. f<hC Sdt? iro?rC , '
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? / Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?LYes No A ,
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ,/ Yes No
Remarks:
[-ER Uri!
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
riv?cw?uc• _. U-- If '#9Date: i . 2 . os
Applicant/Owner: N CD OT County: I
Investigator: T, sassc#e./ ?_Z. gLtGl?.,tu State: NI r_
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes V' No Community ID: UPL
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: E L1f
(If needed, exDlain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Pa s lug ri s G F
Ileac !
i r tu?' I C FA r-
Over a
U,
FA CtL

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) , 500
Remarks: 56'nOIJ

A j_ Il0'?" Co?1 fain /pre d'4 fib ®? y /V ! G (VEge74 ,
RIA .7
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
„ R Water Marks
-Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:_ (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

De
th t
F
W
t
i
Pit Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
p
o
ree
a
er
n
: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wr_jf

Community ID: Uri, Project/Site: U-4444
Transect ID: Date: 1, 2-%, OS
Plot ID: EER U t.
SOILS
Map Unit Name

(Series and Phase): rlearl loa

Taxonomy Subgroup: Brut ic. IHo

?? .Sa

olud u (ta Drainage Clas:

W u ;
/' -0-dP114
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
inches Horizon Munsell Moist
Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
4
- z t io ?rk 43
-
--
S

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
nl o ?yd roc Sat `nd ;calors
tl+- sa.?wP?in
?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Its this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes _ /_No
tV#_'f /area`

Project Name U= Ne s
t- Road l`1_ itr t,?? s ,?,,?
+?
unty Wetland Area ?`? c ?
`'
acresWetland Width 70 `?1 -30 - -rile of evaluato
feet tUA41 &M P
r ck{E'
Date 01 S
Wetland Location Adjacent land

oil pond or lake {within 1f2 mile e,_oC 7adtus)
on perennial stream forested/navegetation --nn
7

on intermittent stream
within inter
strea
di
id urbaa/suburb?
agriculture%
m
v
e
other impervious
%
Dominant vege
Soil series ??r' l?rntr 4Snn {1) ?t
predominantly organic - humus, much,. (2) A#/..<fa h?'41.
or peat
d _ ----
`
pre
ominantly mineral - non-sandy {3} L i r?
a c?P
predominantly sandy C

Hydraulic factors Flooding and wetness

steep topography semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
ditched or channelized
total wetland width zioo fe
t seasonally flooded or inundated .
e
_ intermittanly fl
ooded or temporary
surface water

Wetland pe (select one)* no evidence offlooding.or surface water
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna

Headwater forest ' .
Freshwater marsh.
Swamp forest Boglfeii
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the ratin s stem cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels_

-R Water storage weight
x 4.00 = Wetland
Bank/Shoreline stabilization _ x 4.00 = Rating
T
Pollutant rtmoval
-

x =
5.00 -
I
Wildlife habitat c4
x =
I 2.00
N
Aquatic life value
5-
x 4.00 =
Recreation/Education
x =
1.00
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
u slo e, or radius
------p--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
V? wErz
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: (J.- 4444 Date:
Applicant/Owner. IaCDOT County:
Investigator: 'P- g ?r?#FP E E?Qclrs State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? /
Yes L/ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(If needed, exDlain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
bar 6'w"',
r Nei rl
am J'. vi i
Ac' rvb, C C
` FACW

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)/ / r0()°l,
Remarks: .r- $cuyP ??q pal C?'Gen? q, ?1 l9)'?+? ?. ?? /byQ C.- V?!? o?
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
X Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
i/ Saturated in upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits.
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

De
th t
F
W
t
i
Pit
6 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
p
o
ree
er
a
n
:
(in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: , e
Community ID: FF6 Project/Site,;
¢
46-4
Transect ID: ),pate: / 28_ v5
Plot ID: 8'ER W ET2
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
G lead l o%.u Drainage Clas: fijode6gA?4 r /
.? Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: Aauic 14op ludi l4c X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle . Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast , Structure, etc.

l y .

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditi ons Listed on National Hydric Soils List
'?C Gleyed or low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 5'a -P any P&A c ;wS cL Aya/,-iC Sol I n e!a ?o?•
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
GIs this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?

Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No

FtQ WET 2
Project Name U 4444 /Mvr k4yx fast W dew}m Nearest Road Myr:lv,Tm Rd
aunty CUrnbMond Wetland Arla ?S es Wetland Width ?_- feet W19A-A Ut'
MIIIme of evaluator M _°i' l3assefte/ E. Rrae1u.* Date ! 28 OS
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
?C other sAa e
Soil series siilwa t annul s A
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral - non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
;K-steep topography
ditched or channelized.
total wetland width 2100 feet
Adjacent land use
.(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or Cadlus)
X forested/natural vegetation (06 %
X agriculture, urban/suburban 30 10/0
- impervious surface
Dominant vegetation
(1) _perzea bo(bortia.
(2) Ma IV u' d A.
(3) Aces r vbrmn
FIooding and wetness .
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
yr eiiana type (select one) ,
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna 1?to?-civu)ne Pks?ss
x a
ea water forest Freshwater.marsh -
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest X Other ML
*the rating systeYm cannot be applied to_salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
- -----
'• weight
-R Water storage x 4.00 =
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 2 x 4.00 =
T
Pollutant removal -w,<
I * x 5.00 =
I Wildlife habitat t x 2.00 = >=
Aquatic life value Z x 4.00 = t:<:::r>J
Recreation/Education x 1.00 =
Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, .
u sio e, or radius
-----?-- E-------------- - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F7 WE7
DATAFORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: L,- 4 4 44 Date: 2.2.05
Applicant/Owner: N (D pT County: b r lgn_j
Investigator: T" 13R 040- E• RAC1494 State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Pewpro
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: Tg WCT
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
L',4 tAdsmb . s 4vra c p vo. C, AC+
r unejn i 4i' @Ihtft S q
r c FFu H FA

rnI I&k

Percent of Dominant. Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) l , fl°lo
Remarks: 5ct v ' /2A, r- t',v e A1°ev4tJ0 Y tb?44j/)?C vep f,
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
X Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
_ ' Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _ (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Water-Stained Leaves
„
Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1?
Remarks: 5&.- oIiAg ?b$4 ?1^9 W?f? hydfol7y i4ictr
?J
Community ID: Pj5ft Project/Site: U-q g g 4
Transect ID: Date: 2, 2- 05
Plot ID: g WE
SOILS
Map Unit Name
p Drainage Clas: ' , f ; ,
?
(Series and Phase): ?Jobn'4oro Hofw Confirm Mapped Ty e.
/?
Taxonomy Subgroup: Cvmv{lc Humaouenfs Yes
_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
Q v
- :o to G 2 10 K 414- M &w I Ai i
10 -IA4 to to 614-
e
c! 01,

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
educing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: S n , t
?p 1 J
?+?c?r? c +
s? I) , +?dt C4°i*`o4?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
F R- uPc
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
r1ujcL;u01Lc: U.' 44A-t Date: Z. Z, 05
Applicant/Owner: N 40 07' County: 6ert
Investigator: I- gGSS?tf?i ac, Rmcweu State: -N c,
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: pL
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: U/tL
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
r iaie, .5 FAC
PiAtj at rt,sf.%s S FA w+

i Ui Jamb r r "o dC S PC+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)3
- °7Q
Remarks:
54 1 oil 1
Pei ? 0?5 en vol e+lc e ® Ay tv'P' + C.. veq 2 e4
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
k Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
r, I r Water Marks
Q?"? Lines
Drift
Field Observations: I v
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _ (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

De
th to Fr
e W
t
i
Pit
712 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
p
e
a
er
n
:
(in.) Water-Stained Leaves
i Q N Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12- (in.) J? FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: uy
No
hydrology iacq

sa0??{n?f

g?"

Community ID: UPL Project/Site: U-4444
Transect ID: Date: $, Z • 0 5
Plot ID: F`r6 UPt-
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Clas: kw &aina
rr
(Series and Phase): ya yd use. lO da* S&MJ, Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: T ic, 14dIZ u d a I+_c No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
ID-2 10 2 313 -? sfifiv loam
- ) o A --. S
- 2? 10 R 10 6 C0wv,0k1dirFr4t a A 1

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
(?lo h?pdric Soil ihdtcchrS /t
q+;Alph Q ?IdeitT
/?/
WETLAND DETERMINATION
hytic Vegetation Present?
d Hydrology Present?
Soils Present?
1Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Yes No
Yes ? No
Yes No
Yes No
l Remarks:

Project Name Nearest Road l?o S;r
lan-itofevaluator- unty Gberla.1t? tiVettand Area acres Wetland Widthfeet
(IM a act Date of
Wetland Location
??01
on pond or lake.
on perennial stream (.s is 't a? e
on interrruttent stream
within interstream. divide
other
Soil series Johns+on le )&M
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral- non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
Adjacent land use
(within I/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
mac, forested/natural vegetation ? %
agriculture, urban/suburban 4D_ %
)c impervious surface %
Dominant vegetation
(2) Li u ?. a u

Flooding and wetness
semipermariently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
interrr ttanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
?-steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width z-.100 feet
w euana type (select one) `
Bottornland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater fo;est Freshwater, marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
= weight
R Water storage x 4.00 =
fC Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00
T Pollutant removal * x 5.00 =
I Wildlife habitat , x 2.00
I I Aquatic life value x 4.00 = =>
Recreation/Education x 1.00 =

Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >I 0% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
u slo e, or radius
----?-- p------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: U
Applicant/OWner:
Investigator: 9-
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ?ess
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Area? o
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
0 131,4M
2. o.r ?aada- C fAr-
3.rSp_p/bow ® .? FAQ
4.Cc.r hubttirn C Fqc
5._ gx ob .?. FAQ
s. »Ges c?Fvsvs - FACR
7.
ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:.
Remarks: Spl?
J
--,6-(in.)
-10 -(in.)
-- J_(in.) JJ
100"Vi - Go'hhT .'qs
Dominant Plant Species
G1 8 WET
Date: 2.2. Q5
County: j? L-?
State: _Nc
Community ID : Fo p
Transect ID:
Plot ID: T
Stratum Indicator
10.
11.
12.
1
16.
5 b
8307.
?r^eva?tnc? e l? ? - Ve9e,7Iaf^
Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_i!!?'Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS -jp
% f we
?roJer- 0-ggqY
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): _J064^ h IoGln..
Drainage Class: erU nwo-iu-d/Y1in
i
?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Curr,(ili Numno Field Observations ?
?
u?,tz Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
C3 D t2 2 -? _ ?aPrni sdr b .

l0 R 5 ? team
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? s No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: 60+ner h GX+wt0V 1 4 .,cxs eL detm, - +o Gee • ? ?i fr
!'oad Icee , tc?a+Pr;n we'//m ) +Aereby ceeq+inq hnwdet*M OT' ux:i-4.
by HQUSACE 3/92
Q TB VPL'
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
'rcject/Site: IL-44 4
Date:
kpplicant/Owner: N coo County:
nvestigator:,
State:
)o Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ,/ No Community ID:
s the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No s/ Transect ID:
s the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indi
t

nvs 44g-J&
C
AC ca
or
ors; a"Iiperg w A C+
1 Cx o Acrti- . r A -
a ncria FAcw+

f S"?
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) 017
Remarks:
"t
C. i f
enS ??'2VQte?tCe a?-fi?c?i^A?'I?y4?iG ? ?1
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits

Depth of Surface Water: -(in,) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary- Indicators (2 or more required):

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Water-Stained Leaves
---
Local Soil Survey Data
N Q 1V G
Depth to Saturated Soil:
>12 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No ky j r o lo3 j ;,,d lr c0. s e4

N
Community ID: APL Project/Site: U-4e444
TransectID: Date: 2. g, ®.S
Plot ID: G L
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): - ?d use (bat f san,4.

Taxonomy Subgroup: _ „??nnl uddl Ls Drainage Clas: We& d tai n-A
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
inches Horizon Munsell Moist
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
/0 ?iz
2, ?- - sank

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Usted on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes -7-No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes 71-No
Remarks:
..................
..::........::...
D.>
Project Name V -
-ounty _
liffame of evaluator.
Nearest Road
Wetland Area acres Wetland Width _ feet
Date 0a /QZY3';
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on internuttent stream
within interstream divide
other
Soil series Jo?ns?o„ loan,
predominantly organic - humus, much
or peat
predominantly mineral- non-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
I? -steep topography rejetti ve fo *e co" I
ditched or channeEzed. Plain
_,,-total wetland width zt 100 feet
Adjacent land use
.(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope,_or adius)
forested/natural vegetation S °!o
x agriculture, urban/suburban ? %
Y_ impervious surface _101 %
Dominant vegetation
(1) J w? cH,.s g ? sL, s
(2)
(?) /?auA0I rlA
19 F ([r? Llfq-Al`^?r1Y?(/fV°
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water.
VY C«ana Type ?setect one) , .
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
XHeadwater forest Freshwater. marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
" weight
R Water storage 3
x 4.00 =
?>
Bank/Shoreline stabilization oZ x 4.00 =
T Pollutant removal * x 5.00 = < <
I Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =
Ar Aquatic life value x 4.00
Recreation/Education a x 1.00 = f
P??PO
Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >I 0% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, .
u sto e, or radius
----- e---p------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
HER WET
Project/Site: U-4444
Applicant/Owner: 1? W oT
Investigator: IT Bass e?Fe E. Reek Iv..
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the, site? Yes V No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
Date: 2,4.
County: CvMI
State: kie
Community ID:
TransectlD:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species St
t
ra
um Indicator
orpus k- OBL.
t
"'6'y"hl
S
FA- c
Jun , eFF t/ H CvJ
08L-
nuS f c 1L -
FA
c,

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (exclud ing FAC-) .
51
Remarks: Sgw?,?l rt.i ,I?pd.?T r rt1S prf."???6 C? A }? A),, fVAy 4 VQ4+ZAihvv%

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
X Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
V_Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits

Depth of Surface Water: Q? .. (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

Depth to Free Water in Pit: $ (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil:_ (in,) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ,
dr-;-Je, and 9row?dwa? S
F
1* -0
a pl;? ?Ooi,11'
c?-1Q??? ,,vef/ l ydf?l?y
ri r , eu
?v? ? i oC5
Community ID: p,?M 'Project/Site: U-4444
Transect ID: Date: 2.4.05
Plot ID: HER WET
occ
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):

Taxonomy Subgroup:
B1a4w tooYr%u

Ar a is 1 LPI
zart)

Ud a l fs Drainage Clas: We& dain,4
Confirm Mapped Type?
Yes
X_ No
Profile Description:
Depth
inches Horizon
Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
O- b to 53 to R 5/4 -Corn hm 4."+t„ . JAA&
-12.+ /o t 10 2 :Y4 i Gii !

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: S an I , ^h pof * CACWA ??Ydi".C soy r nab. c4foe
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ,/ Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ,/ Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Ks: we,-" /w r n
roadside ?!!',`5
s Cross C+ ek we -fanol sys Ir 'S-f 744dr 1976P, FTB ? A vd C',
t
NER UPI-
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: U-4444 Date:
Applicant/Owner: N Wo r County:
Investigator: T 8asse•Nc? E. Rraekl,.1 State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes _,,- No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No -?- Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain in remarks.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicat
r
C o
K N/
FAc
rA
21 u aevl

a?3
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-) _12? S4
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks:)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits

Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 in.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
).j ON Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12. (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No kyd f o loqy i'A c NWr a+

Community ID: SQL ProjectlSite: U `4444
Transect ID: Date: 2.4 , o5
Plot ID: HeR vpL
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): A(U.nW f o2X
W Mn) Drainage Clas: dt'atneeL
Confirm Mapped Type?
.0 Yes
Taxonomy Subgroup: Qrcn;. 14u )yduli*_g NO '
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
R ? 13 c" M c/

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?i G-vh p ?;,,? p a i
S61 t„p1C cl Cmf ?o? S hD? CGYI? ? hYr?N's C?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes = No
_ 1r
1?ER.
Project Name 0-4A44 Nearest Road 11/larr?„ ?„ .?.
mC?imberia? at `Vetland Area ?) acres Wetland Width -39
feet
of evaluator I- A&CS64kj 6. Raticif
Date
9?e-
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide ?.I ,
_ other _A ¢.p- i ( t?car?5?+??? '
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope,_or adius
forested/natural vegetation -5 %
agriculture, urban/subiirban -15 %
impervious surface
Dominant vegetation
Soil series lc?aM.a s?,?? (1) SG+r?VS GVmP{invs
predominantly organic - humus, muck,. (2) _ J unu+s eFfusvs
or peat
predominantly mineral - non-sandy a,
X predominantly sandy
I Flooding and wetness
Hydraulic factors
semipermanently to permanently
steep topography flooded or inundated.
ditched or channelized seasonally flooded or inundated
total wetland width z100 feet interrnittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
rr euana type (select one)-
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna .
Headwater forest ` Freshwater marsh .
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat k Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
weight
.R Water storage x 4.00
Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 =
T Pollutant removal * x 5.00
I Wildlife habitat x 2.00 = <>
Aquatic life value. x 4.00 =
C Recreation/Education ( x 1.00 =
Wetland
Rating
*Add I point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstreani,
u slope, or radius
----p-- ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
USACE AID# .
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
?T$
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: E'- klead
3. Date of evaluation: 3 - 3 , fl5 4. Time of evaluation: q ; no o-
5. Name of stream: GT13 ( Gnat cr d 6. River basin c'#'` rear
7. Approximate drainage area: 944 W 8. Stream order:
„+e w,s, c%a?ne/
9. Length of reach evaluated:- e t -- ?
7 ? 10. County:_ nnber-bn,?
11. Site coordinates (if known):__ LIA1Owt1 °?
12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
'
13. Location of re h under evaluation ote,nea?rby roads and ]a,n?ks attach map identifying stream(s) location):
0?1 w25f- S, C 0(-' d??ritN Z?AG7'?+ 1i t,,y?teCh IS
4-AP we-.;+ cA. _c M-4--- hi _ r,_.
14. Proposed charm
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of visit: .5 Vn R?/ co W
t
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed ff--(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: / t
1 QI j?oes channel appear on USGS quad reap? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
estimated watershed land use: _% Residential Commercial _% Industrial
Agricultural
a% Forested % Cleared / Lo ed 4(A°/ Oth M 1 `
22. Bankfull width: - I - 4,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -/ Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight _Occasional bends
-Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc.- Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for, the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The. total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Evaluator's Signature Date 3.9, oS
This channel evaluation foci is iused only as a guide to assist landowners-and environmental professionals in
a ing the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
lar mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
gel o er.(_ , t{n?r„ ban- tm?
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
i uv.av vaacaawvwaaauw a v llvt, "bumocu Ill Uumi l Suvains.
USAGE AID#
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:-. NCDoT 2. Evaluator's name: E Rafkieu
3. Date of evaluation: 3 - ,3. 05 4. Time of evaluation:- 9 'Do a,
5. Name of stream: -(".T$ cr?oLs 6. River basin CQn? -
7. Approximate drainage area: O W, 8 . Stream order: s }
w+s, tJ,e
9. Length of reach evaluated: (.? ?„/„ 10. County: nnber J
11. Site coordinates (if known): (.olkhow/1 ??0?
12. Subdivision name (if any): NIA
13. Location of red h un
$,V r jvaluation (?ote,nearby rods and ]ap rks attach map identifying stream(s) location):
0? w?5f- E'.. 0F' d?•er?rrtJ` RetetdPat?itSt dJ.,e tS
4-0 v.,e..,+ sill. -r n, _ ri_.
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sun RV Celt
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: -440A-
170 oes channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? N.
stimated watershed land use: Residential ° o
?/o Commercial ? o
a% Forested
22. Bankfull width: - 4'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -/Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ? Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from
Evaluator's Signature . ,, Date-3. J. os
This channel evaluation foci is intended o be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
ing the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
lar mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
-/ o dustrnu -/o o Agricultural
Cleared/ Logged Y001o Other .(All, 12n,
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ?? $ ''
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
?+.w.. vuau uvwia?uw cuv 11V1, aaacaacu mi t;Vanai strcur yy.
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form (p?
Project Name: Mvr &t,zi, PA River Basin: Ca.,, FQ,r County: Cu" bert a"A Evaluator: E ?
Wi ?ey't'?
DWQ Project Number: U -4444 Nearest Named Stream: Goss OIr44 Latitude: Signature:
?j
G(??J Dam: ,3.3.05 USGS QUAD: Mana.,sfer Longitude: Location/Directions, ay WCsf Sid,
of tm-chiza" l?d.- T?gYvS istio
/
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line) 4?/c}?a•.d GTB
1. Geomor holo Absent w Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 2 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 1 2 3
4 Is The Channel Sinuous? 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present? 1 3'
Is The Channel Braided? 3
7 Are Recent Alluvial De osi resent? 0 2 3
8 IS There A Bankfull Bench Present? 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 2 3
(*NOTE• IfBed & Bank Caused By Dttchinn And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score-0*)
'
10) Is A 2°e Order Or Great; nnel (As Indicated
On Togo May And/Or n Fie] Present? Yes=3 NQ
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOWGYINDICATOR POINTS:-q_
Secondary Field Indicators: Circle 0neNwnberP,,Lfne)
1 Is There ead ut Prese t In hannel? .5 1.5
2) Is There AGrade Control Point In Channel? 5 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainaa_e Way? 0 n 1 15
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. O.5
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 15 © 0
2 Is Sediment On Plan Or Debris Present? 0 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 1 1

4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0
3
1 _
1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE.: If Ditch Indicated #11 Above And
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 S 1 1.5
Conditions Or I Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes S No=6
SECONDARY HYOROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: S. S`
A)/q 8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL osttyFACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of Ail Plants in Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skin T ht Step UNLESS SAV Presenn
SECONDARY BIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:.
TOTAL POINTS (Primm + Seeonda") = 2" S (If Greater Than or =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 1 2
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
USACE AID#
DWQ #
Site # (indicate on_attached map)
E E
E E STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
7. Approximate drainage area:.- (4^40WA 8. Stream order: a 9- ct4d .v?? ?.? P-rtes y
9. Length of reach evaluated: aiDllrrl?c• A155D ? 10. Coun try:
11. Site coordinates (if known): 4A kAown 12. Subdivision name (if any): &- , ra'aq
Provide 5. Name of the stream: following G OS 5 information for the stream C reach under assessment:
's name: 2. Evaluator's name:
I i'? t ?a SP,?
3. Date of evaluation: C'1 > o?, 4. Time of evaluation: M
1. Applicant 6. River basin: ?-
0
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
On of r 8r : inF ion
14. Proposed channel work (if any): know id t
15. Recent weather conditions: a
16. Site conditions at time of visit: '3
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ;Water Supply Watershed Z (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO f yes, estimate the water surface area:
Roes channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does c el appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
I I I stimated watershed land use: _% Residential JA% Commercial _% Industrial -% Agricultural
Q% Forested _% Cleared / Logged q% Other
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank heighl?(from bed to top of bank): A,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%°)
-
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score
s ?
O
LA
co a strea,..e(bc?+uee'? /? ra. I 2 ah t 1 et c mG Flo s C s
Evaluator's Signature Date a$ $
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and-en fm m tal professionals in
Lathering the data required. by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
pm-ular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version Q6/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
--App aka°^ eQs)- s;de ®-F tic atc?CM?4?s?,n Qo,?J, _
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

I USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
I
tiiwt
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: N CO ar
3. Date of evaluation: 2.2• o 5
5. Name of stream: :;TB CUT Cross Creek)
7. Approximate drainage area: l AI:k rown
9. Length of reach evaluated: -"S:b
11. Site coordinates (if known): u4tknow,,,^
-+TF-:.
?f
2. Evaluator's name: - -r Gassrflcl t Racal
4. Time of evaluation: T; on
0
6. River basin: Cnbe- FPnr
8. Stream order: 16+
10. County: Curn6 llarir
12. Subdivision name (if any):- N/A
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
csf side- of Murchison P-4 - -lrib -lo Cros reels,
14. Proposed channel work (if any): `_A,p 4wst he'?`t+?`??el? teary I.cu?a/ee;
15. Recent weather conditions: No rai„ tea gh 44 k y
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cool., _ GloyAW -.45"F
'17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters - Nutrient Sensitive Waters /Water Supply Watershed V(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface .area: &
1 Q mopes channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O A` 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES(N J
I I III ? .
?timated watershed land use: % Residential -k% Commercial _% Industrial Agricultural
5-0 % Forested % Cleared / Logged 10 % Other IYI i !; } i M fJ'v? ok5_ l -
22. Bankfull width:
23'. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):-)-81
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _ Flat (0 to 2%) t% Gentle. (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: --?/ Straight .Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how.to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ?$ Comments:-
Evaluator's Signature- yam. Date 2• Z Os
This channel evaluation fofm is intended O'Ve used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
eathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
alar mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
NCDWO Stream Classification Form 2Tn
t-projectName: ftrchison loo! River Basin:
L Fwr County: Coftbeeld#%& Evaluator:
widero,,5 t E' R4ekley
Gray! DWQ Project Number: (1- 444 4 Nearest Named Stream: leek. Latitude: Signature: C?,,?c?L
Date: Z• 2. OS USGS QUAD: MtAnGl7eS}Gr Longitude: Location/Directions: WGe_s+ S) ?e
Murchimr- Rd. - 44 i'e &14,
Geek,
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomo polo Absent W%ak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed ,.
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) U A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 U 3
(VOTE, If Bed & Brock Caused By Ditchinr And FrrffOUT Sinuosity Then 3core-0t)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater ne1(As Indicated
PRIMARY GE0MORP19F9BGrGYINDICATOR
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
FlowlDischaree Present? 0 1 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.-_2
Secondary Field Indicators: f0releOneNwnberPerLine)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR
R. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Stron¢
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter _
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0 .5 1 1.5
Last Known I Ditch ndi ted In p Above
5)1s There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1 1.5
N,A al Are Wetland Plants In Streamoeot SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU MostlyUPL
(• NOTE: IfToral Absence OfAIf Plants In Streambad 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 12 (If Greater Thanor =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1.5
USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
l f
i ' ? r ? STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: /UCOc)T 2. Evaluator's name: ?? SstTQ
3. Date of evaluation: 144 J Q 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: (IT ar- ( esrPpk @ E/Z 6. River basin:- (G,p{?
i
7. Approximate drainage area: 04:110WA 8. Stream order: 1cl't- i"
9. Length of reach evaluated:- rid! ur, s{? )10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): IA&%JCA*WA J 12. Subdivision name (if any): ??QGq
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): W4 IEnow ' c f
15. Recent weather conditions: #1b ra,n , i'i?Y, nr
16. Site conditions at time of visit: c% ??? (7 °
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters - Nutrient - Sensi ' Waters ? Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO f yes, estimate the water surface area: n
QI Roes channel appear on USGS quad map? YES to) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
estimated watershed land use: _% Residential 10 % Commercial Industrial _% Agricultural
50 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged ? % Other (/fib _ a ?_1 Mph d"?`? ? '
22. Bankfiall width: 1 4-1 JC f - w; d Q 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): L;,,-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) =Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (-10%)
25. Channel sinuosity:. Straight _Occasional.bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within-the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
s
Evaluator's Signature ?L+?'? Date Z o j
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and envii onm tal professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. to make a preliminary assessment of stream
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
ular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1 nese cnaraciensncs are not assesses to coastal streams.
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: Wrcirson RoaL River Basin: c PF41
4
W
ide i .5
[I? DWQ Project Number: (1 -4444 Nearest Named Stream-,C,,53-
Daze: DUSGS QUAD: mAOC?)?
es4er

Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number PerLine)
1. Geomor holo Absent I
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed ..
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 V 3
(*NOTE• If Bed A Bank Caused By Ditching And ]MOUT Sinuosity Then Score-0e)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or GreaJy.Cty3nne1 (As Indicated n?
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)

PRIMARY
INDICATOR POINTS:
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0 S 1
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 S
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ?'6
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL
(* NOTE: IfTatalAbsence Of All Plants lit Streantbed 2 1
8ER
County: C,?e?,iod Evaluator:
Latitude: Signature: -T, 9ctflo*
Longitude: Location/Directions-6$+ Ne, OF
Mu t-c-h SOn Rd,; VT +o G ass
Leek
1.5
y FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
S 0 0
BIOLOGYINDICATOR
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) =257.7r- (lf Greater Than or =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).

11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Dischar e Present? 0 1 2
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
?6k
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name:- ss
3. Date of evaluation:- `t 1 ZDU 4. Time of evaluation:- J) , o GL-1
5. Name of stream: ER [ZT p C!D SS c/`t 6. River basin:
?QC,I'
7. Approximate drainage w 8. Stream order. 5 ?u1(J
`?L
i? 9 t
9. Length of reach evaluated.- 710. County: G `wt beP/a
11. Site coordinates (if known): UA4 12. Subdivision name (if any): q
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads, and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
F-a S(dc of MVrch+sa, RA 7 tl?' to Goss IngtL
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ! Mk1kawn 00+04141 "ed u)iJ0A#tAn
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters
- Nutrient Sensitive Waters
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?
F 1oes channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20
p -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Water Supply Watershed l (I-IV)
If yes, estimate the water surface
appear on USDA Soil Survey?
. -stunted watershed land use: % Residential 10-010 Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
SO % Forested _% Cleared /Logged % Other ( +4 rrow5
lM R _cr 1 MA
22. Bankfizll width:- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ! in in
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ,Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between ?? 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): f0 Comments: D ere.,4; ./ ro ..::r. t _ . 1 _-L; ..? • i_ _n
L-
Evaluator's Signature C?.?? ?Ll (or)i Date `f I ? a aLOpS'
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and en 'r on ental professionals in
Ftherilar ng the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change-.version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
NCDWO Stream Classification Form ?CR
Project Name: River Basin: QoeJrzal-
' County: ?'"P//c{/t01 Evaluator:
w: o(r?;?f
NC a) 0 M i s?
yG DWQ Project Number: U-944 NeardsstNamed vStream: ??k
Latitude: Signature:

r Date: 14JAZJ?Z005 USGSQUAD: hA_nc??
''yyYYRR Longitude: Location/Directions: F43t sidc
1 `???
V of Murchi4ch PXL UT +,M
(, /
/ Goss 4efg.
t Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNumherPerRne)
1. Geomor bolo Absent W k Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed ,f,,c7\
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 01-----? -2 3
(NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Michine And WITHOUT Sinuosity Thin Score=0t)-
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greate nel (As Indicated ?p
PRIMARY
INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNamberPerL&w)
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0 .5 1
Last Known Rain? MOM ff Ditch IndicaMd #11 Aim: And s
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
1C>>
SECONDARYI3YDROLOGYINDICATOR
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2 (3
)
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:-
R. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter _
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) _ °' MI5 (If Greater Than or =19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
usaeE AlD#
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
IM STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:.- NCDoT 2. Evaluator's name: E• Zckls,,,
3. Date of evaluation: 4.12.05 4. Time of evaluation:
J2 ; !0
5. Name of stream:. /OER ; Ur to Gass Creek' 6. River basin: C&pc F-e4
7. Approximate drainage area: tM kl'lOwn 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: -)o ?-?p 10. County: M ber ka
11. Site coordinates (if known):. tAAknot-JA 12. Subdivision name if any):
Brpao
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): i de
X F Mu fC-GSi eri tu? UT ?o Cross Lr c 14
14. Proposed channel work (if any):. t.-ftkA wn ! A0+enA.1 MnA
15. Recent weather conditions: ho r&, ',r oc, sf s A (?
16. Site conditions at time of visit: G WJu ?O ° p •
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed 1(I-IV) .
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes estimate the water surface are AJ p
1 QI Roes channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
.: estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
ROL% Forested
22. Bankfull width: r' 2 "
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ,/ Straight -Occasional bends Frequent meander
-Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
-Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2):..Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 4,12. 05
This channel evaluation f is intende a used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
athe data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
ular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
a.
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
I O % Commercial _% Industrial Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged % Other (JYlit/tare b4 /iM/Xlwiew y 1
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4? •1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name:fi'Jurch,swr Road. RiverBasintape Fever County: CVmberictrA
I / ASS ?elyden:.u-.I
V? DWQ Project Number: U_4441- Nearest Named Stream: CroSS Creek Latitude:
Date: A. (2.O S USGS QUAD: fNt ches*tr Longitude:
10 EP,
Evaluator: E. Q'ckl*tf
Signature: Location/Directions: On w4b 39,
OF 1'?°lurchisa^ RA. - IJt 'la
Cross Cfeed-
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle OneNmeberPerUne)
2) Is The USDA Texture In
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
UT--A-I-:- n_-.-...o n I n rr\
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 U 3
MOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Dttchinr And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Scare-0")
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated ,
PRIMARY GEOMORPRVMGY INDICATOR
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1 I Thee A Head Cut Present I Channel? V V1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 15
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? o 5 1 15
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:J•_
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? ? ,ri h i red In #11 Above And Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
Are H dric Soils Present In Sides O Channel Or In Headcut ? Yes 1. No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:- -4-
g) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mosby OBL costly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
1 t (? NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Stremnbed 2 1 .75 S 0 0
BIOLOGYINDICATOR
TOTAL POINTS (Primary+ Secondary) = 25?.5 (If Greater Than or= 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent).
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 1 2
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:

Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
Wetland Boundary _ Wetland Data Point
Perenn,al Stream 0 Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow Military Reservation
Boundary
w
E
s
I ' I I Feet
0 100 200 400

North Carolina
Department of Transportation
INC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 8
•

-
low
P'
- (( 1
-'°s? -ram- 7
r ?? _,.. `
4
tNrl,
Legend
Limits of Project Study Corridor
--- Wetland Boundary '"I" Wetland Data Point
Perennial Stream Q Upland Data Point
Intermittent Stream Fort Bragg
Stream Flow - Military Reservation
Boundary
w
F
s
I I I Feet
0 100 200 400
-.? North Carolina
Department of Transportation
NC 210 Improvement Study
Cumberland County, NC
T.I.P. No. U-4444
WBS No. 36492
Wetlands and Streams Exhibit 9

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
September 21, 2006
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
o?
sFA
'1L '0 ?s ?TAx
o,Q??q?lYy
0
R??v
This letter is in response to your request for comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) on the potential environmental effects of the proposed improvements to NC 210 from
NC 24-87-210 (Bragg Boulevard) in Spring Lake to the proposed Fayetteville Outer Loop in
Cumberland County, North Carolina (TIP No. U-4444). These comments provide information in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act requires that all federal action agencies (or their
designated non-federal representatives), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action
federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any federally-listed threatened or endangered species. A biological
assessment/evaluation may be prepared to fulfill the section 7(a)(2) requirement and will
expedite the consultation process. To assist you, a county-by-county list of federally protected
species known to occur in North Carolina and information on their life histories and habitats can
be found on our web page at http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/countvfr.html .
The Service is very concerned that at least four federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker
(RCW)(Picoides borealis) clusters are located.near the project area, of which their half mile
foraging partitions overlap with the project area. These clusters are located on Fort Bragg
property and are being monitored and actively managed as part of the North Carolina Sandhills
East Primary Core Population of the Sandhills Recovery Unit. Three of these clusters are
currently active (FB 0207, FB 0165, FB 0375), and one cluster is currently inactive (FB 0264).
Two additional active clusters are near the project area (FB 0208, FB 0281), but their half mile
foraging partitions do not currently overlap the project study area. The removal of pine trees
greater than 30 years old may negatively affect the RCW.
If pine removals occur, a foraging habitat analysis using the guidelines in the 2003 RCW
Recovery Plan - Standard for Managed Stability (USFWS 2003) will be required in order to fully
assess the effects on the RCW. The Standard for Managed Stability requires a minimum of
3,000 square feet of pine basal area in stems > 10 inches dbh (diameter at breast height) on at
least 75 acres of suitable habitat as defined in the 2003. RCW Recovery Plan for each foraging
partition. Should habitat removals lower one or:more RCW foraging partitions below this
threshold, the Service will consider this a "take" of the species and formal section 7 consultation
will be required. This process requires up to 135 days to complete once a complete initiation
package is received from the Federal Highway Administration. It is extremely important that
this project be designed to remove the least amount of RCW habitat possible.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect. (Le. likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) any other listed species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e. no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on other listed
species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence.
We reserve the right to review any federal permits that maybe required for this project, at the
public notice stage. Therefore, it is important that resource agency coordination occur early in
the planning process in order to resolve any conflicts that may arise and minimize delays in
project implementation. In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the
environmental documentation for this project include the following in sufficient detail to
facilitate a thorough review of the action:
1. A clearly defined and detailed purpose and need for the proposed project, supported by
tabular data, if available, and including a discussion of the project's independent utility;
2. A description of the proposed action with an analysis of all alternatives being considered,
including the upgrading of existing roads and a "no action" alternative;
3. A description of the fish and wildlife resources, and their habitats, within the project
impact area that may be directly or indirectly affected;
4. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that are to be impacted
by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, or draining. Acres of wetland impact should be
differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the National
Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers;
5. The anticipated environmental impacts, both temporary and permanent, that would be
likely to occur as a direct result of the proposed project. The assessment should also
include the extent to which the proposed project would result in indirect and cumulative
effects to natural resources;
6. Design features and construction techniques which would be employed to avoid or
minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources, both direct and indirect, and including
fragmentation and direct loss of habitat;
7. Design features, construction techniques, or any other mitigation measures which would
be employed to avoid or minimize impacts to waters of the US; and,
i
8. If unavoidable wetland or stream impacts are proposed, project planning should include a
compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting the unavoidable impacts.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please continue to advise us
during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr.
Gary Jordan at [phone], ext. 32.
Sincerely,
dt Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Literature cited:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis): second revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 296 pp.
cc: Richard Spencer, USACE, Wilmington, NC
Rob Ridings, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
John Sullivan, FHwA, Raleigh, NC
AND NATta .'_ RESOURCES
aanOFZEE\a ? ' a iAL OFFICE

t
OCT - 4 200E
AT ER U'TV rS TI "t
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
MEMORANDUM Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator ??
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: October 3, 2006
SUBJECT: Response to the start of study notification from the N. C. Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) regarding fish and wildlife concerns for the
proposed improvements to NC 210 from NC 24-87-210 in Spring Lake to
the proposed Fayetteville Outer Loop, Cumberland County, North
Carolina. TIP No. U-4444, SCH Project No. 07-0086.
This memorandum responds to a request from Gregory J. Thorpe of the NCDOT
for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the
subject project. Biologists on the staff of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) have reviewed the proposed improvements. Our comments are provided in
accordance with certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our records indicate the Federally Endangered Red-cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis) occurs within the project study area. NCDOT should conduct
surveys to determine the presence of cavity trees and foraging habitat within the study
area. Any unavoidable impacts to Red-cockaded woodpecker habitat should be
minimized. To help further facilitate document preparation and the review process, our
general informational needs are outlined below:
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area,
including a listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered,
or special concern species. Potential borrow areas to be used for project
construction should be included in the inventories. A listing of designated
plant species can be developed through consultation with:
The Natural Heritage Program 0 ?°
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation' ,), 1 ['23
1615 Mail Service Center BY
OCT 3 0 2006
UENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORRAWATER 15RAMCH
Memo
2 October 3, 2006
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1615
[phone]
W W W.ncsparks.net/nhp
and,
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocating portions of streams crossed and the extent of
such activities.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by the project.
Wetland acreages should include all project-related areas that may
undergo hydrologic change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or
filling for project construction. Wetland identification may be
accomplished through coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE). If the COE is not consulted, the person delineating
wetlands should be identified and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife habitat impacted by
the proposed project. Potential borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or
fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and indirect
degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes the environmental
effects of highway construction and quantifies the contribution of this
individual project to environmental degradation.
8. A discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources which will result
from secondary development facilitated by the improved road access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal,
or private development projects, a description of these projects should be
included in the environmental document, and all project sponsors should
be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for
this project. If we can further assist your office, please contact me at [phone].
Cc: Gary Jordan, USFWS
Richard Spencer, USACE
Polly Lespinasse, DWQ