HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060274 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20100105December 30, 2009
S&EC Project No. 1021.E1
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
US Army Corps of Engineers NCDENR - DWQ
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Parkview Building
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Jean Manuele Attn: Mr. Eric Kulz
Reference: Year One Monitoring Report E Pr 0 V
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Warren County, NC JAN 0 5 W-0
USACE Action ID No. 200221365
DWQ Project No. 20060274 WERM WSTORM IS$RpWA
Please find the enclosed Year One Monitoring Report for the above referenced site. As you will
find in the report, it is our opinion that the stream, wetland, and vegetative components of the
restoration have met the success criteria as described in the Monitoring Plan.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest opportunity.
We thank you for your assistance to date and look forward to the continued success of this
project.
Sincerely,
S IL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
avid Gainey
SA&M Department Manager
Attachments: Year One Monitoring Report dated December 2009
Cc: Mr. David Lee, Wake Stone Corporation
Newell Farm
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Year One Monitoring Report
Warren County, North Carolina
December 2009
Cataloging Unit - Tar River Basin 03020102
Prepared For:
Soil & Environmental
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 •
www.SandEC.com
Consultants, PA
Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467
Wake Stone Corporation
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Project History ....................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Mitigation Components .......................................................................................... 1
2.0 Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Methodoloy ............................................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring ........................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring ............................................................................ 3
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring ............................................................ 5
2.2 Results .................................................................................................................... 6
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria ................................................................... 6
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria .................................................................... 6
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria ..................................................... 8
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success ................................................................................... 8
Figure 1- USGS Vicinity Map
Appendix A - Monitoring Layout
Appendix B - Stream Cross-section and Overbank Event Photos
Appendix C - Groundwater and Rainfall Data
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Appendix E - Pebble Count Data
Appendix F - Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This monitoring report has been prepared by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) to
present and evaluate site monitoring data for the period October 2, 2008 through November 10,
2009, for the Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site located in Warren County,
North Carolina.
1.2 Project History
The Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site was restored by the Wake Stone
Corporation in order to offset an estimated 2,058 linear feet of stream channel impacts and an
estimated 6.28 acres of wetland impacts associated with the expansion of its Nash County
Quarry. The project site consists of approximately 28 acres and is located roughly 2.25 miles
southeast of the Town of Warrenton on the west side of Dr. King Road (SR 1001) in Warren
County, NC. A vicinity map is included as Figure 1.
Waters on-site drain to Fishing Creek (C;NSW) in the Tar River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloguing
Unit 03020102). Stream mitigation includes the restoration of approximately 2,551 linear feet of
stream and the enhancement of approximately 737 linear feet of stream. The wetland mitigation
effort involves a total of 18.55 acres of wetlands, including the restoration of prior converted
wetlands, the creation of new wetlands, and the enhancement and preservation of select existing
wetlands. Wetland acreage generated calculations on the Newell Farm Mitigation Site are based
on a wetland delineation performed by S&EC following the completion of site construction.
Construction of the restoration, enhancement, and creation areas on-site was performed during
the period May 2008 through June 2008. All construction and planting was performed by the
Wake Stone Corporation. Periodic construction observation was performed by S&EC in order to
ensure that construction was performed in general accordance with our design intent.
1.3 Mitigation Components
After the completion of the project construction, total accrued mitigation credits were tabulated.
Field data were gathered and evaluated to quantify the length of the stream channel and wetland
acreage on-site. Sheet 1 in Appendix A depicts the overall monitoring layout, with the A----A
section line (at Station 7+37) shown to separate stream enhancement from stream restoration
areas.
Mitigation Type Total
Stream Restoration 2,551 linear feet
Stream Enhancement 737 linear feet
Total Stream Length 3,288 linear feet
Wetland Restoration 5.17 acres
Wetland Creation 3.83 acres
Wetland Enhancement 3.55 acres
Wetland Preservation 6.00 acres
Total Wetland Acreage 18.55 acres
In November 2006, a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit was issued to the Wake
Stone Corporation for impacts at the Nash County Quarry. Mitigation for these impacts has
debited against available mitigation credits at the Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Site. The permit Action ID Numbers are identified in the following table:
Impacts on the Nash Mitigation Provided by the Newell Remaining
County Quarry Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation
(USACE Action ID Restoration Site
Number 200221365,
DWQ Project Number
20060274
2,058 linear feet of 2,551 linear feet restoration and 737 493 linear feet
stream linear feet enhancement (total 3,288 (restoration) and
linear feet) 737 linear feet
enhancement
6.28 acres of 5.17 acres restoration, 2.72 acres
jurisdictional wetland 3.83 acres creation, (9 total acres of (restoration and/or
restoration and creation), 3.55 acres creation), 3.55
enhancement, and 6.00 acres acres
preservation (total wetlands 18.55 acres) (enhancement), and
6.00 acres
reservation
2
2.0 MONITORING
As described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan dated February 16,
2006, site monitoring will be performed for a period of 5 years or until approval is given by
USACE and DWQ (hereinafter Agencies) to discontinue monitoring. This report serves as the
Year One Monitoring report for the Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site. Stream
and wetland monitoring will occur annually, with quarterly site visits to assess general site
conditions. Physical, vegetative, and hydrologic data collection will also be performed as
required during these site visits. Monitoring reports will be submitted annually to the Agencies.
2.1 Methodology
This section includes information concerning; 1) hydrologic monitoring, 2) vegetation
monitoring, 3) stream morphology monitoring, and 4) evaluation of site monitoring success.
These data will be used for comparison with data from subsequent monitoring years.
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring
A total of eight (8) Infinities U.S.A., groundwater monitoring gauges (labeled Gauges A through
H) were installed on the site, with four (4) in wetland restoration areas, three (3) in wetland
creation areas, and one (1) in a wetland enhancement area. An Infinities U.S.A., rain gauge was
also installed on-site. The locations of all monitoring gauges are shown in Appendix A on the
Monitoring Layout (Sheets 1 through 6).
Gauges were installed on October 2"d, 2008 (during the growing season). Gauges were
operational for a total of 31 days during the 2008 growing season, and at the time of the last
download on November 10, 2009, had been operational for the entire 210 days of the 2009
growing season. Rainfall was recorded by the on-site Infinities rain gauge. Rainfall during the
2008 monitoring year (for the period October 2 through December 31, 2008) was 2.19 inches.
Rainfall during the 2009 monitoring year (for the period January 1 through November 10, 2009)
was 30.08 inches.
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring
Eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots labeled VP1 through VP8 are located across
the site. Each tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plot is a square, 10 meters (32.8 feet) on each
side (100 square meters, or approximately 1,075 square feet). Two (2) bank vegetation
monitoring plots are located adjacent to the restored stream channel. Each bank vegetation
monitoring plot includes the planted live stakes along approximately 65 linear feet of stream
channel. Three (3) herbaceous monitoring plots are located across the site. Each herbaceous
monitoring plot is a square, 3 meters (10 feet) on each side.
The locations of all monitoring plots are shown in Appendix A on the Monitoring Layout (Sheets
1 through 6). Photos of each vegetation plot are presented in Appendix F. Vegetation counts for
Monitoring Year One were performed on July 14 and 15, 2009 by S&EC.
To aid in future surveys, the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 1 Protocol was used to
prepare a map of the plants within each of the eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring
plots. These maps will be utilized in future years to aid in determining the survival of individual
planted stems within each vegetation monitoring plot. Each planted stem counted during
Monitoring Year One was flagged with pink or orange flagging.
A table indicating the total number of live, planted woody stems in each sample plot is included
below:
Plot VP I VP2 VP3 VP4 VP5 VP6 VP7 VP8 Total
Numbers
Planted
Woody
Stems- 16 35 7 0** 12 19 16 11 116
Year One
Count
** See Section 2.2.2.
Species diversity is described in the following table:
Planted Woody Stems, Year Plots
One (2009) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Year One Totals
River Birch
(Betula ni ra)
1
--
1
0
--
--
--
3
5
Silky Dogwood (Corpus
amomum)
--
1
--
0
8
4
7
1
21
Persimmon (Diospyros
virginiana)
--
2
--
0
--
--
--
1
3
Virginia Sweetspire (Itea
virginica)
--
1
--
0
--
--
--
--
1
Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) -- 1 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 1
American Sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis)
9
--
3
0
--
--
--
2
14
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus
michauxii)
2
5
1
0
--
--
--
1
9
Water Oak (Quercus nigra) -- 2 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus
pagoda)
3
8
2
0
--
--
--
1
14
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos) -- 13 -- 0 __ 13
Silky Willow (Salix sericea) 1 1 -- 0 4 9 7 1 23
Arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum) -- -- -- 0 -- 6 2 1 9
Possumhaw (Viburnum nudum) -- 1 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 1
Year One Totals 16 35 7 0 12 19 16 11 116
Plot Live Stem Density
(stems/acre)
648
1,417
283
0
486
769
648
445
671/587
Site Average
Live Stem Density 671 stems per acre is avg. of all plots except Plot 4**
587 stems per acre is avg. of all eight plots including Plot 4**
** See Section 2.2.2.
4
Planted live stakes were counted within the two (2) bank vegetation monitoring plots. Live stake
survival will be calculated based on data collected during the Year One Monitoring in 2009.
Future bank vegetation monitoring data will be compared with this monitoring data to determine
survival rates for live stakes planted along stream banks. Live stake counts by species and by
plot are presented in the following tables:
Year One (2009) - Bank Plot 1
Common Name Species Total Number Planted % of Total Species Composition
Silk Dogwood Cornus amomum 23 26%
Silk Willow Salix sericea 57 64%
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 9 10%
TOTAL 89 100%
Year One (2009) - Bank Plot 2
Common Name Species Total Number Planted % of Total Species Composition
Silk Dogwood Cornus amomum 23 44%
Silk Willow Salix sericea 17 33%
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 6 12%
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 6 12%
TOTAL 52 100%
Herbaceous vegetation varies throughout the restoration site. The three herbaceous monitoring
plots all meet the requirement of being over 50 percent covered with herbaceous vegetation.
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring
Fourteen (14) stream cross-sections consisting of seven (7) nested riffle-pool pairs were
established on-site and are shown in Appendix A on Sheet 1. The As-built stream survey,
including cross-section data, stream pattern data, and structure location, was performed by the
Wake Stone Corporation in October 2008.
The Monitoring Year One survey of the stream enhancement area and two representative
longitudinal profiles was performed by S&EC in July 2009, and the Year One cross-section
survey was performed by the Wake Stone Corporation in November 2009. Representative
Longitudinal Profile No. I was surveyed from Cross-section Pool 4 to Cross-section Pool 5.
Representative Longitudinal Profile No. 2 was surveyed from Cross-section Pool 6 to Cross-
section Pool 7.
The As-Built and Year One survey data will be compared to survey data collected in future years
to assess continued channel stability. Cross-section and representative longitudinal profile data
from these surveys are presented graphically in Appendix D. Photos of each surveyed stream
cross-section (all taken facing downstream) are presented in Appendix B.
5
2.2 Results
This section includes a summary of site monitoring ass compared to established success criteria
for hydrologic, vegetation, and stream morphology. For additional information the interested
reader is referred to the appendices.
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria
Success criteria for wetland hydrology, as described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream and Wetland
Restoration Plan include the saturation of the upper 12 inches of soil for at least 18 consecutive
days during the growing season. There is no specific data regarding the average growing season
for Warren County, NC; however, the growing season for Vance County, located immediately
west of Warren County, is 210 days (from April 6th through November lit).
Hydrologic monitoring data for the 2009 (Year One) monitoring year indicates that the site is
experiencing conditions consistent with local jurisdictional wetlands. Data collected for the
monitoring period are presented in graphical format in Appendix C.
All eight (8) gauges on-site have met hydrology requirements for both the 2008 and 2009
monitoring years. Consecutive days of saturation for the 2008 growing season range from 28
days to the entire 31 days the gauges monitored hydrology during the 2008 growing season.
Consecutive days of saturation for the 2009 growing season range from 56 days to the entire 210
days of the 2009 growing season.
Based on our site observations and recorded groundwater gauge data, the site has
performed successfully during both the 2008 (Post-construction) and 2009 (Year One)
monitoring seasons with respect to hydrology.
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
The success criteria of planted woody stems within the riparian wetlands are based on the
combined survival of tree and shrub species for the 5-year monitoring period. Survival of woody
species planted within the restored buffers and wetlands must be at least 320 stems per acre
through Monitoring Year Three, 288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 4, and 260 stems
per acre through Monitoring Year 5. The stem count is based on an average of the stem counts
of the eight (8) evaluated 10x10-meter tree and shrub buffer vegetation plots. The success
criteria of the two (2) bank vegetation plots along the restored channels are based on the survival
of approximately 50 percent of live-stake bank plantings for the 5-year monitoring period.
Vegetative success criteria of 50% coverage will be required at the end of the 5-year period for
the herbaceous planting zones. This coverage will be qualitatively evaluated based on
observation of the three (3) herbaceous monitoring plots and herbaceous vegetation within other
planted areas.
The average number of stems per vegetation survival monitoring plot is 14.5 stems for
Monitoring Year One. Based on the eight (8) vegetation survival monitoring plots, the overall
site planted woody stem density is 587 stems per acre for the 2009 (Year One) monitoring
6
season. There are thirteen (13) different planted woody species represented within the eight (8)
tree and shrub monitoring plots.
* * NOTE: Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is located within an area of wetland enhancement.
The area surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is heavily vegetated with natural
volunteer herbaceous species and is regularly inundated with shallow water approximately
6 to 24 inches in depth. Soil in this area has a high organic content. Enhancement of this
area consisted of modifications to the surrounding grade in order to improve the hydrology
of the area. This area was not planted due to the level of inundation at the time of planting.
Enhancement of this area consisted of grading the surrounding areas to improve
hydrology. Based on a visual inspection of the inundated portions of the wetland
enhancement area including and surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4, the area
appears functional, is a well vegetated wetland, and contributes to overall site diversity by
providing a more open wetland type necessary for many native plant and animal species.
We will continue to observe Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 and the surrounding wetland
enhancement area in subsequent monitoring years to assess its progression and the role of
this area in the overall ecosystem within the restoration site. Because the Restoration Plan
specifies a total of eight tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots, we have included
Vegetation Plot 4 in the calculations of site average stem density; however, it is our
opinion that the inundated wetland enhancement area including and surrounding
Vegetation Plot 4 will likely naturally revegetate without further planting efforts. Volunteer
woody species such as Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) have already begun to
appear within Vegetation Plot 4.
Native herbaceous species have become densely established and are dominant throughout the
site. Herbaceous species observed along stream banks and in the buffer and wetlands on-site
include:
• Jewelweed - Impatiens capensis
• Soft Rush - Juncus effusus
• Lizard's Tail - Saururus cernuus
• Sedges - Carex spp.
• Switchgrass - Panicum virgatum
• Joe-Pye Weed - Eupatoriadelphus fistulosus
• Duck Potato - Sagittaria latifolia
• Goldenrod - Solidago sp.
• Dog-fennel - Eupatorium capillifolium
• Boneset - Eupatorium perfoliatum
Many volunteer woody and herbaceous species have appeared likely due to surrounding forests
and mature trees preserved on-site, which provide a nearby seed source. Volunteer tree and
shrub species noted within the tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots include Swamp Rose
(Rosa palustris), Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Red Maple (Ater rubrum), American
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Black Willow (Salix nigra),
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), Tag Alder (Alnus serrulata), and Sweet Gum (Liquidambar
7
styraciflua). Volunteer woody stems within the tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots
were noted and counted, but not taken into account in calculating planted woody stem
densities within the plots.
Multiflora Rose (Rosa mult flora) and Privet (Ligustrum sinense) are two invasive species that
have been observed on-site. Prior to site construction, the population of Multiflora Rose on-site
was treated with an herbicide to prevent it from dominating the restored wetland and buffer
areas. Currently, one small area of Multiflora Rose is still located on-site, and is being monitored
for future herbicide applications as needed. Privet, although it is a highly invasive species, is not
common on the Newell Farm site. Very few specimens of Privet were noted in the northern
portion of the stream enhancement area.
The vegetative component of the mitigation effort has been initially calculated and based
on current stem density is expected to meet the established success criteria of 320 live stems
per acre by the end of Monitoring Year 3, 288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 4,
and 260 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 5. Live stake counts within bank
vegetation monitoring plots have been performed and a baseline determined for future
survivability calculations. Herbaceous vegetation in all herbaceous monitoring plots and
other areas of the site is dense and vigorous.
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria
Based on visual observation of the restored stream channel, it appears that the restored channel is
quite stable. Multiple overbank events have been documented by the presence of wrack lines,
flotsam, and flattened vegetation observed in the floodplain during various site visits. No areas of
severe erosion or failing structures were observed during this year's monitoring. Any evidenced
erosion, bare banks, or failing structures observed in future monitoring years will be documented
and a plan implemented to repair the problem areas.
A representative pebble count was performed at cross-sections Riffle 5 and Pool 5. The pebble
count shows that Riffle 5 is currently composed mainly of gravel, and Pool 5 is composed of silt,
sand, and very fine gravel. Year One pebble count data will be compared to future year data in
subsequent monitoring reports. Data collected are presented in tabular and graphical form in
Appendix E.
Per the Mitigation Plan, success criteria have been met in that the stream bedform features
and cross-sections have remained stable (i.e. the restored portion of the stream has retained
its proposed Rosgen stream-type classification of C) through the current monitoring year.
Accordingly, it is our opinion that Year One monitoring of the stream channel confirms
morphological success.
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success - Year One (2009)
Based on vegetation data collected within the sample plots, existing groundwater gauge
data, and stream physical data, the site meets the success criteria as set forth in the
approved Restoration Plan.
0
Project ENo Figure I - U5G5
Vicinity Map
Project Mgr.: Wake Stone Corp. Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Newell Farm Restoration 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 846-5900 • (919) 846-9467
Scale: Warren County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1 2,000 -Ii3
Warrenton and
8/21/2009 Afton Quadrangles
APPENDIX A - MONITORING LAYOUT
9-40 1 ina l 9NNOlINOW 11VNIA0
:-ON 4994:vNll a774®o'DHp S-A% A
+00£ = I NOIlV210d2107 Z ' 07 NJNRNM L946-94B (616) :m3 • 006"M(616) 'mod 4I9LZ m!1?J glnx `gei'PY PAY LPN ?t11 OI01 I
?i 3NOls 3)NM `sjuv:tsuoUaWU0JjAUH O
?a oa 31lS NOllb9lllW vdm a; S
:ameJO :-?5ryro?
a i 'o' W21bd 11149N
..ON ;-fold :aovloJd
935
.l9 6000 `0£ - 90 onr NO )jA/ 1n5 9Nl*N;QN19N3 a311Wil £
'3NOlS9tbM
Jl9 9000 `Z N9901.oO NO AAAain5 9N121]3N19N3 Q31IWIl 0
'31bWIXmw" ANN S32lnlb3-4
3115 TV d0 SNOISN3WIa aNb `SNOUVAT3 `SNOIlb90l I
:5310N
tarn ?nlNSia
W
C)
1 \
(W+Zf'??sJ
NO11V71QL9M WvzMLS aNZ `
1 t 1
l
1 L U
Ir-
,unorNJOa ua2JaN O
o
/ J
Z
E-
z
y y O
YJN YJ
f
W
---
d O
(G6+L '761 /
21R e- -d AG m101111
j
NOLLVYQIGM 1142,116NIUM /
v
Zd/N
I
'133'13 9NINSId yJ
NOIIVd 10igg'd "
W` g3 UG - IV, N0I1:)95 MO139
d
lN3W3DNVPN3 avm
Wb3?JlS - N0IlD35 9AO'2 d ca "Im Y
Doc 0 osI Doc
SV9?Jb N0llbn*83G9&l CINVU-M
,? N17JS ?
Sd3?Jb 1N3W]:)NVPN3 CINVU9M Doe = 1. I Tv:)G
9V3?Jb N0liYN0iG3?J aNbl13M ® Nl?JON E
GV-:NV NOIIV-: JD aNbl13M
w
0
0
(V
6Nw'7?oki6uuoyuoyNlc6uimuO?Nl1t7\I ZO f\?I£-I WOh2?S?\
9 d0 Z I d .O;ZWG inoxM 9NNOIINOW
o1224G :21411 aaay -
09 I NOIlV210d?J07 7N "M N72R AM L94Y448 (6i6) n3 0069-9M(616): oogd 419LZ ?!l?J R7n11 CPU Prop ?P!11 ?*tl 010 11
]NOls alvM V] AM
?siuminsuoa ivlu;DUIU0JTAU3 V ITOS
00 D 3115 NOIld9111W
ime. :v6yy fw
I T I Zo 1 MV=j 1l3M3 N
:-ON ;ovlo..d :aoafoad
z iol (A
?N12JO11NOW
NOliVi]0]n
r IIJJj /
1 If
I
I ? ?
I I
I "
I 1
]N I? V---- V ?fl a?lON?C] /
NOUVd 101S3?J AVJ?IiG N1919 / yw
p
Ir I
/ 11 r I, z?
zJN
Icl
Ia
= 1
r ?
IAN
1
r
x
I iMci
N I?JO11 NOW
NOUViIDIn
9NISSO?D
clvo'?l
all?I]ninD
(00 + 0 ' eqG)
1N]W]DN` PN]
A`V'Ms NI919
09 0 0£ 09
.09 = ., I Qld:)s
PDION
9
Q
w
w
Z
U)
O
Q
Z
OL
O
Z
O
2
MOON-r N00I L
- l
?m
9NVA
SS0210 )OUN hi
)loop-r OOl vir
N33-N0 9NINSI:A ES
NOUV101S3?J
'
?I1S -..V.. N0110I5 M01.99
Wd_q
1N:]W30N` PN3
AV-:MIS -,,V.. N01103S 9n09`d
5V-:NV NOLLVA ]G-INd aN`d119M
C;VgN d 1N3W30MdNN9 OMdl13M
,,V-:NV NO11` dO1S3-N aN`d11gM ??ll
?J
GV-:NV N O UV_q? 10 a NVI.L9M
S39f1`d9 9NN011NOW .190IONCI IN
SN01103S-SS0*80 AV-4N1S UN <
d
G1011 9NR1011NOW N011V 993n a
S1NIOd OlONd N0UVi99_9A :du
a N 999?
0
N
8
tV
9.40 c 9 143NS inO;,`dl 9NNOIINOW
:'ON 7294 :219111:
09 = I NOUVIND-MW 7N "07 N"N
:71 34015 3)IVM ?I :uoq
3115 NOIl` OWN
M I zo W r? MV=J ll3/ N
®a'3GP®s''tiLAL
L906.948 (616) !-d • 0069-M (616) mwgd • 419LZ V1q°"J gVOX V?alyY • Prot a" -Td OI01 I
Vd 6siuv4jnsuoa joluamuosleug Yg jjoS
-VcIN
Va
I iMJ
9NI"NOlINOW
NOliVi]9]n NN` 9
NOON-r N0MI
-
"
9NVA
SSO?JO )OO
d
,IOON-r 901
-AgJN0 9NINSI?
NOUVJOIG-:N
`
-
W
d3?JIS
..b,. NOIi03S M0199
AgAgON` PN3
VWD'?I1S - ,Vii N01109S 9A09`d
GV-:NV NOII`Mn 199-: Jd aN`dI1-qM
GVgN ' IN3W30NVPN3 UNVIJLgM
GVJN`d NOIIV'NOiGn (IN`1f119M
GV91 d NOliVn:) aN` 119M
539f1`d9 9NNOIINOW J.9010?JOJ.N
SN01103S-SSO?J0 Wb3?JIS UN ?
d
SIOIJ 9N1?JOIINOW NOIIVJ999A Q
SINIOJ OlO[4d NOIi` I]5;IA t„
CA
09 0 O£ 09
mmmmmm?
09 = 13Td0S
PENON
0
-vd
?`, Idu
I iMd
9NI?IOlINOW
il
a
snoiovg9 Ji N
I,
J / V ?.1 V ?3
DDJ /
l 11f[t I
? { I
(NOUV1O1sg21)
N igndq
?o of o? al?N
w
W
T-
0
Q
r?
V
rv
O
z
O
al
6.
E
L
W
N
J
9 d0 t' O 133NS 1f1owl 9NISO11NOW
:'ON 1994:21411 1904 ®° ?dP®S eee?r
09 I NOIIYN0d?J07 7N ' 07 NJNWM L966-968 (616) and • 0065-968 (616) -I9d • 619LZ wRQwJ 41>old `98i 91"d • PWN 28PIM BMRI OI011
7WIG.4M ::Llowe-?ai Vd ,%unjnsu0:) TnIIaIUUOJIAUH V THOS
JiIS N0)iV9111W
?n[J° :v6 ro?
i iaoI MV=J T;]NgN
:-ON 3?7rOJA :477rOJd
(1N9W93N`dNN:I)
d i!D nd!D ,k!D mo?a,k u
_V lOl d
DNI'JIMINOw
NOliVi]9]n
13)
(NOUVI
? i E)ndq
?9 of o'?akN
? iol J
9N I' ?IMI NOw
NOliVi]9]n
igndq
N I`d l
vil9l
z iol CA
_9NNOiINOW
snog3dg,?iiN
09 O O£
? "mm
Pi?ION
4--4(; A
0)
(NOUV9
e i!Dndg
"k9M O?J a.1kp
'Ld
L?
cl
u
w
W
Z
to
g
J N ,r z
oC
?o
z O 'z
0
)loop-r )IOMI
-
GGM0 )IOMI
9NVA
-loop-r Sol
Ng-IND 9NINSW
NOllValOIGIN
*
211S ..d.. NOUD-IG M0139
Wd3
lN3W9ONVPN9
AVJN1S - X, N01102G 2A09`d
Sd3?Jd N0IIVA-J3S3'8d (INV 9ffi
GV-:NV 1N3W3ONV14N3 aNYligM Q
GV-INd N0I1b'2l0lS3?J aNYligM
GV-:NV Noll` nO aNV119M
Gign '9 9NN0IIN0W k9010'&l kP
SN0IJ03S-S90?J9 W` n-LG ZdN
d E
SlMd 9NR1011NOW NOI1`d199-q/1 C
w
S1NI0d OlONd NOI1`d1;I91n cow s
G N 9 99? OQ
9 d0 9 1 a 133NS -LnoA` i 9NI?JOIIN0W
:'ON a„y :21111 v
09 = .I NOII"1)11?107 7N -O7 NAM
:,fin 7N015 ])IVM :lu,q :uoy
570 gO 3iJG NOUVO)11W
Izn i" ro W?1`dd TINgN
L946-9V9 (616) :-3 • 006i-M (616) -OW • t•19LZ -gOBO VPON ` wl°N • PION aPr11-*N 01011
Vj `s;uv}insuo:) lv;uamuosleug V Uo5
D
- °
SSONO )IO021
INVA
MOON-f E)m
-130 9NINSI.
NOLMNOIS3c?
'
al1S NOIIDgG MM99
AV9
INgAIDNVNN9
W`dglc?is - N,. N01199S 9A02V
GV-:TNd NOIIVA21353Nd CINY119M
GVJNd iN9A9DNV14N9 aN` Ii3M
GV9NV NOII` NOIG9'N aMd119M
Sb-:NV NOIl`dD-NO aMd11-qM
53`Jn`d9 9NINOIINOW .19OlO'NG.N
SNOIIO3S-SSO?1O V4Vg&LS dJ" '?
J
SIO-IJ 9NNOIINOW NOITV1993n Q
SINIOcl OIONd NOIIVI991A
a N 999?
(NOUVlOlsJ*d)
g igndE)
"k 9olO?alk p
9 10-1 cl
)NNOIINOW
e iol cA
-9N I?Oil NOA
sno?ovgg lg u
9 10-1 i
)N121O11NOW
NOUViIDIA
(NOUVl01sJ?J)
o giDn` q
?9 of o"N(IJ. N
L iol j
)NNO1lNOW
NOUViIDIn
LU
W
Z
()
z
rv
O
z
O
Q
09 0 0£ 09
.09 = .1 ald:)s 3
NI?10N U
E
c
O
W
cm
cm
6uuovuowtc6mmexisdeHnrT?zo rtac-i caofl??t
9-409
3 133NS inovKI 9NNOIINOW
:717111774 aW-03 S'AU&A
NOII"Od?J07 7N "07 N?2NM L946-948 (616) -3 • 0065-M (616):-Rd • V19LZ -gOBD 9lpN *21111 • TO11 aM -Td 01011
]NO1s.IVM :7upi :uoi7no1 Vd 6s4uv4jnsuo3 TvjuaU uojFAII$ Yg IlOS
311G NO)IV9111W
i i!Dndg
J.DO1 0?J CIJIN
W
W
W
z
O
z
rv
0
z
0
Nook-r N:)o?
9NVA-GGG?O )OMI
IIOOU-r 901 W"
Ngg-N9 9NINSI-4 N
NOIl` NOiG3?1
Ad3M1S - ..d.. NOUDIG MOI39
1N]A39N` kN9
A` -:MIG - ..`d.. NOIIDgG -QA09`d
GV-:NV NOIldA?J3S3'ald aNVligM
GV9NV 1N9A3DMd14N3 CINVUIM
5` AV NOIlYNOIGA CIWvgi9M
S`dAV NOIl` AD (IN` 9J-gM
Gign '9 9NNOlINOA Jl9Ol0'NQA I
SNOIiO2G-GGM10 AVAIL
d
SlOld 9NIWIINOA NOIld1999A
GiNIOd OlONd NOIlVi.993A :,w
C M 19T
d
0
N
g
N
APPENDIX B - STREAM CROSS-
SECTION AND OVERBANK EVENT PHOTOS
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
k•
? b
t
? ? f= B
-3y.
•? Y ?0 6t e
• ?L ', Vi'i' 8.;
,e
r ?k
14
i?34.. ?A
' a z ' rc `t. >F e-
Oil,
Riffle 1 - Year 1 (2009)
f? w' w
T?!?'•F". Y^ DIY c r.1. t.?
y fy ?
r ;
?^ a
Art`
4 K's 1
Pool 1 Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102 LE1
Appendix B
Riffle 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Pool 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year I Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102111
Appendix B
Riffle 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE1
Pool 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
'4f
t;o 4 ?, 1'0 :1 .1u"1'S4 `?\ \ 4 t ?. , i?fft sloe,
` 64 b. 5 # fl fY i
t.1iv
f#i"++
c r g ?; } :Tai s r 9 F ?r
Armi*" •?
i"...k 4 a?,.4 }8• ? x ?' ? ?. ?? ?`y,y? 3Y? 4,rr`,' ?r
,.; 'rye;??,?yy`" ,?•,-1?" '* Y1 ?,?'.A,
t 'fH" f s
``err {{{ ( ii P ? _ J
Riffle 4- Year 1 (2009)
I' q w aryl o ?i
%
?y .b ? Y f t ?'ar
t ?
? a4;?-try ? ? ry ??
Pool 4 -Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102111
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
i k
p1
y?yy'6< 3 Y ??
r y ?Y?ypc? ya4?'^Y ? Af,
p? f yL ?!'t ??f `f?? g yt .F
yi^? a ?i y ` ? w
5s>.r
a
gas., l 4,
Riffle 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Pool 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102111
Appendix B
s ? ?P ? 4 4 9 Sr?!'?? ?? } uo; Y
+, t a, d YT• °? Y ?
4
4 4
41
??tA F
1
IL.
r ?
1? 1 t
Stream Cross-Section Photos
¦
?i
r ,
It
W `4
.
r'.+i
'. k~s
r gam'-?<?
asp r ??. ?_,' ?"A.?si}i'!
Riffle 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year I Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102 LE 1
Pool 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
t
w
i w
i\
4,,kAt'
s,
t?' z
==Ar r
Riffle 7 - Year 1 (2009)
Pool 7 Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.E1
Appendix B
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E1
Overbank Photo 1 - July 2009 - Note Wrack Piles
APPENDIX C - GROUNDWATER AND RAINFALL DATA
gp-0aa-OE
80-?ad-EZ
-
80-0aa-9l
80-0aa-6
80-090-Z
N
gp-noN-9Z
M
L
80-noN-8
L
? ? -
gp-noN- 0
V
gp-noN-?
0 0)
80-100-07
co rr?nn
V
Q 80-300- ? Z v
N O f
.
)
.,
E N U
90-100-Z 0)
LM
O r.
-da - 0
80 S OE
:3
LL
V
O ._
80-daS-EZ O
O
?
80-daS-g O
L A
gp-daS-6
Z
E
gp-daS-Z a)
cm
=3
O
V
gp-Bny-gZ Cu
rn
V
?
m gp-Bny-6 ?
gp-Bny-Z ?
tQ
gp-Bny-S
80-Inf -6Z cu
=
0 80-Inr-ZZ T
,
O 80-Inf-S L
80-Inr-8
80-Inr- ?
L
c O L
o N O L O L O L O
' L O L
N O
s ayoui `aalsM of yjd aa
/•'•%
co
O
O
N
M
L
E
V
O
O
N
w
E N
L
L
V
C
o
N
E
O
V
0
O
*a
._
O
m
80-0aa-OE
80-0aa-EZ
80-0a(l-9
- 80-090-6
?
- 80-0aa-Z
80-noN-SZ
- - 80-AON-8
80-noN- 6
80-noN-7 0)
80-100-BZ
V
- so-loo- 6z 00
80-100-b ?
a
90-100-L =
•L
O
80-daS-O£ _+ 0)
?
O
80-daS-EZ
80-daS-g O
?
>,
m
80-daS-6
a)
0)
80-daS-Z :3
cu
80-6ny-gZ V
80-6ny-6 l
W
80-6ny-Z 6
80-6ny-9
Cu
80-Inr-6Z V
80-Inr-ZZ t
80-inf-9
80-Inf-8
80-Inf -
LO LO L
ce) N O L O LO LO LO
(V
sai4aui `aa}sM of uldaa
MOOMWA%
co
O
O
N
r
M
L
E
V
4)
O
L }'
tv co
O
O
N
N
L
•0
MOR
Z"
O
m
80-090-OE
80-?aa-EZ
80-0aa-9
80-090-6
80-090-Z
80-noN-9Z
80-AON-8 L
80-noN-1 L
80-noN-17
80-100-82
80-100-?Z
O
.L
80-100-b L
a
80-100-L co
O
80-daS-08 _+
O
80-daS-EZ 2
V+-
80-daS-g 6 0 ?
80-daS-6
80-daS-Z
80-6ny-9Z
80-6nb-6 ?
80-find-Z
g0-6ny-5
80-Inf -6Z
80-Inf -ZZ
80-Inf -5 ?
80-Inf -8
80-Inf - ?
N 00 (0 ' T N co
O (0 I
O T
O N O
O
Salloul `llejuie J Al!ea
60-unr-SZ
O
O
N
O
M
O
O
O
N
r
L ?
O
N
CL
O
V
c?
m
co
r.
.L
O
,w
¦E
O
2
60-unr-8 ?
60-unr- i ?
60-unr-t7
60-AeW-8Z
60-AeW- ?Z
60-AM17 L
0
60-ABW-L
60-jd`d-OE
Cu
60-ady-gZ
O
60-jdV-9 i
o. U
60-ady-6
CY,
60-jdy-Z
60-aeW-9Z
60-JeW-6 ? 4-
O
? M
W
60-JBVY-Z ? Q a)
60-JBW-9
Cu
60-ga=l-9Z (D
60-qeJ-6 L
60-ga=I-Z L
60-qej-5
cu
60-Uer-6Z 11
60-Uer-ZZ
60-uer-9 ?
60-Uer-8
i I I I i I ¦I 60-uer-
r . . . . i . . 1 11 , a , , ¦I , , I I I ? A¦
1IO L./ L./ L./ 1r/ r/ L./
M N N
saLlaui `ialsM o} yldaa
O
O
N
O
M
O
O?
O
O
N
r
N
C.
O
V
O
O
2
?f
60-unf-SZ
60-unf-8 6
60-unf - ? L
60-unr-ti
60-Aew-8Z
60-Aew- LZ
60-Aew-t, L
60-Aew-L
ci
60-Jdd-OE =3
Cu
60-jdV-EZ
O
60-Jd`d-9 L
0.
60-Jdy-6 a)
CY
L
60-ady-Z 0
60-Jew-9Z O V
60-Jew-6 L O
> LL
m
60-JEW-Z L Q
60-Jew-9
rcu
60-gej-9Z V
60-ga=1-6 L
W
60-gej-Z L a)
0
60-qa=l-5 :3
Cu
60-Uef-6Z
60-uer-ZZ
60-uef -9 L
60-uer-g
ice-' ' ' } . . . I . . . . . . . e i lb1 1 60-ue f- L
LO Un u7 u7 u7 u7 u7
M N ' N
sauoui `aalsM of yldea
60-unr-SZ
60-unf -8 ?
60-unf-L L
60-unr-t7
60-AeW-8Z
60-AeW- 2
60-AeW-b L
-Ae
-
ISO
MEN L
60
W
O
O
60-JdV-OE
N
O
M
60-Jd`d-EZ
C
7- Olo
O
60-Jdy-g L
6o-jdd-6 O
E
O
L O SOON
'-
SOMEONE
L
60-Jdd-Z
cc N A
r -
60-JeW-gZ 0
s cu
60-JeW-6 L O .
= cu
0
00
? 60-JeW-Z L ? .
Z
!0 ¦
60-JeW-S
60-gej-gZ
t?
60-g9J-6 L
('
? 60-gej-Z L
60-gej-5
-Uer-6Z
60
60-uef -ZZ
60-Uer-g L
-Uef-
60
8
60-Uef-L
N c o (
? D '
?
sayo ? N r
? ?
ui `llslui - c
eN o (
O
Allsa D q
O ql
O N
O O
60-090-OE
60-09G-CZ
60-0aa-9
60-0aa-6
60-0a(]-Z
O
O
N 60-noN-9Z
O
r 60-noN-9 L
L
60-noN- 0
E
60-noN-7
O 0)
60-100-9Z cu
z
O CD
60-}00-6Z
O
O
O L
60-10014
E N a U
r 60-300-L =
L
2%
_
60-daS-OE ? 0)
?
... _
O
60-daS-EZ cu
c
O
N `*-
O
60-daS-9 L
_ 60-daS-6 ?
Z?
60-daS-Z 0)
=3
V (u
60-6nV-gZ
60-6ny-6 6
60-6ny-Z 6
tQ
0 '
i
-
60-6ny-5
0)
m
_
60-Inf-6Z =3
cu
O v
A-A
-
60-Inf -ZZ
_
O
-- 60-Inf-56
4
60-Inf -9
- T
60-In('- 6
L O L
M O L
N O L O LO L O L O
sayoui `ia}sM of Lildaa
60-09Q-OE
60-09G-CZ
60-094-9 L
60-0aa-6
60-094-2
O
O
N 60-noN-9Z
Cw
r 60-noN-8
L
6p-noN- L L
?
E
60-noN17 CD
`
/ - - =3
O cu
z 60-}0p-gZ
-
i
O
?••+ 60-100- L Z 13
0 ? O
0 ? •
60-10017 (D
a
N
w W
r 60-100-L
L r.
m 2%
L
? 60-daS-p£ 4.0
cu
- M?
?
`-? C O (n
V
60-daS-EZ
.i , i O
60-daS-9
>+ V..
l 60-daS-6 a)
Z E CY)
p
60-daS-Z
V cu
m
A-A 60-6ny-gZ v
m
60-6ny-6 ?
?
? i
60-6ny-Z
m - 0)
0 ?
60-6ny-5 =3
? I
L - ? 60-Inf-6Z (D
v
-
0
60-Inf-ZZ
_ -? -
O _
60-Inf-9 L
- -
60-Inf-9
I
60-Inf-L
-
L
(` O L
7 N O L O L O LO LO L
r- N O
s agoui `aajsM of uldea
60-094-0£
60-080-£Z
60-090-9 L
60-094-6
60-090-Z
60-noN-SZ
60-AON-9 L
60-noN- L L
60-noN-t,
C
N
0
-
-
p
Tom
L 3
60
BZ
0
60-100-LZ wo
O
•L
E 60-}0017 L
0
O
E Z a
60-100-2 co
L O 'L
60-deS-O£ 4.0
LL SEMEN
o p
N _
O
60-deS-£Z
cu
WIN
O C:
SOMME 60-daS-g L • ?
?
Z 60-d9S-6
¦
60-daS-Z
O
60-6nV-9Z
60-6ny-6 L
C
-6n
-
Z L
60
y
60-6ny-9
60-Inf-6Z
60-Inr-ZZ
60-Inr-9 L
60-Inf -9
60-Inf - L
N 0
r 0 C
- ?
s O ?
lr_
ego N
_ ?
ui `ll
-
ejui 0
O
ell A 0 (
O
liea D V
O . N
O O
APPENDIX D - STREAM SURVEY DATA
ELEVATION (feet)
0
m m m N
cn v co - c.,? cn
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
ELEVATION (feet)
I
?n
c
c-r
(D
v
O
O
O
O
O
0
N
O
Cn
D O
O +
O
(0
(D
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
rn
z
s
>n
z ?
n O
rn ?
rn ? z
z ?+
rn
C?
_ ?
v rn
. r
rn
N _
O
N N N N N N
6> 6> 6> ?l ?J ?l
CJl ?] CD - C1J CSl
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
O
+
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
I
O
D +
O
z
v
- O
O
O
cn
O
O
O
rn
z
z
D n
z
rn O
Cn
rn ?
z ?
? rn
D ?
c? 0
s
U) 0
v O
r
? N
N
u
z
rn
r
r
11
D
N N N N N N
6> 6? bl 6> J J
C?.? C31 J CD - (?a
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
I
?n
rlr
T
co
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
(J)
O
O
fi
?- O
O
O
O
Ul
0
rn
z
z
n
z ?
n O
rn ?
rn ? z
z rn
rn
n rn
rn
_ o D
v ?
. r
rn
-f- N
C31
CIl
N N N N N N
n T)
C? u J CD - C?
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N N N N N N
Ul 6> 6> n 6> n
0? O N -tom 6> 0?
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
iq
I
D
-i O
z
(D
co
(D
v
O
c.u
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
0
0
(1?
O
ON
O u z
zC11?
rn rn
D r
rn
z z
O
r
v
m
ELEVATION (feet)
I
?n C!?
s D
O
z
c0
(0
c?
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
0
O
O
O
Ul
O
O
O
q
U)
? n
O 70
O
O
rn
C)
D ?
?o
z
U)
rn
-TI
rn
-A.
z
D N) N
rn
r
r
K) m m n
U n
0? O N A 6> 0?
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
I
U)
O
z
t c
c?
0
0
0
O
O
O
N
O
O
Cu
O
0
0
O
cn
O
O
m
0
A
U)
A
O
O
z
?i
n
Z
Cn
Ul
n
O
Cn
CP
rn
C?
O
rn
O
r
z
rn
r
r
71
D
N N N N N N
C31 Ul (.fl 6> 6> 6>
cn v CD - c,.? cn
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O o O O
ELEVATION (feet)
I
? D
?* O
z
t co
c?
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
O
N
O n
O
O N z
z rn
Tnnrn
= zz D
v rn
rn
- rn
Ul
J
N N N N N N
Ul u u 6>
U1 J CO - (IJ U1
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
I
D
?- O
z
c?
(0
n,
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
cn
O
iq
U?
O n
O
O c1? z
z CJ? s
rn
O -Ti
D
z
O
v
O
_ r
CD Ul
W
J
N N N N N N
UI u Ul U
N -A 6> 0? O N
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
T
CJ?
O
z
t co
O
O
O
O
O
0
N
O
O
O
O
.p
O
O
cn
O
a
N
O n
O
O U) z
z ?
rn rn
C?
= Oz D
v rn
rn
r-
- rn
J
N N N N N N
CSI CSI CTI CSl 6> 6>
N 6> 03 O N
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
I
Cn
? D
O
z
c?
co
(D r'"
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
cn
O
O
+
0
CJ?
O
O
z
n
s
v
N
C31
CD
n
O
C!? z
CP ?
rn rn
O rn
z
O
r
6>
cNn cn vN+ N)
6> 0? O N ? 6?
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
?n
c
fit
T
(?D
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
?n
D
n
Z
n
0
cn
CP
rn
n
O
z
z
FTI
0
N
O
N
D
O
z
O
n- ?
O
O
O
O
cn
O
v rn
rn
N rn
N
rn
r
r
11
D
N N N N N N
A 3?1 (Jl CIl (Il Ul
6> 03 O N 3 6>
O O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
0
O
O
0
0
O
N
O
I
O O
z 0
co
co
co ?*
O
O
O
O
O
O
O n
0
O cP rn
z 6
rn rn
-Tl
_ z0
O
O
r
W
O ?1
n
Ul LR
?n ?l CD - W cn
00 00 00 00 00 00
ELEVATION (feet)
I
U)
? D
O
z
t co
(D
(D
v
0
0
0
O
0
0
N
O
O
W
O
O
O
0
cn
0
0
m
0
O n
O
O U) z
z rn
n rn
D
= Oz D
v ?
r-
r
N rn
Co
u
cn v O - c,? Ul
0 0 0 0 0 0
O o O O O o
W
_J
LL
O
J
Q
_Z
F)
R/
W ?
-? Z
J O
J
W W
Z >
Q
z
W
(S)
W
CZ
W
R/
Ln
O Ln
w
LL
cn
x LL
u?
x
Lu
J
LL
LL
oL
J x
O
O
IL
x
0 0 00 O 00
(Y) N - O
C9 C9 L9 C9
N N N N
°0 0 0
0 0
C6 r
Ln Ln Ln
N N N
(gOOI) NOUVA-?I]
O
m
0
N
+
O
O
O
0
0
0
N
+
0
O
co
O
co
-11
N
O ?
+
t? Z
O
o Q
O
N
+
0
0
O
co
U
O
U
lD
O
CD
O
N
+
C9
O
O
0
co
Ln
O
° In
Ln m
Ln Ln Ln Ln
N N N N
N
x
w
F-
U
-b
O
O
N
DZ/
Q
W
J
J
LLJ
W
Z
N
W
_J
lL..
O
D-
J
Q
_Z
Z
O
J
W
Q
Z
W
W
OL
W
R/
J
O
w
cJ?
x
?
w
J
U-
IX
U
w
J
LL
LL
CZ
U
J
O ?
x
w
cn
X
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
<9
Ln
N Ln
Lo
N
Ln
N c?
Ln
N N
Ln
N
Ln
N
U)
N
N
N
N
N
O
m
O
m
O
0
M
O
m
m
N
O
r
m
N
O
Ln
+
N
O
m
m
N
O
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
Ln
co
N
O
m
+
co
N
O
co
N
O
m
+
r
N
O
r
r
N
O
Ln
r
N
O
m
r
N
O
N
O
L9
N
O
r
N
O
Ln
L9
N
m
N
O
QD
N
O
Ln
N
Z
O
Q
(f)
jx
f
u-I
H
U
V-
(j)
¦
O
O
1N
I
(g221) NOI1` AIT
APPENDIX E - PEBBLE COUNT DATA
Pebble Count Data Form, Riffle 5 - Newell Farm Mitigation Site
Material Size Range (mm) Count % Cumulative %
silt/clay 0 0.062 2 2% 2%
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 0 0% 2%
fine sand 0.13 0.25 0 0% 2%
medium sand 0.25 0.5 0 0% 2%
coarse sand 0.5 1 0 0% 2%
very coarse sand 1 2 1 1% 3%
very fine gravel 2 4 2 2% 5%
fine gravel 4 6 2 2% 7%
fine gravel 6 8 0 0% 7%
medium gravel 8 11 2 2% 9%
medium gravel 11 16 23 23% 32%
coarse gravel 16 22 41 41% 73%
coarse gravel 22 32 18 18% 91%
very coarse gravel 32 45 3 3% 94%
very coarse ravel 45 64 2 2% 96%
small cobble 64 90 2 2% 98%
medium cobble 90 128 0 0% 98%
large cobble 128 180 2 2% 100%
very large cobble 180 256 0 0% 100%
small boulder 256 362 0 0% 100%
small boulder 362 512 0 0% 100%
medium boulder 512 1024 0 0% 100%
large boulder 1024 2048 0 0% 100%
very large boulder 2048 4096 0 0% 100%
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.E1
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
a?
cn
0
m
L
N
z
u
14-
Lt
R/
-i
0
U
N
Ss
N
-- ----------------------------------- ----------------
-- ----------------------------------- -------------
--- ---------------------------------- ----------------
---- --------------------------------- ----------
- - \-- - ------------- ----------------
e- ?p 62 e- ?p e-
o mo c o ° 0 o O
U eHi 'Jau g quoo jocl
62
O O
°o
.-.
E
E
N
O _
N
CV/
V
L
CL
0
?- o
o
0
Pebble Count Data Form, Pool 5 - Newell Farm Mitigation Site
Material Size Range (mm) Count % Cumulative O
silt/clay 0 0.062 35 35% 35%
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 0 0% 35%
fine sand 0.13 0.25 2 2% 37%
medium sand 0.25 0.5 3 3% 40%
coarse sand 0.5 1 3 3% 43%
very coarse sand 1 2 16 16% 59%
very fine gravel 2 4 13 13% 72%
fine gravel 4 6 4 4% 76%
fine gravel 6 8 2 2% 78%
medium gravel 8 11 3 3% 81%
medium gravel 11 16 4 4% 85%
coarse gravel 16 22 4 4% 89%
coarse gravel 22 32 9 9% 98%
very coarse gravel 32 45 0 0% 98%
very coarse ravel 45 64 0 0% 98%
small cobble 64 90 1 1% 99%
medium cobble 90 128 1 1% 100%
large cobble 128 180 0 0% 100%
very large cobble 180 256 0 0% 100%
small boulder 256 362 0 0% 100%
small boulder 362 512 0 0% 100%
medium boulder 512 1024 0 0% 100%
large boulder 1024 2048 0 0% 100%
very large boulde 2048 4096 0 0% 100%
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.El
v?
cn
0
4-?
m
Z3
5
E
L
LL
N
Z
lf?
O
O
4
O
U
v)
n
i ? ' l
- ------------------------------------ ----------------
- ------------------------------------ ----------------
- ------------------------- ---------- ---------------
- ------------------------------------ ----------
- ----------------------------------- ----------------
t iiI
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
0 0
O m
e e tp e e e
0 O o O o O
00
LO m
UeHiJoug 4uaojacj
w w
O O
C\j
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
0
? o
o
0
E
N_
°o
N 1CL
c?
IL
APPENDIX F - VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
own
1 1
. h.4 1
:x :?«s r ' In ? X11 t ti? ?' ? :y-?1 .?, ek ??" F •`? '"ou
?t a ? 1 n F
1.1*ea{l
1-
'1 ;y w lr ' y
{
2 !
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year I Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.El
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
r
:A ot t aY a r
t' 6;0
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.El
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
t -A lag
i
a ?. . •??,?i ??1 i a
T 1
iRp? t jC i Y
•.9 r y d
A1,
? "? r ??_ Jb . to
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7- Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.E1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 -Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LEI
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 - Year 1 (2009)
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E1
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1- Year 1 (2009)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E1