20200697 Ver 1_401 Application_20200521

0� \NA rE,, �
Q��
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑x Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes x❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
7314 Doverton Court
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Greystone Manor Townhomes Assoc Inc.; Margarita Z Allen
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB008105 PG00525; DB017475 PG02313
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7150 LEAD MINE RD; 7314 DOVERTON CT
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27615; Raleigh, NC 27615
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: City of Raleigh
4b.
Name:
Wayne Miles, PE
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh Public Works Department
4d.
Street address:
222 West Hargett Street, PO Box 590
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27602
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-996-3940
4g.
Fax no.:
919-996-4011
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Becky L. Ward
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Timmons Group
5c.
Street address:
5410 Trinity Rd #102
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
984-255-2354
5f.
Fax no.:
919.859.5663
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1707046572
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.8780
Longitude:-78.66071
1 c.
Property size:
4.91 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Mine Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Please see documentation attachment
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 660
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Please see documentation attachment
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see documentation attachment
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary El Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑x Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
Environmental assessment report identifies no wetlands with in the repair area , see the attached environmental assessment report Appendix C.
Wetlands are shown on the impact map just downstream of the limits of disturbance.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
UT to Mine Creek
PER
Corps
10
62
S2
Corps
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
62
3i. Comments:
Please see documentation attached
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑x Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 T
Constuction acess
UT to Marsh Creek
No
2818
420
B2 P
Rip -rap and Block wal
UT to Marsh Creek
No
69
0
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
2887
420
6i. Comments: Please see attached documentation
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Please see documentation attachment
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Please see documentation attachment
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑x Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
No new impervious area is being added
❑ Yes ❑x No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No new Impervious added.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
N/A
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Raleigh
❑x Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑x NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes 0 No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑x Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑x No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑x No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ❑x No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑x Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Environmental Memorandum in Appendix C
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project is located in an urban stream. Please see attached Environmental Memorandum in Appendix C
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑x No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Please see letter attached in the Environmental Memorandum Appendix C
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
(Flood maps.nc.gov)
S. Wayne
Miles
2020.0
.15 08:41:13
Wayne Miles, PE
_04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

PCN Supplemental Information
SECTION B — PROJECT INFORMATION AND PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
PART 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3a. Project Description:
The project site is located in a primarily residential area at 7314 Doverton Court within the Greystone
Manor Subdivision in Raleigh, North Carolina. The project is situated just below the outlet of a 60-inch
stormwater culvert from a stormwater system on Wedgeland Drive and just upstream of an existing pond
feature on the townhome property. The stream that connects the storm system outlet with the pond is
an unnamed tributary (UT) to Mine Creek. The proposed work will be located primarily on the townhome
community HOA property with some grading extending into the south east corner of 1305 Wedgeland
Drive for improvements to the western terrace slope.
The project involves repair of an eroded stream bank and terrace slope that is migrating west towards an
existing building structure. These improvements will include bank stabilization work with vegetated soil
lifts, stream bank grading and benching and renovation of landscape block wall.
The watershed to the project site on UT to Mine Creek has a drainage area of approximately 0.101 square
miles and is not FEMA regulated. The regional curve data for a watershed of this size is listed in Table A.
Table A: Piedmont Regional Curve Data
Bankfull Urban Curves Rural Curves
Area (Sq Ft) 13.7 (10-30) 4.8 (2-9.5)
Width (Ft) 11.5 (7.9-13) 6.4 (2.8-10.1)
Depth (Ft) 1.14 (0.8-2.4) 0.85 (0.5-1.5)
Discharge (Cfs) 73 (58-150) 18 (5.5-58)
The project reach classified as a C4 stream that is slightly entrenched. The eastern stream bank is lower
and has better connection to the floodplain than the steep western bank located on the outside of the
meander bend. The following morphological data included in Table B, was obtained from surveyed cross
sections at riffle locations. Due to the constraints within the project area of a piped system upstream and
a lake downstream only 120 linear feet of stream was surveyed and therefore data collected was limited.
The morphological cross sections and longitudinal profile data are included in Appendix B.
Timmons Group 7314 Doverton Court
Supplemental Information, PCN Applications

Table B: Site Morphological Data
Cross
Slope
Wbkf
Abkf
dbkf
dmax bkf
Qbkf
W/D
ER
Section
(ft/ft)
(ft)
(sgft)
(ft)
(ft)
(cfs)
3
0.0286
9.53
6.54
0.69
1.05
31
13.88
1.99
4
0.0286
9.59
6.91
0.72
0.94
31
13.32
1.71
6
0.0286
10.04
9.69
0.97
1.4
57
10.34
1.68
7 0.0286 9.99 7.08 0.71 1.16 34 14.07 1.65
The site morphological data falls within the high data range for the rural curves and low range for the
urban curves as listed in Table A.
3b. List total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
The total amount of wetlands are unknown. Potential wetlands were investigated in and adjacent to the
project limits. Wetlands were found at the end of the stream and headwaters of the pond. These existing
wetlands are outside of the limits of disturbance for the repair project and therefor will not be disturbed.
These wetlands are quantified in the Environmental Memorandum included in Appendix C.
3d. Explain the Purpose of the Project:
The purpose of the project is to provide bank stabilization repair measure and mitigate stream bank
erosion from further expansion and encroaching into the adjacent building. The impacts that will occur
on the stream and associated buffers are to repair a small section of stream bank with vegetated soil lift
placed over rock base and grading and benching of the adjacent stream bank.
3e. Describe the Overall Project in Detail, Including the Type of Equipment to be Used:
Stream Bank Grading and Benching
The existing stream bank on the eastern side has a lower floodplain, this will be further graded to provide
a flatter bench to ease the shear stress due high flood flows condition. This will facilitate overbank flow
area during high flow minimizing the shear stress on the west side.
The stream bank corridor within the repair area will be re -vegetated along Eastern bank of the stream.
This will hold the bank intact during high flows and avoid further stream bank erosion. This will reduce
the runoff erosion potential by spreading over wide vegetated area before concentrated flow is formed.
No SCM's were required to control nitrogen export for the site. These measures are being install only as
an opportunity to provide aid in better water quality exiting the site.
Stream Bank Stabilization:
The incised channel and banks will be repaired with soil lifts, fill, matted and replanted. A rock base has
been designed at the bottom of the soil lift to re-establish the channel toe and secure the proposed soil
lift and embankment fill. The stream bank corridor within the repair area will be re -vegetated with both
herbaceous and woody species. The re -introduction of vegetation to the repair area will aid in providing
2
Timmons Group 7314 Doverton Court
Supplemental Information, PCN Applications

long term bank stability. The stabilized banks and re -vegetated corridor will additionally provide
stormwater quality benefits. Concentrated runoff at the top of the slope has been transitioned with riprap
for long term stabilization.
Proposed Equipment
The equipment to be used in the project is earth moving equipment and various other support
apparatuses. The stream normal flow will be pumped around the project site. Stabilization will occur daily
within the work area. Heavy equipment may include hydraulic excavator, compactors, bulldozers,
skidsteer loaders, and dump trucks to load and unload materials. The construction equipment will enter
the site through Parking Lot side from Vinson Court Driveway. All construction will be performed within
the defined limit of disturbance.
SECTION C — PROPOSED IMPACTS INVENTORY
3i. Stream Impacts:
S1: Permanent Stream stabilization will be provided on the west side stream bank through a rock base
layer to support vegetated Soil Lift and back filling in the repair area , this is within the sewer easement,
other rigid structure options such as gabion baskets are not allowable.
A Rip Rap will be provided at the upstream and downstream end of the rock base as a transition to the
soil lift. A Rock toe will be constructed upstream of the soil lifts to reconstruct banks due to equipment
access and just downstream to transition the soil lifts.
6i. Buffer Impacts:
131: This area will be impacted due to construction access and re -grading operations to reconstruct the
bank on the East and West sides of the stream. The buffers will be re-established with vegetation as shown
on the construction plans.
132: Permanent impact to the buffer will be due to transition rock riprap and existing block wall fence.
Riprap will be provided as transition from natural stream bank to steeper soil lift layers on both upstream
and downstream side of soil lift layers.
The existing block wall fence is located inside the sanitary sewer easement, this block wall fence will be
demolished and relocated outside the sewer easement. The block wall is required to hold the soil adjacent
to the building. This provides an aesthetic value to the stream repair and provides additional support to
the stream bank. The relocation of block wall fence has reduced the total impact area by 28SF.
SECTION D — IMPACT JUSTIFICATION AND MITIGATION
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This project is necessary due to the severe erosion in close proximity to an existing structure. The repair
improves water quality by stabilizing the bank and prevent additional sediment transport into the stream.
The project will be limited to the eroded bank only with minimal transitions areas up and downstream.
Soil lifts, a soil and vegetative stabilization techniques was selected to minimize use of hardened materials.
3
Timmons Group 7314 Doverton Court
Supplemental Information, PCN Applications

The limits of disturbance have been minimized to only the area needed to construct the repairs. Impacts
to the stream buffer will be minimized by accessing the site through a narrow corridor and protecting as
much existing vegetation as possible.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniaues.
Pumping of normal stream flow be maintained and pumped around the site during construction activities.
Bank stabilization, coveringthe slope with riparian seed and coir matting, erosion control mating will occur
daily upon completion of bank grading.
SECTION F — SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species
or Designated Critical Habitat?
The site is an existing urban residential area that has been previously impacted by development. Open
areas are currently being mowed and maintained. Habitat is not present for Wake County listed vertebrate
and invertebrate endangered species with the exception of Northern Long Eared Bats. It is not anticipated
that this tree removal would be an impact to critical habitat for the Northern Long Eared Bat in Wake
County. Therefore, it is not anticipated that there will be any adverse impacts associated with T/E species.
Please see the attached environmental summary letter provided by Timmons Group in Appendix C.
4
Timmons Group 7314 Doverton Court
Supplemental Information, PCN Applications

O /
O O
/w t0 N
Lo
U) / • t2
c/) w / tr
/ ply <U) �p / / e • �,
ERMANENT STREAM IMPACT /
S2 -ROCK BASE FOR SOIL LIFT 38 LF / / / / / z � �` Y '� / it
/ —� w w :3
--f-----0.29 CY/LF / / / w� � � J o pV / J rt
--------- --�- j- -- -- ml cn Y J
U O SANITARY SEWER co z
p co / e tt v 3
tx€ P/O I�AN K / ' / - I z z Lu - / / / 2 � �
---- /� w mLL-lv
/ooM ool
=1f20. _ \\ z w/ - / - I .. fir• :; ��ym-
_- TEMPORARY BUFFER
0" B1
==
0�=
a
IMPACT ZONE-1
1f60_448 SF? EXISTING
WETLAND ~
PERMANENT
1 S2 ROCK TOE FOR EQUIPMENT v _ -
i
tt o
CROSSING 13 LF
ol
PERMANENT STREAM �t \
IMPACT ROCK TOE 5 LF S2 a
TRANSITION rt DATE
0.14 CY/LF tr o 5-6-2020
DRAWN BY
Jsv
DESIGNED BY
WILLIAM AND NORMA DOWLING \ \ \ / ' �a�, \ \ �� �ROCK RIPRAP TRANSITION ' •. AA
PERMANENT BUFFER � �"
1305 WEDGELAND DR \\ • ECKEDeV
PIN: 17
7046952 // I \ \ y \�\
-IMPACT ZONE-1 �,���\\ : • BW
SCALE
MARGARITA Z. ALLEN i \ 25 SF. \ ` ,•=20'
JI 7314 DOVERTON CT.
\ / / PIN:1707046831 i
XISTING BLOCK WALL TO BE REMOVED � •
B2 ROCK RIPRAP TRANSITION / // / 455 SF. OF EXISTING IMPACT
PERMANENT BUFFER / = / a
IMPACT ZONE-1 \ \ I / / / I % J TO BE REMOVED) `�
35 SF. _ �/' `\ TERESA C. KAY � \
/ 7312 DOVERTON CT.
'\ PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACT
/ PLN: 1 07046738 B2
BLOCK WALL RECONSTRUCTION
ZONE-1 \
TEMPORARY BUFFER I 1 I / v ° ° ° 9 SF. RELOCATED IMPACT O
B1 IMPACT ZONE-1 )
\ 2370 SF. ° \ �\ Z
00
LEGEND U Y a
•�I / I I ,° a � / v °
LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE z ,
\ \ \ I //► v °I 4 ° / �� a ° TEMPORARY BUFFER IMPACT ZONE-2 1 — — EXISTING BUFFER LIMITS a
°°a °a �4°20/// SFa .
°
a Ia BUFFER IMPACTS Z
Q
oTAYLORALLARD ;
EDWAAND JOLENE LOFRESE u
1307 WEDGELAND DR ° STREAM IMPACTS
PIN.1707045973 ° °ft-T V/ 1-1°I
°o
BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS
O
BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
BLOCK WALL RECONSTRUCTION
BLOCK WALL REMOVAL v
20 10 0 20 40
4a36s.00s
SCALE 1'=20'
SHEEjT NO.
1

Appendix A
Photo Log
Location Map
USGS Quad Map
Wake County Soils Map

Top of Slope and adjacent building
Photo Log
Doverton Court
Wall and eroded slope as viewed
from the channel.
Stream as viewed looking upstream, floodplain
picture right and steep eroded bank picture left.
Stream at 60-inch stormwater pipe upstream of
repair area.

L:\209\44363.005-DovertonCt COR\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\PCN - Doverton Exhibits.dwg I Plotted on 5/7/2020 2:30 PM I by Shane Vandergrift
O
0
ME
Lull
1
.`� f
l �,
ate, �1 I
i 1 0 400 800
Feet
TIMMONS GROUP000 •• 15DRAwINGR33,812DATTHE
• •• I.W VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. 5110 Trinity Road, SU 0-2 EITRL.gh, NC 27607
TEL 9t9.866.— EA%919.83—N, -16 2mmonS.Com
NOM Carolina Dcense No. C-1652
GATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
W_ 7314 Doverton Court _
W w CITY OF RALEIGH - NORTH CAROLINA - 27615 a £ z
o LOCATION MAP
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be r,pr,d—d in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, biddi— and/or wnsiruction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

L:vu%Pw43o,5.uuo-uoverionui t umxuVVlO\JneetxrxnIDlixt L iV - uovenon rxnlons.owg I vioueo on o///Lulu G4u YIVI I oy Jnane vanaergrin
N ST r
Six Forks
AR DR
O
NOW'WINp,� - FORUM DR'
� w
Q �
� � I
LQIJ
y t
L sue, iy O
---
4L 4- O�
70.
rn v (�
70f, ^a rn
z�� z
0
-DSO VALLEY R D 3§0
41 �� O
;Y LAKE DR PROJECT LOCATION 44
WEDGELAND D �"'�"�. o�
4.
CREST RD j
,�QC 0 500 1000
Feet
--Mine 0°----�
TIMMONS GROUP •' S410TTM15D�w1N9.33.8NfipATTNfi
• • •• VOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. MSu,n, OFFICE
emty Road, Suite RO' RaleI9M1, NC 27607
TEL 919.Bfifi,— FAX 919.8—No. -1652 mons.com
NortM1 Carolina Licenu No. C-1fi52
7 314 D OV E RTO N COURT DATE REVISION DESCRIP ON
m� a - m m n °g a
W z CITY OF RALEIGH - NORTH CAROLINA - 27615 o S o g m F z N
° o QUAD MAP
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive properly of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express wriflen consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

-Uu`J\446bi.uub-uover[OnG[ uuK\uvvC,\Jneei\txnloaw IN - uover[On
rloaea on bri-uzuzu z:zi rive 1 oy mane
C}
O
IN
r zm
F4
[-I P"rzz
TIMMONS GROUP
W 7314 DOVERTON COURT
W z CITY OF RALEIGH -NORTH CAROLINA - 27615
o SOILS MAP
0 400 800
Feet
0 04D 1 TIlI.T TR�p IT
• • YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. 5410 niIoaa ty R, S1171 c2 I 11601
TEL [phone]S1 YPx 915.tlii.tl124 'xxw.ti
NortM1 Carolina License No. C-16ELmmons.cam
DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive properly of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced In whole or In part and shall not be used for

Appendix B
Existing Condition Morphological Data
Longitudinal Profile
Surveyed Cross Sections

324
323
322
d
c
321
W
320
319
318

Project: Doverton Location: Croas Sections
Station: 2-11 Benchmark Eescrtplion: RM.
Date: 8/13/2019 a
Photo Reference Location:
Permanent Benchmark Elevation: Permanent Benchmark Location:
Grey calla are outpuN antl eM1oultl be lea alone, a mem. Crone Section taken hem lento dgM1t looking tlownaveam.
y neetl-ional aM1eeN for more crone aecb ,1 creates copy of -eh- by rigM Clicking on the tabMme b-M this sheet
OEM
��Mmm
umbers an Nken
from Ne raw tlma table. Thers
la no b.d N change
thane calla
Bankfull
TOB
TW
Left
Right
LA
Right
Station I Elevators
Station I Elevation
Staten Elevation
Station
Elevators
Station Elevation
100 320.01
m.rn lm
98.43 322.59
ThiTFa calls can be lea blank
0 0
p
if you do n wish to make
98.43 322.59 0
than ^s of p mmers be ow. TFe
Bankfull
TOB
Left
Ri ht
Left
Ri M
Stagers Elevegon
Stegon Elevation
Station Elevators
Staten Elevation
Station Elevalion
0 0
0 -1.24
0 0
0 tt
0 0
mmara tlml
cent
en uaetl formorpM1ology
ulculaaona. efmrany etl,u-bb,
below. TMre N no neetl b, chnnge
Bankfull
TOB
Leff
Ri
ht
Left
Ri ht
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Sfation
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
100 320.01
98.43 321.35
0
0
98.43 322.59
0 0
Bankfull
Station Elevafior
Stream Morphology
99.13886 321.3
W bkf =
7.624
108.]81 321.3
Abkf=
7.413
2x6ankfull
dbkf=
0.972
Station Elevation
W/D=
7.841
98.21 322.8
10].7fi 322.69
ror, a a nee re
a at aetla d
dmbkf= 1.340
Wfpa - 9.547 eacn
ER=
ba
1,252 kfwlelevan^madtld-,
Avera a Bankfull Elevato, X 1.3
LBH =-320.010
Bankfull Width ft
. 2A7
LBH/dma-238.813
Bankfull Area
7.41325
D50 =
Bankfull Wettetl Perimeter
ft 8.68, 38
Obk(=
Bankfull H d..Ilc Radlus ft 0.85392
DA=
Low Bank Height ft'
-320.01
Slope =
Aver. ti. PIN Elevation
ft 0
Sinuosi
LPIN and RPIN 0
p
Sta Eler
REF!
0 0
0 0
330.00
329.00
328.00
327.00
326.00
325.00
324.00
323.00
322.00
321.00
320.00 91
90.00 92.00 94.00 96.00 98.00 100.00 102.00 104.00 106.00 108.00 110.00

Project: Doverton Location: C... S-fi-2
Station: 1+93 Benchmark Eeacrtplion: RM.
Date: 8/13/2019 a
Photo Reference Location:
Permanent Benchmark Elevation: Permanent Benchmark Location:
Gray wile are outpuN antl eM1oultl bs 1•H alone, a Nem. Crass Ssctlon taken M1om 1•H to HgM1t Iwhing tlownaveam.
H you —d addW... I ah.- for more cross aecLws, last create a copy of the —k by rIgM cllcking on Ne tab M me botlom d Hlls ah—
OEM
��Mmm
NIE=
mr-MON�
umbers an Nkan
from Na raw tlNa table. Them la no nwtl N thong.
tbasa cells
Bankfull
TOB
TW
Left
Right
LA
Right
Station I Elevators
Station I Elevation
Stators Elevation
Station
I Elevators
Station I Elevation
1001 320.591 94.82 322.08 ,0601 322.1798.28 32-3 0
m a awlaH bak lrrw tlo aotu..a as or p mMars ba ow. Tha
TW
Bankfull
rob
Left
Ri M
Left
Ri M
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
0 0
0 -0.18
0 ol
ol 0
0 0
Th-b­motors tlNl en usM larmomhology oalwlallam. alNrany atlluaknaMa below. TM1are N no naatl N Glenga
BTII
TOB
Left
Ri
ht
Left
Ri ht
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
100 320.59
94.62 321.9
106.01
322.1]
98.2bi 321431
t,l 0
O
00
g • 11
g 11
g 11
g 11
g 11
L
I
g 11
I �
90.00 92.00 94.00 96.00 98.00 100.00 102.00 104.00 106.00 108.00

Project: Doverton
Location: Cross Section3
Station: 1-76
Benchmark Eeacrtplion:
Date: Ell 3/2019
a
Photo Rehrence Location:
Permanent Benchmark Elevation:
Permanent Benchmark Location:
Crass Settlers taken M1om IeH to dgM1t loohing tlownsveam.
H you neetl addW...l sM1eeN for...... secLons, luer creates copy W the-9 by rIgM cllcking on Ne tabMNe botlom M thls ebeet
Gray oils are outpuN antl eboultl be IeH alone. a Nem.
�����
• -
aaa®��®��
umbers an Nken
fmm N. raw tlNa tabl.. Th..
la no nutl N.hang.
mono tolls
Bankfull
TOB
TW
Left
I Right
Le
I Right
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
I Staten Elevation
Station
Elevators
Station Elevation
.23
100 321.221
92.1 322.28
0 0
92.83
322.28
0 0
feetHam aaaw lm blank iryo,.
e. sot wianlmm
..al aaa.r
p mM.m ba ow. Th..mN
rn
Bankfull
ToB
Left
Ri M
Left
Ri M
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station I
Elb­tIonj
Station I Elevation
0 0I
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
m pommotam tlwten uotl tormomM1ology
ulculaHua.elp...yatlluab—below.
Thomhno.-dto-M
tlwso
TW
Bankfull
TOB
Left
Ri
ht
Left
I Ri ht
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
S[a[ion
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
100 321.23
92.83 322.28
0
0
52.831
322.28
0 0
Bankfull
Station Elevatior
Stream Morphology
11 92,83 322.28
Wbkf=
9.527
702.3572 322.2
Abkf=
6.540
2x6ankfull
dbkf=
0.687
Station Elevation
W/D=
13,878
84.57 323.3 E at aaa a
103.52 323.33 ror, a a nee e re
dmbkf=
Wfpa =
1.050
18.950
each
ER=
1.989
kran elevation, aaa data.
Avers a Bankfull Elevation X 322.2
LBH =
-321.230
Bankfull Width ft 9.52721
LBH/dma
-305.933
Bankfull Area 8.54048
D50 =
Bankfull Wetted Perimeter ft 10.0943
obkf=
Bankfull H d..Ilc Radlus ft 0.64793
DA—
Low Bank Nei ht ft' .321.23
Slope =
Avers a PIN Elevation X 0
Sinuosi
LPIN and RPIN 0
P
Sta Eler R
0 0
0 0
331.00
326.00
321.00
78.00 83.00 88.00 93.00 98.00 103.00 108.00

Project: Dovadon Lr a— Cmea Section 4
SWdon: 1+62 Ben.M1mark degcdptlon: Riffle
DaW: e11&2018 C
Pnao Reference Location:
Perm1211 BencM1mark Blevrtion: Permanent Ben.M1mark Locapon:
�BIUY a roam.' Cross ewllon taken hom ba g aoking aonnstream.
y neee aae.—1 of the a trucking an the What the uonom of tms meal.
OEM
M===®
OEM
��Mmm
mmm
mums
rsc�rrmc��
�sa�
00
326,00

Project: Doverton Location: Cross Section5
Station: 1-59 Benchmark Eescriplion: RM.
Date: B/13/2019 a
Photo Reference Location:
Permanent Benchmark Elevation: Permanent Benchmark Location:
Grey wile are outpuN antl eM1oultl be lea alone, a Nem. Crone Section taken hem IeH to dgM1t looking tlownaveam.
H you neetl addd... I aheeN for more crone aeMlona, Jaen create a copy W the -k by rIgM clicking on th. tab M lb. bosom of thle sheet
IMEM
ME=
umbers an Nken
from No raw
tlma table. Thom
la no b.d N change
tb-tolls
Bankfull
TOB
TW
Left
Right
LA
Right
Station I Elevation
Station
I Elevation
Staten Elevation
Station
I Elevaton
Station I El-ti-
1001 321.211
m.rn lm IWTM1e calls
93 322.98
can bo lea blank
10.3 322.57
p
if you do n wish to make
95.84j 322.29 0
than ^s of p mmers be ow. Tne
Bankfull
TOB
Left
Ri M
Left
Ri M
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
0 0
0 -0.13
0 0.28
0 0
0 0
mmara tlml en usotl formomM1olopy
cello
ulculetlww. afmrany atllu-bb,
below. TMre lb no nootl b, cMngo
Bankfull
TOB
Left
Ri
ht
Left
Ri ht
Station Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
Station Elevation
100 321.21
93 322.B5
103.31
322.85
95.84 322.29
0 0
Bankfull
Station Elevation
Stream Morphology
1193.457411 322,811
9.954
103.4112 322.8
10,048
2xBankfull
1.009
Station Elevation
9.860
#NUM! 324.4 at aalf a
324 49 E nor, a a nee a re
PLEd
1.640
#NUM! eacn
ba
#NUM! kfanel-ti^n,addd-.
Avers a Bankfull Elevation X 322.8
-321.210
Bankfull Width ft
9.9537
Bankfull Area
10.048
Bankfull We Perimeter ft
10.9038
Obkf=
Bankfull H Eraullc Ratllus ft
0.9215
DA-
Low Bank Height ft'
-321.21
Slope =
Avers a PIN Elevation 1.10
Sinuosi
LPIN and RPIN
p HO
0
Sta Eler
0 0
0 0
321.00
89.00 91.00 93.00 95.00 97.00 99.00 101.00 103.00

Project: Dovadon
Loca — c— section 6
SWdon: 1+41
Benehmark deacdptlon: Riffle
Data: 811&2018
c
Photo Reference Location:
Permanent BencM1mark Elava4on:
Permanent Ban.M1mark Locapon
�uY a
tk m.' Cro¢sewtlon taken from be p eo g wn¢tream.
y neee aaeieonal sneats br mare<ross wceona iu¢r<reateawpy oftne sneetryegm cpcking an me What Ma 6onom aftals ¢M1an.
�MENEM���
NMENEM
aa��������
MOONED
NIEMEN
Elam
�MENEMMENEM
���
MENEM
MENEM
miume Maxon
III
IMIEMMI
rsc�rrmc��
�sa�
00

Project: D—d- Location: C... Section 7
Station: 1+30 Benchmark description. Riffle
Date: &13/2019 a c
Photo Reference Location:
Permanent Benchmark Elevation: Permanent Benchmark Location:
©����
®' ®-
i
®' '
®' El—b-®'
®- '
Sti- ®-
dbkf
0.710
WID
14,073
ER
t"7 . ..........
a�
LBHldma,
0.712
—
a�
©�
00
332.00
327.00
322.00
90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00

Appendix C
Environmental Memorandum

MEMORANDUM
TO: Becky Ward, Timmons Group
FROM: Susan Thebert and Morgan Gilbert, Timmons Group
PROJECT: 7314 Doverton Court, Timmons PN: 44363.005
RE: Informal Wetland/Stream/Buffer Confirmation & Protected Species Review
DATE: October 14, 2019
On behalf of the City of Raleigh, Timmons Group conducted an informal environmental
review of the jurisdictional status of a stream and pond located east of 7314 Doverton
Court in Raleigh, NC (Wake County) (see Figure 1. Area of Interest Map). The review
area included the northern end of a pond, an approximately 130-ft reach of stream feeding
into the pond, and the immediate surrounding areas. The project site is further described
as a portion of Wake County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 1707046572 (See Figure
2. Parcel Map). At the time of inspection, the review area was comprised of a pond,
maintained grass lawn, a stream, and mixed hardwood -pine forest.
The project site is located within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202010803) within the
Middle Creek watershed and drains south to Crabtree Creek. There is no NC Division of
Water Resources Stream Index Number or Stream Classification for this stream. The
closest stream, Mine Creek, has an index number of 27-33-14 and a classification of C;
NSW. The project area stream flows south into the pond, which then drains to Mine Creek.
According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 3720170700J (effective May
2, 2006), the review area is located within Zone X, Areas of Minimal Flood Hazard, and
is therefore located outside of the 100-year floodplain.
A site inspection was performed on September 17, 2019 to determine the presence and
approximate extent of any potential wetlands or other surface waters connected to the
pond which may be subject to Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act. The
evaluation for potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. was based on the methodology
outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Wetland Delineation Manual
and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0) and subsequently issued USACE
regulatory guidance regarding the identification of jurisdictional stream channels
(Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE 2012; USACE 2005). In addition, streams were
identified based upon the methodology outlined in the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and Their Origins (Version 4.11). During the field visit, wetland boundaries were

delineated, and flagged utilizing pink and black striped flagging tape tied to woody
vegetation. The stream and pond feature on -Site were not flagged during this
assessment.
The project is located within the Neuse River Basin; therefore, the intermittent stream and
pond are likely subject to the associated 50-foot Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules. Formal
Buffer Confirmation through consultation with the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Department of Water Resources (NCDEQ DWR) was not included
in the scope of this assessment. If any permanent disturbance is proposed within the
delineated wetland areas, intermittent stream, and/or 50-ft buffer area surrounding the
stream and pond, a 404/401 consultation will be required.
General Environmental Features
To the east of the stream and north of the pond the study area supports a mesic mixed
hardwood -pine stand characterized by a mature closed canopy, a well -developed
sapling/shrub layer, and a sparse herb layer. The canopy is dominated by tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), lobolloy pine (Pinus taeda), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and American beech (Fagus grandifolia). Sub -canopy
species include tulip poplar, sweetgum, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), glossy privet
(Ligustrum lucidum), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate), red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), and mimosa (Albizia julibrissin). Herbs and vines include muscadine (Vitis
rotundifolia), honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium
vimineum), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), and mimosa seedlings.
To the west of the stream and pond there are several apartment/residential buildings.
This portion of the study area supports a plant community that is maintained in low
growing condition.
Section 404 Jurisdictional Areas
Palustrine Open Water
There is one jurisdictional Palustrine Open Water (POW or pond) in the study area. The
pond boundary was not flagged or located with GPS technology.
Stream
There is one intermittent stream within the study area. This assessment was limited to
the approximately 130-ft section of the stream which flows from the culvert pipe to the
pond. The stream flows into the head of the pond and has riprap along the bottom and
sides. There is a retaining wall present along the entirety of the west side of the stream.
The stream was not flagged or located with GPS technology.
PSS Wetland
One palustrine scrub/shrub (PSS) wetland was delineated along the northern edge of the
pond to the east of the stream. This wetland consists of a narrow fringe bordering the
pond and is adjacent to the mixed hardwood -pine forest. Dominants include tag alder
(Alnus serrulata), black willow (Salix nigra), and red maple (Acer rubrum).

PEM Wetland
One Palustrine Emergent Wetland was delineated along the western side of the pond.
This area is maintained in low growing condition and was recently mowed. Dominant
species present included a few black willow and tag alder shrubs.
Federally Protected Species
The below Table 1 contains federally listed species in Wake County, North Carolina as
recorded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (dated June 27, 2018). The bald
eagle and six federally protected species are listed for Wake County. The North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer was reviewed for records of
occurrences of the aforementioned species within a 1- mile radius of the project area. the
NHP Report identified a noted occurrence of the bald eagle within 1-mile of the
project area on February 2, 2019. No other occurrences of the aforementioned species
were noted. No consultation was completed with the USFWS, therefore, all opinions in
the table below are informal. Consultation with USFWS is recommended.
Table 1. Federally Protected Species listed for Wake County, NC
Common
Scientific
Federal
Habitat
Opinion
Name
Name
Status
Roosting habitat consists
May affect but
of mature forests with
not likely to
Haliaeetus
large, dominant trees or
adversely affect
Bald eagle
leucocephalus
BGBA
snags, typically within 1-
based on low
mile of open water, which
quality foraging
constitutes foraging
and roosting
habitat
habitat
Cape Fear River basin in
No effect due to
Cape Fear
Notropis
association with gravel,
location outside
shiner
mekistocholas
E
cobble, and boulder
Cape Fear River
substrates in slow pools,
Basin
riffles, and slow runs.
No effect due to
poor/fragmented
60-year-old pines for
quality of
roosting on an average of
potentially
Red-
10-acre tracts; foraging
suitable foraging
cockaded
borealislis
borea
E
stands are 30 years or
habitat, and
woodpecker
older mixed pine-
absence of
hardwood stands totaling
proximity to
at least 80-acres
potentially
suitable roosting
habitat

Common
Scientific
Federal
Habitat
Opinion
Name
Name
Status
Small streams to large
rivers on a variety of
No effect due to
habitat types in
absence of
Dwarf
hydrologically stable
suitable habitat
wedge-
Alasmidonta
E
environments. Can be
(stream
mussel
heterodon
found in a variety of
bed/bank
substrates including clay,
consists of
sand, gravel, and
riprap)
pebbles, and sometimes
silt depositional areas.
Tar and Neuse River
basins in relatively silt
No effect due to
Tar River
free, uncompacted
absence of
spiny
Parvaspina
E
unconsolidated beds of
suitable habitat
mussel
steinstansana
gravel and/or coarse
(not a fast
sand in fast flowing, well-
flowing stream)
oxygenated stream
reaches.
Clean, coarse to medium
No effect due to
sand in riverine or larger
absence of
Yellow
creek environments;
suitable habitat
lance
lannceo
ceoiolate
T
dependent on clean
(small, slow
moderate flowing water
moving stream
with high dissolved
with riprap
oxygen content
bed/bank
Sandy or rocky open
woods in association with
No effect due to
Michaux's
Rhus
E
basic soils. Requires
absence of
sumac
michauxii
areas with some form of
suitable habitat.
disturbance to maintain
open area.
Notes:
The opinions provided in the above table are informal, as no USFWS consultation was completed.
Consultation must be provided to receive formal determinations of effect.
BGPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
E = Federally Endangered
T = Federally Threatened

Enclosure
Attachment 1
- Figure 1: Area of Interest Map
Attachment 2
- Figure 2: Parcel Map
Attachment 3
- Wetland Determination Data Form
Attachment 4
— Perennial Stream Assessment Form
Attachment 5
- USFWS Species List for Wake County, NC
Attachment 6
— NCNHP Report

No wetland features
found adjacent to stream.
Wetland feature continues south
along fringe of pond.
Feature locations are approximate.
Legend
QArea oflnterest
�Strearn
Wetlands
Pond
50ft Neuse Buffer
0 5 10 20 %
Feet

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Doverton Court City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 9/17/19
Applicant/Owner: Becky Ward, Timmons Group State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-39C1-1
Investigator(s): Susan Thebert and Morgan Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Pond fringe Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136A Lat: 35.878244 Long:-78.660061 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: PbD - Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes. NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation f Soil ❑, or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? N Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0✓ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J v l No
Remarks:
Point taken within wetland located along eastern fringe of pond. Wetland was approximately 3-6 feet wide and more than
15 feet long.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches): 6
II
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-39C1-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: N/A ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
6.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Salix nigra 15 YES OBL
2.
5.
6.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Alnus serrulata 25 YES OBL
2, Salix niqra 5 NO OBL
3. Acer rubrum 1 NO FAC
4.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
31 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 15.5 20% of total cover: 6.2
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: N/A ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2 Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Present? Yes 71/1 No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-39C1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 3/2
90
5YR 4/6 10 C M L
4-10
10YR 3/2
85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C M LS
10-16
10YR 4/1
100
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes IZI No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Doverton Court City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 9/17/19
Applicant/Owner: Becky Ward, Timmons Group State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-39C1-2
Investigator(s): Susan Thebert and Morgan Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136A Lat: 35.878256 Long:-78.660033 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: PbD - Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes. NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation f Soil ❑, or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? N Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0✓ No 0 Is the Sampled Area ✓
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �_ Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Point taken in uplands just east of wetland and pond.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
n
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No i " ' Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-39C1-2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Pinus taeda
30
YES
FAC
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
25
YES
FACU
3. Acer rubrum
20
NO
FAC
4. Fagus grandifolia
15
NO
FACU
5. Carya glabra
8
NO
FACU
6. Quercus alba
7
NO
FACU
105
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
52.5 20% of total cover: 21
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Acer rubrum
15
YES
FAC
2. Quercus alba
10
YES
FACU
Wrica cerifera
2
NO
FACU
5.
6.
27 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13.5 20% of total cover: 5.4
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
1. Vaccinium angustifolium 6 YES FACU
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5 YES FAC
3. Lonicera japonica 2 NO FACU
6.
7.
13 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 6•5 20% of total cover: 2.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 YES FAC
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2•5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes 71/1 No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-39C1-2
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 L
2-7 10YR 4/3 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
SL Hit restrictive layer, rocks.
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No IZI
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Doverton Court City/County: Raleigh/Wake Sampling Date: 9/17/19
Applicant/Owner: Becky Ward, Timmons Group State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-39D1-1
Investigator(s): Susan Thebert and Morgan Gilbert Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Pond fringe Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136A Lat: 35.878176 Long:-78.660144 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: PbD - Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes. NWI classification: Riverine
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation f Soil ❑, or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? N Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0✓ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J v l No
Remarks:
Point taken within wetland located along western fringe of pond. Wetland formed in a wedge like shape with a corner
protruding into the pond.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches): 6
II
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-39D1-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
15 ft
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
-
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft )
ED 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Alnus serrulata
3 YES OBL
0 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2, Salix niqra
2 YES OBL
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Mecardonia acuminata 60 YES OBL (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Polygonum pensylvanicum 2 NO FACW Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
62 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 31 20% of total cover: 12.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Present? Yes 71/1 No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Rest of Herbaceous stratum has been cut.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-39D1-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/4 98 5YR 4/6 2 C M L
4-0 I U T rl J/L 1 UU
6-16 10YR 3/1 90 7.5YR 4/4
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced
10 C M
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
SL Dead pine needles mixed w/ so
SL
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes IZI No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

1r u v W C j Ntream wentmeation r orm v ersion 4.11
Date: q/t % t r, Project/Site: �o� o✓i Latitude: 3.5, V7Y555
Evaluator: '��r-� 5, i e�- County: li_ Longitude: 7g,,61.ppcJy
Total Points: Stream Determination circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent r/ Ephemera] n ermitt Perennial e g Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =, r✓' }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
CD
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
�
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1)
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
R. Hvdrolnav (Subtotal = ! S ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C_ Rinlnav ISuhtotal = 75 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed i7d
62
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
e71
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23 Crayfish
T
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
CID
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OB
= 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
'
*k _r
(vas
Sketch:
J

10/11/2019 Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species
of Concern, and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina
Updated: 06-27-2018
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA Current
Cape Fear shiner Range by
Notropis mekistocholas
E
Current
Basin
Carolina madtom Range by
Noturus furiosus
ARS
Current
Basin
Neuse River waterdog
Necturus lewisi
ARS
Current
Range by basin
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
Southern hognose snake
Heterodon simus
ARS
Obscure
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Range by
Fusconaia masoni
ARS
Current
Basin
Dwarf wedgemussel Range
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Current
by basin
Green floater
Lasmigona subviridis
ARS
Current
Tar River spinymussel
Parvaspina steinstansana
E
Current
Range by basin
Yellow lance Range by
Elliptio lanceolata
T
Current
basin
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Lindera subcoriacea
ARS
Current
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html
1/3

10/11/2019 Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii E Current
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of
its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient
information to support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing
under the Endangered Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not
required for Candidate or Proposed species; although a Conference, as described under
Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting species proposed for
listing.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal
Endangered Species Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the
US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those species
that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of conservation and are under
consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support listing at
this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and
other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action
Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to
similarity of appearance with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa
listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to
Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or
nonessential). Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red
wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as
species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted
as "PE" or "PT", respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)_
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared
recovered, and removed (de -listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered
wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the primary law
protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and
provides a statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has
developed National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land
managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid disturbing bald eagles. For mor
information, visit http://www.fws.goy/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html 2/3

10/11/2019 Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A))_
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the
bog turtle (from New York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the
southern population (from Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due
to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and
international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T(S/A)
designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North
Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as
T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the bog
turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the
proximity of known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable
habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html 3/3

\\'I ♦ ♦ t ♦ t 1� 1`I ♦ t 1 11 ♦ ♦ \ 17 1 1 111111115
♦ t 1 51111111
♦ t ♦ t t t 11111111
♦ ♦ t 1rd 7 ♦ t t t t 1 1'I ♦ t ♦ ♦ 1i� 7 t t \' I ♦ 111110
♦ ♦ 11111
♦ \ i7 t t ♦ t \ i7 1 I t 1'I \ 1I \-►11111111
♦ t ♦ ♦ 1 1 \ 1711111
♦ ♦ 1t`1 t \'I t l / t ♦ \1I ♦ t 1 1 ♦ ♦ 1' I ♦ t
1�l���1 111��11��11!i1111N�lQ�Illlhll l,!�111 Lllll.�pl�l IIIIIIL���N111111111,!ill 111.��1N�1I�i��l 1��111111,�1111111��1 IIIIIIIIIIIII�II 1.��111111�11 1,���11,�11�l11�1�1 111.11.��1 1!�111111111,�1111,��111�1��1111111��11,!�Illl.��i�l L�N11
1111111/�II'll 11►;II 11
1111111111 I1 11111�� 1111�;�1►.1111
11 II 11 11 11 111t.�;1;1111'.111
11 lt111 II11 „�1 1'.1111'.1►:�II I'11'.1111:11; 111/1111 1111 I�1111►;i1 11;�11;�11;1�1
I.1 I.1►.1►1/11.111 ��� /1►.1 1,�!d M ►. ��� I.11.�,! I,t� I;il 1111 /1
I:1 ►t111:1►1
IN11 111111 1111 11 111'��IIt.1111t.I11
It11111111111111'.111It111
11111�11 11�1►;�11111►;�1111�11111I1 I11�11��1►;�I II I��1►:�I11
111111 ►1 I ►1►; ; ►1 I� 1' ►.1111111 ►� ►;III 111111
11 111'.111►:�I11I�It111 11 LIIIIt.11t1t1'.11111
11 111�11 11 111111
1111It1(\„ 1'.11'.1 l',tl 1111111/� 1 11111I1 11
►1 II 1:1111:1 1t,/y!I ►; 1:1 1:11:11:1111:1
l1111:l;11111:11,�,1.1Ii111111t.111
1112 1111111110111:1l'IVIAllONA
L,, II►I
�i�...�,��111
►.I►,�I►/1►� /I���►.1►5/11
Itl 1:11.11:1 I III
►.i1►1►1►��I1►I;i
►.1
►.►1►11i111 /1►�I ►I
II
1111 li l 11 /��11� I l i l III1.11.11\, I III Ii 1111t.1I I I1I 111t.1 lit ►slll E�1 li l 11 l 11111'.�11 II M 1111 E�1►.11�114�III 1l li l II ►;"I I1111IMF"111
11 1111I.1 I.y 1.1I.1
►1 /111 I.1 /� I.1
I.11I I I
11 ►,!,1.11111 ►.1 It.�y /�
II lINO 1All 11
Itl l/ MA ltl
111111 I
1111111t.1
Itl It.�I 1',t111
Itl Itl I;tl Itl11 11►P, "I Itl Itl
Itl Itl l/5l 11 lt.IQl 11 111
►tl ►tl
►tl (tl l'.I ltl ltl
Itl Itl 111'tl
1.1
II Itl Itl
1.1 N:N 1:11t.�11
I:�II
►I lfl ltl l;';I;I ltl ltl lt.�;tl
1:1 11
Itl 1:1 Itl
51111 Itl
/I ►11„ 1
►.��1►.1►1
LMpl
►l ►� ►.1►l ►� 111� ►.l. /l
Il @ ►1
►111
FAI , 21 M ►1
►.�1��1
►� 111� ►.1►PMIl I
1111 /I 0
/1►.1
11111�►1I►1:
11 11 1�,11 1� 11111111 11 PI�11
1; 11; Itl 11 1;il 11:11 1:4 1111;1111I:l I ►;11:11:l11 1A 111l1
Itl 11 Itl Itl Itl
Itl 11 II II It.�hl Itl 11 Itl
1:1 1;;111'1lll 1:11;11;111
1:111Itllll;; IIIIIII:�lAW
1:1 1; ;111,\ 111 1 I:l I;t11;111
1:111 Itl1:1I; ;1 1101111►:lI
I\, 1II I;f l 1;1
I;1 I01111 1tl
Itl I; ;I I`, l 11 Itl l; l l',111
Itl 11 Itl II If;; 11101 1lI Itl 111t.111
l; l l',111
Itl 1111 Itl PI 1 1111111t.� 1'.1 111111
Itl 1', I I PI 114 1 Itl 1',}I 1',111
It.11111 Itl P',t; 1 1111111t.� 1'.1 111t.111
1:1 I; I' 11 PI 1 11Ml Itl ►;�I PI 111
Itl 11 ll ltl lt; II II II I:l IVll 111t.111
1:1 I; I I PI 111 1 Itl ltl l; l 11
III 1111 ltl PE 1 11011111:ll I Itl 111:111
Itl Il I Il 1 Itl 1'tl 1'111
Itl Itl tt1t4P1.11tI Itl t1'Itl 11
I 1; ;111; 11 1:11;11;t111
1:11:1111t.1 I;t; 11011111/ it 1:11:111
11;;II; l FEN 1:11;1;�111
It.11t.1111t.11;f;�1 1111111:�I1:1 111110
1:1 1;1I I;1111 1 1:11;11;11:1
1:11:1111:11; ;1 1111111:� 11:1 111:11:1
►1►;.. EIE1 01►t1►;111
►1►1►1►1►;; ►I/II1�I►1 ►1►1►1
I►I10111111►;12V;131►&1:i2l

11 111111111111►;1i I11� 1' 1'►; 11/11111 ►.11111�1►.11� 1 ►; � � ►; ; l l l ►1►1►11� ►%s 7 I ►;411,►1►1►118 10„ 111118; I ►1 I F, ilI ►l I I ►�1 I 1' ill 1 /1111
1:1 1'.11:11.11.11:111111 1111111i1 1.11.1 1'.1
1'.1 11 111:11'.1
11 I�Q i1111��1111411�111I�1 1111111i�111111111
11 I�Q� 1►I l�l��l 11El11�111
1'.1 1', ;�11'„ 1111 1'.11',fl l',tl 111',!1 1'.1111:11 111'.11'.11:1
1'.1 1; ; 1',!l 11;1 1'.1 PIP, l I', ;111
1'.1 1;���11'„ 11 1'.11',EI I',tl 111',l 1'.1111:11111'.11:11:1
1'.1 1',t;�11'„ I;II 1'.11',tl I;�l 11
1:1 1�;11',l I;I;I 1'.11;:'l l;�l 11 l',l 1'.1111'.1111111'.11'.11'.1
1:1 1;�;11',1l I:I;I 1'.11;}l l;�l 11
1:1 1�;111',! I Il; 1 1'.I l;�l l',�l II I;i 1 1:1111:1 l 1111:11:11:1
1:1 1;�;1',11 Il 1 I:I l;�l l;�l 11
II Ill; I; l C"I l 1'.I I,,9 P,tl 111',il E1111:111111:11:11:1
1:1 1; ;111;►111 1:11;}71;111
irl Iqr I I 1 II, ��� 0 �� � II, I I ql
►1►111„1►, 1111011111111►II IIIIII,111111 „1111111 0 11 I1o11►Ilo,llllll„1111u11►1111111111111►II►1►1111111�IIIIIIIl1111 51
� �11.11.11.1�♦I.\..II.L\..1.1..♦i.1.I.\111111♦♦I.\..1.1..♦i.1.♦II..I\...♦I.\.�I\.L1\..�I.\♦I_-
1.'l 1;11;11'.11'.11'/I;II I Q1 Qy1Q1 I Q III i1i Q11111iOk I lr I�AlI I 11 IBAN 111'I;r11'.11'.1;1'.1;ICI I IQV1�HAllI,;1'.1QM" I1111 I�AI�111 � I11'A11 11111111 I Q'1111 Q1 I �I 1 I Q112 I (E12 1�lllr1
11 /1 ►1►1►I1l 111i 1l
A :111111�; 111111►:1111FrAN'
1'.11111PI, 111..1'.11111.111111111111
I►I@@PI;'1111111►:l 11 ►1►1►1
('.11'.11'.11'.11;4i� 1 111'.1111'.11'.1 1:11:111
11111I 111',ii 1 111:1111:1 1:1 111:111
I:lll111:1I;t; 111'.1111'.1 Al 1:11:111
.....,:r.............,,,,',r....,.....,........,r.,,........,
IIINM111!IN.1111111111.N NNIIIIDRI,t111.11.1,111111.I1111I111111.1LIl."ll11111.1111111,II11►.1►.I"11111.1►r" lll1,„11111111t14llllH"11�li111111111I,d11111111�l!i111111111
ova �r �r �rer �.w.r��r,�r.♦v.:n rr♦�...n �n ♦.r.♦♦♦.r �......♦
II �r 11 IH Ir I IH 11 111 I11 I I 11 1 „11111 1 111 1111 11 111111 111111,.,1111111111111 11 11111 1111 11111 1111 11111111111
1.1.1 1 • � ♦ ♦ ♦ 1.1 1 11.1 I. \ 1 � ♦ 1.1 1 � 1..1 I. \ 1 1 1 1 I. \ � I.1 � 1 I \ ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 I. \ 1 � � 1 1 1 �
1111111111 P,IP 1FE12

NCNHDE-10327: Doverton Ct
of y Cir `'f Ur Y
- d
'NaLsbury Pin Farrlav,,
• o Bi
vo
r'q/p
ro
r• °c° o
y�t.g Dove
w
Rd z m
.vord Rd Bndgepo ,t O, �gP
1F ao
orrYorfn
$°
Neall
o wu glen
6P
�yd s o SteinO
IdayR
~'- f arnborouA _ -
o
c?
C tonO'
Oy'
er
11e
J
O
'
Ot O
Old V �.°
tayapP'�O.
�� pr
o 0
e
p. � Ife mbr,dA
�
Food
Lon
.,
Nugget (�
`
WrMN ass '
Ac
a
Rd n 7gmo.r D'
Q
s•
.
_ O v
o
r� Quo ya.
n
P
o1
^ \d,e 0"nve Rd rc..
[t'C
U` �h
err 4
eY Rd
a
fa
c
IE
1111c,
�O
�
,en Or
�c9 d u
Sri y
9y
cS
Rd
Nt.pie7U'�•r
yN'Ca ne 4�
Mo Wt"zql� c
o� Dr ti
'I *
RaMecresl Rd
y sil
RYdal Ct ��
c
Q�
¢ E
Thti"
a.
,fro Or
S
o
Lynn,%
z
=
Hinton
k16
pr
_
Mtn A
BrookhaV n
atr 4
�re Rd W iF
°Ysyoe
a
Dr
>
N
'
o n,
O
•
W E
°
y J
NfP
S
E Ia•Wrwaii� �.
D
�
'` g a
September 25, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Sf� �No od h,,,�C r Van Thor
ce
�s
er HeotyeV Dr l3+ecKe �, Ritlge�
l a /OY w
Ctia 4nrx: Lr
t So n O
� l":eslbronK
- �c Id`
cI ^� y
m Ridge Dr
�y -
o�
.p 'A;oods� •�
� y2iAge Wood U� /fir
c 6
Gaea � Killington Dr ? E
4
1:20,622
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
MET, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
ILLLI_I_LJ,1@1@IP'1 IP'l"I 1

Li
-c
m
Rr,
r
m
m
a
XP
A
WL,bgeland br
baflQY Rtl
p/
0'10nn�e P,k M
PROJECT
ROJEC 1
ffm
Wedgelaad Or wrdgeiand 4t
r
m
a ❑nvorton
is
� m
o`
0.
C
The Montessori
School of Raleigh
P�
Mine Shag Rd Mine Shah Rd
ne Creek
b
7314 Doverton Court
VICINITY MAP
Scale: NTS
NOTES:
1. ALL STORM, SEWER. WATER AND SEDIMENT/ EROSION CONTROLS TO
BE BUILT TO CITY OF RALIEGH STANDARDS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL
EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED 48 HOURS
PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION ON SITE. NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL
CENTER DIAL 811.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO
REMAIN UNDISTURBED.
5. DAMAGED EDGES OF ASPHALT OR CONCRETE SHALL BE SAW CUT
PRIOR TO PATCHWORK.
6. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY
OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS, DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
7. ANY DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE REQUIRED
TO BE REPLACED TO CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS
AND INSPECTED.
Plans Prepared By: CAD File Path:
Becky L, Ward, P.E.
Mini U$lley Rss
w
rn
m'
Q
a
Sr
old F
'bitk`flr
re �,
v
c
+�. Ti]j]i1E Iti fj fji
Mfg Creek
IMMONS GROUP .•••�'••
THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE
RALEIGH OFFICE
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.com
North Carolina License No. C-1652
Contact —Becky L. Ward P.E., Becky.Ward®Timmons.com
CITY OF RALEIGH PROJECT MANAGER
DALE HYATT, P.E.
[phone]
P.O. BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Portal Email: [e-mail]
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Right -of -Way Obstruction Notes:
• Lane and Sidewalk closures or detours: Prior to any lane or sidewalk obstruction, the
contractor or engineer shall submit a traffic control and/or pedestrian plan along with a
Right -of -Way Services Application to request the obstruction prior to the start of work.
rightofwayservicesPraleiehnc.eoy for approval.
• The City of Raleigh requires an approved Right -of -Way Obstruction Permit for work on
any public street or sidewalk and NCDOT road within Raleigh's Jurisdiction.
• All Traffic Control Signage and practices shall adhere to the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control, and the latest edition of the NCDOT "5tandard Specification for Roadway
Structures", NCDOT "Roadway Standard Drawing Manual", and the NCDOT supplement
to the MUTCD.
• All public sidewalks must be accessible to pedestrians who are visually Impaired and/or
people with mobility concerns. Existing and alternative pedestrian routes during
construction shall be required to be compliant with the Public Rights of Way
Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), the ADA Standards for Acc essib le Design and the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
• Prior to the start of work, the Client shall schedule a Pre -Construction meeting with the
Engineering Inspections Coordinator to review the specific components of the approved
plan, and ensure all permits are issued.
• All permits must be available and visible on site during the operation.
CITY MANAGER
RUFFIN L. HALL
PROJECT SURVEY DATA FOR
6818 VALLEY LAKE DRIVE
PROVIDED BY:
RWK, PA ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
DATUM:
HORIZONTAL NAD83
VERTICAL NAVD88
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA COLLECTED BY:
TIMMONS GROUP
Sheet Index
1. Title Sheet
2. Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan
3. Erosion Control Plan
4. Proposed Plan and Cross Sections
5. Stabilization Plan
6. Erosion Control Details
NANCY McFARLANE
MAYOR
Construction Plans
7314 Doverton Court
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT QUANTITY TABLE
Phase Number (s)
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
Number of Lot (s)
0
Lot Number (s) by Phase
0
Number of Units
0
Livable Buildings
0
Open Space
NO
Number of Open Space Lots
0
Public Water (LF)
0
Public Sewer (LF)
0
Public Street (LF)
0
Public Sidewalk (LF)
0
Street Signs (LF)
0
Water Service Stubs
0
Sewer Service Stubs
0
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF
RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS
The Construction Contractor responsible for the extension of water,
sewer and/or reuse, as approved in these plans, is responsible for
contacting the ENGINEERING SERVICES at [phone], and the
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT at [phone] at least twenty
four hours prior to beginning any of their construction.
FAILURE to notify both City Departments in advance of beginning
Construction, will result in the issuance of monetary fines, and require
reinstallation of any water or sewer facilities not inspected as a result
of this notification failure.
FAILURE to call for Inspection, Install a Downstream Plug, have
Permitted Plans on Job site, or any other Violation of City of Raleigh
Standards will result in a Fine and Possible Exclusion from future work
in the City of Raleigh.
90% REVIEW SET
0
0
o
�
0
�U
SHEET NO.
1

I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I '
YICNSf/C
I
I
40
PATRICK AND AMANDA KENT
1236 MOULTRIE CT
PIN:1707048765 , -
/
a3
N TING 5
20 /S
' DAVID AND EMILY WATTS � BIR I
1301 WEDGELAND DR EXIS G SSMH WOO
P. 327.15 �� - X 11 G N
PIN:1707047930
W INV l 7.55 AI 6--332 IR v
IN. 317.75
O V IN 95 P M 9�J - - - _ - ��' , - N 19
30 VARIABLE WIDTH PRIVATE -
I DRAINAGE & CITY OF RALEIGH INV UT. 318.15 ,� c _ IR_ 7 �� _ ����A7'
' - OAK 1 PN �� 18 6
O _
Z SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
J I BM 1997 PG 1305 �R-�h= �=6 -�- ��� �o ��� I 9 w
Q ' SOAK/1?i IR 7 I �� ' / 26/1 o 12 tt
I
ill �flF'-2
i L LR l 1C3 - ' 26 / c PN 9 '� tt tt
EXISTING SSMH i i i 5`L� F. Z T II¢ 4- \ 14 1 1�
G n Zy� Z N PN 1
TOP: 337.44 �'� � ��' - - - - - _ _ -, t�� a 9 19 PN 6 P re_z
INV IN: 327.99 / EX STIN i i i CRz I n / I " Mj2o
T P OF BAN i i i i z��'I`��\i� tt
INV IN.- 327.04 � I / H � EXISTING POP 8 �
INVIN 326.94 / / /�^�° / i I v � Z STREAM 2�� P tt RZ
INV OUT.- 326.54 i / �q� / / I I- i DEAD R& CENTERLIN i tt CRZ
---------- i i COi / /" --`� - SGJ P 5 Z
- - ---- EXISTING i '� 'T�\I i I,� C c� ®�r / i i N tt
i I�- ^� (q SG 11 \ _ - EXISTING
_ TOE OF BANK I I
-- /
an� � cp R�d�� J SG 10 � •' WETLANDS
' lNV.321.16 1 _��� A b ��� ` P 6 ` \i �/ .• p.•:{•.':
I
�-- ----- ------------ J- I -__ _____-4= _ \IrT- Lp.
PN 1 N 1 R2 ..... a t EXISTING POND
6 o T
' ------ _' x0- _ _ �2 ��� IM YC� 0P 2+00- 6 •G��tt
EXISTING 6 'RCP _ -- _ __ 3
--- --
---- '------- - - - - - - - - - - -
EXISTING Cl I X _ _ - - - -�__ �- \\ \ \ \`:✓
TOP OF HEADWALL XISTING \
RIM. 337.09 \ \\ \ - - ' �J ��\\ \ �•• a tt
INV.' 329.75 BUILDING \ � t
INV IN. 331.87 TBM 3 '•'•:•:
INV IN: 325.89 I - DECK - \
INV INI324.59 �� � - - - - \ � � \ \\ \ \ \��\D tt
' EXISTING WOOD TIMBER WA L \ \� 0 TBM2I BRICK tt
INV OUT.- 321.7 ` 1'\ S
PATIO L11111
�
I \ \ EXISTING 4'
I � OOD FENCE
EXISTING 4' SPLIT RAIL FENCE / I , / '
I T MARGARITA Z. ALLEN
I 7314 DOVERTON CT.
' Q0 \ \ \i / /� I PIN: 1707046831
WILLIAM AND NORMA DOWLING TERESA C. KAY
/ 1305 WEDGELAND DR EXISTING LANDSCAPE // I 7312 DOVERTON CT.
PIN: 1707046952 BLOCK WALL I / PIN: 1707046738
' (TO BE REMOVED
-------------- AND REPLACED
/ WITH MODIFICATION) \ I I �O I /
' \ ERB,15 °
LS
\ �l
% EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE
LS
/ C ° °
TAYLOR ALLARD \ \ iO � ° � �° ° p� / ° ° � �S ° � `° °A
EDWARD AND JOLENE LOFRESE06
I 1307 WEDGELAND DR ' m l ° ° "' LS
PIN: 1707045973 � "CONCRETE
I
/ °
DRIVE a`%°�vw
I° \,
_ �i %
�
I / ... LOD,-
LOD�__
_� ° L41
v
/� I' ° ° °��� �q ° d- =
j LSI] I i I--°
3 PN 19 / / a `V
° ° v
------- �I 0
----- TP
M 12 I LS \ v ° a u
7
___-- C
_--- ° I
1 ° \
I -
/
o % GN G,� /
n Cp
CHY7
I GREYSTONE MANOR '' \
' TOWNHOMES
I ASSOCIATION INC -
PIN: 1707046572 i \ LP
- _ J40
I
I
I I '
I 1
3R I I 342
/
I
1 /
I
I
3
-------------------- ---- --
I
L-X/S / IN&
CURB AND GUTTER
(TO BE REMOVED
AND REPLACED
0
SCALE 1 "=20'
NOR
0 20' 40'
NOTES:
1. UNDERGROUND UTILITYLOCATIONSAPPROXIMATE.
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFYALL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. MORPHOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTED BY,
TIMMONS GROUP
5410 TR/NITYROAD, SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27607
3. PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHOWN BASED ON PLANEMETRICS EXCEPT
WHERE EIP LOCATED BY SURVEYOR.
4. PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY.-
RWK, PA ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
101 W. MAIN STREET, SUITE202
PO BOX 444
GARNER, NC 27529
[phone]
DATUM:
HORIZONTAL NAD83
CONTROL POINT
NORTHING
FASTING
ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION
TBM 1
774894.35
2100698.06
ELEV=331.20
60D
TBM 2
774833.41
2100671.29
ELEV=330.65
WOODEN HUB
TBM 3
774773.93
2100679.26
ELEV=329.25
60D
TBM 4
774791.63
2100740.62
ELEV=326.11
60D
LEGEND:
330-------
330 -- -- --
LOD LOD LOD
t
LS
EXISTING SURVEYED CONTOURS
NC FLOODMAP CONTOURS
PROPERTY L INE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
EXISTING TREES
BUFFER LIMITS
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK TBM
TREE REMOVAL
EXISTING WETLANDS
WALL/ FENCE REMOVAL
LANDSCAPE AREA
CRITICAL ROOTZONE
TREE LEGEND:
PINE
PINE
POP
POPLAR
OAK
OAK
CHY
CHERRY
SG
SWEET GUM
ASH
ASH
BIR
BIRCH
CED
CEDAR
CPM
CREPE MYRTLE
%%•%%%�N. CARO� Ilk
ONLY
; , ; NII 1N
E
0
u
ir� ui
0 0
0
E
N
E
= Z + IN
Q U
0
0 W 0
Lu rl
of ,.., -, z
a aL-00 Q)
z
O
0O M d
om u
a
z
J� X =
U
<<
w
p 0 U
HI Q� L
0
_ 0
L 1.6 z
cn
o O0
w
rn
lc�
L rn
J
w
DATE
5-I8-2020
DRAWN BY
3ne Vandergrift
DESIGNED BY
Becky Ward
Abrham Asfaw
CHECKED BY
Becky Ward
SCALE
1 "=20'
� z
O
U
z _
D }I J
Z O O
Z)
U°w
w 0
zY
Q Q
0!z
I
= Q
w
�Jz
W o� p
> O
Ouo
0 z
O
U
At,
90% REVIEW SET
JOB NO.
363.005
SHEET NO.
2

___
r'n / SG 6 / V I ` PN 6 1 1
N6 / SG 11 / PN16' % 1
f i
r / / EXl 'PING / I — — — — — J / ft
/ ROCK / I
EXISTIN T-OP OF B`4NK 5ROCK I _ —
� � ^ _ SlL T SCREEN r� • I
fi ► ?? 1IrOE OF BA j✓ 6 SIL T SCREEN I 11 / PN 8 .' • • .' t
PROPOSED / SG 1 SG 10 i"• • l
syc 10 1 — — — — ' �Qp'� CENTERLINE / / EXISTING I:3�n11G• If
EXISTING
\ - �STRE % ��CAW POND
QOl /rye / / J / �
1 SOIL LIFT ' .
— — — — — — — — — — ROCK BASE I 1 322 V r,v— GOPl N 8 / / / PN 6 _ �;ENTEh?Ll • i ► ... •
VIA
OAK 11
I _ tt _ SILT FENCE_Av 3 v
\
J
_ 1 ROPOSED
-__ 5 SOIL LIFTS _ _ -_---322
a
1 0 0 0 \
- - - -
EXISTING \ X // \ ' _ L ---- _ — _ \ \ • • • • 7:,-------
BUILDING $ 330 — ` � \ \\ \ ♦••• ."t \
�X \ 32 \ \ ,WE'T.L/d NOD �`
bRICK
\\ \\ \\ \\ I PA TIC, \ \ \\ \ \ \----
\ DECK
BRICK �� \ \————— — — — — ——
\ p / I PATIO \ \ \ X/S�/N 1 \
pcn / I DECK-z- -- — — —
,
EXISTING 4' \ \ \ � w � / I � Q � � � \ \ , ! \ \ \ ► ���,
\ \ \ \ WOOD FENCE \ \ \ � U)
\ \ \ \ \ Q EXISTING LANDSCAPE
� \ \ \ / /_ BLOCK WALL LQJ/ \ \\\ \� — — — — —— �\
/ p / / I ¢ (TO BE REMOVED) 2 TREE XIST1 LANDSCAPE \
PROTECTIO j BLOCK WALL
(TO BE REMOVED) \
\ I
\ EXISTING 6' WOOD F NCE \ °
\ I�
\ \ 15' PVT. DRAYN EASEMEI�°
\ \ BM 1998 PC 1186
\ \ I
\ ,v
1
n I
DISCHARGE WITH
STABLE OUTLET
(NOTE 3)
OR ON BEDROCK
PUMP
ACTIVE WORK ZONE
250' MAX
ILI
ROCK SILT SCREEN
P4 1
DISCHARGEI
HOSE DEWATERING
SEDIMENT PUMP -.— F�-_----- - -
AS NEED E D --------------------
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN DIVERSION PUMP
RAW PUMP
WITH ROCK PAD BASE FLOW
NOTES:
1. WORK AREA TO BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.
2. ROCK SILT SCREENS REQUIRED FOR PUMP
AROUND OPERATIONS ARE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO PUMPING.
3. STABLE OUTLET TO CONSIST OF ROCK PLACED IN CHANNEL
FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AND 45'
ELBOW INSTALLATION AT THE END OF THE PIPING SO THAT
THE WATER DISCHARGES VERTICALLY UP IN THE AIR. THE OUTLET WILL
BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER PRIOR TO PUMPING.
SUMP HOLE
OR POOL
CONSTRUCTION 1
ENTRANCE 6 / \
i �� \ DISTURBED AREA = 8,385 SF.
a
JERB 15
/
°
J$ ° LS
SCALE 1 "=10'
0 10' 20'
— INTAKE HOSE
Table 6.10a
Temporary Seeding Specifications
for Winter and Early Spring
Seeding Mixture Spedes Rate (lb/acre)
Rye Grain 120
Seeding Dates
Mountains >2500 ft.
<2500 ft.
Piedmont
Coastal Plain
15-Feb to
15-May
1-Feb to
1-May
1-Jan to
1-May
1-Dec to
15-Apr
Soil Amendments
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2 ton/acre ground
agricultural limestone and 750 lb/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer
Mulch
Apply 4,000 lb/acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt,
netting or a mulch anchoring tool. Use 400 gallons of tack per acre
or straw covered with pinned netting.
Maintenance
Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertilize and
mulch immediately following erosion or damage.
/ LS
Table 6.10a Temporary Seeding Specifications for Summer
LEGEND
330- - - -
EXISTING SURVEYED CONTOURS
330
NC FLOODMAP CONTOURS
320
PROPOSED CONTOURS
PROPERTY LINE
— — — — —
— PROPOSED CENTERLINE
LOD LOD LOD
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SF SF SF
SILT FENCE
TP
TREE PROTECTION
o PROPOSED ROCKTOE/CHECK DAM
8" SAN -m--
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
OHP
OVERHEAD WIRE
— — — — —
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
cRz cRz cRz
CRITICAL ROOTZONE
EXISTING TREE LINE
EXISTING TREES
@
TREE REMOVAL
Seeding Mixture Spedes Rate (lb/acre)
German Millet 40
In the Piedmont and Mountains, a small -stemmed sundangrass may
be substituted at a rate of 50lb/acre.
Seeding Dates
Mountains 15-May to 15-Aug
Piedmont 1-May to 15-Aug
Coastal Plain 15-Apr to 15-Aug
Soil Amendments
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2 ton/acre ground
agricultural limestone and 750 lb/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer
Mulch
Apply 4,000 lb/acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt,
netting or a mulch anchoring tool. Use 400 gallons of tack per acre
or straw covered with pinned netting.
Maintenance
Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertilize and
mulch immediately following erosion or damage.
Table 6.10a Temporary Seeding Specifications for Fall
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES. LIMIT CLEARING AND LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY
TO THE AREA NECESSARY TO INSTALL THE MEASURES.
2. COMMENCE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
3. INSTALL ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND/OR INCREASE MAINTENANCE FREQUENCY WHERE
APPROVED MEASURES FAIL TO PREVENT ACCELERATED EROSION, OFF -SITE SEDIMENTATION, OR REPETITIVE
NON-COMPLIANCE ISSUES.
4. MOBILIZE TO THE STREAM AT 7314 DOVERTON COURT.
5. PERFORM CLEARING, GRUBBING, DEMOLITION, AND DEBRIS REMOVAL AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
6. INSTALL STREAM PUMP -AROUND OR OTHER STREAM DIVERSION MEASURE TO PROTECT WORK AREA ALONG STREAM.
7. CONSTRUCT BENCH ON EAST SIDE OF STREAM AND STABILIZE.
8. WORKING FROM UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM RECONSTRUCT WEST BANK WITH SOIL LIFTS. INSTALL PLANTS DAILY IN SOIL
LIFTS AS WORK PROCEEDS.
9. SEED AND MAT EMBANKMENT SLOPE.
10. REMOVE TEMPORARY PUMP -AROUND.
11. INSTALL REMAINING WOODY VEGETATION AS CALLED FOR ON THE PLANTING PLAN.
12. SEED ALL DISTURBED NON -PAVED AREAS. SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE PER THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
13. MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER AND CITY OF RALEIGH PROJECT MANAGER.
14. MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES IN GOOD WORKING ORDER. SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION
AND OTHER SIMILAR MEASURES MUST BE CLEANED OUT BEFORE THEY ARE HALF FULL. CLOGGED STONE FILTERS MUST BE
REFRESHED/REPLACED. SILT FENCE CAN NOT HAVE HOLES OR TEARS.
15. REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONLY AFTER THE SITE IS STABILIZED AND APPROVAL HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY THE
CITY PROJECT MANAGER.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. FENCES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET ALL FENCES AS NOTED IN THE PLANS AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY
THE ENGINEER. THE EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE THESE ITEMS TO BE REMOVED OR DISTURBED DURING
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RECORDED AND PHOTOGRAPHED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO REQUESTED TO SAVE ALL OTHER EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS WHERE
POSSIBLE. TREE ROOTS EXPOSED AND/OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PRUNED USING EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR PRUNING. ALL PRUNING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY AN ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST.
3. GRASSED SURFACE RESTORATION: ALL EXISTING GRASSED AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE
SEEDED AND MULCHED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS OR AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
4. STOCKPILE AREAS: ALL STOCKPILE AREAS SHALL BE AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM ANY STREAM OR STORMWATER
STRUCTURE AND SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARD DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ANY DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED TO THE CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR
NCDOT STANDARDS AND INSPECTED.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST CITY OF RALEIGH
STANDARD DETAILS AS FOUND ON THE CITY WEBSITE:
HTTP://WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV/BUSINESS/CONTENT/PLANDEV/ARTICLES/DEVSERV/DRAWINGSSTANDARDDETAILSINDEX.HTML
Seeding Mixture Spedes Rate (lb/acre)
Rye Grain 120
In the Piedmont and Mountains, a small -stemmed sundangrass may
be substituted at a rate of 50lb/acre.
Seeding Dates
Mountains 15-Aug to 15-Dec
Coastal Plain and 15-Aug to 30-Dec
Piedmont
Soil Amendments
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2 ton/acre ground
agricultural limestone and 750 lb/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer
Mulch
Apply 4,000 lb/acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt,
netting or a mulch anchoring tool. Use 400 gallons of tack per acre
or straw covered with pinned netting.
Maintenance
Repair and refertilize damaged areas immediately. Topdress with
50lb/acre of nitrogen in March. If it is necessary to extent
temporary cover beyond June 15, overseed with 50lb/acre Kobe
(Piedmont and Coastal Plain)
late February or early March
%`,`�I11111111////,'
%%'',o��N• CAR��
r c F SS/n� '• 9 T
Lv��.v�r=_
: =
ONLY
r •:; vU I N��:•' P�
NNA
/11IIIII
0
U
C
o �
o
E
N E
LL Z + N
Ln
Q .� U
0LU -Fu U�Nz
dU_ —
LL LU 0 N CIO �
lY M N
0- 0� U
M J
,�--,
Z J M C
<Q-0Q o
o U
Ln
_ o
kD z
�kD
0
�rn
Ln
J
LU
H-
Ln
0
U
0
H
0
LU
LU
U
Q
z
0
0
z
0
d
U
Ln
LU
0
z
0
w
LU
Q
0
DATE
5-18-2020
DRAWN BY
Shane Vanderarif
DESIGNED BY
Becky Ward
Abrham Asfaw
CHECKED BY
Becky Ward
SCALE
1 "=10'
�
z
2:U Q
'
J
pz�
UD
U
O
zz
w
0!
O
=
U
w
Q
z
O
w
LL
O
U')
O
O�
0
U
LU
TYPICAL PUMP AROUND OPERATION
NO SCALE
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
NO SCALE
90% REVIEW SET
JOB NO.
363.005
SHEET NO.
3

335
330
325
320
31575
CROSS SECTION 5 (STA 1 +59 )
(AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
BLOCK WALL
FENCE
CUT
PROPOSIMU
/ 211
r--
IV
EXISTING
GRoulvu
CUT
— —
_
,
CUT
EXISTING
z
X
w
4'
K TOE
RO
SANITARY SEWER
INV. = 317.76'
335
33C
325
320
315
75
80 85 90 95 100 105
SCALE: 1 "=5 HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
CROSS SECTION 4 (STA 1+68.5)
(AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
110 115
(BLOCK WALL)
FENCE
/
2'
FILL
2H
EXISTING
PROPOSED-1V
SOIL LIFT
wi
EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER
INV. = 17. '
z
4'
PROPOSED
ROCK
TOE
X
1111
335
325
320
315
80 85 90 95 100 105
SCALE: 1 "=5 HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
CROSS SECTION 3 (STA 1+76 )
(AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
110 115
FENCE
(BLOCH
PROPOSED
SOIL LIFT
CUT
FILL
sk
npniwn—
GROUND
—EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER
NV. = 3 7.62"
z
X
w
75 80 85 90 95 100
SCALE: 1"=5 HORIZONTAL
1"=5' VERTICAL
335
WAI
330
33
335
)
330
325
320
120 5
335
330
325
320
315
120
33(
325 325
320 320
315 315
-
/ 30 POP 8 SG 7
VARIABLE WIDTH P IVAT , / / / I / - H s ,�- - _ _ _ - _ / / H a Aft SG s
DRAINAGE & CITY OF RALEfGH / g/ / I I H 6 f
SANITARYSEWERIEASEMENT / / �� / I �/ I - - - - - / / , PN I
PN 14 rr
BM 1997 PG 1305
EXISTING / I / - - L / /M 7 PN 18
TOP OF BANK / ' III i / I nF" _ - - / / �[c / �, M TREE
`� H 8 / / %I\ / PN 24 � � f ;
/ I EXISTI G I z `w' Z - _ SGs cq O/ / / PN6 i jt
CO
CE/N`rERLINE �O W )k O U SG 11 � / / / / / i� �•
XISTING ' (/) j U U U cA / / / PN 8 f/ ,
TOE OF BANK �1 I ° w - 323_ PROPOSED , / / / • • , • t t
U (1)t
i► - = lI � 326 \ I ' � � � � \ urn
CENTERL/N _ — � � SG � SG 10 y • . • • • . • •
.Zff
qw , ,"Xi`$�(NQ
l\P�N6INV.'321.16 _ - - - - - - PN5 N8
♦••I
'
♦t•t♦••••
-----324—
--------- -pep
--- -----
+_ --= EXISTING
-� OAK +00 PONDFLU_ 31
_
\\ \7f4
EXISTING 60" RCP N\ \\\ f— _ - - ✓ —
- - - - - - - - - - - - --� � ���\ � - �
TO OF HEADWALL _—
INV.329.75 \ \ \ I ' — — — ;� �\ N.
126
\ EXISTING BUILDING \ \ \ \ �x — _ _ _ _ / — _ , , 330 - _ ��\\ \\ \ \ ••, , �,��LA91lDS•
EXISTING WOOD \ \� \ \ �` I / / ' �� SOIL LIFT 1 S� \
\ �o ` _ _ _ �_ \ \ \
TIMBER WALL \ ` , \ - _ II / / �ROCK BASE 5 ' \
\ EXISTING \ 1 PROPOSED PA lO \
EXISTING 4' WOOD FENCE \ / / \\\ \ \ \\ \ \\
4' SPLIT RAIL FENCE `\ \ \ ` ` '� _ ` 5 SOIL LIFTS ,
\ \ I EXISTING I - �' - - -
/ LANDSCAPE DE£K BRICK\
BLOCK WALL - I PATIO
r---1 CO \ \ \ I —
\ DECK
\ \ \\ J \ �O // I /- -332. L�J
RECONSTRUCTED 6 Q
BLOCK WALL 6 / L-
\ \
WILLIAM AND NORMA DOWLING
1305 WEDGELAND DR
\ PIN: 1707046952
\ \ O= \ \ \ \ \ T / MARGARITA Z. ALLEN / TERESA C. KAY
334 7314 DOVERTON CT. 7312 DOVERTON CT. LEGEND:
PIN:1707046831 PIN:1707046738
330 _ EXISTING CONTOURS
�- 327 PROPOSED CONTOURS
SCALE 1"=10'
- - - - - - PROPERTY LINE
0 1I NOR
0, 20' — — — — — — PROPOSED CENTERLINE
LOD LOD LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXIS TING SA NI TA R Y SE WER
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
PROPOSED ROCK TOE
PROPOSED SOIL LIFTS
EX/STING TREES
TREE REMOVAL
BUFFER LIMITS
CROSS SECTION 2 (STA 1+88 )
(AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
FENCE
(BLOCK WALL)
CUT
i
zri
i
PROPOSED
SEAL L�F-11-
FILL
1.5H
010
16
TWO
FILL
ROCK
TOE
w
105 110 115 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110
SCALE: 1 "=5 HORIZONTAL
1"=5' VERTICAL
35 335
330 330
325 325
320 320
315 315
CROSS SECTION 1 (STA 2+07 )
(AS VIEWED LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
CUT
2H
_ —
1V
1V
/
EXISTING
GROUND
CUT
UP
z
U)
X
w
115 120 125 75 80 85 90 95 100 105
SCALE: 1 "=5 HORIZONTAL
1"=5' VERTICAL
110 115 120
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=5'
0 5' 10'
335
330
325
320
w
J
Q
U
rn zo
J
Q
U
H
w
90% REVIEW SET
C
CARO
ONLY
%%•`�N �'
'' *
..
III ••••.. N••• � ��`
N1N
E
O
u
ui
o C:
O
E
N
LLI z a--+ N
Q U
0 W i O
Lu
a LL—oo Q)
z
0
r, o c, M d
o' 2
� N J
d
�M'� 12
z
J� X =
U
Ln
O U
z
V)
HI � Q) 1­-
O
O
O
N
w
L�
J
L.I
H
0
0
0
LU
>
w
w
Lu
0
Q
z
0
DATE
cn
>
O5-I8-2020
DRAWN BY
Shane Vandergrift
}
DESIGNED BY
•
Becky Ward
•
Abrham Asfaw
•
CHECKED BY
•
Becky Ward
• •
SCALE
AS -NOTED
IL
z
O
U
It z U
w
0zV)
0
U ° cn
w Q
z<�
0IU
= 0
w z
J Q
w° z
> 0LL Q
}J
O ~ �
Q U
0
w
O
a-
O
a -
JOB NO.
44363.005
SHEET NO.
4

EXISTING GRADE
III\`
EROSION CONTROL
FABRIC ON BANK
ROOTED PLANT
PLUGS (TYP.)
2H
III 1V
\ �I
TOP SOIL I \
TYP. 2" BETWEEN LIFTS I�
EXISTING GRADE
\ \ \ SET SOIL LIFTS
BACK V EACH LIFT
2H—
��� 1V
//IIIIII�
24" MIN 0 /
ROCK BASE
FOR SOIL LIFTS
PROVIDE DRAINAGE FABRIC / 3'-0"
BEHIND ROCK BASE
MIN
NOTES:
1. ROCK BASE TO BE
CONSTRUCTED OF 70% CLASS II, 20% CLASS A, AND
10% #57 STONE MIX. SAND OR SOIL TO BE ADDED
TO MIX TO SEAL VOIDS WITH ROCK.
SOIL LIFTS WITH ROCK BASE
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
PLANTING NOTES:
2'-0"
MIN
CLASS II RIPRAP BASE
1. WOODY SPECIES TO BE PLANTED WITH A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING SHRUBS:
(ROOTED PLANT PLUGS/TUBELINGS - 12"-18" IN HEIGHT. LIVE STAKES MAY BE USED UPON APPROVAL BY THE
DESIGNER). SPECIES SUBSTITUTIONS REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE DESIGNER. CONTRACTOR TO
SUBMIT PLANT QUANTITIES BY SPECIES AND ZONE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTING.
AMELANCHIER ARBOREA - SERVICE BERRY
LINDERA BENZOIN - SPICEBUSH
ILEX VERTICILLATA - WINTERBERRY
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS - BUTTONBUSH
CALYCANTHUS FLORIDUS - SWEET -SHRUB
SAMBUCUS- ELDERBERRY
XANTHORHIZA SIMPLICISSIMA - YELLOW ROOT
2. STREAM BANKS TO BE MATTED WITH FIBERWONDERS COIR MAT C-700 OR APPROVED EQUAL. PLACE RIPARIAN
SEED, EROSION CONTROL SEED AND THIN LAYER OF STRAW PRIOR TO MATTING INSTALLATION. SEE COIR
MATS CHANNEL INSTALLATION DETAIL SHEET 7.
3. PLANTING STOCK TO BE GROWN BY NURSERIES WITHIN THE SAME PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGION (PIEDMONT) AND
WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE.
4. FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY WITH ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS:
LIME'/2 TON/AC
PHOSPHATE 20-40 LBS/AC
POTASH 50-70 LBS/AC
WATERING REQUIREMENTS ONCE/WEEK IF NO RAIN
5. RIPARIAN SEED MIX ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS PIEDMONT RIPARIAN SEED MIX OR APPROVED EQUAL BY
DESIGNER. APPLICATION RATE 25 LBS/AC.
6. TEMPORARY SEED TO BE PLACED IN ALL ZONES SEE EROSION CONTROL SHEET 3.
7. SEE PLANTING ZONE TABLE THIS SHEET.
PLANTING ZONES
ROOTED
RIPARIAN
LAWN SEED
STRAW
ZONE
AREA (SF)
C700 MATTING (SY)
PLANT PLUGS
NOTES
SEED (SY)
FESCUE (SY)
MULCH (SY)
(EA)
SPACING T OC- SHRUB
A
1301
145
180
190
SPECIES ONLY
B
2482
275
275
MATCH EXISTING GRASS
C
136
67
200
200
SPACING VON CENTER
(SOIL LIFTS)
Totals
212
275
275
380
390
1
\ I IAD
_ _ 1 7
I
---------------
i
PROPOSED / / / %'• , .
/ \ _ ROCK TOE / / - ♦•♦•+•♦ 1/
-330
\
LAB
ZONE B
I J
Z9NE
Lo
\\ \ II I I \ r
°
°
p
p
\
SCALE 1 "=10'
0 10' 20'
tt%J11iu1ii1.
�`��o��N• CARO�
CW=
oWly
0
u
r� ui
0 1=
O
E
N
2 Z Ln
Q U
0 W i O
LU
d� —
LL N C'o Cx
Lu Lu0CCz
M az
x
M � M
-4 U
L
Trn L
2 O
koCD z
�ko
LnM
J
W
H
Ln
0
(7
0
0
w
w
U
Q
z
0
Ln
ZONESPLANTING
ZONE A
PROPOSED ROCKTOE
ZONE C
z
0
a
U
V)
w
z
0
w
Tr
i
DATE
5-I8-2020
DRAWN BY
Shane Vanderarif
DESIGNED BY
Becky Ward
Abrham Asfaw
CHECKED BY
Becky Ward
SCALE
1 "=10'
U
z
zI
Q
oz)
a
U°z
z<
w
O
0!
Q
=
cu
NLu _
J
J
H
Lu
C2
0°
>0
o�
O
QU
90% REVIEW SET
JOB NO.
363.00
SHEET NO.
5

50' MIN.
AND SUFFICIENT TO KEEP
o
0
SEDIMENT ON SITE
00
00000 00 0 00 0 0 000 0 0000o 000 00 0
000000000 OooSo0oo�boo0o 00 (DC
Q
00
o 0000
0 000000000000000 00 0 0000o p0 0 00
p
0 0 00 00
'Do
25' OR FULL WIDTH
Q
00000
0o p 000c) 3" - 4" STONE TO BE USED oo
OF PROPOSED STREET
�
ono 00 0o (SURGE STONE OR o)
0 0
OR ENTRANCE,
z
0c), 00
o0000000 o RAILROAD BALAST) 0 0 o
WHICHEVER IS
Ln
000000000 00 0 000o
0 00 00 00
GREATER.
LU
0 0000 0 0 0 o00 o0o0
o0o0poo0 0 %O0 00 0 0 0 0 0000 0 00 000 0
00000 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0
0 0 0
0o00 000 0 0 000000000000 00 00 000
0000
0
PLAN
SILT FENCE (SEE NOTE 1)
EXISTING ROADWAY 35MIN.
0000000 000 000 000
6" MIN. o0 o0000 000oo0o0c
0
0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0o c 000 000000 III
I
— FABRIC UNDER STONE
CROSS SECTION
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
1
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
LONGITUDINAL ANCHOR
TRENCH
TAKE AT 3'-5�
y INTERVALS
0
P pal
/
CHECK SLOT AT
25' INTERVALS (MIN)
P
TERMINAL SLOPE AND CHANNEL
6„
6
INITIAL CHANNEL ANCHOR TRENCH INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOT
NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHOULD BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
2. IF MUD IS NOT REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLE TRAVELING
OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF THE
VEHICLE MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE
PUBLIC ROAD OR THE LENGTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE EXTENDED.
NEW
CONSTRUCTION
15' MIN.
io 0o O0o 0 00 I I2MIN.
00000 -0 00
� 000 00 0 000
IMP
MAINTENANCE:
ADD ADDITIONAL STONE AND "FLUFF" TOP
DRESSING WITH 2" STONE.
SEE N.C. DEQ EROSION and SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLANNING and DESIGN MANUAL
FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.
TOP OF BANK
c
C
SIDE VIEW
0T=-L POST
VEN WIRE FABRIC
4RNING SIGN
)RANGE, UV RESISTANT MIN. 10 GA.
iIGH - TENSILE STRENGTH LINE WIRE
'OLY BARRICADE FABRIC (TYPICAL)
IIIII-11
NOTE: FOR TREE PROTECTION ONLY
& MAX.
WARNING SIGN
TREE PROTECTION AREA
DO NOT ENTER
III ig
III
III
III IIII
III =
=IIIII IIIII=IIIIIIIIII=IIIII-IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=11 IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII
IIIII
ORANGE, UV RESISTANT
HIGH - TENSILE STRENGTH
POLY BARRICADE FABRIC (TYPICAL) IIII
911
III
IIII
III
=
PLASTIC OR
/ WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
GRADE
IIII=u�
PROVIDE WARNING
LANGUAGE IN BOTH
ENGLISH AND SPANISH,
FRONT VIEW ASSHOWN
40"
M .IT TREE PROTECTION AREA
DO NOT ENTER
M ZONA DE PROTECCION M
PARA ARBOLES - NO ENTIRE
WARNING SIGN DETAIL
NOTES:
1. TREE PROTECTION FENCING MUST BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM RADIUS OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
( SEE DETAIL TPP-02 FOR EXAMPLES)
2. THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING MUST REMAIN IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY URBAN FORESTRY STAFF.
3. APPROVED IMPACT PROTECTION DEVICES MUST BE REMOVED AFTER CONSTRUCTION WHEN APPLICABLE.
4. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED AT 50' MAXIMUM INTERVALS. PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50'
ON CENTER FOR THE REMAINDER
5. FOR TREE PROTECTION AREAS LESS THAN 200' IN PERIMETER, PROVIDE NO LESS THAN ONE SIGN PER PROTECTED AREA.
6. ATTACH SIGNS SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS AND FABRIC.
7. ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED BY CITY OF RALEIGH BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.
8. SIGNS ARE TO BE MADE OF DURABLE, WEATHERPROOF MATERIAL WITH LETTERS A MINIMUM OF 3" HIGH, CLEARLY LEGIBLE
AND SPACED AS SHOWN.
STANDARD TREE PROTECTION FENCE
2
bAbL Ur JINLAM
TOP VIEW
1'-6" MIN. TOP OF BANK
=1IIIII-III 1�
N STAKES
STREAM BED FRONT VIEW
NOTES:
1. CHECK SLOTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 25' INTERVALS.
2. ALL MATTING TO BE SECURED WITH WOODEN STAKES ACCORDING
TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AT 5' INTERVALS.
3. FABRIC OVERLAP WHEN 2 ROWS OF MATERIAL ARE USED SHALL BE PLACED
WITH THE UPPER ROW OF MATERIAL PLACED OVER THE LOWER ROW OF MATERIAL.
4. TRENCH MATTING AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF MAT AS SHOWN IN DETAIL
5. OVERLAP FABRIC IN DIRECTION OF FLOW WITH MATTING UPSTREAM ON TOP
OF DOWNSTREAM MAT.
6. MATTING WILL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS.
SEDIMENT
CONTROL
STONE -
V-6" MIN.
2
3' MAX.
STRUCTURAL STONE
CROSS SECTION
NOTES:
USE CLASS B STONE FOR STRUCTURAL STONE AND PAY FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE
PER TON STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL, CLASS B. USE NO. 5 OR NO. 57 STONE FOR
SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PAY FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE PER TON SEDIMENT
CONTROL STONE. CONSTRUCT DAM A MAXIMUM OF 1 FOOT ABOVE NORMAL FLOW DEPTH.
Surface Per Pla
8" Min. Low Permeable Soil —
Unit Drainage Fill (3/4" Crushed —�
Rock or Stone)
Approximate —
Limits of
Excavation
Retained Soil
Typical Reinforced
Wall Section
Compact Unit - Near Vertical
Setback
GRID DEPTH
Foundation Soil
Reinforced Soil
MAINTENANCE: CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
NOTES:
1. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
3. SEE NC DEQ SEDIMENT DESIGN MANUAL FOR CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES AND PLANNING
CONSIDERATIONS.
4. SILT FENCE SHOULD NOT BE USED ALONE BELOW GRADED
SLOPES GREATER THAN 10' IN HEIGHT.
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
SILT FENCE
3 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
4' MIN FILL SLOPE
GRADE
MIN
-0"
SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SIDE VIEW
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
>001
klww
SILT FENCE FABRI
INSTALLED TO SECONC
WIRE FROM TOP
III
III
-
III
IIIII IIIII=IIIIIIIIII-IIIII=IIIII=IIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII=IIIII
IIIII
III
FRONT VIEW
IIIII
-_
III
IIII
IIII
IIII
PLASTIC OR
WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
(GRADE
IIIII=III
Base Leveling Pad Notes:
Block Unit
Cap Unit
1. The leveling pad is to be
constructed of crushed stone
From on site
From on site
or minimum 200 psi unreinforced
existing wall
existing wall
concrete
2.The base foundation is to be
approved by the site geotechnical
engineer prior to placement of the
leveling pad.
Unit Face
Segmental Block
Cap Unit
0
1 /8" - 1 /4"
"
8"
DESIGN HEIGHT
2'-0" (MAX)
Finished Grade
Excavation
1=
-I -
- - - -
24"
Embedment
Limits
�IIII
I -III -III -I :
-III-III-III-III-III-III-
I-11 I-1 T-
Depth
1
6" Crushed Rock or
Unreinforced Concrete
Unreinforced Concrete
Leveling Pad
or structural fill
Leveling Pad
4" Perforated PVC
Drainage Tile
NOTES:
1) Contractor to reuse existing on -site blocks.
2) Wrap drainage tile in 3/4" aggregate and filter fabric with drainage composite or aggregate back drain system.
3) Refer to Grading Plan(s) for wall height(s).
4) Grid depth 4'-0" minimum.
( QsTOmT2R%Nc Ibn View
%%•%�N CARO' ,"'' *
qf W V4t-*W=
oWly
III ••••.. N••• � ��`
NNA
0
U
�Ui
oC:
l0 0
E
N
E
2 Z Ln
Q v U
0 W F 0
0 i
d 1LLL oO -
Z
O
LU CO M d
00 U
d
�cnX. c
U
r a L L (Uw
0
0 o U
I
z
,,) Ln
HI Q� L
O
� � O
o O0
w
O�
LU
Ln rn
J
w
H
0
CD
0
H
0
LU
> w
w l­_
U
z
0
>
O
0
DATE
5-I8-2020
DRAWN BY
ane Vandergrift
DESIGNED BY
Becky Ward
Abrham Asfaw
CHECKED BY
Becky Ward
SCALE
J
Q
I
w
O
zo
UUJ
zY
w
Q
O
Q�z
('
O
w
U
LU
J
<
O
>
LL
O
�
�
O
U
ce
COIR MATS CHANNEL INSTALLATION
4
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
�SC
OCK SILT SCREEN
5 ALE: NOT TO SCALE
SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL (NEAR VERTICAL)
6 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
90% REVIEW SET
JOB NO.
363.005
SHEET NO.
6