20070501 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20070322

__ ~
f
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
07.050 1
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".l
I. Processing ~'HYMrN'T
1. Check all of the approvals} requested for this project: R~rE~VE~
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check-here; ; ®. ~..,, . .,
II. Applicant Information
~~, , . ,,
~( _ : '~ i,
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: BDG Smith Pamlico Associates LLC `' `' "
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jav Johnson
Company Affiliation: Bluewater Environmental Services
Mailing Address: 1473 Boyd Galloway Rd.
Grimestand. N.C. 27837
Telephone Number: 252 341 9802 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: '~ b ~ c ~ 4 0- '~ hod n n : ~ GD f-t~
Page 5 of 12
ieiepnone ivumoer: yiy 4~i you rax ivumner:
E-mail Address: ~~~~~~~-~~-WN[tkiautiii+~!

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold.until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Stillwater
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Parcel # 07-016869 Pin # 6694-10-7722
4. Location
County: Beaufort Nearest Town: Sidney
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Stillwater
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Hwv 92 from Washington
through Bath to 99 North over Jack Creek. Proiect is on left beside SR 1770.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.4883 °N 76.6767 °W
6. Property size (acres): 74.047
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Jack Creek, Trib. to Pungo Creek
8. River Basin: Tar -Pam
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Residential, Rural
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:Subdivision
development, Typical land clearing and road building equipment: dozers, backhoes,
road graders. dump trucks.
Page 6 of 12

11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:For development of a residential subdivision
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list ~ and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.USACE has been onsite to verify wetland delineation but has not
signed off on it or issued an action ID #.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Unknown
VL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Buffer impacts adiacent to coastal
wetlands and 404 wetland impacts associated with a single road crossing
Page 7 of 12

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
F7oodptain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
#1 Fill Herbaceous yes 400' .08

Total Wetland Impact (acres) .08
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:+/ 30 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,550.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im ct Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.NONE
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(~ applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the vroiect:
Stream Im act (acres):
Wetland Im act (acres): .08
O en Water Im act acres):
Total Im act to Waters of the U. S. (acres) .08
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream} and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization}
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.Imuacts are associated with
oniv one road crossin~_on_ the- entire- tract. Area being crossed has reduced area of wetland
imaacts and will not impact CAMA wetlands. Onlv filling wetlands associated with the
road crossing. No other wetlands will be impacted.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h?o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmaide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Please refer to Mitigation Plan attached.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h~o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:N/A
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA}?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse}, 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Taz-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 1 SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water. Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify TAR-PAM )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the squaze feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. SITE #1
Zone* Impact

( care feet)
Multiplier Required

Miti tion
1 103 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
2 5222 1.5 0
Total ~ 5325 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC ZB .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NIA
Page 11 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. Stormwater has been approved for this site by DWO. Stormwater from tract will
sheet flow through vegetated uplands prior to entering wetlands.Stormwater from road crossing
will enter level spreaders before dispersing into adiacent wetlands.
XIL Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Onsite gravi septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
httpa/h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Nothin
i~ planned.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applic~Age~n~s Signaty~e,I- fDat~
(Agent's signa r is va only if authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

~~~ D
„z,;a , ~~[Uli7
DENR • WATER OUAUTY
wErtArons ANp sroRa~vrAtER ewa~cH
Agent Authorization
I certify that Baldwin and Associates and Jay Johnson have my permission to
submit all applications for permits to the environmental review agencies for the
Stillwater Subdivision on my behalf.
9/~/0~
Robert Anderson
Date

°Topo~one -USGS Ransomville (NC) Topo Map
-.-
~_
~ 4.
y
1~7~~~YpIMlMl6 ti'0~' :~ *'•~n °`' ? ~nS (''- 9.nithca..e ~ ~+~ ~-.~'~ F
-

- ra„ ~ r ,~~~ ~~r ~. - ~.~• ~
''r e fit r~
- ~ i ~ •* !
~

,.~~B
- '
4
,r ,.
~ r-;, r,i
A• s
- ~ .mow

. r

' -r • -
l ~ II
1 -
t 1 ~
1 ~

~
w...j~ l '~ ~ ~
~ r
l f _ l .a

~ •
-t.~..a
h - .rte.. - ~_-
r
w
f// _ _

- - - ~' .'l, r- ~ ,~ I

i
.j

M*
0 -0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 km
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 mi
UTM 18 347905E 3928293N (NAD27)
USGS Ransomville (NC) Quadrangle M--10.14
Projection is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum G--0.973
07.0501
Page 1 of 1
http://www.topozone. com/print.asp?lat=35.48834&lon=-76.67667&s=100&size=m&u=4&layei=DRG251... 1/13/2007

\ ~ ~ ~
DETEAIL OF ~ ~v ~ ~/i
~- \ RE~AD CROSSING ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.
o s SITE # 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 5 LEVEL ,~l/~
~ \ ~'~°~ ~ ~ ~ SPREADER ~2
® \~G~~i ~ V _ UFFER IMPACT
\ ~~p° J ,~ ZONE 1 = 296
\ ~~ ~
\ 15\LEVEL ~ V ~ ~
~~ \ ~
SPREADER ~1 O COASTAL WETLANDS
~ ~ O i - ~ .~ ~~ PROPOSED CU RT ~
~~ ~ ~ 48LF 18" RCP~~
,~O ,~
~ ~ 404 WETLAND ~~~J~/////// Q~~
~~ ,Ili . , ~ N/ /i~. // ~~ /
O 404 WETLANDS
R P F F EF
COASTAL WETLANDS ~ ~ M~\CC
~ ~0, R\PN gUF
~~ BUFF~~MPA~T ~/~ ~P~
ONE 1 - 0 SF ~
NE 2= 2255 SF ZONE 2
_ N L~M~TS
S~RUC~~~
~~N
~ 1~ LEVEL - /
Q~~' SPREADER ~3 15 LEVEL
~'~. / SPREADER ~4
/ /~-- / ~
_ ~ ~L/ _ ~ ~ 404 IMPACT
Q~/ __~ ~~ 3549 SF
~ ~- \
=~ ~

07.050
STILLWATER MITIGATION SITE
FINAL MITIGATION PLANNING REPORT
BDG Smith Pamlico Associates LLC
7000 Sia Forks Rd. Suite 115
Raleigh, NC 27615
Issued: March 2007

07.0501
1.0 INTRODUCTION & GOALS
The BDG Smith Pamlico Associates LLC proposes to construct 404-wetland
compensatory mitigation site at Stillwater Subdivision located off HWY 99 near SR 1770
in Beaufort County, North Carolina. This site will be used as compensatory wetland
mitigation for impacts planned (.08 acres) in the subdivision. A 3:1 wetland mitigation
ratio on .08 acres of wetland impacts was a requirement by the US Army Corps of
Engineers.
The mitigation concept for this site focuses on creation of 404 wetlands on existing
uplands adjacent to existing 404 wetlands. Therefore, this project has been designed to
include the following components; 1}Excavating uplands to appropriate elevations for the
establishment of targeted adjacent 404-wetland elevation.
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH
The Stillwater mitigation site is near SR 1770 and the planned subdivision encompasses 30
plus acres of 404 and coastal wetlands. The site is near Jack Creek that is a tributary to
Pungo Creek (refer to topo maps). Uplands/wetlands have been delineated and mapped
onsite. Upland vegetation at the proposed mitigation site currently have Loblolly pines
(Pinus taeda}, White Oak (Quercus alba), Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata), and Wax
Myrtle (Myrica cerifera) growing onsite.
BDG Smith Pamlico Assoc. LLC proposes to remove the existing vegetation and soil
from the upland area down to the adjacent wetland grade that will allow surface water
exchange from the existing wetlands into the excavated upland area.
Existing on-site plant species or "biological benchmarks" were used to identify the plant
species and target elevations. Plan and cross sectional views of the Stillwater site are
included as a detail on the plan map.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/ELEVATIONS
The existing site consists of three community types; an upland area described above, a 404
wetland area that contains: Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) in the tree canopy, wax myrtle
(Myrica cerifera), and red bay Persea borbonia as the saplings and saw greenbrier (Smilax
glauca) at the ground level.

Existing site elevations range from 14 feet in the upland areas to 7 feet in the lower areas
of the wetland areas.
4.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION COMMUNITIES
Stillwater March 2007
Final Mitigation Plan Page Z of 4

A transect was used to identify plant species. The transect extended from lowest to highest
elevations within the existing wetland and upland area. Sample points were selected along
the transect to represent the lower and upper boundary of the wetland. Plant species were
inventoried. The plant species identified and elevations selected for the wetland creation
effort resulted from the use of the transect method.
5.1 Wetland Creation
Hydrology to the site will be provided by the adjacent existing wetland and stream. The
BDG Smith Pamlico Assoc. LLC proposes to conduct mitigation by utilizing an upland
area. Upon receiving an approved plan, In early spring 2007 target elevations will be set
onsite. Silt fence will be placed around the upland to be excavated. The plan is to remove
the existing vegetation and grade the sites to a target elevation of 5.0' nearest the existing
wetland. All vegetation and any spoil material will be removed and taken offsite to an
upland stockpile area. The site will be accessed from within Stillwater subdivision. The
plan is to plant the site with black willow (Salix nigra) and red maple (Acer rubrum) at a
density of 1 per 100 sq. ft. Early successional plants such as sedges and rushes should
revegitate naturally. If Phragmites australis emerges in the mitigation area it will be
controlled with "round-up" herbicide.
5.2 MONITORING PROCEDURES
An asbuilt report will be submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers once the site is
constructed. The mitigation site is owned by BDG Smith Pamlico Assoc. LLC and lies
outside of DOT R/W. Routine road maintenance or mowing will not disturb the sites being
restored to wetland elevation. Emergent wetland vegetation will be monitored at randomly
located sample plats using GIS software. The location of the sample plots in the field will
be determined using real-time GPS. A minimum often 1.0 m2 sample plots will be located
in the wetland areas. Vegetation at the site will be visited twice a year and monitored for
five years, or longer as necessary, following the completion of the grade work.
5.3 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success of the wetland creation project will be evaluated using the frequency and
average percent cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation. The site will be considered a
success if the calculated value for frequency is 0.5 and the calculated value for
average percent cover is at least 80% by the end of the fifth growing season.
Frequency will be determined by f=nX/n,,, where f= frequency, n,~= number of plots where
emergent herbaceous vegetation occurs, and ny total number of plots. Average percent
cover will be determined by c=E~n, where c= average percent cover, E~ =the sum of
estimated foliar cover for all plots, and n= the total number of plots.
StillwaterA~Iitigation Site March 2007
Fina111~Iitigation Plan Page3 of 4

6.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Stillwater Mitigation Site will provide onsite wetland mitigation for impacts generated
with in the subdivision.
Table 1 summarizes wetland mitigation credits that will be generated by constructing
Stillwater Mitigation Site. Credits at the site are "creation".
Table 1. Summary of Mitigation at Stillwater Mitigation Site
Location - UTM : 18 347905E 3928293N
Miti ation T e S ecies Miti ation Area Miti ation Credits
404 Wetland Salix nigra
Acer rubrum 0.38 acre
Amount used 0.24 acre 0.24 acre
Balance 0.0 acre

Stillwater Mitigation Site March 2007
Final Mitigation Plan Page 4 oj4

_ - - '`? 0 7 • 0 50 1
~ ~ DATA FORM
~~~~~~d~"~ _ ~°;,,
~.:----- v-~- --~-- - t'!98? CAE Wei ~~ Macxr~3
~~
_ ~(~
. ao
PrQjet~iS~e: ~'/l v6 t¢~'
~fli OT ~ 'Q OYS ~
E7o Ntxrtial t;Gr~rwes exist or: the she? -
Isthe site gel ~ (Aiypica[ S~On}?
Is the aneat a peal Pno6~ierrt Arm?
lif r~eedexi_ eamlair~ on rev+ecse.)
s~r~rinu
Date. 1 ~ to
Cov~ty_
Sfafe: /U, f
No Cody ID: ~ w'
Yes ~ Tram iD: „~ 05
Yes Plot lU:
saes Shaum ---

n
~ /u /Ar 9 a !~i___~_.. ~~
2 t7f /'t, iv ~,,qc.-~ non:~aa FtantSnedes ser~m- ' t

10.
~
~. ~ a lFo~ ~tnf ~ G i~,
q_ vPrCv i ~ ~~a4 FAt- ,~,
$
- T ~~.
z
~. 14_
Z 1a.
B~ i6_

fafDoq~S~eaes8tiat:xe QB[.. FAGW ocFAC
~~
Rettes~
HY~R[~i_~GY
_RecfltdedDaRa{QescxbainR~natts~ WaUandHydavlogy~ - -
_Shea~n.te[ae;a'Tidet3rytge in~iwRas:
Aaiai Photegaptts
~Ufh~- kwncta~d
/~trsaled6i tJp{~s'i2 t1Cti85
~Efo Reoot~l Ua~-dEAxa3ahte VYai~s
^
t3t~tlirres

.Field tltsecra4oce~ _Sedraer~De~ossts
_„ Draasage PaU~iss !n Weltands
j~ Seoor~dacy rocs (2 a more regacedx
DepN: a<ScYfaae 1Ka6er: i/ Cnj _O~ad¢ed RontChamets in Upper` 92 ~cf~es
WaOer-:fined t,eaves
ne~thto Free Wa0ar6i P~ ___~____Ssz~ 6~t~cat soi slurvay t3a1a
FAGi+~e[~IratTest
p~~p -~ Sad (~ ~)
~-"' _ lOlher (F~plain in Rert~)
Rental
B2
AppentrxB Btanicard6enpie4alaForms

SOILS
_.
_..
3 __
x ~~~ ' ~
~,, P l L~

;- tax ?~Pfr'C ' 6aE
,~ • F
~~

" co
~ Y~
--
,
i~ ,-
~~ - r - Mat~oc£okic
~~ L"~--~- _ lVAaistl
~~ ~6oitle totots ~ "'
Rai 8 Moist) ~ ' - Te~dt~e Cnnaefios-s.
er~*n
StrL
t
_
_e
c.
_ _. .
/~1~c
~1~ ~ ~ v~
--- ,.
._l~a~.
-----
~,

~~~
~

-~ _~
_~~~~
_ ~~

55 ~~1Y9k1G1.
Ali
l

~~~ {1V~If~ ~ 'N ~~~„`~f ~I'~!_`

i2.rt~a[i~: i~i0 ~ tt1iS Point Ni(fti~! a VilCtfaxl? (~f ~ pio
~./
i
~Pendoe B t3far~c acxt Exampic; Data F~oarts
B3

DATA FOt~t!
ROUT~~1~-~
f9~8T COE We#ta~ds ©eiir~tiati 14ta~
~~ r.J Y Datt~ r ~ . ~'~(~
Appi'~/O~rner " N[n
irr+OT= ~ "'~ r'
~' Co~[Y !D: Cv ~ -
t3a Tfofmat {5r~s e~E ai tFte she? ~ es ~ Teanseet tI3: _--
is ~e she ~f ~~ ~~ Yes
is ~e etea a pa~ec#~I ~obtert~t Area? Yes Pk~
~° L~6 ar, ac o ~ -~_
2
3.

PESOSC~tttf~oa~aueOHE.EAt~liflrFAC ~ ~~
#fYD~QLIUGY
~(f~isR~ctcsx
Stamm. Laia~ ~Ttt~ L#age
!lariat ~
L~ +foR~~edDa3a
L~ptEtc~fStafaceVY~' '^`~-'~Q Can}
DepihioFcrsWaterirt#'fi ~--~~')
E7epti~ sa SaUsa~ted sox ~~x'')
itemad~
B2
Fiekiflbsenra6oc~
~a
1Z.
'YL
i3.
i4.
4~.
t~
w~a~
PiimaY -
!_Sah=algid ii l i~et'I2 -y~t~es
Wade~6lfacks
~Dri&t3rres
~SetfiTte[stt
_!' inYife3tands
y ~icatocs (2ormoce
ppd¢~ bootf~terc~eis in ~Z2fia~es
^W~~t~eaNes
~Lsxxt:ioi Sttrveyf i~
~Tesc
j _OriiestExt+taininR)
gpp®nducB eEaicaoalF.~r~rms

SOILS
Ta>~y
Pf ~//
~ ~PP~ i~pe? Y t~to
p .'_ _ _ __
~ ~ ~) Mofsil ~ ~ -'Fe~dtB~ ~~ '~
-~_ .5~ S - s' ~ l-
~tcsoa~tcaencs:
-~
_tx~
~,~
=c
Lo~CXuon-a Cbtots
~esredcs:
_~
_~~ ~~ sanay~So~s
_ [.tste~t °" i~ tiytirtc~ list
_ O ~ Sow L[si
~h~iry4cYegeta6on p
Hydcicso
('~ (Cecte~
es ()
Yes Nb Ls this Sampling Post Win a ,~
Yes /t~tn
cB B~Ncand t~We DaFa Forms
B3

DATA fOR6A
ROtJT'!I~ VYETLJ4Nt3 DETE~INATi0t~2
19987 COE Wetl~ds [3e~fion Ma[x~[)
S~
VEGETATION
_~
~~ ~ ~~
t :
Jr^nCyS rno.~ ~P/±pn"vS ~ O L s:
n
2 [_ f~~(t'(iih MQi'L .JS %l-n~,oiP~PntP ~ ~I~L. i0.
34 ~~D~ C r) ,rte O R~
~
~
'ti.
'
_~~i~~h a?L
`~ ~ 13.
6- i4.
Z ~
8- 16.

P~crtof Fib~~Species~atat~eOBL.Fl4CWorF1VC tb~
t

HYDROLOGY
,Recadedtrala(fle~aiiRenmds~
-per ~KT+de L~uge

_~iieardsd Oa~aPor~a6le We~andattiyyd[dfogy6cs:
P"`..~~da6 -
_ ~d
~a:a~ea ~ c)pper t2 ixhes
-Wader NEarts
^~~

Ftefd4ns: _sedrnestT~pos~s
_Dr~eP R1KCltil[1d5
~-'+, 3eoudary ks (2 or mote r~qugedx
/
/
DepUt of Slsface Wader_ V [tttti.) O)udtLed ROOt L [I [J~7p~'i2 B'iChBS
-
wase<-sra~ea
Depihb Fnes Water in Pit o~ (nj „=,tncat Sal SZe~nsy t~ata
FFYCaJe~~tta1 Test
DeptltSo Sa4raEed Soit ~~n) _„Olher (F~q~tain in Rematis)

~ Appen~cB BtaE~IcandE~mpieOataForms

SUILS
(Serves, Phase~W/
f
t~j ~. .v ~~~q~,~ p~~ ~i' pol1y
'lift
'
y
^
Ta~nortgr-49ubg~?= -_/Pfli < 1 ~q~ /
f t ?' 4
Mapped Type? Yes ~ .
P~otie Des~tio~t
~P~ r • l~atsucl;3o{nr
f~hes? [~b~on [~Asuell-OAS) ( . - : w
Motile Cobrs FAottie A6widatxe/ Te~dtae; Cnrtaetions,
Ap Moist) ~rfedune. etc
n=la - ~ ~e a ~ ,Y,~C~ _ _ _
~
.

. ~
_
~~~
v~ wed on taeat liydric Sots flat
~,~~

WETLAND DETERbilINATtON
~~~ Fta tom) ()
wettanrt tyaotoc~yr Pn3sent? Na
ttydnc Sow ~ Fb is ttxs Sampling Pant Witttire a wetFand? Yes Fla
P~pendocB Stankax3 Example grata Forms 63

., .~
DATAFORIIIIt _ _ _ _
[tpltTlNE VYETtJ~ pEfl~lilNAT[ON
{9987 CAE We4t~ds D ~
J~~DYVt1et: _ n IG
jar. ~ e - _ .
Do NoctYtai {lr~ on the she?
isthe she ~~Y~-~ ~~
is ~e area a.pofiet~ra~ Prom Acea.
ttf'.~r~cL-~antaitt at riav~se.1
__ l~
IIo,.i:s~xPl~aslnedes !
4. ~ ~=
5. ~v rt
E
T.
a
Pecoa~tafSpaeiesl~ace~81.,. FpGlAtocFAIG
_n~~x
~a~
-~~~
~~
fHoD~par
~a
pe}rihofsZ,~iacewa~ V cm.)
pep~eioFi~waaecinP~ ~-~~(~~( c,~.}
t]epU~to Saduta~ed Sa'~ ----G1-~-sn)
82
~ Cotnmuniiy iD:
•~ Tt iO~:
Do,rcwntP~+rt9ae~as - s~
~~
7i.
l2 ----'
'l4
95.
46.
wg02ndE'~didoc~y ...
t~ima~yindc~.a~o~
-s~,~~ups~ •~
`-w~~
-~
`sedrme~tlepos~s
=pr~a~e P inweUaods
Secondary k~dicabocs (2 oc mars ~
U~ad¢atRaotc~ac.~4s in upper 126~ches
-wa~rL
-~sas~r~
'~ -.FpC~traFTest
-' pg,~(E,cptaimin Remads)
gppend6cB BfaicaodF~mpleB~~'$

setts
~~
(sew: ena use `
T~1O"~` «k u u G ` F © B ~ ~ ~$~ t EcrB
~ttrxm ~PPed TypeT Yes tJo
~~ ` - -
r - 1~adrvc,EoVcr `
~~----~-- ~~)_ ~A6'°nda"ce/ Ted Con~ce, N~
-___-_ ~!
'~~Dj~ ~ SYb - sue- a ?.r+
u 1.
Ssn~-~oQM
---- ____
seat
FFssc Epipedan ____ Conctetiocu
-Odor .___ ~ E)rganic Cotrtgrt in SutEaoe Layer in Sandy sods
---~ Cw> -~dOR ~ M~icso~ds L~
---_ a t~ Coots _ O~ ~Sods Eist
WEF~.ANp QETERN1fNA1't©N
~Hydro-og~r~resent? ~ Nta (fie) tCincie}
e: Hydcic Soi4s Pres-~ Yes
is this Sarnpdrg Poezt VVdtrn a Wetland'? Yes
bY3/92
APPen6nc8 BFankand~rnPteDataForms

~~~ ,--
1.; ~
r

.. ^~~w ~}
` k y' I
~~
t~ `. n n'
~ 1.~~
.i °~

~.
Cam'
~~ 6~ \ --~
~
I
~~
~~ ~ \s9
~ ~S~
JACK CREEK
WIDTH VARIES
~- ''-Y~- ~ 20
33,754 S.F.
~' ' ~ / I 50,774 S.F
~ ~ ~ -
~ ~ / /
J~ I. ~, I l
C,S6 C\s ~\ ~
~\
S ` ~ ~~~/ ~
A ~ ,~, ~
C\S
.s~ ~ ~
S~ ~,, ~
~\ ~
S~ ~
~~
0P%~
EXISTING WETLAND
3:1
WETLAND SECTION A-A
T FENCE i
E DETAIL ~,
,EXISTING GRADE
~~~
100' S0' 0 100' 200' 300'
GRAPHIC SCALE : 1" = 100'
REVISED: 11/16/06 (WATERLINE)(VH)
REVISED: 12/06/06 DEED BOOK AND CONS. LIMITS)(DS)
REVISED: 12/ 1 1 /06 LEVEL SPREADERS)(DS)
SHEET 1 OF 1 PARCEL #07-016869
ROAD CROSSING PERMIT PIN 6694-10-7722
~J •
REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 1541, PAGES 735 & 739
OF THE BEAUFORT COUNTY REGISTRY
BATH TOWNSHIP, BEAUFORT COUNTY, N.C.
owNER: BDG STILLWATER ASSOCIATES, LLC
ADDRESS: 7000 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 115
RALEIGH, NC 27615
PHONE: [phone]
B Baldwin and ASSOCIATES DESIGNED: MWB APPROVED: MWB/JSJ
ENGINEE
RVEYING
G
AND
PLANNING DRAWN: CCB/JJB DATE: 10/25/06
1015 CONFERENCE DRIVE
,A GREENVILLE NC, 27858
[phone]
CHECKED: MWB
SCALE: 1 " = 100'
FB 386, PG 56 CAD FILE: 06-015\06-015 STILLWATER COMPOSITE.DWG
FILE #06-015 C&G FILE: 06-015

! ~... ...~ r
v+ r
x-

I - ~' ~
-; ti3 r ~

I..... ~ ~9.p •
w

[ fAl V.'
~W.u~ .
~.v..t"_`..~ 3~.
S
SITE DATA
TOTAL AREA IN TRACT. 74.047 ACRES
NUMBER OF LOTS CREATED .30
LINEAR FT IN PROPOSED STREETS .3,276 LF
AREA IN COMMON AREA. 18.620 ACRES
AVERAGE LOT SIZE .1.590 ACRES
ZONING CLASSIFICATION R-1
ROAD CROSSING IMPACTS
CAMA IMPACTS 0 S F
404 IMPACTS 3,549 SF •
0.0 8 ACRES ~°~\C ~9~\,-~~
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS (TOTAL) 5,325 SF o~`
J
0.12 ACRES ~~89 ~'~
ZONE 1 103 SF ~ ~ ~ ~' ~
0.002 ACRES ~ ~" ~"' ~~
ZONE 2
5,222 SF ~ ,
,~
0.1 18 ACRES ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~~ ' ~'
STREAM IMPACTS 0 SF ~ ~ ~` -'~ i ~;/
\7
~~~ ~'
~~ ~~~9 C~B.~ i ~~~
M~ ~ ~ L-80 ~~ ~ / / / HYDRAN~ 7EE
JACK CREEK .;~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ % ~~ n' s° PLUG 28
~ ~ 25,496
I
mil` 16 ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ yr, 1 (~ s u
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1
~ {
i"~ 1 \ ~ n 3
NORMAL HIGH WATER LINE ~ ~ ~ ~ 1` ~~ 27
IS PROPERTY LINE ~' \ ~
/~-~ vr. ~ ~ \~ 62,081 S. F.
~. '~ ~ G
Ml~ k / \\
~ ~ \ Fr 1,,~~ ~ ~ 15 `EL
~ \ ly ~C. ~ SPR DER ~ 1
~ ~ ti
i
r ,\ ti
J ~- ~ ~ ~~( ~ ~~ yL ~ yL FES
.~ ~ ~ 26 ~ A yr. ~/ INV. 2.02
n - ,~ o
v, - ~ . - 25 sa,s3s ~.F. ~ ~
\ ~A~ .
/ ~~~ ',~ ~ INV. 2.20
M~ ~ 30,758 S.F. - -
1
~~ O / ~' ' ~ 50' TAR/PAMLICO ~ ~ VI/
~ ~ \ / ~ RIPARIAN BUFFER ( ~\ v 15' ~LE
ING 15 LEVEL y; SPREAD ~ ,
~ HYD ANT ~ `SPREAQER iJ /
~~~ ,, ~ / ~ 6" PLUG ~~~' 20' DRAT
~: ASEM
- ._. __ _ ,
~~ ~` ,- ~ 24 ~~ ~ ~
~4~ /•3 _ ~ ~ 26,730 S.F. l - ~ IN 2.6
-~ ~ =,a ~ ~wFE
coo ~ ~ ~ s ~ `r• 6.21 O ~ _.
~ ~-~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ X55 6.73 ~ ~~ F
\~ ~~ 23 W .85 R~30.
~I ~ _I I ~ \ \ 40,605 S.F. t .t FE
\\ ~ 0
co I ~ ~ I `,. 1~ ~ ~ '_ 4g~ ~ e X
~O BEND
J I~, ~ ~ >"' ~ (TYP) 4~$LF~- RCP /
Mme. __~___.v, ~ ~ s w/2-F FE
--~~ / INV. 2.8
,~ ,
~ ~ ~ o ~ 22 :. \ _-- 2-6" ~VE
Ir _ ~ ~ ~ i 60,738 S.F. ~ RIPARIAN/ BUFFIER 21 ~ ~ ~ 30'
~~ '~_~ ~ ' -' . s ' ~~ ~ 37,0 S.F.

1~-
8"X8" TREATED POST
EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE
Trr-_ ~ ~ 11==-=1 1 1~--
_. ~i=air- III ~ i _I
= 13. 12 " .1 I
I~'24"#4 BAR
® 4' O.C.
FLOW SPREADER

LEGEND
EIP = EXISTING IRON PIPE
R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY
FOC = FIBER OPTIC CABLE
PP = POWER POLE
EPKN = EXISTING PARKER KALON NAIL
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PT = POINT OF TANGENCY
PC = POINT OF CURVATURE
PCC = POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
GW = GUY WIRE
GV = GATE VALVE
= 404 WETLANDS
/ ~ = COASTAL MARSH
I
(13) I
I (12) _
(> >) I AUGUSTUS WINDLEY
I _ SUBDIVISION
I (~ ~) I OB 813, PG 876
I (?)
EIP-DIST '
WOOD/WIRE
/' FENCE
COMMON AREA
,~
pNS RUC `~ 5'x6' CLASS ,.B.,
TIpN UA,/~TS ~ STONE, APRON WOODED
DEPTH = 22"
3 TANS
----_ ~'_
-.~._
~~
40LF 18" RCP
W/2-FES
INES 3.29 F ,
/ .91
°i/
6"X6" LOCKING
HYDRANT TEE
6" G~
L ~ ~_ ~ X
;/
~Oyy
INES 3.05
27~LF SWALE ~
0 ?T~0% W/ 5:1
as
NOTES:
WIRE SHALL BE A MINIMU
IN WIDTH AND SHALL HAVE
OF 6 LINE WIRES WITH 12"
SPACING.
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE
OF 36" IN WIDTH AND SHAL
FASTENED ADEQUATELY TO T
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
STEEL POST SHALL BE 5'
HEIGHT AND BE OF THE SEL
ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
~ ~6>
~
~5~
~
CHAINLINK
FENCE.
1045, 8 ~ ,
W ODSUNf ~O
PROPOSED MITIGATION
AREA - .38 ACRES
w~NOS 401E 18" R
~N f W/2-FES
`_~ \V• 2.80
1A
30,740 S.F.
OFF-SITE NITRIFICATION
FIELD EASEMENT
~~_ f
~T CANC
200LF SWALE C~ -
0.209' W 5:1
SIDE SL PES
~_
INV. 2.56 ~~' ~
TOP ANO BOTTOM STRAND -
SHALL BE 10 GAGE MINIMUM
w
INV.

~-
O
~~ ~
~
O
~.
R: ~

~
~_~,
TSQ
..
i_,. ,
,,
cl / o
</,~f/~S \ 0/L R~g80.00' FE 11 ~ G ~
/~ ~ ~ ~_ 5. 5 ~_ f~i
~'y. WOODED
\ ..
FES -/ ~ EASEMENT
- _ ~ ~-- ~ INV. 2.52 f~
- /~ I -1 I 11
~/ ~ 200LF SIWAIE
y,, "°O"7 I ~IDE%S WOPES~ 1 I 90,514 S
I 18 ~:
~' ~ /74,418 S.F. ~~ 14
~~./ / ((( I 76.738 S.F. I 13 12
~ O
/ `~ 59,205 S.F.
/ ~ - ,~ /` I ~ 50,346 S.F. 50' TAR/PAMUCO
TEMPORARY ' RIPARIAN BUFFER
/ SEDIMENT DAM
~f / (TYP)
/ i ~ ~-_
I ~ NWA 2 00
\ I ~ 7 75,273 S.F. _ / ~
~ I
~P ~ /~
--' ~ VP ~, ~ 87,494 S.F. 16 ~I ~ ~ ~JG ~ I
~ ~ \ 48,007 S.F. // ~\ ~ yr. ~ l ~ ~
~' I ~ ~ ~~ ~w ~. II I ~ ~
( JV. av. ~ 1 \ ~ ` ~. ~
~srj yr. I ~~~ ~ 1 ~
~ ,~-~ ~
J~J.J` szS ~ ~ ~r. / i 1 ~„ ~ ~ ~" Ali
~ ~ ~ /,
~ \
I ~ // ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ ~i ~Il.
d ~ / y~,
L~A2 ~\\ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ y, ~ ~ ~ ~ x,30
~ may/ ~, ~ ~ y'' ~ L_ 32 ~~
\4 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 4 L_33
~.~.~. 38 L- 37
~...~.~
~~
60'
R/W
8' 6' 20' 6' $'
DITCH SHOULDER PAVEMENT SHOULDER DITCH
_. ..moo cnOT 1/4" PER FT. _ 1" PER cnnr
CABC ~ I ~- i 1 /2" 5-9.58
ti•,
TYPICAL STREET SECTION
N.T.S.
BEFORE YOU DIG.....
N~ C~F.:.s..k 0~-C~.fl Cam., fem.
Call 48 Hours Before You Dig!
1-800-632-4949
EXISTING GRADE

i-
~'f _ ~~
h
A~
per. .
r
Q
.,. )
ti
4

I
I Z
U
,0 1 ~ ~
117,441 S.F. II Z
U
1 ~ O
O
\ --~ ` ~ 99,927 S.F.
/ "_
i ~ ~~
F. \ ~ 1
/ / L
I
I I \
I O
I ~ I 69,014 S.F.
l~
i ~ ~ ~
~ \
I ~ ~ \
I ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ JIL JIy ~_ ~_
~' BENCHMARK
~' ~ 15' PINE ^~~ '~
~ ~. ,ELEV.=4.4711 ~ ~ ~ 2 L- ~"
~' ~' (NGVD 1929), 1 ~.~
~, ~ ~' ~r. L-22L-2
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~~
~. JVi yr. ~' 25
L-
`_2$ L_27 ~v.~
\ ~..
WOODED
c~ ~
O ~i,9 \ 2
7 ~%y I o~," O
96,428 ` I o~ 6
~ 3 94,782 S.F.
~ ) ~ ~ 50' TAR/PAMLICO
RIPARIAN BUFFER
'~ I ~ 4
0
U O 79,995
~ ~
~ 74,398 S.F.
O ~ ~
~ ~ /
~ ~ ~ ~
.~ ~
I ~~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ I
'~' \ JVi
~ , ~ I ~
JIG ~v. ~ I ~
~ 1 ~ ~
aw ~ ~ '~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~
~' ~ JVi ~w
L - (~~ ~I/i ~ yr.
L - 14 E , `~ ,~,
~ 3 JVi
~~ (~ ~
i 12 ~,, JIB
NORMAL HIGH WATER LINE ~~ ~
~~~ IS PROPERTY LINE ~ ~! ~ ~ ~
JACK CREEK ~ `~ ~o
~' RW
T cN~R)
511EET FLOW ORNNAGE
VO SwN.ES RlSIDE 50'
9l1fEER
AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGE
SECTION
60' R/W
(NOT TO SCALE)
PROPOSED 60' R/W ROAD
18" Reinforced Concrete Pi
CURRENT GRADE
20~ OF DIAMETER OF PIPE
TO BE BEDDED TO ALLOW
FOR AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGE
--- --- _
IJ~I I Illl I~I I I~I Ill~~~Ll Ii
-iiiiTiiiriii--iii iii-iTi-iTi iTi-iTi-iTi-u i iTi iii-Ti i i Native Soi l
AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGE
END VIEW
(NOT TO SCALE)

,~
,i' ~
_, _ ~~,
_ ~
,<
3 w

U~
',''7i~

0.20' w 5:1
SIDE SL~PES
\
~ EX. 6" PVC WATERLINE

_ ~ SWALE
INV. 2.20

.-.
~
TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT DAM O ``
I.o ~ J
(TYP) >
F
13
~S
38 ~ m
I ~
41
z
J .
1,
.
0
/ EI I o d
~
O
3
j
' 5
O 2 2~
O ~ / ~ \ Z O
I ~
S.F, 10 8,192 S.F. ~
122,723 S.F.
oh /
o
3o S 10' 20' 13" W
'
_ ~ 193.94
_ _
~
~ ~
-~ ~ / ~ / ~
/ 1
aU~ ~

~ ~ ~
~ ~
,
~
I
~ ~

~ ``
S 13'07' 13" W
97
36'
~ ,
,~,
aw
~/
V ~
~
1 .
~ \ ~ ~ ~
,
~ / I `.
I
~~.~ I I `
~

~~
~-

~i
~ /
~ ~
. ~~~
POND I
S 1 727'43" w
93.12'
~ ~
~ ~~
I

~x. ~ ~
~
~ ~
y, ~J~.J~h ,
/
M~
PP
1

~ ~
~ rAWAV~A!
~ ;
'
7"
'

`~
~

~.
~ ET
\ ~
LANDS LINE
-,~.
~
, ~ S 21
W
25
3
96.39'
_
T,
~
~. ~ .>
~

~~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~9 ~ ~ ~
y,,
~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~
„~
S 25'24' 10" W
109
79'
~
l
~ ~ ,~,
~ ~
~ /

~ .
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
~ ~ ~
\~ ~v. JVi
~J~ ~ ~' av.
~

(~6 ~ ~ S 28'34' 17" W
51.48'
~~ ~ ~ ~ /
(~S
'
"
(~4 ~ ~r S W
32'14
24
'
(~~ / 99.91
~~ r
~~
N 32'33' 15" W
32.42'
N ~
~~~
m~
S 35'09'33" W
72.32'
NCGS"8165"
ELEV.=5.88

5 ' _' '~~ -
J
f . -~

ll ~
Li
.s
T~
l
~ , A
~~
WIDTH VARIES
5:1
DEPTH
VARIES
(SEE PLAN)
5:1
TYPI AL SWALE DETAIL
CHARLES E. SLADE I
EXISTING GRADE
,~ DB 1005, PG 719 /
/ " 32 I
X28' ~ ~ ~ I
/ / y2 /
i ~'~
' / / (17)
i~ ~ ~ ~ _ -
~ ~ /`~ 0 ~ ~_~ ~ ~ 15
31,949 S.F. ~ ~ ~ =s I
__,
~ \ ~ /
50' TAR/PAMLICO ~ ~ ~,,
I RIPARIAN BUFFER ~ l ~' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ r, U ~ ~ 4 )
~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~',
29 ~KrYP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~
71 S.F. " ~ ~ 50' TAR/PAMLICO ~~, ' .9
V ~~ / o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~~~ RIPARIAN BUFFER
Q~ y` ~ ~ ~ / 1 / ~ ,
6.31 `~• 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Jb ~ ~" `' ,,-J
V. ~
S.F. ~ ',o ~ C ~ 5
~,~ a 1~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~J
/ y~ , ~
~ o !' ~~ Jr' ~~~ __ ~ ~ _ \~
~~
,_ ,1
/~ / ,,
v
_ ~
o - ~~L. ~; ~ ` ~.o
~ G ,~,~ ~~~" 15' LEVEL ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ - ~ ~ `---. ~ ~ ~_ .
~ SPREAD ~R ~2 CL~S ~,~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 ' ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \
x ~.
2 /'T .' ~ R' STA~4E APRON ~ ~ a s ~ ` __ ~, ~ a \
O Q / OEPTN = ~2" ~
V 1 TON ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~5
3 Ali ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ V A
~ ~ ~ ~~ )
O /•
C ~, j ,
-~ ~ /~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~_ .~ ~ \
a.
2- ~
~ 5.0 ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~~
~ / ~ ~~ _
PT _ _ .. IN S\; .~ I I ~ . ~ a.s ~ ~ f ~ s.~
~ /
~ \ A RO OF CROSOS NG AS T ~F 1 ~~ s , /~
~ ~~ 3 \ 1 .493 S.F. ~ '~ i (!`
N 15 L ~ ~ i
~ ~ SP DER #4,\ ~ ~
100LF SW//ALE ®, ~ ' O Q~ W000
C ~ ~ ~IDE%S WOPES 1 ~ 3 Ay / / ~ ~~ ~P~~ SUN
"O~~FIEID EASEMENTSON ~~ ,56 6I `aP~ pie
~ O V`
13A 1 0 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~,~
34,631 S.F. / ~ ~'
S.b /
3'X1' CLASS "B" ~ JV / / ~~ .y0
STONE APRON
DEPTH = 22" fij / / 60
a 3 1 TON O / ~ /
a ,, V ~ ~ 6'X7' CLASS "B" B.9
% STONE APRON X
\ < , / / DEPTH = 22"
f ~___,~ ~ 4 TONS
Q/ _ ~ rsi ~ A~ ~ ~
9 ~ ~ FES 40LF 18" A -y`L"~° g ~ / ~
~ ~
INV. 2.76 W/2-FES \~, /O• ` ~a. (~
6.i

~-

~~.

> i~

C
- 8' MAX. WITH WIRE
6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES
/~SHAIL BE 12 1/2 GAGE MINIMUM
E FILTER FABRIC
~/PRT~B P~'j1~ o (`^
iP ~
v
70 O
A~ Z
n
Z
SITE S^~,o
Q
OF 32"
MINIMUM
TAY
MINIMUM
BE
E WIRE AS
0" IN
-FASTENER
WOOD~D 3'X1' CLASS "B"
STONE APRON
/ DEPTH = 22" -
1 TON
SILT FENCE DETAIL NCSR 1770 ~ NC HW 99 & NCSR ,770
~ / -
(3)
~~
5'X4' CLASS "B"
STONE APRON
DEPTH = 22"
2 TONS
~ :,,.
rn°j
~~
2~' NpRTy
FILTER FABRIC SgVgNNgy
~ ~9
COMPACTED F ~s~~
~'o
~~
IN~ VICINITY MAP ~
~,
EXTENSION OF FABRIC AND
WIRE INTO FABRIC
EPKN LOCATED AT ~ INTERSECTION OF
FES 1
~ INV. 2.
v
!= R=400.00'0.8
MBC ---`--L---~
N LrMIT$ 6"X6" LOCKING
HYDRANT TEE J
6" GV
FES -~
INV. 2.50
DRAINAGE
:MENT
15" RCP
S 66'00'00" E °m
30.57'

BENCHMARK
P ~ z
SPIKE IN PP
"
~ ~
ELEV.=6.61
(NGVD 1929) ~ _
R
VE O
N
`
TRU
T W
A
G
CO
S
ON
C c
P
Nv.=3.09 FES ENTRANCE/EXIT ~
INV. 2.74 ~''
SOLF 15" RCP
W/2-FES
.=z.~s
S 11'08'59" W
201.31 '
CUT-IN 6"X6" TEE
3-6" GV
FES
R- INV. 2.42
)
3'X1' CLASS "B"
i
STONE APRON
DEPTH = 22"
1 TON
OVERHEA
.=i.68 f UTILITIES TYP.)
0
1.32 ~ S 10'53'05" W
1~T-- 2 62.51 '
(60' R/W
to
/ 2 0
/ (2) _ / 3~
(~) 4i•a
/ _~
/ ~ Q7
2 O
s/ Y
PUBLIC)
EIP
3
IMF
3 O N
oM
n. ON
N (p
~ M
~ N (n
O O
N
- N ~ I !Y
• ,Keno
lrMr~
EIP 01ST
I
ii
ii ~-
P~ _~ ii
> ";~~~
DITCH
40LF 15" RCP
W/2-FES EX. 15" RCP .,.
7