20061731 Ver 1_Application_20061102

WITHER5 ~~ RAVENEL
November i, 2006
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Monte Matthews
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite i2o
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC-Division of Water Quality
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
,- ~ R ., ~-
Re: Waterford Estates -Alston Avenue Road Widening ~ .',,
Request for 4o4/4oi Certification „':~LEw~Q
W&R Project Number - 0205534.00
20061731
Dear Mr. Shern and Ms. Karoly, ._
On behalf of Robert C. Rhein Interest Inc., we are requesting authorization from the USACE to
use NWP 39 for aroad-widening project on Alston Avenue. We are also requesting 4oi-
certification from the NC-DWQ. The project consists of replacing an undersized culvert with
twin culverts and extending the footprint of the existing culvert in order to accommodate a
turn lane that will support residential development.
The subject property is approximately 35.11 acres in size and is located at 263i'Alston
Avenue (SR i63o), Latitude 35.8593342°N and Longitude 78.9006684°W in Cary, Wake
County, North Carolina. Kit Creek runs along the southern property boundary. The site is
located in the Cape Fear River Basin. The Hydrologic Unit Code forthis basin is 03030002.
The Water Quality Classification is "WS-IV; NSW" and the Stream Index number is:16-4i-i-
17-2-(0.7).
Project History
Wetlands were delineated by Withers and Ravenel on November 28 and 30, 2005. Site
meetings were conducted with the Town of Cary on December 22, 2005 to confirm our
riparian buffer evaluation. Data forms are included with the attachments in support of our
wetland delineation.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 56 linear feet of perennial stream channel and 0.257 acres
of wetland impacts for a culvert extension and improvements. Impacts are summarized in
the table below as well as in the PCN form.
NWP # Impact # Linear Feet SF Acres
(Road) Area A (stream) 6 22 0.00
(wetlands) NA 11,186 0.257
Avoidance and Minimization
No streams orwetlands will be impacted within the proposed subdivision. In orderto
replace the existing culvert and add a turn lane, impacts to the steam channel could not be
avoided.
„i ,
c.u(,i,
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, North Carolina 27511 i tel: [phone] i fax: [phone] i www.withersravenel.com
7040 Wrightsville Ave i Suite 101 i Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 i tel: [phone] i fax: [phone]

Stormwater Management Plan
The proposed impervious for this project is expected to be approximately 23.7%, therefore,
we do not believe that apre-approved stormwater management plan is required by the NC-
DWQ. During construction the applicant will utilize BMP devices to prevent sediment from
entering jurisdictional stream channels or wetlands.
Mitigation
Because impacts to perennial channels are less than i5o linear feet, we do not believe that
mitigation should be required for the stream. However, since wetland impacts exceed o.i
acre the applicant proposes payment to the NC-EEP to satisfy mitigation requirements.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
Todd Preuninger
Attachments -
i) PCN Form
2) Data Forms
3) Site plans
4) Agent Authorization
5) USGS Quad
6) Wake County Soil Survey

Office Use Onlv: Form Version March OS
20061731
USACE Action ID No. llWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing 3,Q,',~~r~,`~
1. Check all of the approvals} requested for this project: ~~~k--Lt~~E
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not
required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check
here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the
project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern
(see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
.. _..
II. Applicant Information ~.
1. Owner/Applicant Information !`~,' ~" 'a' ~; ~ Ut)1 ~~
Name: Robert C. Rhein Interest Inc. -Attn: Richard Westmoreland
Mailing Address: 7 Corporate Center Court _
Greensboro NC 27408
Telephone Number: 33b-288-9355 Fax Number: 336-382-4480
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Withers & Ravenel
Mailing Address: 11 I MaeKenan Drive
Telephone Number: 919-469-3340 Fax Number: 9I9-238-2099
E-mail Address: tpreunin~er(ct~~~~ithersravenel.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such
as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and
development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include
a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities
must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic
Page 1 of 7

Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps
may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For
administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no
larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-
size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans
are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the
project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
I . Name of project: Waterford Estates - AIston Avenue Road Widening and Culvert Improvements
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN}: 0726951686
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Waterford Estates
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the west side
of Alston Avenue ASR 1630Lp~roximately 4000 feet north of the intersection of Alston Avenue and
O'Kelly Chapel Road (1678) at 2631 Alston Avenue SR #1630.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists
the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8593342°N ; 78.9006684°W
6. Property size (acres)
35.11
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Kit Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at http:!%h2o.enr.state_ne.usiadmin%maps%.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application: Land use in the vicinity of the project is primaries residential.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Road improvements
to accommodate a turn lane into a residential development. Typical heave equipment such as
excavators will be utilized to install the infrastructure (i.e. roads
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is intended to meet the growing
demand for housing in the area and alleviate the potential for flooding upstream of the existing
r.nlvert
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project
(including ali prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE
Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were
issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful
information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated
Page 2 of 7

mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior
segments of the same T.LP. project, along with construction schedules. On November 28 and 30, 2005,
Withers and Ravenel conducted wetland delineation and riparian buffer evaluations on the site. On
December 22 2005 the Town of Carv conducted a site visit to verify our riparian buffer determinations.
Data forms are included with the attachments in support of our delineation.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and
provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands,
open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the
tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to
indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and
must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all
streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are
proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as
appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly
for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is
needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist of
S6 linear feet of~erennial stream channel and 0.257 acres of wetland imRacts for a proposed road
Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized
clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts
due to both structure and flooding-
Wetland Impact
Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number
Type of Impact
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on
etc.)
herbaceous
bog Floodplain Stream (acres)
map) ,
, (yes/no) (linear feet)
NWP 39 Culvert Forested no Adjacent 0.257
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.257
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: ~O.S acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts- Be sure to identify temporary impacts-
Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction,
flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.),
excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing
the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage,
multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 3 of 7

Stream Impact Perennial Average Impact pr-ea of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact or Stream Length Impact
(indicate on Intermittent Width Before (linear
(acres)
map) ? Impact feet)
NWP 39 UT Kit Creek Culvert Perennial 2-4 feet 56 0.005
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 56 0.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and
any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation,
dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water
Type of Waterbody
Area of
Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, Impact
Site Number (if applicable) bay, ocean, etc.) (acres)
(indicate on map)
NA NA NA NA NA
Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.005
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.257
Open Water Impact (acres): NA
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.262
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 56
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size
of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that
have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included
above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Afso, the proposed pond should be described here
and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down
valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, imgation, aesthetic, trout pond, local
stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:_
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
NA
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial
viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site Iayouts, and
explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the
Page 4 of 7

desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during
construction to reduce impacts. No streams or wetlands will be impacted within the proposed
subdivision. In order to replace the existing culvert and add a turn lane, impacts to the steam
channel could not be avoided.
VIIl. Mitigation
DWQ - in accordance with i SA NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of
Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands
or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits,
published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to
ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of
proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in
determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation
that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project;
establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as
streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing,
or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required
mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also
choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for
Stream Work in North Carolina, available at httpaih2o.enr_state.nc.us.!newetlandsr'strm~ide.htmL
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much
information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if
offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed
(restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e_g., deed
restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed
method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. Because impacts to
perennial channels are less than 150 linear feet, we do not believe that mitigation should be required for
the stream. The applicant proposes payment to the NC-EEP to satisfy wetland mitigation requirements.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at [phone] to
determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept
payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the
application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at
htt~Uh2o.eiu-.state.nc.ushvrp;index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the
appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N~'
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres}:
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
NA
Page 5 of 7

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land? Yes ^No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If
you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919}
733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State CIearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy
of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant`s (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state
and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these
impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be Listed herein, and must be clearly
identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts
are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Neuse),
15A NCAC 2B _0259 (Tar-Pamlico), I SA NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250
(Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(s ware feet) Mitigation
1 NA 3 (2 for NA
2 NA LS NA
Total NA NA NA
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2
extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of
Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within I SA NCAC 2B
.0242 or _0244, or .0260. NA__ _ _____
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The proposed impervious for this project is expected to be approximately 23.7%,
Page 6 of 7

therefore, we do not believe that apre-approved stormwater mana ement plan is required by the NC-
DWQ. During construction the applicant will utilize BMP devices to prevent sediment from entering
jurisdictional stream channels or wetIands_
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most
recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us!ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We do not
believe that this project will have a negative impact on downstream water quality. During construction
the applicant will utilize BMP's to prevent sediment from entering the stream channels. Following
construction, 50-foot and 100-foot riparian buffers will be retained on the remaining stream channels. In
addition the applicant will comity with the Town of Cary Riparian Buffer Rules (i.e. diffuse flow
requirements thereby reducing the nutrient and sediment load before stormwater enters the jurisdictional
stream channels.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction
dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints
associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down
schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or
other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~ O ~o
Applicant/Agent's Signature Il~at~
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7

WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
Site Access/Agent Authorization Form
Project Name: Waterford Estates
Property Owner/Contract Purchaser: Robert C. Rhein interests, Inc.
Address: 7 Corporate Center Court
Greensboro, NC 27408
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email
I hereby grant Withers and Ravenel, INC permission to conduct environmental
studies on the property described above. In addition, 1 authorize Withers and
Ravenel to act on my behalf as my agent when conducting site meetings and/or
correspondence (i.e. permit applications etc.) with the USACE and the NC -Division
of Water Quality, if necessary.
Property Owner: ~tUaAt2r) µ - W t~S"fMOt2.~t.~-w ~ Date: ~ ' l~ • ~
(Print Name)
(Signature)

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN-LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 5/16/2006
Print this form, fill in requested information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes. All correspondence from
NCEEP will be to the Applicant, with a copy to the Applicant's Agent (if indicated).
APPLICANT APPLICANT'S AGENT (optional)
ni`~Yr'9 N('. a "iur~~, ~ l' 11 Yil lV (s ,~ "lei 1

. CL~n
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake Water
Supply Watershed. For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
http:/lcfpub.epa.gov/surfllocate/index.cfm Direct all questions to Chris Mankoff at 919-716-1921 or
Chris. mankoff@ncmail. net

WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA — SHEET NUM
wyl WsC2 _
3 I C� ws62 WsB2
CrC2 i WsC2
WsC r WsB2 ��� WsE
WsB2 WsC2,i " Cm Wsr WsC2
G
�
sC2 sE . Wy; ;
! CrB CrC2
t �4�1: �S� Ws SAF I I WsE WsC2
s !ye
/ WsB2
1 i WsE wY!
' WsE--
_ . a Wy �s8 WsC2 WsC2 �I 55
_ � I WsB
f CrB2 ry
W s 3� y wvD3 Wsc
e ;; CrC2 WsB2 Cm WSG2;( Gu
ti I . Gu
I�Ws l
� � WsC2 'r \
r= `WsE
WsC2 Creek! Y i
C Gu
CrB2 �e
i
A Cm _fiil� r Cm WsE
PkF
1 A CrB2
f CrB y-� �.�. WsC2
WsE
WsC2Cm
W mry�)�1 WsE" m
O _Y
U WsEWsE j '. ;,.WsE >� X/CrE
l Ws6 v �\
z \
WsC2 WsC2
r 9 O /
Q I WsB2
Z, J \\
Wsc
PF r WsC2 �, \ WsE \
W< \ C'E \,, �. \ —...WsC2
`E WsC2 WsE WsC2
ipCrC
.. WSC2 62 Se? WsC2 \ \ WsB2
`'lk Ws6 — WSB 1 �" WsEWvD3 WsC2
- WsC2
WsC2 WsE CrE
WsE � CrC2 � � WsC2 •3ti (%�._
/ CrC2
'L r
3�S
WsC2ry WsE,i WsB2
y
wsc y 3 WsC2
wy 'CrC2
o
w5E CrC W5E! �1 �� WsC2
\ _ Grcz
WsE �— Wy wy Nancy
CrC2
wyj
Fk_\ WsE
WsE WsC2 .
e e� v WsC2
WsE 3� F WsC2
WsB2WsE
i W y
W \. WsE /..... I
CrC
CrC2 CrB2�:.—=—= ICrC2 , WsB2 WsC2'
CrC2 WsG2 .WsE �d
WsC2
-- WsB2
Gr82 \ ���
/ Ws 2 Ws WsE., z
GrC2 WsC2 WsC2 WsB2 / WsC2 WsE _
WsE /
� GrC2 ,
Cr62 , WsE WsC2 /`�
WvD3 � \ 4 / WsEI
/ WsC2 WWy v CrC2 } %
_ scWsE �L Gu
ti/<r Wo CrC2 i CrC\ n� WsE ( WsE/ / � E WsE cm

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: W&R Project #205534 00 -Rhein-Rigsbee Tract

Applicant 1 Owner: Rhein interests Inc Date: 11 /30/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
Investigator: Todd Preunin~er

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes
ls the area a potential problem area? Yes
(explain on reverse if needed) ~ No Q
Q No ~
Q No ~ Community ID: wetlanas
Transect 1D: -
plot ID: Ftag #106
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree .FAC+ 10.
3. Quercus~hellos Tree FACW- 11.
4. Betula nigra Tree FACW 12.
5. Eulalia viminea Grass FAC+ 13.
6- 14.
7. 15.
g, 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). l00%
Remarks:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
Q Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
^ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Q Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Q Other Q Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
Q No Recorded Data Available Q Water Marks
Q Drift Lines
Field Observations: II Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Q (in.) ~ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water~tained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Q Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydrology Indicators Present.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: W&R Project #205534 00 -Rhein-Rigsbee Tract
Applicant 1 Owner; Rhein interests. Inc Date: 91/30/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
investigator: Todd Preuninger

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed {Atypical situation)? Yes
1s the area a potential problem area? Yes
(explain on reverse if needed) ~ No Q
^ No ~
L1 No ~ Community ID: wetiaz-as
Transect lD: --
plot iD: Flag # 106
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plank Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Liquidambar s raciflua Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Quercus~hellos Tree FACW- 11.
4. Betula nigra Tree FACW 12.
5. Eulalia viminea Grass FAC+ 13.
6. - 14. -
7- 15. -
8. - - 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). l00%
Remarks:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
^ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
II Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Q Aerial Photographs Primary indicators:
Q Other Q Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
Q No Recorded Data Available ^ Water Marks
II Drift Lines
Field Observations: ~ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Q (in.) ~ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) II Local Soil survey Data
Q FAC-Neutral Test
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydrology Indicators Present_

SO1LS
Map Unit Name
{Series and Phasej: Chewacla (Cm) Drainage Class: Poorly Drained Soils
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Fluventic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? YesQ NoQ
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
0-6 B lOYR 5/2 Clay
b-12 C lOYR 5/3 CIaY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Q Histosol Q Concretions
Q Histic Epipedon Q High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
QSulfidic Odor Q_Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Q Aquic Moisture Regime Q_Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Q Reducing Conditions Q_Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric Soils Present
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No Q
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~ No [~
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yeses Noa
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
{1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: W&R Project #205534.00 -Rhein-Rigsbee Tract
Applicant I Owner: Rhein Interests, Inc Date: 11/30/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
Investigator: Garrett Morgan

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes
(explain on reverse if needed) ~
Q
[1 No ^
No ~
No ~ Community ID: uptanas
Transact 10: -
plot tD: Flay # 106
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Smilax rodundifolia Vine FAC 9.
2. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 10.
3. Quartos alba Tree FACU 11.
4. LoniceraLponica Vine FAC- 12.
5. Lic~uidambar s[yraciflua Tree FAC+ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15-
8. _ 16. -
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 60%
Remarks:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
Q Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Q Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Q Other Q Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
II No Recorded Data Available f ~ water Marks
Q Drift Lines
Field Observations: Q Sediment Deposits
Q Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) II Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Q Local Soii Survey Data
Q FAC-Neutral Test
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydrology Indicators Absent

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Creedmoor Sandy Loam (CrB2) Drainage Class: Moderately We(t Drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? YesQ Noa
Profile pescription•
pepth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Strocture. etc.
0-6 B lOYR 5/4 Sartdy clay loam
6-12 C lOYR 5/3 Sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi Q Concretions
Histic Epipedon Q High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
QSulfidic Odor [iOrganic Streaking in Sandy Soils
^Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Q Reducing Conditions Q_Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Q Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors II Other (Explain in Remarks]
Remarks:
Hydric Soils Absent
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No Q Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesQ No ~ Within a Wetland? YesQ NoQ
Hydric Soils Present? YesQ No ~
Remarks:

t4P~ /~ .r ;r,
i . ~/~ - ~j ~ ;~~ \ ' ~.,~~ • Gene II l! ~ ••
! ~ 4itt ~ f -~, '~ rF ci't'4'a S itF z~t~... - .
_~ ,
( ~ i,~ ~ -
_ _
`•I `~ ~ J \~ ~ ~
~t I v ~ ~ ~ _
,\ /
J '
_ . i „ I '~,
~ ~ 1 • ,~ {
'.~ ~'~~~ - 't~ _ E1,.~ ~ ~, ~ x ~' ' ~
v
~ ~' ~1 ~ r. t Creek ~~- -- ~ ~',
~ Cl ~ C~ ~.
J ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~: ~ ~ _
296 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,Z, ~~`
(\ \` ~ I / \
~ ' _.
~.~., ~ (`-~' ~r ~ -~ ~ ~`~ 5 ~.~, ~~, ' ~ ' ', , ~ l ~ ti
V f 1 r `J r' `~ "'. ~.
~_
277 ~ /y . • //~~ /t ~ ` .f~~.. ~~ ~ ~f ~~ (/ `~ .- ~ . ~` , J ~ ~ t.
l V 1 _
- `-V _..-.~ ~r _.
~--~~~a
~~_ti.
f (I _
;~ ~\ ; ~' ~;`-,= ~/, ,l ' \''\`...~:` _ At u r r t ~ ~ ~'~..~./J ~ ~'~~ f ! , A n h ~ 'mil,
z ~ ~~
USGS Quadrangle -Green Level _ ;° " - ~`'~
• - _ _,~.
WITHERS ~1 RAVENEt_ / ~~• - ~ '- "~
FNC=INFERS ~ PIANNFRS 1 SI;RVEY!)RS / ~-. •~~~, V~ ~ -
111MacKenanDrive Cary, North Carolina ~ ~ //j ~I l !.) )r,.1 i.r/// r /~. ~'~
telephone: [phone] www.withersravenel.com ~.. - " ~ ~, fit, ( ~~ J ,'- \./~ ~ !~/~ ^-. ( /i: ~ 1. l cg _
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 4 \,_~ / ~ ~ ~ ~/ ,~ ~~-'' `'
_ .......-__. Feet __ _-~ (- `'"~ , /~ / c ;._~`~'~ -~ so-_

VICINITY MAP (NTS):
Q
z o
0
x ~
SITE
~KEI~LY
~ ~
"1
-- ~ __

~I
~_`~
',
..
t
~,t
--- _-,
3, !~..~
^.
, ~ ~'`~
No. e
~-~~-
t f ~
~~~, x.~e
„„ns. '"' o.n '
~,.~+~ne. ~ i~.~a
1 inch = 300 ft.
Y Y >Y Y
,v ,r r
dk~ y
r ~ ;r
r ~ r
~~,
f 1,
r r
REMOVE EXITING 42" ~ / ~
PIPE~AND dKISTALL TWIN , ~
'~8" RCP CULVER'~ ; ~ / - _ ' ~~
,,
f r> r; i ~ V
>~
N' ;~
,Q
..
'/ ' _.._
FU1'URE~EDGE10F

~ PAVEMENT & CURB
,
~ GUTTER
~,;
~
~I
~ ~.,
EXISTING EDGE OF'
r~ ~
~/ ~ ,- ~ PAVEMENT & CURB &
~ , , ' ~
~ GUTTER
~
~ ~~~ ~ EXISTING 42" CMP AND',
,; .
~ RIP-RAP DISSIPATOR
_f (TO BE REMOVED)
ti ~~ ~~'

~~

Y
~
EXISTING STREAM
~
_.

MITS OF CO
T
~
LI
NS RUCTION
.
1
S '~/ / ~e
o~
~. ~
J~
~~ I

~~~~/
~~, ' r
`~\ > I , ~~
.~
~~~~ . ~ ~ ~ q --
LIMfTS OF EXISTI ,'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~'
WETLANDS `~ Na!
l ~ / Z ~~.,~ f l
~ ~~
~ ~~ ~~~
~, ~~
Boa / ~
I I~ , ~
~Q - ~/ f.
ALSTON AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT MAP -OVERALL
~- r, ~ ! ,
~~ / ~ / ' ~~
`~
/ `,, `~
`~ ~ v
~~ /
~~
0
z
y
x
GRAPHIC SCALE
so o zs so ioo
1 inch = 50 ft.
WITHERS ~(' RAVENEL `"""""
[NiIM![Ilt I ~LANNlRf 1 fURYfCORf
MsY,eiun Pi~~e Cx, Na~~A (vufnil:5~i rck Yt4M99)~t0 1..: 1~9~6"1408 ~ viiFUSmrcn~.~an

- ~ ~ ~ ~ i
,,~- t
(•~.. ~ ~ ''~ t
\/ ,
,I I ,
WATERFORD ESTATES _ ;,~
(PROPOSED)
t

~ 1 ~~
I _ '^~ Y.r"~'

PROJECT INFORMATION:
TOTAL PROJECT ACREAGE: 35.11 AC
PIN #: 0726951686
1. WETLANDS DELINEATED AND
SURVEYED BY WITHERS & RAVENEL
2. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA =
8.33 AC (23.70
PROPOSED IMPACTS:
ROAD CROSSING
AREA "A"
IMPACT LENGTH AREA AREA
LOCATION LF SF AC
STREAM 56 224 0.005
WETLAND --- 11,156 0.257
TOTAL 56 11,410 0.262
PROP05ED WETLAND
IMPACT AREA
~ ~. __ ~.
r i.`
.~
IMPACT
AREA
,~
>
t~
z
` H
~~ ,~ x
~~` G~APHIC SCALE
~~! t 0 150 300 600
300
.--- /
,i~~i~,
S f'
,~ _ ,~
-LIMITS OF EXISTING ~