R-607_complete file

q?,- 1-¢<1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
September 27, 1991
From: Alan Clark
Subject: EA/FONSI for US 1 from US. lA to US 1 Business
State Project No. 6.399001T, TIP #R-6D7
Franklin and Vance County
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
The subject document has been reviewed by this office.. The
Division of Environmental Management is responsible for the.
issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality; Certification for
activities which may impact waters of the tate including
wetlands. The following comments are 'offered in response to the
EA prepared for this project which will impact 12.36 acres of
wetlands
1. NCDOT should require that the contractor not impact
additional.wetland areas due to the-disposal of excavated
spoil material, as a source of borrow material or other
construction related activities.
2. The stormwater collected within the curb and gutter
section should be handled in a manner that will not
result in the direct discharge of stormwater into surface
waters.
3. A mitigation plan for the replacement of the 12.36 acres
of wetlands should be developed.
4. As stated above, a 401 Water `Quality Certification will
be required for this project.
5. Endorsement of the EA by DEM does not preclude the denial
of the 401 Certification upon application if wetland
impacts have not been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable.
Questions reg,
to Ron Ferrell in
USIFRVAN.927/REF1
cc: Ron Ferrell
Asheville Fayetteville
704/251-6208 919/486-1541
arding the 401 Certification should be directed
DEM's Water Quality Planning Branch.
Regional Offices
Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919946-6481 919/395-3900 919/761-2351
Pollution Prevention Pays
PO. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

U.S. 1
FROM U.S. 1A (SOUTH OF FRANKLINTON)
TO U.S. 1 BUSINESS (SOUTH OF HENDERSON)
FRANKLIN AND VANCE COUNTIES
State Project No. 6.399001T
T.I.P. No. R-607
Administrative Action
Finding Of No Significant Impact
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
In Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
For Further Information Contact
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.,
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
r
.? 9/ "
ate L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
U.S. 1
FROM U.S. 1A (SOUTH OF FRANKLINTON)
TO U.S. 1 BUSINESS (SOUTH OF HENDERSON)
FRANKLIN AND VANCE COUNTIES
State Project No. 6.399001T
T.I.P. No. R-607
Administrative Action
Finding of No Significant Impact
August 1991
Documentation Prepared by:
GREINER, INC.
Date Stepha F. Heimburg, P.E.
Project Engineer
N.C. Registration #16980
SS
SEAL
16980
N
J4?
? . , Act it
• a
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Prepared by the
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. TYPE OF ACTION
This document is a North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Administrative Action, Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The NCDOT has determined that this project will not have any significant impact on
the human or natural environment. This Finding of No Significant Impact is based on
the Environmental Assessment, which has been independently evaluated and
determined to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts
of the proposed project. Copies of the Environmental Assessment are on file at the
Planning and Environmental Branch of the NCDOT. The Environmental Assessment
provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that an Environmental
Impact Statement is not required. The NCDOT assumes full responsibility for the
accuracy, scope, and content of the Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The NCDOT Division of Highways proposes to improve U.S. I from U.S. IA, south of
Franklinton, to U.S. 1 Business, south of Henderson. This approximately 13.4-mile
segment of U.S. 1 is located in Franklin and Vance Counties, North Carolina. A
Project Location Map (Exhibit 1) follows page 18. The proposed project is being
undertaken by the NCDOT in order to accommodate projected increases in traffic
demand through the year 2010.
The proposed improvements involve widening the existing rural two-lane highway to a
multi-lane facility. The improved roadway will consist of two 12-foot travel lanes in
each direction, two-foot paved shoulders along the inside and outside, and a center
median width of 30 or 46 feet depending upon location. A five-lane curb and gutter
section with a continuous left-turn lane is proposed for the town of Kittrell.
1

The U.S. 1 project corridor is part of the Intrastate Corridor Network identified in the
1991-1997 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Designated as
project R-607, the current TIP schedule calls for right-of-way acquisition and design
to begin in fiscal year 1991 and construction in fiscal year 1993. The estimated total
cost of the project including right-of-way and construction is $29,946,000.
Project R-607 connects to the north with project R-501 (Henderson Bypass), which
involves a similar widening of U.S. 1 from U.S. 1 Business to south of U.S. 158.
Project R-501 is presently under construction and scheduled for completion in fiscal
year 1992. Another project, R-205, is located to the south of R-607 and involves a
similar widening of U.S. 1 from Richland Creek to Youngsville. Project R-205 is
presently in the design and right-of-way acquisition stages with construction scheduled
to begin in fiscal year 1992.
III. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
To facilitate the development and analysis of the project alternatives, the 13.4-mile
corridor was divided into seven study segments (designated A through G). Segment
limits were based on the existing right-of-way widths and are shown on Exhibit 1.
Segment A extends from U.S. IA, south of Franklinton, to U.S. IA, north of
Franklinton. Segment B extends north from U.S. IA to south of S.R. 1207, paralleling
the CSX railroad corridor. Segment C extends from south of S.R. 1207 to the Tar
River (Franklin-Vance County Line). Along the northern portion of this segment, the
Person-McGhee farm (listed in the National Register of Historic Places) is located
along both sides of the project corridor. Segment D extends north from the Tar River
to approximately 3,000 feet south of the S.R. 1100/S.R. 1555 intersection. Segment E
extends north from that point to S.R. 1104, south of Kittrell. The historic Josiah
Crudup House is located along the west side of the roadway within this segment.
Segment F extends from S.R. 1104, south of Kittrell, to U.S. 1 Business, north of
Kittrell. This segment includes the town of Kittrell and a concentration of roadside
development. Finally, Segment G extends from U.S. 1 Business, north of Kittrell, to
U.S. 1 Business, south of Henderson.
2

Within Segment E, the Preferred Alternative continues the west side widening and
utilizes Typical Section 2 all the way to Segment F. In Segment F, south of Kittrell,
the alternative transitions to east side widening utilizing Typical Section 3. This
configuration is preferred due to the considerable roadside development and the
minimal existing right-of-way available through Kittrell. North of Kittrell, the
alternative transitions to west side widening and Typical Section 1. Within Segment
G, the alternative continues west side widening utilizing Typical Section 1 to just
south of the northern project terminus. There, the alternative transitions to Typical
Section 2 to match with the adjoining project R-501 to the north, already under
construction.
IV. WETLANDS FINDING
It is NCDOT policy to avoid, to the extent possible, adverse impacts to wetlands.
When a proposed alternative impacts wetlands, Executive Order 11990 requires a
finding that there are no practical alternatives to construction in wetlands.
Approximately 12.6 acres of wetlands will be displaced by the Preferred Alternative.
It is anticipated the wetland involvement will be covered under a general bridge
permit(s). If this is the case, the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency does not apply.
Because the MOA does not apply and because of the disturbed condition of the
wetlands involved, bridges will be constructed and culverts extended or replaced using
Best Management Practices. If after design it is determined that any of these sites
require an Individual Permit, available land adjacent to the existing wetlands may be
considered for mitigative uses. If adjacent lands are unavailable and on-site
mitigation is not feasible, the NCDOT will investigate off-site mitigation
opportunities.
Due to the nature of the project (widening an existing roadway) and based upon the
above considerations, it has been determined that there is no practicable alternative to
the proposed construction in wetlands and that the proposed action includes all
practicable measures to minimize harm to the wetlands.
4

All wetland areas adjacent to, but not affected by the project will be protected from
unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction materials will be allowed in wetlands or any other water-related area.
Wetland areas to be protected will be flagged by qualified NCDOT personnel and, if
necessary, be temporarily fenced. Standard erosion control measures will be observed
and included in the design plans supplied to the contractor. Any bare fill or cut
slopes adjacent to streams or intermittent drainages will be stabilized as soon as
possible. No fertilizer, hydrofertilization or hydromulching will be allowed within the
proximity of any stream, intermittent drainage and/or wetland.
V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment
The Environmental Assessment was approved by the Division of Highways on April
22, 1991. The Environmental Assessment was circulated by the State Clearinghouse to
State, regional and local agencies for review and comment. Copies were also
distributed to appropriate federal agencies for their review and comments. All
comments received are included in the Appendix.
B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
Written comments pertaining to the Environmental Assessment were received from a
number of agencies. The substantive comments and responses are provided below.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Comment:
"There is one major stream and several smaller tributaries being crossed by the project.
The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis should assure that there will be no significant
increase in flood stages due to the proposed project."
Response:
As indicated in the Environmental Assessment. encroachments into the floodplain were
analyzed for impacts to surrounding areas. Encroachments into the floodplains will be
limited to the amount of fill required for the expanded roadway with return slopes.
5
,_
Longitudinal encroachments will be avoided because the stream and river crossings are
perpendicular to all of the proposed alignment alternatives. There will be no
significant increase in flood stages as a result of this project.
Comment:
As mentioned in our letter dated August 22, 1990, Department of the Army permit
authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended,
will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material in waters of the
United States or any adjacent and/or isolated wetlands in conjunction with this
project, including disposal of construction debris. Under our mitigation policy,
impacts to wetlands should first be avoided or minimized. We will then consider
compensation or mitigation for unavoidable impacts. When final plans are completed,
including the extent and location of any work within waters of the United States and
wetlands, our Regulatory Branch would appreciate the opportunity to review these
plans for a project specific determination of Department of the Army permit
requirements."
Response:
See WETLANDS FINDING on page 4. The NCDOT will continue coordination with
reviewing agencies throughout the project construction phase and will continue to
address agency concerns and comments.
U.S. Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service
Comment:
"The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect the Federally-endangered
dwarf wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Tar River spiney mussel (Ellintio
(Canthvria) steinstansana). The visual surveys which were conducted along the stream
banks are inadequate to document that these species do not occur in the project impact
area. Appropriate surveys conducted by a professional biologist experienced in mussel
surveys, particularly with regard to identification of the dwarf wedge mussel, are
recommended. Additionally, although the document states that Federally-endangered
Michaux' poison sumac (Rhus michauxii) potentially occurs in the project area, the
results of the surveys for this species were not provided. The Service cannot concur
with a "no effect" finding until we receive additional information assuring us that
these species are not likely to be adversely affected by the proposed project."
Response:
Prior to project construction, the NCDOT will conduct additional surveys for the Tar
River spiney mussel and the dwarf wedge mussel.
6
,. ?
Field surveys to locate Michaux' poison sumac within the project study area were
conducted in April 1990. No individual specimens were observed. The North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program has no record of the species within the project study area
and only one recorded site within Franklin County. The preferred habitat for the
sumac consists of longleaf pine/turkey oak communities in the sandhills of the upper
coastal plain. The species also requires frequent fires to provide open canopies as it
does not colonize dense forest. Based on the results of the field surveys and due to a
lack of preferred habitat in the study area, no impacts to Michaux' poison sumac are
anticipated.
Comment:
The document discusses general mitigation concerns but does not provide a mitigation
plan nor make any commitment to develop and implement such a plan. It also
indicates that individual wetland crossing impacts may be covered under certain
Nationwide Permits, which reduces the likelihood of mitigation being required. The
Service recommends that total wetland impacts be considered in the permitting process
and in the environmental document and that all unavoidable wetland impacts be
mitigated fully in accordance with the Service's Mitigation Policy (Federal Register
46(15): 7644-7663), January 23, 1981). Pending field confirmation, the forested
wetlands that would be impacted are classified as Resource Category 2 habitat. The
Service's mitigation goal for Category 2 is not net loss of in-kind habitat value."
Response:
See WETLANDS FINDING on page 4. The NCDOT will continue coordination with
reviewing agencies throughout the project construction phase and will continue to
address agency concerns and comments.
State of North Carolina Department of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources
Comment:
"As recognized in previous scoping comments, the construction of this project has
potential environmental impacts. The Department of Transportation (DOT) has done a
thorough job in evaluating some of these impacts but has fallen short in reducing
wetland loss, developing an effective mitigation plan and providing accurate data on
mussels.
This department does not object to the environmental assessment but emphasizes that
final project approval will depend on DOT working with our commenting divisions in
adequately addressing their concerns."
7

Resuonse:
See WETLANDS FINDING on page 4. The NCDOT will continue coordination with
reviewing agencies throughout the project construction phase and will continue to
address agency concerns and comments. In addition, the NCDOT will conduct
additional survey work for the Tar River spiney mussel prior to project construction.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Comment:
"With regards to the freshwater mussel surveys, it is our opinion that additional work
will be required. The reported surveys were conducted at the wrong time of year and,
as stated in the document, results are inconclusive. In addition, and as we stated in
previous comments, we recommended that a mitigation plan be prepared to compensate
for cumulative wetland losses associated with this project. Provided that the NCDOT
will commit to additional mussel survey work prior to commencement of construction
and development of a wetlands mitigation plan, we would be willing to concur with
the findings of this EA."
Resuonse•
The NCDOT will conduct additional survey work for the Tar River spiney mussel
prior to project construction. See WETLANDS FINDING on page 4.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources-Division of
Environmental Management
Comment:
"Alternative 3 impacts approximately 6.54 acres of wetlands versus 12.6 acres for the
preferred alternative. Please discuss why Alternative 3 was not selected."
Response:
As indicated in the Environmental Assessment. Alternative 3 impacts a total of 11.8
acres of wetlands. This total includes 6.54 acres of wetlands associated with the three
major stream crossings: Tar River (1.10 acres); Cedar Creek (2.10 acres); and Mill
Creek (3.34 acres). In comparison, the Preferred Alternative impacts a total of 12.6
acres of wetlands including 6.35 acres at the three major stream crossings: Tar River
(1.10 acres); Cedar Creek (2.32 acres); and Mill Creek (2.93 acres).
8

Although the Preferred Alternative does impact approximately 0.8 acres more wetlands
than Alternative 3, the Preferred Alternative makes better use of the existing right-of-
way available and utilizes more of the existing pavement. Overall, the Preferred
Alternative best minimizes the potential environmental, socioeconomic, and cultural
impacts of the project and provides the safest roadway alignment.
Comment:
"Why was a median width of less than 30 feet not considered? Wetland impacts could
be minimized with medians of less width."
Response:
A 46-foot median has been designated as desirable for most areas along the U.S. 1
project corridor. A median width of 46 feet provides adequate separation of opposing
traffic lanes and accommodates the stormwater drainage requirements. A 30-foot
median section has been developed to "match" the four-lane highway sections with 30-
foot medians already existing or currently under construction at the southern and
northern project termini, respectively. The 30-foot median provides the minimum
acceptable separation of opposing traffic lanes for the rural roadway segments and is
utilized only where required by physical or design constraints.
Comment:
"Where will the stormwater collected by the curb and gutter sections be discharged?"
Response:
Several drainage outfalls presently exist along the proposed curb and gutter section.
The stormsewer system presently in place will maintain the existing drainage divides
to prevent stormwater diversion, and the upgraded roadway will utilize these existing
outfalls for discharge.
North Carolina Department of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources - Division
of Forest Resources
Comment:
"All of our comments have been addressed except the document does not indicate the
number of upland woodland acres that will have to be removed to permit construction.
Only forested wetland and bottomland forested acres are indicated."
9
? J r
Response.
The dominate plant communities adjacent to the project corridor, including hardwood
forests, mixed forests of hardwoods and pines, and pine forests (including planted
pine), were surveyed and the dominate canopy and understory species were identified.
It is estimated that approximately 13.37 acres of wooded uplands will be displaced by
the project. The widening of U.S. 1 will not significantly impact wooded upland
communities or timber resources within the project study area.
C. Public Involvement Following the Environmental Assessment
Following agency and department circulation of the Environmental Assessment, a
public hearing was held on Tuesday, June 18, 1991 at the Franklinton Elementary
School. Approximately six individuals spoke during the hearing and 7 written
comments were received. One comment against the proposed project was received.
Most speakers had questions or concerns about the effects on their property, the
location of median openings, provisions for left-turn lanes, and the scheduling of the
project.
Citizen questions were satisfactorily answered during the hearing. Other citizen
comments were submitted in writing to the NCDOT. The key substantive comments
and questions received from the public during and following the hearing are
addressed below:
Comment:
"There is poor site distance at S.R. 1104 which should be corrected."
Response.
Design Criteria set for safe sight distances for this project will correct the deficiencies
presently existing at this location.
Comment:
"Why wasn't a five-lane section considered through the Franklinton city limits."
Response•
U.S. 1 serves to by-pass the central business district of Franklinton. The four lane
divided section provides for higher design speeds and provides positive traffic
10
.t
separation of opposing travel lanes. Sufficient right-of-way exists through this by-
pass section to accommodate the desirable four-lane section while minimizing social
and environmental impacts.
VI. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Property acquisition for the purpose of control of access will be considered adjacent
to the ramps at the N.C. 56/U.S. I interchange. Control of access would improve
traffic flow and eliminate possible wrong way movements on the ramps. The existing
U.S. 1 bridge at N.C. 56 will be replaced because it does not provide sufficient
horizontal clearance.
After additional analysis of the Mason Street/U.S. 1 intersection, it has been
determined that the intersection should remain open. In addition, a median crossover
will be relocated from the S.R. 1263/U.S. 1 intersection to the Mason Street/U.S. 1
intersection.
A discussion of the Michaux' poison sumac was omitted from the Environmental
Assessment. The Michaux' poison sumac (Rhus michauxii) is a federally listed
endangered species with the potential to occur within the project study area. The
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program data base contains no record of this species
within the project study area and only one recorded location in Franklin County. The
preferred habitat for the sumac consists of longleaf pine/turkey oak communities in
the sandhills of the upper coastal plain. The species requires frequent fires to provide
open canopies as it does not colonize dense forest. Field surveys were conducted in
April 1990 to locate the shrub within the project limits. No specimens were observed.
Based on the results of the field surveys and due to a lack of preferred habitat in the
study area, impacts to Michaux' poison sumac are not anticipated.
VII. BASIS FOR THE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the proposed project as documented in the Environmental
Assessment, and upon comments received from federal, state, and local agencies, it is
the finding of the NCDOT that the project will not have a significant impact upon
the human or natural environment. The project is consistent with the plans and goals
that have been adopted by the appropriate local governments and the State of North
11

Carolina. Therefore, a state environmental impact statement or further environmental
analysis will not be required.
In particular, the following have been determined:
* The project is not controversial on environmental grounds.
* No adverse impacts on natural, ecological, cultural, or scenic resources of
national, state, or local importance are expected.
* A minimum number of businesses and residences will be relocated.
* There will be no significant impact on air or water quality for adjoining
areas. There will be a minor increase in noise levels for some areas adjacent
to the project. The use of noise abatement measures is not judged feasible
or reasonable for this project.
* The project is consistent with local plans and will not divide or disrupt a
community or neighborhood. The project is locally supported.
* Temporary increases in sedimentation may occur during construction.
In view of the above points, it has been determined that a Finding of No Significant
Impact is applicable for this project.
VIII. LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
1. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) has been developed between the North
Carolina Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Historical
Commission. A copy of the MOA is provided at the end of this section. The
MOA contains the following five stipulations:
* In the event the final plans for the widening of U.S. 1 from Franklinton to
Henderson change from those shown on the June 18, 1991 public hearing
maps and require additional right-of-way from the properties and/or move
the roadway closer to the houses, NCDOT will consult with the staff of the
Division of Archives and History to determine the effect of the change(s) on
the properties.
* NCDOT shall provide to the Division of Archives and History the
landscaping specifications and plant materials list for U.S. I from
12
Franklinton to Henderson. In consultation with the staff of the Division of
Archives and History, NCDOT shall develop a landscaping plan and plant
materials list for the right-of-way within and adjacent to the historic
properties. In addition to routine maintenance of the landscaping, NCDOT
will replace, in-kind, any plant materials damaged or lost within two years
of installation within or adjacent to the historic properties.
* The Historic Buildings and Landscape Recordation Plan shall be carried out
for the Josiah Crudup House and the Person-McGhee Farm before any
construction is initiated.
* Josiah Crudup House: NCDOT shall utilize increased side slopes (3:1) along
the roadway on the eastern edge of the property and a median section of no
more than thirty feet to reduce effects upon the property.
* Person-McGhee Farm: In addition to the depressed plan, NCDOT shall
grade back and round the cut sections to reestablish as much as possible, the
look of the existing landscape. The NCDOT shall reestablish the fence lines
along the right-of-way and landscape the median to be compatible with the
existing historical setting.
2. In order to minimize wetland impacts, the NCDOT will employ Best Management
Practices. These shall include the minimization of side slopes, minimal wetland
canopy removal, and prohibition of construction staging in and around wetland
sites.
3. The NCDOT shall obtain a permit(s) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(ACOE) for any wetland impacts. It is anticipated that most of the wetlands
involvement will be covered under a General Bridge Permit(s) with the ACOE.
Additional permit requirements shall include a 401 Water Quality Certification
Permit from the N.C. Department of Environmental Management and an erosion
and sediment control plan from the Land Quality Section of the N.C. Division of
Land Resources.
4. Prior to the initiation of construction at the Tar River, the NCDOT will conduct
additional sampling for the Tar River spiney mussel (Elli i canthvria
13
steinstansama) and the dwarf wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon). Sampling
will be conducted during optimal sampling conditions to establish the absence or
presence of the two mussels.
5. At those cross-drain locations where stream modification or realignment is
required due to expansion of the roadway, the modifications shall include
maintaining velocities, channel depths, slopes and floodplain storage to existing
conditions or making improvements where existing conditions are inadequate.
6. The NCDOT will provide on-site control of the first one-half inch of rainfall
runoff from all impervious services associated with the U.S. 1 project. Control
will consist of on-site infiltration through undisturbed vegetated areas within
the proposed right-of-way. Grassed swales will be used for water quality
treatment. Slopes in vegetated areas will be kept to a minimum to reduce runoff
velocity and enhance infiltration.
7. The NCDOT will acquire any wells located within the proposed right-of-way.
Wells will be capped and abandoned in accordance with North Carolina well
construction standards.
8. Any subsurface contamination encountered during the project will be reported to
the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources.
9. Measures will be taken to insure that the public's health and project safety will
not be compromised during the construction of the project and that any
inconveniences will be kept to a minimum.
10. Dust control will be exercised at all times to prevent endangering the safety and
general welfare of the public and to prevent diminishing the value, utility or
appearance of any public or private properties. Dust control measures include
the following:
* minimizing exposed erodible earth;
* stabilizing exposed earth with grass, mulch pavement or other cover as soon
as possible;
14

* applying water as a stabilizing agent to the work and haul roads;
* covering, shielding or stabilizing of materials storage areas;
* using covered haul trucks; and
* prohibiting burial of vegetation or other materials.
11. Any open burning of land clearing debris will be conducted in ways which will
minimize unconfined emissions and be consistent with all local and state
requirements.
12. Prior to construction, a conference involving the general contractor, local
officials, utility owners and the NCDOT will be held to coordinate construction
procedures and precautions that will minimize interruption of utility service.
The contractor will be required to notify the owner in advance of work to be
conducted. In addition, the. contractor will be responsible for damages to any
water lines or buried cables incurred during construction.
13. Unless otherwise required by the plans or special provisions, waste and debris
shall be disposed of in areas outside of the right-of-way and provided by the
contractor. Vegetation, demolition, construction and land clearing materials will
be disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, state and local air
pollution and solid waste regulations. The contractor will be encouraged to
salvage any merchantable timber involved in right-of-way clearing operations.
14. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for use on this project, the
contractor will obtain certification from the State Department of Cultural
Resources certifying that the removal of material from the borrow source will
have no impact on any known district, site, building, structure or object that is
included in the National Register of Historic Places. A copy of this certification
will be furnished to the engineer prior to performing any work on the proposed
borrow source. Borrow pits and ditches will be drained insofar as possible to
eliminate breeding areas for mosquitos and care will be taken not to block
existing ditches.
15. The North Carolina Geodetic Survey in Raleigh will be contacted prior to
construction regarding impacts to survey markers.
15
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO G.S. 121-12(a)
FOR THE WIDENING OF US 1 FROM FRANKLINTON TO HENDERSON
WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has
determined that the widening of US 1 from Franklinton to Henderson will have an
effect upon the Josiah Crudup House and the Person-McGhee Farm, properties
included in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the staff of
the Division of Archives and History and the North Carolina Historical Commission
(Commission) pursuant to G.S. 121-12(a); and
WHEREAS Herman J. Holder, owner of the Josiah Crudup House, and Wyatt
L. McGhee, owner of the Person-McGhee Farm, participated in the consultation and
have been invited to concur in the Memorandum of Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, NCDOT and the Commission agree that the undertaking
shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into
account the effect of the undertaking on historic properties.
Stipulations
NCDOT shall ensure that the following measures are carried out:
1. In the event the final plans for the widening of US 1 from Franklinton to
Henderson change from those shown on the June 18, 1991, public hearing maps
(attached hereto as Appendix A) and require additional right-of-way from the properties
and/or move the roadway closer to the houses, NCDOT will consult with the staff of
the Division of Archives and History to determine the effect of the change(s) on the
properties.
2. NCDOT shall provide to the Division of Archives and History the
landscaping specifications and plant materials list for US 1 from Franklinton to
Henderson. In consultation with the staff of the Division of Archives and History, NCDOT shall develop a landscaping plan and plant materials list for the right-of-way
within and adjacent to the historic properties. In addition to routine maintenance of the
landscaping, NCDOT will replace, in-kind, any plant materials damaged or lost within
two years of installation within or adjacent to the historic properties.
3. The Historic Buildings and Landscape Recordation Plan (attached hereto as
Appendix B) shall be carried out for the Josiah Crudup House and the Person-McGhee
Farm before any construction is initiated.
4. Josiah Crudup House: NCDOT shall utilize increased side slopes (3:1) along
the roadway on the eastern edge of the property and a median section of no more than
thirty feet to reduce effects upon the property.
5. Person-McGhee Farm: In addition to the depressed plan shown on Appendix
A, NCDOT shall grade back and round the cut sections to reestablish as much as
possible, the look of the existing landscape. NCDOT shall reestablish the fence lines
along the right-of-way and landscape the median to be compatible with the existing
historical setting.
16
Memorandum of Agreement
Widening of US 1 from Franklinton to Henderson
Page 2
Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by NCDOT and the Commission,
and implementation of its terms, evidence that NCDOT afforded the Commission an
opportunity to consult on the widening of US 1 from Franklinton to Henderson and its
effects on historic properties, and that NCDOT has taken into account the effects of the
undertaking on historic properties.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By: Date:
(Name an Title o Signer)
NORTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL COMMISSION
By: Date:
(Name an Title o Signer)
CONCUR:
HERMAN J. HOLDER
Owner of the Josiah Crudup House
BY: Date:
(Name o Signer)
WYATT L. MC GHEE
Owner of the Person-McGhee House
BY: Date:
(Name of Signer) -
17

Appendix B
Historic Buildings and Landscapes
Recordation Plan
Photographic Requirements
Photographic views of each historic structure and associated outbuildings,
including:
Overall views
Each elevation, including distant views showing the property in its setting
Details of construction or design
Views showing the relationship of the buildings to each other, the road, and
any significant landscape features
Aerial photographs of each historic property, showing the setting, relationship of
the historic structures to the setting, and to each other.
Format
4x5 or larger black and white negatives (all views).
8x10 black and white prints (all views).
Color transparencies of all views, except aerial photographs.
All processing to be done to archival standards.
All photographs, negatives, and transparencies to be labeled according to
Division of Archives and History standards.
Copies and Curation
One (1) set of all negatives, prints, and transparencies will be deposited with the
North Carolina Division of Archives and History/State Historic Preservation
Office to be made a permanent part of the statewide survey and iconographic
collection.
18
a {® N
V
o c z N
a = m
o co o 70
m o
N a m
m m a
Z
3 c c
m 3
cr 3
N Q to
1 (B
r-
rn
ea
rn
x
v
r
i
7
O
. 7
t
t`
s
?.r
o
0
l z ? ?
a ?
O 1
Z?
1
N 1 ? a
•
Z
o-
r
.0 1
I 0 '.40 ".? . I 0
0
z
n
0
?v
0
0
?v
y
m
G7
m
a
C"
.
r
z ,
Z ?
.
.
.
.
1
1
0 ?. 004

tZG? tr
nC
Oa
ZZ
m 'o
rases g0?? ?

lD
•
•
?O •

J
I41
m
2
m
4
IC
o •
'p to ? i
O a ND
`<zo
C
-? _
m (a O o 00
•al '-" mm
O N Oz
z° z
0 CO
w mz
? y1
ZO
? v
N
i
O
m
3
Z
N
Z
W
z
Z
-i
-4 a
ao
zr
wz
1D
qm
070
zm
m
z
-1
In

N

v
_ Z7
Z -
1 N D

? D

-
- ::o
- C « ul)

rri

0 O
U) =

v r
O
m 1
N - O Z -- \
0
ND
A
O ffi?
n

1

z
V « Z a U)
m?
ou a
D N r N c
C7
-I r Cf)

? Cl)
~
o

a m
m
° D
CO
-i Z
N
n

_ N

a
o.q
°
z
m N
O n r' v
m O Z ° ?o

U) U3
C)
0

r >

aa)
Z Z Cf) m N m
p '^
y' --? «
m? 0 0 o - o
o_
m
-4

a

?

o
00 Z r =
00
ZC «
N (!1
m Cl)
rn D
z
v « A
_ 0 -y z
V1
N JJ
Z ? ? -1
ZI
cf) ML v

?o n Cl) o
m , z
r ;u n

m O =
C) D Z

? M

-
--1 _
O
Z
1 m

n -n

O
«
0)
N -P&.
O
a
r m « D o

m m
D
m
C7
Cl)
.A -1
N O
Z
- - N
-n > 0
°
m _
SA C Z
O p
Z " C)
N m z

. 0
-?
w
m - I

--? CO)
< z m'
m
0

n N C
? O
z
-
? vs 3 r
CO o
° c-n 0 pa -I

M
r
O z z
Wv - - --
\
-4 (D 0> m
m > 10
'?1
N M m
z O
Z
=rZ1N m
.
z
N
m
x
2 CO)
O ?0
W
? ?

N m
M STNF o
1=
W 1 ,
4?.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resou
James G. Martin, Governor Divis oM
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
?a
July 23, 1991
MEMORANDUM
I Yrvc,
- U
L7 l= -? U:
f Archhok an< -Hjst ki
S. Pri gJr.,?isecto
TO: L. Jack Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transports ion AUG - 5 1991
FROM: William S. Price, Jr.?, '
I
DMIKR, INC.; TAMPA, FL
SUBJECT: US 1 from Franklinton to Henderson,
R-607, Franklin and Vance Counties
GS 92-0009
Attached is the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the above project
which will adversely affect the Person-McGhee Farm and Josiah Crudup
House, properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and
protected under North Carolina General Statute 121-12(a). As director of
the Division of Archives and History, I believe the North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) will adequately address the concerns we have
regarding the historic properties, if it agrees to the MOA and to carrying out
its five stipulations.
It is my understanding that NCDOT wishes to issue a Finding of No
Significant Impact on the environment under the State Environmental Policy
Act and begin right-of-way plans. Since neither of these actions will result in
immediate or irreparable damage to the.properties, I propose that NCDOT
sign the MOA, obtain the signatures of Mr. McGhee and Mr. Holder, and
forward it to me for presentation to the North Carolina Historical Commission
at their November, 1991, meeting.
Based on NCDOT's cooperation with the Historic Preservation Office and the
comments we have received on the proposed plans from both property
owners, I would expect the Historical Commission to give the MOA a
favorable review and direct me to sign it. The fully signed MOA would
constitute the commission's comments under G.S. 121-12(a).
Although both property owners have indicated their acceptance of the June
18, 1991, plans, they may or may not be willing to concur in and sign the
MOA. Their signatures on the agreement in November would certainly allay
any questions or misgivings the Historical Commission might have.
However, their not signing would not delay the commission's consideration
109 EastJones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
of the project. By copy of this memorandum we are notifying the owners
that your agency will be contacting them in the very near future.
These comments are made in accord with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive
Order XVI.. If you have any questions regarding them, please contact Renee
Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
WSP:slw
Attachment
cc: T. Harry Gatton, Chairman
North Carolina Historical Commission
Wyatt L. McGhee
Herman J. Holder
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
n
a
ai
z
A
0
0
W REPLY REFER TO
Planning Division
June u, 1991
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
?SAVMH;)„:
As requested in your letter of April 309 1991, we have reviewed the "State
Environmental Assessment for proposed improvement of US 1, From US 1A (South of
Franklinton) to US 1 Business (South of Henderson), Franklin and Vance Counties,
R-607, State Project No. 6.399001T" and offer the following comments.
There is one major stream and several smaller tributaries being crossed by
the project. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis should assure that there
will be no significant increase in flood stages due to the proposed project.
As mentioned in our letter dated August 229 1990, Department of the Army
permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 19779
as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material
in waters of the United States or any adjacent and/or isolated wetlands in
conjunction with this project, including disposal of construction debris.
Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands should first be avoided or
minimized. We will than consider compensation or mitigation for unavoidable
impacts. When final plans are completed, including the extent and location
of any work within waters of the United States and wetlands, our Regulatory
Branch would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for a project-
specific determination of Department of the Army permit requirements. Should
you have any questions, please contact Ms. Laura K. Manuele of our Regulatory
Branch, Washington, North Carolina, at [phone].
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can
be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Saunders
in¢ Division
h ?
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. L.J. Ward, Manager
Planning and Environmental'Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Caroli.na.27611-5201
¦
TA1E ?
PR?EM??
•ssss¦ is
s¦ ¦
June 5, 1991 `,INV?
C
4TO
C
SUBJECT: State Environmental Assessment for US 1, from south of
Franklinton) to US 1 Business (south of Henderson), Franklin and
Vance Counties, T.I.P. R-607, State Project 6.399001T
n
0
9
i
0
°o
4
Dear Mr. Ward:
This responds to your April 30, 1991 letter soliciting comments on the
subject document. This is the report of the Department of the Interior and
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and is submitted in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.
661-667e), and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
General Comments
The Service has reviewed the subject document and finds that the document
provides a. good assessment of general fish and wildlife resources in the
project area, but it is inadequate with regard to Federally listed
threatened and endangered species. The Service appreciates efforts that
have been made to avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands but is concerned
over the loss of an estimated 12.6 acres of wetlands, primarily bottomland
hardwoods, that would result from the construction of the proposed project.
The Service places considerable value on palustrine forested wetlands.
These habitats are of significant value to wildlife as sites for feeding,
cover, migration, nesting and juvenile rearing. They also perform essential
water quality functions such as pollution and sediment removal and flood
water retention.
Specific.Comments
Section IV-C-2-e, V. 4-23. Protected Species. The proposed project has the
potential to adversely affect the Federally-endangered dwarf wedge mussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon) and Tar River spiny mussel (Elliptio (Canthvria)
steinstansana). The visual surveys which were conducted along the stream
banks are inadequate to document that these species do not occur in the
project impact area. Appropriate surveys conducted by a professional
biologist experienced in mussel surveys, particularly with regard to
identification of the dwarf wedge mussel, are recommended. Additionally,
although the document states that Federally-endangered Michaux' poison sumac
(Rhus michauxii) potentially occurs in the project area, the results of
surveys for this species were not provided. The Service cannot concur with
a "no effect" finding until we receive additional. information assuring us
that these species are not likely to be adversely affected by the proposed
project.
Section IV-C-2-b & c, P. 4-20,21. Mitigation/Permits. The document
discusses general mitigation concerns but does not provide a mitigation plan
nor make any commitment to develop and implement such a plan. It also
indicates that individual wetland crossing impacts may be covered under
certain Nationwide Permits, which reduces the likelihood of mitigation being
required. The Service recommends that total wetland impacts be considered
in the permitting process and in the environmental document and that all
unavoidable wetland impacts be mitigated fully in accordance with the
Service's Mitigation Policy (Federal Register 46(15): 7644-7663), January
23, 1981). Pending field confirmation, the forested wetlands that would be
impacted are classified as Resource Category 2 habitat. The Service's
mitigation goal for Category 2 is no net loss of in-kind habitat value.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments.
Sincerely yours,,
Lt"
L.K. Mike Gantt
Supervisor
0
0
K
Z
0
1
.^ SIM,
J€:
/QO?
North Carolina
Department of Administration
James G. Martin, Governor
June 19, 1991
Mr. Calvin Leggett
N.C. Department of Transportation
Program Development Branch
Highway Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Leggett:
James S. Lofton, Secretary
RE: SCH File #91-E-4220-0799; Environmental Assessment for the
Proposed Improvements to US 1 From US 1A, South of
Franklinton, to US 1 Business, South of Henderson
(TIP #R-607)
The above referenced environmental information has been reviewed
through the State Clearinghouse under the provisions of the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made by state/local
agencies in the course of this review. Because of the nature of
the comment(s), it has been determined that you may submit a
Finding of No Significant Impact to the State Clearinghouse for
compliance with the Act. The comments(s) should be taken into
consideration in project development.
Best regards.
Sincerely,
?James S. LIr
JSL:jt
Attachment I ( ; -,_r f :? _ 1 } i L L -
cc: Region K
L --"- _ e
116 West Jones Street* Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 • Telephone [phone]
State Courier 51-01-00
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
?0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee
Project Review Coordinator

Douglas G. Lewis
Director
Planning and Assessment
RE: 91-0799 US 1 Widening, Franklin and Vance Counties
DATE: June 19, 1991
The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
has reviewed the proposed project.
As recognized in previous scoping comments, the construction
of this project has potential environmental impacts. The
Department of Transportation (DOT) has done a thorough job in
evaluating some of these impacts but has fallen short in reducing
wetland loss, developing an effective mitigation plan and
providing accurate data on mussels.
This department does not object to the environmental
assessment but emphasizes that final project approval will depend
on DOT working with our commenting divisions in adequately
addressing their concerns.
MM: bb
P.O. Box 27657, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7057 Telephonc 919733-6376
. z

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission g
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Division of Planning and Assessment
Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
FROM: Dennis L. Stewart, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program 41-t? ljzalP
DATE: June 13, 1991
SUBJECT: Administrative Action, Environmental Assessment, US 1 Widening Project from
US 1-A South of Franklinton to US 1 BUS South of Henderson, State Project No.
6.39901T, T.I.P. No. R-607
The Wildlife Resources Commission has completed a review of the subject Environmental
Assessment and professional biologists on our staff inspected the project area on May 22, 1991 to
determine the environmental impact of the proposed action. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the N. C. Environmental Policy Act(G.S. 113A-1 et seq., as
amended; 1 NCAC 25).
First, we would like to compliment the N. C. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for
preparing a reasonably thorough documentation of the potential environmental impacts of this
project, and a quality discussion of the alternatives. In general, we feel that when roadway
improvements follow existing rights-of-way, environmental impacts have been minimized. With
regards to the freshwater mussel surveys, it is our opinion that additional work will be required.
The reported surveys were conducted at the wrong time of year and, as stated in the document,
results are inconclusive. In addition, and as we stated in previous comments, we recommend that
a mitigation plan be prepared to compensate for cumulative wetland losses associated with this
project. Provided that the NCDOT will commit to additional mussel survey work prior to
commencement of construction and development of a wetlands mitigation plan, we would be
willing to concur with the findings of this EA.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project.
DLS/lp
cc: Mike Scruggs, District 3 Wildlife Biologist
i
. P

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor June 3, 1991 George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee
FROM: Alan Clark
SUBJECT: Project No. 91-0799; EA for US 1 from US lA (South of
Franklinton) to US 1 Business (South of Henderson),
Franklin and Vance Counties
The Division of Environmental Management's (DEM) Water
Quality Section offers the following comments based on review of
the subject document.
1) Alternative 3 impacts approximately 6.54 acres of wetlands
versus 12.6 acres for the preferred alternative. Please discuss
why Alternative 3 was not selected.
2) Why was a median width less than 30 feet not considered?
Wetland impacts could be minimized with medians of less width.
3) Where will the stormwater collected by the curb and guttered
sections be discharged? Direct discharge into surface waters
should be avoided, if possible.
4) Endorsement of the EA/FONSI by DEM does not preclude the
denial of the 401 certification upon application if wetland
impacts have not been minimized and mitigated as appropriate.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed
to Mr. Ron Ferrell in DEM's Water Quality Planning Branch.
91-0780.mem/SEPA3
cc: Ron Ferrell
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
?.i
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal OPportunity Affirmative Action Employer
4 k

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Forest Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Griffiths Forestry Center
2411 Garner Road
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
May 17, 1991
Stanford M. Adams
Director

MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee
C-1 :.X:f?<_:: _ i
Environmental Assessment Unit
ll ?
FROM: Don H. Robbins f? ?l68L g5'4r`?
Staff Forester
SUBJECT: EA for the Proposed Widening of US #1 from US IA (South of
Franklinton) to US #1 Business (South of Henderson) in Franklin and
Vance Counties
PROJECT #91-0799
DUE DATE 5-30-91
We have reviewed the above subject environmental document and have the
following comments:
1. We have no objections to the proposed improvements.
2. All of our concerns have been addressed except the document does not
indicate the number of upland woodland acres that will have to be
removed to permit construction. Only forested wetland and
bottomland forested acres are indicated.
DHR/la
pc: Warren Boyette - CO
File
PO. Box '7687. Kalei,h, North Carolina 27611J687 "Ielephone 919733 2162
An Equ, 1 Oppurcunih• Athrma:^:c A,n<l:` Empfo, cr
+ c
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources I Reviewing Office:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
Project Number: Due Date:
4c{i u q 5--3c q!
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) indicated must be obtained in order for this project to
comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding tnese permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
app cduum , imormauon ano guioeunes relative to these plans and permits are available from the same
R
i
eg
onal Office. Normal Process
Ti
me
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
D Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment
f
i Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
ac
lities, sewer system extensions, & sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES • permit to discharge into surface water and/or
i Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
D perm
t to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply (N/A
time, 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichever is later.
Water Use Permit
Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(NIA)
Well Construction Permit NIA 7 days
(15 days)

?
Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each riparian property owner.
On-site inspection
Pre-a
lication
f 55 days
.
pp
con
erence usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
D Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 d

facilities andior Emission Sources
N/A ays
(90 days)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
lY?tl must be in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing ,
asbestos material must be iniccmpliance
with

NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal
N/A 60 days
.
prior to demolition.

Complex Source Permit required under 15 NCAC 2D.0800. (90 days)
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion & sedimentation control plan
ill
w
be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect.) at least 30 days befo•=_ begin activity.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance:

On-site inspection usual. Surety bend filed with EHNR as shown:
Any area mined greater than one acre must be permited.

Mining Permit AFFECTED LAND AREA AMOUNT OF BOND 30 da s
y
Less than 5 acres 5 2,500
5 but less than 10 acres 5,000
10 but less than 25 acres 12,500 (60 days)
25 or more acres 5,000
North Carolina Burnin
ermit
O g p On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 d

exceeds 4 days a
(N/A)
S
ecial Gro
d Cl
p
un
earance Burning Permit • 22
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more
th
fi 1 day
an
ve acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (N/A)
should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned."
Oil Refining Facilities
N/A 90.120 days
(NIA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.

Dam Safety Permit Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans,
i 30 days
nspect construction, certify construction is according to EHNR approv-
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. An a (NIA)
404 permit from Corps of Engineers.
Ps-105
Continued on reverse
J .
1841:
C
CITY OF HENDERSON
Post Office Box 1434
180 Beckford Drive
Henderson, North Carolina 27536-1434
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGER
ERIC M. WILLIAMS
May 15, 1991
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Division of Highways
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
RE: Your Transmittal of April 30th, 1991
State Environmental Assessment - U.S.*1 Widening Project
State Project No. 6.399001T
Dear Mr. Ward:
Please accept this letter acknowledging the receipt of your
subject correspondence by Mayor Young's Office. In fact, as
noted in your letter, we also received a referral several days
ago from our local Council of Government Office as part of the
Intergovernmental Review Process concerning this same project.
The City has reviewed the Assessment Report and feels quite
confident that he environmental safeguards suggested will be more
than adequate for any of the alternatives chosen. In particular,
we concur with your Basis for the Environmental Assessment
Report, on page IV of the Summary which notes in part "The
proposed U.S.*1 improvements will be constructed utilizing the
existing road realignment and no significant impacts are expected
to result As such, it has been determined that the minimal
impacts associated with the proposed action require environmental
assessment and no Environmental Impact Statement will be
required."
As your office may very well be aware, this segment will be
one of the several associated with the four-landing of this
corridor from Henderson/Vance County to Raleigh/Wake County. The
?. portion through Vance County is scheduled for completion this
4 summer and we have experienced no environmentally related
i_ concerns regarding this construction. Consequently, we believe
o that every possible action should be taken to keep this project
on schedule (and speed it up if at all possible) as the full
benefits from this project would only be realized once the full
four laning is complete.
We would request that you provide us a copy of the "Finding
of No Significant Impact" at the appropriate time.

-2-
L. J. Ward/NC Div. of Hwy.
5/15/91
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the
Assessment Report and the chance to comment. Please feel free to
contact us further if additional information is required.
Very truly yours,
CITY 0 RSON
Eric M. ms
City Ma
EMW/dew
CC: Mayor Robert G. Young, Jr.
n
o:
K
n?
or
o-

P?
P O?
C
C
A
K
Z
r ?
?f T h?
KERR - TAR REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
P.O. BOX 709 238 ORANGE STREET HENDERSON, N.C. 27536
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Neil Mallory, Executive Director
_ C , . P _
MEMBER UNITS
COUNTIES
Franklin
Granville
Person
Vance
Warren
MUNICIPALITIES
Bunn
Creedmoor
Franklinton
Henderson
Kittrell
Louisburg
Macon
1.!iddieburg
Norl i na
Oxford
Roxboro
Stem
St ova I I
Warrenton
Youngsvitle
Ms. Chrys Baggett
Department of Administration
State Clearinghouse
116 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603-8003
May 31, 1991
RE: State Number 91-E-4220-0799
N. C. Intergovernmental Review Process Response - Environmental
Assessment and Proposed Improvements to U. S. #1 from U. S. # 1A,
South of Franklinton to U. S. #1 Business, South of Henderson
Dear Ms. Baggett:
The four-laning of U.S. #1 corridor from Henderson to Raleigh has
been a major priority for some time; and, would be a tremendous
economic boost to the entire area. Completion of the section South of
Franklinton to South of Henderson (subject review) is essential to
this goal.
Relative to the environmental impact of alternatives outlined in
this project, it appears that adequate safeguards are sufficient in
the design and routing process of any of the alternatives that may be
selected.
We encourage that this project proceed on schedule.
NM:fs
Sincerely yours,
Neil Mallory
Executive Director
Vutirr Lountg ?Qoarb of (Eonlmissionrrs
ranrr GuntU GUrthnusr 1r$?? 2 ! 1991
?.irnbrrsnn, X. T. 27536
Jerry L. Ayscue
County Manager/Finance Officer
Telephone [phone]
ow T Y Q •R?I
I
•io+• • • •?`?r
't?iltrM ••C?R??? -
1

May 17, 1991
Mr. Neil Mallory,
Kerr-Tar Regional
P.O. Box 709
Executive Director
Council of Governments
Henderson, NC 27536
Dear Neil:
Sandra K. Catherwood
Clerk to Board
Telephone [phone]
Although Vance County's normal response to projects chan-
neled through the NC Intergovernmental Review Process is facili-
tated through the Review and Comment Form, the significance of
the US Highway #1 Project to our area warrants a formal response
from our unit of government, much like Henderson City Manager,
Eric Williams' correspondence to you.
The County of Vance has repeatedly (over a period of fifteen
to twenty years) and emphatically solicited the four-laning of
the US #1 corridor all the way from Henderson to Raleigh. Com-
pletion of this project will provide essential economic develop-
ment opportunities to the entire area. It perhaps is.the one
remaining key to a burst of economic activity for us.
We firmly believe that adequate safeguards are provided to
protect the environment during and after the completion of this
project. We are also appreciative of the extensive effort that
has been exerted in formulating plans to environmentally protect
the surrounding area. We are confident that such planning will
insure the environmental integrity of that part of the County.
? ? t
Mr. Neil Mallory
May 17, 1991
Page 2
Needless to say further, the County of Vance supports the
environmental assessment for improvements to US #1. If you need
additional information, please let me know. Thank you for the
opportunity to respond on this vital project.
W}t4i,,kindest regards,

Jeremy L. Ays ue
C unty Mana er
xc: Terry Garrison, Commissioner
Chairman
Eric M. Williams, City Manager
Benny Finch, Economic Development
Director
? o
_T=10'F. HENDF9?Oy11i
•;1841 .
Rk?z" C AiO*7

OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGER
ERIC M. WILLIAMS
CITY OF HENDERSON
Post Office Box 1434
180 Beckford Drive
Henderson, North Carolina 27536-1434
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
May no, 1991
Mr. Neil Mallory, Executive Director
Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments
P. 0. Box 709
Henderson, NC 27536
RE: NC Intergovernmental Review Process Response
Environmental Assessment and Proposed Improvements to U. S.#1 from
U. S41A, South of Franklinton, to U.S.#1 Business, South of Henderson
State Application Identifier No. 91-E-4220-0799
Dear Neil:
The City has received your transmittal relative to the above
project with a request that we provide our response on or before
June 3; 1991.
Under normal circumstances I would simply return the form
indicating that we are in favor of the project and had no
particular question regarding the Environmental Assessment, as
prepared by the Planning and Environmental Branch of the NCDOT.
However, given the overwhelming importance of this project, I
feel compelled to write you on behalf of the City, particularly
concerning this project since we consider it so vital to the
future economic well being of Henderson and Vance County. As you
know, the section of this project through Vance County is now
under construction and is scheduled for completion during the
summer of this year.
The City of Henderson has continued to encourage the
Department of Transportation, our Legislative Delegation, and
others about the overall importance of completing the four laning
corridor all the way from Henderson to Raleigh and the portion
which is the subject of your comment form is essential to that
overall goal. Along these same lines you will see a copy of
recent correspondence from the Raleigh Convention and Visitors
Bureau (including a Resolution) which we feel reflects quite
adequately our position regarding this entire project. We also
intend to list this one of our major concerns during the upcoming
Transportation Improvement Project Update Meetings, which for
this NCDOT Division will be held in the Roxboro Council Chambers
this coming Wednesday afternoon, May 15th.
Insofar as the various alternatives outlined in the
Assessment, and the possible environmental impact of each, we
believe there are sufficient safeguards in place in NCDOT's
design and routing process which would make any of the
alternatives chosen acceptable and environmentally sensitive.
J • f
_ L
MallerY/ 1
Consequently, please forward our strong and cont_inue.d
endorsement along to those receiving the Intergover imentai ievieltiJ
Process comments and please f eel free to contact :;.s fiir tiler if
additional information is needed.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF HENDERSON
Eric M. sams
City Manager
EMW/dew
Attachment
CC: {w/supplemental attachments}
Mayor Young
Mr. 3erry Ayscue, County Manager
Raleigh
Raleigh Convention and Visitors Bureau
December 14, 1990
The Honorable Robert G. "Chic" Young
Mayor
City of Henderson
P. O. Box 1434
Henderson, NC 27536
Dear Mayor Young:
The widening of US 1 between Raleigh and Henderson has been the subject of interest of
many individuals and organizations for some time. During our December 11, 1990 Raleigh
Convention and Visitors Bureau board of directors meeting, we passed the attached
resolution in hope that we can keep it as a priority in the North Carolina
Transportation Improvement Plan.
Our organization would like to support you and others in convincing those in the
decision-making capacities on the importance of this project to the economy of North
Carolina. Now many prospective visitors and business prospects pass directly through
North Carolina on I-95 going north or south with little opportunity or interest in
stopping.
We feel that the "Capital Route" will have economic significance to the communities
along that route. We also feel that this route will give them more incentive to stop
in North Carolina thus having more far reaching economic ramifications.
We hope you will adopt a resolution similar to this or write a letter to those you feel
can assist in keeping this a priority on the North Carolina Transportation Improvement
Plan. We all recognize the state faces a major budget problem, and that the General
Assembly in 1991 will have a difficult time keeping the Transportation Improvement Plan
on track. We hope this project is not only retained, but is kept on schedule.
Thank you for your. efforts in the past and please look to us to continue to support
this important project for our state.
Sincerely,
S. Leigh Wilson
Chairman of the Board
SLW:lmb
Enclosure: Map
Resolution
225 Hillsborough St. • Suite 400 • PO Box 1879 • Raleigh, NC 27602 -1879 • [phone]* [phone] • FAX [phone]
Rale1
9_
Raleigh Convention and Visitors Bureau
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, tourism is a major contributor to our state's economy;
and
WHEREAS, highway transportation continues to be the most popular
means of travel for tourists; and
WHEREAS, North Carolina needs to provide incentives for travelers
to remain in our state for longer periods of time; and
WHEREAS, the timely widening of US 1 from I-85 at Henderson
southward would create an alternative route through the capital of
North Carolina for tour operators, travel planners and individual
travelers; and
WHEREAS, this new capital route would be approximately the same
distance from Petersburg, VA to Benson, NC as it is now on I-95,
providing further incentive for tourism,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Raleigh Convention
and Visitors Bureau requests the state of North Carolina and its
Department of Transportation to consider the state's economic
ramifications and keep the widening of US 1 between Raleigh and I-85
at the highest priority in its transportation improvement plan.
Duly approved at the December 11,
1990 Raleigh Convention and Visitors
Bureau Board of Directors Meeting
S. Leigh Wilson, Chairman
Raleigh Convention and Visitors
Bureau
225 Hills borough St. • Suite 400 • PO Box 1879 • Raleigh, NC 27602 -1879 • [phone] • [phone] • PAX [phone]
4 =• . _I
/•.. ':;d f „?., ri --- C;4-1001 ' ynchbur
'Ifr "na•. ?T rW. •?01 ?" 61
1rwrN ^•?-? L(rYl - n .
/ 7Q,.?:r„w\; n a .. /r-n. t?•r Sal .•.e aJ 4rYdM\? Ir.w,r .yp PeftriDYrP L•?? ?:f? ?r hrr
.?rv r?rl Cwhr• \ efr10 ?+(m Oargke ATLANTIC
LR. • t.r. +I.Ia ? /` 8 r .: ,?Iem r:ui rs n ?A.rrrp? t ! . • n0 •
..'«. / "'"' • ''3???/'-('_^.?. t? ar ? ?..: ?r 1?.• ,..=wq'• B? ., .rl.r New r ?..r?
,7'Ey ??y+Ir?w?r r. ri!eA ?!' ?! ',? r cJ 't 1 k'' ?f ° Yrw ?.?, ?Y tl Llu W. ?k naY
T - :?4? 1? ?-i L Unr r ; ": - 1 ••YM., w Iw'? IC?Y Q aW
' iw •'if 7frr r _ ,? xMlw n ._ YY rrr lanwt' • S r,•a ,P ftsmpu IITIR{i ge>lCrb
r r 7t` a a Gr7 - .r• ? G - Srno - OCEAAG
,I r' r ?' ? r ? YartintBilY }.' .? e} re n•' r, " J
r tr Dl Y'.? ? -
Kin r? _ ;? Sf 7r lle ,r L.C-e. _I 6• ?.
Or• m rl..• '? • e} _.?. 1aI ':^r ° fY a Ilr. aGnara ?.
,. \ _ Hnwra +7.7r: `WS.• / „gyp .s ......! tr ?,Y ?Y ,Y ,..,.A
RBDI
,nSOn G ?7 :al Q 1 • n r \ lmmr .a ) IP'• Roan
rrt n pa \ n wari• S 1?"n fF Q's IY >.. \ 71M .r r > /epe .ua? _ ax ,d 7r. ul°°r r• i' \
IL p rA Ir4 1O
•.
,a NaMallllt~1,? rr , I .s 1a! a 7ID ?r? \ t_!L?{ l1W tyy? q T; ?V•1 P-0
i^1elDF: Mrr '{• ?. '7i?,•'rDurham 1 ??• _ -tiyf11?C - - .Il
- ra _..?. .c a«.rv - . f} n !.i„ LlYpal mn `. - 1 -? ? i,u-.[•z? f ,-? _ -
it V 7118 '0 In V? Wil a7 a_I. .rN 7rr^"u . ??F
AShtYlllt} o T°^ "• sleigh r d4 ?y
^ ..? Irw. m P A7. ,.rs h x un r ? ._ n ! tA« I
+? Ma. « urr O S?11Shur) ? •j' n ^° ? r IrtroM 2r MA 7rr :.:.:+?sC,?•CM IIt71BY
- - r
• G•Ir :•tar r C. T -t n,. • / •nlxq o 1 W 21 Snww _ r. ?afrlM.nc
\ t. t1 •r r :J•rrr•rr ? ..n , naCr011 I,coro ra a1rOK
? .rlan... She • ,rta 5 w L4 /1 - - tl r rent. . ¦NEW
M„r I?n1 s . ' .. "'^r!s ,.. T S f/1? Gol o• rtalon - or•+r•1; dl
to • ?s, ..C. nr wI. T. :.. Yed r ,RIM ?`y .. :\ ?• flu ?1 J?
's• ae r? ?T"' ?.i w ro'r . x„?.. a,7 ??t? ? n Ys art _ v P nr?
I ' • ?tO? 77 ..rr ae.•rFr,°,w?'r rl? •nl ? WrDr Nrw 4 IT L
«nu ` •'t'' [a> aIwW.7.\_•/•t' 8•I r,ofds
/,• T^m.n1+ I Gat ME• ?ra\ 'rrx.\ h2ettev I wrw n1Ya>rri ,
n. 4n ?Ln urk V yn .fir - .-J1rxr h• Cwl uwu.rr _ .. .' j4ylr•. •' ]•y J1
en 'j' Y e^?`14"_..r'?+rs rwr
•:?.. ?ttnvlll n,rtanbf`-_ ? Dfl -„•ru- rJ?'.• ? ru "1'.rlrrar. rnmr,x...ru?"°'tiun. J.nr?•
.,i'°.n r a 1Y•rr gal v ?lt?, SL I.rr ,aer,w `r.°•-sattlac mine ac. .I'
U ,wl`?" .
„ ?T` elr. • ` •.Wr+tw Gnenrryl. w moerton w,llan rr t+.}.a ; 'j'. .
eu ,.
n. I, nl `- • :c:, ry c7+r
?? }s u is la yr.raJ '° No-
efson w• r+•... ¦ rrw a.rn.. ?
- C.ar = .n, ..?.,.. yn ? /'Srrn MNl • •.arlMr \ C:rtr - i i :+Ir, -
J•r151,oY '^ 1a r} 'a } • "il •••• MONr •1 Yet.• (p ?. •. ,\ lY YrNrIW •+? •• . _.
J n1 ?_ . ?_ ,la x ;r xLtmro ?CYlrrw. tim ?•`? :: ?- ? Nr 3.Ir
" ! :1 Aar.. Jrn w "? CY•.n r"'rr mineton -
...1 nn. Floren` „ r _ r
r pu•rY sae
r} i?...? Ia 1?y?C to n • rn•p?r? t>n nl. rees.n '- •_.. .
mtrn 01 iJla I• a .so ra \?rerf.- . ncfCf -j!S„;^=.-A^
w rirn w r U' lit • 11 t7'r. Olnl wr ,? C?nr lwr :Y --+Ly °eRt . .
,.>r }ate I 2 __ .,.•••, umlr -S.,m •C%L .'G Jrr .. ..
np 778 i _ .T • S ^Ini Are Gn ItrtS 11"; 1•tA :.:.r•.:
wrw.n n tiivr ?,_: ..IS; " rN r ? f '?4'7rnr W?ln rt'.awr rs s.r?r =W. PL T 1. .'1
Au _ ........._.
Aue it • . . . . u, rn
''r?'•?'•''.'•:.:
.rrwrl?-- .«+ ?Or`an I =-(tt. jnMr wr /1`-lunrr. ro r. PL
fttddt?
• t. n a
"-r B rm r ?
u er. s n. R\
al- ruwi} ..:f :'> rwr rr• Si. • 1 - L
NaY p C E A N
-tut - ..: t, .
r e
:. - - .ate ItA•Yntr S'
villa ?, _•T.m. ChA. 7r' ;?ry- - - A..I,,..y. cm- L
..rorn.,?N I;, . wo,..r• ' ; ? ?nolr _ 71'- .G+xn - •..? .. - s'?t Imo.
6rNr,.r »..`i ?>i'\::Iml:e•I -'°-: nrr.,w• _ ?;.Cy?rlestpn
Tcharlest
I •,..enr?. mr R p.l.
fz cAUN? wr -yl. ,t ta.n r n,nw
In Lt V •w _ w _ r . _ a CYa1La t15MYn _S J ROM EA' WA tan
Imp Mo OaD.r , S LOIVN _ 5
....,:... ...q:e. - •-.iru^e/ h,I P.fr
._-.A .l 7 aneYN ..._. .. -, vn • : r _? ]
fw
_. :nun ue- 1? =:'-imiwi raiirn.ra 1 e.lrlrl ._..__..._r +aearru _. .. ; '. ^:ro _..? • r ?r 8?arl....._t 7
-. Jc>eA .n 1n / , ,r. rr ll: rrr ..rti Owtre ____A / tort rrln_B { 4n.eere : - .....-• n ._..._...: 1
„ In j ,4s1yY1 A-CM .A 1 C'=C.- _B J =- _-_ 1 O•,ewua _c s
s. non /'? WM G .3 2 Sn•r Ln1 em w,u __? 2
w I{Kna n_-C S ee 1 Smolrr _I 2 5.- ]
z v,palx . ' ! 1: ,n ? 1G n. ra cansr.ar. E Care. { Ir•.>a
r.r" I Sr.a.?P _c 2
r: Sown t^,•, - • .?. >^ i _ ...r c. r.•..Irr La C a x,rt..u .._a J tunNtrr „_.`.D . mleu.• _C 2 s.. __p 7
7r r•u•t wtp>,> l: Nato If•r l«nu CA,r..,,r -_B 6 Itm.,nmlr _....8 J c' 2 SR«r VI ?L 2 Unr --_C J
rw?r'•"•r??'\'?' f'?? $0 _C 5 S bn s:".-,.
`^ p•? stN A<rnrr y 1 r,ann? crn rut 8.0 -C C N. rwwrr Ch?l 2 irmr. t w 3_
1::n r -?._.. e'a'r ^ m..n • _ 0. xur L. Or _B 8 t,c,..7.._a i Cl ? . :.-_[ I x•trriw. J 2 rw c
Sa;aerr L Yrrwr -._A S lr.mlu„Ir ___9 1 Munn 9-? S 2 xlnle.rwr._.__E ]
Aorr I
Y,a .r '?\ •, hrau -?: S MI-IW _rA . OulAer _?_] ' .dl?raw _-J 1 4uMl
hNn+•p --A 2
' a • •h Kf1._ ? L..M..L. Q-7 -_.l { SW ru ._?1 ] Ed. .._-._._..: t wnrnn•A -[ 7
/ c , Sr ^•• C S 11"66r x. __a { [a..w __J 1 rat- _? 7 Ctrew,r _F 7
A r ? L . T.Brrv. a m"•• -a J urru an --J 1 .,n. 41- : u?•? -c 7
flen.a..l. ---A { Fuma. ___ I
77 1. SESWU C SSM CAaRI\1 4..rNr ?Y 2
1: Anr• . . rmro,..._B 5 Iennn,ty __D I
Douglas y, - Aar S S x+r.,,r -_.B 5 I>rtt C,p Ayenlr ..3 7 ?n _e 7
,= - w OL• - s.r.1 A4•q ' S x•.,,a __rt 1 GenWe {
hoop ?,• fL` Aft 1 S Ocala __. B S G.Ietp.H 1 s'•1°•'r --8 1
~-Yr` ?t •.clW,r-^ . Anrror S rnh- ------ A 5 Gent........-_.: 2 Ar•>r., _-.3 7 A 2
N Ar. ?.rc S I Wtrrr _? 1
wa c/os r °° ' =°? •"' - T L A :\ T I !- Aar.. _e ] p«,I,ror _ e s cr..n.«r .._'_; a,l.rui J Yt,.,rr __B :
r !arl;nn 7r r.r A l..w _A ] a.Yt>t =-, ] .n.n
x,.«.1 _: 1 fu r. M --A I
I/ a i ?^ra , _ S L ,•rMr -?C t B.w• _____-.1 ] N•.4r.r _..-__ /enrrrtmrr .-D 7 Ib^rYw _B 7
•fbrh«N _ `'?` Y ff'~ 4•.rP ?A S aermlN -_A 2 x•nrre. . __I I 5•urw«r .5 J 01 NA __t 2
Ci Sr .InJn? Ao•r tRtrntr / S- _C S Nrcwr ....r-, 2 C- _. 1 0i a.l. _._A 2
- . r n.•tr >edr ^?_ ` br7 t S Shr.tr _..A ] N'p Art _-_,D 2 c'm 8188re18
- ' .- •? y ?? : - - I,R, sad IfM.n ' 3 Scum _.c 1 Irtetr«r 7 , pp I
•" '"° Mr • O C E A \' ' ?iO -C s s«.r..,r _a ] a>rrlN ---:: ch- t
.? i ,n,u /r SI i•n -.t 7 A.,mw. ,t { xlryl mnarlw_C 1 sour _: ] Mrw ___C 1
Inre m Y t AA't •. rrrr BVrRfaer B Srrtenu _?_C / artlr .___i. C:.nlr __?_: J Cr,a•r. __? 1
"'%nt ,r• S.r„r a.•e Gar __A J Srlwtt« _.__.8 S I{urrl,.uA ___...C J GI•Irou `-: ] [o,al.x n
_ 6t 1
?• '1 - -?- C-111 __.A 5 rae,ro,., _..A _-
-..-0 1
......__A 7 Tbrn„rIIN .... J 6 ln.nnen .. _ r_
\i _ ..• ...:;nn...1 ........ _ -un .. r , .... _ _- .. 7 rna --...... E 1
`•_ _:wl. .? •. :NaYw• ___.w 7 T.IIm .._._..-...i 5 l.m•erlen ... • • ••• ...... ..
rl -" 'a Caor•. __8 { To®• _._J J Y,o.n fN.._1 7 tNr __ ' 1 lrlr>rre -p 1
la SOnvll a CMre• M _A 7 r. aem _?I f fart __? 2 !r a rr 7 11- e t
W
-r„r,?,-•? o I C.A..x -.A { Ytt. -_J 5 Y. Id __C 2 Wnrr _c 2 Yn-d -li 1
fr.rts t ] w..., Ie•.L-1 / farm Div J ] Con- ---v 1 a.r•Rt 7trra._•,r 1
Jadmmiis Bead C«w --8 5 rs _.B 7 mrtwr 2 r- __-7 7 trrra e 1
Cw.Ntlr a 7 .,K/.N .___.7 s 7r«n1A,n.....-.:: :.,•,..r __. 7 ro„r ___,-e 1
77, s 1 ?p m t .a G •l: --1 { x1.^?I.r.I ?i 1 xNIwIY _?J 7 rr-doom _?7 7
LI•ar ' 4 'I os ? S wYr __J 1 x.aw 2 x?nr •.r es.• ---a
1
a1 _ :au r r ro
• \ \ -Cow r - Is Or••n/ -J 5 O,f•ra ANM..a.C I LLxrii2 nw _? S e•r..?D I
n ir`t Yrt" f o swa Amp- D * e ..+r ___A 7 Ww•.r..r _A 1 Pf:. % _=:f 2 Lm QfF ? i sue. r.r? i
•r JA.1.. • / Cwr•r. 1 a YN _t 2 L.m. _: Sral.a __ 1
w ` ,?•. "°?- -• Trrrnoa LM a•Re _A 7 N-f 1 a.ranlr _2 7 Iwrr 7 Y.e•r a..a 1
Ntrr I T a 1 •C.el.tlr xauei em/CtB1®, 1.t 1 5 YreraR• _B 1 alaray=nw te•r?t 1 Y,•w,M _] ] R WO-ft «I-mmov .f 1
Gagne tn«/ • Yre.ra x. 1. . Lrr -B / SArtrl -_A 1 _C : Yrr WO-ft _.C 1
1 2• 58 :% t :54 MILES
5t 7m
8 23 m too in Sit ri tt1 IN w uLarRgp

MEMBER UNITS
COUNTIES
Franklin
Granville
Person
Vance
Warren
MUNICIPALITIES
Bunn
Creedmoor
Franklinton
Henderson
Kittrell
Louisburg
Macon
Middleburg
Nor I i na
Oxford
Roxboro
Stem
Stovall
Warrenton
Youngsv i I le
KERR -TAR REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
P.O. Box 709 138 ORANGE STREET HENDERSON, N.C. 27536
PHONE [phone]
Neil Mallory, Executiye Director
S
N. C. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCES>
Review and COm-nent ^orm
This office received the attached information about a
proposal which could affect your jurisdiction.
If you need more information contact the applicant directly.
If you wish to comment on this proposed action, complete
this form wits; comments and return. to .this office by- June 3, 1991
Jf you need additional time past the due date, please contact
our office as soon as possible.
If no, comment is received by the above date it will be
assumed you have no comments regarding this proposal.
State Aul ication Identifier 91-E-4220-0799
Commenters Name L(Lc G JA,,(.c..1A Nts Title C" f?,???d,??-?
Representing G`r7
ocal government
Address Q r3 . (?ck" 14'3 Q-
Phone q 1 e{/ 4-q Z• 61 t 1 Date 1?> AA4 -f t g 4 l
COMMENTS: (attach additional pace if necessarv)
Vl? S TJ GJa L'1 ?'120 jj?GC` A14 1
Ja P, prlcL L4, ?,UU L?_'?? C;t4 ??14;C s
cnx-u A tFr-,,> t a 7i l s6'4nC C"'AU (Ii!A(AAc rr7f%_ 4 s sc'S5? L'1 dT
f ?I ? f3-f 9C0=:!7_. G ? ? Ati6-r a•l ?c7Z.