20190559 Ver 2_More Information Received_20200522

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#* Version* 2
20190559
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Stephanie Goss: eads\szgoss
Select Reviewing Office:* Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r
New Project
r
New Project w Existing ID
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: William Sullivan
VUio is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20190559 2
20170001(no dashes)
Project Name: Barber Mill Road Site
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Johnston
Please upload all files that need to be submited.

aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
01 _BarberMil I Rd_ResponseToComments_2020050... 1.47MB
02_BarberMillRd_PJD_Request_20200504.docxpdf 3.56MB
C-4.0 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN signed.pdf 1.03MB
C-8.0 STORM DETAILS_signed.pdf 6.17MB
Only pdf or krre files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
In response to a RFI received from Christopher Hopper (USACE) on 4/27/2020, Kimley-Horn is submitting the
attached response to comments, PJD request, and revised plan sheets.
Sign and Submit
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in autorratically.

kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

May 11, 2020

Mr. Christopher Hopper
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587

Ms. Stephanie Goss
NC Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3600 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609

RE: Iglesia Primeros Frutos – Barber Mill Road Site (SAW-2020-00418; DWR# 20190559 v2)
Request for Additional Information Response
Clayton, Johnston County, NC

Dear Mr. Hopper and Mr. Goss:

On behalf of our client, Iglesia Primeros Frutos, Inc., Kimley-Horn is providing the following
clarifications related to the 401/401 permit application for the above referenced project in Clayton
County, NC (Figure 1). The Barber Mill Road Site 404/401 application was submitted as a non-
reporting Nationwide Permit #18 on April 14, 2020. Kimley-Horn received an Incomplete Notification
from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on April 27, 2020 via email requesting additional
information. The following provides detail on the questions raised by the USACE:

1) A review of our records indicates that approximately 0.3 acre of potentially jurisdictional wetland
had previously been documented on this site associated with an old pond bed. In 1998, impacts
to approximately 0.3 acre of herbaceous wetland were permitted to facilitate construction of
commercial/residential development on this site. A review of aerial photography and other
available mapping indicates:
a. The site was never developed under the permit (expiration 13 December 1998),
b. National Wetland Inventory resources occur on the site, and
c. Tire rutting, possibly associated with saturated soil, is visible as recently as the
February 2019 aerial photo (Google Earth).
• While the development that was previously permitted on the Site was not completed, imagery
from Google Earth shows the site was cleared and graded between February 1999 and April
2004. Our client purchased the proposed site in 2016 and has no knowledge of whether the
prior development graded/filled any potential wetlands on the site. Kimley-Horn staff
delineated the project area in February 2019 and no wetlands were identified. Tire rutting was
observed on the ground during the field investigation, however soils were br ight, non-hydric,
and lacked wetland hydrology indicators. Approximately 0.36” of rain was recorded in the 36
hours prior to Kimley-Horn’s site visit, and despite the recent rainfall, only small puddles were
Page 2
kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

present in the tire ruts. Below are two photos taken in the vicinity of the former pond bed, and
a data form documenting site conditions within this area is included with this package.

Photo 1 – Taken from Dairy Road facing south facing across the former pond bed (2/2019).
Photo 2 – Taken from the center of the former pond bed facing southwest. Note tire ruts were
present but soils are bright. Wetland hydrology indictors were not identified during the site
investigation (3/2019).

Page 3
kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

2) Impacts to stream resources are requested, but no JD request has been included to document
Section 404 Jurisdiction over these impacts.

• See response to question (3) below.

3) USGS, NRCS, and NWI mapping all indicate this stream is a modified natural stream. Impacts
under non-reporting use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18 require demonstrating no special aquatic
site would be impacted.
To address items 1-3, above, please expand on the discussion of this site’s history and
impacts that have occurred to date, and submit a JD request for features on this project.
Include data forms from within the old pond bed, the ditch above the stream origin shown
on impact mapping, and the ditch occurring along the southern property line where
impacts would occur. Please also include photographs of the stream and tributary ditch
features to document no special aquatic site occurs along this reach.
• Kimley-Horn staff delineated the site in February 2019 and no jurisdictional features were
identified. At that time, the project was anticipated to have no impacts to jurisdictional
features or potentially jurisdictional features (roadside ditches). Since there is an NRCS- and
USGS-mapped stream within the site that would be subject to Neuse River Basin buffers if
present, Kimley-Horn submitted a Buffer Determination request to NCDWR and had a field
review with Erin Deck and Zack Thomas in March 2019. NCDWR determined that the
mapped stream had been relocated to the roadside ditch running along Barber Mill Road and
that this ditch would be subject to 401 jurisdiction and Neuse River Basin buffers. Kimley-
Horn determined the most efficient course of action would be to assume 404-jurisdiction over
this feature (Stream S1) and entirely avoid disturbance or impacts accordingly. Since that
time, the site plan has been modified based on feedback obtained during site plan review to
include sidewalks and modified stormwater outlets that now are proposed to drain to S1.
Photos of stream S1 are displayed below and a PJD request including a NCDWR Stream
Identification Form has been included with this package. As S1 has functioned historically as
a roadside drainage ditch and subject to repetitive manipulation and maintenance, S1 was
found to lack any identifiable natural bed form or stream characteristics. The lack of in -stream
structures, degraded aquatic habitat, heavy erosion, and multiple bank failures have resulted
in a primarily stormwater-driven stream channel with no special aquatic sites identified in the
proposed impact areas.
Page 4
kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

Photo 3 – Photo of the Stream S1 origin at the culvert outlet flowing below Dairy Road at the
northeast corner of the site. Note the roadside swale (non-jurisdictional) connecting in from the
east (right side of frame) along Dairy Road (2/2019).
Photo 4 – Photo of Stream S1 along Barber Mill Road. Note the lack of natural stream features and
the degraded banks (2/2019).

4) Non-reporting use of a Nationwide Permit requires compliance with all general and regional
conditions, including coordination with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The USFWS
IPaC website identifies three listed, and three proposed listed, species as potentially affected by
Page 5
kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

activities in this location. There is no requirement to address proposed listed species at this time,
though it is recommended to protect applicants from unnecessary delay in the event listing occurs
during this review. Please either document coordination with USFWS and secure their concurrence
with this project as proposed or provide assurances for each species so we can complete this
requirement under NLEB SLOPES Situation 2 coordination.

• The USFWS IPaC website lists red-cockaded woodpecker (E), Neuse River waterdog (PT),
Carolina madtom (PE), Atlantic pigtoe (PT), dwarf wedgemussel (E), and yellow lance (T) as
the six federally-protected or proposed species that may be affected by activiti es in this
location. A review of the NCNHP database records, updated April 2020, indicates there are no
known occurrences of any federally protected species within 1.0 mile of the project area.

The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open, mature stands of southern
pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for foraging and nesting habitat. The RCW
excavates cavities for nesting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, which are contiguous
with pine stands at least 30 years of age for foraging habitat. The foraging range for RCW is
normally less than 0.5 miles. Suitable habitat for RCW is not present within the study area due
to the lack of mature pine stands. A few open-grown loblolly pines (Pinus taeda) are present
along the eastern boundary of the site, however, these trees are isolated from large pine stands
and appear to be ~30 years in age. Due to the lack of known occurrences, the lack of suitable
nesting habitat in and around the project area (tree stands >60 years in age), and the amount
of development surrounding the site, it has been determined that the proposed project will have
no effect on RCW.

In North Carolina, the dwarf wedgemussel is known from the Neuse River and Tar River
drainages. The mussel inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to moderate current and
sand, gravel, or firm silt bottoms. Water in these areas must be well oxygenated. Stream banks
in these areas are generally stable with extensive root systems holding soils in place. Suitable
habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel is not present within the project corridor due to the lack of
well-oxygenated, perennial streams with stable banks. Stream S1 has been relocated to a
roadside ditch with poor substrate, vertical banks, frequent failures and bank sloughing
throughout, and is choked with algae. Due to the lack of known occurrences and the lack of
suitable habitat in the project area, it has been determined that the proposed project will have
no effect on the dwarf wedgemussel.

The yellow lance is endemic to the Chowan, Tar, and Neuse river drainage basins in North
Carolina. The freshwater mussel prefers coarse sandy substrate and sometimes prefers lightly
graveled sandy substrate. Yellow lance is often found in mixed sand and gravel substrate at
the base of a stream riffle. The mussel also requires clean streams that are well-oxygenated,
with moderate flow and little sediment discharge. Suitable habitat for the yellow lance is not
present within the project corridor due to the lack of well -oxygenated, moderate-flow streams
with stable banks. Stream S1 has been relocated to a roadside ditch with poor substrate,
vertical banks, frequent failures and bank sloughing throughout, and is choked with algae. Due
to the lack of known occurrences and the lack of suitable habitat in the project area, it has been
determined that the proposed project will have no effect on the yellow lance.

Page 6
kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

In addition to the above federally-protected species, the USFWS IPaC website also identifies
the Neuse River waterdog, Carolina madtom, and Atlantic pigtoe as species that are proposed
for listing and may occur within the project area. These three species require specific aquatic
habitats that have not been degraded by sloughing banks, sedimentation, and stream
relocation. Habitat for these species is not present within the study area due to the degraded
nature of Stream S1, the only stream in the project area. At this time, these species are
currently listed as “Proposed Threatened” or “Proposed Endangered” and, for that reason, are
not currently protected under the Endangered Species Act. However, due to the lack of suitable
habitat in the project area and the lack of known occurrences, it is assumed that the proposed
project will have no effect on any of these proposed species.

In addition, the northern long-eared bat is listed as “Threatened” and occurring in North
Carolina. The USFWS has developed a 4(d) rule that provides special coverage for those
working within northern-long eared bat habitat. Per the USFWS NLEB website, Johnston
County is not listed as a “NLEB County” and no Red HUC occurs within 0.25-mile of the project
area.

The bald eagle is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA) and is
listed as occurring in Johnston County. Habitat for the bald eagle consists of mature forests in
proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for
nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop GIS-assessment of the project
area and the area within 1.13-mile of the project boundary was conducted in May 2020. No
water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered as feeding sources were
identified. In addition, the NCNHP database records, updated April 2020, indicates no known
bald eagle occurrences within 1.0 mile of the project area. Due to the lack of foraging habitat
and the lack of known occurrences, it has been determined that the proposed project will have
no effect on bald eagle.

5) The PCN application states that no trees will be cleared as part of construction on this site.
However, development plans included in the application indicate this is not the case. Until a JD
review is completed we are unable to determine whether this clearing would occur within areas
subject to our jurisdiction.

• The only trees present within the site are along the eastern edge of the property boundary,
across the site from the jurisdictional stream impacts. These trees are proposed to be cleared
to the property line. No trees are present along Stream S1, within the riparian area of S1, or in
the vicinity of any jurisdictional resource on the site.

6) Riprap used under NWP 18 must comply with general condition 9. Please provide a detail to
indicate that placement will preserve the pre-project channel morphology.

• The plan sheets have been updated to include details on the keyed in rip rap and are attached.
Flow within S1 will not be restricted or impeded by the stream bed and bank armoring. Due to
the presently degraded nature of S1, the proposed armoring will prevent future bank failures
and better prevent sedimentation impacts to downstream waters.

Page 7
kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000

7) Reference is made to the Town of Clayton’s requirement that this project include sidewalk. Per
NWP 18 general condition 15, this would be included as part of a single-and-complete project. Plan
sheets provided state “Limits of disturbance to extend beyond property line for construction of
offsite sidewalk and regrading of roadside swale” along Barber Mill Road. Please clarify the
roadside swale referenced is not the stream shown on project mapping. No details are provided to
indicate what, if any, impact to the stream would result from either the sidewalk or regrading, or
how the stream would be protected during construction. Additional detail of all impacts assoc iated
with development of this project are required to complete our review.

• The only stream on-site, as delineated by Kimley-Horn and NCDWR, is the stream along
Barber Mill Road. There is a vegetated roadside drainage ditch (swale) located along Dairy
Road that the call out on the plan sheets is referencing. Due to safety concerns, water cannot
be allowed to flow across the required sidewalk, so the vegetated roadside drainage ditch
(swale) will be piped beneath the sidewalk and discharge to S1.

No impacts to the stream would result from the sidewalk or grading. The only permanent stream
impacts proposed would result from keyed-in rip rap stabilization in Stream S1 at the two
proposed stormwater outfalls flowing below the proposed sidewalk. These two stormwater
pipes are located on the northern and southern boundaries of the project – the northern outfall
would convey stormwater from the existing vegetated roadside drainage ditch (swale) along
Dairy Road and the southern outfall would convey stormwater from a proposed underground
stormwater treatment facility below the proposed parking lot. Temporary stream impacts at both
sites would be required to install a temporary pump around to facilitate for working in the dry.
Rip rap will be keyed into the banks and channel to match the existing stream contours at both
sites. In total, less than 10 cubic yards of rip rap will be installed in Stream S1 between the two
sites.

Additional details regarding the construction sequence and rip rap installation have been added
to the included plan set.

If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing of this request, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 919-677-2113 or [e-mail].

Sincerely,

William Sullivan

Attachments
REF.DWUPUPUPPROPOSED 1-STORY
7,650 SQ. FT. BUILDING
PROPOSED USE: CHURCH
FFE: 303.00'
IGLESIA DE DIOS PRIMEROS
FRUTOS
PREPARED FOR
DOSAN CORP.
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN©C-4.0
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
NORTH
GRADING AND DRAINAGE LEGEND
GRADING NOTES:
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
NOTE
SWALE CROSS SECTION A-A
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE
STORMWATER SYSTEM NOTE:
ALL ONSITE AND OFFSITE INSTALLED STORM DRAINAGE PIPING AND
RELATED STRUCTURES ARE TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. THE
TOWN OF CLAYTON WILL NOT ASSUME ANY OPERATION AND/OR
MAINTENANCE OF THIS SYSTEM OR ITS APPURTENANCES.
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
3
3
5/8/2020
IGLESIA DE DIOS PRIMEROS
FRUTOS
PREPARED FOR
DOSAN CORP.
STORM DETAILS
©C-8.0
REV B7001-110-189DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:20SCALEDWG SIZE A
3130 VERONA AVE
BUFORD, GA 30518
PHN [phone]
FAX [phone]
www.nyloplast-us.com
12 IN DRAIN BASIN QUICK SPEC INSTALLATION DETAIL
TITLE
PROJECT NO./NAME
MATERIAL
DATE
APPD BY
3-29-06DATE
EBCDRAWN BY
3-29-06
CJA
5 ADAPTER
ANGLES
VARIABLE 0° - 360°
ACCORDING TO
PLANS
3 VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH
ACCORDING TO PLANS ( 6" MIN)
4" MIN
MINIMUM PIPE BURIAL
DEPTH PER PIPE
MANUFACTURE
RECOMMENDATION
3 VARIABLE INVERT HEIGHTS
AVAILABLE (ACCORDING TO
PLANS/TAKE OFF)
NYLOPLAST 12" DRAIN BASIN: 2812AG _ _ X
4 WATERTIGHT JOINT
(CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN)
4 VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET ADAPTERS
AVAILABLE: 4" - 12" FOR CORRUGATED HDPE
(ADS N-12, ADS SINGLE WALL, HANCOR DUAL WALL),
SDR 35, SCH 40 DWV, CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVC
1 2 INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRON
FRAME & GRATE TO
MATCH BASIN O.D.
THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICH
NYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPT
OR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,
TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN OR
TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN
REPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATION
CONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANY
ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS
IS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.
1 - GRATES/SOLID COVER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05,
WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE BRONZE GRATE.
2 - FRAMES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05
3 - DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS.
RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84" DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS.
SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-065
4 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212
FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS & HANCOR DUAL WALL) & SDR 35 PVC
5 - ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0° TO 360°. TO DETERMINE MINIMUM
ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-012.
THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER
GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS II
MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR
SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED
UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.
STONE BEDDING FOR PVC STORM PIPE PER
GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION
YARD INLET
FRENCH DRAIN DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
3
3
5/8/2020
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version:May 2017 Page 1
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville,North Carolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORY FIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NorthCarolina27587
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington,NorthCarolina27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
69Darlington Avenue
Wilmington,NorthCarolina 28403
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G .
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which mayinclude inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version:May 2017 Page 2
A.PARCELINFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B.REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C.PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Mustprovidecompleted Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
îîïð Ü¿·®§Î±¿¼
Ý´¿§¬±²ô ÒÝ
Ö±¸²­¬±²
ïïêëèïïóêéóìîïè
Õ·³´»§óر®²å ßÌÌÒæ É·´´·¿³Í«´´·ª¿²
ìîï Ú¿§»¬¬»ª·´´» ͬòô Í«·¬» êðð
ο´»·¹¸ô ÒÝ îéêðï
øçïç÷ êééóîïïí
©·´´·¿³ò­«´´·ª¿²àµ·³´»§ó¸±®²ò½±³
×¹´»­·¿Ð®·³»®±­Ú®«¬±­ô ײ½ò
ëðð Ѹ¿®¿ ͬ®»»¬
Ý´¿§¬±²ô ÒÝ îéëîð
øçïç÷êðïóççïï
¶¼±³·²¹«»¦à¼±­¿²½±®°ò½±³
ì
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version:May 2017 Page 3
D.PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E.REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources underCorps authority.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JDwould be used to avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and asaninitial step in a future permitting
process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
É·´´·¿³Í«´´·ª¿²
ì
ì
5/11/20
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version:May 2017 Page 4
F.JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approvedJD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G.ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
ïòìë
ì
ì
ì
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version:May 2017 Page 5
H.REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
North Arrow
Graphical Scale
Boundary of Review Area
Date
Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
íêòêíéëðï
óéèòìéíëçð
ì
ì
ì
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version:May 2017 Page 6
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
PrincipalPurpose:Theinformation thatyou provide will beusedinevaluatingyour requestto determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:This information maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal,state,and local
governmentagencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice asrequiredbyfederal
law. Your nameand property location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andonthe Headquarters USAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary;however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJD cannotbeevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:County/parish/borough:City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Íï íëòêíéêìï óéèòìéíçîð ëî ´º²±²ó©»¬´¿²¼©¿¬»®­Í»½¬·±² ìðì
É·´´·¿³ Í«´´·ª¿²ô ìîï Ú¿§»¬¬»ª·´´» ͬòô Í«·¬» êððô ο´»·¹¸ô ÒÝ
ÒÝ Ö±¸²­¬±²Ý±«²¬§Ý´¿§¬±²
íëòêíéëðï óéèòìéíëçð
ïé
Ô·¬¬´» Ý®»»µ
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be”waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ________.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______.
or Other (Name & Date): ______.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________.
Other information (please specify): ______________.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
ïæîìôððð ó Ý´¿§¬±² Ï«¿¼
Ö±¸²­¬±² ݱ«²¬§ô ïççì
5/11/20
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name:
Address:
Phone:.
Project Name/Description: lglesia de Dios — Barber Mill Road Site
Date: _ 1
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Mr. Ross Sullivan
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Iglesia Primeros Frutos, Inc hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Determinations, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revocation by the owner.
In addition,1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the day of
'421wv/-4
Print Property Owner's Name _ operty Owner's Signature
Cc: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

Figure 1: Vicinity MapBarber Mill Road SiteJohnston County, NCMay 2020
0 1,200 2,400Feet
I
Lege nd
Project Study Area
WAKE
JOHNSTON
WAYNEHARNETT
WILSON
NASH
SAMPSONCUMBERLAND
CHATHAM
CHATHAM
FRANKLIN
LENOIR
Study Area
Figure 2: USG S Topographic MapBarber Mill Road SiteJohnston County, NCMay 2020
0 300 600Feet
I
Lege nd
Project Study Area
Dairy Rd
Barber Mill RdBarber Mill RdGrovewood Dr
Figure 3: Jurisdictional Feature s MapBarber Mill Road SiteJohnston County, NCMay 2020
0 75 150Feet
I
Lege nd
Stream
Project Study AreaS1
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey MapBarber Mill Road SiteJohnston County, NCMay 2020
0 300 600Feet
I
Lege nd
Project Study Area
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:16
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score
0 1 3 3
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 0.5 1.5 0.5
0 0.5 1.5 0
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.5
0 1 3 3
0 1 3 1
1.5 1 0 0.5
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 1
3 2 0 0
3 2 0 0
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 1
0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream S1 is a a weak intermittent stream that has been relocated to a linear
roadside ditch along Barber Mill Road. S1 originates at a culvert outlet below
Dairy Road and flows south along Barber Mill Rd. S1 banks are eroding and
sloughing into the channel. Algae and iron oxidizing bacteria are present in pools.
Large amounts of vegetation in channel throughout the evaluated length. Water
was cloudy, but approximately 0.29" of rain was recorded 36 hours prior.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 1
24. Amphibians 1
25. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 2
9. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-
pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other
e.g. Quad Name:Clayton Quad
6.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 2
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
2/28/2019 Barber Mill Road Site
Stream S1 35.637641
J. Hartshorn, PWS
(Kimley-Horn)Johnston County -78.47392
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology YesX
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
NoX
NoX X
NoX
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Approximately .29" of rainfall recorded in the last 36 hours. Rutting on the parcel has rainwater pooled in small areas, but soils appear to be
compacted by heavy equipment access. No evidence of wetland hydrology observed.
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
City/County:Barber Mill Road Site Clayton, Johnston Co
DP1
2/28/2019
Iglesia Primeros Frutos NC
No
Section, Township, Range: n/aJ. Hartshorn, PWS
<1%FlatFilled Lot
Datum: NAD83-78.47344335.637622LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Bb - Bibb sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
DP1 is located within a filled and graded lot that was formerly a pond based on historic mapping. Lot appears to have been filled in late 90s/early
2000's. Shallow rutting observed from heavy equipment or dump truck likely accessing stored fill material on the property. Ground surface throughout
former pond bed feels firm and compacted, no evidence of groundwater or wetland hydrology throughout the parcel.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP1
0
1
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
500
500
100
100
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
0.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30')
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
Festuca trachyphylla 100
30'
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30')
100
2050
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
0
0
Multiply by:
0
5.00Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
DP1 is within a graded and filled lot. Lot is frequently mowed and dominated by lawn-type fescue grass.
)30'
=Total Cover
UPLYes
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
Fill - mixed with some yellow soil
Texture
Fill - mixed with some yellow soil
DP1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 6/8
10YR 5/6
12-24
0-12
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Soils within the lot are predominantely fill material. Pond was present on this property but historically filled and graded. Soils are clayey and
compacted.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0