20031338 Ver 4_401 Application_20200521

S&ME, Inc. | 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard | Charlotte, NC 28273 | p 704.523.4726 | f 704.525.3953 | www.smeinc.com
May 21, 2020
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Ms. Samantha Dailey
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Mr. Paul Wojoski
Reference: Pre-construction Notification
Nationwide Permit No. 18/WQC No. 4139
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project 7435-19-094
Dear Ms. Dailey and Mr. Wojoski:
On behalf of our client, Dominion Energy North Carolina (Dominion Energy), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby
submits this notification to inform you of work they plan to conduct in accordance with Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 12 and the corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 4139. The
project will involve the proposed installation of a natural gas pipeline largely within an existing NC
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) right-of-way (ROW).
The application and accompanying support information is being submitted through the NCDWR E-PCN
website (https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Pre-Construction_Notification_Form\). The supporting
information submitted online consists of the following:
Figures: Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map Exhibit (Figure 2), and NRCS Soil
Survey Exhibit (Figure 3) and a 2017 Aerial Photography Exhibit (Figure 4);
Authorization to Act as Agent
Previous Section 404/401 permit authorizations for Rutledge Landing
NCDWR stream form/USACE upland data form
Site Photographs
Jurisdictional Impacts Exhibit (Figures 5)
Typical Construction Details (Figures D01-D03)
NCNHP Report and IPaC Report
Restoration Plan
Pre-Construction Notification
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
2
Written concurrence from the USACE is required because the project will result in temporary impacts to
aquatic resources. The project will otherwise comply with applicable conditions of NWP-18.
Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) is also required
because the project will result in stream excavation. However, NCDWR approval for Neuse River Basin
riparian buffer impacts is not required because: 1) the new easement will cross the subject stream channel
at a near-perpendicular angle; 2) the work will not disturb greater than 40 linear feet of the buffer and; 3)
the work will result in a maintenance corridor of 10 feet. Accordingly, this activity is identified as “exempt”
by the Neuse River Basin.
Previous 404/401/Riparian buffer permits associated with the larger Rutledge Landing subdivision have
been provided with the information submitted online.
General Project Information
Dominion Energy is currently planning to install a natural gas pipeline within the Rutledge Landing
residential development. The purpose of the project is to provide natural gas service to the development.
The new line will begin at the entrance to the Rutledge Landing subdivision at Poole Road. The line will
then extend north along the west side of Rutledge Landing Drive and cross a perennial stream into a
newly-constructed portion of the subdivision, ending at Stolls Lane. The pipeline is proposed for
construction within an existing ROW owned by the NCDOT, with the exception of one tract where
additional workspace is needed to accommodate a near-perpendicular stream crossing, and in most areas
the disturbed width will be approximately 10 feet.
The general project location is depicted on the Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1). The project vicinity consists
primarily of existing residential development or formerly undeveloped areas that have been cleared and
graded for construction of the new subdivision phase. The location of the project corridor is depicted in
greater detail on the appropriate U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map Exhibit (Figure 2) and
NRCS Soil Survey – Wake County Exhibit (Figure 3).
Description of the Proposed Work
The pipeline will be installed within a new 10-foot wide permanent easement. Additional temporary
workspace sufficient to accommodate an open-cut crossing of the stream may also be required.
Construction of the new line will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and
other associated workspaces, etc. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control (E&SC) measures will be
installed as clearing proceeds to help prevent sedimentation of adjacent jurisdictional features. No
grubbing or below-ground vegetation removal will occur within stream buffers except where necessary to
safely install the pipe.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E&SC measures in upland areas, the
trench will be excavated along the “non-working” side of the easement. Lengths of the new pipe will be
strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). The pipe segments will be heat-
welded together, inspected, and then lowered into the trench. Affected areas will then be “cleaned up” by
rough-grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and
mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre-disturbance contours and conditions. All
work at the stream crossing will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permit conditions.
Pre-Construction Notification
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
3
Jurisdictional Areas
S&ME visited the project area on March 9, 2020 to delineate jurisdictional features located therein. S&ME
followed the procedures set forth in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual and the appropriate
Regional Supplemental Guidance. Field conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland
Determination Data Forms, as appropriate. The field review also included identification of tributaries
(streams or jurisdictional ditches) within the project area. Drainage features identified during the field
review were assessed to determine the jurisdictional status of the tributary. Drainage features were
classified as either non-jurisdictional or jurisdictional. S&ME used the NCDWR Stream Classification Form
to document characteristics of identified drainage features on the day of the assessment. During the site
visit, the boundaries of regulated surface waters were demarcated using sequentially-numbered flagging.
One perennial stream (S1) was identified within the proposed project area during the site visit. S1 is an
unnamed tributary to Poplar Creek (DWR Index No. 27-35, Class C;NSW). Wetlands are not observed
within the project area. An NCDWR Stream Classification Form prepared for S1 and an upland data form,
both prepared on the day of the assessment, are included with the information submitted online.
Project-wide stream impacts are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Stream Impacts
Stream Impacts
Stream ID Temporary (lf) Permanent (lf)
S1 15 0
The proposed stream impacts are temporary in nature, and no wetlands will be impacted. Typical
construction details (Figures D01-D03) are included with the information submitted online with the E-
PCN. Following construction, the temporarily affected stream will be returned to its pre-construction
grade and contour, seeded, and stabilized.
S1 appears on both the most recent version of the Wake County NRCS Soil Survey and the appropriate
1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic map, and scored greater than 19.0 points on the
NCDWR Stream Assessment Form (Version is 4.11, effective September 1, 2010). The remainder of the
route is located within an existing residential development where no vegetated buffer is present, and an
existing use is present and on-going, and will remain unchanged. Project-wide buffer impacts are
summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Summary of Riparian Buffer Impacts
Crossing Zone 1 (sf)Zone 2 (sf)Notes
S1 946 660
Perpendicular crossing that disturbs equal to or less than
40 lf of riparian buffer with a maintenance corridor
equal to or less than 10 ft. in width.
Pre-Construction Notification
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
4
The project will result in disturbance within the buffer at the stream crossing location. However, the
crossing is considered exempt from the buffer rules because: 1) the pipe will cross the stream and buffer
at a near-perpendicular angle; 2) less than 40 linear feet of buffer will be affected during construction,
and; 3) the width of the new maintenance easement will be limited to 10 feet.
During construction in the buffered area, Dominion Energy will limit grubbing and below ground
vegetation removal to the trenchline and those areas necessary to safely install the pipe. Efforts will also
be made to maintain diffuse flow through the buffer area. Upon completion of the work, affected portions
of the buffer will be restored, seeded, and mulched with a native riparian seed mix. In any areas where
additional workspace was required, vegetative cover within portions of the easement outside of the 10-
foot wide maintenance corridor will be allowed to return to their pre-construction state.
Protected Species
To determine the project’s compliance with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), S&ME conducted a search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database to identify element occurrences (EOs) of such species listed as potentially occurring
near the project area. The NCNHP list was compared to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) service list. Additionally, S&ME personnel conducted a
pedestrian field review of the site in conjunction with the delineation to locate potential habitat or the
presence of protected terrestrial species with documented occurrences in the county. The assessment did
not include sampling or a habitat assessment for aquatic or state-listed species.
The NCNHP report that identified one record of red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) within one
mile of the site. The report did not identify additional records of rare federal species, within one mile of
the site. The NCNHP report is included in the accompanying information submitted with the online
courtesy PCN.
Review of the NCNHP and the USFWS databases identified the following federally-protected species with
documented populations in Wake County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally-Listed Species Summary for Wake County
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
County
Status
Recorded w/in 1
Mile of Route?
Haliaeetus leucopcephalus Bald Eagle BGPA Current No
Notropis mekistocholas Cape Fear Shiner E Current No
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded Woodpecker E Current Yes
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf Wedgemussel E Current No
Parvaspina steinstansana Tar River spinymussel E Current No
Rhus michauxii Michaux's sumac E Current No
Elliptio lanceolata Yellow Lance T Current No
Pre-Construction Notification
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
5
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic pigtoe ARS Current Yes
Noturus furiosus Carolina Madtom ARS Current No
Necturus lewisi Neuse River Waterdog ARS Current No
Heterodon simus Southern Hognose Snake ARS Obscure No
Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater ARS Current No
Lindera subcoriacea Bog Spicebush ARS Current No
Based on pedestrian assessments conducted by S&ME, it was determined that the project corridor does
not contain suitable habitat for any of the species identified above. S1 is considered too small to support
any of the listed aquatic species, and the remaining project area consists of a residential development that
is either existing or under construction.
Copies of the NCNHP report is included with the information submitted online with the E-PCN.
Historic and Archaeological Resources
To determine the project’s compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
of 1966, S&ME reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS web mapping service, which
identified several sites within one mile of the project area. However, because the new pipe will be installed
within existing developed area, the project should have no effect on historic resources.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed easement was routed to avoid wetlands and streams and utilizing areas that have been
previously developed (the NCDOT ROW) where practicable. Dominion Energy plans to only maintain a
10-foot wide easement. At this crossing, Dominion Energy will only require additional temporary
workspace of 5 feet, which will be necessary to safely install the pipe. A dam-and-pump system will be
used to divert clean water flow around the work area until the crossing is completed. Once work affecting
the stream is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of
disturbance. Typical details for a temporary coffer dam and pump methodology for isolation of the trench
excavation were included in the information submitted online with the E-PCN.
Project BMPs used in connection with the stream crossing include the following:
The crossing will be executed in as minimal amount of time necessary.
Sufficient equipment to execute the crossings in an expeditious, environmentally responsible manner
will be available on site prior to initiation of the crossing.
Efforts will be made to perform the crossing during anticipated low flow conditions.
Local weather conditions will be monitored such that, to the extent possible, stormwater events will
be avoided during and immediately following installation of the pipe.
The crossing will be monitored during installation by personnel experienced in stream crossing
procedures, familiar with site conditions, and knowledgeable of North Carolina environmental
Pre-Construction Notification
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
6
regulations. The monitor shall have the authority to stop work should conditions change, and
additional or different measures be needed.
The upstream and downstream portions of the crossing point will be sealed to isolate the crossing for
pipeline installation “in the dry.” Clean steel plates, sandbags, or similar measures will be inserted to
temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be cleaned prior to use on streams using biodegradable
products or heat. On both sides of the installed plates (both upstream and downstream) sandbags will
additionally be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the damming of water, and provide a secondary
barrier to seepage. The excavated trench will be monitored for groundwater intrusion and, if noted,
excess water will be pumped to a discharge site located 50’-100’ from the top of bank of the receiving
stream. Discharged water from the trench will be filtered through an appropriate E&SC measure.
The top 6-12 inches of streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately from the subgrade material
and kept saturated during the installation.
Pumps will be obtained and staged prior to executing the crossing. Back-up pumps shall be kept on-
site should the primary pump(s) malfunction, or to control high flows. All pumps will have screened
intakes and will be placed in secondary-containment for the duration of the installation. In the event
an unforeseen weather event occurs during installation, pumps near the crossing will be monitored
24-hours a day until normal flow conditions are present.
Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that water neither
accumulates behind the upstream dam nor is discharged too rapidly on the downstream side. At the
downstream discharge location, flow discharge rates shall be controlled such that scouring of the
stream bed and/or banks does not occur. Efforts will be made to aerate the water prior to its
downstream discharge into the receiving stream.
Removal of in-stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to allow a gradual re-
introduction of flowing water into the channel.
Banks will be restored in a careful manner, achieving pre-construction contours to the extent practical.
Affected streambanks monitored for stability following construction and for the duration of the
pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered complete when herbaceous vegetation reaches
80-percent coverage.
Stream banks temporarily affected by trenching will be stabilized with a native seed mix specifically
designed for riparian areas, and with biodegradable coir matting.
Construction equipment operating near the stream will be limited to that necessary for excavation,
pipe installation and restoration activities. Vegetation near the stream will be cut at ground level,
leaving existing root systems in place to promote re-growth.
Appropriate E&SC practices outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and approved by the local governing authority shall be in
compliance with specifications governing the proper design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
such BMPs to comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
The project will comply with applicable conditions of NWP No. 18 and WQC No. 4139. Following the work,
the affected areas will be restored to their original grade and contour. As proposed, the project will not
result in permanent changes to the ground surface elevation(s) in the proposed easement or permanently
affect the dimension, pattern, or profile of the subject stream. Temporarily affected areas are proposed to
be restored in accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (submitted online with the E-PCN) following
completion of the work.
Pre-Construction Notification
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
7
Mitigation
The project will not involve impacts to wetlands. Therefore, purchase of wetland mitigation credit is
not required.
The project will temporarily impact less than 150 linear feet of stream. No permanent stream impacts are
proposed. It is our understanding that stream impacts are considered temporary if the affected stream is
restored to original pre-construction contours once construction is completed, and permanent placement
of hard armor is not involved. A stream restoration plan was provided with the information submitted
online with the E-PCN. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that purchase of stream mitigation credit
will be required.
The project will cross one stream subject to Neuse River riparian buffer rules. The crossing will be installed
in a perpendicular manner and impact less than 40 linear feet of buffer with a maintained easement that
does not exceed ten feet. Accordingly, the crossing is considered exempt from the buffer rules, and
do not require mitigation.
Closing
Thank you for your review of this courtesy PCN. If you have questions or need additional information,
please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME
Joey Lawler, PWS
Natural Resources Project Manager
[e-mail]
Senior Review by Chris Stahl, PE
Cc Robert Schwartz, PE
DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20031338
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Rutledge Landing Service Line
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Joey Lawler, PWS
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/21/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Uf to Poplar Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.7507960
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.4594140
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
4
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
U
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
18 - Minor Discharges
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
See list accompanying this PCN
2b. Deed book and page no.:
See list accompanying this PCN
2c. Responsible party:
Dominion Energy North Carolina
2d.Address
Street Address
220 Operation Way, MC C221
Address tine 2
city
Cayce
Postal / Zip Code
29033
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Ifgion
South Carolina
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r- Yes r No
r Yes r No
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

3a. Name:
Robert Schwartz, PE
3b. Business Name:
Dominion Energy North Carolina
3c.Address
Street Address
220 Operation Way, MC C221
Address Line 2
City
Cayce
Postal / Zip Code
29033
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
.bey Lawler, PWS
4b. Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Address Une 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28273
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
aaron.schv,[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization Form - Rutledge_Signed.pdf
State / Province / Region
South Carolina
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
449.8KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(W appropriate)
Rutledge Landing
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Knightdale
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
See list accompanying this PCN
0.75
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Rutledge Landing Drive
Address Lim 2
City
State / Province / l?gion
Knightdale
NC
Postal / Zip Cbde
Country
27545
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*

UT to Poplar Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011103
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located within an wasting residential development. The vicinity consists of additional residential development or formerly undeveloped areas that have been cleared and
graded for construction of the new subdivision phase.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000)
DWQ Project No. 03-1338 and USACE No. 200421152
Project History Upload
401 WQC 3704_073108.pdf
1.05MB
401 WQC Approval_ Rutledge August 2004.pdf
239.1 KB
404 Re -verification by MM 2006.pdf
348.6KB
Buffer authorization-DWR #03-1338 v3.pdf
195.51 KB
DWQ Buffer Determination letter_03-26-OO.pdf
163.01KB
DWR #03-1338 v3.pdf
195.51 KB
Notification of Statutory Status_081908.pdf
214.98KB
Rutledge -NRB Buffer Impact Exhibit#1-02017.pdf
208.44KB
Rutledge -wetland buffer Impact map site-02017.pdf
1.39MB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
2_USGS_Rutledge.pdf
1.18MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
3_Soils_Rutledge.pdf 2.2MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Unknown
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property
Unknown
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To provide natural gas service to a residential development.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The pipeline will be installed within a new 10-foot wide permanent easement. Additional temporary workspace sufficient to accommodate an open -cut crossing of the stream may also be
required.
Construction of the new line will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other associated workspaces, etc. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation
control (E&SC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to help prevent sedimentation of adjacent jurisdictional features. No grubbing or below -ground vegetation removal will
occur within stream buffers except where necessary to safely install the pipe.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E&SC measures in upland areas, the trench will be excavated along the "non -working" side of the easement.
Lengths of the new pipe will be strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). The pipe segments will be heat -welded together, inspected, and then lowered into
the trench. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the
easement as closely as possible to pre -disturbance contours and conditions. Al work at the stream crossing will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permit conditions.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
Stream within the current project area delineated by S&ME
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
200421152

5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Ashley Bentz PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Rutledge DP.pdf 46.68KB
Rutledge SF.pdf 214.91 KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
F Yes O No
Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No additional gasline crossings of jurisdictional areas are required.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries W Buffers
r Open Waters F Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Utility line crossing Temporary Excavation :]E.
plar Creek Perennial Both 6 15
Average (feet) (linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
15
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
15
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
17 Neuse
r Tar -Pamlico
F Catawba
1 Randleman
F Goose Creek
r Jordan Lake
r" Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
S1
P
Ui to Poplar Creek
No
946
660
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 946.00
660.00
Zone 1
Zone 2

Total combined buffer impacts: 946.00 660.00
6i. Comments:
Proposed crossing is exempt from riparian buffer rules
Supporting Documentation
Impact Drawing.pdf 2.85MB
Details.pdf 2.42MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
See cover letter submitted with PCN
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
See cover letter submitted with PCN
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Project impacts are temporary and less than 150 LF
FFStormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r" Level Spreader
r" Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r" Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
r" Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r' Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
Project is located within existing development. The utility project will not generate additional impervious surface and does not require "stand-alone" stormwater management.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
v
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*

r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will provide natural gas to an existing residential development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
See attached NCNHP and FWS IPaC letters
Consultation Documentation Upload
FWS Species List pdf 217.57KB
NCNHP Report.pdf 949.37KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS web mapping service https://wAw.ncdcr.gov/about/history/division-historical-resources/gis-maps-
and-data
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Mapper https://flood.rc.gov/ncflood/
Miscellaneous
Comments

Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
1_Vicinity_Rutledge.pdf
1.24MB
4_Aerial.pdf
2.69MB
Restoration Plan.pdf
120.78KB
Photos.pdf
319.56KB
Cover Letter.pdf
214.89KB
Landowner_Information.pdf
74.16KB
Signature u
® By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Joey Lawler
Signature
.76EY(_., -L6�—
Date
5/21/2020

Affected Landowners
Dominion Energy North Carolina
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
Note: Dominion Energy North Carolina has acquired or is in the process of acquiring temporary workspace or a
permanent easement on these properties.
PIN Owner Mailing Address County Deed
Book Page
NCDOT
RTOW
NCDOT HIGHWAY DIVISION 5,
DISTRICT 1
4009 DISTRICT DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27607 WAKE NCDOT
ROW
NCDOT
ROW
1752993555 NCDOT ROW
CLAYTON PROPOERTIES GROUP INC.
441 WESTERN LN
IRMO SC 29063-9230 WAKE 17328 1171
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date:
Nro ect intormation
S&ME Project Name: DENC Rutledge Pipeline Project
Type of Project: Natural Gas Pipeline Extension
Location: Wake County, NC
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Agent information
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Intormation
Dominion Energy Southeast Services, Corporate Environmental
220 Operations Way, MC 221
Cayce, SC 29033
803.217.7112 -- —---
Robert Schwartz, PE
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
Joey Lawler, PWS / Walter Cole, LSS
n
Authorization: I, Sort w% A 7 7 hereby authorize S&ME, Inc. to
submit information to and coordinate with the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and/or the NC Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) and other
relevant Federal/State/Local agencies pursuant to obtaining necessary
environmental permits for the project referenced above. If applicable, this also
authorizes the USACE/NCDEQ to access the proposed easement for the
purposes of conducting site assessment/confirming the accuracy of delineated
boundaries.
l
Signature: T_
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

Wake CountyJohnston CountyUnincorporated Wake County
Garner
Raleigh
Clayton
Clay ton
Wendell
RaleighWendell
Z e b u l o n
REFERENCE:PROJECT ALIGNMENT INFO RMAT ION WAS OBTAIN ED FROM T HE OWN ER. PLEA SE N OTE THISDATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PU RPOSES O NLY. IT IS NOT M EANT F OR DESIG N, LEGAL, OR A NYOTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. AS SU MES NORESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE O R A NY ACTIONS TAK EN BY THE USER BAS ED UPONINFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE A BO VE DATA.
0 1 2 3
(MILES)GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPELINE
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER :
FIG URE NO.
1
1 " = 1 MILE
5/13/20
7335-19-094RUTLEDGE LANDING SERVICE LINEWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: \\charnc\Active\Projects\2019\Energy\7335-19-094 Dominion Rutledge Pipeline Extenstion\Working_Documents\PCN - Rutledge Landing\Figures\1_Vicinity_Rutledge.mxd plotted by kwallace 05-13-2020SITE VICINITY EXHIBIT³
REFERENCE:THE ABOVE USGS DATA OBTA INED F RO M THE 2019 L AKE WHEELER, NORTH CAROL INA USGSQUADRANGLE. PROJECT ALIGNMENT INF ORM ATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER. PLEASENOTE THIS DATA IS FOR IN F ORMATIONA L PURPO SES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR D ESIGN, LEGAL ,OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO G UARAN TEES A BO UT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, I NC. ASSUM ESNO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY D ECISION MADE OR ANY ACTION S TAKEN BY THE USER BA SEDUPON INFORMATION OBTA IN ED F RO M THE ABOV E DATA .
0 1,000 2,000 3,000
(IN FEE T)GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPELINE
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER :
FIG URE NO.
2
1 " = 1,000 '
5/13/20
7335-19-094RUTLEDGE LANDING SERVICE LINEWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: \\charnc\Active\Projects\2019\Energy\7335-19-094 Dominion Rutledge Pipeline Extenstion\Working_Documents\PCN - Rutledge Landing\Figures\2_USGS_Rutledge.mxd plotted by kwallace 05-13-2020USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP EXHIBIT³
REFERENCE:THE ABOVE 1970 WAKE COUNTY S OIL SU RVEY MAPS 61, 62 , 7 1, & 72 WERE OBTA IN ED FROM THENATURAL RESOURCES CONS ERVAT ION S ERVIC E (NRCS). PROJECT ALI GN MENT INFORMATION WASOBTAINED FROM THE OWNER. PL EASE NOTE T HI S DATA I S FOR I NF ORM ATIONA L PURPOSES ONLY.IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGA L, OR ANY OTHER US ES. T HERE ARE NO G UARAN TEES A BOUTITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASS UMES NO RESPO NSIBILITY FO R AN Y D ECISION MADE OR A NYACTIONS TAKEN BY THE U SER BASED UPON INF ORM ATION O BTAINED FROM THE A BOVE DATA.
0 1,000 2,000 3,000
(IN FEE T)GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPELINE
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER :
FIG URE NO.
3
1 " = 1,000 '
5/13/20 RUTLEDGE GAS PIPELINE EXTENSIONWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: \\charnc\Active\Projects\2019\Energy\7335-19-094 Dominion Rutledge Pipeline Extenstion\Working_Documents\PCN - Rutledge Landing\Figures\3_Soils_Rutledge.mxd plotted by kwallace 05-13-2020NRCS SOIL SURVEY - WAKE COUNTY EXHIBIT³
7335-19-094
Golden F ie ld D rWaterRockWayP a r k e r w o o d D r
Moo
r
e
s
CreekDrCal Erin CirLim ewood StRu
tl
e
dge

L
a
n
di
ng DrTant C irWindy Field CirWoodsRunNorth
Bend
D
r Sandy RunDwellingPlKirkFarmRdSweetgrassStH u n tsb o ro R d
S

S
mit
h
fie
l
d

R
d
Whi
t
e
Opa
l Dr
Pine Run
S a p phire SpringsDr
T
oppi
n
g
L
n
Kir
k
PondRdO ldForestCirTelli
s
Dr
Stonew o o d PinesDr
M a p l e V i e w D rK
not
t
s
Hill
P
l
P o o l e R d
P o o le R d
P o o l e R d
J u l i p D r
REFERENCE:2017 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. PROJECT ALIGNMENT INFORMATION WASOBTAINED FROM THE OWNER. JUSRISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE DELINEATED IN THE FIELD AND LOCATEDWITH GPS EQUIPMENT CAPABL E OF SUB-METER ACCURACY. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONALPURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. T HERE ARE NO G UARANTEESABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, I NC. ASSUM ES N O RESPON SI BILIT Y FOR ANY DECISIO N MAD E OR AN Y ACTI ONSTAKEN BY T HE USER BASED U PON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA.
0 400 800 1,200
(IN FEE T)RUTLEDGE LANDING S ERVICE L INE
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
FIG URE NO.
4
1 " = 400 '
5/13/20
7335-19-094RUTLEDGE LANDING SERVICE LINEWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA2017 AERIAL ORTHOIMAGERY EXHIBIT³Drawing Path: \\charnc\Active\Projects\2019\Energy\7335-19-094 Dominion Rutledge Pipeline Extenstion\Working_Documents\PCN - Rutledge Landing\Figures\04-13JD_Aerials.mxd plotted by kwallace 05-13-2020GRAP HIC SCALE
Stolls Ln
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Rutledge Landing Wake Co.
DP1
3-9-2020
Dominion Energy NC NC
No
Section, Township, Range:A. Bentz
6-10nonehillslope
Datum: NAD83LRR P, MLRA 136
N/ANWI classification:
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X5
=Total Cover10
Lonicera japonica
5 Yes
Yes
FAC
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)10*10
=Total Cover
FACU
FACU
No
2
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
23 9
5
5 No FACU
No
Yes
FAC
FACU
5
No
Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
FACW
FACU
Yes
No FACU
FAC
2 No
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FAC
Total % Cover of:
(A)
(B)
(A)
No
1
1024
2
50*50
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FACU
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10*10 )
Smilax rotundifolia
4
Ligustrum sinense
No2
Arundinaria gigantea 5
20
Viburnum dentatum
Tipularia discolor
Rosa multiflora
Polystichum acrostichoides 2
47
Juniperus virginiana
Acer rubrum
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Acer rubrum
Liquidambar styraciflua
Ilex opaca
50*50 )
45
Indicator
Status
30
5
No
Dominant
Species?
Yes
10
5
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
5
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
FACU
Absolute
% Cover
60.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP1
3
5
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/40-14
DP1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%Texture
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11

41

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:

Sketch:

c �Q\
I - AD ST HEADWAL
\�� \ SS SERVICE _ — / TO CONFORM TO \
TYP — 24 J \ RO D ALIGNMENT
\ \ J #15
' I R0
co Pulkic
I SLY PERMI E
A STALLED -,I
IMPACTS I
METER —
��\\ TYP \
CB H
336 I* +207.0338
3137
* o
1 1 1
335
„ A I ITS
334 '''— — —
zon — —
ream p s
cros ing
G / WE —AL3,S a
0.0 �jqjt-
acres
ETLAND S S 8c E C
zone 1
zone
Priv� road
/ er enc v h4ei-
/ & pe can access
\ �r
a
a
DJUST CATCH BASINS o
0 CONFORM TO
ROAD ALIGNMENT I/
CO JSANDFILTER #6
4" UNDER DRAIN
RSR 4D
7-1
firA
r_�--7'_
�EX RIP RAP DITCH
/�. o`
UFF R IM�S
,, JJ
1 s —
--0. cres
oo �l
4e�
PROPOSED FUTURE 40'
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT
AND TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE GREENWAY EASEMENT
FLOODWAY
1IIIIIIIIIIENE
.0 V�ii119 ff C
� ' MCI
�'M
., . ..-
w��NA���o�
1 3Q4,,,&qu4't'.
1 �acres
i
FLOOD PLAIN
UFFER IMPAC
1 1c1'ft. /
.03 acre-s-, GRAPHIC SCALE
M M
i imh - 40 e.
i
R-30 ZONING
HUNTSBORO SUBDIVISION
LOT 15
BM 1995 PAGE 1214
41' q
zQ
"' E-
E1
�Aw
dQ
w �r
E1d�"
U
F �
ai w
c� w
z

W
00, Z / / %
�<
MHO /17� � g1�g0
o / /17 2
V/ Sg
I E. METER R-30 ZONING
G WELL SITE ASHLEY HILLS SUBDIVISION
BOM 1984PG 821 BOM 1981 PG 111
o / / / 68
\f\
170 pVHp / �� �� 1 /161 \ \ EXISTING ,
30' / ASHLEY HILLS TOF= 230.92
� °�iy CONNECT WATER MAIN / � H A E 2 P R T O E
D TO EXISTING WATER 1 Z ROB
�a .,_No Or.
o \ �a SETBACK
I ►�,,w' M 980PAE67
/ / G
GRAVEL PATH R- ZONI � !� �- NECT ATER MNN
/ nury Lor _PERMANENT 20' STORM DRAIN- - --- - - • -+- /
L WILL BE SERVID BY D LOPER S7�RAIN• - - --
FOR USE AS TIC FACILITY UPGRADEEAgMENT - -- r -- T- / - - _--22
EXIST. WER PLANT IF R IRED / --- _ a„� J N. <
-o= WELL T 4
2 Ac
609 \ 407 1 406 405 04 403 I 4021 1401 _ / (
r° a oc �� \ \ - / 3011 02 303 304 3 5
704
® I \ \ \ \\ I OPEN SPAT 5 ,V C
WELL LOT 5 /� - FH ` - -
`� c 1,539 S.FT. _\
2T \ 703 WETLANDS S&EC R100. H #57 MH j.e MH /e9 50' PC R/
l 6. W/L , • 2j. .B. 1
\ P�0\ RP\N 6� W �\ yF�N P€ `
NOD
ABANDON
RUTLEDGE LANDING PHASE 3 & 4
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
e
1r
AC.
AC
AC
LF
LF
LF
LF
SF
SF
PHASE
WETLAND
WETLAND
POND
INTERMITANT
INTERMITANT
PERENNIAL
PERENNIAL
NRB ZONE 1
NRB ZONE 2
IMPACTS
AREA
STREAM
STREAM IMPACTS
STREAM
STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACTS
IMPACTS
3
0.30
0.00
0
472
0
1530
0
2,298
2,775
4
0.35
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
0.84
0.03.2
0
1 472
1 0
1 1530
0
2,298
1 2,775
ASHLEY HILLS SUB'D
PHASE 4 PART 4 /
BM 1983
PAGE 25 20' DRAINAGE
R-30 ZONING EASEMENT /
TBM WELL SITE S
/
TOP^ 2312T� METER \ BM 1981 / 81
PAGE 965 / Z BM 1983
/ CREEK D ti PAGE 25
LOCATION
20' DRAINAGE
EASEMENy
30
J a°c PERIMETEF
M2 _ ry@6 i i 308 309 310 !is F S / /�ETBACK
00
_ ACM
M r FIDODPYEAR
OPEN
S R RDM AIN�601
FH EAS IENT /
NTSBORO SUB'[
REA RESERVED
BY OWNER OF
ROAD, -r11
5 �P . • \ / 91 PER LENT E%ISTING ATERO METERS
604 CONFOR
t
/ 346 TO NEW !)T LOCATIONS
345 344 3 3 342 341 340 39 I ; p�M EN
� / H p2 OPEN PAC
/ RM DRAT
�' . . y/• EASEMENT 490 / IS 24
TOPO D uSIN IGINAL TOPO FR \ 361 .y - ' /� • • /
\ / NOVEM 04 AND B ING NEW TOPO SH TS \ / f 222
421 �' H 4 / f� \ / A D PERIMETER. A WGH GRADING DON \ 347
,�/ / SIDE ORIGNAL T ITS WILL NOT BE R CTED \
X / ON THIS ADD
9 \ • • 4� 408 422 NO .HANG MADE T ORIGINAL TOPO IN AREAS \
SERNc4�3
4 O \ 459 / / 0 gNAL ROADS. �6020 / /
423 J � � / � ` / ¢ \ / / / TE oR ABANDON \ -' 348\ 0 319 \
WETLANDS E - * I A / f/ /� CONFOR M #3 CE I usE
424 LL ATION � � \ •: 100
* y /0 460 CP&L E SEMENT / R10 ST
s �\ 425
\ \ 426 a '9 g 4 \ 410 / J / rO
FH 6-L
CM / / l H n� / �1 358
Tw
I *.
MH 452 322 7p �p 17 1 316
MH 4 418 \ 411 j / 462
ro \ m 451 rn
\ EE1 PERMANENT
27 41 \ / 412 / / \ VA \ \ yoPEN SPA,y y y I rs
463 �/ MH / 48 4y / 1355-
450
4* 8 13�� / ti 35� \\ nEr W" a METER -
\\ 416 'T \ I 464 1 / a sw .1 y y 00 �"` ,` � TYP �
f�oo\\ * �� 484 - / 355 �dr 336 1* +202.0
o*
pc� i 449 \ \ * \ t7 338
29 353 \ V ■ _ 335 �
\�\4 46 483
448 / 202 r c... • .
/ 35
\ 4 �• �y y t
15 \ / / n, y..' y y 334 �. -..
\ 43 \ /l / �j / �_ ��a96.='�' / e 333 ne 2
482 604 y PERMANL44T y � E'I / 332
\ * 447 1 to OPEN SPACE
\ 431 \ / �� / / WE AKLA
ex y
WETLANDS S&EC \ `D "4° \ 467 r 481 slq.f4.L \ T.o ',
\\ �� ��s � \ 1; � agree 9�� \ y y FwM / x'!�' 331 Q ii iii �
5
43/ 4� \ \ y ��� y y / ° / \ * 330 a1 �% x' n p,NDS SdtEC
i 468�I A .1� / •' / \ 29 / � ��� zone ,
*
\ /\ 328 zone 2
o srMlE e `98' Prlva „ road
M / I \ /1 / �Q / / x ,
Iy 433 1 / \ O �.. j 2� / , o / e p•. can as
444 469 \ ��
7��0 /: / / \ 0 327
47927 x
F x
x`
I b I 434 I I I 1 1 / / y y x1�0 326 20
--- t E SE NT
I I " 443 470 / H 1 47 /
OD '
I 1 I <435 l I I 471�Rv�d
I I 442
I \ 477 / P ry a \
� N I ss ce \ \ \\ / / 1• y y Hie ` � � � � �
1 I 436 / 'I / o� ` 177
P II I I 2 / 476
\
II N I I 441 I � \ \ / �: y / i ti� � ry � ,' • 'o� N
+ 11 437 I I OOj�� \ 176
1 RIP-RAP0' I
_ __-- \ �' / / J • r APRON (\\,
I I Srgy DRAIN. _ \ � - � '�•�� GR I /••�' ` 7 175
FAST H F,.o A�fALL✓ED \ , �''�
I438 MH ' ' 9y G1 Q9 180
174
PERMANENT II M 1
0P a 173
i610 � �il // OOQ � � � •''• �
271 182
172
(A 1 F.,a` WETLANDS OT LOCATED
r N WE L #2 �\ ON SUT,' BJ T TRACT-`.
/ ,oa' sTRE F /
..... ry ��
e
� / oc 1 /
FLOOD W Y LINE /
CUD-R10 ZONING
,' orVOTLEDGE LANDING
Ds s&Ec / / / �e° / SUBDIVISION PH2 l
Bioretention
area no.
Drainage
area
(sa ft
Drainage
area
ac)
Impervious
area
(sa ft
la
Rv
WQV by Simple
Method
(cu ft)
0.75 WQV by
Simple Method
cu ft
WQV
Provided
(cu ft)
outlet
Wet Pond 1
950,500
21.82
213,008
0.22
0.252
19,936
20,110
FES #33 &37
Sand filter 2
128.938
2.96
54,014
0.42
0.427
4,588
3,441
3,475
BPS #54
Sand filter 3
148,104
3.40
65,776
0.44
0.450
5 550
4,163
5 160
BPS #54
Sand filter 4
87,120
2.00
39,204
0.45
0.455
3 303
2,477
3 175
BPS 63
Sand filter 5
143.748
3.30
79,715
0.55
0.549
6 578
4,933
5 110
FES 46
Sand filter 6
32 234
0.74
1 12,632
1 0.39
1 0.403
1 1,082
811
1 1,240
1 HW 4C
STORMWATER RUNOFF QUANTITIES (CFS)
AREA CONTROLLED 62.02 AC
1 Q10 Q100
PRE DEVELOPMENT
1 62.1
1 182.3
1 342.9
POST DEVELOPMENT
1 41.9
1 211.5
1 382.9
STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN TABLE
PIPE SECTION
A
A
IMP
GRASS
WOODED
C
Tc
Q(cfs)
Q(cfs)
PIPE L
RIM
US
DS
SLOPE
V
I
D req'd
D use
n
TYPE
FROM
TO
(sub)
(total)
AREA
AREA
AREA
SUB
(min)
SUB
TOTAL
(If)
ELEV
INV
INV
%
fps
(in)
PHASE 3
EXISTING STORM SYSTEM
CB #58
CB#5A
0.16
0.16
0.07
0.09
0.00
0.57
5.0
0.64
0.64
24
227.70
223.93
223.81
0.50
3.72
7.22
7.18
15
0.013
RCP
CB#5A
CB
0.14
0.16
0.09
0.05
0.00
0.71
5.0
0.71
1.35
52
227.70
223.81
223.55
0.50
3.72
7.22
9.49
15
0.013
RCP
CB#5
CB
0.17
0.17
0.09
0.07
0.00
0.66
5.0
0.81
2.16
24
228.51
223.55
223.43
0.50
3.72
7.22
11.31
15
0.013
RCP
CB#6
CB
0.08
0.32
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.62
5.0
0.34
2.50
189
228.51
223.43
216.55
3.64
10.03
7.22
8.24
15
0.013
RCP
1#88
CB#8A
2.62
2.62
1 0.81
1.81
0.00
0.50
5.0
9.47
9.47
40
221.00
217.00
216.81
0.47
5.91
7.22
17.32
18
0.009
HDPE
CB#8A
CB
0.48
0.48
0.36
0.12
0.00
0.78
5.0
2.71
12.17
24
222.43
216.81
216.69
0.50
6.06
7.22
18.85
18
0.009
HDPE
CB#8
CB
0.35
2.97
0.18
0.17
0.00
0.63
5.0
1.60
13.77
83
222.43
216.69
215.50
1.43
10.27
7.22
16.21
18
0.009
HDPE
CBf7
Ylf7A
0.20
3.17
0.07
0.13
0.00
0.53
5.0
0.78
17.05
113
223.00
215.50
209.50
5.31
13.68
7.22
15.77
18
0.013
RCP
YI#7A
CBf7C
0.32
3.82
0.09
0.22
0.00
0.49
5.0
1.13
18.18
94
214.50
209.50
200.50
9.57
18.37
7.22
14.46
18
0.013
RCP
CB#7C
CB #15
0.00
3.82
1 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.0
0.00
18.18
141
216.00
200.50
199.41
0.77
6.32
7.22
23.18
24
0.013
RCP
CB #15
CB #16
0.26
4.08
0.16
0.11
0.00
0.68
5.0
1.30
19.49
26
204.94
199.41
199.28
0.50
5.90
7.22
25.82
30
0.013
RCP
CB#16
CB#16A
0.27
4.35
0.16
0.11
0.00
0.68
5.0
1.32
20.81
80
204.63
199.28
197.90
1.72
10.96
7.22
20.98
30
0.013
RCP
CB/16B
CB#16A
0.82
5.17
0.42
0.40
0.00
0.64
5.0
3.77
3.77
24
203.26
199.85
199.73
0.50
3.72
7.22
13.94
15
0.013
RCP
CB#16A
CB#18
0.12
5.29
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.61
5.0
0.53
25.11
124
203.26
197.90
196.67
0.99
8.31
7.22
24.97
30
0.013
RCP
CB#17
CB#18
0.12
5.40
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.75
5.0
0.63
0.63
24
201.93
198.27
198.15
0.50
3.72
7.22
7.13
15
0.013
RCP
CB#18
SMH#19
0.22
5.62
0.12
0.10
0.00
0.66
5.0
1.03
26.14
73
201.93
196.57
196.20
0.51
6.71
7.22
28.75
36
0.013
RCP
SMH#19
FES#19A
0.00
5.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.0
0.00
26.14
8
201.93
196.20
196.15
0.62
7.45
7.22
27.64
36
0.013
RCP
FLUME#5
0.92
0.92
0.48
0.44
0.00
0.64
5.0
4.26
4.26
10
264.40
NA
NA
4.00
1.60
7.22
NA
NA
0.035
NA
STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN TABLE
PIPE SECTION
A
A
IMP
GRASS
WOODED
C
Tc
0(cfs)
Q(cfs)
PIPE L
RIM
US
DS
SLOPE
V
I
D req'd
D use
n
TYPE
FROM
TO
(sub)
(total)
AREA
AREA
AREA
SUB
(min)
SUB
TOTAL
(If)
ELEV
INV
INV
%
fps
(in)
CB#11CB
0.38
0.38
0.11
0.26
0.00
0.50
5.0
1.35
1.35
27
221.83
218.00
217.85
0.56
3.92
7.22
9.31
15
0.013
RCP
CB 2
SMH 2
0.09
0.46
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.80
5.0
0.50
1.85
7
221.83
217.85
217.66
2.71
8.66
7.22
7.76
15
0.013
RCP
SMH#2
SMH#3
0.00
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.0
0.00
1.85
84
222.00
217.66
212.00
6.74
13.65
7.22
6.56
15
0.013
RCP
SMH#3
SMH#4
0.00
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.0
0.00
1.85
93
217.00
212.00
210.38
1.74
6.94
7.22
8.45
15
0.013
RCP
SMH#4
CB#4A
0.00
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.0
0.00
1.85
6
214.14
210.38
210.35
0.50
3.72
7.22
10.68
15
0.013
RCP
CB#4A
CB#4B
0.10
0.56
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.63
5.0
0.47
2.32
28
214.14
210.35
210.20
0.54
3.85
7.22
11.48
15
0.013
RCP
CB#48
HW#4C
0.17
0.74
0.05
0.12
0.00
0.50
5.0
0.63
2.95
18
214.14
210.20
210.09
0.61
4.11
7.22
12.25
15
0.013
RCP
RSR#4D
FES#4E
0.03
0.77
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.30
5.0
0.07
0.07
45
211.20
207.75
207.5
0.56
3.92
7.22
3.06
15
0.013
RCP
CB#22
FES#23
1.37
1.37
0.69
0.68
0.00
0.63
5.0
6.20
6.20
90
204.70
200.54
199.00
1.71
6.88
7.22
13.34
15
0.013
RCP
HW#10
HWP11
42.11
42.11
3.10
39.01
0.00
0.35
5.0
105.75
105.75
60
222.50
216.35
216.00
0.58
4.02
7.22
47.30
15
0.013
RCP
HW#4A
HW#4B
1.62
1.62
0.13
1.50
0.00
0.35
5.0
4.11
109.86
36
212.00
206.90
206.50
1.11
5.54
7.22
42.52
15
0.013
RCP
CB#24
CB#25
0.34
0.34
0.28
0.07
0.00
0.82
5.0
2.04
2.04
24
212.00
208.00
207.85
0.63
4.16
7.22
10.61
15
0.013
RCP
CB#25
CB#26
0.39
0.73
0.11
0.27
0.00
0.49
5.0
1.38
3.42
86
212.00
207.85
206.50
1.57
6.59
7.22
10.84
15
0.013
RCP
CB#26
CB#27
0.33
1.06
0.03
0.30
0.00
0.35
5.0
0.84
4.25
36
208.50
203.50
203.20
0.83
4.80
7.22
13.26
15
0.013
RCP
C8127A
CB#27
0.47
0.47
0.12
0.35
0.00
0.46
5.0
1.56
1.56
38
209.50
205.00
203.00
5.26
12.06
7.22
6.44
15
0.013
RCP
CB#27
CB#28
0.70
2.22
0.09
0.60
0.00
0.39
5.0
1.95
7.77
47
208.50
203.50
201.75
3.72
10.14
7.22
12.55
15
0.013
RCP
CB#28
CB#29
0.30
2.52
0.25
0.05
0.00
0.85
5.0
1.84
9.60
141
206.10
201.75
197.80
2.80
8.80
7.22
14.33
15
0.013
RCP
C8129A
CB#29
0.53
0.53
0.25
0.27
0.00
0.61
5.0
2.32
2.32
26
202.40
197.95
197.80
0.58
3.99
7.22
11.32
15
0.013
RCP
CB#29
CB#30
0.39
3.37
0.17
0.22
0.00
0.58
5.0
1.62
13.07
119
202.20
197.80
195.90
1.60
7.50
7.22
17.88
18
0.013
RCP
CB#30
CB#31
0.28
3.65
0.10
0.17
0.00
0.54
5.0
1.08
14.15
47
201.45
195.90
195.00
1.91
8.21
7.22
17.80
18
0.013
RCP
CB/31A
CB#31
0.70
0.70
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.62
5.0
3.14
3.14
51
201.45
197.00
196.00
1.96
7.36
7.22
10.08
15
0.013
RCP
CB#31
CB#32
0.65
5.00
0.23
0.42
0.00
0.53
5.0
2.49
19.78
105
201.00
195.00
193.10
1.81
9.67
7.22
20.40
24
0.013
RCP
CB#32
FES#33
0.22
5.22
0.90
0.02
0.00
0.89
1 5.0
1.38
21.17
55
200.05
193.10
192.80
rO.55
6.16
7.22
26.20
30
0.013
RCP
Y
OWN
FLOOD PLAIN
W
Nitrogen Reductions
Total Site
51.90
Area
IMP
Open
Permanent
#TN
% Reduction
# removed
#TN
total area
Wet Pond #1
3.18
5.36
1.00
74.45
25
18.61
55.84
9.54
Sand filter 2
1.24
1.72
0.00
28.35
35
9.92
18.43
2.96
Sand filter 3
1.51
1.89
0.00
34.28
35
12.00
22.28
3.40
Sand filter 4
0.901
1.10
0.00
20.40
1 35
7.14
13.26
2.00
Sand filter 5
1.83
1.47
0.00
40.56
35
14.20
26.36
3.30
Wetland area 6
2.85
5.17
7.80
71.30
40
28.52
42.78
15.82
Grass Swale 7a
3.00
2.96
0.00
67.15
20
13.43
53.72
5.96
Veg buffer 7b
0.64
0.60
3.98
16.68
30
5.00
11.67
5.22
Sand filter 6 7c
0.29
0.22
0.00
6.41
35
2.24
4.17
0.51
Wetland area 1b
0.03
3.14
0.00
4.38
40
1.75
2.63
3.17
15.47
23.63
12.78
363.96
112.82
251.14
51.9
TN Der Acre
4.84
1.00
final loadinj
target
idiff
ac
offset fee
bu down
bu down
1 4.841
3.61
1.241
51.90
1 850.51
1 54 771.66
R-30 ZONING
HUNTSBORO SUBDIASR
LOT 15
BM 1995 PAGE 1214
/ 115 91�
c
m
a n6
n
m
s�
a
n' 117 _
R- NPF
- 118
119
LOT
- 120 BM 1995
121
GRAPHIC SCALE
,Da D 50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT COUNTY OF
WAKE, TOWN OF KNIGHTDALE AND NCDOT STANDARD DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. A COMPLETE COORDINATE LISTING AND AUTOCAD RELEASE 14
DRAWING FILE ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FROM THIS FIRM.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. CONTACT ULOCO AT 1-
800-632-4949 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
4. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED ON PLANS.
5. ALL PAVEMENT ON SITE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TYPICAL
SECTION DETAILS ON DETAIL SHEETS.
6. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE
TOP OF ASPHALT OR FINISHED SURFACE.
7. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, AND NOT
INDICATED TO BE PAVED OR PLANTED, UPON COMPLETION OF
GRADING ACTIVITIES. USE REBEL 3 FESCUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SEEDING SCHEDULE ON DETAIL SHEETS.
8. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND
FEATURES.
9. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR LOCATION OF VAULTS, BACKFLOW
PROTECTION ON FIRELINES AND PIPE SPECIFICATIONS OF FIRELINES.
10. THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN WAS FIELD LOCATED BY THIS FIRM.
11. ALL SANITARY SEWER SLOPES AND PIPE LENGTHS ARE COMPUTED
FROM CENTER OF MANHOLE TO CENTER OF MANHOLE.
12. CONSTRUCT ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES FLUSH TO FINAL
PAVEMENT GRADE OR AS SHOWN IN NON -PAVED AREAS.
13. SEWER LATERALS TO BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1% ON
4" LINES AND 0.5% ON 6" LINES. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PLACED
AT 50' INTERVALS AND AT BEND POINTS. ALL CLEANOUTS IN PAVED
AREAS SHALL BE APPROVED LOAD BEARING TYPE.
14. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' OF COVER.
15. CONSTRUCT ALL FIRE HYDRANTS WITH BASE FLANGE SIX INCHES
ABOVE FINAL GRADE.
16. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ENTIRE R/W WITHIN 100' OF
ALL INTERSECTIONS.
17. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSURING POSITIVE
DRAINAGE TO ALL STORM STRUCTURES.
18. DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF ALL PRIVATE STREETS. COPIES OF CERTIFIED
INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY
NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER NOTE:
THE NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION AND MAINTENANCE RULE (15A
NCAC 2B.0233) APPLIES TO ALL PERENNIAL AND INTERMITTENT STREAMS, LAKES,
PONDS AND ESTUARIES IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN WITH FOREST VEGETATION ON
THE ADJACENT LAND OR "RIPARIAN AREA". IN RIPARIAN AREAS WITH EXISTING
FOREST VEGETATION IN THE FIRST 30 FEET DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE STREAM,
THE RULE PROHIBITS LAND DISTURBANCE, NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FERTILIZER USE
WITHIN THE FIRST 50 FEET OF LAND NEXT TO THE WATER. IN RIPARIAN ARES
WITH FOREST VEGETATION THAT IS LESS THAN 30 FEET WIDE, THE RULE PROHIBITS
LAND DISTURBANCE, NEW DEVELOPMENTAND FERTILIZER USE WITHIN THE AREA
THAT CONTAINS FOREST VEGETATION (BUT NOT THE ENTIRE 50 FOOT RIPARIAN
AREA). FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS RIPARIAN AREA RULE, PLEASE
CONTACT THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY S WETLAND/401 UNIT AT
919-733-1786.
11
a
rn
t~
f�
• �
Ub
0
� � i:i
o I °o�'
NbiD�DO
� 0 0 Do
r.
A .°
as
� 'DO
-Z0
I N
N CO
NM
��aoCCoo�0
w
kn
ii
F.,
d. 1 o
CD
} II
} PL1 .:-, (U
as A I� z
z
3 U J w
400 � = U Q w
I 1l U 0 1l O�
STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN TABLE
PIPE SECTION
A
A
IMP
GRASS
WOODED
C
Tc
Q(cfs)
Q(cfs)
PIPE L
RIM
US
DS
SLOPE
V
I
D req'd
D use
n
TYPE
FROM
TO
(sub)
(total)
AREA
AREA
AREA
SUB
(min)
SUB
TOTAL
(If)
ELEV
INV
INV
%
fps
(in)
FES#34
CB#35
14.97
14.97
2.00
8.47
4.50
0.36
18.7
23.90
23.90
15
19(.50
192.50
192.25
1.67
10.77
7.22
22.24
30
0.013
RCP
CB#35
CB36
0.33
15.30
0.17
0.16
0.00
0.64
5 0
1.52
25.42
25
197.80
192.25
191.84
1.64
10.69
7.22
22.83
30
0.013
RCP
CB#36
FES#37
0.29
15.59
I_
0.07
0.00
0.80
5.0
1.69
27.11
64
197.80
191.84
191.50
0.53
6.8;
7.22
H.89
36
0.013
RCP
RSR#38
FES#39
21.82
21.82
4.89
11.66
5.27
0.42
5.0
66.41
66.41
100
193.75
190.00
189.70
0.30
4.57
7.22
45.00
2-30
0.013
RCP
CB#40
CB#41
0.32
0.32
0.18
0.13
0.00
0.67
5.0
1.55
1.55
24
208.75
205.25
205.10
0.63
4.16
7.22
9.59
15
0.013
RCP
CB#41
CB#42
0.38
0.70
0.13
0.25
0.00
0.52
5.0
1.42
2.97
345
208.75
205.10
193.00
3.51
9.84
7.22
8.85
15
0.013
RCP
CB#42
CB#43
0.59
1.29
0.03
0.56
0.00
0.33
5.0
1.41
4.38
24
198.00
193.00
192.75
1.04
5.37
7.22
12.85
15
0.013
RCP
CB#43
CB#44
0.51
1.79
0.37
0.14
0.00
0.77
5.0
2.83
7.20
163
198.00
192.75
190.35
1.47
6.38
7.22
14.52
15
0.013
RCP
CB44A
CB#44
0.37
0.37
0.19
0.18
0.00
0.63
&0
1.69
1.69
32
194.55
190.55
190.35
0.63
4.16
7.22
9.89
15
0.013
RCP
CB#44
SMH#45
0.23
2.40
0.01
0.22
0.00
0.34
5.0
0.57
9.46
130
194.65
190.35
188.15
0.92
7.72
7.22
15.67
18
0.013
RCP
SMH#45
FES#46
0.00
2.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.0
0.00
9.46
30
192.35
188.15
188.00
0.50
4.20
7.22
19.69
18
0.013
RCP
CB#49
CB#50
1.13
1.13
0.07
1.06
0.00
0.34
5.0
2.77
2.77
32
194.50
190.80
190.50
0.94
5.09
7.22
11.05
15
0.013
RCP
CB#.50
CB#51
0.56
1.69
0.09
0.47
0.00
0.41
5.0
1.65
4.42
24
195.10
190.50
190.35
0.63
4.16
7.22
14.20
15
0.013
RCP
CB#51
CB#52
0.12
1.81
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.95
5.0
0.83
5.25
41
195.20
190.35
190.00
0.85
4.86
7.22
14.28
15
0.013
RCP
CB#52
CB#53
0.62
2.43
0.13
0.49
0.00
0.44
&0
1.94
7.19
24
193.75
190.00
189.60
1.67
9.29
7.22
12.60
15
0.013
RCP
CB#53
BPS#54
0.18
2.61
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.67
5.0
0.86
8.05
100
193.75
189.60
189.00
0.50
7.89
7.22
18.53
18
0.013
RCP
CB#61
CB#62
0.78
0.78
0.18
0.60
0.00
0.45
5.0
2.55
2.55
24
193.75
189.70
189.55
0.62
5.37
7.22
10.50
15
0.013
RCP
CB#62
BPS#63
0.18
0.96
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.67
5.0
0.88
0.88
110
193.75
189.55
189.00
0.50
4.76
7.22
7.37
15
0.013
RCP
D1#64
FES#65
0.30
0.30
0.07
0.23
0.00
0.45
5.0
0.97
3.94
110
195.50
192.50
191.50
0.91
5.01
7.22
12.67
15
0.013
RCP
FLUME#5
0.92
0.92
0.48
0.44
0.00
0.64
5.0
4.26
4.26
10
197.00
197.00
196.50
4.00
7.22
NA
NA
0.035
NA
FLUME#3
0.74
1.70
0.16
0.58
0.00
0.44
5.0
2.33
3.21
10
192.00
192.00
191.50
5.00
7.22
NA
na
NA
NA
FLUME#4
1.44
1.44
0.28
1.16
0.00
0.42
5.0
4.41
4.41
10
192.00
192.00
191.50
5.00
7.22
NA.
no
NA
NA
C1
M••�1
c )
W
O
W
�
O
V 1
T4
M••I-•1
1�
r�^/�
!-�•1
V1

STREAM CROSSING - PUMP BY-PASS NOTES1.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN THESTREAM OR TRAVERSE STREAM UNTIL THE DAY OF PIPEINSTALLATION.2.CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN LIMITS OFDISTURBANCE.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS ANDENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATERWHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A FILTER BAG PLACED INCONJUNCTION WITH APPROPRIATE E&SC MEASURES. INSTALL12-INCH COMPOST FILTER SOCK ON THREE DOWNGRADIENTSIDES OF FILTER BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACEDWITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.4.SCREEN PUMP INTAKES TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINMENT OF AQUATICLIFE. PLACE PUMP INTAKE IN SUMP HOLE/POOL UPSTREAM OFUPSTREAM COFFER DAM. PLACE BYPASS HOSE OUTSIDE OFSTREAM BANKS WITH DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OFDOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM BEFORE COMMENCING BYPASS.TAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT STREAMBED SCOUR AT PUMPDISCHARGE THROUGH THE USE OF AN ENERGY DIFFUSER. TAKEREASONABLE MEASURES TO PREVENT INTAKE FROM SUCTIONINGTHE STREAM SUBSTRATE.5.THE PUMP(S) SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONVEY NORMALSTREAM FLOW. HAVE STANDBY PUMPS AND GENERATORSCAPABLE OF HANDLING 100% OF ANTICIPATED FLOW ON-SITE INCASE OF PUMP FAILURE OR A RAIN EVENT. CONTINUOUSLYMONITOR THE DAM AND PUMPS TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATIONTHROUGHOUT THE STREAM CROSSING. ALL PUMPS SHALL BEPLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.6.THE STREAM CROSSING SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TOTHE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS SHOWN ONPERMITTED PLANS. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THECONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT THE STREAM CROSSING. EXTENDSILT FENCE 20-FT. MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OFCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.7.LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTIONEASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAMBANKS AND WITHIN 10-FT. OF TOP OF BANK, EXCEPT WITHIN THETRENCHLINE OR FOR SAFETY PURPOSE.8.THE STREAM CROSSING SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY"DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONSSHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANTICIPATEDRAINFALL EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING,INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.9.THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMALAMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THEMORNING, INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL OCCURWITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATIONEXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THEENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BEDSUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE.11.NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHINSTREAM OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSEDEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS.12.THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALCONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCECONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEENBACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENTPRACTICAL.13.ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY INORDER TO PROTECT THE AFFECTED STREAM AND PREVENTVIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.14.ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR TO ASSIST IN DETERMINATION OFWHETHER PUMP AROUND OR FLUME STREAM CROSSING METHODIS TO BE USED.15.REFER TO ADDITIONAL FIGURES PROVIDED WITH PCN FORDESIGNATION OF NCDOT ROW, PERMANENT EASEMENT, ANDTEMPORARY WORKSPACE DIMENSIONS AT THE STREAMCROSSING.20-FT. MIN. (TYP.)LODLODLODLODLOD■■■■■■■■■■■■LODLODTRENCHLODLODLODBY-PASS PUMP WITHSECONDARYCONTAINMENTBY-PASS HOSESCREEN INTAKE(TYP.)COFFER DAM(TYP.)TRENCHDEWATERING HOSETBTBPROPOSED PIPESTREAM
FLOW
10-FT. (TYP.)50-FT. RIPARIAN BUFFER (TYP.)SCREEN INTAKE(TYP.)DEWATERING PUMPWITH SECONDARYCONTAINMENTTOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
OHWM
DIFFUSERSILT FENCE OR 12-IN.COMPOST FILTER SOCKCONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR(PERMANENT + TEMPORARY)10-FT. TO 15-FT.(SEE NOTE 15)FIGURE NO.Drawing path: Q:\7335\19\094 DENC Rutledge\DWG\DETAILS\STREAM_CROSSING.dwg
PROJECT NUMBERDATE:SCALE: RUTLEDGE LANDING SERVICE LIEN
WAKE COUNTY , NORTH CAROLINAD‑011/06/2020STREAM CROSSING - PUMP BY-PASS
N.T.S.7335-19-094
STREAM CROSSING - POST-CONSTRUCTION NOTES1.AFTER THE PIPELINE IS INSTALLED, RESTORE STREAMBED & BANKSUBGRADE TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL,.AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE,TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.2.UPON COMPLETION OF CONTOUR RESTORATION, DISTURBED STREAMBANKS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH RIPARIAN SEED MIX (SEE RIPARIANSEED SPECIFICATIONS).3.RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL EXTEND FROM 50-FT. LANDWARD OF THETOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK.4.INSTALL COIR MATTING ON STREAM BANKS. COIR MATTING SHALL BENORTH AMERICAN GREEN BIONET C700BN OR ENGINEER APPROVEDEQUIVALENT.5.COIR MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM 10 FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOPOF BANK TO DOWNSLOPE TOE OF BANK. DO NOT INSTALL COIRMATTING IN STREAM BED.6.INSTALL TEMPORARY MATTING ON SLOPES ADJACENT TO STREAMBANKS. TEMPORARY MATTING SHALL BE NORTH AMERICAN GREENBIONET SC150BN OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT.7.TEMPORARY MATTING ON SLOPES SHALL EXTEND FROM COIRMATTING A MINIMUM OF 40-FT. LANDWARD.8.FOLLOWING PIPELINE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT FENCE ORCOMPOST FILTER SOCKS PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTIONEASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS.9.PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE RESTRICTEDTO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 10-FT.IN WIDTH.10.REFER TO ADDITIONAL FIGURES PROVIDED WITH PCN FORDESIGNATION OF NCDOT ROW, PERMANENT EASEMENT, ANDTEMPORARY WORKSPACE DIMENSIONS AT EACH STREAM CROSSING.STREAM CROSSING - POST-CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE1.INSPECT STREAM CROSSING E&SC MEASURES AT LEAST ONCE PER 7CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAIN EVENT GREATERTHAN OR EQUAL TO 1.0-IN. IN 24 HOURS.ORDINARY HIGHWATER MARK (OHWM)5-FT. MIN. COVER DEPTHCOIR MATTINGSTREAM BANKS = C700BN(10-FT. + STREAM BANK)RIPARIAN SEEDING AREA (TYP.)(50-FT. + STREAM BANK)TEMPORARY MATTING = SC150BNTBSTREAM SECTION VIEWTRENCH BREAKER(TYP.)20-FT. MIN. (TYP.)LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LODLODTBTBTEMPORARY MATTING = SC150BNTB10-FT. (TYP.)50-FT. RIPARIAN BUFFER (TYP.)STREAM
FLOW
COIR MATTINGSTREAM BANKS = C700BNTOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
OHWM
STREAM PLAN VIEWSILT FENCE OR 12-IN.COMPOST FILTER SOCKCONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR(PERMANENT + TEMPORARY)10-FT. TO 15-FT.(SEE NOTE 10)FIGURE NO.Drawing path: Q:\7335\19\094 DENC Rutledge\DWG\DETAILS\STREAM_CROSSING.dwg
PROJECT NUMBERDATE:SCALE: RUTLEDGE LANDING SERVICE LINE
WAKE COUNTY , NORTH CAROLINAD‑021/06/2020STREAM CROSSING - POST-CONSTRUCTION
N.T.S.7335-19-094
TOP OF BANK
30 MIL HDPE LINERTOP OF BANK
COFFER DAM NOTES1.CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHINEDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCTDAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 30MIL HDPE LINER OR CLEAN STEEL PLATE DRIVENINTO THE STREAM BANKS AND STREAM BED. USESANDBAGS TO SHORE STEEL PLATE IF NEEDED.2.THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER (HC) DAM SHALL BECALCULATED USING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWINGMETHODS.A.HC = HB/4 + 1-FT. (HB = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANKIN FEET) WITH A 2-FT. MINIMUM DAM HEIGHTB.HC = BASE FLOW + 1-FT. (BASE FLOW TO BEIDENTIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION) THE GREATER OF THE TWO RESULTING HEIGHTSSHALL BE USED FOR THE COFFER DAM.ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ONFLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OFCONSTRUCTION.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OFSANDBAG COFFER DAM.4.SAND BAGS SHOULD BE PLACED ALONG THE EDGESOF THE COFFER DAM TO KEEP WATER FROMCUTTING AROUND THE COFFER DAM.TOE OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
30 MIL HDPE LINER30 MIL HDPE LINEROHWMOHWM
OHWM
STREAM FLOW
STREAM FLOWA'ACROSS-SECTION A-A'COFFER DAM SECTION VIEWPLAN VIEWTOP OF BANKHBHCHBHCSANDBAGS (TYP.)FIGURE NO.Drawing path: Q:\7335\19\094 DENC Rutledge\DWG\DETAILS\COFFER_DAM.dwg
PROJECT NUMBERDATE:SCALE: RUTLEDGE LANDING SERVICE LINE
WAKE COUNTY , NORTH CAROLINAD‑031/06/2020COFFER DAM
N.T.S.7335-19-094
1762094724
817 STOLLS LN
1762092764
901 STOLLS LN
1752993555
5432 RUTLEDGEVILLE LN
S
TO
L
L
S

L
AN
E
21
0
20021021+76
20+0
0
21+
0
0
■
■
■
■
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■
■
■
■
EXISTING RIPRAP (TYP.)
10-FT.NSTREAM S3
15-FT.
FIGURE NO.Drawing path: Q:\7335\19\094 DENC Rutledge\DWG\733519094_INS.dwgPROJECT NUMBER
DATE:
SCALE:RUTLEDGE GAS PIPELINE EXTENSIONWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA5
5/20/2020 IMPACT EXHIBIT1" = 20'
7335-19-094
REFERENCE:
TAX PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM THE WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) DEPARTMENTS. 2016
TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS DERIVED FROM NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (NCDPS) NC SPATIAL DATA DOWNLOAD TOOL.
THIS DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM) IN WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WAS CONVERTED INTO 2-FOOT CONTOURS USING ARCGIS SPATIAL ANALYST.
HYDROLOGY DATA OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHY DATASET
AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS). 2017 AERIAL
ORTHOIMAGERY OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. NATURAL RESOURCES
DELINEATION PERFORMED BY S&ME PERSONNEL IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER
2019. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED LAND DISTURBANCE AREA IS
APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. 
EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR (2-FT.)
EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR (10-FT.)
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING RIPRAP
RIPARIAN BUFFER (ZONE 1 - 30-FT.)
RIPARIAN BUFFER (ZONE 2 - 20-FT.)
LEGEND:
PROPOSED NATURAL GAS MAIN
CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR
TEMPORARY MATTING (NAG SC150BN)
COIR MATTING (NAG C700BN)
SILT FENCE
COFFER DAM
■■■■■■■
REINFORCED SILT FENCE
ZONE 2 = 328 S.F.
ZONE 1 = 462 S.F.
ZONE 2 = 332 S.F.
ZONE 1 = 484 S.F.
PERMANENT IMPACT
SILT FENCE OUTLET
PHOTOGRAPH 1
VIEWING DIRECTION: SW
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
S1 facing downstream towards
bridge.
PHOTOGRAPH 2
VIEWING DIRECTION: NE
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
S1 facing upstream.
1
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
PHOTOGRAPH 3
VIEWING DIRECTION: SE
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
S1 as it flows under stream.
PHOTOGRAPH 4
VIEWING DIRECTION: N
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: Facing
towards Stream 1 and new phase of
Rutledge Landing.
2
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
PHOTOGRAPH 5
VIEWING DIRECTION: S
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
S1 facing towards existing phase of
Rutledge Landing.
PHOTOGRAPH 6
VIEWING DIRECTION: N
DESCRIPTION/COMMENT: View of
S1 and existing bridge.
3
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
1
Restoration Plan
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts where practicable. As
part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan shall be implemented to restore the
temporarily-affected stream. This plan entails restoration of temporarily-disturbed areas to their original
contours and conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion. Unless otherwise authorized by
the appropriate permits, no fills or spoils of any kind will be permanently placed along the stream banks.
Further, disturbed streambanks will be permanently stabilized using coir matting (with no plastic or nylon)
and native vegetative cover.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and restoration of original pre-
disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to the trench to the extent possible, and
remaining excess material relocated and retained on an upland site. The top several inches of excavated
streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then replaced uniformly over the area of
excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be utilized within
temporarily-disturbed streambanks and riparian buffer areas.
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix
Species Common Name Percentage Of Mix
Agrostis perennans Autumn bentgrass 15
Andropogon gerardii Big bluestem 10
Coreopsis lanceolata Lanceleaf coreopsis 10
Elymus virginicus Virginia wildrye 20
Juncus effusus Soft rush 5
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass 15
Rudbeckia hirta Blackeyed susan 10
Schizachyrium scoparium Little bluestem 5
Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass 5
Tripsacum dactyloides Eastern gamagrass 5
Riparian Seed Mix is to be applied to all disturbed streambanks and buffer areas. The recommended
application rate: 20 lbs. per acre.
Restoration Plan
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Wake County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-094
2
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Table 1 should also be augmented with the appropriate
cover/companion species, as identified in Table 2.
Table 2: Cover/Companion Crops
Species Common Season Mix Notes:
Secale cereale Cereal or
Winter rye
Early Spring or
Fall 30 lbs/acre Grows 3-4' tall, but not a strong a
competitor.
Lolium perenne Perennial rye Early Fall or
Spring 15 lbs /acre Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years,
then dies out.
Urocloa ramose Brown Top
Millet Spring, Summer 15 lbs / acre Good germination; dies off with
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
Substitutions to the riparian and wetland mixes identified in this restoration plan may be made with prior
approval. Any substitutions shall consist of appropriate native species.
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the Typical Stream Crossing
Details. Riparian seed mix is available at:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store
Road Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
May 15, 2020
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1214
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749
Project Name: Rutledge Landing Service Line

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
05/15/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
05/15/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749   3

▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
05/15/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
05/15/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2020-SLI-1214
Event Code:04EN2000-2020-E-02749
Project Name:Rutledge Landing Service Line
Project Type:OIL OR GAS
Project Description:Roadside gas service line
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.75099650930346N78.45949530601503W
Counties:Wake, NC
05/15/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed
Endangered
1
05/15/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-02749   4

Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed
Threatened
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Endangered
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
NCNHDE-12044
May 15, 2020
Joey Lawler
S&ME
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 29273
RE: Rutledge Landing Service Line; 733519094
Dear Joey Lawler:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Rutledge Landing Service Line
Project No. 733519094
May 15, 2020
NCNHDE-12044
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Bird 15047 Picoides borealis Red-cockaded
Woodpecker
1977-01 X 4-Low Endangered Endangered G3 S2
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G5 S2?
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
Wake County Open Space - Lake Myra County Park Wake County Local Government
Town of Knightdale Open Space Town of Knightdale Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on May 15, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3