20081549 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090421

V
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: Z. Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: US 70 south from Goldsboro. Pass through intersection with NC 111. Right onto Casey Dairy Road. Site at
end of road
1. Office Review Information:
- - -
Project Number: 20081549
Project Name: Casey Dairy-Walnut Creek Buffer Restora
County(ies): Wayne
Basin & subbasin: Neuse 03020202
Nearest Stream: Walnut Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; NSW
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status:
Total Mitiqation on Site
Wetland:
Stream:
Buffer: 72 acres
Nutr. Offset:
Proiect History
Event Event Date
Report Receipt: Monitoring 5/27/2008
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
Il. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20081549-1 72 acres Buffer Restoration

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
i
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 72 acres Buffer Restoration Component ID: 20081549-1
Description: Walnut Creek and ditches
Location within project:
III. Buffer Site Details:
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Streams verified by DWQ: Yes No Buffer Width:
Comments: Comments:
Total Acres: Total Acres:
Restored Acres: Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres: Enhanced Acres:
Buffer Width: 50' > 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) Yes No
IV. Success Criteria Evaluation:
VEGETATION: Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
NOTE: Success Criteria is 320 spa
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas and associated stream bank (e.g. bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc.)
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
Easement Marking Method:
List any remaining issues to address (e.g. plant survival, easement encroachment, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional Comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Label and attach photos to
this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important field observations.
- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2
f cn z
a
no
M
= r
r1
I R1-
CD
o Z
.iS"LU.000' N S?"L1.000 IV

r I
5Q
i
q
t ` f
w. ? 1 r
?Fd? / \ t
a ?
c
t +Ft
a 1 I
0, Ln
r I ,

,
ei ?' b' M
1
I
0
° 7-
! \
?
r '
9
1
••
o
to ?
!
?l I t
-
_
f o

Isf
I ? ? ? \ 111 W
i ?{
6
? ? I
,
•
?
? • i ' [
`•/ r'__/% ?l - , i \'? ?rV •? if 9 t \?i • 9 . r i ? !?1.
3J'LV.UVV N
35°21.000' N
O
0
O
M.
eY
l?
CL
O
D
0
0
0
10
O
3^
01
Ln
lD
tL
eY
O
CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 26 ?GS Cry O ? !?v
Dr \IV J
Ly To . ;' Ke - - Dry
/
NoA We W Len • NoB ' To 14"' '('T .:
Go D l• Dr Go To Ke TQ'
)70 We NoA Ke.• /We POCOSI., - -
777 7 Dr To We We
P. Ly
oP Dr
We •''
We ..j
Ra s /
?, Ke To
\\ i., a Go Dr / We
\ \.\ Dr To i • Ly WaB Ra
i
W.13 e Go
'ller
1 NoB
?? Chu h Ra La
r\\ Ra L y Go NoA is,... Dr We
?.
Ly WaC 4is Ke
\ • 70 1 I Ke _
Ke
ka • • w Noe ?oG Wa? NoA Wa6 Go
Go Fla • • Bb ? Ly
iti We
Ra Or y Ly • ( Go / Ly
Go D,
\ \ . NoA/ Ra •Ly Ra
Ga; ` Ly NoA Js NoA • / J We
R a
Go Ra
A NoA • We -
7 6 ( i
b' NoB Js I; Bb / G Go \ , •, Casey
?o a? Pei
Ra
Ke Ly Ke Ly
NoA
Ra Ra
Ly
Nob --+ Ly NoA Ly • Ra '\ . -
LY
8
Go . Ly_ I^
:e NaA is \ NoB n
\ Ra a
v
NoC Go N
Ly
NoC•; Go 0
Go Ly NoA Kew ,
Bb Ke Noe 2 \ / Noe Ly
U \`
<? o Go
I
?l We is Bb . ?' ti09
Dr Ke • 2
•<' NuA os'
Ke
?Ln t/4/ Ra
Ke NoC Ke
To
is A is
Dr We We • `` \?l .
Is ?? ?,WaD
Ke Wa8
Ke Tr I r -
Ke WaC A
P _ - 1
Ke We -NoA
L a We Tr Tr ` Js \. Ra. NoB
/ } La Ln i
L\ a J We ?-? ? WaC
We ` WaB Tr CrC2 \
Po is
Ke
I; i Ln ?
We WaB Go n
La Bb
R m
Wae
We Ln _ Ln 66
Tr
We? Ke oC
La
To ... La Ln Tr Wal
La •...
Rm Ke La Ke
Tr -
71 To La / Dr ?Ii Tr
Ke
La ?z
I
Ln Ke ai% Ke Le Ke \b -mil wo
La I • / - -- - - / Ke ` Ln aD
La aBW '