U-2306

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
74 4i ?e
D E N R
September 15, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dome
From: Cyndi Bell L
Subject: Finding of No Significant Impact for Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension from
Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue Northeast in Hickory
Catawba County
State Project No. 8.2791701, T.I.P. No. U-2306A;
DENR #99E-0148; DWQ #12206
The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands. The project will involve no fill in
wetlands. Two unnamed perennial stream crossings will be required. NCDOT has sufficiently
demonstrated avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts. The project, as
currently planned, would not require wetland or stream mitigation.
Based upon the wetland impacts described in the FONSI, a General Certification will be
applicable to this project. Final permit authorization will require formal application by NCDOT
and written concurrence from DWQ. Please be aware that this approval will be contingent upon
evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical,
and provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the FONSI. DOT is
reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality
concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Cyndi Bell at [phone] in
DWQ's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Steve Lund, COE, Asheville
Mark Cantrell, FWS
David Cox, WRC
Mike Parker, ARO
U2306AFON
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 17, 1997
MEMORANDUM
To: Michelle Suverkrubb
Through: John Dorne
From'. C y n d 1 Bell C` L
r41 e
?EHNF?
Subject: Environmental Assessment for Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue Northeast in
Hickory
Catawba County
State Project No. 8.2791701, T.I.P. No. U-2306A; EHNR #98-0312
The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including
wetlands. The project will involve no fill in wetlands. Two unnamed
perennial stream crossings will be required. DWQ offers the following
comments based on the document review:
A) NCDOT has sufficiently demonstrated avoidance and minimization of
wetland and stream impacts. The project., as currently planned, would
not require wetland or stream mitigation.
Based upon the wetland impacts described in the EA, General Certification 3103
will be applicable to this project. Final permit authorization will require
formal application by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ. Please be
aware that this approval will be contingent upon evidence of avoidance and
minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and
provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. DOT is
reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires
satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that. water quality standards
are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Questions regarding the 401
Certification should be directed to Cyndi Bell at [phone] in DWQ's Water
Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Steve Lund, COE, Asheville
Mark Cantrell, FWS
David Cox, WRC
U2306AEA.DOC
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Q - Water` (Vuatity Section

Date:
MEMORANDUM
TT: Env. Sciences Branch (WO Lab)
p Trish MacPherson (end. sps)
O Kathy Herring (forest/ORw/HQw)
p Larry Ausiey (ecosystems)
O Matt Mathews (toxicology)
p Jay Sauber (intensive survey)
Non-Discharge Branch (Archdale 9th)
O Kim Colson (Permitting)
Wetlands (WQ Lab)
O John Dorney (Corps, 401)
Cyndi Bell (DOl)
p Eric Fle-k (dredging)
p Eric Galamb (ocher)
Point Source Branch (Archdale 9th)
p Dave Goodrich (NPDa)
p Bradley Bennett (Stormwater)
p Tom Poe (Pretreatment) (Archdale 7th)

Reg./ Prg: Mgmt
O Ed Buchen Oi ' ...
0 Brent McDon;"
Regional Water.:
O Asheville O l
C] Fayetteville O R.,.,. 0. Winston - Salem
Planning Branch J
O Alan Clark (bas ..:..,
O Boyd DeVane (c;:,:, _
O Beth McGee (mama<..,
O S teve Zoufaly (-U:. : .
O Ruth Swanek
--
O
O _
FROM: Lisa-Mazin, Regional / Program Management Coordination Braric:l7, / .+_= - c: ._ •_
PROJECT:

Attached is a copy of the above document_ Subject to the requirements of the Nlc1 : c _ =..-_
Policy Act, you are being asked to review the document for potential significant i) .._.. ?_? e 0 ?~e7
especially pertinent to your jurisdiction, level of expertise or permit authority. Pl,
box below and return d'zis form to me along with your written comments, if any, b,'

0/ /Ar

?M EN T?? _
jQ COi&Ei NTS TTACL
-

?. r
-- -a ?

fhank you for your assistance. Suggestions for streamlining this process are greatly F-
,Totes:

can be reached at: ? S 5637
;3 ?G?
phone: [phone], ext. 56,E fax: (919) 7
4;41- e-mail: l sa_ m. @ 1,:: : _st: te. c. Us
Y.
tls:kircmemo - mac version
f i
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Off ice of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form ly?-a6
Prvjeci Number COUnry: Date Received: Date Response Due (firm deadline):
i tis project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Ofct• Regional Offlec Area I In-House Review
? Asheville ? Air ? Soil & Water ? Marine Fisheries
? Fayetteville ? Water ? Coastal Management
-
'
? :Mooresville ? Groundwater d ? Water Resources
04i
I
1
? Raleigh C Lard Quality Engine r En:,irotimcntal Health
? Washington ? Recreational Consultant ? Forest Resources ? Solid Waste Mgrnt
o Wilmington ? Land Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Winston-Salem Recreation ? Other '
Z
uality
{
? Groundwater
? Air Quality
Manager Sign-OT/Region: Date:
1 In-liouse Reeie«•cr/A&=c)•:
•
Response (check all applicable)
? No objection to project as proposed.
? No Comment
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Other (specify or attach comments)
RETURN TO:
Melba McGee
Environmental Coordinator
/1,,.....r T ?.,.?.•t.,{.?... ;q. T-,???..m•,.?n^.icnt:?1 :1.!f:iirs
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD EXTENSION
TATE BOULEVARD TO 7TH AVENUE NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
State Project 8.2791701
Federal-Aid Project MASTP-1216(8)
T.I.P. No. U-2306A
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)
-71
D Ate William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
Z &::v (_ -
Date Nich s L. Graf, P. E.
f-OX Division Administrator, FHWA
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD EXTENSION
TATE BOULEVARD TO 7TH AVENUE NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
State Project 8.2791701
Federal-Aid Project MASTP-1216(8)
T.I.P. No. U-2306A
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Document Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
alzz ? A,
William B. Kinlaw
Project Planning Engineer
Richard B. D
Planning and
7
°O.c°eccu = M
?'F?iF:55ct7??e?'`•
Linwood Stone, CPM
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
1. TYPE OF ACTION .......................................................................................... 1
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................ 1
III. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS ........................................................ 1
IV. NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................................... 2
V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS .......................................................... 2
A. Circulation Of The Environmental Assessment ................................... 2
B. Comments Received On The Environmental Assessment ................... 3
I . U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington ........................... 3
2. N. C. State Clearinghouse ........................................................ 4
C. Public Hearing ...................................................................................... 4
D. Permits Required Of The Division Of Highways ................................. 6
VI. REVISIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .................................... 6
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .............................. 8
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Location Map
Figure 2 - Aerial Mosaic
Figure 3 - Thoroughfare Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Public Hearing
Appendix B - Agency Comments
Appendix C - Revised Right-of-way/ Jtilities/Relocation Reports

HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD EXTENSION
TATE BOULEVARD TO 7TH AVENUE NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
State Project 8.2791701
Federal-Aid Project MASTP-1216(8)
T.I.P. No. U-2306A
I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined that this project will not have any significant impacts
on the human environment or natural environment. This FONSI is based on the
Environmental Assessment (EA) which was approved on September 30, 1997. It has been
independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately
discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project. It provides
sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that an environmental impact statement
is not required. The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content
of the EA.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to improve
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard in Hickory (see Figures 1 and 2) along the existing alignment
from Tate Boulevard to 7`h Avenue NE, a distance of approximately 1.1 kilometers (km)
[0.7 mile (mi)]. Proposed improvements consist of constructing a five-lane, curb and
gutter facility within 30.5 meters (m) [100 feet (ft)] of right-of-way. Additionally, the
railroad bridge just south of 7`h Avenue NE will be replaced with a new bridge designed
to accommodate the proposed cross section.
The project is included in the NCDOT's Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) 1998-2004. Right-of-way acquisition is scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year
(FFY) 1999 and construction is scheduled to start in FFY 2001. The proposed
improvements are a portion of a larger project, U-2306, which calls for extending Lenoir
Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 8th Street NE in Hickory. The northern section
(U-2306B) included improvements from 7th Avenue NE to 8th Street NE. The U-2306B
section is currently under construction and is expected to be completed by the end of
1998. The subject project (U-2306A) is the southern portion of TIP project U-2306
extending between Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE. Right-of-way acquisition is
scheduled to begin in FFY 1999 and construction is scheduled to start in FFY 2001. The
total cost included in the current TIP for project U-2306A is $5,900,000 ($1,300,000 for
right-of-way and $4,600,000 for construction). Total updated estimated cost of the
project is $5,680,500.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
A plan which consists of rigorous requirements to minimize erosion and
sedimentation will be used on this project. This plan was developed using the North
Carolina Division of Highways Erosion and Sedimentation Control program in
conjunction with the Soil Conservation Service and Wake County in close coordination
with NCDOT.
Existing drainage patterns encountered along the project area will be maintained
and improved where possible. 4r
Standing trees outside of construction limits will be protected to the extent
possible. Clearing of standing trees will be limited to within the construction limits and
an area approximately 3 meters (10 feet) outside the construction limits on each side.
Any open burning associated with the subject proposal will be in compliance with
15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing asbestos material will be in
compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0525.
The North Carolina Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction
regarding the relocation of survey markers.
There are no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the proposed
improvements. The project has been coordinated with the appropriate state and regional
review agencies, the federal permit agencies, and with local government officials and the
public.
All applicable Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be implemented and
maintained throughout construction of the proposed project.
IV. NEED FOR ACTION
The proposed project will have a positive impact on the area involved by
providing increased capacity and overall safety at the intersection of a major east-west
corridor and a major north-south corridor. The major east-west corridor consists of
providing direct access from the Hickory central business district (CBD) and west
Hickory to the commercial and industrial areas along Highland Avenue, N.E., and
eventually to the CBD of Conover. The major north-south corridor connects the major
growth area of northeast Hickory to the rapidly expanding industrial and shopping areas
of southeast Hickory. Both of these projects are to be completed by the City of Hickory.
V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
A. Circulation Of The Environmental Assessment
The environmental assessment (EA) was circulated among the following federal,
state, and local agencies and officials:
2
* U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service-Raleigh
U. S. Soil Conservation Service-Raleigh
ti N. C. Geological Survey-Raleigh
* N. C. State Clearinghouse
* N. C. Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR)
* N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
* N. C. DEHNR - Division of Water Quality
* N. C. DEHNR - Permit Section
N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
N. C. Department of Human Resources
N. C. Department of Public Instruction
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
Catawba County Commissioners
Catawba County Manager
Mayor of Hickory
Written comments were received from the agencies denoted with an asterisk (*).
Copies of the comments received are included in the Appendix.
B. Comments Received On The Environmental Assessment
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
Flood Plains
Comment 1:
"Our comments on flood plains for this project were provided by our
March 25, 1997, letter to you, a copy of which is contained in Appendix F of the
Environmental Assessment (EA). We are in agreement with the statement on
page 25 of the EA that the project does not cross any identified flood hazard
areas."
Response 1:
None.
Waters and Wetlands
Comment 2:
"The proposed project would impact two unnamed, intermittent tributaries
to Clark Creek. Pipe extensions or minor channel relocations could be authorized
by nationwide or general permits. Major channel relocations over 500 feet in
length may require individual permit authorization. We recommend that any
stream relocations be minimized and accomplished with open channels that
follow natural stream dimension, pattern, and profile. Vegetation and natural
substrate should also be restored. Preliminary design plans for the creek crossings
should be submitted to this office when available so that we may determine
specific permit requirements."
3
Response 2:
All feasible recommendations for stream relocations (if any) will be
coordinated with the U. S. Corps of Engineers (USCOE), U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), and Division of Water Quality (DWQ). i
2. N. C. State Clearinghouse N
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Comment 3:
"Based upon the wetland impacts described in the EA, General
Certification 3103 will be applicable to this project. Final permit authorization
will require formal application by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ.
Please be aware that this approval will be contingent upon evidence of avoidance
and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and
provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary."
Response 3:
NCDOT will submit a formal application for final permit authorization at
the appropriate time.
N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Comment 4:
"The project should have minimal impacts on fisheries and wildlife
resources. Therefore, we concur with the EA and would agree to a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for this project."
Response 4:
None.
C. Public Hearing
The Public Hearing for this project was held on February 10, 1998 in the Hickory
City Hall Council Chambers in Hickory, N.C. There were approximately 50 people
present including representatives from the City of Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne College, the
NCDOT Board Member, and NCDOT representatives. Questions and/or suggestions
related to the proposed project improvements include:
• remove the proposed median barrier which would prohibit the left turn from
northbound Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard to westbound 7`h Avenue NE until traffic
warrants its implementation
4
Response - Refer to this document's Section VI, page 6.
• project landscaping to be continued from the crossover (U-2306B) in front of
Lenoir Rhyne College to address the aesthetics associated with this "gateway
to Lenoir Rhyne College"
Response - Refer to this document's Section VI, page 6.
• additional sidewalks (both sides of Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard) from the
Highland Avenue intersection to the Tate Boulevard intersection (sidewalks
exist north of the Highland Avenue intersection) for the walking traffic
generated by Lenoir Rhyne College and the adjoining neighborhoods
Response - (see Environmental Assessment (EA), page 3) "Existing sidewalks
will be replaced between Highland Avenue and 7`h Avenue NE. The City of
Hickory has expressed an interest in the construction of sidewalks from
Highland Avenue to Tate Boulevard. The NCDOT and the City of Hickory
will share in the cost of these sidewalks, based on the guidelines contained in
the NCDOT Sidewalk Policy."
• lighting to complement the sidewalk traffic and for safety of anyone using the
facility
Response - Street lighting other than what is normally installed/replaced by
the NCDOT will be contained in a municipal agreement between the City of
Hickory and the NCDOT.
• pedestrian access to possibly include signalized crosswalks at warranted
crossing along the project
Response - The feasibility of implementing signalized crosswalks will be
determined by the Traffic Engineering Branch during the design phase of this
project.
• bicycle lanes
Response - Bicycle lanes are already incorporated into the project design (see
EA, page 3).
• the typical section with and without raised median (to incorporate
landscaping)
5
Response - A median typical section was rejected due to the numerous
intersections (intersecting streets) and the ability to incorporate the left turn
lanes within these short sections.
i
• truck turning radius from eastbound Tate Boulevard onto southbound Lenoir
Rhyne Boulevard
Response - The Tate Boulevard intersection has been designed to
accommodate all vehicles, including heavy trucks.
• adequate signing to direct visitors between Lenoir Rhyne College and I-40
Response - All appropriate signing according to NCDOT policy will be
incorporated into the project design.
D. Permits Required Of The Division Of Highways
Impacts to surface waters of the United States come under jurisdiction of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344). A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) should be applicable to the project
improvements. This permit is likely to be applicable at most ditch and stream crossings
found in the project study area and authorizes construction provided the following
conditions are met:
• the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the actual
crossing;
• the fill placed in Water of the United States is limited to a filled area of no
more than 0.1 hectares (1/3 acre);
• no more than a total of 61 m (200 linear ft) of the fill for the roadway can
occur in special aquatic sites, including wetlands;
• the crossing is culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to prevent the
restriction of, and to withstand, expected high flows and tidal flows and
movement of aquatic organisms, and;
• the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent,
is part of a single and complete project for crossing of a Water of the United
States.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) prior to the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any
federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in a discharge to Waters of the
United States. Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted
for the duration of the construction or other land manipulation. The issuance of a 401
permit from the DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
6

FIGURES
j
T•
N
O
Fad
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
rTLE DIVISIO N OF HIGHWAYS
B RANCH
HICKORY
IR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION
E E BLVD. NE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
Figure 1 Location Map
5-}( Hickor
NORTH CAROLINA
000
CATAWBA COUNTY `?-? ?' ? / ,,b?
/
C
/ // - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'?` ,. f'?? r `T _ ?S; ?c,. - V It it '' `,? 1Ai¦,. `?'? `?
W t-
wl
,
?' i ? Q S ? C'" ,r }aka Mks u ?
N /r *t
?r r
f
r ?' A , ?•? r ter` I f '4I'? 1i
fJf ? '
f.
A f4
r.
,
n •
i ?
I, I
• r w Q
4
•y
v LL
f
Y
x,
Ail"
f b' a' x?pP r? .'V ? y r ?yN
y
a f l ? y
0
41,
: W
C" ° io ! .p :yam ,lr f'f
a d f ?A' Y`
U Y R
?./` .Ll?fr •r, \ uW. ?.e •t9y ` vV , I y
4 m' I Z LL ?!
?F!
U 7 ?
10
r
Rk?
r
t: m 4i8 a ¢ 'aYtf FF
r 1- -Z .L. t } - tP
W Q7 n 4 -
y
f
%1k I
CNI'l
O%o
t ?'. •
z
p?f at e t,
0
l " p•.
1 ° .I
41
.
4
a ? P
,
_rA
4 ?
.
-
j, } ff
R -
f
-p.
?yx + M1
. . n ? v
? '•Lk
4 i's
,. 4•?
"Oe
1r
i
? .' w
,
r
t ?
c
\? 133G o' •.. ; ?? ` 110 • . t. ???
t'? ?? l,h\? 1. 7?,x ? 1 26 - 191.7•
1 .7 ti• / t1 /? 141T M=? --.. '-1'T5r-222 /, \' 1526
\\ \\ '` ' ` -V 1 A V 16 •• M 1650 ?• \\\ \`,
u: 'M1 ? \' ?; 1631y =1527
J CITY - '? 1592 .e 1401 )) r
..• ?1 110•~ C,. I589 1189 155^ 2276 „J / •:t,9
7 ,
cow,.. • O I / ?' I eT .2295 _ 22& - w 1
_ • • ?• ? 0?? ... _? ?1631 -\562 ?; ? ? 1/0X
391 631
111 ,. ?T; ... L
2901 1
117 1 1 15• n 2 7
?a?///////777 J 1616 •e «, 1513 ^? ?Y?•_? --CITY
1111 ------ J ^_ ?+•w•.?...1 ..i
usu.. c Y ,/ / x • 1417 '' NIB IS `?<4 ??__
2328
S? L141?ij NvE `I
noun.. nun • ?? ? cwu.cxco?coo?? -t_- r
C,7, 418
_C4 7
•1..}• ?, y, .v\^.J or.. <wxss Q ?'?... 01•.7 I '.ti/ ,,
' •..? ?' ,? „ ... 142 11 l i
1546
41 160 I 3`
14 _N
1603 - .524 •J i3
1. ,. Cx. . ® 1
F r .` •' 1115 +1122 ? ,-042 1554
•• Isz1*f J:
?A 1420 1569
142.
y L .0 1126 I -?^ y? N 2,
C ? p : •. ` 1.27 ////// 11?JL-1l .
• , ? .a io0 1.33 ? ; a,,',:?
HL T RNA E• 1420
__ f u i? . to h V r, , 1129
h , .4 r ?.Il.,a..ic. s .. •
` ., ' ?\ i? '.e r tar"' `?. y? V;"? • c NS A".649
w
.c} y b? 77 .'M. ' `ter - • 111 ,may 1117 1649
f is 3"?' \ 9
s...(, ? ? •., `?M?' a -_
n n . ' Ic??rs •? .

F
?v
.nt?? C..' h. •
• M. . 11,'
•
r ? I ?
•, 11 111
F•417
PROJECT LIMITS °° '
? KR
w
,r 7x( 1469 ? ---
%
?
t
i ..1

•

l
gyn. ,. amp
?
jY,
`(7
(
JI
?
N6B
'??rTKN(
1
i
1455 D
V
VI
,
1676 I

a 1 ?
17
jy1Q /A. •, ".r1®
(V?y 4QV
?CN " 466
®
?
y
? ----
1 1
?? ?
1 L1417 ? ? -
w
1457
f'
(
r .'
0?` '• ' 'A `(
a
.p?
. w ?
167s 1466 1470
1-1 ...,.
C)
-? i
14
ux
' i '30/ n.
i
r L1417 rl Y ` . . 1
I ,• ,? 70 10 `
- -- t 321 Figure 3
7 / • 7 ril.loim s ?.??• • ?`
I ,cfr ?ix L - 1172 \ 1 a
---- •1180 `1 -- 1292 r I. `
APPENDIX
Appendix A
Public Hearing
H. F. Vick, P. E.
C.? Transportation Bldg.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GoVERNoR January 16, 1998 SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Secretary Norris Tolson
FROM: L. Todd Dudley, P. E. e,4a--e eQ
Public Hearing Officer
Citizens Participation Unit
r
RE: Notice of a Formal Public Hearing for the Proposed Extension'bf Lenior
Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 7`h Avenue NE in Hickory
{
The following Notice is furnished for your information:
U-2306A This project proposes to extend Lenior Rhyne Boulevard by widening the existing
roadway to a five-lane curb and gutter section from Tate Boulevard to 7 h Avenue
NE.
LTD:dnh
Attachment
cc: Ms. Ann Gaither, Board of Transportation Member
Mr. Larry R. Goode, P.E., Ph.D.
Mr. J. D. Goins, P.E.
Mr. D. R. Morton, P.E.
Mr. J. B. Williamson, Jr.
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E.
Mr. C. W. Leggett, P.E.
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E.
Mr. D. E. Burwell, Jr., P.E.
Mr. H. F. Vick, P.E.
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P.E.
Mr. W. R. Brown, P.E.
Mr. J. M. Lynch, P.E.
Mr. C. H. Casey, P. E.
Mr. Robert Mathes
Mr. Danny Rogers
Ms. Rosy Goode
Mr. Everett Ward
Mr. Ron Poole, P. E.
Mr. Dean Bridges, Right of Way Agent
FHWA
?' A

NOTICE OF A FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED
EXTENSION OF LENIOR RHYNE BOULEVARD FROM TATE BOULEVARD
TO 7T" AVENUE NE IN HICKORY
Project 8.2791701 U-2306A Catawba County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the above formal
public hearing on February 10, 1998 at 7 PM at the Hickory City Hall Council
Chambers, 76 N. Center Street.
The hearing will consist of an explanation of the proposed location and design of
proposed project. In addition, right of way and relocation requirements and procedures
will be explained. The hearing will be open for statements, questions, comments, and
submittal of material pertaining to the proposed project. Additional materials may be
submitted for a period of 15 days from the date of the hearing to: L. T. Dudley, P.E. at
P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611.
Under this project, it is proposed to extend Lenior Rhyne Boulevard by widening
the existing roadway to a 5-lane curb and gutter section from Tate Boulevard to
7`h Avenue NE. Additionally, the railroad bridge just south of 7"' Avenue NE will be
replaced with a new structure designed to accommodate the proposed widening. This
proposed project may necessitate several residences and businesses to be relocated.
Anyone desiring additional information may contact Mr. Dudley at P. 0. Box 25201,
Raleigh, NC 27611, phone [phone], or fax [phone].
A copy of the Environmental Assessment document and a map showing the
design for this project are available for public review at the City of Hickory Engineering
Department located in the Hickory Municipal Building, 76 N. Center Street.
In order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, NCDOT will provide
auxiliary aids arid services for disabled persons who wish to attend the hearing. To
receive special sgrvices, please contact Mr. Dudley one week prior to the date of the
hearing so that arrangements can be made.

EXTENSION/WIDENING
OF LENOIR RHYNE
BOULEVARD IN HICKORY

FROM TATE BOULEVARD TO
7TH AVENUE
PROJECT 8.2791701
TIP NO. U-2306A'
CATANMA COUNTY.-
FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING
HICKORY-CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 10, 1998
PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT
The proposed project will have a positive impact on the area involved by providing increased
capacity and overall safety along a major north-south corridor. The improvements to existing roads
and construction on new location associated with this corridor have been completed by the City of
Hickory. This corridor connects the major residential growth area of northeast Hickory to the
rapidly expanding industrial and shopping areas of southeast Hickory. This north-south corridor will
also relieve traffic congestion along NC 127 from Lake Hickory to the CBD of Hickory.
PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING
Tonight's hearing is one step in the Department of Transportation's procedure for including the
public as a part of the project planning process. The Department of Transportation is soliciting your
views on the proposed widening to a five lane section of Lenior Rhyne Boulevard from Tate
Boulevard to 7" Avenue in Hickory.
The Department of Transportation Planning and Environmental Branch has prepared the
Environmental Assessment. This document examines issues involved in the planning of this project.
Copies of this report are available tonight for your review.
YOUR PARTICIPATION.
Now that the opportunity is here you are urged to participate by making your comments and/or
questions part of the Official Public Hearing Transcript. This may be done by having them recorded
here tonight, writing them on the comment sheet and leaving it with a Department of Transportation
representative here tonight, or by mailing them in during the next 15 days following the Public
Hearing to:
Mr. L. T. Dudley, PE
Citizen's Participation Unit
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Everyone present is urged to participate in the proceedings. It is important, however, that THE
OPINIONS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS BE RESPECT REGARDLESS OF HOW DIVERGENT
THEY MAY BE FROM YOUR OWN. Accordingly, debates are out of place at public hearings.
Also, the public hearing is not to be used a POPULAR REFERENDUM to determine the alignment
and design by a majority vote of those present.
WHAT IS DONE WITH THE INPUT?
All spoken and written comments received through the public involvement process will be
thoroughly reviewed and carefully considered before any final decisions are made. A post hearing
meeting will be held following the end of the comment period involving various units within
NCDOT, including staff from planning, design, traffic engineering, and project development. All
issues resulting from the public hearing will be discussed. To resolve these issues, Staff members
will consider safety, cost, traffic service, social impacts, environmental impacts, and public input.
•rr t `. rtes j•.•: - .? ?'` .
"sue` 'I?, //• ' nes • r es tee zxre C 7 jH't?„?v.\
-t....IIL\r\? ? ti • ?' r ?•:??.. ' '`• , ?, » _xzet LSA' -
tw.. 't. 1• ?. 1 ?? 't •1 1162 ?`]1 - •'JF.
.. Kew. ' / t..a. w .•. ' ~ -t- /« -L 1 '
•• _.... • ?\ a , .. ' %G '?S ' ( 1551
?• _ x.15 ? ?? l.??i •_zz. ~ '???'..
??`? ._ __ .-.;t,-•; •.? ` i/ ?'T?t-? ?;??"'rte \ , /" .?. \ '1::; '
46
? r ? .w. ? .att. / G _..? w . Y - ?. •, .. -
PROJECT LIMITS '
IMF 11
way ?'
1 lriri - m
32-
/ J ? 1 t.ewt a.??•-F
I 1. tee.: • ? rr?
f 1 t -1-
1

l
'f
1
Figure 6
Figure
t
1
1?
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, proposes to
extend Lenior Rhyne Boulevard in Hickory. The proposed widening of the existing road will be
from Tate Boulevard to 7'' Avenue NE, a distance of approximately 0.7 miles. The proposed
project consists of constructing a five-lane, curb and gutter facility on 100 ft. of right of way.
The proposed project is included 1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) with right of
way acquisition scheduled to begin in March of 1999 and construction in April of 2001. The total
estimated cost of the project is $ 6,276,000. This estimate includes $ 4,600,000 for roadway and
structure costs and $ 1,676,000 for right of way. It is anticipated that this project will require the
relocation of six residences and one business.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Typical Section: 5 lane curb and gutter
Right of Way: 100 ft with additional easements
Estimated Cost: Roadway Cost $ 4,600,000
Right of Way Cost $1,676,000
Total Cost $ 6,276,000
Tentative Schedule: Right of Way - March 1999
Construction - April 2001
Relocatees: 6 Residences
1 Business
TYPICAL SECTION
rt
I
1
1
20.6m
0.6m
(2')
2.4m
(6')
(68')
yarn a.om J.om J.om 4.Jm
(14') (12') (12') (12') (14')
I
1
0.6m
(2')
I
1
Typical 5-lane roadway with curb & gutter
(w/Bicycle Accommodations)
2.4n
(6)
STATE-FEDERAL RELATIONSHIP
This is a proposed Federal-Aid Highway Project and will be constructed under the Federal-Aid
Highway Program. Funding for this project will be 80% from Federal funds and 20% from State
funds. The Board of Transportation is responsible for the selection, scheduling, location, design,
and construction of the project. The Board is responsible for 100% of the maintenance of the
roadway after it is built. The Federal Highway Administration is responsible for the review and
approval of the previously-mentioned activities to ensure that the project is designed and
constructed to Federal-Aid standards.
RIGHT OF WAY PROCEDURES
Upon completion of the final design, the proposed right of way limits will be staked on the
ground. Affected property owners will be contacted by a Right of Way Agent who will explain
the plans and the impacts to individual properties. Professionals who are familiar with real estate
values will evaluate or appraise the property. The appraisals will be reviewed for completeness
and accuracy and then a written offer will be made to the property owner by the Right of Way
Agent. The current market value of the property at its highest and best use when it is appraised
will be offered as compensation. The Department of Transportation must:
1) Treat all owners and tenants equally.
2) Fully explain the owner's rights.
3) Pay just compensation in exchange for property rights.
4) Furnish relocation advisory assistance.
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
If you are a Relocatee, that is, if your residence or business is to be acquired as a part of the
project, additional assistance in the form of advice and compensation is available. In addition to
being contacted by a Right of Way Agent, you will also be contacted be a Relocation Agent. This
Agent can provide you with assistance on locations of comparable housing and/or commercial
establishments, moving procedures, and moving aid. Moving expenses may be paid for you.
Additional monetary compensation is available to help homeowners cope with mortgage
increases, increased value of comparable homes, closing costs, etc. A similar program is available
to assist business owners. Your Relocation Agent can explain this assistance in greater detail.
NOTE: PAMPHLETS SUMMARIZING RIGHT OF WAY PROCEDURES AND
RELOCATEE ADVISORY ASSISTANCE ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
16
r,•
Hickory
/ nover
NORTH CAROLINA % ' 1efe"`?
CATAWBA COUNTY *,..0- At :, r F Newton
a
w
/ F"'" 'Stsrto+^
"C 7 lEkY
' i 10 Mcrae"
1
or r.
OC;
o

r ?.
=4 o
?-

o[
`
w
e•
° ROJECT
s 3< LIMITS
wwr+..ruer.

SW,
63

.e

a
1 to ? '
`
/ tia
(

.
•
,
' . w,
w 11' " Tv,
+ [ 8I
e. ro
' -- [o.

,
Csls.ei ?
4Mrr?ll{

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTIZNT OF
TRANSPORTATION
t DIVISION OF HIGHWAY5
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION
TATE BLVD. NE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
Figure 1 Loe.tion Map
A
COMMENT SHEET
Extension/Widening of Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 7' Avenue in Hickory
February 10, 1998
T.I.P. # U-2306A Catawba County Project 8.2791701
NAME:
ADDRESS:
COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS:
Comments may be mailed to:
L. T. Dudley, PE
N. C. Department of Transportation
Citizens Participation Unit
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Appendix B
Agency Comments

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
\ WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
- P.O. BOX 1890
\\
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO February 11, 1998 G E (/
Planning Services Section
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
-? FEB 1 1998
??? P
This is in response to your letter of October 17, 1997, requesting our comments
on the "Federal Environmental Assessment for Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension, Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue, NE, Catawba County, TIP No. U-2306A,"
(Regulatory Division Action I.D. No. 199830316).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources, which
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. There are no
Corps-constructed flood control or navigation projects which would be impacted by the
proposed improvements. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
C. E. Shuford, Jr., P.E.
Chief, Technical Services Division
Enclosure
February 11, 1998
Page 1 of 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
"Federal Environmental Assessment for Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension,
Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue, NE, Catawba County, TIP No. U-2306A," (Regulatory
Division Action I.D. No. 199830316)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC -_Bobby L. Willis, Planning Services Section, at
[phone]
Our comments on flood plains for this project were provided by our March 25,
1997, letter to you, a copy of which is contained in Appendix F of the Environmental
Assessment (EA). We are in agreement with the statement on page 25 of the EA that
the project does not cross any identified flood hazard areas.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - Mr. Steve Lund, Asheville Field Office,
Regulatory Branch, at (704) 271- 4857
The proposed project would impact two unnamed, intermittent tributaries to Clark
Creek. Pipe extensions or minor channel relocations could be authorized by
nationwide or general permits. Major channel relocations over 500 feet in length may
require individual permit authorization. We recommend that any stream relocations be
minimized and accomplished with open channels that follow natural stream dimension,
pattern, and profile. Vegetation and natural substrate should also be restored.
Preliminary design plans for the creek crossings should be submitted to this office
when available so that we may determine specific permit requirements.
Any questions concerning Department of the Army permits should be directed to
Mr. Lund.
.?o V E RI :
4I - F r
3 ... I k i
DEC
North Carolina Program, Developm?,;, _
Department of Administration
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
December 1, 1997
Mr. Whit Webb
N.C. Department of Transportation
Program Development Branch
Transportation Building
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Webb:
D
DEC - 4 iy97
Katie G. Dorsett, Secretary
C%' v
."Utz
e: SCH File # 98-E-4220-0312; Environmental Assessmen Pflmes X- sion of Lenoir Rhyne
Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue, NE in Hickory, NC; Catawba County; TIP #U-
2306A
The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intergovernmental
Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing this document.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
N. C. State Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region E
Melba McGee, DEHNR
i 'V
F
?. 190/7
116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee
Environmenta Review Coordinator
RE: 98-0312 Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, Catawba
County
DATE: November 14, 1997
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has
reviewed the proposed information. The attached comments are
for the applicant's information.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
attachments
WV 2 1 1997:
rt.c. STAT` C«A``k%,GHOUSF
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH NC 2761 1-7687 / 512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET, RALEIGH NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.EHNR.STATE.NC.us/EHNR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
-He2ith and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne. McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.,Zirector
Novernbc>r 17: 1997
jy1EMORANDI L9
To: Michelle Stiverkrubb
S{r
Through: John Dorne V
ilk
Adam 0L
[DEHNR

;Subject: E;tnvironmentO :Assessment for Lenoir Rhyne :.Boulevard.
Extension frcirn' Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue Norlh(01asz .in.
Hickory f r
Catawba County
State 'Project No. 8,2791701, T.T.P. No. U-2306A; EHNR,#98-0312
Thee referenced document. lias been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is. responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality. Certification for activities which impact. -waters of the state including
wetlands, The project will involve no fill in wetlands. - Two unnamed
perennial stream crossings will he required: DWQ offers the following
comments based on the 'd•ocumem review:
A) NCDQT has sufficiently demonstrated avoidancc till rt,iuicutixati0n t,f
wetlahd and stream .impacts. The p0jocL, as currently planned, wouict
not require wotland ur stroarn rtdtigniki- t7.
Based upon }he' r,6tland ;Impacts described in the EA, General C:crti.(Tc .lion { 103
tivill r ?IiPlit-able to :ithls` project.. Final Fcrmit autharixtttibn will requi-rc
formal 'application by NCDOT and written cbnCurrenCe front DWQ, !'lease be
aware that this approval 'will be contingent upon evidence of avoidance . and
ii inimi7ation. of, wetland and: tarearrt irnp ms to the extent praoti.cal, and
provision of WClland and strc.arri rniti8al:ioin whete neeesAary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity' to provide continents on the EA. D UT is
reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires
satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that water duality standards
are met and no wcdl ind or stream uses are Most. Questions regarding the 401
Certification should be directed to Cyndi Bull at [phone] in DWQ's Water
Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
CC; Steve Lund. COE, Asheville
Mark Cantrell, FWS
David Cox. WR
L12306AEADOC.
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Cppertunky ANlemative Adion Employer 60% rsgcI9WI0iL post Consumer pepvr
C0/T? .J _r: 1T ).1 =,T `-01'.] T :Ap72 i',.n (,,ri,,•, -.p,
K2 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission®
312 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
FROM: Joe H. Mickey, Jr., Western Piedmo t Region Coordinaattt r
Habitat Conservation Program #- AL, /
DATE: November 10, 1997
SUBJECT: State Clearinghouse Project No. 98-E-0312, Environmental Assessment for
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE, Catawba
County, TIP No. U-2306A
This correspondence responds to a request by you for our review and comments on the
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension in Hickory. These
comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d.) and the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 through 113A-10; 1 NCAC 25).
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to extend the Lenoir Rhyne
Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE for a distance of 1.1 km in Hickory. The
proposed improvements consist of widening the existing roadway to a 5-lane curb and gutter
section. Two unnamed tributaries to Clarks Creek will be impacted totaling 97 linear feet.
The project should have minimal impacts on fisheries and wildlife resources. Therefore,
we concur with the EA and would agree to a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for this
project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any
questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 910/366-2982.
cc: Mark Cantrell, USFWS
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Reviewing Office:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number. Due (Date:
After review of this projec: It has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Ouestions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same
Regional Office. Normal Process'
L
L
C
L
L
L
C

C
L
C
L
C
_ Time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REOWREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
Permit to construct d operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions, d sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES • permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 160 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES Reply (NIA)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichever is later.
Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
INIA)
Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued 7 days
prior to the installation of a well. (15 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct d operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.06 N/A (90 days)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 20.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A 60 oays
NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal NIA
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group
919.733.0820
(90 days)
Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion d sedimentatio
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect.) at least 30 20 tlays
days before be innin activity A fee of S30 for the first acre and S20.00 for each additional acre or art must accompany the plan (30 davsl
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: (30 days)
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bona amount
Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be permited. The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued.
North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
exceeds 4 days (N/A)
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit • 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more / day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned."
90.120 days
Oil Refining Facilities NIA (NIA)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N.C. Qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days
Dam Safety Permit inspect construction. certify construction is according to EHNR approv
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito central program. And (60 days)
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is neces-
sary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of 5200.00 must ac-
company the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion
?y rp Continued on reverse
L
L
L
L
L
C
C
C
f
•
F--_., ...ccess I

PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)

Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well File surety "liOnd of 15,000 with ENNR running to State of N.C.
conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall. upon 10 days
(NIA)
abandonment, be plugged according to ENNR rules and regulations.
Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with ENNR at least 10 days prior to Issue of permit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application form. (NIA)
State Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure site is charged. Must include 15.20 days
descriptions i drawings of structure d proof of ownership (NIA)
of riparian property.

401 Water Cuslity Certification
NIA 60 days
(130 days)
CAMA Permit for MAJOR development 1250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)

CAMA Permit for MINOR development
s50.00 lee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
Several geodetic monuments are located in or now the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed. please notify.
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Abandonment of any wells. if required, must be in accordance with Title 15A, Subchapter 2C.0100.
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if 'orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2N.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. 45 days
(NIA)
Other comments (attach additional pages as
necessary. being certain to cite comment
authority).
/
,
?+w ?ee ?Qr"4./?nnr""'t( ? ?,?..r,? ?„?/V..r K' "'^+"t il!"? /?Lt.?,I??.-tom ? d?ti
'71 3
?0

REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office
59 ? Fayetteville Regional Office
Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville. NC 28301
{?/Q04) 251-6208 [phone]
EzMooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
P
O
B
95 Raleigh Regional Office
,
.
ox
.
0 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Mooresville. NC 28115 Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone] [phone]
? Washington Regional Office
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, NC 27889
(919) 9464481
? Winston-Salem Regional Office
8025 North Point Blvd.
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
[phone]
? Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Exicnsion
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
STATE NUMBER: 98-E-4220-0312 F02
DATE RECEIVED: 10/29/1997 ?11a
AGENCY RESPONSE: 11/24/1997
REVIEW CLOSED: 11/29/1997
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Clearinghouse Coordinator
Dept. of Cultural Resources
Archives-History Bldg.
Raleigh NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Dept. of Agriculture
Dept. of Crime Cont./ Public Safety
Dept. of Cultural Resources
Dept. of Env. Health, & Natural Res
Western Piedmont COG
PROJECT INFORMATION
N
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
ERD: Environmental Assessment

`
DESC: Proposed Extension of it Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue,
NE in Hickory, NC; Cat wb County; TIP #U-2306A
CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER: 97- - 220-0303
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date. If additional review time is needed, please contact this office
at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
NO COMMENT
IF] ? COMMENTS ATTACHED

SIGNED BY : ?
Cam`/
l^
DATE :
W 3 0 1997
WOy. 0 4 1997
Appendix C
Revised
Right of Way/Utilities/Relocation
Reports
RELOCATION -R-SPORT
M E.I.S. I I CORRIDOR M DESIGN
North Carolina Depsgampha,!?,? ortation
RINkMALYar'?b?6 OFFICE
PROJECT: 8.2791701 COUNTY Catawba Alternate One
I. D. NO.: U-2306 A F.A. PROJECT MASTP-1216 8
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Hickory, Lenoir-Rhyne Boulevard Extension, Tat r even
Avenue N.E.
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Resi
Busin
Farm
Non
X
r
X
X
X
X
acees Owners Tenants Total Minorities
dential 3 4 7 6
esses 0 0 0 0
S 0 0 0 0
Profit 0 0 0 0
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
No Explain all "YES" answers.
x 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
x 2. Will schools or churches be affect by
displacement?
3. Will business services still be available after
project?
x 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed?
8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
x 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
x 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 6 months
0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
4 3 0 0 0
VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
0-20M 0 $ 0-160 4 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 .0
20-40M 0 150-250 0 20-40M 1 150-250 0
40-70m 3 260.400 0 40-70M 7 260400 0
70-100M 0 400400 0 70-100M 20 400-600 7
100 UP 0 600 uP 0 100 UP 122 600 uP 6
TOTAL 31 1 4 1501 1 13
REMARKS (Respond by Number)
3. No permanent displacement of business.
6. Newspapers, MLS, publications, on-ground
investigation.
8. Will be administered according to State law.
11. Housing is available from the City of Hickory.
12. If current housing trends continue, housing should
be available in the foreseeable future.
14. Same as number six.
5-19-98 ? ? ? oZ0 ~ ?'
D. A. McCallum, Area Relocation Agent Date Approved by Date
'Forth 15.4 Revised 02/95 d OriOinal & 1 CODv: State Relocation Aaent
2 Copy Area Relocation Office

REQUEST FOR R/W COST ESTIMATE
DATE- ' OS-06-98
1. D. NO.• U-2306 A
COUNTY. CATAWBA
PROJECT NO.:8.2791701
ENGINEER: BILL KINLAW\P&E
ESTIMATED NO. OF PARCELS:
RESIDENTIAL_RELOCATION:
BUSINESS RELOCATION:
LAND AND DAMAGE:
UTIL_T_ES.
ACQUISITION.
TOTAL ESTIMATED R/W COST:
ALT.
OR
SECT.
42 ALT.
OR
SECT. ALT.
OR
SECT. ALT.
OR
SECT.
4 48000

1 15000

995000

100000

222500
1380500
DESCR=PT ION ANC SPEC-AL INSTRUCTTONS.
HICKORY,LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION,TATE BLVD. TO
emu n« MR * "En BY 5-29-98 * THIS IS FOR A REVISED ESTIMATE**
TYPE OF PLANS FURNISHED FOR ESTIMATE PUBLIC HEARING MAP
PRIOR ESTIMATES OF .LAND AND DAMAGES (W=TH DATES):
ig 3i961
I= INCREASES OR DECREASES ARE SIGNIFICANT, PLEASE EXPLAIN:
SIGNIFICANT INCREASE DUE TO REFINEMENTS TO LAND AREAS
TO BE AQUIRED AND GRADUAL APPRECIATION OF PROPERTY IN AREA LOTS OF ACQUISITION
TAT yAcA!MT.b=s
AMOUNT THAT HAS BEEN ADDED TO LAND AND DAMAGE TO COVER CONDEMNATION AND
ADMINISTRATIVE INCREASES: $ AND OR:30 %
ESTIMATED BY: Pjr Tj_TS VANDT-P (DATE) 06-01-98
NOTE: THIS ESTIMATE WAS NOT BASED UPON FINAL RIGHT OF WAY PLANS NOR FINAr
DESIGN DATA. THEREFORE, ITS ACCURACY IS SUBJECT TO WHATEVER PLANS
AND/OR DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY REQUESTING PARTY. .
Environmental Review Tracking Sheet RECEIVED
DWO - Water Quality Section
MEMORANDUM
TO: Env. Sciences Branch (WQ Lab)
O Trish MacPherson (end. sps)
O Kathy Herring (forest/ORW/HQW)
O Larry Ausley (ecosystems)
O Matt Mathews (toxicology)
O Jay Sauber (intensive survey)
Non-Discharge Branch (Archdale 9th)
O Kim Colson (Permitting)
* Wetlands (WQ Lab)
O John Dorney (Corps, 401)
*Cyndi Bell (DOT)
O Eric Galamb
IVU " U 7199
7,
6"g0NMENTALSCIE S
Reg./ Prg. Mgmt Coordination Branch
O Farrell Keough (Archdale 9th)
O Brent McDonald (Archdale 12th)
* Regional Water Quality Supervisors
O Asheville O Mooresville O Washington
O Fayetteville O Raleigh O Wilmington
O Winston -Salem
Planning Branch (Archdale 6th)
O Alan Clark (basinwide planning)
O Boyd DeVane (classifications & standards)
O Beth McGee (management planning)
O Ruth Swanek (modeling) (Archdale 9th)
Point Source Branch (Archdale 9th)
O Dave Goodrich (NPDES) O
O Bradley Bennett (Stormwater) O
O Tom Poe (Pretreatment) (Archdale 7th) O
FROM: Michelle Suverkrubbe, Regional / Program Management Coordination Branch
RE:
L A,n n i r-
Attached is a copy of the above document. Subject to the requirements of the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act, you are being asked to review the document for potential significant impacts
to the environment, especially pertinent to your jurisdiction, level of expertise or permit authority. Please
check the appropriate box below and return this form to me along with your written comments, if any, by
the date indicated.
RESPONSE DEADLINE:
NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
Naive:
Date:
Thank you for your assistance. Suggestions for streamlining this process are greatly appreciated!
Notes:
I can be reached at:
phone: [phone], ext. 567
fax: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail]
mis.\circmemo - mac version
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Ja mes B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howesy Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 13, 1997
MEMORANDUM
To: H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Manager, Planning & Environmental Branch
NC Department of Transportation
From: Cyndi Bell C
DWQ, Water Quality Lab
A LT.K?FA
r4i 0
C) F= F=1
Subject: Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE
Catawba County
State Project No. 8.2791701, T.I.P. No. U-2306A
Reference your memorandum dated October 24, 1996, in which you requested information from DWQ in
order to prepare the EA for the referenced project. Our records indicate that no perennial stream
crossings or wetlands will be involved in this project. At this time, we have no comment. We will review
the EA when it is circulated through the state clearinghouse.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please call me at [phone] in the Division
of Water Quality, Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Bill Kinlaw
U2306A.DOC
Environmental Sciences Branch • 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal opportunity Aifimiative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Hickory
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE
Catawba County
State Project 8.2791701
Federal-Aid Project MASTP-1216(8)
T.I.P. No. U-2306A
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)
APPROVED:
. ? • QI?J
Dat ?rH. Franklin Vick, P. E., Mana er
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
f13 197
D to Nicholas Graf, P. £.
)W?-Divisio Administrator, FHWA

Hickory
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE
Catawba County
State Project 8.2791701
Federal-Aid Project MASTP-1216(8)
T.I.P. No. U-2306A

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Document Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
i
William B. Kinlaw
Project Planning Engineer
i7?? .CrYl ? ?
Linwood Stone, CPM
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
qlast i
s[ AL
RUarB. vi s, P. E., M = 6944
Assistant Manager, Planning and Environmental Br bk
%yFNGI NEB`.' J??`
4RD
""81,8184 1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
This document calls for the following environmental commitments:
• NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be
strictly enforced during the construction phase of the project.
• Erosion and sedimentation will be controlled through the specification, installation,
and maintenance of standard erosion and sedimentation control measures.
• A municipal agreement between the City of Hickory and NCDOT for additional
sidewalks between Tate Blvd. and Highland Ave. will be attained using the
NCDOT's sidewalk policy as a guide.
Ob
Summary
1. Description of Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to
extend Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard in Hickory in Catawba County (see Figures 1 and 2).
The proposed widening of the existing road will be from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue
NE, a distance of approximately 1.1 kilometers (km) [0.7 miles (mi)]. The proposed
project consists of constructing a five-lane, curb and gutter facility on 30.5 meters (m)
[100 feet (ft)] of right of way. The project is included in the NCDOT's Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) 1998-2004. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin
in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 1999 and construction is scheduled to start in FFY 2001.
The total cost included in the TIP is $5,900,000. Total estimated cost of the project is
$5,621,000.
2. Environmental Impacts
The proposed project will have a positive impact on the area involved by
providing increased capacity and overall safety along a major north-south corridor. The
improvements to existing roads and construction on new location associated with this
corridor will be completed by the City of Hickory. This corridor connects the major
growth area of northeast Hickory to the rapidly expanding industrial and shopping areas
of southeast Hickory. This north-south corridor will also relieve traffic congestion along
NC 127 from Lake Hickory to the CBD of Hickory.
The project will require the relocation of 1 residence and 2 business. The
Division of Highways offers a Relocation Assistance Program to help minimize the
effects of relocation. There may be some erosion and siltation during construction;
however, the NCDOT, Division of Highways has developed an Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Program which consists of rigorous requirements to minimize
erosion and sedimentation. Traffic noise level increases will be minimal and short-term
in nature. No special noise abatement measures are proposed. No significant effects to
animal or plant life are expected and no recreation facilities will be involved. No
structures of historical or architectural importance will be affected by the project nor will
the proposed improvements have an effect on archaeological resources. No wetlands will
be affected.
f There are no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the
proposed improvements. The project has been coordinated with the appropriate state and
regional review agencies, the federal permit agencies, and with local government
officials and the public.
3. Alternatives Considered
Due to the nature of this project, the widening of an existing roadway, no
alternative corridor alignments were considered. The proposed 5-lane curb and gutter
section will match the cross sections on each end of the project.
Public transportation is not considered an acceptable alternative to the proposed
project. The provision of transit and paratransit services in this area would compliment
the proposed project but would not serve as an adequate substitute.
The "no-build" alternative was also considered, but rejected because the existing
street system cannot adequately accommodate the projected traffic volumes at an
acceptable level of service once the planned Highland Avenue / 8th Street NE east-west
corridor and the Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard / 8th Street NE north-south corridor are open to
traffic.
4. Coordination
The following federal, state, and local agencies were requested to comment on the
project during the preparation of this Environmental Assessment. And asterisk (*)
denotes agencies from which comments were received:
* U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Raleigh
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
* U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Asheville
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Raleigh
U. S. Geological Survey-Raleigh
* N. C. State Clearinghouse
* N. C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
N. C. Department of Administration
* N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
* N. C. Department of Public Instruction
N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
Hickory Mayor
Catawba County Manager
Catawba County Commissioners
0
5. Permits
A Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality
will be required. This certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for
the duration of the construction or other land manipulation.
. A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a)(14) is likely to be applicable at most ditch
and stream crossings found in the project study area.
6. Additional Information
Additional information on this environmental assessment may be obtained by
contacting:
Nicholas L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone [phone]
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone [phone]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
11
r
SUMMARY
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ....................................... 1
A. General Description ........................................................................... 1
B. Summary of Proposed Improvements ...................... :......................... 1
1. Project Len .................................................... 1
2. Cross Section ......................................................................... 1
3. Right of Way Width ............................................................... 2
4. Access Control ....................................................................... 2
5. Railroads ................................................................................ 2
6. Bridges ................................................................................... 2
7. Design Speed and Speed Zones ............................................. 2
8. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control .......................... 2
9. Parking ................................................................................... 3
10. Sidewalks ............................................................................... 3
11. Bicycle Provisions ................................................................. 3
12. Landscaping ........................................................................... 3
13. Greenways .............................................................................. 3
14. Cost Estimate ......................................................................... 3
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................... 4
A. Existing Roadway Inventory ............................................................. 4
1. Cross Section .......................................................................... 4 .
2. Right of Way .......................................................................... 4
3. Type of Roadside Development ............................................ 4 .
4. Access Control ....................................................................... 4
5. Structures ............................................................................... 4
6. Speed Zones ........................................................................... 4
7. Intersecting Roads and Types of Control .............................. 4
8. Sidewalks ............................................................................... 5
9. Utilities .................................................................................. 5
10. Greenways .............................................................................. 5
11. Geodetic Markers ................................................................... 5
12. School Buses .......................................................................... 5
B. Functional Classification and Thoroughfare Plan ............................. 5
C. Traffic Volumes and Capacity ........................................................... 5
1. Signalized Intersections ......................................................... 6
a. Tate Boulevard / Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension ....................................................... 6
b. Highland Ave. / "D" Avenue SE / Lenoir Rhyne
Blvd. Extension .............................................. 7
2. Unsignalized Intersections ..................................................... 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
D. Accident History ................................................................................ 7
III. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND ALTERNATIVES
TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................................... 8
A. Recommended Improvements ..................................:........................ 8
B. Other Improvements Considered ...:................................................... 8
C. "No-Build" Alternative ............................................................. I 8
D. Public Transportation Alternative ...................................................... 8
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................................... 9
A. Social Environment ............................................................................ 9
1. Population .............................................................................. 9.
2. Neighborhood Characteristics ................................................ 9
3. Public and Private Facilities .................................................. 9
4. Cultural Resources ................................................................. 9
a. Architectural Resources ............................................. 9
b. Archaeological Resources .......................................... 10
5. Relocation Impacts ................................................................ 10
B. Economic Environment ..................................................................... 10
C. Land Use ............................................................................................ 11
1. Scope and Status of Planning ................................................. 11
2. Existing Zoning ...................................................................... 11
3. Existing Land Use .................................................................. 11
4. Future Land Use ..... ......................................................... 11
5. Compatibility of Project with Local Plans ............................. 11
D. Natural Environment .......................................................................... 12
1. Physical Resources ................................................................ 12
a. Regional Characteristics ............................................ 12
b. Soils ........................................................................... 12
C. Water Resources ........................................................ 12
(1) Best Usage Classification .............................. 13
(2) Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters ... 13
(3) Water Quality ................................................. 14
(a) General Watershed Characteristics.... 14
(b) Benthic Macroinvertebrate
Ambient Network .................. 14
(c) Point Source Dischargers ................... 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
d. Summary of Anticipated Impacts .............................. 15
2. Biotic Resources .................................................................... 16
a. Biotic Communities ................................................... 16
(1) Disturbed ........................................................ 16
(2) Wildlife .......................................................... 17
b. Summary of Anticipated Impacts .............................. 18
(1) Terrestrial Impacts ......................................... 18
(2) Aquatic Impacts ............................................. 19
3. Jurisdictional Topics .............................................................. 19
a. Waters of the United States ....................................... 19
(1) Characteristics of Wetlands and
Surface Waters ................................... 20
(2) Permits ........................................................... 20
(3) Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation ........... 21
b. Rare and Protected Species ........................................ 22
(1) Federally-Protected Species ........................... 23
(2) Federal Species of Concern and
State Listed Species ....................................... 24
4. Hazardous Materials Evaluation ............................................ 25
a. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Facilities ............. 25 ,
b. Landfills and Other Potentially Contaminated
Properties ....................................................... 25
5. Floodplain Involvement ......................................................... 25
6. Traffic Noise .......................................................................... 25
a. Characteristics of Noise ............................................. 26
-? b. Noise Abatement Criteria .......................................... 27
C. Ambient Noise Levels ............................................... 27
d. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels........... 28
e. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours ................ 29
f. Traffic Noise Abatement Measures ........................... 30
(1) Highway Alignment ....................................... 30
(2) Traffic System Management Measures ......... 30
(3) Noise Barriers ................................................ 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
g. "Do Nothing" Alternative .......................................... 31
h. Construction Noise .................................................... 32
i. Summary .................................................................... 32
7. Air Quality ............................................................................. 32
E. Construction Impacts ......................................................................... 35
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION ........................................................ 36
A. Comments Received From Federal, State, And Local Officials ....... 36
B. Citizens Informational Workshop ...................................................... 37
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Location Map
Figure 2 - Aerial Mosaic of Project
Figure 3 - Proposed Typical Section
Figure 4 - 1997 Average Daily Traffic
Figure 5 - 2020 Average Daily Traffic
Figure 6 - Thoroughfare Plan (project area only)
Figure 7 - Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. / Tate Blvd. Intersection
Figure 8 - Existing Bus Routes
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Division of Highways Relocation Programs
Appendix B - Relocation Reports
• Appendix C - Traffic Noise Analysis Tables
Appendix D - Air Quality Analysis Tables
Appendix E - Citizens Informational Workshop
Appendix F - Comments Received from Federal, State, and Local Agencies
w
Hickory
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE
Catawba County
State Project 8.2791701
Federal-Aid Project NIASTP-1216(8)
T.I.P. No. U-2306A
1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. General Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of
Highways, proposes to extend Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 7th
Avenue NE in Hickory. The proposed improvements consist of widening the existing
roadway to a 5-lane curb and gutter section. Additionally, the railroad bridge just south
of 7th Avenue NE will be replaced with a new bridge designed to accommodate the
proposed cross section. , The estimated total cost of the subject project (U-2306A) is
$5,621,000.
This project is included in the NCDOT's Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) 1998-2004. The proposed improvements are a portion of a larger project, U-2306,
which calls for extending Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to 8th Street NE
in Hickory. The northern section (U-2306B) included improvements from 7th Avenue
NE to 8th Street NE. Construction for U-2306B is scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal
Year (FFY) 1997. The subject project (U-2306A) is the southern portion of TIP project
U-2306, Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to
begin in FFY 1999 and construction is scheduled to start in FFY 2001. The total cost
included in the current TIP for project U-2306A is $5,900,000 ($1,300,000 for right of
way and $4,600,000 for construction).
B. Summary of Proposed Improvements
Protect Length
The project is approximately 1.1 km (0.7 mi) long.
2. Cross Section
The ultimate typical section is a five-lane, 20.6-meter[m] (68-foot [ft])
face to face of curbs, curb and gutter section (see Figure 3).
2
3. Right of Way
The recommended right of way width is 30.5 in (100 ft). Temporary
construction easements will be used to contain proposed construction outside the
30.5 in (100 ft.) proposed right of way.
4. Access Control
No access control is recommended for the proposed project.
5. Railroads
A new Norfolk-Southern railroad bridge will be constructed on its current
location, over the proposed 5-lane curb and gutter section. To maintain rail
operations during bridge replacement, a temporary detour structure will be
constructed to the south side of the existing tracks. Plans for a temporary detour
to re-route existing Highland Ave./Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. traffic on local streets
while the new railroad bridge is being constructed, will be coordinated with the
City of Hickory.
6. Bridges
There are no highway bridges on the subject project (see Section I.B.5.,
above).
7. Design Speed and Speed Zones
The proposed roadway section will be designed for 64.4 kilometers per
hour (km/hour) [40 miles per hour (mph)]. It is anticipated that a 64.4 km/hour
(40 mph) speed limit will be posted.
The possibility of attaining a higher design speed is currently being
investigated. Any major change in the existing grade will increase the
construction limits of the proposed roadway caused by larger cut and fill sections.
Any new grade may affect the estimated relocations due to the increased
construction limits. In addition, it will also affect the grades of the existing
intersecting streets and thus, creates the potential for additional relocation along
them as well.
8. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control
The Tate Boulevard, Highland Avenue, and 7th Avenue NE intersections
will be signalized intersections. All other intersections will be at grade with stop
sign control on the cross streets.
3
9. Parkin
Parking is not to be provided for or permitted along the project.
10. Sidewalks
Existing sidewalks will be replaced between Highland Avenue and 7th
Avenue NE. The City of Hickory has expressed an interest in the construction of
sidewalks from Highland Avenue to Tate Boulevard. The NCDOT and the City
of Hickory will share in the cost of these sidewalks, based on the guidelines
contained in the NCDOT Sidewalk Policy.
11. Bicycle Provisions
Outside lanes will be constructed 4.3 meters (14 feet) wide to
accommodate bicycle traffic. The Office of Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation has commented that "We recommend that AASHTO standard
bicycle accommodations be included in the subject project. Due to the projected
traffic volumes, a 14' wide outside lane will be needed to adequately provide for
bicycle safety. Share the Road signs and bicycle safe drainage grates should also
be provided." In coordination with the City of Hickory by the Office of Bicycle
and Pedestrian Transportation, Mr. Tom Carr, City of Hickory Planning Director,
said that "Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard is presently used by bicyclists for alternative
transportation to the Lenoir Rhyne College area and business/commercial areas."
12. Landscaping
The City of Hickory has expressed an interest in additional landscaping
along the subject project. An agreement between NCDOT and the City of
Hickory will be executed establishing each party's responsibilities prior to the
expenditure of landscape funds.
13. Greenwavs
No greenways will be affected by the construction of this project.
14. Estimate of Cost
The proposed project is estimated to cost:
Construction $ 4,300,000
Right of Way $ 1,321,000
Totals $ 5,621,000
4
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Existing Roadway Inventory
1. Cross Section
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard between Tate Boulevard and Highland Avenue is
an 12.2-meter (40-foot) face to face of curbs, curb and gutter section. Highland
Avenue between Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard and 7th Avenue'NE is generally an
8.5-meter (28-foot) face to face of curbs, curb and gutter section.
2. Right of Way
The existing right of way along this portion of Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
varies from 21.3-30.5 meters (70-100 feet). Along Highland Avenue, the existing
right of way is approximately 15.2 meters (50 feet).
3. Tyne of Roadside Development
Residential areas are located on both the east and west sides of Lenoir
Rhyne Boulevard in the southernmost two blocks near Tate Boulevard. The
remainder of the project to the north is composed of commercial development.
4. Access Control
None.
5. Structures
Norfolk-Southern Railroad Bridge #286 crosses Highland Avenue
between Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard and 7th Avenue NE. The bridge is constructed
of a reinforced concrete deck on plate girders supported by reinforced concrete
cellular abutments. The bridge is on a tangent alignment and consists of one span
of approximately 14.6 meters (48 feet) on a skew of approximately 45 degrees.
The bridge was built in 1934 and is estimated to have a remaining life of 18 years.
There are no major drainage structures since no major streams are crossed
by the project and the terrain in the vicinity of the project is rolling with natural
draws located so that the project may be drained without difficulty.
6. Speed Zones
The existing speed limit along the project is 56.5 kilometers per hour
(35 miles per hour).
7. Intersecting Roads and Types of Control
Signalized intersections include Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard/Tate Boulevard
and Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard/Highland Avenue. All other intersections are
at-grade and stop-sign controlled.
5
8. Sidewalks
Sidewalks are currently in place on Highland Avenue between the Lenoir
Rhyne Boulevard/Highland Avenue intersection and the Highland Avenue/7th
Avenue NE intersection. No sidewalks exist on Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard between
Tate Boulevard and Highland Avenue.
9. Utilities
Utilities along the project are light to moderate. Existing utilities include
electric, telephone, and cable TV overhead and telephone, sanitary sewer, and
water underground.
10. Greenwavs
None.
11. Geodetic Markers
This project will impact 2 geodetic survey markers. The N.C. Geodetic
Survey will be contacted prior to construction. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic marker is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
12. School Bus Data
According to the Assistant Principal at Hickory High School, Mr. Richard
Armstrong, 8 school buses use this facility each school day. This results in 16
bus trips per day, considering both morning and afternoon assignments.
B. Functional Classification and Thoroughfare Plan
In the Statewide Functional Classification System, SR 1007 (Lenoir Rhyne
Boulevard/Highland Avenue, N.E.) is classified as an Urban Principal Arterial-Other (see
Thoroughfare Plan, Figure 6 ). It is also a part of the Federal-Aid System as an urban
arterial.
C. Traffic Volumes and Level of Service
The estimated traffic volumes for 1997 along the proposed Lenoir Rhyne
Boulevard Extension project range from 11,700 vehicles per day (vpd) between Tate
Boulevard and Highland Avenue to 13,100 vpd between Highland Avenue and 7th
Avenue NE. These estimates of the average daily traffic (ADT) include 2% truck-tractor
semi-trailers and 3% dual tired vehicles. Estimated 1997/2020 ADT volumes are shown
in Figures 4 and 5, respectively (for truck percentages, see table below ).
6
Truck Percentages - Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
ROUTE 1997 2 020 PHF
%TTST %DUALS %TTST %DUALS
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Highland Avenue 2
1 3
3 4
2 6
3 0.95
0.95
The traffic carrying ability of a roadway is described by levels of service which
range from A through F. Level of service A, the highest level of service, is characterized
by very low delay in which most vehicles do not stop at all. Typically, drivers are
unrestricted and turns are freely made. In level of service B, traffic operation is stable
but more vehicles are stopping and causing higher levels of delay. Level of service C is
characterized by stable operation with drivers occasionally having to wait through more
than one red indication. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted in these circumstances.
At level of service D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Delay to
approaching vehicles may be substantial during short periods of the peak hour. Level of
service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay and represents the theoretical
capacity of the facility. Level of service F represents over saturated or jammed
conditions which are considered unacceptable to most drivers.
All signalized intersections (both existing and proposed) were analyzed by the
Congestion Management Section of the Traffic Engineering Branch using current traffic
operations modeling tools. The proposed intersection geometrics for the intersection of
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard and Tate Boulevard, recommended as a part of this project, are
shown in Figure 7. The results of their analysis are summarized below.
1. Signalized Intersections
a. Tate Boulevard / Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
The Tate Boulevard intersection is currently signalized and is
identified as having the heaviest turning and thru volumes. Based on the
Congestion Management Section's analysis, exclusive right turn lanes will
be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches of Lenoir ,
Rhyne Boulevard due to the number of right turns and heavy thru traffic.
An exclusive right turn lane will be added for the eastbound approach of
Tate Boulevard. Due to the high volume of left turns (approximately 770
in the 2020 peak hour) on the eastbound approach of Tate Boulevard, dual
left turn lanes will be provided. Even providing these improvements, this
intersection is expected to operate at a poor "E" level of service (LOS).
7
Major geometric improvements will be needed to improve the operation of
this intersection before an acceptable "D" LOS can be expected in the
2020 design year. An additional northbound left turn lane will provide an
acceptable "D" LOS.
b. Highland Ave / "D" Avenue SE / Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Extension
This intersection is currently signalized. Based on the Congestion
Management Section's analysis using the existing geometry on Highland
Avenue and "D" Avenue SE, this intersection is expected to operate at a
LOS B" in the 2020 design year. No geometry changes- are anticipated at
this intersection.
2. Unsignalized Intersections
The intersection of 7th Avenue NE and Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension is currently unsignalized, but is recommended for signalization under
this project. This intersection is expected to operate at a LOS "A" in the 2020
design year.
The only other unsignalized intersections along the project are residential
streets and do not project enough traffic to warrant signalization now or in the
future. These streets will remain at-grade and stop sign controlled.
D. Accident History
A total of 46 reported accidents with no fatalities occurred within the project area
on Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard and Highland Avenue during the period between January 1,
1993 thru February 28, 1996. During this period, reported accidents, by type, include 24
(52%) rear-end collisions, 12 (26%) angle/sideswipe collisions, and 8 (17%) left turn
collisions. All together, these 3 types of accidents accounted for 95% of all recorded
accidents. The majority of accidents (89%) occurred in the vicinity of the Lenoir Rhyne
Boulevard/Tate Boulevard intersection. Incorporation of the proposed additional lane
improvements (see Section II.,C. La.) to the Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard/Tate Boulevard
intersection will result in a safer intersection and a lower accident rate.
The total accident rate for this roadway section is 352.08 accidents per 100
million vehicle kilometers (acc/100 mvk) as compared to an average of 200.44 acc/100
mvk for similar routes in the state.
III. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE
PROPOSED ACTION
A. Recommended Improvements
The recommended improvements consists of widening the existing facility to a
5-lane, 20.6-meter (68-foot) curb and gutter section. In addition, a new Norfolk-Southern
Railway bridge crossing over the existing facility will be constructed to accommodate the
new 5-lane curb and gutter section, plus sidewalks. A temporary railroad detour and
bridge to the south of the existing tracks is recommended to maintain existing train traffic
while the new railroad bridge is being constructed.
B. Other Improvements Considered
Due to the nature and scope of this project, no other improvements, except for
various intersection configurations studied during the intersection analyses, were
considered.
However, two additional railroad detour alignments were studied. The second
alignment located the railroad detour to the north side of the existing tracks and the third
alignment located the railroad detour on the north side of the existing railroad bridge.
The second alignment was the most expensive due to an additional business relocation
and length of the detour tracks. The third alignment would require the new railroad
bridge to be constructed to the south in order that half of the existing bridge could be
used for the detour during the new bridge construction. Since the existing railroad and
bridge are on a tangent (straight line), the third alignment would require the new tracks to
shift off this tangent and then back on again. Representatives of the Norfolk-Southern
Railroad have indicated they would prefer the new bridge and tracks not be constructed
to the south of their current location because of the resulting shifts in alignment just
mentioned.
C. "No-Build" Alternative
The "no-build" alternative was also considered but rejected. A traffic analysis
indicated that the existing street system will not adequately accommodate the projected
design year 2020 traffic volumes once the proposed east-west (Highland Avenue / 8th
Street NE) and north-south (Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard / 8th Street NE) corridors in the
current thoroughfare plan are completed and open to traffic.
D. Public Transportation Alternative
The public transportation alternative is not a feasible alternative since this
project's purpose is to provide a connecting link in the north-south corridor (which is
partially under construction). The north-south corridor is partially on new location, thus
no public service is currently available. The Piedmont Wagon is a public bus service
9
operated by a consortium of local governments in the project area. The Springs
Road/ 127 Route provides hourly service along Highland Avenue, N.E. and into the
downtown area (see Figure 8). Transfers are available to other routes which serve the
greater Hickory area as well as Conover and Newton. The provision of transit and
paratransit services in this area would compliment the proposed project but would not
serve as an adequate substitute due to the lack of high density and "spread out" nature of
Hickory's population, the commercial and industrial sectors, and the Central Business
District of Hickory.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS AND THE PROBABLE
IMPACT OF THE PROJECT
A. Social Environment
1. Population
Catawba County is. located in the west central section of the State and is
bounded by Wilkes, Iredell, Lincoln, Cleveland, Burke, and Caldwell counties. It
has a population of 118,412. There are 57,536 males and 60,876 females in the
county. In terms of racial composition, Catawba County consists of 106,370
whites, 10,689 blacks, 232 American Indians, Eskimos or Aleuts, 830 Asians or
Pacific Islanders, and 291 listed in the category Other.
2. Neiahborhood Characteristics
The neighborhood of the proposed action consists of residential and
commercial development. Beginning at the southern end of the project at Tate
Boulevard, there are a few brick homes on the west side of the project and a few
frame dwelling homes on the east side. Some of these dwellings are in close
proximity to the project. Other development along the proposed project consists
of commercial establishments. These commercial establishments appear to be
back far enough from the project to avoid being taken.
3. Public Facilities
There are no public facilities along the proposed project.
4. Cultural Resources
a. Architectural Resources
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed pictures
of the project area and, based on those photos, commented (see
December 23, 1996 memo in the Appendix) that the structures over fifty
10
years of age "do not appear eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places. Therefore, we recommend that no historic architectural
survey be conducted for this project."
b. Archaeological Resources
In the same memo referenced above, SHPO stated "There are no
known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on
our (SHPO) present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any
archaeological resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project
construction. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological
investigation be conducted in connection with this project."
5. Relocation Impacts
It is the policy of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) to ensure that comparable replacement housing will be available prior
to construction of state and federally assisted projects. The NCDOT has the
following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of relocation:
(1) Relocation Assistance,
(2) Relocation Moving Payments, and
(3) Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or rent supplement.
See Appendix A for further discussion of the NCDOT Relocation
Programs.
The recommended project improvements will require the relocation of
approximately 1 residence and 2 businesses (see Section I.B.7. and Relocation
Report in Appendix B). This proposed action will not adversely impact social
cohesion, nor have a long term impact on facilities and services. It is anticipated
that adequate replacement properties will be available for the relocatees.
B. Economic Environment
North Carolina Preliminary Civilian Labor Force Estimates (Preliminary Data for
March 1997) indicates that Catawba County has a labor force of approximately 74,280.
Of this total, 72,170 persons were gainfully employed. This left an unemployment total
of 2,110 persons, or 2.8 percent.
The proposed action will not adversely impact the commercial community along
the project, nor will it disrupt community cohesion, nor will it interfere with facilities and
services along the project. Increased accessibility to the businesses in the area will be
11
enhanced because of the proposed action and it will have an overall positive impact on
the economic environment.
C. Land Use
1. Scope and Status of Planning
The proposed project is located within the municipal limits of the City of
Hickory. The city has an active land use planning program, centered on its Land
Development Plan, which was adopted in 1986. The city also enforces a zoning
ordinance and subdivision regulations.
2. Existing Zoning
The project is divided into two zoning districts, R-20 (Single-family
residential) in the southern portion, and ED-2 (Economic Development) in the
northern portion of the project. ED-2 is a district which permits light industrial
uses.
3. Existing Land Use
The project site is located in an urbanized area containing a variety of land
uses. The southern portion of the project is composed of single-family residential
land uses. The northern portion is primarily light to moderate industrial uses.
4. Future Land Use
According to the Land Development Plan, only twenty percent (20%) of
the land within the Hickory Regional Planning Area remains undeveloped.
Therefore, the focus of the plan is on improving existing conditions, such as
traffic circulation, particularly within the central business district; creating buffers
between incompatible land uses; and preventing the deteriorating affects of
commercial and industrial encroachment on residential neighborhoods.
The project site is located within the Railroad Corridor area identified on
the Land Development Plan Map. This area is designated primarily for industrial
uses, although existing residential areas should be protected. The project is also
included in the city's thoroughfare plan.
5. Compatibili of Project With Local Plans
The project is compatible with the policies stated in the Land
Development Plan , and is in fact an element of the adopted thoroughfare plan.
Additionally, the project will improve circulation around the central business
district, another goal cited in the plan.
12
D. Natural Environment
1. Physical Resources
Soil and water resources which occur in the project area are discussed
below with respect to possible environmental concerns. Soil properties and site
topography significantly influence the potential for soil erosion and compaction,
along with other possible construction limitations or management concerns.
Water resources within the project area present important management limitations
due to the need to regulate water movement and the increased potential for water
quality degradation. Excessive soil disturbance resulting from construction
activities can potentially alter both the flow and quality of water resources,
limiting downstream uses. In addition, soil characteristics and the availability of
water directly influence the composition and distribution of flora and fauna in
biotic communities, thus affecting the characteristics of these resources.
a. Reizional Characteristics
The proposed project is located in Catawba County within the city
limits of Hickory. This area is located in the western portion of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. Topography in the
vicinity of the study area is characterized by rolling hills. The elevation
throughout the project area is approximately 335 in (1100 ft) above mean
sea level.
b. Soils
Soils found in the study area are of the Cecil-Pacolet Association.
Two soil map units were identified from the study area, Cecil sandy loam,
6-10 percent slopes (CmC2) and Cecil sandy loam, 2-6 percent slopes
(Cm132). Soils of the Cecil sandy loam map unit are well drained and
occurs primarily on slopes and ridges on uplands. This soil has moderate
infiltration and rapid runoff. The seasonal high water table is located
more than 3 m (10 ft) from the surface and the shrink swell potential is
low. This soil is susceptible to erosion in disturbed areas. No mapped
soils that are listed as hydric soils or soils that are known to contain
inclusions of hydric soils are found in the study area.
C. Water Resources
This section contains information concerning surface water
resources likely to be impacted by the proposed project. Water resource.
assessments include the physical characteristics, best usage standards, and
13
water quality aspects of the water resources, along with their relationship
to major regional drainage systems. Probable impacts to surface water
resources are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts.
(1) Best Usage Classification
Water resources within the study area are located in the
Catawba River Drainage Basin (sub-basin # 030232). The
proposed project crosses one intermittent stream (Ut2). A second
intermittent stream (Utl) is located to the east of the existing
roadway and flows parallel to it. Both streams are unnamed
tributaries to Clark Creek. Construction of the subject project is
likely to require that the existing pipe culverts be extended and the
relocation of one stream to accommodate the new roadway.
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), formerly Division of
Environmental Management (DEM), which reflects water quality
conditions and potential resource usage. Unnamed streams carry
the same best usage classification as the streams to which they are
tributary. The DEM classification of Clark Creek [Index No.
11-129-5(03)] is "C" (9/1/74). The Best Usage Classification C
refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival,
fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. No waters
classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I
or WS-II) or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within
1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area.
(2) Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters
Utl is located to the east of the existing roadway just north
of "E" Ave. This stream flows parallel to the road and has
intermittent flow. The channel is approximately 0.9 m (3 ft) wide
and 3-15 cm (1-6 in) deep. Stream banks are steep and eroded.
The substrate is composed primarily of sand and silt. This stream
occurs in a forested setting in the study area and had low flow
during the time of the site visit.
Ut2 is crossed by the proposed project near "I"' Ave. This
stream has an intermittent flow and is highly disturbed. The
substrate is composed of gravel and the stream banks are forested.
The channel is 0.9 m (3 ft) wide and the water is approximately 5.
cm (3 in) deep. This stream had very little flow during the time of
the site visit.
14
(3) Water Quality
This section describes the water quality of the water
resources within the project area. Potential sediment loads and
toxin concentrations of these waters from both point sources and
nonpoint sources are evaluated. Water quality assessments are
made based on published resource information and existing
general watershed characteristics. These data provide insight into
the value of water resources within the project area to meet human
needs and to provide habitat for aquatic organisms.
(a) General Watershed Characteristics
The watershed for this sub-basin of the Catawba
River Basin includes Hickory and its suburbs. The
immediate vicinity of the study area is highly industrialized
and few streams exist in a natural setting. Streams are
vulnerable to industrial spills and point source pollution as
well as domestic waste and other sources of nonpoint
source pollution. Nonpoint source pollution includes
domestic waste from septic tanks. fertilizers and pesticides
from lawn maintenance. Streams in this sub-basin are
considered to have a high potential for nonpoint source
problems (NCDEM, 1988).
(b) Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
(BMAN), managed by the DWQ, is part of an ongoing
ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses
long term trends in water quality. The program monitors
ambient water quality by sampling at fixed sites for
selected benthic macroinvertebrates organisms, which are
sensitive to water quality conditions. Samples are
evaluated on the number of taxa present of intolerant
groups [Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera (EPT)]
and a taxa richness value (EPT S) is calculated. A biotic
index value is also calculated for the sample that
summarizes tolerance data for all species in each
collection. The two rankings are given equal weight in
fmal site bioclassification. The biotic index and taxa
richness values primarily reflect the effects of chemical
pollution and are a poor measure of the effects of such
physical pollutants as sediment. No BMAN sampling sites
are located on streams crossed by the proposed project.
15
(c) Point Source Dischargers
Point source dischargers located throughout North
Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program
administered by the DEM. All dischargers are required to
register for a permit. No registered NPDES dischargers are
located on streams in the study area.
d. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Impacts to water resources in the project area are likely to result
from activities associated with project construction. Activities likely to
result in impacts are clearing and grubbing on stream banks, riparian
canopy removal, instream construction, fertilizers and pesticides used in
revegetation, and pavement installation. The following impacts to surface
water resources are likely to result from the above mentioned construction
activities.
• Increased erosion in the project area and increased sedimentation
and siltation downstream of the crossing.
• Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to vegetation
removal and increased sedimentation.
• Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or
additions to surface and ground water flow from construction.
• Changes in and destabilization of water temperature due to
vegetation removal.
• Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from
exposed areas.
• Increased concentrations of toxic compounds from highway
runoff, construction, and toxic spills.
• Increased potential for release of toxic compounds such as fuel and
oil from construction equipment and other vehicles.
• Alteration of stream discharge due to silt loading and changes in
surface and groundwater drainage patterns.
In order to minimize potential impacts to water resources in the
project area, NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters will be strictly enforced during the construction phase of
the project. Impacts can be further reduced by limiting instream activities
and revegetating stream banks immediately following the completion of
grading.
16
2. Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include terrestrial and aquatic communities. This section
describes the biotic communities encountered in the project area, as well as the
relationships between fauna and flora within these communities. The
composition and distribution of biotic communities throughout the project area
are reflective of topography, soils, hydrology, and past and present land uses.
Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant
community classifications. These classifications follow Schafale and Weakley
(1990) where possible. Representative animal species which are likely to occur in
these habitats (based on published range distributions) are also cited.
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are
provided for each animal and plant species described. Subsequent references to
the same organism refer to the common name only. Fauna observed during the
site visit are denoted in the text with an asterisk (*).
a. Biotic Communities
The biotic community includes terrestrial and aquatic elements.
Much of the flora and fauna described from the biotic community utilizes
resources from other communities, making boundaries between
contiguous communities difficult to define. All portions of the study area
are disturbed to some extent.
(1) Disturbed
All portions of the study area have been disturbed and
manipulated by human activities in the past. None of the current
area resembles a natural assemblage of species. Many introduced
and invasive species were observed in the study area. This
community includes three distinct habitat types: Forested,
maintained lawn, and waste lots.
Forested areas are more diverse than the surrounding
habitats. Common species observed include tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), black willow (Salix nigra), silver maple
(Acer saccharinum), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), white oak
(Quercus alba), American elm (Ulmus americana), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), pecan (Carya illinoensis), red maple (A.
rubrum), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbrier (Smilax
sp.), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), red mulberry (Morus
rubra), privet (Ligustrum sinense), pokeweed (Phytolacca
americana), box elder (A. negundo), wild rose (Rosa sp.), Virginia
17
creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Christmas fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides), violet (Viola sp.), and ebony
spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron).
Waste areas and lawns have been disturbed more recently
than the forests. Lawns are frequently mowed and maintained
through herbicide application. These areas are dominated by herbs
and shrubs including smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), muscadine
grape, Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), privet, red
mulberry, dandelion (Taraxacum ofcinale), clover (Trifolium
spp.), plantain (Plantago sp.), honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos),
mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), wild carrot (Daucus carota), fescue
(Festuca sp.), lespedeza (Lespedeza sp.), mock strawberry
(Duchesnea indica), milkweed (Asclepias sp.), Venus' looking-
glass (Specularia perfoliata), Carolina geranium (Geranium
carolinianum), black cherry (Prunus serotina), and paper mulberry
(Broussonetia papyrifera).
(2) Wildlife
Communities that are maintained in an early successional
state provide little cover for animals in the study area. These areas
do provide a significant food source for herbivores and also
predators found higher up on the food chain. Butterflies, such as
cabbage butterfly (Pieris rapae) and painted lady (Vanessa cardui)
are commonly seen going from flower to flower feeding on the
nectar that these plants produce. Other animals that frequently
forage on roadside shoulders and fill slopes include: black rat
snake (Elaphe obsoleta), Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhousii),
Carolina chickadee (Pares carolinensis)*, American crow (Corvus
brachyrhynchos)*, European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)*,
mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), northern cardinal (Cardinalis
cardinalis)*, eastern bluebird (Sialia sialis), loggerhead shrike
(Lanius ludovicianus), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), gray
squirrel (Scurius caroliniana), and eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus
jloridanus).
Portions of the study area that are forested or shrubby
provide habitats for a greater diversity of species. These areas
provide habitat for eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina),
American toad (B. americanus), northern cricket frog (Acris
crepitans), five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus), brown snake
(Storeria dekayi), common flicker (Colaptes auratus), Carolina
wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus), gray catbird (Dumetella
carolinensis)*, American robin (Turdus migratorius)*, red-eyed
vireo (Vireo olivaceus), scarlet tanager (Pirango olivacea), hispid
cottonrat (Sigmodon hispidus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), Virginia
opossum (Didelphis virginiana), and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus).
Intermittent streams in the study area are highly degraded
and channelized. These streams offer limited opportunities for
aquatic organisms due to degradation and low flow. Aquatic
organisms that may be found in the study area include crayfish
(Cambaridae) and herps found in adjacent habitats that utilize
pools in the stream channel for reproduction.
b. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on
the biotic resources described. Any construction related activities in or
near these resources have the potential to impact biological functions.
This section quantifies and qualifies potential impacts to the natural
communities within the project area in terms of the area impacted and the
organisms affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are considered
here as well, along with recommendations to minimize or eliminate
impacts.
(1) Terrestrial Impacts
Impacts to terrestrial communities will result from project
construction due to the clearing and paving of portions of the
project area, and thus the loss of community area. Calculated
impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the relative abundance of
each community present in the study area. Estimated impacts are
derived based on the entire project length and the entire proposed
right-of-way width. However, project construction often does not
require the entire right-of-way; therefore, actual impacts may be
considerably less. Construction of the proposed project will
impact approximately 2.2 ha (5.4 ac) of the disturbed community.
The projected loss of habitat resulting from construction of
the proposed project will have a minimal impact on populations of
native fauna and flora. Biotic communities impacted by project
construction are already disturbed to some extent. Plants and
animals found in these communities are generally common
throughout North Carolina and are well adapted to persisting
through disturbance. Animals temporarily displaced by
construction activities should repopulate areas of suitable habitat
following project completion.
19
(2) Aquatic Impacts
Impacts to the aquatic communities of streams crossed by
the proposed project will result from the extension of the existing
culverts. Impacts are likely to result from the physical disturbance
of aquatic habitats (i.e. substrate, water quality, stream banks).
Disturbance of aquatic habitats has a detrimental effect on aquatic
community composition by reducing species diversity and the
overall quality of aquatic habitats. Physical alterations to aquatic
habitats can result in the following impacts to aquatic
communities:
• Inhibition of plant growth.
• Clogging of feeding structures of filter-feeding organisms, gills
of fish, and the burial of benthic organisms.
• Algal blooms resulting from increased nutrient concentrations.
• Mortality among sensitive organisms resulting from
introduction of toxic substances and decreases in dissolved
oxygen.
• Destabilization of water temperature resulting from riparian
canopy removal.
• Loss of benthic macroinvertebrates through scouring resulting
from an increased sediment load.
Impacts to aquatic communities can be minimized by
minimizing riparian canopy removal and limiting instream
construction. Revegetation immediately following the completion
of grading activities, and strict adherence to BMP's.
3. Jurisdictional Topics
This section provides inventories and impact analyses pertinent to two
significant regulatory issues: Waters of the United States and rare and protected
species. These issues retain particular significance because of federal and state
mandates which regulate their protection. This section deals specifically with the
impact analyses required to satisfy regulatory authority prior to project
construction.
a. Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of
"Waters of the United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of
Federal Register (CRF) Part 328.3. Any action that proposes to dredge or
place fill material into surface waters or wetlands falls under the
20
jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Surface waters include all
standing or flowing waters which have commercial or recreational value
to the public. Wetlands are identified based on the presence of hydric
soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and saturated or flooded conditions during
all or part of the growing season.
(1) Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Criteria to delineate jurisdictional wetlands include
evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation and hydrology.
No wetlands are identified in the study area. Prior to project
construction, if a wetland site is identified in the project area, the
guidelines for avoidance, minimization, and mitigation (see
Section IV.D.3.a.(3)) will be followed.
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are calculated
based on the linear feet of the stream that is located within the
proposed right-of-way. Physical aspects of surface waters are
described in section D.l.c.(1). Impacts to jurisdictional surface
waters are expressed in the table below.
to jurisdictional surface waters.
Stream Length Impacted Area Impacted
linear.m`(ft) mZ (ft)
Ut 1 20(64) 18(192)
Ut2 10(33) 9(99)
(2) Permits
impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated
from the proposed project. As.a result, construction activities will
require permits and certifications from various regulatory agencies
in charge of protecting the water quality of public water resources
A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is likely to be
applicable at most ditch and stream crossings found in the project
study area. This permit authorizes construction provided the
following conditions are met:
• the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the
actual crossing;
• the fill placed in Water of the United States is limited to a
filled area of no more than 0.1 hectares (1 /3 acre);
21
• no more than a total of 61 in (200 linear ft) of the fill for the
roadway can occur in special aquatic sites, including wetlands;
• the crossing is culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to
prevent the restriction of, and to withstand, expected high
flows and tidal flows and movement of aquatic organisms, and;
• the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary
and permanent, is part of a single and complete project for
crossing of a Water of the United States.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality
Certification from the DWQ prior to the issuance of the
Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires
that the state issue or deny water certification for any federally
permitted or licensed activity that may result in a discharge to
Waters of the United States. Section 401 Certification allows
surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the
construction or other land manipulation. The issuance of a 401
permit from the DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404
permit.
(3) Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
(see Section IV.D.3.a.(1))
The COE has adopted through the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland mitigation policy which
embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing.
The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical,
biological and physical integrity of Waters of he United States,
specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been
defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts (to wetlands),
minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of
these three aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory
mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and
practicable possibilities of averting impacts to Waters of the
United States. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the COE, in determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to
offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate
to the scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms
of cost, existing technology and logistics in light of overall project
purposes.
22
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and
practicable steps to reduce the adverse impacts to Waters of the
United States. Implementation of these steps will be required
through project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization
typically focuses on decreasing the footprint of the proposed
project through the reduction to median widths, right-of-way
widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder widths.
Compensatory mitigation in not normally considered until
anticipated impacts to Waters of the United States have been
avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is
recognized that "no net loss of wetlands" functions and values may
not be achieved in each and every permit action. Appropriate and
practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable
adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable
minimization has been required. Compensatory actions often
include restoration, creation and enhancement of Water of the
United States, specifically wetlands. Such actions should be
undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site.
Compensatory mitigation is required for those projects
authorized under Nationwide Permits that result in the fill or
alteration of-
• More than 0.45 ha (1.0 ac) of wetlands will require
compensatory mitigation;
• And/or more than 45.7 in (150.0 linear ft) of streams will
require compensatory mitigation.
Written approval of the final mitigation plan is required
from the DWQ prior to the issuance of a 401 Certification. Final
permit/mitigation decisions rest with the COE.
b. Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the
process of decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist
with human development. Federal law (under the provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action,
likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected, be
subject to review by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).
Other species may receive additional protection under separate state laws.
23
(1) Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE), and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under the provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. As of 02 May 1997, the FWS lists the dwarf-flowered
heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) as Threatened for Catawba
County. A brief description of the characteristics and habitat
requirements for this species along with a conclusion regarding
potential project impacts follows. Threatened is a species likely
to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all
or a significant portion of its range.
Hexastylis naniflora (dwarf-flowered heartleaf) Threatened
Family: Aristolochiaceae
Federally Listed: 14 April 1989
Flowers Present: mid March - mid May
The dwarf-flowered heartleaf is indigenous to the western
piedmont of North Carolina and the adjacent portions of South
Carolina.
This plant has heart-shaped leaves, supported by long thin
petioles that grow from a subsurface rhizome. It rarely exceeds 15
cm in height. The leaves are dark green in color, evergreen, and
leathery. Flowers are small, inconspicuous, jugshaped, and dark
brown in color. They are found near the base of the petioles. Fruits
mature from mid-May to early July.
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf populations are found along
north facing bluffs and their adjacent slopes, in boggy areas next to
streams and creekheads, and along the slopes of nearby hillsides
and ravines. It grows in acidic soils in regions with a cool moist
climate. Regional vegetation is described as upper piedmont oak-
pine forest and as part of the southeastern mixed forest.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
A field survey was conducted of the proposed project on 20
March 1997 by NCDOT biologists Tim Savidge and Matt Smith.
This survey did not identify any suitable habitat for the dwarf
flowered heartleaf in the study area. A search of the NHP database
of rare species and unique habitats shows no populations of this
24
species in the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore,
construction of the proposed project will not result in any impacts
to the dwarf flowered heartleaf.
(2) Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are two federal species of concern listed by the FWS
for Catawba County (see table below). Federal species of concern
are not afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species
Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section
7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or
Endangered. However, the status of these species is subject to
change, and so should be included for consideration. Federal
Species of Concern (FSC) are defined as a species which is under
consideration for listing for which there is insufficient information
to support listing. In addition, organisms which are listed as
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program list of Rare Plant and
Animal Species are afforded state protection under the NC State
Endangered Species Act and the NC Plant Protection and
Conservation Act of 1979.
FSC species and state status' for Catawba County. .
Common Name - Scientific Name State Habitat
Status
Catawba crayfish Dactylocthere SR NO
ostracod isabelae
sweet pinesap Monotropsis odorata C NO
Note: "SR" (Significantly Rare) any species not listed as
endangered, threatened, or special concern but which
exists in small numbers and has been determined by
NHP to need monitoring.
"C" (Candidate) any species which is rare in North
Carolina and if present land use trends continue is
likely to merit listing as endangered or threatened.
A review of the NHP data base of rare species and unique
habitats shows no occurrences of Federal Species of Concern in
the study area. Surveys for FSC species were not conducted
during the site visit.
25
4. Hazardous Materials Evaluation
This hazardous materials evaluation is based on a field reconnaissance
survey conducted along existing Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard between Tate
Boulevard and 7th Avenue NE. A file search of all appropriate Federal and State
agencies was also conducted to determine if any known environmental hazards
are present along the proposed project alignment.
a. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Facilities
Based on the field reconnaissance survey, there does not appear to
be any sites within the project limits which have the potential for UST
involvement.
b. Landfills and Other Potentially Contaminated Properties
Based on the Geographical Information Service (GIS), no
regulated landfills or unregulated or dump sites occur within the proposed
project limits.
5. Floodplain Involvement
Catawba County is currently a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Regular Program; however, this project does not cross any identified flood hazard
areas. The project is not within a water supply watershed, nor a high quality
water zone. Therefore, erosion and sedimentation will be controlled through the
specification, installation, and maintenance of standard erosion and sedimentation
control measures. This project will not affect wetlands or other environmentally
sensitive areas and is above headwaters. Existing drainage patterns will be .
maintained and improved to the extent practicable. Groundwater resources will
be evaluated in final design to ensure that measures are taken, if necessary, to
prevent contamination.
6. Traffic Noise (see Appendix C for Traffic Noise Tables)
This analysis was performed to determine the effect of the proposed
widening of Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension from Tate Boulevard to Seventh
Street North East in Catawba County on noise levels in the immediate project,
area. This investigation includes an inventory of existing noise sensitive land
uses and a field survey of ambient (existing) noise levels in the study area. It also
includes a comparison of the predicted noise levels and the ambient noise levels
to determine if traffic noise impacts can be expected resulting from the proposed.
project. Traffic noise impacts are determined from the current procedures for the
abatement of highway traffic noise and construction noise, appearing as Part 772
26
of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If traffic noise impacts are
predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures
for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be considered.
a. Characteristics of Noise
Noise is basically defined as unwanted sound. It is emitted from
many sources including airplanes, factories, railroads, power generation
plants, and highway vehicles. Highway noise, or traffic noise, is usually a
composite of noises from engine exhaust, drive train, and tire-roadway
interaction.
The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound pressure.
Since the range of sound pressure varies greatly, a logarithmic scale is
used to relate sound pressures to some common reference level, usually
the decibel (dB). Sound pressures described in decibels are cared sound.
pressure levels and are often defined in terms of frequency weighted
scales (A, B, C, or D). The weighted-A decibel scale is used almost
exclusively in vehicle noise measurements because it places the most
emphasis on the frequency range to which the human ear is most sensitive
(1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound levels measured using a weighted-A decibel
scale are often expressed as dBA. Throughout this report, all noise levels
will be expressed in dBA's. Several examples of noise pressure levels in
dBA are listed in Table N I.
Review of Table N1 indicates that most individuals in urbanized
areas are exposed to fairly high noise levels from many sources as they go
about their daily activities. The degree of disturbance or annoyance of
unwanted sound depends essentially on three things:
• The amount and nature of the intruding noise.
• The relationship between the background noise and the
intruding noise.
• The type of activity occurring when the noise is heard.
In considering the first of these three factors, it is important to note
that individuals have different sensitivity to noise. Loud noises bother
some more than others and some individuals become upset if an unwanted
noise persists. The time patterns of noise also enter into an individual's
judgement of whether or not a noise is offensive. For example, noises
occurring during sleeping hours are usually considered to be more
offensive than the same noises in the daytime.
27
With regard to the second factor, individuals tend to judge the
annoyance of an unwanted noise in terms of its relationship to noise from
other sources (background noise). The blowing of a car horn at night
when background noise levels are approximately 45 dBA would generally
be more objectionable than the blowing of a car horn in the afternoon
when background noises might be 55 dBA.
The third factor is related to the interference of noise with
activities of individuals. In a 60 dBA environment, normal conversation
would be possible while sleep might be difficult. Work activities requiring
high levels of concentration may be interrupted by loud noises while
activities requiring manual effort may not be interrupted to the same
degree.
Over time, particularly if the noises occur at predicted intervals
and are expected, individuals tend to accept the noises that intrude into
their lives. Attempts have been made to regulate many of these types of
noises including airplane noise, factory noise, railroad noise, and highway
traffic noise. In relation to highway traffic noise, methods of analysis and
control have developed rapidly over the past few years.
b. Noise Abatement Criteria
In order to determine whether highway noise levels are or are not
compatible with various land uses, the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) has developed noise abatement criteria (NAC) and procedures to
be used in the planning and design of highways. These abatement criteria
and procedures are set forth in the aforementioned Federal reference (Title
23 CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise abatement criteria for various
land uses is presented in Table N2. The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is
the level of constant sound which in a given situation and time period has
the same energy as does time varying sound. In other words, the
fluctuating sound levels of traffic noise are represented in terms of a
steady noise level with the same energy content.
C. Ambient Noise Levels
Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the
project to determine ambient (existing) noise levels for the identified land
uses. The purpose of this noise level information was to quantify the
existing acoustic environment and to provide a base for assessing the
impact of noise level increases. The existing Leq noise level in the project
area as measured at 15 meters (50 feet) from the roadway was 64 dBA.
The ambient measurement site was located between "E" Avenue SE and
"F" Avenue SE.
28
The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the
most current traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate existing
noise levels for comparison with noise levels actually measured. The
calculated existing noise level averaged approximately 3 dBA higher than
the measured noise level for the location where noise measurement was
obtained. The differences in the dBA level can be attributed to
"bunching" of vehicles, low traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds
versus the computer's "evenly-spaced" vehicles and single vehicular
speed.
d. Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels
In general, the traffic situation is composed of a large number of
variables which describe different cars driving at different speeds through
a continual changing highway configuration and surrounding terrain. Due
to the complexity of the problem, certain assumptions and simplifications
must be made to predict highway traffic noise.
The procedure used to predict future noise levels in this study was
the Noise Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and OPTIMA
(revised March, 1983). The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction) procedure is
based upon the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model
(FHWA-RD-77-108). The BCR traffic noise prediction model uses the
number and type of vehicles on the planned roadway, their speeds, the
physical characteristics of the road (curves, hills, depressed, elevated,
etc.), receptor location and height, and, if applicable, barrier type, barrier
ground elevation, and barrier top elevation.
In this regard, it is to be noted that only preliminary alignment was
available for use in this noise analysis. The project proposes to widen the
existing 2-lane roadway to a 5-lane curb and gutter section. Only those
existing natural or man-made barriers were included in setting up the
model. The roadway sections and proposed intersections were assumed to
be flat and at-grade: Thus, this analysis represents the "worst" case
topographical conditions. The noise predictions made in this report are
highway-related noise predictions for the traffic conditions during the year
being analyzed. '
Peak hour design and level-of-service (LOS) C volumes were
compared, and the volumes resulting in the noisiest conditions were used
with the proposed posted speed limits. Hence, during all other time
periods, the noise levels will be no greater than those indicated in this
report.
29
The STAMINA 2.0 computer model was utilized in order to
determine the number of land uses (by type) which would be impacted
during the peak hour of the design year 2020. A land use is considered to
be impacted when exposed to noise levels approaching or exceeding the
FHWA noise abatement criteria and/or predicted to sustain a substantial
noise increase.
The Leq traffic noise exposures associated with this project are
listed in Table N3. Information included in this table consists of listings
of all receptors in close proximity to the project, their ambient and
predicted noise levels, and the estimated noise level increase for each.
e. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours
Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise levels
either: [a] approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria (with
"approach" meaning within 1 dBA of the Table N2 value), or [b]
substantially exceed the existing noise levels. The NCDOT definition of
substantial increase is shown in the lower portion of Table N2.
Consideration for noise abatement measures must be given to receptors
which fall in either category.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the
Federal/State governments are no longer responsible for providing noise
abatement measures for new development which building permits are
issued within the noise impact area of a proposed highway after the Date
of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of the location of a
proposed highway project will be the approval date of CEs, FONSIs,
RODS, or the Design Public Hearing, whichever comes later. For
development occurring after this public knowledge date, local governing
bodies are responsible to insure that noise compatible designs are utilized
along the proposed facility.
The maximum number of receptors in each activity category that
are predicted to become impacted by future traffic noise is shown in Table
N4. These are noted in terms of those receptors expected to experience
traffic noise impacts by approaching or exceeding the FHWA NAC or by
a substantial increase in exterior noise levels. Under Title 23 CFR Part
772, there are 8 residences and 3 businesses impacted by traffic noise in
the project area. The maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level
contours are 23 and 42 meters (75 and 138 feet), respectively, from the
center of the proposed roadway..
30
This information should assist local authorities in exercising land
use control over the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway
within local jurisdiction. For example, with the proper information on
noise, the local authorities can prevent further development of
incompatible activities and land uses with the predicted noise levels of an
adjacent highway.
Table N5 indicates the exterior traffic noise level increases for the
identified receptors for the alternative by roadway section. Six receptors
are predicted to experience a substantial increase in exterior noise levels.
The predicted noise level increases for this project range up to +10 dBA.
When real-life noises are heard, it is possible barely to detect noise level
changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change is more readily noticeable. A 10
dBA change is judged by most people as a doubling or a halving of the
loudness of the sound.
f. Traffic Noise Abatement Measures
If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation
of alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the
noise impacts must be considered. Consideration for noise abatement
measures must be given to all impacted receptors. There are 11 impacted
receptors located in the project area.
(1) Highway Alignment
Highway alignment selection involves the horizontal or
vertical orientation of the proposed improvements in such a way as
to minimize impacts and costs. The selection of alternative
alignments for noise abatement purposes must consider the balance
between noise impacts and other engineering and environmental
parameters. For noise abatement, horizontal alignment selection is
primarily a matter of setting the roadway at a sufficient distance
from noise sensitive areas. Changing the highway alignment is not
(2) Traffic System Management Measures
Traffic management measures which limit vehicle type,
speed, volume and time of operations are often effective noise
abatement measures. For this project, traffic management
measures are not considered appropriate for noise abatement due
to their effect on the capacity and level-of-service on the proposed
roadway.
31
(3) Noise Barriers
Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels
can often be applied with a measurable degree of success by the
application of solid mass, attenuable measures to effectively
diffract, absorb, and reflect highway traffic noise emissions. Solid
mass, attenuable measures may include earth berms or artificial
abatement walls.
For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it
must be high enough and long enough to shield the receptor from
significant sections of the highway. Access openings in the barrier
severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then
becomes economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a
small noise reduction. Safety at access openings (driveways,
crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted sight distance is also a
concern. Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction, a barrier's
length would normally be 8 times the distance from the barrier to
the receptor. For example, a receptor located 15 meters (50 feet)
from the barrier would normally require a barrier 120 meters (400
feet) long. An access opening of 12 meters (40 feet) (10 percent of
the area) would limit its noise reduction to approximately 4 dBA
(FUNDAMENTAL AND ABATEMENT OF HIGHWAY
TRAFFIC NOISE, Report No. FHWA-HHI-HEV-73-7976-1,
USDOT, chapter 5, section 3.2, page 5-27).
In addition, businesses, churches, and other related
establishments located along a particular highway normally require
accessibility and high visibility. Solid mass, attenuable measures
for traffic noise abatement would tend to disallow these two
qualities, and thus, would not be acceptable abatement measures in
this case.
g. "Do Nothing" Alternative
The traffic noise impacts for the "do nothing" or "no-build"
alternative were also considered. If the proposed widening did not occur,
5 residential receptors would experience traffic noise impacts by
approaching or exceeding the FHWA NAC. Also, the receptors could
anticipate experiencing an increase in exterior noise levels ranging up to 6
dBA. As previously noted, it is barely possible to detect noise level
changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change in noise levels is more readily
noticed.
h. Construction Noise
The major construction elements of this project are expected to be
earth removal, hauling, grading, and paving: General construction noise
impacts, such as temporary speech interference for passers-by and those
individuals living or working near the project, can be expected particularly
from paving operations and from the earth moving equipment during
grading operations. However, considering the relatively short-term nature
of construction noise and the limitation of construction to daytime hours,
these impacts are not expected to be substantial. The transmission loss
characteristics of nearby natural elements and man-made structures are
believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive construction
noise.
i. Summary
Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is not
recommended, and no noise abatement measures are proposed. This
evaluation completes the highway traffic noise requirements of Title 23
CFR Part 772, and unless a major project change develops, no additional
noise reports will be submitted for this project.
7. Air Quality (see Appendix D for Air Quality Tables)
Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from industrial
and internal combustion engines are the most prevalent sources. Other origins of
common outdoor air pollution are solid waste disposal and any form of fire. The
impact resulting from highway construction ranges from intensifying existing air
pollution problems to improving the ambient air conditions. The traffic is the
center of concern when determining the impact of a new highway facility or the
improvement of an old highway facility. Motor vehicles emit carbon monoxide
(CO), nitrogen oxide (NO), hydrocarbons (HC), particulate matter, sulfur dioxide
(SO2), and lead (Pb) (listed in order of decreasing emission rate). Automobiles
are considered to be the major source of CO in the project area. For this reason,
most of the analysis presented is concerned with determining expected carbon
monoxide levels in the vicinity of the project due to traffic flow.
In order to determine the ambient CO concentration for the receptor
closest to the highway project, two concentration components must be used: local
and background. The local concentration is defined as the CO emissions from
cars operating on highways in the near vicinity (i.e., distances within 100 meters)
of the receptor location. The background concentration is defined by the North.
Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources as "the
concentration of a pollutant at a point that is the result of emissions outside the
local vicinity; that is, the concentration at the upwind edge of the local sources."
33
In this study, the local concentration was determined by the NCDOT
Traffic Noise/Air Quality Staff using line source computer modeling and the
background concentration was obtained from the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR). Once the two
concentration components were resolved, they were added together to determine
the ambient CO concentration for the receptor in question and to compare to the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons -and nitrogen oxides.
Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are carried into the
atmosphere where they react with sunlight to form ozone and nitrogen dioxide.
Automotive emissions of HC and NO are expected to decrease in the future due to
the continued installation and maintenance of pollution control devices on new
cars. However, regarding area-wide emissions, these technological improvements
maybe offset by the increasing number of cars on the transportation facilities of
the area.
The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide require
several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of ozone generally occur
10 to 20 kilometers (6 to 12.5 miles) downwind of the source of hydrocarbon
emissions. Urban areas as a whole are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons, not
individual streets and highways. The emissions of all sources in an urban area
mix together in the atmosphere, and in the presence. of sunlight, the mixture reacts
to form ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and other photochemical oxidants. The best
example of this type of air pollution is the smog which forms in Los Angeles,
California.
Automobiles are not regarded as significant sources of particulate matter
and sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources account for less than 7 percent
of particulate matter emissions and less than 2 percent of sulfur dioxide
emissions. Particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions are predominantly the
result of non-highway sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, and agricultural).
Because emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from automobiles are
very low, there is no reason.to suspect that traffic on the project will cause air
quality standards for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded.
Automobiles without catalytic converters can burn regular gasoline. The
burning of regular gasoline emits lead as a result of regular gasoline containing
tetraethyl lead which is added by refineries to increase the octane rating of the
fuel. Newer cars with catalytic converters burn unleaded gasoline eliminating
lead emissions. Also, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
has required the reduction in the lead content of leaded gasolines. The overall
average lead content of gasoline in 1974 was 0.54 grams per liter. By 1989, this
composite average had dropped to 0.003 grams per liter. In the future, lead
emissions are expected to decrease as more cars use unleaded fuels and as the
34
lead content of leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 make the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead additives
unlawful after December 31, 1995. Because of these reasons, it is not expected
that traffic on the proposed project will cause the NAAQS for lead to be
exceeded.
A. microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine future CO
concentrations resulting from the proposed highway improvements. "CAL3QHC
- A Modeling Methodology For Predicting Pollutant Concentrations Near
Roadway Intersections" was used to predict the CO concentration at the nearest
sensitive receptor to the project.
Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO concentrations
consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions with predicted traffic
volumes, vehicle emission factors, and worst-case meteorological parameters.
The traffic volumes are based on the annual average daily traffic projections and
the highest volume along the project was used in the CAL3QHC modeling.
Carbon monoxide vehicle emission factors were calculated for the year of 2000
and the design year of 2020 using the EPA publication "Mobile Source Emission
Factors" and the MOBILE 5A mobile source emissions computer model.
The background CO concentration for the project area was estimated to be
1.8 parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the Air Quality Section, Division
of Environmental Management, North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources indicated that an ambient CO concentration of 1.8
ppm is suitable for most suburban/rural areas.
The worst-case air quality receptors were determined to be along the
right-of-way line at a distance of 15.2 meters (50 feet) from the proposed
centerline of the roadway and 9.1 meters from the existing centerline. The
"build" and "no-build" one-hour CO concentrations for these receptors for the
years of 2000 and 2020 are shown in the following table.
One Hour CO Concent rations (PPM)
Nearest
Sensitive Build No-Build
Receptor 2000 2020 2000 2020
R/W 2.6 2.7 4.0 5.4
Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations with the NAAQS
maximum permitted for 1-hour averaging period = 35 ppm; 8-hour averaging
period= 9 ppm) indicates no violation of these standards. Since the results of the
35
worst-case 1-hour CO analysis is less than 9 ppm, it can be concluded that the
8-hour CO level does not exceed the standard. See Tables Al through A4 for
input data and output.
The project is located in Catawba County, which has been determined to
be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Part
51 is not applicable, because the proposed project is located in an attainment area.
This project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of
this attainment area.
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from
clearing and grubbing, demolition or other operations will be removed from the
project, burned or otherwise disposed of by the contractor. Any burning will be
done in accordance with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of
the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
Care will be taken to insure that burning will be done at the greatest practical
distance from dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions are such as to
create a hazard to the public. Burning will only be utilized under constant
surveillance. Also during construction, measures will be taken to reduce the dust
generated by construction when the control of dust is necessary for the protection
and comfort of motorists or area residents. This evaluation completes the
assessment requirements for air quality of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
and the NEPA process, and no additional reports are necessary.

E. Construction Impacts
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing
and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be removed from the project, burned,
or otherwise disposed of by the contractor. Any burning done will be in accordance with
applicable local laws, ordinances, and/or regulations of the North Carolina Plan for
implementing National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
The major construction elements of this project are expected to be earth removal,
hauling, grading, and paving. General construction noise impacts, such as temporary
speech interference for passers-by and those individuals living or working near the
project, can be expected particularly from paving operations and from the earth moving
equipment during grading operations. Overall, construction noise impacts are expected
to be minimal, since all alternative alignments generally traverse through low density
areas. However, considering the relatively short term nature of construction noise, these
impacts are not expected to be substantial. The transmission loss characteristics of
nearby structures are believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive
construction noise.
36
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Comments Received from Federal State and Local Agencies
Comments on the proposed Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension were solicited
from the following federal, state, and local agencies. An asterisk indicates a written
response was received (see Appendix F for comments).
* U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-Raleigh
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
* U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Asheville
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service-Raleigh
U. S. Geological Survey-Raleigh
* N. C. State Clearinghouse
* N. C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
N. C. Department of Administration
* N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
* N. C. Department of Public Instruction
N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
Hickory Mayor
Catawba County Manager
Catawba County Commissioners
In addition to the above comments, the subject project was further coordinated
with local government and NCDOT officials on June 11, 1997. The City of Hickory
expressed an interest in construction of sidewalks along the project where they do not
currently exist, specifically on both sides of the project between Tate Blvd. and Highland
Ave. See Section I.B.9. for details concerning the sidewalk policy. The City of Hickory
has also expressed an interest in additional landscaping along the project. See Section
I.B.12. for details concerning NCDOT's landscape policy. Coordination with the City of
Hickory and the NCDOT will continue until these issues, and any other issues which may
arise, are resolved.
An on-site meeting with representatives of the Norfolk-Southern Railroad and
NCDOT representatives was conducted on August 22, 1996 to discuss construction of a
temporary railroad detour and the new bridge over Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard. As a result
of this meeting, three (3) alternative detour locations were drafted and preliminary plans
were sent to representatives of Norfolk-Southern Railroad in Atlanta for their review and
comments. As long as the existing railroad traffic will not be interrupted, Norfolk-
Southern said that they had no preference-which detour is constructed. Coordination with
Norfolk-Southern Railroad will continue to ensure all issued will be resolved without
project delay.
37
B. Citizens Informational Workshop
A Citizens Informational Workshop was held at the City of Hickory Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, 76 North Center Street on November 20, 1997 (see
Appendix D). The purpose of the workshop was to explain the proposed project to local
citizens and to solicit their comments and/or suggestions. Less than 5 citizens attended
the meeting. Comments at the workshop were positive and no citizen's comments have
been received since the workshop was held.
WBK/plr
r FIGURES
s

°o
' 16
s Wnl?nru
NORTH CAROLINA .m4
CATAWBA COUNTY
Cnc
-? 1
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
O
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION
TATE BLVD. NE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
Figure 1 Locotlon Map
r
A
>
.i:
0
.
- ` t
L I
-
?, ?I Pp W
x
:.??-? 'I !C?' _ r IL E_.. •?-- ? ? / 1 c ? mama n ? n .:
!Y V ? Z f?'r? = Z O ?? I cc
FF ,
r
00
?? h t ?r`? find igf for
4 f , r .
r
f
f . A y? 3Y ?8 r ti?
.
.
r f
?. G
. : ??? ? ' ?_ 0] E ? . ? :?" 1 04 ': y j ? ? ,w-w ice. 's_. '?a• r ? ?'
IC If
40 U,
h. j yr t ?" a '? ?!
rY?V r ` t
1
T
F T_
` ve,, • Y i 1s"c a s: ?? Q y V a .`" yy?? p y {f tT? P?
4a '; r F< { =OAg. ! 4 ' + 4th{ s 6
> ? 'C4'4? ?Y ? ? _t^A
w
10 1?` t &
n r _
;. f "` ? acA
P
k
i b- "c 1f Z F- P? ` y m r
r,
r .
V..
fl, "k
Owl"
•
i
< i [r
cc "I
I tf' a y1 M1 5 y Y
µ, Z
rte} _
- I• ?'lr 1 N r C' ? ? ? R " a C?J
3
.. y
f .-. t I
? _?. . I S t 1 7
, ,

i

O

O V
E -
v co
^ N ..
N
M ?
v
L
t?

M
N CO)
,O C
O
L
U ?
O
'O
O
? E

?J- - - - -O
N
CO CD
O M
N- - - - - E
- - U
U

O N
U
O
C >'
U
to
E
CO ?. m
Lf)
_U
.
Q
F-
M
v
G
O
O
N
?C
C f-
CD
N A`cn
L
cm
U-
EST. 1997 ADT VOLUMES U-2306A
HICKORY, LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXT. CATAWBA
TATE BLVD. TO 7TH AVE. NE COUNTY
0
0
O LO
7th Ave. NE 4J 1
o U)
?Lo
cll? Tc:' 0 0 , ,?°vi°?K.S°?thet

000
000
i
i N "T
0
26°0 Op
•\
300
*1 IF*
3°0
Pie 000
`gh\ara
? °o
300
fhNN
N
?
40
9°o
o
0
o.
L
1
0
°
n
m
00
000
or,
cn d 7 l? 300
4- 8200 ? 4- 4300 ?-- 5100
Tate Blvd.
1300 J
6200 -? 4700 r 5100 -?
200 000
ccoo 0T
m?
o
o
a
co
1 0
Figure 4
0 4- ?
,ooo
00
00

A.
9
EST. 2020 ADT VOLUMES U-2306A
HICKORY, LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXT. CATAWBA
TATE BLVD. TO 7TH AVE. NE COUNTY

w
I
°oo
rn
2rn .
0 Ok
0 e<v\
?o
?o
300
4i
600
500 *1 i F
000
y
N?g\00 P? 200 000 600
0
0
0
•?1
7th Ave. NE
0
leoo
0
m
1
00
000
?l
p0
°0 I
m
co
0
°
N
1 °
r

O
Co ODD O

?--- 14800
?I?
Tate Blvd. i

600
4- 7800 ?- 5100
?soo
+
2400
F
11100 -? 8300 -? 9100 -?
400 000
?°0 °n
co O
o
0
a
a?
°
1
`? Figure 5
N06

•.'
?? ? i•a ai ^?3I ??
- '?
'
T ,
? ? .1.1•ww1 ?_
1 ,
_? .
...
- to __ uts ILL
?I AVE
K w.. w 1527
S
° .'
• ? t 0177 ?- f
•1 . 1' 1$92 wx
411
. ,
, „ ? • 1651
1101
1589
' 1 s 1333
•, °+
227e
?
G ? rH 11
... ..L.e•.
we,.•. ca., ^
r . r° i° „„.,.w. '? 7
q91 ......
V
' ,... 1293

I362
t 1 ?, • .634
? ? 1 _
• .
1117 • L. e0 1

• h IOe
1543
• /?
11
,w° 123 41.
• xz7

• h. /
127 •
?r
1117
• ----_.rwJ •• CI)v? .- CIT r_ •nj

•` F
, ..1
??
1
o.o '

..c•e.. ;.
u i . N17
Y w., ti
2320
t L IY1T l `<4 y
N1e ,S
C
- 1 1 1
: Y 1.

Cqy' ?N

1
- . -- 140,
?•
? T
, /
sewn ??
? -? . N 1

y W„1
p .. ? _
•
1347 {
?...,1
w
. icoro t ?,
t
•

•
° 4w
..1. - -

,
' 1569
'
? .. erw _

. w.
16I, 1423
1321
4ft

^•

31
r w" 142
4.

2W
:::?.<<: " ?) L T _
•? n 1027
_%/ 1133 .4 . 2.
;
v:• ?'.
To
HICKORY
S ?' w ui i. • sr .??
.rt •eM
r7 t3!R •'
11-

.
1
? Itt3 ?
1 r.
/ 7 ` ? . el• rcls
1 r-
1 .. 1

70 . a •m N
10
t 321
12" 1
1 i1i,1T-?
`6i ? L2 /r ?1

•,e • 1129 1 `
•
? w 1131 _?
111
?.
"`• 649; ?!.
\ •
'
'
'I Ny 1
?

'• h. ° ?•
? 1? t. 1619
1117
'
1
I ?
•
y
\ .649
tl `' ®
••'
• ?.
h? ? ? • NII

,• 1, 1/
/
/lam t?
W 1, 4
PROJECT LIMITS 1Op it
•AO 6e
.... = R.1.? e1 „.

R
16 it
1
I
LiY IT
14P z". c

ry
14 /
v /
4L "s

L
.
Figure 6
1
1? Ir
i

-- - - - - - - - - - -
- 0
I I I I I
I ` I` I? I? I
1 I VIII
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
M?
W
W
LL
L
.O
J

- - - - - - - - - - - -
- --I._--------
Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. / Tate Blvd. Intersection
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
( I I
I I I?
11111
I I I
Figure 7
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
?' • BRANCH
BUS ROUTE HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION
TATE BLVD. SE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
Existing Bus Routes
Figure 8
APPENDICIES
Appendix A
Division of Highways
Relocation Programs
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS
It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable replacement housing will
be available prior to construction of state and federally-assisted projects. Furthermore,
the North Carolina Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize
the inconvenience of relocation:
* Relocation Assistance,
* Relocation Moving Payments, and
* Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement.
With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be
available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes,
apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing of other housing programs. The
Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual
moving expenses encountered in relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or
tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing
arrangement (in cases of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or
Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to $22,500 to owners who are eligible and
qualify and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance
with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and/or the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act
(GS-133-5 through 133-18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced
persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one
relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced families, individuals,
businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations for relocation assistance
advisory services without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The
NCDOT will schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for
negotiations, and possession of replacement housing which meets decent, safe, and
sanitary standards. The displacees are given at least a 90-day written notice after
NCDOT purchases the property. Relocation of displace persons will be offered in areas
not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and commercial facilities. Rent
and sale prices of replacement property will be within the financial means of the families
and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible to their places of
employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses, non-
profit organization, and farm operations in searching for and moving to replacement
property.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive and
explanation regarding all available options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing,
(2) rental of replacement housing, either private or public, or (3) moving existing owner-
occupant housing to another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply
information concerning other state or federal programs offering assistance to displaced
persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships
to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location.
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displacee
for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit
organizations, and farm operations acquired for a highway project. Under the
Replacement Program for Owners, NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental
purchase payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals,
and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any increased interest
expenses for replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to owner-occupants for replacement
housing payments, increase interest payments, and incidental purchase expenses may not
exceed $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort Housing provision.
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed $5,250, to
rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, including incidental expenses,
on the purchase of a replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the
State determines is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250.
It is a policy of the State that no person will be displaced by the NCDOT's state or
federally-assisted construction projects unless and until comparable or adequate
replacement housing has been offered or provided for each displacee within a reasonable
period of time prior to displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered
as income for the purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of
determining eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance under the
Social Security Act or any other federal law.
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is
not available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's financial means, and the
replacement payment exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the
program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by the State so that
decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can be provided. It is not felt that this
program will be necessary on the project, since there appears to be adequate opportunities
for relocation within the area.
Appendix B
Relocation Reports
RELOCATION REPORT
El E.I.S. [-] CORRIDOR r_? DESIGN
North Carolina Departm6nt of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
IC?•'= f fi
PROJECT: 8.2791701 COUNTY Catawba Altemate One of three altemates
I.D. NO.: U-2306 A F.A. PROJECT MASTP-1216 8
Railroad detour on south side of existing tracks while constructing a new railroad bridge,
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (Hickory-Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, Tate Boulevard to Seventh Avenue, NE,
Catawba Count
ESTIMAT ED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Businesses 1 1 2 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-150 0
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 1 160-250 0 20-40M 3 150-250 1
Yes No Explain all 'YES" answers. 40-70M 0 260.400 0 40-70M 20 250400 7
x 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100M p 400600 0 70-100M 23 400-600 12
x 2. Will schools or churches be affect by. 100 up 0 60o UP 0 100 up 16 M UP
1 8
displacement? 1
TOTAL 1 01 1 61 28
x 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond b Number
project? 3. No permanent displacement of businesses.
x 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of 4. (a) Zagorli: Construction: 40,000 square feet, eight
employees, minorities, etc. employees, no minorities.
x 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? (b) Gand W Plastic: 40,000 'square feet, two
6. Source for available housing (list). employees, no minorities.
x 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? (Both business use the front which is about 2000
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? square feet for office, the remainder is storage.)
x 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families? 6. Realtor®, MLS, real estate publications, and on-
x 10 . Will public housing be needed for project? ground investigation.
x 11 . Is public housing available?
x 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing 8. Will be administered according to State law.
housing available during relocation period?
x 13. Will there be a problem of housing within 11. Newton, Conover and Lincolnton.
financial means?
x 14. Are suitable business sites available (list 12. There are no government programs competing
source). for housing and housing outlooks are good.
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? Ei ht 14. Same as three.

Anita M. Lee, Relocation Agent Date Approved by Date
r

form ia.4 Revnea UZIV* a - - ungmai a, 1 copy: ware Kwocation Agentn
2 Copy Area Relocation Office
RELOCATION REPORT
?X E.I.S. M CORRIDOR 0 DESIGN
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT: 8.2791701 COUNTY Catawba Altemate Two of three altemates
I.D. NO.: U-2306 A F.A. PROJECT MASTP-1216 8

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Railroad detour on south side of existing tracks while constructing a new railroad bridge,
(Hickory-Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, Tate Boulevard to Seventh Avenue, NE,
Catawba Count
ESTIMAT ED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees
Owners
Tenants Total
Minorities
0-15M
15-25M
25-35M
35-50M
50 UP
Residential 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Businesses 1 2 3 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M 0 so-ISO 0 0-20M 0 so-ISO
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 2040M 1 150-250 0 20-40M 3 150-250 1
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70M 0 250.400 0 40-70M 20 250400 7
x 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100M 0 400-600 0 70-100M 23 400-600 12
x 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 UP 0 600 UP 0 100 UP is Goo UP 8
displacement? TOTAL 1 0 61 28
x 3. Will business services still be available after REMARK S (Respond b Number
project? 3. No permanent displacement of businesses.
x 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc. 4. (a) Zagorli: Construction: 40,000 square feet, eight
employees, no minorities.
x 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? (b) G & W Plastic: 40,000 square feet, two employees
6. Source for available housing (list). no minorities.
x 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? (Both business use the front which is about 2000
x 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? square feet for office, the remainder is storage.)
x 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. (c) Alice Connection Beauty Shop: 1500 square feet
families? two employees, no minorities.
x 10 . Will public housing be needed for project?
x 11 . Is public housing available? 6. Realtor, MLS, real estate publications, and on-
x 12 . Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing ground investigation.
housing available during relocation period?
x 13 . Will there be a problem of housing within 8. Will be administered according to State law.
financial means?
x 14. Are suitable business sites available (list 11. Newton, Conover and Lincolnton.

15. source).
Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? Eight
12. There are no government programs competing
14. Same as three.

Anita M. Lee, Relocation Agent Date Approved by Date

Forth 15.4 Revised 02185 d ungmai a 1 copy: wme Keiocanon Agent
2 Copy Area Relocation Office
RELOCATION REPORT
I X I E.I.S. M CORRIDOR M DESIGN
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT: 8.2791701 COUNTY Catawba Altemate Three of three alternates
I. D. NO.: U-2306 A F.A. PROJECT MASTP-1216 8
Railroad detour on south side of existing tracks while constructing a new railroad bridge,
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (Hickory-Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, Tate Boulevard to Seventh Avenue, NE,
Catawba Count
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Businesses 1 0 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-160 0 0-20M 0 $ 0-150
ANSWE R ALL QUEST IONS 20.40M 1 160260 Q 20-40M 3 150250 1
Y- No Explain all "YES' answers. 40-70M 0 250-400 0 40-70M 20 260.400 7
x 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100M 0 400.600 0 70-100M 23 400.600 12
x 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 up 0 600 UP 0 100 UP 15 600 UP 8
displacement? TOTAL 1 0 61 28
x 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond b Number
project? 3. No permanent displacement of businesses.
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of 4. (a) Zagorli: Construction: 40,000 square feet, eight
employees, minorities, etc. employees, no minorities.
x 5 . Will relocation cause a housing shortage? (About 2000 square feet is used for office, the rest
6 . Source for available housing (list). is storage.)
x 7 . Will additional housing programs be needed?
x 8 . Should Last Resort Housing be considered? 6. RealtorM, MLS, real estate publications, and on-
x 9 . Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. ground investigation.
families?
x 10. Will public housing be needed for project? 8. Will be administered according to State law.
x 11 . Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing 11. Newton, Conover and Lincolnton.
. housing available during relocation period?
x 13. Will there be a problem of housing within 12. There are no government programs competing
financial means?
x 14. Are suitable business sites available (list 14. Same as three.
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? EI ht

Anita M. Lee, Relocation Agent X-Y Date Approved by Date
4
Forth 15.4 ROVeWd UZM 0 -FY. • ^`J°1
2 Copy Area Relocation Office
.
Appendix C
Traffic Noise Analysis Tables

TABLE N1
HEARING: SOUNDS BOMBARDING US DAILY
0
140 Shotgun blast, jet 30 m away at takeoff PAIN
Motor test chamber HUMAN EAR PAIN THRESHOLD
130
Firecrackers
120 Severe thunder, pnematic jackhammer
Hockey crowd
Amplified rick music UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD
110
Textile loom
100 Subway train, elevated train, `arm tractor
Power lawn mower, newspaper press
Heavy city traffic, noisy factory
90
Diesel truck 65 kmph 15 m away
80 Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal
Average factory, vacuum cleaner
Passenger car 80 kmph 15 m away MODERATELY LOUD
70
Quiet typewriter
60 Singing birds, window air-conditioner
Quiet automobile
Normal conversation, average office QUIET
50
Household refrigerator
Quiet office VERY QUIET
40
Average home
30 Dripping faucet
Whisper 1.5 m away
20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves
AVERAGE PERSON'S THRESHOLD OF HEARING
Whisper JUST AUDIBLE
10
0 THRESHOLD FOR ACUTE HEARING
D
E
C
B
E
L
S
Sources: World Book, Rand McNally Atlas of the Human Body, Encyclopedia Americanc,
"Industrial Noise and Hearing Conversation" by J. B. Olishifski and E. R. Hartford
(Researched by N. Jane Hunt and published in the Chicago Tribune in an
illustrated graphic by Tom Heinz.).
TABLE N2
NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
Activity
Category Leq(h) Description of Activity Category
A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important
(Exterior) public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to
continue to serve its intended purpose.
B 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels,
(Exterior) hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals.
C 72 Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above.
(Exterior)
D - Undeveloped lands.
E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals,
and
(Interior) auditoriums.
Source: Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772, U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration
TABLE N3
DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
Existing Noise Level Increase in dBA from Existing Noise
in Leq(h) Levels to Future Noise Levels
<_50 <15
>50 >10
.Source: North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Guidelines
A
Y
TABLE N3 1/1
t
Leq TRAFFIC NOISE EXPOSURES
Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Ext., From Tate Blvd. to 7th Ave. N.E.
Catawba County, State Project # 8.2791701, TIP # U-2306 A
AMBIENT NEAREST NOISE
A RECEPTOR INFORMATION NEAREST ROADWAY NOISE PROPOSED ROADWAY PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS LEVEL
ID # LAND USE CATEGORY NAME DISTANCE(m) LEVEL NAME DISTANCE(m) -L- -Y- MAXIMUM INCREASE

From Tate Blvd. to Highland Ave.
1 Residence B 8th St.Dr.SE 40.0 L 57 8th St.Dr.SE 40.0 L - * 66 + 9
2 Residence B 51 25.0 L 61 at 25.0 L - - * 70 + 9

3
Residence
B
to 15.0 R
64
to 15.0
R - * 73
' + 9
4 Residence B to 15.0 R 64 " 15.0 R - - * 73
* +
+ 9
9
5 Residence B if 35.0 R 58 35.0 R - 67
- .
6 Residence B
it 30.0. R
59
is 30.0
R -
- * 69
* +
10
7 Residence B " 20.0 L 62 " 20.0 L - - * 72 * + 10
8 Business C 01 32.0 R 59 it 32.0 R - - 68 + 9
9 Business C It 35.0 R 58 is 35.0 R - - 67 + 9
10 Residence B It 51.0 R 55 It 51.0 R - - 64 + 9
11 Residence 6 to 20.0 R 62 is 20.0 R - - * 72 * + 10
12 Business C is 20.0 R 62 " 20.0 R - - * 72 * + 10
From Highland Ave. to 7th Ave. N.E.
12A Business C 8th St.Dr.SE 32.0 L 59 8th St.Dr.SE 32.0 L - 69 * + 10
13 Business C is 30.0 L 59 to 30.0 L - - 69 * + 10
NOTE: Distances are from center of the existing or proposed roadways. -L-=> Proposed roadway's noise level contribution.
All noise levels are hourly A-weighted noise levels. -Y-=> Noise level from other contributing roadways.
Category E noise levels shown as exterior/interior (58/48). * _> Traffic noise impact (per 23 CFR Part 772).
Description
1. From Tate Blvd. to Highland
Ave.
2. From Highland Ave. to 7th
Ave. N.E.
TABLE N4
FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY
Lenoir Rhyine Bovd. Ext., From Tate Blvd. to 7th Avenue N.E.
Catawba County, State Project # 8.2791701, TIP # U-2306 A
Maximum Predicted Contour
Leq Noise Levels Distances
dBA (Maximum)
15m 30m 60m 72 dBA 67 dBA
71.7 67.5 62.0 21 m 39 m
72.3 68.1 62.6 23m 42 m
TOTALS
NOTES - 1. 15m, 30m, and 60m distances are measured from center of nearest travel lane.
2. 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of proposed roadway.
Approximate Number of Impacted
Receptors According to
Title 23 CFR Part 772
A B C D E'
0 8 1 0 0
0 0 2 0 0
0 8 3 0 0
TABLE N5
TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE SUMMARY
Lenoir Rhyine Bovd. Ext., From Tate Blvd. to 7th Avenue N.E.
Catawba County, State Project # 8.2791701, TIP # U-2306 A
RECEPTOR EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Substantial
Noise Level
Section <=0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 -25 Increases'
1. From Tate Blvd. 0 0 8 4 0 0 0 4
to Highland
Ave.
2. From Highland . 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Ave. to 7th Ave.
N.E.
Impacts Due
to Both
Criteria2
4
0
---- --- -- ----• ----• ---- ---- -------- --------
TOTALS 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 6 4
1 As defined by only a substantial increase (see bottom of Table N2)
2 As defined by both criteria in Table N2
a.
s

Appendix D
Air Quality Analysis Tables
TABLE Al
CAL30HC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 1
JOB: U-2306 A: Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Ext, Catawb RUN: Rhyne Blvd. Extension, Year 2000, Build
SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ *---------------------------------------- *----------------------------------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 10.8 805.0 10.8 -805.0 * 1610. 180. AG 725. 14.0 .0 13.2
2. Near Lane Link * .0 -805.0 .0 805.0 * 1610. 360. AG 725. 14.0 .0 13.2
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
* COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR ' X Y Z '
------------------------- '-------------------------------------*
1. R/W, 15.2m From CL ' -9.8 .0 1.8 '
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 2.6
DEGR. * 7
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 2.60 PPM AT 7 DEGREES FROM REC1 .

TABLE A2
CAL30HC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 2
JOB: U-2306 A: Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Ext, Catawb RUN: Rhyne Blvd. Extension, Year 2020, Build
SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES e
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M)
* X1 Y1 X2
------------------------ ------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 10.8 805.0 10.8
2. Near Lane Link * .0 -805.0 .0
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
*
Y2
-----------
-805.0
805.0
LENGTH BRG TYPE
(M) (DEG)
----------------
1610. 180. AG
1610. 360. AG
VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
(G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
----------------------------------
1180. 10.6 .0 13.2
1180. 10.6 .0 13.2
* COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z
------------------------- *-------------------------------------*
1. R/W, 15.2m From CL * -9.8 .0 1.8
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 2.7
DEGR. * 5
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 2.70 PPM AT 5 DEGREES FROM REC1
TABLE A3
CAL30HC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 3
JOB: U-2306 A: Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Ext, Catawb RUN: Rhyne Blvd. Extension, Year 2000, No-Build
SITE 8 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
' U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AM8 = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION • LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 • (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------
1. For Lane Link * 3.6 805.0 3.6 -805.0 • 1610. 180. AG 725. 34.6 .0 9.6
2. Near Lane Link * .0 -805.0 .0 805.0 * 1610. 360. AG 725. 34.6 .0 9.6
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
• COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z •
-------------------------•-------------------------------------•
1. R/W, 9.1m From CL * -7.3 .0 1.8 *
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 4.0
DEGR. * 7
• THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 4.00 PPM AT 7 DEGREES FROM REC1 .
TABLE A4
CAL30HC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 4
JOB: U-2306 A: Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Ext, Catawb RUN: Rhyne Blvd. Extension, Year 2020, NO-Build
SITE 8 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 1.8 PPM
a
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
* X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ *---------------------------------------- *----------------------------------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 3.6 805.0 3.6 -805.0 * 1610. 180. AG 1180. 34.6 .0 9.6
2. Near Lane Link * .0 -805.0 .0 805.0 * 1610. 360. AG 1180. 34.6 .0 9.6
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
* COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR * X Y Z
-------------------------*--•---- -------------------------------------
1. R/W, 9.1m From CL * -7.3 .0 1.8
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND * CONCENTRATION
ANGLE * (PPM)
(DEGR)* REC1
MAX * 5.4
DEGR. * 7
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 5.40 PPM AT 7 DEGREES FROM REC1 .
y
Appendix E
Citizens Informational Workshop
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
ft
OR
CIO
v
rn
-o

9
z
0
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD EXTENSION
TATE BOULEVARD SE TO 7TH AVENUE NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
T.I.P. NUMBER U-2306A
NOVEMBER 20, 1996
Citizens Informational Workshop
OF TRi
INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP
Hickory
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
From Tate Boulevard SE to 7th Ave. NE
Catawba County
State Project 8.2791701
F. A. Project MASTP-1216(8)
TIP No. U-2306A
PUBLIC WORKSHOP
This workshop is being held to discuss proposed plans for the Lenoir
Rhyne Boulevard Extension in Catawba County. The project extends from Tate
Boulevard SE to 7th Avenue NE. Comments and suggestions concerning the
proposed project improvements are appreciated and will be considered during
the project study.
The Division of Highways recognizes that individuals living close to a
proposed project want to be informed of the possible effects of the project on
their homes and businesses. However, exact information is not available at
this stage of the planning process. Additional design work is necessary
before the actual right of way limits can be established. More detailed
information will be available at the public hearing to be held at a later date.
Written comments and requests for additional information should be
addressed to:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E.. Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The 1997-2003 North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) calls for widening the existing
roadway to a multi-lane facility. It is anticipated approximately 30.5 meters (100
feet) of right of way will be required to contain the proposed improvements.
CURRENT SCHEDULE
Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in federal fiscal year 1999
and construction is scheduled to begin in federal fiscal year 2001. These
schedules are subject to the availability of sufficient highway funds.
EXISTING FACILITY
Length: 1.1 kilometers (0.7 mile)
Roadway width: approx 12 meters (40 feet) except at Southern RR
bridge which is approx 7.3 meters (24 feet)
Right of way width: 18.3 meters (60 feet)
Terrain: m Em
Access control: none
Speed limit: 56 km/h 35 mph)
Traffic volumes: 1996: 11200-13100 ADT
Signals: (1) Tate Boulevard SE and (2) Highland Avenue
Structures: Southern Railroad Bridge
TIP COST ESTIMATE
Right of way $600,000
Construction $3,550,000
Total estimated cost $4,150,000

INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP
City of Hickory Council Chambers
November 20, 1996
COMMENT SHEET
Proposed widening of Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard SE to
7th Avenue NE in Catawba County. Transportation Improvement Project No.
U-2306A.
NAME: (please print)
ADDRESS:
CITY/TOWN:
STATE: ZIP:
COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, ETC.
Statements relative to the proposed project may also be mailed to:
MR. H. FRANKLIN VICK, P. E., MANAGER
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
POST OFFICE BOX 25201
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611

A

/ljll IVV
NORTH CAROLINA
CATAWBA COUNTY
)~ T n
c"
00
p
Y ^ u
O
=g t-
3 ? H ? o•
y`
or a ? ? .
ROJECT
LIMITS
..o.nnn.nM.
S W. "33 cr' nr.
° sr
'2 a p
.7 a a - •?3
t
r '
v?
a? .
i
Z ?
Std
*03
i
A
TRANSPORTATION CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Of
TRAANSPORTATION
DIVISION Of HIGHWAYB
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION i
TATE BLVD. NE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
i
Location Map ;
Appendix F
Comments Received from
Federal, State, and Local Agencies
K-A n1oa.0
41
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO March 25, 1997
Special Studies and
Flood Plain Services Section
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
z •9I
This is in response to your letter of October 24, 1996, requesting our comments
on "Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, From Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE,
Catawba County, State Project 8.2791701, TIP No. U-2306K, (Regulatory Branch
Action I.D. No. 199702136).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources, which
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. There are no
Corps-constructed flood control or navigation projects which would be impacted by the
proposed improvements. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
too:
C. E. Shuford, Jr., P.E.
Acting Chief, Engineering
and Planning Division
Enclosure
March 25, 1997
Page 1 of 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
"Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, From Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE, Catawba
County, State Project 8.2791701, TIP No. U-2306K, (Regulatory Branch Action I.D.
No. 199702136)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC - Bobby L. Willis, Special Studies and Flood Plain
Services Section, at [phone]
The proposed roadway project is located in the city of Hickory, which participates
in the National Flood Insurance Program. However, from a review of Panel 20 of the
August 1981 Hickory Flood Insurance Rate Map, the proposed project site is not
located in an identified flood hazard area. This is confirmed by a review of the
pertinent United States Geological Survey topo map, "Hickory, N.C."
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - Mr. Steve Chapin, Asheville Field Office,
Reaulatorv Branch, at (704) 271- 4014
The referenced project has been reviewed in the field. The project will involve one
crossing of an unnamed tributary to Clark Creek in its headwaters. A study should be
conducted for wetlands adjacent to this tributary in the proposed alignment. Wetlands
should be identified and delineated using the Corps 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual.
Wetland delineation must be supported by data sheets. At the minimum, Department of
the Army (DA) permits would be required for the crossing of the tributary. It is
anticipated that the project can be authorized under Nationwide Permit Number 26.
Any questions concerning DA permits should be directed to Mr. Chapin.
rte:I? K-Ih [Q(,)
10,
L
t?tEHT F >y
sm United States Department of the Interior
9
O
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
?1gRCH 3 ?$a9 Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 12, 1996
?'A,` ,
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager Atop
R 19
Planning and Environmental Branch Z ,, 96
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation E?
P.O. Box 25201 ?y
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Subject: Lenoir-Rhyne Boulevard Extension, from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE, City of
Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina, State Project 8.2791701, TIP No. U-2306A
In your letter of October 24, 1996 (received on November 1, 1996), you requested-our comments
on the subject project. The following comments are provided in accordance with the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
According to the information provided with your letter, this project will involve the widening of
Lenoir-Rhyne Boulevard from Tate Boulevard to just north of the Norfolk-Southern Railroad in
Hickory, North Carolina. The proposed project will cross under the railroad. The proposed
improvements will be constructed using the existing two lanes and asymmetrical widening. A
temporary bridge detour will be constructed to maintain train traffic while the old bridge is
removed and a new is one constructed. Sidewalks will be replaced with the new 5-lane section
where sidewalks are to be removed during construction.
We have reviewed our records and believe that no federally endangered or threatened species
occur within the impact area of the proposed action. In accordance with the provisions of the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, we also reviewed the subject project to determine what, if
any, effects the proposed action could have on wetlands and related fish and wildlife resources.
It appears there will be no significant impacts to wetlands or other important environmental areas
in or adjacent to the proposed impact area. Therefore, we have no objection to the project as
proposed.
Thank you for notifying us about this project. In any future correspondence concerning the
project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-97-013.
Sincerely,
?Z/? -?k
Brian P. Cole
State Supervisor
cc:
Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 320 S. Garden Street,
Marion, NC 28752

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Ja mes B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 13, 1997
MEMORANDUM
A4J
1? EHNR
To: H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Manager, Planning & Environmental Branch
NC Department of Transportation
From: Cyndi Bell (' L'!
DWQ, Water Quality Lab
Subject: Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE
• Catawba County
State Project No. 8.2791701, T.I.P. No. U-2306A
Reference your memorandum dated October 24, 1996, in which you requested information from DWQ in
order to prepare the EA for the referenced project. Our records indicate that no perennial stream
crossings or wetlands will be involved in this project. At this time, we have no comment. We will review
the EA when it is circulated through the state clearinghouse.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please call me at [phone] in the Division
of Water Quality, Environmental Sciences Branch.
cc: Bill Kinlaw
U2306A.DOC
t;
Environmental Sciences Branch • 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
FAX
Telephone [phone] # 733-9959
/1ffimiative Action Employer 5096 reCyclBd/1090 post CofL^.um2r paper
An Equal Opportunely

=M208
02-28-97
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
MAILED TO: FROM:
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MRS. CHRYS BAG E TT '
H. FRANKLIN VICK DIRECTOR
PLANN. E ENV. BRANCH N C STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
TRANSPORTATION BLDG/INTER-OPFI '
PROJECT DESCR'PTION:
SCQPING - PROPOSED LENOIR RHYME BLVD. EXTENSION FROM TATE BLVD.
TO 7TH AVENUE NE IN HICKORY? NC; TIP #U-2306A
SAI NO 97E42200303 GROGRAM TITLE - SCQPING
THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SUBMITTED: ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
( X ) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE [phone]•
F
C.C. REGION F
G E IN,
MAR m - 3 199)
State of North Carolina IT Department of Environment,
L 4 •
Health and Natural Resources
Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
James Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DE H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Richard E. Rogers, Jr., Acting Director

MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee e
Project Review Coordinator
RE: 97-0303 Scoping, Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. Extension Catawba County
DATE: December 6, 1996
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources has reviewed
the proposed project. The attached comments are a result of this review. More
specific comments will be provided during the environmental review process.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. If during the preparation of the
environmental document, additional information is needed, the applicant is
encouraged to notify our respective divisions.
attachments
UEG 9 1996
,
N. 0.
P.O. Box 27687, 7W FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
919-715-4148 _ 50% recycled/ 100% post-consumer paper
NCW12C. HCP , FALLS LAKE
TEL : [phone] Dec 02 ' 96. 1215 No. 003 P.09
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission F
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charks R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mclba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DEHNR
FRONT: David Cox, l lighway Project Coordi toz
habitat Conservation Program
(?-L 4:/4/
DATE: November 26, 1996
SUBJECT: Request for information froin the N. C. Department of Transportatioa
('NCDOT) regarding fish and wildlife concerns for Lenoir Rhyme
Houlevard Extension from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue NE, Catawba
Cnnnty, Nnrth r:arnlim, TIP No. 11-2306A, SCH Pmicot N4, 97-0303•
Tlus mcniorandurn responds to a requost frum Mr. H. Frunkl4i Vick of tht
i?1CDOT for our eonaernr, regardin impacts on fish and voildlife rrsniirnns resnltint frnm
the suhjcct project. Biologists an the staff of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) have rcviewed the proposed improvements, and our comments are provided in
accordance with Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C:. 661-667d).
At this time the NCWRC has no specific; recommendations or eoncenis regarding
the subject prolcct. However, to help facilitate document preparation mid the review
process, our general informational needs are outlined below:
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project arc,,
ini-hidina a listing of frdmily nr stole, dr?si8natrd thrratmol. rntlanprual,
or special cunccrn rprcire. PoAniiiul Iru ii „a, n,rni ii l,r nmr,l r, , tn,grad
construction should W included to we ,ntiveut0rlas. 11 listing of designated
plant species can be devolopcd through cuttbukutioli with.
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
P, O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
NCWRC.HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Dec 02'96 12.15 No.003 P.10
Memo 2 November 26, 1996
and,
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. U. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. DoEcription of any streams or we lends sf'fnrtrrl by the, project. The reed for
t:lt uutcl,e.;,1g VI t61"atilig portians of stremns era sood and the extent of
such activities.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by the pn ;cct.
Wetland ucreagcs should include all project-related areas that may undergo
hydrologic change as a result or ditching, other drainage, or filling for
project construction. Wetland identification may be accomplished through
coordination wlth die U. S. Army Cutpa of Lu6.,ilvcl. (COL). if 0:1 COL
is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and
criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the
proposed project. Potert;al borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent to which the project will result in lass, degradation; or
fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimising or compensating for direct and indirect
degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.,
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes the enviroruttcntal
effects of highway construction and quantifies the contribution ol'this
individual project to environmental degradation.
S. A discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources which will result
fjulli z."vllJaty Jcvolvp&s6ut fUIli#AV.d by the iinpravcd road access.
!). if construction of Wo facility is to bu uuordittated with other staty, municipal,
or private development projects, a description of these projects should be
ittc;ludzd iu [lit ouviiumucutal Juvutit,6itt, Alto All praitet spnmorv Shauld
be identified.
Thank You for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for
this project. if we can further assist your office, please contact David Cox, Highway
Pro'lect Conrdinfilor, ai [phone].
cc' Howard Hall, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Senice, Raleigh
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources / • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 5, 1996
TO: Melba McGee, DEHNR SEPA Coordinator
FROM: Michelle Suverkrubbe, Planning Branch
RE: Comments on EA # 97-6303
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
Catawba County
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) requests that the following topics be discussed in
the EVEIS document:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The current stream classifications
and use support ratings for these streams should be included This information is available
from DWQ through the following contacts:
Liz Kovasckitz - Classifications - 919-733-5083, ext. 572
Carol Metz - Use Support Ratings - 919-733-5083, ext. 562
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelization/relocations. If the original stream banks
were vegetated, it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DWQ requests that these catch basins be
placed at all water supply stream crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion control measures are not placed in wetlands.
G. Wetland Impacts
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating jurisdictional
wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat losses.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 500/6 recycled/ 106/6 post-consumer paper
Hickory Public Schools
432 Fourth Avenue, SW
Hickory, North Carolina 28602
[phone] -
Superintendent of Schools
Dr. D. Stuart Thompson
Associate Superintendent
Curriculum and Instruction
Dr. Duane H. Kirkman
November 20, 1996

Mr. Gerald H. Knott
Section Chief
School Planning
Department of Public Instruction
301 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Lenoir/Rhyne Boulevard Extension from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue, N.E.
in Catawba County: State Project 8.2791701, TIP No. U-2306A
Dear Jerry:
The referenced project will not interfere with school construction plans of the
Hickory City Board of Education.
. There will be an impact on school bus transportation. The route indicated is one
used daily by half of our bus fleet. That is, all of those on the east side of town that travel
north and south. The effect will be an increase in the time riders spend on the bus and the
distance that the buses travel. In addition, students living in the vicinity of the
construction work will need to walk greater distances to bus stops, although those
distances will be within the tolerance of the law.
It appears that the construction project will take an extended period of time
inasmuch as it involves the destruction of a railroad bridge and its reconstruction over five
lanes.
My suggestion is that the Transportation Information Management System be
informed of this change so that it can be taken into consideration with respect to the
efficiency rating of the Hickory City Schools so that the local school board is not assessed
a monetary cost for inefficiency caused by this project. ti
Despite the disclaimer cited in the paragraph above, upon completion of the
project the impact on our school bus transportation should be positive 0improving the flow
of traffic and the safety of our operation.
•

F"W' n*
Public Schools of North Carolina
State Board of Education
Jay Robinson, Chairman
Department of Public Instruction
Bob Etheridge, State Superintendent
November 25, 1996
MEMORANDU M
TO: Mr. Bill Kinlaw, NC Department of Transportation
FROM: Gerald H. Knott, Section Chief, School. Planning
SUBJECT: Lenoir/Rhyne Boulevard Extension from Tate Boulevard to 7th Avenue, N.E. in
Catawba County: State Project 8.2791701, TIP No. U-2306A
Enclosed is the response from Hickory City Schools to our impact inquiry.
/ed
Enclosure
it

301 N.Wilmington Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
RECEIVED
DEHNR .
State of North Carolina - I 'T
Department of Envitonme, t, LT9?rA
Health and NaturalPesourceA91V 4 PA A 4 • •
Division of Land Resources I I ...,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Goverrlgf^JJ QUALITY SECT! C
Jonathan B. Howes, SeC_r_etaa H N F=1
Charles H. Gardner, P.G 1.
Director and State Geologist
Project Number:
Project Name:
n 2PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS
County:
,er1o y- Rhwie, 9 old wrAfI l X?t
bAawbo'
4
NC Off'/ca of State Planning - Geodetic Survey
This project will impact geodetic survey markers. N.C.
Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O.
Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional
destruction of a geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General
Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the N.C. Office of State
Planning, Geodtl? Survey Office at 919/733-3836.
Nog 1 IR9?
Reviewer Date
'Erosion and Sedimentation Control-
No comment
This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if
more than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as
part of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of. the project is located within a High Quality
Water Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental
Management, increased design standards for sediment and erosion
control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentation control plan.required for this
project should be prepared by the Department of Transportation
under the erosion control program delegation to the Division of .
Highways from the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at 919/733-4574.
R viewer Date
Geological Survey Section .. Land Quality Section Geodetic Survey Section
[phone] [phone] [phone]
FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone] FAX: [phone]
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, Project Number -
AND NATURAL RESOURCES ?7 - f, 5U_`
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH County
Inter-Agency Project Review Response 471/ 1
Project Name Type of Project ?Sn f44--rc
The applicant should be advised that plans and specifications for all water system
improvements must be approved by the Division of Environmental Health prior to the award
of a .contract or the initiation of construction (as required by 15A NCAC 18C .0300 et. seq.).
For information, contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone]. with
This project will be classified as a non-community public water For mopeiilfoand must rmation the ppl can
state and federal drinking water monitoring requirements.
should contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
If this project is constructed as proposed, we will recommend closure of feet of adjacent
waters to the harvest of shellfish. For information regarding the shellfisIT'sanitation progra
m, the applicant should contact the Shellfish Sanitation Branch at [phone].
The spoil disposal area(s) proposed for this project may produce a mosquito breeding problem.
For information concerning appropriate mosquito control measures, the applicant should
contact the Public Health Pest Management Section at [phone].
. The applicant should be advised that prior to the removal or demolition of dilapidated
structures, an extensive rodent control program may be necessary in order to prevent the
migration of the rodents to adjacent areas. The information concerning rodent control,
contact the local health. department or the Public Health Pest Management Section at (919)
733-6407.
. The applicant should be advised to contact the local health department regarding their
requirements for septic tank installations (as required under 15A NCAC 18A .1900 et. seq.).
For information concerning septic tank and other on-site waste disposal methods, contact the
On-Site Wastewater Section at [phone].
The applicant should be advised to contract the local health department regarding the sanitary
facilities required for this project.
If existing water lines will be relocated during the construction, plans for the water line
relocation must be submitted to the Division of Environmental Health, Public Water Supply'
Section, Plan Review Branch, Parker Lincoln Building, Raleigh, North Carolina, (919) 733-
2460.
Reviewer
f lvu S 61Z i /////L1/Q(2)
Secti n/Branch ate
DEHNR 3198 (Revised ^0/°3)
Division of Environmental Health
Thank you for the opportunity to offer these reactions to the planned project.
Sincerely,

D. Stuart Thompson
Superintendent
DST:mcd
cc: Derek Graham, Chief, Transportation Services, Department of Public Instruction
Stephen Gay, Director of Transportation, Hickory City Schools
Mary Arnold, Director of Technology and Accountability, Hickory City Schools
r

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RLCEI EL}
1 0,3 01996
ENV!g1 L0M _N i A! SG1GNCES
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
October 24, 1996
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR - Water Quality Lab
4401 Reedy Creek Road
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Enviroinmenal Branch
SUBJECT: Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension, From Tate Boulevard
to 7th Avenue NE, Catawba County, State Project 8.2791701,
TIP No. U-2306A
The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has begun studying
the proposed Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension in Hickory and Catawba County. The project is
included in the 1997-2003 North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled
for right of way in fiscal year 1999 and construction in fiscal year 2001.
The project will begin at Tate Boulevard and extend northward to just north of the
Norfolk-Southern Railroad, widening existing Lenoir-Rhyne Boulevard to a 5-lane curb and
gutter section. The proposed project will cross under the Norfolk-Southern Railroad. The
proposed roadway improvements will be constructed using the existing 2 lanes and asymmetrical
widening. A temporary detour bridge will be constructed to maintain train traffic while the old
bridge is removed and the new one is constructed. Sidewalks will be replaced with the new 5-lane
section where sidewalks are to be removed due to the new construction.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating
potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable, please identify any permits or
approvals which may be required by your agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation
of a federally funded Environmental Assessment (EA). This document will be prepared in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond
by February 28, 1997 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Bill Kinlaw, Project
Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone], Extension 203.
HFV/plr
Attachment
.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVIBION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION
TATE BLVD. NE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
NORTH CAROLINA /
CATAWBA COUNTY f I'! Al
i Fo
dobs
r? n
00
a
a Vd <6
ri =g €W
3 < g? to.

o P't
r
/
ROJECT
? IF
' LIMITS
? ++wnnvtsrtiw
es- ' sr' nn

-77 aa'
„
R
<
r 0?
I
?

r

.57

... .?
t Si
'i ;? . q1 Svc
fgm
.35

L.oostlon Map
onown

N. C. I3EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
FRO REF. NO. OR ROOM. BLDG.
4000
ACTION:
? NOTE AND. FILE ?.:P.ER OUR CONVERSATION
-? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME, ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? -RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS..` ? FOR OUR APPROVAL
NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT.THIS OR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER. -? ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
?. PREPARE, REPLY. FOR MY SIGNATURE Q SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION, ? INVESTIGATE, AND REPORT
COMMENTS:,
Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR - Water Quality Section

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPtANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
June 4, 1996
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR - Water Quality Section
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager '
Planning and Environmental Bran
SUBJECT: Scoping Meeting for Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension, From Tate Boulevard SE to 7th Avenue NE,
Catawba County, State Project 9.8121691, T.I.P. Project
U-2306A
Due to an unforeseen scheduling conflict, the location and time for
the subject project's scoping meeting has been changed from June 27, 1996
at 10:00 am to June 26, 1996 at 2:00 pm. The meeting's location will
remain in the Planning and Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470).
Thank you for your patience in this matter. If you have any questions
about the revised meeting date and time, please call Bill Kinlaw, Project
Planning Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 203.
WBK/pl r
cc: File
3?2
9 N. C. DEPARTMENT OF, TRANSPORTATION
Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR - Water Quality Section
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
(RETURN. WIT" MORE DETAILS ( FOR. YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER r ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
?' TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION .? INVESTIGATE- AND REPORT _
COMM$NTS:

?rv?G
J(/1y 4 199
ENVIRQ,,"IFNrAL
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
May 24, 1996
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR - Water Quality Section
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne
Boulevard Extension, From Tate Boulevard SE to 7th
Avenue NE, Catawba County, State Project 9.8121691,
T.I.P. Project U-2306A
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting
of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for June 27, 1996 at 10:00 am in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please
call Bill Kinlaw, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 203.
WBK/plr
Attachment 110 f{z© _ via N t c -
?:C.
NORTH CAROLINA
CATAWBA COUNTY 9
71
/ j ` ,aC bs park R•
T
10
}? n
00
Y r' o
Va <$
as SQ ?Y
i?N s ? n? al .re;
P c 9Q ROJECT
LIMITS
? NOIEHWESrF1N e°?.•?
.65 SI' nvE =1
5. W.
o ^
S.W. 89,
y?. o v
-15
^ 11 'I
W ? 4 ?I
w a df y,
r +2.?y- Qr;.;
a .. •E
p I
+
+
r +
.57
.5
w ??:1 _ ?;;a i Z7 S?!
•••Sj .Y5 Mt :9 ppl C , tali (.;;... r
vi_ o

A
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. EXTENSION
TATE BLVD. NE TO 7TH AVE. NE
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306A
Location Map

. 2
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Thoroughfare Plan Designation: /liar- ?ThOrovatir?
Type of Access Control- Full: Partial: None: _X
Number of- Interchanges: 8_ Grade Separations: 25t Stream Crossings:
Typical Section of Roadway: S 1 ne l9 2 m ?G?- ? -dace-?a-Face CG G
Traffic Projections- Current: L&S-06 ,¢DT Design Year g, "6 A-DT
% TTTST: I % DUAL: 3 % DHV: 10
Design Speed: Sd 5lemAr ?SOTh? dc°S?r ble
Preliminary Resurfacing Design:

Preliminary Pavement Design:

Current Cost Estimate:
Construction Cost ................................................................................ $ ism Gl
(including engineering and contingencies)
Right of Way Cost ................................................................................
(including relocations, utilities, and acquisition) $
Force Account Items ........................................................................ $
Preliminary Engineering ................................................................... $
Total Cost ............................................................................ $
TIP Cost Estimate.
Construction .................. ..................................................................
0
$2,5-00
Right of Way .................................................................................... $ Goon o00
Total Cost ........................................................................... $ 100
List any special features, such as railroad invoivement, which could affect
cost or schedule of project: e

y
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Date: Project Development Stage
Programming:
Revision Date: Planning: X_
Design:
TIP No.: U-2506 A
F.A. Project No.: h /0- State Project No.:
Division: /.Z County: ex- awba.
Route: SR /007 Length: /.1 kin (4.7 wli)
Functional Classification: X-I'ylor- Arterial
Type Of Environmental Document To Be Prepared: -aYI raA01 nie/ AssessmeY&
? _-
Environmental Study Schedule: 'a : JAAI-A&
Type Of Funding: Sfzz f
Will there be special funding participation by municipality, developers, or other?
Yes: _ No: -2L
If YES, by whom:
If YES, by what amount or (%)
How and when will this be paid?
Description Of Project (including specific limits) And Major Elements Of Work _
v,r Ac4n.e..+ -?il?•; ?; ,?.i 'Ln /l ?ifn ? ?'_U? /) L!/J t°,Y' _Sp??D/t
3
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
CONSTRUCTION: COST
Estimated Costs of Improvements
Pavement
Surface ............................................................................................. $
Base ................................................................................................. $
Milling & Recycling .......................................................................... $
Turnouts ........................................................................................... $
Shoulders: Paved ............................................................................ $
Earth .............................................................................. $
Earthwork .......................................................................................... $
_
Subsurface Items ................................................................................... $
_ Subgrade and Stabilization .................................................................... $
- Drainage (List any special items) ........................................................... $
_ Sub-Drainage ......................................................................................... $
Structures Width x Length
_
Bridge Rehabilitation x ................. $
New Bridge x ................. $
Widen Bridge x ................. $
Remove Bridge x $
New Culverts- Size: Length: Fill Ht: ..... $
Culvert Extension .................................... $
Retaining Walls- Type: Avg. Ht.: Skew: ... $
Noise Walls ..................................................................................... $
_ Any Other Misc. Structures ............................................................. $
Concrete Curb & Gutter ......................................................................... $
Concrete Sidewalk ................................................................................ $
_
Guardrail ................................................................................................ $
Fencing- W.W.. _ and/or C.L.: -,,,. .............................................. $
Erosion Control ..................................................................................... $
_
_ Landscape ............................................................................................. $
_ Lighting .................................................................................................. $
Traffic Control ........................................................................................ $
_ Signing: _ New ................................................................................ $
_ Upgrading ....................................................................... $
_ Traffic Signals: New ..................................................................... $
Revised ............................................................... $
_
_ RR Signals: _ New .......................................................................... $
Revised .................................................................... $
_
With or Without Arms .............................................. $
_
Drainage Safety Enhancement ...........................................
If 3R: $
_
_
T Roadside Safety Enhancement .......................................... $
_ Realignment for Safety Upgrade ......................................... $
Pavement Markings- Paint: _ Thermo: _ Markers: . ......... $
Delineators ......... .................................................................................. $
_
Other (clearing,grubbing, mobilization, misc.) ....................................... $
Contract Cost (Subtotal) ....................................... $
4
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Contingencies & Engineering ....................................................................... $
Preliminary Engineering Costs ....................................................................... $
Force Account ............................................................................................... $
Construction (Subtotal) ........................................... $
Right of Way:
Existing Right of Way Width:
Will Contain within Exist. Right of Way- Yes: _ No:
New Right of Way Needed-
Width: Est Cost ................................... $
Easements- Type:
Width: Est. Cost ................................... $
Utilities ..............................................................................:.................... $
Right Of Way (Subtotal) ........................................ $
Total Estimated Project Cost ........................................................................ $
The above scoping has been reviewed and approved by-
INIT. DATE
Highway Design
Roadway
Structure
Design Services
Geotechnical
Hydraulics
Loc. & Surveys
Photcgrammetry
Prel. Est Engr.
Planning & Environ.
Right of Way
R/W Utilities
Traffic Engineering
Project Management
County Manager
City/Municipality
Others
INIT. DATE
Board of Tran. Member
Mgr. Program & Policy
Chief Engineer-Precon
Chief Engineer-Oper
Secondary Roads Off.
Construction Branch
Roadside Environmental
Maintenance Branch
Bridge Maintenance
Statewide Planning
Division Engineer
Bicycle Coordinator
Program Development
FHWA
Dept. of Cult Res.
Dept of EH & NR
Others
Scope Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engineer for handling.
If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scoping, note your proposed revisions in
Comments or Remarks Section and initial and date after comments.
5
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Comments or Remarks Section:
Prepared Sy. Date:
Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
Highland Avenue N.E. to 8th Street N.E.
Catawba County
State Project 9.8121691
T.I.P. # U-2306B
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
State Environmental Assessment
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
In Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
For further information contact:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

"te H. Franklin Vick,*
ic
k, P. ., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT

Boulevard Extension
to 8th Street N.E.
County
9.8121691
U-2306B
State Environmental Assessment
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch by:

Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne
Highland Avenue N.E.
Catawba
State Project
T.I.P.
William B. Kinlaw ?S
Project Planning Engineer
Linwood Stone
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
Richar B. Davis, P.
Planning and Environm,
Asses ant Man g r
al Branch
Q,?,?o???1• CA R pI
?'??OFESSlp?y•9 ' .
SEAL
6944
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SUMMARY. ....... ........
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................... 1
A. General Description 1
B. Summary of Proposed Improvements ..................... 1
1. Length of Project ............................... 1
2. Project Termini ................................. 1
3. Design Speed .................................... 1
4. Typical Section ................................. 1
5. Right of flay .................................... 2
6. Access Control .................................. 2
7. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control ...... 2
8. Railroad Work Required .......................... 2
9. Structures Required .................. 2
10. Parking ......................................... 3
11. Sidewalks ....................................... 3
12. Bicycles ........................................ 3
13. Speed Limits .................................... 3
14. Cost Estimates .................................. 3
15. Special Permits Required ........................ 3
16. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Area.. 3
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................... 4
A. Thoroughfare Plan .................................... 4
B. Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service ................ 4
C. Accident Record ...................................... 5
D. Characteristics of Existing Roadways ................. 6
1. Functional Classification ....................... 6
2. Existing Roadways Cross Section ................. 6
3. Type of Roadside Development .................... 6
4. Intersecting Streets and Type of Control ........ 6
5.
6 Right of flay ....................................
Access Control 6
.
7 ..................................
Utilities 6
.
8. .......................................
Speed Limit 7

9. .....................................
School Bus Data ..................... 7
7
10. ............
Geodetic Markers ..................... 7
11. ...........
Structures ........................ 7
..............
E. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community.......... 7
I 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
PAGE
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ........................ 7
A. Recommended Alternative 7
B. Other Improvements Considered 8
C. "No-Build" Alternative 8
D. Public Transportation Alternative .................... 8
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............... 8
A. Land Use Planning .................................... 8
1. Scope and Status of Planning .................... 8
2. Existing Land Use 8
3. Existing Zoning ............................ 9
4. Future Land Use Plans 9
5. Project Compatibility with Local Plans .......... 9
B. Social And Economic Characteristics .................. 9
1. Neighborhood Analysis 9
2. Economic Factors 10
3. Public and Private Facilities .......... 10
4. Relocation Impacts 10
C. Cultural Resources ................................... 12
1. Archaeological Findings ......................... 12
2. Historical Architectural Findings ............... 13
D. Natural Resources .................................... 13
1. Plant Communities 13
2. Wildlife 13
3. Geological Findings ............................. 14
a. Methodology ................................ 14 {
b. Physiography, Relief and Drainage .......... 14
C. Geology and Soils 14
d. Mineral Resources .......................... 14
e. Erosion Control 15
f. Groundwater ................................ 15
4. Water Resources 15
5. Jurisdictional Wetlands 15
6. Protected Species ............................... 15
a. Federally Protected Species ................ 15
b. State Protected Species .................... 15
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts .............. 16

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
PAGE
E. Floodplain Involvement ........................ 16
F. Traffic Noise and Air Quality Analyses ............... 16
G.
H Construction Impacts ...........................
Contaminated Pro
erties 16
.
1 p
.......................
Farmland 17
.
J ...........................................
Permits 18
. .............................................. 18
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION .................................. 18
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Project Location Map
Figure 2 - Aerial Photo of Recommended Alternative
Figure 3 - Hickory Thoroughfare Plan
Figure 4 - Hickory Bond Projects #1 and #2
Figure 5 - Projected 1996 Traffic Volumes
(Recommended Alternative)
Figure 5A - Projected 2016 Traffic Volumes
(Recommended Alternative)
Figure 6 - Proposed Lane Configurations of Recommended
Alternative
Figure 7 - Accident Types (Highland Avenue, N.E.)
Figure 7A - Accident Rates (Highland Avenue, N.E.)
Figure 8 - Accident Types (8th Street, WE:)
Figure 8A - Accident Rates (8th Street, N.E.)
Figure 9 - Existing Bus Routes
APPENDIX (Agency Correspondence)

Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
Highland Avenue N.E. to 8th Street N.E.
Catawba County
State Project 9.8121691
T.I.P. 7 U-2306B
SUMMARY
1. Description of Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of
Highways, proposes to realign Highland Avenue, N.E. at 7th Avenue, N.E. to
connect with 8th Street, N.E. at 8th Avenue, N.E. and realign 8th Street,
N.E. at 7th Avenue, N.E. to connect with Highland Avenue, N.E. at 8th
Avenue, N.E. The proposed improvements consist of designing an
intersection for the two realigned roadways on new location. The
improvements will be contained within the city block bounded on the west
by 8th Street, N.E., on the north by 8th Avenue, N.E., on the east by
Highland Avenue., N.E., and on the south by 7th Avenue, N.E. The estimated
total cost of the project is $4,716,000.
This project is included in the NCDOT's Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) 1994-2000. In the TIP, the proposed improvements are a portion of a
larger project, U-2306; which calls for extending Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
from Tate Boulevard to 8th Street, N.E. in Hickory. For this project,
right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1995 and
construction is scheduled to start in fiscal year 1997. The total cost
included in the current TIP is $2,820,000 ($620,000 for right of way,
$2,000,000 for construction, and $200,000 in prior years cost).
2. Summary of Environmental Impacts
The proposed project will have a positive impact on the area involved by
providing increased capacity and overall safety at the intersection of a
major east-west corridor and a major north-south corridor. The major
east-west corridor consists of providing direct access from the Hickory
central business district (CBD) and west Hickory to the commercial and
industrial areas along Highland Avenue, N.E., and eventually to the CBD of
Conover. The major north-south corridor connects the major growth area of
northeast Hickory to the rapidly expanding industrial and shopping areas
of southeast Hickory. This north-south corridor will also serve to
relieve the traffic congestion along NC 127 from Lake Hickory to the CBD
of Hickory.
The project will require the relocation of approximately 5 residential
properties, 9 businesses, and 2 non-profit organizations. The Division of
Highways offers a Relocation Assistance Program to help minimize the
effects of relocation. Traffic noise level increases will be minimal. No
special noise abatement measures are proposed. Other impacts include
erosion and siltation and the delay and inconvenience to motorists during
construction of the project. However, these effects will be short-term in
nature. No significant effects to animal or plant life are expected and
no recreation facilities will be involved. No structures of historical or
architectural importance will be affected by the project nor will the
proposed improvements have an effect on archaeological resources.
3. Alternatives Considered
Due to the nature of this project, the intersection of two major urban
transportation corridors, no alternative corridor alignments were
considered. However, numerous lane configurations were analyzed.
Public transportation is not considered an acceptable alternative to the
proposed project. The provision of transit and paratransit services in
this area would compliment the proposed project but would not serve as an
adequate substitute.
The "no-build" alternative was also considered, but rejected because the
existing street system cannot adequately accommodate the projected traffic
volumes at an acceptable level of service once the planned east-west and
north-south corridors discussed in section 2 are open to traffic.
4. Coordination
Comments on the proposed intersection were solicited from the following
federal, state, and local agencies and officials. An asterisk indicates a
written response was received.
Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
*Fish & Wildlife Service-Asheville
Fish & Wildlife Service-Raleigh
*State Clearinghouse
*Department of Cultural Resources
Department of Human Resources
Department of Public Instruction
Region E Planning Agency
Catawba County Commissioners
*Mayor of Hickory
5. Additional Information
Additional information on this environmental assessment may be obtained by
contacting:
Nicholas L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone [phone]
ii
H. Franklin Vick, P. E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Telephone [phone]
r
iii
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. General Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
realign Highland Avenue, N.E. at 7th Avenue, N.E. to connect with 8th
Street, N.E. at 8th Avenue, N.E. and realign 8th Street, N.E. at 7th
Avenue, N.E. to connect with Highland Avenue, N.E. at 8th Avenue, N.E. and
9th Street, NE (see Figures 1 & 2). The length of the proposed
improvements is approximately 2,000 feet (1,000 feet for each connector).
The proposed intersection and the four adjacent intersections and
approaches are designed to allow vehicular traffic to operate with minimum
delay. Improvements to Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard under the Norfolk Southern
Railroad southward to Tate Boulevard will be included in the study for
Project U-2306A. For this reason, the intersection design of 7th Avenue,
N.E. and Highland Avenue, N.E. will be temporary until U-2306A is
constructed. This intersection will not be signalized as part of this
project. The 7th Avenue, N.E. approach will operate as a right-turn only
and Highland Avenue, N.E. northbound traffic will be restricted from
making left turns on 7th Avenue, N.E. by a temporary median island. In
conjunction with proposed U-2306A improvements, the median island will be
removed and the intersection will be redesigned to conform to the proposed
typical section for Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard. The estimated cost of the
subject improvements is $4,716,000.
B. Summary of Proposed Improvements
Length of Project
T.
1000 ft. + between Highland Avenue, N.E. and 8th Street, N.E.
1000 ft. + between 8th Street, N.E. and Highland Avenue, N.E.
2. Project Termini
The project begins just north of the existing Norfolk Southern
Railroad bridge at the intersection of Highland Avenue, N.E. and 7th
Avenue, N.E. and terminates at the intersection of 8th Street, N.E.
and 8th Avenue, N.E. In addition, 8th Street, N.E. will be connected
to Highland Avenue, N.E. between 7th Avenue, N.E. and 8th Avenue,
N.E.
3. Design Speed
The design speed for the proposed project is 40 mph.
4. Typical Section
The typical sections for the.proposed intersection and the four
(4) adjacent intersections and approaches vary in accordance with the
design year traffic volumes. See Figure 6 for detailed intersection
configurations.
2
5.. Right of Way
The proposed project will require the acquisition of most of the
entire city block where the proposed intersection will be located
(see Figure 2). Right of way easements will be required to tie the
proposed project into the four (4) adjacent intersections.
6. Access Control
Access to the proposed project will be limited to two existing
street connections. These include the Lenoir Rhyne College parking
lot just south of the intersection of 8th Street, N.E. and 8th
Avenue, N.E. and the entrance to the Hickory Manufacturing Division
of King Hickory Furniture. The latter entrance is 7th Avenue, N.E.
and is used as access to the main office and the personnel office for
Hickory Manufacturing.
7. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control
The proposed intersections will be at grade and signal
controlled. Three (3) of the existing 4 intersections connected with
the project are, and will remain, signal controlled. The only
exception is the intersection of 7th Avenue, N.E. extension and
Highland Avenue, N.E. in the southeast quadrant. Signalization of
this intersection will be deferred until project U-2306A is
constructed.
The existing traffic signal at the intersection of Highland
Avenue, N.E. and 7th Avenue, N.E. will be retained in its present
location. This signal and the associated section of 7th Avenue, N.E.
will be relocated to align with existing 7th Avenue, N.E. south of
its present location in conjunction with project U-2306A
improvements.
Two major city road bond projects (see Sect. I.B.16., Other
Proposed Highway Improvements In The Area) will converge at the
proposed intersection. Due to the projected traffic expected to
utilize these facilities, the need of a coordinated signal system to
include the existing and proposed traffic signals in the location of
the proposed project is imperative.
8. Railroad Work Required
No railroad work is required for the construction of this
project. TIP project U-2306A improvements to Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
between the subject project and Tate Boulevard will include widening
the Norfolk Southern Railroad underpass immediately south of the
subject project.
9. Structures Required
None.
3
10. Parking
The proposed improvements will not provide for parking along the
project.
11. Sidewalks
All existing sidewalks that are disturbed during construction
will be replaced. Special consideration will be given to the
replacement sidewalk in front of Lenoir Rhyne College because of the
high pedestrian traffic from local residents and college students
using it as a loop for walkers, bikers, and joggers.
12. Bicycles
There does not appear to be any need for special accommodations
for bicycles on this project. This section of Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
in Hickory does not correspond to a bicycle TIP request, nor is it
part of NCDOT's Bicycling Highway system. There has been no
indication of unusual levels of bicycling on this roadway.
13. Speed Limits
The proposed project is anticipated to have a posted speed limit
of 35 miles per hour. Due to the nature of this project and the
proposed traffic signals to regulate traffic flow, posted speed
limits will be incidental.
14. Cost Estimate
The estimated cost of the proposed improvements in 1993 dollars
is as follows:
IRoadway Construction $ 2,050,000
Right of Way & Utilities 226661000
Total Cost of Project $ 4,716,000
lIncludes 15% for engineering and contingencies.
2Includes acquisition cost.
15. Special Permits Required
None.
16. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Area
The City of Hickory has two road bond projects which will be
directly affected by the subject project, and visa versa. Road Bond
Project No. 1 (8th Street, N.E. Extension) is the extension of 8th
Street, N.E. from its present terminus at 13th Avenue, N.E. near
Stanford Park to the intersection of 21st Avenue, N.E. and Sandy
4
Ridge Road. After further study of traffic flow patterns and traffic
volumes, the city of Hickory has approved the one-way pairing of 8th
Street, N.E. and 9th Street, N.E. between the subject project and
13th Avenue, N.E. Road Bond Project No. 2 consists of the one-'ray
pairing of Highland Avenue, N.E. and 9th Avenue, N.E.
In conjunction with the subject project, Road Bond Project No. 1
will provide a major north-south corridor to allow access between the
rapidly developing residential areas of northeast Hickory and the
commercial and industrial areas along Tate Boulevard, U.S. 64-70, and
the Central Business District (CBD) to the south. Road Bond Project
No. 2, also in conjunction with the subject project, will provide a
major east-west corridor linking the commercial and industrial areas
along Highland Avenue, N.E. to the CBD of Hickory and west Hickory.
Future improvements to Highland Avenue, N.E. will provide a major
east-west corridor between the CBD of Hickory and the CBD of Conover.
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Thoroughfare Plan
Highland Avenue, N.E. and 8th Street, N.E. are listed as urban major
thoroughfares on the mutually adopted 1986 Hickory And Vicinity
Thoroughfare Plan (see Figure 3). The proposed extension is included as a
future urban major thoroughfare. A five-lane typical section is in
conformance with this plan. However, the five-lane typical section has
been modified to accommodate traffic flows on the project. Construction
of this project will be a step toward the implementation of the
Thoroughfare Plan.
The proposed intersection is part of the Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension and will serve as a vital link in the transportation network for
the City of Hickory. The Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension will function
as a major radial street to the northeastern part of Hickory via Sandy
Ridge Road. The proposed project is extremely important as it completes a
vital link between rapidly developing residential areas in northeast
Hickory and industrial and shopping centers in southeast Hickory.
The Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension project also connects 8th
Street, N.E. with Highland Avenue, N.E. The 8th Street,.N.E./Highland
Avenue, N.E. combination will also function as a major radial street from
Hickory to Conover. The proposed project is extremely important to the
large industrial areas between Hickory and Conover.
B. Traffic Volumes and Capacity
The 1996 average daily traffic (ADT) volumes in the area of the
proposed corridor of the relocation of 8th Street, N.E. (assuming the
proposed project is completed) range from a low of 11,200 vehicles per day
(vpd) on the southeast leg of the proposed intersection to a high of
16,600 vpd on the southwest leg of the proposed intersection. These
volumes are projected to 20,200 vpd and 30,000 vpd, respectively, by the
year 2016 (See Figures 5 and 5A for projected traffic volumes) and include
5
2% truck tractor semi-trailer (TTST), 3% dual tired trucks (DTT), a design
hour volume (DHV) of 10%, and a directional volume of 60% unless noted
otherwise.
The traffic carrying capacity of the proposed facility is described
by levels of service (LOS) which range from A through F. Level of service
A, the highest level of service, is characterized by very low delay in
which most vehicles do not stop at all. Typically, drivers are
unrestricted and turns are freely made. In level of service B, traffic
operation is stable but more vehicles are stopping and causing higher
levels of delay. Level of service C is characterized by stable operation
with drivers occasionally having to wait through more than one red
indication. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted in these circumstances.
At level of service D, the influence of congestion becomes more
noticeable. Delay to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short
periods of the peak hour. Level of service E is considered to be the
limit of acceptable delay and represents the theoretical capacity of the
facility. Level of service F represents over saturated or jammed
conditions which are considered unacceptable to most drivers.
Based on current and projected traffic volumes, the existing facility
would operate at level of service E in both cases. With the proposed
improvements, the proposed intersection will initially operate at a level
of service B. By the year 2016, the level of service will drop to a level
of service C. The proposed signalized intersection and the 4 adjacent
intersections (3 are signalized initially) are the controlling factors for
vehicular level of service.
C. Accident Rate Data
Highland Avenue, N.E.
There were 27 accidents along existing Highland Avenue, N.E. between
7th Avenue, N.E. and 8th Avenue, N.E. over a recent 3-year period
(07/01/90 thru 06/30/93). Ten (10) of the total accidents occurred at the
7th Avenue, N.E. intersection and the remaining 17 occurred at the 8th
Avenue, N.E. intersection. Approximately 52 percent of the accidents on
Highland Avenue, N.E. were rear end accidents (30%) and left-turn
accidents (22%) (see Figure 7).
The total accident rate for existing Highland Avenue, N.E. between
7th Avenue, N.E. and 8th Avenue, N.E. is 1120.3 accidents per 100 million
vehicle miles (acc/100 mvm) compared to an average for similar routes in
the state for the same time period of 315.9 acc/100 mvm (see Figure 7A).
8th Street, N.E.
There were 50 accidents along existing 8th Street, N.E. between 7th
Avenue, N.E. and 8th Avenue, N.E. over a recent 3-year period (06/30/90
thru 07/01/93). Forty (40) of the total accidents occurred at the 7th
Avenue, N.E. intersection and the remaining 10 occurred at the 8th Avenue,
N.E. intersection. Approximately 82 percent of the accidents on 8th
Street, N.E. were angle accidents (46%) and left-turn accidents (36%) (see
Figure 8).
6
The total accident rate for existing 8th Street, N.E. between 7th
Avenue, N.E. and 8th Avenue, N.E. is 4166.7 accidents per 100 million
vehicle miles (acc/100 mvm) compared to an average for similar routes in
the state for the same time period of 1475.8 acc/100 mvm (see Figure 8A).
D. Characteristics of Existing Roadways
1. Functional Classification
In the Statewide Functional Classification System, SR 1007
(Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard/Highland Avenue, N.E.) is classified as an
Urban Principal Arterial-Other. It is also a part of the Federal-Aid
System as an urban arterial.
2. Existing Roadways Cross Section
Seventh Avenue, N.E. west of 8th Street, N.E. is a 2-lane curb
and gutter section westbound and a 1-lane curb and gutter section
with diagonal parking eastbound. The eastbound and westbound lanes
are separated by a grassed median. Seventh Avenue, N.E. east of 8th
Street, N.E. is a 4-lane curb and gutter section with a grassed
median. Eighth Street, N.E. is a 5-lane curb and gutter section
south of 8th Avenue, N.E. Eighth Avenue, N.E. west of 8th Street,
N.E. is a 2-lane section with parallel parking on one side and
diagonal parking on the other. All other roadways in the immediate
project area are 2- lane curb and gutter sections.
3. Type of Roadside Development
Roadside development in the immediate project area is a mixture
of commercial, residential, and educational sites.
4. Intersecting Streets and Type of Control
The intersections of 8th Street, N.E. and 7th Avenue, N.E., 8th
Street, N.E. and 8th Avenue, N.E., 8th Avenue, N.E. and Highland
Avenue, N.E., and 7th Avenue, N.E. (east) and Highland Avenue, N.E.
are signal controlled. The intersection of 7th Avenue, N.E. (west)
and Highland Avenue, N.E. is stop sign controlled.
5. Right of Way
The claimed right of way width for 8th Street, N.E. south of 8th
Avenue, N.E. is approximately 80 feet. The claimed right of way
width for 8th Avenue, N.E., Highland Avenue, N.E., and 7th Avenue,
N.E. is approximately 60 feet.
6. Access Control
No control of access is maintained along any of the roads with
the project area.
7
7. Utilities
Telephone, power, cable, water, sewer, and gas lines are located
within the city block occupied by the proposed project.
8. Speed Limit
The speed limit on 8th Street, N.E., 8th Avenue, N.E., Highland
Avenue, N.E., and 7th Avenue, N.E. is posted at 35 mph.
9. School Bus Data
In the immediate area of the studied intersection, there is an
estimated total of 22-24 school bus trips per day.
10. Geodetic Markers
None.
11. Structures
No major structures are located on the project.
E. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community
The proposed improvements should improve operational efficiency and
safety. It will reduce travel time for vehicles traveling between the
commercial, residential, and industrial facilities on each corridor and
reduce transportation costs by providing a more direct route between them.
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Recommended Alternative
The recommended alternative consists of constructing an at-grade
intersection to connect a major east-west corridor and a major north-south
corridor (see Figure 4). In addition, the approaches to the four (4)
adjacent intersections will be modified as needed to accommodate the
future traffic volumes. The proposed construction, except for the
proposed approaches to the existing intersections, will be contained
within the city block bounded by 8th Avenue, N.E. on the north side,
Highland Avenue, N.E. on the east side, 7th Avenue, N.E. on the south
side, and 8th Street, N.E. on the west side.
The approach configurations are shown in Figure 6. The southeast
intersection approach consists of double right-turn lanes. The northeast
approach is one-way leaving the intersection. The northwest approach is
one-way approaching the intersection. It consists of double right-turn
lanes, double thru lanes, and a left-turn lane. The southwest approach
consists of 2 thru-only lanes and a shared thru-right-turn lane. A center
left turn lane will be added to the 7th Avenue NE approach to Highland
Avenue NE to accommodate traffic entering and exiting Hickory
Manufacturing Company.
8
B. Other Improvements Considered
Due to the nature and scope of this project, no other improvements,
except for various intersection configurations studied during the
intersection analyses, were considered.
C. "No-Build" Alternative
The "no-build" alternative was also considered, but rejected because
the existing street system cannot adequately accommodate the existing or
projected traffic volumes at an acceptable level of service once the
projected east-west and north-south corridors discussed in section 2 are
open to traffic.
D. Public Transportation Alternative
The public transportation alternative is not a feasible alternative
since this project's purpose is to provide a connecting intersection for
an east-west corridor and a north-south corridor. The Piedmont Wagon is a
public bus service operated by a consortium of local governments in the
project area. The Springs Road/127 Route provides hourly service along
Highland Avenue, N.E. and into the downtown area (see Figure 9).
Transfers are available to other routes which serve the greater Hickory
area as well as Conover and Newton. This route provides public transit
along the east-west corridor, but since the north-south corridor is
partially on new location, no public service is available. The provision
of transit and paratransit services in this area would compliment the
proposed project but would not serve as an adequate substitute due to the
high density and "spread out" nature of Hickory's population, the
commercial and industrial sectors, and the Central Business District of
Hickory.
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. Land Use Planning
1. Scope and Status of Planning
The proposed project is located within the municipal limits of
the City of Hickory in Catawba Country. The City has an active land
use planning program, centered on its Land Development Plan, which
was adopted in 1986. The City also enforces a zoning ordinance and
subdivision regulations.
2. Existinq Land Use
The project site is located in an urbanized area containing a
variety of land uses. The block bounded by 8th Street NE, 8th Avenue
NE, Highland Avenue, and 7th Avenue NE contains institutional uses
associated with Lenoir Rhyne College, commercial businesses, and
residential uses. The Lenoir Rhyne College is a popular area for
recreational walkers, joggers, and bikers.
The Hickory Manufacturing
located to the southeast of the
is located to the northwest,
located to the northeast.
3. Existing Zoning
Company and other industrial uses are
project site. Lenoir Rhyne College
and a residential neighborhood is
The block is divided roughly into two zoning districts, 0-I-1
(Office and Institutional) in the northwestern half, and ED-2
(Economic Development) in the southeastern half of the block. ED-2
is a district which permits light industrial uses.
Future Land Use Plans
According to the Land Development Plan, only twenty percent of
the land within the Hickory Regional Planning Area remains
undeveloped. Therefore, the focus of the plan is on improving
existing conditions, such as traffic circulation, particularly within
the central business district; creating buffers between incompatible
land uses; and preventing the deteriorating affects of commercial and
industrial encroachment on residential neighborhoods.
The project site is located within the Railroad Corridor area
identified on the Land Development Plan Map. This area is designated
primarily for industrial uses, although existing residential areas
should be protected. The project is also included in the city's
thoroughfare plan.
5. Project Compatibility with Local Plans
The project is compatible with the policies stated in the Land
Development Plan, and is in fact an element of the adopted
thoroughfare plan. Additionally, the project will improve
circulation around the central business district, another goal cited
in the plan.
B. Social And Economic Characteristics
1. Neighborhood Analysis
Catawba County is in the West Central Section of North Carolina
and is bounded by Iredell, Lincoln, Burke, Caldwell, and Alexander
counties. According to the 1990 U. S. Census and North Carolina 1990
Population totals, Catawba County has a population of 118,412.
Hickory has a population total of 28,301 according to the 1990
U. S. Census.
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard runs in a northerly direction from Tate
Boulevard and passes within the block that is bounded by 7th Avenue
NE to the south, 8th Street NE and Lenoir Rhyne College to the west,
8th Avenue NE to the north, and Highland Avenue NE to the east,
10
forming a square city block. The proposed action will require the
relocation of most development within this square city block.
Development within this square block consists of old single family
houses facing 8th Street NE and Lenoir Rhyne College. Commercial
dwellings, offices, and empty dwellings line existing Highland Avenue
on the east side.
2. Economic Factors
There is a diversity of businesses in Catawba County offering a
range of economic opportunities to residents in the project area.
The major employment sectors are textiles, furniture manufacturing,
trade, and service.
During the month of May 1993, Catawba County had a labor force
of 73,810. Of this total, 70,710 persons were employed and 3,100
were unemployed resulting in an unemployment rate of 4.2 percent.
(Employment Statistics taken from North Carolina Security Commission)
Based on the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the per capita income
for Catawba County during the year of 1990 was $17,396.
3. Public and Private Facilities
Both public and private facilities are located in the vicinity
of the proposed project. These include St. Andrews Lutheran Church
and Lenoir Rhyne College. In addition, there is a dwelling within
the block of structures to be relocated that belongs to a local
church. The church officers and members are anticipating a financial
settlement from the Department of Transportation (DOT) to compensate
the church for the proposed loss of the dwelling to proceed with
their future plans. It appears that the only adverse impact the,
church will realize from the taking will be the wait in receiving the
DOT's financial settlement.
4. Relocation Impacts
The recommended project improvements will require the relocation
of approximately 5 residential properties, 9 businesses, and 2
non-profit organizations (Hickory Jaycees and The Fraternity House).
This proposed action will not adversely impact social cohesion, nor
have a long term impact on facilities and services. It is
anticipated that adequate replacement properties will be available
for the relocatees.
Any businesses along the proposed project site that may be
relocated will probably not be adversely impacted. The owners have
anticipated the construction of the proposed highway project, and are
ready for the construction to get under way. Businesses impacted by
relocation will be compensated for their losses. Therefore, adverse
impacts on businesses are anticipated to be minimal.
11
It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable
replacement housing will be available prior to construction of state
and federally-assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina
Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize
the inconvenience of relocation:
* Relocation Assistance
* Relocation Moving Payments, and
* Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement.
With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff
will be available to assist displacees with information such as
availability and prices of homes, apartments, or businesses for sale
or rent and financing or other housing programs. The Relocation
Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual
moving expenses encountered in relocation. Where displacement will
force an owner or tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost
or to lose a favorable financing arrangement (in cases of ownership),
the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement
Program will compensate up to $22,500 to owners who are eligible and
qualify and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted
in accordance with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and/or
the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-5 through 133-
18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced
persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do
business. At least one relocation officer is assigned to each
highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced
families, individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm
operations for relocation assistance advisory services without regard
to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The NCDOT will
schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for
negotiations and possession of replacement housing which meets
decent, safe, and sanitary standards. The displacees are given at
least a 90-day written notice after NCDOT purchases the property.
Relocation of displaced persons will be offered in areas not
generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and commercial
facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement property will be
within the financial means of the families and individuals displaced
and will be reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The
relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses,
non-profit organizations, and farm operations in searching for and
moving to replacement property.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced
will receive an explanation regarding all available options, such as
(1) purchase of replacement housing, (2) rental of replacement
housing, either private or public, or (3) moving existing
12
owner-occupant housing to another site (if possible). The relocation
officer will also supply information concerning other state or
federal programs offering assistance to displaced persons and will
provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize
hardships to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location.
The Moving Expenses Payments Program is designed to compensate
the displacee for the costs of moving personal property from homes,
businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations acquired
for a highway project. Under the Replacement Program for Owners,
NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental purchase payments for
replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals,
and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any
increased interest expenses for replacement dwellings. Reimbursement
to owner-occupants for replacement. housing payments, increased
interest payments, and incidental purchase expenses may not exceed
$22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort Housing
provision.
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to
exceed $5,250, to rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down
payment, including incidental expenses, on the purchase of a
replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the state
determines is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250.
It is a policy of the state that no person will be displaced by
the NCDOT's state or federally-assisted construction projects unless
and until comparable replacement housing has been offered or provided
for each displacee within a reasonable period of time prior to
displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered as
income for the purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for
the purposes of determining eligibility or the extent of eligibility
of any person for assistance under the Social Security Act or any
other federal law.
Y
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable
replacement housing is not available, or when it is unavailable
within the displacee's financial means, and the replacement payment
exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the
program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by
the state so that decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can
be provided. It is not felt that this program will be necessary on
the project, since there appear to be adequate opportunities for
relocation within the area.
C. Cultural Resources
1. Archaeological Findings
A review of the files at the Office of State Archaeology
indicates that there are no archaeological sites recorded in the
project area. The likelihood of the project encountering any
significant archaeological sites is low, given the limited scope of
13
the project and the extensive modern development in the project area.
The modern structures within the vicinity have been evaluated and are
not significant. Therefore, the possibility of significant
archaeological deposits associated with these structures is low.
There are no sites or properties listed on the National Register
of Historic Places within the project area. No further
archaeological investigation for this project is recommended.
2. Historical Architectural Findings
In consultation with the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the city of Hickory, no National
Register-listed properties are located in the area of potential
effect. For this reason, this completes compliance with GS
121-12(a).
D. Natural Resources
1. Plant Communities
ROADSIDE is the only terrestrial community found in the subject
project study area. This community includes road shoulders, lawns,
and parking lots. Dominant faunal components associated with this
type of community will be discussed in the community description.
Many floral species characteristic of the roadside are adapted
to disturbed and maintained habitats. Tall fescue (Festuca sp.),
Bermuda grass (Cynodon sp.), plantain (Plantago lanceolata and P.
ru elii), and various other herbaceous species dominate this
community along with scattered white pine (Pinus strobus), hemlock
(Tsuga canadensis), crepe myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica), flowering
dogwood (Corpus florida), red maple (Scer rubrum), crab apple (Malus
sp.) and Russian olive (Elaaeagnus sp.). A variety of ornamental
species are also prevalent around homes and offices.
2. Wildlife
Animal species diversity is low in the project area and is
limited to those species which are commonly found in areas saturated
by development. Mortality of animals living in and migrating through
roadside habitats provides forage for opportunistic species such as
Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), which may in turn become
fatalities and subsequently forage items themselves. The grey
squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) is a common inhabitant of lawn and
park-like settings in the project vicinity. Birds, including broad-
winged hawk (Buteo platypterus), chimney swift (Chaetura pelagica),
European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), house sparrow (Passer
domesticus), northern mockingbird (Minus of lottus), and American
robin (Turdus migratorius) can be bound nesting and or foraging in
this community.
14
3. Geological Findings
a. Methodology
A field reconnaissance survey along the project and a
records search of appropriate environmental agencies was
conducted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation's
Geotechnical Unit in April 1993.
b. Physiography, Relief and Drainage
The study corridor is located in the Inner Piedmont
Physiographic Province. Moderate hills rolling through
urbanized land make up the project area. The relief along the
project corridor is mostly gently sloping.
Elevations range from a low of slightly less than 900 feet
at Clark Creek to a high of over 1120 feet on several ridgetops.
There are no streams or creeks in the corridor, but around the
town, creeks are downgrading and have small to moderate sized
floodplains. Streams exhibit a dendritic drainage pattern and
flow into Lake Hickory, a reservoir on the Catawba River, or
into tributaries of the Henry Fork River. Erosion has altered
the topography of the corridor surrounding area.
C. Geology and Soils
Late Proterozoic, Cambrian metamorphic and metaigneous rock
of the Inner Piedmont Geologic Belt underlie the project.
Country rock includes metamorphosed intrusive igneous and
pol,ymetamorphic rock of the Inner Piedmont Belt. Gneiss,
granite, diorite, and schist are the dominant bedrock.
Exposures are common in past road cuts and excavations along the
project corridor. Hard rock is expected in cuts deeper than 25
feet throughout the area with shallow rock in areas of granite
and diorite bedrock. The corridor dominantly consists of Cecil
sandy loan with 2 to 10 percent slopes that are eroded. Thick
mats of residual clays cap the hills. Deep, residual clays
underlain by clayey silts and sandy silts are expected to be
found on upland portions of thE! project. Engineering properties
of this soil for use in fill sections is fair with moderate
shrink-swell potential. The soil profile for this project is
show in the Soil Conservation Service county soils manual to be
well drained and to include A-4, A-5, and A-7 soils of the
ASSHTO soils classification system.
d. Mineral Resources

There are no known mineral resources in the vicinity of
this proposed construction.
15
e. Erosion Control
Soils within this corridor consist mostly of eroded Cecil
loam and residual clays. They range in slope from 2 to 10
percent throughout the project. This is a well drained soil on
the uplands. Control of runoff and erosion is needed for this
project corridor.
f. Groundwater
Groundwater occurs across
greater than 10 feet below the
Groundwater is somewhat deeper
corridor. Subsurface water may
of the project, specifically in
4. Water Resources
the project area at depths just
existing ground in alluvium.
for residual soils along the
be encountered upon construction
cut-sections.
The proposed project construction will not impact any water
resources. No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW),
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or waters designated as WS-I or
WS-II will be impacted by the proposed project, nor are these
resources located within I mile of the subject area.
5. Jurisdictional Wetlands
The project, as planned, will not impact wetland communities.
6. Protected Species
a. Federally Protected Species
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists the federally
threatened dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) for
Catawba County as of February 7, 1994. A federally threatened
species is a species that is likely to become an endangered
species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
No habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf exists in the
project study area. It can be concluded that the subject
project will not impact Hexastylis naniflora.
b. State Protected Species
One Federal Candidate species is listed for Catawba County
which is classified by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program as State Protected. The Catawba crayfish ostracod
(Dactylothere isabelae) is listed as Endangered.
16
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
No habitat for state or federally protected species is
present in the area to be impacted by the proposed project.
Therefore, no impacts to federally protected species will occur
from construction of the subject project.
E. Floodplain Involvement
The proposed project is located on a ridge and thus does not have any
major drainage crossings. Since there are no major drainage crossings, no
floodways will.be affected by the proposed project.
F. Traffic Noise and Air Quality Analvses
The project is
Air Quality Control
has been determined
Quality Standards.
Implementation Plan
Hence, the conformi
project.
located within the Metropolitan-Charlotte Interstate
Region. The ambient air quality for Catawba County
to be in compliance with the National Ambient Air
This project is located in an area where the State
(SIP) does not contain any transportation measures.
ty procedures of 23 CFR 770 do not apply to this
The proposed construction will not move any traffic lanes closer to
the remaining receptors in the project area, and the project will not
substantially increase traffic noise due to the new traffic patterns. The
traffic noise and air quality impacts for the receptors at the
intersection of 8th Avenue NE and 8th Street NE, and at the intersection
of 8th Avenue NE, Highland Avenue NE, and 9th Street NE will be addressed
in the environmental studies as part of the city's associated. projects.
This evaluation completes the assessment requirements in Title 23 of
the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 772 (highway traffic noise) and Part
770 (air quality) and no additional reports are required.
G. Construction Impacts
To minimize potential adverse effects caused by construction, the
following measures, along with those already mentioned will be used during
the construction phase.
.
- Solid wastes created as a result of highway construction will be
disposed of in accordance with Section 802 of the NCDOT Standard
Specifications. -
- Demolition or renovations of structures containing asbestos
material must be in compliance with NCAC 2D.0525 which requires
notification and removal prior -to demolition.
An extensive rodent control program will be established where
structures are to be removed or demolished in order to prevent
the mitigation of rodents into surrounding areas.
17
Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and ordinances, along with regulations of the North
Carolina Plan for Implementing National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. Burning will be done only on the right of way, under
constant surveillance, with good atmospheric conditions, as
remote from dwellings as possible.
Precautions are to be taken to prevent waterlines along the
project from being damaged and to minimize disruption of water
service. The contractor is to prepare a work schedule which
• will minimize possible impacts on water service.
The contractor shall maintain the earth surface of all waste
• areas, both during the work and until the completion of all
seeding and mulching or other erosion control measures
specified, in a manner which will effectively control erosion
and siltation.
Traffic services in the immediate area may be subjected to brief
disruption during construction of the project. Every endeavor
will be made to insure that the transportation needs of the
public will be met both during and after construction.
H. Contaminated Properties
In a reconnaissance survey of the study area, one (1) operational and
no (0) non-operational facilities with the potential for underground
storage tank (UST) involvement was identified on the project corridor.
The location of this site and the respective number of USTs potentially
impacted by the project is given in the list that follows:
- Griffith's Inc. (active): 765 Highland Avenue N.E., Hickory
UST owner: Griffith's Inc.; 765 Highland Avenue N.E.
Facility ID #: 0-029810 2 gasoline USTs (2000 gallon), located
at 61 feet from the centerline of 8th Avenue N.E. and Highland
Avenue N.E., made of steel construction with cathodic
protection, these tanks were installed in September of 1981
(There is the potential for tanks older than this to exist on
the project at this site, but no groundwater records exist
showing this to be true.)
The files of the Solid Waste Section, Division of Solid Waster
Management were consulted and no landfills were located in this section of
Catawba County that should affect the project.
The files of the Solid Waste Section, Division of Solid Waster
Management and the Hazardous Waste. Section, Division of Solid Waste
Management were consulted to ascertain whether any unregulated dump sites
or other potentially contaminated properties exist within the proposed
project limit. Based on those records and the EPA's Superfund list, there
are no potential environmental problem sites that should affect this
project corridor.
18
I. Farmland
North Carolina Executive Order 96;. Conservation of Prime Agricultural
and Forest Lands, requires that all state agencies ensure that their
actions will minimize the loss of prise agricultural and forest lands.
The proposed improvement is located in an urbanized area and will have no
impact on farmland or forest lands. Therefore, no further consideration
of impacts to agricultural uses is required.
J. Permits
No permits for construction are anticipated to be needed for the
proposed project as it is presently designed. However, should design
parameters change, the permit issue will require new evaluation.
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
Comments on the proposed project were solicited from the following
federal, state, and local agencies and officials. An asterisk indicates a
written response was received.
Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington
Environmental Protection Agency-Atlanta
*Fish & Wildlife Service-Asheville
Fish & Wildlife Service-Raleigh
*State Clearinghouse
*Department of Cultural Resources
Department of Human Resources
Department of Public Instruction
Region E Planning Agency
Catawba County Commissioners
*Mayor of Hickory
Several meetings between local officials and NCDOT officials were
held to coordinate the construction of Hickory's two (2) Road Bond
Project's (see Figure 4) and this project. The city's construction of the
proposed one-way pairs cannot function unless' the connector and
improvements are completed in a timely manner.
WBK/plr
Aopo% sa
cam= I Ri im rofflibil MEMM JOE%
IN 0
IN
t
R
r
NORTH CAROLINA
CATAWBA COUNTY

S ciowo --
IFork R 1
.obs 7 12 B
2
!0 lp
t aiden
LENOIR RHYN
COLLEGE K 1
= TS• r t? HIGHLAND 4
rN
PROJECT f AVE.
H16ME ANO M.E. _ ? 4;
CT. ME - AREA -
- Tyr. S qy? ? ? ? ? ? r`
MCCOMBs i Al
?
y ?f
N.E. PARK ST. ANDREWS 0 G 1
LUTH. CH. q?
J
IST UNITED METH. CH. YF 2 rti '' "?, AAVF
S h
?Jy ?, W •A 8.. h.
IST
COMMUNIT7 a
E. F. h '• 2319
H. D 0 •?, `,' W BAF T. T v£• o
4y W. 8. YT
f. CH. ^'r 4y4y1.1Hf. Sf'.0 AvE. n S.E. ?' S.£• ??•
h
2319 tiF ?? tf ,6c EAS
N. E. HICK
'T• F St' Q _ a E"AVE.S.EJ c? 8AP
INA 16'
KS 8 = ar a r AVL. 4y
ROEN n ?H FLYNN c w ?f? f•
v.E• PP CHRIST. ?iy a{ 4 '
FELLOWSHIPyp?,?, a S.E.
HALL v' : PNE• AVE. PENT. CH. OF
1007 - LIVING 600 F AVE. ?' OOCCJJ
n r " `F' " AVE. S. E.
`V 1TOOT ZZOS F
N W ' 2221 f' AYE. S•E 1692
o e W
AYE. - TATF H
S.E.
CHRIST 2222 ?" __ eLVp• S.F.
= LUTH. 2231-?. n
'• CH. .n CLINTON -i `145
Ay TAKER.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH I
HICLORY
LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD EXTENSION
HIGHLAND AVENUE N.E, TO 8TH STREET N.E.
CATAWBA COUNTY
U-2306B i
- 1
FIG. 1
t

f?'?, '
r ,

?, it ?

';??

,I
I
?
?
r
£__-•_•?I?J 1333 OOOZ. .0...
AWND 114
ia1-7G?
HJNVT9 Sb6a? "?w
'IVIN2NNOHIANa QNV JNINNVga f
ST,VMHOIH 1o NOISIAIQ ?
NOUVIdoasWal
do WNaj4,IZida ii VNI•IOMTVO H111ON I s??xlAOriy°?

91 I - ,
L91 ? ??
1911/ i••x ..y ?e«x.r --
y,
1
1
1
1
1
1
iOtlIV' 1
\ i 9LC1
31
1
I 1 11
,`_ 1 fo21 M30JJI008
1> LoZ1
l -? _ -- a\ 1 Utll ?? -?• •' f?l- J ? ?[I, 6o:L ,?,.
1 VVV
1 ? •C
•1_" 7c? r
46LI `-\?-\ `??\ 71. IT,l?o .4 -
I _T
?..? p9-ice' BO4Z
\\ I 4TGi ` J1 ( ? t Loo, l ? ? ? \ 1
9.1
\ oY IZC ?'?? -
01
IJ ?\? I Y9 "? `\
1 / R11 ? F9vil .-
L, ?I bl LL bI _ , ?r \
TL j71-
Tw b
Ik"
40
/I :z
\`\ 1 lady 001 ' C ? . ..
?4L?J 69s1 ?'• tl ?!
9 ? a,. u, / Loa ?• / ?'•: ?!
9. -? go., 1 _ as ®•. P.y /? ® _? '?. .__.M _-_
- "tL.•??p. °yr\7/J' /??1(JYY..CY] t1iZ ".x n •? ? L1 l
99 ,
a9-.r? ?' ? t Z3aY ;: ., lczz ?a
QNV •J 1 ' „ JJII . ?yyN ?- y x i
89.1
y9t ' R - 30.4.., ?..•'! L T.,^ ? `?" '
. 1 ZT3 tisl -?E 12
67, n
\\ .•O«.n • -`\ J:J` ,i ?i?^ wJ rrlh el,,.n lt1
• \` ? Yb11 9 LYl -
6661 .,a 6>91 "-_ _ \ rNl, ,'? ••', +•?iw ,•- -- __-_- _
it \ .I . Pii1 ? \ - ev9 i?\?''\ ?p a ?"w ???; .,.«.,rr •.% •? ? 1 ?s ? J .? .. -_.
--ITT Z 0,
66L2? '/ H r. 1 '? • 1. - ?f 11 ?? /I BZbI / / V N .L
L A%-
-T
ZSi 1 9Zei'? I
0922 40t L. "?'N_ ?\ \-?• ?rn'
- ---L£G`\.•?4911Zb-1 ;/ _-__I''?- -- `l?• ."\
69C1 _© X261 r _ _?_ \ '
z -ITT
aft
j79 z,
?9V • n ?.u9..? 1 ,91?i - `y/. ?(\`\ .\ s-lGl - _ J,III so9. +Ohl `ft. _?? ???/'? ': ,. ",.:• !1 ..
_ I1lI ? ._ . II ?-J ?ql ' ? rail "• _-- 1 / _ .' y .'.. ?----? \ _ f I, ? ?I _ ^? ' C ? /\
- _-?Sfr_ 1. 11 CL? - '• 1 ?? ?Gt, L ?, r. .. :\ 5•? .?
1• I i rcv ?, 3ta ! -4l _o bl '? vbcl/?- :ZV
r _-
sobr?.r. _ isV`11? II 61iL «, .cl _ 10-1 / ,• ... :, ,.
6f S1S1 loll-
s z-
XF1
J . „ )
61 J
15.1 ,OG1 4091 - - ri Z .'I 11'• , ' 1091 ._` ' BIY 1'?, • LL,j 1
n6o9r >2 ••• '1GL22 I T , I I ,`• ?A`4`,L' J l1i•`1 17J _t_ s,.?w. ,r 1r,,,. 1 •?• \•` ._
I' 96.1 ' ?--_'? ? l' ?I ` ..? •Bl Cr:p C ?,\ ?
II ., ,Li9 )? G042 y? :OG91 __ //H ' 1,.,.r - --:.,• ,y, --___ ----_ L\ :•I /' r-- • J Z
! `? 8991 ?- ) G191I _ :.. - i ,•• ,L A11J ! \ J rr Y I- \ L` / _ ?/'--
\\ •/ '• \ ( /? ~09 ?' I I__6LLL ,.1, r1«. •• - fr`.? \ ro. ??!-f... ?\
I{
X991 OL.?I
./ 1„ ?:d .?.... _ \? `? / 1 06LZ. _?.. Sf/ 1, .. ?? • - •J 4.?VI T,T
9t- _J o ?C_.. _
9 ZI I.•!• G691 /Ob1 ` (; 29.1 - ???•\.•\ ?, - - (r. •-? If.• i?\ e,.' \ \.
2 N• / 1 1-L _ _[?ZZ? \ ?.,.. 1?5?:^ --._iY. •;•.,`\? ." a
•\? _ _JI JJJ \_ 9L2
[?91 /. \ •._? If .. _.t - 6GLZ' i 691 Bobltll [' y . BLZ2 -4-4 4-1 /?.?CTill ?\ O (I( .. 'ovT ---_- \ - 26x1 `\ c,\.'^? Llu
L2SI ? I?? ,
aSbi I`\_-\ 1- (iii/ /?\ \ // Oj491 - /,•_•?._' ~ 91Z
i l' ?1 • __.i \ Y?alf ,'
]AV
\ t6E1
`N / SF.S1 ` 00 ,Fj \\ 1 J•r. 1.., -?) - 90Y ,• ?'ro iw `(? ''',99Z`i \
_ ?\ IoYI \? \ r]/•:: :;:.- d?tT (/T
JJ el - '9622
r. r... O II •,'1 N V Cl ... h, To-* I
T5W
VNI
'' ,,831'- - /)/y ? ? 7 ?;1 w / •`'C \ ??
A91 SB9•I / /i\ ?? \? `? ? ?? 1:Oit .\ \\ a• V • • ..- __obl J/ _? •]?'\• y
I IIIfN91 71i
_-J?, __-? '\.. \, I?1II1 //?j1C• ?1.,•• \ 9191
1691 I .. bU91 - _ •? - - ?_)l f' ti %) ?\ \ ?? / J- `\`'' ,
Wrl
\1 B09\ 1.GG91
-- BAS Ot LL ?b BLL \? ti ,. L1L=:41 #3or.
kC_
tool. BOZZ T A
??.
fit
'rr
05c. u2zry sii sa •F3pa ? ' // - ` i • '\ iciz ips,I cwl. I(io2rJ? /^ \_ \ •-?`.-€7 • ??iiT iai
/? '`/ricCi
. !2 I
? i1 • • n, WALL '? ?' I ' ( rarw• J?,•? ?1 //
r .. _ i.. • ' •\??` \-?1}? / ?
\
e69 3•? .,
O2zl ( (?/( -b1 . ?:: ?«izz 1 :-r..., `a7uza- '. .,,.«1-i 1 ! ??• ? ,:• \ ..... :.,
I llaz y J.t L2 -. ?j,•oG l.•?! r,GI.L ?insi ?' io31 ?? ` w i?: ? l/`
a r M ?
j I j i?
I!i

??;I
i
ii,'
!ii
iii
???
I?I
??;I
'
ii
l i di
III
I
,.
I
I ?'
P
?I,
i
i
'I
i ?il

?

w

x

r
'CI3
133J OOOZ 0001 0
A'LNf 10U Y qAk V i V z)
' N 13u^S1 S PIS 01. ' 9 " N Zfh NaAV QW'II DIH
SSbI ''`d
,3.B•314
Oaf 'j5 pM2 ^'r
,bpd '3'S ']jAV
s
'H 0S 'W313 ?n
y 'aH LIZZ = m ?? H1dOMK3N
S
•~ 1a m Q ? 15
°A.2 H d3e V1 3Ab
SSbI NO1NI10 U 'HO I-i
I£ZZ ' =
IS --A XT? CildvA:??POg al%UI2I 2II0i I 3'S = H J. n 1
'ante •`^ 3333 1SI21H0 Lx
A2i0114,7IH 31 171 3 S ?-
m ? 7,691 •3•S '3AV „J,• IZZ3 °. m
01 1 3 N 3.s ® 90ZZ L001 ?I.3's 3n,
HONV2Ig t
'IVINMNINOdIANa QNV ONIRRVad f r '3nv e„ 3 S °F
S1IVRHDIH 3O NOISIAIQ I OOJ JfJln ll > = be 3Aq V90£"-: ? LOOI
JO'HO'1N3d + . and 11VH
NOILV12IOdSNVdZ 6 .3,S ® 35 ?S ?? dIHSMOl13J
dO ,LNaNldVdHG VNIWIVO HIHON e ?b :nv' -'3 ?o `syf 1, t NN?)3aH?
-pr
m ?c 4
3'S'3Ab„3„ ?d S
'1qb % m Ad01r lMi y r _
_ L441 ?V y p lsv3 ?y = end
-Hr
'" Q '3'S N '3'S v '3ntl 0.. .5 ?j•Ntd^b y •H? .
'3N = .3'S v •3^ '11;1 '1 iV9 '^ r ..V •9 I Hla .e'M'J 3db
H0 'Hlnl * 3pb •.b b y •.8, w LIINOWVJ00 ?m J 6123 Y LSI
3dOH 0000 y + r ''.y ?.
y '< 4, '.3'S = N .3's
3?V S _O
m JAb,y H LYJ v 61EZ 140 -113N 0311N
d •3';J •34b 2a) y ?4b 'H0 'Him
T H1e ?'.? m y v, r 1 SM380NV '1S N
W ?1
L bbl I 1 U ??b wtirr
3'1173 N Hl6 " 2541 d N .?'d,y ti 2 ? ? y1` Q z
Hl p1 1e .'b C„?
A, Lbbl '3•A. _ d1b i w 3'N ?ONtl lHO1H ?
! Hl -1 3ntl 3.
35S3N11M 81741 3Ay Hl A? ?DN? 6 :? m 'H0'1dV8 ? .Y ?r '16
NgA0H3f '80'3nq •H 3'N Of
v ?•r. rn d 1
??•.. ti ONg1HJIH 717 r ?1
JO 11VH - 01 u 3?b IQ 0/
I d ?• 3931100 .Y
1e ?
D OSbI ~ _ \?• N N by e NI ?YAHd dION316
3N '3n 11 rin ? _ 'H0 = x ?'. .a° ?' sy ? o v .'>
111 H0 H13W H1 i d ~ c= 3fGgd Q z ?' r? m a 3NAH21 d30N31 -100
1V31130NVA3 . Qi08FO2I
_ ' ?b 5
,Sb:m-3h0 z
3?b S81 V"
111 17941 N181 3'1 3:1 F' ! N !s ?b
ae 1S b m y NL11 z QkF'TH07H 134 v tit ?
J b and x 'n -• 'H0S 'IV313 H1 •?. ? w :y
3 N ar3£bl H %n a z ti z ONV'tiH01H °n. ,;,Ib N •'3'N
N 6341 I m _ t Y' ti1o. '' yntl H16 Z
m ' uV a
J 172171 83171 Av a H1 zI X a z Z
y 22
Jo
'H0 a 3ti 3'N
o N IObI a LZbi z Y N [AV H1£I
_ 3n
17 rn a ^ y o ? b Hl F1 ? Y ??b ti a?
m I L 91 92 41 ? ya Y y1° >r a~
LE91 1 3171 b3bl 3'N 3n ?! a~ 3N 3 Y
ti z b Hl 61 ?
m
b 6 91 =~ ti S Z b l ? ?? Hl a? '= b H<?i r
\ 6
2351 y\ \ • N 3ny 46? O
r Y and 11 rr11 H1 sl bZ b I ? ?b3 N 9 I b I a
2341 ? 3
' 3Ab '? a °f ,? ' 3 •N 3 3 41 ?\ 3 ,?;. H1 zr ? .'i
.O t
H1 S, .r? J u? Z. 3Ab H1 91 G. 2 Y H c
2191 °a N Z s 47,91 EZ171 2091 oo may 3ro ?a y xIoN:
3 N ' 3.117 r
HL 91 5091 1, ?V r •3ntl H1 L' ? d? •'yn' I 4I bl 3,117 ''
T3-T7-1-
et, ? orb T M
Z 21171 171171
91" `? wh 21171
.'i ? a d ? `,. may'
m 9451 ? \ 3'N '3Ab •3'Nw
OZ41 ?T Hibl o m '
3'N y 3 h
3AV H18' z x \
'80'3Ab Hlbl
1A `?
y?
81 'HONV83Hln1
N 1, is z 2 N1 c r oa3Hd3HS 0000
,, Hl Bra N r 3.".'1d ?Cr LbSI = y _ 3 N '3Ab Hl BI v z 2
m r w D .3'N
t0z z y r c n i z z
m ^ m
`? 6141 rt- •3•N a '3Ab r 3San00 J10J 3N
HL 61 `• • 3'N ~ z = H161 - d' -Ni 3'117 _ 3 N
3Ab Hl rn rn ~ h = 1,r r ? ? 3A V
61 810 w 2 ,? 1?, N b
No '3'N '3Ab l OZ 'T y 2~ / ~ r .3H a1b, y5 H14.?'N
-1 - r y I \ 1S
J
1041 Z ?\
r 3 81171 z 'K\ .3 N x-4/0 1
? ? m I
H 16' '7'N 'le '1S H161 ,3n'd HI_oz
2
x
r
I 3 N ?d 3Ab H 1S1z r
I I ? 1°z 3ntl -L. GOO 30 H0dnH0 Y N
I i ^ ?? ?? ' ylwl 1 J W S11IH NOIONUNnH ; 3'117
`, ??? ? / a•IV
8393 ati aN
?'/?\ ?+SI 8141 LICI 3nb 19IZ / Y 3?b ?AV
s w °tia
I'H0 '1dV8 1?1 S? °a s
HilVAIN
b •3. ??L? _91751 - b 3N y`'Z~l
6L33 'HO NVA31S3M•3^bOdf2 Nr 3117 O w 3Ab °roz2 91791 ?? 3nb °bFd ?/
I 30018 ACINVS OyFZ i = a ? 2 2
3•N 917 51 z -I 08 £Z Y , rn
I 0932 ?d 3AV aafz w m x 9491 a 80171
II' ? 17£91 4291 3'N Llbl e~ ?zz
3951 '3Ab Hl b,,, '3'N '3Ab Hl bZ '? 1651 .3 0 1 41 vl\ td
Z 3'N o
m z
? ? ? ? -i 1833 ? E6ZZ Z 1j LS H1171 m ? .? ? l ?d rN ,v 'aa fz
J
•? Y,P ,jN'ld'3Ab H1 bZ L8511S~9 3N 'ld •3AV OCIZt and "j1°?\Z
N .170 BLZZ 5 5 6891 6851 N d 6
_ 0141
O 3Nb 10 t71. yYPI 3 '3'N'3Ab 08U 3651 , Yi1'
H162 L351 1£91 \ r
to 3'N '3Ab H192
0291 3nb i 91 Z Z
bd1N3J
3Ab H1
dy 97,91 ?110z
3251 -? - -
0 9351 '3'1 -pr
3nv LObI H1cz
r
a 'H0 '1dVe ? 3041 'W30 8'H0
?°) 310VN838V1 cZ51 ? NV233Hin1
9Obl '3.N 3A110 •1W *.
\ '3Ab Hl BZ
9633 •3,N '-Id
IObI '3Ab Hl 92 09£
\ ? - 30171 17017 l ,? y y
0
'3'N 'N l '3Ab 9 63 3
g
HLBZ 3'N '3AV HLoc b
17691
!'?'
I 'i
l!
i
FIGURE 5
EST. 19% ADT VOLUME IN HUN DREDS u-2306B
8 th ST. N.E. CATAWBA COUNTY
ONE-WAY PAIR OCTOBER, 1993

A -
---- MATCH LINE
-------
--
--
---
- A
+
W W
Z 1
Q
Z O
?
U1 L ??

` 158 t

103
22 131 5 --22 8th AVE. NE. L2
44 .- ..I t I. - 2 24 ? 3

Be 3

44 38 -` _
43
g _}
36
-i
s ?}
21
13 -` 1 1 f
43 18
'C' AV E.
80 5
\y
139 '
139
tP?
. 2?
56 •1
83 56

166 83
!
?
N !L'Li0 112
83 /
56
X \56 .py
83
7 76
19 ?? -- 7 10
38 I- 3
18 7 -J
7 ---
r -
10 10
5 -1 5 76 3 7th AVE. NE. io 5s
841 t84 66 l t 66
168 132
8th St. NE. LENJOR RHYNE
BLVD.
FIGURE 5A
EST. 2016 ADT VOLUMES IN HUNDRE DS U-2306B
8 th ST. N.E.
ONE-WAY PAIR CATAWBA COUNTY
OCTOBER, 1993

A - - -
- - - MATCH LINE
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - -A
fi 97
w LL1
Z Q
Z
c
cf)
?a

282 L
W ?

184
' 38 236 ---35 8th AVE. NE. L 3
38 5
146 ?--- 19
_
60 - ?
73 13-1
68 14-f
ff 54
27
35
-` 1978 f' 'C' AVE
19
146 8 .
252 /

r? 251
IPA

101 1
150 <101

150
N
0
??p
150 \101
Io1'? \ ,Q
ye
ti
150 fi
9 141
31 ?r -13
18
62 f 5 _
31 13--. t 18
9 --f 9 141 5 7th AVE. NE. 18 101
155 1 f 155 11,91 1 119
310 238
8th St. NE. LENJOR RHYNE
BLVD.
l s k
;?'
x r
0
v
Q
m
Q
U
}
Y
c
CO-
N
D-
z

05
U

U
(Z
co
N
Q

J
11J
/'L
\i)
Ir
s2.
N
U
Q
0
Cl)
0
J
0
0
v-
ty
4J
Q
L
_U?
vI
0
-1
o
O
T
L
O
Q
v
U
U T
Q

;o r

co
:6

-co

a
a-l
1o

:N
c

0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
N O OD QD d' N
T T

v

0,
O
4-j co
00

>
j
0) co
r U

T z
4-j

I O O (1)
r?? z LU
l
O j z

4--j
L L
,

W `V
? i

H
Q
v
i?
C?
U
Q
m
Q
r
Q
U
ll?l '190
U
iw
M
d
Lij
4-a
CO
Co
i
N
mm.
U
70
N
Cc

J
Cll
Q
U)
Q
1a
U
Q
c?
rn
0
0
0
0
co
0
0
W
?y
mil
c.;
Q?
Q
OD
a)
L

¦
•i
LL.1 '
i
z ?
I
I
?I
? i
i
i
0
W
0
O
Q)
0-i
co ,
v'
v
0
0)
co
co
L i
O
C\J
co
C5
0
: O
Lo
c
C
C
;co
L
LO mot- co tv o

I

vJ
co
co
` 0
r z

?
+ v
+
- tG >
? 0

'
CY)

Q
-} - 4-1
L-- ° z
CO
0 0
z
E !
Q
W

L I

co i - I
H i

>
co

W
CC)
is.
LEGE if
< JR.
SCH. II
yi
A TH.
MCCOMBS
PARK ST.
I
IST UNITED METH. CH.
2319
N.
? .eY
BUS ROUTE
`E
F A
1-6 1NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
"?qF 10.Aa BRANCH
HICKORY
LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD EXTENSION
EXISTING BUS ROUTES
FIGURE 9
i
s
n
NITT
r. Cr
APPENDIX
T
?PQSMEN OF;,, United States Department of the Interiors N
AMERICA?¦
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
?4RCH 3 ?sa9 Asheville Field Office l M
330 Ridgefield Court
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
March 4, 1993 ? E 11VI
1
`0
MAR 0 6 1993
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch DIVISIGN OF Division of Highways G ^HIGHIAIAYS
? v
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201 "ti'•,??1" ??
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
Subject: Scoping for the Proposed Hickory Rhyne Boulevard Extension to
8th Street, NE., and Realignment of 8th Street, NE., with
Highland Avenue, NE., in Hickory, Catawba County, North
Carolina, T.I.P. No. U-2306, State Project No. 9.8121691
In your letter of February 10, 1993 (received February 15, 1993), you
requested information about potential environmental impacts that could
result from the subject construction for your use in the preparation of
an environmental assessment for the project. The following comments are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to the information provided in your letter, this project will
involve the construction of a five-lane curb and gutter section, most of
which is a new location from north of the Norfolk-Southern Railroad to
8th Street, NE., and will also involve the realignment of 8th Street,
NE., to connect with Highland Avenue, NE., in Hickory. Falling and Clark
Creeks are located north and south of the project area, respectively.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's review of the environmental
assessment for the project would be greatly facilitated if the document
contained the following information:
(1) A complete analysis and comparison of the available
alternatives (the build and no-build alternatives).
(2) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources
within existing and required additional rights-of-way
and any areas, such as borrow areas, that may be
directly or indirectly affected by the proposed road
construction.
(3) Acreage and description of the creeks, streams, or
wetlands that will be impacted because of the
proposed road project. We recommend contacting the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory
Field Office, to determine the need for a Section 404
Clean Water Act permit (704/259-0855).
(4) Acreage of upland habitat, by cover type, that will
be eliminated because of the proposed project.
(5) Mitigation measures that will be employed to avoid,
eliminate, reduce, or compensate for habitat value
losses associated with any of the proposed project.
Based on our records, one federally listed plant species, the dwarf-
flowered heartleaf (Hexastvlis naniflora), is known to occur in Catawba
County. The dwarf-flowered heartleaf grows in acidic, sandy loam soils
along bluffs and nearby slopes, in boggy areas adjacent to creek heads
and streams, and along the slopes of hillsides and ravines. Soil type is
the most important habitat requirement with Pacolet, Madison gravelly
sandy loam or Musella fine sandy loam soils recognized as necessary for
growth and survival of this species. The presence or absence of this
species in the project impact area should be addressed in the
environmental assessment.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these scoping comments and
request that you continue to keep us informed as to the progress of this
project. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please
reference our Log Number 4-2-93-042.
Sincerely,
Nora A. Murdock
Acting Field Supervisor
cc:
Mr. Randall C. Wilson, Nongame Section Manager, Division of Wildlife
Management, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604-1188
Director, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, NC 27611 t
Mr. Cecil Frost, North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Plant
Conservation Program, P.O. Box 27647, Raleigh, NC 27611
Mr. Dennis Stewart, Division of Boating and Inland Fisheries, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 512 N. Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604-1188
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE vfj
FM208 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-
03-26-93
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS 3 1993
U y
MAILED TO: FROM: ?Z U
DIVISION OF
N.C. DEPT- OF TRANSPORTATION MRS. CHRYS BAGG HIGH'NAYS
L.J. WARD DIRECTOR ?FNI// uN1E??'
PLANNING E ENV. BRANCH N C STATE CLEARINGH
HIGHWAY BLDG./INTER-OFFICE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
SCOPING - PROPOSED EXTENSION OF LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. TO 8TH STREET
AND REALIGNMENT 8TH STREET TO CONNECT WITH HIGHLAND AVENUE
TIP #U-2306
SAI NO 93E42200676 PROGRAM TITLE - SCOPING
THE-ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SUBMITTED: ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
t X) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE [phone]•
C.C. REGION E
ate. STA7Z
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
MEMORANDUM!
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee V
Project Review Coordinator
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
RE: 93-0676 Scoping Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
to 8th Street N.E. and Realign 8th Street N.E.
to Connect Highland Avenue, Catawba County
DATE: March 25, 1993
The Department. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
has reviewed the proposed scoping notice. The attached comments
list and describe information that is necessary for our divisions
to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the project.
More specific comments-will be provided during the environmental
review.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. The Department of
Transportation is encouraged to notify our commenting divisions if
additional assistance is needed.
MM: bb
Attachments
CC: David Foster
MAR 2 6 1993 t
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.7687 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Assessment
Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
FROM: David Yow, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: March 22, 1993
SUBJECT: Request for information from the N. C. Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) regarding fish and wildlife
concerns for Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension to 8th
Street N. E. and Realignment of 8th Street to connect
with Highland Avenue N. E., Hickory, Catawba County,
North Carolina, TIP No. U-2306, SCH Project No. 93-
0676.
This memorandum responds to a request from Mr. L. J. Ward of
the NCDOT for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife
resources resulting from the subject project. The N. C. Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the proposed
improvements, and a site inspection was conducted on February 19,
1993. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of
the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 et seq.,
as amended; 1 NCAC 25) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed work involves construction of roadway on new
alignment in an urban area. While the NCWRC prefers improvement
of existing facilities, it is unlikely that significant loss of
fish or wildlife habitat will result from the project as
proposed, due to the urbanized nature of the project area.
Recent NCDOT documents for projects of this scope have generally
provided satisfactory information on project impacts. For
purposes of reference, our informational needs are listed below:
Memo Page 2 March 22, 1993
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within
the project area, including a listing of federally or
state designated threatened, endangered, or special
concern species. When practicable, potential borrow
areas to be used for project construction should be
included in the inventories. A listing of designated
plant species can be developed through consultation
with:
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
and,
Cecil C. Frost, Coordinator
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
In addition, the NCWRC's Nongame and Endangered Species
Program maintains databases for locations of vertebrate
wildlife species. While there is no charge for the
list, a service charge for computer time is involved.
Additional information may be obtained from:
Randy Wilson, Manager
Nongame and Endangered Species Program
N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, N. C. 27604-1188
[phone].
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the
project. The need for channelizing or relocating
portions of streams crossed and the extent of such
activities.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by
the project. Wetland acreages should include all
project-related areas that may undergo hydrologic
change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or
filling for project construction. Wetland
identification may be accomplished through coordination
with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the
COE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands
should be identified and criteria listed.
Memo Page 3 March 22, 1993
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife
habitat impacted by the proposed project. Potential
borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent to which the project will result in loss,
degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife habitat
(wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for
direct and indirect degradation in habitat quality as
It well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes
the environmental effects of highway construction and
quantifies the contribution of this individual project
to environmental degradation.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early
planning stages for this project. If I can further assist your
office, please contact me at [phone].
cc Jack Mason, District 8 Wildlife Biologist
Chris Goudreau, District 8 Fisheries Biologist
Randy Wilson, Nongame/Endangered Species Program Mgr.
Janice Nicholls, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

N E
State of North Carolina FEB
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resqurces
Division of Land Resources 1QU,4LI! Y SEC 1,0;%1
James G. Martin, Governor PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Charles H. Gardner
V0111am W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary C. C• Director
Project Number: 7?G A76 County:
Project Name: /-)L
Geodetic Survey
1
This project will impact geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic
Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
/i This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at [phone].
?731
Date
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
No comment
This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentat?ion?
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if mdre--
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
-? If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
North Carolina Sedimentation Control commission.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at [phone].
_-021i 9 19 3
Reviewer Date
P.O. Box 27687 • Melgh, N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
R
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512.North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
March 10, 1993

MEMORANDUM
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Assessment
FROM: Monica Swihart','Water Quality Planning
SUBJECT: Scoping Comments - Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension to 8th Street N.E. and Realign 8th Street N.E.
to connect with Highland Avenue N.E., Catawba County, TIP
No. U-2306, Project Review #93-0676
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The
stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify, the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it
is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be
revegetated.
4

C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. I.dentify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to
be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 9191486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 9191946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Preventlon Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh. North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Melba McGee
March 10, 1993
Page 2
G. Wetland Impacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from
DEM.
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Prior to the approval
of any borrow source in a wetland, the contractor shall obtain
a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilized the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under
our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require
written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be
denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to
the maximum extent practicable.
8434er.mem
cc: Eric Galamb
r
. State of North Carolina Reviewing Office:
Npartm int of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number. Due Date:
L
s L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

7-
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Ouestions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same
Regional Office. ( Normal Process'
_ Time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REOLUREM£NTS (statutory time
' limit)
Permit to construct i operate wastewater treatment
J Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions, a sewer construction contracts On-site Inspection. Post application
systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPD£S . permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 1110 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
t permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to
1 discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES Reply (NIA)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichwer is later.
Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(NIA)
1
Well Construction Permit
Complete application must be received and permit issued
7 days
prior to the installation of a well. (15 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre application conference usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of (90 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct d operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H. NIA (90 days)
f Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A 60 days
NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal NIA
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group
919733.0820
(90 days)
Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion i sacimentatio
control plan will be required it one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Duality Sect.) at least 30 20 days
days befote be mnin activity. A fee of 330 for the first acre and S20 00 for each additional acre or art must actor an me plan 30 days)
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: (30 days)
On-site Inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount
/dining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be permited.The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be Issued.
North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
exceeds 4 days (NIA)
Special Ground CNarance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "(f more 1 day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic toils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
should be requested at least ten days before actual bum Is planned."

Oil Refining Faclitties
NIA 90.120 days
(N/A)
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must Aire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days
Dam Safety Permit Inspect construction, certify construction Is according to EHNR approv
ad plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And (60 drys)
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of slit Is noces-
sary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of 1200.00 must ac-
company the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percents a or the total pro'ect cost will be requited upon completion.
h ue
Continued on revtrse
Normal Process
Time
fstatutory time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REOLItREMENTS limn)

D
Pemmtt to drill exploratory oil or gas well File surety bond of $5,000 with EHNR running to State of N.C.
conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon 10 days
(NIA)
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations.
D Geophysical Exploration Permit Application fiied with £HNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application form. (NIA)
D State Lakes Corutnrction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must irtclude 15.20 days
descriptions t drawings of structure [ proof of ownership (NIA)
- of riparian property.

401 Water Ouslity Certification
NIA 60 days
(130 days)
D
LAMA Permit for MAJOR development
1250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)

CAMA Permit for MINOR development
$50.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
v-m
?J Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
D Abandonment of any wells. if required, must be in accordance with Title 15A, Subchapter 2C.0100.
Notification of the proper regional office is requested If "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered Curing any excavation operation.
D Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. 45 days
(NIA)
Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being cenain to cite comment authority).
ACV - /(o 4_1 ?Z 3/f 3
f-
NQ K>JO -? Go/-Jc.t?wJS ? C3s?- ? x:93
/Vo obfi"? ?/???ss
G?

REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Buifding
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville, NC 28301
(704) 2514208 [phone]
? Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
? Washington Regional office
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Rale'i h Regional Office
3800 Garrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 33.2314
? Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
? WinstonSalem Reoional Office
8025 Nort fi Point ®Ivd.
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
[phone]
a STAIZ o
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

i
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
March 19, 1993
MEMORANDUM
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
TO: L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Trtation
FROM: David Brook % ans r?,'v` ?,tk V
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension to 81h Street NE
and realign 8th Street NE to connect with Highland
Avenue, Hickory, Catawba County, U-2306,
9.8121691, GS 92-0065, CH 93-E-4220-0676
We have received information concerning the above project from the State
Clearinghouse.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no National Register-
listed 'properties located within the planning area. Please note, however, we have
located the following structures of historical or architectural importance within the
general area of the project:
Gas Station (#395). 896 Highland Avenue.
A. E. Witherspoon House (#416). 619 8th Street.
Gas Station (#415). 625 Highland Avenue.
Highland commercial Block (#402). 909 8th Street/804 Highland Avenue.
Development House (#408). 710 8th Street.
Four Houses (#407). 836, 810, 768, and 748 8th Street NE.
None of the above properties have been evaluated for National Register eligibility.
While we note that this project is to be state funded, the potential for federal
permits may require further consultation and compliance with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
GQ
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 Q
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend
that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
These comments are made in accord with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive Order
XVI. If you have any questions regarding them, please contact Renee Gledhill-
Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: State Clearinghouse
B. Church
T. Padgett
Rick Cowick, Hickory HPC
16

NC;'TH CAi 0LI,NA STATE CLEARING4CUSE
CEPART."!ENT OF ACS.-INISTRATIGv
INTERGCVERNMENTAL REVIEi?
REVI=W CISTRI:.{UTIC`,
PT OF AGRICULTURE
PT CF CUL RESOURCES
PT CF EHiNR
PT OF TRANSPORTATION
PT OF CC&PS - NFo
ATE PLANNING REGION F
i
STATE NUPEER 93-E-4220-C676
DATE RECEIVED

02 15 93
STATE AGENCY RESPONSE DUE 03 24 93
LOCAL RESPONSE CUE 03 23 93
REVIEW CLOSED 03 26 93
R0JFCT
PPL= N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
FDA ': 00001
ESC: SCOPING - PROFSED EXTENSION OF LENOIR RHYNE BLVD. TO 8TH STREET
AND REALIGNMENT 8TH STREET TO CONNECT WITH HIGHLAND AVENUE
TIP -rU-2306
ROSS-s:EFERENCE NUMBER:
F02
REVIEW THE ATTACHEC PROJECT. SUBMIT YCUR RESPONSE t"Y THE ABOVE INDICATEC
DATE. IF AO ITIONAL REVIEW TIME IS NEECED CONTACT THIS OFFICE.
aS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED
( ) NO CCMMEiNT
( COMMENTS ATTACHED
MAR
SIGNED BY: ?/ep
- ----------- ----
`GATE -- 9
----?----
O
-RELOCATION REPORT North Carolina Department of Transportation
Q L2 E.I.S. [_] CORRIDOR [_] DESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PROJECT: 9.8121691 COUNTY: Catawba Alternate ONE
I.D. NO.: U-2306 F.A. PROJECT: _N/A PAGE 1 OF 2
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Hickory-Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension to Eighth Street N E and
Realign Eighth, N.E. to connect with Highland Avenue N.E.
ES TIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Displacee Owners Tenants Total ities 0-15M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Individuals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Families 3 16 19 4 16 3 0 0 0
Businesses 8 0 8 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLINGS AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-
Profit
2
0
2
0
0-20M
0
$ 0-150
0
0-20M
0
$ 0-150
0'
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M 0 150-250 0 20-40M 2 150-250 7
YES NO EXPLAIN ALL "YES" ANSWERS 40-70M 1 250-400 16 40-70M 18 250-400 41
X 1. Will special relocation 70-100 2 400-600 0 70-100 29 400-600 20
services be necessary

X
2.
Will schools or churches be
100 UP
0
600 UP
0
100
_
P

7-7
37'
= _

600^UP

3
affected by displacement :
X X 3. Will business services still TOTAL 3 16 ?`' ' 86' - -•?I
be available after project
4. Will any business be dis- REMARKS (Respond by Number)
;
X placed. If so, indicate size I
JUL 12 1993
type, estimated number of 3. NO PERMANENT DISPLACEMENTOF BUSINESS.
employees, minorities, etc.

X
5. Will relocation cause a 4. a. GRIFFINS, INC., SECURITY SERVICES'
housing shortage SQUARE FEET, 20 EMPLOYEES;---8-MIf*R3-:F3fS--1
6. Source for available hous- b. R. H. BOLICK & CO. (MACHINE SHOP)
6000
ing (list) ,
SQUARE FEET, 6 EMPLOYEES, 2 MINORITIES

X 7.
Will additional housing
c. .
LENOIR-RHYNE ADMISSIONS OFFICE, 3600 SQUARE
programs be needed FEET, 12 EMPLOYEES, 3 MINORITY.
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing d. LENOIR-RHYNE DEVELOPMENT HOUSE, 3800 SQUARE
be considered FEET, 6 EMPLOYEES, 2 MINORITY.
X 9. Are there large, disabled, e. ADULT LIFE PROGRAMS, 3400 SQUARE FEET

elderly, etc. families ,
4 EMPLOYEES, NO MINORITY.
ANSWER THESE ALSO FOR DESIGN f. CENTURY 21, AMERICAN HOMES
1400 SQUARE
X 10. Will public housing be ,
FEET, 8 EMPLOYEES, NO MINORITY.
X
X needed for project g. MICHAEL'S HAIRCARE CENTER, 600 SQUARE FEET,
11. Is public housing avail- 2 EMPLOYEES, NO MINORITY.

x able h. CONNECTIONS, 1400 SQUARE FEET, 4 EMPLOYEES,
12. Is it felt there will be ad- 1 MINORITY.
I equate DSS housing available i. HICKORY JAYCEES (NON-PROFIT), 5000 SQUARE A
during relocation period FEET
X
13. Will there be a problem of j. TKE FRATERNITY HOUSE (NON-PROFIT), 1800
housing within financial SQUARE FEET
means
x 14. Are suitable business sites 6. REA LTORS, NEWSPAPERS, MLS SERVICE, AND REAL
available (list source) EST ATE PUBLICATIONS.
X 15. Number months estimated to
complete RELOCATION 18
Relocation Agent Date Approved Date
Form 15.4 Revised 5/90 Original & 1 Copy: State Relocation Agent
2 Copy: Area Relocation File
RELOCATION REPORT North Carolina Department of Transportation
[_] CORRIDOR [_] DESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PROJECT: 9.8121691 COUNTY: Catawba Alternate ONE
I.D. NO.: U-2306 F.A. PROJECT: N/A PAGE 2 OF 2
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Hickory-Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension to Eighth Street N.E. and
Realign Eighth, N.E. to connect with Highland Avenue, N.E.

A.
REMARKS: (CONTINUE FROM PAGE 1)
8. WILL BE ADMINISTERED ACCORDING TO STATE LAW.
10. POSSIBLY SECTION 8 HOUSING.
11. HIGHWAY DISPLACEES GET HIGH PRIORITY.
12. THERE APPEARS TO BE ADEQUATE REPLACEMENT HOUSING IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
14. REALTORS, NEWSPAPERS, MLS SERVICE AND REAL ESTATE PUBLICATIONS.
4

CITY OF HICKORY
POST OFFICE BOY 398 HICKORY NORTH CAROLINA 28603 • ?4
FAX [phone]
MAYOR
William R. McDonald, III
January 27, 1993
Dr. Larry Goode, P.E.
Chief Engineer-Programs
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
RE: City of Hickory Eighth Street Extention
Project U-2306
Dear Dr. Goode:
0
o
H ?, g0

The City of Hickory's funding is in place for the subject
project. We have design under contract with plan completion
scheduled for early 1993.
Our major concern is that the city's Department of Transportation's project U-2306 pbe?completed the
proposed for smooth traf f is f low through the college area. The one
way pair cannot function unless the connector and improvements are
completed in conjunction with our work. Is there anything we can
do to be assured the City and NCDOT's project will stay on
schedule?
Please advise if there is anything the City of Hickory can do
to maintain our coordinated schedules.
Sincerely,
William R. McDonald, III
Mayor
1986-1987
111111
,ALL-A,VERIC4 CITY

It
aw STA1f
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TMNSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
May 26, 1994
Mr. Eric Galamb
DEHNR - Div. of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1148
Dear Mr. Galamb:
R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
5 ? t l.ii ? 1
g JUN 2 0 1994
L ?.? _..
Ell, i?l
SUBJECT: State Environmental Assessment for Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension from Highland Avenue NE to 8th Street NE, Catawba County,
State Project 9.8121691, TIP No. U-2306B
Attached is a copy of the State Environmental Assessment and the Natural
Resources Technical Report for the subject proposed highway improvement. It
is anticipated this project will be processed with a "Finding of No
Significant Impact"; however, should comments received on the Environmental
Assessment or at the public hearing demonstrate a need for preparing a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement you will be contacted as part of our scoping
process.
Copies of this Assessment are being submitted to the State
Clearinghouse, areawide planning agencies, and the counties, towns, and
cities involved.
Any comment you have concerning the Environmental Assessment should be
fnrwardAd to- 1A
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N. C. Division of Highways
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Your comments should be received by
received by that date we will assume you
the "Finding of No Significant Impact,"
HFV/plr
July 15, 1994. If no comments are
have none. If you desire a copy of
please so indicate.
Sincerely,
d v.?Cj CM
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
.r

51'A1F o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. )R. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
July 19, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Linwood Stone, Unit Head
ATTENTION: Bill Kinlaw,
Project Planning Engineer
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
FROM: Hal Bain, Environmental Biologist
SUBJECT: Proposed Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. extension to
Eighth Street NE and realignment of 8th
Street NE to connect with Highland Avenue NE,
Hickory, Catawba County, TIP * U-2306, State
Project # 9.8121691.
The attached Natural Resources Technical Report provides
pertinent details and descriptions of each natural resource
likely to be impacted by the proposed project, including
wetlands and federally-protected species. No impacts to
federally-protected species will result from project
construction. Please review the information at your
convenience. This report is available on computer disc and I
will be glad to transfer the file to your disc at your
convenience.
cc: V. Charles Bruton,
M. Randall Turner,
Beth Horne, Permits
File * U-2306
Ph. D.
Environmental Supervisor

Proposed Lenoir Rhyne Blvd. extension to Eighth
Street NE and realignment of eighth
Street NE to connect with Highland Avenue NE
Catawba County
TIP # U-2306
State Project # 9.8121691
NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
U-2306
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
Hal Bain, Biologist
July 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Description.. .............................1
1.2 Purpose ..........................................1
1.3 Study Area ................... ...................1
1.4 Methodology ......................................1
1.5 Physiography .....................................2
2.0 Biotic Resources
2.1 Terrestrial Communities ..........................2
2.2 Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities ........ 3
3.0 Water Resources........ ..............................3
4.0 Special Topics
4.1 Permits ..........................................3
4.2 Rare and Protected Species ......................3
4.2.1 Federally Protected Species ..............4
4.2.2 Federal Candidate/State Protected
Species ..................................4
4.2.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts .............5
5.0 References .............................................6
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following report is submitted for use as a
supplement to assist in preparation of a State Environmental
Assessment (EA).
1.1 Project Description
Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard is to be extended to Eighth
Street NE and Eighth Street NE is to be realigned to connect
with Highland Avenue NE. Proposed action calls for widening
the existing three\four-lane facilities to 5-lane curb and
gutter facilities with turn lanes at intersections.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this technical report is to inventory,
catalog and describe the various natural resources likely to
be impacted by the proposed action. The report also attempts
to identify and estimate the likely consequences of the
anticipated impacts to these resources. These descriptions
and estimates are relevant only in the context of existing
preliminary design concepts. It may become necessary to
conduct field investigations, should design parameters and
criteria change.
1.3 Study Area
The proposed project study area lies in Catawba County
(figure 1) on the upper Piedmont Plateau in the west-central
part of North Carolina. Catawba County has a mix of rural
and urban areas with Hickory being,the largest city. Major
economic resources of Catawba County include agriculture and
industry.
1.4 Methodology
Information sources include; U.S. Geodetic Survey (USGS)
quadrangle map (Hickory), NCDOT aerial photographs of project
area (1"=100'), Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soil maps,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected and
candidate species, and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NC-NHP)
database of uncommon and protected species and unique
habitats. Research using these resources was conducted prior
to field investigations taking place.
General field surveys were conducted at the proposed
project site by NCDOT biologists Hal Bain and Matt Smith on
July 12, 1993. Plant Communities and their associated
wildlife were identified and recorded.
loo kfo
9 \+
NORTH CAROLINA v? f 127
tisex
CATAWBA COUNTY 00 vo ?
00 10
vI VIO d ,
to
?.
0000 00
F c" 7
a
H?
ST. ANDREWS
LOTH. CH.
41,F
TED METH. CH.
4.' •Z•
F.IW. B. 5 sT 2319
'ELLOWSHIP
HALL
1007
O w
°F° AVE. S. E.
w 2221
N
S.E
CHRIST
LUTH, r 223
CH. n
Itr .?
IENOIR RHYN
COLLEGE
qtF HIGHLAND
RAPT. CH,
4. gT
i. N P
// 0 SRI
A,l
4 `
?2 „C., a
s
to
A
J'? VF S. E.
S ! vi 9 COMM
F,,I BA
-p" AV E.
o. S.E, m
4
S v Z
PRO.TFI:T AF2F.A : m 'E.AVE.S.E.,
2 \ V L y
w
pVE AVE, -
uR "F
S.E.
1007 2205 m
AVE. S.E. 1692
Tq T E
2222 W BLVD,
S.E,
?' ?-may a
'CLINTON h h h 1455
TABER. 2.yD
S? ? 4
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
_ TRANSPORTATION
_ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
n'?or_u,.`'c9'. BRANCH
IITCRORY, LENOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD
EXTENSION TO EIGHTH STREET
C:ATAWBA COUN'T'Y
I1-2306B
X. .ION !SAP
AVE.
2
1.5 Physiography
The topography of the area is characterized as one of
fairly broad ridges and short, steep slopes. Elevation in
the project vicinity ranges from 1100 to 1160 feet (335.5 to
353.8 meters). This part of the county (Hickory) is
dominated by heavily developed urban areas.
Catawba County contains six general map units. One
general map unit (Pacolet-Cecil) is crossed by the proposed
project. The project area is dominated by soils in the Cecil
series.
Mapping units include Cecil sandy loams with slopes
ranging from 2 to 15 percent. The Cecil series consists of
well-drained, gently sloping to moderately steep soils on
uplands. These soils formed in residuum from acidic rock,
including granite-gneiss and granite.
2.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES
Living systems described in the following sections
include communities of associated plants and animals. These
descriptions refer to the dominant flora and fauna in each
community and how these biotic components relate to one
another. Complete listings of fauna can be found in one or
more technical references in section 5.0.
2.1 TERRESTRIAL COMMUNITIES
ROADSIDE is the only terrestrial community found in the
subject project study area. This community includes
road shoulders, lawns, and parking lots. Dominant faunal
components associated with this type of community will be
discussed in the community description.
Many floral species characteristic of the roadside are
adapted to disturbed and maintained habitats. Tall fescue
(Festuca sp.), Bermuda grass (Cvnodon sp.), plantain
(Plantago lanceolata and P. rugelii), and various other
herbaceous species dominate this community along with
scattered white pine (Pinus strobus), hemlock (Tsuga
canadensis), crepe myrtle (LaQerstroemia indica), flowering
dogwood (Cornus florida), red maple (Acer rubrum), crab apple
(Malus sp.) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus sp.). A variety of
ornamental species are also prevalent around homes and
offices.
Animal species diversity here is low and is limited to
those species which are commonly found in areas saturated by
development. Mortality of animals living in and migrating
through roadside habitats provides forage for opportunistic
species such as Virginia opossum (DidelAhis virginiana)
which may in turn become fatalities and subsequently forage
items themselves. The grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
is a common inhabitant of lawn and park-like settings in the
project vicinity. Birds including broad-winged hawk (Buteo
platvnterus)*, chimney swift (Chaetura pelagica)*, European
Starling (Sturnus vulgaris)*, house sparrow (Passer
domesticus), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottus)*, and
American robin (Turdus migratorius) can be found nesting
and\or foraging in this community.
"*" indicates species observed during field visit.
2.2 Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
Biodiversity is limited in the roadside community due to
the frequent maintenance schedule and heavy urbanization
associated with the proposed project area. Any construction
related activities in or near this community will result in
minimal impact to biota associated with this area.
Destruction of terrestrial communities along the project
alignment will result in the loss of primarily foraging and
to a lesser extent breeding habitats for many of the
terrestrial species which utilize this area. Much of the
roadside habitat loss will be temporary since new road
shoulders will be part of the proposed construction.
3.0 WATER RESOURCES
The proposed project construction will not impact any
water resources. No waters classified as High Quality Waters
(HQW), Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) or waters designated
as WS-1 or WS-11 will be impacted by the proposed project,
nor are these resources located within 1 mile of the subject
area.
4.0 SPECIAL TOPICS
4.1 Permits
No permits for construction
for the proposed project as it is
However, should design parameters
will require new evaluation.
are anticipated to be needed
presently designed.
change the permit issue
4.2 Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of plants and animals have been in or
are in the process of decline either due to natural forces or
due to their inability to coexist with man. It is important
to determine why these declines take place so that man may
better understand how to coexist with natural systems.
4
4.2.1 Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended.
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists the federally
threatened dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastvlis naniflora)
for Catawba County as of July 7, 1993. A federally
threatened species is a species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout
all or a significant portion of its range.
Hexastvlis naniflora (dwarf-flowered heartleaf) T
The dwarf-flowered heartleaf is found only in eight
northern piedmont counties in North Carolina and the adjacent
portions of South Carolina.
This plant has heart-shaped leaves, supported by long
thin petioles that grow from a subsurface rhizome. It rarely
exceeds 15cm in height. The leaves are dark green in color,
evergreen, and leathery. Flowers are small, inconspicuous,
jugshaped, and dark brown in color. They are found near the
base of the petioles. Fruits mature from mid-May to early
July.
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf populations are found along
bluffs and their adjacent slopes, in boggy areas next to
streams and creekheads, and along the slopes of nearby
hillsides and ravines. It grows in acidic soils in regions
with a cool moist climate. Regional vegetation is described
as upper piedmont oak-pine forest and as part of the
southeastern mixed forest.
Biological Conclusion: NO EFFECT
No habitat for dwarf-flowered heartleaf exists in the
project study area. It can be concluded that the subject
project will not impact Hexastvlis naniflora.
4.2.2 Federal Candidate/State Protected Species
One Federal Candidate species, Catawba crayfish ostracod
(Dactylothere isabelae), is listed for Catawba County. This
species is also listed as state Endangered by the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
5
4.2.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
No habitat for state or federally protected species is
present in the area to be impacted by the proposed project.
Therefore, no Impacts to Federally protected species will
occur from construction of the subject project.
6
5.0 REFERENCES
American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North
American Birds (6th ed.). Lawrence, Kansas, Allen
Press, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical report Y-87-1,
U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Miss.
Lee, D.S., J.B. Funderburg, Jr. and M.K. Clark. 1982. A
Distributional Survey of North Carolina Mammals.
Raleigh, North Carolina Museum of Natural History.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey and J.R. Harrison III.
1980. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and
Virginia. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina
Press.
NCWRC. 1990. "Endangered Wildlife of North Carolina".
Raleigh, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission.
Plant Conservation Program. 1991. "List of North Carolina's
Endangered, Threatened and Candidate Plant Species".
Raleigh, North Carolina Department of Agriculture.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds
of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The University of North
Carolina Press.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and G.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of
the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The
University of North Carolina Press.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of
The Natural Communities of North Carolina. Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
1975. Soil Survey of Catawba County, North Carolina.
North Carolina Agriculture Experiment Station.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1979. Classifications of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.,
U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
Weakley, A.S. 1991. "Natural Heritage Program List of the
Rare Plant Species of North Carolina North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program;
r
Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell and W.C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals
of the Carolinas, Virginia and Maryland. Chapel Hill,
The University of North Carolina Press.

91
March 10, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning and Assessment
FROM: Monica Swihart??,Y;Water Quality Planning
SUBJECT: Scoping Comments - Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard
Extension to 8th Street N.E. and Realign 8th Street N.E.
to connect with Highland Avenue N.E., Catawba County, TIP
No. U-2306, Project Review #93-0676
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The
stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it
is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be
revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to
be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.

Melba McGee
March 10, 1993
Page 2
G. Wetland Impacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from
DEM.
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Prior to the approval
of any borrow source in a wetland, the contractor shall obtain
a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilized the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under
our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require
written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be
denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to
the maximum extent practicable.
8434er.mem
cc: \/ric Galamb
'••! "?+? 111 Ci
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IAN1 > 6. HUNT. IR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SAN, HUNT
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRITA.Y
February 10, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
Dept. of Administration
FROM: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager 9• ala- ?
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension to 8th Street
N. E. and Realign 8th Street N. E. to connect with
Highland Avenue N. E., Catawba County, State Project
9.8121691, TIP No. U-2306
The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has
begun studying the proposed improvements to Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
in Hickory and Catawba County. The project is included in the 1993-1999
North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right
of way in fiscal year 1994 and construction in fiscal year 1995.
The project will begin just north of the Norfolk-Southern railroad and
cross on new location to 8th Street N. E. at 8th Avenue N. E. (see Location
Map). In addition, 8th Street N. E. will be realigned to connect with
Highland Avenue N. E. and will be constructed as part of this project. The
proposed typical section is a 5-lane curb and gutter section with multiple
turning lanes at the proposed intersection. All existing sidewalks to be
removed due to the new construction will be replaced.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful
in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable,
please identify any permits or approvals which may be required by your
agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a state funded
document evaluating environmental impacts of the project. It is desirable
that your agency respond by March 15, 1993 so that your comments can be used
in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Bill
Kinlaw, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone].
WBK/plr
Attachment

f
d over
`? t tB(?ok or •
00
CL?r T z e'o r
NORTH n 1 N=. ` a%
CATAWBA COUNTY )321
'
?00 C r AE!
00
' '
00
s
r rh LENOIR RHYN 4 ?- a
ry q ? COLLEGE
qyf HIGHIANp v
qy? ti's y ' •v BAPT. CH
,t, ,-2• ? MtGHl ANO AVE.
1
F 6
?v ? 8T
JTym z ? q f ?
yF ? L
i
ST. ANDREWS yf. ?. ?? G
LUTH. CH. ,? qye
F ?
fED AtETF;. CH. 2 ? ; •c••
4L, S.E. u+
I s T h 2319
F. W. B.?? 4Th s v COMM
CH?^ N gyt;?ti6 S? , '0" AVE. n S.E. BA
5i
P E t
l1 y?
P!RTEC:T AREA ? E'AVE ?.S.E.?
F LY N N k P ors ¢ {}
CHRIST. ?j sr Z y
ELLOWSHiP s w
HALL ^ ?E•
``??Oyy/ ? pvE'
10177 •. E • AvE,
e,0 w Oq ..F
P y
"F•• IAVE. S. E. LO-O7 m O7
2205 S.E.
LLL7?
J y 2221 °F•' AVE. S.E. 1692
-? S.E, ig7E ?[Y
CHRIST 2222 4 BLVD.
I LUTH. =
CH, 2231 S.E.
n CLINTON
y
AVE- TABER. 1455
? to rY0
b q
i,
?Fsrco-rc•
I?Le?ri
fxsrra?.Jv NORTH A.ROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ,
TRANSPORTATION
tt DIVISION OF IITGIiWAYS
4 - 1 PLANNING AND E VIRONMF.N TAL ?
BRA:.(II
t 1 t
I
i
I HICKORY, u:NO I.R ItHY\E ISI)Iff,j.-RI)
EXTENSION TO EIGII-I'll STREET
CATA W BA COPNTY 1
U-2:30611
I
i

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE

TO: REF. NO.. OR ROOM, BLDG.
?i2?c Gr?cr?r+ls BEM
FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
.Biuin1LAC? J p 't 9
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
fieTAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
u-- ?-Sot,

jTUUY
Srt p -r C 'r-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA i
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATIO
JAMES B. HUNT. JR SAM HUNT
GOVERNOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECRETARY
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
February 10, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor /
FROM: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager 9. ala2
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Hickory, Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension to 8th Street
N. E. and Realign 8th Street N. E. to connect with
Highland Avenue N. E., Catawba County, State Project
9.8121691, TIP No. U-2306
The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has
begun studying the proposed improvements to Lenoir Rhyne Boulevard Extension
in Hickory and Catawba County. The project is included in the 1993-1999
North Carolina Transportation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right
of way in fiscal year 1994 and construction in fiscal year 1995.
The project will begin just north of the Norfolk-Southern railroad and
cross on new location to 8th Street N. E. at 8th Avenue N. E. (see Location
Map). In addition, 8th Street N. E. will be realigned to connect with
Highland Avenue N. E. and will be constructed as part of this project. The
proposed typical section is a 5-lane curb and gutter section with multiple
turning lanes at the proposed intersection. All existing sidewalks to be
removed due to the new construction will be replaced.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful
in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable,
please identify any permits or approvals which may be required by your
agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a state funded
document evaluating environmental impacts of the project. It is desirable
that your agency respond by March 15, 1993 so that your comments can be used
in the preparation of this document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Bill
Kinlaw, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone].
WBK/pl r
Attachment

-`7 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
_ TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
\oL ian
HICKORY, LE:NOIR RHYNE BOULEVARD
EXTENSION TO EIGHTH STREET
CATAWBA COUNTY
11-230GB
kio
fiuef 9
Imo' R S
NORTH CAROLINA 27
CATAWBA COUNTY *0 10 S , . r rk
00 '00 i 10
00 00 00
00 00 ? 00 Ito
i
ry LENOIR RHYN
r q ?`S COLLEGE
H aye HIGHLAND 9
BART. CH
F. h`. AVE. 1
- ? - - MIGHL.AND
HF ?
z A 'rti ry?\/ INA
4,' 8T
0
ST.-ANDREWS NF h ?? G =
LUTH. CH. 'y an qpF
q y? ti ? N
TED METH., CH. ?. s
N
?+.• ,y e ? S? A?F s. E.
w
1ST y 2319 N y? COMM
-F.W.B. ? gTh E• q ? J w BA
CH?^? N 4ye1NE S• -G" AVE. a S.E,
s• z
t
Q
s FL?aJEGT AI?FA •E"AVE. s.EJ
E'
FLYNN JC)-
CHRIST. ?l `rT i
-ELLOWSHIP ?y sF 5 E'
HALL -
1007 E PEE AVE. x
f,• Dq F
?p w S E .
a?P °F'• ur LAVE, S. E.,? I007 2205
W 2221 F„
AVE. S.E. 1692 IT'IC'?..
TATE
S. E.
BLVD,
CHRIST 2222 w
LUTH. F 2231 - y ,,-?? °'? S.E.
CH, h CLINTON Q H 1455
AVE TABER. 2,y0
? b O
LOrLTnN MAP