Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutU2804BDRAFT Channel Mitigation Monitoring Sheets I, II, III, AND IV Monitoring Data Record Project Title: U-2804 B (Harrison Avenue) COE Action ID: Stream Name: DWQ Number: _ City, County and other Location Information: Station 16+60 LT on Left, Station 18+20 LT on Left, and Station 19+20 LT on Left in on Harrison Avenue in Cary, Wake County Date Construction Completed: Monitoring Year: (1) of 1 Ecoregion: USGS Quad Name and Coordinates: Rosgen Classification: Length of Project: 295' Urban or Rural: Urban Watershed Size: Monitoring DATA collected by: K. Smith, M. Green Date: 3/4/04 Applicant Information: Name: NCDOT Roadside Environmental Unit Address: 1 South Wilmington St. Raleigh, NC 27611 Telephone Number: (919) 733-2920 Email address: Consultant Information: Name: _ Address: Email address: Project Status: Complete Telephone Number: Monitoring Level required by COE and DWQ (404 permit/ 401 Cert.): Level 1 2 -3 Monitoring Level 1 requires completion of Section 1, Section 2 and Section 3 Section 1. PHOTO REFERENCE SITES (Monitoring at all levels must complete this section) Attach site map showing the location and angle of all reference photos with a site designation (name, number, letter, etc.) assigned to each reference photo location. Photos should be provided for all structures and cross section locations, should show both banks and include an upstream and downstream view. Photos taken to document physical stability should be taken in winter. Photos taken to document vegetation should be taken in summer (at representative locations). Attach photos and a description of each reference photo or location. We recommend the use of a photo identification board in each photo to identify location. Total number of reference photo locations at this site: 3 Dates reference photos have been taken at this site: 7/30/03 11/26/03 3/4/04 Individual from whom additional photos can be obtained (name, address, phone): Other Information relative to site photo reference: 7 reference photos taken at each quarterly monitoring. If required to complete Level 3 monitoring only stop here; otherwise, complete section 2. 8 digit RUC unit 200221216 DRAFT DRAFT Section 2. PLANT SURVIVAL Attach plan sheet indicating reference photos. Identify specific problem areas (missing, stressed, damaged or dead plantings): Although plants were dormant at the time of monitoring, the streambank appeared to be highly vegetated. Vegetation consisted of Lespedeza, fennel, black willow, sedge, baccharis and dormant trees. Estimated causes, and proposed/required remedial action: N/A ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: This is the 3rd quarter monitoring for the Harrison Avenue Mitigation site. The site is covered with thick dormant vegetation. The far streambank at station 18+20 LT on left was solid rock and was left unplanted. If required to complete Level 1 and Level 2 monitoring only stop here; otherwise, complete section 3. DRAFT DRAFT Section 3. CHANNEL STABILITY Visual Inspection: The entire stream project as well as each in-stream structure and bank stabilization/revetment structure must be evaluated and problems addressed. Report on the visual inspection of channel stability. Physical measurements of channel stability/morphology will not be required. Include a discussion of any deviations from as-built and an evaluation of the significance of these deviations and whether they are indicative of a stabilizing or destabilizing situation. Channel is very stable at time of monitoring. NCDOT proposes to continue monitoring the Harrison Avenue site quarterly until the end of one year per permit conditions. Date Station Station Station Station Station Inspected Number Number Number Number Number Structure Type Is water piping through or around structure? Head cut or down cut resent? Bank or scour erosion present? Other problems noted? NOTE: Attach separate narrative sheets to each monitoring report describing/discussing the overall monitoring results. Include the identification of specific problem areas/channel failures, estimated cause and proposed/required remedial action. This should include a brief discussion of any parameter that has changed significantly from as- built. DRAFT Harrison Avenue w T` _ V r Y ?? y T Photo 1 Photo 2 'i -l i 1 i 1f f ,A , ' v a , 'C ; ?* yi'+a 1p d 14;_ r I,,°--sky, Photo 3 Photo 5 Photo 4 d i a ' s f v' M 7 k, h# ; k 64 0441 Photo 6 2004 Harrison Avenue :a ya? & $ a k sKt^? 6 * F p.: Photo 7 2004 Action ID. 199601876 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6814 DAD ? ??'? 'f December 9, 1999 PUBLIC NOTICE THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, (NCDOT), POST OFFICE BOX 25201, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611- 5201, HAS APPLIED FOR A DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (DA) PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE THE PROPOSED DISCHARGE OF FILL MATERIAL IMPACTING A TOTAL OF 0.20 ACRE OF WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, CONSISTING OF 0.02 ACRE OF WETLANDS, 1,099 LINEAR FEET OF STREAM, AND 2 SMALL PONDS, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SECTION B OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 1652 (HARRISON AVENUE) (T.I.P. NO. U-2804B), CROSSING UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES TO BLACK CREEK, AND ADJACENT WETLANDS, FROM SOUTH OF NC 54 (MAYNARD PARKWAY) TO SOUTH OF WESTON PARKWAY, IN CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant. Plans submitted with the application show the placement of fill material impacting a total of 0.20 acres of waters of the United States, including wetlands. These impacts are necessary for the construction of Section B of the improvements to SR 1652 (Harrison Avenue) (T.I.P. No. U- 2804B), crossing unnamed tributaries to Black Creek, and adjacent wetlands, from south of NC 54 (Maynard Parkway) to south of Weston Parkway, in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. The project will involve fill impacts to 0.18 acre of unvegetated waters of the United States. These impacts to stream channels (1,099 linear feet) and 2 small ponds occur at 8 locations throughout the project. At stream crossings, culverts or pipes will be used to allow for adequate hydrological flow underneath the roadway. The proposed construction will also impact 0.02 acres of vegetated wetlands by filling and mechanized clearing. The impacted wetlands are a small palustrine, wooded, headwater wetlands. A portion of the impacted streams will be relocated to 295 linear feet of constructed channel that will be designed using natural stream channel design principles. NCDOT is proposing payment to the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program to provide 920 linear feet of compensatory stream mitigation for the remaining 460 linear feet of stream impacts that require mitigation. The purpose of the work is to provide for safer and more efficient road travel in the Harrison Avenue road corridor and at its interchange with I-40. The applicant has considered several alternatives to the proposed project, including the no-build alternative, project postponement, alternative modes of transportation, asymmetrical widening, and alternative interchange designs. In addition, the applicant has committed to investigating measures to avoid and minimize wetland and stream impacts, including minimal use of riprap in stream channels, and use of check dams within a riprapped channel to decrease flow velocities and reduce downstream sedimentation. A Federal environmental assessment for this project was completed by the NCDOT, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration on October 31, 1995. Overall plans showing the proposed construction are included with this public notice. Additional detailed plans may be reviewed at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office at 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6846, or at the offices of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality at the address shown below. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a Department of the Army permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and the project does not impact any registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer. NCDOT has conducted surveys for architectural resources, and has coordinated with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). SHPO has concurred that the project will not have any effect on architectural or archaeological resource properties eligible for inclusion in the Register. The District Engineer is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. 3 The District Engineer is not aware, based on available information, that the activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes, and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. 4 The NCDWQ considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the offices of the Wetlands /401 Unit, North Carolina DENR, Division of Water Quality, 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina DENR Division of Water Quality, Wetland/401 Unit, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621, on or before January 3, 2000, Attention: Mr. John Dorney. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this office, Attention: Eric Alsmeyer, until 4:15 p.m., on or before January 10, 2000, or telephone 919-876-8441, extension 23. VICINITY MAP c-% tTr VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF STATE PROJECT 8.2403701 {> SITE MAP " ? ? SITE 7 - END PROJECT 1719 ? . t 171 I ?. 1 i. 1 i 1 SITE 1 . cz tisa j \ f ^9 ..BEGIN ROJEC? - .20 N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY PROJECT 8.2403701 (U2804B) HARRISON AVENUE I1 VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF STATE PROJECT 8.2.103701 SHEET 2 OF 5 -AUG. 1949 o ° c A L E N N N ? ? m C U W O m L4 CM E v v ? o ? ? M ?I a- U of o m c .% m 0 E C . N pp (O o M ?n O w U E ii d c 6 0 nL c E c o - a 0 m m o o U ? m O W 'D S C v? O ? y N O ? =?L ? N s M s n s m s N s O o ? ?Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q ? a = c a t M M s s ?" 0 o c Q a C g3= Ul c o m E = 1 ? m ? c c ? L pv g a s L 0 O 1 C 6 t e co U LL V Ti w c c ¢ V c 2v) - Y n n N ¢ ( ° U 0 t7 c m c is U x ? ci ¢ ? Q n a g N x ?O a O E c4 w W N Q ?i Q Q ¢ ¢ . J J N C O 0 ? o m ? i o O ? + 0 m m + Ol + (V (V W ¢ J + CO ? h R o ? o c ` o m A m N N N N M ? pv 1/1 m f? ? y ? ? O U) Z Q F F S'T'REAM DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFMCATTON DATA Item Existing Stream Reference Stream Proposed Relocation Stream Name Unnamed Trib. to Black Creek Sta 17+65 to I8+10 It. Drainage Area (DA) 40 Ac 40 Ac Channel Slope (Sc) Valley Slope (Sv) 2.50% 2.50% Bankfull Width (Wbkf) 7 ft. 7 ft Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf) 1.2 ft. 1.2 ft. Bankfull Xsection Area (Abp 6 sq. ft. 6 sq. ft. Width / Depth Ratio (Wbkfl / dbkf) 6 6 Max. Depth (dmbkf) 1.5 ft. 1.5 ft. Width Flood Prone Area (Wfpa) 30 ft. 30 ft. Entrenchment Ratio (ER) 4 4 Channel Materials: D50 0.2 in. 0.2 in. Sinuosity (K) 1.2 1.2 Meanders Avg. Length 40 ft. 15 ft. Avg. Amplitude 15 ft. 8 ft. Avg. Radius 20 ft. 20 ft. Discharges Q bankfull 20 cfs 20 cfs Q2 30 cfs 30 cfs Q10 50 cfs 50 cfs velocity V bankfull 3.4 ftJsec. 3.4 ft./sec. V2 3.8 ftJsec. 3.8 ft./sec. V10 3.5 ftJsec, 3.5 ft./sec. Classification Type C4 Type C4 N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY PROJECT 8.2403701 (U-2804B) HARRISON AVE. DATE Aug. 1999 SHEET 4 of STREAM DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION DATA Item Existing Stream Reference Stream Pro osed Relocation Stream Name Unnamed Trib. to Black Creek Unnamed Trib. to Black Creek Sta 19+241t. Sta 19+241t. Drainage Area (DA) 719 Ac 719 Ac Channel Slope (Sc) 1.40% 1.40% Valley Slope (Sv) 1.10% 1.10% Bankfull Width (Wbkf) 16 ft. 20 ft. Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf) 2 ft. 2 ft. Bankfull Xsection Area (Abkf) 28 sq. ft. 42 sq. ft. Width / Depth Ratio (Wbkfl / dbkf) 8 10 Max. Depth (dmbkf) 2.6 ft. 3.5 ft. Width Flood Prone Area (Wfpa) 70 ft. 150 ft. Entrenchment Ratio (ER) 4 7 Channel Materials: D50 0.6 in. 0.6 in. Sinuosity (K) 1.2 1.2 Meanders Avg. Length 200 ft. 200 ft. Avg. Amplitude 60 ft. 60 ft. Avg. Radius 40 ft. 40 ft. Discharges Q baakfull 100 cfs 125 cfs Q2 230 cfs 406 cfs Q10 530 cfs 809 cfs Velocity V bankf ill 5.1 ftJsec. 53 ftJsec. V2 5.5 ft./sec. 5.6 ftJsec. V10 3.7 ft./sec. 5.8 ft./sec. Classification Type C4 Type C4 N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY PROJECT 8.2403701 (U-2804B) HARRISON AVE. DATE Aug. 1999 SHEET 5 of 5