20200649 Ver 1_JD Information Pacakge_20200517

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Matt Haselden
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
4/8/2020
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
Fj I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
Q✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)

I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.

A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.

I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.

An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).

I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.

G. ALL REQUESTS

Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.

Size of Property or Review Area acres.

The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS

Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________

A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
 North Arrow
 Graphical Scale
 Boundary of Review Area
 Date
 Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
 Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
 Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
 Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
 Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.

Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)

____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8

Vicinity Map

Aerial Photograph

USGS Topographic Map

Soil Survey Map

Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)

Landscape Photos (if taken)

NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets

NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms

Other Assessment Forms

_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/

Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 5/17/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: William Wescott 859 Manson Drewry Road, Manson NC 27553
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Beaufort City: Washington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.49821 N Long.:-76.96175 W
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Broad Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
M Field Determination. Date(s): 4/8/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1
35.49682
-76.96102
1.2
wetland
Section 404
2
35.49949
-76.96165
0.22
wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there `may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
0 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth 2019
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
W1 6 -o -ZQZo
Signature and crate of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Vicinity Map

Overall Map For JD Request

JD Request For Driveway Crossing

Red polygon is the proposed driveway in wetlands.
C1 to C2 is the wetland boundary close to the road. B1 to B3 is the wetland boundary close to the house site. Flags C1, B1 and B2
were established by USACE in 2020.
JD Request For Ridge

Blue shaded area is wetland. Red shaded area is upland.
Matt Haselden
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,[e-mail]
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Other
Riverine
May 14, 2020
0 0.1 0.20.05 mi
0 0.15 0.30.075 km
1:5,793
This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.
Station: NBFT - Beaufort
Date of first observation: January 6, 2003
Station type: RAWS -
City, State: River Road, NC County: Beaufort County
Latitude: 35.52° Longitude: -76.93°
Elevation: 25 feet above sea level
Climate division: NC07 - Central Coastal Plain
River basin: Pamlico
Supported by: S&PF

Date/Time of ob daily SUM of
Hourly Precipitation
03/20/2020 0
03/21/2020 0.06
03/22/2020 0.1
03/23/2020 0.41
03/24/2020 0.06
03/25/2020 0.81
03/26/2020 0
03/27/2020 0
03/28/2020 0
03/29/2020 0
03/30/2020 0
03/31/2020 0.77
04/01/2020 0.32
04/02/2020 0
04/03/2020 0
04/04/2020 0
04/05/2020 0
04/06/2020 0.1
04/07/2020 0.27
04/08/2020 0.1 site visit

2.27 inches of rainfall in the 14 days prior to site visit.

Weather Station located 2.3 miles northeast of site.

Date/Time of ob
monthly
SUM of
Daily
Precipitation
Compared to
WETS
Table
May 2019 3.36 Normal
Jun 2019 4.45 Normal
Jul 2019 2.73 Below
Aug 2019 3.76 Below
Sep 2019 6.15 Normal
Oct 2019 2.98 Normal
Nov 2019 2.89 Normal
Dec 2019 2.62 Normal
Jan 2020 2.02 Below -0.71
Feb 2020 7.45 Above +3.5
Mar 2020 3.4 Normal

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matt Haselden / Cox Road / Broad Creek City/County: Washington / Beaufort Sampling Date: 4/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Matt Haselden State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 flag Al
Investigator(s): Wescott Environmental Services, Inc. Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T _ Lat: 35.49707 N Long: -76.96119 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon sand NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
— Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
` Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '24
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '24
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DPI flag Al
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Pinus taeda
12
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
Quercus falcata
3
No FACU
3
Quercus nigra
2
No FAC
Total Number of Dominant 7
_
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Ilex opaca
3
No FAC
5.
Liquidambar styraciflua
3
No FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
57
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
23
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 11.5
20% of total cover: 4.6
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
OBL species x 1 =
1
Pinus taeda
2
Yes FAC
FACW species x 2 =
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
1
Yes FACU
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
6'
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 1.5
20%
of total cover: 0.6
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
M✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
3
No FAC
�n 3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2
Acer rubrum
2
No FAC
L Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
Vaccinium corymbosum
11
Yes FACW
4
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes FAC
'Indicators
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.-
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
Yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
26
= Total Cover
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 13
20%
of total cover: 5.2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) y) plants, including
7,
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
$
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20%
of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1
Vitis spp.
5
Yes NI
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover
Vegetation
17
50% of total cover: 2.5
20%
of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPI flag A13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
_(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-9 7.5YR 3/1 100
sand
9-14 7.5YR 3/3 100
sand
14-24 2.5Y 6/3 100
sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
J Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Ll
(inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matt Haselden / Cox Road / Broad Creek City/County: Washington / Beaufort Sampling Date: 4/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Matt Haselden State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 flag A13
Investigator(s): Wescott Environmental Services, Inc. Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 35A9699 N Long: -76.96140 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon sand NWI classification: PF01C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
✓ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
` Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2 flag A13
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
% Cover Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Taxodium distichum
1
No
OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2.
Persea borbonia
1
No
FACW
3
Nyssa sylvatica
6
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
10
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.-
Ilex opaca
4
Yes
FAC
5.
Liquidambar styraciflua
1
No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
90
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6
Acer rubrum
2
No
FAC
15
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 7.5
20%
of total cover:
3
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
OBL species x 1 =
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20%
of total cover:
n 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
�✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
Persea borbonia
5
No
FACW
� 3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2
Ilex opaca
4
No
FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3
Acer rubrum
3
Yes
FAC
4
Liquidambar styraciflua
3
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
Leucothoe axillaris
18
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
33
= Total Cover
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 16.5
20%
of total cover:
6•6
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
Woodwardia areolata
17
Yes
oBL
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2.
Osmundia cinnamomea
8
Yes
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
25
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5
20%
of total cover:
5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1
Vitis spp.
7
Yes
NI
2
Berchemia scandens
15
Yes
FAC
3.
Smilax laurifolia
9
Yes
FACW
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
31
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 15.5
20%
of total cover:
6.2
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2 flag Al
to the
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-20 10YR 211 100
to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Locatiorr PL=Pore Lining, M=Mati
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
✓ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
✓ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) V
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— Marl (1710) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 7 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matt Haselden / Cox Road / Broad Creek CitylCounty: Washington / Beaufort Sampling Date: 4/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Matt Haselden State: NC Sampling Point: DP3 flag B2
Investigator(s): Wescott Environmental Services, Inc. Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 35.49939 N Long: -76.96190 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Seabrook loamy sand NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired� check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
— Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '24
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '24
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3 flag B2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
% Cover Species?
Status
1
Pinus taeda
17
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2
Quercus nigra
3
No
FAC
3
Quercus falcata
2
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71 (A/6)
6.
22
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 11
20%
of total cover:
4.2
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
OBL species x 1 =
1
Pinus taeda
2
No
FAC
FACW species x 2 =
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
1
No
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
3
Quercus nigra
6
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
4
Ilex opaca
2
No
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
5
Liquidambar styraciflua
3
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
6.
------
Prevalence Index = B/A =
14
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 7
20%
of total cover:
2.8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
�✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
9
Yes
FAC
n
3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2•
Acer rubrum
2
No
FAC
L Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3
Cornus florida
3
Yes
FACU
4
Liquidambar styraciflua
2
No
FAC
'Indicators
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
2
No
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Quercus nigra
3
Yes
FAC
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
21
= Total Cover
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 10.5
20%
of total cover:
4•2
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Pteridium aquilinum
12
Yes -...
FACU
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) y) plants, including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
12
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 6
20%
of total cover:
2.2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
0
= Total Cover
Vegetation n
50% of total cover:
20%
of total cover:
Present? Yes � . � No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3 flag B2
Profile Description: (Describe to the de
Depth
Matrix
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
0-7
2.5Y 3/1
100
7-13
2.5Y 5/3
100
13-24
7.5YR 5/6
100
to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture
sand
sand
sand
Remarks
<70% coated sand grains
I ype: C=Concentration, D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) —
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
— Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1-1 No W]
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matt Haselden / Cox Road / Broad Creek City/County: Washington / Beaufort Sampling Date: 4/8/2020
Applicant/Owner: Matt Haselden State: NC Sampling Point: DP4 flag B2
Investigator(s): Wescott Environmental Services, Inc. Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 35.49945 N Long: -76.96171 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon sand NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
` Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
` Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4 flag B2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubum
5 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Pinus taeda
1 No FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86 (A/B)
6.
6 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 3
20% of total cover: 1.2
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
OBL species x 1 =
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3.
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Ej 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
ID 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Persea borbonia
7 No FACW
Ll 3 -Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2 Ilex opaca
3 No FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3. Acer rubrum
8 No FAC
4 Ilex glabra
40 Yes FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5 Leucothoe axillaris
30 Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6•
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
88 = Total Cover
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 44
20% of total cover: 17.6
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Woodwardia areolata
11 Yes OBL _
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 Osmundia cinnamomea
6 Yes FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
17 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8.5
20% of total cover: 3.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1 Vitis spp.
6 Yes NI
2 Smilax laurifolia
20 Yes FACW
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
26 = Total Cover
Vegetation LL
50% of total cover: 13
20% of total cover: 5.2
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4 flag B2
depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
0-20 10YR 2/1 100
i ype: U=Concentration, D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
— Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
✓ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
✓ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Texture Remarks
loamy sand
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) u
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (178) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
— Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
"Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 7 No La
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Beaufort County,
North Carolina
Matt Haselden
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
May 14, 2020
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
392940039295003929600392970039298003929900393000039301003930200393030039304003930500393060039307003929400392950039296003929700392980039299003930000393010039302003930300393040039305003930600321700 321800 321900 322000 322100 322200 322300 322400 322500 322600
321700 321800 321900 322000 322100 322200 322300 322400 322500 322600
35° 30' 14'' N 76° 58' 0'' W35° 30' 14'' N76° 57' 19'' W35° 29' 30'' N
76° 58' 0'' W35° 29' 30'' N
76° 57' 19'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
0 300 600 1200 1800
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Meters
Map Scale: 1:6,550 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ap Arapahoe fine sandy loam 27.8 14.4%
CnB Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 5
percent slopes
6.3 3.2%
Cu Currituck muck, frequently
flooded
3.5 1.8%
Lo Leon sand 23.8 12.3%
Me Muckalee loam, frequently
flooded
1.3 0.7%
Sb Seabrook loamy sand 46.4 24.0%
TaB Tarboro sand, 0 to 5 percent
slopes
41.7 21.6%
W Water 42.4 21.9%
Totals for Area of Interest 193.2 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
Custom Soil Resource Report
11