The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About640011_Structure Evaluation_2020051161,5 :20Aao137Z__ Facility Number -1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation -_ O Other Agency Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: O Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up ORReferral 0 Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time:!-1.1� Departure Time: County: Farm Name: 1.;q i1? 4, _ Owner Email: Owner Name: Sd ci r T el-L 13,E i lL Phone: 7 7 7 — 7 /-( 5 — -), I o -7 Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: '`� ryI a. S 4 1 1 ! Title: Onsite Representative: '/ i1/ 1y Certified Operator: 4 Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Phone: Integrator: L Certification Number: Certification Number: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. I E]La cr Nan -La er Pullets Other Pou Design Current Dischar es and Stream Impacts I - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) Region: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non-Dai Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE [—]Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes rN. ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: — /— Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. Ifyes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): f 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Iwo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑'f o ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir entnl threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Ye ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste A"lication 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop TYpe(s): I l e r M car 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EfN 15. Does the receiving crop and or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [rVN 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA g�E Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? I f yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ZNE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Surve 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA [NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection. 5 -f/ -.1- 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Other issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Ycs A No ❑ NA ❑ NE Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No T;� Yc�So No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA [] NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better ea lain situations (use additional pages as necessary). l=t42m (,vvl5 5c)(d A Sot(4her� r3�1�i4 n ��-�tlCq Q.UJ 0w✓1to f 5 n r�r_e el rC G�d c4,q e D!-57 v(,vh zr5 , A .1 �� !7_r.L2h".4r._.t V� (lie I'r67 hz� �?�S.' yott nL�Fr �` s I j it a- n 1-5 1'0 , T iA Gi) +� tr /� e i tiY 7 V �� Urh� /� c t cv �^� �,�� e . 0w(� 122p toJ .( 3r 4J' rJf$r�y SOkr t4;- -n /7Iq111Z.. Fn ,,^ Al h t`Zer�" l�.v l Pe to& ca pe,/M.t e�P1.-L j 72,O)l n,, d 81MS s1^OwS t T (-- 5 hO� �JL� rr9V)U.'a J Rev ieweriInspector Name: Phone: 7 1 ! c/ Ly o Reviewerilnspector Signature: (3 C, S 4yL 70-w C it Page 3 of 3 Date: S - / t - z D 21412015