20050150 Ver 1_Stream Call Letter_20051221

F
x4- 4? aw- 4do vi wq A?eS?-- -,+Y-e??)
__ ?._Ul-(.I?CL- ?? 1 ?-??Y P () Yl? n `K 1 ?I c?T (.S D
M e
i

f
A LT ??? ?11 loe, r??r
in
115
i ! r ! tom. `?????, 335
?? \\\ 33
oz-
1
\ - arc y
?: , 4 t

r`y

i
77

1
l s ?
/C2
i?
,l

Oil
325 `` -
IC?
Wj
i
?O'
?a
-
lg ?

?e
?s

0
ss
N
n

lk.
I it,
_zz
I J ((?

W

325 _
Is ?.
PROJECT VICINITY 1
M U L K E Y Ballentine Road Extension Figure No.
Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared For: Feet A
me rown or 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 1
Holly
Springs USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle: Apex, & New Hill
----NA Contour Interval 10 Feet
o?

r
- - --- --------
{
- 1 -0
O?O? SAT ?9QG
7
>_
Harold M. Brady
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27511
October 10, 2005
Subject: Proposed Ballentine Street Extension in Holly Springs, Wake County
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Clean Water Act
Dear Mr. Brady:
On Friday September 23, 2005, Nicole Thomson and Christina Breen conducted an on-site determination
to review four stream features within the study area for the referenced project for applicability to the
Clean Water Act. The features are labeled on the attached maps initialed by Nicole Thomson and
Christina Breen on September 23, 2005.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) determinations for the features are as follows:
The stream feature labeled SAA was determined to be intermittent at the confluence of two ephemeral
channels with a field rating score of 28.5 below the confluence. (Above the confluence, field rating
scores were 12 and 14.5) Therefore, this feature (below the confluence) is subject to the Clean Water
Act. Stream feature SAA empties into another UT to Utley Creek. This stream feature is labeled SA and
had a field rating score of 30.5 and was determined to be perennial and therefore subject to the Clean
Water Act. Additionally, bridging options of this perennial stream feature were discussed and it was
decided, pending permit submittal and review, that no major drainage structures would be required and an
appropriately sized culvert that provides appropriate fish passage and floodplain overflow may be
acceptable. Two additional channels that drain to a UT to Utley Creek along the existing gravel Thomas
Mill Road were determined to be ephemeral and therefore not subject to the Clean Water Act.
These on-site determinations shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the
Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o
John Dorney, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals
that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date
that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not
start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision.
DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
NorthCarolina
Transportation Permitting Unit Natmally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
A, li
, 41' . , `,! �. t.>` %
5,
�Al
Ti.
w - ]am
7fK
1%7
P2
75
t,77
xv
tl
Fin
•
j7A
jr
T&
it
vi
i7
w - ]am
7fK
1%7
P2
75
t,77
xv
Fin
•
j7A
jr
T&
it
vi
4.,

® MULKEY
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS
NC DENR/Division of Water Quality
Section 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
ATTENTION: Ms. Nicole Thomson
NCDWQ Transportation Coordinator
DATE: September 30, 2005
QI ( FO_? '[2-oe12D
OCT 0 4 2005
DENR -WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
SUBJECT: Proposed Ballentine Street Extension in Holly Springs, Wake County
This letter serves as a follow-up to the field meeting held on Friday September 23,
2005 on the proposed Ballentine Street roadway in Holly Springs, North Carolina.
Attending the meeting were Ms. Nikki Thomson and Ms. Christina Breen from the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ); and Mr. Harold Brady and Mrs. Cindy
Carr with Mulkey Engineers & Consultants.
The meeting began around 8:00 AM at the end of the existing Ballentine Street.
Y,
We then drove gether to the end of the proposed roadway on New Hill Road and
investigated regulated waters within the proposed project corridor that have not
previously be6n reviewed.' Two unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Utley Creek were surveyed
to determine their jurisdictional status within the proposed roadway corridor. The nick
point break twmn ephemeral and intermittent channel was identified for one of the
UTs, identi9d as SAA. This nick point was determined to be at the confluence of two
ephemeral hannels. Field rating scores of 12.0 and 14.5 were calculated above the nick
point and,18.5 below the nick point of SAA. This stream empties into another UT to
Utley Creek (Stream SA), which had a field rating score of 30.5 and was determined to
be a perenpial w,ater.body within the project corridor. This perennial stream is located
ad, tithe #oIVosed ct'nterline of the new roadway. Pending permit submittal and review,
an appropriately sized culvert that provides capacity for floodplain overflow may be an
acceptable drainage design for this perennial stream.
We concluded the field meeting by driving along the existing gravel Thomas Mill
Road observing two ephemeral channels that drain toward a UT to Utley Creek.
Attached is a map depicting the approximate locations of the streams studied.
Please contact myself at [phone] with any questions or comments regarding the
information in this letter or concerning the project.
Sincerely,
Harold M. Brady
Scientist
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
MULKEY INC. 57513 TRYON ROAD CARY, NC 27511 P? Box 33127 RALEIGH, NC 27636 PH: 919-851-1912 FAX: [phone] WWW.MULKEYINC.COM
Cc: Ms. Kendra Stephenson, Town of Holly Springs
Ms. Cindy Carr, Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
_
4 a,
• ��, � „r t ,• :' s ..meq a
1Rt
VIP �w
j.
—17
d• �
Stream SA
�♦J � f {Ci�C�A J +�ty9
r;r ��-,-, 7*� �'� �' jp` �� �,�� v t,j•�'�4 � rt:.r� � -sr.� � � �,t� tr �++ - tom,.. "�
�,{,s�a hF'a,..! '�;#-r � ' S.�'. tr � � � � '"•.'..-i.t�RE .�r�'i'";^s � `,� 'l j`` ky,,'s 17q `
'4,� trt�Ti' 1�p � �'"'�ikl tr ,� iv�r r; ..t•'+' r -a y�� � � .�•' w'tt� • *• ..,� �, _ �`-L, .
r#s f�•�4 • , �1� a
}ij +f r+r{F,+71k� 1JJr r \\• : % 4s �` ' >.
} , r" t^1 ul .. 1 f tr w., t +P ,
fir`: "` "1 y� WY7C'•rj.i} - �..
�,,s`� •3_"� ►.%+'"t� 7 - T r�y♦`i�� s a ff� ,'!s� ; `e p;t r
�' � `t'+-,"�� f'"+' t g.�`tyt,�'%'r�fF �'y �-.--..��-!'Y ri J { �`\ �.1ti il�w�✓ • t•. 'y`y - ..t.
'�`q'y `,� - +�'��= ' � �,�,•�0"t,,, i�;•'1�'yi�,r``�', "i��. t . `y.c � t.� ; l � � \_���c .� ' r ■ f .�' �..
':�. !'��>i Y�" "*��l,qr� � k � � rt ~+ . ��. � e ',�,+ _ !'.' s C`�► � f\� _ t rr.
,�> ,� ,.-_ t �,ti'� ax` k �rY" � 3.Slt[:r -l.P %�c�.-ca>. �• .�,1 •ti,.
1 : ' r .-.✓''v t i C �?,�r�ti.. f4l,
Ivi
�i r a t'7. + ?'jam - [.• f ,f ,,., 5 l4_� -t' �.
4
- fF' �V�`` .�{y+y} .yi PI }A'��� �}. /, 4 1. ����* - ,-�� t r • -}t
r4 ,y�.,R•`e^a=!t � .�. � 't y -. � y ! a ^� "* . ''r,rt`�. 's � �e { •- "i. ..,.
t'�f• Y J' r r']t C..- � P �'"��Y i � '� .7, •. ' .f b-' l+S �.'� ^� � ! �
i $i, a •fiff »` n
'i 1. d r. f. �' • - •..' i'.' .`
PROPOSED ALIGNMENT
M U L K E'YFigure No.
Ballentine Road Extension
Holly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared For: 1.24,000
tine sown or 1Holly Feet
Springs 0 700 1,400 2,800 4,200 5,600
MOP TM C.AX0-A
Aerial Photography provided by Terrian Navigator

O
i
U)
Y
RADITI
Legend
I
Existing Roads -
Streams
-••-° Tributaries ?
® Potential Impact Areas (GPS Data) j
I`
Ponds/Lakes
National Wetlands Inventory j?
i
Hydric A
Wake County Property Boundaries
Alternative Alignments
Corridor
Ballentine Street Extension
M U L K E Y Northern Alignment Alternatives Figure No.
Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared For:
A nre TOwn or Feet 1B
Holly 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Spr ings
o.T S pr
Wake County GIS Data. 2004 REV. June 21, 2005
I
h
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: a Project: [1z SPRIA) Latitude:
Evaluator: p•v - l±?r?1SC Site: p-PA s L ? Longitude:
C 46
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent j - County:
if? 19 or perennial if? 30 I v\ e.g. Quad Name:

A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural Levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts CO 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 .5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No =O
Yes = 3
-Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual \.
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal= 14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3

15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season CO 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = U_`- Yes = 1.5
r
C. Biology (Subtotal = _2, 7 )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0 '
22. Crayfish 0 • 0.5 1
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 ' 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 c 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC - 0. ; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29loetKes on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: I f -?, 1 6
1 -
,-Evaluator::
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent,
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30
f? Site: #3
County: w A y
Longitude:
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 '
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 ' 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9 a Natural Levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 ) 1
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5 `
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ^'\
Yes ?O ,
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual \
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal=
> > \
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season CO 1 2
?--? 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 065 0
17. Sediment on plants 0 ? 0.5 1
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 '
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Ye = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = T 1
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish r_00 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 c 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. (-0) 0.5 1 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Project: -1-ib ?? 5 f'R 1 N 4 Latitude:
- Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
'(T- Latitude:
Date: ?.? Project:
Evaluator: Site: Longitude:
Total Points: ' Other
Stream 's - `-r°iffent County: e.g. Quad Name:
if?
!1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = `j ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 > 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 1 ' 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural Levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
N C=O
Yes = 3
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual \.
B_ Hvdroloav (Subtotal =-? 1 \
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ' 0 - 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 `
17. Sediment on plants 0 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0. 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel C3_) 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 c 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
i
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -- Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 9 / / rJ S-'' Project: , # 2 -
Evaluator: Evaluator: Site:Longitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: y e.g. Quad Name:
if? 19 or perennial if? 30 K
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= \ ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relicfloodplain 0 1 2'; 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural Levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 <0> 1
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Ye = 3 ;
"Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = I). I \1`
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or

Water in channel -- d or growing season no
1
2
3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants 0 0.5 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5 i
C. Bioloav Subtotal = 1
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish Q o) 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 c 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERDIINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 10/20/2005
Applicant/owner. Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID: WA
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: WAI
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carya glabra tree FACU 9.
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC 10.
3. Ouercus alba tree FACU 11.
4. Liguidambar st waciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda tree FAC 13.
6. Andropogon virginicus herbaceous FAC- 14.
7. Solidago spp. herbaceous FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 57%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 2-6 %slope
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan silt loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Ochraguults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 7.5YR 513 sandy loam
2-12+ B 10YR 514 sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfrdic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERNIINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Soils Present?
Hydric Yes No
Yes No

No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:
plot taken 20' uphill of WA1.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 10/20/2005
ApplicantJOwner: Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes HNo Transect ID: WA
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: WA1
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
I . Paccinium arboreum shrub FACU 9. Microstegfum viminuem herbaceous FAC+
2. Nyssa sylvatica tree FAC 10.
3. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU IL
4, Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taedo tree FAC 13.
b. Ouercus rubra vine FACU 14.
7. Osmunda regalis herbaceous OBL 15.
8. Osmunda cinnamomea herbaceous FACW+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 67%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
z Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: z Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
z Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 10 (in.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: riparian wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Worsham sandy loam Drainage Class: Poorly Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 A IOYR 516 sandy clay loam
4-12+ B 2.5YR 512 10YR 4/4 ' common, medium, distinct sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
z Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
z Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YNo
Remarks:
plot taken -15' downslope of WAL

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 10/20/2005
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID: WB
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: WBIO
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carya glabra tree FACU 9.
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC 10.
3. Ouercus alba tree FACU 11.
4. Liquidambarstyraciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda tree FAC 13.
6. Vitis rotundtfolia vine FAC 14.
7. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC ( excluding FAC- ). 71%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) _
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 2-6 % slope
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan sandy loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) 0%funsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
- 0-4 A 7.5YR 513 sandy loam
442+ B 10YR 514 sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
N
? Y
H
ling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Is this Sam
es
o
ydric Soils Present p
Remarks:
plot taken -20' uphill of WBI0.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 10/20/2005
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID: WB
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: WB10
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Arundinaria gigantea herbaceous FACW 9.
2. Oxydendron arboreum tree Ni 10.
3. Acer rubrum tree FAC 11.
4. Liguidambar siyraciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Anisostichus capreolata vine NI 13.
6. Microstegium viminuem herbaceous FAC+ 14.
7. Osmunda cinnamomea herbaceous FACW+ is.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC ( excluding FAC- ). 71%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: a Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
a Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 10 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: headwater wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Worsham sandy loam Drainage Class: Poorly Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A 7.5YR 413 sandy clay loam
6-12+ B 2.5YR 512 IOYR 416 common, medium, distinct sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
a Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken --10' downslope of WBI0.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 10/20/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
Community ID: Upland
Transect ID: WC
Plot ID: WC20
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ilex opaca shrub .4A- 9.
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC 10.
3. Lonicera japonica vine FA C- I l.
4. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda tree FAC 13.
6. Andropogon virginicus herbaceous FAC- 14.
7. Solidago spp. herbaceous FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 57%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _
-Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 2-6 %slope
SOILS
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) , Mayodan silt loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile DescriRtion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horiwn (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 7.5YR 513 sandy clay loam
3-6 BI 2.5Y413 sandy clay loam
6-12+ B2 2.5Y 614 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E
nt? Yes
il
P
H
d
i
S ling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
this Sam
Is
rese
y
r
c
o
s p
Remarks:
plot taken -20' uphill of WC20.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 10/20/2005
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID: WC
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: WC20
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum tree FAC 9. Juncus effusus herbaceous FACW+
2. Ilex opaca shrub FAC- 10.
3. Alnus serrulata tree FACW 11.
4. Gelsernium sempervirens vine FAC 12.
5. Pinus taeda tree FAC 13.
6. Rubus argutus herbaceous FAC 14.
7. Arundinaria gigantea herbaceous FACW 15.
8. Cyperus spp, herbaceous FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 89%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_Inundated
a Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
x Drift Lines
x Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: z Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
z Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 4 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: riparian wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Worsham sandy loam Drainage Class: Poorly Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horiwn (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 A 7.5YR 512 sandy clay loam
4-12+ B 2.5YR 511 5YR 516 common, medium, distinct sandy clay loam
IOYR 516 few, fine, distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
z Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
z Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
a Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
N
? Y
Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Is this Sam
lin
o
es
Hydric Soils Present p
g
Remarks:
plot taken --15' downslope of WC20.

. DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Ll
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes (If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 11/3/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
Community ID: Upland
Transect ID: WD
Plot ID: WD14
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liriodendron fulipgfera tree F4CU 9.
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC 10.
3. Ouercus alba tree F14CU 11.
4. Liqufdambar sryracfflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus faeda tree FAC 13.
6. Vids rotundifolia vine FAC 14.
7. Prunus serotina tree FACU 15.
8. Smilax rowndifolia vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC- ). 62%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 6-10 % slope
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan gravelly sandy loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12+ B IOYR 413 sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMWATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes El Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken --20' uphill of WD14.
t .PPruvcu uy nw0tii.t Xy/_
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 11/3/2005
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID: WD
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: WD14
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Saururus cernuus herbaceous OBL 9. Vitis rotundifolia vine FAC
2. Liriodendron tuliptfera tree FACU 10. Ouercus phellos tree FACW-
3. Acer rubrum tree FAC 11. Woodwardia aerolata herbaceous OBL
4. Liquidambar styractflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Rubus argutus herbaceous FAC 13.
6. Microstegium viminuem herbaceous FAC+ 14.
7. U mus rubra tree FAC 15.
8. Pinus taeda tree FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 91%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
z Water Marks
z Drift Lines
a Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
x Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) see note x Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils were not saturated at the time of the survey; however, this is likely due to the mild drought conditions observed throughout
the area. Including water restrictions for the Town of Holly Springs; therefore, subsurface primary hydrologic indicators were
not observed
This is an isolated wetland in the headwaters of an ephemeral channel immediately below a farm pond.
In addition to the other indicators hummocks were observed in the wettest portions of the wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan gravelly sandy loam Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 7.5YR 414 sandy loam
3-5 BI 2.5YR 512 10YR 4/6 conunon, medium, distinct sandy loam
5-12+ B2 2.5YR 711 IOYR 618 common, medium, distinct sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
z Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken -10' downslope of WD14.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 11/3/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
Community ID: Upland
Transect ID: WE
Plot ID: WE4
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liriodendron tuhptfera tree FACU 9.
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC 10.
3. Ouercus albs tree FACU 11.
4. Liquidambarslyraciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda' tree FAC 13.
6. Vitis rotundifoha vine FAC 14.
7. Ulmus rubra tree FAC 15.
8. Smilax rotundtfolia vine FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC ( excluding FAC- ). 75%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
% No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 6-10 %slope
SOII,S
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan gravelly sandy loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12+ B 10YR 414 sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophy[ic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Soils Present? Yes No
Hydric

No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:
plot taken -20' uphill of WE4.

t Pynv- ?y
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
(If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 11/3/2005
County: Wake
State: NC
Community ID: PFO
Transect ID: WE
Plot ID: WE4
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Saururus cernuus herbaceous OBL 9.
2. Liriodendron tulipifera tree FACU 10.
3. Acer rubrum tree FAC 11.
4. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Rubus argutus herbaceous FAC 13.
6. Microstexium viminuem herbaceous FAC+ 14.
7. Ulmus rubra tree FAC 15.
8. Pinus taeda tree FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 87%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
z Drift Lines
z Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
x Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) see note s Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils were not saturated at the time of the survey; however, this is likely due to the mild drought conditions observed throughout
the area. Including water restrictions for the Town of Holly Springs; therefore, subsurface primary hydrologic indicators mere
not observed.
This is an isolated wetland in the headwaters of an ephemeral channel.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan gravelly sandy loam Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Haph dults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 7.5YR 414 sandy loam
3-5 BI 2.5YR 512 10YR 416 common, medium, distinct sandy loam
5-12+ B2 2.5YR 7/1 IOYR 618 common, medium, distinct sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
a Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
z Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken -10' downslope of WE4.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs
Investigator(s): H. Brady
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Ld
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes (If needed, explain on reverse)
Date: 10/20/2005
County: Wake
State: NC

Community ID: Upland
Transect ID: XWD
Plot ID: XWDI
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Solidago spp. herbaceous FAC 9.
2. Acer rubrum tree FAC 10.
3. Ouercus alba tree FACU 11.
4. Liquidambar soTaciflua tree FAC+ 11
5. Pinus taeda tree FAC 13.
6. Vitis rotundifolia vine ,4A- 14.
7. Toxicodmdron radicans vine FAC 15.
8. Rubus argutus herbaceous FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-). 87%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 2-6 % slope
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan gravelly sandy loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Lj
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 7.5YR 513 sandy loam
2-12+ B 10YR 614 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken -20' uphill ofXWD1.

Approved by IIQUSACF- 3/9Z

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2 Date: 10/20/2005
Applicant/Owner: Town of Holly Springs County: Wake
Investigator(s): H. Brady State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: PFO
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID: XWD
Is this area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: XWDI
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Arundinaria gigantea herbaceous FACW 9.
2. Pinus taeda tree FAC 10.
3. Acer rubnan tree FAC 11.
4. Liquidambar styractflua tree FAC+ 12.
5. Woodwardia aerolata herbaceous OBL 13.
6. Smilax rotundtfoha vine FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC ( excluding FAC- ). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
R No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
-Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
x Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil 5 (in.) _
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: headwater wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase) Mayodan sandy loam Drainage Class: Well Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes Lj
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 7.5YR 414 sandy loam
5-12+ B 2.5YR 511 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
z Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERNUNATION

Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
plot taken -10' downslope of XWDI.
rFpjvvw vy ta?var?t.c vi?< -
V//It
WETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
y? on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
SOILS:
ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
forested/natural vegetation yp %
agricultural/ urbanized SS %
impervious surface S %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
DOMINANT VEGETATION:
Soil Series: 1^/0i7_S1,tA,s!a 1 V/JCCiyi d? s!>ZbDTL?v?
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat) 2 1lflS45. 1- YV,4v7e_A
predominantly mineral (non-sandy) 3 G//Z>D Fiv?1,20?/ 77v-PIGE17-A
predominantly sandy 4 G iav12>Al,?73,4f- STYiL 4G <L(/A
HYDRAULIC FACTORS: FLOODING AND WETNESS:
X freshwater semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
brackish seasonally flooded or inundated
steep topography X intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
ditched or channelized - no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width >= 100 feet
WKI'LANI) TYPE: (select one)*
Bottomland Hardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest X_ Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels.
DEM RATING
1. WATER STORAGE `L X 4.00 = B
2. BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION X 4.00 = 17-
3. POLLUTANT REMOVAL I * X 5.00 =
4. WILDLIFE HABITAT X 2.00 = Z
5. AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT Z X 4.00 = g
6. RECREATIONIEDUCATION X 1.00 =
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE' =
6
* Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius.
NCDWQ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)

NCDWQ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)
Project Name: &ALd-f1-MA,1E $T, -P7x7-, County: t^1A/-- E
Nearest Road: /-/EtAl /d/GL 27, Date: 10 /-_04005'
Wetland Area (ac): -- p, 7X Wetland Width (ft): 60
Name of Evaluator(s): !/ f3 /ZA* Y
WETLAND LOCATION: ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake forested/natural vegetation G/O %
on perennial steam agricultural/ urbanized SS %
on intermittent stream impervious surface 5 %
within interstream divide Adjacent Special Natural Areas
other

SOILS: DOMINANT VEGETATION:
Soil Series: \,/005sAO/_1 1 1417el?l/IAIAil,14 L-,l A IT,54

Eci?.t
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat) 2 QX ft F/, / ?,roA/ A Z t*!, a12
predominantly mineral (non-sandy) 3 A? E;n .LY?'/TCiivl
predominantly sandy 4 G/fJvi7>i?r.?i3?i? ST"!2 iGGu?
HYDRAULIC FACTORS: FLOODING AND WETNESS:

freshwater semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
brackish seasonally flooded or inundated
steep topography i_ intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
ditched or channelized no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width >= 100 feet
Wk:l'LANI) TYPE: (select one)*

Bottomland Hardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest X Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosia Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and br ackish marshes or stream channels.
DEM RATING
1. WATER STORAGE Z X 4.00 = rj
2. BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION Q X 4.00 = Q
3. POLLUTANT REMOVAL * X 5.00 =
4. WII.DL.IFE HABITAT X 2.00 = Z
5. AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT X 4.00 = 8
6. RECREATION/EDUCATION X 1.00 = a
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE _ 1 2j
Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius.
C34F
k/ G
NCDWQ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)
Project Name: L?ihLGEi?Tti/? ST 5X7 County. wdkE
Nearest Road: P)a /zb Date: ro/zo tooS
Wetland Area (ac): < /,0 Wetland Width (ft): 110
Name of Evaluator(s): b2 ?t?
WETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or cstusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
A on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
forested/natural vegetation Np %
agricultural/ urbanized %
impervious surface %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
SOILS: DOMINANT VEGETATION:
Soil Series: 1.J02S/14m 1 AG?'2 IZy912vN1
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat) 2 LEX O?G/-{
predominantly mineral (non-sandy) 3 AL,vt-S SFi22ciaT
predominantly sandy 4 C?EGSryt??Yl S?i?f'ErZt//rzF??S
HYDRAULIC FACTORS: FLOODING AND WETNESS:
freshwater semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
brackish X seasonally flooded or inundated
steep topography intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
ditched or channelized no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width >= 100 feet
WEMAND TYFE: (select one)*
9( Bottomland Hardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels.
DEM RATING
1. WATER STORAGE ?J" X 4.00 =
2. BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION 5
3. POLLUTANT REMOVAL 2
4. WILDLIFE HABITAT
5. AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT Z
6. RECREATIONIEDUCATION
X 4.00 =
X 5.00 =
X 2.00 =
X 4.00 =
X 1.00 =
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE
_
17-
Z_ /O
V/
* Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius.
x w?
NCDWQ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)
Project Name: ?AGG-fN771,1E ST F,<7- County. ?,?? ??
Nearest Road: H/GL /Z'!> Date: to Zo/zoos
Wetland Area (ac): < 0.2h Wetland Width (ft): Z S
Name of Evaluator(s): H, &ZAD1
WETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or cstusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other E?/Lr,?i7 RG Gx. v?G
SOILS:
Soil Series: /"V ro ?)AA1
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat)
>C predominantly mineral (non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
HYDRAULIC FACTORS:
X freshwater
brackish
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width >= 100 feet
WKI'LAND TYFE: (select one)*
DOMINANT VEGETATION:
1 1417 av VA/4-'1,4t 4/l.4t//"•'
2 PIWv ,,5 TZ€-bA
3 /fGF/L 1:?-Ag-m
4 G/Qvi1?f?§dZ STYIZ/=GOF4u,4
FLOODING AND WETNESS:
semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
_>? intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Bottomland Hardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest a Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels.
DE1NI RATING
1. WATER STORAGE
2. BANK, SHORELINE STABUzATION 0
3. POLLUTANT REMOVAL
4. WILDLIFE HABITAT
5. AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT
6. RECREATION/EDUCATION
ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
forested/natural vegetation 419 %
agricultural/ urbanized 4457 %
impervious surface 6- %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
X 4.00 =
X 4.00 = h7
X 5.00 = O
X 2.00 = 7-
X 4.00 = 4/
X 1.00 =
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE _
Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream upslope, or radius.

NCDWQ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)
Project Name: 3A44rA177/.1E 57- _r*<i County. c%1le?
Nearest Road: .,/Fw /?iGL 2'> Date: /l 3 zoos
Wetland Area (ac): 0, 5 Wetland Width (ft): doo
Name of Evaluator(s): P, UPA D Y
WETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
C other i??IIOAL
ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
forested/natural vegetation 1/0 %
agricultural/ urbanized SS %
impervious surface XI - %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
SOILS: DOMINANT VEGETATION:
Soil Series: ",4Vo?1 ? i 9vlZ(/IZvS G 1ZiC/v?5
. predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat) ? L/1210 ?E.v?o?r T?JL/iFG?.4
predominantly mineral (non-sandy) 3 A6-AlZ 1Z 113fZ,-m
predominantly sandy 4 ucPvl j>A1%i,9AP_ 57'1eAG/FG,?4
HYDRAULIC FACTORS: FLOODING AND WETNESS:
>/ freshwater semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
brackish seasonally flooded or inundated
steep topography intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
ditched or channelized no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width >= 100 feet
WFfLANll TYPE: (select one)*
X Bottomland Hardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels.
DEM RATING
1. WATER STORAGE X 4.00 = y
2. BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION X 4.00 = O
3. POLLUTANT REMOVAL X 5.00 = O
4. WILDLIFE HABITAT I X 2.00 = 2-
5. AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT ? X 4.00 = 1 2
6. RECREATION/EDUCATION X 1.00 =
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE' =
GT
* Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius.

NCDWQ WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION)
Project Name: 5,6aEA,,17v6- - % F7- County. WAkk5
Nearest Road: NrW u/LG iZ Date: I 1 3 zoos
Wetland Area (ac): G O, ZS Wetland Width (ft): 20
Name of Evaluator(s): / l ,132Ab `t'
S
WETLAND LOCATION:
on sound or cstusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
)_other
ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
forested/natural vegetation GAO %
agricultural/ urbanized SS %
impervious surface 15- %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
SOILS: DOMINANT VEGETATION:
Soil Series: /VI,Qf/d-D,d,5k_/ 1 y2?//Zv5 GF1_7A/L/yS
-predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat) 2 G/2/O??F!>2on/ 77/L/?/FC/Z,4
predominantly mineral (non-sandy) 3 A?FlL i2v?tZuM
predominantly sandy 4 U Qv/ J*;v 941? SrY/2?G/F? r?
HYDRAULIC FACTORS: FLOODING AND WETNESS:
X freshwater semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
brackish seasonally flooded or inundated
steep topography intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
ditched or channelized no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width >=100 feet
WYMANI) TYPE: (select one)*
_ Bottomland Hardwood Forest Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay Bog Forest
Pocosin Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah Other:
Freshwater Marsh
* The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels.
DENT RATING
1. WATER STORAGE X 4.00 = y
2. BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION X 4.00 = t?
3. POLLUTANT REMOVAL Q * X 5.00
4. WILDLIFE HABITAT I X 2.00 = 7-
5. AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT 3 X 4.00 = J Z
6. RECREATION/EDUCATION X 1.00 =
TOTAL WETLAND SCOPE' = J q
Add one point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius..
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 5A9_r.1,1ThiF ST ;5x7' Evaluator: EA Dr Date: 1 D/Z '/200?
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
v-)/,- '/ G?ZE?? GAS FcA2 W?lcG
Location/Directions: A/X
/[phone],' 1-/ES7- ©C /?Ek/ f/iGG 41> Iti>' lyG hs / yic?SEG77p?
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of tite evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: {Circle One Number Per Line
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
S) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodulain Present? 0 1 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 (? 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 U 2 3
MOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And 97THOUT Sinuosity Then Score=09
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 0=0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: IO
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? 0 2 3
PRIIVL4RYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
PRIIVJARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
,ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Weak Moderate Strong
'here A Head Cut Present In Channel? em 5 1 1.5
'here A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 1.5
:s Topography Indicate A
it Drainage WU? 0 5 ® 1.5 -
)NDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYEOICA TOR POINTS: 2
ydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
.- . ... ,d , .Z1121% n
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 0 1 1.5
[mown Rain? (-NOTE- If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And 45 Below*)
[here Water In Channel During Dry 0 Q 1 1.5
9NDA1ZYHYDR0L0GYI0ICATOR POINTS:.S
Strong
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly CW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
TE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 7 .5 0 0
ted Above Skip Yhis Step UNLESS SAV Present) -
ONDARYBIOLOGYEOICA TOR POINTS: 1.25
TAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
2Z-25
US'ACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:-TD1,/h/ 4??/Zr,v(7S 2. Evaluator's name: /J, b2A1)Y
3. Date of evaluation: 10A / zyo5 4. Time of evaluation: pm
5. Name of stream: t/ % 70 Vn- f 4'-Z5 E& 6. River
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
8. Stream order: /
10. County: \.,IA,kE
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
.vGt<1 la?L? ?Z J ?. y? A/4 575' o.T 4-c74770, V
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial ?% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
i
22. Bankfall width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): /
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight .-Occasional bends Frequent meander _ -Very sinuous -Braided channel
'Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment *of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): J?O Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
k

..
• .. ON OM sM
aY .c: ?• ?
_ •.:x,<,• -- C C.Llt>1<A- PiR fl'S11C?*o-: r?' 'r'••:'v:.':v-.•? .y 'r•':a; cl?E:t:-': ,?9+P :rc3.? r:
".
e
r
y a9}
L
^
'
°'
?
'
?
?.a
?4 ?N.,q::. p
?y
a
Coasta
1,{
;??=? --?y??;? ?
:4 .iedmon - !
J16. .4sJ,i<ii}.t?ti?t'???'. %i:3:_ .rl:?i.:C?J?:.?C:rR?'s?-<r<'?^.T.?..'.y?,Ct-'.•• .?^S!-'''
.. ?Y,':T`??7`_c,u<4>.,z:.i<?'?= W... :..:Ra ?.unt+a? .r?M
l+`
?
?.-'

;?° _
Presence of flow /persistent pools n:`streairi::??r??s=? ,: s: ? •x` -%{F•?'%.'`?.it
?
`
`'• - •:.
no flow or saturation - 0; strop flow - max points) _ - ;f :;<.,,-F :?:?~c> `;

"?
= Evidence of past human alteration `-
}-per 6.J;'
: •?`
(extensive alteration= 0; ao alteration.=. max oints K?
rt
-

3`
•• _
?: f-c.?a::a.'m _?.., r::??-.
•ti;: _ .,;c. ':?y.?.-3i°i -'i'`:i.:: w<'a:a?,? ^ -+Q?e?
Rl artan Zone
_v. r tag a
'
a:...+t. W..-6"??E
'
?O
h 0
?' ?
=
?'
2
'
.
.
.. •
,
-
Ty
;?X
:3:x.:
x :;
:
,
? ?'y
.:- t::i .•"_..._ £ 4 ~ r F '..,,..
contiguous wide buffer =. max omts
no >;iiffer = 0
'
•
?'
e

;a I
.
-A
`• ?.,.-:' ?w«`.?.
. 4:'::
M1.
`4-••F`?
y,,,'•:i^....`?'.-i `?Jic••:+''451i:;`}'?,?•.a? ?' .r
?. Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
::{::
a
?
? :
- AN
.n
•
M -1'• .
R
;
;„ - -...x-
-V .Llc.?.. ..... =t,?; r
`.?.?-i• ?-(extensive discharges O; n6`dischar es -•max points : =:. -?.._ F..:.:
?,;; ?"• ?•';-
2

5 _
Groundwater discharge
44
'

;...
e = 0 springs,* see s, wetlands, etc: = max' oints ` M,. < ?? -•
no dischar
-?•. M rte,
S
.
- r"
c., - w`'C?i'. ;R
'p. j. ?•:''?}H'r ?' ?c°i''4%^d's-•'-1-? ='•?i'; :`'_?
•Sa'F:.
.
'Presence.of adjacent floodplairi "`'' ' ?:4-
:
3
-
•r z.:..
6 . _,.
= max,points '=r?. ? ::.c -?.?a -:? •?„ ;,; =Lw` - ?' a ??4:':..,_ ?`<
- `(no flood- lain = 0• `extensive floodlain

:
7

- access ,J' ?;
p
- ?.'. Entrenchment / flood lain. :.s
??.. ,,s ?.; 3
;
..
: l entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max ?•;':'
:t- clee

°g• ?tt•%- i++. .a1,-: .. ir'Yiw`.-"??^p?•l:t`-•n- c:4?".:?t•'e ).fr:iyL' ?.^??<'n_''c_1 -.•FaC ?v A., f,,, ?,:z,'.y^,M?.li_
•: ;•- __ Presence of adjacent wetlands?:%?'.? ,,,w,r; :,. ?-?•-: : e, t?•- .; :?._' ;???•?.;• ` :?M? ?• .??. "3'1
.:r
: :???•?-:?.??;_..§:.YO:
k .
v',
6'
;??+:??
4=4s
a*:?'-??•'
A
=`` r
t
.
.
..
?
r
:
I -max points):.°;?? . '.:.._.:
'x= no wetlands = 0 large ad°acent wetlands:--:"
_ _ -?'?- xt•? ?} ^' 3. 'S.'.• tee'"y
:Channelsiniiosi ;; ;
- +rr'
`
?
maz pouiYs'}'}'" : +s-. ..;-,Y==:? -•??
' (extensive °channelization natural meander
-

1.O - i .'"?,-a'+:•'I: ?.: rK. +f';%{s•.t•,?? '• ? ??l<._f'":,` '^°?''". '.' ?'='4111'i::? 'L' ?n

:i:'?... .l:
a, .. _. ,?: M F:,.t, ? :•?sK,. ?; .?::?: a,..? ?'`? +:
_ "Sediment iII ut,r::t::?a,:
?
'l
°j
•
'•Y
•
t
'
-
,.Y :. r.
.
[..$ ?.£., .
-
'•
.;4, !? -
..`.?.`' :: yL4:Kl,r S,'L
:1^' - ,'Q."
•.. .
- osition- - 0; little 'or no'sedimeut` inaX oints'! ._. :. ? ;;?, r ,• zt l., ?:, ,;.
.•K'{extensive de
_
"{,:_ _ _ t'T'^"s'Y?.'<'' 4,?''r..rT - _ k: _•»M1r.4,?'? :.+TF :
Size'& diversity of channel bed. substrate
w.4, 3R

:' .; : :
(fine; homo enous = 0; Iar a diverse sizes= max oints) • , _ r =1z

:T2" <=Evidence of channel incision
"'E'
yr_?' - e2
..
.
-w
:.
:ats
`
D
S
0-
`
± ?
'

.
?
sT7_
•
r
:
,
.. -
? :K.c -
r .Kr,•
-
incised = O stable bbd' &'banks -max
d
Y

°??3 :.Presence of ma'or',bank'•failures`:} :s f„ K;Yf :,:: r? -' : t •'
.::....
: gip
:
_ _ _ r •u;, n
;
.
t- f (severe'eoSion = O; no eion; gtabla`banks •-'riax oznts zu
::
.

:.+ .,
-
r: <:.;_,_ ,.• gym;.-
a` :,;.;_ " -.L•u°=.?...,g? .fir." ..
.
Root d e pt h and den'si}y on b "' n .- L-',
max'.. omts'
•-c: =;=??Yr??Y:
no'visible`roots:= 0; dense roots 'tiltbu •liout -.
?'?
t?
<
..
?
?.?t??-a
?
'
;r
:
...•-..t
_. ,
,:??.
x
.
.
..
.
rzp."rod uttioir RY: - - -
_I>Yi act by a
..griculture,'-)i es ock;.ortimbe .... ?` `''° •
n': '
2
_ ?.
;(substantial.`im Oact noievidence -:inaz`points)?t?.:`
Presence of riffle- ooUri 'le= ool'eom teges ,;= :• =°'``"`° xi- .- =?
-.(no riffles/iipples'or pools= 0;'well-develo ed='..=ax points)`:w
:'.il;+, - +riy,•t'Y"v .?x,;' 'r "Y i^.$;•'iiS.' '•t•V (f!. :i•:j y'.<:G. ? C,?•v
r:r.r.:.'.°.•! 'avi :. e,rs'.:_.' .5`.: u,',•..y,`^:e= :r; ..?,.',., ;dm,._Q•, _ t ,
:Habitat-comTtexit•. ..?r'd:s••x'. .:i°'•i.?a }'sr:; ....F._^r `•. ,C•a' 'r'1fr 'C r:•_'v }«. f -
/?•
??
,,. r F. ?..C.
"'
*'':?• .ES's:?'6?
Si ? ,?1?. /
:-?i..:
'C
?Nitr.5 •S:?•.•/!q? -
.
F-
' ::ht~F
"?i
'?=6
13
?
,
: f
.
?
.
. K
.
.E.}.
v
r
:.
..
,
(little:or no'habitat 0, frequent varied habitats =`max omts?-.
~

1
8
°
_ _•<
;rye.-.
`1• CanoPY _ eoveiage OW,
a
,? { ?t /? ?
_ ,•. ?
it
• _ ?a'. • .'=? Q:
S _ =E s0
.x:
_
. ,
j
:.:
-
=max. oints ? t ; • " s "
no shadm Ve etation = 0 continuous' caao
.'
'

19 ti^iv .: ....?...
.{.'.s•.::•-;yr'TS
--?Wd -':2'%i.L<L?l
;Substrateembeddedness:.
.:? `?Y?.? ra. _.?4;?:. • .fir . ..
'
" •
`
• . , m ?:. x... ?a? . _ ?t<t . •. ?.
"(e 1
embedded' :'. O; loose
structure :
t
?

- - '•U•.L?K
?t!- :tA:X"i
' a?-i,.?y'w. "<::,i"Ly:: '=?`s69 ?')'k•r :t:?::
' =z -t - `t? Presence of'stream'invertebrates see e`4
x
?y
> ?
?'*
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es'= max' oiiits .r: = ?`?• _" .??.
Y.^

21 ° :?•' s,. _ ;.;,: ..:''.k. Fi?,: '• i5 ?y.•...,... ;y?' •k't.:e rt`E:,v;?i+
r •:,.; Presence of amphibians m
;4'; s;?'' ? ?? ,'4Q 0
- - s r.:-:.
•r ?4'? +.
;: ?r,
.?' ; ' Q
?• .
t
11
,
,
•
.
T
_
•y
es=max: . oints)' 4
(no evidence.0;"common, nuinerois
1 '

° 22?• - .??• ei:'••?'.T i::ti: ^+tt:w .?f+?- 1r -_'' ."%?at .. :.-?,.i->r ?-.Y
'Presence. of fish''.:;.:; e' r`i
w•.?_., -
_ RtP? .
,:?a
.,s
0
:4t:
:
?: :?;A
;1t?;
.
y
Q
l
•
`
.
:
,
..
.
?;
. _.a
.
,
,>
.
- y.
` es = inaic . oints,;b =r?; t., z:=• <ti='t.?n • x':;??...,
' •5r ..
' evidence common; numerous
6o
'

23 •
p -n_..
,..r:•xy,+,:Az Wy.. ;?:r ^'^:+t•;lc`:::':'•i% a:_''.:'.:yti:yj,?.: ..p
^ 'r y",+n y,.':!+2'..:a :i'•'• ::k: _.9Sy_.K-v-'2•?:l:?a<1`i.,.<?, ,yY':'+•:+,:
Evidence'ofwildlife use::?=rE:i il' .,?yy???,n¢y?f A?
S:`,?JO•J. •'i r !C•0".-?'
?:a s?el?$:6Y.'ex4t+a'F.S 4'"`9i'
1`
?
^It"
•--
:'L ;•F
z
?
.
_
i
.
^
.
evidence - max oints) at` :- .:? °:: _ .:,?: • r:, x ?
? ?
_?a .-;: :
(no evidence - 0; abundant

G:',??k ?
t _,
a?_
r• ?{. •1? r y?--. •;1<?"..?Yjs'"P?''???{ia?? >• _ ._. ....r, q/ y '..
ws.? otal
PointsP
ossible?
f f
rt .
,
?
.
kT t
? .. "f> .+C ] ?:n ?-:: '... Sa;?• _ .P '•ft yf.-L. ? NZ 'Ya yK.:. ,?, -?3MM? .. ? _

e - :..
•'•tt L Yh•.n'BF Y,,.%? _I i •k <?• * ? `2. .`L`t' '?.dt''a°_"<' `yyc` ?rL•- -
ent
e fir
s
TOTAL:SCIE
=
l
o
C

M g
?
a
s
.
;
A
i
L
N
0
-
-
•'
}
"
Siw _ -gr3AY, +_
1?''
.'•i-^'r'si1R.Fh•.:!r•.9?•,:1
i
••y:-! h .. ^A r 1' a-?:Y.:'l:°,t:at ,YTS:&'1?
.3.au"
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: - ALGfivr1A),_C S 7- Ex T Evaluator: Y, $IZA1b f Date: fo12 i/rood
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
VT`- ;Y e- -55 it Gil iP 5 FcA Z ?AIAkl-':? Al?u
Location/Directions:
AF7 / ,ti//?? ya fw?sT ©F
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 l? 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 f?7 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 (l 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 3
S) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 0) 3
(WOM If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sirarosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Togo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 Na=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: ) 2J
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharae Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: S
mdary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
,.`I-- LL--
MnrinratP
yes Topography Indicate A
-al Drainaee WaP 0 .5 1.5
ONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2J
lvdroloQV AbsentWeak Moderate Strong
This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
•e Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 Q 1 1.5
Known Rain? ("NOTE' If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And 45 Below*)
There Water In Channel During Dry 0 a 1 1.5
Litions Or In Growing Season)?
•e H dric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 No=O
'ONDARYHYDROLOGYIIVDICATOR POINTS:
Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
- r-u D-f'? ('r)' S i . 15
-e Macrobenthos Present? (0) .5 1 1.5
-e Iron Oxidizing BacterialFun Present? 6) 5 1 1.5
Filamentous Aly-ae Present? ffi) .5 1 1.5
-e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
) E. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
ved Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*1
'ONDARYBIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
T AL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Z
U9-ACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map) 1.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
M
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:. ''II
1. Applicant's name: '10 N s ' 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: 10 /-Z r lvzo 5 4. Time of evaluation: q"00 q m
5. Name of stream: t? 17 r/TGEY GiZlc 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: L^/A*
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Aice? 5&1v7711,? ,57- 0,C 1412,4 NG 4:5- /t./7-2?15?F--77a,/
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES
lz? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (Y
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial Industrial % Agricultural
-% Forested % Cleared / Logged ._% Other ( )
? c
22. Bankfull width: J 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight .-Occasional bends X Frequent meander -Very sinuous Braided channel
'Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment 'of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): S-6 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
t,.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
5,0 MIA i
ECOREGION:POIl I'r GEC
`..-
?..
=CACTERISTICS'
HRA
`
'
ta?
me
t
P
'

':.;'i<? ?.

a?
4
. r Dun
-:rC_oas
iedmon
w-_
?r
i3
?-iP:h•af.:r?:4??'.>„rr
'? r' ? .q; .?a?1.:.1. _RC'u?_s''?.'?':Rfi?:l`??' _ -::Y+., _ >. ?,:,,.•r.w,?> :.*:w.
Presence of flow / persistent pools in.stream::?`r_Nr_•- `?
-'.` .q _
' :. •-
_ .:? _ •'''_ _ <,
-^a.
ir
0 - $?
5
Oy- •5; -?-
0
-`4t
r

'' ;:
,
,
, .a :
;;..
:r
.
y
,I.,.
„a
s
i
o fl
turation= 0;
t
=
x
o
fl
ma
o
m
ow or sa
r
ow
- n
s
n
`

;':?, :.:£. 6*+.ai'• :ri•',.L=eY = ?"?}`^',,f
1.E •t ?..T.:. ?Yisr?'1S54o,(Sy.?
ON
_ ?_? w.; :' , • Evidence of past human alteration ::I< „
s w. :.
extensive alteration= 0; no alteration= niax oints).s %
?

M.4 ' a; Fkpw:v :.? .T??`::rii1:•-(?'.,?
"!?:.41' - _ - ^^.; •a'E`aa rw -i,;_nr;`:'de:: s?y,YY,`.'
.:}
_ Ri arian zone
:
r
SFr '
.
'
??Fa` ?
• C ? `<
"'
i.:
.
. -:1'
p.
?
point's)
<
'
""
-
ff
'
?'
s `
!rA ? 4. <
c.<'ri ?: i=•
?? .
er = O
; _... F
no bii
contiguous; wide buffer =. max
?¢

;'
r? Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischar es`

omts
.. (extensive dischar es - 0; ao.dischar es -.:max
P a. c,4

5 - _ .s• :.!; .: - "-,,?ri' -.4::E2`i?., 4.: Vii.: •r•A. :,_l':ja• ;••'x~.•''?'`:•?C.??.'R'+.?" •r:
' Groundwater discharge'a&-
Y'- .r: 'fwt?- "'•y?<F. .- •rc'(? ,(4`•te% •'.iW?p; ]?, ''<?•^a'
Y Fr. ..
;.' i'j
y V v'J7 :nk. '' V
r C
1:
tL : J
"
`
..?
:
G
-
T4
Dints
e = 0; s rin s; see etlands, etc: = max'
har s w
disc
no

Z
;v- Nti::??i :inn: ;-`?:?:S'?'}Y>r ^•iv:?'^P:Mi'b2K.. ^- - .•`-.'??_-"G.-ts?,
Presence.of adjacent floodplairi,:: = '•;'K, .
b' 6aofl6!4plain-0;`extensive.fl6661ain. max`points) -

;
? floodlain.access. •;??;:;,,..? -;ni=u??L.,..:r';??:.' Ell

Ent
IN
p- ..rssm. . .," :r•.y, 0
•
'
/. y
, F _ ... :f
_ - _ - •:
1,`.• a+!. rr i.;•i.•ia-F !',. 1..,.. M.+i,;a
fy dee 1 'entrenched - 0; fre uent f.1 din = max_points) •;?:; ... : = ?'>> lj. ?y_ ±? Z•, STi

o :Xy .J+. ;:Sr,?`.t?"ei: j;- :ifs" ^r',:b:.' . n.u1-in::S.'4- s. '•KlE"%?;'
- Presence of adjacent wetlandsrwt::
•p
•. i
?
O . F
- .4 (.. tl.,rY,?.. ?•ytr.R'Z:> {..
gp< -
?_.?s.:_.
.(no wetlands - 0• large adjacent wetlanDints ':? ?:... •`?,..:,-.--• riG:.,:? .?- G.?
Channel siniiosi ' a . .r.:t"•
ty.
-
Y
max points'}" _ •.- - •t:--. .?:-•<:
^.. _..
'(extensive
'channelization -.0` natural meander -
?
•

l_O "•- .
•
q,'., ::J.: y.....• x
_ :% ':i:i` i`.: `:,;y:•.:L',: .'+_r' y4i$::.Ix..i,...
- - : Sediment in at?ra ::?. _r,£ ?: ?- .'.Fy,,•
'S ' =-;:?'
0'`!'tiiy •74 E
%''• 4°?:V
I
:
-
rte`
'
`
4

_ =?.
?
,
:
t
-P'
Dints _ :? !• , , ?r - ?.
ved f = tt
e e t ='iriaz
?.'(extensi d osiion 0 li le or no`s dim n ,.a..r>_... .. 4?

:f
' i; "V

;-'
ize,& diversity. of channel'be_d.subsfrate= - +vr«:Y k: ' '?v?. '
`.= --:.e
??"ate:
?:??•?pt
"
laiA
4x
??' .s0?5<
-
•
'
.
:
,
?
,
:
.
nt
= 0 la
l ve a sizes'='
X`
homo
n
s
a
fie
Di
s TM
e
ou
r
c
, t rs ma
(

?f
5 ?F'+f !?e,a ?k•" M?°"
<:Evidence'of channe widenin i rx ;s
1 incision or'.
R.
_
VV
-4
AW
?
incised - O;? stable bed' 8c`bankS = max .'oints)':;r?=.-.: _ w?>,.? ?????? -: •?;r:...Fx:3:?:,. ?:?.,:,?: ??? ?
'°(deepty •

- . • `wc :w` ip,^Grt?..,,"r'c :ti t :' ;;;d L',c, . Y05N 0• MINIM,
'?' k;, Presence of ma'or bank'failures'':r ?..y>: r.._ _:' ?;

-.i7?'(` F,: '
" 1 _C;;.r .S+„ ,j'=+l:•. .';£
l} . `'
:, t
•?
?
_
y
-
- '
: _
'maacpoants). ,.; ;..
'
:, ?,
?,r,, ?. .a
seYere'eioMon-O;
noerosion stable
banks. '

?? .
.
..
.
.
.
„•' O.
Root depth and•den'si on baalis
r li<
1410 _ . t
ei-_, •.. .: , .. :, n' s; •.iC-t, ?3:
r3- .3, .1..? a .. ?.
t
(]

e
r
:,
i. .'a'-.
Y t cn y Yf
F ' no'visibl6 roots dense roots fhrou out = max" Dints t
•

? ,
?
. .
ct b :a 'cultur 11 toc or tiinbei `'rod coon `s ` - `
a
.. ?
r .'l
J1r
-
r . o•?Y. S.p. _Y ??4 `.
l!, :;i r"':_••., •:.f •e :::f
w
}
:F•>Y
•
- c •`£' a.•?.
*c
c:9:i!':-
G
'•?
°
?
? s
ial` im
a
x`poin
}
bs
n
o ev
dence'Y
:
. .
3
.
?,
,•,-.f
.'
.r
:::n
f.
5
l?
ta
s
, ?.,.
u
t
p
ct -n
;ma
i

•

resence of riffle- ooUri le= "ooI `completes
P
. ?. e

`t
3 90
0

4
:_.
(no nffles/npples or'pools= VW:- ed,-max po ts)''

2_
=2
- :.".t `r- ::'v.,.'?rJ.??_.. •.G;.
'..'.:s' - Y-?: :':.w-..,•'.-.+<,.-?,,,#' S:.i'
Habitat com 1,e x-. - ,-x=:,s:^-'•S'vsK"i .sri.:;: ,=tx,;._?4t,,,tc,;,, ?,i?'"
3.µs ?. f.?il'?. q9.!'s. s- ,..v:,l.,!.
"(x_•. .. a z = - _
_ =(little°o no habitat = 0; frequent, Greed `habitatsmax ponts)=.
:.•.
+
xtsi.i4 "j "

'$.
:~•','S.: ¢,??
Cano co'vera a over: sfreambed
p CRU - - .,? ?<:xc?e. s "•y;fw?"-l-•?e?, ?
t e ?. ? '+iiui..:?;?
3 {3" rf"ti' }Nis .....,3r v .. • x•+.1+?.

;; X

..
no`sliadm" Vegetation: continiioiiscaiio Dints.
a,s'

•19-•• Vf. .,••,_._
ri-
' .niiA'f•'f+ A
-:
`
(-=F'
3 fi
•44 •a,,, .. ..
3
M"0'
N
..
.
1
R
r
) :
(`de
l
dd
d = 0
ose`st
t
r
=
mb
l R
M
I
"?
?
max
ep
e
e
e
ruc
u
e
:
;
o -
. ?
-
?
•
-
-
X20 rt?(s .•x-'. n.Kr'•?.C,^"•
-.-: + Pre's'ence of 'stream'invertebrates see
r'.
.
..
• ,iS -::?.r 4:i' :'?•`.nQt.K••ix.Na ii.L.?:'`.-r,.a',.:•.f-,?`. _, _>:
`.-:'?
t
-
s ??0 KS
?
, .
.
= max" ` dints}°.
Ono evidence = 0; common, numerous e-s 4r
:
, r i
?.
E. ... •? , * == >
-{.,- - '•n.:
.,~ Presence of am hibians _
' n: i,=•": - F.5 a':i,%'ai.' ;.. ^ fll:z'?..c:%'•. ltd •"'.

max' oints)
(no evidence.= 0;°common, numerous
es:-

; 'Presence.of..fish
-
.61
?tZ -54;
no 'evidence =.0; common,: numerous es = maX oint§
X,_ - .-'1(,
_ ,. 6Evidence'of 11'dlife use':
' '.' u 1'?
'.a"w?°'"'
.- '+; :.:.q!'1'CC",_+ a.... ??•?v..:n,:r:::?_.1 va n'r.?.'??:?Lu"'y? w'<?.<...:,,??.,

,;x- ,.. s* 5 : Fa ' '4F. ;^a..• .r ..
.
evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max Dints)
- (no

?
wS
' ?I30:?•

oir 4a:v ..,
?a
Q?.;-g"'?Fcy','.+.i+<t
?tc."F.Q:..f'i.lil' :': i•^tdt •- ..'4"' °
3?'rTr"!
..
?
? ,
s,::,. N3ia aC4iC_ _ L?'•
.. _ _
.-za - 4: ....rtr? VqW. MySbi.!.
.k• _,-,;,,.-: ?:: " ?4 iS:r..- .?:. `t .2 Y,: ? ?
t???:F!?'P'v" t?n.,a?t?s.`k4k?• ?1:'^„ ',:'t' ,FC':d9''3r2•i?`c?".+c?: ?'•?ii •%:,._?''a??w,:.
.
: ?: _?,»,?:?? ?`?'' .:,? ? ?'fi0?'I'AL:S?ORE ^;?alsoyentei?•:o?`fi
? ,?•,s.. .. Ca .?
_ -
??
rstpage' _
? ,

//?•?
?
.
-.-".. •rc`rrc - ..;a.?{-4",•=?`f
;-? ?. :.L.?:•:> :•E :-f:f .o i:a»'!r'J?"?"w??d.?+ ???Ab?•IG;,?r r'.WGx.? _ _ _3",r ' _
'i.5t?+F?'.ca ' ?
:?!?
*
E`?
W
F
i;
f•
E
54?
1
r
i
r>
cf
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
PH
Project Name: SAGGCiV7"ZA1 = S,7- `xT Evaluator: l ,b12A-,i Y Date: IO/z r?zvo?
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
";-CAP- ????' III>5X
Location/Directions:
AP-) I ?y M/Gc5 So?TflkiFST o? i? t? ??tG 2? e .? Ale ?:? rzs?erroc?
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a than-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream.-this
rating system should not be used'
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 n 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
8) Is There A Banldull 5ench kTesent7 C u 1i 1 z s
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 2 3
('NOTE- If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchinr And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On TODD Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 Nn=O
PR13 RYGEOMORPHOLOGYEVDICATORPOINTS:
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharse Present? (0) 1 2 3
PRIM RYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. p
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 In 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? N? 1 2 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
)ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
es Topography Indicate A
al Drainage WaY9 0
5
1
1.5 -
ONDARY GEOMORPSOLOGYEVDICATOR POINTS:
{ydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong=
This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
resent In Streambed? 1.5
1
.5
Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? no .5 1 1.5
e Wrack Lines Present? 0 5 1 1.5
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since OQ .5
Known Rain? MTE• IfDitch Indicated In 99 Above Skip This Step And 45 Belown 1 1.5
There Water In Channel During Dry O .5 1 1.5
-e Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)?
ONDARYHYDROLOGYEVDICATOR POINTS:

Moderate Strong
1 1.5
1 1.5
•e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU, Mostly UPL
)TE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 0 0
)ted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*)
'ONDARYBIOLOGYEVDICATOR POINTS: S
?TAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: ?f1GG?v77.?/f ST 77- Evaluator: Y /3,ZADY Date: 10/Z112ctl-5--
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
vTG L/? GZEF/c Ga i?_ ? AiZ ?? E? A PEx
Location/Directions:
AlfW ,4%1_ 41? > A,, . it l_?;cGr7?c/
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed ti
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 r2) 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 vT 2 3
(WOTE. 1f Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchinz And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=O*)
10) Is A 2" d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 0=0
PRIIl1A.RY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5-
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 2 3
PRIMARYRTDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 7?'

>ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Weak
es Topography Indicate A
al Drainage Way? 0 1 1.5
9NDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I.5
B W racx tines rFOStlnL1
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since ® .5 1 1.5
Known Rain? (*NOTE.- If Ditch Indicated In 99 Above Skin This Step And 45 Below*)
There Water In Channel During Dry Q .5 1 1.5
itions Or In Growin Season)?
e Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=13 0=0
ONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: O
Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
•e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
ITE: If Total Absence OfAll Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 0 0
rted Above Skin This Step UNLESS SAV Present*1
'ONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
?TAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
•ydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Phis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: I5,AGLF1.177A1E ST Ex7- Evaluator: 14,&zADy Date:
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
Location/Directions:
i
/?/7 Y /?ti'11 . S t JEST tJF i?E / f1iGG <2> / i ?? ss /,i7?C2 S t-G77a/
``PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomornholozy Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed .
Different From Surroundine Terrain?
MV
1
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 5 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 r? 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
(1'7
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 (17 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 ( 2 3
(*NOTE: 1fBed & Bank Caused By Ditchine And 97THOUT Sinuosity Then Score =0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AndlOr In Field) Present? Yes=3 r 7Vo=01
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY EOICATOR POINTS:
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharze Present? co-D 1 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYEVDICATOR POINTS:
III. BioloQV Absent . Weak
4
1-5
PRIIVIARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.
)ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Nwnber Per Line)
.mmnrnhn1aov Absent Weak Moderate Strong
['here A Head Cut Present In Channel? L02 .5 1 1.5
There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 !f7 1.5
es Topography Indicate A
al Drainaee Way? 0 / 1 1.5 -
ONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYEOICA TOR POINTS:
LvdroloLrv Absent _ Weak Moderate Strong -
This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
e Wrack Lines Present? 0 1 1.5
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since ® 5
Known Rain? (-NOTE- If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And 45 Below*) 1 1.5
There Water In Channel During Dry
itions Or In Growing Season)? (5) .5 1 1.5
e Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 IFVo=O
ONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
Biology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
•e Fish Present? ( .5 1 1.5
e Amphibians Present? .5 1 1.5
-e A uaticTurtles Present? .5 1 1.5
•e Crayfish Present? .5 1 1.5
•e Macrobenthos Present? .5 1 1.5
•e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
?TE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In SYrewnbed 2 1 .75 0 0
ted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present)
'ONDARYBIOLOGYEOICATOR POINTS:
?TAL POINTS (primary + Secondary)= - (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
,r- ) -& s
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: BAG4.61, vC' ST %x 7- Evaluator: f Date: ,oA /Z,7a-5'

Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
V-rl'i5K 4-1.7.E54
Location/Directions:
AP7, Nl/GCj s-??? p6 New h?iGL 2> AA/ > .vG ?" ci7? s<cnv.v
`PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a than-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used'
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
1
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 2 3
) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
(-1p
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 M 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 3
('NOTE. LfB d & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A tad Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 0=0
PRI111ARYGEOMORPHOLOGYIIVDICATORPOINTY- ?5
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharze Present? 9) 1 2 3
PRDLMYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. D
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.
3 Is Pet hyton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
)ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
A h-+ Wp?lr T%4f Apraf m Ctrnna
es Topography Indicate A
al Drainage Way) 0 1 1.5
9NDARY GEOMORPSOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
wdr^l^gy Absent Weak Moderate Strong
r'his Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
-esent In Streambed? 1.5 1 .5
e Wrack Lines Present? 0. 1 1.5
Water In Channel And >49 Hrs. Since (, 1 1.5
Mown Rain? CROM If Ditch Indicated In 99 Above Skit, This Stea.4nd #5 Below*1
There Water In Channel During Dry ® .5 1 1.5
itions Or In Growing Season ?
ONDARYFIYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: t
e Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 1 1.?
e Iron Oxidizing BacterialFunp-us Present? 0 5 1 1.5
Filamentous AI ae Present? AD 5 1 1.5
•e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
OTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 0 0 0
ted Above Skit, Y his Step UNLESS SAV Present*1
ONDARYRIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
(Primary + secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points 77te Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
TAL POINTS
-.713
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: &A6G7_111;7,_15 ST ?x° Evaluator: f? ?2fl?Y Date: 11131"O<
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
Location/Directions:
A ` ar M /LG S i5 T or a,E?? /?yGG 2 ?.
* PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 3
2) Is The USDA Texture in Streambed
Different From Surroundin¢ Terrain? 0
v 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 r1 /? 3
S) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present? 0 1 n 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 ® 3
(*NOTE. IfBed & Bank Caused By DitchinQAnd WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=D*)
10) Is A 2na Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And1Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 N_ y0
PRIMA.RYGEOMORPKOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I Z
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 0 2 3
PWL4RYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
1H. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 f9 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? ® 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIhL4RYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: S
>ndary Field Indicators: (Circle On,NmnberPerLine)
fiere A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 .5 1.5
There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 1 1.5
es Topography Indicate A
0 Drainase Way? 0 .5 1.5 -
9NDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYEOICA TOR POINTS. 2,
Wrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Phis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter _
' W raCK Llnes rreSeni ?% i i •>
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 0 1 1.5
Tnown Rain (*NOTE- If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skis This Step And 45 Below*)
5 1 1.5
There Water In Channel During Dry
ONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 3
Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
e Fish Present? .5 1 1.5
e Amphibians Presents 5 1 1.5
o AmiafirTnrtlac Pro-Cant'? _S 1.5
e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
ATE: If Total Absence OfAll Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
ted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*1
ONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. O
TAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
22J.s
T
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Q
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 7-0 fl S 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: / J A A0015'. 4. Time of evaluation: I f7.0 G Am
IF r .
5. Name of stream: V7- 70 u7-7-EY 6. River basin: G.41>:- GEi1,Z
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: 1-??kG
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
A7? L ,vli»s !n<_<ST O? ??Fk/ /1 GL n? ,4 i? vGhS iN7?JZScGT??/
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO f yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YESO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial Industrial Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged Other
i
.22. Bankfull width: 2 21 Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream.under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): JT" 3 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. " The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
I
r .
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
_ .. .A N.
?_ .r•.a. .;3?c`-•°'
?f - - ?COxE?io
PanT`i
,
?-;;_ CHARACTERISTICS
- . -_ „?" Cpastal5 =
JPiembn - oirn
E
=
?

ll
tl ;
? r-r
`.,!.. J.'m ?:: { S :.eF w .C'i - F??_,•- _ i ..a.s, t>r::w•R. c ... :.S- ..._.... ,........ ..
r••;:,.r.3'
a ?,,
':
1?:.5: Rk?. -
rr.p x
._._-
. .
.
.
r:??:? ': i.>P"<_-: r _?F`f
:;ti. ••,..?.Y:'.c_'p'Y.'.:.:3•x..._ .y"=''x'411:.• 2:: •_.• :?•?
- Presence of flow l persistent pools in:stream::?
i
`'210 flow Or Saturation= O; soon flnui max Olnts .'.t`: ':s ; ?:x {lE r -?TrF ;•,w•

?• 54
Evidenceof.past hutuan alteratidn'`aa?
_.E :... :. .::;i ..-:.
6 f
'
fiO
4'0

y
: .
.
_
,...
r Y
eration = max Dints
" (extensive alteration = 0; no alt
..
:
s
-
iµ
•. .
••;:t. :N' - 'Y' -r, .'i::•i - ts'r`x.•'',. _ -.<'.,2d :.?? rr_...::5:_•.:_a-w .•ii,..;,:: i.....
- - Ri arian zone -:-_?r Ass _ a
-Tts r per, • - _ .F_
_ ••
f: EI
=' ?C'?':1!
'4'
v'f
iA'• Q U.n

^?'
s ,
.t
.
(
.-Y`.
-
no Buffer - 0; Conti ous; wide buffer,- max omts
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges` - ._ " ?? ? ?'???';?;?;, ,:.? -; ?.?: _.: ?• Z/
7!?. ?. :. •f:..%q' ':i <?t nrX-cl ?,a:`_'!i:< `J ',:.'r., ..¢3i:?iw;, is-'_,ry
:=(extensive dischargesnodischar es -max Dints).
Groundwater dlSChar a ,?;• - :,-?• .?:1 ?..?'. - ° .,?,? ?.?. -., r ,..? .;r:?•!. J?. >?.a
.
no dischar e = 0; s nn s, see s, wetlands, etc: = max oiiitis"' s`h.;e= .:,' a W r k .. :•° --:
k?
"'c.. •» "•,_,ti i :=L'r:? •„:a..'r>:.•Er.c::r .:?sb??'.°-::4: .-rj?''? :V•t r.'rr '=S+'•J,

.;,` ?'f
Presence.of adjacent floodplaiu -
, a
'
:, ts)
- (no floodplain = 0; `extensive flood lain= aiax'po
.: '-

??•'- F, zi.Y; : •c«.cz'?. ' ,r,..'?"-c-l?=".
',i, w c•• ,'.a .,j-;.w •a'',= s• n
:,: : tea, x P ?F.. , MY
.T' 'Entrenchment !flood lain access:: ?'' < _ '
•
:: -;-ti :?>
T?;
1•' -
`
• T.?.?'` '1.
V
V j:
'• +;
•?
:?
-
:
FL
'''??V
?'?
'
`-
•t•
t
g
"
,
.
:?
_
R
:
:
.
.
.
e..
:.
.i.^cy.
,
v
-
r7'Ch?;lr
= max omts ;:•V_: '<+ •,, r:: ;-:!,. 9:r w: : { :•.:Yk
1 ntrenched = '0; fre_
uent floodin
e
`(dee

" :: °:=:F:;' ```,,;,=<;=• :ca=rri
!x- ° Presence of adjacent wetlands' -z"';
s x :W(no wetlands = 0 lar e`adjacent wetlands:-max poiuts):_:
Channel sinno5l :' *s s`" <S `'.
?
•
"
niax poin?Cs'}`"
=
.'channelizatioa natural aieander
.:
(extensive
. '
•
'
'
F c..
`-•'
`:_"'
`il"''^.:r`iV; ':.'a, '•; ,
•`ci'.s.Frtr'`+.'- ... ::S:,y.7'°'=:•:-{.?!_.
?bfMrc
r• .,.?s:t:??. ?:.;?w •?? ? .,a:
??Sediinentin u't:1,"4. ?:>•v?'??. ?? ??=':..,._:?
?
?
?
.k

' :1' •s i'ti. W.4ti"', ff?.
i
.`maz- onit
.?: ?'T _?,, ,.E. .?• 'Tu+-R_.I??.,.'S,i•C•': f:,i>+?:5:. ..-?.,-.:•:,-..?+>l'...
littleofno'secliment
itlon-0
L,r?'(extensve`deos
.
..j
,
' •kY _ ':.t,•:g:F" .`iCF 4.'..'SFN
..i_"rw.4?eeA __ ii 3.?',;s?•. ,L•,t,rTc"'yT'e"-w.?s r.
,.. =<Size & diversity of channel bed substratej: .. , ,:_.
4,
`

2
diverse size`s =max' Din q ' ' :h z r - u.
arge
fine; Homo enous = 0;1
=• ,
'C: r•- - `?p.`•4'.71r',. :r:.ry_ ...1.+•:' *t ^ s::7
dence of.channel pgstoa or?widenirig;; . ;y,- R sir O='?' : '4:"c...
an
s
=I2"d. k = a : ,::,:-
.
r 3 ==
11 (deep! incised = O; stable bed' 8c' banks = max Dints
..
,

' •
r. !>,•C'.'',-+=.
'a`I.`-`tr h,.,r*.•+x . ,j w ,-;g ?y 5'.,41;4 t&ZL'.
-,.: I.t"kci .5e.a
Presence of major bank-failures`:$ ?.: ?..;G,;.,x;?,_;?•. ., .;,
t
)
''
""
:
'
anks -
on tt
b
e:
'er
n
'0
o
s
..
?, x.: ?, c: .1
max om
.
n •
a
l
b
osio
-
; no er
si
?.: seyera.
Root depth and dea'si on bauks?s .>c:Y<_.?>rs:;.>=::qi. ?.5 "-,.=
?
'
' ? lllal" O1nLJ 7t_ tom: p`.54L'__ Y ri.ar?1k -:1 . `s?3 Et'
throii ot
-° no'visible roots O dense r)ots
:Iiii act b ,a 'cultur vestoe or timber roductioa=;w '
?
T
- :Ya. a
r Q,
im act Ld; no. evidence ax O nEs .G ?S? ?
w t? ?`T,:,(substailtial
.
'Presence of rifft'e- ooUrip` le-pi?ol'co mpleaes;.°°; = ,.:}r•• . ?. .• _. -`;
no"riffleslripples or pools= O; well-develo` ed
?'t,

'
: _ ;. ,:y:, ';;x•?;.: :y:.- "''xT-•?`"• ; r ' :t•?s .. 1
Habitat coin Iexi rtr`...? .:0*
` `
-2
';;;a
y7•
3,
ii '
'mss' .f
: a.
r.: _
gar"
0:
?'
°
?

-
1,
. .
:.
r.}
.
.-•
-a
..e<c <r:
;,,•.
4
?
- N. rsg
• t ?•r `•_: ;;: =
=>
` ittle°or uohabitat ='O frequent; vaned?liabitafs = max points-: ?
`'?• " ` } .ano covers a over sfreambed "' a " C ° .
_
=max. Dints
-no'sIiaiiin°ve etatCon - 0; oontiniious cano

.
?•1 ;
4+:-
- i; ':yr a?:??r•?? ? Substrate: eihbeddedaess.•=: ?.{,u: "`?`-? =:8. ,'• ,,-'»• .? m +,?-m 'K
''.`. -:•t;"- - -
•_
rub
'
S
j
-
'
y'
?
'*
'

t :..
-!
7
:. ,
>:: ,{Fa•
..
y. ,. .,
:f„"
.:..My
_ - - ^,y:r• .!
iy. r•
- y.F
?
,
n .Y
embedded =. 0; loose structure .= maz .::?.>.??;^?; .; ? ' >r• ?;?.,.: _,.?_:??+.:?:,?, . ,?;•?? ? ?:. .
„;<,- • ' dee 1
:
0':
j• = ''r Presence of'stream'invertebrates .(see: age4 w:' ;y ?:,, ,}.: _:. ;. °- •;
..;.
..
? .
"•?
>
:5
, ?••
S?rs
?:s
;
?4
,?
??
-
U;
?.
?0.-
2
{ _
-
.. ..
?
.
.
_
4
:
?,g?
•
;
,;
?,
:.
.
?
Din
ts _
`.(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es= maz
^
??•' - '.z..: %':;?''t .,`? •.>rs"'? ;':5 •>iw:,^ ?..+c'?•'7av:'••:: °?s*.,:'=a'3.'r%ry .
•; Presence of amphibians.-.-:....
Y WL 7, ;c
(no evidence.= v; common, numerous' es =max'. oinfis).;,, r... ?:.•?,. z?:'sr,,r ,,.,,s-•.

' :: ;?:;; : :';•r resence.of.fish': nP?,•i-? E-J" r?s r ,..:
:{j .
f
t
'
'
'
'
`
O
22 • : .,.
p?
!, .r,
-
,.., a,.a?N •
;:S
,..<c •.?•; fi"S??a
no evidence=, comin6n,:numerous?. esfn:&.•?omts)?...,a' ?:FS•t?!4'.:::.':7._ =),. ..;=; !6^1h.:1;rE?°°`" ^*`?":*':r .:-S"'',` 't•'w

23 -r'+ni' s « ,." scar`
gvidence'of wildlife use'> ?..4?,vk s?+ t. yf 'i' _e aN -M^%
a•. %.. "
''-
+C: frr.
:
.
Yu
-~.
?
4
Q
6
T
:
'
t

3
f
. ,
,.,e
-.; t_
e
.
:
:
.1:. •
.,i.
;fs
;e?:•-
dence = 0; abundant eeidenoe -max Dints)
'evi
no

?}v's .rwjl
: 4r
otalPointsPos ibler OOH :0 'Ef0'
r• S .tom ^..y„- :l
M4"r',r- tsH?'t y Cl!v .µy,? si, t " _ - :X • `.._p:i%,p :t? _ _.
.

'. - -
l,x,,.,
ryw c'??dn: s? ?:z °•-`?,::;X''.v -:iir- '`i.?.a";:.; ,new rr`ti'°" '' ?
y':?•7;? ??,. .._-.
?`'_.,rt? t<'•iR":;, R,'_'..""?F."?!.• .':i:n ?"+?. " •e fr,:.d'TM?"•::,:.:.: ":?'?,?'?,•+?.r??=Et _ -
?crstgage
?j
et
e
I2
also
i °?TOTAI?:S?O
?
?

573
,x
_ :?T.I', .,
_ y
?e;
?
?
pp
'1•:j2`??Gr;.:,+!Si,;?rL'?j•?,%i1;:•R:.T:??ri^TC:•£k?R?+?'I1E:is?n?y.•-:.-•3e•3?i.F?•.V:c.?!+!?.'.:+?. i'?:='•1+tLF?"??.??•:.'S}M
S?si
` _ ? _
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 1314G1-1-?v7'7Ai5 S-7- hFX7- Evaluator: ?, 6-RA-b- Date: l 1/3/aa04-
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
v 7-z-,5 I/ GlzEEe4 'Ai--E F?AiZ ?.?A?? ?jPEX
Location/Directions:
A?)? z
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a roan-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
11 Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 4T
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present? 0 1 (2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 3J
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On TODo Man And/Or In Field) Present? /Yes=3_ No=O _
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 02-
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2
PRDL4RYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
PRE L4RYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
)ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Absent
es Topography Indicate A --
al Drainage Way? 0 5 1 r?
ONDARY GEOMORPSOLOGYINDICATOR POWTS: 2
ydroloey Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Phis Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter `
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since - 0 .5 Q) 1.5
mown Rain? (*NOTE: Ypitch indicated in #9 Above Skip This Step And 15 Below*1
There Water In Channel During Dry 0 1 1.5
itions Or In Growin Season)?
e Hvdric Soils Present In_Sides _Of Channel Or In Headcut ? es=1.5 No =0
ONDARYSYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: `7
ak " Moderate Strong
1 1.5
1 1.5
1 1.5
1 1.5
1 1 1S
•e iron umdlam ttactenait?un rresenr! tw .J i i•D
Filamentous Alzae Present?- 5 1 1.5
•e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
ATE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
ted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*1
ONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
-TAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary}= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
vG> Q = 3`0. S
, , „
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: I?AGG=??77?/? 57- y:T Evaluator: 11,1317- Pr Date: I113 Z704-
Nearest Named Stream: River Basin: County: USGS QUAD:
vTG EV Uz%E? GFb7F Fr,,,q?Z ??.9kF /? PEX
Locatio"ections:
/4,71? L MEGCS wO57- D l /Ft?/ / izL 1Z?, A,-1?1> A/G g`? 1,v7:51Z5Be770y
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
.4 [so, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-thus
rating system should not be used`
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorpholozy Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ® 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
FIoodplain Present? 0 1 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 CV 2 3
('NOTE. IfBed & Bank Caused By DitchineAnd WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2'a Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 0=0
PRIIITARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 7
H. Hydrolou Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharee Present? n_ 1 2 3
PRIMA.RYHYDROLOGYE01CATOR POINTS: D

Weak Moderate Strong
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.
>ndary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
omorphology Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
Fhere A Urade Uontrol romt in l nannel-! V ?u i •?
es Topography Indicate A
al Drainage Way'? 0 5 1.5
9NDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: Z.
wdrolozy Absent Weak Moderate Strong
F his Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
•esent In Streambed? 1.5 1 .5
Wrack Lines Presents 0 5
62

1.5
Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since ® .5
mown Rain? (*NOTE- If Ditch Indicated In 0 Above Skin This Step And 45 Below) 1 1.5
There Water In Channel During Dry
itions Or In Growin Season)? 0 .5 1 1.5
e Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? es =15 No =0
ONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: ?J
Biolozy Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
-e Fish Present? on .5 1 -1.5
e Amphibians Presents 5 1 1.5
e AquaticTurtles Present? .5 1 1.5
e Macrobenthos Present! YU) l i.D
e Iron Oxidizin Bacteria/Fungus Present? .5 1 1.5
Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
e Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
ITE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 75 5 0 0
,led Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present )
ONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0, 76-
TAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points.7he Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
12/06/2005 11:29 9195529881 TOHS ENGINEERING PAGE 02/02
MULKEY
ENMIKMERS & CON2ULTANT4
Permission to Enter and Inspect Subject Property by the
United States Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Project Name: Ballentine Street Extension, Phase 2
Project Owner: Stephanie L. Sudan,, P.E., Director of Engineering
Town of Holly Springs
P.O. Box 8
Holly Springs, NC 27540
919.557.3938
Project Agent Mulkey Engineers & Consultants, Inc.
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Location of Property. Holly Springs, Wake County, North. Carolina
Approximately 1 mite west of the New Hill Road and NC Highway
55 intersection.
Nearby Water Body: Utley creek is approximatcly 0.5 mile south of the project area
Type of Work Proposed; New Location Roadway
As the applicam of subject property referred to as the Ballentine Street Extension Project I hereby
grant representatives of die United States Army Corps of Engineers permission to enter said
property for the purpose verifying delineated jurisdictional wetland areas and stream features.
c ,
Signed Tit1eE"e cf (tom p- 14q
Date $ ?S J

MULKCY INC, 6750 TRYbN BOAC CARY, NC 27$11 PD 90K 33127 RAMON. NO $7638 PH: 919-@g1-1912 FAX; 919-0',1.1910 WWW.MULXMYIWQ.COM
D U-1
O
O 0
N O
DU1
O O
w C?.I
D ?
00
? W \
N
D ?
O Oct
nco co Lo wwww CTS C_.1
.p .tA 4?1 .p .p .A ?
???f?A LA ?A Lh UN
:> O O O O O O O
a w w w w W W N
T LA -A w N - O ?o
zzzzzzzz
T 01 CN C1 D\ C1 CN CN
J N N N N N N N
J 00 N ?- N W J
ptli.ACnONO?I
O ?l ?D ? O? O W ?
l? O J O N .A w
J W C, ON M O
t m mtTjm m m m
V N N N N N N N
O O O O O O C> 0
A 41.- A A 4?-. A 41-
A.AA?wwww
N A w O ?1 C1 ? ?
O N ?1 N Vr ?' O O
?p In lh ?D W N Vi
O O N ? ? J t-h
?Tj It Oil I'll It It 171
aaaa???a
?H H H H H H H H
rrrrrrrr
aaaaaaaa.
H???%3y?H?ro3
C'JC7C7C7C7C7dC5
m m m m m m m m
C/]U]110 mU) mcn En
aaaaaaaa
?o0o0ooo
? O
D N
O ?
I
I ?
cs
O
Q C?.I
6>
00
D C-1
O O
D U-I
O O
A A A A A A A A A A A A
LA LA LA U to to to -
A A? A OA A A? A O O O
Oo ?t?UAwN?-O W'V ooJ
zzzzzzzzzzzz
O C, 0, o O o 0 0 0 o O C,
C, N O? U A D\ oD .+ A ?l oo
A \O 00 V Oo J A N A N DD
? W lJ W lJ ?-+ A CO ?--W ?I N
'V N r' -' OV U N w A ?l N
AV Do O? ? N OO U rV O ?O W
t=7 trJ C=7 I? C37 td C?7 [? t17 b7 Ci7 t=7
N N N N N N N N N N N N
000000000000
A A _A A A A_ A A A_ A_ A A_
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JJV 00 00 00 00 ON A A to 00
U N D\ U J W O? V^ Q\ J J O
A r-. V W ?l A .-. N N a Oo C,
N AA?OO w?O ?1NNV Cl
A U N O O+ - A U U w %0
U
H H H H H H H H H H H H
rrrrrrrrrrrr
z zzzz>zzz
10101
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
HH-3HHHH HHHH -3
t? Cl 1:1 d u u dt? Cl tl Cl cl
?G ::E
td G7 b7 Gf C> 0 tC 0 CO 0 b7 0
000000000
N O I-O 00 rn U A w N
()o Ln
O O
W Ul
O
O
Co LTI \ N OJ
O
O.
0 0
Ln
OD
0o ! ZE -1?, _ w
CE ?2
:ELI 0 cz) (-n
? p c W O
--j W Co O cn W Co U1 O O --j
O O t0 .fl
CO Ln
VV
45055 45054
/
45057 45056 '1WC06
45050
'WC09 - WC07
WC08 t /'"?WC02
45058 45059 45049
_ _ _ 45060 45053
" WC10 - WCII 7WCI2 WC05 145051' WC01
1 \ WC03I
y45061 45052 45082
1 WCI3 WC04 / WC33
45062 z
WCI4
045081
WC33
45063
WC15 /
v0
4450B0
4506 / WC32
WCI4 6
45065 /
WC17 AS 45079
1 / wc31
450661` /
WCI6 /
45067
WC197 45078
WC30
45068 / 45077
45069 WC20/ WC29
WC21 -(?)- '
/ m
J
S 45049 N 692158.076 E 2042054.806 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WCOI"
45070
S 45050 N 692171.622 E 2042047.868 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC02"
WC22 45075 /WC27 45076 S 45051 N 692148.550E 2042041.171 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC03"
/ W C 28 S 45052 N 692135.782 E 2042034.066 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC04"
/ S 45053 N 692155.309 E 2042020.831 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC05"
S 45054 N 692182.152 E 2042015.321 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC06"
/ S 45055 N 692175.505 E 2041999.167 PEA WETLAND7-PT DES "WC07"
S 45056 N 692171.855 E 2041969.186 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC08"
45074 S 45057 N 692174.366 E 2041944.759 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC09"
45071 WC26 S 45058 N 692156.933 E 2041939.383 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC10"
WC23 / / S 45059 N 692157.635 E 2041985.116 FEA WETLAND_PT DES "WCI l"
S 45060 N 692155.492 E 2042004.328 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC12"
_ $r4 5073 S 45061 N 692134.296 E 2042008.946 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC13"
W C 25 S 45062 N 692121.903 E 2041983.499 FEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC14"
45072 S 45063 N 692096.505 E 2041959.565 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC15"
W C24 S 45064 N 692071.241 E 2041954.066 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC16"
S 45065 N 692047.815 E 2041943.996 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC17"
S 45066 N 692020.409 E 2041950.823 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC18"
S 45067 N 692006.226 E 2041932.146 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC 19"
S 45068 N 691981.551 E 2041912.128 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC20"
S 45069 N 691977.611 E 2041879.853 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "W C21"
S 45070 N 691955.545 E 2041863.630 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC22"
S 45071 N 691924.261 E 2041843.816 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC23"
S 45072 N 691910.786 E 2041828.267 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC24"
S 45073 N 691911.721 E 2041860.143 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC25"
S 45074 N 691932.020 E 2041886.171 PEA WETLAND_PT DES "WC26"
S 45075 N 691960.431 E 2041909.157 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC27"
S 45076 N 691956.280 E 2041930.028 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC28"
S 45077 N 691986.459 E 2041935.693 PEA WETLAND_PT DES "WC29"
S 45078 N 692003.006 E 2041953.985 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC30"
11 _ S 45079 N 692042.867 E 2041987.351 FEA WETLAND PT DES "WC31"
_ 4 O $45080 N 692078.626 E 2041995.385 PEA WETLAND PT DES WC32
S 45081 N 692117.866 E 2042027.199 PEA WETLAND-PT DES "WC33"
S 45092 N 692135.936 E 2042052.743 PEA WETLAND PT DES "WC33"
II ?
o cn
? J m
/ m m \ o o
v, w
0ul
O ?u f
p L
0 00
CY) -4-1
Ln
Lrl t Ln
(DO 0 O Cl)
o U, i o cn
LO m
w n 21
0 v_,
cn ?? w
o LT, o
Q Ul N W N
O
v cncntoEn wwwca v)In En En wco co v)In Lnw
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
In N N C2 4 CA w N U? U 111 N In In 4 In In U -
?I --7 -7 ?7 --l -l ?l -7 ?l -.7 cl, ON O+ 01 (71 C7, T C, 01 O?
1o 0y0 zl O, Ury A w N ?-' O\D 0y0 J a, LA AwN O
?-+
zzzzzzzzzzz zxzzzzzzz
O1 ON O\ C1 C, C\ 01 01 01, 01 D1 CI' C1 01 ON 01 O\ 01 C1 ol
A A A A A A A w w w w w A A A A A A A A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?D ?D \O \-D ?D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O?i?W ?NN.W W NNNN wv oAO PO Ao
JO?ON.PW OC%O w LAw V-r) n A
to o O N w 00 W ?t ?D. O Vr Z] O -l w w C\
AN o -.l -l Vr.100J W AN.00 ?D O\?N 000 V A
m tz m m m m m m w t7i tz m m m to m m m tii m
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w w w w w w w w w WS w w w w w w w w w
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 w w w w Oo 00 =WW w w
N .?•+ O 0 N W t V.A Vii A N O w O to Oho a J
O O ... Q, O D\ In A Ch 00 O Do A i--O N G1 N V? J
W O w O O 0 A W 000 - N N 00 N A ?? ?V
Ql w a\ 01 Cl N O •-' CIS N o lD LA o J O N O V1 00
'? 'r1 '71 'iY '? "77 "7j 'i7 171
a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
?r"t7irntatntnt7?t7?tntntat?r?rnrntacn1-3tn
H H H H H -3 H H H H H H H H H H H H H
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro? ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
?-3 H H ?-3 ?-3 ?-3 H H H H H H ?-3 ?-3 H H H H H H
tCtl tdd tdd CCG CClz? t? 0 tdd b0'J taxi C077 CdiYY CtZIrJ ltZIn t?
CCCCCCCCCCl7CCt7t7t70t10u
.? N •-• •-?D oD J U In A w N •-a O 'V 00 J lli A w N ••+ O o o o o o _ v

O O O O O
00 00 00 00 00
J C*? vh p w

01 01 01 01 O\

W W W W W
-A -P -P -P-
00 00 00 CN
00 N J
i-+ Q W 00 0o
?-- N O w th
J ? J O O
rn rn rn rn rn
N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0
L ?
?lc
vl o? 00 v,
?c o :-A ,A
O w w ? `o
N J N N ?l

rn rn rn rn rn
H H H H H
17' t-" 17' t--' t-"

d d d d d

H H H H H
d d d d d
rn rn rn rn rn

Cl d d d d
O O O O O

LTI
I-
x .L
::?E U-1
0 O
O CO
U-1
X
::?E U-1
D O
0 CC)

o U-1
w o
x O CO
LTI U-1
o O
O CO
N
N

-P -P -P -P
Vt Ch c.h tl?

00 00 00 00
W N O

O1% OIN 01 a1
? ? ?
W W W W
J J 00 J
01 `O O \O
W J J `O
:p ? oo O?
c?, N Oo ?O
-P -P J `o

N N N N
O O O O
W W W W
I'D IC ? 1.0
O ?--• O O
INO O 00 O,\
O Vt W W
N w ?1 c?
00 to
C1 a1 J

d d d d

d d a d
m m m m.

r? m m r?
W N F-'
UI
? U1
m co
-o
N co
00
F q U-?
L"i 00
N
a}IsgaM SIE) Ajunoo 9? eM woj j so;oyd Ieuay v u i IIo m v o u i b o u
s8updS
000` 091- 009 osz 5z? 0 slop
Z Jae-I AO uMO.L 2"1
000'17:? :aoj pajedaid
eullWeO uIJoN `Alunoo @NeM -
'ON aan6i=l uoiSUGIX3 peon aUIIualle8 3 n w
sn 3Hl -?O S2JDiVM
`' a?"'M ..I ,rt r Y t ./ A _' tiepuno8 }oafoad -
spuellem
t { ,fF aw` ?. ?, + k KY ' , f y' ,, .; y( f?`? a ,. sw eeils
`y. ?r ..r F L ? :?.. ?.%Q;. ?Y ? +9„'J i } ,..., ^ * ?R. ? C, fr' 9'?•?`?' a'.r e j ,' ? ): ?.
a h41,,.:rv ?: ' puod
i''J:. I.• fj y?4.a''?• '?"^'tr ;•?' `{Lwfr xs r?5? ''.• =r
t i ?: yiY }. ?J- ,? _ ) `,* } '• ,mot .
PUOBG
J. ,?a • i ?. `may., w..n y'll, I t '??` -Y'•ff , tVi•Y„• / • t
.!r+ tr' r .. ,`i •Jf' > i ?? L 1, : r 1,!(' , •?' ? - { : ,?.., -, y? +:. r?• ate. "i •?L,
ij A%?Y ?4 h y l) ).tea. c"t.arK
• . -. .. _ n) ? $ 1 .' ?ti. ,,,. ,': t. .? ?- . ?'•` rd. jl ,. (,r; t~ ?' ~ ¢ •r) F4j '.i??J f°? •a
F y?. 4. ?a a- 4 y ` t} 6 rr r?? f t n dr`' :?
? - , ..y - r.{ ? - ?„ t ? "?.6't l ?• ,..."R AS •? ? •, r ti. 4 ? ,•>,t .? 0. ? / ' ' . •
• ,, ,, `R-? •C try. a1 ,t
',yw+.. ..
qM •i,y.e a f" . r" f? n L- - " K'? ?, ,•'nY ` r. f J rt ?r
/•.r ?a ? ,Yx s•''??Ny e" `?`v ;r> "!,ti zr l.. r, .'f' ?' . „ ` ,
- " ' s •? r t r. ?? ;! ?'11 t y. >a ` ,'yT ty ^? p? a t..
u s s , ' { Y+r ': j t, .th
!t. b t v ?-, $G.t
?; 3h i3 v
? r? . ?„ ? .w :t.? ? ^. x.71 ;. ?.ti ?. r ti•;,
3 q < i r s
't 4 t F! k I 1 V M _;!'? *, ?Y)
sa T Y ?? A ? ,ht. ? ?? t ?': td1, le ^-1 r yra { :a '? ,f. ~r r? r ? ).? .
`' , r ! ? .- t •r;t "Va" ? K +,•',- r. rKr• ! ?`? `ty .* r ?r t .? ' ? C' 1
4? •-. fire ? ?,..y .. ? }?. .. .t ? rig y '? ?. ,r ?.:T `,S ^?.,
tr !.fit, h, a? •yC ?? ;?,+j'r ... t r , !rY`" i ?ft,?e
•'? /. , ; s , s? s n.i?g. _?' ; rs. .. a a rat, t ?.
0 L.r S••.Id` y ,,fie `'S' -i
? ., r „' ,, tit 4: ?l ,t r r rk" t .s'l - t t?y?
- r:! r . ,.' "-.a ,.ldl r' «e+f ram a. '?- 1 !). ; ?/ •' ht : .
.. i ,j, ••,?..- {iJ,14t l x -? r -.s.t},.':a a,it,ry,.c ?y1_•_. 1• t, t .i ?/ Pt.a
1*40ij}ew7i. .T?• r
.. .__ .... ?..• (»a. w.,.. fir:" _ ??v . 'td1'? w.,'?y y''a`?'l.•n ..r ?:: v'.. v.. ... Y'
%
•.e? .;? f fat.: ` i -' '? y` ?r ..r 'j
-- ?? r. - a. - +• ; : ?''tl >
+N ,..^r •?N- 3? i r, r•. hr1 ?,t ra.• ! :.l 'l ? tk
% 1 f ii,rrr v .•?' r ! ,>S t N .t l ?' _ - V , ? .'e( ,..a ?.+, o' /
iY 4sLr
I ? y f i r'` 7
r 3 x y? t Y ` r 3+' R it f .wit aa.
): f r / > ? ,p?'~ ) r , ?ki9t ? ? _}•? • ?' ?. x'd a ?,? .tt ,t' S I ,t ir• ./ ? ,, .,, .
rr A ?;. 1J r
{. .? t..y i 7 r
r. ?' ft?„?, ' ? Y:•... rZ.- a ?: f ?; t ;} rr {n as, ?? _. t., ?? .r' , ?•t• ;i ?j p Y r i.` r ,7
j#A J,
lie*
kf•rr .d+ R jrr:.'i t1?'. /fr `?
,,'.. ?.: ! ? _;!'I 4 I. + ` _, ?' ', s -- ,f x' r J" t ?. tp' fit. ? .»< '.L?a-•Jr ?' ' t., cJ° ,?-yt.
_ ° ?'."' }7T • ` •A`w ;fir fr v,r,,.l A," e7'i Prx•''' - , ? 1b?. t,'?Y{ Y.•! e, „ a. -• " ?•'?i. J !Y•:s, c ' .}? ,tn :1 4?
_ r'?,` ,?' ... 1 .rt.d •J ?' 4. -z.i :` :r .r1 '"? `?.l,t,`?' r? ,{'r ,', ,?? -? :`.f ?!.r
+ ? .( r t- rd y 341: Xc ati?' ;?, i?.'„, ?, i ;:. ..f r. r.• .?? f, ,i ,, 3,'a".?
r' tK L _ _ 1 i .