20061223 Ver 1_Emails_20061003

RE: Brookstone, Level Spreader Design
Subject: RE: Brookstone, Level Spreader Design
From: "Jamie Midgette" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:01:29 -0400
To: "'Ian McMillan"' <[e-mail]>
I spoke to Charles Vanderford with the Pitt County Drainage District today concerning the diffuse flow through
their easement along the stream. He said that he would not accept the plan with overland flow through the 70'
easement. His phone number is 252.752.7070; please contact him regarding this matter.
Thank you,
Jamie Midgette, EI
Malpass & Associates
Greenville, North Carolina
From: Ian McMillan [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:12 AM
To: Jamie Midgette
Subject: Re: Brookstone, Level Spreader Design
Jamie, you must satisfy the local municipal stormwater regulations first, and then the DWQ
requirement for diffuse flow since you are in a buffered basin. To date, the earthen level spreaders are
still acceptable.
Jamie Midgette wrote:
Mr. McMillan;
I'd like to thank you again for your patience with the design process at Brookstone Subdivision. I have a
couple additional questions:
1) Regarding Brookstone, since the impervious coverage is < 30% we are not required to provide a certain
percentage of nutrient removal only the 85% TSS removal is required. Therefore, I can remove the wet pond
design and provide an appropriately designed dry detention basin followed by an appropriately designed level
spreader.
2) Regarding level spreaders, are the new requirements accepted or do the old still apply.
Sincerely,
Jamie Midgette, EI
Malpass & Associates
Greenville, North Carolina
1 of 1 10/3/2006 4:07 PM